WEBVTT - Marvin Minsky: Forward Thinker

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says Marvin, I

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>love you. Remember, I'm programmed for you. I'm Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe McCormick. And our other host, Lauren is

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not with us today, but you you had something to

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>say about Marvin there. Now, does that mean today we're

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about somebody named Marvin? We are? Is

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it going to be Lee Marvin? It will not be

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Lee Marvin apart from this very moment where we are

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about Lee Marvin. No, Lee Barman wouldn't make a

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense on this party. No. I mean, you know,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the lyric refers to Marvin the paranoid android from Hitchhiker's

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Guide to the Galaxy. But we're not talking about that

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Marvin either. Although we're talking about a Marvin who had

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with artificial intelligence, which Marvin the

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>paranoid Android possessed a great love that was kind of

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a long way of going about that. We're talking about

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Minsky. Marvin Minsky. So he passed away last month. Yes,

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Minsky was an artificial intelligence pioneer associated with the

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>m I T. And he he passed away on Sunday,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>January four, sixteen, and a bunch of publications that I

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>read and I'd seen online had been running some retrospectives

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of his life, looking at his influence on his main field,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>which I guess you would say is artificial intelligence, but

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>also on the history of computational theory and on cognitive science.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>You might say, yeah, it's interesting because uh, you know,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we often will refer to artificial intelligence as being multidisciplinary.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not. You know, you could argue artificial intelligence is

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>its own discipline, but within that you have other disciplines.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It's far more complex than just a label. And really,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about the the entire scope of artificial intelligence,

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it almost necessarily encompasses all of human knowledge. Yeah, you're

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You're not wrong, I mean, and Minsky in many ways

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a human example of this, because he's

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly had a wide variety of interests and um and

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so we wanted to really kind of talk about him,

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and in a way we're thinking about doing occasionally an

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>episode about a forward thinker of some sorts. So we

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>may in the future do episodes about other Forward thinkers.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>This is sort of a pilot program for that, and uh,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, there are a lot of people we would

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>love to talk about in the future, So we're gonna

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of start with this one. And if you guys

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.119
<v Speaker 1>out there have people, you know, Forward thinkers you would

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>love us to to profile, you should definitely let us know.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk more about that at the end. But

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>let's talk more about Minsky. Yeah, and so we we

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>thought it'd be good to talk about Minsky because we

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>so often talk about artificial intelligence on the program and

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the great future frontiers that we keep

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>coming back to, and that his his influence on the

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>development of artificial intelligence in the SA and half of

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century has been so profound, and also his

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>views on where artificial intelligence had been going over the

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>last decade are really interesting. Yeah, we'll conclude with our

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>discussion on that, but to start off at the beginning,

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Minsky himself was born in New York City on August nine,

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seven. Yeah. I so there was a piece that

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we read that was a profile of Minsky from The

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker in nineteen eighty one that was written by

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the physicist Jeremy Bernstein. It was just shy of a

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>full autobiography. I mean it was Yeah, it was really

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>comprehensive and and one of the things that makes me

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>realize is that we totally do not have space on

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this podcast to cover all of the interesting aspects of

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>his life. So we're just going to do a kind

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of highlight reel of some of the things that stuck

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>out to us. But if you're interested in the stuff

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we have here, I would highly recommend checking that out

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about him. But anyway, that piece is

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be the source of several quotes that I've

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>pulled about Minsky's childhood and and edgy cation that I

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>thought would help give you a better picture of sort

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of the color of his personality in life. Right, Yeah,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>because this guy was a lot of people described him

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>as being imaginative and humorous and maybe some people would

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>say eccentric. Certainly they would say, you know, he was

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>very enthusiastic, so a vibrant personality, not like some person

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>who would cloister himself away from everybody else in order

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to work on ideas. He strikes me as uh a

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>quintessential outside the box thinker, you know what I mean,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody who would always approach a problem in a in

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a strange and usually fruitful way. And he loved to

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>incorporate students in his in his thinking. You love to

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>collaborate with students because I think, although I don't think

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>he ever necessarily articulated it this way, to me, it

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he loved to talk with people who had

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 1>not yet learned what was impossible, because that meant that

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't put those constraints on their ideas from the getting.

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's where you see a lot of innovation. Yeah,

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you mean, and I think it's

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of inspiring in that right. I agree, But but

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with with a little a picture

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>of little Marvin. So he's talking about the different interests

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>he had in in subjects in school when when he

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, and he he talks about his interesting

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>chemistry and this is his sort of hands on approach

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to doing experiments and learning things firsthand. So he says,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading some chemistry books and I thought it

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>would be nice to make some chemicals. In particular, I

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>had read about ethel merkup Tan, which interested me because

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it was said to be the worst smelling thing around.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I went to and this is his teacher, Zim mr Zim.

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I went to Zim and told him that I wanted

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to make some. He said, sure, how do you plan

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it? We talked about it for a while,

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and he convinced me that if we were going to

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>be thorough, we should first make ethanol, from which we

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>were to make ethel chloride. I did make the ethanol

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>and then the ethyl chloride, which instantly disappeared. It's about

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the most volatile thing there is. I think Zim had

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>fooled me into doing this synthesis, knowing that the product

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>would evaporate before I had actually got to make that

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>awful merkuptan. I remember being sort of mad and deciding

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that chemistry was harder than it looked on paper, because

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>when you synthesize something, it can just disappear. I thought

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this was an interesting metaphor also for the way you

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>would end up chasing the basis of physical intelligence. Sure, yeah,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's you know, there's one thing that

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he would refer to, uh, you know. He would say

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that intelligence was sometimes why you would call a suitcase

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>word because he would cram so many different concepts into

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the the suitcase of intelligence. And uh, we've also mentioned

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>this when he would say the same thing about consciousness.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But I know that we've on this episode or not

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but on the show I've talked about how

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is kind of one of those ideas where you

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>almost define it by striking things out from under the

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>umbrella of consciousness, right, and then you're like, okay, so

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever's left, that's what consciousness is. It's it's just some people,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>some people have made the criticism of of consciousness theory

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's almost like when you're saying what

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is, you're just making a list of all the

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>things the brain does and then striking out everything that

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we fully understand or not fully understand, but everything that

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>we understand the physical basis, we've got a good grip

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>on the actual mechanisms that are going on behind the scenes.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And so actually, I'm okay with using consciousness as a

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>placeholder until we figured everything else out. That will kind

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of come into play with his ideas on what thought

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was all about. But before we get to that, we

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>also need to talk that about how when he was

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>uh when in the four he was joined the U. S. Navy,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>served in the Navy until nineteen. Yeah. I think he

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>explains that he he joined the Navy because he was

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>saying that he knew they would send him to electric

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>electricians electrical school whatever they called it back then, They

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>would send him to school if he if he joined.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think he was going to he was on

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>track to be a radar technician or something like that.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But of course that you know, he was in the military,

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>so they had him do basic training, he says. And

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he talks about this group that he was in the

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Navy with, and he says, our little group

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was a strange kind of mini Harvard in the middle

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Navy. Everything seemed unrealistic. I practiced shooting down

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>planes on an anti aircraft simulator. I held the base record.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I shot down a hundred and twenty planes in a row.

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I realized I had memorized the training tape and knew

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in advanced exactly where each plane would appear. But I

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>must have some odd skill in marksmanship. Many years later,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I were in Mexico on a trip.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>We came across some kids shooting at things with a rifle.

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I asked them if I could try it, and I

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>hit everything. It seems that I have a highly developed

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>skill at shooting things for which there is no explanation.

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I also, I also love that he he talks about

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>how there were maybe four people in my company who

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are really remarkable, including a mathematician and an astronomer. And

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he started hearing this, you think there's like a nerdy

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>version of inglorious bastards that could be made from Minsky's

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>experience in the Navy. So instead of being these these

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>tough like special forces guys, it's like the brilliant mathematicians

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and scientists who were part of the Navy and then

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>went on to go and do other things. Um Minsky,

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>after he left the Navy, joined well. He attended Harvard University,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is where we really get a first look

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>at how he was interested in so many different fields

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that collectively lent themselves to this idea of artificial intelligence.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>He studied psychology, and he studied neurophysiology and physics. When

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he graduated, his degree was in mathematics. But he was

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>interested in all this stuff while he was in school. Yes,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he moved around a lot like he He says quote.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I was nominally a physics major, but I also took

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>courses in sociology and psychology. I got interested in neurology

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>around the end of high school. I started thinking about thinking.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that got me started was wondering

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>why it was so hard to learn mathematics. You take

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>an hour a page to read this thing, and still

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense. Then suddenly it becomes so easy,

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's trivial. I had never thought about that before, but

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>he's exactly right about understanding math concepts. It's always been

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that way for me. That you can go over how

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to use a certain operator. You know, you're learning a

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>new type of mathematical function or operation, and it's just

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>banging your head against a wall until you get it.

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>And then as soon as you get it, it's it

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>seems so simple, it's stupid. Yeah, this was how I

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>experienced math when I was in high school. I remember

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>by the time I got to trigonometry, uh it was

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it didn't take very long for that switch to click

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in my head where I would see what I was

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do and understand why I was doing it

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that way. It wasn't until I hit Calculus, and I'm

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not certain what the roadblock was, but for some reason,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>when I hit Calculus, that switch would take longer and

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>longer to click. And I would often attribute that to

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I think the way it was being

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>taught was here's how you do this, not here's why

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you do this. So I think it also depends on

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>your approach to learning that concept. But I totally get

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what he's saying. Where you look at something and it

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>just feels like I could read this for the twentieth time,

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's still not going to become any more clear

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to me, and then two hours later, when you're doing

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>something totally different, you just think, oh wait, now I

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's it says something very

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting about human cognition. And I think this insight that

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he mentions here could very well come into play when

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about how you construct intelligence from base parts, uh,

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because there's something happening here. There's something about intuition and

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>about maybe the formation of pathways like you would have

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in your old at work, where you know, once the

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>pathway is set, now you can find your way back

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there quite quite easily. Yeah, you could even think of

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that as being, you know, make it an analogy of

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a physical pathway through a forest. Like the first time

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you go and make a path, you're cutting your way through.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of work. Uh. It might even be

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hard for you to retrace it the first time, But

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>after you've done it a couple of times, there's a

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty worn path there that's much easier to follow. It's

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a fitting analogy in many ways. But Minsky also had,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>as we've said, very eclectic interests when he was in school.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>For example, there is all throughout his life he was

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>interested in music, and I love what he says about

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>music here. This is another interesting thing about cognition that

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to in this. He says, quote, I had

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>also taken a number of music courses with Irving Fine.

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>He usually gave me ces or d's, but he kept

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>encouraging me to come back. He was a tremendously honest man.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that referring to the season d's. I'm not sure. Uh.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>He says he was a tremendously honest man. I think

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the problem was that I was basically an improviser, one

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of those people who can occasionally improvise an entire fugue

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in satisfactory form without much conscious thought or plan. The

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>trouble is, the more I work on a piece deliberately,

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the worse it gets. I can totally get behind this too,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we're both writers, and I'm sure that

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I know what he's talking about. There's been experiences where

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll sit down and you just you get a nugget

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of inspiration and you just start writing. And why you

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>end up whether you may have to go back and

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>revise a little bit, but in large part, it's just

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it feels really satisfying. And there are other times when

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you think I have an idea, I'm gonna go ahead

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>and start the whole process of outlining all of this

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and then blocking it all out, and then I'll actually

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>get around to writeing it, and then, like you know,

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two hours later, you're just like, I don't know, whatever

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>made me think this was worth putting down on paper. Yeah,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you mean. I mean usually, I

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>would say for most people and for myself, more work

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>leads to improvement, but not all the time. Sometimes you

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>can just write a thing to death. The more you

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>keep tinkering with it, the less interesting it becomes. Uh So,

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>by nineteen fifty one, he had graduated Harvard the year before,

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and then he goes and joins Princeton University for postgraduate studies,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh that same year he built the world's first

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>neural network simulator. And this is this is a thing

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that is worth noting. It's a neural network simulator in

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty one, So try to imagine that this is

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not based on microchips. No. Um. Also, it was called SNARK,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>which is great. It's s n A r C. And

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that stands for stochastic Neural analog Reinforcement Calculator, which really

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>clears it all up. Uh. Stochastic is one of those

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>words that's going to pop up a couple of times

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>as we talk about this. In case you aren't familiar

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>with the term, it essentially means random. That's that's kind

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of a easy way of translating it. Uh So. He

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>graduated Princeton in nineteen fifty four with a doctorate in mathematics.

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The following year, in fifty five, he invented the confocal

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>scanning microscope, which actually uses a little spatial penhole inside

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the lens, and the purpose of that is to filter

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>out all the light that would not be in focus,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>so it therefore creates a higher resolution image of whatever

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it is you're looking at through the microscope. So it's

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of just really improving resolution now. In nineteen fifties seven,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Minsky began to work for m I T. Massachusetts

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Institute of Technology, and he was specifically interested in researching

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>computers in order to understand human thought, which uh might

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>seem counterintuitive to some people, like why would you look

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>at computers in order to get a better understanding of

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>how humans think? There it was a really good analogy,

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought. In um one of the pieces we looked

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at it was on edge dot org that was talking

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about it was interviewing different people with recollections about Mints

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>his life. But there was one part of this piece

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that talked about how, even though the analogy was not perfect,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>if you were a person today who wanted to understand

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>how birds fly, probably one of the easiest ways to

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>start would be to look at how airplanes work. Even

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>though airplanes and birds work in a different way, you

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>can start getting the principles about what you know how

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>things stay aloft in the air by looking at what

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>an airplane needs to do in order to not fall.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think the same thing could be true about

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>computers and brains. Both do computation, both to information processing.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at a thing that's kind of

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>graceful and mysterious, like a human mind, and you want

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to try to understand it, it it might be a good

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>place to start to say, Okay, how does information processing

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>work in a machine? Yeah, I mean, I I'm always

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hesitant about that. I there are a lot of things

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that Minsky talks about that I like a lot, but

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's because it lates to the mind, not the brain.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh it's because I know that computer's process information

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in a very different way than the way we think

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in general. I mean, if you're talking about classical computers

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and the neural networks that we have in our in

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the wet ware we have in our heads. Uh, So

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm always hesitant to make that comparison. However, when you

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>go to an abstract level of the human mind as

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the human brain, then suddenly these conversations make

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sense to me, and I'm a lot

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>more um inclined to agree and engage on that level

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to just crossing my arms and going yeah, well,

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it plays on the same principle

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as the idea of the universal computer, right that if

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a touring machine, you know you have a

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>basic universal computer. It doesn't matter what the hardware is.

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>If you can do the basic computing functions, you can

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do the same job as a different kind of computer

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that uses different hardware, right right, Well, moving on with

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>our little biography on Marvin Minsky before we get into

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>some more details about his specific ideas in fifty eight

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>or fifty nine. And the reason why I put that

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>down is because depending on what source you read, some

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>site that uh, this happened in nineteen fifty eight, others

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty nine. My suspicion as this particular thing

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>took a long time to happen and probably started in

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight and became official in fifty nine. Uh. Minsky

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>partnered with a man named John McCarthy who was a

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>professor of electrical engineering at m I t and together

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they formed the m I t Ai Laboratory. And as

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a side note, John McCarthy is generally attributed as the

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>person who actually coined the phrase artificial intelligence in the

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>mid nineteen fifties, I didn't know. Yeah, so he was another, uh,

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>founding father of the science of artificial intelligence. Like you know,

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>if you were to make a list, you'd have people

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>like Ada Lovelace and Alan Turing and Marvin Minsky and

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>John McCarthy all on that list easily. I mean, you

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would not want to leave them off. He would. Minsky,

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that is, would stay with m i T for the

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of his career. He became the Donner Professor of

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Science in nineteen seventy four and the Toshiba Professor of Media,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Arts and Sciences at the m i T Media Lab

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen Yeah. Well, I think we should now just

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>transition to a more general discussion of what were some

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of Minsky's influential ideas, concepts, and books, because, as we've

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, he was massively influential. We we don't have

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>time to talk about everything, but we want to highlight

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a few interesting things that he brought forward and and uh,

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of his work kind of relates to this

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>running theme of the whole and its parts. Yeah, like

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so whole as in w h O L E uh,

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the entirety and its parts, specifically with reference to intelligence.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Right that that's a running theme throughout a lot of

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>his work. One of his early ideas something that he

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>called frames. It was this concept that he proposed in

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and defined frames as the general information a computer

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>system would have to possess before it can make specific decisions.

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So what do you mean by that? All Right? So

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you've you've built yourself a robot and

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you want the robot to do things. In order for

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the robot to to do the things you wanted to do,

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>you have to teach the robot certain concepts. First, I

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>love that sentence. You want the robot to do things? Yeah, well,

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>let's you know, you could just build a robot, right,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe maybe you're rawsom and you're just like,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>I just want some universal robots run around this place.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't care if they do anything. No,

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you must send it upon the world with a mission.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.479
<v Speaker 1>But if you here's a simple example, you've got a roomba.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You've built a roomba. Well, before you can just set

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a rumba down and have it vacuum of a room,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got to teach it general concepts, things like uh, walls,

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Uh, the what happens if you come up

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to allege all this kind of stuff. You have to

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>teach it all of this before it can complete eat

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the task it was built for. So one example that

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is commonly sited is imagine you've got a computer system

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and you've got a series of rooms, and these rooms

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>are connected to each other through doorways that actually have

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>doors on them. In order to have a this computer

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>system be able to navigate through those rooms, you know,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>presumably through some sort of robotic form, it would have

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to understand how doors work. What a door is, that

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a door could swing either inward or outward, the various

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms that might be employed in order to work a door,

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a door knob or um a handle that's

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>got a latch that you have to press down with

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>your thumb, or maybe even a bar that you have

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to push or pull. And you have to teach the

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>computer system all these things. Now, these are things that

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>humans once you teach them. Once humans are really good,

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Like they can recognize get the basic concept of a door.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got pretty much all doors ready to go. Yeah,

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>you might get thrown by something like a revolving door

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that you see for the first time. But most most

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the time, you're gonna see a door and you're

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna think, all right, this is either going to open

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>inward or outward. It's not going to do anything else

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>unless it's Star Trek and then goes But yeah, like

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you said, you're a robot and you come to a

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>door with different types of door knobs, or with door

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>knobs at different height, or you or you only taught

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the robot how to open a door if it opens outward.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>What if it's a push door and it doesn't have

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a knob. Yeah, And these are all sort of things

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that that we take for granted as humans because we've

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>had some experience and we're able to extrapolate. Computer systems

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in general are not good at this. Computer systems are

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>very good at performing tasks that they've been programmed to do,

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but they're not so good at doing tasks they haven't

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>been programmed to do. Who to thunk it? So um,

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>But he was he was using this this idea of

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>frames as a way of explaining this concept of These

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are the These are the sort of contextual information buckets

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that you need to each a computer system in order

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for it to be able to do the thing you

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>designed it to do, and whatever environment that might be,

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, a robot moving around rooms or

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>autonomous some submarine exploring underwater features. Anything. Really though, I

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>would suggest that, well, I guess I'd have to guess

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know for sure, but I would guess

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that Minski would agree that if the human mind can

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>figure out things without having to be told them, a

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>computer potentially can too. It just needs the right equipment.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>It needs the right process is to be able to

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>know things that without being told them it would need

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able. It would still need some frames, right

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Like for example, if I, uh, let's say that that

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>your mind is completely wiped, Joe. So let's imagine it's

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>last Tuesday, because we all know what happened that day. Uh,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and I were to produce for you a coffee mug

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and I point to this, and I say, this is

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a mug. Sometimes people refer to it as a cup,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and it holds liquid. This is where the liquid goes.

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>As a human being, what's liquid, We've already covered that,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We've already gotten to that part. Though that stuff we

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>already covered. This is actually pretty advanced in the day.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>This is like four pm on Tuesday, and so, but

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at that point you would you would be able to

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>recognize another cup, even if it were a different color,

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>different size, even if it were a slightly different shape.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's say it's like a novelty cup, so it's in

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the shape of a tartist or something, you would know.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>You might not know that that's a tartist, but you

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>would know that that was a cup, and you would

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to use it as such. Whereas computer systems,

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>or if you haven't built in any sort of machine

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>learning so that they can actually start to extrapolate information,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they can't do that right if it's if it might

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>not even recognize the same cup, if the light in

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the room is different, or if it's a little too

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>far away from the camera, are a little too close

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>because the size will look different to it by perspective.

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know, you would still need those frames

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>at least to exist for some amount of information so

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that the machine could know what to do. But the

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>goal of course and artificial intelligence is to get machines

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated enough where those frames can be more basic that

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to map out every single possibility in

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>order for a machine to be able to understand that

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the machine itself would be able through perhaps even trial

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and error, learn how things work. Like if you taught

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the uh the the machine how certain doors. Like let's

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>say that you've got ten different varieties of doors in

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this other scenario we mentioned, and you teach it about

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>five of them and how those five work, and it

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>has all the basic information of how all the doors work,

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but the other five are slightly different variations on it.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>And you have taught it how to uh do trial

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and error so that it can actually experiment when it

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>owners a door that doesn't fit the five that it

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>was taught. That would be more like he will it

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>will do science in order to break on through to

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Right yeah, it might just turn into

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a robotic kool aid man, you know, and just crash through.

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But your goal is so that it actually learns and

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>experiments and continues to uh grow its own knowledge. Okay, Well,

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>let's look at another one of Minsky's influential ideas, which

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>is his society of mind theory. Now, he had a

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>book called Society of Mind I think in nineteen eighty five, right, Yeah,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>before that, he had started really playing around with this

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>concept all the way back in the nineteen sixties, and

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what really inspired him was that he started to work

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on a very basic robotics system. Uh. And it was

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a very simple exercise and artificial intelligence. Simple in the

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>sense that it was elegant, not simple as in it

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>was easy to do. Yeah, and Minsky had done some

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>work with with robotic motion and the manipulation of of

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>arms and claws and stuff like that, right even back

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>when he was in school. This was one of the

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>great stories from that piece in The New Yorker that

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Minsky tells. So once the Harvard zoology professor John Welsh

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>offered Minsky access to his lab and his equipment after

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Minsky found out that scientists didn't know how the nerves

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in crayfish worked and uh Minsky told The New Yorker,

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I became an expert at dissecting and crayfish. At one point,

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I had a crayfish claw mounted on an apparatus in

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>such a way that I could operate the individual nerves.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I could get the several jointed claw to reach down

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and pick up a pencil and wave it around. I'm

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not sure that what I was doing had much scientific value,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but I did learn which nerve fibers had to be

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>excited to inhibit the effects of another fiber so that

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>the claw would open. And it got me interested in

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>robotic instrumentation, something that I have now returned to, trying

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to build better micro manipulators for surgery and the like. Yeah,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So in between his UH Frankenstein like experiments with crayfish

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>claws and developing UH micro mechanical systems for surgery, he

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was experimenting with this very basic artificial intelligence robotic arm apparatus.

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And it consisted of a computer that did calculations, a

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>camera that could focus in on what needed to be manipulated,

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>a robotic arm, and then a series of blocks. And

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that if you could UH teach the

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>computer system what certain terms were, like I want you

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to build a tower, that you would then be able

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to teach the robot how to pick up a block,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>how to manipulate it so it's in the right place,

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>how to stack the blocks so that they're stable, and

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>also to teach them things that people kind of grasp

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly once they get out of the infant stage

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of their lives, like if you're trying to build a

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>tower and you've got three blocks stacked on one another

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and you need to put you know, your instruction is

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>make this tower four blocks high. One solution is not

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to grab the block that's on the bottom of the tower,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 1>pull it free, and then try and place it at

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the top. Was the one I was thinking, was you

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>would it would it necessarily understand that you have to

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>lay down the lowest level first, right if you try

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and all, right, well, you know, let's let's start from

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the top and work our way down. That doesn't you

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. This is something we've talked about before.

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it's an interesting thing about artificial

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that's often overlooked is the basic locomotion and physical

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>interactions with objects is a kind of intelligence. Absolutely, It's

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not at all just like, well, that's the dumb

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>thing the robots do, and artificial intelligence is getting them

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to be chatter bots, you know, to pass the Turing

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>test and have have conversations. I mean, knowing how to

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>move things in your environment in a smart ways absolutely

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. Sure, yeah, you know, knowing how to handle

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>any particular you know, object so that you are not

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>damaging it, that you can move it effectively, you might

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>even want to program in things where the robot knows

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I cannot move this particular object because either it's too

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>delicate or it's too heavy, or whatever it may be. Yeah, okay,

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but back to MINS. So when Minsky was working on this,

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he began to think about all the different elements that

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are necessary in order to make this task possible, and

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he began to look at kind of discrete facets of

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.479
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that are required in order for you to do this,

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's where he had this breakthrough, this idea that

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>led to the society of mind idea. So in the

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies he began to develop this theory and he

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>published a lot of essays on the subject, and he

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>worked with an m. I. T. Mathematician named Seymour Papert

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on several of the early ideas. So the book came

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>out in ve and the argument he makes is that

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the mind not the brain, that the human mind is

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>made up of individual parts called agents and agents It's

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>important to note have no mind of their own, So

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>agents themselves have no emotion, they have no thought. They

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>are aspects of the mind itself, and each agent is

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>responsible for a particular aspect of intelligence. It's through their

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>cooperation that conscious thought emerges, according to this society of

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>mind theory, and it's really about how the mind works

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at a conceptual level as opposed to the biological level.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>This is an idea I've encountered before in cognitive science,

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but I wasn't aware in the past that it really

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>came from Minsky. Um. But I think there's a lot

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to this. I think this is a very I would

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>consider this a very plausible and convincing way to think

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>about what consciousness and intelligence are. And even if you

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are hesitant to argue for that, at the very least,

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it is a very compelling way to think of artificial intelligence.

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.959
<v Speaker 1>How do you get a machine to do any particular

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that would require intelligence on behalf of that machine?

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But if if you're not convinced, maybe we should look

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at an example. And this comes straight from the book.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I read the book. Um. It's very easy

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to read. Uh. Each idea is about a page long,

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and each chapter is a collection of between eight or

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>nine ideas, maybe more a fewer depending upon the chapter

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in their thirty seven chapters. UH and I Love I

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>actually also watched the beginning of a lecture that Minsky gave.

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>There's an open course on m T where you can

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>go to m I t s website and watch a

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>lecture series led by Minski himself from two thousand eleven. Oh,

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that sounds fun. I kind of want to get on that.

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty cool. And at the very beginning he talks

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about how he really liked Society of Mind, and the

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>main reason he liked is that so each idea is

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 1>like a page long, and if you don't like it,

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you can totally skip it and go to the next one.

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really easy. Like this other book I wrote later,

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the chapters are much longer, and if you don't like

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>an idea, you kind of have to just keep going. Uh.

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't really hear the students, but I would hope

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there was some good natured chuckling going on at any rate.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So he gives an example in his book, and he

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>presents a very simple scenario, the idea that you are

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>told to pick up a cup of tea and you're

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna you're gonna drink from this cup occasionally, but it

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is immediately What I'm thinking of is something you mentioned

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast a few episodes episodes ago, which is

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the office simulatory pick up the cup and throw it.

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Just just start throwing things across the virtual reality office.

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>That that video is hilarious, by the way. So from

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>his book, he says, let's think about all the elements

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that go into picking up a cup of tea uh

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in the in this idea of society of mind that's

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>made up of agents, he says, you're grasping. Agents want

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep hold of the cup. And he uses the

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>word want as in not not that they have an

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>actual motivation, but that's their purpose. So you're grasping. Agents

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>want to keep hold of the cup. You're balancing. Agents

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>want to keep the tea from spilling out your thirst.

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Agents want you to drink the tea. You're moving, agents

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>want to get the cup to your lips. So he

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>argues that these four agents working together, although each one

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is independent and that is important, they're independent of one another,

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but they're working together in concert, can accomplish the task

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of allowing you to drink your tea. And more importantly,

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you can do this while doing other things like you could.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>His example was walking around like at a like at

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a tea party type deal, and you're having conversations with people,

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're just casually holding your tea and occasionally sipping it.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But you're not thinking about that, right, at least not

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>consciously thinking about it, right. But clearly your brain is

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>doing all this work, right, It's not like you're just

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>magically holding this cup and keeping the liquid from spilling

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>out and all that kind of stuff. But he said

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know consciously, you're not really aware of it. Uh.

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>So my example, I said, you could, uh, you could

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>drink your tea while not interrupting other stuff you might

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>be doing, such as telling the Queen of England that

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>hilarious story about the time you got drunk on the tube. Um,

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>because as soon as I think tea, I'm like, well,

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 1>clearly I'm If I'm drinking tea, I'm obviously having as

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.479
<v Speaker 1>as I am want to do. And so Minsky would

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>go on to argue that the concept of agents is

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a necessary concept. He argues that if we cannot and

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a quote, explain the mind in terms of

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>things that have no thoughts or feelings of their own,

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>will only have gone around in a circle. So, in

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>other words, he says that if your definition of thinking

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>requires you to talk about smaller elements that also think

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you're you're not really describing thinking, You're just you're just

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>shifting the definition around two different parts of the brain.

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>This is something that parallels uh and analogy that I

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>remember coming across in the works of Daniel Dennett, the

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>cognitive philosopher, and he so he presents this idea of

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the Cartesian theater. Have you ever heard this, I've heard

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the term. Well, essentially, he says, okay, so some people

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>think that look there is what your eyes do is

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that they take in light from your surroundings and they

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>paint a picture. And it's like the brain projects that

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>picture as a movie screen for you to see. But

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>who's doing the seeing? So then you have to imagine

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>that really inside your brain is a small is a

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>little brain that gets to sit in the movie theater

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of your mind and watch the screen that is made

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>by your eyes and so, but who's seeing within that

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 1>brain in that movie theater. So if you keep postulating

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a little person inside you that is the audience of

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts or the audience of what you are perceiving,

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>it's an infinite, infinite grass right right, And that's not

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.879
<v Speaker 1>helpful if you want to have an actual meaningful conversation

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>about how is this working? Um. So the book divides

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>up concepts into these categories that kind of mentioned that,

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>where you have like maybe up to eight or nine

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of these one sheet descriptions collected under these categories. And

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>those categories include things like holes and parts, kind of

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:27.240
<v Speaker 1>what I was referring to earlier, conflict and compromise, the self,

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>problems and goals, and lots of other ones like I said,

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>They're thirty seven in that book, and each section details

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Minsky's ideas on how the human mind processes this information

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on a conceptual level. So Minski uses the example of

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>building blocks early on in the book to demonstrate all

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>those all the considerations one has to take in order

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to complete that simple task. So, uh again, you know,

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>back to that idea of I want you to build

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a steeple. I don't know what a steeple is. A

0:37:55.920 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>steeple is going to be two green blocks and one

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>orange triangle that goes on top. And then once you

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>teach it, then it, you know, it knows how to

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>do that, but it has to you have to give

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it the all you know to find all the agents

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to identify things like a block versus a triangle, how

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to pick that up, how to place them, the fact

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that the blocks have to go on the bottom and

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the triangle has to go on the top, all this

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. Um. And he says that once you

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>break it down into those basic parts, then suddenly these

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>these uh advances and artificial intelligence become possible. Um. And

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like I said, you can take an open course on

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the Society of the Mind on the m I T website.

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You can actually find that for free. So if you

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>want to check it out, even if you just want

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to see some of the lectures and and hear what

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the man himself had to say about this idea, you

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can go and do that. And I highly recommend checking

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it out at least you know, satisfied your curiosity for

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>given a good ten fifteen minutes. The first lecture is

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>two hours long, and there are a lot of lectures,

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>so um. But yeah, and that this kind of leads

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to that idea of common sense and common sense is

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that we kind of innately understand

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>as human beings. But what does that mean for artificial intelligence? Yeah,

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:15.399
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of the things that I think

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>got mentioned most often, like in the obituaries after he

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>passed away, a lot of publications mentioned that he was

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in giving computers common sense. But what does that

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really mean from Minsky's point of view, Well, it goes

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>back to that that description I talked about earlier, like

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're building a tower, you can't we know, you

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>can't take a block from the bottom of the tower

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and put it on the top, or you can't start

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>at the top and work your way down. Gravity obvious

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to us, but maybe not obvious to a computer. Right,

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 1>So things that are are common sense we often kind

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of dismiss as being easy or simple, or it's just

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, and therefore it's not anything to

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to really worry about, except if you're building an artificial

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>system to do those things. The artificial system doesn't know

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>any of that, so you have to teach it. And

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think his point is sort of the common sense

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is not as simple as we think it is. It's

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>actually it's actually quite hard. We think common sense is

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>something that's very basic or very simple because it's intuitive

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to us, but it's not basic. It's not simple. Common

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>sense is incredibly complex. Yeah, he he had a quote

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>um that says, a common sense is not a simple thing. Instead,

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it is an immense society of hard earned practical ideas,

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of multitudes of life learned rules and exceptions, dispositions and tendencies,

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>balances and checks, which I think is a good way

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of putting it. Like it's stuff that once we humans

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>have come in contact with it. You got it right,

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like this little, this little box in our brains

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 1>gets checked and we understand that concept from that point forward,

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>even if we encounter it in a different context in

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the future. Not so with machines, at least not naturally,

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's a big problem in artificial intelligence

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that if you can create a machine intelligence that is

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>able to mimic that sort of uh feature of human intelligence,

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you're you're way ahead of the game. So um uh yeah,

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting too because you've got this, I like

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 1>your fun fact in here. Well, yes, the fun fact

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>is that did you know that Marvin Minsky was consulted

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>by Stanley Kubrick as I don't know exactly what you

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>call it, maybe sort of a science advisor for two

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand one of Space Odyssey. I did, but only because

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Minsky would often have Kubrick over to his house for parties,

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as Arthur C. Clark and Isaac Asimov. Minski

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 1>moved in some awesome circles, like like people who were

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>really interested in robotics, not just from the academic side,

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>but from the literary side. We're all uh in contact

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with him at the time. He taught re Curse Wild,

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't he? He may have. I don't know that for

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a fact. I do know that he he had conversations

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with Albert Ein's line and said he couldn't understand a

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>word of it. Um he uh. He was friends with Heindline,

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>So I mean the guy was like, he was like

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy who knew everybody. So it would not surprise

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>me to learn that he had taught Kurtzwile we have

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>some other stuff to talk about. He has another book

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.959
<v Speaker 1>called The Emotion Machine, which came out in two thousand six,

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>and this is sort of following up on some of

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the same ideas earlier in his career. Yeah, it's a

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's most people refer to it as a sequel to

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Society of Mind. His central argument, and this one is

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that emotions are really just different ways of thinking. Yeah,

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and I've read several quotes of his along these lines

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>where he talks about he's sort of urging people not

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to underestimate the the cognitive content of emotions, if that

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>makes any sense. He certainly says that you know, the

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>ability to have these emotions, whether or not their different

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>methods of thinking, uh, hey, they lead to greater intelligence.

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>That it creates a new capability of looking at information,

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and it is an interesting way of looking at it right, Like,

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 1>like if you are thinking about something and you're angry,

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you might come to a different conclusion and learn something

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that you otherwise wouldn't have if you were happy or sad. Well,

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it also for me, raises an interesting question, which is

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that we naturally make a distinction between thoughts and feelings.

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>We think there are two different species of things. You know,

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I have feelings and then I have thoughts, And I

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>can have thoughts about feelings, and I can have feelings

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>about thoughts. But are they necessarily different species? Are are

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>feelings maybe just another type of thought? Are they just thoughts?

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And this kind of brings us to that amazing documentary

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Inside Out, which a lot of people have said, you

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>know it was it's based on some of the most

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:57.959
<v Speaker 1>current information and scholarship on emotions and memory, and thought, yeah,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>I really haven't seen it. I know, so, I know

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>some people who liked it a lot. I I saw

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it so anyway, when I described my reaction to Inside Out,

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was entertaining, but that's about it. Most

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>people think I'm dead inside because like that movie destroyed me,

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I cried, like crazy, like what's wrong with being dead inside? Yeah? Look,

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Pixar's movies affect me deeply. That was

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>just not one of them. However, I did think it

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was a very interesting approach with emotions their connection to

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>thought and memory, and it seems very similar in many

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>ways to what Minsky was saying. Now, not everybody was

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>totally thrilled with this approach. Some people thought it was

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way of understanding the mind, but a misleading

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking about how the brain actually works. So

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>neurologist Richard Rustack wrote up a review about his you

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>know his work on emotions and criticized part of Minsky's approach,

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>saying that Ski failed to show how emotional functions relate

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to brain activity. Now, he acknowledged that Minski explains this

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>by saying our knowledge of the brain changes so quickly

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 1>that it becomes outdated rapidly. But then Respects says, well,

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.720
<v Speaker 1>how can you possibly draw any meaningful correlation between brains

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and machines if you also are arguing our knowledge of

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the brain changes so quickly as to essentially contradict itself,

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>So you can't make any conclusion if part of your

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>argument states our knowledge of the brain changes so quickly

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that it changes our understanding. Like, how can you conclude

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>anything if at the very start of your argument you say, listen,

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna write about the brain because our knowledge

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of it changes so quickly. Anything I write will be

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>out of date by the time this book is published.

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>But they're totally like machines like that, he says, You know,

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a logical Like there's there's a disconnect there now.

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Respect also wrote that he had some reservations about some

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of Minsky's other assertions, many of which seem to draw

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 1>conclusions of about how the brain works based on how

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>large complex computer systems work. So Restack wasn't so sure

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you could support such a connection. But he also said,

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it may turn out that Minski is completely right. We

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>just don't have the science to support it one way

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, deny it one way or the other.

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just that without knowing, we can't be sure.

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But it may turn out that these are absolutely on target.

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>We just we just can't be so so sure of

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.439
<v Speaker 1>it right now. But he did say you could learn

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about how the mind works by reading Minsky's book,

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you just wouldn't learn about how that relates to the

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>way your brain functions. So again, the mind being this

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>more nebulous platform that rests upon the brain, like it's

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a manifestation of the brain's abilities. Um, and that we

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>can learn more about how the mind works, but not

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>so much necessarily about the neurology underneath it. Um. Just

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool, any hope coming through for my theory that

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the brain is just for cooling the blood and we

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>really think with our tone nails, h I'm gonna I'm

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that science does not currently have very much

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>support for that particular belief, but shine on you, crazy diamond.

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>They also said Galileo was wrong. Okay, and moving on,

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Minsky and the concept of free will. Yeah,

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Minsky had some really interesting thoughts on this, and I

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>want to read a quote from his paper Matter, Mind

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and Models, and this was cited in another thing I

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 1>read about him. But this quote goes, if one thoroughly

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>understands a machine or a program, he finds no urge

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to attribute volition to it. If one does not understand

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>it so well, he must supply an incomplete model for explanation.

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Our everyday intuitive models of higher human activity are quite incomplete,

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and many notions in our informal explanations do not tolerate

0:47:57.280 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 1>close examination. Free will or villa is one such notion.

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 1>People are incapable of explaining how it differs from stochastic caprice,

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>but feel strongly that it does so. Stochastic caprice, in

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>case you're wondering, would mean random whimsy. Yeah, so he's

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 1>saying that even though we can't really explain, we can't

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 1>give any good account of where free will comes from,

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we insist we must have it, and that it is

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>different from just random impulses that we have that we

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>act on. Yes, but he continues, I conjectured that this

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>idea has its genesis in a strong primitive defense mechanism. Briefly,

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in childhood, we learn to recognize various forms of aggression

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and compulsion, and to dislike them, whether we submit or resist. Older.

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.840
<v Speaker 1>When told that our behavior is controlled by such and

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>such set of laws, we insert this fact in our

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>model inappropriately, along with other recognizers of compulsion. We resist compulsion,

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:00.479
<v Speaker 1>no matter from whom and whom is in quote, it's there.

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Although resistance is logically feutile, this resentment persists and is

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:10.760
<v Speaker 1>rationalized by defective explanations since the alternative is emotionally unacceptable.

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very interesting insight. Yeah, And and

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>it applies to more than just intelligence, Yeah, you know,

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:20.720
<v Speaker 1>because it It actually reminds me of any time where

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we encounter something we've never encountered before, and by we,

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean humans at large, and we naturally, as curious beings,

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>want to understand that thing we've just encountered, and often

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in our first attempts we will we will create explanations

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that don't necessarily correlate to any kind of reality in

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 1>order to explain it. And it's only later on, as

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:51.319
<v Speaker 1>we start to peel things away that we really see

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 1>what's happening underneath the surface. Yeah, and then totally he

0:49:55.560 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>goes on to apply this same reasoning, uh about the

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>origins of our resistance to, you know, the idea of determinism,

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>and and our and our tendency toward free will as

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a kind of rebellious impulse against compulsion. Uh. He's like, well,

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 1>hold on, now, if we create intelligent machines and they

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 1>have something like consciousness, will that inherently bring with it

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the illusion of free will and the resistance to the

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:31.359
<v Speaker 1>idea of compulsion by physical determinism. Would a robot with

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 1>consciousness also insist that it has free will? Yeah, it's

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 1>an excellent question that right now remains in the realm

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of philosophy. One day it will not be though. One

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>day it will be a reality whether or not, and

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it may turn out that the answers No, I don't

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 1>need to worry about that. I don't know that that's

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case, because I I believe very

0:50:55.600 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 1>strongly that, uh that our our concept of re will

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is based upon ultimately the activity going on in our brains.

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>So if we in fact build a system that is

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:12.320
<v Speaker 1>truly simulating that activity, it stands to reason that whatever

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>entity is created from that would also experience that same

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling that it possesses free will. Yeah. And even if

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>you argued, no, I built you so that you can

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 1>make me toast. It's you know, that's that doesn't matter.

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 1>If someone told me, no, I built you so that

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I can make you toast, I would they say, I'll

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 1>show you why you built me exactly. So, Hey, we

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about the future on this podcast. I have to

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 1>assume that Minsky, given all his thoughts about artificial intelligence,

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>made some comments somewhere about what he thought the future

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>would be like. He talked about the future. And he

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 1>also months before his death, he had there were a

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 1>few different interviews where people were asking him his opinions

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on the current state of artificial intelligence. And I think

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>those answers are really interesting too. But uh, you know

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the New Yorker piece that that you dug up from

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty one, it was actually called like it was

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:13.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about his vision of the future. Although spoiler alert,

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if you read the whole thing, there isn't a lot

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in there about that. It's mostly about a profile of him. Yeah,

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>though it is a really good one. It's fascinating. It's

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>just that the headline might be a tad misleading, but uh,

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or or it could be more of like a broad

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:33.240
<v Speaker 1>approach like you know, he he saw this stuff happening

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>well before it became reality. In fact, his work is

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what allowed a lot of the artificial intelligence uh developments

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to to take place in the first place. But one

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things he talked about was he could envision

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a future and remember this, in which a with a

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>relatively small amount of technical improvements in robots would see

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>automatic factories in space dead on. And we do have

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 1>robots working in a lot of factories doing automated work,

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just not in space. Oh wait, I forgot. You have

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not seen the factories on the far side of the moon. Well, Jonathan,

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you are in for a pleasant surprise. Yeah. Uh, this

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.800
<v Speaker 1>actually reminds me of a terrible movie by the Asylum

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I once watched, and which robots were being built in

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>a space station orbiting the Earth and then sent down

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to Earth. And I thought, what a huge waste of resources.

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Just build them on the Earth. Build them on Earth

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>if if that's where they're doing work, why would you

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:37.919
<v Speaker 1>ever build them in space? It's too expensive? Uh So Yeah,

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that obviously has not panned out. But we are seeing

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of automated systems in factories around the world,

0:53:43.960 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot more robots being employed to the point where

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing like the thoughts about robotic drivers and robotic

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:53.320
<v Speaker 1>drones delivering stuff to us. I mean, it's it's pretty

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:56.439
<v Speaker 1>far along in that respect. Now, where did Minsky come

0:53:56.480 --> 0:53:59.240
<v Speaker 1>down on that? We talked about the possibility of machines

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:04.240
<v Speaker 1>developing aciousness? Was was he thumbs up to that? Uh?

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:08.959
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. I would argue that his answers, depending upon

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>what time of his life you were looking at, Uh,

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 1>went a little back and forth. It was always a

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:18.759
<v Speaker 1>little vague to me. But he did say that he

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>could see a future where machines have minds of their own,

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and their minds would be aware of the various parts

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:27.839
<v Speaker 1>that make up those minds, kind of the agents, if

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you will, and that what each of those agents would

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be capable of doing, and be able to use that

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:36.840
<v Speaker 1>knowledge to solve any problems that the machine would encounter.

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same thing as consciousness, however, Necessarily it

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>may just be Oh, I have this task that I've

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>never had to do before that I have got to complete,

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:49.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's similar to all these other things I know

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:52.759
<v Speaker 1>how to do. Therefore, I'm going to employ all of

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:56.279
<v Speaker 1>these agents that help me do those similar tasks to

0:54:56.320 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 1>complete this one. You wouldn't argue that that in itself

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 1>is a manifestation of consciousness. I think if you were

0:55:03.400 --> 0:55:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like that rotten so and so wants me to do

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:07.799
<v Speaker 1>this thing and didn't even tell me how to do it,

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll fine, I'll do it, but I'm not gonna be

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 1>happy about it. Then he'd be like, Okay, that's a

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:16.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty conscious machine. So I'll show you why you created me, right. So, so,

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would hate to ascribe a position when

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I myself, I'm not entirely certain where he fell on

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that he may himself have been like, this is a

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>philosophical question that fascinates me, but I don't know what

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the answer is, or I don't know what I feel

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer will be. Um. So, but you mentioned that

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:37.879
<v Speaker 1>right before his death he had thoughts about where we

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 1>stand with AI today. Yeah, they were not um complimentary thoughts. Actually,

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, he he was very dismissive about certain things,

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Like there was a Washington Post piece that was published

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:54.319
<v Speaker 1>shortly after his death, and it contained a lot of

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>little nuggets about Minsky and what he felt, how he

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>felt about certain developments, you know, recent developments and artificial intelligence. So,

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, they asked him about UM IBM S Watson.

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people would argue that IBM

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 1>S Watson is a very impressive display of artificial intelligence.

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not, or at least a very impressive display of

0:56:15.440 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>word play. And that's kind of what Minsky would say.

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 1>He said he called it an ad hoc question answering machine,

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't intelligent, it was just a question answering machine. UM,

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 1>which is I think if you would go to maybe

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Watson chef style, where it's starting to try and

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>invent things based upon other things, it's not doing a

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 1>great job, but it's trying, I think it goes beyond

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 1>question answering machine. But that was his opinion, and he

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 1>also talked about how he felt AI developers were making

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a mistake aiming for what he called the top of

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the AI problem, So, in other words, trying to create

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>systems that on their surface appear to be similar to

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 1>human thought, but they lack the foundation of what thought

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is really all about, and therefore it's just it's kind

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of like a chat bot. It's just it's simulating it

0:57:10.160 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 1>enough so that it seems intelligent, but there's nothing underneath

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it to actually support that supposition. I guess from his

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>point of view that the problem might be that it's

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>uh that it's lacking these agents, right, the society of mind,

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the basic agents that populate the society that becomes thinking. Right. So,

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in other words, instead of having agents, it's simply uh,

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to follow a program that mimics the way humans

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:43.440
<v Speaker 1>would respond to situations, but without that underlying you know,

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>network of agents that are actually making it happen. Uh,

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like skipping those those those found that

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 1>foundation in order to just get the result. But that

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:56.040
<v Speaker 1>means that the underlying system is not as robust as

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what you would need to have a truly intelligent uh computer.

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 1>He also said in an interview with M I T

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Technology Review that the last decade of AI was about

0:58:06.360 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>quote improving systems that aren't very good end quote. So

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:14.960
<v Speaker 1>he contrasted that with the era of the nineteen sixties,

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the early era of artificial intelligence development, when he said

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that they were having major breakthroughs on the order of

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 1>every couple of days, that he and students would talk

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 1>about these ideas and come up with new approaches and

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 1>new concepts about thought that would lead to enormous potential

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 1>breakthroughs in artificial intelligence. So these days it's every two

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or three years you might see a breakthrough. And part

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of that, he argued, was that we rely too heavily

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on so called experts in AI. He was actually calling

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:52.840
<v Speaker 1>back for the days when he would work with students who,

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:57.240
<v Speaker 1>again because they don't know what's impossible, end up asking

0:58:57.360 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 1>questions and coming up with ideas with those constraints, and

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 1>therefore push forward the discipline much further than people who

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have a preconceived idea of what is and isn't a possibility,

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that have already placed limitations on themselves that they aren't

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>aware don't really exist. So it was interesting, I, you know,

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I I can see his point. Also, there is something

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to say about when you get to a when you

0:59:26.400 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 1>when a new discipline is created, you would probably expect

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:34.680
<v Speaker 1>advancements in that discipline to be extremely rapid early on,

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>because there was nothing before. But as you build and

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 1>build and build by necessity, usually things slow down. You

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>just you know, you've you've explored, you you've picked up

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 1>all the and I hate the phrase, but you've got

0:59:47.960 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you picked all the low hanging fruit. Why do you

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 1>hate the phrase because it's overused. I worked for consultants

0:59:53.880 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for seven years. I hate low hanging fruits. We come

0:59:57.280 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>up with an alternative expression, the eazy cheese. All the

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>easy cheese has been eaten, and it's it's the difficult

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to get cheese. That is, it's the only cheese that's left.

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You've you've picked You've picked up the deli counter cheese. Yeah. Yeah,

1:00:13.360 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the really good stuff that's like under a heavy glass

1:00:18.880 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>case and it's guarded by wolves. You just haven't been

1:00:22.320 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>able to get to that yet. I go to a

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of weird cheese parties. Alright. So that kind of

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>wraps up our discussion of Marvin Minsky. Obviously, like you said, Joe,

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>there there's so much more we could have talked about. Um,

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy was absolutely fascinating. He has had an enormous

1:00:39.960 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>impact on the discipline of artificial intelligence, and I have

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>no doubt will continue that impact will continue into the future. Uh.

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you guys enjoyed this, let us know if

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you have other people you would like us to talk about.

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>If if I mean, I would love to do a

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>full episode on Ada Lovelace. I think that she was

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely phenomenal person and uh, it would be really

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting to do a full rundown on on her ideas

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and how how much of a pioneer she was. Uh,

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know other people too, like people who are

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>still alive would be great too, Like we it doesn't

1:01:16.800 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>have to be someone from I think they must be dead. Okay, alright,

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you have an idea of someone you would

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like us to profile, living or dead, let us know

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>send us an email. The address is f W Thinking

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at how Stuff Works dot com, or you can always

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line on Twitter or on Facebook. At

1:01:35.240 --> 1:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter we are f W Thinking. Just search fw Thinking

1:01:38.280 --> 1:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook's little search bar will pop up. You can

1:01:40.360 --> 1:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>leave us a message there. We read all of them,

1:01:42.680 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and we will talk to you again really soon. For

1:01:50.640 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>more on this topic in the future of technology, I'll

1:01:53.200 --> 1:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>visit forward thinking dot com. Brought to you by Toyota.

1:02:07.560 --> 1:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go places,