WEBVTT - This Is What Happened to the Meme Stock Mania

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy. Tracy. You know, it

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was really fun last year was Game to Stop? That

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was a really good time, wasn't it. Yeah, plus a

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>land war in Europe that we haven't seen for many,

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>many decades. But yeah, retail mania was this big thing

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>that happened in early one And I'm just looking at

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the chart of Game Stop that was sort of the

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>flagship stock for mean stock Madia Mania, and it looks

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like if you zoom out now, it kind of looks

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>like an earthquake, which in some sense it kind of was,

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Like it was this thing that just shook up the

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>entire market and people at the time we're saying that

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.959
<v Speaker 1>this was like the end of capitalism as we know it.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It does. It definitely feels like so much has happened

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>over the last year. I mean, we've had a pretty

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>big sell off in areas of the market that are

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>really hot. It's been a long year. So many different

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>things have happened over that time, so many new narratives,

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously tons of focus these days on inflation and so forth.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>That whole period, it really seems like ancient history, but honestly,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it was really not that long ago. I think Matt

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Levine has had some columns saying things that like, oh,

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of game Stop is still trading above a hundred and

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>three months, I have to retire because all of markets

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are broken. And I think it was still there or

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely lasted a long time. And that's kind of the

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>other weird thing about these sort of these manias, which

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is that you can identify them as a mania sometimes

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in real time, or say this is ridiculous, this is

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>over overvalued, but it's really hard to call them at

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the time. It's really hard to time the trades. Yeah,

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. But there was also this aspect

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of game Stop where people were treating it, you know,

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily as there were plenty of people treating it

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as a speculative bubble, but there were some people who

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>just said I like the company, or I like whatever

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this stock represents to me, and I'm going to buy it,

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>almost using it as a sort of like go fund

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>me for the business. And I honestly, one of the

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>things that I think is really important in all this,

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which is that you know, at the peak, you know

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it got started in the spring of like that's really

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>when it kicked off. That's when we had the explosion

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>of new people trading. A lot of people who are

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>staying home, either they were working from home, people have

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>lost their jobs, and so you had this explosion of

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are getting into retail trading options, trading, opening

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>up a robin Hood account, and for the first time,

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like I guess really since the late nineties into the

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble, it was the first time and basically

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty years in which it felt like stock trading was

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like part of the environment, part of the culture, and

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>something that people are just talking about their individual stockholdings

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in a way that really, yeah, I don't think had

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>been the case for at least twenty years, right, I mean,

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember there's a there's a dorman who works at

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a hotel in New York who I know who was

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>asking me about Tesla options around that time, and that,

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it's verging on the famous JP Morgan

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>shoeshine boy kind of thing when the doorman starts asking

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you about what options you should be buying for tesla um.

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it definitely was a cultural event, right, it

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>was really it was really a cultural moment, and so

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in like what became of that. And

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I have my suspicions, you know, my guests would be

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people have now lost their money,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they lost their gains that they experienced during the pandemic,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe their disillusion. We know that trading volume is down,

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but I also have to imagine there's at least some

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>people that have done well, you know, they've used this

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>moment perhaps to learn more, wanted to further their own education,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>become deeply interested in how the markets work, options are prized,

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>how trading works, how to evaluate an investment, And so

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I suspected at least some decent percentage of people got

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about the market from Spring twenty one one have

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>stuck around and really further their knowledge to quite a degree. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that you see on you know,

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the classic message board for a lot of the retail training,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>which is Wall Street bets. A lot of the posts

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that go up on there are incredibly sophisticated in trading strategies,

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.559
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of them aren't, I have to admit,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but you can learn a lot by by reading some

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. Now, I think you make a really important

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>point like some are, they're not great, some are extremely great.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Some people have learned quite a bit, some got really smart.

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Some are much smarter than anything I know about, much

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>more knowledge of market mechanics, how to price volatility. So

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we don't know yet the final chapter of

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this story and what this new cohort of traders that

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and what became of them that really started at

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the pandemic. I'm really excited. We have

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>two guests to great commenters who've followed for a long time,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>get to give us different perspectives on the world. What

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>happened all those memes dogs, what's going on with retail trading.

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be speaking with Lily Francis. She's the director

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of quant research at Moody's Analytics. And we're also going

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to be speaking with Kyla Scanlon, fantastic content creator, founder

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>of a new finance education startup, awesome on Twitter and Instagram, TikTok,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>her newsletter all great stuff. So Lily and Kyla, thank

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you so much to both of you for coming on. Yeah,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks stoving us. So what do we kick it off?

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's say both of you be such great

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.559
<v Speaker 1>commenters over the last year, of the last couple of years,

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>building up significant audiences, great insights into the world of memestocks,

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>retail trading, the sort of new cohort of investors. But

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>why don't you just give us your perspective, Like, how

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>does right now in Spring two feel different than a

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>year ago? Yeah? Sure, So I'll take you first and

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>then lily up stuff to you. F for for me. So,

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't really in the still working at an institution

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>back when game stock kicked off in February. Orry, but

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you have noticed a little bit of a downturn,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>whether that be from people you know participating in discussions

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter or on Reddit. But I think the people

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that you see who have stuck around, they're even more

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>impassioned than they were back in February April twenty April,

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>um February. So I think that you're seeing a decline

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in the number of people who might be participating, But

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who are still around are incredibly into a

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>m C G M ME And you still do see

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.799
<v Speaker 1>these stocks continue to tick back up. And I also

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>see think that you're starting to see people get a

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit more interested in monetary policy. Jerome Powell has

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>become a household name, and I don't think that was

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the case maybe you know two or three years ago

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 1>where people knew the Federal Reserve president name. So I

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's a big one as well. Yeah, really, what

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Yeah, so I want to echo callus

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sent men here essentially, And you can see this pretty saliently,

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know Google trends or app any if you've

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>looked at those about the rise and fall of Robin Hood.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean fundamentally, you can't talk about the meme stock

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>episode without thinking about Robin has impact on the options

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>market in particular. I mean, in my own data you

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>can see fundamental differences over time and the growth of

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>options with a pretty dramatic change in their volumes, as

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>well as impact the paddle the markets when Robin Hood

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially announced the trading of zero costs their transaction options.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think that you know, you can see now

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's definitely a decline in retail participation, especially in

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the options market. I think, as you know, I discussed

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this with something I speculated back in January that when

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at these meme stocks based on the fact

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that fundamentally, they're trading well disconnected from stuff like fundamentals

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>or even you know, kind of an understanding your future

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>value of the company itself. Then what you're seeing really

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is the evolution of something that kind of looks for

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the cults. And I don't even mean this in a

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>bad way or a good way, but I have these

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this passionate core of people who believe fundamentally in this

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>truth that is extremely heada head. I can never get

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that word right, head heterodox, heterodox. So what happens is

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that no matter what you throw at them, whether it

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was Robin Hood, you know, turning off the buy button,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>or whether it was new earnings reports and game stop,

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or whether it is the macro environment where now you're

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>still going to have these people who have faith in

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>this narrative that over time becomes a pretty dominant force.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I when you see this in cryptocurrencies, you saw this

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago on Apple, and you're salt with Tesla

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>that fundamentally, this group of people is a capital base

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that the company, if they do play their cards right,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can draw on to actually hopefully create value for their investors.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is something that I've thought a little bit

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>about but it's almost like, you know, you talk about

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the disconnect between the fundamentals and the share price, and

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like the price becomes a token that is

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>representative of an idea or people's idea of what that

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>company or that business or that cryptocurrency or whatever actually

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>stands for. And I wonder what does that kind of

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>meme trading or stalks, like, what does that actually mean?

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean to you? Like, how would you

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>define it? Is it that idea of you know, a

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of a belief system getting wrapped up in a

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>tradeable token that people are willing to throw their support behind,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:09.239
<v Speaker 1>or how would you define it? Roughly, everything that trades,

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally is an agreement for someone that this is the

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>value and I will be willing to buy it from you.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the only arbiter price of any asset is

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that someone is willing to buy it from you at

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that price in the future or now, you know, I mean,

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about marketing spot prices, so there are

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>institutional memes. I mean, when you think about fundamental analysis,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 1>there is no law of the universe, like a law

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of gravity that says stocks should trade at twenty times Pde. Obviously,

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we have models which kind of give us mathematical certainty

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that allows us to look at how the market is

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>reacting and say we disagree with it. That's where you

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>get the idea of theoretical versus market pricing. But at

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, you know, even those models,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the models of the mental analysis, they largely depend on

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>either are assumptions being correct or the adoption of the

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>model itself. And this is something that Emmanuel Derman, for example,

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the famous options plant, has talked about as well. With

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the advent of black shuals in option pricing, you see

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that the assumptions of black shoals start dictating market structure.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, fundamentals is obviously probably the most cohesive

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and long lasting meme of the markets in the sense

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that we all agree that a company should be trading

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>at a certain discounted cash flow evaluation. But it doesn't

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>mean it has to because at the end of the day,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if I go to you and I'm saying, look, I

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>will buy this from you at a value wildly inflated,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that is my prerogative. You know that is

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the market price at that juncture. And you see this

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>with a higher susceptibility, especially for these smaller companies like

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a game Stop, because realistically, with a game Stop or

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>an AMC retail, especially if they're highly dedicated as well

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>as newly enriched by you know, the recent bubble and

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>what we call the stock market, they have enough force

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that they could own a significant fraction of the float.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And when that happened, you know, obviously you can have

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>short sellers who can interact with the markets and try

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to restore what we call efficiency. But at the end

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>of the day, there's a reason why game Stop is

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>still trading in a hundred fifty dollars to share. We're

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>talking now a year and a half later, and you

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>see these companies that I wrote it off, everybody else

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>wrote it off. We were wrong. You know. It doesn't

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>mean that the market and fundamentals are dead in any way,

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, everything that trades

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>trades on someone's belief. Yeah, I see, that's a core

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>driver of what's going on. Like I think G and

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>A m C all of that it was. It's really

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>emblematic of like a bigger thing in my opinion, Like

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about obviously a video game company or

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a movie company. It's you know, dissatisfaction with the institution

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or being upset about how things are playing out. And

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>we were in the middle of a pandemic during that time,

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and I guess I don't know if we're out of

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it yet, who knows, But I think there's this big

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>loss of trust in traditional institutions and g M E

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and a MC somehow we're able to capture that, and

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they were able to. That's like the premium that they

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of end up reflecting is like people being like, well, actually,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty mad, and I'm going to buy this company

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to try and prove to you how mad I am.

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's still going up is because I

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>think that narrative of this loss of trust in institutions

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>or in like traditional structures is continuing to play out,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and somehow AMC and g M E and other beam

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>stomps have sort of captured that narrative. And I also

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think that we are in the era of themification of everything,

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>where um, you know, Elon Musk buying Twitter for example,

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>or even that like the idea of coming through where

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>everything is sort of meant to be laughed at, like

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing is real like there's a lot of financial nihilism,

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and so I think G M, E, A, M C, etcetera,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like this is you can't really quantify that, right, like

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this is all just speculation. But I think that that

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is also an element of what we're seeing where people

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>are just like, Okay, what's going on? I don't know,

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so let me buy the stock because nothing makes sense anymore.

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is it kind of harkens back to date

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of credit. You know, when we look at firms that

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>are very close to let's say a default point, then fundamentally,

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the basic model that we all kind of

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>understand is the Merrigin model, where we treat the equity

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>value as an option on the firm's continued survival and

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways. You know, that is the basis

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of how I viewed the moon stock trade, where you

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have these stocks which you know fundamentally maybe worthless or

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>close worthless, or as I joke last year, I think

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>at one point AMC had negative shareholders equity. But at

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, you know, you treated the

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>core reason that one buyas stock is a belief that

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>they will make money from doing so. It isn't based

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>on some ethics, it isn't based on true financial calculations.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And as you see these squeeze more and more, you

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>know you could almost treat these as an option on

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the continued mean value of this equity or of this asset.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, one of my practical realizations

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>from that is that there are disruptions to this meaning,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>which you could say are stuff like earnings, where you

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of get this pressure to go back to reality.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But then you see an asset like a bitcoin, which

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>has no fundamental value. It doesn't there is no equivalent

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of a bitcoin earnings. There is an equivalent of something

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that will directly imply a market price that can be

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>arbitraged downwards. And that's when you see like the longevity

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of these memes. How means die, I don't know how

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>beams die, Like I think that you see market cycles

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes really hard for memes to hang on

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>during that time. Where As Lily just pointed out, like

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you have earning supports, and if all of a sudden,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the company that you're putting all your networth into, it's like, oh,

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not a company, it's actually just like a

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a holding company, per se it doesn't really

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have any underlying value like that can be really difficult.

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think like everything sort of boils down to

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this idea of collective belief. And so if all of

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, the collective belief behind whatever the asset is

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>goes away, if people stop saying, if they just stop

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>believing and whatever, that ends up looking like like you're

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>going to see the stock price end up going down,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know if robin hood is not really

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a meme stock, right, but like you're starting to see

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people sort of rotate away from that because collective belief

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and whatever they were meant to do sort of rotutes

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>away too. So I think that's what I would say

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is collective belief begins to die out, um, but humans naturally,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like we'll just go meme and other things. So it's

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>like as long as the meme cycle continues, they're just

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>going to move on to something else. I think there's

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a joke on Twitter especially that I treat everything kind

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of in the lens of option theory, because once you

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>once you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know you're looking at the attention economy, where

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally you know, all of these stocks, especially once they

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have a fundamental basis on what to trade on,

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>are really based on this idea of future liquidity, or

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you can say it's a greater full theory, or you know,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever kind of derogatory term a pond Zi scheme. Those

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are all kind of analogous to each other, these zero

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sum games where you you assume that at the end

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the day someone is going to be holding it back.

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I've argued, you know, previously last year looking at credit analysis,

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's a bit more muddied in the sense that

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, once you have these stocks, that mean, if

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a base that's essentially rabid enough, they can

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>actually conduct at the money offerings which will turn into

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>capital for the firm, which, assuming a good management and

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>not management that's actually aligned with the vision, you could

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe see a pivot. You could actually rescue a firm

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that way, fundamentally, just because they have this new capital

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>injection when they wouldn't have been even in the market

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>for refinancing their debt before. But memes inherently are time limited,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and since that attention is fleeting, obviously, you have individuals

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>like Elon Musk who are very, very talented at staying

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 1>in this in basically the news cycle, and I do

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think fundamentally that a significant fraction of tests Let's value

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it is due to the fact that Ellen can command

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this attention continuously. I think you're seeing that when people

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>we thumb our noses that individuals like Elan and be like,

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>why is he doing these crazy stuff? I sec should

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>come get him, etcetera. But you're seeing that the Overton

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>window of how CEOs interact with the environment has shifted

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>toward him, not away from him. You could argue this

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of started with basically the Tea Party and Trump

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as well, but at the end of the day, it's

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>become a powerful force in the capital markets, even with

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this macro environment that's become more unfavorable. So I actually

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>want to ask more about the politics. So I remember,

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, thinking a year ago and when all of

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this was reaching a feed for pitch, and I'm totally

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>cool with it. I have no problem with people trading

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or speculating or gambling with their own money. I'm pretty

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Lizzie Fair. It's cool to do what you want. If

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you want to have fun trading, go for it. I

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>don't have any issues with it. If you want to

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be part of a club that looks fun, it looks

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>fun to be part of the Game Stop club or

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the Apes. All that honestly looks really fun to me.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, and you know you mentioned this

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of financial nihilism aspect. I totally get that. The

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>only part that kind of offended me, and maybe there's

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just being made old fashioned or what. The only part

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that sort of like bothered me was the wealthy, successful

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>influencers telling their followers on Twitter and elsewhere, and I

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>won't name any names, but telling their followers on Twitter

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and elsewhere that buying AMC or buying game stuff is

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>itself a political act. Like if you want to stick

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it to the man, buy shares of AMC. Everyone buy

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>shares of AMC, and as you say, you sort of

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>breathe the life back into this company. And like, okay,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>that's great for AMC. Maybe some traders made money, but

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not obviously other than you know, some great strike

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>against elite institutions other than maybe one or two hedge

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>funds that lost a lot of money. And so it

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of bothered me at the time, these big time

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>influencers telling their listeners that buying these stocks was a

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>powerful political act. But I'm curious both of your perspectives

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about the political logic behind it. Yeah, I can, I

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>can go first and then really passive to you, But

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's super difficult, right to like figure

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>out what exactly it was or what sort of um

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>people were thinking. I think there was a lot of

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a rug pulling to use that term, people saying Okay,

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>everybody goes and buy this, I can sell some of

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>my shares. I think that to the point of, like, Okay,

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a way to stick it

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to the band, This is a way of representing politics,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>This is a way of conveying your beliefs to the

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>broader world. I think that that like this gets into

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea of crypto sort of being religion, right, Like

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people treat bitcoin and kind of as

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a religion. And I think that you sort of saw

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that with a m C and gm ME and you

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>still sort of do to at least point around not

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>a cult like a cult essentially, right, Not that the

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>religion is always a cult, but there's threads between all

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. And so I think to your point

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>around like, why would wealthy influencers say like, hey, you know,

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>go and by this. I do think there's this this

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>horrible trend that's always existed where people are like, oh,

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you go and buy this thing. It's like essentially a

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>pyramid scheme, like you go by this thing and then

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to sell it once you buy more, and

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>then I'll make money off of you. Um. But I

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>also think that it was this thing where people thought

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that they could sort of make a difference, and so

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people probably got wrapped up

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>in that. In terms of like what it represents from

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a political perspective, I don't know. I think it was

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>mostly a money grab, though, yeah, I mean i'd add

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to that. I mean, look, there probably is a contingent

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>which and you know, excuse my language, I mean to

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>give an example, you know, the Soviets used to call

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>them useful idiots, where there are some people who probably

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>did believe that it was this true battle. And I'm

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not trying to, you know, just count what they viewed

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it as. But fundamentally, I've talked to institutions, I've talked

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to traders and prop traders that they they made a

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of money off of people. Like realistically speaking, I

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>think maybe you could argue Melvin Capital had a really

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>bad order on it. But at the end of the day,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>most hedge funds as well as prop firms jumped into

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the mess made a lot of money off of retail backs,

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>primarily I mean pain spread. I remember in January the

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>spreads were abysmal when you know, treating Jamie, especially on

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the option side, and it was kind of co opted

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>by this contingent of grifters. I mean, we know some

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty famous ones who basically took this you know, retail

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>cause celebrate and made it about them. They basically encouraged

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what was essentially a manic frenzy without regard for you know,

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>consumer protection, without regard for thinking of people who could

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>lose money off of this. And I do not wish

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>those people well. I think that, you know, that is

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of the lowest forms of operation. You know.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It isn't to say that there weren't true issues that

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>were in masked by the GMME to boggle. I think,

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was one of the first people, to

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge, on Twitter to break the news that Robin

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>had turned off the by button because I was actually

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>informed by someone in one of the trading groups that

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I was part of, and I said, this is really bad.

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I do not understand why they did that, And you know,

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>that is a true issue. But at the end of

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the day, I don't think that the individuals involved in

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>those decisions were punished in any way. In fact, you

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>could argue that Robin Hood had a fantastic order due

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to the game Stop and Jamie Friends Frenzy and made

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of money off of again normal people. So,

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>speaking of people taking advantage of retail traders, how do

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we feel about CEOs and companies themselves tapping into the

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>meme phenomenon? And Kyli you already mentioned um elon Musk,

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, a MC for instance, has done phenomenally

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>well by playing to a certain base and really like

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>leaning into memes and stunks and crypto and all of that.

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that the smart thing to do in a market

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>where memes can lead to actual inflows of real money

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or is that taking advantage of, you know, a certain

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>fandom or base. Yeah, I think it's sort of a

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>tough one because theoretically it's just free marketing, right, Like,

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>if you try to memify your stock, you're just doing marketing.

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think the difficult part becomes when you sort

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of encourage behavior that might not be very good for

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the people who own your stock, like, oh, whole no

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>matter what, um, even if like the company isn't doing

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>very well. And I think that kind of gets into

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing where the stock is sort of separate

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>than the actual company itself. Like there's AMC the company

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and then there's AMC the stock, and they don't seem

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the same thing. And so I think that,

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, people can do whatever they want with their money,

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>but there is this aspect where you have to be

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>an informed consumer. And I think that CEOs have a

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to tell people the information would be both good

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and bad um. And you know, they can lean into

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the memification of things because that's just how life is.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And Elon Musk doesn't have a PR team for a

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>reason because he theoretically does all his own PR on

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter dot com and it seems to work okay, like

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's the o G memes doonk um. But I do

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a level of responsibility that I

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>wish was, you know, underscored a little bit more. Sometimes

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>from leaders of companies when they try to become meme stonks. Again,

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be a bit more I guess sharp

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>with my criticism here right before begin You know, this

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is my own personal views. I'm not speaking on behalf

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, either my employer or anybody else here.

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just good like how we have a long

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>history of laws on concern protection, we have an accredited

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>investor laws, and it's just mind boggling to me that

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 1>because the trades on the secondary markets that the CEOs

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>can get away with us. You know, I think realistically

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a line between informing the public and presenting unbiased

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>facts and you know, doing something like you know, basically

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>making memes about you know, I forgot. I think one

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that remember in was the short shorts that Tesla started

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>selling stock as well, And it's just like, you know, look,

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm a twenty six year old I I am aware

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that there's been periods of froth in the markets, but

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what are the regulators doing here? You do see basically

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that small fishes are being prosecuted for pumping dumps because

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much well established to be on the side

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of not okay in the markets. But you know, it's

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's impressive to me that you have et

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>F providers and funds that are more regulated on what

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they can say to the general public then the CEO

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>of some of the largest companies on Earth. So I

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>actually want to pivot just a little bit and talk

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>about the cohort of people who are trading, who started

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>trading maybe a year or two years ago, um, and

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing now. And of course, Kylie, you're launching

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a new education founding information company. Literally for a while

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you ran just like really great discord were extremely sophisticated

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>conversations about trading. I used to lurk of their super impressed.

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious, like, where do you see the people now,

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Like where where did they go? And what's changed? And

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been I've been out of the woods on the

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>retail side for a couple of months, So I couldn't

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>say specifically, um, what's captivated the retail mindset. I would

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, I do have on good knowledge

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from individuals still in the space that there is still

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty dedicated cohort of traders. I think that everybody

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just assumed that, you know, when the tide washed out

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with liquidity from bond yields going up, that a retail

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>would be destroyed instantly. You know, I'm sure a lot

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of people lost money. I mean, realistically, I've seen portfolios,

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the carnage and grows stocks. But I do

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot. You know, what makes it different,

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's always saying this time it's different is the perennial.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, usually the top of the market in a

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases. I mean, look, you're still seeing crypto,

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in the private markets, command and saying valuations. You're

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>also seeing that we have a new generation of traders

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>who are natives to the Internet. They're experts at getting

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>new information and news, and you're seeing the advent of

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>tooling that previously we're talking ten fifteen years ago, wasn't

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>really available nor financially, you know, within reach of all

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>but the richest retail investors. So you're seeing that with

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this democratization of information. It isn't to say that retail

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't playing with negative edge still, but you are seeing

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that it is becoming more and more possible to be

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>competitive in the markets. And you know, there was a

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>recent paper that actually Matt Leevin mentioned where you know,

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you could see that there was a correlation between retail

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:51.479
<v Speaker 1>interests and stock performance. So fundamentally, it's hard to argue

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that retail investors didn't see success in the period. I

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the will assume the tide would

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>wash out, just like two thousand. From my own perspective,

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I am seeing people hanging on to money. I am

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of people who became new vote rish

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they are getting more and more sophisticated.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, my conversations and even my background started in

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>these trading discords very much similar to the old days

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of let's say like a nuclear finance, where you see

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>these dedicated quantitative people start taking their talents from you know, cs,

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>from mathematics, from other fields that demand pretty similar skill sets,

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and start looking at the markets and saying, hey, why

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>don't I try this? And I think that a lot

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of them will give up eventually. I think the turn

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>rate is extremely high, and I've observed that myself. But

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think that this is the market that is

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>going to birth the new generation of traders and a

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>new generation of funds that will look pretty different than

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the previous generation. From yeah, I totally agree, and anecdotally

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I post on TikTok every single day, So go into

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the throws of the devil, right, and the questions that

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I get asked and the comments that are left are

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>completely different than they were about a year ago. Um,

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>people are a little bit more attuned into like monetary policy,

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.479
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned a little bit earlier, and they're just

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of thinking about the broader financial universe. So like

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have as much insight on what treaders are doing,

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but it just seems and totally that people have become

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>really interested in which they have the right to be, Like,

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we're all economic entities, and like we should all kind

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of be interested in what's going on economically and in

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the markets because it doesn't impact us. And so I

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have seen people like really become interested. I get a

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of like really really good questions. And to Lily's

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>point about the paper that Matt Levine mentioned, like there's

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>over twenty one thousand discord investing servers, and so I

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>yea that you know twenty one tho servers you're just

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>going to shut down because all of a sudden, you know,

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's gonna rease rate. It's inflation is like all

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. I don't think that's necessarily going to happen.

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's an element of stickiness to this,

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and people are just genuinely interested in sort of this

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>like big being that that is the financial markets. And

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, um, the way that it sort

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of entered into because I like the cusp of gen Z,

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a z a lineal. I guess the older

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>edge of gen Z and gen Z is like the

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>way that they learn is sort of through watching TikTok videos,

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are doing different things like that, and I think that

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we've had sort of the gamification of finance and that

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>really allows people to become a little bit immersed as well.

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that you see sort of like

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the same level of frothiness, but I do think that

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you see people who are sticking around and are just

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>genuinely interested in what the markets are doing. I was gonna,

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I've I've been more cleared into the

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>crypto landscape, especially over the past six seven months, and

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there it's interesting because it's almost native for

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the trading mindset to be clued into retail chatter. You know,

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I think fundamentally, if you look at a crypto trading role,

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's systematic strategies, but when I talked to trader,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>especially for smaller funds, there's a role now for individuals

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to essentially just sit on discord and telegram all days

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they're involved in the n f T space. You know,

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>part of me is wondering, I'm like, when you tell

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>me that, I'm like, well, this is kind of an

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>anomaly in time, and I don't know how transferable those

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>skills will be later. But the other part of me

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is like, is this kind of just a paradigm shift

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>where you see that historically retail has been trying to

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>get the crumbs of what the institutionals are giving off,

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and now you're seeing the converse where you're seeing institutions

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>go on these niche trading discords just to get some

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>insider information before that you know, token goes on hundred cks. Yeah,

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've actually written this or about this before,

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but like, if you think about something like crypto, if

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it's driven purely by sentiment, which it is, and by flows,

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>then actually you know the person who's sitting in the

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>discord chat or the guy who's like sitting in his

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>mother's basement spending all his time on the internet is

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>probably going to have a better handle on where that's

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>going than an institutional investor in you know, a white

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>tower bank or something like that. But that said, one

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>thing that's interesting to me is that, you know, at

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the height of the meme investing phenomenon, people were getting

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>really really upset. And we mentioned this in the intro,

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but people were like, oh, this is the end of capitalism.

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 1>All our markets are going to stop working. They're making

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>fun of fundamentals and the financial industry and all of that.

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>But actually it seems like the two groups of financial

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, traditional fine an aunts and the retail investor

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>slash crypto, it feels like they're sort of coming together,

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or at least taking bits of each other and incorporating

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>them into their behavior. Because the other thing that's happened

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this year is you see a lot more crypto people

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about the FED and what new bond yields mean

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin, and you know, this is sort of all well,

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:26.919
<v Speaker 1>and on Wall Street bets you see lots of people

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about the FED and what's going to happen with

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and things like that. So it kind of

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>feels like that body, that group has moved more in

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the direction of Wall Street. Yeah, I would agree that they.

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a knowledge that you kind of have

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a broad understanding of, or it's at least

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 1>good to have a broad understanding of everything that's going on,

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think to at least point earlier about like

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>all these different tools that are being developed, you can

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of get a lot of information that was previously

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>only allowed to Wall Street. Like there's it's like Quiver Quantitative,

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which are really a valuable um. You can get different

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>substitutions to different news outlets or different data aggregators, and

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think that maybe maybe the two are starting

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to converge. But I also think the resources and the

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>tool links that they use are starting to converge, and

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of reducing the information asymmetry that used to exist. Yeah,

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that, like I said, it's it's

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>really hard to wear the crystal walls see what the

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>longer term impact will be here. I do think that

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>there is culturally, and this could be tied almost to

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea of a failure of capitalism, although this is

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>probably ironically the most capitalist thing that could happen is

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that more people have been you know, included in especially

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with inflation and the growth wages to income inequality in

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the country. And you know, I've kind of I touched

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>on this briefly last year, but it's kind of worth

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>re stating that what you're seeing is it's almost nihil

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a sick tendency, especially among those who are younger, who

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are you know, less enriched by the traditional system, where

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of like effort. You know, I am going

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to gible my money here because it is my way

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to cross the chasm from you know, a diminishing middle

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>class to the land of the rich. You know, you

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of see this. I think someone brought up that

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>this happened in Iran as well, where you saw that

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the population started day treating. And I

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>do think, you know, on one respect, people are getting

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 1>more informed about the financial markets and economics on average,

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>which could only be beneficial for us as a society.

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that obviously the world at large is dictated

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>by the flow of capital, despite how people want to believe,

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's different, it's never different. And being more

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>informed about how the markets were and how markets interact

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>with governmental policy. International policy is fundamentally important to being

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>successful in life, so I do think that is a benefit.

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>The downside, of course, is you're seeing this occur because

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of an erosion of trust and traditional you know, intermediaries

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like the news, like thanks like these basically cornerstone what

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we considered a functional society. So I don't know how

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>basically it ends, but you know, it is kind of

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>concerning and sad in the way that this is kind

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of the ethos that has been adopted, especially by my generation.

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't know if Kyla technically different generations

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>people kind of kind of treating stocks and crypto like

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>lottery tickets. Right, if you don't if you don't think

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you have that future income growth, well why not just

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>spend your money on on a chance to get it?

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>You know something and Tracy that something you've talked a

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>lot about is like China and this gigantic ball of money,

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>like the trading speculation in trying in China, and you

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>know you have day traders and housewives buying iron or

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>futures and stuff like that. There's basically nobody retail in

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the US trades. But I guess you know, I'm interested

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 1>in this idea that if there's the perception that the

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>economy is rigged, that you're never gonna be able to

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>buy a home, that income is never going to be

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>able to outpace inflation, they're gonna have this huge dead

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>burden that basically markets are the only game in town,

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the only way to get ahead. And of course, if

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>your perception that stocks are rigged, that perhaps crypto is

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>like the ultimate way, Like this is your one shot

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to get ahead. I just want to add here and

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>then I'll pass it over as well to Kyla and Tracy.

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I recently saw a friend of mine who

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is also of our generation. She's a four year old,

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>just got her first job as the designer, and you know,

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.319
<v Speaker 1>she was telling me when I talked to her, She's like,

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>my dream was really tone to how and it's really

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>sad in a way that you know, this dream of

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>homeownership has become so much insurmountable to the average American

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>where something you know, old adage is what basically a

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>home with a white picket fence and a dog and

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>two kids. It's like, how do you even afford that?

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>At this point? You know, America may be better off

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>even still than other nations which have seen the explosion

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of real estate prices even more than what we saw

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>over the past two years. And I think that, you know,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this may be the fundamental check and the fundamental cost

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of you know, quantitative easing that started in the global

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis basically fifteen years ago. At the end of

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, people are looking at the markets right now

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>as a way to, like I said, skip the chasm

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>where it's like this is your shot. And you're kind

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of seeing this even in the discord, especially of crypto

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or just course of crypto Twitter, where you can see

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this compression of time. Basically Buffett or the tradition of

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>value investor, the way that you look at investing is

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at a long time horizon. You are less susceptible to

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the fluctuations and follies of the market if you are

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>investing for thirty years versus for thirty seconds. And I

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think that because there's this general nihilism and honey ease,

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen this solatively the past year, people are

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking hand to mouth here with the markets. It's basically

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I have this one shot I need to invest. Now.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing the deterioration of even doing due diligence not

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>only at the retail level, but also at the venture

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>level when you're seeing the innovation of stuff now like

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>pre idea investing. So everybody has kind of adopted this ethos,

0:42:53.480 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so that time itself has compressed down two years, months, days,

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and nothing good to come out of that. Yeah, I

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 1>think we also have this um broad problem of economic fragmentation.

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think the leader of the I M F.

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember the exact title, came out and was like, Yeah,

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the world is increasingly economically fragmented. And I know re

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Sulton has spoken a lot about that, where you know, sanctions,

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>whether that impacts the reserve currency and how the dollar

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to respond to all that. But I think

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on an individual level, like we sort of experienced that fragmentation,

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of people are trying to

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of get some sort of grip on reality because

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we keep on having things that it sort of exists

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the tail end of the distribution happening, like a pandemic, war,

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.399
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of things have happened, and I think

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are like, wow, like life is

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of crazy. I better go and figure this stuff out,

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and the stock market and this like get rich quick

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>narrative some in some essences, the gambling aspect of it,

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, are people just trying to like figure that

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff out because there isn't that promise of you know,

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>work forty years and have a home and to have

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>two and a half kids or whatever. That's just not

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>something that is feasible anymore for the average person, and

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>so you almost have to, like to Tracy's point, lean

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>into that lottery ticket of the stock market, because otherwise

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of other options. What do you

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 1>think is gonna happen to retail trading over This is

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>such a broad category, but where do you see retail

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>investing going over the next year or so, Because in

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some respects it feels like the easy gains are gone.

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>In crypto, you know, the idea that you're going to

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>put like a thousand bucks into bitcoin and become a

0:44:56.080 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>millionaire a few years later seems far fetch nowadays, although

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could do it with another coin, who knows.

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>And then and then you have the pressure of liquidity tightening,

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates going up. A lot of the growth stocks

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>seem to have gotten the air kicked out of their tires.

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 1>We're recording this the day after Netflix earnings and that

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>is down massively and that was a big sort of

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pandemic stay at home play. It just feels like there

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 1>are all these pressures building on typical on the kind

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of things that are typically popular with retail investors. How

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think that will end up playing out? I

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think that we're going to see people still be involved

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market, Like I think the meme I guess

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of long termism, like to stay in the market and

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>you'll be fine for a couple of years, is going

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to stick around. But I think, like so we are

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>recordings today after Netflix. I do think that Netflix sort

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of falling is really interesting because that could be a

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sign of regime change where one of the things is

0:45:55.480 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>going down, right, Like the tech era is potentially sort

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of deteriorating, and a lot of people are just throwing

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>money at tech and that's kind of like, you know,

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto has essentially become the nest tech it to a

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>certain extent as well, So you're starting to see all

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>these correlations pop up. Um. So I do think that

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see people invest still, but like what

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they're investing in I think will be an interesting question

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and sort of how that pm L plays out over

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the next two years, Like will the stack market continue

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's march upwards. I'm not sure, um, but that that

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it could be interesting. Yeah, I think I'm reminded here

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the sort of Mark Cuban basically sold

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Broadcast dot Com to Yahoo in the late nineties and

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he was actually paiding out his stock and the reason

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he was still a billion after the tech bubble crashed

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was here was strategic. He bought puts basically and he

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>made out and now he's still quite a billionaire. You know,

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 1>he invested in the next generation at tech and I

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to kind of see that basically from

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever the remains of this bubble period is as well,

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You're going to see that despite the vitriol of many

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>who have been much longer in the markets, I think

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a substantial fraction of the new beaux reach will hold

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>their net worth from you know, this current period. I

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think they will be the new billionaires that fund the

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>innovations of tomorrow. I think from what you've seen in

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the tech bubble and what happened later, Yes, there was

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of froth. There was pets dot Com famously

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in their ipo, it crashed. A lot of people lost money,

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but those people who made money and held on funded

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of tech companies, which turned into the Googles,

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook's, the Netflix is the I guess Apple, Microsoft

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>already still there, but you're not going to see this

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>money go away. I think there's going to be a

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>demand for retail investor, especially those who didn't make it,

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:02.959
<v Speaker 1>for more sophistication, as well as portfolio managers and wealth

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:06.800
<v Speaker 1>management solutions which are really tailored towards what they're interested

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.799
<v Speaker 1>in and what they believe in. I think that you know,

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about this even on Twitter. I think

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people who are gonna have a

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of net worth locked up in something pretty much

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>a liquid who are looking for these strategic solutions to

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>protect their their wealth to make it last for a

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.320
<v Speaker 1>long time. I think there are a lot more savvy

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on how the market works and how cycles work then

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people give credit to and I think

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that this market, if there's savvy individuals, especially in those spaces,

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can really be capitalized on. Tracy, I think there's a

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:45.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty good place to leave. Yeah, I agree, Well, Kyla

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Lily, that was a great spot to leave it.

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>That was absolutely fantastic and I appreciate both of your perspectives.

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Is a great conversation. Thanks to both of you for

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:58.960
<v Speaker 1>coming out on Thank you guys. That was for fun.

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Yeah, that was great, It was really good.

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Tracy. I thought that was great. It was

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like unexpectedly poignant in a way, like I

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't anticipate how that was going to go, but I

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>actually thought that was like incredibly compelling. Yeah, I was

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>ready for lots of meme jokes, but it got kind

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of dark. I mean, so this is also something I've

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about. So I feel like the lightest way

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 1>or the most optimistic way to view the retail trading phenomenon,

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or you know, the meme investing slash stunk thing is

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of go fund me for companies. So

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason you like this company, you don't really

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>care about the share price versus the fundamentals. You want

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to show your support for whatever you think it represents,

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so you buy into it at its darkest. I think

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a prone to manipulation, but be also goes to

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.799
<v Speaker 1>this idea of the economic disparity that both Lily and

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyla were talking about, and this idea that people see

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>stocks basically as an escape plan from, you know, a

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:26.839
<v Speaker 1>life of of economic dreariness, which is incredibly depressing. You know,

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. So, like, obviously the origin of this moment

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we identify as being March. That was a time when

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>people are stuck at home, maybe they're laid off. The

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.320
<v Speaker 1>other overriding thing was like a period of like exit

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 1>mar It was a period of existential dread. People were

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>really worried, and people worried about death and sickness in

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>the way that at that time, in a way that

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:52.280
<v Speaker 1>nobody was expecting, like really you know, like a deep depression,

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 1>great depression levels of anxiety. Stock marketed crash. People were

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>worried about their unemployment prospects. So it's notable that this

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>enthusiastic financial nihilism came out of a period of extreme

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>economic uncertainty totally and lots of people just rethinking their

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 1>lives versus the kind of life that they would like

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to have. Um this one to a really depressing place.

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Shall we leave it there? Yeah, let's leave it there. No,

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, you know, the other thing and obviously

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is negative, but there are some really interesting positive idea

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>positives about this idea of equalization. You know, there's the

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 1>proliferation of newsletters, the proliferation of quantum computing power that

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 1>used to be something that only people who had access

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to a main frame at a major bank would have.

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's not all bad, and there are some really

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting development is Kyla pointed out, people are like getting

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 1>deeper and they're like deepening their understanding of financial instruments,

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and they want to learn how monetary policy work and

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals of analysis, So it's not all negative. Sign

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:05.359
<v Speaker 1>democratization of finance is a terribly overused um and misused term,

0:52:05.440 --> 0:52:07.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think it might actually apply in this case.

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>The idea that you're getting more people into this realm

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>who are learning about it is somewhat heartening. Um, I

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>guess as long as they're able to sort of And

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess the other thing I'll just add it was interesting.

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Lily made this point about crypto specifically, which

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>is that in crypto, the chat is the signal, so

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not even a matter of can you get the

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>same information as the pros. It's like, if you're there chatting,

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you have the signals, you have what the pro wants,

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and so there is sort of like this inversion of

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the typical relationship of who has the value. Well, this

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is the old flows versus pros argument, which is that

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if you have an asset that is driven purely by flows,

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like a meme stock or a cryptocurrency or a token

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of some sort, then really the guy who's spending all

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>his time on the Internet, who's you know, eyeball deep

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in meme and on the discord chats, is going to

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>have a much better handle on that sort of sentiment

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>than someone who's not spending all that time. So yeah,

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in that respect, it is sort of a reversion of

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 1>power from Wall Street to Main Street. So it's not

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>all bad. There's some exciting things happening in the aftermath

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:21.399
<v Speaker 1>of the memes dog Mania. Let's leave it there. This

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 1>has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway.

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe wi Isn't Though. You can follow me on

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and follow our guests on Twitter. Lily Franka, She's

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>at Nope It's Lily and Kyla Scanlon on Twitter at

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Kyla scan Follow our producer Kermen Rodriguez at Kerman Arman.

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today,

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts Bloomberg under the

0:53:49.320 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 1>handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening to