WEBVTT - What are false positives?

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff you should know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's Charles W. Chuck Bryant. It's just us. There's

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 1>no producer, there's no guest producer, there's no nothing, just

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a ghost in the chair. Why is it whenever we're

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in this room, just the two of us, I go

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>back to like elementary school or middle school and feel

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>like we should just start drinking whiskey or something. Isn't

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that weird? Uh? Yeah, well, I guess Jerry kind of

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>provides like a teacher like presence, and I guess Nol

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like a substitute teacher like presidents. So

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ever have the urge to drink whiskey in

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>elementary school. But I can see where you're coming from.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>It was eighth grade before that started from me. I

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>did drink to college. But I don't know. It's just

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and neither one of the Jerry. No one would care.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Even it's just some weird thing about the teacher leaving

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the room. After all these years, I'm still like, all right,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I need to act up right. My thing went more

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>towards paper airplanes than breaking out the pint bottle whiskey

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I have in my sock. Again, I didn't even drink

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>until college, so of course I wasn't doing that. I

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>just probably started joking around. No, I know what you mean,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but today's Chuck, but hit the bottle right. Actually, today's

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Chuck is all business. Because I hate to tell you this, buddy,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>but you're doing your job right now. That's true. We

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>both are because this is our job to podcast. It's

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>funny during the the Emily and Chuck pre Oscar's Mini

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Crush show, it was kind of dragging on. She's like,

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this starting to feel like a job, and I was like,

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 1>this is my job. This is the job. The job

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we we say. We talked about it like cops talk

0:01:54.760 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about their jobs, good jobs. We're real, real podcasters that job.

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember that show The Wire. Have you ever heard of it?

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding. We've talked about it before. I remember

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they called that one uh cop, real police, Yeah, real police.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember her name. Yeah, they said a lot

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on that show. Yeah, but they mostly talked about one

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>officer in particular, police trying to think of Yeah, right,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>there you go, So let's start real podcasting is this

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>one gonna be a stinker. No, it's not. Actually, it's

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>actually really do you know why, because it has the

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>hallmarks of a good episode, And I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>peel the curtain back a little bit for everybody, Chuck.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the hallmarks of a good episode, at least

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>of stuff you should know, is that there is controversy

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>associated with something even where there doesn't seem to be,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and that there are people who are either getting drew

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it over, suffering, being neglected, being abused. There is some

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>group of people who the rest of the world aren't

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>really thinking of, um, who are who are suffering at

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the hands of other people. And this this actually, this

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>episode has all that, all right, Surprisingly, I'll let you

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>guys guess where that stuff comes in. Alright, So we're

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about false positives, and here's what that is. If

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you've ever been to the doctor, I've had a medical

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>test done generally, well, not generally always, you will get

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>one of four results. Yeah, good point. You can get

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a true positive. And remember, when you're getting a medical

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>test back, positive is negative. Yeah, usually means bad news.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Positive is not good. They don't say I have news,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I have good news. For you. Your results are positive,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a mind trick that you

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>need to reform. But positive is you have this condition. Right.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It means that the the test that that searches for

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a condition found a result. It is confirmed as yes. Right,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>so that's it should say that's a true positive. Right. Yeah,

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>then you've got a true negative, which means you don't

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>have this. However, I feel like me or probably you

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>and most people, you say that's good news, but I

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>should like to get a confirmation on that. Yeah, how

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do you know? How do you know? Doc? Then you

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>can get a false positive, which is what we're talking

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about here, which is they say you have this condition,

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like let's say you have cancer. I'm sorry to tell you,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>but you don't, as it turns out later on, which

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>is great. False positives are kind of they should call

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it the new lease on life result, right, the Dabney

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Coleman out of time result. And then the worst of

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>all probably is the negative. Agreed. Man, I'm glad you

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>said that, because this this article just walks right past

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that fact. That means results say you're fine, but it

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>turns out that you're not. Your your toast, so whatever

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the lead and not even good avocado toast. You're bad

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>burnt toast right, exactly terrible stuff with that really cheap

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sliced cheese that nobody would want to eat. What's what's

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of a lease on life to result um

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>early death? Sudden early death out of the blue, Although

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>there is something to be said about that, about just

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not knowing right just out of nowhere, bay up, you

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just fall over dead. That's not necessarily the worst way

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>to go. Yeah, I guess I was thinking more in

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the play on words of instead of a new lease

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on life, something to do with renting in your landlord,

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>so an old and uh, we'll figure this one later

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and dub it in Wait, what's it called when you

0:05:55.440 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 1>get kicked out of your apartment? An old eviction death? God,

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we did it, chuck man. So those are if you

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>take a test at the doctor, those are the four

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>possible results you can get. What's really interesting here, and

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this is something that you're going to want to remember.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And after you hear the rest of what we have

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to say, you're really gonna want to remember this. But

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>when you hear something like this test that I'm about

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to give you is accurate It doesn't mean that if

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes back with a positive result that says you

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>have this thing. It doesn't mean there's a nine chance

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that you have that. It just means that when they

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>say a test is accurate, that if if you do

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>have that disease, there's a chance that this test will

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>catch it. Okay, huge, huge difference between those two things. Okay,

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that's step one. So really what this is saying is

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that this test doesn't let very many false negatives get through.

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the numbers, this is how

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>that works out. If you have ten thousand people chuck,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and they take a test that's accurate. Uh and and

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this is so ten thousand people and the them don't

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.119
<v Speaker 1>have this and it's a ninety nine percent accurate test,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be one hundred that come back positive

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>out of ten thousand. Okay, nine of those positive results

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to be true. One is going to be

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a false negative. Okay, Okay, are going to be negative.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna come back negative. One are going to be

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>true negatives, but are going to actually be false positives. Right.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I know this is really mind bending, but if you

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>if you take the numbers like this, that means that

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>only one out of nine thousand, eight hundred and two

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>people had a false negative. So that's a big deal.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>As you said, that's the big daddy, that's the one

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got to really watch out for. But nine out

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred are false positives, which means that this

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>accurate test has a fifty percent chance of giving you

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a false positive if you come back positive. Should I

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just not even have said any of that stuff now?

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just funny that after ten years it's

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>done on me that you have to true talents. One

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is explaining extremely complex things in a very easily digestible way,

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and the other is completely confusing me with words that

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>come out. Well, this is very confusing stuff. I mean,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not just me, this is BAYSI and statistics. Basically,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the point of all of this is is that, first

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, if you're accurate test comes back that says

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you have something, it doesn't mean you have a ninety

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>nine chance of that you have it. Very important number one.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Number two, if it does say you have it, there's

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a fifty chance that a test is wrong even if

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it's accurate test. That's a big thing to remember that

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>if your doctor doesn't explain that to you, you punch him,

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>him or her in the arm and you say you're

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>not doing your job fully because I'm scared, buddy. Yeah,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I just got a positive test result and I'm scared

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>out of my mind. So if your doctor is not

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>going to come for you, hopefully Baysian statistics, well, and

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>don't listen to me, go look it up yourself, because

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure someone else on the internet can explain it

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>better than I can. Perhaps Mr Billy Bays in his

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>whole statistical model. Was he a character of Melrose Place?

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so. He's a pool cleaner? Um. Alright, So

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>with medical testing period, like you said, if your doctor

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>is not telling me that, with with any test that

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you take, not all medical tests are created equally. Some

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are really accurate, some aren't as accurate as a well

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that's about say, so they could be. There's accurate as

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they can be, which is to say, maybe not as

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>accurate as you would like it to be sure, but

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you really need to talk to your doctor and hopefully

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>they're offering this up anyway, like, Hey, what's the deal

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with this test? How reliable is this? Do I need

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to get a second test? Because the whole thing with

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>false positives and false negatives and even true positives and

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>negatives is there's a bunch of different reasons why uh

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>follow up testing is both good and bad. Like sometimes

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>these procedures, like the follow up isn't like a pen prick.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's an actual surgical procedure that you may not

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>need a lot of times, and we'll get into these

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>more specifically, but there's expense involved. Um, a lot of

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>times you don't you didn't need to spend that money,

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's hard to say, because you should

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>be your own medical advocate and spend whatever money you

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can to ensure that uh, the testing is is reliable.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And then there are things like the time that it

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>takes between these things, like all right, we'll see you.

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We need to follow this up with another test, but

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take three months to get you in. And

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, in those three months, you're stressing out,

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you're up all night, you can't sleep, your sex drive

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is out the window. That sounds like a silly thing

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, but it's a real thing, especially when

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you're grown ups like us. Yeah, it's important, um, but

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a here's a study from two thousand nine said,

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>granted this is a little old, but it's from the

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Annals of Family Medicine, and when it came to test

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for prostate long colorrectal and ovarian cancers, they found that

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>positive false positives. Uh, after four tests they did tests,

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think either four tests or fourteen test. After four tests,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you had about a thirty seven percent chance for men

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in the chance for women for false positive. And then

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the more test you got, the more that went up,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>which is distressing. It is something like if you had

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>fourteen tests, all fourteen to the tests that they studied, um,

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you had a sixty point four percent chance for men

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and forty eight point eight percent chance for women of

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>coming back with a false positive. And again this isn't

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just like it's yes, you have that new lease on

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>life on the other side, but studies have shown like these,

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>getting a false positive result from a test, it it

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>can be emotionally devastating and it can have an impact

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on your finances if you're a Scrooge McDuck type who's

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>only moved by the idea of money, well and your

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>physical health because of stress. Yeah, because it's not like

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>you're not addicted demand which in the time just because

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you're stress eating the whole time. So that's not good

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for you. What was man? Which man? Which was a

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>canned sloppy joe starter. Okay, I know it's a meal,

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and well it's more than a meal. A sandwich is

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a sandwich, but a man which is a meal? Oh

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's right, I got it wrong. You're like, no, it's

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>more than a meal. Even it's even greater than the

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ads per prophecies. Uh so the financial costs like you

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Scrooge McDuck um forty. They did another

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>study of about a thousand people, and this was in

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>December of two thousand four and the issue of Cancer

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Epidemiology bio Markers in Prevention that is a legit journal,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just by the title oh for sure, oh eight, and

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then it says and and wakeboarding. More than participants had

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>at least one false positive. Of these people went on

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to receive additional care at a cost of about a

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars for women and about eleven for men. So

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not chump change. No, it's not um And a

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, well, who cares, I got insuredce, Well,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the health care spending is kind of a problem in

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this country. There's apparently in two thousand five, the National

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Academy of Sciences big shout out to them UM. They

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>found that there was thirty of healthcare spending was wasteful

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the United States in two thousand five, and the

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of that gave rise to something. There's a campaign

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>called Choosing Wisely. Have you heard of that? Know? So

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a campaign called Choosing Wisely. They have a site

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>called Choosing Wisely dot org. It's a joint effort between

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the American Board of Internal Medicine, so it's physician based

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and consumer reports, and they're basically saying, like, there are

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of unnecessary tests being performed out there that

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are leading to these unnecessary surgeries, unnecessary expenses, unnecessary anxiety,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and we want to figure out what they are, and

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we want to start advising people against them, or at

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>least advising doctors to advise their patients against them because

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they might be unnecessary. And so this campaign UM has

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>really kind of had a big impact is we'll talk

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>about in a little bit. You know, the idea of

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>breast cancer screening has changed. The recommendations have changed from

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>what I understand from this Choosing Wisely campaign as UM

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>really kind of just shifted things from well, this over

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>abundance of caution can't be harmful to actually there are

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>some harms involved in an over abundance of caution. Let's

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of UM streamline our caution and make it a

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>little more UM laser focused. Should we take a break? Yeah,

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll take a break, and I'll I'll hit

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you with a stat right out of the gate when

0:15:36.440 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we come back. All right, So before break, you were

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about UM breast cancer and mammograms in particular, And

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a study a few years ago in twenty

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>two zero about false positive mammograms and breast cancer over

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>diagnoses alone at four billion dollars a year billion. So

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just such a fine line of uh, striking

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the right note with preventative care and over diagnoses. Yeah,

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and here's here's the problem. Like the tests, it's not

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like they're not out there saving people's lives. Yeah, it's

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>not like the people like Dr Papa Nicolau who came

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>up with the pepsmere said, oh man, this is gonna

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be like a cash register for Western medicine. That's not

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>what these tests were designed for. Unfortunately, they are used

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in some circumstances like that, and probably more circumstances than that.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>They're used again out of an over abundance of caution,

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.719
<v Speaker 1>because no doctor wants to be responsible for missing something

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and their patient um and and the leading to their

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>patient dying, so they're using this over abundance of caution.

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that the tests aren't aren't infallible. They

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>do have um they do have accuracy problems, and some

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>tests are better than others, or another way to put it,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>some tests are worse than others as far as false

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>positives go. And it takes the PEPs mirror in particular. UM.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>With the PEPs mirror, it looks for pre cancerous cervical cells. Right,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>three million, three million women in the United States get

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a positive PEPs mirror result UM. From what I understand,

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>every year only three thousand of them have a deadly

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>cervical cancer and that of women will get a false

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pepsmere in their lifetime. But is the thing. Four thousand

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 1>women who die in the US every year from cervical cancer,

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>most of them did not have a PEPs mirror or

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>hadn't gotten a PEPs mirror in the last five years.

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a really there's a there's a tough um

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>relationship between using the tests and and and overusing the tests.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And for every say, I think two thousand women who

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>undergo a mammogram, one woman's life is saved. Well, those

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand women, they didn't know whether it was gonna

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be whether they were going to be the one whose

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>life was saved or not, so that to them or

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.959
<v Speaker 1>to their doctor, it was worth it. Unfortunately, two hundred

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of them will get false positives, and ten of them

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>will undergo unnecessary surgeries, painful, unnecessary surgeries to remove non

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>cancerous suspicious cells in their breasts. So there's this idea

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>where yes, we need to use these tests, and then

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there's also this idea where we need to use these

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>tests better or come up with more accurate tests. Yeah,

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in particular, mammograms UH and screening for colorectal

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>cancer are two of the big ones that can show

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of false positives, and they're sort of under

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the microscope as to how we can correct this UH

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. UM. For instance, mammograms UM correctly identifies breast

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.239
<v Speaker 1>cancer of the time However, uh, if you're younger, if

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you're a younger woman, or if you have very dense breast,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to have a false positive. And so

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>because of this, over the past like even ten to

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, they've changed the recommended recommended age a few

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>times for who when when you should start getting these mammograms.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It's gone from I think in two thousand nine they

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>recommended between fifty and seventy four. Uh, then I think

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 1>it went down, but mean, um, I think it went

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>all the way down to forty. At one point, forty

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>was where it started, I think where it started, then

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>up to fifty and now I think this is the

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>latest as of a few years ago, the A c

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>American Cancer Society said if you are at average risk,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and this is probably how they should do it and

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>not just a sweeping age. But if you're an average risk,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you should start at forty five annually, but you could

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>begin as early as forty and I would guess that

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>means if it if it runs in your family, and

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>then after fifty five every other year, like Emily's mom

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and my mom both went through breast cancer, so Emily

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.719
<v Speaker 1>started getting mammograms. I think it maybe even at forty

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>because she was in the higher risk group. Yeah, and

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they're no fun to go through, but she is. Uh.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Emily has a good head on her shoulders

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>as far as advocating for herself, but also um, not

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going off the deep end. Yeah, that's simily like through

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and through. Like she's not just gonna sit there and

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, whatever you say, doctor, and she's like

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>that actually doesn't sound quite right. She will stand up

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>for herself. Yea. Yeah, advocating for herself it's important. Um.

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So with Mamma Graham's chuck, from what I've seen, nobody's saying, well,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of X ray, so you don't

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>want to build up, you know, the radiation. That doesn't

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>seem to be the problem with overuse of mammograms. What

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the problem is that they that well,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a Mamma Graham is an X ray, and the X

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ray is handed off to a radiologist and they apparently

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>are like eight eighty four some high eighty percent effective

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at finding cancerous tumors in breast. Just looking at an

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>image of a breast. This trained human being can say, yep,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>there you go right there, circle it initially go follow

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this up. The follow up UM is it results in

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a a biopsy, usually a needle prick biopsy to remove

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the cells. Those are examined, and if those

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>come back as suspicious, a doctor might say, we need

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to get those cells out. Most of the time those

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't actually cancer as cells, but they're still being removed surgically,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>which is painful, costly, and can be a problem emotionally

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>to have to go through that surgical procedure to have

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>cells removed that you didn't need to have removed. That's

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the that's the problem with with UM mammograms as far

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>as getting them frequently, and supposedly, between ages forty and fifty,

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a woman has a fifty to sixty percent chance of

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>getting a false positive result from a mammogram. Yeah, man,

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean a sixty chance. Yeah. And again, no one's saying, oh,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>don't get mammograms. They're gonna just totally screw you up.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's more like medical community, we need a better way

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to to find to keep an eye on breast cancer.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're trying. I sure they are, of course

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>they are. In Colorectal cancer is a perfect example. UM.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It is the second leading cancer related death in the

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>US right now? Um was it? Say here? A hundred

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty two thousand, seven hundred new diagnoses in two thousand fifteen.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:22.479
<v Speaker 1>And one of the big problems with colorectal cancer is

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that not a lot of well, I'm saying a lot

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of people, but I think about fifty of people don't

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>follow up on a recommendation to get a colonoscopy because

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to get a colonoscopy. Yeah, so that's

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Have you got one of those? Not yet?

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>You know not. I haven't either. I'm really really not

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to it. And I was researching it today

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and just almost fainted like three or four times while

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I was reading the procedure. About the procedure, Yeah, it's hardcore, man.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>There's like a finger with tube that they stick in

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>your anus, past your rectum up to your colon. The

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>c seesme I think it is, which is the top

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of your colon, which is basically where the your rib

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>cage ends on your left side, that's your sesome. They

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>go all the way up there and it has like

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a camera and a light on the end, and basically

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing is visually inspecting the inside of your colon.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>If they see something that they find suspicious, they can

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>put four steps through the tube and take a sample

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of it and then just you know, come on back out.

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Normally they'll they'll give you a sedative for this. UM.

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>They also give you I can't remember the name of

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the drugs um, but it basically makes you forget that

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it ever happened. Like you can prevent you from forming

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>memories during the procedure. But most people don't want to

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>go through this, even though it's extremely effective. It finds

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>like of um coal erectal cancer from what I understand, Yeah,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing, what like all the advances of medical science,

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they're they're literally saying, like the best way is to

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>really just get on up in there and take a look.

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Just jamming up there, you know, get up there. However,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>they do have some because like we said about people

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.959
<v Speaker 1>won't even get a colonoscopy when recommended. Uh, they have

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>other tests. Now they aren't as accurate, but at least

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they're at least they're trying to get another test on

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the table for people that are reticent to have the

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>two stuck up their butt, and some of them work.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>There's this one called colon Guard from Germany. Yeah. They

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>they have accuracy rate of um no, no, no, this

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one is oh well yeah, yeah, yeah, colon Guard. That's high.

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm sorry, I'm miss spoke earlier. The the colonoscopy catches.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So this stuff that you just poop into a cup

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and mail it in and some Porschemo tests it. Right,

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that's that's really great. Well it's not not quite. It

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>showed of the cancers that a colonoscopy would uncover. Okay,

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>so that's not overall. Oh okay, I got it. But

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's still pretty good, right, But it has a high

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>high false positive rate, of which I mean if you

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.959
<v Speaker 1>think a tube up your butt will make your rectum pucker,

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so will a false positive of colorectal cancer. Yeah, the

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>German one, although that might be German two. But there's

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>another German. Uh actually this is a German study about

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>stool tests, and that's when you literally are just looking

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>at it trace amounts of blood in the stool. Well,

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>some do that had accuracy all over the place. That

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was from which I mean, that's such a wild swing,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>right that I don't know if I would opt for

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 1>that one of them. So one of them. Some of them,

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I should say, probably most look for blood in the stool,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some some look for DNA or genetic material of cancer

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in your stool, and another one looks for chemical changes

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of a certain gene that's that could be present in

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>your stool. And by stool, of course, I mean poop

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, everybody um and they analyze them for this,

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and again they're pretty good at catching the stuff, but

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they're also pretty good at giving false positives. So I mean,

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that's just a great the idea that we can catch

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>like colorectal cancers with colonoscopy, But people who need one

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>don't go get it because it's such an awful procedure that,

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like you were saying at the outset, like that begs

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>for something new. You want to take another break, Yeah,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>let's go prepare the finger with tubes. We'll talk about

0:27:52.480 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>drug testing right for this. Okay, all right, So we've

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>honed in on mostly medical testing up into this point.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>But if anyone's ever taking a drug test, there is

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>always the risk of a weird false positive. You can

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be a clean liver and still get a test that said, hey,

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it says here that you smoked marijuana and you can

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>be like, dude, I don't and have never smoked marijuana,

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to plead. Like basically every athlete

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>ever this test of positive for anything says I didn't

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>do it, man, this false positive. They're like whatever, stoner,

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but it does. That's like the same thing with up

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter account was hacked alright, Like really every time

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>some thing awful came out on your Twitter speed someone

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hacked it. Yeah, but Twitter hacking does happen, and true

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>false positives and drug tests definitely happen. Yeah, it depends

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on on what you've been doing. Like if you are

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>using a prescription medicine or even some over the counter medicines,

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you can come up with the false positive on a

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>drug test. It says between seven and fifteen million people

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a year in the United States get a false positive

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>drug test. That's a lot because think about it. When

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're applying for a job and you

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>go do the drug tests and you go home and

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you hear that you got passed over for the job,

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they tell you that it was

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>because you failed your drug tests. And even if they do,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be like, well, we want to

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>hear your side of the story. Mr Candidate number nine

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven. You know they like you, just you just

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>lost out on a job because of a false positive.

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>You lost out on a sports scholarship, you lost out on,

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>UM don't know, getting to deliver meals on wheels, who knows,

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But you're gonna miss out on something because of a

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 1>failed drug test when you didn't do anything. You've been

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a straight air of your whole life. But again, you

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>did you You made the mistake of um not keeping

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>up with what prescription medicines can give you false positives. Yeah,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and here's the thing parents, if you drug test your kids,

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not weighing in on that one way or the other.

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you drug test your kids and they return

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a positive test from marijuana and they say, Mom, that's

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>because I was in the car with some people who

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are getting stoned. That's how it showed up. Uh, it's

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not true. I hate to break it to you, but

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that is not You will not I don't think you

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can ever get a false positive for a marijuana from

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>second hand smoke. Right. That's not your cue to burst

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>into tears and grab Todd and go oh Todd, I

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>knew you would never use drugs, And Todd's winking at

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the camera and breaks the fourth while and winks at

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the camera Ferris Bueller style. Yeah, stoked. It did kind

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of remind me though, because it said here that cocaine

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the drugs that routinely do not come

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>back with a false positive or a false negative. Yeah,

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of on the money. That means they have

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a good test for it. Well yeah, but I kind

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of that made me remember that old thing. I used

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear that like whatever percentage of dollar bills has

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>cocaine on it, and I thought that's totally not true

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and one of those things that you just here in school.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But I looked it up and apparently that is totally true. Uh.

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>There was a study just a few years ago in

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>New York City by n y U and they found

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of dollar bills had trace amounts of cocaine. Yes, some

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous amount of euros to too. Yeah, and not just cocaine,

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like there was some morphine, heroin and meth and

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lower quantities and then all manner of disgusting gross things

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on on paper money, right, which apparently people were using

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to roll into a tube and sticking into their nose

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to ingest draw ugs with not were but kind of

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>always have. So so the idea that, um, you can

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>find drugs on money? Have you heard that? They're They're

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like local laws around the country in the United States

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that say that police can confiscate money as drug money

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if they test it and it turns out that there's

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>drug residue on it. But it sounds like it's of money.

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah wow, yeah, not too cool. What are some of

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the other things that can give you a false positive

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>aside from just jamming dollar bills in your nose? So

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>remember that Seinfeld where I think Elaine was supposed to

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>go on a j. Peterman trip but she got she

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>got disinvited because she turned up positive for heroin. But

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that she was eating lemon poppy seed

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>muffins every day. That apparently is true, although this article

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>or how stuff Works article gets it wrong. So the

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>poppy seeds don't actually contain opium, but when you're harvesting

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the seeds, opium can rub off onto the seeds and

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>depending from people, they were doing opium no no, no

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>from so like they're harvesting opium from the poppy and

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 1>then they're harvesting seeds later, and the seeds can come

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in contact with opium residue from the poppy plant. And

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 1>then however, well they're processed or not processed by the

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>time you eat them, they they have they might have

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a substantial amount of opium on the outside of the shell,

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>which will show up in a drug test. Seinfeld was

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>correct because I felt was correct. Apparently, ibprofen um can

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>come back with a positive from marijuana, barbiturates or Benny's

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>m Benny's and that was Jack Carouac's drug of choice,

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>one of several. Yeah, but he really, I mean I

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>remember him writing about the Bennies a lot. That's how

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>we wrote that book in like forty eight hours. He

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>write on like one long scrolling piece of paper. That's

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>what I've always heard. But last time I heard that,

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I was like twenty years old, so I know it

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>looked into it since I think it's true, Well, I

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>think I've seen it. Jack Caroway clad us no, uh uh.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Some some OTC colden allergy medications apparently can result in

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>result in positive tests for like emphetamines. It's crazy. Yeah,

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>well you know that, like like if you're making bathtub crank.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>You can use suda fed as like a precursor or

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>an ingredient in just crank. And that's why you're only

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed to buy like one box at a time with

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a driver's license. It such a seventies. Well yeah, if

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you're using over the counter suda fed to make your

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>your meth, that's cranky. It's crank. Uh. And then tonic water. Surprisingly, um,

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>apparently quinine contains a little bit of the real quinine,

0:34:55.520 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>which is a drug. So here's the thing I looked

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>into this. I could not figure out why quinine would

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>result in the positive test for heroin. Here's why, Chuck,

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you ready for this. I'm ready because you know gin

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and tonics are my jam. Okay, well, just be careful

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>because gin or tonic water does contain sometimes like eighty

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>three milligrams of quinine in it, which was a malaria

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>drug right well back in the thirties, Supposedly heroin dealers

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>started adding quinnine to their heroin to combat malaria. That

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>was the urban legend. It turns out that's not the

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>case at all, but quinine actually interacts with heroin in

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a way that kind of boosts it and it also,

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more to the point, mimics heroin's bitter taste. So somebody

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>would taste the heroin and what they were tasting was quinine,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but they thought they had like some dynamite s gag

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on their hands. So it was really just kind of

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to take terrible junk and make it seem like it

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>was much better by adding quinine. Apparently this has been

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 1>going on for so many years that they that drug

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>tests test for quinnine because they consider that an indicator

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of the presence of heroin. I think my big takeaway

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is here, is it quinnine and not quinine? I've heard both. Okay,

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that's your big takeaway. I was laying down gold. Well

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>here's my deal. As lately, I don't have been buying um.

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been buying the real deal tonics. Yeah, like Feverit Tree.

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I hate to use the word artisan tonics. You should,

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>but I've been buying the artisan tonics because they're delicious,

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and I've really embraced bitter as a as a taste

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that I can enjoy. Now Here in my late forties,

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I've never liked bitter at all, but I'm kind of

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have come around to it a little bit. Yeah. It

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is like the definition of an acquired taste, isn't it. Yeah?

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>But now I really like it. And you know, these

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 1>these tonics that they make her like they're made from

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the real Uh, what's the root the chincha? What is

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it chinchilla? It's not chinchilla, chin shona? Is it chinchona?

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe so. Yeah, And that's like the key ingredient, right, Yeah,

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand it is the key ingredient tonic.

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an artisan tonic making cinchona bark so as I. Yeah,

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's the key ingredient or if

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's one of them. There's also like in white willow

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>or something in that like an ingredient, and aspirin is

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:35.879
<v Speaker 1>also in to water. Yeah, I don't know. I enjoy

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it though, And it's it's the thing is, you don't

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>use a ton of it. You just use like an

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ounce and then some club soda or whatever. If you

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>have artisan soda water. Oh, I see what you're saying.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So you're using artisan like tonic, not with any kind

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of fizz. You're using like the tonic tonic. Yes, oh wow, man,

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that's hardcore. It's you know, it's like dark brown.

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I got you, and then you pour that in. It's

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like a couple blounces a gin an ounce of that

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>and then top it off with some soda water. Give

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.479
<v Speaker 1>it a good shake. Man, that sounds great. It's really

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>good and it has a nice come over, come on over.

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I think I started gin and tonic season early this year.

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>That's great, which is not good. No, it's great as well. Okay, yeah,

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not good. It's great artisan tonic made from doomed goats.

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>They have some down They have a one kind downstairs

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>at the eighteen. Yeah, the bitterest place. Yeah, And I like,

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's okay. But then there's another one in Evandale, States

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that I think. I like there's a little more so

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>is there like a specific tonic or just like the

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>general tonic that they have? Well, the one uh in Evandale,

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>States is one called dry Tonic and one called robust Tonic,

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think the robust just has a little more

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>limp lime citrus. But they're they're both delicious this stuff, man,

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Nice work, Chuck trying, yes, deer clear of the drug tests.

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure they're going to start instituting them at

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff media any day. Now. You know, the only drug

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>test I ever had to take my entire life was

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 1>when I went through, uh the adoption process. Oh yeah,

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember that. I never had to take one for

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for work or anything. Uh, nor have I now that

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it. I think we're in the minority. You

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>never had to drive a Bobcat for work. I did,

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but the guy I worked for couldn't have cared less.

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Who's insured to the teeth? Before we go, Chuck, you

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>got anything else? You got nothing else? All right? So

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>before we go? I found um one test that is

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just supposed to be. It just seems to me like

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the gold standard for test. It's an HIV screen

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's called the Enzyme linked immunos Orbit Essay or ELSA.

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about it in our HIV two

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>parter um. This is how this test is performed. So

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you you get this one screen, the ELISIA screen. If

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes back positive, a second ELISA screen is performed

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if that's positive, of a separate test that uses an

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>entirely different technique is performed. All this is in the

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>lab before you ever hear your results. And that means

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that one in the United States, one out of two

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand tests show a false positive. That

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>means that has a point zero zero zero zero zero

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>four percent chance of returning a false positive. That is

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a bomb test. Yeah that's all I got. I got

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing else. Go check out choosing wisely dot org. It

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty interesting to me. Uh And in the meantime,

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>how about some listener mail. Yeah, I'm gonna call this

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>email from Mr Sweedman's class. All right, this is actually

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>from Mr Sweedman and on his class, but we're gonna

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>shout out his class and helps that he starts incorporating

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this into his class. Hey, guys, love the show on

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Walrus is wanted to chime in regarding reproductive isolation or

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons why different species don't mate. I have taught biology

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for several years and evolutionary biology is always my favorite unit.

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Remember when we talked about reproductive isolation and yeah, what

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>other different types of like how that? How that would

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>manifest itself? I remember? So he says there are several

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 1>types of reproductive isolation, and geographic isolation is one of them.

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And here's a little breakdown geographic isolation when species live

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in different geographic reasons, sorry, regions, ecological like isolation, same region,

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>different habitat, Okay, okay. So so they're in the same

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 1>they're in the same big city, they just don't hang

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out the same clubs, different neighborhoods, different neighborhoods. Behavioral behavioral.

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I always have a trouble with that word isolation. One

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>species mating behavior won't work on another. For instance, a

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>peacock won't attract a chicken, right because the peacock can't

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>do chaw cockaw? No, what is the peacock say? Help?

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Uh. Temporal isolation, same area, but breed at

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>different times, and that could be everything from the season

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to literally the time of day. That's called two ships

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>passing in the night reproductive isolation. And that's like I

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>like morning sex and the other one's like, shut up,

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I only like depth sex at night when I'm drunk.

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Then there's gametic isolation. Mating can occur, but sperm and

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>egg won't mix. No, not you again, And he says

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in this case it is usually the egg releases a

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:37.439
<v Speaker 1>toxin that kills the sperm. Quid. That's right. Uh, And

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>finally has said, my student's favorite type of reproductive reproductive isolation,

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>mechanical isolation. That's when the parts don't fit, like just wait,

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just hold, like, just give me a second. Wait, I

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can do this and then nothing, he says, think square, peg, round, whole. Sure,

0:42:57.520 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good way to put it, way better

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>than what I was. So there you have a guy's

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>all the types of reproductive isolation. Now you know, and

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>knowing is half the battle. G I, Joe, nice job.

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't stop believing or whatever journey lyric guide your life.

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>That is from Mr Baird Swedman. Thank you, Mr schwed Man.

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I's goot that you added at a h What is

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it Swedman? It's just Swedman, but I like Mr Mr Schwedman.

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to call him Schwedman. You know Mr Swedman

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.919
<v Speaker 1>from PS right exactly. That's how I'm doing well. Thank

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you very much, Mr Swedman. I'm sorry I got it

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong in the first time, but Chuck said behavioral wrong,

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.399
<v Speaker 1>so we're even. I could never say that right. If

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with us, especially if

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you are one of the fine teachers instructing America's youth

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or any youth of any country around the world, because

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we think everybody's great. You can tweet to us where

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>s y s K podcast I'm at Josh Ouam Clark

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's at Facebook dot com slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant.

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>He's also on Twitter at movie Crush. You can send

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>us all an email to Stuff Podcast at how stuff

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.359
<v Speaker 1>works dot com and it's always Join us at our

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>home on the web stuffy sho dot com. For more

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, is it how

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com.