WEBVTT - Weekend Bonus: Crypto IRL, Episode 6, with Tim and Katie

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heard podcast,

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Murray Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Yes, I know it's Saturday, but we're here

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to offer you our listeners a special audio only version

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of a new weekly video series called Crypto I r L.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>That's I r L Like in Real Life, and it's

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>hosted by friends of the show, Katie Greifeld and Tim Stenovic.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is episode six. If you want the full video experience,

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>head over to Bloomberg dot com, slash qt or check

0:00:48.880 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it out on YouTube. Tim, where are we? Obviously we

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>are in an art gallery or I don't know, a museum.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>That obvious. It's obvious to me. Okay, fine, why are

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we here? Well? Really, it's just some sort of convoluted metaphor,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>or at least device to give a little bit of

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that extra to the top of our show. This one

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>is particularly tortured. How dare you do you remember? I

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.919
<v Speaker 1>do well? They were supposed to transform the stodgy world

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of museums and art galleries into something perfit for the metaverse.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is this it? Yeah? What do

0:01:52.000 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you think? I don't like her. Okay. Just a few

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>months ago, n f t s were all the rage.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Barris Hilton went on Jimmy Fallon to explain what they were,

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>only to return a few months later to have Fallon

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>show off his very own board eight, something he reportedly

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>spent more than two grand on. People were talking about

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>n f t s not just as exclusive and expensive collectibles,

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but also as a way to transform the creative world.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>If we put art on a blockchain, we'd see a

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>fundamental shift in power from the middleman to the creative.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Instead of a gallery making all the money, an artist

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>would get a cut each time their piece was sold.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It would be easier for musicians to retain creative control.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But interest in n f t s has fallen off

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>a cliff. Trading volumes for n f t s, which

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are basically just digital art and collectibles that are recorded

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on blockchains, has tumbled from a record high in January.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>As the hype around n f T s has died down,

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>companies are now trying to find a use for them.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Nike bought an n f T studio, Starbucks is an

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>n f T rewards program, and luxury players such as

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Gucci and Tiffany have launched n f T S. So

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the path forward for n f T s. Will

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we find a good use for the underlying technology, or

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>as some critics say, our n f T is worthless

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and just the stuff of hucksters trying to pray on

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the unsophisticated. How would you explain what you do to

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>a five year old? What I do now is I

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>run the consumer business at a company who does security

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for digital assets. And if I was talking to a

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>five year old, I'd probably say there is digital stuff.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It would be much easier if it was a fifteen

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>year old, because you would say, do you know if

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you ever ever bought a skin in a game? And

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they would say yes, and I'd say, okay, well we

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure nobody can steal those things from you. Let's

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>bump it up to a ten year old, still prepubescent.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Your title is chief experience officer? What is chief experience

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>officer me? And when we're talking about the digital world, well,

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're in the very early stages of this

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>transition to a world that actually has digital stuff, digital belongings,

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>scarce digital goods, digital things that you could lose, and

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the user experience is pretty bad, you know. I mean

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, it's sort of like the early days

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet. You didn't say go to my website.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You said get a computer, get a modem, get an

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I SP get a web browser. Okay, now go to

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>my website. You know. Now you just say like, hey, Siri,

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>go to a website, and it goes to the website.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's a That's what's happened over the last

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years. The same thing will happen over the

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>next twenty five years in the world of digital assets

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrency and digital value. Well, I want to talk

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about some of those digital assets. Um. We're going to

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>speak later in this episode with John Rick Start and

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>he basically thinks that digital assets are a scam. And

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not necessarily just talking crypto here, we're talking from

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the n f T perspective, the idea of h digital

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>goods that don't exist in the real world but only

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>exist online. UM. Kind of like the equivalent in the

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>metaverse or online version of like owning a pet rock,

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>buying a pet rock? Did you did you ever have

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a pet rock? I never had a pet rock. I

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>think I know my daughter at a Toma Gucci. So

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we could use that as an analogy. Wait, what did

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you say, my daughter at a Toma Gucci. Yeah, we

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>could use that. We could use that analogy. Did you

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have a Toma Gucchi? I think it's Tamagotchi. Did you

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>have one of those? I had a Tomagotchi for sure.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Also also had a new pet was big. Yeah. Yeah,

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that was the original metaverse and sort

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of your neo pets for the original and f t

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>s I mean new Points. I lived and died by those,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>even though they were virtual currencies. Actually don't know what

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, but the fact is that there are

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of critics. You just say, this

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff is worthless, it only exists in a digital space,

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's not real. We're not buying it. What

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>do you say to them? I say, honestly, what I

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>say is eventually you'll be dead. Because you know a younger,

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>younger generations who grew up, you know, through COVID and

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>go to school on Zoom and live digital lives and

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>spend eight plus hours a day on on their phones,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know that it's not a foreign concept to

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>them at all, and also, you know, look, I'm fifty

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>years old and I you know, graduated college in nine

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and I remember very well the people who told me

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet is nonsense, the Internet will never work. I'm

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>really glad that you brought up the example of the

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>internet because I've actually tweeted to this effect before. Like,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if I think about what I would have tweeted in

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousand's about the Internet, they would have

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>been absolutely terrible. But to that point, I would have

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>really said a lot of really stupid things that are

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>now stupid in hindsight. But the point remains the Internet.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I can see a use case, you know, I can

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I have just the entire world of information at my

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>fingertips um. You know. For a smartphone, I also see

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the use case. Maybe it costs way too much, but

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it does have a use case. But for n f

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>T s, what is the use case? I mean, there

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are tons, So let's like, let's like figure out where

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we want to start. I mean, there are there are

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>tons of things you have a lot of Let's just

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>go with something very simple. Fifteen years from now, your

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>government issued I D will be a digital asset. I mean,

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I find it super ironic that the the technology I

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>used to get into parties at n f T n

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>y C was technically more secure and better than the

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>technology I used to get into the United States from

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>France to come you know, to come to America. So

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just a very simple one. Now. Look at even

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>just like the fact that when you use Apple Pay

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay at the local um vegetable shop, which you

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>know in my neighborhood in Paris, they didn't want to

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>do three years ago, right. It took COVID to get

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>them to actually want to take digital money. But why

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is Visa International involved in that transaction? Right? And my

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and my am I taking it on credit. I'm not.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do a cash digital cash settlement right um.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually technically possible but not yet happening. So

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>these are just the most basic of things. You know.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I just spent five years working with lvmh um, you know,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Louis Butan Moah Hennessy, big luxury conglomerate. You know, the

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are in the luxury business have spent the

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>last how however many years, you know, trying to explain

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to people why you have a three thousand dollar handbag,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Why do you have a three thousand dollar handbag. Why

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do you wear a T shirt? Says Thrasher. Why do

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you wear a T shirt? Says Slayer? Why do you

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do so many? Why do you have a MySpace page?

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Once upon a time? Right to be an individual like

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this is just you know, basic human um you know,

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>uh kind of behavior. Let's look at another example I

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>love to use is just the example of digital art.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we agree that there's an art market, right,

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we agree that a boscyott is not worth what it's

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>worth because of the wood and the paint. Right, It's

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a cultural artifact, right, A piece of art is

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a is a cultural artifact. And you know the reality

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is that there are any great um digital artists out there.

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And when two people have a value exchange around creativity,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say that's a more beautiful digital business than

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>say an advertising business where you steal someone's attention and

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>sell it to someone else. Can I just make one

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>point really quickly? As you were talking about my Space,

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it occurred to me I actually spent money for Neo

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Pet's premium account just so that I could unlock certain

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>things and certain features to put on my Neo Pet Unfortunately,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the evolution of my thinking in real time. So,

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking of art and cultural artifacts, I'm glad you brought

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it up, because I have some fine art right here.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Mona Lisa. What is that? Is that you?

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>This is yeah? This is me, this is the Mona

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>This is me as the Mona Lisa. That's awful. I

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't like this, Katie didn't know. I don't have a

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>better reaction than that. That is just fell did you

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>bring this because I live in Paris, But I mean

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you've probably seen the real thing at the loop. But

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>it actually it's quite small. It raises it's probably it's

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like about this. It raises an important question though, I mean,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter that if I have a print out like this,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter that it's not the original. Um from an

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>n f T perspective, like if you have a replica

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>of an n f T or if you have like

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a replication and the Mona Lisa is a great example.

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, you know, I have been to see

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Mona Lisa to love more than once. Every time

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I've gone. The room is full of people who want

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to see the Mona Lisa and take pictures of it

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, You go outside two feet and there's a

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand Mona lisas. There's Mona Lisa is on t shirts.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>You want to buy another one? My favorite is the

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Mona Lisa. There's dabbing right. Um, that's a that's a

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>popular one these days. Um, But it doesn't really seem

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to prevent people from wanting to see the real thing,

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>right because there is actually only one. And let's be honest, like,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>human beings are story consuming creatures, right, It's not the

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Mona Lisa. It's it's the fact that the Mona Lisa

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>has notoriety. Mona Lisa has notoriety for particular reasons, and

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the Mona Lisa has become the Mona Lisa and the

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>subject of a slick Rick song and the subject of like,

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, heist movies or whatever she's smiling at. I

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's storytelling. This is all storytelling. We are

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>story consuming creatures. That's part of the reason I love

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this space is because it makes you ask those original

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>questions of like what is value? What is money? What

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>do we care about? As people? Um? Look, I find

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff quite easy, frankly, because I grew up collecting

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>records I grew up um collecting fanzines and skateboarding and

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>being a part of these You know. Again, you you

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>wear a T shirt that when you wear it to

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the mall, you know, if there's another skateboarder, they come

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>up to you. Right, that was what it was like

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties. Um, So to me, these things make

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton of sense, you know. And what I say

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>to my colleagues at LVMH is who you know, had

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this similar conversation with often. You know, you're you want

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to tell me that if I kill a cow and

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I colored the skin and I cut it into pieces

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and I stitched it together into a bag, go, that's craft.

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But when Matt Caine makes an extraordinarily complex, beautiful artistic product,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>our project called Gazers, Oh that's not craft. Why because

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's digital? Oh come on, I honestly, I like, I'm

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>offended that you would even that, that someone would even

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>say that, because it's an individual. It's an artist who

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>has a craft. Now, again, whether you like a Louis

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Baton handbag or not, you don't need to. Lots of

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>people don't. Whether you like Matt Caine's Gazers or not,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that's up to you, but don't deny that people do

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>write Ian Rodgers. We're gonna have to leave it there.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, thanks for having me this special

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>audio only episode of Crypto I r L. Will be

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>right back with more from Katie Greifeld and Tim Stanovic.

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>If you want the full video experience, head to Bloomberg

0:12:47.600 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash qt. We're talking to n f t

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>s and we're talking about their use cases when it

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to arts, So we should probably talk to an

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>artist people. Pleaser is what she goes by, but also

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>her real name Emily Yang. E'mily, good to see you.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So what what do you see as the possibilities for

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>n f t s when it comes to your work

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>and when it comes to your life? Well, I mean,

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I really shouldn't be saying this as an artist, but

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense that n f T started taking off

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>because of art because it's visual and humans are visual creatures,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's easier for us to make the

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>connection in our brains. But UM, my opinion is that

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>n f t s should be way more than art

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and it should actually just be sort of the underlying

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 1>technology that runs infrastructure in society, um, including you know, documentation,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>ticketing and things like that. But to your point that

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there's uses for n f t s beyond art, do

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that n f t s are the best

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>vehicle for art? Uh? If you don't like physical things,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>then probably I've adopted a much more nomadic lifestyle recently,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like many others in crypto. And then you actually just

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>get into this mindset of not wanting physical things because

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they're a burden when you travel, and a lot of people,

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know in the real world have too much money

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and don't know where to spend it. Also by art

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and the store and what are those called ports ports? Yeah,

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>for tax purposes, right, Yeah, But like that's taking up space.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that was just an episode of Billions I saw.

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that actually happens. And so, you know,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for nowadays, like being able to flex that

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I spent a lot of money on a piece of art,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but I don't have to I just pull up my phone.

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you flex that you spend money on a

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>piece of art that doesn't exist in the physical world.

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can take a screenshot of the purchase

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and then post it on your Instagram story, but couldn't

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody then take a screenshot of your Instagram story and

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>post it on their Instagram story and it looks no

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>different than Sure, if you own a Ferrari and then

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I went to your house, I can sit in your

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Ferrari and take a photo, and then I can pretend

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's mine, and a lot of the f X

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>scammers on Instagram do that. Wait, but there is if

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we play this metaphor completely. The difference is that if

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the Ferrari's mine, I can drive it around and it

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>can take me places and it drives fast. Well, if

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you knew how to use etheroryum, you'd be able to

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>interact with your n f T or transferred to somebody.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't transfer that n f T to myself, right,

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where to go from there. That was

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a good point. So, John, what what is your issue

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>with n f T s. What's your problem with them?

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The problem that I have with the fact that you've

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>got a some sort of fractionalized hyperlink to a jpeg

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>file or the metadata of a jpeg file as a

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>representation of some sort of investment. What my problem with

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that is, It's ridiculous, it's absurd. There's nothing to it.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a giant scam. It's a giant Ponzi scheme, turns

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>victims into victimizers. It's one of the most absurd things

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that has come up, and it it evolved from you know,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>they had initial coin offerings, but the SEC cracked down

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on those, and then you know, lending products and staff's

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>s a f T s, the SEC crackdown on those.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's just an end run around that with more nonsense,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>more crypto nonsense. So it sounds like your problem isn't

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>just with n f T, so it goes beyond that,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>deeper than that, it's with sort of the idea of

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the crypto ecosystem in general. Oh. Absolutely. Look, I worked

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at the SEC in the Enforcement Division for almost twenty years.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I was eleven years chief of the Office of Internet Enforcement.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been teaching law school at George Town and Duke

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years and this stuff is so obviously a

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>scam to me on so many levels. So all of

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>this hype and nonsense is just awful, and it's it's really,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I think, done some awful things to the world. So

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you're not a hoddler God, No, just

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we got that. I mean, we got that out of

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the way. The externalities are so terrible, ransomware attacks. I mean,

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it does have one good use for criminals. John, what

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>if it's I get what you're saying. I completely get

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, and it actually it does make sense

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to me. But what if you think about it from

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of a luxury good, and you think about

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it from the perspective of somebody who lives online and

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>who does play a lot of games and does believe

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be a metaverse? You know, why

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>not pay for a luxury item in your in your

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>own digital world if after all, I mean, look, I'm

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>not buying this stuff, but you know there are people

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>who pay two or three hundred bucks for a pair

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of foam slip on shoes that probably cost a couple

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of dollars to actually manufacture. Oh my god, you know

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I like, Hey, I'm a sneaker head. You're a sneaker head. Yeah, absolutely,

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge sneaker head. I just went to sneaker Con

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>with my son and bought and sold sneakers. Sneaker head,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you should love n f T. I'm a sneaker head.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing my my if you can see my brand

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>bread's right now, my Jordans ones. So no, of course

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't love n f T s because I'm a

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>sneaker head. I think they're still so ridiculous. If you

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>want to flex with your n f T, you want

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy your n f T and put it as

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>your your your icon or whatever it is on your

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Twitter account, go ahead, have at it. But the marketplace,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>let's think about the marketplace where n f T s

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 1>are bought and sold, because most people buy them thinking wow,

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna go up and I'm gonna make a

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. And most of those people are the

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>people who aren't very sophisticated when it comes to investing.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's think about that. Those marketplaces, they're incredibly corrupt,

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>match trades, wash trades. The fraud isn't just encouraged, it's taught.

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Turn on YouTube. If you're promoting an n f T

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're not using fraud and match trades and wash

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>trades and and sock puppets to somehow tout and manipulate

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the price of your n f T, you're committing malpractice

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in that world. So if you want to just buy

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this stupid picture and put it up somewhere. Go ahead,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and you think that's a flex, go ahead. But but

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're buying it as an investment, which most people do,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>it's absurd. And you know that's why the market is tanked.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just just absolutely tank. People have finally

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>figured it out, and it will just keep getting worse

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's so ludicrous. You know, it's Alice in Wonderland.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>It's it's absolute nonsense that actually I can explain it

0:19:54.920 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to you this special audio only episode of Crypto I

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>r L will be right back with more from Katie

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Greifeld and Tim Stanovic. If you want the full video experience,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>head to Bloomberg dot com slash qt. I do want

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to go down the sneaker head rabbit hole a little

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Is that in Alice in Wonderland reference. No

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>kidding anyway, but I guess what we're The point we're

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to make is you're paying a lot of money

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>for sneakers, which do have a use case, but you're

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>paying a lot more for the status symbol. If I

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>have these sneakers, where you could buy a pair of

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>sneakers that cost a hundred dollars, but you choose the

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>luxury item. And for people who live extremely online, I

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe it's the same sort of vibe. I think

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that's fine if you want to go buy your Rolex

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>or your Louis Vuitton bag or your Jordan's sneakers and

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>right around, and then I don't have any problem with that.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk about it as an investment, like

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the way n f T s are, and you build

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a marketplace around that, there's several things that happen. Number One,

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people get ripped off because they have

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>no idea what they're buying. They have no idea what

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. They're just hoping it will go up. Number Two,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>criminals will use those marketplaces as places to launder money

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 1>or move money around uh for different nefarious purposes. So

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you're opening up the world to all these dire externalities

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time, you're putting a lot of

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>people at risk. And that's why the SEC is there,

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, there's special laws around the way investing.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>The way investing is done to protect people and protect them,

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>often from themselves. You may be a libertarian and say, look,

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want those protections I just believe in caveat

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>M tour and I just want to live the way

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that I want to live. Well, that's fine, you can

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>make that argument to Congress, but right now we have

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>these statutes and these rules so that people can't do

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff. They can't do an initial coin offering,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they can't do a lending program, they can't do a SAFT.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>All of these things are unlawful. John, I do want

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to ask you know, you've mentioned a few different times

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.239
<v Speaker 1>that you're a professor. I gotta know what is the

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>what are your the perspective of your students? What did

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>they say? I assume you guys talk about this, Oh, Katie,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>what a great question. You know. First of all, I

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>like to teach my students how ridiculous all this stuff is,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and they love to challenge me. Okay, but once we

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>get into it, I just again, I'm not the smartest

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>guy that's ever taught law school. And you know, but

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not difficult to combat all this nonsense and ridiculousness

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>because there's no there there. And so I do think

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you're right. The younger generation look at me and say, okay,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>boom where you just don't get it and that just

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>makes me laugh. And that I put together a website

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>called Digital Trustwatch dot com, totally free. Anybody can go there,

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I put a lot of the research that

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I've done, which is years and years of research, on

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this website so people can see it and and read

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for themselves. So they can't. They gotta stop telling me, Hey,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you just don't get it. Well, uh, John, have fun

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>being poor. Sorry, That's just how I had to end it.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>That was so fun. That's what they say to you, right, Oh,

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>you you hit the nail on ahead, Tim. They tell me,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>how fun being poor? They tell me, I don't know

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. I mean on Twitter. Look, I

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>don't make a nickel from being a crypto skeptic, not

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>one nickel. I don't profit in any way, shape or form.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>John thinks a lot. This is really great. I really

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time. Absolutely great meeting you both.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I kind of felt like you had

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a moment when you were when you were talking to

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you in like some sort of epiphany. I didn't have

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>a moment. When you think about the fact that I

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>participated in the digital world for many years. I spent

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>more money, more real money than I should have four

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>items for that digital world kind of made sense to me.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, did you have a moment um? You

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>hear one guest and they're really convincing. You hear another

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>guest and they're really convincing. I wouldn't say. I wouldn't

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>say I've had a moment. I'm going to make it

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>my mission to find your moment. I want to see

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>these episodes of Crypto I r L in video. Check

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>them out on Bloomberg Quicktake at Bloomberg dot com, slash qt,

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>or find Katie and Tim Over on YouTube. This is

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>For more shows from I Heart Radio, visit the I

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Send us your comments, questions, or suggestions for the show

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to Crypto at Bloomberg dot net or find us on Twitter.

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We're at Crypto. The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Vicky Verglina. Our senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>are Mohammed Faruk and Sharon Barriro. Our associate producers are

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Ty Butler and Moses on them. Desta wonder at is

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>our engineer. Original music by Leo Sidrn. I'm Stacy, Marie Ishmael.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend.