WEBVTT - why are predator drones flying over LA?

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so this episode is partially about protests, but not

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a specific one. It's not really about Trump's military

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>parade on Saturday, or the No King's protest and response

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to that. It's not about the ice raids or the

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>protests that have been going on in response to that

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for almost two weeks at this point. I'm sure you've

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>seen all that online. But just to start us off,

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>i live in Los Angeles where some of the biggest

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>protests have been happening, and I've been out every day

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>with my camera covering the protests. Most of the time,

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty calm and peaceful. Despite that, law enforcement presence

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>has been massive, and it's not just the LAPD. The

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>National Guard is here and so are the Marines. Officials

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>estimated that this deployment would cost one hundred and thirty

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>four million dollars. It does get hectic. I've seen tear

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>gas canisters launched a protesters' heads. I've seen police horses

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly trample multiple people, and an unhoused person who didn't

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>seem to understand what was even going on being beaten

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.639
<v Speaker 1>up with a baton. And that was in the space

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>of half an hour on Saturday. Afternoon. This stuff is

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>usually aimed at protesters, but journalists are not exempt from

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>being pushed, having tear gas thrown at him, or even

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>being shot at with one of those less lethal rounds.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I can confirm that because I've been hit by one

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of those rounds twice. But again, this episode isn't about

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>me or journalists in general. It's also not even really

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>about the protesters. It's about the tools that are being

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>used to watch all of them, and about surveillance and

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>protests in general, and a trend that we're starting to

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>see take shape. If you're listening to this in June

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty five, the things you're about to hear

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in this episode might sound concerning to you. If you're

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>listening after that, all this might just sound kind of quaint.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But let's get into it.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm time.

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>From Kaleidoscope and iHeart podcasts. This is kill Switch. I'm

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Dexter Thomas. Goodbye. On Tuesday, June tenth, Joseph Cox over

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at four or four Media noticed something weird going on

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in the flight data over LA.

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 3>When the protests started over the weekend. I did what

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I often do when there's a protest or some sort

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 3>of large event is I go and check flight data

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 3>to adsb exchange dot com. It's a website where volunteers

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 3>they run basically little sensors that can detect flight traffic.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 3>The website then makes this freely available. But what I

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>usually do is I go and I start seeing what

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 3>aircraft are in the sky above this protest or this event.

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>And in this case, the skies were busy. There was

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot going on up there.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Zerre one traffic couble clock one droll ma ab direction,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>another Troy Q nine to two drum seven three traffic

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>cover clock eight miles the direction, another Troy nine two

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>three drunk.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure people on the ground would have noticed this

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 3>as well, But there were aircraft up there that you

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.839
<v Speaker 3>would have heard, would have seen, and then I think

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 3>many others do you may not have even noticed as well.

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>So there are sort of two suspicious flight paths. The

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 3>first time, I was doing circles and I followed where

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>it took off, and it took off and eventually landed

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>from March Air Reserve Base, which is to the east

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>of LA. We don't fully actually know what that flight is.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a larger DHS plane. I haven't fully

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 3>verified that. But the other one which we have verified

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 3>is that there were these other really interesting flight patterns

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 3>above downtown LA and Paramount, but they were in this

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>very distinctive hexagonal pattern and it was a much higher altitude.

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 3>It was like over ten thousand feet something like that.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 3>There's something in the sky at around ten thousand feet

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>flying these hexagonal patterns. Doesn't have a call sign.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>What is a call sign? Why would you expect a

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>call sign from an aircraft?

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll try my best because I'm definitely on an aviation expert, okay,

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 3>but I am incredibly interested in it journalistically. So a

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>col sign is basically unique code and aircraft is going

0:04:55.480 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 3>to broadcast, be assigned so it can identify itself of

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 3>two other planes and to air traffic control. So to

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 3>be able to effectively organize air traffic, you need to

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 3>know which plane is which. You'll have Delta flight seven

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 3>oh two or whatever, and obviously that's going to be

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 3>a Delta one the DHS call sign or one that

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 3>they often uses Troy Troo y. So this is how

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 3>planes identify themselves and how ATC can manage them. If

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 3>you don't have a call sign, that's interesting because it's

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>obviously raised the question of why don't you want this

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>plane to be identified? And it does make it harder

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 3>to figure out what agency is behind this craft. Not impossible, yeah,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>but that information is out there and you cross reference it.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 3>You'll look up FAA registration records, and that's usually how

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 3>you'll go, oh, that's registered to DHS. Oh that's registered

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>to California Highway Patrol or something like that.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's kind of like driving that a license plate,

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>which yeah, I suppose some agencies can do, yeah in

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the sky, driving with a licensed plane in the sky,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that would raise them questions From.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Me, I'm immediately interested because I've seen those hexagans before,

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and that was when DHS flew predator drones above Minneapolis

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>during the BLM protests in twenty twenty. So that is

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 3>immediately really interesting. It's very distinctive, like you don't normally

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 3>see those patterns on flight data.

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Joseph started connecting the dats and he wrote an article

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on four or four media saying that it looked like

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>two very similar drones were flying over the anti ice

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>protests in LA and that these might belong to DHS,

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Homeland Security fly in a hexagon.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So again this is where the limit of my

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 3>expertise shows itself. I can't necessarily say they're flying exactly

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 3>in a hexagon, or is that how the data is

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 3>being interpreted by ADBs exchange or something like that. But

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 3>it appears as a hexagon, and that is an immediate

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 3>red flag of that might be a predator drone.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>In case that phrase predator drone sounds familiar to you,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking generally here about a series of unmanned aircraft

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>developed by General Atomics, the MQ one, the Predator, and

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the MQ nine the Reaper. These have been used for surveillance,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>including along the border between the US and Mexico, but

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they've also been used for so called targeted strikes and

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>launching air to ground missiles to kill people in places

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like Afghanistan and Iraq. Most people wouldn't expect that one

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of these drones were flying over a major American city.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>You think of predator drones, you think of this as, oh,

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this is something used in wartime, this is use for war.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Just a backup, what usually would you associate a predator with?

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I would usually associate a predator just broadly speaking, flying

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 3>over a country like Afghanistan during the US's war on terror,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I would associate it with maybe a convoy of cars

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>is driving from one location to another, and intelligence of

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>some veracity set that there is some sort of insurgent

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:07.119
<v Speaker 3>or some sort of al kaeda isis Taliban whoever leader

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 3>inside this vehicle. We're now going to fire the health

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 3>fire missile and we're going to destroy that vehicle. That

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 3>would be the standard way of thinking about it. And

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I think, of course, with the US's drone wars, it

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>has targeted weddings as well. Is done so called double

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 3>tap processes, where you fire a drone strike, it kills people,

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 3>people then go to help you, then fire a second

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>missile because you want to get those as well. These

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>are weapons of assassination and weapons of war, and now

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 3>those are flying above US soil. To be clear, I'm

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>pretty sure that DHS ones are not armed, so I

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>want to be very clear about that. But they are

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>still incredibly powerful surveillance apparatus. They have very high powers

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>cameras on them. They can potentially have very sophisticated electronic

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 3>surveillance technology as well. We don't know whether that's being

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>used above these protests, but at.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>This point Joseph wasn't one hundred percent sure who these

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>aircraft belonged to. And this is where a community of

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>people who study this stuff come in. An aviation enthusiast

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>named aero Scout did some digging and finally helped connect

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that final dat.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I tried to see where it took off. I can't

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 3>figure it out. Maybe it had this transponder off or

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 3>whatever before that. Eventually I see it flies to the

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 3>US Mexican border, which is obviously where US Customs and

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Border Protection hangs out and stores some of their drones.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 3>So they were very smart and they followed the flight

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 3>path of what looked like the drone. They found the

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 3>relevant atc Audio, and in that haystack they found a

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>couple of needles, including the mention of Troy, which is

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the DHS call sign. Even though this drone is not

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 3>broadcasting a call sign, it's mentioned there. And then crucially,

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 3>some of the audio says a Q nine, which is

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 3>shorthand for the MQ nine, which is the official name

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>for a Predator or a reaper drone. So cross referencing

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 3>it was confirmed. I actually emailed Customs and Border protection. First,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 3>when I first saw the hexagons, I was like, oh,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean I have to immediately approach the comment. Now.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>They took several days to get back to me, like

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 3>an unusually long time. But then they got back to

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>me and they confirmed that their MQ nine predators are

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 3>supporting federal law enforcement in the Greater Los Angeles area,

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>including quote, Immigration and Customs enforcement with aerial support of

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 3>their operations.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so specifically ICE.

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Also yes, because I asked, are you flying these for

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 3>yourselves or you flying them for another agency? This statement says, yes,

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 3>we are flying them for ICE. Interestingly, CBB says it

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>is not engaged in the surveillance of First Amendment activities.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 3>End quote, which is, well, you're flying above a protest,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I hope, Like, are you just not gonna You're gonna

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 3>not point the camera at the protest?

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sorry. Not read that sentence to me again.

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I need to partse that again.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 3>This is the four quote. Additionally, they are providing officers

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 3>safety surveillance ren requested by officers air and marine operations.

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 3>Is not engaged in the surveillance First Amendment activities.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment activities, I would certainly associate with the protest.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>That is interesting, Okay.

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 3>I would say it's a few different ways to interpret it.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 3>The one would be that, oh, no, we were asked

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 3>by ICE to fly and provide situational awareness for the

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 3>protection of our employee. Is that sort of thing, and

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe we incidentally filmed people protesting. That's one very charitable interpretation.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Another one would be that we don't view the protests's

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 3>First Amendment protected speech because they're all violent or whatever.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 3>And again this is me extrapolating from the statement. But

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 3>when you marry that statement with drone footage like DHS

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 3>posted on Twitter, it says these protests that they are violent,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>California needs to get this under control. And there's footage

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 3>from a drone. They don't say predator. By'm going to

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 3>presume it's the predator and it's specifically of the protest

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 3>like it shows Peel protesting. So I don't know. It's

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 3>very hard to square that statement with the fact that

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 3>a predator drone flew not just above downtown LA, but

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 3>also flew above Paramount. It flew above the two areas

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 3>where the protests were.

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk real briefly if we could about this site

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>where you're able to actually track stuff. This data is

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>basically freely available to anybody who wants to look at it.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can go to adsb exchange dot com right now.

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 3>You can then move your cursor over Los Angeles and

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 3>then you can see the air traffic coming in and out.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 3>But it is an amazing tool journalistically for researchers as well,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and this information is available to anybody. It's just a

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 3>barrier to entry for interpreting it. And again I'm absolutely

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 3>non expert. I'm just good enough to go that looks

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 3>like a drone to me people who are a lot

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>better than me.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So at first, there's a flight pattern that looks like

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a hexagon. This looks like Minneapolis twenty twenty. And

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>actually tipping back to twenty twenty, when you first realized

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that there was a predator flying over Minneapolis, were you

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>surprised at all?

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 3>I was entirely shocked, and that was the first time

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 3>I had seen it. My co founder, Jason Kubler has

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>been covering drones is and years. He may have been

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 3>less surprised, but I think I almost had a benefit

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of coming in sort of clear eyed about it because

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 3>they're flying predator drones for protests. That's insane to me,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>as somebody way back when I was actually an intern

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 3>at the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in London, and I

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>was one of my jobs was you need to enter

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 3>into a spreadsheet the drone strikes from Obama's drone war

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>inside Yemen and then subsequent administrations as well. So for

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 3>me journalistically, predator drones, reaper drones, they are a weapon

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 3>for war, they are a weapon for assassination, and now

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 3>they're flying essentially that same technology over protests inside the

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 3>United States. I was blown away by that. I confirmed

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 3>it with DHS at the time, and then I started

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 3>to go back and look through more flight data associated

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>with those drones and you could then go look through

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>historical data and figure out, oh, they're actually flying these

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 3>all over the country, sometimes over the one hundred mile

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>border limit above US cities. So this is actually happening

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. It's just we don't necessarily understand

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>or see that. Customs and Border Protection published footage, so

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 3>that they said was drone footage, and it's very clear

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 3>you can see people running around and protesting and the

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 3>police response and all of that. So in this context,

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>they're being used as a situational awareness tool, is what

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 3>CPB told me. But I still think it's wild and

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 3>there's a big public interest in telling people there's like

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>a dot in the sky watching this, and you may

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 3>not realize that, and then we have a conversation about

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>whether we want that where we think it's proportionate. Some

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>people might be okay, but we can't have that conversation.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 3>That's what digging free flight, DATCHA and finding out in

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 3>the first place.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So these situational awareness tools, that dot in the sky

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>might feel distant, but it is watching. That being said,

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not the only way people are being watched. That's

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>after the break. If you go to a protest, whether

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you're actually marching all day or you're just there for

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to see what's going on, you're probably

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>aware that you're being watched more than normal. For some people,

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's comforting. For others that feels like a risk

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that would make them uncomfortable. Surveillance is no longer theoretical.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's over your head, it's in your pocket, and especially

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at a protest, it's all around you. So this brings

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>me to another set of questions. Which is I've been

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>here physically out documenting protests as best as I can

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>on one person, and as I'm out here reporting on

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the protests, actually physically going to the protests. And I've

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>covered protests before where people are increasingly concerned about their security. Right,

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>especially in twenty twenty, people were already wearing masks because

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of COVID, which you didn't see too much of before

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that it would really sort of a select group of

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people who would wear masks to a protest. You saw

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that more than twenty twenty, and you certainly see that now.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But if there are drones in the sky, realistically, how

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>anonymous can one be at a protest?

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'll preface this with I'm not necessarily giving advice

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to one side or activists, law enforcement, to any It's

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>more just like a cold analysis of the technology itself.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say it's impossible, but I would say it

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 3>has got exponentially harder, just based on the sort of

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 3>technology that's going to be at one of these protests. So,

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 3>as we've said, you'll have prejudice drones with very high

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 3>powered cameras. I don't know whether footage from that would

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 3>be used in a criminal prosecution or anything like that.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 3>But regardless, it's there and it's collecting data on the

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>ground or even sometimes in the drone. Maybe you will

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 3>have technologies such as imsy catchers, which are basically these

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 3>fake cell phone towers which broadcast a signal they trick

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 3>phones into connecting to them, and that can give up

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 3>unique identifiers associated with your phone. That can be sort

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 3>of a springboard for law enforcement to then go get

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 3>more information about people. They can also in some cases

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 3>intercept text messages and phone calls as well, although with

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 3>upgrades to four G and five G like that may

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily be the case. And then the big one

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 3>for me is that I don't think we've seen it

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 3>deployed by will be very interested if state or local

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 3>do use This is, of course, facial recognition technology, where

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 3>so many agencies across the United States by this tool

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 3>called CLEARVIEWAI that's built on a massive database of billions

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 3>of images of people's faces. They point a camera at

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 3>somebody on their phone. It's an app you installed on

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the phone. A police officer does that, scans the face

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 3>and brings up their vembo or whatever it is, so

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 3>they can identify the person quite easily. Apparently it works

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>in some cases even when people are wearing masks, and

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 3>it's sort of to hammer on that just cold analysis

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 3>of the tech. I think that might also be why

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ice officers and well primarily ice officers

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 3>masking their faces right, may be concerned about there, because

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>there's actually tools that anybody can use in the same

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of way anybody can access flight data. There are

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 3>facial recognition tools that anybody can access and you can

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 3>put faces through there.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Officers also being concerned about being identified themselves using the

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>same sort of technology.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 3>But potentially, yeah, it's a dual use technology. It can

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>be used by anybody. Because the access to this tech

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 3>has filtered down. It's not just a tool for law

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 3>enforcements anymore. It's a tool for anybody with an Internet

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>connection and the smartphone.

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>There's really two things that we can be thinking about

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>when we're thinking about ones. I suppose the right to

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>privacy even just walking around on the street, and this

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>is something that you cover a lot just in general.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you have the right to privacy when you go

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and buy chicken at the store or buy apples at

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the store. And increasingly I think people are paying a

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more attention to this they maybe haven't been in

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the past. But there's of course, when somebody hears there

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are drones in the sky, I think immediately some people

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>might be immediately concerned, Hey, why is somebody spying on me?

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Right immediately might think about that. There's also the fact

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's so many cameras. There's so many cameras at

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a protest, you basically can't avoid being on cameras somewhere.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 3>While I was looking at the flight data over the weekend,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 3>I was pairing it with this sort of compilation of

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 3>live streams on tiktoks. Some YouTube channel had very handily

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>taken all of these people who are on TikTok or

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 3>over platforms and put it all on one screen. So

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I could watch like the LA protests from all of

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 3>these different angles at once, and I say, wow, this

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 3>is pretty useful actually, and it would switch audio of them.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 3>But like I was only able to do that because

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 3>ordinary people are filming at live streaming.

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're able to watch it and other people are

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>able to watch it, of course law enforcement is able

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch this.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they will then be able to archive that

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>footage potentially, and if they feel the need to for

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>whatever reason. You can also do facial recognition tech after

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the fact. It's not just a live thing. You can

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 3>take a video that was uploaded or streamed to TikTok

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 3>or whatever and then run the technology on that after

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the fact. This is why Laura enforcement are so attracted

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 3>to this and why clear View and other products have

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 3>been so popular across the US is that you can

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 3>take something as singular as someone's face and then use

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 3>that as a springboard for a criminal investigation.

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the really fascinating things about protests

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, if I can say that, is that, on

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, you do have people, I think rightfully so,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>who are concerned about surveillance of any type. Right there's

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>actual official, purposeful surveillance, say by a drone, and there

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>would be law enforce on watching somebody's TikTok of them.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, there is a desire for documentation.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>We've seen time and time again how difficult is it

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to get police to release body cam footage and how

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>many things would have gone unreported, George Floyd's murder being

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them if somebody were not there to document it.

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen and filmed plenty of things that probably

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people would not have known about had

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody not been there with a camera. Yeah, and there's

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this kind of the dual concerns. I suppose the desire

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for really everybody should be able to film something, the

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>public should know about things. But then everybody is filming

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>things and everyone, if we allow for the police to

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>be part of the public, can see it also.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, ubiquitous surveillance is absolutely a double edged sword. With

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 3>everything you've said, and I agree with all of it,

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 3>I guess I would lean towards Ultimately, I think it's

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 3>probably a good thing that more people are able to

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>film more and more events over time. The idea that

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 3>anybody can see some sort of injustice happening, police brutality

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 3>or whatever and go and film it, I think, on

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 3>average hands out to be a good and powerful thing.

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 3>And I think you can see that where in some

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 3>of the ice raids or the ice activity you can

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 3>overhear or people have reported that they will say, go

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 3>for the one with the camera. This is a very

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 3>powerful tool for the public and for everybody. Just people

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 3>may want to be careful about what they film, just

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 3>in the same way I'm careful about. I'm not going

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>to go on Facebook and upload a bunch of photos

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 3>of myself and tag where they all were or something

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 3>like that, just from a purely personal privacy perspective as well.

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>So what are you going to be watching for. I

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>don't see these protests stopping. I don't see the momentum

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. What are you looking for?

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm going to keep looking at flight data if necessary,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 3>dive into atc audio. I'll be looking above what happens.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 3>If protests move to another city, and I believe some

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>are planned, I'll probably look at those as well. And

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 3>it's not that, oh my god, surveillance planes are always bad.

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>It's no. They can have very legitimate use cases. But

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 3>I think journalistically it's worth looking and analyzing and understanding, Okay,

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 3>is it proportionate to be flying a Predator drone above

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 3>this area of a protest or whatever the aircraft turns

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 3>out to be. And again, we can only have that

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 3>conversation if people are looking at the data and figuring

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 3>out what's going on. Yeah, in the same way, we

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 3>can only figure out what's going on with people like

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>yourselves when you're actually on the ground filming, talking to protests,

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 3>talking to law enforcement, and figuring out what's going on there.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 3>It's the same thing.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>You said you were surprised when you saw this in

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. You were surprised when you saw a drone

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>or reprodrone specifically or Minneapolis. You said you're less surprised

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>now in LA. Would it be reasonable to assume that

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if there's a large protest, there might be one of

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>these things in the sky in the future here in

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States?

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's maybe not a given. Customs and

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Border Protection only has a fleet of I think ten drones.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I think they only have five land mission presents drones.

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>They can't be everywhere all at once, obviously, And I

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 3>guess what made it almost obvious that we're going to

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 3>fly a drone here is that there is a connection

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 3>and a nexus of course to DHS and ICE. These

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 3>are anti ice protests. Customs and Border Protection is also

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 3>a part of DHS. It would make absolute sense that

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 3>one arm of DHS is going to support the mission

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of another one. So will we see them in other protests? Broadly, yes,

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 3>will we see these drones and other anti ice protests.

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it's pretty likely, Yeah, depending on the size

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 3>and the response.

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for making time for this. Thank

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for real.

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, there.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Is a lot more we could say about the protests

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that are happening right now, but again, this episode isn't

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>really about these protests in particular. But I do want

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to mention one thing in the show notes, We've put

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a link to a guide on how you can be

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>safe for the protest. This applies to you whether you're

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, whether you're a protest to yourself, or just

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who doesn't trust the news and you want to

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>turn off the TV, get off your phone and just

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>see for yourself what's happening outside. Again, that's in the

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>show notes. That's from Wired dot com and I've read

0:25:44.680 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>through it and I definitely recommend it for everyone. Thanks

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>once again so much for listening to kill Switch. Let

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think, and if there's something else

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd like us to cover, let us know. You can

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>hit us up at kill Switch at Kaleidoscope dot NYC,

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>or you can hit me up personally at dex digi

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's d e x d I g I on Instagram

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>or on Blue Sky if that's your thing, and while

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>you're at it on Apple podcast or Spotify, before you

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>close that app, leave us a review. It helps other

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>people find the show, which in turn helps us keep

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>doing our thing. Kill Switch is hosted by Me Dexter Thomas.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It's produced by Sena Ozaki, Darluk Potts, and Kate Osbourne.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Our theme song is by me and Kyle Murdoch and

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyle also mixed the show. From Kaleidoscope, Our executive producers

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are oz Lashin, Bungesh Hajigadur and Kate Osbourne. From iHeart,

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>our executive producers are Katrina Norvil and Nikki Etur