WEBVTT - Big Take: Covid Delivers Reality Check To The World 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, well, we're

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>getting some news that at three pm Wall Street time

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>today to CDC will have a press conference presumably some

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>being some reports that perhaps some man mask mandates will

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>be reintroduced for certain populations. Will certainly bring that to

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>you later today. But it just shows the long tale

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of this COVID pandemic, if you will. And there's obviously

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>there's regional differences. But let's get the latest with Bob Langreth,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>healthcare reporter for Bloomberg News. He's got his big take

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>story today and Bob again the news today about a

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>CDC perhaps uh rein instating some form of a mask

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mandate for certain populations. Again, it just highlights this thing

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ain't going away for all, is it absolutely not? I mean,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and the US health officials and CDC is going to

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>be returning reporting to tighter guidelines. They use some masks

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and will be advising where fully vaccinated visual individuals where

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>they're in public indoor settings and places where the virus

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 1>is spreading rapidly. So yeah, they are going to tighten

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>back and kind of dial back that guy and while

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>still recommending that teachers and students returned to school but

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>wearing masks UH indoors. That's what reporting reporting. So they're

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna dill backs and what they said before, but definitely

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on the worldwide basis the kind of this there's in

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 1>this tendency. Our report in unit to try to wanted

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to clear this is over before it's over, and you know,

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and really the virus is to some extent in control

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of this, UH and we'll only know when it's over

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in retrospex, and it's becoming increasingly clear there's going to

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be a kind of long tale to this UH virus pandemic.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>While the worst may be over in the US and

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>New York, we're gonna be dealing with this, you know,

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time to come. For sure, you know,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of them. I mean it's over for me and Paul

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>because we're fully vaccinated and uh, you know, the worst

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that could happen to us, I guess is the worst

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that could likely happen to us, as we get something

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that's worse than a cold and better than a hangover.

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But clearly there are billions of people around the world

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for whom it isn't And what worries me, Bob, is

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that the unvaccinated are going to um, you know, house

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing and allow it to mutate into something that

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>even me and Paul can't fend off. Is that a

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>concern among scientists as well? Well, it's definitely a concern

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're longer this there's this virus kind of hangs

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>around and transmitting on you know, just a massive scale

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in so many places. The more chances that gives the

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>virus to continue to mutate into new forms that we

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen before. And already this delta variant obviously is

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>turning out to be We've kind of underestimated that deltas

0:02:56.400 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are very just how transmissible it is, uh, and you know,

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of the perfect variant for a kind of

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>party vaccinated world. Can you know, just keep keep going.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But just to be clear, Bob, in terms of the

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>delta variant, I mean I was out to dinner with

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>some people on Friday who were freaking out about it.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But we were all fully vaccinated. I mean in terms

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of the vaccinated, it's nb D, right, I mean if

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you're vaccinated, no, no big deal. I mean, if if

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you're vaccine. I just saw stat that ninety nine point

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the deaths are among the unvaccinated. Nineties

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the hospitalizations are among the unvaccinated. So

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant isn't necessarily um got a higher case

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fatality ratio for vaccinated people than the flu. Yeah, so

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the case fatalitiator in general, the delta variant. There were

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>some arguments that there were you know, somehow more subperiable.

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've seen like any proof of that. Uh.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, more broadly speeching even though the vaccines

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>ethics s they're so early reports in terms of eventing

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>mild cases and those those still could be symptomatic, you know,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe saving especially the reports that Israel. What what's clear

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>across the board is that all the reports are showing

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines are still holding strong against preventing severe cases

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and preventing uh, you know, hospitations and depths. But doesn't mean,

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccines aren't perfect, you don't prevent like everything, but clearly

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>they're they're way way better than not having a vaccine.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And we're just going to find out in real time,

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, just you know, whether some people need boosters

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and how long uh, the efficacy lasts. But clearly you

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>need to keep you know, vaccinating as many people as

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>possible because that will loose the spread. And you know,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the mask mandates, Bob, the concern that

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about with a lot of guests today

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is not wearing a mask was the carrot, right, That's

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>why a lot of people got vaccinated because we were

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sick of wearing these masks. And now if you say, okay,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>even the vaccinated that to put them back on, that

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>presents a problem in terms of removing the incentive for

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>those you know who are hesitant. Yeah, I guess you

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>could think of it that way. I mean, um, I

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what the new guy into that you know,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>come up with. I think, you know, it sounds like

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be something about, you know, in places

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>where there's just lots of transmission and a kind of

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a mix of vaccine on vaccinate that you may want

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to wear a mask in doors. Uh but uh, I mean, yeah,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess it could be that way. But the other

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>way you think of it, this is like, you know,

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>one extra step so that the vaccine is kind of

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like you're you're a three point seatbelt. It's kind of

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the main thing. But maybe you know, in some cases,

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of transmission and it kind

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of just may overwhelm the vaccines defenses, and you might

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>want to add in like a sighting back airbag and

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe they mask might be the sighted back airbag. It's

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just going to add maybe a little bit more, you know,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in extra protection in certain circumstances. But where where are we?

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Where is the industry in terms of these a lot

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of these developing countries, um that are you know, not

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>receiving adequate supplies of doses? I think kovacs and think

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Where are we in terms of trying

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to ramp that up? Yeah, well, you know outside of

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the wealthier and middle income countries, you know, we're you know,

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely behind. We're not where we need to be.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, you're trying to look at the

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers we had in the story or is it some

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, dismal. Yeah, the Kovacs initiatives lively just

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>one forty million doses, so for the one point eight

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>billion of names shift early two. And you know, there's

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>one problem, you know, is that there have been those

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uh dependents on supplies from India for

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Kovaks and some of those once the India India had

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>its own served, some of those supplies that were delayed.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's quite far behind. That means there's like

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>gigantic continents that follow people like Africa that has gotten this.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's just you know, a tiny percent of

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the people's accident. And that means if you just continue

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>to transmit and transmit and spread and spread and spread,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, who knows, no one can predict what

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of mutations will produce, you know, if you give

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it billions and more chances. Yeah, that's my nightmare that

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>these that the unvaccinated are going to be able to

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>incubate this thing into something else. And on that note,

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we got a headline for Moderna Crossing just a few

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago saying that they're facing delays in producing the

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>vaccine outside of the US, and I think, you know,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what what What people fail to realize is you think

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about your hometown, you think about your own state, but

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there are whole countries that have yet to hit. So

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we've really got to get this vaccine out to the

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. Bob blank Breath writing the Big Take,

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Check it out on NI Big Take. This is Bloomberg.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Are Brandon Lynn Franco now Director of Economic Indicators and

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Surveys for the Conference Board, And we just had some

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>consumer confidence data that was better than the street had anticipated.

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>UM came in at one nine the Index Consumer UM,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index came in at one nine,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>spot one. We were looking for one three, spot nine.

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>It was also better than the previous reading of spot

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>three revised spot nine. A lot of numbers there, but

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the point is consumers are more and more confident LYN

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>even as well, certainly UM, the media and governments are

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>freaked out by the delta variants spread How do you

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you square that circle? Well, at least for

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the time being, the delta variant doesn't seem to be

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>having a negative impact on consumer confidence. In fact, we're

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, holding steady, strong and steady, and indications are

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that the third quarter is off to a solid start,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so we're expecting another good quarter of economic growth and

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>consumers expect more of the same in the future. So

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of their current assessment and their expectations,

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're holding strong and steady. Lynn, talk to

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>us about the labor side of the equation. That's we

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot of Americans that are out of work,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>yet there are you know, almost a record number of

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>job openings out there, and there seems to be jobs

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for people who want them. Talk to us about how

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the labor market factors into your index, Well, we take

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a look at the question. You know, consumers are telling

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>us right now that they believe jobs are plentiful. We

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of an uptick in that percentage

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>from last month. Um, so it's been going in an

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>upboard trend, and the percentage of consumers telling us jobs

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>are hard to get held steady. And just to put

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it into perspective, only ten point five percent of consumers

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>in July said jobs were hard to get. That was

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at twenty two point eight in January. So we're making

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>progress on that front and looking ahead, they do expect

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>these trends in the labor market to continue. We have

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>an uptick in the percent who said they expect more

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.599
<v Speaker 1>jobs over there the next six months UM. So that

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I think boats very well, and not only for consumer confidence,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>but for spending as well. We know that consumers have

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>saved up or at least on average, the savings rate

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>is higher. Are they ready to spend that down or

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think consumers are still concerned about a future crisis. Well,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we do see a willingness um to spend, right, So

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>are spending intentions, you know, whether it was for homes, autos,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>or major appliances ticked up. I think the flip side

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of that is, as we've mentioned, is you know, then

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got some supply issues at hand. You know, whether

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a home prices going up and lumber shortages or

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, shortages of home appliances autos as well. So

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a willingness there. I don't think the supply is

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just quite in line with the willingness, but we expect

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>those supply chain issues to dissipate by year end UM.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like, at least from the consumer's point

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of view, they are already willing and able to spend.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So Lynn talk to us about the housing market. It's

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>been so strong through the entire pandemic, but now there's

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think an issue. You know, there's just not enough

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>housing stock available. How does how does the housing market

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>uh factor into the data that you guys look at. Well,

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a bit of an uptick in the

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of consumers who would like to purchase a home

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>over the next six months. Uh. You know, but again,

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you mentioned, we're just dealing with sort

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of you know, housing shortages. There's a price uptick that's

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, pushing some folks into the rental market. Um.

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think until these two get aligned, would probably

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to see housing cool off a little bit, but

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>still overall remain relatively strong. I'd like to see. My

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>dream scenario is that Paul sells his house, then the

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>bubble bursts exactly, and then I can find one to buy. Um,

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>what are your what's your take on the virus or

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>or we already talked about the fact that consumers aren't

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>letting the delta variant spread concern them right now, but

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>they surely must be on edge. I mean, after such

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>an unprecedented time to see things like um, you know,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>mask mandates coming back well, that's sort of is the

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>wild card and all of this, right if we begin

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to see some you know, return to restrictions, uh, that

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>could dampen the consumer confidence, or it could be very

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of localized. So for instance, you know, we've seen

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a downtake and consumer confidence in California,

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in Florida this month, while New York hit a new

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>all time high. So it could be very localized and

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>all dependent on what happens with the delta variant. But

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for the most part right now, it's not negatively impacting

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer confidence. Heylyn, thanks so much for joining us. We

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it as always getting your thoughts here on these

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>data points coming out of the Conference board. Lynn Franco,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Director of Economic Indicators and Surveys at the Conference Board,

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from New York. And it's

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting that that, you know, it was Lena's mentioned kind

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the regional nature of some of the data that

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they see some of the states that have you rising

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>infection rates seeing a little bit of a hit to confidence.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess that that makes plenty of sense. On the

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>other hand, New York, who has done you know, quite

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>well with the vaccination effort, seeing high confidence, and I

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>think one I think a lot of Americans forget how

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>big America is. You know, coming from Europe, where a

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>land mass that is smaller has you know, um, more

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>than a dozen different countries, it's always shocking to get

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>back here and see that, um, this massive country has

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>always thought of as as as one block, especially when

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at things like consumer confidence or things like housing.

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>So exactly right, right now, I want to get over

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to William Kai, co founder and partner at will Shure Phoenix,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what's going on with commodities and I

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>guess their digital counterparts Will thanks so much for joining us.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk first about gold, because, um, well, I love

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about bitcoin, but I've noticed that gold is

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>headed for I think it's first back to back monthly

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>drop since it's a it's a rough year for gold

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen o two and we kicked off the year I

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think around nineteen fifty. So um, as inflation concerns build,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>why isn't the price of gold? Hey guys, thanks for

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>having me on. Definitely, I mean gold, Anything that happened

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this year is going to tail in comparison to last year,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>right went when the COVID pandemic and the monetary and

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy of the strong monetary and fiscal and politi

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>has driven the price of gold up. I think currently

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>gold is in especially the first first half of this year,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in a healthy consolidation period. Look, we think the the

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>most of the drivers is still price drivers, still in

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>place to support goals pricing. But the lime light out

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>spotlight is somewhat shifted from gold, and some of the

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>stories and drivers between FFX and US dollars and real

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rate has been has been kind of battling terms

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of driving the gold price up and down. But we do,

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we do believe that inflation is here to stay and

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna sustain it's price. So let's be patient on

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>on the goal price. We think if we tests, if

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, if it's highs in is, it's still possible

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in the next several months. All right, So well, let's

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about Bitcoin here again. It's up,

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, up about one percent today, back above thirty

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand. Volatility continues, give us your sense of but

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for the crash, it's so much for the crash.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It's got that thirty thousand levels a really good support level.

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you think investors should view bitcoin in the

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>context of diversified portfolio? Absolutely, I mean bitcoin in any

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>other market you call it crash, right, but you know

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>what I was talking about, Gold almost apply here at

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin in terms of consolidation. Um, it's uh, it

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is a pullback. But what's uh, what investors and everyone

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>should know is that the space itself in terms of

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto and blockchain remains very strong, and you see continuing

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>adoption by institutional space. The big banks are finally getting here,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's goldvin Zachs or JP Morgan and their clients,

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>their clients is is asking for for crypto exposure so well,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto and bitcoin becoming cycles right, um, and I think, uh,

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we were will share. We don't provide price targets and

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the long term, but we think there's a

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>huge long term potential in bitcoin and the crypto space

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as overall. With bitcoin, I get the scarcity issue. Um,

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know there will only ever be twenty one million tokens.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of the other crypto platforms which looks

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so promising, you know, like Ethereum, I don't understand why

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I need to own multiple tokens. Why does it matter

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>if I own a lot of tokens if I can

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>just do everything I want with one on the platform,

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so big, I guess to to uh to two points.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>First of all, if you're as an investor, if you

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>want to get exposure to to the crypto space, for now,

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>getting exposure bitcoin is pretty good because there's still quite

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>high kind of inch interracorrelation between the different assets. Right,

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so you have exposure to Bitcoin, you probably don't need

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>so much of etherium or light cooin, bitcoin cash and

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>all these outcoins because Bitcoin currently is the dominant asset

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and the fell weather for the space. But to your

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to your question about why do we need so many

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>different different cryptos? There are nuances between the different assets.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Um crypto bitcoin was created? No, well know that again.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, like, for example, the Internet, uh what's

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>it called the Internet? Um? The Internet? There's ethereum is

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>one platform. There was another one called the Internet company

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>or the Internet platform. I don't know. Don't you over

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>this alight? In any case system is ipfs potentially, but anyway,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>still ahead, My point is you've got these the Internet computer. Sorry,

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. I just blanked on that. I

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>loved the idea of the Internet computer, which was basically

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>like spreading the cloud around the world, and it was

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna put a ws and and uh Microsoft out of business.

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I love the platform idea, I love the technology and

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>um the blockchain, but I didn't get why I would

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>need to own too many tokens. I don't understand why

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I care about owning a lot of ether as as

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>long as I have one, I can do what I

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>want with etheriums technology, right, right, right, But this is

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the same same argument, will be I guess an example

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>before stocks? Right? Um, you argue, why do I just

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>need maybe not company specifically, but let's say no browser.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Why do I need a clone when I already have

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Internet explore there each of these different platforms, do you

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>pitch himself potentially as different or better or do something

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>else a little better? So we do see competition, So right,

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of healthy competition. Um, just s liking

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in attech industry and a half different uh intail versus

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>am D and happy Intail. Why do I an m D? Well? Okay,

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they have different slightly different value proposition, different growth and

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>funtmentals and support. Hey, well, thanks so much for joining us.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate it. Will Kai, co founder partner of will

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Shear Phoenix, talking a little bit of gold, talking a

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of bitcoin again. Gold up just fractionally right now,

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen hundred dollars per ounced. Bitcoin up again about

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one percent today, Uh, three and sixty eight points thirty

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand, one seventeen four bitcorn Now you were just

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hearing about ups from Greg Jared sinking further uh this

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>morning in the market, UM on its margin forecast operating

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>margin forecast for the second half, suggesting it's going to

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be low. We're then the level seen in the second quarter.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Alison point Pacqustick joins us. She's director of equity research

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for Transportation Industrial Technology over at Wells Fargo. Alison, what

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the earnings? Hey, well, good morning

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for having me UM. I would say,

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>taking a step back, earnings were solid in the second quarter,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and even though the margin performance is slightly below where

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we were anticipating, it's a still quite a solid outlook

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>for the back half of the year. UM. Keeping in mind,

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say historically what we have seen

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>as sequentially, you know, a lower margin in the second half.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Keep in mind as we're building to the peak shipping season.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, another thing I think investors are overly focused

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>on here is really the slowing of that B to

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>see the B t C volume at this point in

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, you know, as things start to reopen here.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But overall, we believe EPs is still you know, working

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>on track UM to deliver what CEO to my had

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>put out in terms of that profitability of a revenue

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>here for ups longer term. So Allison, where is the

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>margin pressure coming from here? Where were they really feeling

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it in their income statement? But you know, we're focused

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically on the domestic margin and as you can imagine,

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as you're delivering for peak, you know, we've all seen

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>those signs ups looking to hire for delivery expectations in

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the back half. So I would say partly due to

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>your traditional historical peak build up, you'll see a greater

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>cost pressure for ups, you know. And also much like

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>many other companies that have reported wages have increased rate,

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they're certainly labor challenges that are out there today that

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>have been well documented in the market. So UM, in

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of the rest of the the industry, we've had

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a really bullish outlook from airline chief executives, but it

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really jibe with the rest of you know, what

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in terms of the delta variant and uh,

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know talk of masks coming back. How do you

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>view the economy the reopening play well with the UPS.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say they benefit both. You know, you look

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to last year in the midst of the pandemic, which

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is another reason why the volumes are slowing here in

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>B two C is we were looking to et commerce

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>deliver anything local market toothpiete and such. As the economy reopens,

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't need to do that anymore, right,

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we can run to the store and grab our toothpaste.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>But keep in mind that UPS also delivers the retail

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of rick and mortar, so they will benefit right from

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that reopening play. In terms of bills variant, I would

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>say we haven't heard too much impact at this point

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of those demands, and it doesn't appear to

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be something that UPS is building in in terms of

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>elevating that that B two C. I will never go

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.719
<v Speaker 1>back to the store to buy toothpaste. I gotta tell

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you there's there's some stuff I don't know why toiletries

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>seems like, why do I need to get that at

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store. You know, I'll get fresh produce, Yeah,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't need to pick out my Colgate or Crest.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So when we see the boxes on the front front yard,

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that's toothpaste for you. And yeah, well everything that isn't

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that isn't fresh. I can just order. There's no reason

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to truck at home. So Allison, it's a are the

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>ups Is of the world are they talking about in

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the FedEx? Is a a structurally higher kind of cargo

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>you know flow for them unit volume because there are

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>people like Matt who are just you know, maybe during

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic became increasingly used to delivery absolutely and there

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has you know, there's certainly that talk about structural step

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>up and you know the e commerce demand and EPs

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is certainly benefiting from it. I would say part of

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really just you know, there's it's twofold. It is

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>some of those there are people that are actually going

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the store to get their toothpaste, um, you know.

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>But on on top of that, UPS is being very

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>disciplined right in terms of what volume it wants to

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>take on to its network. Right, going back to CEO

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>tem A's comments on focusing on profitability over just playing

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>revenue and volume. So I think there's two pieces to that.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But yes, absolutely the structural will step up and B

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>two C has certainly been noted. I mean, you don't

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't just cover ups. You like Norfolk Southern, you

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like Canadian Pacific Um. It looks like in general you're

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>bullish on these uh you know, shipping rail um companies

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that you follow. Absolutely, I'm a big piece of that

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is you know, we've had that consumer recovery right, that's

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>been noted, but as you seek a step back, industrial

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>has been slower to start, and there's certainly been some

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>noted supply chain challenges, labor challenges. But we see the

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>trend line for an industrial recovery as a net positive

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and that would benefit certainly the rails and to a

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>lesser extent UPS as well. Hey, Alison, thanks so much

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We really appreciate getting your thoughts on UPS.

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The stock is down eight point seven percent today, so

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>spooking the market there with their earnings. Alison Plenty Accustic.

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>She's director of equity Research. She covers transportation, industrial technology,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all that fun stuff that supply chain the backbone of

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>industrial transportation for Wells, Fargo, Secure Teas and and Matt

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And My first job on Wall Street was a research

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>assistant doing rails and trucks and all the transportation stuff.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's a lot of fun and it is literally

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the backbone of this, you know, US industrial economy. You

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>know what I miss, uh, blimps. I wish blimps would

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>come back. I would travel by blimp, you would travel

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>school when I was a kid, um well it when

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I was in my early thirties, late twenties, there was

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a company cargo lifter that would um that was going

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to try and transport stuff also by blimp. They went

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt the course, but yeah, what happened to that? All right,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll get we'll take take a look at that. Thanks

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. On false Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio