WEBVTT - When AI and climate anxieties collide to make beautiful stories: Imagine Series

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Imagine This a climate damage world where advertising funded robots

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 2>known as Hum's, provide all the manual, labor and constant

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>surveillance over society. Maywebb has just lost her job to

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>AI and is now using proceeds from an experimental operation

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to take her family on a holiday to one of

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the last bits of nature left a botanical garden. This

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>is the World of Hum, a novel by the author

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Helen Phillips and the winner of the twenty twenty six

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Climate Fiction Prize. It's a book where anxiety is about AI,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 2>climate and capitalism collide. Helen is a professor of creative

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>writing at New York's Brooklyn College and has written six books.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I got the opportunity to ask her about the inspiration

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>for HUM and how she's used her own anxieties to

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>fuel her writing. This is Zero. I'm Akshadrati This week

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>how climate fiction is Expanding. This is the latest episode

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 2>in Zero's Imagine series exploring how art is interpreting the

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>climate crisis. You can find the previous episodes in the

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>series with authors like Kim Stanley, Robinson, Abi Dhari and

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>George Saunders linked in the show notes, here's my interview

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 2>with Helen Phillips. Helen, Welcome to Zero.

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you so much.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Now, without spoiling it, can you just give a brief

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>summary of Hum to the listeners who may not have

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>read the book already.

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, So Hum begins with the protagonist may losing

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>her job to artificial intelligence and desperate to make money

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for her family, she becomes a guinea pig in an

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>experiment that alters her face so that it can't be

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>recognized by surveillance, and with the proceeds from this strange operation,

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>she buys her family three night passes to this one

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>beautiful remaining green space within their city of the future,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>where there are still animals and wilderness for her children

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to experience. That it is, as I said, said in

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat dystopian future, though many readers have told me

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it is fairly recognizable and significantly, the world, alongside humans

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is inhabited by super intelligent embodied robots called hums, hence

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the title.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>It was a really fun read. It's super fast based,

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 2>and yes, I mean dystopian parts come through in the

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>story for sure, but there are also funny parts. There

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>are these vignettes, as your readers have told you, which

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>are completely recognizable, like the face that people make when

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>they get sucked into their phone, which we see all

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>around us as we're traveling or commuting, or then these

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>like strange interactions that we have at least with chatboards

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>these days, but essentially ones that you would have with

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>robots as well. There's just something off about the conversation,

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>like instantly recognizable and really lovely scenes. But if we

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>focus on the climate side of this, because in your

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>description that doesn't play a central role in the plot

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of the story, but it is there constantly in the

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 2>background and in direct ways as people are either reading

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 2>the news about it, the characters are dealing with air quality.

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 2>How much did you have to think about what it

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>is climate is doing in this story.

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would say that, for better or worse, one

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of my greatest inspirations as a writer is my anxiety,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's very much true with this novel. When I

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was setting out to write Ham, I was anxious very

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>much about climate change. I was anxious about artificial intelligence.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I was anxious about the future that we are creating

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>for our children, and so that climate anxiety really suffuses

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole book, as you say, in all sorts of

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>little ways that her, my protagonist, May has a daughter

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>who's very anxious to go outside when the air quality

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is poor, and is really keyed into that and checks

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that every morning to see what the air quality is.

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Even the fact that May spends all of this money

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>quite foolishly, I might add, she does not have the

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>money to spare to go to the botanical gardens, but

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>because her children don't have a lot of ways to

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>access nature because of the detriment of the environment, this

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is such a priority to her that she spends her

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>money in this way. So that climate anxiety is just

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>prevalent in so many different elements of the story.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>And as someone who writes about climate change a lot,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 2>there are aspects of climate change that make me anxious.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>There are aspects of trying to tackle climate change that

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 2>make me very excited. But on the anxiety side, why

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 2>is it useful to write about the anxiety?

0:04:55.160 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think for one, it's cathartic just to acknowledge

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that anxiety and to bring it out into the open.

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that for a lot of people it's something

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>that just adds an anxious hum to our days, but

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe we try to look away from it because it

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's not a ton you can do about it.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So one is just bringing it out and for myself

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>processing that anxiety that I do feel on a daily basis.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>We've had quite a summer here in the United States,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>as people are having all over the world, but a

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of wildfires burning in the United States and Canada.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We've had a real expansion and where ticks are living

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>because of climate change, just a lot of changes that

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>people are living with extreme heat and all of that.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>So one reason to write a book that has climate

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>anxiety and it is to just create a way to

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>begin a conversation about that. And then also in the

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>process of writing the book and beginning with that climate anxiety,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I read a lot about it, and I feel like

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the more you read, as you say, the more anxietnciety,

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but also the more solutions you begin to see. So

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the research process itself was extremely meaningful to me in

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>rather than just having this be an ambient anxiety, actually

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>coming to understand more what the situation is and educating

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>myself about it.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>There is a tendency that people have and this has

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 2>been the case for a long time now, of turning

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 2>off on bad environmental stories because most people don't feel

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>like there's agency they can't do anything about it. But

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to AI, I don't sense the same

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 2>thing from the readers. Even though you know there are

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 2>plenty of AI dystopian stories to go around, and the

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 2>harms it's doing through the climate and the environment, and

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the harms it's doing to people's way of thinking to

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 2>maybe social connections, etc. There is still appetite for people

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>to want to engage with that story, which they don't

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 2>seem to have with climate. Why is that?

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why that is, and I think it

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>does have something to do with just the vastness of

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>climate change and the complexity of both the natural systems

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and the political systems that would enable change to happen.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that it can feel so overwhelming to think

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that human's activities are changing our beloved planet in such

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>profound and really it feels like often uncontrollable ways. So

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a big question for anyone thinking

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about climate, and any journalists and any scientist, how do

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you talk about climate without filling people with such despair

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's a feeling of nihilism that comes with that.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>In terms of AI and people willingness, I think you're

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>saying to engage with AI narratives and maybe even feel

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>scared of AI in a more active way. I wonder

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if that's because AI just feels extremely present in our

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>everyday lives. I think climate, for me, climate change does too.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But you do a search and suddenly GPT is speaking

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to you. It's just it's really becoming so ever present.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think both AI and climate are ever present, but

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the AI is even a little bit more in

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:30.119
<v Speaker 1>our faces at the moment.

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's really interesting. It's sort of climate change is

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 2>all pervasive but still a little bit far away, whereas

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 2>AI is all pervasive and a little bit too close,

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and that makes people think a lot more. You talk

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 2>about the duality of technology a lot in those stories.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 2>So you have this moment where May warrants her children

0:08:55.960 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and her husband do not be tight to their vices,

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and so she takes those away, and then in the

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>process there are problems that come through. They're not able

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to do basic things, and so there are advantages that

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 2>technologies bring, but also disadvantages that technologies bring that duality

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>makes the story interesting, whereas climate change feels like a

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 2>thing that just is bad. There is there's really no

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 2>duality to it. How do you make a story be

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 2>interesting if there isn't a duality? So how do you

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 2>break the climate story interesting?

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Well? I first want to speak on your first point

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>about the duality of tech in the book, which was

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>extremely important to me when I was writing. I do

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not consider hum an anti tech book because of the

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>very thing you said when she tries to separate her

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>family from their technology, problems ensue from that. We are

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>so enmeshed with these both miraculous and dangerous technologies all

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>around us that we can't throw the baby out with

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the bathwater. And I actually we gave the book an

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>epigraph on this very subject, so I want to share

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it with you and your listeners. The quote is from Paracelsus,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>who was a physician and alchemist, so this person was

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not writing about technology, but I think this quote is

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>very relevant to our technologies and actually to climate change too.

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So the quote is poison is in everything, and no

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>thing is without poison. The dosage makes it either a

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>poison or a remedy. And this idea that anything can

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>be a poison and anything can be a remedy. It's

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all about how we use it. So it's not we

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can't stop using our earth. We have to in order

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to survive, but how can we use it in a

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>way that is healthy and harmonious. And the same with

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>our tech. We can't stop using technology, but how can

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we use it in a way that makes it a

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>remedy rather than a poison. I think about this all

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, and this duality is very important to me

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in hum and in my own life. How do we

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>find some kind of balance with our environment and our technology.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 2>If you read the most recent IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Climate Change Report, if you read about what happens if

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>we actually tackle climate change and reach in at zero

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 2>by twenty fifty or even twenty seventy, is that the

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>whole series of good things happen. Beyond just helping us

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>protect and preserve some of the climate that we can

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 2>over these next few decades, the air just becomes a

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>lot cleaner than it ever was, even when we weren't

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 2>worried about climate change. You know, people become much more

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 2>resilient and being able to live to their full potential

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>because they are now living in environments that are you know,

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>for example, air conditioning will become much more accessible to

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 2>poor people as a result of us pushing more efficient

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 2>electric technologies. Solar power becomes you know, essentially the base

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>power source for humanity, which it should be eventually, but

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>just becomes so much more quickly because we are pushing

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 2>for clean, renewable energy and thus reaches people who don't

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 2>currently have access to energy. So there is a duality

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>of climate being a good driving force for solutions, but

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 2>that didn't come through in the book. To me, there

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 2>were no climate solutions that I could spot in the book,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>whereas I could spot like the dystopian nature of tech,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>but also like the advantages that technology brings, like at

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 2>one point the robot when it's paid for its ad

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>free version, it's just so much nicer to talk to

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and so much more empathetic and so wise that you

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>could actually eat, sit down and have dinner with it.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>But doesn't quite track for like the solution side of climate.

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Was that a deliberate choice? Like did you not want

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the fact that we are doing something

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to try and tackle climate change.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>In a way? I think what you're getting at with

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this point about climate change not having the duality that

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>I've put in the book in terms of the artificial

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and technology gets at the point that for me,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the climate change elements of the book are not the

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>plot of the book, but the setting for the book.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it is hard to make climate change into

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a plot, although it is quite dramatic. And now you've

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>given me an interesting thought. What would it be like

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to write a novel where climate change was literally the

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>central conflict? And how could I find the duality sufficient

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to drive a narrative forward. So maybe you've now given

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>me my idea for my next book, So thank you

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for that. But in hum specifically, it is the setting

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for the book. It is the context. It is it

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>motivates this woman to seek this place for her children.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>But she is an individual who's actually having a very

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 1>difficult time. She's not very stable in her life, and

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>she's not in the position to do anything about climate

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>change except here on the news, Oh there's another terrible hurricane,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or they're a fire, or her We learn on the

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>first page of the book that her family's home burned

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in a fire, in a wildfire, and they didn't have money,

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>just very scant insurance payments to buy a new home

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't in the forest where they had lived before.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So climate change is affecting her in all sorts of ways.

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>But maybe, like we were talking about before, she is

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>just one strained, stressed mother with a lot of financial problems,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and she is not able to deeply engage with the

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>climate crisis except to say, let me get my kids

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>so that they can have three nights in a forest,

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just to see what that's like. I do think that

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in the end, and I'll try to avoid spoilers here.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>The home has a moment where it proposes perspective futures,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of those futures are a little bit solar

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>punk in nature and offer glimpses just like tantalizing glimpses

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of the world that you're described, where solar panels are

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>more common, and it seems like people have figured out

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a way to live in greater harmony. But it's really

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>just the most tiny, tantalizing glimpse. And it is by

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>way of the technology, perhaps ironically, that those images enter

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the book.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 2>After the break. Summer is here, and so is the

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 2>reading season. I ask Helen Phillips for a few of

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>her favorite book recommendations. If you're enjoying this episode of Zero,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 2>please take a moment to rate and review the show

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 2>on witchevera platform you're listening on. Recently, listener Chevy Bolt wrote,

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>every show seems informative without being augmentative. That's a gift, thanks, Chevy.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I hope you're enjoying listening to this in your car.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 2>The AI aspect of it also brings with it sort

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>of helplessness in May's life. You know, her job is

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 2>taken away, and then suddenly, in the process of resolving

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the issues she faces, she has to give up so

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 2>much of her life's data essentially to AI so that

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>it can process it. There is a helplessness to the

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 2>system being all pervasive and all controlling. You know, one

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 2>aspect that you don't clearly define, but it's there. The

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 2>private enterprises use HUM and the government uses HUM, and

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>they intershare the data without actually there be any barriers

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>between a private or a public enterprise. And that's sort

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 2>of like very unsettling a future. But one aspect of

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>this which I wanted to understand is there is no

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>political dissent in this world. It doesn't feel like, you know,

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 2>you'd never talk about like a trillionaire that's like all

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>controlling of this AI, or a president who is controlling

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>of the system. Was that a choice to not have

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>like a point of focus for the other problems that

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:08.479
<v Speaker 2>AI brings.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I did think about that, what is the political situation

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in this world? And it is completely off screen. The

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>one thing we do learn early on in the book

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is that the AI, the hums, the embodied robots were

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>created by a private corporation that has figured out how

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to embody the brain of the network in these really

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>graceful and beautiful and sculptural robot bodies. So it is,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as you just pointed out, and I think this is

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>very important, it is a private company, but it's working

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so closely with the government that it's almost like there's

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>no division or separation between the two. This is, like

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>many things in the book, drawn from our own reality,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>where that is happening so much all the time. I

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>think to something that I experienced just as a human

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and as a consumer, is these new technologies are just

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>released upon us so quickly and surprisingly, and suddenly they're

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>there and you're just living with them, and you've never

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>had any time to think about it or prepare yourself

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for this fact that suddenly, when you do a Google search,

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's giving you this intricate AI answer. You never signed

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>up for it. So just this feeling that, whether it's

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the government or a corporation, suddenly you are in a

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>new reality with a new technology, and you never even

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.959
<v Speaker 1>agreed to do it, and it's just there in your life.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 2>Talk me through things that you changed your mind on,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 2>because as a writer, we almost used writing as a

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>way to process what's happening to us in the world.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 2>You've specifically talked about how you use writing to deal

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>with anxiety. But having done a long project, did you

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 2>change your mind on any of the aspects of either AI,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 2>or capitalism or climate.

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of the most interesting examples of

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that for this particular book was early in the writing process,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I went to a talk given by the writer and

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>professor Arthur I. Miller at Brooklyn College where I teach,

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and he had just published his book The Artist in

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the Machine with MIT, which is a fascinating book about

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the positive potential of human and AI collaborations. I believe

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it was published in twenty nineteen, which now feels so

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>long ago in terms of where we are with Ai now.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But his book and his talk and then our subsequent

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>email exchange really enabled me to move away from the

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>knee jerk reaction I have and I think a lot

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of people have, and you can see it in popular

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>culture the robots are here to destroy us all and

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more towards what are the possibilities for

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>collaboration that could be very meaningful. I still don't know

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>about that, but but it definitely enabled me to build

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the character of the HUM with a lot more nuance

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and compassion. And one thing that I've experienced is people

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>who read the book have a lot of different reactions

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to the HUM, and their reactions change over the course

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of the book, and that's very valuable to me. That

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you're scared of the HUM and find it sinister,

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.199
<v Speaker 1>like this spy, and sometimes the HUM is extremely cute

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and charming and delightful. And then as you say, once

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you turn off the advertising feature becomes very wise and insightful.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is how I feel about technologies. All of

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>those different reactions, all of those different feelings, are feelings

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>that I have towards technology. Sort of somewhere between this

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is terrifying and this is miraculous. And I really wanted

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the character of the hum to embody that, and Miller's

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>book helped me arrive there.

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is not core to our conversation, but

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the aspects of how advertising shows up in the book

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and the all pervasive, seamless, annoying but weirdly interesting moments

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 2>in which advertising shows up is just fascinating. And I

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 2>think it is the closest I've seen anybody capture the

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of lives we live today, with how much advertising

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>we're facing as we just go around doing normal things

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 2>in life, most of them on the Internet.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that was a very important and very early aspect

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of the book, and for me actually a lot of

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>humor derives from it, kind of a dark humor, because

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>may We'll be having what feels like a very intimate

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the hum, and then the hum will start

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to sell her things. So you realize, oh, the

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>whole time we were talking, communicating, you were just trying

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what you wanted to sell me. So

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>there's humor in that. But also I find that to

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>be one of the least science fictional aspects of the book,

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and most realistic it's the same we're constantly getting fed

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>targeted advertisements and May. Throughout the first half of the book,

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the HUM keeps on saying to her, women of a

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>certain age, show their age in their hands. Can I

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>sell you this lotion that will be specifically targeted to

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>your And so in all of these serious moments, this

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>silly ad comes into the conversation. And that's just a

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>way of presenting and making really concrete however present advertising is,

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and how the technologies that surround us often have as

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a very central goal that targeted advertising, as we've mentioned

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times at the end of the book,

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>may pays quite an exorbitant sum to turn off the

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>hums advertising, as we are often asked to do to

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>pay to turn off advertising in our streaming services. And

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>at that juncture, when the HUM no longer has the

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>advertising agenda, May and the HUM become capable of having

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a much deeper level of conversation, and in that there's

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit of a utopian idea of what

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>it is like to or what it could be like

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to interact with AI that has no agenda except truly

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>consolidating all of the best knowledge and wisdom and empathy

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of humanity and advising someone with all of that in play,

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with no advertising agenda.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about AI and writing, you said,

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, we still don't know whether there are ways

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 2>in which AI can be used for good, but already

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>people are using it for all sorts of things. So

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 2>in February there was a New York Times profile of

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 2>an author by the pseudonym Choral Heart, who has used

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty one pen names to publish more than two hundred

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 2>romance novels, selling around fifty thousand copies and earning six figures.

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Not mainstream, it's not like it's going on the New

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>York Times Best Salary anytime soon, but it's not unsuccessful either. Like,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>is this the kind of AI can be used for

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 2>art that you imagined would be a useful thing to have.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not really what I'm picturing. I suppose I would say.

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>The way I feel about that personal with my own practice,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is writing is the thing I do. It's my favorite

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>thing to do with my brain. How incredible to have

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a human brain, and then how incredible to be able

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to use it to do this task that is for me,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the most challenging task I can set my mind to,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and therefore the most interesting task and the most flow

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>state I can get into. I can't imagine outsourcing that

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>particular thing to a machine. It's why would I give

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>away all of that fun and all of that delight

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and challenge. And certainly as a professor of creative writing,

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>this is something and I was even thinking the other

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>day preparing for the upcoming semester, we really need to

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talk deeply about this on the first day of class,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that as our world becomes more and more automated, our

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>own unique, idiosyncratic trains of thought and the words that

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we choose to put down become ever more precious and

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>ever greater evidence of our humanity. So I am not

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>interested in using AI in my own writing practice, and

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I encourage beg my students not to use it either,

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because I want their voices.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 2>But when they do, how do you feel?

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they are robbing themselves of the opportunity

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to think. Because writing, for me, especially

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>when they are young writers educating themselves, it's not the

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>final product. It's the thinking that goes into it, and

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the preciousness of putting your brain in a challenging situation,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So I just worry. I've read some things about cognitive

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>decline that people have when they overuse AI. Now I

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>do talk to my students, and of course we have

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to be practical here. It is an amazing tool, and

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll say to them on the first day of class,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll give them different examples. Okay, is it appropriate to

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>use AI to write a creative piece in this class? Okay?

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it appropriate to use AI to write a letter

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to the DMV challenging a parking ticket? Maybe that's fine.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Probably that's fine. How one thing that they're always divided

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on is writing a wedding toast for your best friend.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>That's usually about half and half. So there are uses,

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think that for the highest kind of thinking

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and creativity, it is a long term disadvantage to your

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>own brain to rely on AI.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I am a little surprised about the half a knife

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 2>on the wedding toast. I mean, well, really depends on

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 2>how much you love your friend.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's twenty five would use it in seventy five wouldn't.

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But that one is a little divided sometimes.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 2>But writing is, and admittedly a very lonely exercise, and

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 2>in my most frustrating parts of writing, that is the

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 2>thing that stands out. And you know, you could use

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>AI as an editor. Would that be a good use

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of give me feedback on this new piece of

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>writing that I've done, And I could, I don't have

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 2>somebody else who will have time to read it.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Potentially, I haven't used it that way, but I do

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>know I have spoken to former students who have done

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>that after they leave the academic context, they don't have

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>someone to read their work. And I feel like, as

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with any feedback you ever get, even if it is

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in a creative writing class with humans, you're always going

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to take it with a grain of salt. So if

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you receive editing advice and fifty percent of it is

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>helpful and useful and fifty percent of it is useless,

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. So I again, as I said, you know,

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not anti tech, it's just how do we use

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it so that it's a remedy and not a poison?

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 2>How do you balance tech in your own life as

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>a writer, You know, focuses something that really is necessary,

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 2>but tech is also useful and distracting.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think that this question in my life as

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a writer, when I am actually in the active process

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of writing, I put on a timer and I go

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>into literal focus mode in word and I don't look

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at the internet. Occasionally, if there's an extremely specific question

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I have, like about the color of a certain animal,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I might quickly look that up, but I am really

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>in the habit as long as the timers on the

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Internet is pretty much off. But I feel like this

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>question is more relevant actually to being a parent and

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to dose the technologies that my children

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>are exposed to. And it was quite interesting and fairly

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>ironic that right as I was finishing up home, my

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>ten year old daughter said that she wanted to start

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to walk to school by herself, that she felt ready

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and I love that independence. But we

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>live a mile from her school and it's in I

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>live in New York City, in Brooklyn, and so I

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sure about letting her go. But then we had

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea if she had a little watch where I

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>could track her and call her and it would be

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>fine for her to walk to school. And we haven't

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>spoken about this, but in the one of the quasi

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>villains of the book is these little bunnies, which are

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>these watches that the children wear and which may takes

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.479
<v Speaker 1>off of them to go to the botanical gardens. So

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the tension in the book springs from

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the mother is constantly tracking the children.

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But then in my own reality of my life, it

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of sense and was incredibly relieving and

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>beautiful for me and my daughter that she could walk

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to school and I could feel comfortable with it. So

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's all complicated, but I think this balance of technology,

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about it all the time. Where is it

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a tool and where is it a detriment?

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>And then, as a writing professor, what is your advice

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>to budding writers want to write about climate change, either

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 2>incorporating it directly into their stories or indirectly.

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually, though I personally as a writer have

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a very significant climate change interest. I don't talk to

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>my students about that very much, but I do expose

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>them to my favorite works about climate change where I

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like a work of fiction has been as subtle

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and interesting and meaningful as literature should be. So one

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of those stories that I love to teach is the

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>story Exhalation by the writer Ted Chiang. It is a

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>completely different society from anything we've ever encountered. It's these

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>robots who live in these bodies and they have to

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>breathe in this very particular way. And it's a beautifully

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>executed story. And by the end you realize this robot

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>society is in threat, and so it becomes a metaphor

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for climate change. But it really sneaks up on you,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and that to me is very powerful and more goes deeper,

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>gets deeper into you than a more in your face,

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>like we need to save the climate right now. I

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like literature needs to be it's wonderful, strange, nonlinear

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of circuit as self in order to really have

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to really present climate change, because if it

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just sounds like a writer is on a soapbox yelling

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>at you, you're going to shut down. First, you need

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a literary experience and an emotional experience, and

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>then you can arrive at some deeper understanding of climate change.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Another book that I put in the same category is

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Samanta Shweblin's book Fever Dream. It's an extraordinary probably my

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>all time favorite book, but it ultimately is about pollution,

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but it really takes a while to arrive there, and

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you arrive there in a very interesting way. So those

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are two that I love to present to my students.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 2>You are the second winner of the Climate Fiction Prize,

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>which in a way is also telling because it was

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 2>only about ten years ago that Amitav Ghosh, one of

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the sort of climate writers who came out with a

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 2>book The Great Derangement, saying how literature has failed at

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the task of telling people about the deep crisis that

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 2>we are in, whether it's direct or indirect. And the

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 2>fact that there is a Climate Fiction Prize, that there

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 2>are these finalists, you know, five others who are good

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 2>books to read, is a confirmation of finally literature correcting

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 2>itself to try and bring the climate story in different ways.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 2>But you are a novelist, You've written multiple novels. What

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>is it that the novel offers that other mediums like

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 2>TV or film don't.

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:44.479
<v Speaker 1>I think for me, what the novel offers that's unique

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is just an incredible intimacy with a character's mind and

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>train of thought and lived experience, which in film you're

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>watching them from outside, which can be wonderful. And I

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>love I love movies, I love TV. But the novel,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you're just it's in your brain and you're in the

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>character's brain, and there's just it's a unique level of intimacy.

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And so if May is feeling anxious about taking her

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>children outside because of the air quality, and her daughter

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is upset about it, you're really feeling my intention, my hope,

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>my dream is that you are feeling that feeling with

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>her as though it is your own feeling. It becomes

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>your own feeling. So that's for novels and short stories too.

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel that that intimacy is the greatest strength.

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 2>And it is the end of July when we are

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 2>recording a lot of people listening, at least in the

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Northern Hemisphere, are going to go on summer holidays. Are

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 2>there book recommendations that you would have for people?

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I love this question. So one book I just read

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that was released recently that is about the future of

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>life on Earth is Earth seven by dev Olen Unfirth.

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And another book I read this summer that I had

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>never encountered before, although it was published in Taiwan in

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six, but is a very interesting climate book

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and technology book is The Membranes by Chi Taiwei. Interestingly,

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>both of the books I've just recommended involve humans living

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on the floor of the ocean, so if that is

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a particular interest, I recommend those, but they're both very interesting.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>And then of course I will add the works I've

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Fever Dream by Samantha Schweblin, Exhalation by Ted Cheeing,

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace Wells, so you'll

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>be all set for your climate anxiety reading. But they're

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>all joyful books in their own way too.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Helen, of course, and thank you for listening

0:34:54.120 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to zero now for the sound of the week. That

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 2>is the sound of a printing press cutting the pages

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 2>of a freshly printed novel. If you like this episode,

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 2>please take a moment to rate and review the show

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 2>on Apple Podcasts, YouTube, and Spotify. This episode was produced

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 2>by Oscar boyd Our. Theme music is composed by Wonderly

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Special Thanks to Samrsadi, Laura Milan, Summer Maxwell, and Alissa McDonald.

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Akshatrati back soon.