WEBVTT - Don't Be a Cyberbully!

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette and

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as always a senior writer, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I want my two dollars. I haven't thought about that

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in a long time. Actually, I accorded from that movie

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago. But you know what, it's a

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>good one. Not sense then, not sense then. So today

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we're actually gonna tackle a pretty serious subject, but it's

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's one that has had a lot of attention recently

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for various reasons. Um, we're gonna talk about cyber bullying,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of relates to a previous episode we

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>recorded a couple of years ago, the about internet trolls, right,

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>controlls work, cyber bullying being a sort of a specific

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>type of internet troll. Yeah, yeah, And um, I think

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of interesting we're gonna have to people will

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 1>ask about this. Cyber bullying in a lot of ways

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is not especially different in character from Frankly bullying in person.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>It's just using the tools of the internet. You know,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>now that we have the ability to publish instantly and frequently. Um,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, people use those tools to pick on others. Yeah,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and we've been seeing a lot of this

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in the news, uh, from like I said, from various sources,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>over various um activities, you know, things that have happened recently.

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>But the one that kind of spurred this, at least

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>from my perspective, was the whole Rebecca Black phenomenon train wreck,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>however you want to call it. Right, So, for the

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>few of you out there who may not have heard

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of who of Rebecca Black? I suspect most of you

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>probably have. Rebecca Black is a thirteen year old girl

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>who received an amazing gift her mom um paid for

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>her to have a music video done. And it's a

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The song is called Friday and let's just get this

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>all of the way. It is not a good song.

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It is very let's let's the lyrics are banal, would

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you yes? The tune itself is pretty catchy, you know

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's one of those that's that's been engineered

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to get stuck in your head and stay there until

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you start to go crazy. But Rebecca Black did not

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>write the song but not but she did. She did

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>perform it, and the song features her voice being auto

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>tuned to the point where it sounds almost robotic and

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>um and like I said, the lyrics are really really boring,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but not really that's not really here nor there. She

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>uploaded the video to YouTube and then, um, I think

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it was on like February tenth, two thousand eleven that

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>she uploaded it to YouTube, and it took about a week.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But then people started to to share this video and

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>it went totally viral, and before you knew it, there

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 1>were thousands and thousands of views of this video. Yeah.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I had read an article in preparation on Mashable by

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Todd Wasserman who was basically charting it. And yes, you

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>know February tenth, this when it was initially published. Uh

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you remember Michael J. Nelson, don't you? Yes? Yes, of

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Mystery Science Theater three thousand and tracks fame. Um. He

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about it on his Twitter account to he's got

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>According to Wasserman, more than nineteen thousand followers, probably had more.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't actually look this morning right before we decided

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to do this podcast, but um basically said, you know,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a catchy song, but it also answers the

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>question what's the worst video ever made? It's a quote

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>from that and and of course when someone who is

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>got that level of followers, you know, you're it's going

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to attract attention. And that's around the time that it

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>started picking up, and that was in March. So really,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I should also point out that I think Total Eclipse

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Heart still gives it a run for the

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>money as total worst video ever made. But anyway, I'm

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not fond of the song to begin with, let alone

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the video turn around Bright Eyes the uh. At the

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>time of the recording of this podcast, which is in

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>late March right now, according to YouTube, the video has

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:40.799
<v Speaker 1>had forty seven million, seventy six thousand, three hundred four views.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh there's another one. Yeah, And and we should also

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>add that YouTube does not update these in real time,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that the numbers update to a schedule that makes sense

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube basically in batches. Yeah, so so it could

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>be that that number is, of course not entirely accurate.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Even as I'm saying this right now into the microphone.

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, will not be accurate by the time you

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hear this podcast, so million views, that's a lot. I mean,

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that's an incredible And the song is actually on iTunes

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>as well. You can purchase the song on iTunes, and

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have done that, and you could

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>argue that maybe it's in a sense of irony, they're

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>they're ordering it because they think it's so bad. It's

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, and therefore they're going to get the song.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Some people may legitimately like the song, although they may

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>also say that it's a terrible song. Personally, Like I said,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the tune is kind of catchy. I think

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the the the lyrics again are so ridiculously plain, Like

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's explaining such a mundane experience that you know,

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't help but think, wow, this is kind of

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this is really ridiculous, right in a nutshell. It's Friday,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>and she's happy about that because it means it's the weekend.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the weekend. And I think it's when you hear

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that Sunday comes afterward. That was the point where I

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, really, I mean, just the going down and

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>have to get a bowl, have to eat your serial

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 1>that was That was a little rough too. But here's

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>here's where we're leading with this. This video has prompted

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people to leave extremely negative comments on

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube video. Now I would not I don't argue

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that leaving a negative comment for a bad video and

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>saying like, wow, this was a really dumb song or

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this was a really dumb video. That's one thing. Yeah, yeah,

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out it may sound since we're

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>both kind of negative on the song. I don't want

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to give anyone the wrong impression and think that we

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>are are anti Rebecca Black or the songwriter, or or

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>anyone involved with it. I mean, it's, uh, you know,

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved is making an attempt to entertain people, and

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 1>you could say that it was, you know, an unsuccessful attempt,

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least it wasn't successful in the way they

0:06:54.520 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 1>had intended. Right, Even even star musicians can write yeah,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not And I'm certainly you know you have the

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>old the old saying well, let's see you try it. Well,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I haven't ever written a song, so I

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>can't really talk. And you know what, there's some bad

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>songs out there that have become incredibly popular and became standards.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Someone left the Cake out in the Rain. I'm just saying,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the lyrics to MacArthur Park, it

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is the dumbest song. I mean, it's dumber than Friday.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>People seriously read the lyrics. So yeah, we're not angry

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>at at anyone involved with the project, right, But the

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>point being that there have been a lot of people

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who have left comments that were directed personally at Rebecca Black.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're not talking about people who are criticizing the

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>song or criticizing the video or saying that, you know,

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the subject matter is ridiculous. We're talking about people who

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are directing personal attacks at Rebecca Black to the point

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of saying that you are stupid, or you are ugly,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>or you know, uh, you know, things like that, things

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that have nothing to do with the actual subject matter

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>but are more of a personal nature that I think

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>constitute cyber bullying. You know, it's it's it's harassing someone

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>directly well as a matter of fact. Um she she

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>came out in an interview not terribly long ago and

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>uh said, and I quote at times, it feels like

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm being cyber bullied end quote, which um, I actually

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>found that in an article in Time magazine online by

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>hands Villa Rica and UM basically he uh was was

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that this isn't helping her case because she's drawing

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>attention to the fact that she's being attacked and for

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>some people that leave them to UM. But in that article,

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>um Hans also mentioned that UM he had spoken with

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Karen Slovak in Ohio University professor UM and she basically

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>said that cyber bullying is it doesn't really fit this

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with Rebecca Black necessarily, although it

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>may she may change her mind. Now this was done

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>uh several days ago, probably about a week and a

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>half ago by the time we're recording this, so UM,

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what what she said was that cyber bulling

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>has done over time, like it's consistently applied. It's not

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one personal attack. If somebody attacks you, that's not bullying,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is what she's saying. Bullying is something that you know,

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the big kid comes up and asks you for your

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lunch money every day, So yeah, I got you. So

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's repeated and it's yes, over it got you.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But at this point you might argue that by now,

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>now that it's been several weeks and it's still going

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>on that it is it has graduated to actual cyber bullying. Um,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they they He spoke to several experts about

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it and said, um, you know, yeah, it may not

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be cyber bullying, but it is definitely a personal attack,

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh know it's it's painful to the person being attacked. Ye,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and she has said as much. Chris and I have

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>talked offline about how sometimes you know, we get negative reviews,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's legitimate. You know, if people don't like what

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we do, then I I don't think there's any reason

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>why they shouldn't say so, or why they cannot offer

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>criticisms or anything like that. But occasionally we get uh

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>personal attack comments, things that things that are not criticisms

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>or helpful in any way. They're just you know, you're

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>stupid or something like that. And that hurts, you know,

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>even even as a grown adult. You know, there's there's

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>an element, there's an emotional element there. And yeah, I

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>don't even know this person as far as I know.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>This person could be uh like the person who directs

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>an attack towards me, maybe someone who I would never

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>care for or respect in person if I met them.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's beside the point that you don't. It doesn't

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>feel good to get that kind of stuff, and if

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you get enough of it, it could really affect yourself image. Now, fortunately,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with the the case of Rebecca Black, it appears that

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>she's got a pretty level head on her, which that's

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>amazing because she's thirteen. When I was thirteen, I did

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>not have a level head. Um, technically I don't right now.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of rounded. But anyway, the uh no, it's

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're when you're thirteen. Sorry, I'm interacted. I was

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>going to say that that's you know, that's a a

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>troublesome time. You're going through a lot of changes in

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your life. Um, you know, starting to come into your

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>own as an adult, and you know the the opinion

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of your peers is very important to you. Yeah, and

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of listeners who are in that

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>age range twelve to uh to sixteen. So imagine having

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>literally thousands of people saying that you are not worth anything.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>So there were I remember Rebecca Black did an interview

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>with Good Morning America in which she said that there

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>were people leaving comments saying things like you should starve yourself,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you're too fat, or you should cut yourself or things

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. I mean people saying that you should harm yourself,

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's me. That's a threat, is really what that

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>comes down to. It may not be a threat that

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone's going to act on, but you get enough of those,

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's really gonna affect yourself worth if you aren't careful.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, apparently, uh, Rebecca Black has a

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>very good um um. She she's she's comfortable with herself

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>enough where that's not affecting her um. And she says

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that she no longer is paying attention to the negative reviews,

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>which is helping a lot. And she's also taking steps.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she's making some serious money off of this

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this music video, and that's of course fueling more people

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to even up the ante and talking about how ridiculous

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, how terrible it is. But the fact is

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is that at least on one one analyst I saw

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>said that they had projected she would make around twenty

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars off iTunes and another twenty five thousand off YouTube.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I might have those mixed up, um, And that was

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>just one analyst, so it may be that it could

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>be more than that. Rebecca Black by the Way has

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>also said that she's going to donate some of her

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>proceedings to uh to relief efforts for the victims of

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Japan earthquake and tsunami, and that she's also donating

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the money to her own school. I think

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that's remarkable, you know, it's an amazing thing. So considering

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the storm she weathered, I think that she's she's behaved admirably.

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Now to get back to the people who are directing

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>these attacks. The internet is a weird thing. Uh. We

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>see there are cases of bandwagons that go for or

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>against certain causes, and sometimes it doesn't make much sense,

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but you'll see that that they'll become there'll be this

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of groundswelling of support for or against certain people. Uh.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes it's a great thing. So for example, in

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the case of of Katie Goldman, Katie Goldman was the

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>young girl who loved Star Wars and she would but

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>she was getting teased when she would go to school

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>because she had a little Star our Wars backpack and

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars lunch box and things, and she was told

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>by the boys that Star Wars is something that boys like,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not what girls like. And she she felt she felt

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure from her peers and that that

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>she was doing something wrong and she would actually she

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>came to her mom and said that she wanted like

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a pink lunch box, something that didn't have Star Wars

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on it, because she didn't want to be teased anymore. Well,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>there was this huge ground swelling of support amongst the

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>internet because first of all, a lot of us are geeks.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I incured myself, and we think there's nothing wrong with

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>being a geek. And I agree, there's nothing wrong with that.

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of people through support at this

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>young girl. She received tons of gifts from people, She

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>received messages from folks who have been in Star Wars

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>property projects. I mean, she she got a lot of support,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was really heartwarming to see that, Like this

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is a This is a bunch of people saying, no,

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it's good, you should be who you are. That's okay,

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Then you see this

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Black video come out, and you see kind of

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. You see all these people piling on saying

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you're terrible, why are you doing this? Your music is horrible,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You're not worth anything, and it I can't help, but

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>suspect that there's at least some overlap that some of

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the people who piled on Rebecca Black were the same

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>ones who thought you go girl for Kitty Coldman. And

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the hypocrisy there is kind of amazing. Why should Kitty

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Goldman be proud of who she is but Rebecca Black

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>be ashamed of who she is? Right, that's a mixed message.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>So that again is what spurred the whole cyber bullying story. Now,

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the actual stories about cyber bullying go well beyond Rebecca Black, Right,

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we have had a lot of different stories come out

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in the news about particularly about teenagers who have either

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>committed suicide or attempted suicide. And and at least part

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reason for that that horrible decision, uh stemmed

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>from cyber bullying online and uh and and that's just

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so unthinkably terrible to me that that people

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>online can feel the freedom to criticize or bully other folks.

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it is that when you're online,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're the attacker, you kind of feel a sense

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of distance, like the words you're saying don't really impact anything,

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>because you're not really telling the person to their face.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>You're telling a website or you're telling a screen these things, right, Well,

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people wouldn't have the courage to go

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>up to that person or yeah, or even if it's

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not courage, I mean, yes, I think that's a that's

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely a legitimate point. But there's some people who

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>if you were to present them with a computer screen

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or the actual person and you know, whatever it was

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that triggered that that comment, if the person were there,

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't necessarily even be a matter of courage. It's

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that that cultural pressure of saying, no, you don't say

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that to a person. That's just wrong. You wouldn't come

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>up to a person and say, you know, you're you're

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>ugly or you're fat or whatever. I mean some people would,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but well most people would not. But then you show

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>them on a screen. You've got that level of distance there,

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly that some of those those cultural barriers that

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>would prevent you from doing such a thing in person

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are gone, and you don't feel restrained, so you start

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>doing But the problem is that those words still hurt

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>when you read them, right, Yeah, I was just thinking too.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that you have sort of spurring this along too,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is maybe you're you've decided somebody mentioned the video to

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>You've gone to YouTube, and now all of a sudden

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you can read all the other people who are attacking

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>her for the quality of the song and of the video,

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and you go, you know what, this does stink? And

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and look at her, look at her, You're

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna weigh in, Yeah, exactly, or so it's a it's

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a mob mentality exactly online and you get you get

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that that thing. You know. You might think, oh, I've

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>got this great, great snappy bar, but then I want

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to throw in there. And you're doing it as part

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of a mask conversation, right, You're not necessarily thinking I'm

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.719
<v Speaker 1>directing this at someone. I'm just I got this funny

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really really sharp and cruel and acidic, and

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be awesome and people are gonna laugh, not

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking ultimately the target of this is a thirteen year

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>old girl. So um, yeah, there's a lot of those

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>elements there. So and this is kind of again like

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>armchair psychology and armchair sociology, but there have been several

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>studies about cyber bullying. There's actually a I found a

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>document called cyber Bullying Research Summary cyber Bullying and Suicide,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>which was very disturbing to me. And in the highlights

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>from the research section, the report says that they surveyed

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>students who are are young people who had been um

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>active online and tried to determine, you know, how many

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of them had admitted to either considering or even attempting suicide,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how many of them had been victims of bullying, how

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>many of them have been victims of cyber bullying specifically. Well,

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the highlights from the survey said that of all the

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>respondents reported seriously thinking about attempting suicide, so that was

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>disturbing on its own, and then that all forms of

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>bullying were significantly associated with increases in suicidal ideation. So

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in other words, UH, the people who had seriously considered

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>attempting suicide, more of them had been victims of bullying

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>than otherwise, right, And that cyber bullying victims were almost

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>twice as likely to have attempted suicide compared to youth

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>who had not experienced cyber bullying. So the survey at

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>least suggests that they and this was around two thousand

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>randomly selected UH students from middle school age. So two

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand people, that's a decent size, right, That's that's a

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not a you know, you couldn't call it definitive

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but it's it's a good size for a study. Um,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that suggests that there is a definite link to cyber

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>bullying and your sense of self worth as well as

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>your likelihood to consider suicide. So those words really do count.

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we've all heard the little rhyme of

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>never hurt me. That's not really true. Those words can

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be really, really impactful. And because of that, and because

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of the attention on recent cases of tragic suicides and

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and cyber bullying in particular, there's been a lot of

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>uh proposed legislation in both state and federal venues to

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ban cyber bullying or to punish cyber bullying. Probably probably

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the most notable case of cyber bullying that has um

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>led to these efforts, these legislative efforts was Megan Meyer. Um.

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>It was very very well known. Yeah, I but I

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>believe we talked about her in the troll episode. I

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>believe I'm thinking so too. Um and Jonathan wrote a

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>post on it back on Mail eleven, two thousand nine

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>called Internet trolls come under Fire. UM, And at that

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>point we were talking about legislation. UM. But what had

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>happened Megan Meyer was had a friend who lived just

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>four houses away from her and UM, the other girl's mother,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and she basically had decided that they were growing apart.

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the two girls were growing apart, and they were

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>concerned that Megan might have been telling stories about her,

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>so they decided to get back at Megan. Yeah, they

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>were trying to apparently trying to figure out what was

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>being said, seeing if there was a way to win

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>her trust through another method to uh, to see if

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they can figure out what she was saying about the

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>other girl and and you know, possibly do a little

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>punishment to UM. I think I think from what I've read,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it sort of went awry because they had

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a family friend who has said that she was the

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>one who came up with the idea to do this.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>They created a fake uh persona on my Space UM

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and befriended Megan Meyer. Yeah. It was It was a

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>boy and it was showing interest in Megan Meyers. So

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you've already got that romantic, you know, and they picked

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they picked a picture that was a very good looking

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>young man. Yeah. So you know, think about you are

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a teenager, you're you know, you might have some insecurities,

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you have this good looking person suddenly showing

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>an interest in you. I mean that that makes you

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>feel good, right, And they did start up a virtual

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>friendship with this this fake persona and this real girl,

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and then they they began using the persona to make

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>personal attacks on Megan. Yeah. They they first won her

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.959
<v Speaker 1>trust and then they started to use it to criticize her,

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to insult her, uh and to belittle her. Um. And

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>so eventually, uh, she decided to hang herself because she

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>was very upset about some of the things that that

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>were said. And the mother, Laurie Drew Um, was charged

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on several counts UM. But the case really sort of

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>came down to whether or not violating the terms of

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>service of my Space UM was illegal action. Yeah, because

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're at that point, were no cyber bullying laws

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anywhere on the books. UM. And that

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>was the thing was they didn't really have anything to

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>charge them with. There was you know, what do you do?

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like people wanted to punish them, and there wasn't

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>anything to punish them with, right, So that that definitely

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>gave rise to this, uh, this movement to try and

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>find a way to deal with cyber bullying in a

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>legal aspect of legal way and and there are a

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of states that have been trying at Louisiana proposed

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a cyber bullying bill that would make harassment on text

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>messages or through sites like Facebook illegal. Arkansas as well.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of states that have actually proposed legislation.

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And here's where we're going to transfer into a different

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of conversation. I'm personally a little nervous about cyber

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>bullying legislation. And here's why. There's a very delicate line

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to walk in this because on the one hand, yes,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that that there is some

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>way to uh to legally pursue UH punishment against people

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>who are are legitimately causing injury and harm to other people,

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through cyber bullying or other means. Right, otherwise

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have you know, society breaks down if you

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have that kind of stuff. But on the flip side,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that you do so in

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a way that does not infringe upon people's First Amendment rights.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And so where is that line, Where does the line

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>go from this is cyber bullying. Uh, And on the

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>other side, this is a criticism or this is a

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>commentary that is legitimate in nature. And and that's gonna

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>be a very difficult thing to do. It's kind of

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like saying what is art versus what is not art.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It really becomes a subjective issue. And I think judges

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in the in the states where the this this, these

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>proposed bills become actual legislation, are going to have a

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>really challenging time determining in individual cases which things are

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, which things constitute actual cyber bullying versus expressing

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>your opinion, you know, under the rights of free speech.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Now we must keep in mind, of course, free speech

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>is not unfettered right. You know, it's not truly free

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in that there are limitations. It was Oliver Wendell Holmes

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>who said the right to swing my fist ends at

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the other man's nose. Uh. That being said, you know,

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't you cannot, uh, you cannot expect to have

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>complete freedom of speech because there are certain things you

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>cannot do. The famous example being don't yell fire in

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a crowded theater. UH. The idea thing that you create

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a panic and thus people can come to harm. So

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the argument is that those people's right to an expectation

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of safety overrides your right to yell something that's not true. UM.

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes and um uh. Representative head her name right here,

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Linda T. Sanchez has tried a couple of times to

0:26:55.000 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>introduce federal legislation UH in the House of Representatives. UM.

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And in that that particular piece of legislation, which is

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>aimed to amends Title eighteen of the United States Code,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>UM would define it makes a definition of cyber bullying

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>UM and I'll quote any communication with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass,

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>or cause substantial emotional distress to a person using electronic

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>means to support severe, repeated and hostile behavior end quote

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>UM and and in that case, it was introduced in

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the Congress in the United States UM on July th eight.

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>It was referred to a House subcommittee and then referred

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security, and

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it basically died. Uh. She tried again in the Congress UM.

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>On April second, two thousand nine, it was referred to

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the House Committee on the Judiciary and again to the

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security on on September

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, there were hearings hell but again it's

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it is stalled and there's there's nothing going on now.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot too about bullying in general, not

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just cyber bullying, but bullying in general UM at schools

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on TV. I know, I've seen lots and lots of

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>public service announcement. There's there's the entire it Gets Better

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>routine that UM for for for people, young people who

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.959
<v Speaker 1>realize that that they're gay and that they are receiving

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>lots of bullying and pressure from other people because of

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>their identity, or they feel like they can't be who

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they really are because there's this pressure around them, and

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that as a result, their their sense of self worth

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>declines over time and they begin to consider attempting suicide

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or or or having other really negative impacts on their lives.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a lot of the p s a s

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that come out and say, look, you know, I know

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that this part of your life is terrible and that

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's never going to end, but it

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>does get better. So yeah, I mean there's been a

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention on a national and even global level

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to this kind of of thing. And and I know

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>there have been uh principles, school principles who've been pressured

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to do things. But part of the problem is that,

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is cyber bullying. A lot of it

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is not taking place in school. And even though for example,

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was limited to two people, two kids, the bullier and

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the bullied, Uh, if it's happening at eight o'clock at

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>night after school, there's really nothing the principle can do

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. And because I mean legally, because we're talking

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about the internet, it wouldn't even necessarily be two people

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the same school. Yeah, it can be, but it

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>could also be two people who know each other but

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>don't go to the same school. Well then what do

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you do. Do You contact the other school and say

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>your student is harassing a student of another school, So

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>therefore it's your job to discipline. And I mean, it

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>gets really muddy, and that's that's part of the reason

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>why you have this legislation being proposed, because there a

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of prosecutors feel like there's not a whole lot

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of avenues to take in these in these sort of situations.

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are harassment laws that are out there,

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but some of them are difficult to apply using if

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the harassment is taking place online. It's just it's it's

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>hard because the laws were not formed with that in mind,

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and therefore there's a debate on whether or not the

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>laws apply in those cases. Um. And I did see

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>one comment on a on a thread related to this

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of made my eyes open a little bit

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>because I wasn't thinking of it in those terms. But um,

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there it depends on what's said and how it's said.

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there are laws against libel and slander. Um.

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And depending on what what's said, how again, how it's done.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, there is that case which you could say,

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, yes, there is illegal grounds under which someone

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>can be punished, right with slender and libel, You've got that.

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>That's again another restriction on free speech. Your speech is

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>not entirely free if what you are doing is spreading

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:22.479
<v Speaker 1>misinformation and lies about someone deliberately, deliberately, right, you you

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>knowingly are lying about someone's character or their behavior, and

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing so as a means of hurting that person.

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>That speech is not protected under the First Amendment. Um,

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>hate speech, hate speech as well. Yeah, so you might

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>also hear about fighting words. It's true you can be

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cited by the police for using fighting words. Well, you know,

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't understand the difference between a

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>salt and battery. But AsSalt is you know, I'm going

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to kill you, and that you could be charged with

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a salt even though you never lay a finger on

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the other person, because you were intending to do harm

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to that you have to prove I guess that the intent,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>which is really trick. But like if you never swung

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a fist, then it's gonna be hard for them to

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>prove that you really did intend that and you weren't

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just quote unquote joking. Yeah, but yeah, I mean you

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>say that your friends, Yeah you do. But yeah, you

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.479
<v Speaker 1>had a bat at the time, Yeah you had you

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>had your eyes were glowing red and there was really

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>creepy music playing in the background. Um, And you know,

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I do have this concern about the legislation that's been

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>proposed to to prevent cyber bullying or to punish it's

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not even to prevent cyber bullying. Really, it's to punish

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>acts of cyber bulls, right, So this is this is

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a reactionary thing, not a proactive thing. It doesn't stop

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it from happening in the first place, exactly. So the

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>damage has already been done. It's just that you're punishing

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the people who have committed the act. Now, to me,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important. I can't say that that's not important.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But to me, what's more important is finding ways to

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>educate children and even adults really because a lot of

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>people fall fall into this kind of trap. But to

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>educate people about respect and compassion and these concepts that

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you should extend these to other people because

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to make everything better. People don't deserve

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to have this kind of stuff heaped on them for

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the smallest of of what you think of as as

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>something like you know, like Rebecca Black's video something like

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that does not She doesn't deserve getting hate mail and

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and and veiled threats or unveiled threats directed at her

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for that. Just say, you know the song is is

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>goofy and leave it at that. And uh. And I

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>think that what's important is that we've we concentrate on

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that front end that we do try and instill in

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>people a sense that it's important to respect and show

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>compassion towards others, and that if we follow those those guidelines,

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the back end of punishment becomes less important. It still

0:33:57.840 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>needs to be there because there's always going to be

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>people who will always fall to that side. But I

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>think we need to really concentrate on ways to encourage

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the that sort of sense of community and responsibility early on,

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and that that's what we're funding needs to go because

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>otherwise what you're talking about is, yeah, we've got all

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this punishment in place, but that's not going to stop

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the victims. Like, the victims are still going to be hurt.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would rather see us work on ways to

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>prevent victimization in the first place, right because I'm crazy

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 1>like that. Well, you know that that's that's admirable. But

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you know, I think that a

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are going to want to see something,

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, what happens when it happens. Anyway, I agree,

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that does need to be there. I

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>just right, I think I don't think it's ever going

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a deterrent. I think it's only going to

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be a punishment, but I think it's still necessary. I

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>just think that we can not focus on that at

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and and then ignore the front end. Right. If we

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we just focus on the punishment, then you haven't solved

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the problem. You've just created a way of punishing the

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>people who commit the problem. And same way I think

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of pretty much the criminal system in general, is that

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>if you don't address the underlying reason for why the

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>crime is happening, you're just going to have a cycle

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of crime. And yeah, you have a way of punishing it,

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have a way of preventing it. Right,

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And they'll also have to if they ever want to

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>get something like that passed on a national level. I

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think they'll probably need to be very careful how the

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>bill is written too, because it free speech advocates are

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>going to say, sure, that's fine, but it's so broad

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>now you can punish all these other things well, and

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a legitimate concern. And what would happen with

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that is, even if the law were passed, you would

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially it wouldn't take long before you saw a case

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 1>come before the Supreme Court, and then the Supreme Court

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>would have to rule on whether or not it was truly,

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, violating the first Amendment of the Constant Ship.

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's a very long and drawn out process.

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, you have a law that might

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>be hurting people almost as much as the actual crime

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of cyber bullying is hurting people. It's it's it's a

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>complicated issue. And so offer constructive criticism, right, constructive criticism.

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Try to be a little compassionate about people. That doesn't

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that you can't say that something is um poorly

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>written or or poorly done. There's no reason for you

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to feel fettered that you you know, you cannot say

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is a bad work or anything like that.

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, try to keep the personal attacks under control.

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I would like to have heard her without auto tune,

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just to see what her voice is like. Yeah, on

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Good Morning America. She's saying a couple of bars at

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Star Spangled banner, and she had you know, she

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>could carry a tune like I wouldn't say that she had.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>She herself said, I don't think I have the best voice,

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think I have the worst voice either,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>And I would agree with that. My voice is certainly

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.959
<v Speaker 1>much worse. Um, of course. I I also and there

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>is a video of me on YouTube singing, so you

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have said that. Well I already they already know

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>about it because it's the Evil League of Evil Things.

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Part of the part of the audition process was you

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>had to sing. Uh. And I apologize to the you know,

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>two dozen of you or whoever you went over and

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>saw that video. I should have should have warned you beforehand.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>That was my fault. Well, they're not around to complain now,

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna wrap this up. Well, I'm gonna wrap

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this up by just stating one other thing that I

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>find really uh infuriating about about the American psyche, and

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I am also guilty of this. I include myself with this,

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>which is that we have in America this this uh,

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the American myth or the American uh like the underlying

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>foundation of what we think it is to be American

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is that if you work really hard, or you or

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you really tried to do something, then uh, you should succeed.

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But then at the same time, we have this feeling

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that that people who exceeed, we have this need to

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>tear them down. So we've got folks who will succeed

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and and at the first, at one point, you've got

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the drive to succeed because culturally, that's what it is

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to be American. You want to you want to try,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and whatever your goal is, you want to make sure

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you get it because this is America and whatever you

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>want is possible. But then you get there and then

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>people start tearing you down. And that's also American, and

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just insane. It's not just America that does that either.

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that. But you know when you see that

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of that, that double edged sword, like succeed succeeds, succeed,

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you succeeded, You're a jerk. That's just come on, people,

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 1>give me a break. I work hard. Don't tear me

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>down for working hard. Now. I know we're way over now,

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>but my my personal thing like that is your your

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite restaurant on the corner and then and everybody loves him,

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're enjoying this because hey, they're they're finally getting customers.

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Look at this, and then well then you can't get

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a table. And then they open one acros us town.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>You're like, oh, that's cool, they're expanding, and then they

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>get three and then all of a sudden It's like

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>they're on every corner in every place in America. Like man,

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that big corporation, right, Yes, they stink or or want

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>them to support little restaurants or as you know bands. Yes,

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the band is cool when no one knows about it,

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and then when it becomes a success, they sold out

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that that's what I think of his from from my

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>age group r EM and you two both got that criticism. Well.

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 1>To close out, I just gotta say, Chris, I'm glad

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's Friday Friday. I'm going to have fun, fun, fun, fun,

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and uh, if you guys want to have some fun,

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you can interact with us. We promise we will make

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>it fun. You can let us know on Twitter or

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or handle There is tech Stuff hs W, or

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you can shoot us an email that addresses tech stuff

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com. Chris and I will

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. For more on this

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics. Is the House to works

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com. To learn more about the podcast, click on

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast icon in the upper right corner of our homepage.

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>The House Stuff Works iPhone app has arrived. Download it

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>today on iTunes. Brought to you by the reinvented two

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve Camray. It's ready, Are you