WEBVTT - White Sox snap road series losing streak

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Howard, my dad was te vowed by an utility vehicle

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and isn't surgery. Now what should I do?

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry to hear about that.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 3>It's really great that you're getting him the medical care

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and treatment that he needs right now. These are three

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 3>important things that I think you need to know. Injuries

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 3>are unexpected and turn lives upside down. I'm Howard Ankin,

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'm here to help if you are a loved one.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I have been heard at work for in a car

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 3>truck to write your accident.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Called three one two six million injury law made personal.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>That's aaken law.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 4>From your favorite source for Chicago White Sox talk, delivering news, interviews,

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 4>analysis and more. This is the Socks Machine Podcast with

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 4>your hosts Jim Margolis, James Vegan, and Josh Nelson.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you a new episode of the Soccer Gine podcast.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Josh Nelson. We are recording this on

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday nights, July one, twenty twenty six. After the Chicago

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>White Sox ended up losing on Wednesday to the Baltimore Orioles.

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But they won the first two games and that is

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>huge because they finally snap their road series losing streak,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>finally winning a road series since early May back in

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>San Diego.

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 5>And this is a good.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Omen because now the White Sox had the Cleveland which

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is to date the biggest series of the season for

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago White Sox as they still hold a one

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>game lead over the Cleveland Guardians and the American League Central.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 5>Joining me is Sox Machines.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Beat reporter James Vegan and managing editor Jim Margolis. And hello, gentlemen,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with recapping what happened in Baltimore as the

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>White Sox had two easy wins on Monday and Tuesday

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the offense. And again the White Sox are

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>forty five and forty.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 5>On the season.

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And James, you recently wrote a wonderful feature with it's

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>plenty profanity from White Sox hitting coach Derek Showman, and

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he is going to enjoy as far as

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>those quotes, as he got excited last.

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 5>Time about it. And I found it very.

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Interesting because it continues this line of coaching and thinking

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>from Will Venable of leading with empathy and on a

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>hitting perspective, not trying to put too much pressure on

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the hitters, allowing them to make stakes, understand that they

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>want their A swings and to continue to try to

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>do as much damage as possible. Do we get a

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>chance to see some of that come to light against Baltimore,

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>especially in the first two games of this series.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think it's like something that's like their

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 6>overall methodology, which is very warm or conducive, at least

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 6>they say so to like coming back in terms.

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 7>Of like the players believing, you know, they.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 6>Not getting discouraged, not kind of getting wrapped up with

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 6>their mistakes, you know, even kind of accepting that in

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 6>getting multiple shots at a starter maybe not even having success,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 6>or just trying to get to the bullpen of general,

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 6>that there's always kind of opportunities in the game. I

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 6>think Showman's even referenced like telling him about like when

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 6>they're down in big games that they still get paid

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 6>off the at bats that they have late innings, which

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 6>is like, I think a refreshing tone for them to

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 6>take so.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 6>I can't say, like, oh, they had like a pep

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 6>talk in the seventh inning after like bas departed on Monday,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>and like that's why they rallied. I think that their

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 6>general attitude of like moving on from mistakes quickly and

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 6>not necessarily like having a restrictive response to or even

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 6>just like a reactive response like not getting to a

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 6>starter or not getting like offense going early in the

0:03:55.120 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 6>game and being kind of not doing things that kind

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 6>of facilitate panic or self doubt or just kind of

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 6>like frustration early in the games. I think they view

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 6>that as something that pays dividends broadly and certainly like

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 6>keeps them in a good frame of mind when they're

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 6>down in games. So that's at least what they attribute,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, having have so many comeback wins and having

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 6>so many especially recently, like because they try to slug.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 6>I feel like they've had some outings recently where the

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 6>starter like has a pretty efficient you know start or

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 6>pretty efficient open to the game where they're getting through

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 6>the lineup once or twice on a limited amount of pitches,

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 6>just because like the Socks are so often trying to

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 6>like blitz strikes that they see early that bad and

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 6>not wait for them, and the fact that that doesn't

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 6>seemingly like build panic in them or see them kind

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 6>of spiral into losing their approach or not like even

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 6>just kind of hunkering down a bit more and working

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 6>account later in games as they adjust mid game is

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 6>something that I guess they at this point view he

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 6>was endemic to what they're doing overall, and like kind

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 6>of the environment they're building for hitters. So yeah, that's

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 6>part of the positive feelings that they have. Also generally

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 6>just they got a lot of pop. They got a

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 6>little left fan of pop and that should play well

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 6>in that ballpark, and it certainly did for a couple

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 6>of games.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 7>I think we wanted.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I think a good example too from White Sox as

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>far as the culture that they are building Jim when

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the offensive side, is allowing young employers

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like Jacob Gonzalez to take islamps. He had a pretty

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lengthy hitless streak, but in the last ten games, Jacob

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez has figured out how to hit MLB pitching and

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that is huge, especially in the bottom of the lineup

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>where he's batting ninth and he's coming in with these

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>big doubles, especially against Baltimore that seemed to be backbreaking,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>where Orioles pitching things that they have a breather here

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're facing number nine hitter and they still get hurt.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And in this series against Baltimore. Gonzalez went five for

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>a lets been with six RBIs. But when it comes

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to Jacob Gonzalez, Jim Munitzaka Murakami could be returning soon.

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a definitive date when Munittako Burkami returns,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but when he does, and with how Jacob Mignzalez has

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>been hitting, how do you see Jamgonzalez fitting in with

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the current White Sox roster.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 9>There's always the caveat that every time we try to

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 9>plot out what a rosterill look like. When a player

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 9>returns from injury, somebody else gets hurt and so you

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 9>never have this confluence of healthy guys that are going

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 9>to spell at the end of Luis an Helicunya like

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 9>Austin Hayes.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 8>Eversin Pereira, like we've been playing that game.

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 9>With the outfield, so like I'm hesitant to do it

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 9>with any part of the White Sox roster, be it

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 9>rotation or innfield or anything else.

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 8>Because of the way an injury ends up.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 9>Solving the problem. Well enough, but let's say let's indulge

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 9>your question and say Murakami comes back with nobody else

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 9>missing time, and I think this, You know there are.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 8>A couple of ways to do it.

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 9>This could finally be the end of Luisan Hellacunya because

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 9>he isn't really playing in the outfield much anymore now

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 9>that Tristan Peters is more or less the everyday center fielder,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 9>and if he's the backup shortstop, well, you know, my

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 9>Drath and Gonzalez can cover that well enough. And it

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 9>seems like Akunya just right now, he's kind of a bunter,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 9>especially with the runners on base, like he more or

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 9>less gives himself up, or whether it's he's terrified of

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 9>grounding to a double player, uh you know, the coaching

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 9>staff is, or they just want to get something out

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 9>of his back. They're almost treating him like a pitcher

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 9>when he comes to the play with a runner on base.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 9>So you could use this as the opportunity to be like, well,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 9>you know it's Kunya can go out, we will have

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 9>an eight to nine part of the lineup, no matter

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 9>who's pitching. That feels like you can start something for

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 9>the top of the order, you know, because either Gonzales

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 9>will be down there or my draft will be down there.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 9>So there's that approach, but that requires probably a big

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 9>chunk taken out of my drafts playing time, which some

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 9>people might be okay with because of his platoon splits.

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 9>But I think the White Sox have been generally supportive

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 9>of him or like they you know, they like the

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 9>defense he brings, the overall approach he brings, and aren't

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 9>dismissing him as a platoon player yet. So if that's

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 9>the case, then it seems like probably Gonzales goes down

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 9>just because yeah, a kunya, say what you will about him,

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 9>but the White Sox really don't care how often they

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 9>play him, Like if he plays one day a week,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 9>it's more or less fine because he's out of options,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 9>and if they lose him or they try to put

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 9>them their waivers, they might lose him, and that's not

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 9>something they seem like they want to do until it

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 9>gets that points where their hand is forced. And if

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 9>they want Gonzales to play every day, then he can

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 9>go back to Charlotte's and maybe go back to positions

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 9>of need that they can anticipate, be a second base

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 9>or be more of a utility guy versus being somebody

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 9>who's forced in the first base and just wait for

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 9>the next opportunity to pop up. I guess the other

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 9>one would be, you know Andrew Benin Tendy is you

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 9>know DH right now is left handed bats. So if

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 9>you want a Gonzalez to be more of a DH

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 9>or use that really more of a flex spot versus

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 9>Ben and Tendy hogging those bets, that would be another

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 9>way to do it than you relegate Bet and Tending

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 9>to the bench. But you know, everybody seems like they're

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 9>more or less happy with him being the veteran presence

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 9>on the bench, especially since he's playing well with Gritchik,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 9>you know, being somebody that can swap in and out.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 9>So it seems like they have a good arrangement there.

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 9>So I would say I would anticipate the most likely

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 9>scenario being Gonzalez goes back down to Charlotte's, but I

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 9>wouldn't necessarily bet on it over Kunya finally getting waived

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 9>or dfad see if he clears waivers, just because they

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 9>could step on the gas and say we want to

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 9>have a threatening lineup no matter what, and we'll see

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 9>how Gonzalez plays when he's playing half the time versus

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 9>most of the time.

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's Junior Perez who he had a three run

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>homer against the Orioles. Is that an opportunity to option

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>back to Charlotte without having to lose Luisa Halikunya.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 9>They could, but just more a matter of like if

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 9>they want, you know, Gonzalez doesn't play the outfield yet,

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 9>so if they're looking to get him at bats, that's

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 9>where I think you kind of run into problems is

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 9>can you know Gonzalez.

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 8>Be on the roster but also get at bats?

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 9>And who's at batsayes he take and I don't think

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 9>he threatens perezes at bats to where you know he's

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 9>in the factoring the discussion.

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh they have maybe Jim finally found more bats than

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>spots White Sox lineup.

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 7>But they haven't done it yet.

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 6>They have to actually get there, like where comedy is

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 6>like one into two or more weeks away, Like until

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 6>they actually reached that point, they're not more bats than spots.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 7>It's the problem with like doing this.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 6>Who happens when somebody goes like pumps back projection is

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 6>that you were never actually overloaded until you.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 7>Reach the point, which is the whole reason you need covered.

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, yes, I know that's what Jim mentioned earlier when needs.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 8>More flustered fashion.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 2>They're over eight million drivers in the state of Illinois.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>With that many people on the road, accidents are bound

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>to occur. I'm Attorney Howard Ankin, and if you or

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 2>someone you care about has been involved in an auto

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 2>rideshare trucking accident, I'm here to help. Called my office

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 2>for a free consultation at three one two six million.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Heroin. You need me injury law made personal, that's

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 2>akin law.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the players that we were hoping or

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we thought needed a big series against Baltimore. We know

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>about the White Sox starting pitching, and Noah Schultz returned

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and he took the start on when and things were

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>going pretty smoothly until the fifth inning, and James, that

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>was your pick. White Sox could use some help in

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the starting rotation. They could really use someone to be

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that number five starter in this rotation right now. What

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>did you like from Noah Schul to start on Wednesday?

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 6>His slider played for whifts to each handed hitters.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 7>I guess as well as he could have hoped.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 6>It obviously didn't carry him through the fifth inning or

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 6>anything like that. But in terms of like showing progress

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 6>or showing the sweeper playing the tops the handed hitters.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 6>I want to say one like the CSW was pretty good,

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 6>but just in general, like I think it was fourteen

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 6>swinging strikes like that was pretty happy z own for

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 6>him to be in overall, it's just like, especially more

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 6>so if he's like throwing strikes, which he's still not

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 6>doing to his efficient degree, and and it's kind of

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 6>out a character outside of like when he's dealing with

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 6>knee stuff and you've obviously had him miss a bunch

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 6>of time with recurring the stuff last year and kind

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 6>of have it this year. So it's it wasn't exactly like, ah,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 6>this looks like him top operational gear even outside of

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 6>like not saying like he's not healthy, but just in

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 6>terms of like the Noah Schultz, it's like going to be,

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, take be a dynamic part of the rotation

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 6>going forward, and the second half as you're worried about

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 6>like upgrading rotation, would like to see like more or

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 6>less uncompetitive misses in general. And so a little little

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 6>of what he needed and a little like stepping back

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 6>from like what is the baseline profile of what makes

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 6>it work, which is you know, kind of his own

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 6>So but on the one side, I thought like they

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 6>need a good start from him because maybe like the

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 6>bullpen would be needed in the first two games, and

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 6>said it wasn't needed at all really beyond like some

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 6>grand tailor work, so they didn't need him to get

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 6>the six innings to like have a you know, coherent

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 6>plan to end the game and just not doing anything

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 6>offensively took care of that. So at least depends on

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 6>a good place going in Cleveland. So that part of

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 6>like needy Noh Schultz didn't come up as much, But

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, some good, some bad.

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 5>And that was given me.

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>My follow up is what you're hoping to see that

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>he can approve upon because he's going to get an

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>extra day of rest as the White Sox have Monday

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>off after their Sunday game against Cleveland and they'll be

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>returning to action at home at rat Field against the

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Boston Red Sox on Tuesday, July seventh. Then Noah Schultz

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>right now is projected starter. Is there a milestone or

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>what aspect of Noah Schultz's start against the Red Sox

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>are you hoping for more improvement?

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 6>James under three Walks, I think is like a probably

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 6>a crude way to say it, but certainly like being

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 6>able to locate the sinker just fast falls a bit

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 6>more and work accounts more like. I think those are

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 6>general things that would work towards you know, you were walks,

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 6>which is more just like tag into a result. But

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 6>I felt like it was kind of there's maybe like

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 6>one of those walks where he's just like, all right,

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 6>you lost a good battle and you don't really fault

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 6>him for it. But I think the rest were just

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 6>kind of like spraying the fastball a bit, which he

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 6>knows he was kind of like up and down with

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 6>control through the rehab process of him being rusty. A

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 6>little bit like that happens, but more so than like

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 6>it's nice to see the whiffs uptick. But like if

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 6>Schultz is like a seven or eight KPRI nine guy

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 6>with like control and like a fifty percent ground ball, right,

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 6>we'd be like, all right, that looks like the guy

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 6>who's coming up as a prospect. Whereas like there's not

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 6>really big precedent of like him being super effective while

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 6>like working Dylan C style where.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 7>He's walking three to four guys per AUTI got it, all.

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, we'll see what Schultz does again. His next

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>projected start is against the Boston Red Sox. Next Jim

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Yervick was Colson Montgomery and he hit his twenty first

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>home run of the season. He did go two for

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ten against the Orioles with four strikeouts, but he also

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>did drive in three RBIs. Is that a satisfying outcome

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for you from Colson Montgomery in this series?

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 9>It's in terms of how it played, Yeah, I mean

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 9>just because the homer was really impressive, you know, in

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 9>those Utah Street violent four hundred and forty footers always

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 9>fun to watch, and you know, one hit a game

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 9>is kind of the baseline for you contributed something, So

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 9>that part worked, I think, you know, kind of bigger

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 9>picture is it fits in Wealth is June in which

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 9>he kind of hit two hundred and he slugged pretty well,

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 9>But he also struck out nearly forty.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 8>Percent of the time.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 9>So four strikeouts and ten played appearances is a lot,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 9>and you just wonder how long that can continue. Like

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 9>he's been contributing while doing that, So it's not a

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 9>case where you're sounding any alarms necessarily, but it's kind

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 9>of like the long time to go on striking out

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 9>forty percent of the time and think like, is it

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 9>gonna get better or is it going to have to

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 9>pay the price of having so many empty plate appearances

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 9>to where you're gonna see a kind of pronounced slump

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 9>that you know requires some intervention besides.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 8>The odd game off.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 9>So it's okay, just at some point, you know you'd

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 9>like to see him you break this strikeout Jaggie's been on.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 8>And produce more. You raise the average a little bit.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 9>But if he's able to somehow go one for five

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 9>or a game and hit the occasional homer, like that's uh,

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 9>it's hard to bank on a two hundred average playing

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 9>that well or that practically, but you know he's he's

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 9>found a way to do it so.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 8>Far in his career.

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Is this an Adam Dunn hitting profile? But it actually

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>can play shortstop a fewer walks.

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 8>So it's a case where yeah, it's yeah, there's.

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 9>There's more of a hit tool, but it's also like

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 9>the hit tools tested more because he goes out of

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 9>the zone more, and I think he's trying to. You

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 9>can see him thinking long with pictures and pictures getting

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 9>to him because like they're gonna tack me high and

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 9>then they go higher than high and somehow it you know,

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 9>he ends up chasing out.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, and it's he's a work in progress.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 9>Still, like he said in James Post the show and

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 9>post like when I'm struggling, I'm adjusting and just been Yeah,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 9>I guess you could just say there's been a lot

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 9>of adjustments lately. But fortunately, you know, playing shortstop and

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 9>not having like the numbers are down, but he hasn't

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 9>had like the huge hitless slump, but he had one

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 9>in the middle of the month. But lately it's just

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 9>been like one hit a game mostly, and that's fine.

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 9>It's just it's you know, it's not great for the

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 9>season numbers, but as it plays for a shortstop kind

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 9>of like Tristan Peters in center field, Like if he's

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 9>playing a good center field and he comes up with

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 9>a single, uh you know, that's something that will keep

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 9>his value afloats until he uh you know, it gets

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 9>on a heater.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, again, it is twenty one home runs or Coleson Montgomery,

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he's on pace to maybe get to forty home runs

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. Only one White Sox shortstop in franchise history

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>has hit twenty five or more home runs Pop quiz

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>do you remember who that shortstop is?

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 7>Jim?

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 8>Is that Ron Hanson?

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 5>No, okay, more recent, Jose James. It is Jose Valance.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 7>It's Jose Valentine. Josh, thank you, James, thank you, thank you.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Jose. Jose did it three times.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Nobody else for White Sox shortstops has hit twenty five

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:48.959
<v Speaker 1>home runs.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 9>Hanson topped out at twenty, but it was a nineteen

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 9>sixty Ford old Comisky Park so had played really big.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, end up being his seven point seven war season.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh Wanner Reba came close. Alexi Ramirez came close. Tim

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Anderson came close, but Coles Montgomery just needs it four

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>more and he joins very rare company in White Sox

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>franchise history.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 5>And then my pick was Tristan Peters.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Tristan had a solid series, went four for twelve against Baltimore,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>solid performance. I thought that he was going to be

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the one to maybe help carry the offense and set

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the table for top of the lineup with his performance

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom of the lineup, but that ended up being

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Gonzalez again, Jacob Gonzalez picking up six RBIs in

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that series win against the Baltimore Orioles, so good series

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>win for the White Sox. Also a cap tip, I

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that Sean Burke looked really strong as well Jim

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, and he seems to be on a heater

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's he's helped stabilize the rotation. I think he's

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 9>been the if not a number two started the way

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 9>you classically think of one, at least number two started

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 9>this rowation needs behind Davis Smartin, I think Athony k

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 9>is been. Yeah, he's pitched more like a number four

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 9>than number three, but he's kind of a number three

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 9>right now because Eric Fetti needs know whether it's opener supporter,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 9>whether he's like about to go five inning. It's like

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 9>he's more of a number five as a number four.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 9>So everybody's kind of like one slot down in this rotation.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 9>But like we talked about with the mid season grades,

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 9>it's it's worked so far, it hasn't been the problem,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 9>and every turn where it's it doesn't get exposed or

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 9>you don't feel that cumulative effect of like.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 8>One guy disappointing, another guy disappointing.

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 9>Because they're all pitching slightly above their pay grades.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 8>That's basically a win.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 5>Well for the White Sox.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>They made their way from Baltimore to Cleveland on Wednesday

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to get ready for a very important four game series

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>against the Cleveland Guardians. The Guardians won their last game

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Texas Rangers. They're currently forty five and forty two,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so they are just a game back of the Chicago

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>White Sox, even though the White Sox have two games

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>in hand in their last ten games. The Guardians are

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>four and six at home this year. Even though they're

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the few teams of the American League that

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>has a winning record on the road, their home record

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is just twenty two and twenty so they're not seeing

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the same level of success like the White Sox have

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or even like the Tampa Bay Rays. For the season series,

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago White Sox currently lead that against the Guardians,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>as the White Sox won that last series at raid Field,

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>winning two out of three. Your probable pitchers for this series.

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night, it is Davis Martin against Slade Socni. Friday

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>night it's Anthony k against Gavin Williams. Saturday it's Sean

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Burke against Parker Messek, and then on Sunday we'll see

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>if there's an opener, But right now it is Eric

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Fetti against Tanner, Biby and James with these games beating Cleveland.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Run prevention is a big factor in how these games

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>go between the Guardians and the White Sox. So many

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>defensive blunders in Cleveland over the years have cost the

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>White Sox games, and right now opposing teams are only

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>scoring three point ninety two runs per game against the

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Guardians in Cleveland.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 5>But I think one.

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Of the bigger factors and the way that Will Venable

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>has to manage this series is how does he use

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>his best bullpen weapons in Grant Taylor and Sean Newcom.

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any insight or any thoughts on how

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>he could use those two in these four games.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, if I've learned anything from writing about his strategy,

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 6>I think he will use them aggressively.

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 5>Josh, you kind of use him often, I'd be.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 6>Sur I don't think with like necessarily special consideration, like

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 6>you're talking about, like these a lot of lefties that

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 6>they'll probably stretch out over the course.

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 7>Of the order.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 6>Zana the Lotter, you know, Watson's been a menace. Mazarta,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 6>Cooper Ingle they called up even you know Kwan has struggled,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 6>but it seems like he's still regularly Stephen Quanta against

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 6>the White Sox. Taylor and Newcomb are both being multi

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 6>inning presence usually are your answer to them trying to

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 6>stagger out their lefties, Like all right, I'm just going

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 6>to like.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 7>Wipe out a whole.

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 6>Slate of like you know, time to the order of

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 6>them coming up and leverage and so because both they

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 6>offer that function to them rather than like trying to

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 6>be super targeted with get as many as you can,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 6>like one Brian Hudson outing. I think on top of

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 6>like that, generally, like their approaches like if they have

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 6>a lead, they if a win in sight, they're going

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 6>to like go aggressively at it rather than like conserve

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 6>resources for like say they're up five to two and

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 6>try to protect like that lead over the last like

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 6>two innings and there's like ultimate lefties. I think he'd

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 6>sooner it's like, hey, let me just put Grant Taylor,

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 6>who's great against left he's at this and salt this

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 6>game away, rather than like, oh, I'm worried about like Saturday,

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 6>and I don't want to use Grant too much. We're

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 6>gonna actually go to make Sir Anthony Demingaz, like go

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 6>into the teeth of this. I don't think they're gonna

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 6>play that conservation game, so I don't think that.

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 7>I'd be surprised.

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 6>Maybe there's a little like half of your consideration for

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 6>it if like the situation allows or if like the

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 6>certainly if the game like opens up in another inning,

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 6>like if you're gonna go for two for Newcomber Taylor

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 6>and like the SoCs score three and like in between

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 6>like what would be his two innings, maybe you back

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 6>off there for future thing. But I don't think that

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 6>they would necessarily sacrifice or take like undue risk for

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 6>the idea of like oh we want Taylor or newcome back.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 7>On Sunday sort of situation.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 6>I think what would be consistent with them would be,

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 6>all right, here's the opportunity, let's go for it at

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 6>full force and take this twin and because I mean

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 6>another if, I don't think it really enter their strategy.

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 6>But maybe like a back your mind thing is like

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 6>they only need a split from this to leave Town

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 6>with the lead in the division, So maybe don't over complicated.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 5>That's a good point. These were tight games at rate Field.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm imagining that these are still going to be tight

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>games in Cleveland. So that's why I'm I'm more wondering

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>about how often Taylor is used in this upcoming series.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Ken they use him in two of the four games, Jim,

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>because if they can, then I think that gives them

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity when they do use him, that they can,

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>as James point out, walk out with a split. But

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it'd be not in the White Sox favor of course,

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>if they use Grant Taylor and they end up losing

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>that game. So this is where I am curious to

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>see and how the White Sox handle as far as

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>these late inning situations coming out of the bullpen, and

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll see just exactly how much confidence they have

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>left in Syriante Domingas.

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 9>I'm guessing Taylor would be, you know, two innings if

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 9>they have a lead, one inning if they're behind. He

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 9>needs to get some work because he hasn't thrown in

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 9>five days, and then keep them available for their back

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 9>to back or two out of three games with the lead,

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, trying to really prioritize that. I think with Dimingas,

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 9>I'm curious if they still go to him in the

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 9>sixth inning or seventh inning, you know, versus the bottom

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 9>of the order if they try to work him in

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 9>earlier in a game, versus having it being the last

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 9>line of defense or having to be back to buy

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 9>like a Chris Murphy or something like that in the

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, in a closer type situation, if they've already

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 9>used Taylor and they want to Writey in there. So yeah,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 9>I think it's probably a bigger series for figuring out

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 9>the dimingas thing in the fly versus Taylor.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 8>I think the Taylor usedage is pretty solid and he's.

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 9>Been really good as of late, so where it should

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 9>be pretty if not paint by numbers because they've used

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 9>him unconventionally, but at least you know what he's gonna

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 9>you know what he's going to enter based on leads

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 9>and part of the lineup.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 8>But I think Domingas is more the mystery.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Well for the Guardians, Chain Lauder has returned for them

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's currently on a ten game hitting streak. We

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.959
<v Speaker 1>did not see him in the series against the White Sox,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and we used to be worried about Rosier Emirez and

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Kwan, but it feels like with the rookies that.

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 5>The Guardians have Jim.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>We spent a lot of time talking about the White

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Sox rookies and how they have been excelling. But Dulauder,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Khalil Watson, Travis Bizana, these three really feel like the

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>big threats against White Sox pitching this weekend.

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 8>It was kind of that story last year.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 9>It's sneaky how it happened, but I was looking at

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 9>the Guardians splits against the White Sox. Last year, Jose

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 9>Ramirez had a three ninety four ops against the White Sox.

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 9>Last year, Stephen Kuan had a five h seven ops

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 9>against the White Sox. They drew still drew their share

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 9>of walk so I think game to game he had

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 9>bats were tough. And also Ramira stole six bases and

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 9>six attempts, so like he made himself a nuisance even

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 9>though he wasn't hitting like, he maximized the times he

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 9>was on bass to where it didn't feel like the

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 9>White Sox really got one over on him. But when

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 9>he get who did the damage was among the four

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 9>digit ops's, it was David Fry, Kyle Manzarto. But then

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 9>in the number two spot, Jen Kenzie Noel, Who's I

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 9>think in triple.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 8>A right now he's out of the Guardians organization. And

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 8>then CJ Cafus.

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 9>Number one, who is not who is he played himself

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 9>out of the mix, is on the forty men roster.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 9>But in Triple A he went off for the time

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 9>that he was so like Khalil Watson coming up and

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 9>immediately proving himself of pain even though he can't draw

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 9>a walk in the majors. Like that fits right in

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 9>with the Cafus thing of like CAFs didn't play that

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 9>well last year, but he played well against the Socks.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 9>And there's always somebody, you know, whether it's whack the mole,

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 9>whether it's h you know, exhausting all the resources to

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 9>face the big guns and then they just.

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 8>Ease up or just.

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 9>You know, you know, just the way it shakes out

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 9>is a lesser hitter getting more favorable pitches to hits

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 9>in high leverage situations when they think they're out of

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 9>the woods. So it's it's I think the games didn't

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 9>have stakes last year, so I think that's probably, you

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 9>know the reason why it wasn't so granular in terms

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 9>of whether Ramirez or Kwan or trying to figure out

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 9>who made a series or who broke a series open

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 9>for the Guardians. But I think now that we're paying

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 9>closer attention, it's worth looking at that and saying, well,

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 9>you know, Quand still a pain.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 8>But also you know it's when it comes.

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 9>To the Guardians, they managed to Maybe maybe it's a

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 9>case of they just game plan against the White Sox

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 9>really well, or it just happens to be luk And

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 9>because it's a division opponent and you see these guys

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 9>so many times, it's inevitable that somebody without a track

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 9>record is going to make themselves a pain. Like even

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 9>like Austin Hedges is playing really well this past month,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 9>he's man just step up and be somebody who is

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 9>maybe not a the sample's too small to call him

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 9>the bats, but he's no longer like an automatic out

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 9>in a ninth spot. They're finding ways to get their

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 9>three or four run a game even without Ramiros.

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Patrick Bailey hasn't been much of a factor for

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians, mostly because pitchers love throwing to Austin Hedges.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, Jim Hedges has instead of trying

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to hit a home run every time at the play,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just trying to get on Bay so he's getting

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot more production offensively than normal. Not a very

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>good offensive catcher still, but he's still producing defensively.

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 7>For the Guardians, he's.

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 6>Got a one o two WRC plus on the year

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 6>after homering today. Not to undercut your point entirely, but.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 5>That's is that a career high for Austin Hedges.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 7>I would imagine, yeah, have a good amount.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think you could add this WRC plus of

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 6>the previous three years together, which is not mathematical, and

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 6>it would still be below one o two.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 9>So for correct it would be twenty seven plus twenty

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 9>one plus forty eight, so forty eight plus forty eight

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 9>ninety six.

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Wow, good for you, Austin Hedges. Let's not have a

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 5>big weekend against the White Sox. Who needs a big series?

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>For the White Sox, so James, I will start with

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you in order for the White Sox to at least

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>get a series split or maybe win this series against

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians, who needs a big series?

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 6>So this is from the White Sox perspective, who needs

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 6>to shine rather than like, yeah, who needs this big series?

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 6>Like in a you know, Gill from the Simpsons type

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 6>of desperation and the job to the workplace perspective.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there someone right now in the White Sox that's

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in a Gill situation?

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 6>That's certainly just the way I interpreted the question last week,

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 6>So now I've been questioning my process. I think with

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 6>all the leftings we've talked about in the batting order,

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 6>tall ass since he just faced them pretty recently. But

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 6>I think Anthony Kay having especially with you talking about like, oh,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 6>how are they going to meet out the Grant Taylor

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 6>to get through this? Kay getting them through six or

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 6>seven even would or certainly just matching the effectiveness of

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 6>the Hado his last time out, given that they'll probably

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 6>be figuring out how to open for Betty or maybe

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 6>even Burke as well.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 7>Just being their only left handed starter in that.

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 6>Mix, I think that continuing to be play as an

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 6>advantage would probably be big for them, especially coming off

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 6>a rough one in Kentas City that said, don't.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 7>Really see the same. They have some lefties in the bullpen.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 6>They have a couple Heron and Sebrowski are certainly good,

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 6>but like certainly with Kate Smith or just kind of

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 6>like a lot of the meat for Holderman, what's his face?

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Seawn Armstrong who close it out. They're one win in Chicago.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Those are guys who I think you need a Benintendi

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 6>that looks hot against them. Certainly Lengths is out a

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 6>bit more, whereas like you would expect Ritchick to be

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 6>more of the situational weapon randomly ties the game off

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 6>of Kate Smith maybe, but more like they're more limited

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 6>opportunities to really use him. Both with like the right

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 6>hand starters primarily from from Cleveland and not as many

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 6>at least left handed relievers as the White Sox offer,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 6>So Ben Andttenni is probably someone there's a bit more

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 6>perspective on is like where is some surprise offense gonna

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 6>come from?

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 5>I like those picks.

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 7>Left handed people, left handed people.

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 5>I like those picks. How about you, Jim who needs

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 5>a big series for the White Sox.

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 9>Maybe not in terms of needs, like it's gonna be uh,

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 9>you know, awful if he doesn't get it, but like

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 9>Kyle Teal, just hoping to see steady progress from him,

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.959
<v Speaker 9>just because I think Drew Romo has been really rough

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 9>watching him when he has to play, and so I

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 9>think just Teal progressing, you know, building on.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 8>A decent start.

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 9>I think to his uh season, like you more strikeouts

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 9>than you used to seeing, maybe not running as you know.

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 9>I can't tell if it's it's him being a little

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 9>bit slower or just being cautious, well him being cautious,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 9>or whether it's just the kind of you know, Eloy

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 9>Jimenez effect of just like watching somebody run all out

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 9>and just bracing for something to break apart on him

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 9>to where it's more painful watching him run than he's

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 9>actually sensing. But yeah, yeah, I think he's still playing

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 9>through some rust or some restrictions. So I think just

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 9>building on what he's done so far to continue working

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 9>towards being like number one catcher at the White Sox

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 9>need be with no interruptions, would go a long way,

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 9>because I think Romo is really and Carol's been off

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 9>to a slowish start with Charlotte, so kind of has

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 9>to be the guy because I think the two catchers

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 9>they have on the depth chart beside him are not

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 9>cutting it right now, so this heal return.

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 8>Has to stick.

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 5>That's disappointing for Caro. I hope he figures it out.

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>It's starting to become almost like a lost season for him,

0:35:56.800 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>right Jim kind of I know there's still half a

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>season left to go.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's a case where you know Romo is there

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 9>because you know, kind of like the Kunia thing, he

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 9>doesn't have.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 8>To play, and you know, Caro just needs a bats.

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 9>He needs the most play appearance as possible to get

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 9>on track, So it makes sense for him if he

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 9>lights up Triple A won't necessarily guarantee success, but at

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 9>least it'll show that he's in a better place.

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 8>And you know right now he's not doing that.

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, lots lots of time for him to to

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 9>get right in Charlotte hopefully. So that's why I think

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 9>Teal just maintaining this track of decent starts showing flashes

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 9>just has to. I think study outs the swing and

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 9>miss a little bit, but otherwise but a pretty good

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 9>start for them all together.

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>For me, I'm going with Sam Antonacci. He was a

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>big factor the last time the White Sox and Guardians played.

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 5>He still knew the left field and James.

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>We know that big wall in Cleveland sometimes plays a

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>factor for new left fielders playing there for the first time.

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not as severe as Fenway, but I feel like

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Samon Tenachi has come a long way playing outfield defense James,

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Like he's new to this position, and you got a

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>chance to watch him in first employ the position more

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>than I have. Is this a position that you think

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he can stick at rather than it still kind of

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>feels like break glass in case of emergency for the

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 1>White Sox this year having Sam Tanaci play left field,

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like the more he plays there, the

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>more I'm confident in his ability to stay there long term.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 6>It's going, I guess, about as well as I would

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 6>have expected. Like I think physically he has the tools

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 6>of like a left fielder, and he like kind of

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 6>plays max effort all the time. So in terms of

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 6>like guys you can rotate out there on a whim,

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.720
<v Speaker 6>I think he's gonna do about as good a job

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 6>as as any one who kind of takes it like

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 6>mid season as much as he did. Like that said,

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 6>like his metrics aren't like amazing or anything like that,

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 6>and he's definitely like figuring out his routes as he

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 6>goes in a way, and I think he's just like

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 6>any new outfielder.

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 7>Would you kind of worry like how.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 6>He's going to deal with like unconventional charms which could

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 6>happen through him in Cleveland or just giving the fact

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 6>that he gives you max effort all the time, which

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 6>is great and to his benefit long term obviously is

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 6>that you know, he's going to try to dive in

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 6>situations where maybe like he can be more conservative and

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 6>that's the right play or overthrow the cutoff man and

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 6>stuff like that. So I think it's going to be

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 6>like a process. I don't And certainly, if he's a

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 6>four hundred OVP guy, then I guess he could play

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 6>whatever he wants, so you don't really have to worry

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 6>about it. But like it's still not like a traditional

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 6>left field profile. So I don't know if like that's

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 6>what they want to do with that position long term necessarily,

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 6>or if you know, if you more strength to require

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 6>more players out there in the corner out feel long term,

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 6>I don't know how necessarily does he like start to

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 6>demand like second base at bats from like Chase my

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 6>drop at some point down the road. I know I

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 6>actively pushed against like people trying to put him together,

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 6>But in terms of like two three years out, I'm

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 6>just saying it's a scenario that like plays out. I

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 6>don't think he's like oh man, he's actually great at

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 6>this right off the bat. Let's just give him left

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 6>field and forget about it indefinitely. But in terms of

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 6>like if he started out there like next year, I

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 6>don't think that'd be crazy either, just because like.

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 7>He's only going to kind of get better at it

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 7>with time.

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 6>And if he plays the average out there while being

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 6>like a great one of the best leadoff men in

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 6>the league, then yeah, that could be a home for him.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, that's been true for many of kind of

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 6>like a hit first, good base runner, a leadoff man

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 6>who it didn't necessarily translate to defense. One Pierre comes

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 6>to mind, even if that's not a perfect COLMP for

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 6>multiple reasons, or Shannon Stewart stuff like that. So yeah,

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 6>kind of, but also not like it's not been such

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 6>an unambiguous success that like you can't imagine a moving

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 6>there from ever either.

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, as long as he gets on base, he still

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>comes up with the big hits late in the games,

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like he did against the Guardians last time these two

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 1>teams played. I think Samontanachi can be a big factor

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in this four game series.

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 5>For the White Sox. It's a big one.

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Again to James's point, if they split with Cleveland, they

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>still have first place in hand in the American League

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Central before arriving to their final homestand before the All

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Star Break when they welcome into Boston Red Sox, who

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>are still a messy team and the Sacramento Athletics who

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just recently got some bad news as Brent Rooker is

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.439
<v Speaker 1>going to miss the rest of the season. So there's

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a way that if the White Sox can at least

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>get a series split, they could still have I think

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>favorable outcomes at home. They could be first place heading

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to the All Star Break, the first place Chicago White

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Sox with the first pick overall, and they will be

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>draft fun times right now for the Chicago White Sox.

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how they start the month of July in Cleveland.

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But that will do it for this episode of the

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Sox Machine podcast. Thank you guys so much for listening.

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>If you just discovered the Sox Machine podcast, you can

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the audio version of the show wherever you

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts at a Spotify and Apple Music. You

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 1>could watch the video of our show on our YouTube

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>channel at YouTube dot com slash Socks Machine. As we

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>start pivoting because everybody's doing this in sports media. You

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>can still get the audio version, don't worry, but we

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>will be doing more with video. You can check out

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>our video work on our YouTube channel and subscribe there

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at YouTube dot com.

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Slash socks Machine. Follow us on social media.

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We're on all the social media platforms at the soxs Machine.

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 1>You can follow James at j RFIGI. You can follow

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 1>me at the sox Machine Underscore Josh and Jim. I

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>believe you are going to be visiting the Bourbenham Barons

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this weekend.

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 9>I will taking the drive down sixty five checking in

0:41:58.200 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 9>on roster.

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 8>It scotten a few twet here and there.

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 9>Good opportunity because I know that when since Salem comes

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 9>later in the month or a middle of the month,

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 9>and then Charlotte comes to Nashville at the end of

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 9>the month, so I should be able to see three

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:12.959
<v Speaker 9>affiliates over the course of July.

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So again, a great reason to file us on social media,

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but also a great reason to subscribe to Soxmachine at

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>soxmachine dot com slash products. Because of your subscriptions, not

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>only does it help keep the lights on at soxsmachine

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com, but it allows us to travel and allows

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>us for that ability to cover the White Sox and

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox Minor League affiliates. So for Jim to

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>go to Birmingham this weekend, next weekend, James will be

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia covering all of the MOB All Star festivities.

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>That only happens with your Guide's subscription. So again, monthly

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>plants start at five dollars. But we still have the sale,

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>right Jim, because they're still above five hundred.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, as long as they have a winning record. It'll

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 9>cost some measure of fifty one to fifty four cents

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:57.959
<v Speaker 9>for your first month.

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so take advantage that fifty four cents your first month,

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>five dollars a month afterwards, and you can help sport

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>socks Machine. The more if you subscribe, the more that

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we can travel, and that will be big as fingers crossed,

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>we can be talking about bigger series later this year.

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:16.760
<v Speaker 5>It is a White Sox inch closer.

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I'm saying this to the postseason in

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty and twenty.

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 5>Six, hopefully to in Jinx the team.

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So again, go to Soxmachine dot com slash products and

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 1>sign up today. The Sox Machine Podcast is a production

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>of soxmachine dot com. You're for all of the things

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Chicago White Sox baseball, alongside James Vegan and Jim Margulus.

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm Josh Nelson. Thanks for listening and watching