WEBVTT - Lending, Jay Powell, Oil, And EVs (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I want to get

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to our next guest, Tim Line. He's the CEO of

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on Terrius Capital. On Terris the folks that are a

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>lender to middle market pe owned company. So it's always

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a good chat with Tim to get a sense of

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with some of these small and mid

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>cap companies out there as they deal with higher inflation, uh,

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the backside of a pandemic, potential recession. Uh. Tim gives

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>us some good thoughts there. Tim, thanks so much for

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. And I'd love just to get kind

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of word of time of flux here. We've got rising inflation,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got rising interest rates, we've got potential for a recession.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>As you talk to some of these smaller and mid

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>sized companies, what are they generally seeing, how are they adapting? Sure?

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, pauling creedy and pleasure to be here. So

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we have almost five hundred middle market portfolio companies, and

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing from them is that demand drivers remain favorable,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Revenue growth is still quite strong, and while there's certainly

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>some inflation concern, our borrowers have managed cost inflation with

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>price increases. The most significant challenge for these portfolio companies

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is navigating this tight, tight labor market. So it's kind

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of how do I retain my best people? Where do

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I find new talent? And this hiring issues impacting almost

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>all industries and it's across all personnel levels. You made

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>a key point. They're offsetting costs with price increases, and

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to your point, it has worked quite well, not just

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>for middle market companies as you're focusing on, but I

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>would like to say broader sp companies as well. But

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how long that can actually last. At what

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>point do price increases become so dicky that it ends

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>up leading to demand destruction. Sure, it's a very good question,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and I would say it's not sustainable. I mean, we've

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen companies in our portfolio implement a ten percent

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>price increase followed by a twelve percent price increase, and

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at some point there's going to be the customers are

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>going to resist and just say I'm not willing to

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>do that. But what's so interesting right now is the

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>customers need the product, so because of all the supply

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>chain disruption, they're willing to pay the extra price to

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>get the product to then be able to meet the

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>demand from their customers. So what I love to just

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>get your sense of a small mid market, MidCap kind

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of M and A activity the last few years. Much

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to my surprise, we're generally very strong despite the pandemic

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and challenges there. Um, what's the M and A activity

0:02:55.400 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this year? Sure, so we did experience a frenzy of activity,

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>one with record deal volume. LBO volume is certainly down

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. But notwithstanding this, what we've seen it's very

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>strong add on acquisition activity in so our private equity

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.399
<v Speaker 1>sponsors are always looking for opportunities to grow their portfolio

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>companies through new services or new product lines. And we

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>really expect this strong add on acquisition activity to continue

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for the remainder of this year and and maybe into

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. But how is that financed? Exactly? How are

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they financed? Is we? So we and other lenders provide

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that financing. So sponsor buys a company, Uh, the deal

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is capitalized with equity and debt, and when they have

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>add on acquisitions, assuming the capital structure is right sized,

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>will be able to provide a financing for those acquisition

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Sans if it's a really large acquisition, the sponsor may

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>need to step up with additional equity as well. So

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the private debt marketplace. It's been

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a area of good growth. That's where you guys play.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about that market in terms of, uh,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, the capital that's available, the rates that you'll lend,

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity in that marketplace. Gives a sense of overall

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>health of that private debt market. Sure, Uh, there's good

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>reason for private debt rapid growth. So the industry has

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated resiliency through numerous second economic cycles over the last

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. If you think about it, for the investor,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>private debt really offers more favorable risk adjusted returns than

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>many other asset classes. Importantly, right now, with the increasing

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>interest grates, it offers an inflation hedge because our loans

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>are floating rate instruments. So you ask, like, what would

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be a rate we've moved from library to sofa, so

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>might be sofur plus five fifty so for plus six

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty um. And we don't really see the current economic

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>environment changing. Private debts appealed for investors. As a matter

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of fact, private debt assets under management are projected to

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>grow at double digit rates over the next five years.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Over the next five years double digit rates, well um,

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>double digit rates per year. Yes, And so where where

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>where does that capital come from? Is that coming from

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>pension funds, endowments, that types of thing exactly so? Uh,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's from all around the world, right, So it's

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pensions, sovereign wealth funds and others looking

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>for they need yield. So they need yield to be

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>able to pay to their pensioneers on a current basis.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And private debt offers that. Uh. It's an attractive product

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>because you're investing in an instrument that provides a current

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>yield and an attractive yield. So it's investors all around

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the world, pension sovereign wealth funds, and dowments, etcetera. All right, Tim,

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>great stuff, Always a fascinating discussion. Tim Line, CEO of

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in Terris Capital, get a good sense when we talked

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to Tim about the state of small you know, midsize,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>M and A out there, not just the big blockbuster

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>deals that are on the Bloomberg terminal every day. We

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>also get a good sense of the private debt market,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>which again is a a growing source of capital for UM.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, companies that are looking for growth capital, private

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>equity firms that are looking for growth capital. You don't

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just need to go to your local bank. The S

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundreds still down almost fourteen percent on

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a year to day basis. And then I looked at

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the foot see one, d are good friends over in

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK It's up one point three pc. I did

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not know that, so I said, we need to check

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in with Tim craig. Hetty's a director of research, senior

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>European strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence and the Pride of Southwest Virginia. Tim,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us. What do you guys get right

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>over there that we're not doing. We're here's a pretty

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>good relative performance for the foot see Paul, thanks for

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>having me on. Look, I think there are a couple

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of things to consider. UM. One is the makeup of

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the foot see. Remember it doesn't have any tech which

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>has gotten tumbled in the US, you know, notwithstanding the

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>bounce that we've had back over the last six weeks. Um,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it's got a big chunk of it is is consumer

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>global brands that are also benefiting from a week pound

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>because they get to translate back strong dollars into the UK.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's got a big chunk of energy with high

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>energy prices, and a big chunk of financials with rising

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, and all this coalesces to a foot. See

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that's doing really well by trading water. Now. The caveat

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the off set is it all depends on your

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>currency reference point. If you look at uh, the S

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred in pounds where I'm sitting, Um,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's down a half a percentum. So you've got to

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>keep that one in mind. Two, give us a sense

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to him just kind of I'd love to just get

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts of kind of what you're seeing and hearing

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>from companies over in Europe. How tough is it and

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>from an economic perspective, and boy, how tough could it

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>be when if you guys really are going to have

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this really challenging winter from an energy perspective, Yeah, well,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>fingers calls for a mild winter, that's for sure. And

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's interesting because you know, inflation being

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the bug bear that it is for all markets right now,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it's different in different places in Europe. Um, the key

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>issue is is energy um in terms of driving inflation,

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's also a key risk factor from the standpoint

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of economic growth. Um. You know our calculations are for

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>rush it does cut off the gas and industry is

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be affected from the standpoint of potential

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>shutdowns in terms of energy consumption. You've got to keep

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>people's houses warm. Um. You could see for example, the

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>docks the main your the main German index with with

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>consensus expectations cut by something on the order of from

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now for two thousand twenty three,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so the profit impact could be quite significant relative to

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.479
<v Speaker 1>what baked in at this point. In Germany is definitely

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the poster child from the standpoint of where the most

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>impact is. And to your point, Tim, as we look

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>at what the docks is doing in particular, the negative

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>correlation between the docks and natural gas prices is just

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>building is getting stronger and stronger. It really shows you

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that even on an inter day basis, you do start

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to see that reaction to the energy prices you're speaking about.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious though about what changes it is the idea

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of a recession kind of this in ability that investors

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of get past to really be foolish

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on Europe again. Um. Yeah, I think that's probably accurate,

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and frankly in ways I think it's true globally. Um,

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, evaluations are mawed down into the low teens.

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at the eurostocks fifty, which is kind of

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>our equivalent of the dal Jones index, right, and it's

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>now at eleven times forward earnings. You know, the SMP

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting it eighteen and change. So evaluation is such where

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot is already baked in from the standpoint of

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the expectations of risk. Um. I think the biggest issue

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is when do we see peak inflation and you know,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the peak in monetary policy tightening and the bad news

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue in terms of economic growth for

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a while. But when we when we sense that we're

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at that inflection that we don't see it yet, Um,

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that's when you can start to think ahead from the

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of when valuation will be more important. Right now,

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we think earnings for the rest of the year are

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be the big thing, and we see earnings

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>risk right now. So as sloppy market outlook. Tim Marcus

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Ashworth from Bloomberg Opinion based in London, we have him

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>on pretty often. He is not afraid to show his

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>disdain for the e c B UM and its approach. Here,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what's the market feel like in terms of or what's

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the market discounting in terms of the ECB and its

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>ability to flight to fight inflation going forward? Yeah, it's

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a good question, Paul. And you know Marcus

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>has some degree views central banks regardless of where they

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>are there between a rock and hart rock and a

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>hard place. They can't ease the energy crisis by um

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>by supplying more oil um. The only thing they can

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>do is accelerate or decelerate economic growth. And so it's

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the best an indirect um sworks tool. And you know,

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe they are late to the game. We can talk

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about that all day long. But if they want to

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on what's going on with inflation, they're

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>only option is to slow economic growth by raising interest rates.

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And lord knows whether they're late to it or not.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>That's where they're headed now, and they seem the beginning

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>all that bus um, and certainly the b o E

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is and it's here in England, and obviously the FED

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is more here and more on this. As you guys

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>said at Jackson Home, Tim, give us a sense. So

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you've been in London now a long time. I mean

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you're born and raised in southwestern Virginia. But you in

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>your career on Wall Street and at Bloomberg, you've been

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. You run business businesses for Bloomberg

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong and New York and now London. What's

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>it like in in England these days? In the UK?

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>How are consumers feeling? Um? You know? And I guess

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>there's this I'm sure there's this tremendous concern about energy security,

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>come come this win. But how's the consumer over there

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and Europe? Um? You know, it's an

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting sort of juxtaposition. Um. If I go to the

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>local restaurants, there's plenty of people there. There's still crowds

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>in the pubs, you know, Lord knows. On the nice

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>sunny afternoon, especially a Wednesday or Thursday, Thursday now being

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the new Friday, you know, the pubs are packed outside

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as you know we do here. Um. And if you

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the Regent Street, Um, there's plenty of activity. Um.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>That said, UM, you know, that's only one element. And

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly there's an awful lot of press reports about especially

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>those on lower income. They are really struggling. And so

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a real dichotomy right now. But

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>boots on the ground, actually things feel pretty normal. Retail

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sales look pretty good. Yep, yep, good stuff, all right.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Tim craig Head always appreciate the euro perspective from Tim. Uh.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim's based in London for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's a director

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of Research, senior strategist over there. He's been on the

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street for well over thirty years. Goldman Sachs, Bloomberg

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Wealth of Experience. We appreciate getting some of his time

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>from London later this week. Uh, some economic nerds are

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get together Jackson Hall, Wyoming. I've been there. It's beautiful,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you can do fly fishing, you can see all these

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>crazy animals that you'd never see. Bison elk I mean,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean bison are huge. Um. Any who they're gonna

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>get together, I'm not really sure what they're gonna do.

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But our next guest can help us figure that out.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Janelle Marte, economics and Federal Reserve reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Joannelle, we're sending out Michael McKee, Bloomberg's Economic School.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna send out the surveillance team, Uh, Tom, John

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa out to Jackson Hole. Can you tell us

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and tell me and our listeners what is this Jackson

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Hole get together? Who goes and what do they do

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and what's the purpose? So, as you said, it's a

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>big deal, especially for economic nerds. Um. They go out

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy nature, but also to talk about what's happening

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, and not just here but globally. And

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's often a chance or a good place for fat

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>officials or fat presidents too. You know, they'll they usually

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>use it like as a chance to unveil some big

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>policy change. Um. But this year, I think what people

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>are looking for is any guidance from the Fed as

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to when they might slow rate increases or if they're

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>planning to do so on any your term, you know, Janelle,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so funny that Paul Sweeney creeps calling

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>them nerds and clearly in school. But I mean they're

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the smart folks. That's put it that way. They are

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the smart folks, Janelle, I'm curious about how much of

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this could be anticlimatic. To some extent, it almost seems like,

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>at least this week for the markets, a lot of

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be in wait and see mode

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to see if indeed Chairman Powell and by ascension, the

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve is as hawkish as the market is expecting

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens if this becomes a huge nothing burger. I mean,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>listen anytime that power speaks, especially when he speaks at

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hall, everyone is, everyone listens, right. Last year he

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>made a big speech trying to defend the idea that

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation was going to be transitory. Of course, he's since

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>canceled that word and said, um, inflation is here, we

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>need to get it, get it under control. So when

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he speaks on on Friday morning, everyone everyone's going to

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>be listening to just to hear what he has to say,

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially given what he said last year. Um,

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, maybe we won't get a big signal. I mean,

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not very likely to give us a hand as

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to what they're going to do exactly in September, for example,

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's already said they're moving away from that specific

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for guidance. They're not going to tell us they're going

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it meeting by meeting. Um, However, you know

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>if he if he's end the message that you know

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>apparently you know from the from the July meeting, the

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>takeaway that a lot of investors um grabbed was that

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fed what might soon slow down the pace of

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>rat increases, and officials have really pushed back against that. So, UM,

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if he sends like a really clear message now,

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, he might not, but certainly that is

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>what people are looking for. You know, based on your reporting,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the consensus here about recession? Are we in one?

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to get into one? If so this year,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>next year? How deep? What are you? What are you

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>hearing and seeing? So I would say that there is

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>no consensus. We're in a really unique and challenging time

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in that, you know, some economic data is pointing to

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a slow down, as we've seen the GDP numbers, but

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>then we have some really strong indicators like what happened

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with jobs, for example, where we saw twice as many

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>jobs I did last month as anticipated. So you know,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I think FED officials are looking at this trying to

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. There are some people saying that we

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.239
<v Speaker 1>might actually see GDP revised upward later and that that

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>might help to close the gap. But really people are

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>just waiting to see and figure it and figure it out.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that as we learn more that that's

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going to inform policymakers as to what the what

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the eventually end up doing with rates, Because you know,

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>economic data is not perfect. It is often revised. Some

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>people have some officials have already blamed that as to

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>why they were a little bit slow to respond into

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>or twenty one rather as inflation continued to soar and

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>so um. I think we'll just have to continue to

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the data and see how all the pieces

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>fall into place, do you know, on the market scale.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>And one of the big conversations and markets has been

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is constantly behind the curve and has

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>been for years. I'm curious though, if they have actually

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>caught up around the cusp of doing so, given that

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we've now had to seventy five bases point hikes and

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty and before that as well, So how much further

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>do they have to go before they can say, well,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is now on top of things. Really good

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>point there. The Fed was behind the curve earlier. They've

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>said so themselves. But at this point, I mean, they've

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>really aggressively raised interest rates and they're at a point

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>now where the rates might be considered neutral, which is

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>an area that people are not really sure where that is.

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But the point being that they've said they're not going

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to move into restrictive so continuing to increase rates to

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the point where that is intentionally meant to slow economic

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>growth and cool demand and bring prices, bring price gains down,

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>bring inflation down. So they've said where they're going, you

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>know where that endpoint is. It's hard to you know,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't know themselves. They're trying to engauge clues or

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>get clues from what happens with inflation and what happens

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with the economy. But we the level of tightening that

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the past few months is really the

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>highest that we've seen in decades from the FAD. So

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>um they're they're they're taking strong action. Uh they are,

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and will certainly pay attention to the news coming out

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of Jackson Hole later this week. Friday is kind of

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the big day. Uh. And again the surveillance team will

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>have full coverage from Jackson Hole. Why. I'm sure they're

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a really cool set up out there, uh,

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of nowhere, but it is beautiful out there.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Janelle Marte, Economics and Federal Reserve reporter from Blueberg News

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>joints us with some calls there. On the economy. You know,

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had oil really pulling back, you know, over the

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>last several months. We hit one twenty on w T

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I crued several months back, and then we got down

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>here below ninety. A little bit of a spike here today,

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a three percent. I want just to get a sense

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of kind of where the short term trends are. I'm

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>really digging this. Blow four dollars or barrel or four

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars a gallant gasoline. Um, We'll get a sense where

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the short term trends are and the longer term trends.

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>To do that, we check the with the Fernando Valley,

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>senior analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Fernando, I guess the news

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>today is maybe OPEC will be cutting production what do

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you what do you make of the news seeing today

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and Paul, I think it's a very interesting indication of

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>where they see the band over the next couple of months.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, our concern has always been that

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED tightening would lead to pain in the emerging markets,

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's something that we're starting to see

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of emerging markets struggling with a strong dollar,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with rising food and energy inflation and and low and behold. Uh,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing some over supply, especially with China being slower

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to buy some buy crude. And we talked about previously

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about how China I was having issues with lockdowns and

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>how that could impact their purchasing and we're starting to

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>see that. And you know, the physical market can be

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>very different from the financial market, and they're starting to

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>see some lag on the Asian side, even though on

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the on the U S side still zee, excuse me,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a very tight market, Fernando. One of the arguments that

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I believe is how the energy MR had made was

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that liquidity is an issue that there's so many people

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>who had hopped into the commodities market. I mean, we

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about all the time oil as this big macro

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>heade from investors who usually don't actually trade oil or

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>trade commodities. I'm curious how much of that is skewing

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers and skewing the price action. Absolutely, and that's

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>why we saw in biatigoing negative. It's a lot of

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>financial UH speculators and the true definition of the word

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that they don't actually want to take the physical barrels,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and they can skew that market. UH. The way that

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we tend to look at it is the difference between

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the crude grades themselves and Brent, Brent being the global benchmark,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and when we see those differentials getting very narrow, it

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>typically means that they are competing and there's less of

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a UH. There's a lot less competition between the crude

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>sellers and not so much between the crude buyers and

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the opposing is true. So while in the beginning of

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the summer you're seeing the differentials widely significantly, now there's

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to narrow, especially in Asia, again a sign

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that the activity there is is slower than expected. Fernando Gasoline,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we're down below three dollars and ninety cents a gallon.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Good news for the average consumer. It's like getting a

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of a tax break, if you will. What's driving

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that is, is more refining capacity coming online, or is

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>demand just kind of fading a little bit in the

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>face of that some of that higher prices we saw earlier,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what's the latter. For sure, we are both passed the

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>peak demand for the northern hemisphere, so that helps. But

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>we also saw weaker demand UH in two then we

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>did in twenty one, and and even UH compared to

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>were still below five to six percent below those levels.

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>But the other part that helps UH is that we're

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>actually seeing a bifurcation between gasoline and diesel. Diesel margins

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>are fifty seven dollars a barrel, while gasling is a

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, And because the refiners are chasing diesel, they're

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>over supplying gasoline. So that's helping bring the gasoline margin

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>down significantly, while diesel remains very high and we expect

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>will continue to go higher, especially as we head towards winter.

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll stick to the subject of spreads in particular. Point

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>of this out earlier in the show. We're looking at

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>front crewed with handle w t I with a nine

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>three handle. That's a spread of about six dollars and change.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>What does that tell you six dollars if I'm not wrong,

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 1>correct me if I am Fernando, it's historically high when

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to that spread, right, absolutely. Uh. It tells

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>me that the spr releases are having that impact because

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, w T I is priced in Cushing and

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to we are continuing to sell more and

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>more crude out of Cushing as opposed to Brent that

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is slightly more UM, so we're basically discounting it for

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the transportation costs to take it to foreign markets. So

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's basically showing us that we are exporting significant portions

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of that Cushing Uh, that Cushing release to oversee markets.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>How are things down into Permian? Those boys down they're

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>still making money, they are. It's certainly and you know

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not just scrude. Natural gas liquids propane utane are

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>are rising very significantly. Natural gas prices as well, very high,

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so they are starting to make money. It's actually been

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed for what we call refracts, when you go back

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>into an old well and you redo the fracking process

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so that you can get more production out of it.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>So we're starting to see are you rising in those

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>refracts um to help produce producing, and that helps bypass

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest issues, which is continuing to drill

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>wells and continue to have to have the the the

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the the drilling rigs and the other portions that are

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.239
<v Speaker 1>more supplied constraint. I think I'm going to go down

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, drill a couple of holes in the ground,

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>put some wells in there, and see what I can do.

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they gotta oil just ripping here back above ninety.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I could do that for now. Of Vale

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Senior Analyst or Bloomberg Intelligence, he does it for a living.

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>He covers all things energy. He's been doing it for

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of decades, and he is one of our

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>go to voices when we get a sense of global oil,

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>global energy. All right, let's switch to I'm gonna talk

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles because I actually drove an electric vehicle. I

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>had a first couple of first month or so ago.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I drove my first pickup truck ever and drove my

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>first electric vehicle ever, the Ford F one fifty Lightning. Uh.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>They were kind enough to loan me for a few

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>days and it was awesome. So I was really skeptical

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 1>about that. Totally, totally, I mean everything. It was just

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>an awesome vehicle and the electric uh, the EV technology

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was pretty cool. Same of course, he's associate associate portfolio

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>management Analysts at ARC Investment Management. That good folks ark

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>they have some passing interest in the EV market here, Sam,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I love to get your thoughts here on the EV

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>market as it relates to the competitive landscape because our

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>good friends at Tesla had had essentially had the market

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to themselves for a long time, and and wow, what

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>an amazing job Elon Musk and the Tesla folks have

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>done and effectively creating and commercializing this market. But now

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you got the Ford f one fifty, you got Volkswagen

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>go on all Electric, got porschego on Electric. Talk to

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>us about how you guys think about this can petitive

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>landscape for electric vehicles? Absolutely, And you know, I think,

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>as you're saying f one fifty electric, I'm sure once

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you drive that you're not going back to the internal

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>combustion engine. So I think really the first place to

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>start is what are the competitive dynamics. The competitive dynamics

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>are that the internal combustion engine is losing out big time.

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're just looking in the first half of two,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engine vehicles sales down eighteen point four, battery

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles up. So the share games are tremendous for

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>electric UH. And then when you look into the actual

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>UH players, who are who are investing in this, you know,

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that's where things we think start to get interesting. It's

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a growing pie, so they're not necessarily competing with one another, UM.

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>But what we what we're looking at for the future

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is who's investing in battery capacity. That's very important UM

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and really looking to see who's putting the money where

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>their mouth is. I think one of the the classic

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>arguments we've heard over time were these large traditional automakers,

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>when they decide to go electric, they're going to crush

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>any of the startups. But then when we when we

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, the actual cafex and what these

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>companies are planning. You have forward planning seven to eight

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars a year in cafex UH, and that's combined

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for internal combustion and electric. You have GM in the

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>nine billion range. Again that's a combination of traditional gas

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>powered vehicles and electric. And then you have Tesla in

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there with seven to ten billion dollars and Cafex over

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the next few years. So you have Tesla who's now

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>competing with UH the incumbents, and we actually forecast that

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna outspend them by sgnificant degree and that's really

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>going to allow them to keep market share going forward.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for the challenges when it comes

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to scaling and producing in bulk? How does the likes

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla Rivian deal with that? Yeah, scaling is it's

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult problem. And I think the electric vehicle

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>industry is in a great position as a whole where

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they do seem to be supply constrained. So it's good

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that they actually have the demand there and so looking

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to scale, um, you have the production side, which is

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>quite difficult UH. And this is actually where we think,

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, China has UH an advantage here when we

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the speed at which these Chinese companies are

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>able to scale production and even Tesla in China right

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>going from start of construction to a million vehicles produced

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in three and a half years is is pretty heard

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of in the auto industry. And then when we look

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>further down the line beyond just you know, the scale

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>zero to one, you know, no cars produced to one

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>car produced, uh, than getting up to the hundreds of thousands.

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>We start to look into the raw materials UH. And

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.479
<v Speaker 1>this is I think where we've seen a lot of

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>concern is saying, Okay, now that people are more convinced

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have an electric vehicle future, where do

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.479
<v Speaker 1>we get all of the raw materials for this? And

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the good news is is that, ah, the raw materials

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>exist right there, They're out there in the earth. UM.

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>The challenging part is going to be the processing of

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>these raw materials UH into what can be used in

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>battery packs for electric vehicles. And we're seeing incredible investment

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on this front as well, and we're even seeing a

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>shift in the bad mattery chemistry is being used to

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>help offset some of these bottlenecks. So a great example

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is if we went back, you know, three to four years,

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone was extremely concerned about cobalts and saying, you know,

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>cobalt is incredibly difficult and there's you know, big human

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>rights implications in cobalt mine. And the battery industry is

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>shifted from using battery chemistry that was equal parts nickel

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>magnese and cobalt to a new chemistry that had almost

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>no cobalts in it. And then there was another constraint

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on nickel. And you know you heard Elon Musk on

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the earnings call saying if you can, if you can mind,

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>nickel will buy it. And now we're seeing a shift

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>from batteries that are extremely nickel dense two batteries that

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>have no nickel at all. So it's a combination of

0:32:54.560 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>supply ramping up and the actual battery manufacturers and vehicle

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers shifting to different chemistries to avoid those bottlenecks. All right, Sam,

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>good stuff, good overview of the e V space there. Sam, course,

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he's associate portfolio manager and analyst at ARC Investment Management

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and ARC. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple podcasts

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three and on Ball Sweeney

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio