Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: Welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. We have good
Speaker 1: news today. I know it's tough to allow yourself even
Speaker 1: to believe it at this point. We've been through so
Speaker 1: much bad news recently. The countries in the grip of
Speaker 1: this pandemic. We have more cases, more deaths in a day,
Speaker 1: in a month than we've ever had before. And we
Speaker 1: also have an election result that continues to be outrageous
Speaker 1: and frustrating and rage inducing a result so far at least,
Speaker 1: and I know the Electoral College is meeting today, so
Speaker 1: there's a lot that we have to just grit our
Speaker 1: teeth for. But there is this vaccine that is out
Speaker 1: there and it is on the move, and we should
Speaker 1: all be very very pleased about this, about this, it
Speaker 1: will be the beginning of the end of at least
Speaker 1: this wave of tyranny. I don't want to overstate this.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of people who see what has
Speaker 1: happened to this country, who see how easily cowed the
Speaker 1: US population is, and they think that this can be
Speaker 1: replicated that this can be copied for other issues, other
Speaker 1: policy areas and concerns. They're not going to give up.
Speaker 1: In fact, they view this as the playbook going forward
Speaker 1: on a whole host of issues. But let's just at
Speaker 1: least look at the vaccine right now. I still remember
Speaker 1: in February being on the Bill Marshaw on HBO and
Speaker 1: being sneered at his stat laughed at because they said,
Speaker 1: Trump is saying that the vaccine is going to be
Speaker 1: delivered in record speed. And I said, well, they are
Speaker 1: planning to deliver it in record speed. That is the plant. Oh,
Speaker 1: you're so ridiculous. Trump will never do it. Well, it
Speaker 1: wasn't just then and there. We've seen countless other examples
Speaker 1: of people, especially when you get back into April, May
Speaker 1: and June time period, where they were laughing at Trump
Speaker 1: for suggesting that operation Warp Speed. They thought the name
Speaker 1: was ridiculous. He'd never be able to pull this off.
Speaker 1: He's not good enough, he's not smart enough, and gosh
Speaker 1: darnat people don't like him. That's what they were saying.
Speaker 1: I mean, that was the the whole laugh line. They
Speaker 1: had fact checkers, even they had fact checkers who jumped
Speaker 1: in on this one. To NBC News fact check from
Speaker 1: May fifteenth, coronavirus vaccine could come this year, Trump says.
Speaker 1: Experts say he needs a quote miracle to be right. Well,
Speaker 1: it looks like Trump delivered a miracle because vaccines are
Speaker 1: going into people's arms in this country today. Less than
Speaker 1: one year research to vile, research to vaccination. They're actually
Speaker 1: doing it. They're getting it done. And there's a lot
Speaker 1: of credit the administration should get for this, but there's
Speaker 1: not really a focus on it. Of course, they don't
Speaker 1: really care to have anybody really come forward from the
Speaker 1: administration and say, hey, all of our critics were wrong.
Speaker 1: That's not good. The media is not going to spend
Speaker 1: any time on that. By their own admission, this is
Speaker 1: a miracle. That's what they told us. By their own admission,
Speaker 1: this is a miracle. And so then we have to
Speaker 1: ask what does it mean going forward? What is the
Speaker 1: reality of this? Now there's a tremendously complicated system here
Speaker 1: to get this vaccine out. I read I read about
Speaker 1: it over the weekend, and it's pretty incredible. I mean,
Speaker 1: this was written in the Wall Street Journal. The journey
Speaker 1: starts in a factory just outside Saint Louis, where fires
Speaker 1: are scientists make the raw materials though the backbone of vaccine.
Speaker 1: Those materials move on to and over Massachusetts, where researchers
Speaker 1: turn them into mr NA, molecular courriers that deliver genetic
Speaker 1: instructions to the body. The mr NA is dispatched to Michigan,
Speaker 1: where machines the size of single car garages envelop them
Speaker 1: with lipid nanoparticles, microscopic vessels used to deliver genetic material
Speaker 1: into the body. Making doses takes about a week and
Speaker 1: batches sit for about two weeks before being shipped. The
Speaker 1: vaccine is transported in glass vials strong enough to withstand
Speaker 1: transit and these subarctic temperatures in which the liquid must
Speaker 1: be stored. Trays carrying one hundred ninety five vials are
Speaker 1: packed with dry ice and suitcases or suitcase like boxes
Speaker 1: weighing eighty pounds. Those vaccines eventually are diluted with enough
Speaker 1: saline solution to make nine hundred and seventy five doses.
Speaker 1: So this is a complicated process, and this is the
Speaker 1: most ambitious vaccination effort the world has ever seen. This
Speaker 1: is remarkable, It is a tremendous scientific achievement and I
Speaker 1: think that it's a shame that we have such a
Speaker 1: focus on other things right now, and there's so much
Speaker 1: partisanship that there isn't any willingness in the media to
Speaker 1: credit and administration, even if they believe it is now
Speaker 1: the outgoing administration. Even though the Electoral College is meeting
Speaker 1: today and has certified will certify Joe Biden in these
Speaker 1: states as the winner. The fact is that the Trump
Speaker 1: team did pull off something of a miracle, and it
Speaker 1: had nothing but doubters and challengers and haters all along
Speaker 1: the way. That's what was really going on here in
Speaker 1: the media I'm talking about now. I mean, all the
Speaker 1: fact checks all they'll never get this done. They're lying
Speaker 1: about this. So this is a victory that we should
Speaker 1: all celebrate. But I know it's hard to be in
Speaker 1: any kind of a celebratory mood because of what's going
Speaker 1: on in the country. And this is going to take
Speaker 1: This is going to take time. In a sense, this
Speaker 1: is like the invasion at Normandy. This is the D
Speaker 1: Day landing of our fight against this vaccine. Remember, after
Speaker 1: D Day, there was still a lot of fighting left
Speaker 1: to do, and there's a lot of people that lost
Speaker 1: their lives that's where we are right now. We've got
Speaker 1: our feet on the shore at Omaha Beach. We got
Speaker 1: our feet ready to go here. But this is going
Speaker 1: to take ninety days before we really feel a massive
Speaker 1: effect from this. Maybe sixty days, but something along, something
Speaker 1: along those lines. And I think everybody should be prepared
Speaker 1: for a very challenging December and January. We all know that.
Speaker 1: But along with this vaccine Asian process, which I just
Speaker 1: I know it's about so much here and it's not
Speaker 1: really it shouldn't be a political issue. But the Trump
Speaker 1: team deserves an enormous wave of thanks. You know, the
Speaker 1: people that hate science so much, right, that's what they
Speaker 1: always say, Trump and his advisors they don't believe the science.
Speaker 1: Well somehow they have helped bring it to being a
Speaker 1: scientific miracle through Operation warp speed of getting this vaccine
Speaker 1: out to people. But while we're distributing this and trying
Speaker 1: to get our lives back, trying to get our society back,
Speaker 1: we should understand that there are those who believe that
Speaker 1: these lockdowns and these restrictions on us should continue long
Speaker 1: after the vaccine reaches a critical massive distribution. Now this
Speaker 1: is our new normal going forward, that it's completely necessary,
Speaker 1: not even acceptable. It is necessary to have all of
Speaker 1: these lockdowns despite all the data you could point to
Speaker 1: to show that lockdowns are certainly insufficient on their own,
Speaker 1: and many would even challenge whether they are beneficial when
Speaker 1: you look at the costs versus the actual benefits of it.
Speaker 1: Bill Gates, who, I don't know why we have to
Speaker 1: listen to this guy outside of how to build a microprocessor.
Speaker 1: I really don't, but we do because because he's really
Speaker 1: Really rich people and really famous people are treated like
Speaker 1: they know things in this country. They're treated like their
Speaker 1: experts and whatever they feel like talking about, which is
Speaker 1: a shame because they're not. But Bill Gates, who is
Speaker 1: worth I don't know, over one hundred billion dollars, some
Speaker 1: absolutely astronomical and crazy number. He wants everyone to know
Speaker 1: that their bars, their restaurants should be closed. Down play
Speaker 1: too well. Certainly, mask wearing has essentially no downside. They're
Speaker 1: not expensive. Bars and restaurants in also the country will
Speaker 1: be closed as we go into this way, and I
Speaker 1: think sadly that's appropriate, depending on how severe it is.
Speaker 1: The decision about schools is much more complicated because they're
Speaker 1: you know, the benefits are pretty high. The amount of
Speaker 1: transmission is not the same as in restaurants and bars,
Speaker 1: so you know trade offs will have to be made.
Speaker 1: But this, the next four to six months, really call
Speaker 1: on us to do our best because we can see
Speaker 1: that this will end and you don't want, you know,
Speaker 1: somebody you love to be the last to die of coronavirus.
Speaker 1: Notice that he won't tell you what the data really
Speaker 1: says about schools. Schools are complicated. That's the only concession
Speaker 1: that Bill Gates will make. Your school closers are They're
Speaker 1: not complicated. School closers are dumb. They're not supported by
Speaker 1: the science. It's absolutely not worth it to close down schools.
Speaker 1: And everybody who was advocating for that at any point
Speaker 1: during this pandemic was wrong. They were wrong. There's not
Speaker 1: a debate on this. They were wrong. We have the data,
Speaker 1: we've run the experiment, we have the numbers. Why won't
Speaker 1: he say that? Why is this guy so obsessed with
Speaker 1: controlling so many people? And also his comment about masks,
Speaker 1: I completely reject Masks are limiting your ability to breathe freely,
Speaker 1: whether you want them or not. I'll put that aside
Speaker 1: for a second. Let's not pretend that it's no big deal.
Speaker 1: It's very annoying. It's a restriction of your most basic freedom,
Speaker 1: the right to breathe free fresh air, more basic than
Speaker 1: anything he even written the Constitution. Are you allowed to breathe?
Speaker 1: Kind of? You breathe the way we say you breathe
Speaker 1: uncomfortably through what we tell you have to breathe through.
Speaker 1: This is moronic. Oh, there's no cost associated with this whatsoever.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a totalitarianism that goes beyond even
Speaker 1: the kind of stuff you see in North Korea. You
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to breathe the way you want to breath.
Speaker 1: Why is that? Oh, because it's so effective at preventing
Speaker 1: That's why we have all these mask mandates all across
Speaker 1: the country and cities and states. And what exactly is
Speaker 1: it done to flatten the curve? I ask you that
Speaker 1: what has it done to flatten the curve? Nothing? They
Speaker 1: won't admit that, they won't say that. They just pretend
Speaker 1: that we can't. This is all the Emperor's new clothes, friends,
Speaker 1: it's the Emperor's new mask. You're not allowed to look
Speaker 1: at what's going on and say, well, maybe it works,
Speaker 1: maybe it doesn't. You know how well it works. Whatever
Speaker 1: we can get into all that doesn't Does a government
Speaker 1: mandate mean anything? No, it does not. It does not help.
Speaker 1: Look at all the charts, look at all the graphs.
Speaker 1: I know I'm like a treated like a lunatic on
Speaker 1: this by the mainstream, But they're wrong. I was right
Speaker 1: about schools. They were wrong about schools. Do you think
Speaker 1: they admit that. Do you think it makes any of
Speaker 1: them think, well, maybe maybe we've exaggerated the intelligence of
Speaker 1: Saint Fauci here, and maybe we should rethink some of
Speaker 1: these policies. They will not do that. And I'm here
Speaker 1: to tell you that while the vaccine is good news
Speaker 1: and it is getting distributed to that certainly is cause
Speaker 1: for celebration, or at least it's encouraging, right. I mean,
Speaker 1: maybe we're not a celebratory move, but it is encouraging.
Speaker 1: The Bill Gates is the globalists, the lockdowners, the authoritarians,
Speaker 1: the left. They want this to continue for I've been
Speaker 1: saying until next fall, but pretty much for another year.
Speaker 1: They want another year of you complying doing whatever they say.
Speaker 1: They want another year of this play one. When do
Speaker 1: you think life will fully return to what we thought
Speaker 1: of as normal back in January, no masks, no social distancing,
Speaker 1: no other protective measures necessary. Certainly by the summer will
Speaker 1: be way closer to normal than we are now. But
Speaker 1: even through early twenty twenty two, unless we help other
Speaker 1: countries get rid of this ease and we get high
Speaker 1: vaccination rates in our country, the risk of reintroduction will
Speaker 1: be there. And of course the global economy will be
Speaker 1: slowed down, which hurts America economically in a pretty dramatic way.
Speaker 1: So we'll have starting in the summer, about nine months
Speaker 1: where a few things like big public gatherings will still
Speaker 1: be restricted. But you know, we can see now that
Speaker 1: somewhere between twelve to eighteen months, and we have a
Speaker 1: chance if we manage it well to get back to normal.
Speaker 1: Why do we have to manage it well to get
Speaker 1: back to normal? I just want to know what he thinks.
Speaker 1: What the logic is there. We're going to get everyone
Speaker 1: vaccinated and then they're going to be at hurt immunity.
Speaker 1: That's what's going to happen, or manage it. Oh so
Speaker 1: if we don't manage it well, we never get back
Speaker 1: to normal. You'll notice they hold this out there. There
Speaker 1: is this thought they have. Maybe we keep this in
Speaker 1: the back pocket. Maybe we use this whenever we want
Speaker 1: to get people to bend the knee. Oh, COVID could
Speaker 1: come back. Oh it's in forward countries. A lockdowns here,
Speaker 1: your business shutdown here, do what we say. There is
Speaker 1: a mass psychological conditioning here that you are a surf,
Speaker 1: that you do what the state tells you to do,
Speaker 1: and it will continue until you tell them no, I
Speaker 1: will not comply. And we have not reached enough of
Speaker 1: that mentality in this country yet. And it's a sad thing.
Speaker 1: It's a sad thing. I used to think we were
Speaker 1: a free people that valued our liberty. Only some of
Speaker 1: us are a lot of us just want to be
Speaker 1: safe and warm and fed, and nothing else matters to them.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bucksexton Show podcast. Get the
Speaker 1: latest news and information from Buck by heading to Bucksexton
Speaker 1: dot com. If I wasn't president, according to almost everybody,
Speaker 1: even the enemy, if I wasn't president, you wouldn't have
Speaker 1: a vaccine for five years. Okay. I pushed the FDA
Speaker 1: and companies that everybody else involved, like nobody's ever been
Speaker 1: pushed before, And now you have it rolling out and Frankly,
Speaker 1: they could have done it last week. They could have
Speaker 1: even done it a week sooner, and they heard from me.
Speaker 1: But this has been a great, a really medical mirror,
Speaker 1: and they call it a medical miracle, and it's going
Speaker 1: to have a tremendous impact. Ninety five percent effective. We
Speaker 1: have Moderner coming out next week. Very soon, we have
Speaker 1: Johnson and Johnson Are one Shot vaccine coming out, all
Speaker 1: great company, five percent effective, a medical miracle. Are you
Speaker 1: seeing a lot of news coverage of all that encouraging
Speaker 1: stuff right now? No, you're not, are you. It's almost
Speaker 1: like they don't want to talk about it. They'll talk
Speaker 1: about the vaccine, but they won't talk about the administration's
Speaker 1: role in helping the vaccine get out there. So you
Speaker 1: have this ICU nurse in New York who is among
Speaker 1: the very first to get the Fizer shot. Right, that's
Speaker 1: Whatever's that's what they're talking about. I don't see anything
Speaker 1: about Operation warp Speed. I don't see anything about the
Speaker 1: Trump administration's unprecedented program to get this thing out there.
Speaker 1: And let me also say that the politics around who
Speaker 1: gets the vaccine and when are going to start to
Speaker 1: get very nasty here right now. There's a novelty to
Speaker 1: all this. Right now, there's a sense of, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: look the vaccine. Give it three or four weeks, and
Speaker 1: some people are going to be walking around feeling just fine.
Speaker 1: Some people are gonna walking around with no problem because
Speaker 1: they know they're almost certain to be protected from a
Speaker 1: possible exposure to COVID nineteen. And a lot of other
Speaker 1: people will be walking around saying when more likely actually
Speaker 1: stuck at home by themselves saying when do I get
Speaker 1: this thing? And you can already hear there are a
Speaker 1: lot of people that are clamoring to put this out
Speaker 1: there along along social justice lines. They say that some
Speaker 1: groups are disperately affected by this, so they want them
Speaker 1: to get it first by age. That certainly makes sense
Speaker 1: based on all of the data, but there are plenty
Speaker 1: of people who you'd look at, you'd say, well, it's
Speaker 1: more about individual living condition or in a crowded area
Speaker 1: in urban area. It should not be about superficial characteristics
Speaker 1: that have nothing to do with your actual risk of
Speaker 1: getting COVID and having a severe case of it. The
Speaker 1: politics around that are going to get very very tricky
Speaker 1: here in the weeks ahead, because there are people who
Speaker 1: are going to get COVID in the next sixty days,
Speaker 1: who don't make it, who would have made it if
Speaker 1: they've gotten a vaccine. And as that dawns on more
Speaker 1: and more people, you can imagine it's going to become
Speaker 1: even more intense. And let's just hope the supply chains
Speaker 1: and everything hold up and that there's no big problems
Speaker 1: with the distribution of this vaccine. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from more buck
Speaker 1: Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to
Speaker 1: the podcast. I just want to deal in fact because
Speaker 1: there is so much speculation out there and there is
Speaker 1: zero evidence that Hunter Biden or Joe Biden did anything wrong.
Speaker 1: Here we should note again you and I've said this
Speaker 1: in the rom any time, there is no evidence that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was, you know, involved in any wrong to
Speaker 1: do it. Of course, I want to note that there
Speaker 1: is no evidence that Joe Biden or Hunter Biden has
Speaker 1: done anything wrong. I just want to reiterate, and let's
Speaker 1: be clear for the viewers. There is no evidence Biden
Speaker 1: did anything wrong. I'll note again because it's important, there
Speaker 1: is no I repeat no, there is no evidence that
Speaker 1: either Biden did anything illegal. There has been no evidence,
Speaker 1: there was no evidence, there's no evidence, there is no evidence.
Speaker 1: There's not an iota of evidenced anything wrong. There's really
Speaker 1: no evidence that Joe Biden did anything wrong. If nobody's
Speaker 1: every accused that, I mean, there's no evidence whatsoever that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden did anything wrong. Got that Joe Biden did
Speaker 1: nothing wrong. Hunter Biden did nothing wrong. Right, they're delusional
Speaker 1: and they're a bunch of liars. But what a what
Speaker 1: a symphony of frauds. Wasn't that amazing. Here's a story
Speaker 1: today on foxnews dot com. New emails appear to show
Speaker 1: a Hunter Biden failed to report four hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: in income from a shady Ukrainian firm. There's no evidence
Speaker 1: he did anything wrong, no evidence he did anything wrong.
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is the most pure and decent man imaginable. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the guy that got the stripper pregnant, pretended he wasn't
Speaker 1: the dad afterwards, and he got kicked out of the
Speaker 1: Navy for doing coke or meth or whatever. It was.
Speaker 1: Great guy, great guy. Oh yeah, Hunter Biden, he's you
Speaker 1: can you can take Hunters word to the bank. Really
Speaker 1: trust really trustworthy fellow. The media is disgusting. The media
Speaker 1: is a disgrace. You know it. I know it, and
Speaker 1: I think it's important that we all understand and that
Speaker 1: they're not going to change. In fact, they're just going
Speaker 1: to become more aggressive under a Biden presidency. They're going
Speaker 1: to stifle this end. They're not going to try to
Speaker 1: win the argument anymore. They're going to prevent you from
Speaker 1: being able to make an argument. They're gonna try to
Speaker 1: shut down people like me who will beat them in
Speaker 1: the argument. They won't allow it. That's going to be
Speaker 1: the game. It's not. It's not oh, may the best,
Speaker 1: may the best pundit or news channel or show or
Speaker 1: whatever win. It's going to be no, No, we're on air,
Speaker 1: you're not because the people that control the plugs and
Speaker 1: the switches and the you know, the Internet and the
Speaker 1: cable channels, they're not letting you on. That's the game
Speaker 1: they plan on playing, full on censorship. They talked about
Speaker 1: state medi against Trump. They're a bunch of morons. There's
Speaker 1: no state media when ninety five percent of the media
Speaker 1: opposes the sitting president. But notice that they in a sense,
Speaker 1: and I know this is not comforting to hear. But
Speaker 1: they were successful in their lives. They were successful in
Speaker 1: what they were trying to achieve here, preventing us from
Speaker 1: figuring out what really happened, at least in time for
Speaker 1: the election. That's what mattered. It was all about when
Speaker 1: this would break. It was all about who and who
Speaker 1: would find out about this? At what point would they
Speaker 1: find out about this? Right? And Hunter Biden was able
Speaker 1: to count on the media to give him the kind
Speaker 1: of the kind of unbelievable, unbelievable protection from the mainstream
Speaker 1: media that you could only expect if you're a Democrat.
Speaker 1: That's really important to their movement. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: didn't report four hundred thousand dollars an income, I mean,
Speaker 1: that's that's the kind of thing that even the irs
Speaker 1: under a Democrat administration would normally pay attention to. But
Speaker 1: does anyone really believe does anyone really think that Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden would face any will face any consequences under a
Speaker 1: Biden administration for this whatsoever? No, of course not. The
Speaker 1: people who have been lecturing you for four years about
Speaker 1: norms and decency and democracy, about the rule of law
Speaker 1: are the same people who lied about Russia collusion from
Speaker 1: the beginning of the Trump presidency used it as a
Speaker 1: weapon against Trump and all of his advisers and family
Speaker 1: members and everyone around him, and now are going to
Speaker 1: completely lock down with nothing but partisan intent. Lockdown anything
Speaker 1: the dj is looking at about Hunter Biden or anything
Speaker 1: else for that matter that harms Democrat interests. That's their plan,
Speaker 1: That's what they're going to do. I mean, the suppression
Speaker 1: of the Hunter Biden media story is something that well,
Speaker 1: we should never forget in the same way that the
Speaker 1: attacks on Brett Kavanaugh. The attacks on Brett Kavanaugh were
Speaker 1: a moment of clarity about who the Democrats really are
Speaker 1: that they would lie about somebody. There was such a
Speaker 1: lack of decency and honor and integrity at the very
Speaker 1: top of the Democrat Party that they would say the
Speaker 1: things they said and present the things they did against
Speaker 1: Brett Kavanaugh, a good man who had done nothing wrong.
Speaker 1: Not only was he not a bad guy, he was
Speaker 1: a good guy, and they tried to ruin him. They
Speaker 1: tried to ruin him. No remorse about a Kamala was
Speaker 1: one of them. Don't ever forget that. I mean, she's ruthless,
Speaker 1: utterly ruthless, a disgrace it's a mediocrity who's playing the system,
Speaker 1: using identity politics, using the Democrat power structure. I don't
Speaker 1: mean the Democrat as in our democracy or whatever. I
Speaker 1: mean the Democrat Party. Kamal is very ruthless, indeed, but
Speaker 1: what we saw with Kavanaugh, now you should view what's
Speaker 1: gone on here with the media as a Kavanaugh like moment.
Speaker 1: They will, in the weeks before a presidential election straight
Speaker 1: up lie to your faces, without without a moment's hesitation.
Speaker 1: They will lie right to your face about an issue
Speaker 1: of major national news concern. And afterwards, when they're exposed
Speaker 1: as frauds and liars for that, they think of themselves
Speaker 1: as heroes because their purpose is not to inform you.
Speaker 1: Their purpose is to influence you for the benefit of
Speaker 1: a political party, the Democrat Party. That is what they
Speaker 1: are doing. Now it's not enough to just point this out.
Speaker 1: We have to be very clear that there are there
Speaker 1: are fights ahead and I have, you know, substantial concerns
Speaker 1: about where all this stuff is going. All right, here
Speaker 1: is here is Stacy Abrams. This Georgia election is weeks away,
Speaker 1: and remember the last two weeks of December. For a
Speaker 1: lot of people, including journos, the last two weeks to December.
Speaker 1: There's not going to be a whole lot of focus
Speaker 1: on anything in the news cycle. No one's really going
Speaker 1: to pay much attention. And then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: you're going to come back, a lot of people come
Speaker 1: back from vacation. There's going to be a Georgia send
Speaker 1: it runoff for two seats, right, Georgia is having this runoff,
Speaker 1: two seats at play, and you got Warnock, Leffler, Perdue
Speaker 1: us off. Which names are going to come out victorious
Speaker 1: of this thing. Stacy Abrams, the make believe governor of Georgia,
Speaker 1: is out there rallying her side and she's speaking with
Speaker 1: a lot of confidence about this place. Sixteen Democrats are
Speaker 1: prepared to win this election because this is the first
Speaker 1: runoff where we have the level of investment and engagement
Speaker 1: that it takes to win a runoff. We know from
Speaker 1: the numbers that we're in a good place. One point
Speaker 1: two million absentee ballots have been requested thus far, and
Speaker 1: just to put that into context, one point three million
Speaker 1: or requested for all of the general election. And of
Speaker 1: that one point two million, eighty five thousand of those
Speaker 1: applications are from voters who did not vote in the
Speaker 1: general election, and they are disproportionately between the ages of
Speaker 1: eighteen and twenty nine, and disproportionately people of color. With
Speaker 1: that signals is that there's an enthusiasm for John Ossoff
Speaker 1: and Raphael Warnock, and its signals that we understand that
Speaker 1: we may need to make a plan to vote and
Speaker 1: deliver this election. Look, millions of you are understandably furious
Speaker 1: about where we are right now in the presidential election.
Speaker 1: I understand that it all feels wrong. Electoral College is
Speaker 1: meeting today to certify a result that you think, in
Speaker 1: your soul, you know is just unfair. It's wrong. The
Speaker 1: Democrats changed the election rules in bad faith. There are
Speaker 1: hundreds of sworn affidavits alleging fraud, and there's this seething
Speaker 1: rage that we should all have that the media openly
Speaker 1: and aggressively stifled information about Hunter Biden. So Joe could wait. Yes,
Speaker 1: the media rigged the game, but the game is not over.
Speaker 1: And I don't just mean in the presidential election. We've
Speaker 1: got to win in Georgia. I've actually got a piece
Speaker 1: up on Bucksexton dot com on this that you should
Speaker 1: all check out. I wrote an editorial on it, because
Speaker 1: I'm trying to make the case to you that it
Speaker 1: is not true that we are losing focus on the
Speaker 1: presidential fight and exposing fraud if we also give all
Speaker 1: due attention to winning these Georgia Senate seats. It has
Speaker 1: to happen, because what goes on if we lose this.
Speaker 1: If we lose and they have a Democrat majority in
Speaker 1: the Senate, well, first they'll eliminate the filibuster. Then they'll
Speaker 1: move for expanded amnesty for illegal aliens. You know they
Speaker 1: already have a surge at the border going on right now.
Speaker 1: Why do you think that is people who are focused
Speaker 1: on this issue, who want to get into the country
Speaker 1: and stay here illegally. They know you're probably never going
Speaker 1: to have a better time. There's never gonna be a
Speaker 1: better option for you to come into the country illegally,
Speaker 1: and right before a Bide administration that's going to be
Speaker 1: pushing for amnesty because even if you're not covered by
Speaker 1: that amnesty, do you think there'll be any real will
Speaker 1: to do deportations. No, if you can get here, you'll
Speaker 1: be able to stay here. So they move for eventually
Speaker 1: it'll be legalization for everyone in the US illegally, they'll
Speaker 1: add to that statehood for DC in Puerto Rico. Some
Speaker 1: Supreme Court packing could also happen. All it feels like
Speaker 1: they don't need it these days. Look at the Texas decision.
Speaker 1: Texas brought suit many states joined with Texas shot down
Speaker 1: by the Supreme Court. Trump is out there tweeting about
Speaker 1: how no judge has the courage. Right, That's what he's saying,
Speaker 1: no judge has the courage. What did I tell you
Speaker 1: all along? And I don't like saying things that I
Speaker 1: know are going to be frustrated to here, but I
Speaker 1: have to tell you the truth. I have to tell
Speaker 1: you what I know is coming judges. All along, I'd said,
Speaker 1: who's going to be the judge who wants to be
Speaker 1: attacked by the Democrats and the left for even giving
Speaker 1: an opening for this to be overturned because of all
Speaker 1: the fraud. I just don't think they have the courage.
Speaker 1: That's not me saying I don't care that they don't
Speaker 1: have the courage. That's me saying, this is the reality
Speaker 1: that we face. And that's what Trump is saying about
Speaker 1: these judges, including supposedly conservative justices. They're saying, nah, we can't.
Speaker 1: We can't touch this thing. Sorry, can't get involved. So
Speaker 1: we absolutely absolutely need to focus in on this Georgia
Speaker 1: election and do everything that we possibly can to make
Speaker 1: sure that the Senate is in Republican control going into
Speaker 1: a Biden administration, because right now it would it would
Speaker 1: take something of a legal miracle to prevent the Biden
Speaker 1: administration from happening. We all, we all need to know
Speaker 1: that that's that's where this is heading. Not saying it's over,
Speaker 1: but I'm saying it's not looking good. We're down to
Speaker 1: touch downs and there's you know, a minute thirty left.
Speaker 1: That's where that's where the situation is. And I'm gonna
Speaker 1: say this to you. And even who tells you otherwise
Speaker 1: right now is not being straight with you. They're not
Speaker 1: being honest with you. You know. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: telling people what they want to hear right now, and
Speaker 1: I don't want to be a part of that and
Speaker 1: have our eye taken off the ball in Georgia because
Speaker 1: some people are squabbling for whatever remnants of the Trump
Speaker 1: movement they can sort of gather up for themselves in
Speaker 1: their eyes, I think that's the play. There are people
Speaker 1: now who are doubling and tripling down and how oh,
Speaker 1: don't worry. You know the plan and we're gonna win.
Speaker 1: And there was a there was a chance, there was
Speaker 1: a time we were having that fight. And yes, we
Speaker 1: see it through to the end. But anyone's telling you
Speaker 1: that it's looking good right now is lying to you.
Speaker 1: They're lying to you right and putting too many people
Speaker 1: on air who are going to tell you that on
Speaker 1: their air, on their show. There's also a dishonesty in that, right. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I could bring us amounts of people. Look, I think
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell's legal challenge in Pennsylvania it is legitimate. I
Speaker 1: think he's right, and I think he's got a shot.
Speaker 1: That's why I put Sean on the air. But if
Speaker 1: you're asking me how I think this is going to
Speaker 1: go for the election overall, meaning whether or not this
Speaker 1: thing is pretty much over and done with. We're close
Speaker 1: and people get get mad at me, that's fine. I
Speaker 1: don't know why they're mad at me. I was saying
Speaker 1: fight all along. I was saying, this is where we
Speaker 1: need to be, dig in, do everything we can. But
Speaker 1: at some point, you know, sometimes you fight and do
Speaker 1: you give it everything again and you still don't end
Speaker 1: up getting the result that would be justice. That's life.
Speaker 1: That's where we are. So I just rather you hear
Speaker 1: that at this point from me than have me pretend
Speaker 1: like everything's fine, which I would not do. And then
Speaker 1: in January, when Biden's a week out from being sworn in,
Speaker 1: say yeah, you know, I guess, I guess maybe it
Speaker 1: is going to happen. You know, we should prepare now
Speaker 1: for that possibility. Doesn't mean that we give up, but
Speaker 1: it means we are being smart and strategic, and part
Speaker 1: of that means winning in Georgia. All Right. The response
Speaker 1: to losing Paris to the Germans, if you're the Allies,
Speaker 1: is not to say, let's hand them London. And that's
Speaker 1: what giving them Georgia would be right now, a disaster.
Speaker 1: So we continue the fight and we understand where we
Speaker 1: are in this process. You're in the Freedom Hut. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from Buck
Speaker 1: by following him on social media at Buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter,
Speaker 1: and Instagram. Y'all got a twelve check, Wall Street got
Speaker 1: four trillion in access to liquid funds, and that to me,
Speaker 1: just structurally, will I'm concerned? What keeps me up at
Speaker 1: night is that it was short term relief that was
Speaker 1: really important and really necessary, but that the help for
Speaker 1: working people and everyday people, as we know, drives up
Speaker 1: super fast. But what we gave away, what we gave
Speaker 1: away to Wall Street was so large and so structural
Speaker 1: that frankly like, that's why Republicans I think have not
Speaker 1: been have been, you know, not as u and why
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell has not been in a rush. Mitch McConnell
Speaker 1: has been in a rush. This is complete rewriting of
Speaker 1: history from AOC who is an idiot, but a dangerous
Speaker 1: and powerful little propagandist for the ignorant left. No, Mitch
Speaker 1: is the one who has been pushing for COVID relief.
Speaker 1: Pelosi blocked it. They can try to rewrite the history
Speaker 1: as much as they want. It won't change what actually
Speaker 1: happened here. Pelosi blocked it, said no, we want more.
Speaker 1: He brings up Wall Street. This is something we have
Speaker 1: got to change. We have got to We've got to
Speaker 1: get the public to understand this. Wall Street is dominated
Speaker 1: by Democrats, by Lib Democrats. The Wall Street Banks Goldman
Speaker 1: Sachs is practically a DNC pack in terms of the
Speaker 1: way that it spends money in elections, It through of
Speaker 1: all these big investment banks, because this is the game.
Speaker 1: The Amazons, the Goldman Sacks, the megacorporations, the global is,
Speaker 1: the internationalists. They're rich and getting richer, and government policy
Speaker 1: from big government action continues to benefit them. They like
Speaker 1: the anti competitive nature of all the endless regulation and
Speaker 1: the ability of government to come in and shut down
Speaker 1: their competitors. Look what's going on during COVID. Small business
Speaker 1: is just getting wiped out. But Wall Street is This
Speaker 1: is a myth. This is a fable that Wall Street
Speaker 1: is Republican. Wall Street is absolutely not. I live in
Speaker 1: New York City. I come from a family with a
Speaker 1: with a dad who worked on Wall Street for decades.
Speaker 1: I got brothers, I got friends that are Wall Street
Speaker 1: people worked in Wall Street. Wall Street is Democrats. Okay,
Speaker 1: not all, but it is a huge majority of the
Speaker 1: giving went to Joe Biden. So this is I just
Speaker 1: hate this because somehow the perception lingers and AOC will
Speaker 1: sit there when she's when she's trashing Wall Street. This
Speaker 1: is a way to avoid criticism of Democrat policy and people. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Wall Streets so bad. Oh, those rich fat cats, those
Speaker 1: are Democrats. Those are people on Wall Street who are
Speaker 1: writing checks to Diane Feinstein and Chuck Schumer and Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi and and you know the AOC types, even of
Speaker 1: a little less so they like more of the establishment Democrats,
Speaker 1: to be fair, but they're the ones writing chest to Democrats.
Speaker 1: I just I this drives me nuts because there's this
Speaker 1: is all all media perceptions, all media propaganda, Wall streets
Speaker 1: a bunch of rich, white male Republicans. That's what Wall
Speaker 1: Street is Wall Street. You go to any of these
Speaker 1: big banks. Now, they've got all the Diversity Days stuff
Speaker 1: going on, they're all about transgender rights, they've got super
Speaker 1: progressive HR policies, and they're giving their funneling money, funneling
Speaker 1: money to Democrats. Just check this is this is public
Speaker 1: record stuff. You don't even have to take my word.
Speaker 1: Really good. Check online you'll see who does Goldman Sachs
Speaker 1: give money to Democrats, people like Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: who these these enormous banks. And in some ways it's
Speaker 1: ideological because you have these guilty conscience, rich libs who
Speaker 1: work on Wall Street and they think, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm getting paid all this money. What am I
Speaker 1: even really doing that's a productive, additive function for society.
Speaker 1: Or am I just in the extraction business. Extract from
Speaker 1: the system, position and extract you so so. A way
Speaker 1: that they like to handle with that. A way they
Speaker 1: like to handle that is to give money to very
Speaker 1: progressive causes and very progressive candidates. It's it's like buying
Speaker 1: a form of social insurance. That's really what they're doing,
Speaker 1: buying a form of social insurance. You know. Now they
Speaker 1: can say, oh, well, I gave to Joe Biden, so
Speaker 1: hopefully no one is gonna, you know, mask up and
Speaker 1: don't worry about the fact that I'm in my ten
Speaker 1: million dollar house in the Hamptons because I gave money
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden. This is what they do. This is
Speaker 1: this is how they get away with this stuff. But
Speaker 1: they support the right candidate. They're just part of the system.
Speaker 1: They're just part of using and leveraging where they are
Speaker 1: in a system and pretending they care so much about
Speaker 1: the poor. These these Wall Street democrats, these fat cat
Speaker 1: hedge fund billionaires, they don't give a crap about the poor.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, they'll write a check a few times years.
Speaker 1: They can go to a fancy gallow or something. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of that that goes on in New York
Speaker 1: City too, not really so much anymore, but there was
Speaker 1: before COVID. But it's it's remarkable. This is a lie
Speaker 1: that will not die. Wall Street is dominated by Democrats.
Speaker 1: It is the ideology now of Wall Street. You know,
Speaker 1: it's all these big mega corporations are what is what's
Speaker 1: you know, pushing the stock market to all time highs.
Speaker 1: There's a tremendous amount of government policy and monetary policy
Speaker 1: that goes into how well all this stuff works or
Speaker 1: doesn't work, and they want to be at the levels
Speaker 1: of power so any it just this really, it really
Speaker 1: bothers me because it's so easy. If an AOC will
Speaker 1: do this, you'll talk about this, and so many other
Speaker 1: Democrats will too. They act like the Democrats are the
Speaker 1: party of working people. Know, the Democrats are the party
Speaker 1: of people on welfare. That is true, Democrats always want
Speaker 1: to increase welfare benefits. But people who work for a
Speaker 1: living are increasingly represented by the Trump era a Republican party,
Speaker 1: and everyone seeing it and that the numbers are bearing
Speaker 1: this out. You know, it's people that either benefited from
Speaker 1: the system and got a you know, a fancy four
Speaker 1: year degree somewhere and have gotten themselves into a into
Speaker 1: a place in our economy where they can work from
Speaker 1: home and they're all comfortable and fine. Yeah, they're Democrats,
Speaker 1: and they want to you know, push more of a pittance.
Speaker 1: You know, they want to give a little bit more
Speaker 1: charity to people who aren't working, to people who need assistance.
Speaker 1: But stunning, what we see happening here really is the
Speaker 1: lie about this will not stop. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the buck Sexton Show podcast from more buck
Speaker 1: Head to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to
Speaker 1: the podcast. Well, first of all, Chris, the plan is
Speaker 1: alive and well, and there's no way, no way that
Speaker 1: we're going to leave Washington without taking care of the
Speaker 1: emergency needs of our people. And that's all over our country.
Speaker 1: And I say to Westford's they're all wording everywhere. So
Speaker 1: they're telling us that they're going to get COVID relief
Speaker 1: out there. I don't know if that's going to happen,
Speaker 1: which is just a total failure on the part of
Speaker 1: our elected officials. Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats are the one
Speaker 1: who've been blocking it for months. But I mean, come
Speaker 1: on now. You know, we've we've got a inauguration day
Speaker 1: coming up here, you've got a new administration likely to
Speaker 1: be in charge very soon. Can we please please do
Speaker 1: what is necessary to help the American people right now
Speaker 1: during this pandemic, and we just get something here out
Speaker 1: to people who have had their businesses shut down, who
Speaker 1: have been told that they have no choice in the matter,
Speaker 1: and now they can't pay their bills, and now they're
Speaker 1: perhaps either living on credit or they've they've run out
Speaker 1: of whatever the savings they've had. They've had to lay
Speaker 1: off employees. And this is because of government mandates. It's
Speaker 1: not because of the market. It's not because of a
Speaker 1: downturn or And this is the government saying, and I
Speaker 1: think unnecessarily, saying, your restaurant, your bar, cannot be open anymore.
Speaker 1: You know, isn't it remarkable we have all these restrictions
Speaker 1: that are put in place at different times, but then
Speaker 1: when cases go up, it's like we are the game
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, is okay, cases have gone up
Speaker 1: and all the stuff that we were doing was apparently
Speaker 1: not enough. Well, then how well could it possibly have
Speaker 1: been working? I never get an answer from anybody on
Speaker 1: this one. But if if we're masking and social distancing
Speaker 1: and limiting the number of people in these establishments, we're
Speaker 1: doing all those things, then case number in general, not
Speaker 1: even from that place or from that industry, goes up.
Speaker 1: They say, sorry, we got to lock it down anyway.
Speaker 1: So is that an admission that all those other things
Speaker 1: things don't really work? What does work mean? If it's
Speaker 1: a five percent reduction and transmission for all that crap,
Speaker 1: is it still worth it or is it more like
Speaker 1: a fifty percent reduction? They have no idea. We're making
Speaker 1: decisions all the time that they say are based on data.
Speaker 1: I mean, I can tell you this if I had
Speaker 1: the opportunity to question doctor Fauci, If I got to
Speaker 1: sit in a senator's chair for a second, or sit
Speaker 1: as a member of Congress, and they just give me
Speaker 1: as their proxy let me question doctor Fauci, the whole
Speaker 1: thing would fall apart. You realize what a preposterous and
Speaker 1: absurd situation we're all in now with these people who
Speaker 1: keep saying that it's the data, and then you ask
Speaker 1: them and you find out there's no data behind this.
Speaker 1: They have no idea. There's making it up as they
Speaker 1: go along a lot of it. I mean, yeah, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of cases and a lot of deaths right now,
Speaker 1: there's that data. But in terms of the transmission risk,
Speaker 1: in terms of the reduction you get from these different choices,
Speaker 1: absolutely not. I have no idea. Now now we have
Speaker 1: to talk about a little bit more of the legal
Speaker 1: challenges to the election. I don't want to avoid this.
Speaker 1: First of all, I don't understand how anyone could see
Speaker 1: this as anything other than the system operating all within
Speaker 1: the guidelines, the rules, the constitutional constitutional limitations and demands. Here.
Speaker 1: Everything is proceeding exactly on schedule. There's nothing the Trump
Speaker 1: team or anyone in favor of Trump has done that
Speaker 1: is a break in the rules. There's no abuse in
Speaker 1: power here. They're saying that they have legal theories that
Speaker 1: go into a very complicated, very they go to a
Speaker 1: very complicated, very difficult year here in what's gone on
Speaker 1: with the law, and they're bringing these challenges, and for
Speaker 1: some reason Republicans like like Chris Christie seem to be
Speaker 1: out there getting ahead of all this, as if we
Speaker 1: need to hear from them right now, as if they
Speaker 1: have to be a smug and dismissive about all of this.
Speaker 1: I mean here he is play nine. This is why
Speaker 1: I think the Republican Party will move on and move
Speaker 1: on briskly after the inauguration, because there's a lot of
Speaker 1: good things to move on from. You know, picked up
Speaker 1: fourteen seats in the House, appears, I think, totally lose
Speaker 1: one seat in the Senate ultimately and keep control flipped
Speaker 1: to state legislatures, flip the only governorship that was flipped
Speaker 1: on on election night. Except for the very top of
Speaker 1: the ticket, the Republican Party had a great night on
Speaker 1: election night. Now a statia, I was disappointed that the
Speaker 1: president lost, and I understand the disappointment the party among
Speaker 1: some people for losing that election, but we need to
Speaker 1: face the facts. Elections have consequences. And in the same
Speaker 1: way Democrats were horribly disappointed by Donald Trump's victory four
Speaker 1: years ago over Hillary Clinton in what was actually a
Speaker 1: closer election than this one a popular vote perspective, in
Speaker 1: the same margin, from an electoral college perspective, Republicans now
Speaker 1: need to say thank you, mister President, for your service,
Speaker 1: thank you for the good things you did while you're
Speaker 1: in office that we agree with, and we now need
Speaker 1: to move on. What does that mean, why do we
Speaker 1: have to say those things. Chris Christie doesn't Chris Christie
Speaker 1: doesn't have some insight into the election process or or
Speaker 1: these legal challenges that the rest of us don't. So far,
Speaker 1: they haven't worked. I mean, we can all observe the reality.
Speaker 1: We can all see what's happening. So far, Giuliani's team
Speaker 1: has not been able to get any victories. That's that
Speaker 1: is true. That is i'm these are facts, you know,
Speaker 1: and we're not going to become CNN here on the right.
Speaker 1: We're not going to live in a delusion and lie
Speaker 1: to people for ratings or for anything else. But there's
Speaker 1: also some time left here. There are these legal challenges
Speaker 1: that are continuing. Let's see what happens if they're all
Speaker 1: so silly, if they're also irrelevant or a baseless fine,
Speaker 1: people bring lawsuits and they get shot down all the time.
Speaker 1: The courts, in a sense, are you know, a purification
Speaker 1: system for legal ideas. Now, they don't always get it
Speaker 1: right either, which we have to also keep in mind.
Speaker 1: But so you bring it forward, you say, this is
Speaker 1: our legal theory, and if it is incorrect or if
Speaker 1: it doesn't work, then you you go beyond that you
Speaker 1: move beyond it. That's where we are. We will accept
Speaker 1: the results of this election if in fact, we get
Speaker 1: through every everything that we've got and the result is
Speaker 1: the result. There's no there is no alternative. The people
Speaker 1: that are people that are out there are saying that
Speaker 1: we're going to come up with some you know, Texas
Speaker 1: is going to become its own state or something else.
Speaker 1: They're just appealing to emotion, and I think at some
Speaker 1: levels it becomes disrespectful of conservatives, conservative audiences and the
Speaker 1: people that are on our side politically to tell them
Speaker 1: what you know is because there's a lot of that
Speaker 1: going on right now. People are saying what they know
Speaker 1: isn't true, but they know that the audience wants to hear,
Speaker 1: and they hope that that that feeling will just translate
Speaker 1: later on when the when the people that are saying
Speaker 1: things right now that maybe aren't not going to the
Speaker 1: Chris Christie length of making fun of a lossage andything
Speaker 1: that that that's absurd. But I really believe that I
Speaker 1: have an obligation to tell you that, you know, our
Speaker 1: challenge so far has not gone well. Our legal challenges
Speaker 1: have not gone well for this election. Do I think
Speaker 1: do I know that there were irregularities in cheating this election. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Do I know that this stinks to high heaven and
Speaker 1: it's it's just a disgrace and it feels like this
Speaker 1: whole thing was was just wrong. Yes, But do I
Speaker 1: also know that there's no alternative system that we have
Speaker 1: in place to do something other than what we're doing
Speaker 1: right now, and that at the end of it we
Speaker 1: may actually lose. Yes. Yes, And I've known this for
Speaker 1: a while now, and I've tried to stay back. You know,
Speaker 1: people who got mad at me and says saying, ah, well,
Speaker 1: you know, I think I said on Sarah Carter's podcast
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago, we got about a five
Speaker 1: or five to ten percent chance of really turning this
Speaker 1: thing around and sending it to the states or having
Speaker 1: a different again legal process where that could occur. And
Speaker 1: some I got a lot of heat for that. That
Speaker 1: was just honest, and I was right. I mean, if
Speaker 1: you're doing the odds, if you look at this, you
Speaker 1: look at the number of legal cases, the number of states,
Speaker 1: the margin of victory, it's a long shot. And even
Speaker 1: the people involved in the legal challenge, I'll tell you,
Speaker 1: they'll they'll they'll they'll tell you it's a long shot
Speaker 1: behind closed doors. So you know, now, now it's a
Speaker 1: question of how we process this and how we get
Speaker 1: ready for the fight going forward as this makes its way,
Speaker 1: as this continues on to the final stages here. I mean, otherwise,
Speaker 1: if someone tell me what they really think the alternative
Speaker 1: is going to be, There's not going to be a
Speaker 1: secession movement. It's not going to happen. There's not going
Speaker 1: to be a rejection of our entire process. We're not
Speaker 1: going to all move to you know, pollen nijo. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's not going to happen. So let's look at what
Speaker 1: is happening, and let's fight these cheaters and scoundrels and
Speaker 1: statusts and authoritarians together with everything we've got. Let's win
Speaker 1: in Georgia. Don't need to be you know, snyde about it.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a club I actually meant to play.
Speaker 1: Here's Chris Christy just being kind of nasty about this
Speaker 1: whole thing. Plate ten. Well, listen, the legal theory put
Speaker 1: forward by his legal team and by the President is
Speaker 1: an absurdity, and the reason why the Supreme Court didn't
Speaker 1: take it is because it's an absurd idea to think
Speaker 1: that any state or any number of states, no matter
Speaker 1: how good they are, can challenge in other states right
Speaker 1: to run the election as they see fit. And also,
Speaker 1: there's no evidence, as as I've been saying since election night,
Speaker 1: show us the evidence. And what's gotten even worse, though, Martha,
Speaker 1: I think is is the attacks by the President on good,
Speaker 1: hard working, decent Republican, good hard working niscent Republican governors. Look,
Speaker 1: there's no need to say that the legal theory is absurd.
Speaker 1: There's a need to track down everything we're doing here,
Speaker 1: look at everything that's going on, and come to a
Speaker 1: final determination about where we are and what we can do.
Speaker 1: At this stage, it's I'm I'm as as upset about
Speaker 1: this as anybody else. It's it's a kick in the face,
Speaker 1: and we're again. I think that the Champarnell case, maybe
Speaker 1: maybe that is the legal miracle that sets all this right,
Speaker 1: or at least gets that going. Maybe we can finally
Speaker 1: prove in a way that a court will uphold that
Speaker 1: dominion voting systems are problematic or are too easy to
Speaker 1: be messed with. But in the meantime, let's all just
Speaker 1: band together. We know what we're fighting for, or we
Speaker 1: know what our team's all about, and we will we
Speaker 1: will get through this. We will get through this, and
Speaker 1: we will get to bigger victories in the future. It's
Speaker 1: going to happen. Keep the faith.