1 00:00:02,160 --> 00:00:06,880 Speaker 1: Welcome to the solid verbal ull that for me. I'm 2 00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:08,079 Speaker 1: a man, I'm for it. 3 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:10,119 Speaker 2: I've heard so many players say, well, I want to 4 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:12,080 Speaker 2: be happy. You want to be happy for a day? 5 00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:13,560 Speaker 1: Edo State is that? 6 00:00:13,680 --> 00:00:14,360 Speaker 3: Woo whoo? 7 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:17,080 Speaker 1: And them and tie. 8 00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:21,320 Speaker 3: Dan Rubinstein, our guest of honor today, has not been 9 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:24,960 Speaker 3: on this show in a little over a decade, if 10 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:26,840 Speaker 3: you can believe it, that's how old we are. 11 00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:30,360 Speaker 4: I could not believe my eyes when I went to 12 00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 4: our website and saw how long it's been. Ralph Russo 13 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:35,240 Speaker 4: from the Athletic, who is going to join us today 14 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:36,000 Speaker 4: in too. 15 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 1: Long, doing a great job. 16 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,320 Speaker 2: Was at the AP forever i remember correctly, and now 17 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:42,400 Speaker 2: has been at the Athletic for a bit and does 18 00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 2: great work. Has been reporting on all of the college 19 00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:50,040 Speaker 2: football playoff conference meetings and has done great reporting for 20 00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:54,639 Speaker 2: the Athletic. Excited to pick his brain about the whims 21 00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:59,880 Speaker 2: and concerns and slamming fists standing on the table top 22 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:04,319 Speaker 2: at some sort of automatic qualifying something he's not great, 23 00:01:04,360 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 2: can't wait to pick his brain. 24 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:08,760 Speaker 4: We've talked a little bit about this subject, and we 25 00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:11,000 Speaker 4: try not to talk too too much about it because 26 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 4: if you do that, people start to glaze over bombers, Right, 27 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:16,880 Speaker 4: it's bummers, it's college football business. People just want to 28 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:20,000 Speaker 4: talk about the football. We can assure you that starting 29 00:01:20,040 --> 00:01:21,720 Speaker 4: the first week of July, we actually are going to 30 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:24,680 Speaker 4: start talking about the football. Our previews are going to 31 00:01:24,760 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 4: ramp up, So make sure you hit follow, make sure 32 00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:28,039 Speaker 4: you hit subscribe wherever you can. 33 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:29,360 Speaker 3: You don't want to miss that. 34 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:32,760 Speaker 4: We've got our standard issue What's New in twenty twenty 35 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,840 Speaker 4: five episode that's going to be coming out start of July, 36 00:01:35,959 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 4: and then after that the following week, we'll switch it 37 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:40,280 Speaker 4: back up to three episodes a week and start worpping 38 00:01:40,319 --> 00:01:43,800 Speaker 4: through conferences and teams and all the actual fun stuff 39 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:46,840 Speaker 4: that people listen to us to hear and people care 40 00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 4: the most about. 41 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:49,760 Speaker 3: But before we do, we have not had. 42 00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:52,320 Speaker 4: An opportunity to actually talk to a reporter who is 43 00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 4: on the ground trying to cover this story, trying to 44 00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:58,920 Speaker 4: figure out, like us, where the playoff is headed, where 45 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 4: the postseason at largest headed, where college football as a 46 00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:05,640 Speaker 4: whole is headed. This is a very very charged subject. 47 00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:08,920 Speaker 4: So uh pretty excited that we get to bring Ralph 48 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:09,680 Speaker 4: back on the show. 49 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:11,400 Speaker 1: I could have been this reporter. 50 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,320 Speaker 2: I sat right behind Greg Sank at a Cubs game, 51 00:02:14,800 --> 00:02:17,520 Speaker 2: and I didn't say anything because he didn't look like 52 00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:18,240 Speaker 2: he wanted. 53 00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 1: To talk about where's the dedication? 54 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:19,760 Speaker 5: Dan? 55 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:21,800 Speaker 2: Well, this was two years ago, I think, and it 56 00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:24,239 Speaker 2: wasn't my ticket. We got gifted tickets, the good good 57 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:26,720 Speaker 2: seats at Wrigley And I was like, that dude's wearing 58 00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:28,520 Speaker 2: an SEC lapelpin. 59 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:32,720 Speaker 3: We'rein of just leaned over and said, where's it all going? Greg? 60 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 3: Eight or nine games? But what's your what's your vibe here? 61 00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 3: What are we doing here? Yeah? 62 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:39,560 Speaker 2: I saw the SEC lapelpin. I was like, oh, he 63 00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:42,320 Speaker 2: must be somebody. As I'm like looking him down to 64 00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 2: up and then I was like, that dude that is 65 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:47,919 Speaker 2: wearing an SEC lapelpin looks like a reasonably about He 66 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 2: looks like Greg Sank. And I was like, wait a minute, 67 00:02:50,080 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 2: we might have a situation on our hands, Detective Rubinstein 68 00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:56,000 Speaker 2: and it was Greg Zank. Yeah, but I did not 69 00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:56,640 Speaker 2: say anything. 70 00:02:56,960 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 4: Oh well, all right again, make sure sure you hit 71 00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:02,400 Speaker 4: follow hit subscribes that you don't miss any of our 72 00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:05,440 Speaker 4: upcoming episodes. Verbalers dot com v E R B A 73 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:07,840 Speaker 4: L l e r s dot comments where you can go. 74 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:11,360 Speaker 4: That is our Patreon. You can listen to this episode 75 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:13,399 Speaker 4: all over episodes without the ads, get them a little 76 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:15,720 Speaker 4: bit early, get access to the discord and the games 77 00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:17,280 Speaker 4: that we're gonna spin up as the season gets a 78 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:21,720 Speaker 4: little bit closer, you know the drill by Now Yes, 79 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:27,720 Speaker 4: can't wait joining us now a senior writer for The Athletic. 80 00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 4: It has been ten whole years since we've had this 81 00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:34,200 Speaker 4: gentleman on the podcast, which I can assure everybody is 82 00:03:34,240 --> 00:03:39,320 Speaker 4: not by any devious design. Ralph Russol, Welcome back to 83 00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:40,040 Speaker 4: the show, my friend. 84 00:03:40,120 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 1: But now you're planted that you planted that in people's heads. 85 00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 3: That's funny because I've actually found myself thinking, have I 86 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,120 Speaker 3: ever been on their show? Yeah? Yeah, oh yeah, like 87 00:03:49,200 --> 00:03:52,120 Speaker 3: I thought I had been, but obviously now I had been. 88 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 3: I haven't been keeping track, just so you know, I 89 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 3: wasn't keeping track. But now that you have, now that 90 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:01,800 Speaker 3: you are keeping track, maybe I should be pissed? Should 91 00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:03,880 Speaker 3: I be pissed? Should I be offended? 92 00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:06,520 Speaker 2: He tells me all the time about guests that we've 93 00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:09,480 Speaker 2: had on the show that I've for like completely forgotten about, 94 00:04:09,640 --> 00:04:12,880 Speaker 2: and he'll say things like, yeah, we had Desmond Tutu 95 00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 2: on to talk about the old Southwest Conference and I 96 00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:17,600 Speaker 2: was like, what those are two concepts that and then 97 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 2: he's like, yeah, the year was two thousand and nine. 98 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:20,159 Speaker 1: It was a different time. 99 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:22,320 Speaker 3: The last time I've got you listed as being on 100 00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 3: our show was with our friend Nicole Auerback and it 101 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:28,840 Speaker 3: was when I believe we were on location covering a 102 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:32,239 Speaker 3: national championship game in Dallas in twenty fifteen. That's all 103 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:36,359 Speaker 3: coming back to me now now I remember that. Wow. Yeah, 104 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:39,400 Speaker 3: that's right, because mostly I was I was, Yes, No, 105 00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:42,080 Speaker 3: that's true, because I actually was offended because you brought 106 00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:42,919 Speaker 3: someone on with me. 107 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:45,800 Speaker 1: Oh that's true. Right, you have to share your shine. 108 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,800 Speaker 3: I have to share my one shot with Nicole, who 109 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:51,400 Speaker 3: you know is a star. Yeah, you need to give 110 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:55,040 Speaker 3: the star a little space. I was clearly like supporting 111 00:04:55,160 --> 00:05:00,000 Speaker 3: role in Wow. Okay, so now our secret guest everybody please, 112 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:03,760 Speaker 3: he's welcome. Now here's here's what I want to start 113 00:05:03,760 --> 00:05:07,839 Speaker 3: out with. So you've been reporting on and visiting, I believe, 114 00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:14,000 Speaker 3: in person two meetings one yes, yes, all of these 115 00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:19,719 Speaker 3: college football playoff and conference or conference adjacent type meetings. 116 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:23,960 Speaker 1: What have you seen? What have you heard? 117 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:26,600 Speaker 2: What is the point of all of these? And if 118 00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:29,880 Speaker 2: you had to sort of top level at all. What's 119 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:33,280 Speaker 2: going on with these conversations that are assuming rooms that 120 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:35,080 Speaker 2: look like Davos or whatever. 121 00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:39,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, well what I The most interesting thing thing I 122 00:05:39,279 --> 00:05:43,200 Speaker 3: saw this week in Ashville was a hawk because it's 123 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:46,400 Speaker 3: a very nice resort resort, mountain town, and there was 124 00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:50,120 Speaker 3: a hawk circling the grounds of the Biltmore for a 125 00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:52,800 Speaker 3: lot of the time. So because they're in the meetings 126 00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:54,800 Speaker 3: and I'm just killing time, I spent a lot of 127 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:56,160 Speaker 3: time just what kind of hawk? 128 00:05:56,360 --> 00:05:57,800 Speaker 1: What kind of hawk? Yeah? 129 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:03,200 Speaker 3: Oh, you know, I'm not that person who can identify 130 00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:06,839 Speaker 3: that type of If my wife was here and I had, like, 131 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:10,760 Speaker 3: she definitely can identify the type of hawk. I can 132 00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 3: I identify the type of hawk, so. 133 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:14,760 Speaker 1: Not to derail it immediately. 134 00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:16,560 Speaker 3: Hawk is a big hawk. 135 00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:20,520 Speaker 2: This is I think it's either hawk mating season or 136 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 2: we just got through hawk mating season because there are 137 00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:27,359 Speaker 2: signs out where I live to watch out for hawks, 138 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:30,600 Speaker 2: and or I think the red tailed blackbirds, red wing 139 00:06:30,720 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 2: they very protective red wing blackbirds. 140 00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:36,640 Speaker 3: Excuse me, yeah, redtail hawks, red wing blackbirds. 141 00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:38,880 Speaker 2: Correct, So you just, I don't know, keep your distance, 142 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,039 Speaker 2: but yeah, the hawks are definitely like you file under that, 143 00:06:41,120 --> 00:06:43,839 Speaker 2: like the nature is metal kind of offering. 144 00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:47,560 Speaker 3: Okay, so the top the top line take away though 145 00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:49,560 Speaker 3: from the meetings, as far as you know, to try 146 00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:51,719 Speaker 3: to be a little serious here though, really again, it 147 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 3: was yet another meeting where you sit there for thirty 148 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:57,240 Speaker 3: six hours and you come away going like why did 149 00:06:57,240 --> 00:07:00,600 Speaker 3: I need to be here? Right? Like? I how did 150 00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:04,120 Speaker 3: I justify the expense report to be here? I think 151 00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:08,719 Speaker 3: I am a little cautious to use the word impass. 152 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 3: But we are at sort of we're in a corner 153 00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 3: here with the discussions as it turns to the college 154 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:18,800 Speaker 3: football playoff and what the future will be. We're a 155 00:07:18,800 --> 00:07:21,800 Speaker 3: little bit of a log jam because I'll try. Let 156 00:07:21,840 --> 00:07:24,600 Speaker 3: me see if I can describe the decision tree here. Okay, 157 00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 3: the decision tree starts in the SEC with how many 158 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:34,200 Speaker 3: conference games it is willing to play, if the SEC 159 00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 3: is going to stay at eight or go to nine. 160 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:43,680 Speaker 3: That influences the Big Ten. The Big Ten very much 161 00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:47,040 Speaker 3: still wants to do the AQS. I don't they have 162 00:07:47,160 --> 00:07:50,280 Speaker 3: not really moved off of a desire to do the AQS. 163 00:07:50,440 --> 00:07:52,520 Speaker 1: Automatic qualifying, Yeah. 164 00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:56,400 Speaker 3: Yeah, on automatic qualifying, mostly automatic qualifying four for them, 165 00:07:56,480 --> 00:08:00,280 Speaker 3: four for the SEC, two for ACC and Big twelve. Yes, right, 166 00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:03,200 Speaker 3: and maybe we go to sixteen. So it creates a 167 00:08:03,240 --> 00:08:07,120 Speaker 3: little more space in terms of at larges and that's 168 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:12,640 Speaker 3: helpful to everybody involved. I think there's still that's still 169 00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:17,680 Speaker 3: where they want to land. I think if the SEC 170 00:08:18,160 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 3: is willing to go to nine games, you might see 171 00:08:22,160 --> 00:08:25,239 Speaker 3: a path where the Big ten and really it comes 172 00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 3: down to the Big Ten and the SEC. Guys, like 173 00:08:27,720 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 3: the other conferences are going to have input. They may 174 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:34,839 Speaker 3: think they could have more input than they frank maybe 175 00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:39,200 Speaker 3: they do, but it seems like the way the contract 176 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:42,160 Speaker 3: is written, the governance gives the SEC and the Big 177 00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:45,600 Speaker 3: ten final say so they need to come together. And 178 00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:48,800 Speaker 3: I think if the Big Ten, if the SEC went 179 00:08:48,840 --> 00:08:52,160 Speaker 3: to nine conference games and said we really want this 180 00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:58,240 Speaker 3: at large heavy format five to eleven something along that 181 00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:01,120 Speaker 3: like with there's a lot of at large, I think 182 00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:07,640 Speaker 3: the Big ten might be willing to relent and say, okay, 183 00:09:07,679 --> 00:09:09,280 Speaker 3: well we don't want to cut off our noses to 184 00:09:09,320 --> 00:09:13,000 Speaker 3: spite our face. We are going to get more teams 185 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:15,040 Speaker 3: in the field here because the field will be bigger. 186 00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 3: Maybe we should do that. But if the SEC is 187 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:25,440 Speaker 3: sort of adamant about staying at eight or the SEC 188 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:29,960 Speaker 3: will only go to nine if it gets to the AQS, right, 189 00:09:30,080 --> 00:09:33,000 Speaker 3: Maybe the SEC says, okay, we want to go to 190 00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:36,680 Speaker 3: nine conference games, Greg Sanke, I think really would like 191 00:09:36,760 --> 00:09:39,520 Speaker 3: them to go to nine conference games, and they say, okay, 192 00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:42,360 Speaker 3: the protection we'll get for going to nine conference games 193 00:09:42,760 --> 00:09:45,840 Speaker 3: is AQS. So I don't know. I hope I explained that, 194 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:50,440 Speaker 3: well that's where things are hitting here, it's eight and nine, 195 00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:54,079 Speaker 3: and then decisions get made from there. But there's a 196 00:09:54,120 --> 00:09:56,520 Speaker 3: little bit of a standoff where the Big ten is like, listen, 197 00:09:56,679 --> 00:10:00,600 Speaker 3: like we'd be willing to listen to something altive to 198 00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:03,600 Speaker 3: the AQS, but you got to go to nine conference games, 199 00:10:03,640 --> 00:10:05,520 Speaker 3: and the SEC is like, we don't want to. I'm 200 00:10:05,559 --> 00:10:07,720 Speaker 3: not really sure we want to go to nine conference games. 201 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:09,320 Speaker 3: So what's what's the breaking point. 202 00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:11,920 Speaker 4: In the event of a true impasse, Because they've got 203 00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:14,360 Speaker 4: this deadline now of December the first to try and 204 00:10:14,400 --> 00:10:17,320 Speaker 4: work out what is the format going to be next season. 205 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:21,679 Speaker 4: If they can't come to some kind of mutual understanding, 206 00:10:22,200 --> 00:10:24,400 Speaker 4: then what happens? What does it look like in twenty 207 00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:24,960 Speaker 4: twenty six? 208 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:29,640 Speaker 3: So I think you default back to what you have 209 00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:33,520 Speaker 3: I do, But again, like I have a hard time 210 00:10:34,640 --> 00:10:38,400 Speaker 3: accepting that, Like I've been told that, well, we'll just 211 00:10:38,640 --> 00:10:41,520 Speaker 3: stick with what we got. But it kind of goes 212 00:10:41,559 --> 00:10:45,679 Speaker 3: back to what I just said about, well, isn't it 213 00:10:45,800 --> 00:10:48,600 Speaker 3: better to have sixteen rather than twelve, Like you'll get 214 00:10:48,600 --> 00:10:51,120 Speaker 3: more of your teams if if the concern is we 215 00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:54,800 Speaker 3: want more teams in And it's always the bottom line 216 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:58,240 Speaker 3: in all these conversations is every league thinks it should 217 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:03,360 Speaker 3: get more teams, right, It's just such a fundamentally they 218 00:11:03,400 --> 00:11:05,760 Speaker 3: all think they should get more teams. They all think 219 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:10,439 Speaker 3: the selection committee does not know, does not give their 220 00:11:10,440 --> 00:11:13,000 Speaker 3: teams enough credit. Whether it's the Big Ten, the Big twelve, 221 00:11:13,040 --> 00:11:16,760 Speaker 3: they all have the same complaint at the core. So 222 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:19,600 Speaker 3: I think the default is, well, we'll just stay at twelve. 223 00:11:19,600 --> 00:11:22,000 Speaker 3: We'll just keep it the way it is. But tell me, 224 00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:26,559 Speaker 3: like I'll ask you, why is twelve the way it's 225 00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:30,640 Speaker 3: set up? Now? Why is that better than going to sixteen, 226 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 3: which is still a similar setup, you just add a 227 00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:36,440 Speaker 3: few more aques. So that's why I'm a little skeptical 228 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 3: about them sticking with twelve, because I do think the 229 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:42,480 Speaker 3: one thing they tend to be able to agree upon 230 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:43,920 Speaker 3: is we'll just make it bigger. 231 00:11:43,960 --> 00:11:46,880 Speaker 4: I mean, if the common complaint is that nobody trusts 232 00:11:46,920 --> 00:11:51,439 Speaker 4: the committee. Can they do something to put less emphasis 233 00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:53,440 Speaker 4: on the committee? We talked about it on this show, 234 00:11:53,559 --> 00:11:58,199 Speaker 4: just kind of spitballing. But can they incorporate computer formulas? 235 00:11:58,440 --> 00:12:01,280 Speaker 3: I know the pr around that last time wasn't great, 236 00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:05,240 Speaker 3: But have there been any discussions about alternative ways of 237 00:12:05,280 --> 00:12:08,560 Speaker 3: selecting these teams and not just the opinions of some 238 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:12,640 Speaker 3: powerbrokers in a conference room? So I think that was 239 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:15,840 Speaker 3: the crux of this past meeting in our Ashville. The 240 00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:20,840 Speaker 3: CFP staff created, you know, kind of sat down with 241 00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:26,440 Speaker 3: their sports Source Analytics, which is the data provider. They 242 00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:28,760 Speaker 3: brought a few outside sources. Did I see the Google 243 00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:31,040 Speaker 3: mathematician in your article? I wanted to ask you about 244 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:33,520 Speaker 3: the Google mathematicians. I want to ask more about that 245 00:12:33,559 --> 00:12:36,200 Speaker 3: person later, but keep going. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot. 246 00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:38,400 Speaker 3: I didn't do a very good job as a report. 247 00:12:38,440 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 3: I don't know if I have more details. It's almost like, Hey, 248 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:42,439 Speaker 3: we have some friends here and one of them is 249 00:12:42,480 --> 00:12:45,360 Speaker 3: a Google mathematician. We'll bring him in. So I think 250 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:47,080 Speaker 3: what they were trying to do is say, Okay, well, 251 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:50,760 Speaker 3: we're going to provide the committee with a new metric, 252 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:56,000 Speaker 3: a strength of record metric that incorporates a little more 253 00:12:56,160 --> 00:13:01,599 Speaker 3: of strength of schedule size the strength of schedule, and 254 00:13:01,640 --> 00:13:03,440 Speaker 3: we're going to give that to commit the committee and 255 00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:05,480 Speaker 3: it will allow and the committee will use that to 256 00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:08,920 Speaker 3: sort of guide their decisions. But overall, we're still in 257 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:12,520 Speaker 3: for the committee. But I'm with you, Ty, It's like 258 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:16,920 Speaker 3: I find myself thinking like, if the committee is the problem, 259 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:21,400 Speaker 3: and not because they're not doing, you know, good faith work, 260 00:13:21,760 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 3: but if the committee is the problem, then maybe try 261 00:13:24,280 --> 00:13:27,120 Speaker 3: to deemphasize the committee. So it sounds like they talked 262 00:13:27,120 --> 00:13:30,559 Speaker 3: a little bit about a de emphasizing of the committee, 263 00:13:30,679 --> 00:13:33,720 Speaker 3: but not whole k like. It sounded like it was 264 00:13:33,760 --> 00:13:37,080 Speaker 3: almost like from talking to a few people after the meeting, 265 00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:40,440 Speaker 3: I came away thinking like, it's a good effort, but 266 00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:44,920 Speaker 3: if your goal is truly to de emphasize or reprioritize 267 00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:48,560 Speaker 3: where the committee's protocols are, it sounded like a little 268 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:49,440 Speaker 3: bit of a half measure. 269 00:13:49,600 --> 00:13:52,520 Speaker 4: The other question that I had, and I know Chris 270 00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 4: Vanini wrote something similar or something along these lines around 271 00:13:56,320 --> 00:13:58,640 Speaker 4: the time that they had the Champions League final. But 272 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:01,320 Speaker 4: since the Big Tens seems to be dead set and 273 00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:05,679 Speaker 4: determined to go with this AQ format. Clearly the pr 274 00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 4: around that isn't great either, but based on kind of 275 00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:12,720 Speaker 4: what the concerns are of the conferences, what the Champions 276 00:14:12,800 --> 00:14:15,440 Speaker 4: League in Europe does is they've got a coefficient that 277 00:14:15,520 --> 00:14:19,840 Speaker 4: determines previous performance in the tournament. They then use that 278 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:22,240 Speaker 4: to try and figure out, all right, how many teams 279 00:14:22,240 --> 00:14:26,160 Speaker 4: from each European league should get a spot in this 280 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 4: broader thing. This is not to say the bigger leagues 281 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 4: don't have their thumb on the scale as well, but 282 00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 4: at least there is something of a metric that helps 283 00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:37,160 Speaker 4: guide who gets what. Has there been any kind of 284 00:14:37,840 --> 00:14:40,920 Speaker 4: I don't know, discussion on the Big ten side about 285 00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:44,080 Speaker 4: incorporating something like that so that it's not always four 286 00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:47,840 Speaker 4: or three or two every year based on the conference. 287 00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 4: But after we get a little bit more data, we 288 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:52,880 Speaker 4: can rejigger this thing so that it's more more equitable. 289 00:14:53,480 --> 00:14:56,280 Speaker 3: Yet that has been talked about. I don't It has 290 00:14:56,400 --> 00:14:59,960 Speaker 3: not been, And frankly, I think part of this string 291 00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:06,600 Speaker 3: the record conversation in terms of a metric to the committee. 292 00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:09,720 Speaker 3: It the more I hear about it, you know, you 293 00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:14,240 Speaker 3: use that term coefficient, right, I like I do wonder 294 00:15:14,280 --> 00:15:18,400 Speaker 3: if this metric is also hey, and we could if 295 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:20,560 Speaker 3: we put a different light on it, it also could 296 00:15:20,600 --> 00:15:23,400 Speaker 3: be used for this, right, it's it's the old airplane. 297 00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:25,400 Speaker 3: It's a it's a it's a broach, it's a you know, 298 00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:29,280 Speaker 3: it's a hat. Right, it's so I think it could 299 00:15:29,360 --> 00:15:33,280 Speaker 3: be repurposed for something like that. Or you're not that 300 00:15:33,480 --> 00:15:38,400 Speaker 3: far away from the idea of repurposing this to sort 301 00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,680 Speaker 3: of do what you said, which is and they had 302 00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:45,200 Speaker 3: talked about this previously, this idea of like, okay, so 303 00:15:45,280 --> 00:15:48,000 Speaker 3: we feel like we're we're rigging the system, right, that's 304 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 3: the complaint. It's being rigged. It's pre determined. What if 305 00:15:51,680 --> 00:15:54,240 Speaker 3: we on the front end came up with a way 306 00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:58,640 Speaker 3: to justify how we get to these numbers? Now, of 307 00:15:58,680 --> 00:16:03,000 Speaker 3: course that could be that could be seen as as 308 00:16:03,040 --> 00:16:05,680 Speaker 3: you said, putting your thumb on the scale and still 309 00:16:05,720 --> 00:16:09,080 Speaker 3: being predetermined. But I do think that they are looking 310 00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:12,840 Speaker 3: into ways of like, let's here's what we want. Let's 311 00:16:12,880 --> 00:16:15,400 Speaker 3: figure out a mathematical way to justify it. 312 00:16:16,800 --> 00:16:21,040 Speaker 2: Here's okay, here's an oversimplified question. Who is holding the 313 00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:24,000 Speaker 2: marker at the whiteboard if they are in a meeting room, 314 00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:26,960 Speaker 2: is it literally, Tony Petiti and Greg Sank each have 315 00:16:27,120 --> 00:16:30,240 Speaker 2: markers next to a whiteboard. And because you need to 316 00:16:30,480 --> 00:16:36,400 Speaker 2: funnel conversation through a central party for these kinds of conversations, 317 00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:41,000 Speaker 2: it seems in big business, in politics, whatever, that somebody 318 00:16:41,080 --> 00:16:44,480 Speaker 2: is running physically running the conversation in these rooms. Is 319 00:16:44,520 --> 00:16:47,680 Speaker 2: it actually you know, is it actually you know Tony 320 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:50,000 Speaker 2: Petiti and Greg Sanky or is there like a central 321 00:16:50,040 --> 00:16:53,560 Speaker 2: figure who is organizing this from a central perspective in 322 00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:54,520 Speaker 2: these conversations? 323 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:57,560 Speaker 3: So you what you're speaking to is one of the 324 00:16:57,560 --> 00:17:00,359 Speaker 3: flaws in the system here, because when they all get together, 325 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:04,040 Speaker 3: You're right, the person with the marker in his hand 326 00:17:04,119 --> 00:17:08,399 Speaker 3: is probably Rich Clark, the college football playoff executive director. Right. 327 00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 3: He is trying to be traffic cop here. He is, 328 00:17:12,080 --> 00:17:15,600 Speaker 3: so he is essentially leading the meetings. But as I 329 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:17,600 Speaker 3: wrote a couple of weeks ago, the fact of the 330 00:17:17,640 --> 00:17:22,359 Speaker 3: matter is this comes down to Patiti and Sanky, like, 331 00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:25,000 Speaker 3: you know, I think I wrote something like get those 332 00:17:25,040 --> 00:17:28,200 Speaker 3: two guys, like, eventually it comes down to those two 333 00:17:28,240 --> 00:17:32,480 Speaker 3: guys in a room together, right, figure it out, come 334 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:35,320 Speaker 3: up with something, get back to the rest of us, 335 00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:39,959 Speaker 3: and they Because that again it speaks to the fracture. Right, 336 00:17:40,000 --> 00:17:44,240 Speaker 3: we have a room of ten commissioners and Notre Dame's 337 00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:47,960 Speaker 3: athletic director. Right, that's the big room where everybody seems 338 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:50,520 Speaker 3: to want to get a voice. But how relevant is 339 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:53,120 Speaker 3: that big room? And then we have the next room 340 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:57,640 Speaker 3: is the four the power four commissioners. But the fact 341 00:17:57,680 --> 00:17:59,480 Speaker 3: of the matter is if Brett, you or Mark and 342 00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:05,280 Speaker 3: Jim Phillups don't have the same power, like quite literal 343 00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:09,359 Speaker 3: like influence on the system as the TD and Sanke, 344 00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:12,359 Speaker 3: then what's the point of that room? So what's the 345 00:18:12,359 --> 00:18:14,280 Speaker 3: point of the big room? What's the point of the 346 00:18:14,280 --> 00:18:18,639 Speaker 3: four room? If it's really comes down to the sec 347 00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:20,680 Speaker 3: in the big ten guys, just get in a room 348 00:18:20,720 --> 00:18:23,159 Speaker 3: and figure it out. But again, like that's not a 349 00:18:23,200 --> 00:18:26,280 Speaker 3: great way to make decisions. If every meeting leads to well, 350 00:18:26,280 --> 00:18:28,359 Speaker 3: then we have to have another separate meeting of four people. 351 00:18:28,359 --> 00:18:30,720 Speaker 3: And then after the four person meeting, well, now we 352 00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:32,760 Speaker 3: have to break it down to have the two person meeting. 353 00:18:33,160 --> 00:18:34,000 Speaker 3: What are we doing here? 354 00:18:34,240 --> 00:18:37,199 Speaker 1: Yeah, let's offline this, let's it becomes a real office. 355 00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 3: In my in my old job, we used to say 356 00:18:39,080 --> 00:18:41,800 Speaker 3: this meeting could have been an email. Yeah, yeah, And 357 00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:43,359 Speaker 3: you know the other thing that's sort of frustrating, And 358 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:45,240 Speaker 3: this is a little bit of a side Like so 359 00:18:45,359 --> 00:18:48,440 Speaker 3: after the ten person meeting is done, you know, Rich 360 00:18:48,480 --> 00:18:50,199 Speaker 3: Clark comes out, and god, you know, God bless him. 361 00:18:50,280 --> 00:18:53,720 Speaker 3: He's another person who has been giving a been given 362 00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:57,640 Speaker 3: a high profile job that has very little power. Right. 363 00:18:57,680 --> 00:19:00,280 Speaker 3: We have a lot of those in college sports. Here's 364 00:19:00,320 --> 00:19:03,000 Speaker 3: a cool title and a big paycheck. You have no 365 00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:07,280 Speaker 3: decision making power, right, Like, what again, what are we 366 00:19:07,320 --> 00:19:10,159 Speaker 3: doing guys? So, you know, he comes out and he 367 00:19:10,200 --> 00:19:11,800 Speaker 3: gives us a little bit of a little bit of 368 00:19:11,800 --> 00:19:13,560 Speaker 3: information that came up from the meeting, and I'm like, 369 00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:15,600 Speaker 3: you know what, just give us a piece of paper 370 00:19:15,640 --> 00:19:17,960 Speaker 3: about what you talked about, Like you talked about you 371 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:20,600 Speaker 3: tried to come up with this metric. Just tell us 372 00:19:20,680 --> 00:19:23,320 Speaker 3: what's in the metric, Like what are we hiding here? 373 00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:27,399 Speaker 3: So it's a frustrating process to cover because of a 374 00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:30,840 Speaker 3: lack of transparency. It's also a frustrating process to cover 375 00:19:31,400 --> 00:19:35,919 Speaker 3: because there's a lot of people who are deemed influential 376 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:38,760 Speaker 3: and having a voice here who really don't. 377 00:19:40,480 --> 00:19:43,480 Speaker 2: Is is there an option on the table, because I 378 00:19:43,560 --> 00:19:46,200 Speaker 2: think this is again I don't have zero business background. 379 00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:49,639 Speaker 2: Is there an option on the table that sort of 380 00:19:49,720 --> 00:19:52,119 Speaker 2: adheres to the like the best deal is one that 381 00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:56,440 Speaker 2: leaves everybody a little unhappy? Is that little bummed out? 382 00:19:56,760 --> 00:19:56,879 Speaker 3: No? 383 00:19:56,960 --> 00:19:57,359 Speaker 1: You what is? 384 00:19:58,359 --> 00:20:01,080 Speaker 3: Yeah? So that's what I keep going back to, this 385 00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:07,920 Speaker 3: idea of if the they can get to you know again, 386 00:20:08,040 --> 00:20:12,920 Speaker 3: it's it's this loggerheads of like I do think the 387 00:20:12,960 --> 00:20:17,200 Speaker 3: SEC going to nine conference games and having a five 388 00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:20,360 Speaker 3: to eleven sixteen team playoff with a lot of eight 389 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,760 Speaker 3: with a lot of at large bids. I kind of 390 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:28,120 Speaker 3: can feel like the SEC would be like, well, we 391 00:20:28,400 --> 00:20:30,680 Speaker 3: this is not exactly the way we wanted to get 392 00:20:30,680 --> 00:20:33,720 Speaker 3: to nine, but you know, we're gonna get a lot 393 00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:36,600 Speaker 3: of teams in this field, so let's just do that, right, 394 00:20:36,640 --> 00:20:38,720 Speaker 3: And the and the Big ten would be like, well, 395 00:20:38,760 --> 00:20:41,680 Speaker 3: we didn't get our aqs, but at least they're playing 396 00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:43,639 Speaker 3: the same amount of conference games. And guys, like the 397 00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:46,639 Speaker 3: thing with the conference games is I understand, like you know, 398 00:20:46,640 --> 00:20:49,440 Speaker 3: Bill Bill c would come on here, Bill Connley would 399 00:20:49,440 --> 00:20:51,280 Speaker 3: come on here and tell you, like, listen, the SEC 400 00:20:51,359 --> 00:20:53,640 Speaker 3: does play the strongest schedules even though they're only playing 401 00:20:53,680 --> 00:20:55,720 Speaker 3: eight games. But I don't know if I have to 402 00:20:55,760 --> 00:20:58,200 Speaker 3: even tell you guys, it's a simple math problem. If 403 00:20:58,200 --> 00:21:02,280 Speaker 3: you just sprinkle nine more losses in your conference in 404 00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:06,719 Speaker 3: a system where the lost column is very important, you're 405 00:21:06,760 --> 00:21:09,440 Speaker 3: being you're at a disadvantage if you're the Big ten. 406 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:13,800 Speaker 3: So I totally understand and get the Big ten's apprehension 407 00:21:13,920 --> 00:21:18,119 Speaker 3: about the nine to eight different differential difference. So I 408 00:21:18,640 --> 00:21:22,600 Speaker 3: kind of do wonder if that's the place where the 409 00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:26,240 Speaker 3: two main parties are unhappy. And I think for the 410 00:21:26,280 --> 00:21:30,920 Speaker 3: Big twelve and the ACC you know, at this point, 411 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:34,040 Speaker 3: the reason why they're so against the aqs is they 412 00:21:34,160 --> 00:21:39,800 Speaker 3: just can't codify their own inferiority, right right, But they 413 00:21:39,880 --> 00:21:43,120 Speaker 3: may be better off in a system that guarantees them 414 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:46,200 Speaker 3: too in the long run, frankly, like they may be, 415 00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:49,359 Speaker 3: like the Big twelve especially, might be better off in 416 00:21:49,440 --> 00:21:51,840 Speaker 3: that system in terms of how many bids they get. 417 00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:57,200 Speaker 3: So but I think that they're just so so apprehensive 418 00:21:57,560 --> 00:22:00,719 Speaker 3: to sign up for the brand degradation. 419 00:22:01,480 --> 00:22:04,160 Speaker 4: The other thing that I know we talked about here 420 00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:07,040 Speaker 4: when we tried to cover this, just following your reporting 421 00:22:07,080 --> 00:22:11,680 Speaker 4: and that of others, this whole idea of transform. I'm 422 00:22:11,680 --> 00:22:15,200 Speaker 4: trying to use the terminology they used transforming. They used 423 00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:20,720 Speaker 4: a very fancy uh, marketing term for this Conference championship week. Right, 424 00:22:20,840 --> 00:22:24,800 Speaker 4: it's not just going to be Conference championship week. We imagine, reimagine, 425 00:22:24,880 --> 00:22:26,000 Speaker 4: thank you, thank you. 426 00:22:26,680 --> 00:22:28,800 Speaker 3: We're going to have like these play in games now 427 00:22:28,800 --> 00:22:31,119 Speaker 3: where the three plays the six and the four plays 428 00:22:31,119 --> 00:22:32,719 Speaker 3: of five, and we're going to make a whole like 429 00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:36,440 Speaker 3: play in tournament weekend out of this championship week. Yeah, 430 00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:38,439 Speaker 3: like we weren't really asking for that. 431 00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:42,359 Speaker 4: I don't know if you were, obviously, Ralph, Like, where 432 00:22:42,440 --> 00:22:45,600 Speaker 4: is that at right now relative to all these other 433 00:22:45,640 --> 00:22:46,879 Speaker 4: conversations that are going on. 434 00:22:47,600 --> 00:22:51,199 Speaker 3: Well, so that's pivotal to the AQ conversation because that 435 00:22:51,280 --> 00:22:55,040 Speaker 3: because one would trigger the other. Okay, the Big Ten 436 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:59,160 Speaker 3: very much wants that what you're talking about, and which 437 00:22:59,200 --> 00:23:03,000 Speaker 3: is also goes back to the problem with the AQ model. 438 00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:08,320 Speaker 3: I think the SEC and SEC country that wasn't their idea. 439 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 3: That was the Big Tens idea, the reimagining of the 440 00:23:11,080 --> 00:23:15,320 Speaker 3: week of the weekend and three six all these play 441 00:23:15,359 --> 00:23:20,000 Speaker 3: in games now. I remind you here, Tony Battiti came 442 00:23:20,000 --> 00:23:22,679 Speaker 3: from Major League Baseball. And if you think, if you're 443 00:23:22,760 --> 00:23:25,159 Speaker 3: Major League Baseball fans at all, and I am, if 444 00:23:25,200 --> 00:23:29,200 Speaker 3: you think that there was a point where baseball sort 445 00:23:29,240 --> 00:23:31,840 Speaker 3: of like a light bulb went on and they were like, boy, 446 00:23:32,600 --> 00:23:35,399 Speaker 3: our final weekend of the season, if we have play 447 00:23:35,440 --> 00:23:39,639 Speaker 3: in games and they're tiebreakers, like we can create high 448 00:23:39,720 --> 00:23:44,600 Speaker 3: stakes small series or play in games that do great 449 00:23:44,720 --> 00:23:48,360 Speaker 3: like that. People really love them, right, So that's what 450 00:23:48,640 --> 00:23:51,160 Speaker 3: the Big Ten is trying to recreate, like these high 451 00:23:51,240 --> 00:23:54,199 Speaker 3: stakes playing games on the final weekend of the season, 452 00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:56,679 Speaker 3: and if you have aqs you can do them. And 453 00:23:56,760 --> 00:23:58,760 Speaker 3: I think the SEC was like, huh, that kind of 454 00:23:58,760 --> 00:24:01,359 Speaker 3: sounds like a pretty interesting idea, but it's not their idea. 455 00:24:01,400 --> 00:24:05,280 Speaker 3: They're not married to it. And the problem is with 456 00:24:05,400 --> 00:24:08,760 Speaker 3: the other conferences. They're like, well, we can't do that 457 00:24:08,880 --> 00:24:11,240 Speaker 3: because we don't have as many bids, like we can 458 00:24:11,280 --> 00:24:14,080 Speaker 3: play one play in game. So you're creating all this 459 00:24:14,240 --> 00:24:18,280 Speaker 3: new like interesting inventory for yourself, Big ten, but we 460 00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:20,119 Speaker 3: can't do that, So why should we sign up that 461 00:24:20,200 --> 00:24:23,200 Speaker 3: allow you to do that. I don't really mind those 462 00:24:23,720 --> 00:24:27,159 Speaker 3: I actually think it's kind of an interesting idea, and 463 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:30,120 Speaker 3: I think it might be fun to have a weekend 464 00:24:30,119 --> 00:24:33,560 Speaker 3: where there's like three or four very high stakes games, 465 00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:36,879 Speaker 3: Like I think, I don't know if I'm down with 466 00:24:36,960 --> 00:24:41,320 Speaker 3: the AQ model, but I find myself being interested in 467 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:44,520 Speaker 3: these play in games, and again, they are tied together. 468 00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:47,239 Speaker 3: You can't have them without the other. If you have 469 00:24:47,920 --> 00:24:53,240 Speaker 3: an at large bid situation, I think you're probably eliminating 470 00:24:53,280 --> 00:24:56,440 Speaker 3: the AQS, though I wouldn't be shocked if the Big 471 00:24:56,480 --> 00:25:00,040 Speaker 3: Ten tried to come up with a way to in 472 00:25:00,080 --> 00:25:01,880 Speaker 3: corporate them in some way, shape or form. 473 00:25:02,520 --> 00:25:04,000 Speaker 2: Do you get the sense that there's anybody in the 474 00:25:04,119 --> 00:25:07,879 Speaker 2: room that listens to all of this and says, guys, 475 00:25:08,440 --> 00:25:12,320 Speaker 2: we're making this sport so difficult, we are making this 476 00:25:12,480 --> 00:25:15,639 Speaker 2: so much it's already an impossible sport to sort of 477 00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:19,119 Speaker 2: leap into as an outsider, between recruiting and NIL and 478 00:25:19,160 --> 00:25:23,040 Speaker 2: the portal and coaching movement and a postseason that changes 479 00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:25,439 Speaker 2: every two or three years. At this point, is there 480 00:25:25,480 --> 00:25:28,080 Speaker 2: anybody that's like, guys, what are we doing? 481 00:25:29,640 --> 00:25:34,480 Speaker 3: So? I don't. I think it might be And I 482 00:25:34,560 --> 00:25:38,600 Speaker 3: hate to sort of paint Greg Sanke as the Knight 483 00:25:38,680 --> 00:25:42,600 Speaker 3: in shining Armor coming in to save the day, because 484 00:25:43,800 --> 00:25:46,159 Speaker 3: I don't think that's the case. But I do think 485 00:25:46,480 --> 00:25:50,040 Speaker 3: he has been through this more than any of the 486 00:25:50,080 --> 00:25:53,960 Speaker 3: other people in that room. Well, I would say this again, 487 00:25:54,200 --> 00:25:57,720 Speaker 3: not a lot of influence, but good perspective. John Steinbrecker 488 00:25:57,840 --> 00:26:01,880 Speaker 3: is I think the longest serving FB commissioner. He has 489 00:26:01,960 --> 00:26:05,600 Speaker 3: been through a lot of these conversations, and I think 490 00:26:05,920 --> 00:26:08,879 Speaker 3: he is a person who will say, you know, when 491 00:26:08,920 --> 00:26:13,600 Speaker 3: you have conversations with I think understands the idea that, like, 492 00:26:13,920 --> 00:26:19,000 Speaker 3: you know, making this really complicated is a problem. But 493 00:26:19,080 --> 00:26:21,600 Speaker 3: I don't know how much influence he has, but I do. 494 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:24,960 Speaker 3: But but but what you're saying, Dan is so true, 495 00:26:25,320 --> 00:26:28,480 Speaker 3: and I don't know if that message is really getting through. 496 00:26:28,800 --> 00:26:33,080 Speaker 3: And I do wonder if anybody within the group is 497 00:26:33,160 --> 00:26:36,240 Speaker 3: really like sort of grabbing them by the lapels. 498 00:26:36,400 --> 00:26:36,560 Speaker 5: You know. 499 00:26:36,760 --> 00:26:40,119 Speaker 3: Bill Hancock understands this too, But again he's gone, and 500 00:26:40,160 --> 00:26:42,520 Speaker 3: I don't know if anybody was listening to him anyway, 501 00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:45,520 Speaker 3: because again, these it's it goes back to you have him, 502 00:26:45,600 --> 00:26:47,560 Speaker 3: you have, you have a title, but you have no power. 503 00:26:48,440 --> 00:26:50,560 Speaker 3: So I hear you. I don't know if that that 504 00:26:50,800 --> 00:26:55,200 Speaker 3: voice is really rigging through. I do think Sankee understands 505 00:26:55,200 --> 00:26:57,840 Speaker 3: a couple of things because he's been through the wars 506 00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:04,560 Speaker 3: here the complication pece. But also if it's unpopular, that's 507 00:27:04,600 --> 00:27:10,440 Speaker 3: a bad idea, Like don't jam through something that's unpopular 508 00:27:10,520 --> 00:27:12,800 Speaker 3: with your fans. I do think that there is an 509 00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:19,240 Speaker 3: somewhere in his in his attache of you know, accumulated knowledge, 510 00:27:20,119 --> 00:27:24,320 Speaker 3: he understands that, like, we can't make this hard to 511 00:27:24,400 --> 00:27:25,800 Speaker 3: understand and unpopular. 512 00:27:26,040 --> 00:27:29,439 Speaker 2: Well, what seems I appreciate that word unpopular is what 513 00:27:29,520 --> 00:27:33,000 Speaker 2: it seems is from our perspective, and we have, you know, 514 00:27:33,200 --> 00:27:35,280 Speaker 2: a couple dozen listeners that we've built up through the 515 00:27:35,359 --> 00:27:39,720 Speaker 2: years that one of the most unpopular ideas of this 516 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:44,280 Speaker 2: sport and how it's evolved is the power that the 517 00:27:44,280 --> 00:27:48,120 Speaker 2: big ten in the SEC wield in the national landscape. 518 00:27:48,359 --> 00:27:51,719 Speaker 2: That they have the power because they are swallowing up 519 00:27:51,760 --> 00:27:55,760 Speaker 2: these teams from smaller conferences to add cachet and brand 520 00:27:55,800 --> 00:27:59,639 Speaker 2: power and value to these conferences, and that this direction 521 00:27:59,760 --> 00:28:02,040 Speaker 2: where the PAC twelve is gone, the Big twelve was 522 00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:04,800 Speaker 2: on the brink, that the ACC has recently been on 523 00:28:04,840 --> 00:28:07,920 Speaker 2: the brink. It's not fun for a lot of fans, 524 00:28:08,240 --> 00:28:11,000 Speaker 2: including fans that have long rooted for Big ten teams 525 00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:14,560 Speaker 2: and SEC teams. Is there self awareness in this room 526 00:28:14,920 --> 00:28:18,040 Speaker 2: that thumbs on scales is not something that is going 527 00:28:18,080 --> 00:28:22,040 Speaker 2: to drive increased passion about this sport among at least 528 00:28:22,280 --> 00:28:24,840 Speaker 2: a good percentage of fans in our experience, but who knows. 529 00:28:25,760 --> 00:28:29,320 Speaker 3: So I don't think so. I don't think that self 530 00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:33,080 Speaker 3: awareness comes until you're on the wrong side of the scale, right, 531 00:28:33,840 --> 00:28:35,960 Speaker 3: So I think the Big twelve and acc are now 532 00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:39,000 Speaker 3: having that moment of self awareness. Oh now we're the 533 00:28:39,000 --> 00:28:42,680 Speaker 3: ones being marginalized. You're right, Dan. It speaks to such 534 00:28:42,680 --> 00:28:45,680 Speaker 3: a much broader issue here, And I mean we could 535 00:28:45,680 --> 00:28:47,760 Speaker 3: go down a rabbit hole of the future of the 536 00:28:47,760 --> 00:28:50,200 Speaker 3: sport and super leagues and where this all might be 537 00:28:50,240 --> 00:28:54,320 Speaker 3: heading in twenty thirty two. But my biggest concern can 538 00:28:54,360 --> 00:28:57,560 Speaker 3: be summed up this way. At what point are you 539 00:28:57,640 --> 00:29:03,480 Speaker 3: going to marginalize the large fan bases to the extent 540 00:29:03,520 --> 00:29:08,120 Speaker 3: where you you you undercut your system, you undercut the sport. 541 00:29:08,360 --> 00:29:12,680 Speaker 3: Because it's one thing to say, hey, Bowling Green, Yeah, 542 00:29:12,680 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 3: this isn't really for you. Well you know what, a 543 00:29:14,920 --> 00:29:17,720 Speaker 3: lot of MAC fans also root for Big ten teams, 544 00:29:17,760 --> 00:29:20,880 Speaker 3: and I think those fans kind of understand that, like, hey, 545 00:29:20,920 --> 00:29:23,880 Speaker 3: we're tangentially part of this thing, right, But as you 546 00:29:24,000 --> 00:29:27,400 Speaker 3: keep going up the ladder here and say no, no, 547 00:29:27,480 --> 00:29:30,040 Speaker 3: you guys don't count, No, no, you you guys don't 548 00:29:30,040 --> 00:29:33,440 Speaker 3: And now we're at the point of like, hey, Oklahoma State, 549 00:29:34,320 --> 00:29:38,880 Speaker 3: you might be marginalized too. Well, that's a big fan, Like, hey, Syracuse, 550 00:29:39,240 --> 00:29:43,200 Speaker 3: you're sort of second class citizen here. I worry that 551 00:29:43,400 --> 00:29:46,880 Speaker 3: as we not just for the playoff immediate discussion, but 552 00:29:46,920 --> 00:29:50,200 Speaker 3: the trend line here if we are heading in that 553 00:29:50,280 --> 00:29:55,080 Speaker 3: trajectory like that's that seems to be very bad for 554 00:29:55,160 --> 00:29:57,640 Speaker 3: the sport. Like I don't like, this is a big 555 00:29:57,760 --> 00:30:02,160 Speaker 3: tent sport. And if we're witt this down and marginalizing 556 00:30:03,000 --> 00:30:06,720 Speaker 3: Big twelve and ACC programs to try to like focus 557 00:30:06,760 --> 00:30:10,920 Speaker 3: on thirty five or forty sec Big ten and you 558 00:30:10,960 --> 00:30:13,440 Speaker 3: know what, then what happens then to the you know, 559 00:30:13,480 --> 00:30:16,320 Speaker 3: the next level of that. So I think that is 560 00:30:16,360 --> 00:30:19,560 Speaker 3: a bad trend line for the sport as well. And 561 00:30:19,640 --> 00:30:24,840 Speaker 3: I'm hoping that these discussions maybe a light bulb goes on, 562 00:30:24,960 --> 00:30:26,560 Speaker 3: but I'm not necessarily scheeing that. 563 00:30:28,920 --> 00:30:32,560 Speaker 2: Who is among these conference commissioners Actually, let's limit it 564 00:30:32,600 --> 00:30:34,640 Speaker 2: to brett or Mark and Jim Phillips from the Big 565 00:30:34,680 --> 00:30:38,200 Speaker 2: twelve in the ACC. How have they been in these conversations? 566 00:30:38,240 --> 00:30:41,840 Speaker 2: How savvy a negotiator with limited leverage? Are these guys? 567 00:30:41,960 --> 00:30:45,120 Speaker 2: Is there anything creative that they're doing to try and 568 00:30:45,840 --> 00:30:49,840 Speaker 2: get their own priorities in play more than obviously they've 569 00:30:49,880 --> 00:30:52,280 Speaker 2: been recently, how have they been at the table? 570 00:30:52,840 --> 00:30:55,120 Speaker 3: So I would I would say this. I always awn 571 00:30:55,200 --> 00:30:59,360 Speaker 3: little apprehensive to give credit when. 572 00:31:00,840 --> 00:31:04,320 Speaker 5: Nothing has been accomplished, well, when nothing's been accomplished, no, 573 00:31:04,400 --> 00:31:07,360 Speaker 5: because like you never know like what like who is 574 00:31:07,560 --> 00:31:12,360 Speaker 5: positioning to themselves to take credit and who is actively 575 00:31:12,400 --> 00:31:13,760 Speaker 5: behind the scenes doing things. 576 00:31:14,120 --> 00:31:19,640 Speaker 3: So that's a caveat to this answer. I think I'll 577 00:31:19,640 --> 00:31:24,440 Speaker 3: give Brett Yormark credit for this, and not that I 578 00:31:24,440 --> 00:31:26,560 Speaker 3: don't want to, not that I want to throw Jim 579 00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:29,040 Speaker 3: Phillips aside, but I feel like the Big Twelve was 580 00:31:29,080 --> 00:31:34,320 Speaker 3: a little more proactive on this front when we pivoted 581 00:31:34,400 --> 00:31:40,120 Speaker 3: away from the AQ model. Part of that was I 582 00:31:40,160 --> 00:31:42,480 Speaker 3: think the Big Twelve in the ACC and I think 583 00:31:42,480 --> 00:31:46,480 Speaker 3: the Big Twelve understood this a little more aggressively. We 584 00:31:46,640 --> 00:31:50,480 Speaker 3: need to convince the SEC, like what can we do 585 00:31:50,800 --> 00:31:55,080 Speaker 3: right to put forth an alternative that gets the SEC 586 00:31:55,280 --> 00:31:57,360 Speaker 3: to go, hey, you know what the Big ten was doing. 587 00:31:57,400 --> 00:32:00,000 Speaker 3: We don't really love that. So they were more agreat 588 00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:03,040 Speaker 3: and I think I think your mark in the Big Twelve, 589 00:32:03,040 --> 00:32:05,120 Speaker 3: I believe I think it's fair to say we're a 590 00:32:05,160 --> 00:32:09,280 Speaker 3: little more aggressive about Hey, how about five to eleven SEC. 591 00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:11,680 Speaker 3: You guys would like that, right, boy? You could get 592 00:32:11,720 --> 00:32:14,360 Speaker 3: like eight or nine teams in How cool would that 593 00:32:14,400 --> 00:32:20,440 Speaker 3: be for you? I think the Big twelve recognize that 594 00:32:20,440 --> 00:32:24,160 Speaker 3: that was a good strategy, and I think your Mark 595 00:32:24,320 --> 00:32:27,160 Speaker 3: recognized that it was a good strategy at that point 596 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:31,880 Speaker 3: to appeal to the SEC if it was also in 597 00:32:31,960 --> 00:32:34,720 Speaker 3: your best interest and it's in the ACC's best interest too. 598 00:32:35,080 --> 00:32:37,240 Speaker 3: I'll give your Mark in the Big twelve a little 599 00:32:37,280 --> 00:32:41,440 Speaker 3: more credit for being proactive going down that road. I'm 600 00:32:41,440 --> 00:32:44,600 Speaker 3: not sure the ACC doesn't deserve any credit. Like I'm 601 00:32:44,720 --> 00:32:46,760 Speaker 3: sure that they weren't just sitting on their hands there, 602 00:32:46,880 --> 00:32:49,200 Speaker 3: But it did seem like the light bulb one on 603 00:32:49,560 --> 00:32:52,160 Speaker 3: in the Big twelve office that like, oh, I know 604 00:32:52,200 --> 00:32:54,800 Speaker 3: the way to do this. Appeal to the SEC and 605 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:58,320 Speaker 3: break those and become and create a format that might 606 00:32:58,480 --> 00:33:01,440 Speaker 3: create a wedge between the SEC. See in the Big ten. Gosh, 607 00:33:01,520 --> 00:33:05,680 Speaker 3: you've just described the plot of Inception two, but the 608 00:33:05,840 --> 00:33:07,360 Speaker 3: college football bent to it. 609 00:33:07,840 --> 00:33:08,080 Speaker 1: Yep. 610 00:33:08,960 --> 00:33:10,640 Speaker 4: There wouldn't be a whole lot of people watching that 611 00:33:10,680 --> 00:33:12,960 Speaker 4: other than us. But yeah, they got to try and 612 00:33:12,960 --> 00:33:14,640 Speaker 4: do whatever they can, I guess to make it work. 613 00:33:14,800 --> 00:33:17,120 Speaker 4: How much talk has there been about breaking away entirely, 614 00:33:17,280 --> 00:33:19,400 Speaker 4: either in the short term or longer term. I know 615 00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:21,640 Speaker 4: that was also a headline in the like. 616 00:33:21,880 --> 00:33:25,480 Speaker 3: Really, we're gonna thirty minutes in, We're gonna we're gonna 617 00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:33,120 Speaker 3: open that portal. Okay, I think more than ever before 618 00:33:34,320 --> 00:33:38,360 Speaker 3: that is a possibility. Now I still think it is 619 00:33:38,400 --> 00:33:43,840 Speaker 3: a remote possibility. But I think if the power for 620 00:33:45,080 --> 00:33:51,000 Speaker 3: literally just created another body, right, this this new enforcement body, 621 00:33:51,040 --> 00:33:55,800 Speaker 3: this College Sports Commission, it's its oversight is only gonna 622 00:33:55,840 --> 00:33:57,880 Speaker 3: be over the money rules, right, the stuff that came 623 00:33:57,920 --> 00:34:03,960 Speaker 3: out of the settlement, and I l roster caps and 624 00:34:04,360 --> 00:34:07,640 Speaker 3: nil cap and the and the revenue sharing cap. But 625 00:34:07,840 --> 00:34:11,719 Speaker 3: once you create a new body, because the other thing 626 00:34:11,719 --> 00:34:14,040 Speaker 3: I would always say is why would why would you leave? 627 00:34:14,120 --> 00:34:17,440 Speaker 3: You just have to create another NC double A. Right, Well, 628 00:34:17,880 --> 00:34:21,759 Speaker 3: they just created something that took away some of the 629 00:34:21,800 --> 00:34:25,200 Speaker 3: power from the NC double A. So that seems to 630 00:34:25,280 --> 00:34:30,960 Speaker 3: be they just I think they just built an off ramp. Again. 631 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:33,960 Speaker 3: I think there's a lot of complicated legal questions as 632 00:34:34,040 --> 00:34:36,920 Speaker 3: to why they might not want to take that off ramp. 633 00:34:37,480 --> 00:34:40,920 Speaker 3: But I do find the creation of the off ramp 634 00:34:41,520 --> 00:34:44,560 Speaker 3: there's also another thing going on, and I think it's 635 00:34:44,600 --> 00:34:48,600 Speaker 3: within the non FBS and non power conferences, especially the 636 00:34:48,640 --> 00:34:51,879 Speaker 3: non FBS conferences. I think there is a little bit 637 00:34:51,880 --> 00:34:56,120 Speaker 3: of sentiment, maybe not overwhelming, of you know what, just 638 00:34:56,280 --> 00:35:00,920 Speaker 3: go right, like at this point, maybe you should just 639 00:35:00,960 --> 00:35:03,360 Speaker 3: go now Again, I think if I think that, that's 640 00:35:03,400 --> 00:35:05,799 Speaker 3: a frustration thing, and I think if you pulled them 641 00:35:05,840 --> 00:35:09,359 Speaker 3: away and gave them, gave them a scotch and told 642 00:35:09,400 --> 00:35:12,120 Speaker 3: them to calm down, they would go, yeah, you're right, 643 00:35:12,360 --> 00:35:14,600 Speaker 3: Like that's not a good idea. They shouldn't just leave. 644 00:35:15,040 --> 00:35:18,080 Speaker 3: But I do think we are hitting a point where 645 00:35:18,120 --> 00:35:21,440 Speaker 3: there's enough frustration on each side where they have to 646 00:35:21,440 --> 00:35:23,520 Speaker 3: take it seriously. But I would also say this that's 647 00:35:23,560 --> 00:35:26,600 Speaker 3: not imminent. Twenty thirty two is going to be when 648 00:35:26,680 --> 00:35:30,080 Speaker 3: I think we have like a new landscape. And the 649 00:35:30,120 --> 00:35:31,840 Speaker 3: one thing I would say to both of you guys 650 00:35:31,920 --> 00:35:34,360 Speaker 3: is because people ask me all the time, where is 651 00:35:34,360 --> 00:35:37,560 Speaker 3: this heading? And I say, I don't know. My imagination 652 00:35:37,760 --> 00:35:40,720 Speaker 3: is not that good, Like I don't have a strong 653 00:35:40,800 --> 00:35:45,080 Speaker 3: enough like what is what is the state of higher education? 654 00:35:45,840 --> 00:35:49,040 Speaker 3: What is the state of the media, Like there are 655 00:35:49,120 --> 00:35:50,640 Speaker 3: too many outside in. 656 00:35:50,640 --> 00:35:52,279 Speaker 1: The cable industry, Yeah, the. 657 00:35:52,280 --> 00:35:56,439 Speaker 3: Cable there's too many things outside of college sports, influencing 658 00:35:56,520 --> 00:35:59,719 Speaker 3: the direction of college sports. What is the state of 659 00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:04,120 Speaker 3: the government that could be running parts of this at 660 00:36:04,120 --> 00:36:08,439 Speaker 3: some point. So it's hard for me to determine, because 661 00:36:08,480 --> 00:36:11,080 Speaker 3: I don't think we're on a linear trajectory. 662 00:36:11,960 --> 00:36:12,520 Speaker 1: We might be. 663 00:36:12,760 --> 00:36:15,440 Speaker 3: We might be on a linear trajectory where it's just, oh, 664 00:36:15,480 --> 00:36:17,279 Speaker 3: the SEC grabs a whole bunch more and the Big 665 00:36:17,360 --> 00:36:19,040 Speaker 3: ten grabs a whole bunch more, and now they're the 666 00:36:19,080 --> 00:36:22,600 Speaker 3: AFC and NFC. That's the that's the that's the linear path. 667 00:36:23,480 --> 00:36:26,799 Speaker 3: But I think it's I think it would be foolish 668 00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:28,799 Speaker 3: for us to think that there's some kind of other 669 00:36:28,880 --> 00:36:33,520 Speaker 3: disruption that's possible that creates a bend in this path, 670 00:36:35,320 --> 00:36:38,360 Speaker 3: A new timeline might one might say, yeah, might create 671 00:36:38,400 --> 00:36:40,640 Speaker 3: a new time, reimagined timeline. 672 00:36:40,880 --> 00:36:43,640 Speaker 4: Reason how we can we can classify it on a 673 00:36:43,680 --> 00:36:47,080 Speaker 4: personal level, Ralph, when you are covering this story because 674 00:36:47,080 --> 00:36:49,480 Speaker 4: it is so charged and so many people care about it. 675 00:36:50,000 --> 00:36:53,040 Speaker 4: On one hand, you may have some I regret to 676 00:36:53,040 --> 00:36:55,759 Speaker 4: call them lesser conferences, but conferences with let's say, not 677 00:36:55,800 --> 00:36:59,040 Speaker 4: as much power as the Big two clearly trying to 678 00:36:59,440 --> 00:37:03,240 Speaker 4: mount something of a pr campaign turn public opinion against 679 00:37:03,280 --> 00:37:05,400 Speaker 4: some of these ideas that might be their best ploy 680 00:37:05,440 --> 00:37:08,239 Speaker 4: to gain some leverage. Meanwhile, you've got the Big Two 681 00:37:08,719 --> 00:37:11,680 Speaker 4: obviously they are at something of an impass as well. 682 00:37:11,760 --> 00:37:14,880 Speaker 4: How do you report this story and be accurate because 683 00:37:14,880 --> 00:37:17,960 Speaker 4: there are so many competing interests, and I mean just 684 00:37:18,000 --> 00:37:21,880 Speaker 4: from Afar, it's hard to discern who is being genuine 685 00:37:21,920 --> 00:37:24,600 Speaker 4: with what they're saying versus who is just trying to gain. 686 00:37:24,440 --> 00:37:27,400 Speaker 3: A little bit more leverage in the court of public opinion. Yeah, 687 00:37:27,680 --> 00:37:32,360 Speaker 3: it is. It is tricky, and you find yourself my 688 00:37:32,719 --> 00:37:34,680 Speaker 3: I tend to try to take a little bit of 689 00:37:34,719 --> 00:37:39,200 Speaker 3: a less is more approach, which is a little frustrating, right, 690 00:37:39,200 --> 00:37:41,640 Speaker 3: because as a reporter, you want is I want to 691 00:37:41,680 --> 00:37:45,040 Speaker 3: get more details and more information. I want to push more, like, Okay, 692 00:37:45,080 --> 00:37:46,839 Speaker 3: give me what you what you think on this, Let 693 00:37:46,840 --> 00:37:49,560 Speaker 3: me get your perspective, let me get your perspective. But 694 00:37:49,719 --> 00:37:52,480 Speaker 3: because it is, it tends to be a little tinged 695 00:37:52,560 --> 00:37:57,680 Speaker 3: with well, your perspective is your is your is is 696 00:37:57,719 --> 00:38:01,719 Speaker 3: your is your spin? Right, So you want to try 697 00:38:01,719 --> 00:38:05,200 Speaker 3: to filter out some of the spin and just keep 698 00:38:05,239 --> 00:38:09,560 Speaker 3: it and boil it down to more narrow issues. That's why, 699 00:38:09,680 --> 00:38:13,359 Speaker 3: like where we started, I was like, here's the main thing, 700 00:38:13,520 --> 00:38:15,960 Speaker 3: here's the decision tree, So let's kind of keep it 701 00:38:16,000 --> 00:38:18,399 Speaker 3: within the realm of the decision tree. The other thing 702 00:38:18,440 --> 00:38:20,680 Speaker 3: I think you try to do is or I try 703 00:38:20,719 --> 00:38:23,720 Speaker 3: to do, is take a little bit of a step 704 00:38:23,760 --> 00:38:28,480 Speaker 3: back from the palace drama and the personality this person's upset. 705 00:38:28,719 --> 00:38:33,239 Speaker 3: Oh that there's you know, there's friction here, and there's 706 00:38:33,880 --> 00:38:40,759 Speaker 3: you know, discontent there. You know, like, yeah, definitely, But 707 00:38:41,040 --> 00:38:45,400 Speaker 3: how relevant is that is hard to weigh. So I 708 00:38:45,640 --> 00:38:48,560 Speaker 3: try to try to filter out some of that stuff 709 00:38:49,080 --> 00:38:53,799 Speaker 3: and stick to just where this is heading and the 710 00:38:54,040 --> 00:38:57,960 Speaker 3: sort of relevant facts without getting drawn into the personal 711 00:38:58,080 --> 00:39:01,200 Speaker 3: drama and who's not talking to who? Right? Who's pissed 712 00:39:01,239 --> 00:39:01,440 Speaker 3: off it? 713 00:39:01,520 --> 00:39:03,359 Speaker 2: Wait a minute? Wait a minute, who's not talking to who? 714 00:39:03,360 --> 00:39:06,279 Speaker 2: Though no, a few years ago there was a lot 715 00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:08,840 Speaker 2: more of that. One of the I will say, like, 716 00:39:09,040 --> 00:39:11,480 Speaker 2: the people do matter here, right, If the people in 717 00:39:11,600 --> 00:39:14,439 Speaker 2: real matter, Like the fact that sank and Petiti get 718 00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:19,360 Speaker 2: along is a really big important deal. Like the fact 719 00:39:19,360 --> 00:39:22,880 Speaker 2: that the two people who probably hold the most power 720 00:39:22,880 --> 00:39:26,279 Speaker 2: in this situation sort of like each other and can 721 00:39:26,400 --> 00:39:30,719 Speaker 2: have like respectful conversations and respect each other's opinions. I 722 00:39:30,760 --> 00:39:33,640 Speaker 2: think is a reason why we will get to some 723 00:39:33,719 --> 00:39:37,400 Speaker 2: kind of resolution as opposed to I don't know, just 724 00:39:37,440 --> 00:39:40,839 Speaker 2: being stuck in a ditch. Well, here's the interesting thing 725 00:39:40,880 --> 00:39:44,000 Speaker 2: about them getting along specifically, so they get along, which 726 00:39:44,040 --> 00:39:46,680 Speaker 2: is good because they clearly have the most leverage in power. 727 00:39:47,040 --> 00:39:50,520 Speaker 2: And it's also interesting because that they have a working 728 00:39:50,560 --> 00:39:56,280 Speaker 2: relationship because behind the scenes, I'm not so sure Disney, 729 00:39:56,640 --> 00:40:00,360 Speaker 2: ESPN and Fox are completely enamored with each other. They're 730 00:40:00,680 --> 00:40:06,640 Speaker 2: obviously competing for teams and conferences and windows and ad dollars. 731 00:40:07,640 --> 00:40:09,880 Speaker 2: ESPN is the one right now who holds the leverage 732 00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:13,239 Speaker 2: ESPN Disney because they are the short term owner of 733 00:40:13,360 --> 00:40:16,080 Speaker 2: this playoff and the broadcast rights that they obviously have 734 00:40:16,120 --> 00:40:19,200 Speaker 2: the ability to sub license out to TNT. At this point, 735 00:40:20,080 --> 00:40:24,239 Speaker 2: what does ESPN want, Even if they're saying that's not 736 00:40:24,400 --> 00:40:27,160 Speaker 2: up to us, that's not our responsibility, what do they 737 00:40:27,200 --> 00:40:28,000 Speaker 2: actually want? 738 00:40:28,560 --> 00:40:32,799 Speaker 3: Yeah, interesting dynamic in this, and I'm glad you got 739 00:40:32,800 --> 00:40:36,480 Speaker 3: to it because I think there is an assumption that 740 00:40:36,680 --> 00:40:39,319 Speaker 3: ESPN is the puppet master of the playoff and it 741 00:40:39,360 --> 00:40:42,319 Speaker 3: gets whatever it wants. And I very much tell you 742 00:40:43,640 --> 00:40:48,720 Speaker 3: that if there's ever been a negotiation or an event 743 00:40:49,080 --> 00:40:54,360 Speaker 3: that sort of belies that idea, it is this okay, folks. 744 00:40:54,480 --> 00:40:58,399 Speaker 3: I don't think ESPN wants any expansion, Like they are 745 00:40:58,480 --> 00:41:02,160 Speaker 3: running out of windows to put these games and exclusive spots. 746 00:41:02,920 --> 00:41:06,400 Speaker 3: They're another thing too, ESPN is not on the hook 747 00:41:06,480 --> 00:41:09,640 Speaker 3: to pay more money for these for more playoff games. 748 00:41:09,920 --> 00:41:12,160 Speaker 1: Or more SEC games at this point, right, they would 749 00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:14,240 Speaker 1: be in the hook for more. 750 00:41:14,120 --> 00:41:16,560 Speaker 3: SEC games, but I think they do kind of want 751 00:41:16,640 --> 00:41:20,160 Speaker 3: some more of the SEC games. Sure, but when you 752 00:41:20,200 --> 00:41:23,120 Speaker 3: talk about like play in games, like I think Fox 753 00:41:23,360 --> 00:41:27,319 Speaker 3: has a lot less inventory. Yep, big ten play in series. Oh, 754 00:41:27,560 --> 00:41:30,640 Speaker 3: that sounds like a cool idea, We'll do that. I 755 00:41:30,680 --> 00:41:34,520 Speaker 3: don't think the ESPN is like really dying for an 756 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:40,440 Speaker 3: SEC Championship weekend with a bunch more games. You know, 757 00:41:40,520 --> 00:41:43,680 Speaker 3: they just did great numbers on the first for the 758 00:41:43,680 --> 00:41:48,640 Speaker 3: first SEC Championship game they've had in years. So I like, 759 00:41:48,640 --> 00:41:51,680 Speaker 3: like ESPN's role in this is weird because like, I 760 00:41:51,719 --> 00:41:56,560 Speaker 3: don't think they're dying for any of the things that 761 00:41:56,840 --> 00:42:00,960 Speaker 3: are being talked about. But they but again, they you know, 762 00:42:01,480 --> 00:42:04,960 Speaker 3: unlike what the perception is. They don't just say do 763 00:42:05,080 --> 00:42:08,319 Speaker 3: this and the and the group jumps, right. 764 00:42:09,520 --> 00:42:15,960 Speaker 2: Is there is there conversation regarding expansion around well, the 765 00:42:16,080 --> 00:42:20,680 Speaker 2: NFL well around a schedule that requires Tuesday games, Thursday games, 766 00:42:20,719 --> 00:42:24,520 Speaker 2: Friday games, which is obviously not you know, a traditional 767 00:42:24,560 --> 00:42:28,680 Speaker 2: window for major college football games, and the unique nature 768 00:42:28,800 --> 00:42:34,320 Speaker 2: of college football as a huge sport trying its best 769 00:42:34,360 --> 00:42:39,200 Speaker 2: to mimic the bigger, domestic version of this sport, whereas 770 00:42:39,520 --> 00:42:42,920 Speaker 2: college baseball is different than Major League Baseball, and decidedly 771 00:42:42,960 --> 00:42:45,880 Speaker 2: so their postseason. They're you know, the format of the games, 772 00:42:45,920 --> 00:42:48,560 Speaker 2: the equipment used in the games. The NCAA tournament stands 773 00:42:48,560 --> 00:42:52,000 Speaker 2: alone with regard to you know, a one and done 774 00:42:52,120 --> 00:42:56,160 Speaker 2: basketball tournament as opposed to a series, and it's just 775 00:42:56,280 --> 00:42:58,399 Speaker 2: very different. The way the games are played, the way 776 00:42:58,440 --> 00:43:01,680 Speaker 2: that the postseason and now college ball is saying, we 777 00:43:01,719 --> 00:43:04,080 Speaker 2: want to get closer and closer to this thing that 778 00:43:04,239 --> 00:43:07,320 Speaker 2: is going to continue to swallow us in terms of attention. 779 00:43:08,360 --> 00:43:11,640 Speaker 2: Is their self awareness there that college football, with each 780 00:43:11,680 --> 00:43:15,399 Speaker 2: passing day is saying, let's get away from the main thing, 781 00:43:15,760 --> 00:43:20,200 Speaker 2: which I guess was bulls and try to mimic this 782 00:43:20,280 --> 00:43:22,319 Speaker 2: thing that's always going to dwarf us. 783 00:43:23,239 --> 00:43:26,799 Speaker 3: So the thought process is not as philosophical as you're 784 00:43:26,840 --> 00:43:29,040 Speaker 3: making it. Okay, you are far more thoughtful. 785 00:43:29,160 --> 00:43:31,200 Speaker 1: It's the off season yeah, thank you. 786 00:43:31,360 --> 00:43:38,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, their issue, they're not concerned about the morphing into 787 00:43:38,800 --> 00:43:41,239 Speaker 3: the I don't think. I don't sense that there is 788 00:43:41,280 --> 00:43:45,200 Speaker 3: a real concern about morphing into the NFL and then 789 00:43:45,280 --> 00:43:49,680 Speaker 3: trying to compete against the NFL by becoming the NFL. 790 00:43:50,360 --> 00:43:53,880 Speaker 3: I think it's a much more base level problem which 791 00:43:53,960 --> 00:43:57,600 Speaker 3: we just referred to. Where do we play these games 792 00:43:58,120 --> 00:44:01,799 Speaker 3: so we're not being in gulf by the NFL like 793 00:44:01,840 --> 00:44:06,040 Speaker 3: it literally is just a proximity issue. We have to 794 00:44:06,120 --> 00:44:10,160 Speaker 3: create some space where we can be the thing at 795 00:44:10,160 --> 00:44:12,960 Speaker 3: a time when the NFL, which is the biggest thing, 796 00:44:13,480 --> 00:44:17,520 Speaker 3: is taking over everything. So how do we balance that 797 00:44:17,960 --> 00:44:22,840 Speaker 3: from a schedule perspective, where and when we play the games? 798 00:44:23,120 --> 00:44:25,279 Speaker 3: How much are we burying ourselves? How much do we 799 00:44:25,320 --> 00:44:27,479 Speaker 3: have to go head to head here? I think they've 800 00:44:27,520 --> 00:44:30,319 Speaker 3: swallowed to a certain degree. Yes, at some point we're 801 00:44:30,320 --> 00:44:32,600 Speaker 3: just going to have to eat it and go sort 802 00:44:32,600 --> 00:44:36,080 Speaker 3: of head to head against the NFL. But it also 803 00:44:36,320 --> 00:44:39,759 Speaker 3: speaks to again the ESPN issue of them going like, hey, 804 00:44:39,800 --> 00:44:44,359 Speaker 3: we paid one point whatever billion for this thing, and 805 00:44:44,400 --> 00:44:47,840 Speaker 3: now you're giving us games that are played against Chiefs bills, 806 00:44:47,880 --> 00:44:52,440 Speaker 3: Like that's not what we signed up for. Some of 807 00:44:52,480 --> 00:44:56,520 Speaker 3: this stuff might sort itself out by the NFL going 808 00:44:56,680 --> 00:45:02,200 Speaker 3: to an eighteen game schedule, putting in some extra buys. Now, 809 00:45:02,239 --> 00:45:04,840 Speaker 3: all of a sudden, the NFL goes deeper. You've created 810 00:45:04,840 --> 00:45:07,160 Speaker 3: a little more space on the calendar for college football 811 00:45:07,239 --> 00:45:11,120 Speaker 3: not to be swallowed up. So it's a logistics problem 812 00:45:11,560 --> 00:45:14,800 Speaker 3: for the college football for college football and college football playoff. 813 00:45:15,160 --> 00:45:18,880 Speaker 3: I don't think it is an existential issue to the 814 00:45:18,960 --> 00:45:22,200 Speaker 3: idea what you're talking about, Dan, in terms of what 815 00:45:22,280 --> 00:45:24,279 Speaker 3: do we want to be? Right? 816 00:45:24,800 --> 00:45:28,320 Speaker 1: Is there anybody in that room thinking long term? 817 00:45:28,520 --> 00:45:29,040 Speaker 3: Oh? I think no. 818 00:45:29,160 --> 00:45:33,319 Speaker 2: I think there are Okay, because that's the first question, right, 819 00:45:33,320 --> 00:45:34,920 Speaker 2: If you're thinking long term, it's what do we want 820 00:45:34,960 --> 00:45:35,879 Speaker 2: to be? Where is this going? 821 00:45:36,640 --> 00:45:39,359 Speaker 3: Yeah? No, but I think what they want to be. So, 822 00:45:40,160 --> 00:45:42,880 Speaker 3: but you have to understand part of the reason why 823 00:45:43,760 --> 00:45:48,360 Speaker 3: we switched to this expanded playoff. I like to sometimes 824 00:45:48,360 --> 00:45:51,359 Speaker 3: describe it as like this. Don't think of it as 825 00:45:51,440 --> 00:45:55,399 Speaker 3: an expanded playoff. All they did was take the BCS, 826 00:45:55,680 --> 00:46:00,279 Speaker 3: not the BCS, the the New York six games, New 827 00:46:00,360 --> 00:46:04,680 Speaker 3: York City. I'm already forgetting the terminology changes every few years. 828 00:46:04,680 --> 00:46:05,879 Speaker 1: It's okay, the. 829 00:46:05,840 --> 00:46:09,680 Speaker 3: Old New Year six games. All they did was say, Okay, 830 00:46:09,680 --> 00:46:13,160 Speaker 3: now you're playoff games, right, We just wanted to put 831 00:46:13,280 --> 00:46:17,279 Speaker 3: relevance on those games at a certain point. What they're 832 00:46:17,320 --> 00:46:20,279 Speaker 3: going to do is the Citrus Bowl, we just want 833 00:46:20,280 --> 00:46:22,880 Speaker 3: to make that relevant. Well, what if we made it 834 00:46:22,920 --> 00:46:26,960 Speaker 3: a early round playoff game when we expand to twenty 835 00:46:27,000 --> 00:46:29,640 Speaker 3: four at some point. Now, that's not happening anytime soon. 836 00:46:29,640 --> 00:46:31,920 Speaker 3: By the way, just to be clear to your listeners, 837 00:46:32,040 --> 00:46:35,360 Speaker 3: they're not talking about a twenty fourteen playoff, right. But 838 00:46:35,480 --> 00:46:39,279 Speaker 3: I think that's the philosophy of how do we keep 839 00:46:39,320 --> 00:46:43,840 Speaker 3: our postseason games relevant? How do we keep the race 840 00:46:44,080 --> 00:46:48,879 Speaker 3: to the postseason relevant for more and more of our schools. Well, 841 00:46:48,920 --> 00:46:51,520 Speaker 3: how do you do that is you just take the 842 00:46:51,560 --> 00:46:55,840 Speaker 3: bowl games and say you're a playoff game. Now that 843 00:46:55,960 --> 00:47:00,200 Speaker 3: same Iowa Tennessee game is now a playoff game. It's 844 00:47:00,200 --> 00:47:03,600 Speaker 3: a playoff game. The players show up, people are excited 845 00:47:03,600 --> 00:47:07,080 Speaker 3: about playing into it, people are excited about the result 846 00:47:07,160 --> 00:47:10,520 Speaker 3: of it. If it's just the bowl game, nobody cares 847 00:47:10,560 --> 00:47:13,319 Speaker 3: about the fact that you're playing to get in it. Right, 848 00:47:13,360 --> 00:47:17,680 Speaker 3: the November stretch to get to the Citrus Bowl, nobody 849 00:47:17,680 --> 00:47:21,440 Speaker 3: cares about anymore. And the Citrus Bowl itself is become 850 00:47:21,560 --> 00:47:24,120 Speaker 3: just something that like, you and I care about it 851 00:47:24,160 --> 00:47:26,480 Speaker 3: because we care about all this stuff, right, and the 852 00:47:26,480 --> 00:47:28,640 Speaker 3: betters care about it because they can bet on it. 853 00:47:29,120 --> 00:47:33,400 Speaker 3: But so I think that's the crux of playoff expansion 854 00:47:33,480 --> 00:47:36,840 Speaker 3: is we have all these postseason games with good teams, 855 00:47:37,080 --> 00:47:40,719 Speaker 3: with fan bases that care about those teams, but if 856 00:47:40,719 --> 00:47:43,640 Speaker 3: they're not playoff games, nobody cares about them. So what 857 00:47:43,680 --> 00:47:45,799 Speaker 3: do you do? Wave your magic wand turn into a 858 00:47:45,800 --> 00:47:46,479 Speaker 3: playoff game? 859 00:47:47,040 --> 00:47:49,840 Speaker 2: So what's next? What is the next step on this journey? 860 00:47:49,840 --> 00:47:52,680 Speaker 2: Obviously the latest stories were just like they have thrown 861 00:47:52,760 --> 00:47:54,520 Speaker 2: up their hands and they're starting all over. 862 00:47:55,600 --> 00:47:58,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, what is the next step? What is the next meeting? Okay, continue? 863 00:47:59,120 --> 00:48:01,319 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm not sure if it's a total restart, because 864 00:48:01,360 --> 00:48:05,400 Speaker 3: I don't think you're necessary. I do think you're okay sixteen. 865 00:48:05,640 --> 00:48:08,360 Speaker 3: We're kind of cool with sixteen. I don't think the 866 00:48:08,360 --> 00:48:12,000 Speaker 3: big ten is relinquishing AQ and the idea of that. 867 00:48:12,360 --> 00:48:15,839 Speaker 3: In fact, I think maybe more than ever that ends 868 00:48:15,920 --> 00:48:18,879 Speaker 3: up being and guys, I pivot every day, Like if 869 00:48:18,880 --> 00:48:20,560 Speaker 3: you called me next week, I could tell you something 870 00:48:20,600 --> 00:48:24,040 Speaker 3: different here. But I actually think that maybe the compromise 871 00:48:24,320 --> 00:48:29,400 Speaker 3: is because the secs there's a faction, and the faction 872 00:48:29,560 --> 00:48:32,520 Speaker 3: being the guy who leads the damn league. Greg Sanke 873 00:48:32,880 --> 00:48:35,239 Speaker 3: would so very much like to get them to go 874 00:48:35,280 --> 00:48:38,560 Speaker 3: to nine games that maybe they go, Okay, they get 875 00:48:38,600 --> 00:48:42,920 Speaker 3: to let's go to nine conference games. Will have the aqs. 876 00:48:43,040 --> 00:48:45,600 Speaker 3: We'll get on board with what the Big ten wants. 877 00:48:45,880 --> 00:48:48,800 Speaker 3: That gives us the protection that we want for playing 878 00:48:48,840 --> 00:48:51,680 Speaker 3: these games. It allows us to have a series with 879 00:48:51,800 --> 00:48:54,960 Speaker 3: the Big Ten, and that makes us more money too. 880 00:48:55,680 --> 00:48:58,560 Speaker 3: So I do find myself wondering if the Big Ten 881 00:48:58,719 --> 00:49:02,279 Speaker 3: might end up getting its way here, because the SEC 882 00:49:02,480 --> 00:49:06,719 Speaker 3: sees that as the better path to getting not necessarily 883 00:49:06,760 --> 00:49:12,000 Speaker 3: the ideal playoff, but to getting the ideal revenue generator 884 00:49:12,120 --> 00:49:17,280 Speaker 3: throughout their entire football operation. His name is Ralph Russo. 885 00:49:17,360 --> 00:49:20,400 Speaker 3: He is a senior writer for the Athletic. We'll be 886 00:49:20,400 --> 00:49:25,359 Speaker 3: watching your reporting like a North Carolina red tailed hawk. Ralph, 887 00:49:25,400 --> 00:49:27,040 Speaker 3: if it was a red tailed HOWK if it was 888 00:49:27,040 --> 00:49:29,239 Speaker 3: the best tail, it was the best thing you ate 889 00:49:29,239 --> 00:49:32,879 Speaker 3: in Ashville good food town. It is a good food town, 890 00:49:32,920 --> 00:49:35,320 Speaker 3: and so I will I will plug. My colleague David 891 00:49:35,360 --> 00:49:39,560 Speaker 3: Oven from the Athletic is obsessed with food to an 892 00:49:39,600 --> 00:49:42,680 Speaker 3: extent that I like, like I was a little taken aback. 893 00:49:42,760 --> 00:49:47,200 Speaker 3: Like every moment with David was either eating or talking 894 00:49:47,239 --> 00:49:51,160 Speaker 3: about where we were going to. Love that. Okay, so 895 00:49:51,400 --> 00:49:53,279 Speaker 3: I'm like, I'm a healthy person. I like to eat. 896 00:49:53,320 --> 00:49:55,400 Speaker 3: Like I'm Italian, I like to eat. But it was 897 00:49:55,440 --> 00:49:59,840 Speaker 3: a bit much like that, the constant steering back, because that, frankly, guys, 898 00:50:00,120 --> 00:50:02,720 Speaker 3: that's what my eighty year old parents do in Florida. 899 00:50:03,160 --> 00:50:06,520 Speaker 3: They're either eating a meal or they're talking about what 900 00:50:06,640 --> 00:50:08,080 Speaker 3: the next meal will be. 901 00:50:08,160 --> 00:50:10,400 Speaker 2: I would I would get along with them. So well, continue, 902 00:50:10,480 --> 00:50:12,839 Speaker 2: You're going to be a great retireing. Thank you so much. 903 00:50:12,880 --> 00:50:13,480 Speaker 2: That's the best thing. 904 00:50:13,480 --> 00:50:15,600 Speaker 3: You're going to be retiring. So the best thing I 905 00:50:15,800 --> 00:50:18,760 Speaker 3: ate was there's a place called the Liberty House Cafe. 906 00:50:19,440 --> 00:50:21,360 Speaker 3: It's a go in, order your food at the counter 907 00:50:21,400 --> 00:50:23,520 Speaker 3: and they bring it to you. It's a lovely spot 908 00:50:23,560 --> 00:50:27,799 Speaker 3: by the way garden outside seating. They do a it 909 00:50:27,840 --> 00:50:33,400 Speaker 3: seems like, I think a baked sour dough buttermilk pancake. Yep, 910 00:50:33,960 --> 00:50:36,720 Speaker 3: it was really really yummy. I mean it was really 911 00:50:36,719 --> 00:50:40,400 Speaker 3: really he like now again, David, most of the conversation 912 00:50:40,520 --> 00:50:43,280 Speaker 3: over the next thirty six hours was about the pana pancake. 913 00:50:43,360 --> 00:50:44,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, the sour dough pancakes. 914 00:50:44,560 --> 00:50:47,680 Speaker 3: I'm still getting texts about the pancake, right, it was 915 00:50:47,719 --> 00:50:49,560 Speaker 3: a real but I will say it was a really 916 00:50:49,600 --> 00:50:51,719 Speaker 3: good pancake. I have blueberries in mine. It was an 917 00:50:51,719 --> 00:50:52,680 Speaker 3: excellent pancake. 918 00:50:53,080 --> 00:50:53,920 Speaker 1: I continue. 919 00:50:54,280 --> 00:50:57,719 Speaker 3: I have nothing further. Okay, I have nothing further. His 920 00:50:57,800 --> 00:51:01,000 Speaker 3: name again, Ralph Russo. Find all of great work out 921 00:51:01,080 --> 00:51:04,320 Speaker 3: at the Athletic. Keep doing good things. We're gonna be 922 00:51:04,320 --> 00:51:06,120 Speaker 3: following it. We're gonna be counting on you, Ralph. Thank 923 00:51:06,120 --> 00:51:09,040 Speaker 3: you so much. Thanks guys. It was a pleasure and 924 00:51:09,080 --> 00:51:11,560 Speaker 3: an honor and all those things, and uh yeah, very 925 00:51:11,640 --> 00:51:14,520 Speaker 3: much of what Maybe maybe we can make it less 926 00:51:14,520 --> 00:51:16,319 Speaker 3: than ten years. We're really sure. 927 00:51:16,719 --> 00:51:18,120 Speaker 1: Next the next pizzas on me. 928 00:51:18,520 --> 00:51:21,640 Speaker 3: Thanks guys, all right, one more time. That is Ralph 929 00:51:21,880 --> 00:51:27,399 Speaker 3: Russo's senior reporter, senior writer for The Athletic. We're very 930 00:51:27,400 --> 00:51:29,160 Speaker 3: pleased to have him back on the show. It's been 931 00:51:29,200 --> 00:51:30,799 Speaker 3: far too long. Yeah. 932 00:51:30,840 --> 00:51:36,560 Speaker 2: A lot of his work is trying to explain, like 933 00:51:37,520 --> 00:51:39,680 Speaker 2: if you were to ask somebody like, hey, real quick, 934 00:51:39,760 --> 00:51:42,080 Speaker 2: could you give me top level about the sort of 935 00:51:42,200 --> 00:51:45,279 Speaker 2: culture and geopolitics of India, You're just like, oh man, 936 00:51:45,320 --> 00:51:47,600 Speaker 2: how much time do you have? There's a lot going 937 00:51:47,640 --> 00:51:51,480 Speaker 2: on here, and I appreciate his ability to sort of 938 00:51:51,920 --> 00:51:55,320 Speaker 2: make sense of it all in sort of an alchemy way, 939 00:51:55,800 --> 00:51:58,359 Speaker 2: and he's making sense of something that to a lot 940 00:51:58,360 --> 00:52:00,960 Speaker 2: of people, I think ourselves included, doesn't fully makes sense. 941 00:52:01,440 --> 00:52:04,720 Speaker 2: So always great to hear his perspective on these types 942 00:52:04,760 --> 00:52:08,040 Speaker 2: of conversations, and you know, him being very patient with 943 00:52:08,120 --> 00:52:10,520 Speaker 2: me asking questions that amount to like why are we 944 00:52:10,560 --> 00:52:13,360 Speaker 2: just why are we doing this at all? And I 945 00:52:13,440 --> 00:52:14,880 Speaker 2: just you know, I got to get those off of 946 00:52:14,920 --> 00:52:15,640 Speaker 2: my chest. 947 00:52:15,560 --> 00:52:19,919 Speaker 4: Something that I think is underrated. You and I both 948 00:52:19,960 --> 00:52:24,759 Speaker 4: worked in an office setting for years. Yeah, and anybody 949 00:52:24,800 --> 00:52:28,120 Speaker 4: listening to this who goes into the office or has 950 00:52:28,120 --> 00:52:29,880 Speaker 4: been in that situation is going to know exactly what 951 00:52:29,920 --> 00:52:32,040 Speaker 4: I'm talking about. But on occasion, there's a big meeting 952 00:52:32,120 --> 00:52:34,080 Speaker 4: that everybody knows about. Maybe you're not in it, but. 953 00:52:34,160 --> 00:52:39,120 Speaker 3: All hands, all hands meeting. It's important, it's meaningful, and 954 00:52:39,480 --> 00:52:42,040 Speaker 3: there's a lot of i'll use his word, palace intrigue 955 00:52:42,040 --> 00:52:44,000 Speaker 3: around what goes on in that room, the room where 956 00:52:44,000 --> 00:52:49,200 Speaker 3: it happens. Dan, and I know from experience that being 957 00:52:49,200 --> 00:52:52,239 Speaker 3: on the outside of those meetings, when you get like 958 00:52:52,360 --> 00:52:55,880 Speaker 3: the report as to what happened it's never really that exciting. No, 959 00:52:56,680 --> 00:52:58,359 Speaker 3: it's really not that exciting. 960 00:52:58,040 --> 00:52:59,520 Speaker 1: But you kind of just want to be in the room. 961 00:53:00,000 --> 00:53:01,200 Speaker 3: I don't want to be in a room where it happens. 962 00:53:01,239 --> 00:53:04,399 Speaker 4: It was a whole song on Hamilton, but like, it's 963 00:53:04,440 --> 00:53:08,640 Speaker 4: never quite as exciting from the outside in. And I 964 00:53:08,680 --> 00:53:11,920 Speaker 4: suspect that if you are covering this story, it's a 965 00:53:11,920 --> 00:53:15,920 Speaker 4: lot of waiting around, it's a lot of getting secondhand information. 966 00:53:16,800 --> 00:53:20,040 Speaker 4: There is probably, on some human level, an impulse to 967 00:53:20,080 --> 00:53:22,239 Speaker 4: make it a little bit more dramatic than it actually is. 968 00:53:23,120 --> 00:53:27,200 Speaker 4: And so I credit guys like Ralph, like Ross Dellinger, 969 00:53:28,239 --> 00:53:30,360 Speaker 4: plenty of people out there working this beat who I 970 00:53:30,440 --> 00:53:33,080 Speaker 4: think are doing a really good job, not really ginning 971 00:53:33,120 --> 00:53:36,239 Speaker 4: this up as some sort of soap opera that's for 972 00:53:36,400 --> 00:53:37,400 Speaker 4: idiots like us to do. 973 00:53:37,719 --> 00:53:38,120 Speaker 1: Correct. 974 00:53:38,200 --> 00:53:40,040 Speaker 4: But Ralph has done a really good job in his 975 00:53:40,080 --> 00:53:42,080 Speaker 4: own right reporting out the facts of the story, as 976 00:53:42,120 --> 00:53:44,759 Speaker 4: he said, trying to be simple with it wherever he can, 977 00:53:44,840 --> 00:53:46,520 Speaker 4: even though it is complex in its own right. 978 00:53:47,600 --> 00:53:49,799 Speaker 3: I appreciate that style. 979 00:53:49,520 --> 00:53:52,520 Speaker 4: Of reporting with something like this that again is charged 980 00:53:52,520 --> 00:53:54,719 Speaker 4: and could go a million different directions, and everybody's got 981 00:53:54,760 --> 00:53:57,520 Speaker 4: an opinion on it. But he does a really good job, 982 00:53:57,600 --> 00:54:00,759 Speaker 4: just sort of presenting the fat they are. 983 00:54:02,040 --> 00:54:05,400 Speaker 2: I totally agree. I'm here for the palace intrigue. 984 00:54:05,400 --> 00:54:08,040 Speaker 3: Though I'm down for the palace entrigue, don't get me wrong, 985 00:54:08,080 --> 00:54:09,360 Speaker 3: but I'm just saying he does beuch. 986 00:54:09,160 --> 00:54:11,480 Speaker 1: A weird connection, not to manufacturing it. 987 00:54:11,600 --> 00:54:14,239 Speaker 2: You know, here's a weird connection between Jim Phillips and 988 00:54:14,239 --> 00:54:17,759 Speaker 2: Greg Sank. Their daughters actually were on the same I 989 00:54:17,800 --> 00:54:22,319 Speaker 2: was like, what nobody mentioned that. I yeah, I'm here 990 00:54:22,320 --> 00:54:24,480 Speaker 2: for it because it's all entertaining to me on a 991 00:54:24,480 --> 00:54:28,640 Speaker 2: certain level. But also it is very strange because this 992 00:54:28,719 --> 00:54:33,120 Speaker 2: seems to be the one major sport that from like 993 00:54:33,320 --> 00:54:35,759 Speaker 2: the NFL is like, should Jalen Hurts be allowed to 994 00:54:35,760 --> 00:54:38,680 Speaker 2: be pushed from behind on fourth and short? That's like 995 00:54:38,760 --> 00:54:41,880 Speaker 2: the big off season story. From like an administrative perspective. 996 00:54:41,920 --> 00:54:44,360 Speaker 2: The NBA teams just keep on selling. But there's nothing 997 00:54:44,680 --> 00:54:46,880 Speaker 2: terribly different, and there's questions about like, oh, the NFL 998 00:54:46,920 --> 00:54:50,440 Speaker 2: might go to eight games eighteen games, or the NBA 999 00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:52,759 Speaker 2: should go back to seventy games or something like that. 1000 00:54:52,800 --> 00:54:59,280 Speaker 2: But it's not a crazy postseason organizational madness meeting, right. 1001 00:54:59,160 --> 00:55:00,920 Speaker 3: I Mean, there are only the two sports that I 1002 00:55:00,960 --> 00:55:04,560 Speaker 3: can think of that right now, feel like they are 1003 00:55:04,640 --> 00:55:07,759 Speaker 3: hinging on decisions being made in a conference room. One 1004 00:55:07,760 --> 00:55:10,000 Speaker 3: of them is golf, which we're not a golf show. 1005 00:55:10,080 --> 00:55:12,560 Speaker 2: That you're talking about, like Live and PGA and that's 1006 00:55:12,600 --> 00:55:15,960 Speaker 2: all together, yeah, in and of itself, right, college football 1007 00:55:16,000 --> 00:55:16,800 Speaker 2: would be the second. 1008 00:55:18,160 --> 00:55:19,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, and. 1009 00:55:19,840 --> 00:55:21,840 Speaker 3: I hate it. I hate that part of it, but 1010 00:55:21,960 --> 00:55:23,480 Speaker 3: that's just reality. That's where we're at. 1011 00:55:24,080 --> 00:55:26,360 Speaker 2: I just like to think about this in terms of 1012 00:55:26,680 --> 00:55:31,120 Speaker 2: other sports behaving as if college football is the path forward, 1013 00:55:31,160 --> 00:55:34,000 Speaker 2: where like now there's a commissioner of the National League 1014 00:55:34,080 --> 00:55:37,920 Speaker 2: Central standing on the table demanding the Brewers get a spot. 1015 00:55:38,239 --> 00:55:41,000 Speaker 2: It's like it's just not an issue anywhere else. And 1016 00:55:41,040 --> 00:55:42,680 Speaker 2: you know, maybe that's the appeal point, you know, the 1017 00:55:42,680 --> 00:55:45,120 Speaker 2: feature or bug kind of thing. But it is funny 1018 00:55:45,160 --> 00:55:48,080 Speaker 2: to think about how insane college football has been just 1019 00:55:48,239 --> 00:55:50,840 Speaker 2: changing by the way, just a preview to the preview. 1020 00:55:50,840 --> 00:55:53,760 Speaker 2: A lot of this is in Bill Connelly's forthcoming book 1021 00:55:54,120 --> 00:55:57,640 Speaker 2: The Last The different roads taken by various conferences in 1022 00:55:57,680 --> 00:56:01,799 Speaker 2: the sport trying to organize itself every few years, which is, 1023 00:56:01,840 --> 00:56:04,680 Speaker 2: you know, without a central governing body, and then various 1024 00:56:04,680 --> 00:56:09,719 Speaker 2: central governing bodies coming up and falling away it's an insane, 1025 00:56:09,880 --> 00:56:12,640 Speaker 2: insane timeline that Bill does a really good job of capturing. 1026 00:56:12,680 --> 00:56:15,680 Speaker 2: So I think that's out closer to the season forward progress. 1027 00:56:15,800 --> 00:56:17,840 Speaker 2: But uh, just look out for that and we'll have 1028 00:56:17,920 --> 00:56:22,360 Speaker 2: Bill on closer to that point. But all is absolutely true. 1029 00:56:22,800 --> 00:56:23,560 Speaker 3: I love it well. 1030 00:56:23,760 --> 00:56:26,200 Speaker 4: Again, big thanks to Ralph for hopping on with us 1031 00:56:26,200 --> 00:56:28,719 Speaker 4: here and letting us pick his brain about what's all 1032 00:56:28,760 --> 00:56:32,000 Speaker 4: going down. We'll have to pay close attention to upcoming 1033 00:56:32,040 --> 00:56:35,040 Speaker 4: reports if there are any. I'm assuming there will be 1034 00:56:35,400 --> 00:56:38,040 Speaker 4: over the next few weeks and months. Again, that deadline 1035 00:56:38,719 --> 00:56:43,160 Speaker 4: is December of the first. Speaking of deadlines, July the 1036 00:56:43,239 --> 00:56:46,000 Speaker 4: first is when we are aiming to get our first 1037 00:56:46,040 --> 00:56:46,560 Speaker 4: preview out. 1038 00:56:46,560 --> 00:56:49,600 Speaker 3: As I said at the top of the show, we've. 1039 00:56:49,440 --> 00:56:51,840 Speaker 4: Got our intro to the season. Then we're going to 1040 00:56:51,920 --> 00:56:55,480 Speaker 4: dive into the Group of six. We've got two episodes 1041 00:56:55,520 --> 00:56:59,759 Speaker 4: slated for Group of six, and then moving forward, we've 1042 00:56:59,760 --> 00:57:03,600 Speaker 4: got three episodes for all the power conferences, sort of 1043 00:57:03,600 --> 00:57:05,759 Speaker 4: the bigger picture look, the high level stuff. Then we're 1044 00:57:05,760 --> 00:57:08,480 Speaker 4: gonna go into individual teams, give you a bit of 1045 00:57:08,480 --> 00:57:11,680 Speaker 4: a preview there, enough to be dangerous. Again, if you 1046 00:57:11,719 --> 00:57:14,080 Speaker 4: read your message boards or your team sites, you're always 1047 00:57:14,080 --> 00:57:16,320 Speaker 4: probably gonna know your team better than us here like 1048 00:57:16,960 --> 00:57:20,160 Speaker 4: bigger picture national show stuff. But we're gonna do our 1049 00:57:20,200 --> 00:57:23,560 Speaker 4: part to be as comprehensive and as thorough as we 1050 00:57:23,600 --> 00:57:28,040 Speaker 4: can from our little thirty thousand foot perch and hopefully 1051 00:57:28,080 --> 00:57:31,320 Speaker 4: give you reasons to care, if nothing more, reasons to 1052 00:57:31,360 --> 00:57:33,040 Speaker 4: care about all of these teams and conferences. 1053 00:57:33,040 --> 00:57:33,880 Speaker 3: That's what we're here for. 1054 00:57:34,360 --> 00:57:37,600 Speaker 4: Agree, Why don't we leave it there again? Big thanks 1055 00:57:37,600 --> 00:57:40,360 Speaker 4: to our guest of honor today. Big thanks to you 1056 00:57:40,520 --> 00:57:44,120 Speaker 4: the verballer hood for your ongoing support, Hit follow, hit subscribe, 1057 00:57:44,200 --> 00:57:47,880 Speaker 4: check out verbalers dot com for that guy over there, 1058 00:57:48,000 --> 00:57:50,520 Speaker 4: my good friend Dan Rubinstein Form myself Tie Hillebrand, thank 1059 00:57:50,560 --> 00:57:53,880 Speaker 4: you again, Catch you all soon, Stay solid, peace,