WEBVTT - Consumer In Great Shape, Room To Spend: Michael Hans

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, as we've been

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 1>discussing really over the last several months, one of the

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the driving narratives of these markets is inflation.

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing it. The question is a transitory is

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's something more permanent that could really put up some

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>roadblocks for this economy. You know, I'm looking at the

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ten years. We're talking with Ira Jersey just earlier again,

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>one point five three percent on the ten years, So

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the bond market is not seeing Michael Hans he's the

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer for Clarfeld Financial Advisors. They about seventeen

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets under management. Michael joints this. Michael.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you taking the time here as you look

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at markets here, we I know you've been constructive on

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>these markets. How do you think about the inflation risk

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to these markets, Good morning, Thanks for having me. So

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest risk that we discuss is we

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>sit down and try to think about setting investment policy

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and direction for our clients is not necessarily the individual

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>asset class performance that you're going to see directly resulting

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>from moves into the inflation data. Is more so the

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>challenges that it puts on the FED, who's really guessing

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time, with two potential outcomes. One

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is that they're right and guiding towards transitory levels of inflation,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in which case they will have the ability of reasonable

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>growth coming in these inflation dynamics moderating with what we're

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now is a complience of issues but making

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it really challenging and the base effects, and then they

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to set policy and be somewhat restrictive

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at the margin in a more gradual pace. The flip

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>side is what I think many market participants are afraid of,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is that they are somewhat complaced because of their desire

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to maintain policy focusing on the labor side of their mandate,

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and then forced to more aggressively restrict policy down the line.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So from our vantage point, not an issue likely, right

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we're still talking about first thinking about some form of paper,

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot that's going to happen before they

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>raise rates, and so the market right now. Frankly, I

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think some of your your guests point about you as well.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit of back and forth here in

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a in a relatively tight range both on equities and

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>on fixed income, waiting for some directional movement that will

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>then set the tone for the pounds of the year. Yeah,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Bill Dudley wrote a piece for Bloomberg yesterday

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and said just that, Um, well two things, one the

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on UM the labor markets, and to the insistence

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that UH inflation be allowed to run hot, therefore overheating

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy. He then said, you know they raise rates

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>after that, Um, they'll be forced to do it at

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a faster pace than they previously had. And if they

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>push up unemployment by just half a percent, this is

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what I found surprising over the past seventy five years.

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Every time the unemployment right rate rises just half a percent,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a full blown recession occurs thereafter. UM. And this is

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the this is the problem, right, This is the concern

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed is going to have to tighten harder

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>than it previously would have had to because it's allowing

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy to overheat. If you buy into his his narrative,

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a very valid question, and they think what's interesting,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And it was a question in one of the prior

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, FED press conferences that like McKay brought up,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was you know, we're not hearing that narrative that we

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>did in the prior rate hiking cycle of we'd like

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to reset some level of ammunition for that next downturn.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very it is somewhat premature, but the

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>question really beg do you need to be buying billion

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars of securities on a monthly basis? And I think

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we're in a different position today than we were on

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the prior cycle because we've blown out the balance sheet

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>substantially more than what we did during the financial crisis.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So there are little pockets of areas where you know,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the Fed last week it was wasn't heavily paid attention to,

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but they're starting at the margins to nibble down at

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that balance sheet. They made comments related to the corporate

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>credit facility and their ets purchases. So this is going

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to be something that I think of volumes and from

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>their perspective in a methodical fashion over a prolonged period

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of time. But we are likely sitting in that in

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the environment right now over the course of the next

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of months, where there may not be a major

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:47.119
<v Speaker 1>direction the news and the data flows might not matter

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>all that much because we all have this heightened level

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of expectations for a high cp I print, right And

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so at this point, I think it's really when does

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the FED start detailing their plans, because they really do

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, calm the market. Hey, Michael, just

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>real quickly thirty seconds. Given that FED backdrop, where what

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>are you telling clients right now in terms of risk?

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>In terms of risk, and I think an important dynamic

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the equity market still has you know, and

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned the onset, we are fairly constructive because

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of the relatively low yield dynamic. What we're looking at

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is just a lower duration position across our fixed income

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>portfolios because you will not get the same benefit even

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>if rates start coming back in, So be more mindful

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about what you own across fixed income, but also being

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, cognizant of the potential for lower rates of

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>return in in the balance of this cycle because we

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pulled a lot of that forward. Michael, thanks so much

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for your insight. Always great to get your view on

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this market. Michael Hans is the chief investment officer at

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Clarfeld Financial Advisors, talking to us about UM, the market's

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>view on inflation, which really has been UM going through

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a back and forth over the past days,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>sometimes hours. This is crazy but fastly I think would

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>count as a small cap stock. UM. It's only it's

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>only worth six and a quarter billion dollars in market cap.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is a company that before today I didn't

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>realize has the power to shut down the Internet, even

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if just momentarily. Nate Langston joins us Bloomberg Europe Tech

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>editor and consumer tech reporter UM and Nate, I get

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>why these shares were up, because the first thing I

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>thought when I when I heard this is, Man, this

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is a powerful and important company. I kind of want

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy shares in that. You're absolutely right, and that

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>was exactly my reaction, UM when I first saw this,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is that this is not a company that many people, UM,

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, myself included. And I've been covering technology for

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>over fifty years and I hadn't really ever paid any

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>attention to this company, and when you see some of

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the sites that it is possible for it to have,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a hand in taking offline, ilbeit obviously

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>accidentally you have to sort of it turned heads a

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit and you think, well, maybe we should be

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>paying more attention to this company, and certainly I will

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>be doing in terms of how we cover it. Um,

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's and as you say, the the investor response

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and that the stock price since since the opens has

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>been really quite fascinating. All right, Nate, tell us what

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>happened this morning and how did it happen? Well, as

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>far as we know, this all originated as essentially user

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>error within the company itself. There's no suggestion here that

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was a a hack or or the subject

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of any kind of UM cyber attack. This is essentially

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent to somebody pressing the wrong button on a

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>computer and then having to quickly roll it back. Certainly,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the speed with which this both happened and was fixed,

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all of which took place within about an hour, UM

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>makes me very confident that that that is the case.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But the short version of what happened is people started

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>noticing that they weren't able to access websites. UM for

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a little while, Bloomberg dot com included in in that

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and um the Amazon and read it exactly and read it,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and there was Spotify was reporting outages Shopify as well. Yeah,

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a lot of a lot of averages.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And people started reporting this. The company within about I

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think twenty five thirty minutes have posted a status update

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on its service datas page, which ironically for a little while,

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was also taken offline to say that an issue had

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>been identified and a fix is being deployed. And in

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>just under an hour total, from the first outage to

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a resolution, things started taking back online. UM, and the

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>company said, it's you know, it's further investigating. And generally

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>when something like this happens, it takes a day or

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>two for sort of full disclosure on the you know,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the cause for that to be. Yeah. They were like,

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>our intern accidentally pressed the red button. He's been fired, Nate. Um.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>You gotta wonder whether or not this makes companies want

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to diversify. I mean, if if I was running a

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>website and this took me down, I would think, man,

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>is there can I get two people that offer the

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>same service. Yeah, I mean, that's definitely the first reaction.

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But realistically, for the kind of systems administrators that are

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in charge of these websites, this is something that it's

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just understood to happen from time to time. You know,

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if if the the entirety of a year, your website

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>goes down for a few minutes here or a few

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>minutes there over the course of that year, you know,

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you're still talking way above up time, which is what

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these companies promise and guarantee, and there

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is often a you know, small amount of edit and

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>compensation that are applied based on the percentage of total

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>autage with course of say a month. Um. So, I

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine they will see a fallout in people moving uh,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>purely because of this one incident. But if this turns

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>out to be one of many over the coming weeks, months,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, that's when things start to get a lot

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>more serious. Sure. All right, Nate, thanks so much for

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Really appreciate your time and getting your thoughts

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 1>on this fascinating story. To start this uh this day,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Nate Lengths and Bloomberg grob Tech editor and consumer tech

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>reporter Matt, You're gonna like this. Our next guests participated

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on a panel at the largest bitcoin conference in the world,

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>entitled Bitcoin One, which took place in Miami, Florida. What

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I found interesting is, Uh, this conference was held two

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago, attracted about two thousand people, but in one

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they're an estimated twelve thousand people in attendance, so assign

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin and cryptos really are getting into the mainstream.

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Frank Holmes he joins US today. Frank's the CEO and

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officers US Global Investors. Frank, I love to

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>start there. There's lots to chat with you about, but

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just give us a sense of what was the vibe

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>down a bitcoin in Miami. It was electrifying. I've spoken

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>as so many investment conferences over the past thirty years,

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>attended so many of them, uh, and never has been

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to an event where we're twelve thousand people spent six

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars to get in the door and on on

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>game day. Basically the tickets were twelve hundred dollars. Uh.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>The big retail conference for investors and ETFs and mutual funds.

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>The money shown Orlando, you know they'll get six thousand people,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's free. So I was really impressed with this.

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>That just the level and it wasn't close to anything

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like you had to have a fifteen minute Uber drive

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to get there. UH. Usually as a big convention right

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>beside the hotel, these other events, if you get lots

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of people, but people who were really committed. People flew

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in from all over the world to an end. Uh.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought that was fascinating and the caliber

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of speakers was outstanding. Great event. I know Mike mcglowan

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>are Bloomer Commodities analysts, was down there as well. What

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>did you what did you take away from the event? Um?

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>What did you learn? Um? Down in Miami? Well, you know,

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on on stage I spoke regarding the cryptal mining companies.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I launched the first UH cryptal mining company in the

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>world in two thousand seventeen, called High Blockchain Technology. And uh,

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because on that panel it was all about

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>being green and clean your coins, and uh, I got

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>booed and then I got hurrah. So you have some

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>real devotees there, bitcoin enthusiasts that are like religious fanatics,

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and then the other hand you have lots of scientists

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and people are for sort of the non centralized or

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>decentralized financial network. Uh. And that spectrum was was huge.

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>There was four thousand people in standing room only in

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>file marshals had to come in and tell people they

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stand at the back. Amazing. Yes, Frankie, what's the

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you think was the overriding key issue for

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>participants in this conference? Here? Is it? Is it regulation?

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it a greater adoption? Um, greater you know, just

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>more technology? What are some of the key takeaways? All

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of them? It was interesting, It was all of them.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Ron Paul, I hope when I'm in my eighties I

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can uh moonwalk like he was. I mean, he was

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable his energy up there on that on that stage.

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So he had the sort of the the political positioning

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of uh, financial independence, etcetera. And and then you had

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the Michael Sailor did a phenomenal job. He had the

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>standing room ovation. Uh. So I think it was very broad,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 1>uh doors he was there for Twitter, uh and he

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a philosophical approach. We had a Heckler

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. But you know, it was it was just

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to observe what I you know, I did see

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is is that there is a push for crypto mining

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to be done in North America and Europe and away

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>from China. The pools for more transparency is better to

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>have than coming from China. That there was a The

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>mayor spoke very well and how he's trying to create

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the Silicon Valley of the East Coast is going to

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be in Miami. So you know, that was very interesting

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to see that shift. So there's many dynamic things happening

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at the same time in all ages. You had the

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>venture capital funds, the bigonaire players flying in from San Francisco,

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>uh to the kid and his flip flops on walking

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>around with his knapstack. That's up three million dollars on

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>his bitcoin holdings. Is that Mat Miller? Matt, were you

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in Miami? I is not, but I would definitely be

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>wearing flip flops because I hate shoes. Everyone who knows

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>me knows how I feel about shoes. Frank I promised

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>our listeners that would get you to talk a little

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>bit about airlines, and I know that on the day

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you left there were one point six million passengers screened. Um,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's up from a year ago. We gotta get you

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>back because we've run out of time, but I do

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>want to hear from you in the future, so well,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you have time we can rebook you talk a

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit about airlines and about the jets E T

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>F as well. Frank Holmes, c i O, Chief Investment

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Officer US Global Investors. He was a speaker at the

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Big Bitcoin Conference in Miami and founder of one of

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the first big bitcoin minds. This is Bloomberg. Let's bring

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in Dan Gantner now, he's president, chief executive officer, and

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer at r NC Gender Capital Management and

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Dan Um. It's great to get somebody who has skin

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in the game game. You've got five billion and asked

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>under management and has some stock picks for us UM.

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about what you want right now. Well, first

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, let's talk about your inflation outlook, because I

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>guess that drives your decisions to some degree. Yeah, man,

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know right now, certainly inflation is

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the is the hot button, and it's the watchword and

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the overall market and uh, it's you know, we're we're

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see what these numbers come out with with

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>cp I and obviously for PC which is really what

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED is looking at. But you know, the numbers

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are very very hot right now, and there there's certainly

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a little above the Fed's expectations. The market

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is little concerned about it. You know, we're seeing PC

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that just came out at three point six per uh,

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>FED once a long term target of about two uh.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the watchword right now is transitory, though I

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think what you're going to see is that the definition

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of transitory is going to change over time, and I

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>think the market is really looking to see, is this

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>something that really is going to be a few months

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to open up as you have supply chain.

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Basically reopening of supply chain is what we're dealing with,

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and so is that going to be truly a few

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>months of transitory nature? We get back on the feds

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more or less two percent guideline for inflation, and therefore

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>any unwinding that they're going to do is going to

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be either insignificant or non existent. If it stays longer

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>than that and really becomes more cyclical, then the market's

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>going to adjust to that. You know. We uh we

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think employment's a huge part of this right now, and

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's the main thing we're watching. Yeah, we got

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some very interesting jolts data out this morning about the

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>record job openings. Uh so that was very interesting for

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this market. Then you know that that cyclical trade, if

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you will, that started it's called it last September has

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>really worked out well for investors that have played, you know,

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the more cyclical parts of the marketingbe even

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the small caps um A, are you in on that

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>trade and be you know kind of what's your outlook. Well,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we're very heavy on that trade as a matter of fact,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and really started in the end of the third quarter

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and pretty heavily into the fourth quarter of last year.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the look the energy sector, you know, which

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>was beat up so badly last year, has led the

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>market this year. I mean, the energy sector is upt

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hot on its heels, as financials at up almost tht

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and even materials are up over so it's it's been

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>a big part of our portfolios and and even in

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>our growth and value portfolios. As we reached the second

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>half of last year, we went much heavier towards the

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>value side, and I think that that's going to continue.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're what you're seeing in this market,

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>despite some of the side shows that are taking headlines, uh,

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is that this market is moving back to being very

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.719
<v Speaker 1>earnings oriented. And whether that's reopening trade or whether or not,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just fundamentals of ongoing companies. I mean, that's where

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going. And and so valuations have become very very

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>critical and and so the market is fully moving that way.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>We think franktically, what we're early in that rotation of

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>rotation back the value. So it's it's something we definitely

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>intend to participate with. And and uh, and something that

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think is going to pull more and

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>more investors into it as they see confirmation and you

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like Philip sixty six here with a four percent yield. Yeah,

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you know, I think it's one of

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the create the very key um underlyings with regards to

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>investor sentiment right now is that people are looking for,

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just again things that are going to

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>be extraordinarily volatile. They may play in those areas, but

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for core portfolio assets. You know, they want to see

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>not only some stability of earnings growth, but they want

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to see some income and some yield. And what we're

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing now is also a very significant transformation and transition

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of bond holders that are realizing if they're going to

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>have some income out there, looking at where pen your

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>treasury rates are and rates overall, they're gonna have to

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have more risk, and they're going to start to gravitate

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>towards high dividend stocks that are in many cases three

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>or four times what they're going to get in fixed

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>income assets because they need to have some cash flow,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they need to have something to live on. And so

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>when you look at a Philip sixty six, which is

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>still trading at ten percent below its pre COVID values, uh,

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>then it's a it's a we think it's a very

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>strong play, especially you get four that's tax preferred. While

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you wait, how about Christol Myers squib that's a obviously

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the we've seen the healthcare stocks with Biogen kind of

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in the news over the last couple of days. Is

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Bristol Myers? Is that another one like a Philip sixties

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>six where it's just a steady eddy kind of a

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>good long term performer. Well, I think it's a combination.

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, first of all, it clearly it's the cheapest

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of the large farmer stocks right now trading at about

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>p of eight and it's got a good strong yield

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>once again three in cash flow while you wait. And

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the real values we see in Bristol Myers

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is we think that the market is just severely handicapping,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the need drugs that are going

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to come off of patent and at the at the

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tail end of the pipeline, and what they're not taking

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>into consideration. They had four new drugs last year, They've

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>got four new launches that are coming out. They're modeling

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about ten billion from those new releases, and we think

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's uh, just significantly lower than the five billion

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>dollars that we're modeling. So when you look at you know,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>based upon that, we think overall earnings are going to

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>be about eighties six dollars even on a multiple of

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>ten half of the overall market. You know, we're you know,

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we think it's eighty six dollar stock right from where

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it is now sixty that would be a good return there,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Dan getting their president, CEO and c i O of

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>r n C Genter Capital Management, they have about five

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets under management. Looking at some of

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>those big cap names and I guess, you know, for

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the market. A lot of investors in the market, you know,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>those cyclical names have really worked well in this reopening trade,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>if you will. And the question I hear from a

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of investors is, you know, what's the duration? How

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>much legs does that trade have? Can I still ride

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the energy stocks? Can I still ride the financial stocks,

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>uh for example? Or do I need to pivot back

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to the tried and true top line growth stories? That

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is what markets are looking at. This is Bloomberg. Thanks

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three pt on Ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.