WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: June 23, 2025

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. To extend the conversation,

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the former senior US intelligence official, Normal Raw joins us

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>now for more Normal Welcome back to the program sir.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Just a quote from the Defense Secretary pet Agseth called

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>it an incredible and overwhelming success. How should we define success?

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 2>This Monday morning?

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Good morning, Well, we have a changed Middle East. The

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 3>United States and Israel of conducted devastating attacks against all

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>ofver Ron's air defense, his leadership nuclear programs in Iran's

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 3>response has been generally feeble. What response Iran has been

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 3>able to conduct, to include missile attacks against Israel have

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 3>not impacted the strategic course of the conflict. The numbers

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>are moving in a direction where Iran's missile program is

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>being whittled away, and Iran's nuclear program is effectively destroyed.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>There will be elements that remain, there will be elements

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>that are concerning, but its nuclear program is effectively destroyed.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 4>Norman, no one really understands Iran quite like you. What

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 4>do you think that Iotola is weighing up right now?

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 4>The menu of options in terms of a response.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, there are many people who understand Iran are better

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 3>than me. But within Iran, the decision making structure is

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be challenged. His leadership has been changed. He

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 3>himself is in a difficult, hidden location. Some of his

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>leadership is being hunted, perhaps by the Israelis. They're under attack,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>their economy is poor, their population is restive. Let me

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 3>give you an example of options and the challenges. If

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>they close the straight of her moves, they close off

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>most of the many of the food stuffs, the vegetable oils,

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the primary goods that come into the country to feed

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>the population. Now, that is something that you really don't

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>want to do at a time when your population may

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 3>erupt into major unrest. So they have many challenges with

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>all of the decisions they make. But again, if they

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>close the straight of her moves, it does not impact Israel,

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>and it will bring in the United States and could

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 3>likely lead to the end of the regime.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Do you think these strikes get around to the table?

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 4>The President continues to say he wants to see a

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 4>diplomatic path forward.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Not immediately. But what it does do is it tells

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the world that the United States is pushing for diplomacy,

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and that actually encourages the world to push back on

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Iran's efforts to escalate the contact conflict or isolate the

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>United States. So in the past, in some cases the

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 3>United States seemed as the aggressor or are alone. But

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 3>the United States is an essence saying you can't have

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 3>a program that is moving towards a nuclear weapon, but

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>we're interested in a diplomatic deal. Be reasonable. Iran is

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 3>not being reasonable and it has no allies.

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean you said that the nuclear program has

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>effectively been destroyed. There's a lot of concern among a

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>number of circles about the four hundred kilograms of enriched

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>uranium that have gone missing that previously were held near Isfahan,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as equipment that was taken out of four

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Dah before the attacks. Do you have any sense of

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>either where that could be or how close that could

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>be to being to restarting some of the nuclear programs

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that are on previously had So those.

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Are valid concerns. So we should be concerned about Iran's

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>remaining nuclear material. It will have nuclear scientists, it will

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 3>have nuclear knowledge, and it will have parts and equipment

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 3>related to centrifuges that it did not declare to the

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 3>IEA that it could in theory assemble and recreate in

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>a covert facility. But let's think about that for a minute.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>If you believe what you read in the newspapers, the

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 3>United States and Israel have is some extremely good intelligence

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>on Iran. So they're going to have to put this together,

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>get away with it, and then the United States and

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Israel are going to have to not learn about it

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 3>and not destroy it. Now that's possible, but it's unlikely.

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 3>But it is something that's going to require diplomatic pressure

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 3>so that it can be identified and removed, and it's

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>probably a card Iran will play in the talks.

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the Foreign Minister of Iran is

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>doing over in Russia today, we know that he is

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>meeting with Vladimir Putin, and there's a real question around

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what the ask is and whether it will be the

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>response that Iranians are looking for.

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Diplomatic support pressure in the UN. Iran has obtained consistent

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 3>diplomatic support at the United Nations Security Consul, the International

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Atomic Energy Agency, and other diplomatic fora from Russia and

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 3>China over the years. In fact, these two countries have

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 3>block any major pressure on Iran for its proliferation missiles,

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>nuclear program and terrorism. And this is really the moment

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>where these two countries can can produce this. It's unlikely

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 3>that either of these countries are going to provide any

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>military support. The Strategic Agreement that has been signed between

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Russia and Iran it doesn't provide for that sort of relationship.

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>But Iran, again it has no allies, but it does

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 3>have partners who have provided a support in international fora

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>that may help on diplomatic talks.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Norman, just before you go, just a brief assessment of

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>this operation thirty seven as long one hundred and twenty

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>five aircraft B two bombers, fourth and fifth generation fighters

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 2>as well thirty thousand pounds bunker buster bombs missiles launched

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 2>from a submarine as well. Norman, how smooth, how well executed,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 2>with the logistics, the precision of this operation.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 3>This operation speaks to the training, leadership, and the technology

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>of the United States military has had for a number

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 3>of years. This operation has been stayed in the press,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 3>has been practiced for many years. This is not something

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 3>that has occurred in any recent administration, but this recent

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 3>administration it had to refine. It significantly matched the target set.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>But what you are seeing is a technology and capability

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 3>in leadership and no country can match. And I think

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 3>North Korea and other countries in the world to include

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>China and Russia are looking in the past weeks and

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 3>saying the world is also a little different from their perspective.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a strong final point Norman appreciated time. Sir Norman

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>role Valley, former senior US intelligence official. Down story for

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 2>a gobent snacks right in the following. A hypothetical sustained

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a very large disruption of energy supply transit would likely

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>push oil and European natural gas price is above one

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ten dollars per barrel. Joining US now is

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>down story for a golment Sachs, Dan, that's the hypothetical.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about a base case. What is the base case?

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Forem of the team so found the smarting.

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so base case remains that we don't see significant

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 5>disruptions neither of oil or natural gas in the Middle East.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 5>And in our base case without disruptions, we actually have

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 5>energy prices gradually declining, with brands reaching around sixty dollars

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 5>per barrel in the fourth quarter of this year, and

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 5>with TTF europe natural gas prices also declining, especially next

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 5>year with the arrival of all these extra energy supply

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 5>cargo terminals.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Dan, how high could oil go if Iran does not

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 4>close the Strait of Hormos but does other potential attacks

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 4>on energy infrastructure or tankers that potentially disrupt the flow

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 4>of energy coming out of the region.

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so you know, old prices could rise significantly in

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 5>those scenarios. And the key reason is that the Middle

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 5>East the Gulf countries are remain the largest regional producer

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 5>in global global oil markets. In general. Our estimate is

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 5>that for every one million barrels per day drop of

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 5>supply that sustained for about a year, brand should be

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 5>about eight dollars per barrel lower. That takes into account

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 5>the fact that higher prices reduce demands somewhat an incentivized

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 5>USHL two to produce more. I think one challenge big

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 5>picture with potential supply disruptions in the Middle East is

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 5>that the most important buffer that the oil market benefits

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 5>from against supply disruptions namingly quite a bit of spare

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 5>capacity among OPEC core producers that's not necessarily available if

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 5>the production to the capacity to produce would would be

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 5>affected by bipotential disruptions because we think the bulk of

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 5>the spare capacity oil markets is concentrated both in Saudi

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Arabia and the UI.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 4>Are you seeing any reductions to Iran in barrels right now?

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 5>No? In fact, are now casts of Iran crude supply

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 5>is added three year high three point six million barrels

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 5>per day of crude. Iranian supply has actually doubled over

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 5>the last three years or so, and we're actually seeing

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 5>very high export flows at the moment. I think the

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 5>idea is to get the barrels out safely. Why while

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 5>we can, and at the moment, prices are are relatively

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 5>attractive given that Dan.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that if there is some sort of

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>calming down of the tensions, you could see a huge

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>decline in oil prices.

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Yes, So we estimated the jubilical respreamum around Tendall's per Beryl.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, if we if we increase, if the market

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 5>were to increase its its probability of our base case

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 5>that you don't see disruptions, this respremum could you know,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 5>could come down. Uh, you know, it may take some

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 5>time for for us to to really learn whether we're

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 5>going to see see disruptions. Now. I think the hypothetical

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 5>scenario where where the three spremium comes up the more

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 5>quickly would be uh, you know, a successful rotori into

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 5>the negotiation tables between the US, the US and Iran.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 5>But I think otherwise it would take some time for

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 5>for markets to you know, to get more confidence in

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 5>the basic case outlook for disruptions.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, Dan, there's this question about how

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>much the US is going to be affected versus other

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>countries or other regions. I'm thinking of Europe, I'm thinking

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of Asia. How big is the dispersion in terms of

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>which areas would get disproportionately hit in terms of their

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>energy costs based on a myriad of potential disruptions to

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>oil supplies.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so I would rank the vulnerability of the three

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 5>big regions as follows. Most vulnerable Europe, both because of

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 5>the exposure to oil prices but also natural gas prices,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 5>and but also diesel prices where Europe no longer imports

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 5>diesel products from Russia, but it is heavily dependent on

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 5>the Middle East. Second, I would put Asia and the

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 5>third vulnerable, But the least vulnerable is the US because

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 5>the US natural gas market is quite insulated from global markets,

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 5>because the US is a large producer, and because the

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 5>US exports are basically at capacity. So if we were

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 5>to see large disruptions, oil prices would also rise and

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 5>increased costs for the US, But the US would be

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 5>the least vulnerable among the top three regions.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Here, Dan, I love to pick up your point about

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 4>how Iran is at a three year high when it

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 4>comes to their barrels that they're producing and exporting. At

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 4>the same time, the Trump administration says they have maximum

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 4>pressure right now on Iran's oil industry, and they're going

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 4>after the teapots and the banks in Hong Kong and

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 4>China that facilitate all of this. How are they so

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 4>high if this administration says they're at max pressure.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So to your point, about ninety percent of Iran's

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 5>liquids exports. Iran is exporting just over two million barrels

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 5>play of liquids. About ninety percent goes to China, and

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 5>I think over the last two years the system has

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 5>built out an alternative supply chain with shipping companies, with ports,

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 5>with refiners, with alternative financial institutions that together ensure that

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 5>these barrels continue to reach global markets, and in particular

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 5>are quite price sensitive Chinese deepot refiners which have margins

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 5>and they basically need those those discounts to continue operating.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Donks Jovan of Goma Sachs down, Thank you, sir as

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>always stunning events. Over the weekend America's attack on around

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 2>years in the banking a stewth thirty six don long

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>operation named Midnight Hammer pilots dropped some of the largest

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 2>bombs in their arsenal on Iranian nuclear facilities. Joining us

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>now to discuss is the former US Defense Secretary Mark Esper.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.599
<v Speaker 2>Mister Secretary, welcome to the program, sir. We'd love to

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>lean on your experience the work to execute an operation

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>like this one and your rarely high level assessment of

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>his success.

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, good morning. Look, it was clearly successful in terms

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 6>of the execution. Our aircraft were able to make it

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 6>in drop what fourteen GBU fifty seven's, the submarines launched

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 6>ta lambs from offshore. We were out with impunity. Nobody

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 6>was hurt, and I just I think it speaks to

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 6>the skill and professionalism of the United States military. And

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 6>now I think what we have to do is two things.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 6>First of all, get a good battle damage assessment, and

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 6>that will take a few days and maybe even then

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 6>will be incomplete until we get inspectors on the ground.

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 6>And then secondly, we're all waiting to see what Iran's

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 6>response will be. And there are various predictions you guys

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 6>have been talking about it what they may or may

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 6>not do. But that's what we're all waiting for now.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 4>If you're advising the president right now, what would you

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 4>say to him in terms of what to expect in

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 4>terms of Tehran's retaliation.

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, I think there are a range of things

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 6>they could do, you know, were they could first of all,

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 6>use Shia militia groups in Iraq to target our people

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 6>and facilities there. Secondly, much like they did during my

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 6>time in early twenty twenty, they could launch Asavov missiles

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 6>against US forces in the Middle East, and there are

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 6>a couple dozen bases there with over forty thousand US

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 6>service members that they could go after. A third, there

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 6>could be sales here in the United States and globally.

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 6>Or they can go against American officials as they did

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 6>a couple of years ago and try that. And then

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 6>they could go after shipping in the straight of Hord moves,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 6>which I think is unlikely, but to me, those are

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 6>the range of outcomes that they may pursue here in

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 6>the coming days.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 4>In twenty twenty, when cost them Sulimani was struck with

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 4>that drone strike, we did see retaliation, but it was

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 4>telegraphed through back channels to the US administration. Do you

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 4>think we could see Iran take that same approach this

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 4>time around?

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 6>I think what they have to do is calibrate this

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 6>so that they do enough for domestic consumption, feel like

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 6>they've satisfied the military. They've struck back, tell the Iranian

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 6>people they struck back, but not so much that President

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 6>Trump really upset anti climbs that escalation ladder and really

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 6>hits them back fairly hard. Within hours of the missile

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 6>strikes at Eli Saud, we had Iranians on the phone

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 6>privately reaching out to us saying they were done, they

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 6>had no more, they wanted to stop fighting, et cetera.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 6>And that was, of course long before we knew that

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 6>Americans service members suffer concussions and TBI. But nonetheless they'll

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 6>do a lot of backchilling because they look they can't

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 6>go much further. They're being dismantled, their leadership, certainly the

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 6>military side is being taken apart. Their nuclear sites have

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 6>been pummeled, and so the question is how long? How

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 6>much long can they go on?

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 4>How can they even decide on some sort of retaliation

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 4>or strike against the United States. If the Supreme Leader

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 4>is reportedly hiding in a bunker, he's in his late

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 4>eighties and he has no access even to electronic communication.

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, that's the big question is who's in charge,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 6>How complete, how effective is the chain of command right now?

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 6>Are there instructions left behind to the IRGC or to

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 6>the missile forces to launch attacks that may may explain

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 6>why they haven't responded here in the twenty four to

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 6>thirty six hours since the US strikes on FDA, n

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 6>Ton's and Esfahan.

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>There's one theory out there, Secretary, that this could potentially

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>reignite some of the efforts that are on has made

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to achieve nuclear status, because that is the only deterrence,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and especially with the four hundred kilograms of enriched uranium

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>missing into action, how concerned are you about that reality

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>going underground and really having the Iranian officials expedite those efforts.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, you bring up a good point that I

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 6>was going to raise. There's still nine hundred pounds of

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 6>sixty percent enriched uranium that's fairly close to what they

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 6>would need for ten nuclear weapons out there that we

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 6>don't have control. We don't know where it is. The

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 6>IE doesn't know where it is, so first of all,

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 6>we have to track that down. Secondly, we don't know

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 6>to what degree the Iranian infrastructure has been destroyed, and

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 6>even if it has, it's just a matter of time

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 6>before they rebuild. Now that at this point probably looks

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 6>more like years than anything else than months, but nonetheless,

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 6>until there is a fundamental change in the ambitions of

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 6>the regime or a fundamental change in the regime itself.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 6>This is likely an ambition that will grow back over time,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 6>arguably moreized than before because of what has happened here

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 6>in the last couple weeks.

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a larger point, Secretary that other people have been

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>making this morning, which is that it is a deterrent

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to say Russia to China, showing what the US military

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>can do and is willing to do in the face

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>of some sort of red line that gets crossed. Do

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you see it that way or do you see other

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>nations and seeing the need to become nuclear or having

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>some sort of deterrent that really takes this potential outcome

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>off the table.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, deterrence is based on two things, capability and will.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 6>And I think everybody's understood the United States military has

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 6>the capability to do a lot of things. I don't

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 6>think anybody ever doubted we could do what we did

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 6>with regard to be two stealth bombers entering Iranian airspace

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 6>and dropping these bunker busters. I think what is different

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 6>here is President Trump has shown the willingness to do

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 6>it despite domestic voices coming from both the right and

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 6>left saying he shouldn't do it. So I think in

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 6>this regard it's more of his willingness to take action,

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 6>which probably caught Rushes and Beijing's attention.

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is one criticism of the previous administration, as

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, missed the secretary. The faibiates provide a satisfactory

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>terrance in key waterways in this region, and I'm thinking

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>more of the Red Sea over the last few years

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 2>as we think about the Strait of Hormos, Can you

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 2>just share with us what you learn about the best

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>way to provide it to Terrance and to prevent the

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 2>disruption of those waterways. Yeah.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, I think sending a clear message first ball

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 6>is important. But secondly, and I say this in light

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 6>of the fact that the Iranian Parliament yesterday voted that

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 6>Iran should close the Straight of Horror Moves, I think

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be a good argument if they strike

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.479
<v Speaker 6>back to take out the Iranian Navy, particularly those elements

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 6>of the navy that could shut down or obstruct or

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 6>hijack shipping in the Straight of hor Moves. So you

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 6>could sink the mind layers of the navy. You could

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 6>go after the swarm boats that tend to come up

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 6>upon cargo tankers and take them ashore. You could knock

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 6>out Iranian missile batteries on the coastline. So I think,

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 6>to me, that would be the top of my list.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 6>If Iran tries to shut down the strait or takes

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 6>more aggressive action, beat it to take that card out

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 6>of their hand, because everybody is concerned about shutting down

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 6>the straight of horror moves, and yet even though we

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 6>fly in the face of their own interests, they continue

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 6>to threaten.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 2>That difficult to answer the next question, sir, but just

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 2>to find a question. Do you get the sense that

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 2>American involvement in this operation is over or do you

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>think this might be ongoing.

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 6>I think it's to be determined based on how Iran responds.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 6>I think President Trump's instincts have long been since the

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 6>time I work with him. He does not want to

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 6>get involved in wars. He doesn't want this to go

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 6>on and on and on. I think if Iran shoots

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 6>missiles and they're largely effectless, I think we stand back.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 6>We probably continue to support the Israelis with munition and

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 6>intelligence and defensive air defense capabilities. But I think in

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 6>terms of continuing strikes, we probably step back at that

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 6>time and then urge a negotiation. By the way, a

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 6>negotiation between Iran and Israel that's going to have to

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 6>include a return to the non proliferation room and inspectors

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 6>and verification mechanisms on the ground in Iran.

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 2>That's absolutely critical parteically thoughtful conversations. And we appreciate your time.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>They former US Defense Secretary Marc Astro stop of the

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 2>price section and your morning coast. Let's send back to

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>our top story about pricing for Iran's response after the

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 2>US attacks. It's nuclear sites over the weekend, joining US

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>now is standing and is ready. Ambassador to the United Nations,

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 2>ambassador com monitor.

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 7>It's good to say morning, thank you for having me.

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the events over the weekend, and let's

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about this also. Who's in charge in a round

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 2>right now? Amory has been talking about this all morning,

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the chain of command. Who's in charge?

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's Aututel, you know, the other regime which still

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 7>hath control over the population. But you know, U see

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 7>statements coming out the minute door for in a furld

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 7>is flying all over sending threats to either to the US.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 7>I don't think that they run today in a position

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 7>to threaten anyone. They should think very carefully about the

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 7>next steps, what they want to do, what they should do.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 7>You know, our position was very clear that we had

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 7>the gold in this operation to degrade the capabilities. I

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 7>think we achieved a lot so far. We still have

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 7>more targets, but I think when you look at Iran

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 7>today and you compare it to the last time I

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 7>was here a week ago, it's a different ballgame. They

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 7>don't have those capabilities over the reactors, and I think

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 7>we were able to push back, you know, significantly a

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 7>one more than expected.

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 4>You were here just a little of a week ago,

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 4>the morning after those versus rarely strike started and you

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 4>said it would take days or weeks.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 8>This operation.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 4>We heard from the Prime Minister's day Benjaminett and Yahoo

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 4>he said they're very close to completing the goal of

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 4>elimiting the dual threats pallistic missiles and nuclear capabilities.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 8>Where are we on the timeline?

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 7>So I can also give you exact dates, but I

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 7>think you know the main challenges we had, which were

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 7>the nuclear reactors. You know, with alt of the US

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 7>attack magnificent, you know, the US they had the capabilities

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 7>that we don't have. So on that issue, I can

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 7>tell that we achieved most of what we wanted, but

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 7>still we have the ballistic missiles, which is a major threat.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>To as well.

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 7>It's important to know that we all speak about the

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 7>nuclear threat, but when you have one thousand ballistic missiles

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 7>targeting well, it's a problem. So we took a lot

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 7>of those launchers, but we still have.

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 8>More to go when it comes to nuclear facilities. Though.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 4>This morning the IDEA said that they went after four

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 4>dough dreances and exits to make sure they were preventing

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 4>the removal of these materials. How do you assess what

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 4>is what around has right now in terms of their

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 4>nuclear capabilities.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, it is a big country and they were hiding

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the materials and they were trying to

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 7>move stuff. So we cannot guarantee the result. But when

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 7>you look at the infrastructure, at the machine of tale

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 7>that they built, and by the way, they spent hundreds

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 7>of billions over the years, now it's not there. So

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 7>we cannot guarantee one hundred percent result, but we can

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 7>tell they don't have the the actors. It would take

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 7>them decades. Do we build it.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>There is a question about how much regime change is

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>part of what Israel is trying to do. We've heard

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>President Trump discuss that as well. What's your sense of

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>how much that's also one of the aims.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, I can tell you feelings. You know, we all

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 7>wish that they would be a regym change for the

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 7>people of Iran. They're victims of this regime, you know,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 7>so we pray for that. But the question if it's

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 7>the goal of the operation, I think you know, it's

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 7>not our goal, and we help President Trump also, it's

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 7>very hard to tell the people of Iran what's good

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 7>for them. They should decide, and I hope that they

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 7>will take the right decision.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 8>They deserve better. You're the ambassador's in that Nations.

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Earlier this year, Israel withdrew from the You and Human

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Rights Council, following the US and doing that. What role

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>does the United Nations have to play in some of

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>these negotiations at a time where people are wondering about

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>its institutional relevance.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, I agree with you that they should think for carefully.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 7>Yesterday there was an emergency session of the Security Council

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 7>in some countries condemned the US, and they told them,

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 7>where will you or all though the US when they

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 7>reach the UN, you when they build the reactors, now

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 7>you come and you and you condemn Israel in the US.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 7>So the UN should be much more effective. And basically

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 7>they're allowed Iran to do what they did all those

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 7>the US and I still believe in the UN, but

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 7>I think the UN should be reformed. We expect the

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 7>new US ambassador to arrive soon, and I think that

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 7>together we can change what's happening there.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 2>There's a line that used earlier in the conversation. You

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 2>reflected on the US capabilities and you said that the

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>US has capabilities that we don't have, and it raises

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 2>the question I think makes some people in this country uncomfortable.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 2>This Israels start an operation knowing that they wouldn't be

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 2>able to complete it without US involvement.

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 7>No, absolutely not, And I said it. I think last

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 7>time I was here, we have the capabilities. It will

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 7>take longer, it would be more painful, but we can

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 7>deal with the threats. So I think what the decision

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 7>of the US was the right decision because now it

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 7>would be a s shorter wall, and I think it's

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 7>much more effective how are.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 8>You preparing for the retaliation?

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.719
<v Speaker 7>So first we have to acknowledge it's not easy for us.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, the entire country is not functioning today. You know,

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 7>people are not going to walk, people staying next to

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 7>the shelters, and they talk about nine point five million

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 7>people for almost two weeks. It's heavy. But we are

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 7>willing to continue as long as it takes. But we

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 7>believe that we as they said earlier, we achieved most

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 7>of the goals. Now we have a few more things

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 7>we want to take it off.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 8>And now with are those few more things.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, mainly the ballistic missiles, the industry. You know,

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 7>they built a huge infrastructure to produce ballistic missiles. They

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 7>wanted to compete with the US and Russia and they

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 7>were very close to get there. So we want to

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 7>make sure that it would be very hard for them

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 7>to rebuild those capabilities, these.

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Kind of blistic missiles coming from around and their nuclear program.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 8>This is the point of the regime.

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Can you decimate their ballistic missile program, their nuclear program.

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 8>Without death mating the regime.

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, we hope that they will not have the desire

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 7>after what happened in the last two weeks that they

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 7>will understand that we will be there if they will

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 7>continue with the aspirations to eliminate Israel, it will will

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 7>be there before the attack us. We learn the lessons

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 7>after October seventh, we are not taking any chances.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Ambassador. We appreciate your time. Once again, thanks for thanking

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>the Australian pansador to the un There, Danny Denaud, This

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>is the Bloomberg Sevenans podcast, bringing you the best in markets, economics,

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 2>an gio politics. You can watch the show live on

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to nine am Eastern.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 2>you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg Terminal and

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Business Amp