WEBVTT - #466 Packers Unscripted: One-of-a-kind contest

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Hi everyone. Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford sitting next to my partner in crime,

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>West hod Kuitz. Were coming to you here from our

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>studios at lambeau Field West. It is Friday, our final

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>show of the week and that means Keys to Victory

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Day Packers Chargers Sunday out in Los Angeles. Where do

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you start with this one? What will it take for

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the Packers to come back to green Bay eight and one?

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Taking care of business? That's been my mentality this entire week,

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I think for this team and where this all shuffles

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>out for them, they have done so many different things

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>well situationally that certainly you need those things to line

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>up again if this ends up being a close ball game,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is I still anticipate it will be. I do too.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>But the thing about green Bay that separated them from being,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, at this point of the season, you know,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>sitting where they are, and then the Chargers being in

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the position they are with five losses already, is that

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Packers have executed so much better with the situational things,

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the four minute offense to close out games,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's their fifteen, you know, first scripted place to

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>start games, third down Situationally, they've been excellent this year.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It's been an area that's plagued them in the past.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The biggest key I think for Green Bay is going

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to be if you can have enough stitch enough of

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>those things together. And then, by the way, if you

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>get Davante Adams back, the element that that offers to this,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and to this offense and a challenge to

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers defense, I think really could be a thing

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that tips the scales. Yeah, I think the Packers, for

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>all the talk about how it's going to be a

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>pro Packers crowd and you know, won't really be like

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a true road game and all that kind of stuff,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the Packers have to be ready for another

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those punches in the mouth they got from

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City last week. Because this is a Chargers team.

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>They were two and five, they were on they were

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>on the brink. If Eddie Pineiro's kick goes through at

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Soldier Field last week, the Chargers season almost for all

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>intents and purposes, is over at two and six at

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a halfway point. They got a reprieve. They know it,

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is a this is a good team that

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>made a really strong second half run last year. I

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>expect them to give the Packers absolutely everything they can

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>handle because they're still in this thing, and they know

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>if they get to four and five with seven games

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to go, as up and down as a lot of

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>teams are in the a f C right now, aside

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>from the New England Patriots, I think the Chargers are

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna feel like they're right in and and uh in

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways. The Packers have to do what

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they did last week against Kansas City, which is when

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that momentum starts to turn the other way, because I

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be a stretch in this game

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>when it will. The Packers need to limit the damage.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And I thought last week stopping that Kansas City drive

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>right at the end of the first half and making

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>them kick a field goal so it was only seventeen

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fourteen at halftime instead of twenty one to fourteen after

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the Packers were up fourteen nothing earlier, I thought that

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was starting to turn things back in the other direction.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And the Packers are going to need a couple of

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>moments like that, I think in this game on Sunday

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:24.839
<v Speaker 1>to withstand or at least limit a surge from the Chargers. Yeah,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the Charges are the most dangerous type of three and

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>five team that you're going to face because they can

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>basically play to anybody's level. And you've seen that. You know,

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they can obviously play down to the competition, but they

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>can play up to it as well. And you know,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers has been through so many of these things

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>over the years. The thing that does stand out to me, though, Mike,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it, the games in which Rivers

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>has turned over the football have been mostly the games

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>where the Chargers have not prevailed. That game against Detroit

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy three passer rating, they lose thirteen to ten. The

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>loss to Denver, which was a demoralizing one thirteen a

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight point six passer rating. To intercept is in

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that ball game Pittsburgh the following week two more interception eight.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>When he's been on, they've had a chance. When he's

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>been off, it's it's hurt them. But with Philip Rivers

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>playing the way he does in the structure of this

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>offense is that he can still go off at any time.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Insider in box. I look at him and

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen is one of the top quarterback receiver combos

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in this league right now. And for that reason is

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.559
<v Speaker 1>why I think, yeah, if there's going to be some series,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>if there's going to be some drives that they end

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>up you know, putting together, you know, lengthy eight nine plays,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they move the ball, you have to be able to

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>stay stout in the red zone. And the Packers have

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>been terrific in that way this season. So there there's

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be those adverse moments. And even if it is

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a pro Packers crowd inside you know, the stadium, thirty

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand seats or whatever, most of it on top of

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the field, you still have to be ready to rally.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You still have to be ready to cut it out.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think one thing that the seven and one

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>start has taught the Packers and Ron Williams was discussing

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>in the locker room this week, is when you find

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>ways to win like this and you keep you know,

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>getting those ws in your your win column, that's what's

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>going to propel you into the second half of a

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>season because you've been there before many times. And then

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I I agree with you entirely, because as

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we talked about at the beginning, of the week. There's

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a narrative with this Chargers team in twenty nineteen and

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>one with this Packers team in twenty nineteen, and a

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of it comes down to executing being the better

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>team in the fourth quarter, and the Chargers for the

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>most part have not been and that is why they

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>are three and five, and they very easily could be

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>two and six. As I said, if that, you know,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>they gave up the drive that set up the field goal.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>They weren't getting it done when they needed to in

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, but they caught a break. The Packers

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>for the most part have been the better team in

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter this year and that's why they're seven

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and one. So as far as with green Bay, that

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>being who you are, you want to continue to be

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that team. But it's funny to me, is somebody in

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.559
<v Speaker 1>inbox this week brought up He's like, well, Philip Rivers

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>has never won against the Packers, which technically is true.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>He's owing three against Green Bay, but he's put up

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards against green Bay. Yeah, I mean,

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 1>I think about that game. I think in two thousand

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen that they played here at lambeau Field. I want

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to say he threw for was it four or eight

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>yards or something insane? It was it was over four hundred.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I know that he was throwing the ball all over

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the place. And the game out in San Diego in

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven, the Packers have built a big lead

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers were coming back. It turned out to

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of be a shootout, going back and forth, and

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>um the Chargers lost the game but still put up

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty four points and Rivers had some big numbers that

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>day as well. Yeah. I mean, he's averaging three yards

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>per game against Green Bay through the air in those

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>three games. So you can't just look at the wins

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and losses and be like, Okay, well this is just

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an easy cake walk. He's going to present challenges.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But the point I want to get to at the

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>end of all this is that the takeaways can be

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the difference maker, that can be the common denominator when

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking for a path to victory against l

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>A and and there's just they've given the ball away

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>too much and then they just haven't been able to

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>take it away the way they have in the past

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>few seasons. So if the Packers can win that area,

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which I want to say, in what six of their

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>eight games so far they have that that is going

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a big path here for the Packers to proceed. Yeah. Well,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of stats and info nuggets here for you,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>wes Um. I actually looked this up just before we

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>came into the studio. Philip Rivers will be the first

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a f C quarterback to face Aaron Rodgers three times

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>with the same team. Yeah, it's never happened before, partly

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>because of Rogers injuries where he's missed games with Roethlisberger

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because you know, because of injuries. He did face Flacco

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for a third time this past year, but that was

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>once with Denver as opposed to the first two with Baltimore.

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's just kind of interesting because because of the

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>once every four years thing that here Rogers and Rivers

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are facing off with the same teams for the third time.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is, do you know how far how

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>far back you have to go to find a Packers

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>game that was played in front of a crowd of

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>roughly thirty thousand people? I must you're pretty close. There

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was one in the I remember there was one in

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the eighties or nineties. There were actually a couple of

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>games that year. One was that the Pontiac Silver Dome

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit, where the announced attendants was like twenty nine

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand people. It's a good year for the Lions. But anyway,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of an interesting. Yeah, there were there were

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember now. I I apologize for not

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>writing it down. I think it was against Atlanta. Was

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the other one that where the the announced crowd was

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like thousand something That just like a post like player

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>lockout kind of lull that really, I don't know, Yeah,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was odd. The numbers there were odd.

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you, though, with regard to crowd size,

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of what we're expecting to see

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of this invasion of the Packers fans, Because

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's going to be a really

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really unique atmosphere to have potentially a pro Packers crowd

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not at lambeau Field. I find that really intriguing

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really anxious to see what that's going to

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be like. But as far as the impact on the game,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the points I made in Insider in Boxes

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Chargers know what this is like because earlier

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this year they played a primetime game in that stadium

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>against the Pittsburgh Steelers, and that traveling contingent of Pittsburgh fans.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>They took over the place and they made it a

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.479
<v Speaker 1>home game for Pittsburgh. So from the whole atmosphere and

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and dealing with that type of crowd situation in your

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>own stadium, so to speak, the Charges have dealt with

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this before, So from that standpoint, it's not there's not

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be some sort of a shelf shock or

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>a shock to the system. And in that respect, yeah,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So if I had my druthers here, I'd rather be

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in London this week. I wish that that would have

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>been where the game is going to be playing, so

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>all this snow falling outside we wouldn't have to deal

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>with until we get back. No, But okay, so that's

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost. I still think, I mean, and they

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>should have played this game in London. I actually even

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I said this on the yesterday show for the Charger's sake,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think would have benefited them to have it in London.

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I was pegging this game to be the one in London,

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>going back to like ten, like per Packers at Chargers

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen that's got to be the game that's going

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to London. We're going to l A, going to l

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>A instead. But uh, that little mini Lambeau that's gonna

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>be over there is going to be something to be

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a part of. Because here's the thing. Thirty thousand seats

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for football I think twenty seven thousand for soccer being

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in Winnipeg this year, even though it didn't fill up,

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that was a thirty three thousand seat stadium, So it

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>gives you sort of a little bit of a field.

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where the press boxes. We could be

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>behind the outhouse for all I know. But as far

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>as the feeling of the stadium, I've envisioning it in

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>my mind much like Winnipeg, and if that plays out,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a really cool environment. To answer your

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>original question, I think it gonna be really fun to

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>be a part of because it's so intimate and in

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this day and age, and you look at college football

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand seeds stadiums, the NFL seven eight seed stadiums,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry World or whatever it was for that game, you

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>very rarely get an opportunity to play in this kind

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of environment. So I think, let me put it this

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>way too. The people that are forking over that cash,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it was straightaway at the ticket office or on

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the secondary market, You've got to be a pretty big

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>fan to be able to wanting to pay that kind

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of you know, premium. So I think it's going to

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be an awesome environment to be a part of. Yeah,

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm really looking forward to it too, I think, I mean, yeah,

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this will be the only the only time the Packers

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in their hundred one year history and moving forward will

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>play a game in this particular stadium because the next

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>time the Packers are going to play the Chargers on

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the road, obviously it'll be well after the new stadium

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in l A has built, the one that the Rams

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers are going to share eventually, So this

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>is eventually, supposedly allegedly. But yeah, I think it's going

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to be I think it's going to be fun. I

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do want to take a look at what else is

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>going on in Week nine in the NFL though. Before

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we signed off for the week, we saw hack of

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a ballgame last night on Thursday Night Football. Look like

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners were in command. They had a two

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>score lead with about five minutes to go, all of

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a sudden boom and eighty eight yard touchdown pass, and

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals had a couple of really really big chances

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to get the ball back down the stretch. A third

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and eleven they gave it up, a third and nine

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they gave it up, And the forty Niners were able

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to kill those last five minutes without giving the ball

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the Cardinals with just a three point deficits.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So this is what's remarkable about what the Cardinals did.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And everybody wants to talk about Cliff Kingsbury in their offense. Defensively,

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they were pretty much the first team to solve the

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco run game puzzle. Now, certainly it's a little

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>bit easier without use check in there, but it's still dynamic.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Just asked my fantasy football team that had to play

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman last week when he off for all those touchdowns.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>In this game, Tevin Coleman three carries, twelve carries for

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty three yards. Matthew Brita also struggling to get going.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But this is where the forty Niners really can be dangerous.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I asked that question I think last week about Okay,

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>can the forty Niners win when they can't run. Now,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they weren't playing from behind per se in this game,

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>but when they needed Jimmy Garoppolo to be the quarterback,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the leader, to be there, the centerpiece of

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>that offense, he came through. And as we were walking

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>in here, I believe it was Matthew Arvin, our valued producer,

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>who mentioned eighteen and two now for Garoppolo as a

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback. I think that just saw that. You saw

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the standard in there. I thought the Cardinals played a

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>tremendous football game. I think the San Francisco forty Niners

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>are a tremendous team. And when that team stays together

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't turn over the football, even if you don't

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have the best aspect of your offense, you're still going

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to victory. Yeah. Well, the San

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty Niners are eight. No, they remain the only

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>undefeated team in the NFC to this point. Looking at

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFC North, interestingly, as we had talked about last week,

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Vikings now head to Arrowhead Stadium and to

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>play the Kansas City Chiefs one week after the Packers did.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be a really interesting matchup.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I will admit I haven't been paying attention to any

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of the talk of whether Mahomes is going to come

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>back this week or if they're still sticking with Matt Moore.

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard anything what the Chiefs are doing. What

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is funny about this is that it's your last week.

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Packer fans are all like, and I've seen an inbox

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I've seen it definitely on Twitter. Packer

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>fans are like, how could you ever consider playing Patrick

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes on nine days after this injury? And then all

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>week this week it's been why isn't a full participant,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Come on, get out there and play. Shoot, I'm out there. Uh,

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he's still limited and at the time in which we're

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>taping this, we still don't have an update. The reports

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>have been that they're looking more at the Titans game

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>as far as when he's going to be back. But

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's which is kind of what the original projection was,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. Anyway, So yeah, I'm sure there's a lot

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of Packer fans. I want to see Patrick Mahomes, But

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>as my brother in law made me wear last week,

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Matt Moore. If there's any silver lining to

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>what Kansas City did against Green Bay's defenses that Matt

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Moore looked fine, looked like he can handle this thing.

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what the Minnesota Vikings are able to come

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>up with. But the big challenge I think for Minnesota

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in this game is they have a lot of experience.

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>How does that match up with Kansas City speed because

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of it in this whole week is

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>very interesting because you were just talking about why this

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>game matters so much for green for you know, almost

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>at San Diego the Chargers on Sunday. I've been struggling

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>with that all week by because if you win in

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota beats Kansas City, if if Oakland you know, comes through,

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>or you know, if Goldland gets beat by Detroit, however

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this puzzle shuffles out, the Charges could be right back

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in this race. So for Kansas City, there's an urgency

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>there because it's like you want to be able to

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>main tame this lead over. I think what a lot

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of people expected going into the season to be relative,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bottom feeder in Oakland with all the

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff they had going on there in a team in

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City that you kind of had their numbers. So

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a very important week for the NFC North

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and for that a f C West in which teams

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>could prevail and in what the byproduct and meaning of

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>those games could be. Yeah, well you mentioned Oakland is

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Detroit Lions. The Chicago Bears talk about

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>heading into a gut check type of game. Here they

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>go to Philadelphia. The Eagles coming off of a big

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>win on the road at Buffalo, a Buffalo team that

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>had only lost one game until last week. The Eagles

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>get themselves back to five hundred at the midway point

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>at four and four, they're playing at home, and again

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the Eagles are looking at that win over

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo as this is our takeoff moment. This is where

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we start to go. And the Bears are up against it.

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Here there are three and four. They see where the

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are, they see where the Packers are, and the

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Bears are trying to get to that even four and

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for that level spot halfway through their season to see

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>where it goes. This is what I love about. Uh,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the f C East right now. Um Philadelphia, who just

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>everything's been going wrong for them. Uh, they go up

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>against Buffalo and basically take it to the Bills. For

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the most part. It kind of reminded me like when

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you get like those middling sort of SEC teams and

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they have to take on like I don't know, one

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Top and the Sun Belt or something like that,

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and they just they just take it to them. They

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 1>get their victory. I think Philadelphia reminded everybody, even though

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>they've been very up and down, and they got it.

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>If they're gonna make a playoff run here, they have

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to find some kind of winning streak.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>They can't be, you know, matching win for loss. Yeah,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to make the playoffs in the NFC

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at nine and seven. I just don't see that happening

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the way things are going right now. Yeah. So, I

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>mean this is a huge game for them. I mean,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with where Chicago season is headed, the issues that they're

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>having um, and I think the way that Philadelphia defends

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the run. Even though David Montgomery had that big game

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>last week, I look at this as a matchup that

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia should win, and they really definitely need to win

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to actually keep themselves in the conversation,

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you're not only just for playoff spots or being in

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the lead of the division or any of those kind

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of things, just to show that, okay, we're still a

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>championship type contender here we weren't, you know, sort of

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that that spark, that that flash in the pan that

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we can actually be a team that rises above. And

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for Chicago, I mean, this is the ultimate gut check

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because that, by by all accounts, was there. That's the

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>most demoralizing loss of their season so far. Now you've

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>got to go into you know, Lincoln Financial and try

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to you know, turn the course of your season. Yeah. Well,

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a rematch of the NFC wild Card game from

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>a year ago in the other stadium, and it's just

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting that obviously with the miss by Cody Parkey at

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of that game, and now the Bears are

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>going into this playoff rematch with their new kicker having

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>just missed a field goal on the last play of

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the game the week before. So a lot to try

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to sort out there. Anything else on the Week nine

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>slate you think is worth mentioning right now? I mean,

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>there's just a total barn burner going on in Miami

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>between the Jets and the Dolphins in the Adam Gaze Bowl.

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, there's some great matchups here. Uh, there's this

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>storyline now that's developing with the Jaguars where you know

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles could potention to be back here soon. Yeah,

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew has been not only a really good quarterback,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>but as I was looking at one of the things

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that ESPN brought up, I mean, he's been one of

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the top rookies so far this season. You can make

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>an argument he's had a better rookie season at this

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>point than Kyler Murray. So they're gonna have to make

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a decision there, and they have a tough opponent coming

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in in the Houston Texans. But realistically, Mike, we've talked

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>weekend and week out, We've written about it numerous times,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots have not been tested. Well, now

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>they get tested. They go into Baltimore, they take on

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that defense. First off, Tom Brady, who has been you know,

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>ky Eve in this game manager sort of role. Now,

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can he get this offense moving and can that New

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 1>England Patriots defense that has been so stout step up

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to the challenge of Lamar Jackson. We're probably not going

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to watch this game. Unfortunately. I wish

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I could because I think it's going to be a

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>really interesting contrast in football styles and seeing if the

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>way that the Baltimore Ravens play right now, run heavy, athletic,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>solid special teams, a sneaky good defense, if that can

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>match up with the very best in the FC right now. Yeah,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people looking at that game Patriots

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Ravens as a potential preview of a of

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a January rematch between between those two teams down the roads.

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>You can make a case, Mike, if you go back

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to last December, that there's no hotter team in football

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>than the Baltimore Ravens, even though you know San Francisco

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>has been on the run they've been on this season

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>if you count that, I mean the Ravens had a

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>run the table esque kind of run at the end

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of last season. They did, would the only interruption being

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that loss in overtime to Kansas City. If you partner

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that together with this way that they got off to

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this season, I mean you got to tip your captain

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>John Harbob, because they they things weren't looking good there

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for a minute, but they got sort of this influx

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of momentum and swagger from that move to to Lamar

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Jackson and here we are. I think they're one of

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>those teams that when you're talking about just a regular

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>seven day, one week preparation, they're a preparation challenge because

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson and the way that offense runs is just

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>so different. It's so it's so non traditional for from

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what en NFL football is and and it is. It's

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a great matchup because the Patriots

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>statistically and what we've seen on the field, regardless of

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>who their opponents have been, they've been uh an incredibly

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>stout defense, very very difficult for anybody's score. And I

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>would make an argument to Mike that the Baltimore Ravens,

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>more than maybe any other team in the NFL right now,

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are as dangerous if they end up thing a buy

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>if you give John Harbaugh that extra week to work

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with to prepare and then teams having to focus on

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a wild card opponent and then taking the Ravens, which

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is how different they are and how different they play.

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things that worked against them

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was working into that hole at the beginning of last season,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>having to make a run to get a wild card

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>spot that ultimately is I think why their their car

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ran out of gas. But man, if they can be

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in position, I'm sure you're gonna have just might as well.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Sharpie in you know, the Patriots for one of those

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>two buys in the a f C. But the Ravens

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the where Kansas City's at right now, Ravens

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>can make a real run at at being that number

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>two seeds. Yeah, it's going to be interesting to watch.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>With that, we'll call out a wrap on this edition

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all of our

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the team and especially Sunday afternoons game from

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. Will have it all for you on Packers

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Subscribe to us, like us on iTunes and

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>other podcast services. On Twitter, He's at west Hot I'm

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at Mike Spofford at Packers for the team account. Thanks

0:22:55.640 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in, everybody, See you next time. The