WEBVTT - Fantasy Football 2019: Panthers and Bucs Previews

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Friends too. Yeah, now's welcome your bab your host by

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>date from Mane Spun, your co host by died from

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>SAT Francis Frank standfall ladies and tell me your ps

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and with that we'll look at you inside Studio thirty

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>four is the BFFs. That is Frank Staffel, I am

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg sauceman Eric Young alongside as well. We made it

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the NFC South yesterday and given the fifty

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>four minutes we have remaining, we'll get to the other half.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>We hope, we hope that's exactly right. Greg. Happy hump

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Day to you, buddy. Had to sleep last night. I

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>slept pretty well alright, if I remember correctly. How's the

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>scott fishball going today? I heard you're you're moving along

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Well, I know, I was very interested in

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>an update. Uh so I made the last uh the

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.199
<v Speaker 1>last pick of last night, I believe. Um. I texted

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys around twelve or some made my pick. Uh.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Since then, that was about fourteen hours ago. Uh, there's

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>been one pick? Is it the same culpra as before? Oh?

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, the same exact person. God. We yesterday we

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>were on the show and we were talking about how

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>one person hadn't hadn't picked for six hours. Now he

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has not picked for another six hours. It was funny.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Like five rounds ago, Greg, we're now officially the slowest

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>draft in Scott's fishbole. I'm sorry this must be killing you.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Why how are you man? I'm doing good, Man, I'm

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>doing good. Uh, yesterday was was fun man. I enjoyed

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>doing the show again with you guys. That made me

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think about all kinds of stuff. Fantasy football season. We're underway,

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we are, We're here, and it's it's awesome. It makes

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>me super super super pumps to have you here along

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with us. Fantasy football season is clearly underway. We had

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a massive argument breakout in the control room down stairs

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>over Leonard four Net, which is excited to get him

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>next week. Unfortunately we're doing the NFC South to the South,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so I'd love to hear coming up next week. Might

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>have to invite Sean Gassimakia and Steve sata boy E

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>y s thoughts on four Nett as well, um, but

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>with just an to do it before the break and

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna start the next team yet, but any

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>other thoughts Frankie when it comes to Atlanta or New

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Orleans since yesterday, No, I mean nothing really stands out.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we got to a lot of them. Like

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really talk about Jared Cook. I mean we'll

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have time to do that once we get into like

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>position previews. So then we'll get into Jared Cook and

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>how he fits in with the New Orleans Saints. But again,

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>if we expect their pass volume to come down a

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit, then is there really going to be that

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>much to go around with Jared Cook? So when we

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>get into the tight ends later on in the draft season,

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about Jared Cook. All right, we'll take a break.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Eric Young, Frank Stample and myself

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>breakdown now Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Bruce Arians back and why

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it matters to us and that comes your way next. Hey,

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember if you want

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, download

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the tune and app and just search for Fantasy Sports

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoyed the show and face for listening.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Back with you, BFFs, Frank Stamford, Gregg Sauceman, Eric Young alongside.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's not waste any more time, guys, Let's get right

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>into it. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have long been a

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>place for fantasy goodness or wanted fantasy goodness, from Jameis

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Winston onto the running Max and certainly to Mike Evans,

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>who was drafted just a year or two ago as

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>a top five wide receiver. Well it's not going as

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that so much anymore. But now that Bruce Arians is there,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone's back on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers bandwagon. Arian's got

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a year off to refresh himself and now we all

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>jump back in. So I'm gonna start with you. Is

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it a bit premature to jump back in on a

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Arians offense. I mean, by the time he was

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>done in Arizona. Maybe it was based on their quarterback

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>usuing all the injuries, but it kind of just felt

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like he was mentally done, that what he believed in

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL didn't necessarily work as well as it did

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in his early years with the Cardinals. Again, it could

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>be really the injuries, certainly, and it could be related

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to just getting a mental break. But now he's in

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. Is it all just gonna go back to

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>what we thought it should be? For me, this is

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a super interesting coaching change. Um. I like Bruce Arians.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I loved the Cardinals. Um I have a couple of

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals hats. I'm kind of high on the Cardinals this

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>year just because all the interesting stories drafting Murray in

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the first round and this new offense that's supposed to

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>be prolific and it's college style and will it work

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL? But Arians was was that guy first?

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was doing different kinds of things five

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>or six years ago, and I loved his coaching style.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it fell off. I mean with anything, things

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>gets dale and and with coaching, I think, you know,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>players eventually stopped hearing your voice and stop doing what

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they're told, and you get tired of the same old

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>things and him saying the same things. All coaches have

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a shelf life, except for Bill Belichick. Maybe, um so,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was hard for him to move on, hoping

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he comes in fresh. They are loaded with talent all

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>over the field. On the offensive side of the ball,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm pump man like I got. Mike Evans

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is my tenth overall pick. Mike Evans tenth overall on

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>eui's big board. He is buying, he is buying hard

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Frankie, you're right there with him. Yeah, yeah.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of what happened with Bruce

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Arians the down years that he had as their head coach,

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically their offense was due to injuries. Greg. If you

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the five years that he was with the Cardinals,

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they ranked top twelve in total offense. The three years

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that Carson Palmer was healthy in they ranked twenty four.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Carson Palmer got hurt. That was the year that Drew

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Stanton stepped in and seen the final season that Bruce

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Arians was there calling plays, Carson Palmer also got hurt,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and then blame Gabbert All No blame Gabbert. Journeyman in

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the NFL came in, stepped in in their offense ranked

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. But let's not forget Carson Palmer put together

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a career year through like thirty five touchdowns. Their offense

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>finished first overall in the entire NFL total offense they

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>finished first, So I think that there's a lot to

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>be excited about with not only Bruce Arian's mindset, but

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously the weapons at the Tampa Bay Bucks possessed because

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they have Damis Winston, who obviously brings a high pedigree.

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Because of where he was drafted in the NFL draft,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been able to necessarily put it together. They

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>have Mike Evans, they have Chris Godwin, they have Ronald Jones,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and they also have O. J. Howard. So there's a

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of really interesting pieces on this offense. I'm I'm

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>close to where e Y is that I'm very excited

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>about both this marriage of Bruce arians style of offense

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and the weapons that they have there already. Greg, all right,

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so let's let's start here with like Evans. He said

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he's the number ten overall player on his word, I'm

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at like my Scot's fish bol For instance, Mike

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Evans wound up being the eighth wide receiver taken. I'm

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not worried about where he went because the quirky rules

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatnot. He was the eighth wide receiver taken after Hopkins, Adams,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Julio Michael Thomas, juju Um, Keenan Allen, and Odell Beckham Jr.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>That sounds right to you, Frank, I think that Mike

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Evans should live in the second round. I would probably

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>take him ahead of Antonio Brown just because I liked

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks offense a little bit more. Uh. Look, Antonio

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Brown is gonna be a target monster this year. And

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into more of the Raiders talk when we

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the a f C. West. But I just

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>think Mike Evans is potential for targets. His efficiency went

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>up last year. His potential for touchdowns, which we've you know,

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the past. He has two seasons of

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>double dig touchdowns already in his career. I mean, I

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>looked this up before the show. Greg. There's an awesome

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>stat on Mike Evans. He joins A. J. Green and

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Randy Moss is the only players in NFL history to

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>start their career with five consecutive seasons of one thousand

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards. So, I mean, that's that's pretty good territory

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to be in there. We know that the talent is

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.599
<v Speaker 1>there with Mike Evans. Um, you know, a hundred and

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine targets are gone from this team now, with

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphries gone, with the Shawan Jackson gone from this team,

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know that's why people are buying into Chris Godwin,

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get into. But look, there's a lot of

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>targets gone, and Mike Evans was already a target monster.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think the potential for UH targets, receptions, yards

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and touchdowns it's all there for Mike Evans. I mean again,

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just the marriage is perfect here for fantasy purposes.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Eric Frankie mentioned Chris Godwin, who, much like Hanny Golladay,

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>bursted onto the scene in middle round pick and people

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>were immediately excited about him. Now Tam was clearly excited

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>about him. With Bruisiians as the head coaches, they didn't

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>do anything to replace Adam Hume Freeze or do anything

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to replace the Sean Jackson. They just like Chris Godwin.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It's your time, now, how early would you draft Chris Godwin? Um?

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I I feel like the hype is kind of getting

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>out of control, but this happens with players that that show.

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.719
<v Speaker 1>He looked really good last year, even in a not

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>massive role, but having Humphrey's gone and the offense is

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be different. I think they're going to throw

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>the ball more. The running game is questionable. Um, I

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>think with between the two guys, I think it can

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>be serviceable. Ron Jones is a sleeper of mine. I'm

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to pick him high or anything, but if

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>he's there and like the mid to later rounds, I'm

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>going to take him because of his pedigree. Obviously last

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>year was a nightmare. But um, Bruce Arians and whoever

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one running back, that's that's a recipe for success.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So Chris Godwin, I mean where he's going now, I

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>think it is still okay. But I think as as

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it goes, he's going to keep moving up. Since July

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on the NFC, Chris Godwin is the twentie wide receiver

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>off the board that is at pick forty seven pick

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>forty seven on average. But how can you argue it though,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean the opportunity is there. He's going to start

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on the outside. I mean he's a verse of a

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too. He can move inside. We saw it

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:10.599
<v Speaker 1>that last year. You can play a little bit in

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the slot. He could play on the outside as well.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Greg he led this team in red zone targets last

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>year with sixteen only playing scent of the snaps. So

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine, as you know, he steps into an

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>every down kind of role now as a starter, and

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he's playing more snaps in that snap percentage you know,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>gets up over eighty five percent of the snaps. You know,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>more targets will be there, obviously, you know, I mentioned

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>how many targets are up for grabs with Adam Humphreys

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>now gone and DeShawn Jackson now gone, he's flashed. I mean,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he could do a little bit of everything.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good route runner. I think he

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>has strong hands, you know. I think he could be

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a possession receiver. I think they can use him in

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the red zone if teams are double teaming Mike Evans.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to really critique where he's going

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in draft because at a DP right now, I mean,

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at that four or five turn, he's go right around

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>guys like d J. Moore, Mike Williams, Tyler Lockett, Calvin Ridley.

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>These are all breakout candidates. And you can argue that

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>his opportunity, coupled with bruce Arians mindset and the scheme here,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the fit and you know what we expect James Winston

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>to do. How can you argue with him going ahead

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of all those other breakout candidates. I think his opportunity

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is probably the best. I think this area is probably right.

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it a lot of it doesn't depend on

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking for you looking at it. But it

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised you if he's better than Robert Woods. Greig. I

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>know you're the Robert Woods guy, but there's three wide

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>receivers in Los Angeles compared to two wide receivers for Tampa.

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I know James he's gonna get his too, but is

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>he gonna get as many targets as like the third

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver for the Los Angeles Rams. I'm not so

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sure he's gonna get that many receiver in the Los

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Angeles right, But we know that they mix and match,

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they're pretty consistent for the most part,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but most of like is it are all three of

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>them going to go off in every single game? I

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>guess my question is when you look at Bruce arians historically,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>has he even able to And I don't know the answer.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just throwing it out there to you guys, like

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been able to have an offense that boasts two

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>thousand yard type of wide receivers because you're at the

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>guy at twenty overall, you want the potential to have

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a thousand yards, to have closest double digit touchdowns. Can

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this offense produce that well? I know he did it

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>one year with he put together Fitzgerald and John Brown

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>when John Brown was still in Arizona. And then was

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>John Brown's career year right where he went up over

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a thousand yards and he had like six or seven touchdowns,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>finishes like a top twenty four wide receiver. And I

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we're expecting Chris Godwin to do and

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>just to piggyback off of you know what Ey said. Look,

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we could be excited about Ronald Jones. We'll talk about

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that more when we get back, but they don't really

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have a run game to speak of as of now.

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So if they have to lean more on the pass,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that only works in the favor of both

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans and Chris Godwin. I think this Tampa Bay

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>team is gonna have to throw the ball even more

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>than the Arizona Cardinals had to do in years past.

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>When Bruce Haarians was with them. Let's take a break

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>here e I mentioned Ronald Jones as a sleeper. We'll

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>get Frank's thoughts on that coming up next. From the

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL to the NBA. Daily Rohodo dot com is the

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>place to win millions in daily fantasy. You can get

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the best DFS NFL coverage all season long for a

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>price of one, or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>realm with the Elite package at month. If you use

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the promo code f n t s Y, you get

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package, enter promo

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>code f n t s Y, and you'll be on

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. Back

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with you, BFFs. You wanta to risk free wages up

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to a thousand bucks? To the points bet dot com

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>slash grin and open up a points bet sports wage

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>your account the promo code grin you'll get two risk

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>free bets up to a thousand dollars. In addition to

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional banning, points bet also offers its own bidding cats

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that what customers are rewarded by how much they will

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>win on the vet For example, we've got the coals

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>minus three and the cover of spread minus seven. You

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>receive seven times your stake. That's points bet dot com

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>slash grid at the promo code grid and you'll get

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>too risk free bets up to a thousand dollars. Today

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you have gambling problem calling a hundred gambler. It's twenty

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one and over and Jay only eligibility restriction supplies you

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>website for details. All right, e I mentioned or Rojo

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>as a sleeper, and he's certainly not the only one

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to mention Ronald Jones here in year two. You're talking

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>downstairs about Philip Lindsay in year two, and of course

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that inevitably leads to Ronald Jones, who struggled all last

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>year injuries and ineffectiveness. And yet all season long we

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>were on the bandwagon, off the bandwagon, and all the

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bandwagon we kept wanting to believe. Well, you can keep

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>believing it never never happened. Peyton Barber almost from day one,

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>held on to that job, and end of the season

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with that job. Reports had a training camp, say or

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not training camp, minicamp say, Peyton Barber's still a guy.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But fantasy owners are rightfully so look the talent of

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones. Look at what Bruce Arians has worked with before,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically David Johnson, and you're like, well, Ronald Jones best

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>fits that profile. Fantasy owners right now, Frank are getting

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in on Ronald Jones. And and the discount isn't exactly

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>well huge by any means. People seem to like Ronald Jones.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the running backs over the nffc

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones is going off the board as the thirty

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>eight running back around pick one oh five. It's not terrible,

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not outstanding. I would say, what do you think

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>about Ronald Jones going forward? I'm interested? How can you

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not be right everything we just said about the Tampa

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>bay Bucks offense. We expect them to score a lot

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of points this year. They're gonna get down the field. Look,

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's more so a vertical passing attack. But we have

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>seen the upside of what a running back can do

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>inside of Bruce arians offense. Now, I will say this,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of that one monstrous David Johnson season, it's not

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like Bruce Arians produce a ton of fantasy viable running backs.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>There were years where like Andre Ellington let us down

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Chris Johnson was the starting running back in Arizona, and

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe he just didn't have the right running back for

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>his system. And maybe, you know, once he got a

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>guy like David Johnson, he was able to bring that

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to fruition. But Ronald Jones has the has a has

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the potential to start for this Tampa Bay Bucks team

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>heading into the season. And if you look at his

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>ADP right now you mentioned it, Greg, He's going around

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, one oh five a DP. He's one of

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the last potential starting running backs being drafted off the

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>board right now. There was a report, you know, a

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks back that Greg Allman of the Athletics

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>said that he still expects, you know, Peyton barber to

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>lead this team in in rushing attempts and rushing yards.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, with all due respect to to Greg Alman,

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>look he's he's around the team a lot, so he's

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>got a pulse of what's going on there. Peyton barbera's

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>average three point eight yards for carrying. The question is

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Greg Allman related to Dwayne Allman? I don't even know

0:17:55.720 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>who Dayne Alman is. Greg. What it was there was

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a Greg all of an Allman brothers joke. Come on,

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't say that I knew their first name. Continue,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I have like five of their records downstairs. I just

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know the first name. Basis well, I knew Greg

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Allman and telling hiout Greg Allman or whatever. I'm pretty

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>sure it's spelt differently to Greg. But we'll let you

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>rock for now. Look, the fact of the matter comes

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>down to where Ronald Jones being drafted right now. It

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>would be one of the last starting running backs off

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the board. You're getting at a good discount. You're getting

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 1>him in the nine tenth round. I wouldn't want him

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>as my RB three. I wouldn't want him starting on

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>my team. I wouldn't even want him as my starting

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>flecks to start the year. But if I could get

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>him as my RB four as some depth and with

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the potential to start on a really good offense where

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we expect him to score a lot of points, I'm

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna downplay his pedigree. Look, he was a second

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>round pick, but he wasn't Bruise arians second round pick.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>That is true. It was. It was the same GM,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but not but not the same not the same coaching staff.

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, he's kind of inheriting that too. But again,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>like they hate him. It's it's not like it's not

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like Bruce Arians wanted Peyton Barbera on the team either.

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But they didn't do anything any of these players. You

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick any of these players. I mean, someone's gonna play. Yeah.

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that argument. I don't think it's silly, Okay,

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but I look, they had all off season to go

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>out and bring in a running back Craig draft one,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, sign a Levian Bell, sign a mark Ingram

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and they didn't. So maybe Bruce Arians

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>likes one of these two, and Ronald Jones has the pedigree.

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Peyton barbara wasn't in draft undrafted free agent. You brought

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>up the fact that in the past, like I got,

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like Andre Ellington led the way and they didn't really

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. Ultimately, they tried and it stopped. It's

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not it's certainly possible they do that. But I agree ultimately,

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Ei like where he's going around pick one oh five,

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that's probably that's fine. That's not costing you all that much.

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not insignificant, but it's not costing you all that much. Ultimately,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>let me get to O. J. Howard and Jameis Winston

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>here Wednesday. Tumultuous season last year, So Moulture's last couple

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of years. I'd say under Dirk Cutter, this is his

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>last shot, essentially under Brusarians O J. Howard in year

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>two cameraon Brad coming off an injury. People are really

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>investing on both of these guys. E y, are you

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you on both O. J. Howard and Jamis Winston? Yeah?

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I am. And I think that just comes

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>down to I believe in the Tampa Bay Buccaneers offense.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And look, if I believe in their offense, I have

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to believe in their starting quarterback. My my hope is

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that Jamis Winston has matured and has become a growing

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>up and in his taking his craft serious. He's got

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>every two a possible big guy, can move pretty decent,

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>can run a little bit, can make every throw short, long,

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>decent accuracy. Like he is a superstar quarterback. I mean,

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he has the ability to be a superstar quarterback, and

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the mental side of it is the only

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>thing stopping him, and in the end, in the NFL,

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the mental side is the only thing that stops all

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys. They're all freak athletes. They're all playing in

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the NFL because they're in the five percentile of freak

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>athletes in the world. And but what separates them is

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>their mental side, their preparation, uh, you know, being able

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back from mistakes, things like that. I think

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be his biggest year yet. And

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe that because he's older, hoping that he's more mature,

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>will approach the game. And he now he's back up

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is backs up against the wall with professional athletes, with

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>people in general, this is where we get to see

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're really made of. And I think he's gonna

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>do well. I think he's gonna end up as a

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>top ten quarterback this year. And e Y staring around

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the term freak athlete, find it interesting because you know,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>e Y knows what a freak athlete looks like. He

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has a freak athlete himself. I work with a bunch

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of them, and he works with a bunch of them,

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So no, you're absolutely right. Look, Jameis Winson is in

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a great spot here. I saw have some question marks

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>about the offensive line the rank according to Football Focus,

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of the weapons, again, the weapons and

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the scheme and having Bruce arians there, Mike Evans, Chris Godwin,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>O J Howard. You know I said this about Carson Wentz.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not to the same level. But everything is set

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>up here for Jameis Winston to have a monster year. So, UH,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the defense is I still don't expect the defense to

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be very good. They invested a lot in the draft.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, they brought in some guys in the UH

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>through free agency, Shaquill Barrett and Dion Buchanan. But I

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>still don't think that this defense is gonna turn around

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>right away. And that was that led to a lot

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of the fantasy production last year is the fact that

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they were trailing a lot in games and they had

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to throw the football. Jamis Winston looked some of the

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>positives for him. Two sixty passing yards per game in

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.479
<v Speaker 1>his career, seven point six yards per tempt. Those are

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>both good numbers. He actually averaged a career ards twenty

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>five rushing yards per game last season. The negatives greg

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the turnovers. We have fifty eight career interceptions in fifty

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>six games. That's not gonna had the job done. He's

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>got to cut down on the interceptions. He can make

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>every throw. I mean there were a few games I

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>watched last year with James Winston. He would make some

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of these throws that and it's baffling to me. And

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's honestly, it's frustrating because he can make throws in

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL that other people can't make. He can flat

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>out he can make all the throws. But Ey is

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just right about it's the mental capacity. That's the step

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that he has to take this year, and it's really

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>his last chance. So many different quarterbacks that choose from. Obviously,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>another one we're gonna get to in a moment is

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton, and I'm excited about him very very much

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>so just based on his ADP. More so for me

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that jameis Winston. O J. Howard I mentioned, and the

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>tight end position always seems to be very very tough

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to fill um O J. Howard has that pedigree. Top

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>ten draft pick, he's draft being drafted is a top

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>five tight end right now? Does that make sense to you, guys? Yeah?

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it does. I want one of those top

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>six tight ends this year. It's it's it's a very

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>obvious group. You have your type, your your top three guys,

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in Travis Kelly, see Zach Ertz and George Kittle, and

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>then you have that next year of really talented tight

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>ends that we expect to make that next step in O. J. Howard, Hunter, Henry,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and we spoke of Evan Ingram the other day as well.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But I have a little stat here for you when

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to O. J. Howard, greg and it is

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with de Sean Jackson and Adam Humphrey still on the team.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Last year, his sixteen game pace was fifty five receptions,

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>nine yards and eight touchdowns. They're now gone again. It's

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy nine targets up for grabs. So

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that typically in years past, excuse me, Bruce

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>arians hasn't really used the tight end all that much,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's never had a tight end this good. Um,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And we know that O. J. Howard's gonna be on

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the field a lot because he's a really good pass

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>blocker and you know, he could play the slot, he

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>can play on the outside as well. It's just really

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>really versatile tight end here. And I think he's one

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, top we're talking about physical freaks.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's one of the top two three among

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position in the NFL. I think every

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>thing is set up for O. J. Howard to have

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>him monster year. I haven't done my rankings yet, but

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, off the top of my head, I would

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>rather have him over both Angram and Hunter Henry. He's

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be my tight end four once the once

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the rankings get published, gig all right and e y

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 1>us you a new problem either? Yeah, yeah, I mean,

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy is a freak. I think he might be

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the best athlete at the tight end position overall. Um,

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he's got everything that makes a superstar tight end. He's

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>proven that he can do it. They just gotta get

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>him in the ball and he's got to stay on

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the field. All Right, we got about a minute remaining.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to Carolina on the other side. So,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>is there anything else with Tampa Bay that we need

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to know about guests? Well, we didn't really talk about

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Barber. He is going about like thirty thirty five

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>picks later than Ronald Jones looked. There's nothing to be

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>excited here in terms of upside, and for PPR leagues

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>offers next to nothing. But you know, if you take

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones, it's very easy to just lock up the

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay backfield. Greg, you can invest your ninth and

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>eleventh round picks or ninth and twelveth on picks, and

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then you have the Tampa Bay backfield. So I just

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>thought it was worth mentioning based on the report from

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Allman, who still expects Peyton Barbera to be the

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>starting running back Dayne's brother. He's just going super late,

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really want him. There's not a lot

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of upside, but it's very easy to lock up both

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay running backs this year. We talked about how

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>hard it is to do with some of these other

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>backfields potentially. Yeah, I mean with the Rams, you have

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to use your first in your sixth round picks right now, crazy,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll take the break, We'll come back. Carolina is up next. Hey,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember if you want

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, download

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the tune and app and just search for Fantasy Sports

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on periscope

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dud Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and face for listening.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're back the BFFs, Eric Young, Frank Standfile, Grex Sum.

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>We're done with Tampa Bay. One last team left in

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>then NFC South to get to and it's the Carolina Panthers.

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned before that I once again feel that

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton is an undervalued commodity. If you look at

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the NFFC again, since the beginning of July, Cam Newton

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is not being drafted as a top ten quarterback. He's

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>being drafted at number twelve, right barely in front of

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray. Is the Cam Newton that a year ago

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>or two years ago, it was number one quarterback in

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the league. We had a conversation that you got a

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>draft this guy inside the top five quarterbacks going forward

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>yet major injury issues. But this offense. We talked about

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>things changing with We talked about being smart. Savage is

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the same as as always been. I know the turners

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>are there now just as they were last year. What

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>if he's healthy, you know Cam is gonna run. You

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>know he's gonna fall into the end zone. That's what

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>he does. I think getting Cam Newton is a twelfth

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback off the board. I love it. Man. You don't

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>even pick one oh three right around where you're getting

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones. You mean Cam Newton every time that if

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy, Greg is a very big if. Though there's

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of players you can say that about. It's true,

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>but with a quarterback, specifically arthurscopic shoulder surgery in the

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>off season. They labeled it as a clean up whatever.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>That's clean up YEA, to clean up, you know, just

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, spray a little, you know, something on it,

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you clean it up. Whatever. Yeah, I mean, I don't

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>think it really works that way Greg. But here's what

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll say about Cam Newton. I think he took strides

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>forward last year in terms of his completion percentage. Obviously

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that was just throwing dump offs to

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey. What sixty seven point nine percent completion That

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was a massive, massive uptick for him in Norv Turner's office,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I really thought Nerve Turner did a great job and

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>getting the most out of Cam Newton, getting the most

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>out of Christian McCaffrey and the rest of their weapons.

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But his ability to run is going to be dependent

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on how healthy he is, Greg, and we saw that

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>last year. In his first eight games, nine point one

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts per game, forty two point eight rushing yards

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>per game. All four of his rushing touchdowns came during

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that nine game stretch. His his next his next six

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>games four point six rushing attempts per game, twenty four

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>point three rushing yards for games. So I mean, look,

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the numbers went down tremendously, zero rushing touchdowns, and during

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that stretch he was QB twelve. The first eight games

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that he played, he was QB two overall, So so

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>much of his value was just dependent on if he's

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>healthy enough to run, and the fact that we have

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this question mark about him coming off shoulder surgery. I

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with you that you're getting him at a really

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>nice discount. Greg. I'm more willing to take Cam Newton

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in a one quarterback league because I'm going to be

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>confident in my ability to get a serviceable backup for

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>him in case he gets hurt. But if I play

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in super Flex and Cam Newton goes down and he's

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>one of my quarterbacks or my super Flex, I'm screwed.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm more apt to take him in a one

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback league where I could get a really good backup

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for him. Greg, what do you think about him Newton

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this year? Eric, Yeah, I think with that style of play,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and I mean the way he's played his entire career

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>college and pro is is it's not if he's going

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to get hurt, it's when he's going to get hurt.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>As far as a single quarterback rea draft league, look,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Kim Newton is a fantasy stud with the touchdowns, running

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball, um having McCaffrey there where he can just

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>do these small dumps and McCaffrey could take it, you know,

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ten yards. That's how is his stats? Improof? Like I mean,

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's a no brainer. Who do I throw it?

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Do I throw it to the best player on the field?

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>That makes complete sense to me. But Cam, it's a

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>huge risk. It can be a huge reward, but you

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be ready to put someone else in. My

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>suggestion is maybe even taking another quarter back at the

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of your draft, if there's a good

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>one available, then that way you know you have somebody

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have the scoop off, some plug off

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the off the waiver wire a Week five or six

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you were saying, Frank, make sure you

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have a good backup and not some scrub that you're

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>plugging off the waiver wire later in the year because

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of that injury risk that Cam Newton presents. Now, Eric

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was saying that smart strategy. You just dumped the ball

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.239
<v Speaker 1>off to your best player and kind of let him

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>do his thing. No, I don't really want to go

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>into Christian miccaffrey all too much, because we talked about

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Camary yesterday. Got it. There's nobody else there. He's a

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>top three pick. You can make the case from a

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>number one, number two, number three. I don't want to

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>have the argument. We have not enough time to do it.

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But I want to talk about who else Cam Newton's

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna dump that ball off too outside of CMC. And

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's d J. Moore and that's Curtis Samuel. Kelvin Benjamin

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was drafted several years ago to be the number one

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and he was for about a year. Devin

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Functions was drafted to replace Kelvin Benjamin and he did

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for about it. You are neither of those guys are

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there anymore? D J. Moore and Curtis Samuel are the

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>number one number two wide receivers theoretically on the team.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Their fantasy values kind of open the air right now, Eric,

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have to pick one of those players, Curtis

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Samuel or d J. Moore in a vacuum, who would

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you rather draft? I feel like the more valuable is

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel because you can get him way later. And

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think anyone honestly could tell you

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>which one of those guys is gonna pen out. They're

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same type of receiver UM with with

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Funchs and Benjamin. Those were guys. They run down the field,

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he throws it, they jump up in the air, and

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they fall into the m zone. That's the kind of

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>receivers that both of those guys were. These guys are

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>much different. They can line up all over the field,

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they can play outside, they can play slot slot. But

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not big bodies, neither of them. Um So for me,

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I I would pick more first if he felt to

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>me far enough. But I think the better value is

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel because Curtis Samuel could end up being the

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>number one wide receiver there in Carolina. The number one

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>right receiver is going to be Christian McCaffrey. That's true. Yeah,

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one receiver on the team is going to

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>be McCaffrey. We saw that last year. He led all

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs and targets and receptions a hundred and seven

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>receptions for Christian McCaffrey last year. If you got those

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers out of your wide receiver, you'd be happy let

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>let alone from a running back. But I do agree

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>with e Y in terms of the value right now,

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel does present more value. True story, Greg. We

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to do a Fandel Hurry video today where

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I will present six busts, and originally I had d

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>J Moore as one of my bust. I started looking

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>into him, and the more I looked into him, I

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>realized there's not really much much that I could say

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>bad about DJ Moore outside of where he's being drafted

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, and even that we mentioned it earlier, he's

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>being drafted right around Chris Godwin. All the breakout wide

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>receivers are going that same range. It's you know, it's

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>at four or five turn. It's late fourth early fifth round,

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and when you draft them there, that's the fourth or

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>fifth round. You can't have them. Must like me, you

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that safety at four or five because if they bust,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you're screwed. But you can pretty much say that about

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>all those wide receivers being there, like, is there a

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 1>safe wide receiver there? It's you know, it's a lot

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of guys who are expecting to take that next step.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It's Calvin Ridley, it's Tyler Lockett, it's Chris Godwin. You know,

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's guys that we haven't necessarily seen do it over

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the course of a full season. So if you go

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, you go a little bit later than that.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Like someone like Cooper Cup is probably safer, that's probably true,

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But cutting off a torn a C is Tyler Lockett safer?

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>He's probably safer because we kind of saw him do

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it last year, but just on really low volume. He

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was like record setting efficiency Tyler Lockett was last year.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he finished as a top twenty wide receiver.

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>You didn't even have a hundred targets last year. So again,

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that when we get to the NFC West.

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But look, a lot of these wide receivers are going

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in the same range, and I think d J. Moore

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>has the opportunity to break out here Greg because I

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think outside of McCaffrey. He's probably going to be the

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>second most targeted player on this team. I think he

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is a and it's not a knock on Curtis Samuel.

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I think d J. Moore is a more complete wide

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>receiver then yeah, but yeah, but it was drafted in

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the first round. D J. Moore was, and over the

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>final nine weeks of the season, he played over of

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the snaps in eight of those games, and you know,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we start to saw him take off a little bit.

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Thirteenth in the NFL in yards after after the catch

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>while he wasn't even a full time starter for the

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>most of the season. So he's dangerous in that regard.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Nine point six yards per target that was nineteenth among

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. So he makes the most of his opportunity.

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Originally I thought he was going too high, but when

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you compare him to other wide receivers going in that range,

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I understand why people are excited about d J. Moore.

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>If I had to choose who's the better value right now,

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Curtis Samuel. I mean, there's no doubt about it.

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.919
<v Speaker 1>He's going sixty picks later right now, and he could

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>have a similar opportunity to d J Moore a Swiss

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Army knife. You know. They can line them up in

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the backfield, get a few rushing attempts. They can use

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.919
<v Speaker 1>them for end around screenplays, quick slants. He can catch

0:35:57.960 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the ball down the field as well. I mean, really

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>two versatile wide receivers. I'd rather have Curtis Samuel for

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the value, but I can't really get mad at people

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for expecting the breakout from d J Moore as well.

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I do want to mention also on this team, outside

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of d J Moore and Curtis Samuel, you have Tori Smith,

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you have jerryus right who comes over from Minnesota. And

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it's still Chris Hogan season Chris Hogan member of the

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers as well. So there's a lot of names there,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>but the two that you trust most that are gonna

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>be on the field consistently as they're two starting wide receivers,

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Curtis Samuel and d J Moore at least.

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually so I think so. But I will say this

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on our lads dot com, which is evil scouting service,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they have Curtis Samuel listens as the third wide receiver

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>behind d J Moore. Like behind Toria Smith's Like, there's

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of names there. I mean a lot

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of NFL teams use three wide receiver sets often now definitely,

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it all move around like playing the slot,

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>DJ Moreker play in the slot with Moore, Smith, Samuel

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>right In Hogan, a lot of like similar guys Like

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I just don't expect Chris Hogan or

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Tory Smith or Right to really demand any targets. I

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>don't really think that any of them have done anything

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in their career. I mean, you know, sens Tory Smith

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years with the Ravens, But I don't

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>know that any of those wide receivers at this point

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in their career, what they've done, what their pedigree is,

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>just overall their skill level, do they deserve to get

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that massive target share? Uh, the answer for me would

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>be no. So that's why I think Samuel and d J.

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Moore are entrenches the top two wide receivers on this

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>team and should get the most opportunity in that regard.

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:35.879
<v Speaker 1>What other of you guys will start with you taking

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a chance of Greg Olson here, I don't think so, man.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, okay, I don't you just don't retire and

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>then come back and are efficient. I just I just

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that he's going to be who he was. Uh.

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Ian Thomas is interesting to me because I feel like

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers are a team that throws to the

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>tight end, especially in the red zone. And I don't

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>know if that was because Greg Olsen was so good,

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like that scheme is set with all

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>those kind of like not gadget players, but like what

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Frank said's kind of Swiss army knife players and you're

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of moving them all around and there is no

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>real big body on the team. Ian Thomas could be

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown guy. Okay, I don't really have much interest

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in Greg Olson. Actually kind of wish that Greg Olson

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>would have retired because then um Ian Thomas would be

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the starting tight end. And he kind of flashed a

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit down the stretch. I mean three of his

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>last four games he was either seventy over seventy five

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>yards or scored a touchdown in three of those four games.

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So he flashed a little bit. Uh. He had some

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>pedigree coming out of college as well. I mean he

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was a productive college player. There was a lot expected

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from Ian Thomas, and I think maybe eventually he's the

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>only twenty three years old, he could develop into a

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy viable tight end. So for those who play in

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>dynasty leagues or you know, deeper keeper leagues where you

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>know tight ends get a premium or anything like that,

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 1>then I would have interest in Ian Thomas for the future.

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if it's gonna happen this year,

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>barring on greg Olsen gets hurt. I just don't know

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's gonna happen. But I don't I don't really

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>have much interest in Greg Olsen because this offense has changed.

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Everything used to go through him, but now he's really

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>fourth in the pecking order behind McCaffrey, d J. Moore

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and Churs Samuel. He's Cameron Artist pain the handcuffed Christian McCaffrey,

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess, but I mean, I mean the guy, Christian McCaffrey.

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna mention this stat earlier on and it's

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not one that comes from me. It's actually from

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gretch following on Twitter at yards Pergretti of uh,

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's true. He works with CBS Sports.

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>He had this awesome stat about Christian McCaffrey. He played

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps eight different times last year. That was

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>done only three other times by all the running backs

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL combined. So that kind of usage is

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>exactly why Christian McCaffrey goes as one of the top

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>four running backs and can flirt with being the top

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>running back because he plays as many snaps as he does.

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't really have a serviceable backup. They're not really

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna come off the field. And if you've seen any

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 1>pictures of him in the off season, he basically looks

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like a white miniature version of the Incredible Hope. It's insane,

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>like you might be able to get you might be

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>able to work him into like a w W contract

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to e y, because honestly, Christian McCaffrey

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is jacked out of his mind. Now, Yeah, it's it's madness, man.

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And I will say this, Uh, he was a guy

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think I was ever super high on.

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Um I just thought that maybe he wouldn't be able

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to hold up. But um man, he won't a season

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I think he's gonna be a beast

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>again this year. All right, fishball just just took Jimmy

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo with the seventh round. Like it, Jimmy g as

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>your second quarterback. Let's go speaking Jimmy G probably quarterback

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rock Like it's just praisy. Everyone's gone west tomorrow. Let's

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>do it. Let's do it. You will be here, Frank

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>will be here, and I'll be here too, and hopefully

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you will be as well. We're back tomorrow, we hope,

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>from the NFL to the NBA. Ealy Rhodo dot com

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 1>is the place to win millions in Daily Fantasy. You

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season long

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>for a price of one, or dominate the entire Daily

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports reround with the Elite package at month. If

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you use the promo code f n t s Y,

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you get ten percent off your Daily Rohdo package. Go

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Rodo dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package,

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n t s Y, and you'll

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire.

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So what did appen? What did happen? Here's what you

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>missed on the BFFs. Mike Evans tenth overall on ei

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>S Big Board. He is buying up. He is buying

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hard on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Frankie, you're right there

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>with him. Yeah, yeah. And I think a lot of

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>what happened with Bruce Arians the down years that he

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>had as their head coach, specifically their offense, was due

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>to injuries. Greg. If you look at the five years

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that he was with the Cardinals, they ranked top twelve

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in total offense. The three years that Carson Palmer was healthy.

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>In fourteen, they ranked twenty four. Carson Palmer got hurt.

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>That was the year that Drew Stanton stepped in. And

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>then in seventeen, the final season that Bruce Arians was

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>there calling plays, Carson Palmer also got hurt, and then

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Blaine Gabbert all no blame Gabbert, journeyman in the NFL,

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>came in stepped in and their offense ranked twenty two.

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But let's not forget Carson Palmer put together a career

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>year through like thirty five touchdowns. Their offense finished first

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>overall in the entire NFL total offense, they finished first.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there's a lot to be excited

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about with not only Bruce arians mindset, but obviously the

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>weapons at the Tampa Bay Bucks possessed because they have

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston, who obviously brings a high pedigree. Because of

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>where he was drafted in the NFL draft, he hasn't

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>been able to necessarily put it together. They have Mike Evans,

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 1>they have Chris Godwin, they have Ronald Jones, and they

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>also have O. J. Howard. So there's a lot of

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>really interesting pieces on this offense. I'm I'm close to

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>where e Y is that I'm very excited about this

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>marriage of Bruce Arians style of offense and the weapons

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that they have there already. Greg, all right, so let's

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>let's start here with Mike Evins. He said he's the

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>number ten overall player on his board. I'm looking at

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like my Scott's fish Well. For instance, Mike Evans wound

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>up being the eighth wide receiver taken. I'm not worried

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>about where he went because the quirky rules and whatnot.

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>He was the eighth wide receiver taken after Hopkins, Adams, Julio,

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas, juju Um, Keenan Allen, and Odell Beckham Jr.

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>That sounds right to you, Frank, Mike Evans should live

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in the second round. I would probably take him ahead

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of Antonio Browns just because I like the Bucks offense

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Uh. Look, Antonio brown is gonna

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be a target monster this year. And we'll get into

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>more of the Raiders talk when we get to the

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a f C West. But I just think Mike Evans

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is potential for targets, his efficiency went up last year,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>his potential for touchdowns, which we've you know, we've seen

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>in the past. He has two seasons of double dug

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns already in his rear. I mean I looked this

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>up before the show. Greg. There's an awesome stat on

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans. He joins A. J. Green and Randy Moss

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is the only players in NFL history to start their

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>career with five consecutive seasons of one thousand receiving yards.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, that's that's pretty good territory to be

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in there. We know that the talent is there with

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans. Um you know, a hundred and seventy nine

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 1>targets are gone from this team now, with Adam Humphries gone,

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Shawn Jackson gone from this team, and you

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>know that's why people are buying too. Chris Godwin, which

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:31.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into But look, there's a lot of targets gone,

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Evans was already a target monster. So I

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>think the potential for UH targets, receptions, yards, and touchdowns,

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>it's all there.