WEBVTT - Episode 9: The U.S. Government's $18 Trillion Debt Problem

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>The phony bookkeeping goes merrily on. You know, we borrow

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>money from the Social Security Trust Fund and we call

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 1>it income Now corporation did something like that, the management

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>would all be watching each other's laundry and club fed.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Hi and welcome back to Bloomberg Benchmark, a podcast about

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the global economy. It's Thursday, October Tween night. I'm Tori Stillwell,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the US economics reporter in DC with Bloomberg News. I'm

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>with my colleagues inco hosts Dan Moss, our executive editor

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for International Economics here in d C with me and Akiedo,

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>our editor for Benchmark in San Francisco. Hello, Tory, how's

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it going. It's going. You know, it's pretty it's pretty

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>miserable weather here and just waiting for a debt deal

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to come down, so you know the usual. Well, this

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>has been another very exciting week in the global economy. Um, Dan,

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what's cut your eye over the past week? I was

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Ali Baba earnings released yesterday. The general

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>nar clity of was that Ali Barbera hit it out

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of the park. Sales were up by almost a third

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 1>despite a slowing Chinese economy, Defying the slowdown overcoming the slowdown.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And yes it's true China's headline GDP is slowing, but

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the mix of what's driving Chinese growth has changed dramatically

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in recent years. Services now accounts for more than half consumption,

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>which is what Ali Barbera is is doing pretty well,

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>getting stronger, exports getting weaker, manufacturing getting weaker, fixed their sets,

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>investment getting weaker. So it's not that Ali Barbera overcame

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the slowdown. Ali barber is the Chinese economy. Yeah, that's

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a great point, and that's also a great plug for

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>our second episode on the Chinese financial market crisis for

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>people who haven't digging to listen to that show yet,

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>which I get out tor, what's been interesting for you? Yeah?

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to share from services to goods. We got

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the Advanced Trade report this morning, so that be Wednesday morning,

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and before your eyes glaze over, I swear it's interesting

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the US merchandise trade deficits, so for goods it actually

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>shrank um and that was due to higher exports. Shipments

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of goods to overseas customers climbed two point four percent,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the biggest increase since March. And this is

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>great news because you know, we've talked in many episodes

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about there being a strong dollar and that being bad

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>for manufacturers here because it makes them goods more expensive

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to foreign customers. Some of that may be starting to abate,

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>which would be excellent news for our economy. Well, you, guys,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk about the deal that the White

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>House made with Republicans. They reached this deal late Monday

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>night to raise the eighteen point one trillion dollar debt

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>ceiling and thus prevent the US government from de fall

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>thing on its debt. So yeah, the government was able

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>to avoid a lot of potential chaos with with the steal.

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>But first let's introduce our guests. John Steel Gordon, a

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>historian and author of the book Hamilton's Blessing, The Extraordinary

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Life and Times of our National Debt. Hello John, Hello,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to be here for people who are listening

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and are like I know that the death ceiling is

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, but I don't quite know what it is. Tori.

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you can you give a quick explainer on what

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly this mysterious term is. Yes, I will do you

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>one better. I will define a couple of terms. So

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we have all our ducks in our own. So the

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>debt is just the total of federal budget deficits you

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>know throughout history, minus federal budget surpluses. That's all of

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>them put together. Now, the deficit is just how much

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>spending exceeds revenues in one given fiscal year. And that's

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of easy to imagine as a consumer, how

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>much you're spending versus how much you're getting in. So

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you can have a surplus and it's still to exactly

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for for one year. You can have a surplus and

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they're still debt exactly. UM. Now, the debt ceiling is

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the legal limit on how much total debt the government

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can issue. And that's not just the amounts borrowed in

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>credit markets, but also insecurities treasuries issued to UM other

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>parts of the government for example, John, how many countries

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>have a debt ceiling? Is this a unique situation here?

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the only one that I know of, UM,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And that may be because we have a presidential um

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>form of government as opposed to a parliamentary form of

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>government where the where the government and the parliament are

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially one and the same, and so they don't need

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a debt ceiling. Why do we have it in the

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>first place, and what are the pros and cons of it? Well,

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the death ceiling. Before nineteen seventeen, Congress authorized all issue

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of debt. If the Treasury wanted to issue you know,

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars worth of treasury bonds, that Congress had

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to say, Okay, you can spend it on building bridges

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And then in nineteen seventeen they put a

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>limit on the various forms of debt. I mean, how

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>many Treasury bills, how many Treasury notes, how many Treasury

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>bonds um the Treasury could issue. And then in nineteen

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine they established the debt ceiling, and you know,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the total debt cannot exceed this number without Congressional permission.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>This seems like it was just kind of a control measure,

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>like Congress wanting some measure of control over what the

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is doing. Yes, um, that's that's the point of it.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But of course, if Congress appropriates money to spend um,

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it has to provide the money to do

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the spending. And if you don't don't have the you know,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>tax revenues coming in, and you have no choice but

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to borrow the money. So it's kind of a you know,

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>dog chasing its tail kind of a thing. John, Was

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it always this contentious, No, not usually. It's in the

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>last UMF twenty years that has really gotten heated, and

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>especially under Obama. How do you account for that? Well,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I've I think partly it's the American politics is polarizing.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>You know. It used to be used to have liberal

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and conservative Democrats and liberal Republicans and conservative Republicans.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>You don't anymore. Old Democrats are liberal, Republicans are conservative. Yeah,

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And for our listeners, let's just sort of establish where

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we are in the In the debt ceiling talks in Washington, UM,

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans and the White House came to agreement, az

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Aki said, And so now it's got to pass both

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the House and the Senate. UM. Our congressional reporters say

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that will probably happen in the House sometime Wednesday today,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the day we're recording, and then it'll have to go

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate for approval as well. And they have

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>until November three is our deadline. Basically, that's before the

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>US gets very close to defaulting on its obligations, which

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>would be an extraordinarily bad scenario. Let's back up a

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit here. When I first learned what the debt

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>ceiling was, I was astonished, because every year Congress decides

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on the budget, you know, it decides on how much

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it wants to spend and how much approximately it's going

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to take in and revenue, and then decides, uh, these

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>are the bonds that we have to issue in order

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to borrow enough to actually be able to spend that

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of money. So they already decide on all of this,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and then later they also have to go through this

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>thing where they authorize the amount that the of the

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>total total debt of the government. And it just seems

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like this very weird thing where you already say that

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to spend this amount and you already decide

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on it, but then you have to go through this

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>separate process of then getting approval to do all of

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that all over again. It's so confusing to me, very bizarre.

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably has something to do with getting good headlines the

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>next morning you can spending John, do you think things

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>would be better if we just got rid of this

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling altogether or if we just kind of tried

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to meld it in together with the budget making process. Yes,

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I do, because I think it's now become a political football, um,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't serve any purpose other than to get

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>politicians to get good headlines the next morning, which is

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of course half of politics. I guess every every year

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>when this issue comes up, it does give us a

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>good chance, though, to reflect on how much the US

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>government owes to everyone else, both US citizens and US

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses and companies and individuals around the world. Tori, do

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to give us a quick primer on what

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this debt looks like? Now? Yes, sell debt comes in

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>many different shades, and there's many different labels for the

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of debt. So I'll walk through a couple

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of them. So, the US public debt subject to limit,

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>which includes um even debt that is accumulated when parts

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of the government borrow or lend from or to other

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>parts of the government. So that amount right there is

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteen point one trillion dollars right now, and that's right

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at the limit that is the debt ceiling right there.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of money. Yeah. Then we have the

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>US public debt held by the public, and this is uh,

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this is more often used by economists. This is what

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>people are really concerned about. And this is thirteen trillion

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>dollars um. To give you some context, before the recession

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>um in December two thousand seven, that number was five

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>point one trillion dollars. So we've we've more than doubled

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that level since then, and you know that has to

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do with revenues decreasing during the recession. Also, you know

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we spent to try to get the economy going back

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>up again, so we've definitely seen debt balloon recently. Let's

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>put these numbers into some kind of perspective, because taken

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in and of themselves, they sound stratus eric. But how

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>is the US doing relative to other major economies? Is

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of debt? Is it average? Is it

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>not very much? It's well above average. We're currently about

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and three hundred four percent of g d P.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>There are countries in worthshape. Greece is a hundred and

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight percent, Japan is about a hundred and seventy

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>four percent. But Japan, the Japanese are very thrifty people,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Japanese national debt is almost entirely internally held.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>The UK is around ninety percent, Frances around eighty six percent.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>These numbers have all been getting steadily worse over the

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>last um several decades, and it's important to look at

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>these debt to GDP ratios instead of just the absolute

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>amount in trillions of dollars. Because your economy produces a

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>lot every year and you have some amount of debt,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that's totally fine. But if your economy doesn't produce a

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>whole lot, but the debt size is actually a lot,

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that's when you're kind of in trouble. But on Japan

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and Act, you may also be able to provide some

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>perspective of this. Shouldn't it to GDP of the magnitude

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that John does just described If you believe half of

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what's said about the US debt, shouldn't that be leading

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to a catastrophe in Japan? Yet Japanese bonds are in

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>more demand than ever. The country is not falling apart.

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Why is it such a big deal. So part of

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason why people aren't panicked about Japan right now

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>is because, like John said, most of the debt is

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>actually owed to its own citizens, its own companies. So

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>when the death's kind of internal like that, you're just

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like you're pushing money around within the

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>same country, it's not that big of a deal. Whereas

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>when you have foreign investors, that's when things get a

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit more worrying. That was the case for Greece,

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that was the case for Spain, etcetera during the European

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>sovereign debt crisis. UM. But at the end of the day,

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this is really about market psychology. You know, investors can

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>really wake up tomorrow and decide that the US or

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Japan or any of these other countries just aren't trustworthy anymore,

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's when interest rates go up very quickly and

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you quickly tumble into a financial crisis. I suppose they could.

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But don't you think comparisons with Greece and Spain are

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>somewhat exaggerated. I mean, here in the US, we or

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you do actually control your own currency. That's not the

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>case in Greece and not the case in Spain. John,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of those comparisons, Well, I think

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's perfectly true. I mean, we are the reserve currency

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is a huge economic advantage for US UM

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's no other country that really could provide the

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency at this point, so we're very lucky in

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that regard. So we're okay for now. Well, we can

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>afford the debt right now because interest rates are extraordinarily

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>low and have been for several years. But if they

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>go back up to normal rates, suddenly the interest on

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the debt is going to be eating up an awful

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of tax revenue. How worried should we be about

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the size of the US debt? I think we should

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be moderately worried about it. It's not a crisis, but

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it can quickly become one. And what are we borrowing

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this money for. In the nineteenth century, we use the

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>national debt to save the Union, you know. In the

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties we used it to save the American economy.

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>In the nineteen four Days, we used it to save

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. What have we spent this all this money on?

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy the national debt was of g d P.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Today it's over and we've had no great war, no

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>great depression. But we do have an aging population. We

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>do have an aging population, but it's not as bad

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as say Japan is at the moment. And so what

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we've basically done is we have borrowed money from our

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>grandchildren so that we can enjoy it today. And you know,

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>don't forget today's borrowing is necessarily tomorrow's taxes. We're taking

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this money from our grandchildren so that we can have

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a nice lifestyle. When I when I talked to an

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>economist yesterday, John Nale over at LPL Financial, he told

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>me that when he talks to clients UM and investors,

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the debt is the number one question that people have

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. It is the thing that people are most

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>worried about. Do you think that's why that is? It's

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>just this whole feeling that it's getting unsustainable and it's

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>getting out of hand, and it jeopardizes serve the U

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>S as we know it, and just kind of curious

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>why they would be so worried about it. Why that's

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the first question. Well, I think one thing is that

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this could this could suddenly become a crisis, very very quickly.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It's again it's psychology. I mean, in the nineteen seventies,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>New York City trotted on down to Wall Street and

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>asked to borrow more money. UM and Wall Street just said, sorry,

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not lending the City of New York any more money.

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And suddenly it was forward the city dropped debt. Fortunately,

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the State of New York bailed out New York City

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and put it under strict control. I mean, one thing

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>they did was required New York City to keep its

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>books according to generally accept at accounting principles. It would

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly help if the federal government had to do that.

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>What they don't. You know, you know those surpluses we

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>had in nine, two thousand, two thousand one, the national

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>debt went up every one of those years. Now, how

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>can you be running a surplus and yet you're debt

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is increasing? It was phony bookkeeping is how you do it.

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And the phony bookkeeping ended in two thousand and one. No,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that's when we slipped into deafic set again. Now the

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>phony bookkeeping goes merrily on, and you know, we borrow

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>money from the Social Security Trust Fund and we call

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it income. Now a corporation did something like that, the

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>management would all be watching each other's laundry and club fed.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering. You know, this is a conversation with a

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of numbers and a lot of vocabulary. That's pretty difficult.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Talking about sovereign debt is not my favorite thing in

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, because it's so complicated. But if you're a

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>normal person out there, if you're like a normal American citizen, Um,

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>why should you care about the debt ceiling? And why

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>should you care about the US debt? I think the

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling is they don't care about it. Most people

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't care about politics, and people who do care about

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>politics find that absolutely incomprehensible. But ninety percent of the

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>American people don't like politics very much. It's sort of

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>now they deal with it as much as they have to,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of like nobody likes going to the dentist, but

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we do. Anyway, I can personally attest to that. Well,

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, John, what do you think Alexander Hamilton's would

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have said if there was a time machine that he

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>teleported into modern day America and saw that the US

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>debt is now around eighteen trillion dollars and that the

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling becomes this huge political debating point every year. Well,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Alexander Hamilton's said that you know that the

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>us a national blessing, and it has many times proved

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to be exactly that we could not have won the

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Civil War without it. Now what Hamilton's who died in

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>eighteen o four, would say about twenty fifteen, I think

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>he'd be probably more interested in things like airplanes and

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>television and ray idea and what have you and snapchat. Right.

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of prominent economists, such as Paul Krookman,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>though he's not the only one who would say, with

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rates the slow ought we not be borrowing to invest?

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>What would hamilton have made of that? Well on thing,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>about one third of the national debt turns over every

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years UM, so it wouldn't be very long

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>before if interest rates go back up to normal, when

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the amount of tax revenue needed to service the debt

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>would go straight up. And then you know, either we

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>keep borrowing um and pretending everything's fine, or there has

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to be drastic tax increases which would certainly slow the economy,

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or there's going to have to be big government cuts

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>which would also slow the economy. So we better to

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>do something about his starting now. But I wouldn't hold

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>my brand well. I want to end on a light note.

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen that Hamilton's and musical yet? I have not? Um,

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I hear it's very good hip hop. Not exactly my

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of music. I'm more Rogers and Hamistan musical type. Um,

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but everybody was saying it said it was absolutely great. Yeah.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I saw it a few weeks back back in August

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's amazing. I am going to plug it.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say that you should watch it. The hip

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>hop is it's very well done and uh it's hilarious

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to boot. So on that note, thank you so much

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thank you, and thanks to all of

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to Bloomberg Benchmark. We will be back

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>next week. You can find us on Bloomberg dot com, iTunes, Podecast, SoundCloud, Stitcher,

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and many other places. If you're on iTunes, please take

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a moment to rate and review the show. That really

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>helps other listeners discover us and let us know what

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you thought of the show. You can reach us and

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>follow us on Twitter at Daniel Mass, d C, Tori

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Stillwell and Akio seven. See you next week.