WEBVTT - The Arms Race Fueling the Creator Economy

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast in

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>which we talked with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein with Variety.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>There may be an estimated fifty million people active in

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the so called creator economy, but only a fraction of

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>them are making the truly big bucks. And that's where

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>my next guest comes in. Dan Weinstein has been representing

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the influencers with the largest audiences for over

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a decade, even before everyone started calling them influencers. Now

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>he's doing it again as part of a new management firm,

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Underscore Talent, which gives us a good opportunity to see

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>how this rapidly evolving business continues to change. Welcome back

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to Strictly Business with Dan Weinstein, co founder of Underscore Talent,

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>which represents some pretty big names in the influencer world.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you've heard of the kid duo of Lad and

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Nikki here in the top ten among total subscribers by

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>some counts, or the Royalty family or the Labrand family.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned, Dan, you've been active in this space

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, so tell me what is it

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about this business that you've stuck with all this time,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is the opportunity here bigger than it's ever been? And

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>why yes, thanks Andy, and I you know, even more

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>so than I think around you know, five or six

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. The opportunity for creators to build meaningful businesses

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and be sort of entrepreneurial is exponential to where it was.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>You look at, you know, somewhere like three or four

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when the top creators in the space maybe

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>five years ago, you know, we're lucky if they were

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>earning a million dollars a year, two million dollars a year.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That was the top half of one percent, and it

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was generally driven by brands. Now you've got the top

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>half of that same one percent earning twenty thirty forty

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in building companies that you know, I think

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>arguably could be the next unicorns in the in the

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>coming you know, coming decade. And that's just a really

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>exciting place to be. And you know, I love being

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of a very disruptive um, you know industry. So

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what changed here? Because I remember those days where it

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was all about, you know, get the brand deal and

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you know the rest is gravy, and now it seems

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's the gravy where the money is made. Yeah,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's interesting, I think, um, you know, a

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>while ago, it was the thesis around the whole company,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>even started two thousand seven, was that access to an

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>audience was going to drive meaningful value. Right. It was disintermediation.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You could circumvent the gatekeepers, go direct to your audience,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the heavens will open up and money

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>will write down upon you. Um. And I think some

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of that was true, right, And a lot of it,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>again was was driven by advertising. But the technology, the

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>plat forms, the companies that have been built even in

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two years to further strengthen that relationship with

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>an audience and provide a low barrier entry to monetize

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that audience in myriad ways has allowed creators that that

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't even in that top half of one percent to

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>build sustainable and real businesses. You know, I call it

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of that middle class of creators are now able

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to leverage their audience, price people's passion or fandom in

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>meaningful ways provide whether it's exclusivity or content or memberships

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>or all these other things that are coming about to

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>drive real revenue and and and brands and advertising is

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>becoming less and less of an important piece. When I

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>would first talk to you about this back in in

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven, when you were dealing with names like

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder, who's going to remember the likes of

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Annoying Orange. Um, you know Lucas, Uh, what is this

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Lucas cruchank right? And back then it was I remember

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you telling me it was all about you get your

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>start on the platform, but then you've got to graduate that.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I pe so that you know, Lucas gets his TV show,

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Annoying Orange gets his movie, and you guys you were

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>great at that. Um did some real pioneering work there. Um.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that no longer the case because that's you know,

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>my from my Hollywood vantage point. Uh, that was the

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>be all and end all ten years ago. Yeah, that

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.679
<v Speaker 1>I that's definitely not the case anymore. Um. And and

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think back then, you know, we we made we

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>were still innovative in the way that we made these movies. Right.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>We leveraged our access to the audience. We put in

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>our own capital to drive a better economic outcome, which

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I think was really interesting at the time. But the

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>goal was get on TV, get in movies. Seldom music

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>do do the traditional sort of Hollywood thing. Um now,

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you know it's almost TV and film are

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>still important, but it's one spoke of that wheel right

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and it and it has to be under the right

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>set of circumstances. In terms take a property like like

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>uh good Mythical Morning with the Mythical Entertainment Crew. Years ago,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I would have said, that is a late night TV show.

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We need to go to MTV or NBC or one

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of these places and and sell this into into late night.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll drive the audience, it will be it'll be great.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be the win. And the reality is today

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it, britten Link would say, well,

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>why would we do that? We own the show, we

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are super profitable, we have a media company that has

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty year ninety executives in it. We've built products around it,

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>We've built other vehicles and other talent around it. This

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is the asset that we're going to continue to sort

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of build. Why would we let MTV own that that

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>asset for a much less economic upside? And I think

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a lot of that today. I think it's gone.

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>There are definitely people you know and creators that want

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to be in movies and television and where that will

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>drive real value, But it's certainly not the only opportunity, um,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and it has to be a part of the right

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of overall strategy. What you're saying actually reminds me

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of another former client of yours, Lily Singh, who I think,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>after you represented her, went on to late night TV

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at NBC for I think just a few years. And

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that was necessarily a successful experiment.

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Not not that anyone's worried about her. I think I

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>think she's gonna do just fine. Yeah, I think I think, Look,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Lily is an incredibly talented creative and she'll be and

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>she'll be you know, great and whatever she sort of does.

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it was an interesting experiment. I mean, I

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>think part of the thesis was that can you know,

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>can she drive her audience to you know, television, And

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the reality is is that, you know, primarily

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>her audience is not going to stay up and watch

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, late night television at two in the morning

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on on NBC, and and the format was not what

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was sort of, um the crux of what drew that

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>audience to her in the first place, and so it

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>was kind of trying to bring the Internet to television

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't separate, and I just think it wasn't,

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bit of a failed experiment. And I'm

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>sure there were a lot of reasons why, including NBC

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, in Lily's camp, um, you know,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I don't. I don't think was was the

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>home run that it was anticipating. So influencers don't need

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood anymore. Give me, as a point of contrast, walk

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>me through an existing client of yours and the spokes

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of the wheel and the many ways they're making money,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>which I would assume are is very heavy on, you know,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>merchandise licensing. Yeah, so I think there's a lot of

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>different ways. So so we'll take the Royalty Family by example. Right,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So they've got you know, north of twelve or thirteen

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers on YouTube. They produced content, you know, on

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis. They generate a tremendous amount of revenue

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>passively from advertising on on YouTube, the ad sense revenue. Right.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>We then also have partnered with them to take their

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>content into other other platforms that are also monetizing, like Facebook,

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like Snapchat, where we're sort of repurposing their their sort

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of really robust library of content and and driving incremental

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and passive and recurring revenue from other platforms. We also

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of partnered with them on their will call it merchandise,

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think it goes beyond that. It's it's less

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hats and t shirts. UM. You know, the mother of

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the mom of the group is very into fitness, and

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we started sort of in a very bespoke way to

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>create a line of at leisure where that we're in

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle of developing. We think that's going to be

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>hugely successful. There's a couple of other consumer product categories

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking around in the in the kids space

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're just starting starting to to sort of develop

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>UM and we and the and obviously brand still at

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that scale, still play a big piece of it. I

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>think you know, once or you know, once a week

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or so, there's a there's a branded entertainment piece that

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>comes out through some really robust partnerships with brand advertisers. UM.

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>We've also created i P that we're launching on all

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>these different platforms Snapchat, Instagram, UM and and and the like.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And so at the moment, TV is not a thought. Um,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>will it? Will it be at some point in time?

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Possibly Is there a larger show that that requires the

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>distribution of the Netflix or or that kind of a

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>budget level. Maybe, but only if it makes sense. It's

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a necessity at the moment, and they're in

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>control of their own destiny. So it sounds like the

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>brand advertiser though it is still an important spoke in

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>all this. And I recall a few years ago having

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>your colleague, the the shy retiring rezazad Uh describing with

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>great candor the difficulties of working with brands in the space,

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the customization that just kind of the wild

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>wild west of it all. Has it gotten any better

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in terms of working with brands and bringing them into

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this kind of work. I think it. I think it has.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think um, I think brands, I mean, look, there's

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a natural maturation that that that that happens, right, Um.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I think you go through all your trials and tribulations,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>both on the agency side on the talent side, there's

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>harder brands to work with, there's harder influencers to work with.

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, so threading that needle sometimes can still be

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>still be challenging, but I think that advertisers for the

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>most part have understood the value of where uh, you know,

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>influencers play in their in their chain of activities. I

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>think that they've learned how to really understand efficacy as

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the performance of the of the videos

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or the content or the influencer, and they started to

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>learn like, look, we don't need to reinvent the wheel.

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>There's some really great bespoke, custom branded content out there,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 1>but not everything needs to to be that and to

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>go viral on if you want to reach a very

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>specific audience, you can very easily say, you know, like

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in podcasting, here's the brand we're powering this piece of content.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, here's your here's your your value as the

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>listener or the fan, whether it be a discount or

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this or that ideality, and you can track that. And

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you see a lot more performance based marketing

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>today than you do general awareness, super custom you know,

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>branded content which was wrought with all sorts of challenges. Dana,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to also talk about the relationship with the platforms,

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>which you know, as we've talked about it here, it's

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>been sort of a very YouTube centric conversation. But of

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>course there's plenty of platforms out there that are seemed

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to be actively courting influencers. So again, in terms of

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a contrast from five, ten years ago, how different is

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of the multiplicity of viable platforms to

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>play with. Yeah, um, I think you were in the

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>middle or maybe in the beginning of you know, proverbial

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>arms race for for influencers. UM. I think with with

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, exponential growth of TikTok and all the

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>value that TikTok is providing to creators and influencers, you

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of the you know, more established platforms

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that may have been behind the eight ball in that

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>regard starting to try to play catch up. So you've

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>got TikTok, You've got all the Facebook companies, Instagram, Facebook, etcetera.

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got Snapchat, who has really leaned in in recent

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>years to um supporting and innovating around creators. Um. Twitter

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>has come out of the woodwork and started creating a

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>tool sets and monetization opportunities for for for them. You

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>had you had an insurgence of very small, smaller but

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>specific platforms like clubhouse or this or that or the

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>other thing, and so there's a lot of opportunities to

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>build audience and people leaning into developed specifically for creators

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so that they can you know, better monetize their their

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>their their wares um. And I think that's reflective in

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>how how creators and companies like us are engaging with

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>these platforms. And so what does this mean strategically? In

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>other words, do you tell your clients, hey, you know,

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pick one platform and really focus there, or you know,

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>spread yourself as thin as you can across ten different platforms,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>or or is it just every client takes a different strategy. Yeah,

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little it's a little ladder, right.

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on the client and the audience

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>that you're trying to reach and where those audiences are. Um,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there are still some differences, right, you know,

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>TikTok tends to be a little on the younger side

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>versus where Instagram is today versus where you know, Facebook

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>proper is, for example. So I think understanding where your

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>audiences and playing to your strength is important. But content

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ubiquity in this world and consistency and and and being

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>top of mind all the time is super important. Even

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>leaning into new platforms like YouTube shorts, for example, which

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>came out you know a month or two ago, has

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>has given creators a whole new opportunity to grow an audience.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>We we had creators that have been operating on YouTube

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and other platforms for you know a year or two years,

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting thousands of views that have really leaned

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>into YouTube shorts and overnight seemingly have started to get

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of views um and so you've got

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to be on top of what what people are responding to,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>where the eyeballs are um and and look, I think

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different opportunities because there's a war for

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for influencers at the moment, and and and frankly because

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the new Apple update where where privacy

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is becoming more of an issue and ad targeting is

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be more challenging people it have very specific

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>audiences that can communicate with them directly are going to

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>become more valuable. So so you know, there's an opportunity

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to I don't want to say, play them off of

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>each other, but leverage each for their strengths. And really

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the creator is in the driver's seat at the moment,

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I want to get back to TikTok

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>because in the scheme of this arms race, it seems

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like TikTok is sort of sucking all the oxygen out

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of the room. Uh, there's just so much attention, so

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>much heat. Um. But does that mean you necessarily I mean,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for your say, more family oriented clients, do they not

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily belong on TikTok, which, as you put it, is

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of more young skewing. Um. No. I look, I

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>think TikTok is really captured, you know, a very large

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>audience in a very short amount of time. And I

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's rooms for room for a lot of things

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of specific niches. I'll address the families

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in a second, but look at something like, you know,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the phenomenon going on with book talk right now, um,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a very specific niche around around literature. And

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think if you search the hashtag book talk,

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve point six billion views in the last month or

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>two have been around that topic. And it is actually

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>catapulted essentially non existent or dormant you know, books to

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the top of the best seller list. Like how influential

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that is in that world? Um, is sort of incredible.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So and I think you find that you find culinary

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok, you find uh you know, books and movies

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and and and all sorts of very specific niches are

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>emanating from that platform. So I do think it's important

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to be there. It's it is the platform of the moment.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It's capturing a lot of the zy guys. Our family

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>channels are there. For example, the Labrandt family, uh, Cole

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and Savannah are some of the largest TikTok creators out there,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and what they do on TikTok, while it's still family oriented,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily what they do on YouTube. I think

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that's an opportunity for Savanna that, for example, but mother

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to be more herself and around her lifestyle and this

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>and that. The other thing where is what happens on

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is much more around the family dynamic, Everley the kid,

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and things along that along the line. We're gonna take

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a quick break, but will be right back with more

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with Dan Weinstein, co founder of Underscore Talent. And we're

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>back with Dan Weinstein, co founder Underscore Talent, a longtime

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>expert in the influencers space. I'm gonna ask a question

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that it may sound like I'm joking, but maybe I'm

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>not which is does a business like yours have to

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>be managing a TikTok house? Do you do you need

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to have you know, uh, ten twentysomething's in a mansion

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in bel Air at this point? Or is that optional?

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's optional. I think Look, I think there's

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 1>there's opportunity there. I think some have done well with it,

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think others have, you know, sort of not

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>done so well to be, to put it nicely, um,

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that just the idea of getting people together

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and creating in a house is you know, isn't enough.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there needs to be a business raph around

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>around that. I think there needs to be adults in

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the room. I mean, I think that, you know, part

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of the reason we started Underscore was that we looked

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>around the creator space and like you said at the beginning,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, my partners and I have been doing is

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a combine thirty plus years in both traditional and digital. Um,

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot of disparate representation, a lot of young,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>inexperienced people, oftentimes a little unsophisticated. Not not everybody, I'm

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>not casting versions generally, but there, but there really wasn't

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that sort of preeminent place where people could

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>go to and feel guided, right and and and safe. Um.

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that was what we were hoping to

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of bring to this kind of space that not

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>only the entrepreneurial spirit that we have and ability to execute,

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but but some real guidance and some real you know, representation. Well,

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>but on the flip side of that, I gotta wonder

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>whether you've got to have a real stomach to be

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>in this space. I you know, you read the headlines

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about you know, certain influence or misbehaviors, and you know,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>also you're working with children, people who you know their

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>parents are working with them, and it just seems to

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>me like there's so many different ways this could get

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of hairry. So how do you deal with all that? Yeah?

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you you've got to be um, you know,

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a guiding principle, you know, guiding point in any one

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of these creators lives, right, you have to make sure

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're surrounding themselves with the right people and the

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>right teammates. And look, you can't plan for everything, and

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and stuff certainly does happen, and people in this space

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>tend to push the envelope a little bit, which has

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>its consequences, but I don't think it's that dissimilar from

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the traditional space. UM. Today, I think the the platforms,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the speed at which news and

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>information and all this sort of stuff can can go

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>viral and haywire is more substantive. But I think there's

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a there's plenty of sort of celebrities, TV stars, movie

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>stars that are capable of the same, you know, anxiety

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>driven stuff. UM. Fair point, but but yeah, you do.

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>You have to. You're working generally with a younger audience

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that haven't done this before. They haven't cut their teeth

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for years and years in the hone to craft necessarily,

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and that comes with its own set of challenges. But

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I like the opportunity though. I think the

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity with that white canvas is worth it. But how

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>do you know who to work with? Again, in this

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>creator economy of tens and tens of millions? You know,

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I assume it's not as simple as you're just looking

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>for someone who has the highest subscriber count. No, I

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>think I think, look there, you know, it's always been

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>I think equal arts, you know, art and science. I

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>think you've got to have a belief. You've got to

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling. You've got to look at something and go,

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that content. I think there's something here. I

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>know why the audiences is engaged with it. Right even

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>even way back in the early days with with Fred,

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you most people could take a look at

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing on YouTube, look at it for

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about three seconds and go, oh my god, what is

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this annoying thing? And what am I watching? But you know,

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>for those select few of those kids, when you really

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>got into that content, there was something there. There was

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a creative storyline. It wasn't just a kid vlogging his life.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>He created characters in a world and this this whole thing,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and and if you could help him amplify that, which

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you know we did. Um, there was a lot of

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity there, a lot of a lot of value. And

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's the same you know, I think, look,

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>they're you're always gonna have your flavor of the month,

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's uh, you know, that is what it is.

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>But trying to find something that that has residents, that

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>people are engaged with and you can kind of put

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>your finger on why people respond to it and that

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>it and it can sustain you know, it's a bit

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of an art and that's what you tend to look for.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>And not everybody's gonna make it, but you know, I'd

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like our chances to to help cultivate some of the

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>next generation, you know, biggest celebrities out there. Well, I'm

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>sure when you're pitching the clients, you're you're showing them

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the track record that you've racked up and and your

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>partners have racked up. I do want to talk about

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got this new venture in place, but

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>this goes back. Now. I've been talking to you for

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for over a decade when the Collective was the name

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of the company, and you had come out of the Firm,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>which was sort of a big classic Hollywood management company,

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the Collective in turn was was brought up

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>by Studio seventy one, And I just kinda want to

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>understand what happened to the last iteration of the company

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that you had with res azad and and Michael Green.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Why are we sort of at this new place. Yeah,

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so it's interesting we sort of we sort

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of did a full one eight. I mean, the Collective

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>back in the day was sort of a pure play

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>management business, although with a different thesis that I sort

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of mentioned earlier, which is that and this is two

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand six, mind you, which was that technology was going

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to enable artists to go direct to their consumers and

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and be able to extract value from that relationship directly.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And we didn't know how that was going to play out,

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but if we could help artists aggregate audience communicate with them,

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that we would be in a position to ultimately partner

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>with them potentially on their on their endeavors UM and

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be a win win for everybody UM and

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially putting the economic power back in the

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>artists hands versus the distributor or whatever whatever that third

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>party was UM. And we did that really successfully for

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and as we scaled, where the opportunity

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>had led us was to sort of becoming more of

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a scaled publisher of content UM. And I think the

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Collective and its iterations over the last ten years, going

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>from collective to collect the Digital Studio, which was really

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a management focused company too when it really became Studio

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 1>sev one was was was just driven by the opportunity

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace. I think YouTube would come to us

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and said we need help, uh working with this creator class. UM.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>We needed to start to build and provide services for

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>these creators. We needed to build a sales organization, we

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>needed to build a distribution apparatus in order to drive that.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>That value and scale was really important to being you

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>know effective, you know in that space and at that time, UM.

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The downside of that UM was that that we really

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of over the years migrated away from being a

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>pure played management business and fiduciary to talent and being

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>more of a a service provider and a and a

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>media player. We were essentially one of the largest social

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>video distributors you know out there, UM and and it

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>was hard to serve both you know, both bosses, I

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>guess right, on the one side advertising which drove the business,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and on the other side of the talent UM. And

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>so last year residentis obligation to the to the company

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>had come come up and we had we had gotten

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>into where we you know, wanted to get it. We're

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>very proud of it. We left it in good hands

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and it's still a very good company. But in our

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>d n A resident I have always been talent people

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>UM to going back to U t A even before

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the collective and again going back to sort of what

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing about the opportunity for creators today being better,

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, much more significant than it was, you know

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. We thought pivoting back towards

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>our roots and being real UH managers again and representatives,

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>UM was was a really interesting opportunity that we couldn't

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>pass up. So you've gone back to the roots. And

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what the dynamic is like because you well,

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say search for clients, but maybe the

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>clients are searching for you. Or is it the kind

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing where you're like looking for needles in a

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>haystack or is this really just a stack of needles,

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know, there's lots of people with millions of followers. Yeah,

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's there's a there's a lot of needles

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>out there for sure, UM, And I think it's both. Look.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think in a very short amount of time, we've

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>got about uh we're zeroing in and out thirty on

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the team UM. Having just launched in January, We've got

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>a very solid list of clients that are at the

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>top of their platforms, and you know, across all the

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>different platforms from TikTok to YouTube, etcetera. Um, we've we've

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>started to execute and I think we've gotten some some

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>some good notoriety and press around some of our executions.

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>And so we're we're getting incoming opportunities. We're looking for

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.479
<v Speaker 1>other opportunities. I think our our our past history, our

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>reputation is certainly helpful in in navigating this this world. Um,

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but we're not building an m C. And again we're not.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 1>We're not we're not looking for thousands of clients. We're not.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not just a pure place scale thing, and we're

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>not just throwing stuff at a wall and seeing what sticks.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We're really focused on trying to cultivate the right talent,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing the right thing, and and and doing

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it in a space where we know that we can

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>add value and we can help them build real enterprise

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>value around what it is that that they're doing. Just Um, yeah,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned mc N, which was of course the

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>multi channel network business model that in the early days

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of online video platforms is a big deal. Um, here's

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>another acronym to throw at you that I'm curious figures

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>into your business. And f T S I would imagine

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that could be a place where your clients will apply. Yes,

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I you know, to be honest, I'm still trying to

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>wrap my head around. And look, I think the underlying technology,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain, smart contract, that whole thing is going to

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be here to stay. It's super valued. It's got a

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of applications. I think some of this stuff

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>has just been um hyper inflated and and and and

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really worked the way that it's supposed to work.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's right for every application, but I

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>do think that there's gonna be some real, real value

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there um in particular around a specific you know, sort

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of audience demographic. And I actually think of it, you know,

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>because I remember back in the day when we were

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>representing Lincoln Park and starting to build out their their

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>fan club from from a very sort of you know,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>bespoke standpoint on websites and etcetera. The n f T

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>has tremendous implication in the music business in particular and

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>around what I think are our fan clubs. Right, how

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>do how do you create exclusive experiences exclusive value where

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the wold the value of the token or whatever it is,

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>can can actually live on and and and be sold.

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's not sort of a one off um sort

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of novelty. I think it's kind of where I I

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>want to play. And we're sort of steering our clients

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>first is hey, let's partner with an artist and just

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>see what we can sell um and and you know,

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so that we're trying to figure that we've got a

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of irons in the fire. Um and and in particular,

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I do like a company like you know, rally Io,

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>which is much more around social tokens and you know,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>versus the actual n F T s UM. But there's

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a there's a lot more to learn, and it's an

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>exciting space to play for sure. And by the way,

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned you know, established talent like Lincoln Park and

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys have represented another established talent many years ago,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Kanye Prince, Martin Lawrence. Is there any piece of this

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>new business that could be playing in the so called

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, established talent space. Yeah, I think that. You know,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>when when we started the company, our our thesis was

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we want to work with any talent that has the

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to cultivate and communicate directly with an audience at

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>some level of meaningful scale. And I think we're agnostic too.

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Are they a quote unquote digitally native or or sort

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of emanate out of the TV, film or celebrity space.

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I think we absolutely wanna Look if I

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>could be representing the Kardashians, for example, that would be

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a home run it were uniquely situated to to help

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>them execute in this world. Um and and that would

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>be that would be an interesting opportunity. We already have

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some crossover talent, you know, again I'm using air quotes

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that you can't see, but um and you know like

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitch and Alison Boss who you know, Twitch was the

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>co host of The Ellen Show and so you think

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you can dance. And I would say they're like they're

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>equal parts, you know, traditional celebrity TV host kind of

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>talent as well as um digital influencers. Right, they have

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>huge followings, they're creating content consistently on their own, They're

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>working a tremendous amount with brands and advertisers, and there's

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of opportunity there, and I think we want

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to get much more heavy in that in that space.

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can't believe we've gone this far into

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the conversation without touching on what must be the number

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>one in fluenz Er monetization tool boxing. When when are

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>your child clients canna be lacing it up for you know,

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>prime time about a note pay per view? Yeah, children boxing,

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be the next one. I read that Tante

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Mojo is gonna start boxing now too. Um. I mean, look,

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's interesting, it's it's you know, you

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>can we can kinda laugh about it. But it goes

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>back to if you have an audience and you have

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle to create something unique and monetize it, that

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>there's there's real value there. I mean, I you know,

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, you know, am I a fan

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of their content and their persona, you know, referencing you know,

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the Paul Brothers. Not necessarily, um am. I hugely impressed

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>with what they've been able to do and how they've

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>been able to do it, and they're they're sort of

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>business acumen and and and all that sort of stuff. Hugely.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It's really really incredible what he was able to accomplish,

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, in particular with the Floyd Mayweather stuff. Um.

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think some people are going to do it

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>better than others, and someone will be a joke and

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they you know, tried and whipped and some will be

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a grand slam well, from boxing to book talk. That's

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>why I love following this space. Very unpredictable, very interesting.

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why I always like talking to you because you've

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>been on top of this space long before it was

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>cool and so happy to take the time to talk

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to you today. Appreciate you sharing your insights. Thanks again.

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of Strictly Business. Tune in

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>next week for another helping of scintillating conversation with media

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>movers and shakers, and please make sure you subscribe to

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the podcast to hear future episodes. Also leave a review

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in Apple Podcasts and let us know how we're doing.