WEBVTT - The Drop | Early Over/Under Picks, New Kawhi Scandal Smoke, Suns Extend Dillon Brooks

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Good mornings, sweet world, and welcome to the No Dunks

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Podcast presented by fan Duel. It's Friday, August seventh, twenty

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixth. This is the drop I'm Jay Skeets here

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>in the Classic Factory. Next to me. It's my top shot,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>hop Bo Boy, Trey Kirby, Hey, ay, and over Yonder

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>making the magic happen. Super producer JD. There he is,

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello here, we are no task today. He'll be back

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>next week, don't you worry. Shout out to everybody joining

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube, hit the like button, subscribe, share

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>the show, podcast listeners, five star ratings and reviews, and

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>comment away of course on Spotify as well. On today's

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>drop TK, we're gonna draft a few of our favorite

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>way too Early over underpicks great right. All the lines

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are out for wind Totals. On fan Duel, we'll pick

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and draft a few of our favorites. We'll also do

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>rapid Fire because it's Friday here, which includes a question

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>inspired by Lamelle balls Penthouse quite an esthetic that he

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>had interesting alien clown core. They were calling it alien.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 2>I can see that looks like a place that should

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>have a ski ball machine.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But I mean maybe it didn't. I don't know very

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>well everything. No, we did it, No, we did it.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But first we have some NBA news and uh we're

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>starting with fun guy. That's right, Pablo Torre also a

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>fun guy. But I'm talking about Kawhi. Pablo Torre finds

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Out reported last night that Kawhi Leonard had a second,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>undisclosed sponsorship deal while with the Clippers. So the podcast,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>citing multiple anonymous sources, reported that Kawhi had a previously

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>unknown deal with Daktronics, which is a company that actually

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>manufactured the into It domes incredible Halo video board. They

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are in the business of making these incredible village That

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>makes more sense. I thought Daktronics was Dak Prescott's conscious

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>hip hop project, Daktronics. No, it's the video board. That's

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe the tie here to the Clipper. Yeah, baby. So

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Pablo interviewed someone identified again as an anonymous high level

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>source under contract for the Intuit Dome, who alleged that

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the sponsorship deal was quote one thousand percent a way

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to circumvent the salary cap. It was funneling, funneling money

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>from the Clippers through Daktronics back to Kowhai so is

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>some similarities, possibly to the whole Aspiration cap circumvention. And remember,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in mid July the Athletic did report that the NBA's

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>investigation and investigators had examined a previously unreported endorsement deal

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>with another company. And then we got Pablo having this

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>whole Rhode Island Football Club thing, but that I don't

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think was the one here. It seems like it has

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that's contacted by the investigation. That's right. That's right. So

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's this one.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Feels like it's this one, yeah, because this is basically

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the exact same playbook as the Aspiration side of things,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>at least how it seems. We got a struggling company

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that is involved with the construction of the into a dome.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Steve Balmer steps in, gives him some money, and then

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 2>suddenly there's some Kawhi Leonard endorsement deal that exists for

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>millions of dollars, which Kuhi is doing nothing for. You

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 2>throw in the fact that Daktronics is like a brand

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:35.839
<v Speaker 2>brand thing.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They've never had a celebrity endorser.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, and the entirety of their like sixty years as

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>a company together, you can't imagine a world where you

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 2>need an endorser for a jumbo tron company. It's not

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>like you're watching Game of Thrones and they give you

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>thirty seconds beforehand. Hey, you want a new Halo board

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>for your house? Right, we got Kawhi Leonard to pitch.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't make any sort of sense that this one

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>would happen. But this is part thirteen of the scandal

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>via Pablo. I guess this is now that we're in August.

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it month eleven? However long this is happening, I

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 2>think it started in September of last year. How much

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>smoke is there going to be before Silver just decides

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.119
<v Speaker 2>to invoke the clause? That's the question to me, because

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 2>there are so many things, this being the second one,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 2>this to me is more along the lines of the

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>aspiration thing than the ri IFC thing was. Even in

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Pablo's podcast today, him and me and are basically saying like, yeah,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 2>we didn't really actually tie back the ri if C

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to the Clippers. It just seemed odd and maybe it

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>is weird because why does Kawhi Leonard have part of

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 2>a team in a second division in Rhode Island?

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Wow? Yeah, why you know, like expanding the portfolio exactly.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's into trees, halo boards, and second tier soccer.

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey man, everybody knows that about everywhere. But there's a

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>lot going on.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And this one feels so similar to the first one

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 2>we found about that it's like a uh oh, this

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>seems even worse for the Clippers.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this one might be more damning in a way

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>because at least with the Aspiration scandal, like, well, they

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>were scam artists, you know, they were crooks. They went

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to jail, that whole thing. So there's like the that

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of like muddles up everything. And even even the

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Clippers I guess are sort of on record or balm

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are like, well we got scammed like they got us,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, as well as other people. And there were

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>other celebrity endorsements with Aspiration from what we know right now,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, they've never done this Dktronics, Why would

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>they have another celebrity endorser. So if Kauhi is the

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>only one that is extremely weird, yes, and maybe does

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not look good. Again, if the money is like being funneled,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's the thing, there's nothing really from what I

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>can tell, there's nothing actually illegal. If Kawhi and his

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>representatives had some weird endorsement deal with Dektronics or whatever company. Right,

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, yes, even if you don't do it for them. Weird,

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but still fine. But if the money, of course is

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>being sent from the Clippers and Balmber through these companies

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to then get to Kauai, well that's allegal under the CBA,

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and you can should be And we don't know if

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he will be, but could be penalized.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess we'll see, because weren't there reports last

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 2>week that the investigation was nearing a close and it

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>was just a matter of Adam Silver deciding what kind

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>of punishment would be acceptable to Steve Balmer from his

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>side of things, considering they're gonna have the money to

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>appeal go into litigation with regards to whatever the league

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 2>decides should be the punishment coming down.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 2>At the very least, it's like everybody who is not

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>part of the investigation thinks the Clippers are guilty, right,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Like who is really defending the Clippers here outside? I'm

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>sure there's Clipper fans and I'm sure there's people who

0:06:58.240 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>are like, there isn't a smoking gun and maybe that

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>that's why the investigation is taking so long. Maybe it's

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>hard to find the equivalent of the email that buried

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Joe Smith and the timberwalls back in the day, like that,

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.559
<v Speaker 2>maybe that doesn't exist. So they have to keep looking

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>for stuff, keep looking for stuff. But I just keep

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 2>coming back to Silver can use this clause. That's like,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 2>if there's no other explanation, we got to do something

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>about it. And just so much is happening with Pablo

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that we're like, there's a second second investigation. That one

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that we thought was the second investigation wasn't even that,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, So I just think something has to happen soon.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>How you feel, has a Raptors fan, like do you

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>just want the Raptors to back out of this?

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know at this one, Like I guess I

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>keep coming down to it really is how much is Kawhi,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if at all, going to be penalized for any of this,

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Like the Clippers side, again, there's so much smoke to this,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>even when you go back to Uncle Dennis obviously, who

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the representative for Kawhi, who's been let

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>go by the way, Sure convenient, right, obviously see you later.

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Uncle Dennis, you were me one of the shady characters

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in all this asking for the moon, because you're on

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>record asking the raptors. You're asking the Lakers like hey,

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we want this, we want that, we want this, and

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they're like, we can't legally do that, man, So it's

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not that far fetch to then like okay, well then

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they ask the Clippers and maybe they go, oh, we

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can't give you this or we can't give you a

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>stake in this, but you know what we could do,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not that sa unreasonable. See how you can

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe get there anyway. I just wonder like Kawhi himself,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I still feel like is not going to be penalized

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>all that much because he's always gonna have the buffer

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of representation too, very true, right, yeah, Like he gets

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to go, well that was Uncle Dennis, or that was

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>my rest and my agent's like so, I mean, whether

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you believe it or not, that's up to you. But

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it feels like the Clippers are the one that have

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to get like just smoked here with obviously the million

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar fine or whatever he can get up to. He

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is allowed to uh silver and the CBA because of

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>their deal. The violation strip them of draft picks obviously, Yeah,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>again penalized Balmer and I guess you could get to

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>the voiding of the contract and all that, but I

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think it's really good the Clippers that

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>should and will get nailed here eventually.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, they are the party who's going to be

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 2>most at fault and at worst, like maybe they avoid

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Kauwhi's contract, but then he can just sign with another team.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>He probably wouldn't be able to sign specifically with the Clippers.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>That's fine.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>He's already been traded away from the Clippers. So maybe

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the Raptors do just wait this out. But it's like

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be close.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>To the NBA season soon. It's August.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, next thing you know, they're gonna be reporting for

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>training camps. We've heard that this might go on into

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven. We're getting new information. Maybe this is not

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>new information to the investigation, but it just feels like

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>it should have been wrapped up. We were talking about

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 2>it being wrapped up at the trade deadline. We were

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about it being wrapped up at All Star weekend

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 2>for into It Dome. That's half a year ago. At

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>this point, it doesn't feel like it's going to stop

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 2>anytime soon.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And I've said before already on the podcast here and

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of answer your question again about Kwai of it all,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like I am a little terrified that this is going

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to completely derail a Raptors seasure, whether he's there or not,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>or Ingram and Grady dicker back to, like, I'm sorry,

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not how you want to start a season where

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you had some promise, some potential building off the last

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>year's playoff performance, Like I would think that would have

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>some effect on the makeup of the team, the locker room,

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the roster, just the vibes of it all, if you

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>want to get as simple as that. So yeah, as

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a RAPS fan, no, this is not great great, not

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>great Bob at all. So we'll see, Uh, we'll see

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens in part fourteen of Pablo's investigation here.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there will be a better line

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 2>than when Amine said Halo board man gets paid.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was bar I didn't think it mean had

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the greatest impersonations in last's episode. I didn't think he

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>brought his a game there, But that was a good line.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>The Halo boarder, he gets paid. All right, we'll leave

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it there. Let's hear your thoughts. I mean people, Yeah.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Next Friday, which QUI investigation I'll be talking about. It's

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 2>like a weekly thing at this point.

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah what Oh that's a that'd be a

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>fun game. Try and predict the next weird company that

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Clippers. We're allegedly funneling money to Kawai. Like

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you said, we got the trees, We've got a Rhode

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Island football club in a league I didn't even know existed.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And then now we've got this the Dektronics video board company. Yeah, what,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.599
<v Speaker 1>very very cool. Where could we go from here? You know?

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see though Pablo Tory finds out

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>on the intoit domes Halo board. Wouldn't you like to

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>watch an episode? Yeah, I'd love to.

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't believe it, man, he said that the like,

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 2>if you add up all of the square footage of

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the Halo board, it's bigger than an acre.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>It's freaking huge.

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I have an acre a land of my house,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>let alone, video boards.

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Massive, man, A lot of toilets, big board, baby toilets,

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>big board. All right, let's get into some other news.

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>In the last couple of days, Phoenix Suns forward Dylan Brooks,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>good old Canadian boy, Good old Canadian boy, maybe not

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the village. Dylan Brooks, Canadian boy, agreed to a three year,

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy three million dollar contract extension through twenty nine thirty.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So Dylan Brooks for now staying with the Phoenix Suns.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>There tka your reaction to this.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is a good deal I think for both sides.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Brooks is gonna be signed from basically aged thirty

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 2>one to thirty four with the Suns at essentially twelve

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to fourteen percent of the salary cap of the seventy

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>three million dollars looks crazy for Dylan Brooks, but the

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 2>fact that it's you know, less than even twenty percent,

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I think is a good deal for the Suns and

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 2>still a lot of money.

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously for Dylan Brooks.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>He's a good player, had a great season last year

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>for the Suns, a great culture setter.

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>If you throw out the first couple.

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Of years of his career, He's played on a winning

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>team the last six seasons. I also think this is

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>a tradable deal. He's got twenty million on his contract

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 2>this year, followed by twenty two, twenty four to twenty six.

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>I just love those even number bumps. That's really nice.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 2>But twenty million dollars for a team that decides, like, yeah,

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>we could use a wing stopper, a guy who can

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 2>score a little bit. Maybe the Suns are able to

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>get some draft picks back if they decide to change

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>up their team, Like I think they're going forward basically

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>running it back last year. They've got the big, huge

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 2>deal for Devin Booker up top. They lost Grayson Allen,

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>they lost Royce O'Neil, Luke Canard come on down. That

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>guy's gonna be looking so tan. Only thirty two games

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>for Jalen Green last year, So the Suns are, like,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, they are running it back. They had

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 2>forty five wins last year. I saw their over under

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 2>his thirty eight and a half. That's quite a drop

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>off considering they're bringing everybody back.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess the lack of tanking teams maybe is part

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>of the reason for that. But I think they can

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>be decent. But if they ever decide this just ain't working.

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>We don't like being stuck in, you know, six through

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 2>eleven or whatever they may be in the Western Conference,

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 2>they could move off of Dylan Brooks.

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a player that would be valuable to

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>other teams as well. I agree with that. Love him

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>or hate him, he is a floor racer. He just

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely is. He's proven that in all these spots, like

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you said, Memphis, Houston, now in Phoenix, he helped establish

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that new culture there. He helped lead them to forty

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>five wins. He scored twenty points per game. Now he

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>missed some time, but that's pretty impressive because he's known

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>more for his defensive side of the floor, and Phoenix

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>went from what they were like near the bottom of

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the league defensively the year before, he came to top

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>ten on defensive part. So that's him as the primary

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>wing defender. I mean, he is always taking the best

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>player on the other team, so he obviously has a

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>part in that. So that's impressive. You know, I saw this,

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you see three year, seventy three million. It

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>looks like a lot. But then when you you know,

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of break it down, you're like, well, he was

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>actually not making I mean he was making almost similar number.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Like he was coming off like a twenty one and

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a half million dollars deal, so it's like in the ballpark,

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and he had a great year, so it's not bad.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>As Bright Side of the Sun put it to, this

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>extension is about far more than keeping a productive rotation player.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a bet on identity and the Suns have spent

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>this past year or so trying to establish this culture

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of toughness, accountability, competitiveness and stuff like that, and he's

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>been at the center of it, and he should be

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>paid for that. And you can always trade it. You

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>always trade it. All these contracts that they've done here,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>these extensions, Dylan Brooks three years seventy three million, Mark

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Williams three years thirty eight million, Colin Gillespie four years

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>forty eight million, and Jordan Goodwin three years nineteen million.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Those are all good players and they all could be moved,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>packaged together or not, so it's like they're not hanged.

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of those will be oh my god,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you've sunk your team and you'll never be able to

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>get off those unless you attach a pick or something

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think they'll all be tradable if you

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>even want to. And they're all rotation players, so good

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>work here. It's just now. Yeah, forty five wins last year,

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you said the over unders much lower. That's why I

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>avoided that one. When we got to overrunder picks. I'm

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to touch that one. I don't you know.

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they shouldn't be that much worse. But

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>where's the growth in this team? I think it's jelling

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Green is what you're hoping for. Yeah, you only played

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty two games last year.

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>There were times when he was the only scorer for

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the Suns out there when Booker was missing some time.

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>So I would actually probably go over thirty eight and

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>a half wins for the Suns. They were decently hell

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>last year. It's it's weird because I do like all

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>of the deals that they've done, except for their top

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 2>three deals. Like Devin Booker, I'm sorry, it's not gonna

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 2>be worth sixty eight million dollars in twenty thirty. Jalen

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Green not a fan of his contract in Miles Bridges

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 2>just not a fan period, right, But once you get

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to like four through twelve, I'm like, hey, let's guys,

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>they're all good.

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Players, good deals. Yeah, it's a good point, like gives

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>them a lot of flexibility without like those, like you said,

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>four through twelve deals, very traitable contracts. You would expect

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>most of them to hold positive value. So so we'll see.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But Dylan Brooks this got paid. You know, I can't

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine his next deal will be bigger. No annual year.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they were sending this guy to China after

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>he was leaving in Memphis. Turns out he wasn't the

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 2>problem and the team completely fell apart when he left.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Just something I noticed. Dylan Brooks man gets paid, all right. Also,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna wait on this guy, the Wizard's big man,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis. He became eligible to sign an extension yesterday

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>August sixth. But according to our guy, Josh Robbins at

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Athletic, any meaningful talks between eighty and the Wizards

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>about a possible extension are going to occur during the

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty six twenty seven season, not before. Because we were wondering.

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>We were keeping an eye on that date, that August sixth. Okay,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that's when you can do it. So they say, hey,

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>both sides, I guess want to sort of see what

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we're working with here. When we get to the actual season,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that makes some sense.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I think this is smart for both sides, especially for

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 2>the Wizards. I think Sham's additionally reported that they're going

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to wait like twenty games, which I think is pretty funny.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 2>They're like, yeah, we'll decide by December. Maybe you'll get

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 2>a nice Christmas present. But the Wizards basically just want

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Davis to prove that he can stay healthy. Thirty

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 2>three years old. The last three seasons, he's played twenty

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 2>forty two and fifty one games. They want him to

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 2>demonstrate I guess twenty games worth of your playing on

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the floor before we're giving you this gigantic deal. From

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Davis's perspective, the Wizards have to prove a little

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>something to him that they're building something. He gets a chance,

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 2>I guess, to earn his last big contract. But I

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>am I'm a little nervous for the Wizards because I

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>see the scam here. Oh he's gonna get healthy. Yeah,

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna be like nice man, Anthony Davis, Trey Young,

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 2>we've taken a step forward.

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>We got aj Debonsa.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna give Anthony Davis a big deal and he

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 2>will immediately request a trade. Yeah, and I think that's

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe part of this as well. He's saying, Okay, I

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>can buy my time here for twenty games. Let's see

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 2>what happens with Joel Embiid. Let's see if he's able

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 2>to stay healthy for twenty games. Or the Sixers are like, hey,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>let's revisit that Embiid for Anthony Davis swap.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Davis apparently is eligible for a four year, two

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred and seventy five million dollar extension, which would run

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>into aj Debonca's second deal. That could be a problem

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 2>down the line, but I think this is smart to

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of just like, let's see if you can play buddy.

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, could they have tried to play him last year?

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Of course they could, yes, but they didn't want to.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>No, no, because you know, you want to hit that

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>number one pick. It worked and it worked out. It

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>did work out. Yeah, And even from eighty side, like

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, I almost get him wanting to wait a

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit too, because how good is this team? How

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>good are these kids? Along with Trey Young, Like, at

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>this point, you gotta assume he does want to win

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>when he's out there on the floor. He previously expressed

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>skepticism about the wizards like ability to go from basically

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the league's worst team to like a contending team, a

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>team even in the playoffs. So everybody's just gonna wait

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and see. But I'm with you, Like, if you're doing

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy basketball here, I feel like Anthony Davis could

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be a sneaky sneaky, like not sleeper pick because he

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.239
<v Speaker 1>obviously puts up numbers, but like he could have some

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>monster numbers the first twenty games of the season on

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this squad. So maybe something to consider if you're in

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the drafting games. In those drafting streets, we'll see if

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you can play though, that's the big big thing. I'm

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in scroll mode here.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to find the Washington Wizards over under for

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>this season because that's surprisingly higher.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I almost took the under. When we get into

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>over unders, I did it. In the end, it's like

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the thirties. I want to say, it's thirty five and

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a half or something, isn't it? Yeah? It is? But

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what is it specifically? I can't tell you because I'm

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in and it's lower. Yeah, thirty two and a half. Interesting.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>They won seventeen last year, Is that right? Yeah? Fifteen

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>more games.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean you're adding three starters to your team in

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Trey AJ and a D thirty two and a half.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Good line, Yeah, good line. Now, it's good line. I

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>spot you don't think they will. I would not bet

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>over that well, I mean that would not segues perfectly

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>into our next segment, here, the real meat and potatoes

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of today's Drop podcast. We are drafting our favorite way

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>too early. Over underpicks all of these odds by way

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of fan duel, of course, So we'll do three rounds

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of this. We'll go back and forth. You can go over,

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you can go under, you go wherever you want. I

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>think what we're looking out here is sort of like

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you saw the line. They've only been out for what

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe a week or so, maybe even less. The win

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>totals for each team. Your gut reaction, right, you're like, Okay, look,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it's early August here. Things can change. Maybe even when

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we do this again closer to the season, you'll even

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>change your mind about the over under. But for this purpose,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, Macgutt says, I like that over or

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I like that under. So get us started where you

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 2>First, one that stuck out to me. The Miami Heat.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>They're over under is forty four and a half wins,

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and I like the over. They went forty three and

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine last season. That's what Tyler Hero playing thirty

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 2>three games, Norm Powell playing fifty eight games. Those are

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>two of their leading scorers, and it missed huge chunks

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of time. They're obviously both gone now, Hero to the Bucks,

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Norm Powell to the Bulls. But they got Janis I

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>ever heard of them pretty good. They got Bobby Portis,

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 2>they got Tim Hardaway Junior. I think the offense is

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the bigger issue for the Miami Heat because

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna be a great defensive team just

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 2>having Davion, Mitchell and Wiggins alongside Jannis and Bam. Finished

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 2>thirteenth in the league in defense last season. I think

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 2>the Heat should easily be a top ten defense this year.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 2>And when I look at the top ten defenses last year,

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>actually the eleven best defenses. The eleventh best defense won.

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Forty five games.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the Heat'll be closer to the top five

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 2>than the top ten. So to me, that like just

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 2>guarantees them forty five wins of playing hard playing defense,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 2>having enough Yannis. Obviously, the reason this would go under

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>is if Yannis misses a huge chunk of time like

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 2>he did last season.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So I went and looked at the Bucks over under.

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Last year forty two and a half. I do think

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 2>that this Heat team without Yannis is better than last

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>year's Bucks team without.

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Yanis Okay, okay, like so yeah.

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I think they would have three better players before you

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 2>take anybody from last year's Bucks team.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So I like the Heat over. I think they're gonna

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>be motivated.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.719
<v Speaker 2>I think that Jannis is gonna want to prove something

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>after finally leaving Milwaukee after a couple of seasons of

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 2>trade rumor hell for this guy. So I'm looking forward

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to seeing what Miami brings. I don't know if I

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 2>think they're like a championship contender this year. I think

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that's more likely next year when they're able to get

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 2>some vetmin guys. But for this season, give me the

0:22:59.280 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>over forty four.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought this line was like shockingly low for Vegas.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>With Yannis coming to the team, You're like, I don't know,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>you'd think they'd bump that up, like, you know, closer

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to fifty or yeah, forty eight and a half something

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. So forty four hours doesn't feel all that impressive,

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>feels like an easy hit. I mean, you always got

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to be skeptical at times with these, but I'm with you.

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I was leaning over. I didn't draft them, but I'm

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>leaning with you. I did want to get your opinion

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on a poll. I saw that Miami Heat had up

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>on their socials. Which nickname are we giving the Bam

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Yannis duo? Did you see this?

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me give you the four options. The

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Poles still alive, five days left over, sixteen thousand votes.

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Bam and Yannis Duo. Here are your four options.

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Bad Boys Smash Bros, rim Reapers, and the Biscayne Barrier.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>What would Trey Kirby be voting for? Yeah, Bad Boys

0:23:55.400 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>smash Bros, rim Reapers and the Biscayne Barrier. Hmmm, that's tough.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you like any of them? I actually do. I

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>actually think that.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the first three are decent. Yeah, you can't

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 2>be the bad Boys.

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Pistons already retweeted like, sorry, buddy, you kill

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>if that. You just can't be the bad great boys.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Although they're I think they're going Bad Boys.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Will Smith lace for sure? Yeah, yeah, Mike Law bring back. Yeah,

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I would like to see that if they Okay, okay,

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 2>so side side quest here. I heard the new Bad

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Boys was good, like Bad Boys four or whatever one

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 2>came out.

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>When one last year, two years ago something. Have you

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>seen it?

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 3>I have not seen it.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Bad Boys Ride or Die?

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Yeah, I'm not a fan of the Bad Boys franchise.

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I have to say, oh really, yeah, oh I am,

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 3>but I haven't watched this.

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think I've seen the last two. Yeah,

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe next summer, maybe next summer. That's are serious curve ball.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of adjacent to Fast and Furious feels like right,

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean style, I don't think yeah, yeah.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately.

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess Smash Broskay Rim Reapers is a little too

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 2>cutesy for me. Definitely not Biscayne Barrier. So dentimately I'm

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna go Smash Bros.

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, right now as of recording this on the Friday,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're live here for everybody on YouTube. But

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty four percent to Rim Reapers, so that's in the league.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's pretty tight. Vo twenty eight percent Smash Bros.

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Twenty four percent, Biscayne Barrier, and then Bad Boys coming

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 1>in last there thirteen percent. Okay, yeah, so sort of

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 1>evenly split. It came up with a decent number of

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>potential nicknames for the two of them. It's not bad.

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who's uh, who's the Will Smith and who's the

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Martin Lawrence? Between Joannis and Bam.

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Will Smith is Bam, I like, even though

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I know Will Smith the bigger name, so that would

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>be honest. But personality, I feel like Giannis is more

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>than Martin Lawrence. I think I think it's right is

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>more probably right the goofy Sillier guy. Yes, that's definitely,

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's I'm going with personality. Yeah, okay, good, all right,

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna piggyback off you taking the Heat over

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>forty four and a half wins because I'm gonna take

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks under twenty six and a half wins. I'm

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you their sort of depth chart right now.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Their guards on the Bucks, Ryan Rollins, Tyler Hero, those

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>two will probably start. Kevin Porter Junior. They drafted Brayden Burry's.

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>They got aj Green and his muscles. They got Gary

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Trent Junior on a very weird contract they do. Let's

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>investigate that one. Pablo Yakachunas from the Heat obviously, and

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Kars Lavert Caroless Pervert as we sometimes call him. He's

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>one of their guards. Forwards, heimehawk As Junior, Kyle Kuzma,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Nate Aman who they drafted, Ushman Jang, and then Bogie

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Markovich who's a Serbian guy coming over and should be playing. Yeah, yes,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that's right. They call him Bogie. That's what I'll call him,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>much easier, and then Myles Turner, Khalil where and Jericho

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Sims Like Okay, there's some names there, but that is

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>not a very good roster. Also, how many goddamn guards

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>do they have on that roster? A lot of guards.

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>That's just too many guards for the amount of minutes

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>available in these back court positions. So that's gonna be

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>interesting for Taylor Jenkins to figure out. They do apparently

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>are still interested in this Peyton Watson sign and trade possibility.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Their name is still in the mix there. We'll see

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens there. But I just think there's so little

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>pressure here after Giannis is left to actually win. They

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have their draft pick right so, because like some

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>people would push back, like, well, you got to stand

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>out of the relegation zone. Now, you can't be the

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>worst of the worst. Yes, but not it doesn't really

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>matter to them. It doesn't really matter. They don't have

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>their pick, so there's got to be some bad teams,

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're gonna be one of the worst

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league. I just think twenty six and

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a half I felt. I was a little shocked. I

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thought it'd be a little lower because they are teams

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that are like twenty and a half, twenty one and

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a half. I thought they would be a little in

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the you know that rat range, twenty two

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half or something. I feel this a bit high,

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty six and a half, So ill the under. I

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna be a fun winter in Milwaukee.

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 2>That wasn't fun last year. I don't think so, you know,

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>it was all but at least that's gone. At least

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>they have their team. The question for me is just

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>how few wins are gonna go to the worst teams

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>in the league. The last three seasons, the worst teams

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>have had seventeen, seventeen and fourteen wins. Yeah, right, And

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 2>like you're saying the lowest over under that FanDuel has

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>right now is the Kings at twenty and a half.

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 2>So in general, they're expecting teams to be better, I think,

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 2>but twenty six and a half, it's a lot of wins.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, However, there's a lot.

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Of guys I know on the books, like you listed

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of players that are legitimate NBA players. I

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 2>think they have more NBA players this season they had

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I guess we'll see how it all works.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, the honest cloud of it all is gone.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. Shouldn't this whole season just be

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about like assessing, like who are the keepers? Where's the chemistry? Like,

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not like wins and losses. I don't think it's growth.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>You're two obviously draft picks. You'd hope to see some

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity let them play with these guys, you know, the

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyler hero at all? Like are we keeping them? Were not?

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be there at the start of the season.

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But like, I just think it's not gonna be w's

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and l's And that's not part of the program here

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this year, nor really should it be, especially when you

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have your pick, like, well, but look at what

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the Pelicans did last year. They didn't have their pick.

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 2>They had two rookies and they went balls out during

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the last half of the season because they didn't want

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to give a good pick to the Hawks. I guess, yeah, fair,

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>but that's just such a high number at the end

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>of the day, I just don't think it's a good

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>team to win a lot of I also, there's not

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 2>many that bad teams in the Eastern Conference, Like there's

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a few. Nets are at twenty four and a half,

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Bucks are at twenty six and a half, Bulls are

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>at twenty nine and a half.

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bulls are better than this Bucks team. Really. Yeah,

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But I'm a Kaeb Wilson believer. I'm all in on

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the rookie. Man.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I love this kid, look so do I. He's gonna

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna leave the balls back to the Promised Land.

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 2>But there's more NBA players on the Bucks than they're

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 2>on the Bulls.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Fair the Nets, Okay, that's definitely, And that's I think

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you're the worst yass up. Well, I mean, they got

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they got Porter and Randall two, Okay, but these are

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be better this year. Well, okay, I was just

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask you, do you think there will still be

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a team that doesn't win twenty games this year?

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think every team's over twenty Wow mmm, I mean

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I got I get the thinking with the whole the

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>change of the draft and all that, but I'm not

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so sure. I mean, injuries happen again, teams just suck.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It turns out some teams just suck yeap, which you

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>know could be one of these teams. So I'm going

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>under twenty six and a half. Though we're not talking

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty and a half now, we're talking twenty six and

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a half. I'm taking the under. Yeah, they could be

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five winning team, sure, Sure, and they see

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>what they have with some of these guys next round?

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Who you going?

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I got a bad team too, the Memphis Grizzlies. I

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 2>like they're over twenty nine and a half wins. Last

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 2>season they went twenty five and fifty seven. The three

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>highest minutes played for the Grizzlies last season where Jalen Wells,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>a second year player who was a second round draft pick,

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Cam Spencer, who was a second year player and a

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>second draft pick, and Cedric Coward who was a rookie.

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 2>These are real names of players who played last season

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 2>for the Grizzlies. Tyler Burton, Adama, Alpha Ball, losson Lovering,

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Jami Myschek, Toby Akanie heard any of these guys?

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>How many of those did you make up? Those are

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>all real names. My god. They had two guys who

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>could have been named Aldama.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>That's anti Aldama, and then they had a guy named

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Adama alpha Ball amazing. Only eleven games for Zach Edy.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.719
<v Speaker 2>He was awesome when he played. Yeah, the Grizzlies were

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 2>plus seventeen points per one hundred possessions in those eleven games.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, obviously a very small sample size. I don't

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 2>even know how healthy Edie is right now. He's coming

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>off basically two straight summers of having ankle surgeries or

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>two straight years having ankle surgeries. But I assume he's

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 2>going to play more than eleven games. Who knows if

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 2>that's the case, even if he doesn't. They added Jeremy Grant,

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 2>They added Isaiah Stewart, They added Quentin Post.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>These are vets that have size.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 2>D'Angelo Russell's there for the time being, Chris Murray's there

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>for the time being. And I actually think Cam Boozer

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to be helpful rookie, Like you're you're in

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 2>on Caleb Wilson, so am. I I think Boozer is

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be a productive rookie as well.

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Ty Jerrealm.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm a fan of this guy. He's coming in healthy.

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 2>He barely played last year. Scottie Pippen Junior barely played

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>last year. It's year two for Cedric Coward. There's no

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 2>drama there, there's no expectations. I think they could easily

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 2>get the thirty wins.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>That's all they got to hit. You said twenty nine

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Yea under thirty is pretty low bar there.

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>If they play, yeah, if guys are healthy, Yeah, that

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one. I don't mind that one all.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you cam Boozer. I mean it feels like,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>especially if they have success winning and he's helping get

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to some wins here, like he'll be in the Rookie

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the year for conversation. You know, maybe he won't, maybe

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he will, maybe won't have the numbers of some of

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the other guys, but if there's team success and all

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that that'll play a part, as it sometimes does in

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the narrative for Rookie of the Year, it seems to

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have had a little bit more recently. So all right,

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I like that one. I can get behind that one.

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I wouldn't be locking it when we get there,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely not, definitely not. They're still young, yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It's but you want to see the progression, like little

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>improvements off of of course last year. So thirty it's

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>not a lot, especially if you believe that there's sort

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of because of the change to the draft that the

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>floor for the worst teams, of the teams that are bad,

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like does get bumped up. Then theory everybody gets bumped

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit, or maybe everything comes together in

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the middle a little bit more. Okay, so you got

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies. My next pick, I'll go in over here.

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Rockets over forty six and a half

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>wins that come in by way a fan duel that line.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>They won fifty two games last season, and they got

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty two games from Steven Adams and they got zero

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>from Fred van Vliet, so they should be better this year,

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not worse. And then basically you know a lot of

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>their team is back. Van Vliet is the key piece

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>here though, because shot making and just being a floor

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>general with some poise at the end of games. That

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>should help one of their biggest weaknesses last year, which

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>was in clutch situations. It was like, Katie, please save us,

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>please hit the big shot, please do anything, and it

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't really work. They were twenty two and twenty three

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in clutch games when the score was within five points

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last five minutes. The Rockets were one in

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>seven in overtime games last year. It's sort of just

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>odd as you got the extra five minutes and they

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>basically only won one of them. The year before that, though,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>when Van Vleet was healthy, they were twenty six and

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen in the clutch, much more reasonable. I think he's

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>going to help there. We already they already have an

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 1>identity which I like to They're a tough nose defensive team.

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>They pound you on the offensive glass. So you know,

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>you bring in Marcus Smart, that's going to help that

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>tough nose defense. You bring back in Theory Steven Adams,

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>who's just carrying around giant logs I saw during the offseason.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That should help obviously on the glass. The guy's a

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>monster there still, so I just was a little shocked

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>with how low this number was at forty six and

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a half, with how they've done previously and some of

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>their young guys are you know, I don't see them

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>getting worse in your Amen Thompson's and your Jabar and

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>your Tarisan. So I like this over I don't, you know,

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're going fifty five to sixty wins,

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 1>but they comfortably feel like a close to a fifty

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>win team to me.

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 2>They won fifty two last year it was KD for

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Fred van Vliet. They won fifty two the year prior

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 2>when it was Fred van Vliet for Kevin Durant. I

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 2>don't think this team is worse. Yeah, that's yeah, yeah,

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 2>So I would be over on this as well. But

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I do have my eyes on Elper and Sheng Doon. Okay,

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>this season he's he's kind of in the polo spot

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 2>for me right now where I'm like, I love the

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 2>way you play. I don't know if it totally works

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 2>in a team context, because last season he was just

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 2>like pounding the ball man, he was going Iso mode

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 2>all the time, wouldn't always get to the rim, shot

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 2>so many floaters and like that's a pretty inefficient shot.

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>He didn't shoot it all that well either. I felt

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 2>like the ball stopped with him so often. But they

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 2>need less creation from Sheng Gun this season. If Fred

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 2>van Vliet is coming back to take over the playmaking

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 2>point guard responsibilities, so that you're gonna have less onus

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 2>on Shongoon to make all the plays.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But he needs to have a bounce.

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Back season yep, to stay in my guys I like category.

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, So rockets over forty six and a half

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for me, let's do one more round. You got your

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>eye on?

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I like the Cleveland Cavaliers, don't.

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 2>I always over forty seven and a half wins from

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>last season. They don't technically have James Harding, but I

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 2>think he'll be there eventually. Last season they went fifty

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 2>too and thirty. That was with twenty six games of

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Darius Garland before he was traded for twenty six games

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of James Harden. Evan Mobley only played sixty five games,

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Jared Allen only played fifty six games. Wouldn't surprise me

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 2>if they missed some time as well, But they missed

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 2>time last season and they went over fifty wins. They

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 2>lost Dean Wade, but replaced him with Mario Hozonia sidways move.

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I do know, we'll see what Hozzonia has left.

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 2>But they're bringing everybody back from the worst possible conference

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.439
<v Speaker 2>finals team, but they still made a conference finals. Since

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Donovan Mitchell got to Cleveland, fifty one, forty eight, sixty

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 2>four and fifty two wins. Those are all over, So

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 2>as long as he's healthy, I think the Calves hit

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>close to fifty wins.

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this line a little perplexing that. I guess this

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is just as simple as the East got better, East

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>better that these these top eight teams or whatever in

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the East, a lot of them improved or some teams

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>jumped into that mix, and that'll dilute the Calves normally

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>good regular season win total. I think that's the thinking

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>here because I'm with you. Otherwise it's like not much different.

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You're still a Donovan Mitchell led team. It gets you

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of regular season wins. Also, so does Harden

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for that matter.

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, forty seven and a half m that's that's

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>really just comes down when they play these other big teams, Yeah,

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that have gotten better and the Pacers back in the mix,

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the heat with Giannis and so on and

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so on, like, yeah, how many of those are they

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:43.479
<v Speaker 1>still getting?

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 4>There?

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Are they splitting those series? And that again hurts their

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>overall record. Okay, you got the Calves over that one.

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>You know when you put that in the in the doc,

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, that's a little spicy that one.

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm the least convinced of your your your three. I

0:37:55.760 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>would say my final one might surprise people. I'm taking

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks, the championship Knicks. Excuse me it right, I'm

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the under fifty two and a half wins and

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>big reason why. And I want to give a shout

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out to the Big Number Pod who sort of crunch

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers showing us there's like a little bit of

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a championship curse they called it when it comes to

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>over unders. And what they mean by that is there's

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>an average drop off of nearly four wins for a

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>team that just won the title when it comes to

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>those over unders. And the Knicks last year won fifty

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>three games, so maybe they're more of a look fifty

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to fifty one that would obviously hit the under here,

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the ballpark they'll be the Gael

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and Bruns and Era Knicks have won forty seven games,

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty games, fifty one games, and then fifty three games,

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So that is a pattern. It could continue to go up.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But I actually think with the season they just had,

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>like the one hundred games they just played, and you

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>can sort of take a step back now and try

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and maybe reduce some minutes for some of these heavy

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>guys that get a lot of minutes there, and you

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>can just slow play a little bit more. You're the

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>defending champs. I don't think you're gonna be all that

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>afraid of anybody, whether you're on the road or not.

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And they won't look at the regular season as like

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we gotta go get the number one seed or anything

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>like that. Nor have they really ever done that last year. No,

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I think they're more of like a

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty win team and they'll come just under this. They

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>swapped out Mitchell Robinson and Ariel Houck party I guess

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>for Andre Drummond, and I think overall fine, but Mitchell

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Robinson is a winning player and helped win some of

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>those games with his style, sure, and they're gonna hope

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Drumming can replicate it and all that. But I just

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think there'll be no rush to come out of the

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>gate on fire. And they're obviously a marquee team, so

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna play these big games early and stuff like that.

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll come just under That's my thinking with that.

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 2>That's one is I'm like, they nailed this line. They

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 2>could win fifty one to fifty three games. It's exactly perfect.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 2>To me.

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Two of those are unders, and you win one of those,

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>is it over?

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 2>And you lose fifty three wins last season Like you're

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 2>saying fifty one in the first Town season, I think.

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>You got to throw. And they were super healthy last year.

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Eighty two games for Bridges as usual, seventy five for Towns,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 2>seventy four for Brunts, and but Og and Josh hart

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Og played sixty seven and Josh hart played sixty six.

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>That's very good for Moss.

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 2>They played the second most minutes of any lineup in

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the league. They're starting lineup obviously they're bringing them all.

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Back, yep. But I'm also like they didn't go for

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>it last year.

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 2>They were just a good team during the regular season

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 2>and then completely clicked in the playoffs.

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Like why wouldn't they try and replicate that again, right right,

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not winning the championship in February, guys.

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>So they've done it, Yeah, proven it when Sky won

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a championship. In December, they.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Won the cup. Then they had a brutal month where

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>we were like, oh the sky is falling, Oh my god,

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.479
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong? Seven and eighty What a terrible month. Yeah,

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So they've done this before and I think that's how

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll approach it. And also Brunson underwent surgery on his

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>wrist a month ago. Now they say he's going to

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>be good to go and basketball activities and all that

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>by the start of the season. But again that's another reason,

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like we don't need to push this guy. He doesn't

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 1>need to carry us since like that, nor does he

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>need to with this squad because it's stacked. This isn't

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like me saying I don't think the Knicks are gonna

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>be able to win another title or get there or

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>go far like that's that's that's the Knicks in the playoffs. Baby,

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that was a team of destiny and could they do

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it again? Yeah, they're elite. This is just regular season.

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I got them under fifty two and a half.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would be curious that a big number. Tom

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 2>did he mention the seeds of the teams that won

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the championship because it's more understandable if a team like

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma City wins sixty seven games and drops the sixty

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to four, it's different fifty three to something.

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know you're right. You're right. It was two

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. I'd have to go do a deep dive

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>on that podcast. Hey, he can be doing part two.

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:41.439
<v Speaker 1>You can do a part thirteen. You can just keep

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 1>going to Thomas Apstro He was on the last one

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with our guy, your man, our man Dan Devine. Tom's

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>voice was going, oh really yeah, And I bring this

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>up because Nora, my wife, her voice just suddenly went

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this week. I don't know if something's going around or

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>not interesting. We just had a kid tested for struck.

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Three thumbs down, Oh, thumbs down. Okay, well well the

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>rapid test thumbs down. Yes, we'll see. Yeah, test I

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>feel are going around. I guess so avoiding it. I'm

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping to keep Yeah. So anyway, Uh, those are over

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>under way too early, over under predictions. Uh six in total.

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>There you went all over. So I just realized, what

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are you test me? Its positive beat on positive Pete, right, Yeah,

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:24.879
<v Speaker 1>yeah it is. It is negative view under. Yeah, give

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>me an under.

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 2>What's uh, let me see what the Golden State Warriors

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 2>is because I would go under on that one.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Really. Yes, Okay, it's thirty nine and a half. That's

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty low under. Okay, it's going under. They went thirty

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>seven last year, I think so.

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, I won thirty seven last year and got

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 2>more wins this season after doing literally nothing.

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. It makes you think. Uh, let's

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>hear from you guys out there. This is always fun.

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Let us know your favorite over under, tell us your

0:42:55.920 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>line and which way you're leaning right now. In early August,

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it's the drop, we gotta do rapid fire,

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I got the questions. I'll answer with the guys. There's

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>only three of us here in the first one, as

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>alluted too early in the podcast. LaMelo Ball's Charlotte Penthouse

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 1>recently went viral after a moving crew I Guess shared

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a video of its eccentric interior. eSPI Nation compared the

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.959
<v Speaker 1>design to a David Busters having a baby with hot

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>topic inside rodblocks, and I said it has an alien

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 1>clown core aesthetic. So my question is, what's the most

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lamello ball like thing we would find in your home?

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Downstairs in my office, I have a vintage leopard rug.

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Not leopards, it's two leopards posing on a red rug.

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Laura's grandfather used to run like a carpet store yep.

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 2>So the family just has a bunch of weird rugs everywhere.

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.760
<v Speaker 2>And I think they were moving her grandmother out and

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Janna brought this down and said, would you want this?

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I would want this more than is crazy.

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>We're showing it to everybody on YouTube. Podcast listers, come

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 1>on over. How big is this rug? I can't tell.

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not it's probably like eight by six,

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 1>like it's pretty soil pretty big, yeah, because it almost

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>looks like that could be like a welcome mat at

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>first size. But that's pretty big. Yeah. Now if that

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 1>red was like Neon green, that's for sure. Yeah, all right,

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I like that one. JD. What about you? What's the

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>most lamellow ball like thing we find it?

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we have a lot of crazy shit on

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 3>our walls because Rachel paints weird pictures painting.

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's probably wild designs.

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 3>But The weirdest thing I have is up in my

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:47.399
<v Speaker 3>bedroom and I think I'm going to move it down

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 3>to the set. It's this, uh ad. It's how to

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 3>describe this. It's it's a framed picture, a hand painted

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 3>uh advertisement. But it's not an advertisement. It goes over products.

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:06.879
<v Speaker 3>It's from the Honest Ed's warehouse that that shut down

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 3>and they auctioned off all their signage that are all

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 3>hand painted. And this is a haircut kit for nine

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 3>to ninety nine. And my my buddy grabbed it for

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 3>me because we were living in Atlanta. I was like,

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 3>grab me anything literally, anything from Honest Ads. I just

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 3>want to have it right, and so this is what

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:27.879
<v Speaker 3>he grabbed me. I think he paid two dollars for it.

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh what steel?

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.919
<v Speaker 3>And it's hand painted and it's kitchy. It doesn't really

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 3>it seems like you're selling a haircut kit, which we're not.

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know what it is, like it's ten

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 3>piece haircut kits, so I don't know if it's It

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 3>can't be like electric clippers because for ten.

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Bucks cheap, very cheap. It's littlely scissors and a little brawl.

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah and yeah, maybe a small mirror or something.

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Good deal, but ten pieces.

0:45:57.160 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, anyway, that's the weirdest thing.

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I asked Nora. Yeah, what do you think is

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the most LaMelo ball? I think I showed her the

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>video of his play. She's like, what the hell is

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>going on?

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, she said, and I'm quoting Nora here before

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>her voice went this flip flop ass magnet from Anguilla.

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>So the one smack dab in the middle there. She

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>hates this magnet really. Yeah, as as most of you know,

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we collect magnets from everywhere we've ever been, and so

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a big board now to sort of show

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.839
<v Speaker 1>them in the guest bedroom. But she hates this one,

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>like to the point where she's like, we have to

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>go back wow just to get And I'm like.

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 4>What's that.

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's stupid, it's ugly, it's in the best way imaginable.

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I do think this has the the bright, vibrant,

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:48.799
<v Speaker 1>kitchy look that a Lamello would like. The neon green

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is very yeah. Yeah, who magnet. Oh, I don't think

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of options. It was probably an

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>airport pickup. It was just too busy on the beach otherwise,

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's crazy. It's an ugly one. It's an ugly one. Okay,

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>next one here. Wemby is spending some time in France

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this summer and many of the Spurs teammates took a

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.919
<v Speaker 1>trip to Paris to join them for some off season work.

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And after the gym the crew hit up the louver

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to see the Mona Lisa and it looks like they

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>had a private tour and see anybody else.

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So that's what's inspired the question here. What's a

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 1>famous building or place that you would love to visit

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all by yourself.

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to go to or Field Laboratories in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Okay,

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 2>they have a thing called the Nchoic Chamber.

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Which is the quietest place on earth.

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 2>It like eliminates like ninety nine point nine percent of sounds.

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 2>People say that when you're in it, you can hear

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 2>your blood rushing.

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I've heard their bond. I've heard this. How crazy would

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that be?

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 2>That's like it's supposedly like a hallucinatory experience because of

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 2>the sensory deprivation.

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You can do it in the dark as well.

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:00.439
<v Speaker 2>There's a I think there's a New York Times peace

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 2>about somebody that spent three hours in there.

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Wh Yeah, it sounds like it would just be crazy

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to be it'd be crazy. I mean I would try it,

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think i'd like it. No.

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like you've been into like a recording studio

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 2>and even that, like you can hear.

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>The deadness in the room and it's kind of weird.

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 2>This like I'm reading about it, and like I think

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 2>it was a woman who read it. She steps in

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and she's like, it felt like the sound was sucked

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 2>out of my head, so weird. She's like, your body

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 2>is so loud and you don't even know it because

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you know there's just noises around, especially me, I'm such

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:30.800
<v Speaker 2>a mouth breezing.

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it sounds like a good place to go to

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>hate yourself. Yeah, always. God, Well, so I've told that

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 1>story before where I've I've run marathons where my headphones

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>cut out on me, so I'm only hearing myself. Yeah,

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I'm fucking I would never want to

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:51.920
<v Speaker 1>run by be so rude. It's so annoying. JD. What

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>about you famous building or place you want to visit

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>by yourself?

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Up there was there it was so packed, like and

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.760
<v Speaker 3>I I've actually never been close to the Mona Lisa

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 3>because I'm like, if I could, I'm not standing on line.

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, like they also like they like hold up things

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can't take photos. That's pretty funny.

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 3>And like what let them take a photo? Who cares?

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like whatever.

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know, Like I I look at cruise

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 3>ships and I go, I wish I was alone on that. Oh,

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 3>because I have no interest in taking a cruise, but

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 3>if I had the whole ship to myself, I'm into it.

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 3>There was a guy who went viral because he he

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 3>accidentally became he was on a cruise ship by himself,

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 3>and it was just like ghost Yeah, totally. And I

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 3>think it was like a crossing, like one of those

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:44.280
<v Speaker 3>you can get on a cruise ship that goes across

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 3>the Atlantic because they they just ferry them back and

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.959
<v Speaker 3>forth for the season, right, you go to the Mediterranean

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 3>for the summer and then back to the Caribbean for

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the wind. Anyway, that would be awesome, you know, just

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 3>to have the entire like three thousand crew members and.

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You, oh they are still working.

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, I gotta eat, I gotta somebody's got to run

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the bar.

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, would you like a show.

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't go see a comedy show though, you know

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 3>how they have like comedy clubs.

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Front row.

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel too much pressure to laugh and I would

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 3>be roasting.

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>No option, he or she would have no other options.

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You would have to do the crowd work. Anybody here

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>from Arizona? No, all right, my bad Georgia? Oh yeah, okay, okay.

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So I had two answers for this one. Santorini grease

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>would be great by yourself because like cruise ships or whatever.

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:46.879
<v Speaker 1>When I was there, it's packed, especially when those cruise

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>ships come in. Yeah and unload all these people. There's

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>walking around and just everything's tight. I mean it's beautiful,

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.839
<v Speaker 1>but everything is super super tight. So Santorina grease or

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a sky zone trampoline park? Interesting? Yeah? Yeah, get the

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 1>kids out of here. Yeah, let me tramp, Yeah, let

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>me tramp. Let me bounce here by chur don't worry

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>about me running into kids, we're locking them over. Yeah,

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that'd be fun. That would be fun. Staff like, no, no,

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>just me, Wow, I'm running it.

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 3>That's that's dangerous.

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh you think if I get injured on this?

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you break your collar bone and you're like and

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:25.240
<v Speaker 3>there's nobody there.

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 1>To hear a good point. One guy, I'll be fine,

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll be fun, all right. Last one here. Last weekend,

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell and Coco Jones tied the knot in a

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>ceremony in Connecticut. The two shared their first dance to

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:41.439
<v Speaker 1>music Soul Child's two thousand hit song Love. I thought

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty good choice. Hadn't heard that song

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.359
<v Speaker 1>in a long time, and I was like, oh, yeah,

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:47.839
<v Speaker 1>that's a good job. So my two questions for you

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>guys married men here, what was your first dance wedding song?

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've told us before, but tell us again.

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And then two, if you had to get married again,

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're just readout redoing your vows. I guess that ways.

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>What song would you pick today? So your real first

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 1>dance wedding song? And then if you did it again today,

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:08.799
<v Speaker 1>what song would you pick? Tough question, man, that's a

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tough question. Our first dance was to Just One Kiss

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>by Rafael Sadeq and Josh Stone. Oh hell yeah, yeah, okay,

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I know something talking about that's a great, great song.

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Rafael Sadek and Joss Stone. I haven't said those

0:52:22.239 --> 0:52:24.319
<v Speaker 2>names out loud, maybe since two thousand and eight.

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>What would I pick today?

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Though? I thought it was way harder, and I came

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 2>down to two songs, either Come and Get.

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Your Love by Redbone or Kiss by Prince. Okay, okay, definitely.

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 2>I just love them like the smooch ching, But neither

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of those are like slow dance.

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Not really. Yeah, I say, you're switching to the songs?

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah?

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 2>And did I take it my first dance very seriously?

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 2>The first time around? No, Laura was standing. I was

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 2>holding her hands, sprinting around her.

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:56.919
<v Speaker 1>It was awesome. She's just, oh, what a silly boy.

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm married, so it doesn't have to be very straight laced,

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:03.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, I get away with either of these.

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, good answers. JD. You said you struggled a little.

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Bit with this one.

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, well we didn't have a first dance, like

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 3>we didn't. Yeah, I didn't we yeah, we While we

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 3>got married in Mexico, it was sort of like we

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 3>didn't put a lot of thought into any of it,

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to be honest. I mean when we we didn't even

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 3>pick the music for the ceremony. We just it didn't

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 3>occur to us like.

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Wow, so and then who was doing it?

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Yeah, it wasn't even like there wasn't

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:36.319
<v Speaker 3>even DJ because it was like an all inclusive resort.

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.720
<v Speaker 3>So it was like they had like we had a dinner,

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 3>we had speeches and all that, yeah, and then we

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 3>just sort of spilled out into the disco and then

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:45.879
<v Speaker 3>that was sort of the everybody you.

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Were with the other people from the resort at a

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:48.959
<v Speaker 1>certain point.

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well we had like fifty people at the wedding,

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:54.799
<v Speaker 3>like who came to the resort, So I mean there

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 3>was that, but after the dinner itself, there was very

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.400
<v Speaker 3>little ceremony. And then me and Rachel just left anyway,

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 3>so you know, we had business to take care of.

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.720
<v Speaker 3>What was the song playing there, That's a great question.

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 3>It's probably Bone Thugs in the Harmony or some I

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 3>mean it's hard because I like the love songs that

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I like. They're all about breaking up, you know, like

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Dolly Parton, I Will Always Love You right, just like

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 3>everything's got like a twist of pain in it, you know.

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But so I mean I hear you the lyrics. This

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is maybe a weird song, but like if it's a

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 1>good song, it's a good.

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:39.880
<v Speaker 3>If it's a good song, if it's just the chorus.

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 3>It's like, I will always love you. Let's leave it

0:54:42.600 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 3>at that. Yeah, exactly. And also another part of it

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 3>is like, there's a lot of songs that are beautiful songs,

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 3>but they're all about I love you girl, and it's

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 3>all from the guy's perspective, you know what I mean.

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 3>So I don't want that. So I'm going with, Well,

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:03.719
<v Speaker 3>there's two songs. There's this is an actual one. Well,

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:06.719
<v Speaker 3>they're both actual, But if it was if I had

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:09.000
<v Speaker 3>my way and could go back to two thousand and three,

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 3>it would it would probably be Luna by A Shout

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 3>Out to Your Dog by the Smashing Pumpkins is one

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 3>of my favorite. This is literally about just love. Yeah,

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:22.839
<v Speaker 3>but I would probably pick how Deep is Your Love

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 3>by The Beg's Right Now just timeless, classic, class second great,

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and it's short. They're both under three minutes.

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 1>It's funny I say that. It's funny you say that

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 1>because one of the songs like so we didn't have

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we got married at a courthouse here, and so we

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:39.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually have the big wedding or do our first dance.

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 1>But I was thinking if we either did back then

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or even today, it would probably be the same song.

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 1>It'd be a song that like When We Fell in

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Love from an artist like When We fell in Love,

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>which is now like twenty five years I've been with

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Nora Shawda's no Ordinary Love, but a song seven minutes long. Yeah, baby,

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a long ass songs. So you get out. You

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:00.839
<v Speaker 1>just got to torn it off at some you gotta

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>switch it up.

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll just hand it over to me.

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll cut it down, okay, Yeah, remix.

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, your boy Brian is very good at that as well.

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Well we did a little bit more than twenty seconds

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of your boy Bryan. So that's probably my answer, But

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple others under consideration. Maxwell, Remember Maxwell, Yes, I

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of jams back in the day, Ascension,

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:26.880
<v Speaker 1>good song, whenever, wherever, whatever, good song. And then Alicia

0:56:26.960 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Keys because I asked Nora this, like what would you think?

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And she said, we listened to a lot of Licia

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Keys were first hooking up. So I'm like, so what fallen'?

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That was our first think. That's a great song. Yeah,

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But then I'm like that one's like, aren't the lyrics

0:56:41.360 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like I keep falling in and out of love with you?

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, one of those situations exactly.

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 3>But it doesn't matter, It doesn't it mayn't matter. Yeah,

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 3>right now, I'm in love with you. That's marriage, baby,

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 3>you go, it's ups and downs.

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. Good point. So those are our

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 1>answers there, good stuff, guys. First dance wedding songs, let's

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. What was is your first dance wedding song?

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Or if you haven't been married or you're gonna get married,

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what's it gonna be here in twenty twenty six? All right,

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that's rapid fire, not so rapid. Yeah, good wedding song. Well,

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>how's it gonna be by Buster Rod? That's a great song.

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you can find one away for one of

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 2>you to morph into like silver water.

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Very cool, Yeah, very very cool. I was just listening

0:57:19.760 --> 0:57:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to Uh funny you brought up buster rhymes flip Mote squad,

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I had that in the posse cuts.

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I can't name only flip only splip starg Wow, I

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 4>didn't know she was in the squad.

0:57:37.120 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 1>We got didn't baby sham, We got you said slip start,

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>we got rampage. Yeah. I think there's a guy something

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is it Lord have Mercy? Is that his name? It's

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Yeah, I look it up. Squad have

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 1>we named them all? Named them all there, decent squad.

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I love I love the flip most squad

0:57:57.240 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>man flip Mo Squad forever. But you know what about

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 1>brittle low too early? Too early? Lord, have mercy your Lord. Yeah,

0:58:05.600 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure. DJ scratch forgot about DJ scratch right right. Uh,

0:58:09.920 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that's like a that era. That's like what ninety eight

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think footboat Squad. I put like I said, I

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>put it on. I'm like, oh yeah, skits, skits. Yeah,

0:58:19.080 --> 0:58:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they had skits back then.

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Up.

0:58:20.560 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Man, It's like a banger of a song and then like,

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:25.240
<v Speaker 1>let's have a dumb ass one minute skit on the

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:28.919
<v Speaker 1>end of this. It's like annoying to listen to the car. Yeah,

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 1>skip skip skip all right, anyway, rapid Fire. That's it

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for today's show. So plan is we're back on Monday, Tass.

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>We back with us I believe, brand new not Dunk's podcast.

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So we'll be talking about whatever NBA news, whatever concept

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we come up with. Topic we come up with there

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>later in the week. Though next week, starting on Friday,

0:58:48.440 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we're rolling out are Pirates of the Caribbean series called

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the Booty Boys, and there we are. Yeah, baby, as Pirates. Wow,

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 1>look at this crue, this crue here, man, we look good.

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>As Pirates guys actually pulling off. So yes, our Pirates

0:59:06.440 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Caribbean series will be doing all five movies

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:11.120
<v Speaker 1>from that Field franchise and breaking it down, having a

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of arms, going through the movies and talking them

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 1>out starting next Friday, and then those will drop subsequent

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Fridays for the next five weeks, so that'll always be

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 1>for the most part of your Friday content. The Booty Boys.

0:59:24.280 --> 0:59:26.440
<v Speaker 1>What we're going with it. We were Fast Friends for

0:59:26.560 --> 0:59:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Fast and Furious. We were Jurassic Pals for Jurassic Park,

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and now we're the Booty Boys are So a couple

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of shows next week. Hit the like button, subscribe five

0:59:36.320 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>star ratings and reviews until next week. Clipper Roads.

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 2>You heard it here first, have a great time, turn up,

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:44.840
<v Speaker 2>love you guys awesome, Thanks for joining us, and remember

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 2>act your age, not your shoe size.

0:59:47.240 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Brace today people,