WEBVTT - Who Should You Trust More: Tyreek Hill or Ladd McConkey? | Week 13 Fantasy Football Wide Receiver Rankings and Tiers: Studs, Sleepers, and Must-Starts w/ Scott Pianowski (Ep. 1467) 0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.720 Hello friends, and welcome in to Fantasy Pros. This is 0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.800 the Fantasy Football Podcast. Wide receiver ranks for Week thirteen. 0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.640 I've got patkits Morris, I've got Scott p and Al 0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:12.399 Scam Chris Welsh, and we are going to be breaking 0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.040 down all these bad boys for you. Top thirty six, 0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.200 the big questions start sits all of it under the sun. 0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:20.840 We got you covering. If you're looking for more ranks, 0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.320 just go and check us out over at fantasypros dot 0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.239 com slash rankings. Because it's a crazy week we got 0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.440 there's games on Thursday, there's games on Friday, Sunday, obviously Monday. 0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.600 So if you guys want to see the latest in 0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.840 the ranks to help for your teams. If you can't 0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.519 get access to us, go to fantasypros dot com slash rankings. 0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.560 Check out all the positional ranks out there for this week. 0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.839 You can see rest of season. We've got dynasty. We 0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.800 got you covered, Go and check that out today, gentlemen, 0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.879 wide receivers not as been deep as usual that we're 0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.640 used to couple wide receivers that could be top twenty 0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.960 maybe taking off due to some crazy snow. We got 0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:57.760 a whole bunch to cover. Are you guys ready to 0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.480 jump into wide receivers? Let's do it raw Robins looks 0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.840 like a big raw like yeah, let's go. Well, sorry, 0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.440 let's get into it. Wide receiver's Top twelve going to 0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.280 the big board. Here's a new entry into our number 0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.679 one overall rank. I do not believe we have seen him, 0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.800 but Nico Collins coming in at number one. As far 0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.440 as all wide receivers go, it's an incredible matchup against 0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.640 the Jaguars this week. AJ Brown number two, Jamar Chase 0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.520 Pooka and Justin Jefferson as your top five, Monrod six, 0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.319 Cooper Cup, Mike Evan, Ceedee Lamb, George Pickens, Courtland Sutton 0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.680 and Terry mcclaurin. That rounds out the top twelve. I mean, 0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.440 no play had me on my seat bigger than last 0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.200 week than Terry mclaurin's just massive touchdown that saved so 0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:44.959 many different the DFS lineup FFPC another big league that 0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.560 was an absolute big savior, and it's something that just 0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.200 kind of happens with the Commanders and Terry McLaurin. You 0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.240 wish you would get more volume because he's such a 0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.160 great player. But man, it feels like we get one 0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.680 of those a week. So let's talk about McLaurin here. 0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.360 He's got an ECR of twelve. We actually moved down 0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.960 one spot. He was eleven yesterday. You guys are a 0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.400 little bit on the opposite ends here, Scott, you are 0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.920 a tiny bit above consensus, fits you are a bit 0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.840 below consensus. So Scott, let's start with you on the positive. 0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.480 Terry McLaurin at number ten this week, going up against 0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.400 the Tennessee Titans, which is only a two star matchup 0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.320 rating Accorn to Fantasy Pro. So what do you got 0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:21.120 on Terry McLaurin. 0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.440 Yeah, I don't know if anything all that illuminating. I 0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.480 wish he'd get a healthier target share or target count. 0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.080 He's only made to double digit targets once this year, 0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.919 but he's got five games with one hundred yards, he's 0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.520 got touchdowns and what sixty five or six different games. 0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.679 He's obviously the first reading this offense. Brown is significantly 0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.360 further down the pecking order. They won't have Eckler in 0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.320 this game. Zach Ertz is going to do what he 0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.160 always does. He'll catch four passes. He'll fall immediately when 0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.360 he catches those passes, he'll get forty three yards and 0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.480 hopefully that does it for you. But at least we 0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.520 saw Washington the buoyancy of the offense. You know, Jayden Daniels, 0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.079 he was able to run a little bit last week. 0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:57.560 I don't know if he was protecting a rib. In 0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.639 previous weeks he looked more back and forth. It's important 0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.799 to remember that just because the Titans are a bad 0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.960 team doesn't mean their defense is bad. It's actually a 0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.359 quality defense. And I think their metrics would be even 0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.520 better if they weren't getting sold down the river by 0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.040 their offense almost every week because Levis just gives the 0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.280 ball away with all those negative plays that he makes. 0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.480 But yeah, we can quibble on is McLaurin a lower 0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.800 end wide receiver one, is a higher end wide receiver two? 0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.520 It doesn't really matter. We're finally seeing the Terry McLaurin 0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.960 breakout season. He's finally tied to a plus quarterback, to 0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.200 somebody we can feel good about. And I mentioned on 0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.200 The Running Back Show, I hope Garrett Wilson has this 0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.800 Terry McLaurin season down the road where he finally gets 0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.840 in the right situation. It's like that friend of yours 0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.080 has been a bunch of bad relationships. They finally found 0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.480 the right person. They're like, oh, that's great. They're gonna 0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.680 have a nice Thanksgiving together. You know, they're gonna get married, 0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.280 they're gonna have kids, They're going to build a pick 0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.800 at fence and all that, adopt a dog, all that stuff. 0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.320 So I think Terry mclaurin's finally having that year and 0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.560 he's been a set and forget guy. I know Pat 0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.040 and I you're sitting next to each other at the 0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.680 King's Classic for funding over Terry McLaurin because he's always 0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.720 been one of our favorite players. So happy to see 0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.200 him out kick his ADP. But to just remember, I mean, 0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.120 he's a fence wide receiver one two. That's really what 0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:04.160 the upside is for him. 0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.560 Pat, do you believe that? It is like we don't 0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.360 need to quabble about you know, wide receiver one, wide 0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.480 receiver two. Do you think that belongs there? The only 0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.720 reason I also to say that is like there's this 0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.919 collection of wide receiver, like the top eight. It's like 0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.080 all the names you expect, but then you start to 0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.919 get into the low teens, and you know, if you 0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.200 make that move for Terry McLaurin down to sixteen, he 0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.560 might be bumping up against a Lad Maconkey, Cortland Sutton 0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.880 looks incredible right now. And again I throw this in 0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.840 here because it's like if someone is out there and 0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.640 they start two wide receivers and they had drafted Jamar 0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.000 Chase and then they had got Cortland, Sutton, Lad and 0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.480 Terry McLaurin. Those are the four wide outs. That's a quandary. 0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.040 That's a little bit of a problem, like who are 0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.240 you sitting out there and you bump him down? So 0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.480 I kind of just push at you. Do you think 0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.080 it's a little arbitrary about you know, ten to sixteen 0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:53.599 is kind of in the same range, or do you 0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.799 have some general concerns putting him down there at sixteen? 0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.920 Yeah? I mean so I would rather play Sutton, who 0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.320 has been on fire ever since that weird Thursday night 0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.800 game where he got zero targets, and ever since then. 0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.320 I think he's like top five in Fantasy scoring. My 0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.880 concern with McLaurin, and it's not that much of a 0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.080 concern because I'm starting him in a lot of leagues 0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.880 this week, although not the King's Classic, where Scott wrestled 0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:18.560 him away from me. 0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:19.400 I believe. 0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.760 He only has seventeen targets over his last four games. 0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.960 He actually has ten fewer targets than Noah Brown over 0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.320 that stretch, which is weird. He's gotten kind of bailed 0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:35.479 out by big plays. The spectacular late game touchdown against 0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.719 Dallas last week, a fifty four yard catch a few 0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.960 weeks ago against the Steelers that helped push him over 0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.760 the one hundred yard mark that day. But McLaurin is 0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.239 only a double digit targets once all season. He's averaging 0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.000 eleven point one yards per target, which is great. And 0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.960 you know, because he is such a good player, not 0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:57.320 that wild for him to OutKick expectations in yards per target, 0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.640 although eleven point one probably a little on stainable over 0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.120 the long run. Also, you know this Titans defense, even 0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.240 without Lugerious Sneid who's on ir It's it's still a 0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:13.159 pretty formidable pass defense. So yeah, I'm just I like McLaurin. 0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.160 Of course, I think most people, accepting the most shallow 0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.279 of leagues are going to be starting him without question 0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:18.720 this week. 0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.320 I just for me, he's not quite a wide receiver. One. 0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.360 Let me just back that up, Chris, because you mentioned 0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.800 Sutton and McLaurin in the same conversation, and man, Sutton 0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.520 is a player I really like. He reminds me so 0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.520 much of Doug Bump even higher than that. Maybe he's 0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.719 in the top five at his peak. But maybe Tom 0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.840 Brady gave us a misleading understanding of what a quarterback 0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.159 could do in his forties, because you know, father time, 0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.680 I always wins, and we've seen a lot. You know, Manning, 0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.080 you know, lost it quicker than Brady did. And there's 0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.039 been other guy you Farv's obviously the comp that people 0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.240 make with Rogers. Who goes to the Jets has a 0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.919 lost season. I just don't want to watch the Jets. 0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:55.320 I don't want to bet on the Jets. I don't 0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.080 believe in the Jets. It's nothing about Garrett Wilson. It's 0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.719 the people throwing him the ball. It's the people calling 0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.279 them plays. There Adams is a mouth to feed too. 0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.320 It's just I can't. I can't do it. Man, I 0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.480 don't have I have him ranked when you're probably the 0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.880 start them anyway, But who knows, Maybe you got lucky 0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.600 with Courtland Sutton later in your draft, or you know, 0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.960 maybe maybe you made a trade and upgraded your depth 0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.480 and you only start two receivers and new league, you 0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.920 could bench Garrett Wilson. I just want you, I don't 0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.400 want you to be annged at all to anything you 0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.760 thought Garrett Wilson was before the season, because that doesn't 0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:23.320 apply now. 0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.840 Ranks almost look like Garret Wilson and DeVante Adams are 0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.720 becoming the Bucky Irving and Rashad White of wide receivers, 0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.520 where they're just kind of being ranked towards each other 0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.400 and you're just not really sure they could both eat 0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.920 in theory, especially more than a running back in the 0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.080 wide receiver side. But the questions on the offense in 0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:40.840 general are kind of out there. Fitz, you got him 0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.800 at eighteen. Do you think there's a little bit more 0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.520 optimism and upside going up against Seattle this week? Three 0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.840 star rating? It is an a matchup. You know, we 0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.840 have seen Garrett Wilson be more efficient than Adams in general. 0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.560 It's just that offense has just been kind of a disaster, 0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.720 and we know that there is a potential that brace 0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.960 Hall could be out in this game, so that either 0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.840 can get messier or they could rely more on throwing 0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.600 the ball, So eighteen a little bit more optimistic. Do 0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.360 you think there's a little bit more optimism for Garrett 0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.840 Wilson because also the last thing eighteen kind of starts 0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.640 to throw a wrinkle in of like maybe this isn't 0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.560 a guy we're actually starting. I know we label them 0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.040 as wide receiver twos, but there are guys that have 0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.600 jumped up that really could give people fits, no pun 0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.480 intended about like what decision they're going to make. So 0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.560 your take on Garrett Wilson. 0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.520 Yeah, I know, the last couple of weeks haven't been pretty. 0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.000 I think he's had like nine catches for fifty six 0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.840 yards over his last two games, and maybe it is 0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.840 right to be ready to wave the white flag on 0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.199 the Jets passing game. And it sounds like Scott has 0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.200 had that flag flying for a couple of weeks now, 0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:48.440 But it was not that long ago weeks five through 0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.800 Week nine. So during that five game stretch that again 0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.240 not all that long ago, Garret Wilson had forty catches 0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.679 for four hundred and seventy two yards and four touchdowns 0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.360 and was the wide receiver in fantasy scoring over that stretch. 0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:07.040 So I just can't forget that He's still inside my 0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.080 circle of trust, even if the passing game as a 0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.360 whole isn't. And I feel much better about Garret Wilson 0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.719 than I do about DeVante Adams at this point. Like 0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.240 Garret Wilson, I would start pretty much unconditionally DeVante Adams, 0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.880 I would, you know, there's some other ify guys I 0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.920 would maybe consider starting ahead of Davante. 0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.160 Wide receiver threes twenty five through thirty six, we start 0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.960 with Marvin Harrison, Junior, Jamison Williams, Brian Thomas, DJ Moore, 0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.520 Khalil Shakir, and Darnell Mooney. At thirty Juwan Jennings, Jacoby Meyers, 0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.960 Tank Dell Deebo, Samuel Jaylen Waddle and DeAndre Hopkins rounds 0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.960 out are wide receiver threes, and yes those are some 0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.480 low forty nine or wide receivers. I am not surprised 0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.240 that Juwan Jennings ranks higher than Debo. It's how it 0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.880 should be, what I've been alluding to for a while, 0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.959 and Debo was an absolute disaster this past week. Brock 0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.040 Perdy really wants to go to Juan Jennings. I think 0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.240 that's the vibe. But this week the LOLO rank is 0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.960 this bad storm that in theory is being thrown out. 0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.559 Is there gonna be a bunch of snow it's been 0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.840 going early on? This is what pushes them out. So Fitz, 0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.800 let's start with you on the forty nine ers wide 0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.120 receiver here. I don't know what you want to take 0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.960 out of it, like, are they complete nothing burgers for you? 0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.560 Because there's snow. Obviously, if it clears up and it's 0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.880 just snowy around, that actually could be a big positive 0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:29.760 that actually would benefit if we're being honest, something like 0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.520 Deebo Samuel, if there wasn't a flurry going on. But 0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.599 the conversation is there might not be much there. So A, 0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.280 do you think both forty nine ers receivers deserve to 0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.720 be outside the top thirty? And b is it Juwan 0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.520 Jennings over Deebo Samuel. 0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.760 Yeah, A lot of moving parts here, mainly the quarterback 0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.719 situation and the weather right now. When I first did 0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.000 these rankings, I did it with the assumption that Brandon 0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.240 Allen would play again, like I haven't seen enough positive 0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:58.520 indicators that we're gonna. 0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.480 Get brock perty back this week. 0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.160 And I also did it with the assumption that that 0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.000 was going to be reasonably playable. Weather didn't realize that 0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.600 there was a blizzard moving into Buffalo, so I had 0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.040 both guys ranked rankings twins in the mid thirties with 0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.959 this blizzard, and if Brandon Allen plays, I'm going to 0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.840 be moving Juwan Jennings probably down at least a dozen 0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.400 spots into the forties and unplayable territory. I think a 0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.920 blizzard would hurt Deebo a little bit less because he's 0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.320 a short area receiver who might also take the occasional reverse. 0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.120 And you know, Deebo is so good with the ball 0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.800 in his hands that maybe I don't know, maybe the 0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.439 snow it hurts defenders who don't know where the ballcarrier 0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.199 is going. You know, the ballcarrier knows where he's going. 0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:45.360 So. 0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.480 I don't know, I might still have Debo in the 0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.960 mid thirties with the snow. And I guess, you know, 0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.640 the problem isn't when Deebo has the ball in his hands, 0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:58.520 it's getting it into his hands. And that was a 0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.080 problem last week when he couple of easy throws go 0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:02.319 right through his mets. 0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.480 And there's you know, again there's some debate on where 0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.480 it is. There's some stuff out there that thinks, you know, 0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:12.280 we're going to have like big wins and massive massive 0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.559 snow some current weather things I'm showing out there, it's 0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.880 like a fifty percent chance of you know, snow flurry 0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.600 that's going to be going on. The wind doesn't look 0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.000 too crazy at this moment, but it's going to be 0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.760 like twenty degrees out so you have to watch that 0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.719 throughout the week. It is dangerous to make massive assumptions 0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.960 like it is going to be some crazy you know, 0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.400 we can't even see it on the screen type of 0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.720 game or anything like that, because we know production can happen. 0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:39.920 But at the end of the day, the question is like, 0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.360 if Brandon Allen is in there, these wide receivers stink 0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.560 down at the bottom. So Scott, it kind of goes 0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.160 to the same thing with you do both of these 0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.280 wide receivers deserve to be in the thirty old one? 0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.720 Just a great understanding of space and leverage. And since 0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.200 that bagel against the Saints and nobody saw that coming, 0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.920 the Broncos have correct They've done what good teams do. 0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.200 They did something wrong and they fixed it. Since then, 0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.640 Sutton has between eight and eleven targets in every game, 0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.240 He's had strong yardage totals. In every game he scored 0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.520 three touchdowns, and bow Nicks has gone from a running 0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.440 quarterback who sometimes throws to a throwing quarterback who can 0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.200 run if he needs to. Courtland Sutton to me, if 0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:18.240 I anticipate there may be some Sutton versus McLaurin questions 0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.240 this week, and I know initially my first ranking had 0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.520 McLaurin higher, but I think that's wrong. I think Sutton. 0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.840 I've fixed it since then. I think Sutton is certainly 0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.720 the preference here, and I think we're going to look 0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.400 back and say Courtland Sutton was one of the right 0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.160 answers of the fantasy season. 0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.120 And it's Nicks too. It's about Nicks. You know, last week, 0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.400 just to shout out to the Betting Pros app will 0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.800 put up these like Betting Pros only plays. And my 0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.000 play of the week last week, if you had checked 0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:44.480 out Betting Pros, you would have got it for three 0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.320 or four days was bo Nick's over nineteen point five 0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.280 completions because he had had three straight weeks of twenty 0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:54.120 two or more completions four now four. I mean, he's 0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.520 a completion monster. They've really perfected some of the big plays, 0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.200 but then the short line completions he can get and 0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.120 that benefits a guy like Courtland Sutton, and it's kind 0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:04.839 of a stabilizer through the rest of the year. So 0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.800 I completely agree here. It's a weird collection of you know, 0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.719 you got these huge names at the top of mon 0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.360 Ra Cooper, Mike Evans, and then it's like at the 0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.559 bottom of the first round it's Courtland Sutton, George Pickens, 0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.200 and Terry McLaurin. And there's some negatives in there. Courtland 0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.640 Sutton is probably the safest of that entire group from 0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.560 a volume in Big Playstann and look at bo. 0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.640 Nicks, by the way, making a run at Offensive Rookie 0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:26.520 of the Year, which was basically that that trophy was 0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.040 already in the case for Jaden Daniels maybe a month 0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.320 ago or six weeks ago, and now Daniel's still the favorite, 0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.160 but Nix is coming on fast to the point that 0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.080 whoever plays better the rest of the season, I think 0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.400 is going to win that award. And remember Cleveland, and 0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.680 we think of the Browns defense maybe is better than 0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.680 it is because you know, their cold weather team, that's 0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.960 their identity, and Miles Garrett is a wonderful player. The 0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.520 Cleveland secondary has not played well at all. So if 0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.400 you need Court and Sutton to come through on Monday, 0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.720 I think you can do just that against the Brown secondary. 0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.360 You can make hay On all right. 0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.520 We got wide receiver two top coming up, some big guys. 0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.760 But first, they're saying that this this week's Texas versus Texan, 0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.560 NA and M is going to be the most expensive 0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.160 college football ticket ever, which is crazy. Well, guess what, 0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.240 let game time make it easier on you than any 0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.520 other place when dealing with a huge game like that. 0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.520 You could get all in pricing. They got the toggling 0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.360 the features shows the total upfront, which is, by the way, 0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.960 my absolute one hundred percent favorite thing on the planet. 0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.800 I don't like to be surprised by extra fees. I 0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.560 don't even know what they are. This is all in 0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.720 pricing right at checkout and you can see it on there. 0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.240 You can check out the panoramic view from the seat 0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.560 that you pick in the app before you buy it. 0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.600 They've got the lowest price guarantee or game time will 0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.200 credit you one hundred and ten percent of the difference, 0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.960 and they've got game time ticket coverage. Your purchase is 0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.680 covered with the most flexible customer service policy in the 0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.000 ticketing industry. Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with 0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.320 Game Time picks. Download the Game Time app, create an account, 0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.840 and use code Fantasy Pros for twenty dollars off your 0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.680 first purchase. Turn do apply, but again, create an account 0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:06.960 and redeem code Fantasy Pros FA n t as ypros 0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.520 for twenty dollars off. Download Game Time today, because what 0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.400 time is it. It's game time. 0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.880 And keep that promo code handy because you may need 0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.080 it for Michigan Ohio State. You may need it for Auburn, Alabama, 0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.040 you may need it for South Carolina Clemson. They're just 0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.280 an awesome schedule of college football games, as there always 0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:26.160 is this time of the year. 0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:27.560 So lock them all up. 0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.960 Yeah, it's gonna be a great Saturday. And what's better 0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.160 than get into the stadium and you're doing some tail 0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:33.680 gaety and watching one of those games. 0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:35.320 I don't live in Buffalo, but I'd like to see 0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.400 what the panoramic views look like if they'll just put 0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.080 snow in there, and what all the snow looks like 0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.400 for that Buffalo forty nine er game. All right, wide 0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.160 receivers thirteen through twenty four. These would be the wide 0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.840 out twos. Malik Neighbors comes in at thirteen. We've got 0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.720 Drake London, Tyreek Hill down outside the top fourteen T Higgins, 0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:55.080 Lad McConkie, Calvin Ridley's A Flowers, Garrett Wilson, Jackson Smith 0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.120 and Jigba, dk Metcalf, Devanta Adams and Jaden Reed. Let 0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.400 me throw kurveball that's not on the sheet here and 0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.760 Pat will start with you. Who would you rather this week? 0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.960 Tyreek Hill or Lad McConkie Tyreek Hill. 0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.520 I'm just going back to the well with Tyreek Hill. 0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.720 I still, you know, fundamentally believe it. It should work 0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.920 with him, even if it hasn't yet, always a threat 0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:15.760 to break a big play. 0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:16.920 Although I am a little. 0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:21.400 Bit concerned about a team based in South Florida going 0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.879 up to Green Band Thanksgiving night, where the temperatures are 0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.720 probably going to be in the low twenties, how is 0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.040 that passing game going to function. 0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:30.600 With a bunch of Where do you have him ranked? 0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.840 I've got him a wide receiver ten. It's hard for 0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.760 me to move him out of wide receiver one range. 0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.800 And I know I keep going back to the well 0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:41.040 on Tyreek Hill, and that probably explains why wide receiver 0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:45.000 has been my worst position in rankings accuracy all year. 0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.000 So the same thing Scott Lad McConkie or Tyreek Hill 0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:49.440 this week. 0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.840 Yeah, I would go on to McConkie. You know, Tyreek 0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.560 Hill was wide receiver four and half point PPR in 0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.760 that first week. That's just unusual runout right, he is 0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:02.280 he incident before the game plays great? Anyway, his best 0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.240 performance since then sing in a half point pprs wide 0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.720 receiver sixteen. And there's a lot of bricks in there. 0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.960 There's a forty, there's a forty one, there's an eighty nine. 0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:13.800 I realized there were some games to it didn't play. 0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.560 At some point you have to accept. Look, I know 0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.960 some people are saying, hey, Jayalen Wattle finally came in. Yeah, 0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.800 it's great after two months of doing absolutely nothing. They 0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.120 don't want Tua taking deep drops. I don't like Miami 0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.160 at all. And I realize this is like the lowest 0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:28.800 hanging fruit, But I don't like Miami at all. In 0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.720