WEBVTT - Chips Act Subsidy Deals, DraftKings Earnings

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard.

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Technology coming up. The race to reward the buy An

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 4>administration is against the clock to complete chipsack deals with

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 4>top companies before the Trump takes office.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 5>And come to Saudi Arabia, the country's one hundred billion

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 5>dollar pitch to become an AI powerhouse hub.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 6>And draftking shares.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 4>They bounced back after earnings and a tough end of

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 4>the year for the online sports spelling company. We speak

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 4>with the CEO, but first let's check in on these markets.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 6>Because I'll give you a five day chart.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Today we're just flat, slightly low on the Nazak one hundred,

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 4>coming off of those record highs, but we power to

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 4>new records on this particular benchmark. A florry of earnings

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 4>is something we need to dissect. So two is a

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 4>fed Rake cup that helps us push higher, but of

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.279
<v Speaker 4>course the election result. Also, we're up five point two percent,

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 4>the best week since mid September.

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 6>Then what are you watching on the.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Micro So I think We're still in a stage where

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 5>you look at single names and we're thinking about winners

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 5>and losers. Post election day, Tesla continues to have momentum.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 5>It is trading at its highest level since early May

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 5>of twenty twenty two, gone beyond a trillion dollars of

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 5>market cap, whether it closes there or not.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 7>But there's the association.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Trump with Musk, and then there's the analysis of whether

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 5>Trump policy adjustments will impact negatively or positively that name. Elsewhere,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 5>there is a scramble in DC in across this country

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 5>in the chip sector about what happens next. Intel is

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 5>modestly higher in the session, but on the week over

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 5>five days on track for its best week since June.

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Could it be a beneficiary of the Trump administration? What

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg is reporting is that deals are done, negotiations settled

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 5>for Chips Act funding, but in some cases is their

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 5>renegotiation to try and actually get access to money through

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 5>the Biden administration before Trump two point zero takes effect

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 5>and President lank Trump takes office in January of next year.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 4>Care I know Pat Gelsinger spoke to you after the

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 4>earnings with a frustration at how slow that money has

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 4>been coming out of the door. Ed, let's discuss that

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 4>all a little bit more from Bogs. Mackenzie Hawkins has

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 4>a great piece out just talking us through how chip

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 4>companies are basically racing, as is the Biden administration, to

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 4>get access to that Chips Act funding.

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 6>What is the latest.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 8>So earlier this year, the Biden administration announced a slate

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 8>of multi billion dollar awards for some of the most

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 8>important companies in the semi collect industry to build factories

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 8>on American soil. The funding comes from the Chips Act,

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 8>where she signed in twenty twenty two. It's a major

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 8>bipartisan initiative to revitalize the American industry. Since those announcements,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 8>companies have been going through pretty onerous due diligence, and

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 8>some of them still haven't reached final term sheets. So

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 8>now the Biden administration and those couple of companies in

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 8>particular Intel and Samsung and Micron are the big ones

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 8>that we're watching, are trying to get those incentives locked

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 8>down so they can get money out the door before

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 8>there's a potential for renegotiation under a Trump admin.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 5>Intel Micron two of the names I showed a moment ago.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 5>Micron lower in the session. Sources are telling us that

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 5>those names, the eyes are not dotted, the t's are

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 5>not crossed. Which areas do they still have to negotiate McKenzie.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 8>It varies by company. In Intel's case, part of the

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 8>hang up is over what's called a change of contract provision,

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 8>which is a fancy way of saying what happens if

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 8>Intel spins office manufacturing business or is acquired in part

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 8>or in whole. Now, Dolsinger has said we're going to

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 8>keep Intel together. Intel has said it's making good progress

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 8>on the award negotiations. But you can imagine why that's

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 8>a sensitive provision with a company that is going through

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 8>some serious financial troubles.

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 4>The key issue here is, as you said at the top,

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 4>this is bipartisan in nature. So where might we see

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 4>changes made. We have heard in recent days weeks key podcasts,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Trump really rail against what he sees is well money

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 4>out the door when he thinks Taris would just bring

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 4>TSMC to build in the US, for example.

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 8>The general consensus among industry lobbys and government officials in

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 8>Washington is that the broad contours of this program will

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 8>stay the same. It passes bipartisan support. It was Trump's

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 8>first administration that recruited TSMC to Arizona in the first place.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 8>But Republicans are already taking aim at what they consider

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 8>it to be social provisions of the Biden administration's implementation,

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 8>things like requirements for childcare facilities, or expectations that companies

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 8>will work with local labor unions or try to limit

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 8>the environmental impact of their facilities.

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 5>Bimberg's Mackenzie Hawkins, thank you for your reporting. Let's get

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 5>the markets perspective, bringing Eric Friedman, chief investment officer a

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 5>US Bank Asset Management. I think we start with semiconductors, right.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 5>I talked to the beginning of the show about still

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 5>trying to discern the winners and losers in Trump two

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 5>point zero through that lens. How are you viewing chips

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 5>right now, Eric.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, we're still favorable on the ship space. I think

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 9>the distinction that we're really trying to make is number

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 9>one in terms of the beneficiarias of AI. That is

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 9>certainly a story that lots of people talk about, because

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 9>there is still some concern in terms of hardware and

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 9>peripheral sales, just you know, with a weakening labor market,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 9>some softening not just in the US, but across the globe,

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 9>what does the upgrade cycle look like? What will corporate

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 9>capex specific to peripherals and hardware look like. We're seeing

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 9>some stabilization aad but really not necessarily an uplift, So,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, probably more the idea of will we see

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 9>diffusion of AI chips beyond the hyperscalers? Again, hyperscalers have

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 9>a ton of free cash flow, and that's what we've

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 9>seen consistently throughout this earning season, and so the ability

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 9>to almost self fund AI chip demand we think will continue.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 9>So I think there's all almost a business to business

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 9>versus business to consumer angle. We're probably were in the

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 9>business to business angle for chips. But then more specifically,

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 9>will we see that diffusion out beyond again hyperscalers, Will

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 9>AI chip growth again meet and demand? We still think

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 9>there's a backlog there.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 10>That's why we're still bullish.

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 5>Eric, how's the US Bank Asset Management team modeling for

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 5>Trump tariff policy?

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think it's important to really discern probably by

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 9>country and by region, and I think that almost a

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 9>knee jerk reaction that we saw heading into election day

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 9>and then the immediacy following the election, is that look,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 9>there would be this you know, almost broad tear iff

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 9>policies set across not just China, which is a very

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 9>common refrain from both parties heading into the election, but

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 9>also you know Western Europe in particular, and if you

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 9>look at the performance in particular of EFA again developed

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 9>international stocks, you look at what's happened within the currency realm,

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 9>there is still this this view that, look, tariffs are coming.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 9>I do think that our modeling work suggests that differentiation

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 9>is probably an underappreciated point right now in the marketplace,

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 9>so as we await again not just the specifics on

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 9>what tariffs looks like, but also who's going to be

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 9>in the cabinet that can have a material impact on

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 9>just again maybe the glide path of what tariffs look like.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 9>Last thing I'd say is this, there's the possibility of

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 9>more of a glide path approach, almost a in initial

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 9>set and then perhaps an expansion depending on success as

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 9>well as depending on how the other side reacts. The

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 9>reaction function of those impacted by tariffs is one that

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 9>we again have to also model in and something we're

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 9>very focused on.

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 4>To that point, has any of your feelings changed on

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 4>big American companies with large exposure to China do get

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 4>more nervous around that or actually does things stay the same?

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, caroly I think it is a bit more nervous.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 9>And when I say nervous, the range of outcomes that

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 9>we're modeling has to expand, and I think that if

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 9>you look at, for example, what's happening in the Chinese

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 9>stock market review as completely anomalist, that is more of

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 9>a policy driven China really trying to regain some of

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 9>the spotlight with the challenges they have structurally within their

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 9>economy and most of the issues that we're.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 7>Seeing within the supply chain.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 9>That's the part that we think is key, and there

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 9>was a lot of rhetoric and obviously discussion about the

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 9>supply chain and what requirements were going to be really imposed,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 9>if you will, pre election. Now that we have the

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 9>election results largely behind us, the extent of the supply

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 9>chain is probably our next area of focus. So I

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 9>do think that in terms of our modeling work and

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 9>if we're looking at the range of opportunities and considerations,

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 9>it's widened, but again having more of a bias towards

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 9>more on shoring and the potential of more inflation we

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 9>think is now our base case, probably more so than

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 9>it was two or three weeks ago.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 4>Talk to that inflation because we've had a raft of

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 4>consumer facing tech companies come out with their earnings and

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 4>they move on the day to day. Not individual names,

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 4>but more broadly tech exposed.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 6>To the consumer.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Are they going to have a better time of it

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 4>or a harder time in twenty twenty five if inflationary

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 4>pressures are there, Yeah, I.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 9>Think that on balance, you know, we're still optimistic about

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 9>the consumer, especially amongst the middle income and upper income

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 9>consumer in the US. We do think there is some

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 9>level of stability in continental Europe. I'm not saying it's

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 9>certainly a gangbuster a consumer electronics demand cycle, but that

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 9>idea of the quote unquote case shape recovery, we think

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 9>is intact one of the things that we've really looked at.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 9>In addition to again our role as a bank, we

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 9>have a lot of purview into delinquencies, We have a

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 9>lot of understanding what's happening within credit flows, and there

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 9>is a very market difference between middle and upper income

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 9>consumers and lower income consumers. And what I mean by

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 9>that is, if if you look at at just the

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 9>bar that the lower income consumers have had to overcome

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 9>expenses on rents, expenses on credit cards. Those are going up,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 9>and so that marginal consumer who's maybe lower end, you know,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 9>consumer electronics demand is probably going to be challenged for

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 9>some time. We still think that middle income and upper

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 9>income consumers will spend, so we think that that that

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 9>refresh cycle will exist.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 7>On balance.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 9>It's it's still okay, it's really not, you know, Carolin,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 9>I'd say gangbusters at this point.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Right now, I Friedman of US Bank Asset Management really

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 4>appreciate you coming on today. Meanwhile, coming up Saudi Arabia

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 4>betting b on Ai for their potential one hundred billion

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 4>dollar investment.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 6>That's next. This is a bluebot technology.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 5>It's time for talking tech and first stop. Sony lifts

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 5>its sales out look. The Japanese tech a saw strong

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 5>music sales and a surprise boost from its PlayStation unit

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 5>due to sales of the video game Black Myth Wu Kong.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 5>Sony says it now expects a net revenue of eighty

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 5>three point two billion dollars plus. By Doo is set

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 5>to unveil a new pair of AI smart glasses. The

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 5>likes of which rival Metas ray bands. According to sources,

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese search leader plans to introduce the device, said

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 5>it's Bydo World event in Shanghai next week. Sales of

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 5>the glasses could start as early as twenty twenty five

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 5>and would likely cost less than Metas two hundred and

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 5>ninety nine dollars price point, and Nvidia has named NASA

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 5>veteran elean Na Choa as a director. The move bolsters

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 5>and videos board to thirty members after the AI rally

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 5>turned the company into a Silicon Valley titan. The Choa

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 5>previously ran NASAs Johnson Space Center in Houston and was

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 5>the first Latina astronaut in Spacekroen ed, let's.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Talk to Saudi Arabia right now.

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 4>It is set to make a big push into artificial intelligence,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 4>investing up to one hundred billion dollars in new projects.

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 4>We're talking data centers, startups, other AI focused infrastructure.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 6>It's all according to sources from More.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 4>We welcome Bloomberg's Tom Jarles on now to talk about

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 4>this was initially potentially an agreement. We've heard Alphabet Google

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 4>helping fund AI focus in Saudi Arabia, but this is

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 4>much much bigger in scale. Now.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 11>There's a lot of ambition behind this project, Caroline. What

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 11>the Saudis are trying to do is make sure that

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 11>they have a seat at the table part of the

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 11>AI revolution.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 12>What can they do? They have a lot of.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 11>Money, they're not and they basically there's a lot of

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 11>money and they want to invest in infrastructure. Something that

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 11>we've been writing about and talking talking to you about

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 11>for a long time is the need for all of

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 11>the data centers, all of that computing power that's necessary

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 11>to drive generitive artificial intelligence. The Saudis have plenty of

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 11>resources to help invest in that. They are putting a

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 11>lot of money and time and energy into this effort

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 11>that they hope will essentially put Saudi Arabia on the

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 11>map as a major force behind generative.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 7>AI code name Project Transcendence.

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 5>According to our reporting, I think what we know from

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 5>our reporting, tom Right, is that it's almost a quid

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 5>pro quo that Saudi's ready to invest hand over money

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 5>to startups, big name players, but in return they have

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 5>to have a presence in country.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 11>That's right. One of the conditions is they want to

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 11>see those operations have a strong to hold right there

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 11>in the Kingdom. Something else that you need to bear

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 11>in mind when you look and when you think about

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 11>the role that the Middle East is going to play

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 11>investing in global startups and investing in this Again, I

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 11>keep referring to it as a revolution because it is

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 11>transforming the way we do business, the way we live

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 11>our lives.

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 12>Something that's really important, something that we've seen come up

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 12>time and time.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 11>Again, is the West, led by the United States, wants

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 11>to ensure that the companies that have a really strong

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 11>stake in AI, in these startups, in these global startups

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 11>and these global businesses, is that they be allied with

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 11>the West.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 12>Something that we've seen before is that when.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 11>When parts of the country, parts of the world excuse me,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 11>become too closely allied with state China, that starts to

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 11>make people nervous. And so one of the things that

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 11>you're going to see is if the IF US companies

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 11>are going to take part in this, they're going to

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 11>want to see the Middle East allying itself with the

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 11>West and away from China.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 6>Interesting, So that's sort of the global context.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 4>When you get into the nitty gritty, it's going to

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 4>be the PIF that's their sort of sovereign wealth fund

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 4>aligning themselves and co investing with big international companies.

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 6>It's going to have similar feel to it, right than

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 6>al At. Can you just spell out how the funding

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 6>might look.

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 11>Well, well, we're still getting our arms around that. We

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 11>know that they want to invest in startups, they want

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 11>to invest in the infrastructure. These data centers cost a

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 11>lot of money. All the servers, all the chips, all

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 11>this computing power that's needed to generate to for generative

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 11>artificial intelligence, the chips themselves, and the equipment needed to

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 11>build the chips, and you see the potential for Saudi

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 11>Arabia to become this major world center of global of

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 11>the global infrastructure needed around artificial intelligence.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 12>We talk a lot about the role that Taiwan plays.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 11>We talk a lot about the US and the Chips

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 11>Act and its desire to bring chip making capabilities in

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 11>the US. This is Saudi Arabia saying we want to

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 11>have a stake in this as well. We're going to

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 11>incentivize you to come to build and invest right here

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 11>in our backyard.

0:15:52.360 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 5>Blomberg Technology Senior Executive Editor, Tom Giles, thank you, Happy Friday, boss,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 5>right shares of draftings Honestly bouncing all over the place,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 5>but currently up almost five percent after reporting third quarter results.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 7>Look at that stot Go five percent game.

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 5>The Sports bending company cut his full year revenue forecast

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 5>below analyst estimates reported are wider and then expected loss

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 5>per share. Let's gets Drafting CEO Jason Robbins, There's this

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 5>idea that the streets fixated on that there were customer

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 5>friendly outcomes, particularly in the realm of NFL. Is that

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 5>true to your mind? And what's a customer friendly outcome?

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 13>Q three actually we said that we had neutral outcomes,

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 13>so you know, we had exactly kind of as we expected,

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 13>and we ended up having a beat in Q three,

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 13>which is great. Q four aside from these outcomes, would

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 13>have been on track for the same So you know, basically,

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 13>what it means is that the favorites one a lot

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 13>and the big name players scored touchdowns and had a

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 13>lot of And sometimes that happens in sports. You know,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 13>the book sometimes wins, sometimes the customers win. And it's

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 13>hard to know, right because we're only you know, halfway

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 13>through the quarter yet, how it's all going to end.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 13>It could easily swing the other way, but at this

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 13>point for the quarter, at least the five weeks that

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 13>we're into it, the customers are winning, and you know,

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 13>over the long term, that's great.

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 7>We need our customers to win.

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 13>Sometimes they want to win sometimes that's part of experiencing

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 13>the product. So we're really excited though that the fundamentals

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 13>are super strong. We saw three hundred BIPs year of

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 13>year improvement in both promotionally and gross margin percentage. Cacs

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 13>were down twenty percent in the quarter. Lots of really

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 13>good things going on.

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 5>It's well, there's lots of things, full stop going on.

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 7>Let's get technology in a little bit.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 5>But in a week where you have a US election

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 5>and it's getting towards the end of the year, the

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 5>holidays are fast approaching, how does sports betting stand out?

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Like what is the consumer attitude towards placing a bet

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 5>in a week like this one?

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 13>Well, obviously a lot of distraction with the election going on,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 13>but you know, as you might imagine, people were even

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 13>talking about speculating on one side or the other the

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 13>election markets, and that was available in certain places too.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 13>So you know, I think it's very much part of

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.479
<v Speaker 13>the culture now that people want to be, you know,

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 13>a participant by having an idea, a prediction, a viewpoint

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 13>on what they think is going to happen. And I

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 13>think betting is really just you know, part of that

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 13>overall trend.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Jason, I want to jump in on that polymarket call

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people's attention.

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 6>Would you go there, would you expand in pass sports?

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 13>Well, we would only do it if it were in

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 13>a legal and regulated fashion. So you know, these types

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 13>of markets on elections are regulated at the federal level.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 13>It's different than the way betting is regulated. You know,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 13>it's something that maybe we would you know, consider looking

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 13>into before the next election. But I do think that

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 13>it's only something that we would do in a legal,

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 13>regulated environment, which is what differentiates us from some of

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 13>those that are offering and now some are offering it

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 13>legally now too, there is a legal framework for it

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 13>as well, but not everybody is.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 4>Let's just talk about therefore that passage of legalization. Is

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 4>that going to be easier under the next administration? I

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 4>mean also just from the point of sports betting too,

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 4>we see Missouri Common Line for example.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 13>Well, definitely for us, it's really you know, the states

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 13>that are legalizing and so a lot of what we

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 13>were watching were the various outcomes and state houses and governors'

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 13>races around the nation. Obviously, you know there is some

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 13>impact from you know, federal government impacts every industry in

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 13>some way or another. But you know, taxes other ways,

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 13>corporate taxes meaning but you know, in terms of legalization,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 13>our action is really at the state level. So as

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 13>you knowed, Missouri's big win passed about initiative to legalize

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 13>sports betting, and very excited about that. Missouri is the

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 13>eighteenth largest state and the huge sports state. Really great

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 13>sports fans in Missouri, so excited about that one.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 7>Hopefully that'll get.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 13>Up and running soon, and you know, hopefully we'll see

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 13>even more action when the legislators come back in session.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 5>In Kew on Jason, we focus a lot on this

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 5>program about how sport is access the technology right, a

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 5>transition from linear television to OTT and I'm fascinated by

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 5>how the betting markets either benefit or don't benefit from that.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 5>The consumer has so many options about how to watch

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 5>sport and pay for it. You know, it's astonishing. Actually

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 5>what flies out of my bank account each month? Is

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 5>that a tailwind or a headwind to you when you're

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 5>thinking about bets being placed in parallel.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think it's actually a tail in that it's

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 13>part of the overall trend we're seeing, which is sports

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 13>and interest in sports continues to grow, and betting is

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 13>a part of that. They're very intertwined, so I think

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 13>they feed off each other as more and more, you know,

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 13>people can see more and more sports from around the world,

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 13>not just their favorite sports or their favorite teams, but

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.719
<v Speaker 13>they can watch any team or they can watch any sport,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 13>and that access is there that's going to be a

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 13>benefit to our business. But it's really part of the

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 13>same overall mega trend, which is, you know, information is

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 13>easier to come by for the consumer, and the consumer

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 13>wants to be a more active participant because they have

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 13>more information and have a viewpoint on things. And I

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 13>think that's why you're seeing this mega trend around betting

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 13>that you know, continues to grow the overall industry in

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 13>the US and really internationally as well.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Mega trend that you're going to continue to enhance products into.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Jason Robbins, we appreciate your time DraftKings CEO on the

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 4>back of the earnings, and we'll have more from Draftkins

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 4>next week. Tune into Bloomberg Chief Future Officer conversation with

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 4>a CFO coming up. Meanwhile, we've got plenty more to

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 4>be dissecting when it comes to tech earning season as

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 4>it continues, will bring you the latest out of pinterest

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 4>out of Airbnb so much more. At the moment, pinterest

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 4>ed off by more than fifteen percent. This is as look,

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 4>the numbers look good from a revenue perspective for this quarter,

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 4>but really it's the forecast and they increase in spending

0:21:54.880 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 4>on AI that's got people's attention. I'll come back to

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in New York and I.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 7>Med Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Pic check on these market said, because what a week

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to the macro policy, when it comes

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 4>to Fed rate cuts, when it comes to earnings, when

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 4>it comes to the election outcome. We are completely unchanged

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 4>on the last one hundred to day, but it's not

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 4>unchanged on the week.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 6>We're other more than five percent.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Best week since September the thirteenth through really seen big

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 4>tech on top after those particularly electoral results. Looking at

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump media back higher today, it sunk significantly more than

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent yesterday. Maybe rumors swirling around the market that

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 4>the President elect Trump could well sell off some of

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 4>his holding in DJT. Of course that's the owner of

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 4>the parent company of his media outlook.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 6>But actually he says no.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 4>He folks back on that particular one, saying he's holding

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 4>We're up nine and a half percent on the day,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 4>but really has been a tell on his electoral chances

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 4>and then success. I'm looking at Pinterest, though off by

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent. We're going to dig into these numbers in

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 4>a moment. Ed this is a raft of earnings, and

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing Pinterest at look double digit revenue growth. We're

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 4>seeing still living up to expectations when it comes to

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 4>forty percent growth in adjusted earnings per share, and they

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 4>build on their overall user base, but the forecast.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 6>Looks a little bit weak.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 4>We're worried about advertising trends when it comes to food

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 4>and beverage in particular, and a spending on AI that

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 4>might top half a billion dollars in the fourth quarter,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 4>and we're seeing the spending also being a warring for Airbnb.

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.479
<v Speaker 4>They're investing in product, but that means margins are going

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 4>to be crimped. It to manage though to show pretty

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 4>good numbers when it came to their fiscalur quarter and

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 4>revenue increasing. Not so for paramount revenue. On the downside,

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 4>for Paramount down by about five percent year over year,

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 4>we're off by four and a half percent. Of course,

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 4>a company in transition. We understand that the deal with

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Ellison will be tied up by the first half, maybe

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 4>at least by the second half of twenty twenty five.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 4>Good TV results relatively speaking, good streaming, but film was

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 4>a weakness.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Let's time into it.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's get some team coverage and bring in bloombergs,

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Ryan Blaceelica and Ryan. If you go under your bio

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 5>on the Bloomberg terminal, literally every single technology company there

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 5>is in Tickery listed. I don't envy you, But in

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 5>this week, of all weeks, many names reported carry has

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 5>been over some day. Is there a common theme between

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 5>the technology sets to names that posted results.

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 14>Hey, good morning, thanks for having me. You know, I

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 14>would say that there's really been sort of a mixed bag.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 14>We've seen some companies come out with some very strong forecasts,

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 14>some very strong growth, and we've seen some you know,

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 14>real double digit gains and the waker results. But there's

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 14>also been a number of companies where, you know, and

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.479
<v Speaker 14>you can point to any number of factors behind it.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 14>Maybe the outlook was a little bit weak. Maybe the

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 14>stock just had rallied so much going into the report

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 14>that it just like had to give some of that back.

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:38.239
<v Speaker 7>There's really been a mixed bag here.

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 14>I'd say on balance, things have been you know, generally

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 14>pretty positive. But it's certainly easy to you know, point

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 14>to some stocks at you know, for whatever reason, just

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 14>seems like they weren't able to continue with some of

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 14>their recent advances.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Can we just go in more on Pinterest because this

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 4>is a big set off and in fact it is

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 4>underperformed the entire year. Yes, it rallied last year, but

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 4>why when it's actual PE ratios forward looking PEE ratios

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 4>are much cheaper than rivals like Meta.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 6>What is there a concern here?

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 14>Right? So you mentioned the week forecast. That's really sort

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 14>of the key issue here. You know, there was a

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 14>lot of optimism building about this company a couple of

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 14>months ago, some analysts commentary, some upgrades, some new analysts

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 14>coming in to say, you know, they're pretty positive on

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 14>the company's growth potential. From here, this forecast does kind

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 14>of you know, throw some cold water on that thesis.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 14>So we are seeing it pull back. This is one

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 14>that's really been sort of struggling. It's hard for these

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 14>smaller social media companies to compete with the metas of

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 14>the world, to compete with the other major digital advertising companies,

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 14>and this is just sort of another example of that.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 7>Ryan.

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 5>The big one November twentieth market clothes in VideA is that.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 7>Everything it certainly feels that way.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 14>I mean, so far this earning season, we've gotten some

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 14>pretty positive data points that would seem to augur well

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 14>for Nvidia.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 7>Notably all the big cappex.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 14>Spending plans from your megacaps, all that points to you know,

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 14>on going demand for AI chips, ongoing demand for you know,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 14>everything surrounding artificial intelligence. That's pretty positive, you know, for

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 14>Nvidia's growth outlook from here. Of course, this is you know,

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 14>one of the big gainers of the year. There's a

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 14>lot of concerns about, you know, how much more can

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 14>this company keep rising after it's done so well so

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 14>far in twenty twenty four, especially following you know, last

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 14>year's big advance. So I think there's a lot of

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 14>you know, there's reason for optimism here. There's certainly a

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 14>pretty strong sign so that the company's demand drivers are intact.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 14>But you know, is that going to be enough given

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 14>how much it's moved up, given some of these you know,

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 14>sort of mixed signals from other companies. You know, that's

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 14>that's really the uh, you know, the three trillion dollar question.

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 4>How much it's moved up is almost two hundred percent.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes today, Randalstelica, we thank you so much. Let's get

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 4>more markets perspective for you now, bring in Fiona Sincoto,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 4>who's senior analyst for City Index Financial Markets.

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 6>Boy, what a week.

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 4>Let's just focus in on, like really the people that

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 4>pick up the phone to post Wednesday and throughout the week.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Is it one of optimism around big tech and its

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 4>continuation of massive market cap increases.

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean the bottom line is yes, you know,

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>and I think that optimism was reflected in what we

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 2>saw happen in the stock market and what we've seen

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 2>happen in the stock market since Trump was declared victory

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of Trump one. So yes, you know, it seems big

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>tech seems to be a big favorite.

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 10>Once again. We're just sort of coming into the elections

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 10>and before.

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 2>The elections, there was this sense that sort of big

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 2>tech was a little bit sort of.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 10>You know, out of favor.

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 2>And we had seen the Nasdaq under performing, the S

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred and the Dow Jones, which we're

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>trading at record highs.

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 10>But we've seen that really turn around.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, Nasdaq's now trading at record highs as well.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 10>We've seen a phenomenal.

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 2>Rally in tech dog and I think there is a

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of optimism that this can continue. I mean, we've

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 2>seen you know, stocks such as Google, Tesla, We've i mean,

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Apple's underperforming a little bit compared to the rest, but

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of optimism surrounding it. And basically this

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>is on the back of expectations of a more favorable

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>regulatory environment.

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we've got other factors that are playing in.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 2>You've got the optimism surrounding end of year seasonality, which

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 2>tends to work in favor as well. Federal reserves still

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>cutting interest rates, albeit more gradually expected.

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 10>So you know, there is a positive outlook.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 2>There are some risks ahead, but that doesn't seem to

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>be the focus right now.

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Look, there are fundamental risks ahead on your side of

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 4>the Atlantic where the bo is cutting but also talking

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 4>about inflationary pressures going forward. You've got the similar echoes

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 4>here in the US. I just want to dig into

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Europe a little bit more though, because what was the

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 4>reaction when people are wanting to get invest in European

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 4>tech but it was a big week for the German

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 4>government as well for you, or is it all about

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.719
<v Speaker 4>us still over European over international flavor?

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 10>That does feel like the way that it is right now.

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they does feel like there is a lot

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>of uncertainty still in Europe. There seems to be concerns regarding,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 2>as you said, the political situation in Germany, fragile growth,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 2>just broadly speaking, the outlook doesn't feel the same. And

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 2>then on top of that, now with Trump sort of

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>taking the helm in the US, they're also concerns what

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that might mean as far as tariff's to concerns. So,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, geographically speaking, the US is.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 10>Now, without a doubt the preferred.

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Geographical location for investing, particularly in big tech.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 10>I think you can get.

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Some feed across into Europe, which is going to be beneficial,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think we're going to see the big positives

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 2>play out more in the US compared to other areas.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, is there a single name that clients, investors

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 5>have been most focused on this week?

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 7>People phoning you about.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 10>Tesla? What one? Yeah, because we've obviously we've had sort

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 10>of Trump and and Aneno.

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Muss cozying up recently, and that doesn't seem to be

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 2>ending any time soon. So, you know, Tesla has absolutely

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 2>outperformed and I think there are expectations that it will

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 2>continue to do so. Now it's a bit interesting the

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Tesla's story because obviously there is the expectation that actually

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump may reduce benefits for the evy industry within the US,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Tesla's already such a big, well established

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>company that actually that means it's going to benefit from

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 2>that disadvantages to its competitors. So that's just one of

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the reasons that we think that, yeah, that Tesla's going

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to be well. It has been very much on the

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 2>on the phones. It's been mentioned, our clients are looking

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 2>at it. It's seen volumes go through the roof, and

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the share price after after having a dodgy starts the

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 2>year is looking much better.

0:30:56.080 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 5>Is it even possible to model into an equity a

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 5>relationship between the world's richest man and President elect Donald Trump.

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 3>The good question, And I mean it's not something that

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 3>we would typically do or have had too much experience

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 3>doing previously, so, but I think it is.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Definitely something that needs to be taken into account when

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at tests evaluations going towards twenty twenty five.

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think that as we've seen, you know, it

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 2>has been reflected in the optimism in the share price.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I just reflect on Gary Cohne and Steve Manouchin

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 5>and somewhat analogous, but maybe they're not Furnising Kota, Senior

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 5>analyst of City Index Financial Markets. Happy Friday, and thank

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 5>you very much. Coming up on the show, it's been

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 5>a stellar week for the crypto community as Donald Trump's

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 5>victory paves the way for deregulation and potentially more innovation

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 5>in blockchain.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 7>We'll discuss neat Oh, look a bitcoin.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 5>This has been bog technology. This is bitcoin, and it's

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 5>trading at its highest level ever, just below seventy six

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 5>thousand US dollars. Be token, it's worth saying again out loud,

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 5>highest level ever.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 7>That's all bitcoin caroc.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 4>It is ed and there's a reason for it because

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 4>many feel that the next administration, and in d Congress,

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 4>we particularly crypto friendly Delta Blockchain Fund general partner KeVita Guptra,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 4>is with us, will it be What action do you

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 4>need to see first and foremost to make the new

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 4>record highs vindicated?

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 15>Hey, go line just the President elect and then of

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 15>course you have Elon Musk standing next to him, and

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 15>then you have all the BAC which has really donated

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 15>this time. This election has been one of the biggest

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 15>pack money going into a political motive and we literally

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.239
<v Speaker 15>saw such a positive return out of it. Everything is up.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 15>You have seen bitcoin all time high. Most of the

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 15>currencies are twenty to forty percent up, but look at

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 15>even dodgecoin. It has literally jumped up twenty one percent.

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 12>There.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 6>Look at some of your investments.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 4>You were like first checks into some significant DeFi projects.

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 4>One protocol, for example, Polygon, has had an epic time

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 4>because it, along with unisworp, was kind of singled out

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 4>by the SEC is potentially not living up to what

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 4>is or isn't a security. How important is a change

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 4>at the top of the SEC and clarity around regulation

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 4>going forward for projects and protocols such as.

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 15>This that is one of the main reason for a

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 15>big boom, Caroline, because we are seeing the whole DeFi ecosystem,

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 15>certainly uniswap RVE and all the DeFi protocols suddenly bumping

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 15>up their prices up to twenty to thirty five percent

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 15>jump because I think now everyone is expecting a change

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 15>in attitude with SEC with the new administration on the

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 15>him via President Trump has actually said in one of

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 15>his rallies that he's going to change the current SEC

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 15>commissioner and going to have much more pro friendly, pro

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 15>friendly agenda.

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 10>So everyone is expecting.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 15>Much more clarity on regulations and the feeling but I

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 15>kept on feeling within the crypto ecosystem is that it

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 15>is going to be Crypto for America and America for

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.240
<v Speaker 15>Crypto after a very very long time.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 7>Cove to prior to the election.

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Many hello, by the way, I was having some fun

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 5>with a bitcoin chart, but there are some serious things.

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 5>Like prior to the election, a lot of people came

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 5>in this program and said, well, look at the inflows

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 5>the ETF products, how significant that is. The harvening and

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 5>then sort of the vibe shift. Things were more positive

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 5>around the underlying technology. Well before we knew the outcome

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 5>of this election. I wonder how important those factors still

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 5>are whatever happens with this Trump presidency.

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely, just the day of the election, ED look at

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 15>the amount one point two eight billion dollars in flow

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 15>for bitcoin ETF, seventy eight million dollar in flow in

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 15>twenty four hours in eat in eat ETF. Now people

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 15>are expecting solana ETF near ETF. But at the same time,

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 15>a lot of IPOs companies which have been sitting quite

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 15>like encourage circle chain chain analysis, bunch of them, so

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 15>they are basically have been sitting Falcon ex just been

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 15>sitting and wading. And we had that conversation with you

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 15>like three months before the election, like are we going

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 15>to see a big IPO boom? Are we going to

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 15>see a lot of legal construct Are we going to

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 15>see a lot of ETFs coming in? And I feel

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 15>like over next six months it's just gold for the

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 15>crypto industry.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 5>Will Trump open the door to modernization of the financial system.

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 15>I think the most important thing which we have been

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 15>asking for over eight years is the clarity on regulations. Everybody,

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 15>every crypt founder across the world wants to work with

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 15>the government and sec in any regulatory body to have clarity,

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 15>and I feel like the biggest pathway which America can

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 15>set trend is to have that legal clarity and to

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 15>create a safe environment for retail customers and for technology

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 15>builders to work together. So I think that's going to

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 15>be the biggest reason for all these movement of prices

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 15>to be.

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 6>Up Delta blockchains. Cavita Gupta, really great to have your

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 6>take today. Thank you.

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Some TikTok staff and creators are hoping President elects Trump

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 5>may become the social media app savior as it faces

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 5>a potential ban come January. Bloombergs Alexandra Lavine joins US

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 5>now and there are many questions. I mean, President elect

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 5>Trump has hinted that he opposes an outright ban, but

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 5>there's a legislative action underway.

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 7>What have you written about?

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 16>Well, I think that really since Biden had signed this

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 16>law earlier this year that would effectively ban TikTok in

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 16>the new year, unless it's China based parent company by

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.479
<v Speaker 16>Dan sells it. The big question is the big question

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 16>has been is this actually going to happen? And I

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 16>think the feeling was really if Harris is elected that

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 16>she would sort of finish the job that Biden had started.

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 6>Now that Trump.

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 16>You know, now that Trump has been elected, he was

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 16>originally the president who tried to ban TikTok. Back in

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 16>twenty twenty, on the campaign trail, he did a stunning

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 16>one to eighty saying that now he doesn't believe in

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 16>a ban. And so I think the reason why there

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 16>is now even more uncertainty than there was prior is

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 16>because his rhet his rhetoric has completely changed, leaving folks

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 16>inside the company wondering whether he will in fact follow

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 16>through on what he has said.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 4>And then there's the closeness with Musk, who has X

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 4>so whether he sees TikTok his arrival, even though perhaps

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 4>he's a bit more pro China than others, can you

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 4>just give us the very next step?

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 6>What do we look for in the legal action? At least?

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 16>So there are a bunch of things that Trump could

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 16>try to do once he takes office to try to

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 16>reverse what has been done or try to stall it.

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 16>And I think though a lot of the things that

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 16>he could do would be really difficult, they'd be uphill challenges,

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 16>they'd be politically sort of unpopular amongst folks in his

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 16>own party. Who were really key to getting this law

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 16>to force a divestiture or to be on the platform

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 16>getting it across the finish line in the first place.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 16>He could come up with another plan that satisfies both

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 16>the company and the US government on national security. He

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 16>could look for an American buyer, and he's got people

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 16>who are certainly interested, who are political and political allies

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 16>of his worlds, yes, exactly. And he could also try

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 16>to get Congress to repeal or amend the law that

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 16>they had passed. I think, though, the most likely thing,

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 16>and the path of least resistance would be to let

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 16>this legal process that you've talked about play out on

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 16>its own. So we're expecting a decision in December that

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.839
<v Speaker 16>where the courts in DC will rule whether the law

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 16>that President Biden has signed should be overturned or whether

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 16>it should be upheld. And then it's likely that legal

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 16>proceeding following that that TikTok may well fight. We'll just

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 16>drag on well past the January deadline for when the

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 16>band would have gone into effect. So I think the

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 16>easiest thing for Trump would really be to sit back

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 16>watch the legal process play out, and that way the

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 16>legal process takes care of it without him having to

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 16>be super proactive, and he then does not have to

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 16>do a complete about face on his twenty twenty crusade

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 16>against TikTok when he initially tried to ban it, and

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 16>he would avoid then being seen as sort of softening

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 16>this tough on China stance. It's been super central to

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 16>his entire agenda.

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 4>Alexandra Levine, all things TikTok, We appreciate it. Meanwhile, like

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 4>traditional media executives maybe Sad's Love, for example, ever at

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 4>Water Brothers Discovery or Perry suk over a Next Star,

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 4>see a possibility for more mergers and indeed deregulation as

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump returns to the presidency. Neowberg's Kelsey Griffiths joins

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 4>us for more. So M and A gonna suddenly launch

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 4>through when it comes to at least the more local

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 4>news and TV side of the equation.

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, if the broadcast executives have their way, that's exactly right.

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 12>You know.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we've heard on Earning's calls over the last

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of days that these executives are really looking for

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a Trump administration that is more friendly to deal making

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of all kinds, whether that is in the broadcast space,

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>whether that's in the content space, whether that is permitting

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some mergers that you know, maybe wouldn't have even been

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>pitched under the Biden administration. So I think it has

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks like really watching this space, Chelsey.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 5>Let's think about a name like Nexstar, how its business

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 5>is set up, but it's got some history with government agencies.

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 5>What kind of happens to them under Trump? Two point zero?

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 6>That's right.

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So Nextstar is the largest owner of local broadcast stations

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in the country, and they've previously tried to buy up

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>more stations. They actually got in trouble with the FCC

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and had to pay a one point two million dollar

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fine earlier this year because as part of a merger agreement,

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they were supposed to divest some stations and they actually

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>effectively maintained control of a station in New York that

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>was at least what the FCC found and ended up

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>hitting them with that fine. So Nexstar has been looking

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>around for a while for other ways to expand sort

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of their broadcast empire, and they're hoping that under the

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, the Federal Communications Commission could actually get rid

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 1>of some of the broadcast ownership restrictions that have held

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>them back in the past, So some rule changes could help.

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 6>What about people who need the FCC or within it,

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 6>That's right.

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at an incoming Republican administration across the

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>government obviously, but that means big changes at the FCC.

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>My sources are telling me that we are very likely

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to see the senior Republican at the FCC, Brendan Carr,

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>be nominated as FCC chair and Car could, you know,

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 1>really makes some big changes for broadcast executives in doing

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>some irregulatory action that would benefit the broadcasters. He would

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>also have some pretty big effects on the rest of

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the media landscape.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Carr has aligned himself with Elon Musk. He has talked

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot about TikTok and rolling back its presence here

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.399
<v Speaker 1>in the US over national security concerns. So it could

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be a very different FCC under Car. So we're going

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to be watching that too.

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 5>Bloombo's Kelsey Griffiths, great reporting and happy Friday, Thank you

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 5>very much.

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 6>What a week? What a day? Or another edition of

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 6>Bloombo Tchnology.

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Yet, Yeah recap if there's any day to recaps today,

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 5>go on the podcast.

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 7>You know where the podcast is. Thank you to the

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 7>team in New York.

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 5>City, a historic week around the world, and the team

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 5>here in SF.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloombo Technology.