WEBVTT - Apple’s Ternus Era Starts the iPhone Duo

0:00:02.540 --> 0:00:07.110
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news.

0:00:13.050 --> 0:00:16.580
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech is live from the heart of Silicon Valley

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:22.780
<v Speaker 2>with Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, it's what everyone's talking about. Apple's first foldable smartphone,

0:00:27.020 --> 0:00:31.020
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone Duo, will break everything down from yesterday's product launch. Plus,

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.020
<v Speaker 2>the AI chip race is moving to inference. D-Matrix CEO

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.010
<v Speaker 2>Sid Sheff joins us on its new partnership with NVIDIA

0:00:37.229 --> 0:00:40.510
<v Speaker 2>and the battle to make AI cheaper and faster. And

0:00:40.570 --> 0:00:44.830
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk's Boring Co. reaches a $ 23 billion valuation after

0:00:44.970 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>its latest funding round. Let's get straight to our top story,

0:00:49.780 --> 0:00:50.980
<v Speaker 2>Apple's showstopper.

0:00:51.890 --> 0:00:55.820
<v Speaker 3>iPhone Duo brings an entirely new design while preserving everything

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you love and expect from iPhone. It gives you the

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.620
<v Speaker 3>largest display ever on an iPhone while still fitting easily

0:01:02.660 --> 0:01:07.310
<v Speaker 3>in your pocket. It reflects extraordinarily complex engineering yet feels

0:01:07.510 --> 0:01:11.310
<v Speaker 3>effortless to use. And it makes new experiences possible.

0:01:12.730 --> 0:01:15.429
<v Speaker 2>That was Apple CEO John Turner making his first official

0:01:15.490 --> 0:01:18.150
<v Speaker 2>keynote in the top seat, turning heads with the new

0:01:18.230 --> 0:01:22.270
<v Speaker 2>foldable iPhone Duo. Shares really accelerating gains 90 minutes into

0:01:22.310 --> 0:01:25.690
<v Speaker 2>the session, up 2.5% now. What's interesting is they were

0:01:25.709 --> 0:01:28.130
<v Speaker 2>basically flat, bang in line with the average of an

0:01:28.290 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>iPhone launch day market performance that we've seen going back

0:01:31.750 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 2>at least a decade. Well, everyone's woken up and said,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.860
<v Speaker 2>this is a big deal. Let's discuss. And who better

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.220
<v Speaker 2>to discuss it with than Mark Gurman, who leads our

0:01:39.260 --> 0:01:42.260
<v Speaker 2>Apple coverage and basically broke most of the details prior

0:01:42.300 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to yesterday's event anyway. Start with the basics, iPhone Duo.

0:01:46.940 --> 0:01:49.260
<v Speaker 2>We were spot on on the price. That's probably the

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>big news headline, right? Just under $ 2, 000. But the specs

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>as well. Your first impressions and the most notable points

0:01:56.970 --> 0:01:57.670
<v Speaker 2>of the technology.

0:01:59.140 --> 0:02:02.190
<v Speaker 4>My first impression is that this device makes every foldable

0:02:02.220 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 4>phone from Samsung, from Google, from Huawei, anyone else before it,

0:02:06.090 --> 0:02:08.230
<v Speaker 4>look like a toy, look like a prototype, look like

0:02:08.270 --> 0:02:11.049
<v Speaker 4>a beta test, basically, because the fit and finish we're

0:02:11.090 --> 0:02:15.010
<v Speaker 4>seeing here is new to the foldable industry. The way

0:02:15.050 --> 0:02:18.769
<v Speaker 4>that they are putting, they call it ceramic inserts into

0:02:18.810 --> 0:02:21.950
<v Speaker 4>the cellular antenna cutouts, so when you go and try

0:02:21.990 --> 0:02:24.389
<v Speaker 4>to bend the phone and break it, people who do that,

0:02:24.690 --> 0:02:27.290
<v Speaker 4>it's not gonna bend in half. The way they put

0:02:27.430 --> 0:02:31.410
<v Speaker 4>a special cover glass over the flexible display to hide

0:02:31.470 --> 0:02:33.769
<v Speaker 4>the crease as much as possible and make it so

0:02:33.790 --> 0:02:36.790
<v Speaker 4>your fingernails don't put cuts in the screen. The fact

0:02:36.810 --> 0:02:40.330
<v Speaker 4>that they're using titanium around the edges to make the

0:02:40.350 --> 0:02:44.010
<v Speaker 4>phone more durable, the fact that it's water and dust resistant, right?

0:02:44.070 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 4>They've hit every checkbox here for it to feel like

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.419
<v Speaker 4>a normal iPhone, but to also be foldable. This really

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 4>has very few compromises other than the lack of the

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.140
<v Speaker 4>telephoto camera on the back and battery life to some extent.

0:02:59.190 --> 0:03:01.550
<v Speaker 2>It was amazing to get hands on with it yesterday. And,

0:03:01.690 --> 0:03:05.170
<v Speaker 2>you know, everyone's sort of first reaction is to say

0:03:05.210 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>there's no crease, there's no margin, there's no seam in

0:03:08.470 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the middle, not one that the naked eye can see.

0:03:10.940 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 2>I do want to talk about the pricing, Mark. You

0:03:13.180 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>said this would be $ 2, 000. It was in the end $ 1, 999.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.890
<v Speaker 2>To what extent has Apple eaten some cost in the

0:03:21.950 --> 0:03:24.989
<v Speaker 2>environment they're operating in? But also, you know, if you

0:03:25.010 --> 0:03:28.460
<v Speaker 2>look at the higher tiers of storage, clearly there are

0:03:28.740 --> 0:03:30.130
<v Speaker 2>some handsets out there up beyond $ 3, 000 too.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 4>So they're eating costs for sure because the memory shortage,

0:03:36.340 --> 0:03:39.300
<v Speaker 4>you know, really is having an impact on so many companies,

0:03:39.340 --> 0:03:43.470
<v Speaker 4>including Apple, delaying products, paying more for memory, needing to

0:03:43.510 --> 0:03:46.870
<v Speaker 4>charge customers more. But they've offset it in two key ways.

0:03:47.210 --> 0:03:49.770
<v Speaker 4>One is on the storage tiers. So you can get

0:03:49.810 --> 0:03:53.370
<v Speaker 4>the 256 gigabytes for that $ 2, 000 price point. You can

0:03:53.390 --> 0:03:56.930
<v Speaker 4>get 512 for the $ 2, 200 price point. But if you

0:03:56.970 --> 0:03:58.590
<v Speaker 4>want to go to the higher tiers, you're talking 2,600

0:03:58.590 --> 0:03:59.490
<v Speaker 4>for a terabyte and then 3,200 for.

0:04:01.610 --> 0:04:02.620
<v Speaker 2>For two terabytes.

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>So they're charging massive premiums on that storage. And their

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.580
<v Speaker 4>thinking is that most people probably aren't going to get

0:04:09.620 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 4>the base level version. This is an early adopter product

0:04:12.460 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 4>for all intents and purposes. And that group of people

0:04:14.900 --> 0:04:17.820
<v Speaker 4>is going to go for higher storage tiers. So they

0:04:17.860 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 4>are going to get their margin on that. The other

0:04:20.100 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 4>thing they've done is they've really jacked up pricing on

0:04:23.020 --> 0:04:28.090
<v Speaker 4>the international customers. So in the US, right, the $ 2, 000

0:04:26.810 --> 0:04:28.750
<v Speaker 4>price point globally is going to be the one everyone's

0:04:28.790 --> 0:04:32.270
<v Speaker 4>talking about. But you go internationally, the prices in Canada,

0:04:32.310 --> 0:04:36.070
<v Speaker 4>the price in Australia, the price in Asia, really sky high.

0:04:36.230 --> 0:04:38.529
<v Speaker 4>And if you do some of the conversions, the prices

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 4>in those other countries, it's not a one-to-one conversion for

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:41.779
<v Speaker 4>what the U.S.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Price is.

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.060
<v Speaker 4>So, for instance, in Australia, there's an $ 800 Australian dollar

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.810
<v Speaker 4>premium on top of the converted rate. So that's how

0:04:50.830 --> 0:04:52.670
<v Speaker 4>they're making up for that shortfall.

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Mark, to me, John Ternus tried to do two things

0:04:56.460 --> 0:05:00.289
<v Speaker 2>with his first formal keynote as CEO. Talk about the

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.750
<v Speaker 2>smartphone being the device for the AI era, but also

0:05:03.830 --> 0:05:06.409
<v Speaker 2>he put a lot of emphasis on your iPhone or

0:05:06.430 --> 0:05:09.230
<v Speaker 2>whichever OS you're using knows you. It has your data.

0:05:09.250 --> 0:05:11.750
<v Speaker 2>It has your context. What did you make of that

0:05:11.810 --> 0:05:16.130
<v Speaker 2>messaging and Mr. Ternus's first full iPhone day event?

0:05:17.370 --> 0:05:19.790
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, for the first time, Apple came out

0:05:19.930 --> 0:05:24.110
<v Speaker 4>and showcased a real AI strategy. Whether it's an AI

0:05:24.150 --> 0:05:27.300
<v Speaker 4>strategy that I agree with, that you agree with, anyone

0:05:27.330 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>agrees with, it doesn't matter. At least they have a

0:05:30.260 --> 0:05:34.100
<v Speaker 4>strategy now. And it's interesting they haven't really showcased a

0:05:34.140 --> 0:05:38.220
<v Speaker 4>coherent strategy until now. He calls it the intelligent personal hub,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 4>the phone being the center of everything for artificial intelligence.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 4>It hearkens back to their previous intelligent hubs That all

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 4>started with the Mac. Steve Jobs introduced the Mac as

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 4>sort of the center of everything, and you have all

0:05:51.580 --> 0:05:53.330
<v Speaker 4>those peripherals around it.

0:05:53.700 --> 0:05:57.050
<v Speaker 2>The iPod, you name it. Then came iCloud.

0:05:57.510 --> 0:06:00.049
<v Speaker 4>iCloud is the center of everything, and the Mac, the iPad,

0:06:00.089 --> 0:06:03.490
<v Speaker 4>the phone, those are all peripherals around the cloud. Now,

0:06:03.610 --> 0:06:05.930
<v Speaker 4>the center of everything is sort of that intelligent hub

0:06:06.330 --> 0:06:08.990
<v Speaker 4>and the iPhone with everything built around that, whether it's

0:06:09.010 --> 0:06:11.890
<v Speaker 4>your iPad, your Mac, your AirPods, your Apple Watch, and

0:06:11.910 --> 0:06:13.969
<v Speaker 4>all the AI wearables are going to have in the future.

0:06:14.290 --> 0:06:16.710
<v Speaker 4>It's all built around AI in the phone. So it's

0:06:16.730 --> 0:06:19.750
<v Speaker 4>a pretty interesting strategy. I do think it's going to

0:06:19.830 --> 0:06:23.510
<v Speaker 4>work to some extent, but obviously it's still early innings

0:06:23.550 --> 0:06:26.150
<v Speaker 4>for their AI and there's more to come and there's

0:06:26.190 --> 0:06:26.570
<v Speaker 4>more to do.

0:06:27.750 --> 0:06:30.110
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who leads our coverage of Apple, but

0:06:30.190 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>also reported so deeply on iPhone Duo, including what its

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 2>name would be prior to its announcement yesterday. Let's stick

0:06:37.300 --> 0:06:38.980
<v Speaker 2>with Apple, but also we're going to talk more about

0:06:39.300 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 2>technology markets. Nuveen's Chief Investment Officer, Sarah Malik, joins us now. Actually,

0:06:43.740 --> 0:06:46.490
<v Speaker 2>the Apple move today is really interesting, up 2.5%. If

0:06:46.500 --> 0:06:48.150
<v Speaker 2>you go back and look at sort of the average

0:06:48.170 --> 0:06:51.169
<v Speaker 2>performance on the day itself of an iPhone event and

0:06:51.230 --> 0:06:54.290
<v Speaker 2>next day, it doesn't often get the momentum we're seeing

0:06:54.330 --> 0:06:57.750
<v Speaker 2>right now. I think you probably want to talk to

0:06:57.770 --> 0:06:59.810
<v Speaker 2>what Mark was just talking about in terms of Apple

0:06:59.830 --> 0:07:02.779
<v Speaker 2>having an AI strategy. That's been a bearing on the stock, Sarah.

0:07:02.820 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Your thoughts, please. Well, definitely.

0:07:05.100 --> 0:07:07.780
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of consumer interest and excitement over the

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.060
<v Speaker 5>new foldable phone. But there's two issues that investors are

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.140
<v Speaker 5>thinking about around Apple and this new phone. So, first

0:07:14.180 --> 0:07:18.030
<v Speaker 5>of all, with the phone, the $ 2, 000 price point or

0:07:18.030 --> 0:07:20.830
<v Speaker 5>$ 19. 99 may lead to a more modest addressable market from

0:07:20.850 --> 0:07:24.420
<v Speaker 5>the start. And we'll grow from there. But secondarily, is

0:07:24.460 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 5>this question around AI? The new CEO has a hardware

0:07:27.260 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 5>background and Apple's very strong on hardware. But what investors

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.460
<v Speaker 5>want to know is, can Apple become more competitive in AI?

0:07:33.740 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 5>They have somewhat lagged their peers in terms of their

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 5>push into AI. So really, that is the key question

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.300
<v Speaker 5>for investors and Apple going forward. Is this AI strategy

0:07:42.340 --> 0:07:45.710
<v Speaker 5>going to turn into something that has monetization for the company?

0:07:45.750 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Of course, this is a wait and see. So happy

0:07:47.990 --> 0:07:50.010
<v Speaker 5>to see the stock up based on the excitement over

0:07:50.030 --> 0:07:51.990
<v Speaker 5>a new phone. But I think the AI question is

0:07:52.030 --> 0:07:54.370
<v Speaker 5>the medium term question for whether the stock.

0:07:54.230 --> 0:07:55.030
<v Speaker 6>Outperforms or not.

0:07:56.010 --> 0:07:58.450
<v Speaker 2>There is lots happening in financial markets right now. You

0:07:58.470 --> 0:08:01.710
<v Speaker 2>look at oil, Brent, $ 105 a barrel. Yields are higher.

0:08:01.810 --> 0:08:05.230
<v Speaker 2>Technology stocks are lower. Chip stocks are underperforming. And there

0:08:05.250 --> 0:08:08.460
<v Speaker 2>are lots of pieces of economic data and macro events

0:08:08.500 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that are driving this market. For you this morning, what's

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:12.619
<v Speaker 2>going on? What's happening?

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 5>It is all about higher rates and higher rates are

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.260
<v Speaker 5>tougher for long duration technology stocks. And really, even though

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 5>we had a very strong second quarter earnings season driven

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:27.610
<v Speaker 5>by the tech sector, it's higher oil price prices, potentially

0:08:27.630 --> 0:08:31.250
<v Speaker 5>higher rates at the FOMC meeting next week, a rate

0:08:31.270 --> 0:08:33.470
<v Speaker 5>hike out of the ECB. All of that is causing

0:08:33.510 --> 0:08:37.050
<v Speaker 5>this turmoil for the markets. The biggest data point we're

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 5>going to see before the FOMC meets next week is CPI,

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.260
<v Speaker 5>which comes out tomorrow. If that number comes out hot,

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 5>and by that I mean above 0.3% on the plus

0:08:47.140 --> 0:08:49.380
<v Speaker 5>side month over month, I think you're going to lock

0:08:49.420 --> 0:08:51.340
<v Speaker 5>in a hike for next week. If it comes in soft,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.210
<v Speaker 5>under 0.2% month over month, that might cause the Fed

0:08:55.470 --> 0:08:58.870
<v Speaker 5>to pause. But either way, we're seeing long-term treasury yields

0:08:59.150 --> 0:09:02.450
<v Speaker 5>at up over 5%, oil prices over 105. That is

0:09:02.470 --> 0:09:04.730
<v Speaker 5>very concerning for the markets. And there is no end

0:09:04.790 --> 0:09:07.290
<v Speaker 5>in sight at this point for the geopolitical issues and

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:07.689
<v Speaker 5>the war.

0:09:07.580 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>In the Middle East.

0:09:08.220 --> 0:09:10.540
<v Speaker 5>So I think this turmoil for the markets is going

0:09:10.580 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 5>to continue because it's hard to see the path for

0:09:13.900 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 5>yields to start to decline from here, especially with the

0:09:15.980 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 5>Fed either pausing or hiking rates next week.

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>For me, Sarah, I'm going to go back to Apple, actually,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.380
<v Speaker 2>because if you think about what the market, at least

0:09:23.420 --> 0:09:26.849
<v Speaker 2>on the equity side, is doing this morning, Apple's massively

0:09:26.910 --> 0:09:30.510
<v Speaker 2>outperforming from a points perspective at the index level. Would

0:09:30.530 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>that indicate to you that investors are genuinely cheering what

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.020
<v Speaker 2>was outlined by the company yesterday?

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.740
<v Speaker 5>The positive here for Apple and out of the Goldman

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.420
<v Speaker 5>Sachs Technology Conference that's happening this week is we are

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 5>hearing positive data points on monetization of artificial intelligence, which

0:09:46.980 --> 0:09:49.570
<v Speaker 5>is what everybody has been waiting for. Today, what you're

0:09:49.590 --> 0:09:53.530
<v Speaker 5>seeing for Apple is great. It's fundamentals outperforming the macro issue.

0:09:53.550 --> 0:09:56.850
<v Speaker 5>So overall for the markets, the macro overhang of higher

0:09:56.990 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 5>oil prices and potential spark of inflation because of that

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.380
<v Speaker 5>is definitely a cloud over the markets. But Apple's new

0:10:03.420 --> 0:10:07.180
<v Speaker 5>product launch, it's exciting. It's a new style of phone.

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.020
<v Speaker 5>It is at a higher price point, but that new

0:10:09.059 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 5>style of phone can start a new product cycle for Apple.

0:10:12.100 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 5>And that's what people are excited about. But as I mentioned,

0:10:14.660 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 5>there is a key question for Apple, which is how

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.860
<v Speaker 5>are they going to gain more traction in in AI

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.140
<v Speaker 5>with their phones. And it's great to see a strategy.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.109
<v Speaker 5>And now we'd like to see the traction and the

0:10:24.150 --> 0:10:25.209
<v Speaker 5>monetization from that.

0:10:26.390 --> 0:10:29.209
<v Speaker 2>We are kind of late in a technology earnings cycle

0:10:29.230 --> 0:10:33.190
<v Speaker 2>where they keep coming. Oracle and Adobe's after the bell.

0:10:33.990 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>One software name, one infrastructure name with a software element.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.060
<v Speaker 2>How much of importance do investors continue to assign the

0:10:41.100 --> 0:10:43.340
<v Speaker 2>data points coming out of earnings in terms of where

0:10:43.380 --> 0:10:44.500
<v Speaker 2>we are in the cycle right now?

0:10:45.580 --> 0:10:49.170
<v Speaker 5>Well, every technology data point counts because technology earnings are

0:10:49.230 --> 0:10:52.330
<v Speaker 5>what are leading overall earnings growth, especially for the S &amp;

0:10:52.050 --> 0:10:54.980
<v Speaker 5>P 500 and in the U.S. So Oracle and Adobe

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 5>will be important. We may get some commentary around hyperscalers

0:10:59.740 --> 0:11:03.750
<v Speaker 5>and CapEx and whether we're seeing any monetization. from AI investments,

0:11:03.830 --> 0:11:05.630
<v Speaker 5>all of that's going to be important. But I think

0:11:05.650 --> 0:11:08.290
<v Speaker 5>the issue is with an FOMC meeting next week and

0:11:08.330 --> 0:11:11.410
<v Speaker 5>CPI data coming out tomorrow, people are more focused right

0:11:11.470 --> 0:11:14.790
<v Speaker 5>now on what do these higher oil prices mean for inflation?

0:11:15.130 --> 0:11:17.830
<v Speaker 5>What does it mean for the US economy? As an example,

0:11:18.130 --> 0:11:21.709
<v Speaker 5>we did get very strong payrolls last week, but if

0:11:22.090 --> 0:11:24.830
<v Speaker 5>inflation stays high and we become worried that oil prices

0:11:24.850 --> 0:11:27.550
<v Speaker 5>will cause the economy to slow, then we could start

0:11:27.590 --> 0:11:30.130
<v Speaker 5>talking about stagflation. I think all of that for now

0:11:30.620 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 5>is going to be a bigger issue for the markets

0:11:32.970 --> 0:11:35.660
<v Speaker 5>than a couple of more incremental technology earnings data points.

0:11:36.179 --> 0:11:38.940
<v Speaker 2>We've covered an iPhone day. We covered technology earnings. We

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.350
<v Speaker 2>covered macros. We covered higher rates. We covered oil. We

0:11:42.370 --> 0:11:44.390
<v Speaker 2>covered inflation and then the Fed meeting next week. That's

0:11:44.450 --> 0:11:47.610
<v Speaker 2>pretty good going. Nuveen Chief Investments Officer Sarah Malik back

0:11:47.650 --> 0:11:51.250
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Tech. Thank you very much. Coming up, D-Matrix

0:11:51.410 --> 0:11:55.620
<v Speaker 2>is plugging into NVIDIA's AI ecosystem. CEO Sid Sheff joins

0:11:55.700 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 2>us on the new partnership and why the next big

0:11:58.260 --> 0:12:01.700
<v Speaker 2>battle in AI chips is inference. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:12:09.030 --> 0:12:12.770
<v Speaker 2>TSMC reported better than expected sales in August, but its

0:12:12.860 --> 0:12:16.179
<v Speaker 2>US-listed shares are under pressure. As investors and analysts start

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>to worry the company doesn't have enough supply to meet

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.780
<v Speaker 2>robust demand, let's discuss with Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom. I mean,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>this is the dynamic of industry right now. In the

0:12:24.460 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 2>AI context, demand for lead-edge chips is running ahead of

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.740
<v Speaker 2>the industry's ability to supply. What did TSMC say?

0:12:32.260 --> 0:12:34.780
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the numbers are pretty staggering. I think we're familiar

0:12:34.830 --> 0:12:37.310
<v Speaker 7>with the trend, but the numbers are quite staggering here.

0:12:37.350 --> 0:12:41.190
<v Speaker 7>So First of all, TSMC reported a 53% rise in

0:12:41.250 --> 0:12:44.770
<v Speaker 7>revenue for August. Taiwan does this thing where they have

0:12:44.830 --> 0:12:47.150
<v Speaker 7>companies report every month. So we get a sense of

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 7>how the quarter is going for them. That's above the

0:12:50.210 --> 0:12:53.189
<v Speaker 7>expectations that analysts have for the company to boost revenues

0:12:53.250 --> 0:12:56.290
<v Speaker 7>about 47% for the quarter. We had an interview with

0:12:56.330 --> 0:12:58.630
<v Speaker 7>the COO though, Cliff Ho, and he talked to us

0:12:58.690 --> 0:13:01.770
<v Speaker 7>a bit about the constraints that they've got on supply

0:13:01.830 --> 0:13:04.270
<v Speaker 7>right now. They say that typically in a typical year,

0:13:04.590 --> 0:13:07.790
<v Speaker 7>they'd be building four or five fabs someplace. Right now

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.510
<v Speaker 7>they're trying to build 20 fabs. They're so far behind

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 7>on demand here that they just can't keep up. So

0:13:12.860 --> 0:13:14.820
<v Speaker 7>they're trying to build fabs as quickly as they can.

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 7>Of course, fabs takes years to build. They're very complicated.

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.910
<v Speaker 7>They're very expensive. TSMC is the best in the world

0:13:21.010 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 7>at building them, but they're having a hard time getting

0:13:23.740 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 7>them built in as quick of a manner as they

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 7>would like right now. And partly it's what you were

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.220
<v Speaker 7>talking about before. Apple certainly wants more advanced chips, especially

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.490
<v Speaker 7>Nvidia in the AI ecosystem wants to be able to

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.330
<v Speaker 7>get more capacity online as soon as they possibly.

0:13:37.910 --> 0:13:40.510
<v Speaker 2>Can get it. That's on the manufacturing side. On the

0:13:40.590 --> 0:13:43.589
<v Speaker 2>fabless chip maker side, MediaTek, a company we've been covering

0:13:43.610 --> 0:13:46.870
<v Speaker 2>very closely on the show recently, out with very strong numbers,

0:13:46.929 --> 0:13:48.270
<v Speaker 2>a lot of momentum for their chips.

0:13:49.530 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, you alluded to this earlier that we've

0:13:52.860 --> 0:13:55.260
<v Speaker 7>had MediaTek CEO on the show talking about this new

0:13:55.300 --> 0:13:59.610
<v Speaker 7>joint venture that they've got with NVIDIA in particular. MediaTek

0:14:00.050 --> 0:14:03.130
<v Speaker 7>is also growing very quickly. They reported strong revenue growth

0:14:03.170 --> 0:14:06.630
<v Speaker 7>of 44%. They historically have done very well on the

0:14:06.650 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 7>smartphone market. Now they're moving into these adjacent markets, especially

0:14:10.050 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 7>in AI services. They've struck this deal with NVIDIA where

0:14:13.500 --> 0:14:17.060
<v Speaker 7>they want to be able to incorporate their technology in

0:14:17.100 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 7>with NVIDIA's technology. They want to also move into being

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.740
<v Speaker 7>able to make chips that will work in laptops and

0:14:22.780 --> 0:14:26.250
<v Speaker 7>computers and bring more AI capabilities there too. So the

0:14:26.290 --> 0:14:28.750
<v Speaker 7>company is growing quite strong at this point. They also

0:14:28.830 --> 0:14:29.970
<v Speaker 7>are trying to keep up with demand.

0:14:31.390 --> 0:14:34.710
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom, who leads our coverage of Asian technology companies.

0:14:34.730 --> 0:14:37.460
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much indeed. NVIDIA is confronting a world

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>of more custom chips for more players and growth in

0:14:40.900 --> 0:14:44.490
<v Speaker 2>specialized inference systems. Its response has been embrace it.

0:14:45.310 --> 0:14:47.930
<v Speaker 8>There's no question NVIDIA's footprint is the largest. There's no

0:14:47.970 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 8>question we're growing share in closed models and open models.

0:14:53.100 --> 0:14:58.260
<v Speaker 8>We're growing share across the entire AI opportunity. And so

0:14:58.500 --> 0:15:04.140
<v Speaker 8>we're not intimidated by this. We're, in fact, welcoming it

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.460
<v Speaker 8>and opening our platform so that they could connect XPUs

0:15:07.500 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 8>into it.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.060
<v Speaker 2>So that was NVIDIA CEO Jensen Wang speaking to me

0:15:11.180 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>after the deal with MediaTek on XPUs last month. Today,

0:15:14.980 --> 0:15:18.150
<v Speaker 2>startup D-Matrix is the latest to partner with NVIDIA to

0:15:18.170 --> 0:15:22.690
<v Speaker 2>plug its specialized inference XPUs into NVIDIA's platforms, targeting ultra-low

0:15:22.730 --> 0:15:27.620
<v Speaker 2>latency AI workloads, where its tech works alongside NVIDIA GPUs

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.590
<v Speaker 2>using NVLink fusions. Dematrix CEO Sid Shash joins us now.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.380
<v Speaker 2>Very interesting. Why is it a benefit to you to

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 2>be able to plug into a largely NVIDIA-based architecture? Yes.

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 9>First of all, Ed, I'm a fan of the show,

0:15:42.580 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 9>so thanks for having me on it. This is a

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:51.550
<v Speaker 9>landmark announcement for Dematrix, obviously, and the biggest reason we

0:15:51.670 --> 0:15:54.110
<v Speaker 9>embarked on this partnership with NVIDIA, and we've been working

0:15:54.170 --> 0:15:58.180
<v Speaker 9>on this for six-plus months with them, is exactly what

0:15:58.220 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 9>Jensen said in his comments earlier. This is probably, most certainly,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.660
<v Speaker 9>the largest deployed infrastructure base for AI in the world.

0:16:08.660 --> 0:16:09.460
<v Speaker 1>It is in every cloud.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 9>NVIDIA hardware is in every cloud, every country, pretty much

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.910
<v Speaker 9>every data center in the world. At D-Matrix, we have

0:16:16.930 --> 0:16:20.510
<v Speaker 9>a very unique memory-centric inference computing technology. We have been

0:16:21.010 --> 0:16:24.350
<v Speaker 9>working on this for seven plus years, really targeted for

0:16:24.450 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 9>ultra-low latency inference. And ultra low latency inference computing just

0:16:30.010 --> 0:16:33.060
<v Speaker 9>took off in a massive way in the last 12 months,

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.620
<v Speaker 9>post GPT Codecs and Cloud Code and with the arrival

0:16:36.660 --> 0:16:40.340
<v Speaker 9>of agentic coding, everyone is looking for how they can

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.790
<v Speaker 9>quickly get access to low latency compute so that they

0:16:43.810 --> 0:16:46.610
<v Speaker 9>can really interact with these agentic coding tools.

0:16:46.770 --> 0:16:48.220
<v Speaker 1>And that's where D-Matrix comes in.

0:16:49.210 --> 0:16:52.410
<v Speaker 9>And this partnership will really allow us to take our

0:16:52.430 --> 0:16:55.770
<v Speaker 9>products to market very rapidly with the NVIDIA partnership.

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:02.260
<v Speaker 2>Sid, in Mediatek's case, NVIDIA made a very significant investment

0:17:02.620 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 2>through the purchase of convertible notes. Under your arrangement with NVIDIA,

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.350
<v Speaker 2>are they making an equity or any other kind of

0:17:09.420 --> 0:17:12.550
<v Speaker 2>investment into D-Matrix to help you get moving?

0:17:13.570 --> 0:17:15.770
<v Speaker 9>At this point, Ted, I couldn't comment on the investment

0:17:15.810 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 9>piece specifically, but look, this is a partnership that is

0:17:20.300 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 9>very strategic to NVIDIA. And they are putting a lot

0:17:24.340 --> 0:17:30.330
<v Speaker 9>of resources, engineering resources. There is obviously a lot of

0:17:30.530 --> 0:17:33.170
<v Speaker 9>work the two teams have been doing for six plus months.

0:17:34.210 --> 0:17:37.390
<v Speaker 9>And our first goal is to really make sure that

0:17:37.430 --> 0:17:40.130
<v Speaker 9>the Raptor XPU that is going to be integrated into

0:17:40.170 --> 0:17:43.020
<v Speaker 9>the NVIDIA ecosystem is going to be ready to come

0:17:43.060 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 9>to market in about 12 months. So the biggest opportunity

0:17:47.100 --> 0:17:50.460
<v Speaker 9>here is really about getting that product in customers' hands

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.050
<v Speaker 9>because we've got a lot of customer pull for that

0:17:53.170 --> 0:17:55.050
<v Speaker 9>specific product in the NVIDIA ecosystem.

0:17:55.650 --> 0:17:57.950
<v Speaker 2>So on your newest chip or your newest platform, I

0:17:57.990 --> 0:18:00.950
<v Speaker 2>should say, Is there any data point you can give

0:18:00.990 --> 0:18:04.109
<v Speaker 2>me on how the partnership with NVIDIA tangibly allows you

0:18:04.130 --> 0:18:06.750
<v Speaker 2>to move faster? In other words, will this deploy into

0:18:06.790 --> 0:18:09.550
<v Speaker 2>the real world quicker than it otherwise would had you

0:18:09.609 --> 0:18:12.070
<v Speaker 2>not struck a deal with NVIDIA for NVLink Fusion?

0:18:12.790 --> 0:18:18.010
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, 100%. Look, the Raptor XPU, which is the specific

0:18:18.109 --> 0:18:22.189
<v Speaker 9>XPU that's in partnership with NVIDIA and will be launched

0:18:22.290 --> 0:18:24.570
<v Speaker 9>as part of this partnership first, is going to be

0:18:24.590 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 9>the world's first 3D-stacked DRAM XPU, right? And just let

0:18:30.780 --> 0:18:33.419
<v Speaker 9>me touch upon why that is so important. It is

0:18:33.460 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 9>important because memory is really the biggest bottleneck for AI

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:38.139
<v Speaker 9>right now.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:39.060
<v Speaker 1>And we all know that.

0:18:39.460 --> 0:18:41.850
<v Speaker 9>And what we have done is instead of using HBM,

0:18:41.869 --> 0:18:45.010
<v Speaker 9>we don't use any HBM at D-Matrix. What we have

0:18:45.050 --> 0:18:48.629
<v Speaker 9>done is we have taken DRAM and found a way

0:18:49.190 --> 0:18:51.870
<v Speaker 9>to package it directly.

0:18:51.510 --> 0:18:52.370
<v Speaker 1>With the compute.

0:18:53.270 --> 0:18:56.230
<v Speaker 9>And it is 3D stacked exactly like you just saw

0:18:56.270 --> 0:19:00.870
<v Speaker 9>in the picture there. And that allows for the architecture

0:19:00.910 --> 0:19:03.350
<v Speaker 9>to punch through the memory wall, which is really the

0:19:03.490 --> 0:19:07.310
<v Speaker 9>biggest bottleneck in AI today in terms of addressing latency,

0:19:07.410 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 9>addressing energy efficiency, addressing cost. And we have found a recipe.

0:19:11.980 --> 0:19:13.550
<v Speaker 9>We have cracked the code on how to do it.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 9>And we'll be the first to bring that solution to market.

0:19:16.220 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 9>So there is tremendous customer pull for that product right

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 9>now because no other company is going to be within

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 9>a two-year window of getting access to that technology. And

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.570
<v Speaker 9>this NVIDIA partnership will truly allow us to take that

0:19:28.590 --> 0:19:31.250
<v Speaker 9>to market the fastest because there is already a deployed

0:19:31.290 --> 0:19:33.270
<v Speaker 9>base of all that infrastructure and all the data centers.

0:19:33.310 --> 0:19:35.170
<v Speaker 9>And we don't want to reinvent that part of the wheel.

0:19:35.650 --> 0:19:37.889
<v Speaker 9>We'd much rather just ride on the NVIDIA ecosystem and

0:19:37.930 --> 0:19:40.129
<v Speaker 9>get the product to our customers as soon as possible.

0:19:40.790 --> 0:19:42.650
<v Speaker 2>So, Sid, we're short of time here. Who are those

0:19:42.690 --> 0:19:45.010
<v Speaker 2>new customers? If I look at your cap table, there's

0:19:45.050 --> 0:19:47.270
<v Speaker 2>lots of sovereign wealth funds on there who have lots

0:19:47.310 --> 0:19:49.930
<v Speaker 2>of national AI projects. We just have 30 seconds.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yes.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 9>It's a combination, Ed, and we'll be announcing these customers.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 9>Stay tuned. It is a combination of hyperscalers, frontier labs, sovereigns,

0:19:58.220 --> 0:20:00.660
<v Speaker 9>inference clouds, high-frequency traders.

0:20:01.740 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned.

0:20:02.180 --> 0:20:04.290
<v Speaker 9>We're going to be announcing these customers in pretty short order.

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.060
<v Speaker 2>Sid Sheff of D-Matrix, thank you so much for your time.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.510
<v Speaker 2>There's another important story. As NVIDIA expands its ties with

0:20:11.550 --> 0:20:15.450
<v Speaker 2>specialized AI chip makers, one of those deals is drawing scrutiny.

0:20:15.609 --> 0:20:20.390
<v Speaker 2>The Justice Department is investigating NVIDIA's $ 20 billion tie-up with

0:20:20.470 --> 0:20:24.229
<v Speaker 2>AI inference startup GROK and whether it was structured to

0:20:24.310 --> 0:20:29.110
<v Speaker 2>avoid an antitrust review, according to sources. Grok remained independent,

0:20:29.230 --> 0:20:32.590
<v Speaker 2>but its CEO and COO moved to NVIDIA as a

0:20:32.609 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 2>part of the deal. US lawmakers have called the arrangement

0:20:35.540 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>a takeover that stifled competition. NVIDIA representatives and a DOJ

0:20:40.540 --> 0:20:43.859
<v Speaker 2>spokesperson declined to comment. A representative for Grok did not

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:45.940
<v Speaker 2>respond to requests for comment.

0:20:47.540 --> 0:20:49.750
<v Speaker 10>It's time now for Talking Tech. I'm Yahaira Ana. And

0:20:49.830 --> 0:20:53.190
<v Speaker 10>first up, OpenAI is ending its deal for government agencies

0:20:53.250 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 10>to use its models for $ 1 per year. That's according

0:20:57.150 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 10>to the General Services Administration. Starting October 1st, agencies will

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.660
<v Speaker 10>have to pay based on how much they use them

0:21:03.820 --> 0:21:08.419
<v Speaker 10>with a 50% discount off standard pricing. Plus, Anthropic is

0:21:08.460 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 10>giving the EU's cybersecurity agency access to its most powerful

0:21:12.940 --> 0:21:16.390
<v Speaker 10>mythos AI model after months of back and forth over

0:21:16.470 --> 0:21:18.930
<v Speaker 10>who should be allowed to use it. Of course, Anthropic

0:21:18.970 --> 0:21:22.260
<v Speaker 10>has tightly restricted access because it says the model is

0:21:22.410 --> 0:21:26.460
<v Speaker 10>so powerful it can uncover cybersecurity flaws on its own.

0:21:27.660 --> 0:21:31.020
<v Speaker 10>And DeepSeek unveiled its latest AI model that charges as

0:21:31.180 --> 0:21:35.140
<v Speaker 10>little as a fraction of a cent per million tokens,

0:21:35.660 --> 0:21:38.690
<v Speaker 10>putting even more pressure on rivals to bring down prices.

0:21:39.210 --> 0:21:43.030
<v Speaker 10>DeepSeek even claims the new model outperforms Moonshot's Kimi K3.

0:21:43.670 --> 0:21:43.810
<v Speaker 11>Ed.

0:21:45.250 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. You're high, Rick. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:53.660 --> 0:21:56.300
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to Apple and the iPhone duo. Bloomberg

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.139
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Senior Analyst Anurag Rana writing today that, quote, we

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:05.139
<v Speaker 2>anticipate a much better consumer reception than recent models. Anurag

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.150
<v Speaker 2>joins us now. I knew this was a big deal

0:22:08.190 --> 0:22:11.149
<v Speaker 2>because while I was at Apple Park running around the

0:22:11.170 --> 0:22:13.429
<v Speaker 2>Steve Jobs Theater, I got an email from you. And

0:22:14.210 --> 0:22:16.150
<v Speaker 2>I thought, OK, Anurag has something important to say here.

0:22:16.490 --> 0:22:18.620
<v Speaker 2>You're really bullish on how many of these you think

0:22:18.670 --> 0:22:20.420
<v Speaker 2>that Apple will ship in the first year.

0:22:21.350 --> 0:22:23.850
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think the rumor was that they had asked

0:22:23.869 --> 0:22:26.780
<v Speaker 12>suppliers to do about 10 million units or so. But

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.380
<v Speaker 12>I think for the first time in years, I've seen

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.300
<v Speaker 12>a product that is designed far better than the earlier

0:22:32.340 --> 0:22:36.740
<v Speaker 12>generation of products. The UI was completely mind-blowing in terms

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 12>of how the software was infused. I mean, I could

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.140
<v Speaker 12>see so many new use cases in terms of consumers

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.060
<v Speaker 12>having things side by side. So again, you have to remember,

0:22:46.369 --> 0:22:49.890
<v Speaker 12>the ultra side of the Apple consumer is fairly expensive

0:22:49.930 --> 0:22:52.450
<v Speaker 12>and rich, I would say. So if you are selling about,

0:22:52.510 --> 0:22:56.169
<v Speaker 12>let's say, 240, 250 million units in a year, you know,

0:22:56.170 --> 0:22:58.189
<v Speaker 12>14 million is not that big of a deal in

0:22:58.210 --> 0:23:00.619
<v Speaker 12>terms of like that's not even, you know, 6% of

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.900
<v Speaker 12>the total units you're going to sell in a year.

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.379
<v Speaker 12>And there are massive amount of affluent consumers who would

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.020
<v Speaker 12>do that. In fact, in our own circle, I asked

0:23:09.060 --> 0:23:11.950
<v Speaker 12>a bunch of people and I got an overwhelming response

0:23:11.990 --> 0:23:14.810
<v Speaker 12>that they actually may be thinking of upgrading for the

0:23:14.850 --> 0:23:15.850
<v Speaker 12>first time in years.

0:23:17.770 --> 0:23:23.270
<v Speaker 2>The price point, Anurag, what was notable about the psychology

0:23:23.790 --> 0:23:26.110
<v Speaker 2>of coming just under $ 2, 000 at the entry level?

0:23:28.390 --> 0:23:31.070
<v Speaker 12>See, I think 2000 is exactly what Mark Gurman had reported.

0:23:31.090 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 12>So we were looking into that. But what I was

0:23:34.300 --> 0:23:37.139
<v Speaker 12>surprised about is when you look at the upgrade plan,

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.060
<v Speaker 12>it was priced at about $ 57. 99 a month for 24 months,

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.150
<v Speaker 12>which means the residual value after two years is also

0:23:44.190 --> 0:23:47.190
<v Speaker 12>still over $ 600. So that number was a bit surprising

0:23:47.210 --> 0:23:48.750
<v Speaker 12>to me because I would have thought that would be

0:23:48.790 --> 0:23:51.590
<v Speaker 12>a little higher. I think that's a very attractive price

0:23:51.630 --> 0:23:54.770
<v Speaker 12>point for people who want to finance it. I mean,

0:23:54.770 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 12>$ 58 a month is not that much if you are

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.340
<v Speaker 12>thinking about it from that point of view.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.740
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting because this is, I imagine, just first generation, right?

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.860
<v Speaker 2>They'll iterate on top of this. Also, Anurag, if you would,

0:24:07.900 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 2>your assessment of John Ternus as CEO, the Apple iPhone

0:24:12.580 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Day keynote for the first time in that role, what

0:24:14.740 --> 0:24:15.619
<v Speaker 2>did you make of all of it?

0:24:16.850 --> 0:24:18.510
<v Speaker 12>I think one of the things that really caught my

0:24:18.570 --> 0:24:22.330
<v Speaker 12>attention was that the center of discussion was around the

0:24:22.410 --> 0:24:26.619
<v Speaker 12>product quality, design, and the integration of the whole ecosystem.

0:24:26.940 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 12>He talked about it a lot, and I think that's where,

0:24:29.420 --> 0:24:32.580
<v Speaker 12>going back to the roots of Steve Jobs, you know,

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.510
<v Speaker 12>the focus on that. And again, you know, Mark has

0:24:35.550 --> 0:24:37.550
<v Speaker 12>said that, you know, he has been working on this

0:24:37.590 --> 0:24:40.430
<v Speaker 12>project for a very long period of time. I'm really

0:24:40.510 --> 0:24:43.889
<v Speaker 12>curious to see if he's able to spend some more money,

0:24:44.010 --> 0:24:46.900
<v Speaker 12>I would say a little more capex into new product developments.

0:24:47.260 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 12>Even if it's a dud, it's okay. But, you know,

0:24:49.700 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 12>more experimentation would be really nice. And I have a

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.010
<v Speaker 12>feeling that we're going to see that from him.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Anurag Rana of Bloomberg Intelligence with the React. Thank you

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 2>so much. I want to get more reaction from the

0:25:00.540 --> 0:25:03.580
<v Speaker 2>sell side. Wamsi Mohan, who leads research covering IT hardware

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.740
<v Speaker 2>and tech supply chain at Bank of America, reiterating a

0:25:06.859 --> 0:25:10.550
<v Speaker 2>buy rating on the stock following the launch of iPhone

0:25:10.570 --> 0:25:14.670
<v Speaker 2>Duo and saying that the iPhone Duo, quote, impresses. Wamsi

0:25:14.690 --> 0:25:17.369
<v Speaker 2>Mohan of Bank of America joins us now. What about

0:25:17.490 --> 0:25:18.810
<v Speaker 2>it specifically impresses you?

0:25:20.970 --> 0:25:22.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good morning, Ed.

0:25:22.050 --> 0:25:25.109
<v Speaker 13>Thanks for having me. Look, I think that this is

0:25:25.210 --> 0:25:28.619
<v Speaker 13>where Apple excels. It's in bringing the hardware and the

0:25:28.670 --> 0:25:32.859
<v Speaker 13>software and the services, all of those, and tightly integrating it.

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 13>I was at Apple Park yesterday. I had an opportunity

0:25:36.100 --> 0:25:40.540
<v Speaker 13>to feel the device. The quality of it really feels excellent.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.470
<v Speaker 13>You can play with it, open it, close it. And

0:25:44.750 --> 0:25:47.410
<v Speaker 13>the way that the software morphs around that, the way

0:25:47.430 --> 0:25:50.889
<v Speaker 13>that the apps rearrange themselves around that, that's the magic

0:25:50.930 --> 0:25:53.510
<v Speaker 13>that Apple brings. And it was truly an excellent product.

0:25:53.970 --> 0:25:58.609
<v Speaker 13>It was definitely a home run from a new keynote

0:25:58.630 --> 0:26:01.530
<v Speaker 13>from a new CEO standpoint. I think one of the

0:26:01.570 --> 0:26:05.290
<v Speaker 13>things that's also very impressive is that obviously Apple has

0:26:05.330 --> 0:26:07.230
<v Speaker 13>worked on this for a long time, but we're seeing

0:26:07.270 --> 0:26:10.290
<v Speaker 13>the same ethos of product design, the importance of this

0:26:10.690 --> 0:26:13.909
<v Speaker 13>whole stack You've heard of a lot of new chips

0:26:14.250 --> 0:26:17.650
<v Speaker 13>that are being designed into this product specifically for this product.

0:26:18.350 --> 0:26:20.030
<v Speaker 13>I think all of these are things that are very

0:26:20.070 --> 0:26:22.750
<v Speaker 13>core to the Apple ecosystem, and we're seeing a reiteration

0:26:22.790 --> 0:26:23.310
<v Speaker 13>of that again.

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Wamsi, how many models or do you have a model

0:26:26.780 --> 0:26:28.659
<v Speaker 2>for the number of units you think Apple can do

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.260
<v Speaker 2>on Duo in the December quarter and its first 12-month period?

0:26:34.310 --> 0:26:38.590
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so actually when we were in Asia back in March,

0:26:38.650 --> 0:26:41.409
<v Speaker 13>we picked up that the foldable was somewhere between 10

0:26:41.410 --> 0:26:44.890
<v Speaker 13>to 20 million units is what Apple was asking for production.

0:26:44.990 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 13>And so as we look through what can happen in

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.500
<v Speaker 13>the first year, it's going to depend a little bit

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.260
<v Speaker 13>on whether or not some of these installment plans are

0:26:53.300 --> 0:26:55.940
<v Speaker 13>taken advantage of. There's also the handoff feature, which I

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 13>think is very interesting and coming at a time when

0:26:59.350 --> 0:27:03.449
<v Speaker 13>people are also facing pressure from a spending perspective. And

0:27:03.510 --> 0:27:06.169
<v Speaker 13>so I would say somewhere between that 10 to 20

0:27:06.170 --> 0:27:09.310
<v Speaker 13>million units for the year is pretty realistic.

0:27:08.869 --> 0:27:09.429
<v Speaker 1>In year one.

0:27:09.470 --> 0:27:11.389
<v Speaker 13>I think about 17 million units for the year or

0:27:11.450 --> 0:27:14.260
<v Speaker 13>so is where we shake out. Now, as we look

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.620
<v Speaker 13>into the following year, I think that TAM really starts

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 13>to expand. You can also bring pricing down a little

0:27:19.060 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 13>bit on some of the models and have a broader

0:27:20.980 --> 0:27:24.340
<v Speaker 13>skew and a broader price spectrum around this product as well.

0:27:24.380 --> 0:27:26.889
<v Speaker 13>But I think to start off, this is going to

0:27:26.900 --> 0:27:30.090
<v Speaker 13>be a very, very well-coveted and desired product.

0:27:30.950 --> 0:27:33.310
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk a little bit more about the handoff.

0:27:33.369 --> 0:27:35.850
<v Speaker 2>It's something we discuss less with Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. But

0:27:35.890 --> 0:27:39.369
<v Speaker 2>the idea is that that could drive an upgrade cycle

0:27:39.410 --> 0:27:42.330
<v Speaker 2>in and of itself because you make it easy for

0:27:42.369 --> 0:27:46.710
<v Speaker 2>a consumer to go from a this shape phone candy

0:27:46.750 --> 0:27:50.670
<v Speaker 2>bar shape to to the foldable. Do you really see

0:27:50.690 --> 0:27:51.540
<v Speaker 2>that as the catalyst?

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.580
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I wouldn't say that's the only catalyst. I think

0:27:55.619 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 13>the feature functionality, it's a very good standalone device by itself.

0:27:59.630 --> 0:28:03.429
<v Speaker 13>I just think that for pro users, the ability to

0:28:03.510 --> 0:28:06.790
<v Speaker 13>have handoff, for instance, if I'm carrying two separate phones,

0:28:06.869 --> 0:28:08.710
<v Speaker 13>one for my work, one for my personal use, and

0:28:08.730 --> 0:28:10.990
<v Speaker 13>then I'm able to hand off any of those at

0:28:11.070 --> 0:28:14.890
<v Speaker 13>any given point in time for productivity reasons, that can

0:28:14.910 --> 0:28:17.590
<v Speaker 13>be really appealing. So I think it does sort of

0:28:17.770 --> 0:28:21.909
<v Speaker 13>substitute almost as a productivity enhancer, which I would say...

0:28:22.210 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 13>is more of me not using an iPad mini almost

0:28:25.140 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 13>instead of using and instead use the Duo is the

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 13>way that I would.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Think about it.

0:28:29.619 --> 0:28:33.030
<v Speaker 13>It's complimentary more so to the iPad from a productivity

0:28:33.050 --> 0:28:37.450
<v Speaker 13>standpoint rather than an incremental yet another device that you're

0:28:37.470 --> 0:28:38.170
<v Speaker 13>going to have to carry.

0:28:39.470 --> 0:28:41.620
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to get into the specifics of the A20

0:28:41.660 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Pro chip. You mentioned the chip innovation, two nanometer process,

0:28:45.660 --> 0:28:49.380
<v Speaker 2>six core CPU, seven core GPU, 40% faster graphics, but

0:28:49.460 --> 0:28:53.010
<v Speaker 2>basically much better in the AI context. Was that a

0:28:53.270 --> 0:28:54.710
<v Speaker 2>real move forward from Apple, you think?

0:28:56.810 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, look, I mean, I think it's very clear that

0:28:59.500 --> 0:29:03.340
<v Speaker 13>right at the beginning, right, John Ternes' opening statements and

0:29:03.500 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 13>in the keynote, it was very obvious that AI is

0:29:06.220 --> 0:29:09.060
<v Speaker 13>going to be very, very central to the strategy. We've

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.550
<v Speaker 13>written extensively about the fact that Apple is going to

0:29:11.590 --> 0:29:13.110
<v Speaker 13>be a winner at AI.

0:29:12.870 --> 0:29:13.330
<v Speaker 2>At the Edge.

0:29:13.430 --> 0:29:17.010
<v Speaker 13>And we think that this whole... notion around privacy, being

0:29:17.130 --> 0:29:20.610
<v Speaker 13>able to do a lot of things on device is

0:29:20.650 --> 0:29:22.729
<v Speaker 13>where Apple's going to excel. And for that, you're going

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 13>to need more memory. You're going to need faster processors.

0:29:25.300 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 13>You're seeing innovation over there with the A20, as you

0:29:27.940 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 13>just mentioned that. And I think that the key here

0:29:30.980 --> 0:29:35.130
<v Speaker 13>is to be able to do more by loading sparse models,

0:29:35.190 --> 0:29:38.070
<v Speaker 13>by being able to take advantage of the architecture, which

0:29:38.130 --> 0:29:42.070
<v Speaker 13>is so tightly integrated with the hardware design overall. And

0:29:42.110 --> 0:29:44.150
<v Speaker 13>I think that this is where Apple, again, excels, and

0:29:44.170 --> 0:29:46.570
<v Speaker 13>we're going to see a lot more innovation in AI

0:29:46.990 --> 0:29:50.110
<v Speaker 13>across all sorts of devices from Apple. And this is

0:29:50.130 --> 0:29:52.050
<v Speaker 13>just the start of that. I think AI is going

0:29:52.070 --> 0:29:55.530
<v Speaker 13>to be very dominant because this is a modernization vehicle,

0:29:55.570 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 13>not just for devices, but also for first-party services and

0:29:58.540 --> 0:30:00.980
<v Speaker 13>eventually for third-party services. And we think the time for

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 13>this is much, much larger than what people expect. So

0:30:03.540 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 13>we're very excited about what's yet to come from an

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:06.980
<v Speaker 13>AI standpoint from Apple.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.500
<v Speaker 2>Wamsi, I heard many Apple executives say, and indeed post,

0:30:11.860 --> 0:30:14.180
<v Speaker 2>this is a new chapter for Apple. What do you

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.470
<v Speaker 2>think changes from this point on under John Ternus?

0:30:18.370 --> 0:30:21.570
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think the most notable change here is what

0:30:21.630 --> 0:30:25.270
<v Speaker 13>was announced as a departure from net cash neutral. And

0:30:25.430 --> 0:30:28.580
<v Speaker 13>what that really means from an Apple standpoint, in our opinion,

0:30:28.650 --> 0:30:32.900
<v Speaker 13>is that we're giving John Ternus the ability to go

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 13>and invest.

0:30:34.100 --> 0:30:35.500
<v Speaker 1>As he would like, right?

0:30:35.620 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 13>So we've taken away some of the barriers around maintaining

0:30:38.820 --> 0:30:41.780
<v Speaker 13>net cash neutral, which means you opened up the aperture

0:30:41.820 --> 0:30:44.050
<v Speaker 13>for more M &amp; A, you opened up the aperture

0:30:44.370 --> 0:30:47.670
<v Speaker 13>for spending more CapEx. And we've done some analysis around

0:30:47.690 --> 0:30:52.030
<v Speaker 13>this and think that if Apple were to spend $ 100

0:30:50.910 --> 0:30:55.820
<v Speaker 13>billion cumulatively through 2030, so $ 20 billion a year, you

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 13>can get a sizable amount of infrastructure set in place

0:30:59.540 --> 0:31:03.020
<v Speaker 13>for a lot of things from an AI workload perspective

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.460
<v Speaker 13>to be done on device and Apple private cloud compute.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.620
<v Speaker 13>And so you don't really have to go off to

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.030
<v Speaker 13>other cloud.

0:31:09.830 --> 0:31:11.550
<v Speaker 1>Providers to really be able to.

0:31:13.070 --> 0:31:18.350
<v Speaker 13>Do all the AI, to take all the AI workloads

0:31:18.470 --> 0:31:20.730
<v Speaker 13>and be able to satisfy those requests that are coming

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.660
<v Speaker 13>to them and instead be able to do it either

0:31:23.820 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 13>locally on device or do it on private cloud compute.

0:31:26.780 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 13>We think this is a big deal, and we think

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 13>that this is where John Ternus will be able to

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 13>differentiate on what we can do on device and on

0:31:33.700 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 13>Apple private cloud compute in the age of AI.

0:31:35.460 --> 0:31:39.740
<v Speaker 2>I'm Zimon of Bank of America from Apple Park. Next

0:31:39.780 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>day on the show. Appreciate it a lot. Thank you.

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.620
<v Speaker 2>Two other companies that we're watching today, Oracle and Adobe.

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>By the way, both have earnings due out after the

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>closing bell. One more of an infrastructure hyperscaler story. The

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.110
<v Speaker 2>other is software. Both of them an AI story. Both

0:31:53.140 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 2>down pretty significantly ahead of those prints. Coming up on

0:31:56.140 --> 0:31:59.770
<v Speaker 2>the show, Positron CEO, Mitek Agrawal, joins us to discuss

0:31:59.790 --> 0:32:03.110
<v Speaker 2>the chip startup's latest funding round at a $ 5 billion

0:32:03.150 --> 0:32:06.910
<v Speaker 2>valuation in the private market. Now, if you're a Bloomberg

0:32:06.950 --> 0:32:10.470
<v Speaker 2>Terminal user, check out Live Go. Bloomberg Power Players is

0:32:10.530 --> 0:32:13.229
<v Speaker 2>live in New York. Some of the leading voices from

0:32:13.250 --> 0:32:16.470
<v Speaker 2>the business of sport join us to discuss the multi-trillion

0:32:16.510 --> 0:32:18.490
<v Speaker 2>dollar global industry.

0:32:19.130 --> 0:32:22.860
<v Speaker 9>Al, Silas, a reporter here at Bloomberg News, we broke

0:32:22.900 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 9>a deal that you're involved in, which was the Yankees

0:32:24.940 --> 0:32:26.420
<v Speaker 9>deal with Apollo.

0:32:26.860 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, are they announcing?

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.690
<v Speaker 2>Okay, across private markets, investors continue to show an appetite

0:32:39.950 --> 0:32:42.989
<v Speaker 2>for backing startups aiming to take on NVIDIA's lead, but

0:32:43.110 --> 0:32:48.110
<v Speaker 2>focused on inference. The latest example, Positron, has raised $ 875

0:32:48.050 --> 0:32:52.270
<v Speaker 2>million at a $ 5 billion valuation to bring its inference-focused

0:32:52.290 --> 0:32:56.450
<v Speaker 2>silicon to market. Positron CEO, Mitesh Agrawal, is with us. Okay,

0:32:56.470 --> 0:32:58.370
<v Speaker 2>let's just do the round. That was a big round,

0:32:58.710 --> 0:33:01.890
<v Speaker 2>split into two tranches, but also the participants, super interesting.

0:33:02.730 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>There must be a need for capital. What is it?

0:33:05.540 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, no, thanks, Ed, for having me. And like, look,

0:33:07.540 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 14>the need for capital is growth. I mean, we've seen

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 14>the last, literally the last three days of news, you know, Navier-Stokes, Muse, Astra.

0:33:15.370 --> 0:33:17.770
<v Speaker 14>Look at the amount of compute increases that's going. So

0:33:18.170 --> 0:33:20.969
<v Speaker 14>the scale is very important. And supply chain, obviously, is

0:33:21.010 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 14>a big kind of constraint. So Anyone that can scale

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 14>out in the current supply chain regime and can use

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.590
<v Speaker 14>capital to do that, that's kind of where the need

0:33:28.620 --> 0:33:30.470
<v Speaker 14>comes from. And that's kind of what this is really

0:33:30.490 --> 0:33:32.870
<v Speaker 14>driving is the scale out of our next generation silicon

0:33:32.910 --> 0:33:33.310
<v Speaker 14>and systems.

0:33:33.670 --> 0:33:36.650
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about that next generation of system. Where

0:33:36.690 --> 0:33:39.630
<v Speaker 2>is Positron at with it? And just explain the basics

0:33:39.780 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 2>of what you offer.

0:33:40.900 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah.

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.660
<v Speaker 14>Look, we're really focused on inference silicon and systems. And

0:33:44.820 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 14>we deploy it at a rack scale. We have our

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.270
<v Speaker 14>first product out recently. First generation called Atlas already out.

0:33:49.270 --> 0:33:52.350
<v Speaker 14>50 racks at Oracle getting deployed. And then second generation,

0:33:52.390 --> 0:33:55.130
<v Speaker 14>the silicon is called Asimov. The systems are called Titan.

0:33:55.530 --> 0:33:58.580
<v Speaker 14>and that scales out of the rack scale setup. Basically,

0:33:58.650 --> 0:34:02.300
<v Speaker 14>what we are really, really focused on is memory-first architecture,

0:34:02.420 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 14>so we drive massive amounts of memory capacity and very

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 14>high realized memory bandwidth to really get fast inference, but

0:34:09.580 --> 0:34:12.229
<v Speaker 14>at really good TCO. That's kind of the, look, making

0:34:12.270 --> 0:34:14.490
<v Speaker 14>inference cheaper so that you can have more access to compute,

0:34:15.130 --> 0:34:18.609
<v Speaker 14>making all these kind of applications, code generation, research, all

0:34:18.630 --> 0:34:21.690
<v Speaker 14>those faster, is very, very critical, right? So we are

0:34:21.710 --> 0:34:25.070
<v Speaker 14>taping out end of this year with our next generation silicon, Asimov,

0:34:25.190 --> 0:34:28.219
<v Speaker 14>and then Titan will be in production sometime second half

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:28.780
<v Speaker 14>of next year.

0:34:28.940 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Taping out at the end of this year, take us

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 2>from there throughout the process. How does that work out?

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so taping out and then you get your first

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.669
<v Speaker 14>silicon back in about anywhere between 8 to 12 weeks.

0:34:40.489 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 14>And we're taping out with TSMC and 3P. They're close

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.219
<v Speaker 14>partners for us. And then N3P is the node. And

0:34:47.260 --> 0:34:48.620
<v Speaker 14>then you get your first silicon back.

0:34:49.060 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 2>And then validation?

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:51.380
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:52.090 --> 0:34:55.130
<v Speaker 14>As expected with most kind of companies nowadays for silicon companies,

0:34:55.150 --> 0:34:57.069
<v Speaker 14>you want your first silicon to be a success, as

0:34:57.150 --> 0:34:57.810
<v Speaker 14>in it should work.

0:34:58.489 --> 0:34:59.270
<v Speaker 1>We expect that.

0:34:59.370 --> 0:35:00.530
<v Speaker 2>Authorizing it's expensive.

0:35:00.710 --> 0:35:01.170
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yes.

0:35:01.250 --> 0:35:04.210
<v Speaker 14>And look, we spend on emulation and other kind of

0:35:04.750 --> 0:35:07.190
<v Speaker 14>techniques to make sure that there are as less bugs

0:35:07.250 --> 0:35:10.390
<v Speaker 14>as possible as we move forward. But yeah, validation, bring up.

0:35:11.050 --> 0:35:14.180
<v Speaker 14>You get your first in production systems. You put your

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.180
<v Speaker 14>silicon into your systems. And then you're really testing out

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.819
<v Speaker 14>all the cutting-edge models of whatever the models will be

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 14>in June and seeing how that works.

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.580
<v Speaker 2>You talked about the existing generation 50 racks of Oracle.

0:35:25.620 --> 0:35:25.819
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.589
<v Speaker 2>But is Oracle the customer? How does your go-to-market work?

0:35:29.670 --> 0:35:29.930
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:29.989 --> 0:35:32.069
<v Speaker 14>So for our first generation, the way we have done

0:35:32.130 --> 0:35:36.050
<v Speaker 14>generally for go-to-market is kind of typical silicon semiconductor company.

0:35:36.070 --> 0:35:38.090
<v Speaker 1>So it's a CapEx sell to Oracle.

0:35:38.110 --> 0:35:40.390
<v Speaker 14>So Oracle buys it as a CapEx purchase on their

0:35:40.410 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 14>balance sheet and they pay us as a PO.

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.420
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very, very standard purchase.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.020
<v Speaker 14>Obviously, as we grow, you know, there is like more

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.900
<v Speaker 14>motions around how do you sell, you know, obviously NeoClouds

0:35:51.980 --> 0:35:55.110
<v Speaker 14>and Hyperscale at a dollar per GPU or dollar per

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.270
<v Speaker 14>systems per hour. And then there's even further optimization into,

0:35:58.290 --> 0:36:00.910
<v Speaker 14>you know, dollar per million tokens and then all of

0:36:00.930 --> 0:36:02.570
<v Speaker 14>those things, right? So as a company, we have to

0:36:02.630 --> 0:36:05.469
<v Speaker 14>evolve through partnerships and working with all these players. But

0:36:05.870 --> 0:36:07.310
<v Speaker 14>the first generation is very simple.

0:36:07.330 --> 0:36:09.910
<v Speaker 2>Do you have some customers lined up for these next generations,

0:36:10.190 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 2>even though given the stages they're at? And what kinds

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 2>of companies are those? Or name them. It's up to you.

0:36:15.940 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Won't name them yet.

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Suspected.

0:36:18.460 --> 0:36:19.300
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah.

0:36:19.340 --> 0:36:22.180
<v Speaker 14>But really, you have to think about the very, very

0:36:22.420 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 14>typical kind of space, you know, the kind of AI

0:36:25.140 --> 0:36:28.540
<v Speaker 14>labs or model labs companies. Neo clouds that are out there,

0:36:28.580 --> 0:36:32.860
<v Speaker 14>hyperscalers that, you know, and one already, Oracle, our customer.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 14>You know, you obviously have a little bit of look

0:36:35.380 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 14>into the sovereign play as well, because they are deploying

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:39.819
<v Speaker 14>and building out a lot of their own inference data

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:43.509
<v Speaker 14>center capacities. And then really, anyone that has to do

0:36:43.590 --> 0:36:45.790
<v Speaker 14>token as a service or inference as a service, So

0:36:45.830 --> 0:36:47.930
<v Speaker 14>either they can be their net consumers of themselves of

0:36:47.989 --> 0:36:51.450
<v Speaker 14>tokens or video generations or someone who's packaging them and

0:36:51.489 --> 0:36:53.819
<v Speaker 14>selling them into the market, right? So that's kind of

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 14>your broad ecosystem of the customer base for us where

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.529
<v Speaker 14>we are really focused on. Look, it is a go

0:36:59.550 --> 0:37:01.130
<v Speaker 14>big or go home market kind of thing in the

0:37:01.170 --> 0:37:03.090
<v Speaker 14>sense that you have to focus on these very large

0:37:03.150 --> 0:37:06.780
<v Speaker 14>application companies to really get a large footing in the market.

0:37:07.020 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's finish by talking about Jevons Paradox and also NVIDIA.

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.939
<v Speaker 2>So on Jevons Paradox, the idea that a resource gets

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.610
<v Speaker 2>more efficient, the economics improve, and then demand goes up.

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:15.950
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:37:16.260 --> 0:37:18.730
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you see? And then earlier you would

0:37:18.750 --> 0:37:21.450
<v Speaker 2>have heard D-Matrix on the show, you know, partnering with

0:37:21.530 --> 0:37:24.950
<v Speaker 2>NVIDIA on MV-Link so that their custom platform slots into

0:37:24.989 --> 0:37:26.730
<v Speaker 2>existing GPU-based architecture.

0:37:26.989 --> 0:37:27.229
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:27.310 --> 0:37:30.189
<v Speaker 2>Both of those things are true at the same time? Yeah.

0:37:30.230 --> 0:37:32.210
<v Speaker 14>So on the Germans' paradox, I mean, like, look, I

0:37:32.230 --> 0:37:35.790
<v Speaker 14>think it's, you know, NVIDIA, sorry, OpenAI recently said that

0:37:36.130 --> 0:37:38.130
<v Speaker 14>when they slashed the prices by half, they saw the

0:37:38.190 --> 0:37:39.450
<v Speaker 14>utilization go up by 10x.

0:37:39.810 --> 0:37:44.390
<v Speaker 1>Today, DeepSeek, we 4.1. Amazing, amazing data. launch, I think.

0:37:44.550 --> 0:37:47.140
<v Speaker 14>Very cheap, sole-level performance based on early results.

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:51.220
<v Speaker 1>I haven't looked into the architecture yet. But look, again, really.

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 14>Great for use cases and utilization.

0:37:53.540 --> 0:37:54.170
<v Speaker 1>I think that will go up.

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:56.980
<v Speaker 14>It's a good story for us as well, especially around memory.

0:37:57.300 --> 0:38:00.549
<v Speaker 14>They're using LPDDR5X. We are also doing that. So that's

0:38:00.590 --> 0:38:04.529
<v Speaker 14>kind of really interesting. On NVIDIA's kind of working, look,

0:38:04.590 --> 0:38:07.370
<v Speaker 14>NVIDIA is absolutely the main player in the market, right?

0:38:07.390 --> 0:38:10.540
<v Speaker 14>Whether it's training, absolutely main one, and then even in inference,

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:11.820
<v Speaker 14>they are the majority.

0:38:11.739 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Kind of there.

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.910
<v Speaker 14>So for all of us, including Positron AI, we really

0:38:14.950 --> 0:38:16.750
<v Speaker 14>focus on how can we work with them, right? You know,

0:38:16.770 --> 0:38:18.730
<v Speaker 14>we have to be in the same data centers, in fact,

0:38:18.770 --> 0:38:20.589
<v Speaker 14>even same racks as them to work with them, right?

0:38:20.630 --> 0:38:22.140
<v Speaker 1>So we also plan on connecting.

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:23.740
<v Speaker 2>Will you do an MVLink Fusion agreement?

0:38:23.860 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>We will definitely, you know.

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:25.540
<v Speaker 11>Try?

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:27.830
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we will definitely, like, talk to them and try it.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.140
<v Speaker 14>But, like, without even, like, just wanted to make clear

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 14>also on technical side of things, you can directly connect

0:38:32.340 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 14>with NVIDIA GPUs even today through standard, you know, Ethernet

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.779
<v Speaker 14>and InfiniBand connections, right? So this is not, like, this

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:39.589
<v Speaker 14>doesn't stop you from doing it, but obviously you want

0:38:39.610 --> 0:38:41.630
<v Speaker 14>to get closer. And then, like, look, you mentioned the

0:38:41.670 --> 0:38:42.910
<v Speaker 14>people on our board, right?

0:38:42.950 --> 0:38:43.090
<v Speaker 11>I know.

0:38:43.510 --> 0:38:46.089
<v Speaker 1>Gavin is on our board. He's very, very clear.

0:38:46.110 --> 0:38:47.070
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Baker at Trades.

0:38:47.310 --> 0:38:48.490
<v Speaker 1>Correct. Gavin Baker at Trades.

0:38:48.730 --> 0:38:51.629
<v Speaker 14>He's very clear about, you know, like, look, we have to,

0:38:51.830 --> 0:38:53.250
<v Speaker 14>you know, this is a heterogeneous computer market.

0:38:53.270 --> 0:38:54.129
<v Speaker 1>This is how it's going to grow.

0:38:54.430 --> 0:38:56.350
<v Speaker 2>Post John C. Mitesh Agrawal.

0:38:56.469 --> 0:38:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:38:56.730 --> 0:38:59.570
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate it. Some breaking news crossing the Bloomberg. Saudi

0:38:59.590 --> 0:39:05.180
<v Speaker 2>Arabia's wealth fund is considering combining electronic arts. with Savvy Games,

0:39:05.260 --> 0:39:08.500
<v Speaker 2>sources say, a deal that would bring blockbuster titles like

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Madden NFL and Pokemon Go under one roof. The sources

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.739
<v Speaker 2>point out no final decisions have been made and the

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.589
<v Speaker 2>deal is unlikely to happen until Savvy completes its $ 6

0:39:18.530 --> 0:39:23.950
<v Speaker 2>billion acquisition of Chinese mobile gaming business Moonton. Coinbase is

0:39:24.010 --> 0:39:27.550
<v Speaker 2>betting stablecoins could become the next big growth engine. CEO

0:39:27.570 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Brian Armstrong says the roughly $ 300 billion market could grow

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:35.219
<v Speaker 2>tenfold by 2030 as more businesses use digital dollars for

0:39:35.260 --> 0:39:38.900
<v Speaker 2>payments and moving money across borders. He says improving regulation

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 2>in the U.S. could accelerate that adoption with a key

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.969
<v Speaker 2>piece of crypto legislation facing a Senate vote next week.

0:39:45.190 --> 0:39:46.569
<v Speaker 2>He spoke with Bloomberg's Haslinda Arman.

0:39:47.489 --> 0:39:49.710
<v Speaker 11>Well, regulatory clarity has been getting a lot better.

0:39:49.730 --> 0:39:50.670
<v Speaker 2>You know, from a U.S.

0:39:50.730 --> 0:39:53.489
<v Speaker 11>Lens, last year, the Genius Act was passed into law

0:39:53.530 --> 0:39:57.090
<v Speaker 11>for stablecoins, and we saw 150 large companies adopt stablecoins

0:39:57.110 --> 0:39:59.469
<v Speaker 11>in the wake of that. And now the Clarity Act,

0:39:59.510 --> 0:40:02.660
<v Speaker 11>which is the second piece, which deals with crypto market structure,

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.060
<v Speaker 11>it's right on the finish line. We actually have a

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.460
<v Speaker 11>big vote next week in the Senate. to see if

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.219
<v Speaker 11>that legislation is ready to become law. We've been meeting

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 11>with both sides of the aisle for many years on this.

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 11>There's hundreds of pages of compromises. Many banks have come

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.180
<v Speaker 11>out and endorsed it, law enforcement groups, the crypto companies.

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:24.570
<v Speaker 11>And it's good for America, good for the consumers. Today's

0:40:24.590 --> 0:40:26.410
<v Speaker 11>big number, $ 23 billion.

0:40:26.469 --> 0:40:29.149
<v Speaker 2>That's how much Elon Musk boring companies valued at after

0:40:29.190 --> 0:40:31.950
<v Speaker 2>raising $ 3 billion in his latest funding round from the

0:40:32.090 --> 0:40:36.330
<v Speaker 2>UAE and affiliated investment entities. That's after slow progress over

0:40:36.370 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the last decade in realizing Musk's vision for a series

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of ultra-fast underground hyperloops. Bloomberg's Kyle Porter joins us with

0:40:43.540 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the details. Let's go into the round. Quite a big raise.

0:40:46.860 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Interesting valuation.

0:40:49.380 --> 0:40:50.260
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, on both counts.

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.219
<v Speaker 6>It's quadruple what they got valued at in their last

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.020
<v Speaker 6>fundraising round. And it comes along with a new anchor

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.350
<v Speaker 6>investor and an incredibly ambitious plan.

0:40:59.450 --> 0:41:02.790
<v Speaker 2>You've done a big take on Boring this year. Where

0:41:02.850 --> 0:41:05.830
<v Speaker 2>are they at? The idea was, by the way, Boring Co.

0:41:05.989 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 2>bores tunnels and those tunnels get used for things. But

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 2>are there actually any of them out there in the world?

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 6>There is an active unit you can go on in

0:41:13.390 --> 0:41:17.230
<v Speaker 6>Las Vegas. They started in 2019. The eventual plan is

0:41:17.410 --> 0:41:22.050
<v Speaker 6>for a, I believe, 60 mile network with a series

0:41:22.110 --> 0:41:25.610
<v Speaker 6>of interconnected tunnels. They currently have 10 tunnels operational. I

0:41:25.630 --> 0:41:28.649
<v Speaker 6>believe it's about 11 miles. And the original completion date

0:41:28.690 --> 0:41:32.110
<v Speaker 6>of 2027 for a complete network certainly seems very unlikely.

0:41:32.910 --> 0:41:35.669
<v Speaker 6>They're also boring down in Nashville. They agreed that last year.

0:41:36.130 --> 0:41:39.270
<v Speaker 6>The original plan was that that 10 mile music city

0:41:39.310 --> 0:41:43.029
<v Speaker 6>loop would be completed by 2027. I'm being told by

0:41:43.070 --> 0:41:46.430
<v Speaker 6>sources that is a little bit unrealistic. And then they've

0:41:46.450 --> 0:41:50.090
<v Speaker 6>struck a memorandum of understanding with the Emirate of Dubai.

0:41:50.489 --> 0:41:54.859
<v Speaker 6>And they also offered a few free projects in two

0:41:54.940 --> 0:42:00.339
<v Speaker 6>US cities, one in Louisiana and the.

0:42:00.300 --> 0:42:00.940
<v Speaker 8>Other in Texas.

0:42:01.980 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Very quickly, do we have any sense of like how

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:05.580
<v Speaker 2>involved Elon Musk is in the company?

0:42:06.900 --> 0:42:09.330
<v Speaker 6>He defers on boring a lot more than he does

0:42:09.370 --> 0:42:12.469
<v Speaker 6>on his other companies. He has a very well-established team

0:42:12.630 --> 0:42:15.670
<v Speaker 6>in place there. He's talked about it a lot less

0:42:16.070 --> 0:42:18.180
<v Speaker 6>recently compared to a lot of his other endeavors. He

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.420
<v Speaker 6>was certainly very, very involved at the start when he

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 6>was living in Los Angeles and frustrated with the traffic.

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.180
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Kyle Porter on the big round that Boring Co.

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.590
<v Speaker 2>just did. Thank you very much indeed. That does it

0:42:28.610 --> 0:42:31.450
<v Speaker 2>for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. A lot going on

0:42:31.489 --> 0:42:32.950
<v Speaker 2>in markets. There's a lot of news in the world

0:42:32.989 --> 0:42:35.129
<v Speaker 2>of technology as well. Recap it on the podcast, which

0:42:35.150 --> 0:42:37.570
<v Speaker 2>you can find on the Bloomberg Terminal, as well as

0:42:37.630 --> 0:42:41.850
<v Speaker 2>online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart. It's Thursday, one more

0:42:41.890 --> 0:42:43.450
<v Speaker 2>day to go in the week. Thanks for being with us.

0:42:43.790 --> 0:42:44.669
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.