WEBVTT - Week 6 Recap, Winners, Losers, EHHH

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Do do do? Didnit? Yeah? Welcome your host Friday from

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Right by God, Frob Say Francis practice stand ball ladies

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and gentlemen, your BFFs. With that, we want you inside

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. Here's Frank Standfeld.

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Susman on a winners losers at a

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>lot going on Week six of one more game, has

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>one more game to go until it is in the books.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>What's happening here, Frankie? Are you? What's up? Man? Happy

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Monday to you. A very eventful week six. I'm gonna

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.919
<v Speaker 1>go over some winners losers in situations as you mentioned,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>as we try and work through all this and figure

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it out ultimately. When it comes to fantasy football, what

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>do we do with Stefan Diggs now that he is

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the hottest modity amongst wide receivers in fantasy football? Is he?

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably not? But I mean he was amazing. He was amazing.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>He was the hottest player in Week six doing here

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>right in case anyone in my league is watching, He's

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the hottest Come on get him now. Everybody's blowing down

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank's doors to go out. And I've already received like

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve trade offers and I'm kind of sifting through all

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of them right now, Greg, trying to figure out what

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to do. But yeah, the hottest commodity in

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>town right now, Stefan Diggs. Greg, how was your weekend?

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He was good at another wedding? What is wrong with you?

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>How many friends do you have? Like, I don't think

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a quarter of the friends that you have.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Every week you go to a wedding, or you go

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to a communion or party or something. You got something

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going on every week? Friends, How many weekends you have

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>booked up for like the next five months? Next year?

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Next year's bad, next bad, next year's bad bad? What

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>about the pat two years next year maybe the worst yet.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So not only I found out so I have it's

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>not really my friends. My friends are done, Mr Popula.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>The last few years have been all my friends. But

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>now Judy's friends are all already get married. Okay, because

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>she's younger than you. Right, So back to back weekends

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in June next year, we have a well, we have

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one wedding on the same day, one in Florida, one

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in Lake George. So we're going to separate. One is

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>my friend was her friends? Oh my god. The problem

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is in November of next year we have the same scenario.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Her family, friend my friend on the same day. Next year,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>two times it's happening. Next June we have the two

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>weddings on that same day in June. A week later

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we have whenning on Saturday in Maryland, and then we

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>wedding Sunday in Brooklyn. How do you have this many friends? Seriously,

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that is a fair question. I have maybe I don't know,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>five or six weddings I'm going to be invited to

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>over the next three year. Bears, those are all just

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>my closest friends. I don't know, I'm just not close

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>enough with other people. Inga has friends. Yeah, but none

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of them are really close to getting married. So so

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a group of ten. Basically I have a

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>group of eleven friends. Right for my whole friends, six

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of them were Now I guess I would be seven

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>or eight. You have to be married, so I would

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be the eighth person to get married. Out of that,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>everybody else is married. Are you tired? Are you tired

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>of weddings at this point? You know what? It's a

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>nice time for all of as we get older, Like

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't like go out of the go to bars

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>every Saturday. You get to see everybody. You probably don't

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get to see everyone else. I've not see anybody. It's

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like all be together, all drinking, like no holds bar

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>type of thing. It was what we did when we

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>were younger. Now we don't do that anymore. True, it's

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>all work, work, work, and no place so fine. So

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>not only is that happening franky like my friends are

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>now getting like pregnant. I'm like, oh god, that that's

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring pressure to you. Greg Susan, Now you need

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to produce a little greggy. It's not from It's only

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>one person. Presure's gonna come from. And he's my mother,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I need a great How you're married? What are we

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>waiting for here? I mean my parents have already out

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>of it's just probably not gonna happen. Ever, I just

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>keep telling them that, so just get their hopes down

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>off there, and then if I decide that it wants

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's gonna happen, then then build them back up,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, set them up for disaster first and foremost.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I have two weddings next year in October, back to

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>back weekends. I'm part of both wedding parties. That sucks.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>That's how I felt the last two weeks. It's terrible.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I did it. I'm sorry. In October it's not fun

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in October. Yeah, same thing for me. You're from Yeah,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to stay at Hood's Telver two nights

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Potentially, I believe it it ends up very quickly. Frank, Greg,

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>how was your weekend? How was my weekend? I saw

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a joker on Friday. It was phenomenal. I thought, lucky

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix today, phenomenal job. I really really enjoyed it. Saturday,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't better. Was he better than the Ledger? He

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>might be? Yeah, he really might be. I mean it's

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a completely different role. It's like way darker. There's no action,

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So if that's what you're trying to find, don't go

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>watch Joker. I think the people who don't like Joker

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>or like this is way too dark. There's nothing to

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>do with Batman. I mean, it's really about the his

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like psychotic break, like how he went crazy. So it

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. I really enjoyed it. And he might be

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>better than Heath Ledger, but they're both amazing in their

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>own right, but two different types of jokers. Saturday had

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>my home league fantasy basketball draft that was a lot

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of fun. And then Sunday Greg, how about them Jets.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I love Adam Cage. What a great coach fantasy executive.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know. I've thought about it, but I was like, uh,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't like it if someone did that to me,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So I just let it rock. Let it rock. I

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gave Brian some some smack talk downstairs that was about it.

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>No green today for you? No green? Why not? I

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>don't you want to? You want to know the real

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>reason lose. I don't have any green button down shirts.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the real reason. I probably wouldn't have done it anyway.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And maybe if we didn't have to wear button downs,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I would wear like a Jets jersey, probably Donald Jersey professionals,

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>or I could have wore a jersey over the polo

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like the closer. He's pretty professional. It's not your image, No,

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not. What is my image? I don't know. I

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think you're professional. If you say sothing, I guess it's

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>got to be. Look, I mean, look, we're in similar

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>things today. Yeah, you were using pink headphones downstairsday match

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>your pope. Why not let's talk football. Great, well, before

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we get that. A great day for the Jets. Not

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so great for the Yankees. Oh, Stanton being pulled off

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the roster. No, yesterday I mean they lost? Yeah, yeah,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>well that is a huge blow. Obviously it sucked. We

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>all had to stay up late. Did you have any

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>problems that we admitted the break? So I'll just talk

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>about this for the next minute, But like, do you

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>any problems to have Aaron Bow managed the game last night? No?

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, based on that quote that you I think

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you sent, you sent it to me this morning. Look,

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to win every game. You know, he's gonna

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have a quick trigger with James Paxson. Paxson didn't really

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>seem like he had anything yesterday, So I get like,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to win that game, and they were in

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>position to win it against Justin Verlander as well, So

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a quick trigger. But ultimately I

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>don't really have an issue with anything, right, Like, maybe

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if Lewiega would have melted down, like bringing him in there,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I would have had an issue with that, But who

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>would you have gone to. Yeah, it's just like Luiss

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is not great either, So look, Jay, have you needed

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>some length out of him? He gives up a home

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>run to a good player, What are you gonna do?

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely right with that. We'll get the winners, losers, and

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>everything else that comes your way next the VFS Daily

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>leading DBS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com optimized in minutes building, optimize line up

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for cast games and turneys. Learned from the game's best

0:08:43.120 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot Com back with you.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>We have FS. He's Frank Stafl. I am Greg Susman.

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>That's time of the week. Frank will go back to

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>week six. We'll tell you who one who lost, and

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the BFFs presents winners won, I won, Losers. You suck.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You are one pathetical loser and I have no idea

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Let's rock on here on the BFFs

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get into who one who lost and who we still

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have questions about. Let's begin with Minnesota, Frank, and let's

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>begin with se find Diggs, who had that squeaky wheel game.

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Last week it was all about Adam Field, and this

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>week they made a concerted effort. He gets to find

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Digs the ball and so they did three touch sounds later. Right,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>you're definitely trying to sell him. I don't know what

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, Greg. He's the hottest commodity in fantasy

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>football already this morning. I'm just kidding. Do not go

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>out and try and acquire Stefon Diggs right now. I

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>actually put out a poll last night, Greg, how do

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we feel about Stefon Diggs after this monster game? The

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>three options were cell cell cell, hold, he's turning it around,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>or by he's just too talented. Sixty three percent are

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>saying sell, Sell, Sell, and rightfully so. Look, even in

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a game where he finally led the team in targets,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>who was the first time he did that all season long?

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Monster game seven for one, sixties, seven and three against

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this porest Philadelphia Eagles defense. Continue to use wide receivers

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>against this Eagles secondary, He's still only through the ball

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine times. Greg, And while Kirk Cousins was awesome,

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs was great. You know, maybe this is a

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sign of things to come where they move a little

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>bit more towards a balanced offense. I still tend to

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think that they want to run the football, they want

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to play good defense. Dalvin didn't look great yesterday, still scored,

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>but alex Alexander Madison looked really good, So they can

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>run with both of those guys. Adam Deeling is still

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna have games where he takes over so unfortunately, Greg,

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Detroit lines are coming up. That's

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad matchup because he plays on the outside. Would

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>likely see Darius slay and then I think the Chiefs

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>after that. While the Chiefs to get into these shootout games,

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>they've actually been really good against wide receivers this year,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of weird, but ultimately I would be

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to sell Stefon Diggs right now. If you can

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>get you know, wide receiver to value, maybe pair him

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>with another player. I was talking to Greg about something

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>downstairs that I'm gonna be trying to do. I have

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson and Diggs on a team together next week

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in Week seven, David Johnson's going up against New York Giants,

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>great matchup. The three or four matchups after that get

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>really really tough for David Johnson. So I am trying

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>to pair Digs with David Johnson to get a really

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>good RB one and wide receiver one in return. That's

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>an example of something I would be trying to do

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>with Digs right now. Greg imagined David Johnson because Arizona

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>also a winner yesterday then beat Atlanta, who are now

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>one and five on the year. Frank, I'm having in

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my winner pool. I didn't take Atlanta like you strongly suggested.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't tell you to take Atlanta. You did it

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>might not yesterday in my team remember my team win draft.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>We were going. We did it on the show live.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think every team before the season. Okay, I wasn't

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on Atlanta. You were. You were an Atlantic guy. I

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was trying to talk to you out of Atlanta. I

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't want one Atlanta. I think you wanted it. Did

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not want We're gonna have to go back to the tape.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't really a big Atlantic. I wanted Atlanta. I

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>would have taken Atlanta. So you didn't take them. So

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you're you're all, you're golden, Greg, what do you call it?

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You're not doing well? I'm sorry? But why? Actually? Good

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>day yesterday? My last three picture the Jets, Bangles and Cardinals.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Not many wins between. Hey, well you know what one

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of those teams got you win yesterday? Did Uh? My

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>New York Jets? How about that? David Johnson only twelve

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>carries in this game, a lot through the air. We

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>knew this was gonna be a Kyler Murray game. Monster

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>game for thirty seven. I think Kyla Murray is a

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>huge winner here. Finally bust out throws for those three touchdowns.

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>He's been running the ball more as well. The rushing

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>attempts have gone up from eleven rushes yesterday for thirty

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>two yards. Uh, just continue to use quarterbacks against the

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcon secondary. They are not a good one. David

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnson continuing to have success through the air six receptions

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for sixty eight yards and a receiving touchdown as well.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds got in through the air, so he remains

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the top handcuffs. If you picked him up

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>last week because you're worried about David Johnson, I would

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>continue to hold onto him because back injuries tend to

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>linger for players in the NFL, especially running backs who

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>take as many hits as they do, and he also

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>has that surgically repaired risks. So I think yesterday huge

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>winner Kyler Murray like I would put Larry Fitzgerald in

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the conversation because the targets have been there and the

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals offensive starting to come around a little bit,

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's not something that is moving congruently together. It's

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>not like, Okay, well the offense is doing well, that

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>must mean Larry Fitzgerald is playing well. Fitz has been fine.

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>He's been more of a safe floor, you know, maybe

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver two, high end wide receiver three. It's kind

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of more so in that cold Beasley Bowl. Yeah, obviously

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he's better than Cold Beasley, But I don't think if

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of upside with Larry Fitzgerald right now.

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So the offense is playing better, but ultimately he hasn't

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>been that great, so to me, he's in the category. Yeah,

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Larry Fitzgerald has been totally fine. I think,

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>as a really good word for it, he's been a

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>fine wide receiver three with the upside hasn't been nearly

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>as dynamic as we kind of hoped it would be

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>for Larry Fitzgerald and his Arizona Cardinals. Generald We knew

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be a really good spot for Kyler Murray

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>yesterday it was. He was a winner for me um,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but the receiving wise was mostly David Johnson. Everybody else

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>stepping up for Christian Kirk nothing nothing, de Sean Johnson,

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing room to mere Bird. It was kind of everybody

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>doing their work. Kyler Murray though. That three forty and three.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>What a day for Murray, who also chipped in thirty

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>yards on the ground. Back again, that schedule for David

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Johnson coming up next week, going up against the Giants

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>who are twenty four against running backs, that's a positive.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And then he gets the Saints, who are fifth against

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>running backs forty nine or second against running backs. We

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just saw what their defense did against the Rams Tampa

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Bay Christian McCaffrey a twenty two carries yesterday for thirty

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>one yards. There one defense. Legit. They are third against

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the run, and then they played San Francisco. They play

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco twice in a three week span. Again they

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are second against the run. So maybe hold on for

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to David Johnson for one more week, get this game

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in against the New York Giants, and then try and

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>sell him he's not really running the ball efficiently. He

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is being used a lot in the past game, but

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>those next four games after the Giants are really really tough.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Plus he has a bye week in week twelve. So

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>if you can target a running back who's already had

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>his by carry on Johnson, maybe a Josh Jacobs at

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>at another piece on that side as well, that's something

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that I would look into doing. Greg alright, and it

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense literally the other side with the Letta Falcons,

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>who are losers in every sense of the word. I

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>thought I was gonna wake up to Dan Quinn being fired.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's over before the game kind of leaked out

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that hey, Arthur Blank wanted to give his team until

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the buy to turn around. What to Arizona and just defense.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately it's on Matt Brian it too, man.

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I understand he's one of the oldest kickers

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in Well, look, if you can't do it, then just

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. If you can't do it anymore, you

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>see him on the sideline, he's like teary eyed. I mean,

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the game with my family yesterday. I

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was sitting around having dinner. My sister as, who is

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that guy? He's like sixty years old, said he's their kicker.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, sometimes you just gotta you gotta

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>know when it when, when your time is up. Greg

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And and ultimately that might be the case for Matt Bryant.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, Matt Ryan for Fantasy Football Winner Winner.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>This guy has had a massive, massive season. He's a

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>top five fantasy quarterback right now, thirty and thirty six,

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>just six in completions, three fifty six yards, four passing touchdowns,

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>nine point nine yards per at ten. This defense is

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>atrocious and that is what's going to keep Matt Ryan

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is a top five quarterback this season. Admittedly I had

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>him ranked, as you know, I think around QB eight

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or QUB nine coming into the season, Greg I was

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more down on him than everyone else

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>because I thought that this defense was going to bounce back.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But they've suffered from so many injuries so far this

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>season that I again, their secondary is causing them to

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>get into the shootouts. And as long as that's the case,

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan is a winner for fantasy football. Austin Hooper

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>also a winner. He might be a top three tight

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>end rest of season. I understand that you have the

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>big three, but let's be honest with ourselves. Travis Kelsey

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>not having this season, we thought, Zach Ertz not having

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this season, we thought he did. I know some people

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>thought that regression would hit, the targets wouldn't necessarily be there,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.239
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately we drafted these guys to be consistent tight

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>end options. They've been fine, but they haven't had massive upside.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper has had massive upside and we saw that

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>again yesterday again against the Arizona Cardinals. They are terrible

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends, but Austin Hooper is legit. Dirk Cutter,

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we know wants to throw the ball, and Julio Jones

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately is not seeing his normal target share that he's

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:47.719
<v Speaker 1>used to. They're spreading it around a little bit more.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper a big winner. Because of that. Devonte Freeman

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>greg probably should have been in our line up yesterday.

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>We ended up starting Malcolm Brown and we will lose

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in the G S T League. I know that some

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>people are probably already talking about it. Yes, the bfs

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be O and six. DeVonta Freeman a winner. Yesterday.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.239
<v Speaker 1>We thought Edo Smith starting to eat into his role

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Being carries for Devontae Freeman. Three for

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Edo Smith. Vonta goes off for eighty eight rushing yards

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>even in a negative game script game four point six

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, three receptions, continues to get it done.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>In the past game two receiving touchdowns. There's not gonna

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of efficiency when it comes to DeVonta Freeman.

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Their offensive line is in shambles, but because of the

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>way that they are using him in the past game,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I think DeVonta Freeman is still in play as a

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>solid to low end RB two just had twenty two touches,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think DeVonta Freeman and his entire offense. From

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective, are winners greg because their defense is

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>so bad overall. From an NFL perspective, Atlanta Falcons huge

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>losers manager perspective. Okay, let me talk about the version

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that we replaced Savante Freeman with Malcolm Brown and the

0:18:54.680 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Losers rams. That's next. Daily Rhodo dot Com. In the

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players, we don't just give you premier advice.

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Rodo dot Com optimizer in minutes

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>building optimize line up for cast games and turneys learned

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Com become the eighth person with a million dollars in

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a fanuelor Draft Kings tournament by sitting there in the

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>lineup US dot COM's DFS A lot of optimizer join

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the call is number of people who have won thousands

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of dollars each week playing dfs US gather Rotor dot com.

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing DFS and not using Daily Rotor dot Com,

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you're doing They're wrong. Said, um, Now, if the NFL

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>annual pass with the Master optimizers, smarter DFS projections and

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>better results and to the Promo Code Action present discount.

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>That's Promo Code Action discount Daily rotor dot com where

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>millionaires are made. Greggye, I mentioned it heading in the break.

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>The Los Angeles Rams kind of losers right now because

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line is future. They got smoked at home

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>by the San Francisco for Robert Slaw going to the

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>head coach next year in this league? Is that the

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners defensive coordinator. It is all right because I

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 1>never knew that guy's name, but I always see him

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline. They always called to him. He's like

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>super pumped up. Always looked like you just got done

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>doing like fifty push ups at the bench pressing. He's

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like fist pumping everywhere. A lot of expletives. Probably is

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a head coach somewhere. Yeah, this forty

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>defense is playing out of their minds right now. Uh,

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and they shut down the Los Angeles Rams this day.

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's look at the disparity in all the

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive category, mean totally yards for the thirty one This

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Rams offense, Greig, I understand your offensive line

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>is not nearly as good as it has been in

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.959
<v Speaker 1>years past. You have no Todd Gurley. Even when Todd

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Gurley has been on the field. Something is not right

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>with this Rams offense right now. Did people all of

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a sudden figure out strow mcphah. Maybe is it because

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line isn't nearly as good as it has

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.479
<v Speaker 1>been in years past? Maybe that contributes to it as well?

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Do they have do they have more tape on Jared Goff? Now, Like,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a many different factors here, but for you to

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>be out yard at home, Greg three hundred and thirty

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>one to one hundred and fifty seven, that is I mean,

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>there's something really really wrong with this Rams offense right now.

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>All the credits to the San Francisco forty Niners defense,

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they played amazing three point one yards per play overall

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Los Angeles Rams in this game. Something is

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong with them right now. Jared Goff thirteen of twenty

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>four for seventy eight yards in two thousand and nineteen.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I can throw for seventy eight yards in the NFL.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not, but seventy eight yards three point three yard

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is per a tent four sacks yesterday against Jared Goff.

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just yes, you credit the defense, the

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. He's just off this year too. I mean,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you saw that wide open play to Gerald Evert late

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.479
<v Speaker 1>in that game that he completely overthrew him. I mean

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no excuse for that. I mean, you are in

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a starting quarterback in the NFL, getting paid as much

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>as you are, you have to hit that throw to

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett. So this RAMS offense is atrocious right now.

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown eleven carries for forty yards three point six

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, not used in the past game at all.

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Darrel Henderson looked a lot better, albeit on a lot

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>less snaps average six point five yards per carry. Only

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>had six carries in this game, had one reception, but

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks three receptions for eighteen yards. Their leading receiver

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>was Tyler Higbee for twenty five yards. Just all around,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg the entire RAMS offense losers. Sean McVeigh, you gotta

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.479
<v Speaker 1>figure this out, man. The offense is looking putrid right now. Hey,

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the next few matchup is very very good for the

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>right facing Atlanta and Arizona, is what it is. I know,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe Atlanta is up next. I know Atlanta's up next,

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it's Arizona since Cincinnati. So those two

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>should help you get back on track. But then how

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>about this. You face the Steelers, who just looked phenomenal

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>last night against ever since they traded for Manke of

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatricks looks like a stud as well in the Chicago Bears.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>So I mean you pick and choose, Yes, your your

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>next two matchups, you should be able to get back

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>on track Falcons and Bengals. But then maybe after that

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you look to sell off some of your RAMS pieces

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can, because the Steelers and the Bears, that's

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be no cakewalk. No, absolutely not. Malcolm Brown, as

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, didn't do much of the Rams that cannot

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>con mert a third or fourth down all game long.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It was truly disgusting performance. But as a Jared Gov owner,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm running them back out there this week against Atlanta.

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the worst def as in the NFL. Yeah,

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to write it's you have to

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the matchups at times, and I understand this

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>is on the road, but it's gonna be inside of

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a dome and Kyler Murray just had the best game

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of his young career. We mentioned that three forty yards

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and three passing touchdowns. I'm going to go back to

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the well with Jared Goff one more week against the Falcons. Look,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't get at them done there, then you

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>know what you have to do with Jared Goff, and

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that means they're cutting him for fantasy football, because that

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>is you know, outside of you know, maybe like the

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Giants in Washington, the Atlanta Falcons are the best matchup

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that you can have as a quarterback right now and

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>as an offense to get back on track. So if

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't do it there, Greg, you know that you

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>can pretty much dump Jared Goff and you know, maybe

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>even think about cutting off some of the Los Angeles

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams offensive pieces as well. Absolutely, the Rams trending in

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the wrong direction. On the other side of the four

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Niners defense, as I said, Robert Sala going to be

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a head coach in this league, I would assume next year.

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>That's how good this defense has been. And this offense

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they're like Jimmy g b a game manager and that

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>is about it. They want to run the football. He

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>did throw it thirty three times yesterday, but Tevin Coleman

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brenda combined for thirty one rush attempts that I

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>felt like every time the red zone turned to this game,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it was Tevin Coleman getting the ball inside the five

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and the only converted once but only average two and

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a half yards per carry. Brida at two point eight,

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>but Tevin Coleman clearly the featured back in side that

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>five yard line at the goal line, tean that wants

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to run the football. Frank Yeah, absolutely. Tevin Coleman massive

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>workload here, eighteen carries forty five yards only two point

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>five yards were carry but got the ball inside of

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the red zone as well, scored a short touchdown greg

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's an a performance here for Tevin Coleman

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because he dropped what would would have been another such

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>an easy touchdown. It was not a perfect throw, but

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>still should have caught it regardless. So I like the

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>workload for Tevin Coleman, but I put him in the

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>act category because he dropped that touchdown, and ultimately I

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like he kind of squandered an opportunity here where

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, he played the most snaps of the season.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I still think that He's going to be in that

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>low nd RB two conversation every single week. And yes,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I would rather have Tevin Coleman right now than I

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>would Matt Brita. I know Matt Brida sat out a

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>few series, was dealing with an ankle thing. Again, He's

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>always dealing with an ankle thing. But that's why we

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>liked Tevin Coleman that over Matt Brita. Moving forward, the

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>workload was here for Coleman, the snaps were there, and

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have as much of an injury risk as Matt

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Brita has had in years past. Greg, the San Francisco

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners team, they should be a model of what

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're a franchise that is trying to turn around,

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this should be your model of what you try to do.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>You build from the trenches first. You build up that

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, You build up that defensive line. You build out.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>You spend on the veteran cornerback into Richard Sherman. You

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>acquire the quarterback via trade, you sign him um to

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a massive contract. Who can just do enough? But this

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>defense is really good, Greg, this offensive line is good.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>You bring in a head coach and a g M

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you have a clear vision, a

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>plan of what you want to do, you sign them

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>both to five year contracts and you build together. A

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were on the forty Niners coming into

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the year. I thought that they would still be another

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.239
<v Speaker 1>year away. But they are clearly ready and they need

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to do it now while they still have that defensive

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>coordinator because his presence is amazing. But if you're a

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>team like Washington, I know that they're never gonna do this,

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but this should be your model. You build the offensive line,

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you build the defensive line, You bring in a GM

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and head coach together in the off season, and you

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>build it up through there. That's what the model should

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be for like five year, long term plan for success

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. You do wonder looking at Washington will

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>get to in just a second. They had Sean McVeigh

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on the staff, They had Kyle shanahanan on the staff together,

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Jake Grunen of course with him as well. All three

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of those guys no longer in Washington at the moment,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you've heard rumbling and said, hey, we

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>want to promote our office coordinator now before we go

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. Kevin O'Connell for Jets backup quarterback is the

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator for the Jet For Washington right now, we'll

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>see what that turns into. Speaking of Washington, in the

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>game you were most looking forward to yesterday, Frank Washington

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>were able to defeat Miami seventeen sixteen in a barn burner.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Um Vante Parker did get into the end zone. So

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>never I tried to tell you he's awful, just as

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Preston Williams is awful, it seems like you didn't listen

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to me. I don't think that they're awful. I think

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen is probably awful. Do you live and you learn, Greg, Look,

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>oh man, I tell you this all the time, or

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you just learn? Yeah, and we will. We will try

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>our best to learn from this. Look. I said it

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>last week. If Josh Rosen couldn't perform in this match

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>up against Washington, this is not a good secondary. We

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>saw Ryan Fitzpatrick come in and march right down the

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>field for eight and thirty two yards through a touchdown

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to Devanta Parker. That's what I thought Josh Rosen could

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>do coming off a by and that that that is

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>my mistake. But you live and you learn. I hope

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you didn't start any Miami Dolphins. Ultimately, Devantay Parker saves

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>his day by getting in the end zone. And now

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a three headed running back by committee on

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>what might be the worst NFL team in the history

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of the league. Kenyan Drake ten carries for forty yards,

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, six perceptions for thirty actually didn't have a

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>terrible day. In PPR leagues, he's playing the most snaps,

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>but now Mark Walton is being worked in as a

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>receiver as well. He had six targets yesterday, he had

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>five catches. His snaps are increasing over the past two weeks,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and calab Blage. While he only played five snaps, he

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>played played five very important snaps because they all came

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>inside of the red zone and he scored the only touchdown.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So we have a three headed running back by committee

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>on a terrible football team that's going to be playing

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>from behind the Miami Dolphins. There is no hope. Maybe

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>if Ryan Fitzpatrick is the quarterback again, you can look

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>at Preston Williams or DeVante Parker in the right matchup

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as a stream a bye week replacement. But you can't

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>rely on these guys. I think that Parker and Preston Williams,

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some talent there, But ultimately this team

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is so bad, their offensive line is brutal that I

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they're going to be able to overcome that.

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Greg huge winner yesterday, Adrian Peterson and Terry McLaurin. They

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>did exactly what they said they were gonna do. Twenty

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>three carries for Adrian Peterson a hundred and eighteen yards

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>over five yards per carry. He said he felt revitalized.

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line played better. I understand it. Against Miami.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>We knew it would be a good matchup for him.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Terry mclaurin's just a real deal man seven targets. They

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>only had twenty five past attempts in this game. He's

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly the number one go to guy for case Keenum

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and this passing attack. They're probably not gonna throw the

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>ball all that much, but when they do, it's gonna

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>go to Terry McLaurin. Him and Adrian Peterson. Big winners yesterday.

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg Absolutely clearly a winner yesterday was Terry McLaurin, which

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is important because when in case keenom is in the lineup, well,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it helps Terry McLaren in a major way. They have

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a connection there. I don't know what that's gonna happen

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>with Dayne Haskins. I don't know what's gonna happen with

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Courte McCoy. I do know the case Keeno constantly is

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>looking Terry McLaren's way. So Washington once a winner yesterday

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. You know it was a loser, Frank,

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>what would that be? Greg Baker Mayfield, Freddy Kitchens, the

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Brown. Freddy Kitchens is such a loser, dude. Sequence

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of fourth down, you score the touchdown and then you

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>threw a challenge fire or what. I don't even understand

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened, But they scored the touchdown, the play

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>got reviewed, they went back to the same play after

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the challenge that scored the touchdown that didn't ultimately happen,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and you get stuffed. Basically, Kitchens Baker Mayfield are huge,

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So basically what happened on that play? They thought Jarvis

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Landry got in on a fumblder whatnot. I guess they

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>called the photo progress stop or something like that. They

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>ran a play as the players running. Nick Chubb gets

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>into the end zone it's a touchdown. Next thing you know,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty just challenging to play gets root. They call the

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>field stands and toushdown doesn't count. The run the same,

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb, It didn't work. Nick Chubb is the only

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>winner here. That's more about the Browns and the Seahawks

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>come over next. Put your money where your mouth is

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and take a shot by opening a sports wagering he

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>account with FanDuel, New Jersey's largest sports buff. Daily Rhodo

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Rhodo dot Com optimize second minutes building optimized line up

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>for cash games and tourneys. Learned from the game's best

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>DFS players joined Daily Rhado dot Com. Baker Mayfield pretty

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>kitchen losers on this week's edition of the BFFs, and

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Frank called everybody on this Brown's team outside of NHL

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a loser rightfully. So Odell Becka finally goes over a

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards. No other pass catcher for Cleveland had more

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>than forty seven Cleveland Brown's not great, not great, Bob

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>at all, Greg thirty seven. For Baker Mayfield, what's the

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>excuse for Baker Mayfield yesterday? Because he was sacked zero

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>times and he was going up against the Seattle Seahawks

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>who do not have a good pass rush evidence by

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>their zero sacks. They're very actually low in terms of

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>pressures per game in the NFL as well. So what's

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Baker mayfields excuse for yesterday? Six point seven yards per

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>at tempt through three interceptions. I know one of those

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was off the hands of Dontrell Hilliard as well, but

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if you watch that play actually toured a little bit

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>behind Dontrell Hilliard as well. Baker Mayfield has regressed big

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>time this year, and obviously, you know if he's a

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>loser the way that he's playing, the way that this

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is playing, the plays that are being called

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for this offense right now, Freddy Kitchens needs to turn

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to Todd Monkin for either some guidance or just give

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it up to Todd Monkin in terms of calling the

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>plays because it's not working right now. The one thing

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that is working is Nick Chubb twenty carries a hundred

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two yards six point one yards per attempt,

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>two rushing touchdowns. Also added five receptions for seventeen yards. Greg,

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>how about this. Nick Chubb wasn't really regarded as a

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>big passing threat. I think coming into the season. He's

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on pace for fifty three receptions, man, So that's pretty good.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>We do have to start to think more about Kareem

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Hunt and what his role is going to be when

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he returns. But ultimately he's going to take some away.

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>But yesterday Nick Chubb had twenty five touches, all right,

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So what's the difference he's gonna be eighteen to twenty touches.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>There's they still want to be a running football yesterday

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>they said. They kept saying it throughout the broadcast, Like

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Kitchens knows that they're supposed to be a run

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>first football team, that they want to run the ball

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Chubble. Maybe that's what it's gonna take when

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt is back, Like they'll just scale back the

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>volume for Baker Mayfield and maybe we'll see, you know,

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty touches for Nick Chubb and we'll see eight to

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>ten touches for Kareem Hunt. And they really will trying

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to trying to transition into a run first football team.

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not worried. I'm not worried about Kareem Hunt. Honestly.

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Someone asked me last night, Greg, who would you rather

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 1>have moving forward? Nick Chubb or Alvin Kamara. I would

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>rather have Nick Chubb. I know what's crazy, but Alvin

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Kamara three straight games without a touchdown, and I don't

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>know if he's healthy. To be honest, it's funny. I

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was all read something weird. This was the offer this

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>morning to me. I was offered Kamarrow for Chubb straight

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>up this morning. How would you do it? I mean,

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>at best, it's probably a lateral move right right, Nick

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Trubb is the top five running back even I believe

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that even when Kareem Hunt returns, and we said that

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>before the season that we didn't know what Kareem Hunt's

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>role was gonna be, and that Nick Chubb was in

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>a really good spot to be a featured workhorse running

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>back on his team, and that's that's been the case.

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I believe he's RB three on the season. Yeah,

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>RB three and half point PPR league's behind only Christian

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey because McCaffrey's having a historic season. He's doing things

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we've never seen before from the running back position. And

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook, who you know, has basically had a hundred

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing in four and six games so far this year,

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>so he's in a really good spot. I think Nick

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Chubb is a top five running back rest of season.

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about Kareem hunt Um, but yeah, I

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>would rather have Nick Chubb over Alvin Kamar right now.

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And Odell Beckham got back on track. It's six catches

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred yards on eleven targets, but still kept

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the end zone. And he's now been outside

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the top forty wide receivers. This wasn't the case this week.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He's been outside the top forty wide receivers in Fantasy

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>three games this season so far. Greg, It's just he's

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>not giving you what he wants. Overall, again, everyone on

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this offense outside of Nick Chubb is a loser, total,

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>total loser. On the other side of the Seattle Seahawks,

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson once again a winner. Roshan Penny has not

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>has been in and out allowed with his hamstring injuries.

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Inactive yesterday as well, he didn't play yesterday. Cars in

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty four yards rushing on the ground,

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.359
<v Speaker 1>had a touchdown there for another thirty five yards through

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the air. Chris Carson clear RB one right now. Probably

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't many running backs you'd rather having Chris Carson. Yeah,

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson is the RB eleven on the season. I

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>do think that he is a RB one. I think

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>he's the top twelve running back. You look at what

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he's done each of the past three weeks. He's had

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>at least twenty two carries in three straight games. I mean,

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll be hard pressed to find a bigger workload for

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a running back than that, maybe outside of Ezekiel Elliott,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 1>but Chris Carson seeing a ton of work on the ground.

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he has at least four targets in

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>each of the past three games. He has at least

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>three targets in three out of in four out of

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>six games that he's played so far this year, So

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he's being used more in the past game as well.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not the best pass catcher, we saw that against

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the Rams where the almost dropped the go ahead touchdown there.

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Chris Carson is a top twelve running back.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now, and obviously will Displey owners huge huge loss yesterday.

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean Will Disley owners are the real losers in

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks offense yesterday and moving forward, I don't

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a tight end here that's going to

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>step up and really take over. They have Luke Wilson,

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>but not really much of a pass catcher, more of

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a blocking tight end. I think that DK Metcalf could

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>end up being a big winner here. Greg could see

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>more targets moving forward. Same thing for tier Lockett, but

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Will Disley was a big part of this offense, and

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think now those targets are going to go to

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the top two wide receivers. I'm not really buying it

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Drawn Brown thing personally. Yeah. So I was

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:01.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out esterday went with great touchdown dance,

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>bye bye bye with Will Disley Tarry that achilles. I

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was trying to figure out who is going to be

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the main beneficiary of those red zone looks, and Dk

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>met up makes sense given his size. Luke Wilson the

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>backup tight end that somebody to consider. Jacob Hollister is

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>there as well. Drawn Brown obviously got too yesterday. I

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. That's the thing I'm gonna be relying on.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Daven Moore could be an option. I don't know. He

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>played a little bit more yesterday too, So that's that

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we know that they want to run the football. There's

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>still gonna be a lower target share because they're not

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a massive amount of past attempts. They do

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>have some games coming up where again the Seahawks, when

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>they have the right matchup in terms of it's there's

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of back and forth. It happened yesterday

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>as well, where the Browns went up big right away

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and then Russell Wilson awesome story yesterday about him having

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to call his own own plays on that drive where

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>his his head, his earpiece went out inside of the helmet.

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, when they have those games where there's some

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, they're playing a really good offensive team

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, those are the games we're gonna get the

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>big Russell Wilson upside, the big upside for Tyler Lockett

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and Metcalf. Tyler Locket didn't have a huge game yesterday,

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but a solid game five for seventy five. I think

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>most people will take that. I think we just get

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>more Chris Carson, I think we get more to lock

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it and more to Metcalf as well. Greg. I absolutely

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>think all of those all of those players will be

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>major beneficiaries. With Will Disley out over the game, let

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>me go over to London here. It was the first

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>game of the day, Frankie and Carolina wins is one

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of six. Haven't may climb back in it. But Jameis

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Winston turns the ball over six times, five interceptions and

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a fumble that Carolina Devens, who tried to tell people

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't need it this weekend in London certainly works

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 1>out twenty one fantasy points in my league. Like now,

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to drop them going into the

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>buy even awesome as of late, Kyle Allen wins again.

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>This team was oh and two, they are now they

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>are now four and you Carolina looks good. Yeah, they

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>really do this. It all starts with the defense. With

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers. Their plan lights out football right now,

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there's always a few defenses that break out and established

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>themselves as top five defenses regardless of matchup. And I

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think that the Carolina Panthers in San Francisco forty niners

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>are those defenses. Damis Winston, man, I mean, what are

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 1>we gonna do? I think this is where we're nearing

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the end of the line when it comes to Jameis Winston.

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with Marcus Mariotta. They were drafted in the

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>same draft, first and second overall, respectively. We saw Mark

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariotta get bench yesterday as well, but it's just

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. Winston sacks seven times yesterday. The

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>pass us for this Panthers defense is legit, but it

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't excuse Jamis Winston turning the ball over six times,

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>five interceptions of fumble lost. You saw the quote from

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Bruce arians just throw the damn ball away Damis Winston

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>through for four yards. But it doesn't matter when you're

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>turning the ball over that much. And that's why I

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>have Winston as a huge loser here, Greg, but I

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have Godwin and Mike Evans as winners because you see

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>yesterday seventeen targets for Mike Evans. I believe that's the

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>third time that he has seen at least seventeen targets

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in a game in his career. Chris Godwin another monster

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 1>performance all garbage time, but that's fine, we'll take it.

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna get a lot of garbage time

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, because while the Bucks have been really good

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>against the run, their past defense has regressed once again.

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And with Winston turning the ball over as much as

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>he is, opposing defenses are going to score as a

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>result of that, which will lead to them playing from

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>behind and throwing the ball more So, Winston is a loser,

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily want to trust him for fantasy football. But

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>because of that volume, we love Chris Godwin and we

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>love Mike Evans Gregg. I think they are both winners yesterday,

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>even though Jamis Winston did not play well. Even though

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston did not play well, the wide receivers winners,

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and they go into the bye being two wide receivers

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 1>that you can count on. You can drop O J. Howard,

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's over, it's over, Greg, Yeah, I think he had

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a few drops yesterday as well. I know it's yesterday

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>morning or over the weekend Byron Left which comes out says,

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you know the time is gonna come for O. J. Howard.

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw that, we heard that a couple of weeks

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>ago to the balls will come. That's what Bruce Arians said, well,

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>guess what, they're not. Four targets for O. J. Howard yesterday,

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>four targets for Cameron Braid. We should have seen it coming.

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>We should have seen it coming. And uh, that's that's

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>our bad. I know there were some people that were

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on the side of Bruce Arians doesn't use the tight end.

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Brad is still there. I tried my best to

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>overlook that because of the talent of O. J. Howard.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We saw last year that you know, he was making

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the most of his opportunities last season, and you know

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>his on pace numbers last year, if he would have

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>stayed healthy for sixteen games, it was nine yards eight touchdowns.

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I really thought we were about to get that third

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>year breakout. It is not happening. You can drop O. J. Howard,

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Greig I agree, and you know, and Frank not. Now

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you were right, like Evan Ingram more there was that

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>group of Evan Ingram and Hunter Henry and O. J. Howard,

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I like to Howard the most of the group here,

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's just not happening. But here's the thing, Bruce

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Arians has never utilized the side end wasn't going. I was.

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I was really banking on O J. Howard's talent being

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the differentiating factor here. I was really hoping that, you know,

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and we say this a lot, right about the best coaches,

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they scheme to the personnel that they have. They don't

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just continue to run their system based on you know,

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, we had this really talented tight end,

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we're just not gonna use him because you know, my

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>system calls for not using the tight end. I really

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that they were going to overcome that and that

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he was going to try and incorporate O J. Howard Moore.

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just all on the coaching staff. O J.

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Howard has not played well. I'm not gonna make excuses

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for him anymore. He's been dropping the football, he has

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not been blocking as well as he normally has as well.

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that has led to him playing less. But ultimately,

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they like utilizing the wide receiver and that's Chris Godwin

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Evans. There's no more excuses. Speaking of Hunter

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Henry last night Sunday Night Football, Hunter Henry returned was

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be limited fashion. It wasn't. He led this

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Chargers team in receiving eight catches for a hundred yards,

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of touchdowns. Melvin Gordon has looked very,

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>very bad since coming back Austin acular file. He has

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a bad game because of Melvin Gordon and the Pittsburgh

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Steelers go into l A and defeat the Chargers with

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>their third string quarterback James connerd led this team and

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>receiving it was obviously just a game management game. J

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the shuster continues to do nothing. One catch for seven yards.

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a monstrous loser. Love spot um for would uju

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>right now? How did you see this? Who are your

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>winners losers from this game? I think Hunter Henry is

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge winner, but ultimately his fantasy owners are the

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>real losers here. Greg he was started an eight percent

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of CBS leagues last night. People didn't know a how

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>healthy he was gonna be, whether or not he was

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>even gonna play, what his target share would be like,

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>what his usage would be, what his offensive snaps would be,

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And he comes out and has what might be his

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>best game of the season, and it's on everybody's bench.

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So his owners are losers for not having him in

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the lineup. But I think he is a winner because

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he re established his dominance and reminded us how talented.

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>He really is. I mean to lead this team in receiving,

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>in receptions to have the two touchdowns, I thought it

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>was a massive game for Hunter Henry as well. I'll

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>even throw Mike Williams in there as a winner. Greg.

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Back to back games with double digit targets, back to

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>back games where Keenan Allen has not shown up. So

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:15.439
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year, Keenan Allen was dominating that target share,

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 1>being used in the red zone, scoring touchdowns. That's not

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the case the past couple of weeks. Now Hunter Henry

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>gets healthy. Now Mike Williams is starting to get healthy.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Back to back games with double digit targets as as

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, and Melvin Gordon is back in the mix.

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:31.479
<v Speaker 1>This is a big win for the running backs. Don't

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>matter analytical crowd, because we saw this offense playing really

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.879
<v Speaker 1>well with Austin Ekeler at the helm, using him, using

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson throwing passes to the running backs. Melvin Gordon

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>comes in and their offense has been putred each of

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks. The Steelers defense did play well,

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>so you give them credit, but yeah, this, uh, this

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>offense has not looked the same with Melvin Gordon back. Overall,

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to James Conner because he hurt himself and

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>left in the second half. Benny Snow had seventeen carries.

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith, Schuster Greig, I would say this, he's nothing

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>more than a high end wide receiver three moving forward.

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 1>That's even with Mason Rudolph, I just don't know that

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be able to overcome this quarterback play right,

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna do it for us. Tomorrow we'll go take

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a look at the waiver wire. He's frank on Greg

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll see tomorrow. We hope Daily rodo dot com learned

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stopped industry leading DBS tools

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily roado dot com

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 1>optimize that in minutes, building optimized line up for cash

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>games and turneys. Learned from the game's best DFS players

0:46:46.400 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>joined Daily rodo dot com. What did happened? What? Here's

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 1>what you missed on the bfps I have. It's not

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>really my friends. My friends are done. Mr Populas. The

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>last few years have been all my friends and now

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Judy's friends are all already get married, okay, because she's

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 1>younger than you. Right, So back to back weekends in

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>June next year, we have a well, we have one

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.800
<v Speaker 1>wedding in the same day when in Florida, one in

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Lake George. So we're going to separate. One is my

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>friend was her friends? Oh my god. The problem is

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in November of next year, we have the same scenario

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>her family friend my friend on the same day next year,

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>two times it's happening. Next June we have the two

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>weddings on that same day in June. A week later,

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 1>we have winning on Saturday in Maryland, and then we're

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 1>winning Sunday in Brooklyn. How do you have this many friends? Seriously,

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that is a fair question. I have maybe I don't know,

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>five or six weddings I'm gonna be invited to over

0:47:57.840 --> 0:47:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the next three years. Of they're all just my closest friends.

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm just not close enough with other people.

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 1>King has friends, yeah, but none of them are really

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>close to getting married. So so I have a group

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of ten. Basically, I have a group of eleven friends

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>right for my whole friends, six of them are now

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would be seven or eight. You have

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to be married, so I would be the eighth person

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to get married. Out of that, everybody else is married.

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Are you tired? Are you tired of weddings at this point?

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You know what, it's a nice time for all as

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>we get older, Like we don't go out of the

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>go to bars every Saturday, and yeah, you get to

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>see everybody. You probably don't get to see everyone else.

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I've not see anybody. It's like all be together, all drinking,

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like no holds bar type of thing. It was what

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>we did when we were younger. Now we we don't

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore. True, it's all work, work, work, and

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>no place so f so not only is that happening, Frankie,

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Like my friends are now getting like pregnant. You're like,

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>oh god, that that's gonna being pressure to you. Greg suffsman,

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 1>now do you need to produce a little greggy? It's

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.359
<v Speaker 1>not from the only one person presure's gonna come from,

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's my mother. I need a great time. You're married.

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>What are we waiting for here? I mean my parents

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>have already out of It's just probably not gonna happen. Ever,

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I just keep telling them that, So just get their

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>hopes down off there, and then if I decide that

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it wants that it's gonna happen, then then build them

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>back up, you know, set them up for disaster first

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and foremost. Yeah, I have two weddings next year in October,

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 1>back to back weekends. I'm part of both wedding parties.

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That sucks. That's how I felt the last two weeks.

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>That's terrible. I'm sorry in October. It's not fun in October. Yeah,

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing for me from Yeah, he's gonna have

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to stay in the hotel over two nights as well. Potentially,

0:49:27.040 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe it it ends up very quickly. Frank, how Greg,

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 1>how was your weekend? How was my weekend? I saw

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a Joker on Friday. It was phenomenal. I thought, walking

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix today, phenomenal job. I really really enjoyed it. Saturday,

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't better. Was he better than the Ledger? He

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>might be? Yeah, he really might be. I mean it's

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a completely different role. It's like way darker. There's no action.

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So if that's what you're trying to find, don't go

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.479
<v Speaker 1>watch Joker. I think the people who don't like Joker

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or like this is way too dark. There's nothing to

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>do with Batman. I mean, it's really about the his

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>like psychotic break, like how he went crazy. So it

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. I've really enjoyed it. And he might be

0:49:57.800 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>better than Heath Ledger, but they're both amazing in the

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:00.360
<v Speaker 1>own right