WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How Filibusters Work

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, this is Chuck and uh surprise, you get

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a bonus episode this week and every Saturday moving forward

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>with our s Y s K Selects episode. So what

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we decided to do was um to kind of you know,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>not everyone knows we have all these back episodes laying

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in wait to the tune of nine plus. So each week, UM,

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Josh will pick one, I'll pick one. We're gonna curate these.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It might be Newsy, it might just be one of

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>our favorites, and we're gonna publish them on Saturday. So

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>if you if you haven't heard this one before, enjoy it.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>If you have, maybe listen again. Uh And this week

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I picked out Filibusters, especially because of kind of what's

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>going on in this country right now with the looming

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>nomination of uh Mr Gorsych to the Supreme Court and

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the threatened democratic filibuster. So if you don't know what

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>filibusters are all about, give this episode to listen and

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>everything will be a lot more clear and we hope

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy it. Welcome to Stuff you should know the

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>house Stuff Works dot Com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark and with me is always at Charles Study,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Bryant, and Jerry And that's the stuff you should know.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I filibuster that you can't. I could talk for the

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>next twenty four hours straight and not allow you to speak,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and that would be filibuster in this podcast. Um, No,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd actually be creating a podcast. Still, I guess we

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>don't have any part elementary rules, So I mean, technically

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you could do that and it's a podcast. Still, upon

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>reading this, it seems like the U. S. Government doesn't either,

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>because one strategy is to just pick up your ball

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and go home. Yeah. I just sort of put the

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>filibustering is, except you don't go home. No, you stand

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there and tell everybody else goes home. In the most

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>classic example, which is what we're all about here at

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know the classics, man, Um, Chuck. You

0:01:55.480 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>know this year two thirteen, which is drawing to a close, Um,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>there were two very high profile filibusters. One was by

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>Wendy Davis, member of the Texas State Senate, who filibustered

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>against a proposed bill that would or a package of

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>bills that would limit access to abortions. Did she actually

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>do it like a solo filibuster? Yeah, the classic she

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>had like on some snazzy pink magenta Mazzuno running shoes,

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>back brace and I believe a catheter. Shut up. No,

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding, I'm I'm almost positive shad a catheter

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and spoke for eleven hours straight. Um. There was also

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>another one by in September by U S. Senator from

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas Ted Cruz, one of the founding people of the

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Tea Party, or at least one of the most prominent

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>members of the Tea Party, who was um filibustering against

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a continuing resolution to keep the government open, okay, or

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to reopen the government. He went solo as well he did.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>One was real. One was fake. What do you mean,

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Cruises was fake? It wasn't a real filibuster. It was

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>basically stage dressing that looked like filibuster. But at its core,

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>as we'll soon find out, it wasn't a filibuster because

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it was the result of a deal with Harry Reid

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that Ted Cruise would be allowed to speak for twenty

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>one hours and then at the end of his twenty

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>one hours, this vote would go on. The whole purpose

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of a filibuster is to prevent a vote from taking place.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Not make a deal to speak for a certain amount

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of time. Uh, and then let the vote go through

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and then cruise even further wild people by voting in

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>favor of the motion after he supposedly filibustered it. So

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we have one, very very real one Wendy Davis. She

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't allowed to take a simple water, She had to

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>stay on on topic, spoke NonStop for eleven hours, catheter

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole she had to stay on topic. Is that

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a new thing, Well, it isn't. It's a Texas state rule.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And then Crews just basically spoke for twenty one hours,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>handed the lecture and over to I think Ram Paul.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>For a little while it was this kind of meandering

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. It looked like a filipbuster, but as we'll

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>find out, it wasn't really, even though Davis was very

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>much filibuster. So let's talk filibusters, man. Yeah, it's one

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of these. Well, I was about to say uniquely American,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but it does happen and has happened in other countries.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually dates back to ancient room, but it is uniquely

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>American in the way that we do it and how

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's abused. So, um, it's history does go back to

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>ancient room. Cato the younger was a master of the filibuster.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is back at a time when you actually

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>could make pretty good use of the filibuster because the

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Senate rule was that all business had to be concluded

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>by dusk. If it wasn't, sorry, it's off the table.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So all you had to do a stand there technically

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>for one day, and you could filibuster anything. It's pretty

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it. Yeah, and a lot of people,

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think assume that it's like part of like the

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Constitution maybe nope, Or that the founding father said, hey,

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we need this rule the filibuster. Nope. Uh that perhaps

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it was um brought up by Superman and the guys

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at Clark Kent. Yes, okay, we get there something alright.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So filibuster is an actual it's any sort of action

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can take to um block or delay action

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate House can't do it, Senate can, right,

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's it exists because there are rules. Yeah,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a really it's an odd thing with an odd

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>accidental history. Um. I guess first we should say that

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the name they believe comes from the Dutch word that

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>means pirate, and as pirates take things hostage, filibustering can

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>also be looked at its taking things off very much. So,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean like a vote or a bill that wants

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>to be introduced, confirmation or a nomination. Yeah, for a

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>confirmation for a judge. Let's say, yeah, you're holding it hostage. Um.

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people think a filibuster is a good

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>thing because it allows the minority, meaning the minority in

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Senate to still have a voice and not just

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have to get run rush shot over by the majority.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And the Senate has very has a long storied history

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of giving a tremendous amount of say and rights to

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the minority whichever whichever party that might be at any

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>given time. Um. And so as a result, the filibuster

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>was allowed to exist for a while ever since it

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>was accidentally created. But initially the Senate and the House

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>had a rule UM that prevented filibustering. Yeah, the previous

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>question motion which required a majority vote, and it was

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>not used though apparently ever so in eighteen o six

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they got rid of it. Yeah, the Senate did, and

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>um kind of didn't realize what they had created was

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a loophole. And that now, if you wanted,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you could get up and speak endlessly about something, and

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that's basically what it is. And Mr Smith goes to Washington.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Stewart did it and everyone loved it. But these

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>days it's kind of a different story. Well, yeah, it's

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely lost a lot of its um substance to you know. Well,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they didn't used to use it very much. No, And

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.119
<v Speaker 1>and that previous question motion, um, that's what it was called, right, Yeah,

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so that was basically like you could say, um, so

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is everybody ready for this guy to stop talking about

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this bill or can we be done with debate? And

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody says yeah, your nay? And then if it's yeah,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>then you just go on and and vote like it

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ends debate. But like you said, nobody was using it

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and so they just kind of threw it out because

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>debate is Yeah, I guess it was Aaron Aaron Burr

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>was saying, we need to simplify these rules. So the

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Senate did it. The House didn't, which is why you

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>can't have a filibuster in the House because they never

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>got rid of the previous question motion. But like you said,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Stewart did it. Everybody was just in awe of

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea of one all you need is one good

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>senator and the rest of the Senate could be corrupt.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But as long as you have Jimmy Stewart, one Jimmy

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Stewart in there. Yeah, and and a little bit of stamina, um,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you the the truth justice in the American way can prevail. Um.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And as you were saying, as a result, a lot

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of people think having a filibuster is a good thing

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>because it prevents tyranny by the majority. Yeah. And in

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>essence it is a good thing in a democracy. Um.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, it wasn't used that much in

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century. The first one was not until eighteen

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven, and less than two dozen took place before

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the year nineteen hundred. Uh. In nineteen seventeen, things change

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>with President Wilson got a little ticked off because there

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was a filibus for blocking a bill arming merchant ships

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Great War was being fought, and he said,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't have time for this, so I'm gonna push

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to pass something called a culture rule, which means that

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we can cease this filibustering with the two thirds vote, right,

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't really have any say. I mean, the

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>President is not the he's not involved in the Senate.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the vice where he but he was. He was

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>using all of his influence in public opinion against a

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>quote a little group of willful men. Yeah. I mean

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>he hated it, and he was a big champion of

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to limit it as much as possible. So the

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Senate passed this culture rule that said you can you

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>can bring something to a vote with two thirds majority,

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>which is sixty seven senators. That's right, that's still you know,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of people. That means that the will

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate, not just the majority. Uh, not just

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the majority party, I should say, but the actual Senate

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is like enough of this, Like, well, let's just we

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>agree that we need to stop debating exactly. Uh. It

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>has since been abused um or used depending on your viewpoint. UH.

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>In the during the civil rights movement, racist senators used

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>it to block all sorts of things, from anti lynching

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>laws to civil rights UH bills and um successfully. Strom

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Thurman in n seven broke the record for speaking for

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours and eighteen minutes. That's still the record straight.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>That's because no one else wants to do that, or

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>has the stamina or the adult papers. We can't leave.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We keep talking about that. We should explain you're not

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to leave, even to pee. You have to keep talking. Well,

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that was the case until the seventies. Apparently, filibustering thanks

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to the um UH segregationists who are using it to

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>prevent lynching, laws, to prevent the um UH, the Civil

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Rights Bill, UH, pretty much anything that had to do

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>civil rights they were using the filibuster for. So by

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the time the seventies rolled around, the Senate passed a

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>um A different rule that meant well, it said, if

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to bring a vote to cloture to end debate,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>no longer do you need sixty seven senators. You only

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>need sixty, which is a little easier to get. But

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to give the minority. Still. See, the Senate

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>loves the minority, UM the ability to threaten a filibuster

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>if they have forty one senators on board with that filipbuster,

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and you don't even have to stand up there anymore. Yeah,

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but you still can if you're a loan senator like it.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It didn't eliminate the loan filibuster. Speaker, no because if

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you have forty or thirty nine or thirty eight, or

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just you, you're just that one person, then you

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>have to stand up there still. But the idea that, um,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>if you had forty one senators who would, if called upon,

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>would vote um against that clture, you don't have to talk,

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>right because by definition, you have that filibuster power. And

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of adding this rule was not just

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to kind of give a little back to the minority

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>when you were taking it away by dropping it from

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a two thirds to three fifths majority for culture Um.

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>They were also trying to make it so that the

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Senate business was more streamlined and efficient. But it had

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the unintended consequence of people saying like, oh, well, I'm

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I threatened filibuster. I'm gonna sit over here and I

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have to talk. I'm gonna threaten filibuster. So that

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>means take this bill out of consideration and let's move

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on with the other business. And that's when bills just

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>started getting blocked the left and right. Yeah yeah, um.

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And back to Thurman. Supposedly with the whole bathroom thing,

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he h took a steam bath to hydrate himself so

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't have to peat. That's the story. I can

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine that would take for maybe ten twelve hours, but

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>then twenty four hours he peat himself. You think, I'll

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bet it's just one of those untold stories of the

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Senate strom Thurm and Pete all over himself. Okay, so

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the simple filibuster, the one you don't see as

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>much anymore because the one guy standing up. Yeah, now

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>now it's more about, hey, we we can just threaten

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it and no one has to waste their time speaking

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and debating. But Chuck, it's also it does. It does

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>keep you from wasting time. But because it's easy to

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>do and because all you need are forty one senators, um,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's created a backlog. It's a really easy way for

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the minority to hold anything they want hostage, which is

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>one reason why while a lot of people say it's

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a good thing to have a filibuster because it protects

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the minority from majority tyranny. Um, but having a filibuster

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>means that really just a fairly small group of senators

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>less than half can hold anything they want up and

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just that that one simple filibuster, the presence of it

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>means that you can have any crazy nut who's a

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>senator hold anything up that he wants as long as

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to stand there and talk. Ye. So there's

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>some people who say we need to get rid of

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the filibuster. There's others who say, no, the filibuster has

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to exist. It's this accidental thing that the Framers didn't

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>put in there, but it was a happy accident that

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it came about, and it proved it's worth as a

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as a part of democracy. Uh. Well, you mentioned earlier

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how who was who was the lady that Davis? Yeah,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Wendy Davis who you said she had to stay on

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>point because in Texas they say you have to stay

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on point. But federally there are no laws, specifically are

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>rules that say you have to do so you just

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have to talk, which is fairly ridiculous. Uh in hughe

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>p Long did such things as read Shakespeare and talk

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>about cooking fried oysters site recipes and I'll bet you

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we Long had a pretty good fried oyster. Uh. It's

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>just crazy. It's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>You know what, that you can say whatever you want. Yeah,

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that literally, that is what our government is doing they're

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>up there talking about oyster recipes on the floor of

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Senate to block a bill being introduced. Perhaps I've

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>always equated filibusters with the senator standing up there reading

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>from a phone book. I think that that was another

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>common tactic too that Yeah, I don't know who did,

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's definitely been done USA, right, And yeah, I

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:30.359
<v Speaker 1>think it'should kind of should leave a it is, especially

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>when it's not just at the very least, you should

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>have to stand up there and debate your bill, debate

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>your position and yes, and talk about what the issue

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is at hand. And if you're willing to do that,

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if you feel that passionate about that, then there's really

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of criticism that slong at you. But

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're staying out there talking oyster recipes, or in

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, if you're just saying they're in filibuster, that

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that that, to me is just that's hijacking. It is

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it's piracy. It is. Uh So that is not the

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>only way you can waste time and block things from

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>happening in Congress. Uh you can. There are all these

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>little tactics that can be used. For instance, um, you

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>can introduce a lot of amendments to a bill. UM,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and instead of just saying waving the right and saying,

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we're introducing this amendment. Everyone knows it.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to waste our time reading it, they

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>can demand, well, I'm gonna introduce forty seven amendments to

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this bill, and we're gonna read each one in full.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just a time wasting measure. You can also add

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on to that UM a roll call vote for each amendment,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>so you have an amendment read and then you have

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a role call taken for every senator to say whether

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they vote yeah your name for each amendment yeah, which

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>would make it even more timely. Uh. Something called quorum calls.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Apparently that UM ascertains a number of senators present. I

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how that's different than a roll call. Role

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>call is what what you're voting, like, like, how do

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you feel about this amendment? Are you present or not?

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Because you have to have a quorum. I can't remember

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>how many makeup a quorum, but basically, like there has

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a certain amount of people present for Senate

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>business to be conducted, So quorum would be to find

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>out if there's enough people present and if you're just

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>doing it delay time. They might be in their offices

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. They might be having dinner and they're still

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>technically present. But if you call quorum call, then that

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>means they have to come in and say present and

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>then go back to dinner. Uh. There can be something

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>called an anonymous hold, which allows someone to block a

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>bill a man or woman in the Senate um when

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it requires unanimous consent in order to be voted on.

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's anonymous, which is kind of tricky because then

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't know who's holding up the gumming up the works, right,

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, then it turns into like a big game

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of clue. So, yeah, Harry read did it in the

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>conservatory with the rope um. So filibuster reform surely something

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>this weird and hanky should be looked at and reformed

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to retain the true spirit of of the filibuster.

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And over the years there's been a lot of talk

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>about reform, a little bit of action about reform, but

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>not a ton until recently. Uh. In the fifties there

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was but one filibuster procession, and in two thousand seven

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand eight there were one hundred and thirty

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>nine threatened filibusters affecting seventy of major legislation in two

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>thousands to seven two thousand, Right, is that amazing? Yeah,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so it obviously got out of hand and people were

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>abusing the power. I can't help but wonder also if

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the the concept that both groups are coming together to

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>rule the country in a combined manner has become less

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and less of a concept over the last few decades

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know, is it? Is it? Or am

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I just like making that assumption and it's always been

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that way. There's always been that division. Is that the

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>case or no? It seemed to be like my opinion

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is that it used to be checks and balances, and

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>now it's not so much checks and balances as it

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in is just severe, severe digging in. It certainly seems

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that way, But maybe it was always like that. I

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I didn't grow up in the fifties. Yeah,

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know either. They probably felt the same way

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that American people, did, you know, those jerks in Washington.

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Oh, I'm sure they did. But I wonder

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if they had as much cause to say that as

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we do today. Like it the way it's always actually worse.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the numbers would suggest that, you know. But

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is it just that the numbers are showing that people

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>figure it out how to use a filibuster better than

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>they knew before, smarter, or they're they're more depth at

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>using it, or is government broken that much more to

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>where there was one a year each year during the

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>fifties and then there's a hundred and thirty nine a

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>year in two thousand eight. Yeah, it seems broken to me,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.959
<v Speaker 1>but I'm definitely indicates that to me too. Yeah, I'm

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>fairly cynical about the state of modern politics, though I

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>am too. And the thing that gets me the most

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>about this is the idea that the government is broken

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>because the two sides can't agree, even though really, if

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you get down to it, there's almost no distinction between

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans Ideologically here they're a little bit, but

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>as definitely between liberals and conservatives, but between the Democrats

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Republicans, I feel there's almost no difference any long,

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like where the rubber meets the road, and not ideologically speaking,

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea that the government still can't function

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>even when you have virtually one large mega party um

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is I don't understand it. I don't understand what's going

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>on there. It's sad. It seems like it would be

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>functioning in a really smooth manner and steamrolling over us.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Silly boy. Uh So we've talked a lot about this

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>weird process, UM, but we should talk about reform right

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>after this message, right, okay, So back to it. We

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>were talking before we went off on some of our

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>personally thinking's about that it stinks now about reforming filibusters.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>But problems arise when you try to reform filibustering because

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that can be filibustered. Yeah, you know, yeah, if you

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>have a proposals to reform filibustering, it's still a measure

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and you exactly. UM. So that this this whole talk

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>of how to reform filibustering, some proposals came up in

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand ten. UM. There were three good ones. One was,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're filibustering, you can't threaten to filibuster any longer.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to get up there and you have to

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>talk play the part. That one that was shot down.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Another one was that UM over the length of a filipbuster,

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the UM required number of senators to invoke clture just decreases,

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>so a filibuster could only go on for so long

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>before you get to like a simple majority. Now that

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>was that was shot down. The third one you got

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that one. Yeah, it would have banned filibusters on motions

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>bringing a bill to the floor, so you couldn't filibuster

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like maybe something to perform filibustering. None of those were passed.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why, like you would think that one

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>party would be like, well, we don't want filipbusters were

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in charge. They you have to remember that eventually you're

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to be in charge and you're gonna want

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a filibuster. Both parties filibuster. The Democrats filibuster Reagan's appointments

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and nominees in the eighties, just like the Republicans are

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>filibustering Obama's right now. Yeah, I will say though, in fairness,

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's record numbers now compared to even what Democrats did,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying one is better than the other. No, No,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it's much more highly evoked in recent years, and it's

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely been squarely on the shoulders of the Tea Party too. Yeah,

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been since the Tea Party started to get some um,

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>some major seats for instance, I got a number for you. Uh.

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>It used to be fairly rare to filibuster a judicial

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>um presidential appointment. Like, it wasn't used that much for that.

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It was more for like bills and things. Uh. And

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there have been only about a hundred and eighty something

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>times in the history of this country that that's been

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>done and more than half of those have happened during

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the past seven years. Wow. So it wasn't used that

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>much in the past, but in the past it's been

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>happened I think more than ninety two times in the

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>past seven years. Well you know what that suggests. That

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>suggests that before those things were used, um, like a scalpel,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and now they're just basically arbitrary. That's exactly what it was.

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>In the eight years that um Bush Jr. Was in office,

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>there was about a dozen of those nominees that were filibustered,

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.239
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to ninety two. And since Obama has been

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in there, so it's definitely not surgical anymore. And again,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>both parties use it, but it's being misused and has

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>been for a while. Yes, And if you if you

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>listen to the GOP, they're saying that Obama is trying

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to pack the courts. If you listen to the Democrats,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, dude, nobody does this come on? Cool. So

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason that all those bills failed, um or the

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the reform failed in two thousand ten was because they

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>basically did a little handshake deal where they said, um,

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, don't use filibustering so much to prevent these

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>bills from being introduced. All right, I won't do that.

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And hey, you guys can add a bunch of amendments

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to. And no one's gonna use the

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>nuclear option. Are we all cool with that? Yeah, we're

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all cool with that. And then the GOP went back

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and started filibustering against so and so the Democrats use

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear option, Yeah, they did, which was huge. I

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>remember Harry Reid threatened it and everybody's like, oh my gosh, okay,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, UM, I can't remember what it was. There

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was the GOP was blocking something that Harry Reid really

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to push through, and he said, I'm going to

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>use the nuclear option and it works. Have we even

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>said what that is? I don't think we have no.

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>So the nuclear option is, uh, it's the power of

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the majority to use parliamentary procedures to change major rules,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case, specifically to remove the ability to filibuster. Yeah,

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>just for that session. Just for that Yeah, just for

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that session. I think. So I saw that in this article,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't see it elsewhere. Well, so, so here's

0:25:55.840 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing. The majority holds the power to say, um,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we're all we need is a simple majority senators, which

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we have as Democrats. Two change your rule, right, and

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that rule that we're going to change is that you

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>don't need sixty senators to block a sixty one senators

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to block a filibuster or sixty sentators. I'm sorry, you

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>only need which we the Democrats have simple majority. Yes,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>so that this has been in the power of whoever

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>has been in the majority the whole time. But it's

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>such a polarizing thing. It's saying like, we're we're taking

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>away your ability to block what we want to push

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>through through filibustering because we're taking away your ability to filibuster.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna pass this rule with a simple majority, saying

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it just takes a simple majority to invoke culture and

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and debate and bring something to the floor. It's not saying, um,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it only takes a simple majority to confirm this nominee,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's already the case. So if you follow it backwards,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it takes a simple majority confirmed a nominee. Now it

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just takes a simple majority to bring that nominee's confirmation

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to a vote. And they did that by passing a

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rule with a simple majority saying that we're going to

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>end filibustering. Yeah, and that was just a few weeks

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>ago on November twenty one, and it passed fifty eight

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>all Republicans and three Democrats hopped to the other side

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and voted against it. And it was not for all filibustering.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>It was just filibustering on executive branch nominees and judicial nominees,

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but not Supreme Court, not yet other than the Supreme Court. Um.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't like, you know, for introducing a bill

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But earlier this year they reached a compromise

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>on some reform. Both sides worked out a bunch of

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>new rules that changed the process somewhat. But I guess

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't enough in the case of Member twenty feet

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Harry Reid, because I kind of threw down the gauntlet

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>which no one thought would ever happen. No, it's been

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>an option for many, many years and no one's ever

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>exercised it. So Harry read either said this is this

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculous, is out of control, or government's broken or

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Harry Reid was drunk with power, depending on who you

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to. Well, it kind of came down to the

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>um or. This particular sticking point was about nominating UH

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>judges to the United States Court of Appeals for DC,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans said that, you know what, the d C

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>circuit has really underworked, and they said that they could

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>save a million dollars a year cut costs basically um,

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty preposterous considering the amount of money that's

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>leaked away every second in Washington. Just that a is

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the argument makes the whole thing smell fishy to me.

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit shallow um. And then Democrats said, no,

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you guys didn't have these concerns when

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Bush was appointing these nominees, and we need to maintain

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this court because in the size of it, because it's

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>UH really complex, like this particular court is so I

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>heard um. The Democrats tried to block appointments to that

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>same court when Bush was in office, sure did string Yeah,

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So like apparently both sides just completely flip flop the

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>same point. Yeah, and and took entirely one another's point

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>when the when the presidency was well, it depends on

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>who's in office and who has the majority on what

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>your beliefs are. It seems like ye wishy washy is

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what I call that USA so um. As of November

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of this year, Obama presented seventy nine nominees who received

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>culture votes. Bush had thirty eight in the eight years

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that he was in office. But we should say that

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>most of those culture votes UM ended the debate and

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>most of those nominees did clear the filibuster, right be

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>You used to have a filibuster that required sixty senators,

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but a confirmation only required fifty one. So now it's

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and fifty one. And in the meantime, regular

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>old Americans are out there like having real troubles and

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>senators are on the floor talking. Actually that was I

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can't keep talking about the oyster thing, but still cathetering

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>up in some cases. I'm pretty sure she had a catheter. Really,

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy, uh and uniquely American, I guess. So you

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>got anything else. I got nothing else. I hate to

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>sound so jaded about all this stuff, but it's kind

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of hard not to. I don't. I think you would

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be a drooling automaton if you didn't like get worked

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>up about and just say it like this is how

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>government should work. Yeah, if this didn't make you cynical,

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't matter what party you're affiliated with

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or whether you're conservative or liberal. If you think things

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are working right now, there's you need to completely reevaluate

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>your life. Yeah, it's hard. Did you hear Russell Brand

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>go off a few weeks ago in the interview It's

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, it's an interesting take, But don't go vote. Yeah, Like,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to make an argument that your vote really

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>matters these days. And I mean, like, if you're in

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a red state, deeply read state, and you're a Democrat,

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like there's really no reason for you to go vote

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>states your vote might matter. And then and then and

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>then those are the states that the the candidates go

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to and that the senators have more power than others.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it is a broken system. But how many politicians

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in this country are out there truly like pure and

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>chaste in their and their motives. I don't think there's

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a single one that's pure and chasing their motives, but

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think some there are still some good ones out

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there now there are, and I guess I don't know.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They believe in their own side. Things that go on

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>behind closed doors you have to look out for. Are

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the ones that don't believe in their own side. They're

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just exploiting one side to get themselves into power. Those

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are the ones that are truly bad. At least, if

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you believe in your own side, you have conviction. Whether

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree with your convictions or not, at the very

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>least respect the fact that you are convinced of your convictions,

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. But if you're just like, if you don't

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>have any convictions and you're just out for power, then

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to tell with you, pal, buddy, lady, all of you. Yeah,

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna move to Costa Rica. Do they have

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>government there? Yeah? Government? There are there any islands, tropical

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>islands that have no government. There's tons of uninhabited islands. Okay,

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what we need. And I'm not going to believe

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in anarchy. Would just be nice to move to an island. Well,

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there's not a bunch of jerks wasting your time and

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>taking your money. Yeah, I don't know. Anarchies looking more

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and more attractively. We should do a podcast on anarchy.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>We really should. Uh. If you want to know more

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>about filibustering, you can type that word into the search

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bar how stuff works dot com. And since I said

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>search bar, that means it's time for listener mayl. All right,

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this one. Uh, let's see if we

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>can help out some heroin addicts. It's not funny, that's

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>funny how I said it though. Hey, there, guys, thanks

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for keeping me entertained insane. Um, I'll explain the same part.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I will let you know what's been up with me

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and how you guys have helped me in the past

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>few months. I am a twenty five year old living

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in Santa Monica, California, and I'm a part of the

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>huge homeless population there. Most nights of my girlfriend I

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>end up staying in a motel in Venice, in l A,

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where we are both homeless. It is my fault we

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>ended up this way. We were both addicted to heroin

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and it was because of me. Each day my girlfriend

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I have to go out and come up with a

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten dollars in order to afford our heroine

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and our room since their daily habit each day, we

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have to do this. It is an awful way of

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>life and we both feel horrible to been to get

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>detox meds through the county clinics. But the waiting list

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to see a doctor to get into rehab like that

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>has uh is a very long list. Indeed, unfortunately, there

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are not a lot of resources out there for drug

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>addicts as far as detox is concerned. Um, what is

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that Switzerland? And actually there are not a lot of

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>people are institutions that are willing to help unless the

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 1>addictive person has insurance or money to pay for treatment.

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We're not bad people, um, just looking at it. In fact,

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know that we were addicted to heroin. We

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>both have had jobs in the past and homes in

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the past, and she is even a college graduate and

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>is certified to do special effects makeup. The reason why

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>why I'm writing you guys, is because you can imagine

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>this lifestyle is very stressful. It's a lot of pain,

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>shame and guilt on a daily basis. Uh. In about

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>three or four months ago, I came across your podcast,

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's really helped me get through some of the

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 1>tough times. I found that listening to you when I'm

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna fight with my girlfriend or stressed or sad really

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>helps me turn around my mood. So thanks for this,

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and thank Jerry as well. And this is from t J.

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And I told t J that we would put a

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>call out, and I don't know if it will work

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>or not, but if anyone in southern California has a

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>resource for t J and his girlfriend to kick heroin,

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>then we'd love to hear from you and we will

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>put you in touch the email. Uh, t J, if

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you're listening. I don't know if this is gonna work,

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is about as far as we can take it,

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 1>but um, if someone writes in, we will definitely put

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>them in touch and uh see if we can get

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>you guys off the junk. Yeah. So thanks for writing,

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad we can help in some small way. Yeah,

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we're doing something to help out you know. Yeah,

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. Um well, I mean like also turning his

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>mood around. Yeah. True. But if you are a resource

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and can help these guys, email us um at our

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast at Discovery dot com email just putting the

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>subject line I can help the heroin addict. I think

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a great subject line. Uh. And until then, t

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>J and girlfriends stay safe. Please, if you need some

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>help that you think Chuck and I can help you

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>out with, you should get in touch with us. You

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>can tweet to us at s Y s K podcast.

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>That's on Twitter. You can join us on Facebook dot

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>com slash stuff you Should Know. You can send us

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>an email to Stuff Podcasts at Discovery dot com, and

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you can join us at our home on the web,

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it's Stuff you Should Know dot com. For more on

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics, visit how Stuff Works

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com.