WEBVTT - 1/12/26: Senator Chris Van Hollen On ICE, Gaza, Schumer & MORE!

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, Saga and Crystal here.

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and we are so excited about what that means for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the future of the show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the only place where you can find honest

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>perspectives from the left and the right that simply does

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>not exist anywhere else.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that is something that's important to you, please

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 2>go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>you'll access to our full shows, unedited, ad free, and

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>We need your help to build the future of independent

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to our recurring segment Get to Know a Senator.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 3>The previous guests have been JdE Vance, Ted Cruz, Alyssa Slotkin,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Markley, who else.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>We let's see see Bernie. We've had Bernie.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh, we had Bernie.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, So if your boss hasn't been on there yet,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>reach on out to us. But today we're talking to

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Senator Chris van holland Senator Van Allen.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for joining us here.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciate it's great to be with both of you.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>One thing and this was kind of the bait to

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>get you into the studio that I wanted to talk

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 3>to you about was and I don't know if you

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 3>remember this, many many years ago I mentioned to you

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>that before the Iraq War, I had been among twenty

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty people at a talk you gave at the University

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 3>of Maryland where you laid out in incredibly prescient detail

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>like why we should not invade Iraq and what would

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 3>happen if we did. Unfortunately, as Penties know, as we

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>did and those things happened. With the helpier staff, we

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 3>actually found evidence that this happened. If we can put up

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>this element on the screen. This is from the Diamondback,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>which is the student newspaper for the University of Maryland.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>So Monday, March third, twenty two thousand and three, this

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>is an advertisement for a talk that Congress and Chris

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>van Holland would be giving from twelve to one thirty pm.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>You had just been elected November of two thousand and two,

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>so you're sworn in in January of two thousand and three,

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and the war starts within within two months. So just

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 3>briefly lay out for us, like how did you see

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>what others didn't and what did you think was going

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>to happen?

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 4>And well, thanks for bringing that up.

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 6>And I actually remember that speech on the House floor

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.399
<v Speaker 6>because it's one of the earlier ones.

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 4>I'd just been elected.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Well and you gave a speech on the House floor

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>like a week later. Yeah exactly, yeah exactly. And look,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 3>this sort of brings us to the moment where in

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>now with respect to many challenges.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 6>But when it came to Iraq, I mean, we all

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 6>recognized that Saddam Hussein was a bad dictator. I would

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 6>have liked to see him go. But the question was

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 6>how do you most successfully do that? And the Bush

0:02:55.160 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 6>administration's answer was you invade Iraq. And the problem is

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 6>when you go in and break stuff, you really need

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 6>to know what's going to happen next. It's easy to

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 6>go in and break stuff. It's building stuff back that's

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 6>really hard. And nation building is something that is I

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 6>think we've learned the hard way that we should not

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 6>be engaged in.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, look, so that was opening.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 6>I called it Pandora's box, right, because what we did

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 6>was when we went into Iraq, we unleashed all these forces, right,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 6>the different sectarian forces within Iraq and then we tried

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 6>to put a cap on them, and that didn't work,

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 6>and the result was American forces on the ground for

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 6>a long time, thousands of Americans killed, thousands and thousands

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 6>of Iraqis killed, and the end result was actually to

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 6>strengthen Iran right by getting rid of remember saying we

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 6>strengthened Iran because they had been mortal enemies. I mean,

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 6>they'd fought a war against one another. So the biggest

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 6>beneficiary from the US going into Iraq was Iraq.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I when I expressed a lot of

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>admiration for you and the courage that you've had on Gaza,

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, I know that was very difficult, especially under

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 2>the Biden administration, going down to a Olsavador with kilmar

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>bergo Garcia at a time when there were other democrats ors.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh, we shouldn't talk about this. This isn't a good

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 4>issue for US.

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious how you sort of arrived at your worldview.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I know you're born in Pakistan and your parents I

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>think when was a state department one with Cia. You know,

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 2>what has that journey been like so that you came

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 2>to that place where you were able to see what

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>many weren't on Irock and have continued to be able

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>to see some things that people are either not willing

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 2>to see or unable to see.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 4>So you're right.

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 6>I grew up in a foreign service family career. My

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 6>father was a career diplomat. He went into the Navy

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 6>and then into the Foreign service. He married my mom,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 6>who was at the forerunner to the CIA. Okay, at

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 6>the time, she was a Russian language expert. She was

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 6>the daughter of an English teacher, but she became a

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 6>Russian language expert. So look growing up overseas and it's

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 6>kind of like a military family.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 4>You go overseas, you come back. But it does get

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 4>you thinking about what does America stand for?

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 6>And I was proud to represent or be part of

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 6>a family that represented the United States overseas. It also

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 6>causes you to hold up a mirror and say, are

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 6>we as good at home as we say we are?

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 6>And in terms of my worldview, I believe in the

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 6>power of America's example in addition to the power of

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 6>our military. And I think it's really important that we recognize,

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 6>especially at a moment like we're in right now, that

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 6>that has really benefited us over time and we're throwing

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 6>away the power of our example standing up for principles overseas.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 6>But it also you know, I remember very clearly in

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 6>Sri Lanka because my father was posted in Sri Lanka

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 6>going to a village and in the hut that belonged

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 6>to the head of the village, there was a photograph

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 6>on the wall and it's kind of hard to see

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 6>was dim light.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 4>It was a photograph of John F. Kennedy.

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 6>Why was that there because the Peace Corps had been

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 6>to that village and help with their water and sanitation.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 6>So I've always believed that the United States can play

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 6>a very important role around the world through the power

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 6>of its example and not the overly reliant on the

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 6>power of our military.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 3>Now you would come to your knowledge of the sectarian

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 3>situation in Iraq in a curious wave in the you

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 3>get this story a little bit for our audience. So

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 3>in the early nineties, you and Peter Gallbraith, who was

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 3>actually a brother of a friend of mine, James Gallbrath,

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>then happened to be the son of John Kenneth Gallbright,

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 3>the famous twentieth century economists. You guys are hill staffers

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 3>and do a very unhill staffer thing, which is sneak

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 3>into northern Iraq, the Kurdish region. Yeah, grab a whole

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.559
<v Speaker 3>bunch of documents and interviews with people there, and prove

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>that Sodam Hussein had used chemical weapons that presumably we

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 3>had sold him on the Kurdish people, Like how did

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>you get in? How does the boss sign off on that?

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 3>And what what did you like? How did that shape

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 3>your your politics? Knowing that our ally had done this

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>with our I don't know, not with our backing, because

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>but we kind of encouraged the Kurds to rise up

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 3>and then we let him gas them with our chemical weapons.

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 6>Like yeah, so you've yeah, I'm glad you brought this up.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>You're right. I was a staff member on the Senate

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>Foreign Relations.

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 6>Committee in the nineteen nineties. Actually, I'm sorry, in the

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 6>nineteen eighties. This is late nineteen nineteen eighty eightish, and

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 6>Saddam Hussein had unleashed his chemical weapons on the Kurds

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 6>in the northern part of Iraq, and so, yes, Peter

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 6>Gabraith and I traveled to the Turkish Iraq border.

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 4>We crossed into Iraq.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 6>Most of the interviews we did were with the Kurdish

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 6>refugees who had fled into Turkey, and there were just

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 6>these massive camps, and we actually camped out on the border.

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 6>How we got permission to do it, I don't know,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 6>But we then interviewed a lot of the members folks

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 6>in these camps who gave us sort of first hand

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 6>accounts of Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons because a

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 6>lot of people were denying it. And I remember to

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 6>this day to your point on who provided the precursor chemicals.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't necessarily sold the chemical weapons with the material

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 6>that was used.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 4>I remember American chemical companies.

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 6>Lobbying against the legislation we proposed when we got back,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 6>because we proposed full sanctions on Saddam Hussein economic sanctions

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 6>at the time, and we were able to ultimately get

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 6>that out of the Senate that died in the House.

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 6>But there's no doubt that the United States had sided

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 6>with Saddam Hussein during that Iran Iraq war.

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 4>And so yes, the hypocrisy.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 6>Of on the one hand, providing support to Saddam Hussein

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 6>and then turning around and trying to condemn his use,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 6>which was right to condemn, is something that always stood

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 6>out to me.

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I love to get your sort of before we zoom

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 2>in more specifically to the immediate moment. I love to

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>get your sense of how we ended up here, I

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 2>was saying earlier in the show, like at least then

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Bush neocons felt the need to make some public case

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 2>and like gin up some fake story about weapons of

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 2>mass destruction. Now we're so downgraded in the war propaganda

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>that we get machine guns and you know, them just

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>out and out saying no, it's for the oil. Like

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 2>we're just we want the oil. We're going to run

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the place. It's ours complete colonial project. But you know,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 2>people are also right in pointing out that, you know,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 2>we did do something similar in Panama, it had more

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of like moralism and justification wrapped around it. So

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 2>do you see those past interventions over years sort of

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 2>leading us to this place now where we just out

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>and out are like global thugs that if you have

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 2>something we want, we're just going to come in and

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>take it.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 6>So I think that when you're talking about going into Iraq,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 6>that was heavily pushed by the neocons, who stated public

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 6>purpose anyway was to bring democracy to places in the

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 6>Middle East, including Iraq.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 4>At the barrel of a gun.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 6>And if we've learned any lesson it should be that

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 6>you cannot by force just transform in a whole society.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 6>In the case of Venezuela, it is all about the oil.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean I came out very early and said, you know,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 6>this is all about the oil. And then Donald Trump

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 6>gets up the next day and says, it's all.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 4>About the oil.

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 6>And of course with this administration, the Trump administration, more

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 6>than in any other earlier conflict, it's all about making

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 6>money for Trump's billionaire.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Friends, like you know, and for himself and himself and

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 4>his family.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you look at what's happening across the

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 6>Middle East and the Gulf States, I mean the corruption

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 6>is just so gross. I mean, everything everything they touch,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 6>they're trying to transform into dollars for Trump and his.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Family and his billionaire buddies.

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you look at Venezuela, it's not necessarily

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 6>so much the oil companies, although in the long run

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 6>they they may benefit. But they're people like Paul Singer,

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 6>who is this huge Trump donor who bought Citgo out

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 6>of bankruptcy in November, and others like that who are

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 6>huge beneficiaries of this and had sort of been you know,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 6>told about it.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they people, you know, they knew that this

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 4>might happen.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 6>So I will say that this administration, the corruption piece.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Is just prevalent throughout.

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I'm curious, Yeah, how you view American power

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 3>abroad given that these mask off moments that we've had,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 3>whether it's the Iraq War, whether it's going into Venezuela.

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 3>And I'll put the question to you in terms of

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 3>the country you do understand quite well, haven't been born

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 3>there Pakistan. And in twenty twenty two, when the Russia

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine War breaks out, the Prime Minister at the time,

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>in Ron Khan says that he's going to remain neutral

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 3>in this war. US wanted Pakistan producing shells for Ukraine.

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>US wanted Russia to be isolated. The State Department told

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 3>him that they found that to be offensive and they

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 3>called it a posture of aggressive neutrality, which is kind

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 3>of a bizarre term to begin with, and told the

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>ambassador that if a vote of no confidence was held

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 3>and Immoran Khan was removed from power, relations between the

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 3>United States would be better and quote all all would

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>be forgiven was the phrase that this this one diplomatic

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you think, you know, Don Low would used

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Since then the military has basically taken over a dictatorial

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 3>control in Pakistan, and the and the US through Biden

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and then through Trump completely behind them, like no pretense

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 3>of you know, support for Pakistani democracy, So that that's

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>more of a mask on American power moment. So is

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>is that like, is that who we are globally? Like,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 3>at what point do we say that the United States

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 3>is this is this is just what we do. Sometimes

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>we do it politely behind the scenes. Sometimes we do

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 3>it with with guns. Sometimes we do it with a

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 3>delta force, sometimes we do it with an occupation force.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 3>How and how have you kind of confronted that as

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 3>somebody who has kind of grown up in that in

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>that in that where there's this belief among the Foreign

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Service that we are with the Peace Corps, were living

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 3>up to these values around the world, Like are.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 6>We so well, we're certainly not at this particular moment,

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 6>and we've never been perfect by any means, But I

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 6>do believe that if you talk to Foreign Service officers

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 6>and others, you know, representing the United States around the world,

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 6>supporting the principles of human rights, rule of law, freedom

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 6>and democracy is an important part of what we stand for,

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 6>and I would argue it's a very important part of

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.359
<v Speaker 6>why the United States does have influence.

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Now. I know you did a lot of reporting on Pakistan.

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 4>You're absolutely right.

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 6>If you look at Pakistan today, it's hard to call

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 6>it a democracy. You know, they have the elements of

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 6>the democracy, but in terms of how it's functioning, so

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 6>much of the control right now, as you know, as

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 6>in the Army chief of Staff and you know, I've

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 6>written to the Pakistani ambassador here. He didn't love my

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 6>letter pointing out that, you know, we need free and

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 6>fair elections in Pakistan. So there's another example where we

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 6>are saying one thing and doing another. Although I will

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 6>say with the Trump administration, they've thrown entirely overboard. Yeah,

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 6>the idea that we represent these values, I mean, they

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 6>think they're archaic. In my view, it's not that we

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 6>it's that we should do better actually in implementing those

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 6>values as part of our foreign policy.

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean we see double standards across the board.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, supporting the net Yahoo government you know, throughout

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 6>the war and Gaza even as they violated not just

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 6>international law but American law, and the Biden administration and

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 6>the Trump administration as well, nothing about it. So that's

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 6>a double standard, and that undermines our strength around the world,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 6>especially in the Global South. But now you have an

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 6>administration that just very explicitly has thrown the whole idea

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 6>that America stands for these principles overboard in favor of

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, as Steve Miller said the other.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Day, we got the power, We'll do what we want.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Can you take us a little bit inside the conversations

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>that you were having with the Biden administration during what

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>we can get into, you know, I say it's a genocide.

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Agree with the international consensus. We can get to whether

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>you agree.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 4>With that or not.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 2>But during the genocide and Gaza which is ongoing, what

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 2>were your conversations like with the Biden administration, you know,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 2>when you were bringing to them information about the way

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>that aid was being blocked, for example, after having been

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 2>on the ground, how did they square that circle? How

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>did they continue to hold this aspirational view that America

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>is a force for good in the world at the

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 2>same time that we're shipping the bombs that are you know,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>part of these horrific atrocities.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, you're right, that's.

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 6>An example of a clear double standard and contradiction. And

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, I reached out to them pretty early on

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 6>in the Gaza where they abide administration to point out that,

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, the government of Israel was restricting humanitarian assistance,

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 6>that we were witnessing and discriminate bombing, and that there

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 6>were violations ongoing violations not just of international law but

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 6>US law. Right, we have a law in the books

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 6>with respect to provision of humanitarian aid that if a

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 6>country is you know, restricting humanitarian aid in a place

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 6>where they're also using our weapons, that we cut off

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 6>support of our weapon transfers. And they just tried, they

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 6>bobbed and weaved, and in the end of the day,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 6>I really think they did great damage to our credibility

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 6>around the world.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 4>Let alone, you know, the.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Number of people have been killed in Gaza. We're witnessing

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 6>this right now, not only in Gaza, in the West Bank.

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 6>You know, I call what's happening in the West Bank

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 6>slow motion ethnic cleansing. I mean, every day you're hearing

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 6>more and more about violence, settlers taking more land belonging

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 6>to Palestin Indians and essentially with impunity, and they're they're.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Backed up by.

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 6>The IDF, because they're backed up by people like Ben

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 6>Giver and Smotrich, these very right wing extremists, and by

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 6>Netan Yahoo. So this is a moment where, you know,

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 6>the United States, the idea that we're standing up for

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 6>principles has been thrown overboard. I mean, unfortunately it was

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 6>done over a period of time, but now the Trump

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 6>administration has made it explicit. I believe, if asking, I

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 6>believe the United States actually does need to be consistent.

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 6>We're never perfect, but these are really important parts of

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 6>who we are as a country. It's part of the

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 6>American identity. I don't think it's entirely a myth. I

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 6>think we we do stand for those things. Ronald Reagan

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 6>talked about the shiny City on the Hill, and Republicans

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 6>have now thrown that whole idea overboard.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 2>So let me ask you. You have the International Association

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 2>of Genocide Scholars who say it's a genocide. They join

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch. There are various Israeli human

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 2>rights organizations like Budslom who agree with that. Do you

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>accept the international consensus that this is a genocide?

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 6>So I think the overwhelming evidence points to the fact

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 6>that this is a genocide. You've seen scholars, including many

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 6>scholars of the Holocaust, your scholars at Hebrew University, Brown University,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 6>and others.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 4>I've not made an independent legal conclusion.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 6>I've made it very explicit that this is ethnic cleansing.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 6>But regardless of what you call it, it is.

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to worry about a huge I have

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 2>one one SoundBite we're going to play for you, as though.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 6>Okay, it's a huge Watching what's happening is just it

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 6>seems to me anybody with the conscience cannot stand by

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 6>and watch what's happening without wanting to do something.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>And how much do you think that the barbarism that

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 2>we've all watched play out in Gaza has allowed this

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 2>moment to emerge where we really do just you know,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration feels fine just saying hey, we're going

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 2>to take over Gaza, right and continue in that direction.

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take over Venezuela because we want their oil.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take over Greenland because we want you know,

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>whatever they have to offer, and we're going to do

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>this wherever we feel like doing it. So they truly

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>have actualized this like might makes right barbarism, not to

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 2>mention the barbarism that we're all seeing in the streets

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>with these you know, ice thugs and CBP and other

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 2>mass goons that are in American streets. How much do

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 2>you think that Gaza contributed to the unleashing of that

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 2>level of sort of accepted law of the jungle barbarism.

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it contributed to it. I think you.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 6>I think that Trump anddministration may well have jumped to

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 6>where they are right now no matter what. But clearly

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Gaz is an example of where the United States did

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 6>not stand up for our values, for our own laws,

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 6>did not implement our own laws, and I do think

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 6>that contributes to a complete erosion of international standards. You're

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 6>also seeing that combined with an attack on multilateral organizations

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 6>and on the UN, and the Biden administration vetoed. I

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 6>can't I lost count how many resolutions they vetoed when

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 6>it came to the situation in Gaza. So I do

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 6>think you have a pattern there. I think it's going

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 6>to be the challenge for the next president will be

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 6>to try to restore some credibility as to what we

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 6>stand for. But you're right, I mean to bring this

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 6>home and watch what we're seeing on our own streets.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, the reason I went down to El Salvador

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 6>to try to, you know, find out whether Kilmar or

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 6>Brago Garcia was alive was because of the lawlessness of

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 6>the Trump administration here at home. So here at home

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 6>and overseas they're taking the same view, which is they've

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 6>got the power, they will do what they want.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 4>That is a lawless administration.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 3>And so just despite the criticism, the Biden administration did

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 3>not change course, which we all acknowledge is absolute catastrophe,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 3>both for the US and for people in Gaza and

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe in the long run for Israel too. We'll find

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 3>out what leverage do you think you had that you

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't use? What could you have done that you didn't do,

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Like if you had to do it over again, like

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 3>because the people trying to change Biden administration policy failed,

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Like was there was there a path to changing that

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 3>policy or.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Was this just baked in? And did you talk to

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Briden directly this? I did raise this with Biden directly.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean not so much near the end of his administration,

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 6>but even a couple on a couple occasions then I

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 6>mentioned it to him. For example, when we had the

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 6>collapse of the Key Bridge in Baltimore, he came to Baltimore,

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 6>we spoke about the bridge. We also mentioned we got

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 6>to do something to stop the killing in Gaza.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 4>So you know, I tried to do everything I could.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 6>The main thing we did was get the Biden administration

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 6>to adopt what became known as NSM twenty.

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 4>So I don't want to go into all the weeds there.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 6>I proposed an amendment to the build and included funding

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 6>for Ukraine and Israel and other things that essentially would

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 6>have blocked funding to any country that was violating American law.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 6>We didn't have the votes to pass it, but we

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 6>were successful at getting the Biden administration to adopt what

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 6>became known as NSM twenty.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 4>It's a pretty long document.

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 6>It was fiercely negotiated, and it ultimately required them to

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 6>provide some reporting on a lot of these issues, right

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the killing, in terms of the distribution

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 6>of humanitarian aid. Unfortunately, when the report came out, I

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 6>felt that it sort of whitewashed the situation. I said

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 6>so publicly, if you interestingly, if you look at the

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 6>amount of humanitarian aid going into Gaza. It did go

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 6>up just before the report was issued. And you know,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 6>the administration did tell me that they used that as

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 6>leverage to improve the delivery of humanitarian assistance. The problem is,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 6>as soon as the report came out, right, they didn't

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 6>stick with it. I mean, the Biden administration didn't stick

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 6>with it. They did not use the levers of power

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 6>that they have.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 2>For a lot of rank and file Democrats, like ordinary odors,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 2>a PAC funding and position on the Gassa genocide has

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>become a litmus test for any candidac they support, and

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 2>in particular candidate support in twenty twenty. First of all,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>would you ever accept a PAC funding? And second of all,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious, you know, do you have a litmus test

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 2>for future candidates to represent the Democratic Party nationally?

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 6>So no, I don't accept a PAC money. I don't

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 6>think anybody should accept a pack of money. You know,

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 6>I remember when I proposed my amendment, it was written

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 6>in a completely neutral way, in the sense that applied

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 6>to any country. We just said that when the United

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 6>States is providing military assistance to a country, they have

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 6>to comply with these basic standards. APAC came out against that.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 6>You know, the issue with APAC, as we know, is

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 6>they essentially adopt the position of the government of Israel,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 6>and there are going to be times when the interests

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 6>of the government of Israel in the United States obviously diverge.

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 6>I don't think what Israel's been doing is in Israel's

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 6>own interests, but that, of course is for the people

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 6>of Israel to decide. But the short answer your question is,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 6>I do not think that anybody should be taking a

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 6>peck money.

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 4>And I think that there does need to.

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 6>Be accountability in the Democratic Party for whether people stood

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 6>up and challenged all the terrible things that were happening

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 6>in Gaza during that period of time.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 3>And now does that mean, Senator Schumer, do you think

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 3>that do you think there should be new leadership in

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 3>future congresses in the Senate well.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 6>As to future congresses. That's going to be obviously something

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 6>for the Democratic Caucus. But let me just say this

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 6>with respect to the presidential race in twenty twenty eight.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 6>You know, my view is it's going to be important

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 6>see whether the candidates are running for the highest office

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 6>in the land.

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Where they stood on this question of conscience.

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that question of conscience obviously, you know,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 2>for me, one of the clearest dividing lines is around Gaza.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 2>But I think, you know, also the way that people

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 2>have stood up or failed to stand up in this

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 2>moment with the second Trump administration. You know, I mentioned

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 2>before and you mentioned going to see whether kil Mahar

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Brego Garcia was alive or dad. You know, I think

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the decisions that were made on the previous shutdown fight,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, everybody was sort of behind you guys, and

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>then you had tumor and a few breakaway Democrats decided,

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I know, we're gonna We're going to cave without getting

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>anything in return. I know you're part of what's called

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the quote unquote fight club, you and some other Democratic

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 2>members of the Senate. So how do you see, like,

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 2>how have Democrats done in this moment and what should

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 2>they have done? How should they have conducted themselves differently?

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 6>So I think a lot of Democrats were late to

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 6>recognize the danger posed by the Trump administration. I mean,

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, people would sort of say, oh, maybe they're

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 6>not serious, this is just rhetoric. Even as the Trump

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 6>administration engaged in lawless activity at home and overseas, and immigration.

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Was one of the earlier ones. Yeah. Yeah, because we

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 4>had this case of.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 6>Kilmarraborgo Garcia, right, he was snatched off the streets of Maryland.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 6>He was sent to Seacott, this notorious gulag in El Salvador.

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 6>And when I went down there, there were a lot

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 6>of voices in the Democratic Party that said, no, don't

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 6>do that, you know, don't don't focus it all.

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they're Democrats above in this book record. Yeah,

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 4>but not just there, but also around the country.

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 6>And it was like, you know, we shouldn't be talking

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 6>about this because when it comes to immigration issues, the

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 6>Trump position is popular. We should always change the subject

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 6>to something else. I mean, here you have people being snatched.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 6>Now that's changed. Now we have people who are responding

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 6>much more than they were before. But at that time,

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 6>it was really very much a finger in the wind

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 6>a kind of thing. And you know, despite the fact

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 6>that you had this gross violation of the constitution and

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.719
<v Speaker 6>things began to change back then. I mean, you know,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 6>when we had the Kilmar Brego Garcia case, folks like

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, Joe Rogan on his podcast, we're saying, you know,

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm not into this just denying people their due process

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 6>rights in Constitution, and that's what this administration has been doing,

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 6>just taking away.

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 4>People's due process rights. So I do think it's changed.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 6>But to answer your question, I think there were a

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 6>lot of folks who are very slow to recognize the

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 6>real danger to our democracy, to our constitution, and to

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 6>our country.

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess my question is has that actually changed. There's

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a possibility of another shutdown fight, and you have some

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 2>including in this part, I will need your ear piece

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 2>and it to be in for Senator Chris Murphy indicating

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>that we should use this opportunity. Democrats should use this

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to force changes at ICE in the wake of

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 2>what I would call a murder of Renee Good, you know,

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 2>being shot three times by this ICE agent as she's

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 2>there in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Let's go ahead and take a

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 2>listen to Senator Chris Murphy make the case.

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 7>You're proposing sweeping reforms to DHS, from requiring warrants for rests,

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 7>to banning masks during enforcement to limiting ICE's use of

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 7>firearms and civil operations. Do any Republicans support your plan?

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 7>Is it realistic that this could actually pass?

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 5>Senator Well Republicans need Democratic votes in order to pass

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 5>a budget for the Department of Homeland Security. And what

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about I wouldn't necessarily categorize as sweeping, right,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 5>we're simply talking about, you know, essentially going back to

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 5>the way that ICE was operating when they cared about legality,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 5>right identification of officers. That's something that has been standard

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 5>practice in every law enforcement agency all across the country.

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Is CBP who are supposed to be at the.

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Border, protecting us at the border, operating in the interior

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 5>with no training on how to deal with complex urban environments.

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 4>That's brand new.

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 5>So we just need to get back to a Department

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 5>of Homeland Security that is prioritizing the law and prioritizing

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 5>keeping people safe. And yes, I think that it's reasonable

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 5>for Democrats speaking on behalf of the majority of the

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 5>American public who don't approve of what ICE is doing,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 5>to say, if you want to fund the Department of

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Homeland Security, I want to fund a Department of Homeland

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Security that is operating in a safe and legal manner.

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 2>So is it appropriate do you support using this sort

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 2>of rare moment of leverage that Democrats have in terms

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>of government funding to force some changes at DHS and

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 2>with ICE.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I've been very clear, I will not vote for

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 6>one more penny getting rid of the pennies, one more

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 6>dollar for the Trump Ice operation, and I hope we

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 6>will use this moment for that purpose.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 4>And this is why the Department of.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 6>Homeland Securities appropriation bill in the Senate has been so

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 6>hung up. I mean, we've passed other bills appropriation bills

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 6>out of our committee, but some we've not. And this

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 6>one is one that I will not support advancing without

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 6>the kind of reforms that Chris Murphy's talking about.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 3>And what's the end game then, because it seemed like

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 3>that that's where Democrats kind of fell down last time.

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>That all they kind of snatched defeat from the jaws

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 3>of victory in that shutdown because it felt like they

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 3>just kind of lost their nerve after the shutdown and

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 3>going on so long.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 4>So how do you avoid that this time? So we

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 4>do have a different situation there.

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 6>We have already moved, for example, three appropriation bills like

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 6>for the Department of Agriculture and a couple others.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 4>There may be other bills.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 6>Where we were successful at putting up safeguards around the funding.

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 4>The Commerce Justice Science Bill is one of those.

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 6>Where we completely rejected the Trump cuts to science and

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 6>the National Science Foundation and NASA Goddard and things like that.

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 6>So we may have a situation where we pass appropriation

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 6>bills for certain agencies. Well, what I'm saying, I think

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 6>Senator Murphy is saying, is that when it comes to DHS,

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 6>we will not support any funding for DHS in lesson

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 6>until we see these reforms.

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And do you know where Senator Schumer is on that.

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 6>I think he supports reforms at DHS. I can't speak

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 6>for him with respect to the actual strategy of not

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 6>supporting that bill at this particular moment.

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 3>There was a memo that circulated in the kind of

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 3>DC progressive world a month or two ago. I'm curious

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 3>if you saw it that made the case for Chris

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 3>van Holland for Senate Majority leader.

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Did you see that memo?

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 6>I heard about the memo. Actually, no, you know I

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 6>did see that memo. I know what you're talking about,

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 6>all right, So what do you think of that memo?

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 3>And would you run if Democrats took the majority or

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 3>if they or even if they don't, would you run

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 3>for minority leaders, that's something you're open to.

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 4>So it's not something that has been top of mind

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 4>for me.

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 6>And ultimately, you know, this is a question of the

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 6>Democratic caucus. And if you go back, for example, to

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 6>your point on the shutdown strategy unraveling, yeah, you can

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.479
<v Speaker 6>see it's it's not just about one person. So look,

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 6>my goal right now is to fight like hell every

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 6>moment we've got against the Trump administration, to work to

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 6>win the midterm elections.

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 4>In the House and in the Senate.

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 6>And then I do believe I'm a strong believer in

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 6>the fact that we cannot just be the party of

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 6>know that we need to put forward a clear agenda

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 6>for the future that makes a tells the American people

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 6>we are not in the party of the status quo. Yeah,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 6>and that is going to be my main focus.

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 2>So you say it's a question for the Democratic caucus,

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 2>is it also a question for the Democratic base though,

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, especially at this period in time when you're

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 2>between president, there's no clear leader of the Democratic Party.

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's sort of an old fashioned way

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of looking at you know, Hookeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer's Oh,

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 2>they just tend to the business of the House, or

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 2>they just tend to business of the Senate. The Democratic

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 2>base and the numbers bear this out, are very frustrated

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 2>with Jeffries and specifically with Chuck Schumer. They feel he

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 2>is failing at the job of standing up to Trump.

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 2>And I think I agree, and I think you probably

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 2>agree that they have a pretty strong case that they

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 2>could make there. So does their frustration matter at all

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 2>in that calculus as well at a time when they

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 2>feel like they're losing their country.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 6>I yes, I mean their frustration definitely counts. It counts

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 6>in leadership races. It will certainly count going into two

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 6>thousand and twenty eight when it'll be a referendum within

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 6>the Democratic Party on the direction that we want to

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 6>take going forward. I would say that at this point

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 6>in time, you know, and again, Senator Schumer, I think

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 6>is now better reflecting the views of more of the

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 6>Democrats across the country. That said, and you know, it

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 6>became public, so I can talk about it. As you know,

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 6>the first rule of fight club is.

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 4>You don't talk about fight club, but somebody talks about it.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 6>So there is a group of us who've expressed frustration

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 6>not only about you know, the direction.

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 4>The clock has taken.

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 6>But also with respect to how the Democratic Senatorial Campaign

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 6>Committee has gotten involved in some of the Democratic primaries.

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 6>That's really what what sort of triggered a lot of

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 6>the frustration among this group. You know, I was, you know,

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 6>I was quite clear how frustrated I was that you

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 6>didn't have the leadership supporting mam Nani in New York

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 6>for mayor.

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 4>What did he What did he say about that?

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 3>How do you how do you justify not how did

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 3>he justify not supporting the Democratic nominee for mayor?

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 6>I can't remember what he has said publicly, but you know,

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 6>all I know is the result. And you know, here

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 6>you have a mayor who ran on the platform of

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 6>affordability that everybody says we should be focused on and

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 6>we should be focused on lowering the cost of living

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 6>for Americans so people, you know, living paycheck to paycheck

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 6>can actually get by, and we want to increase the

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 6>size of their paychecks too. And so that was, you know,

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 6>that was an example where you know, if you want

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.439
<v Speaker 6>to have a big tent memorocratic party, and I do,

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 6>then you can't say you're not going to endorse you know,

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 6>the guy who is the Democratic nominee for mayor.

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 3>One of the grievances that this, according to the reporting

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 3>that the Fight Club brought to Senator Schumer, was recruiting

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Janet Mills when Graham Plattner was already in the race

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and then clearly backing Haley Stevens even though they're they're

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 3>claimed they or not, whether there's a competitive primary there,

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 3>has the Fight Club thought about or talked about endorsing,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 3>like as a group against the Democratic establishment's candidate, Like

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 3>where are you, Well, let's start with Maine, Like have

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 3>you spoken with Graham Plattner? Are you supporting him? And

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 3>should the Fight Club like if they're going to fight,

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 3>like they're gonna fight, So.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.959
<v Speaker 6>Okay, let's let's start with Maine. I've talked to both

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 6>Janet Mills and Graham Plattner a.

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Couple of times.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 6>My view is that the Democratic primary voters should be

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 6>the ones who you know, decide on that election. And

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, we got upset because that is an example

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 6>where the d SCC did weigh in very strongly on

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 6>behalf of one of the candidates in the primary, and

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 6>it was our view and it remains my view that

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:20.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, that's a question for Democratic primary voters.

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 4>And the same was true about Michigan.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Right with respect to Haley Stevens, that they were weighing

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 6>in on behalf of her to the exclusion of the

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 6>other candidates. So our basic message was, we need to you,

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 6>the d SCC, need to stay out of these races. Now,

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 6>we did make an exception in the case of Minnesota.

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 6>We together have endorsed Peggy Flanagan, who's the lieutenant gugnatorial

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:52.839
<v Speaker 6>candidate there, and that's because we also sense that the

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 6>d s CC was weighing in on behalf of in

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 6>this case.

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, So then okay, so if you're weighing in Minnesota,

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 3>what will it take to get you into Maine?

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't know where where.

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 6>I think our main reaction in Maine was that the

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 6>DSCC went in. So we're look I continuing to look

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 6>at these races, and I don't know.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 4>I do think that we're stronger.

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 6>When we can take sort of collective action, and we

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 6>were able to get a consensus on that when it

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 6>came to the Minnesota Center race.

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Center, I'm curious why you change your mind on medicare

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 2>for us? And I was very happy to see. But

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm just wondering if your views have evolved on where

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 2>we should be economically and what it's going to require

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 2>to you don't give working people a shot in this country.

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 6>So the short answer is my view has not changed

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 6>on that fundamental question. I mean, I've been very much

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 6>supportive of getting eventually to medicare for all, but I

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 6>had taken the view earlier that you know, I was

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 6>one of the people is for the public option when

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 6>it came to the Afordable Care Act, and then we

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 6>didn't get the public option even though the House had

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 6>been supportive of it back in the day. And you know,

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 6>at some point, with Republicans continuing to try to just attack, attack,

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 6>attack the Affordable Care Act from every angle, and just

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 6>looking at the healthcare system overall, the amount of money

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 6>that we spend on overhead and administration and bureaucracy and

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 6>insurance companies, I just reached the conclusion that we didn't

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 6>we should move now right's And so I supported the bill.

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 4>I had supported the idea of getting the Medicare for all, yeah, always,

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 4>But what I said was this bill is the way

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 4>to do it over a four year period.

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 6>This is Bernie Sanders' bill, and I've also long supported

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 6>adding to Medicare coverage, you know, dental vision and hearing,

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 6>and I think we should move forward on that now.

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I would say that looking at our

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 6>healthcare system, we spend, as you know, about eighteen percent

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 6>of our gross national product on healthcare, and we are

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 6>definitely not getting our money's worth in terms.

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Of the public health.

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 6>And so my view is that we should move now,

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.280
<v Speaker 6>and I think that bill lays out the right roadmap

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 6>and not try to go through a public option for

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 6>the Affordable Care Act and an even more incremental approach.

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 4>I think we should just pass the build and do it.

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 3>We talked about Senate leader, but you've also been talked

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 3>about as potential presidential candidate. I mean, first, would you

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 3>see any pushback from being born in Pakistan?

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Is there any argument that, hey, they you can't do that?

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 3>Or do you get the John McCain exception there? You

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 3>know in the Senate they say everybody, all senators wake

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 3>up in the morning, look in the mirror and see

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 3>see a future president?

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Do see that? Or when the where are you on

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 4>that question?

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 6>So my big focus right now, beyond the midterms is

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 6>really coming up with what I think the Democrats should

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 6>stand for. It kind of goes to your point when

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 6>you asked about medicare, you also said, you know, how

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 6>about you know.

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Working people around the country.

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 6>And I've long believed that's the fundamental crisis that we're

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 6>facing in America, which is the inequality of wealth and

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 6>power in the country. So this is why I'm going

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 6>to continue to I've been proposing major tax proposals and

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 6>we'll be reintroducing another one soon, which essentially, you know,

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 6>addresses the problem we've got, which is we have a

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 6>tax system that's rigged to favor people who make money

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 6>off of money as opposed to people who make money

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 6>off of hard work. I also support incentivizing employee ownership

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 6>of companies, and then I think we should make sure

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 6>that on the cost side, for example, that these huge,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 6>these AI companies, the richest on the planet, you know,

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 6>aren't essentially free riding off of rate payers when it

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 6>comes to the additional electricity that needs to be generated

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 6>in the costs.

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:04.399
<v Speaker 4>Of all of that.

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 6>So what I'm saying is that is my focus right now.

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 6>I don't know what the Democratic field will will look like.

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Iowa, I am Carolina. I did get invited to go out.

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.439
<v Speaker 6>I was the Iowa Steak Fry, Poe County Steak Fry.

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 6>You know, we had a back and forth with another

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 6>candidate about you know, yeah, anyway, I was. They asked

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 6>me to come out, especially after the Kilmar Brego Garcia situation,

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 6>and and I did give a speech out there laying

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 6>out what I think the Democratic Party needs to focus on.

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 6>Beyond taking on Trump, which we need to do every

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 6>single day to protect our democracy, we do need to

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, I think that we've been much too tied

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 6>to special interests, yes, and corporate special interests. And so

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:56.319
<v Speaker 6>my my view is the best way to regain some

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 6>of the confidence of the American people is to show

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 6>that we we will.

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 4>We want to break with the status quo.

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.280
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it just was my mind that Donald Trump

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.280
<v Speaker 6>was the guy who said he was going to change,

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, Washington, and people thought that that might be

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 6>changing in a good way.

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 4>They just wanted they want to change. Yeah.

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 6>Now I think you know, people are seeing i mean,

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 6>including on the immigration front, but the fact that Trump

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 6>is not focused on bringing out costs or anything like that.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 6>They don't like what they see. But I'm going to

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.320
<v Speaker 6>I intend to be front center in this debate.

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 2>How do you reign in these tech oligarchs? And you

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the concern about electricity rates, that's one thing. They're

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:46.399
<v Speaker 2>also deep concerns about AI and taking jobs. There are

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:50.399
<v Speaker 2>existential concerns about AI and destroying human civilization, like how

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 2>are you thinking about that constellation of issues and specifically

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 2>on the question of how you reign in You know,

0:45:55.920 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 2>these would be trillionaires who want to basically operate in

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 2>a completely unregulated environment and be able to do whatever

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 2>they want, whenever they want.

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 4>So I agree with your analysis.

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 6>I think we're in a really difficult place because you

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 6>have the richest people on the planet and they're getting richer,

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 6>and with that comes a lot of power, and they're

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 6>using their power. I mean, we see this with Elon

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Musk obviously, you know Trump made him the head of DOGE.

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 6>We also see this with the concentration of media power

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 6>and traditional media, which is why I do encourage everybody

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:35.359
<v Speaker 6>to watch independent media channel.

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Grey, appreciate, but like and subscribe. But I don't have

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 4>I will. I will tell you I don't have an

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 4>easy answer to your your question.

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 6>I've been longtime supporter of you know, significant campaign finance reform.

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, we obviously want to roll back Citizen United,

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 6>but you know how hard that is because the Supreme

0:46:54.800 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Court decision. I am the original author of the Disclosure

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 6>Act that we've got past the House of Representatives. When

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 6>I was back in the House, it failed by one

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 6>vote in the Senate on filibuster. So I believe in

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 6>campaign finance reform and we need to fight like that.

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 4>And whoever's you.

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 6>Know, a Democratic candidate for president or even you know,

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 6>Congress should be fighting for those things. But I'm open

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 6>to people's ideas on how you reign in the AI companies.

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 6>And we never were successful at getting a sort of

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:34.760
<v Speaker 6>a oversight when it came to the social media universe.

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 6>And they're obviously all sorts of important questions around First Amendment,

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 6>all those sort of things. But in terms of the

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 6>concentration of power in AI, you know, again, I have

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 6>a tax approach to that, but in terms of reigning

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 6>them in, that is something that I believe we need

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 6>to do.

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 4>I agree with your analysis.

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 6>I'm open to any ideas people have as the best

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 6>approach to that.

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 3>You're colleague, Elizabeth Warren a fight club, another fight club member,

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 3>I believe, giving a speech today at the National Press

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Club in which she's really taking aim at the abundance

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 3>argument and making the case generally and read the entire

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 3>speech that abundance in some ways as a stalking horse

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 3>for old school deregulatory hands off, just let the oligarchs

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and rule the roost and.

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Things will happen.

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 3>And she's coming directly at that and saying no, like,

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 3>we actually need to get these people under control so

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 3>that we can really unleash all of the American people,

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 3>not just the oligarchs. Where are you on this abundance

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 3>conversation within the Democratic Party?

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 6>So I really don't think it's either or on abundance

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 6>versus you know, going after.

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 3>But Donnie stole the word, mom, Donnie stole the word.

0:48:58.160 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 3>He called himself he's an abundance.

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Some of us first executive.

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 6>Look, I mean, I think we can acknowledge that, you know,

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 6>we need to build more housing stock, we need more

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 6>affordable housing, and that there are many cases where especially

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 6>local regulations or an impediment to that. What can the

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 6>federal government do to incentivize changes? I mean, there are

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 6>limited levers at the federal level. It is also true,

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 6>obviously that some of these transportation projects take way too long,

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 6>So I.

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Think there is there's merit to that argument.

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 6>That doesn't mean that we should not also be focused on,

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, making sure that we break up monopolies, because

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, monopolies obviously undermine the whole idea of you know,

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 6>for those people who believe in free markets, you should

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 6>be anti monopoly obviously, So I think it's not I

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 6>really don't think it's either or when it comes to

0:49:55.040 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 6>abundance versus the sort of anti monopoly, anti trust approach.

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 2>So you talk some about accountability electoral accountability for Democrats

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:07.280
<v Speaker 2>who close their eyes to human rights abuses in Gaza

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 2>and failed to stand up to President Trump. Do you

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 2>think there should be criminal accountability for members of this

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 2>administration under a future you know, if you or someone

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 2>else were to run for president, Should charges be brought

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 2>against people who committed crimes in the content context of

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:22.720
<v Speaker 2>this regime.

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 6>I think people need to be held accountable under the law,

0:50:27.200 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 6>and so to the extent that there are people engaged

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 6>in criminal violations of the law, then they need to

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 6>be held accountable.

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Does part of that accountability we talked earlier about renee

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Good and about Kilmara Brego Garcia, and ICE is sort

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 2>of the tip of the sphere of this lawless administration.

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you support abolishing ice? There's some sixty nine percent

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:50.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Democratic base that has come to that position

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 2>at this point.

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's put it this way. I support abolishing Trump's ICE.

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 6>In other words, this kind of operation that's going on

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 6>right now needs to come to an end, and it

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 6>needs to come to an end now.

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 4>So I support raining in ICE.

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 6>I think ICE has an appropriate function when it is,

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 6>when it is conducted and operated in you know, in

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 6>the way that it was I think originally in visioned.

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:24.759
<v Speaker 6>But I think Trump is sort of put ice on steroids.

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 6>And this is why, as we discussed earlier, I'm in

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:31.320
<v Speaker 6>favor of you making sure we don't provide any funding

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 6>for Trump's ongoing ICE operations.

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Let me let me push a little bit on that,

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 3>because this is not like an ancient it's not a

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Jeffersonian agency like you were literally in Congress when this

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 3>was created, right, I think it was two thousand and three,

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Like when they reorganized Homeland Security in twenty nineteen, we

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 3>covered and I think pro public.

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:51.439
<v Speaker 4>It did too.

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 3>When AOC and I think it was Rashida to leaving

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Alanomar went down to the border, there was a report,

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 3>multiple reports about this ICE Facebook group that had hundreds,

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 3>if not thousands of ICE agents and commanders like this

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 3>is top to bottom, where they were threatening violence against

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 3>AOC and these other members of Congress who were coming

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 3>to the border. Their job was they were supposed to

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 3>protect these members of Congress. There were also all of

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 3>this over the top, like sexual harassment and sexualization of

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 3>these members going on.

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 4>You read through these and this is basically public.

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 3>It was a private group, but it's you know, when

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 3>you're in the thousands, it's basically public on Facebook. You

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 3>read through those and you get a window into a

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:45.880
<v Speaker 3>rogue agency, which is how I saw it at the time.

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 3>So this is Trump's ICE, but it's twenty nineteen, like

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 3>we're now many years deeper into Trump's ICE. It already

0:52:54.719 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 3>to me felt rogue, like outside of democratic control, that

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 3>it was its own thing, And I think predictably we're

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 3>now getting the kind of expressions of that. If an

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 3>agency is that far gone, why not reorganize it and

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 3>take the parts that we need. You know that if

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 3>the government needs to carry out and give them to

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 3>agencies that are under the control of the federal government.

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 4>So clearly we.

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 6>Have a problem with the culture of ICE right now

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 6>for the Trump administration, and we had that in the

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 6>first Trump administration as well.

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 4>There may have been abuses under Obama, under Biden. I

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 4>have to go back and look at that.

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:47.479
<v Speaker 6>So, look, I don't The question is the function, right,

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 6>not the name, And so I do believe that that.

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Function requires dramatic reform.

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you look at you know, some of

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 6>the recruitment that's going on right now now, if you

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:03.920
<v Speaker 6>look at the black standards in terms of training, we

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 6>are seeing huge abuses. So look, I don't I don't

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 6>really care what you call it, but that the function

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 6>is something that I think needs to be maintained in

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 6>the sense that there has to be some agency that

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 6>is responsible. For example, when somebody is here who is undocumented,

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 6>someone who's here illegally, that they and they commit a

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 6>violent crime, there has to be somebody in the peral

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 6>government that addresses that.

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 4>And that's currently ICE, so it was before.

0:54:37.320 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 6>So but again, the function, I think when people say

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 6>they want to get rid of ICE, it's sometimes people

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:48.920
<v Speaker 6>may interpret it as getting rid of that function. You know, again,

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 6>my view is we shouldn't be funding Trump's ice operations.

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 2>How scar do you think we are when you look

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:57.279
<v Speaker 2>at the lawless and zoo, when you look at the

0:54:57.600 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 2>mask off foreign policy, when you look at I mean

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:05.320
<v Speaker 2>ice agents, pepper spray a baby, assault random people, illegally

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:09.040
<v Speaker 2>arrest American citizens, and now shoot remaining good three times

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:12.840
<v Speaker 2>in the face, Like, how do we put any of

0:55:12.880 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 2>this back together? Given how far we've gone?

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:17.439
<v Speaker 4>Is it too late?

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Or do you think that we can sort of come

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 2>back from this moment of rising fascism and lawlessness in

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:25.320
<v Speaker 2>this country and abroad.

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:27.799
<v Speaker 6>So I do believe we can come back. I think

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:30.160
<v Speaker 6>there's been a huge amount of damage. I think it's

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:33.400
<v Speaker 6>going to require a lot of repair, both in terms

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 6>of you know, here at home as well as you know,

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:41.799
<v Speaker 6>our foreign policy. But I do believe ultimately that the

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 6>American people don't like what they're seeing with respect to

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:50.279
<v Speaker 6>what Trump's doing, including his ice operations, and I think

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 6>that you will see changes in the midterm elections. Now,

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, given the fact that you ever rogue president

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:00.919
<v Speaker 6>who doesn't care about the constitution will remain a big,

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 6>big challenge until twenty twenty eight. But look, lots of

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 6>damage done. Do I think it's irreversible? No, But I

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 6>think that depends on all of us. I mean, I

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 6>really do think the answer to your question depends on

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 6>what the American people are doing and what's been So,

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:24.839
<v Speaker 6>you know, heartwarming about this even terrible moment is to

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 6>listen to the whistle brigades right out in Minneapolis, the

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 6>neighbors coming out to defend their neighbors.

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Seven million Americans.

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 6>Going out on No King's Day, I mean in Maryland,

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, I I went all over the state.

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 4>It was heartwarming to see thousands.

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 6>Of Marylanders coming out to resist the tyranny of the

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration. So I do think that we have good,

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 6>strong antibodies to protect our democracy.

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:53.960
<v Speaker 4>They are being threatened as never before.

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 6>But I do have faith at the end that if

0:56:56.560 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 6>we all step up and step out, we will be successful.

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 6>After all, what Trump wants most of all is for

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:03.799
<v Speaker 6>everybody to shut up at go away.

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that is what they want. That's why they

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:06.280
<v Speaker 4>threaten people.

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 6>That's why they locked up you know, students for expressing

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 6>their First Amendment views early in the administration.

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 4>That was Secretary Rubio and others.

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 6>We need to push back really hard every day.

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Last one for me, So should we end weapon sales

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 3>to Israel?

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 6>I think in this moment, I would I oppose transferring

0:57:27.200 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 6>offensive weapons to Israel.

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 4>I've not imposed sending some.

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 6>Defensive iron Doome defense systems that are used only to

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:40.320
<v Speaker 6>intercept incoming missiles, but I think at this moment in time,

0:57:41.680 --> 0:57:46.760
<v Speaker 6>we need to at the very least pause transfers of

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 6>offensive weapons, which is why I've continued to vote on

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:53.640
<v Speaker 6>each of the votes we've had in the Senate to

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 6>not allow the transfers of more offensive weapons so long

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 6>as Israel is violating in national law and American law.

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that that distinction really makes it. I mean,

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 2>if you're shipping weapons, you're shipping weapons, and you know,

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a pretty clear argument that supplying iron Dome,

0:58:12.280 --> 0:58:15.080
<v Speaker 2>for example, is part of what allows Israel to operate

0:58:15.120 --> 0:58:16.680
<v Speaker 2>with such impunity in the region.

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 6>I've supported iron Dome because there are other you know,

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 6>this is not only Gaza. They Israel obviously isn't a

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 6>you know.

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 4>A tough neighborhood, and of course they are. Actually they

0:58:28.280 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 4>frequently bomb their neighbors.

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 6>They also it's going to make it a tough neighborhood

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 6>that there's no doubt.

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think that the net Yahoo government.

0:58:35.520 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 6>Has been really you know, bad for Israel and the

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:39.920
<v Speaker 6>United States.

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 4>As you know, we.

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 6>Should be doing much more than we are, obviously to

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:49.440
<v Speaker 6>rain in what the net Yahoo government is doing. But

0:58:49.520 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 6>I do think there's an important distinction between providing defensive

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 6>weapons and offensive weapons.

0:58:55.360 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Senator Chrispin Holland, thank you so much for

0:58:57.720 --> 0:58:58.720
<v Speaker 2>spending so much time with us.

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:00.760
<v Speaker 4>We really appreciate it. Thank you. Good to be with

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 4>both of you.

0:59:01.520 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 2>All Right, guys, that does it for us. I will

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:06.000
<v Speaker 2>be in with soccer tomorrow, so we will see you then.