1 00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:07,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:09,800 Speaker 2: When I'm bringing U Steven Englander, a global head of 3 00:00:09,840 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 2: G ten FX research over at Standard Charter Bank. So 4 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:16,279 Speaker 2: careful policy approach, like, that's what has stood out to me. 5 00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:19,119 Speaker 2: That was a quote from Lisa Cook, careful policy approach. 6 00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:21,400 Speaker 2: How do you express that when it comes to them 7 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:22,040 Speaker 2: the dollar? 8 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:26,960 Speaker 1: Well, I think the market, before it sells the dollar, 9 00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:28,840 Speaker 1: wants to see that the dollar is kind of on 10 00:00:28,920 --> 00:00:32,120 Speaker 1: the front lines of cutting. And you know, with the 11 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:34,800 Speaker 1: S and B cutting, the Swiss National Bank cutting last 12 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 1: week ahead of everyone else, discussion about whether Bank of 13 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:41,519 Speaker 1: Canada ECB are going to be cutting and when they 14 00:00:41,600 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 1: might cut, the market's unwilling to sell the dollar on this. 15 00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:48,240 Speaker 1: We do think that if everybody cuts at the same time, 16 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:51,160 Speaker 1: it's going to be very risk one and that kind 17 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 1: of risk on environment tends to be dollar negative, not 18 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:58,480 Speaker 1: super dollar negative, somewhat dollar negative. But for the dollar 19 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:01,920 Speaker 1: to be really soft, dollar has to go faster than 20 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:05,479 Speaker 1: everyone else and reduce those rate differentials, and so far 21 00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:07,240 Speaker 1: that doesn't seem to be what the market is seen. 22 00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:09,480 Speaker 2: So for the dollar get to get materially weaker, we 23 00:01:09,520 --> 00:01:11,520 Speaker 2: need the FED to cut harder and faster than all 24 00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:13,440 Speaker 2: the other central banks, and that doesn't you don't see 25 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:14,319 Speaker 2: that really happening. 26 00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:17,560 Speaker 1: Well, the market doesn't see it happening. We're a little 27 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:19,560 Speaker 1: bit on that side. We see four cuts this year. 28 00:01:19,600 --> 00:01:22,960 Speaker 1: We think they're going to cut in June. There's an 29 00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:25,680 Speaker 1: outside chance that they cut in May, because they you know, 30 00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:27,959 Speaker 1: if you look at it, they're cutting three times with 31 00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:31,880 Speaker 1: the median of two point six percent two point five 32 00:01:31,920 --> 00:01:35,560 Speaker 1: to two point six percent inflation. There's an outside chance 33 00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:38,200 Speaker 1: will be there by May. So I wouldn't preclude it 34 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:43,200 Speaker 1: if that's if that's the threshold. But you know, the 35 00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 1: market's waiting to see it happen. I mean, unfortunately they're 36 00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 1: not acting on our forecast. 37 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 3: But what's actually driving this though? I mean against the 38 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 3: economic backdrop. I mean there were a lot of people 39 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:54,800 Speaker 3: that looked at the FED meeting last week and thought, okay, 40 00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:56,600 Speaker 3: is this maybe a little too dubbish. I mean, I 41 00:01:56,600 --> 00:02:00,160 Speaker 3: know that's what the market wanted, but against that economic backdrop, 42 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:02,279 Speaker 3: why are we still talking about three to four cuts. 43 00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:06,560 Speaker 1: Well, you might call it yield differential preserving cuts. Okay, 44 00:02:06,880 --> 00:02:09,519 Speaker 1: so you know, if everybody cuts by you know, fifty 45 00:02:09,520 --> 00:02:11,639 Speaker 1: bases points over three months, the FED is still the 46 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:14,919 Speaker 1: high yielder, right, and the market saying, what difference does 47 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:16,680 Speaker 1: it make if it's the FED five and a quarter 48 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:20,680 Speaker 1: and everybody else three or the FED foreign three quarters 49 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:21,680 Speaker 1: and everybody else do it? 50 00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:24,640 Speaker 3: Okay, So this is more about the relative for investors here. 51 00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:26,880 Speaker 3: Then let's fold the yen into that conversation, because if 52 00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:29,200 Speaker 3: there's any sort of relative relationship that's been out of 53 00:02:29,240 --> 00:02:32,040 Speaker 3: whack over the last few years, it's been yen versus 54 00:02:32,080 --> 00:02:33,400 Speaker 3: probably I guess the rest of the world. 55 00:02:34,160 --> 00:02:37,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, look, you know the Bank of Japan has been 56 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:40,519 Speaker 1: obsessed with the long end, whether it's because of Japanese 57 00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:43,519 Speaker 1: government debt, which will have a problem with the long 58 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 1: end moves up too fast, or because of the situation 59 00:02:46,720 --> 00:02:50,840 Speaker 1: of Japanese regional banks. What they did at the at 60 00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:54,079 Speaker 1: the meeting was kind of say, we're getting your YCC 61 00:02:55,960 --> 00:02:58,800 Speaker 1: the title, but everything we did under YCC we can 62 00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 1: pretty much do in the future if we decide that 63 00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 1: that's what we want to do. And I think the 64 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,919 Speaker 1: market was pretty dissatisfied with that. On the other hand, 65 00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:10,760 Speaker 1: they do seem concerned about the end weakening and some 66 00:03:10,840 --> 00:03:13,799 Speaker 1: of the comments that's coming out since then suggest that 67 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:16,040 Speaker 1: maybe they see a little bit more room for moving 68 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:19,400 Speaker 1: quicker than the market had anticipated, so that would help 69 00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:19,760 Speaker 1: the end. 70 00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:22,280 Speaker 2: I mean, they definitely have verbally been in the market, 71 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 2: it just hasn't done anything to really help support the end. 72 00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 2: And I'm just is the end ever going to get 73 00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 2: some real steam to the upside? For example, because no 74 00:03:31,880 --> 00:03:34,079 Speaker 2: matter what, the rate differentials are going to be huge, 75 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 2: even if the BOJ hikes and the FED cuts, for example, 76 00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 2: it's still going to be a fairly large differential. 77 00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:43,480 Speaker 1: Well, I think moving down by twenty five basis points 78 00:03:43,520 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 1: isn't going to do much. There's an old children's story 79 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 1: where the punchline is soft ice cream to soft ice 80 00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 1: cream two hundred and fifty basis points of real yields 81 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:53,240 Speaker 1: is two hundred fifty basis points of real yield. It's 82 00:03:53,480 --> 00:03:57,480 Speaker 1: very hard to resist. I think over time that should compress. 83 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 1: And the question I keep asking myself is all you know, 84 00:04:01,080 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 1: kind of all you're going to do is ten or 85 00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:05,160 Speaker 1: twenty basis points. Why bother? It's not as if anybody 86 00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 1: cared that you were like, you know, kind of minus 87 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 1: ten you know for some rates. So it's quite possible 88 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:15,000 Speaker 1: we'll see a more aggressive bon Jay interesting. 89 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:17,560 Speaker 2: Also, I guess I found what's interesting too is that 90 00:04:17,720 --> 00:04:20,800 Speaker 2: where the repatriation thing we're all waiting for and sort 91 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:24,480 Speaker 2: of the unwind of the carry trade, is that gonna happen? 92 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,920 Speaker 2: As you say, ten twenty basis points who cares. 93 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:30,280 Speaker 1: Well's strangely enough, even though we're all talking about the 94 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:33,640 Speaker 1: US equity market, the Japanese equity market has way outperformed, 95 00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:38,080 Speaker 1: whether in common currency or local currency. The euro areal 96 00:04:38,400 --> 00:04:41,760 Speaker 1: equity market is outperformed. So you know, there is a 97 00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:44,800 Speaker 1: question if the market decides that some capital should be 98 00:04:44,839 --> 00:04:47,800 Speaker 1: going back because there's value there and that would be 99 00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:51,719 Speaker 1: a big help. So far, that hasn't been the decision. 100 00:04:51,760 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 1: That's more focused as we started by saying, who goes first? 101 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:56,719 Speaker 1: And so who do we hit first? 102 00:04:57,440 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 3: All right, Stephen, always great to talk to you. Stephen 103 00:04:59,880 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 3: ng Under, Global head of G ten FX Research over 104 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:04,560 Speaker 3: at Standard a Charter