WEBVTT - Tesla Beats Expectations and Netflix Shares Rally

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power COLLI

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily check in San Francisco and this

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Tesla

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>shares jump after better than expected results showing the car

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>maker is getting production back on track. Tesla making more

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>evis in June than any other month in the company's history.

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Dig into the numbers. Plus Netflix shares rally big time

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>after the streaming giant lost only one million instead of

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>two million subscribers. Could this big shift in investor sentiment

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>booing markets as earnings roll out over the next few weeks.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>We will dig in and it is game on for

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Phase Clan, the influencer marketing house that counts snoops up

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>as a board member. Just what public vias back? Why now?

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Who has to see you taking with tests? I want

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Steve Wesley West, Sleep Group founder and

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>managing partner, also former longtime member of Tesla's board. Steve,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I know you're liking what you see here. Investors seem

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a little look warm. What are you thinking? Well, look,

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's great news for Tesla and Tesla investors. Everybody thought

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a soft quarter. We knew there

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>were supply chain issues combined with COVID closing the China

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>facility for twenty two days, and we saw two U

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>and fifty four thousand units delivered. Fifty increase year over year.

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's growth. The big surprise was revenue and profitability. They

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hit sixteen point nine three billion, that's forty year over

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>year growth. The biggest news is largest cars deliveries in history.

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>In June says they're really ramping up to the back

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. I think they're on track to

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>deliver three thousand units a Q three. I think they're

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit five thousand and before. If they do that,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it'll be closer to fifty six growth. Keep in mind,

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>analysts for predicting profitability of about a dollar eighty one,

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>they hit to seven, so they're on track for record deliveries,

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>record profits. Simply put, Tesla's got manufacturing capability in supply

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>chain relationships no one else has. Someday they may not

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be king of the hill, but for the next year

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or two, they're looking awful strong. Now they didn't change

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>their production forecast. They've made five sixty four thousand vehicles

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. They say they'll make a million

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Can they really make twice as many

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>vehicles as they made in the first half of the

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>year in the second half of the year without a doubt?

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And here's why. Mostly the their car companies General motors

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>for it. They have one electric plant that's going online,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe another one or two or three years. Tesla now

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>has four plants up and running in California, Austin, uh Shanghai,

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and Berlin, and all four are running. Austin and Berlin

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to be pumping into big numbers by the

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>tail end of the year. But that's only part of

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the story. The other key part that investors should understand

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest component in electric cars is the battery.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Teslaw is the first to bring battery production in house.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>With their new technology, they appear to be the technology leader.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They're taking the cost curve batteries down fast than anybody else.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, the leaders are providing what's

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>called O t A or over the air software services

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that are dropping bigger profits to the bottom line. And again,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the big story is profitability was way beyond when analysts

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>saw and I know a lot of people say this

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>test Less stock price is crazy, this is an anomaly

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>at how capital markets work. But the fact is, if

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going in fifty a year from these big numbers

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty three point six billion to what I think is

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be eighty six billion, and you're more profitable

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>than any other competitor in the market, you're gonna have

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a share price that's the envy of the industry. Big

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>story just crossed for Mark Bloomergatto's team, including our own Ludlow,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that Ford is planning to cut eight thousand jobs out

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, gas powered side of the business

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in part to fund the e V side of the business.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>And look, Jim Farley has been very serious about taking

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on Tesla and also his admiration for Tesla. How well

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>positioned is Tesla compared to Ford, compared to Rivan and Lucid. Look,

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Americans want to know how well GM and Ford and

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Lucid and Riva are doing. But to be honest, there

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>behind they came late to the game. Um, they should

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>have started years ago. Keep in mind, General Motors has

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>been making electric cars for eleven years now and they

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>were only able to make twenty five thousand last year

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>compared to Tesla's nine d and twenty five thousand, So

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they've got a long way to go. They need to

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>kick it into higher gear. That having been said, Ribban

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>makes a great ruck, but they too were laying people off.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>They've taken their production numbers down to twenty five thousand. Well,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's ramping their predictions up to one point five million.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>The real people look at Volagon, they saw the writing

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>on the wall. Herbert Dese has been a leader in

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the sector. He took battery production in house early with

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>north Pole. They've got deep pockets factories on multiple continents.

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the Chinese. Most Americans have never heard

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of a Chinese auto company, but no, this b y

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>D lead Pang, x Pang and others are gonna Lee

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Auto and x Panging are going to be coming to market. Four.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's why they're tough. One, they're moving faster than vers

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>than any other auto company except Tesla. To the Chinese

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are really subsidizing battery and auto costs. Three they make

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn good cars, so I expect the global competition.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's good for the consumer, but there's gonna be a

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>shakeout here. Thirty new electric vehicle companies are coming to

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the market the last twenty four months. We may be

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>heading into a recession. More cars, fewer buyers will see

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>who winds up on top. To keep an eye on Tesla,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Folkswagen and the Chinese. But is the China problem going

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to go away? I mean, you still got this twenty

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one day lockdown quarantine excuse me in Shanghai, and you

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just got the unpredictability of an ongoing pandemic where the

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government could once again crack down and make production

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>They're difficult. Well, look, there are two big sign issues

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. One is the COVID one with the Chinese

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>dude that others just can't for labor. A lot of

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>reasons is the Chinese bring the entire workforce eight thousand

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>people in the house and they will sequester them for

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks at a time so they don't get exposed. So

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the COVID issue gets solved. The bigger issue,

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the long term geopolitical issue. Is Hi Jinping, who

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is just reconfirmed as the new chairman of China, has

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>said he intends to reunify or invade Taiwan at some

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>point if you ever see something like that happened. China

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.239
<v Speaker 1>has a huge part of its action capacity, uh Tesla

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>has in China. So there's a lot of issues to

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>solve for. But right now, what investors need to look

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at who's selling the most and who's going the fast.

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>The answer to that question is Tesla. Who's getting the

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>smartest and bringing battery costs down and doing more selling

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>more over the year software services. The answer to that's Tesla.

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But these aren't big secrets. Volkswagen, Chinese, others will catch up.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a question of who's fleet is

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to foot time to buckle up. How big a problem

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Twitter saga? Doesn't seem like Twitter is gonna

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>let this go away. And obviously Tesla investors haven't been

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily pleased about the commitments Elon Musk made. Now he's

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to pull out of them. What do you think

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Testa and Tesla and Elon or a master making great cars.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I hope they stay focused on that. I think Twitter

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>has been a diversion. I think the more they can

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>stay focused on executing, whoever wins the electric car race

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to own a fifty year franchise, So you're

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to keep your eye on the ball. Tesla

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sitting pretty now, but a lot of serious people are

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>coming after you, so we'll have to be on our

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>toes and I hope Tesla's up to the task. I

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>want to see an company win, all right, Wesley Who

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Founder and managing partner, Steve Wesley, thank you as always

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for your insights. Coming up? After Twitter rins round one

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fast tracking and suit against Elon Musk, what's coming in

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>round two? Ali Rogani, Why Combinator Managing partner and the

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>former CFO and CEOO of Twitter, will share his view

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of the saga and the recent market meltdown. Next, Mrs Bloomberg,

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>fast forward to October. That's when Twitter and Neon Musk

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>will officially face off in Delaware court. Will Twitter succeed

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in forcing Musk to do the deal, and if so,

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is that actually good for Twitter? For more insight into

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>all of this, I want to bring in Ali Rogani,

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Why Combinator Managing partner and former Twitter CFO and c OH. So, Ali,

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>what's your take Twitter one round one? That means they've

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially got the upper hand in round two? Is that good?

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>For the company. Well, I think it's good for Twitter shareholders, um,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially seeing the sell off and technology stocks

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of months. I think the deal

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is very richly valued in today's terms. And you know,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I actually expect Twitter to prevail in court. I think that, uh,

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the agreement as pretty ironclad as I read it. Uh,

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter's lawsuit is very clear. I think, um, you know,

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if you read it, you feel pretty I think find

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>it pretty compelling that Musk had agreed to buy the company,

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>even in the case of my market downturn. So I don't, um,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to go on Twitter's direction,

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>which I think is good for Twitter shareholders. UM. But

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, my own personal view, as I said last

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>time I was on your program, is an not sure

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's good for Twitter the service because I don't think

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>that um, you know, Twitter being owned by a single person, um,

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly one whose public statements have kind of indicated a

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>lack of a deep understanding of the way the platform works,

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly in areas of trust and abuse, I'm not sure

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's good for Twitter the service. So that's my personal view. UM.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And and it's been pretty consistent over time, so let's

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>game this out and talk a little bit more about why.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's say Mosque is forced to do the deal. He

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>owns Twitter, he could turn right around and sell it.

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, that is also a possibility. If he is

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>forced to do this deal, then what do you think?

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>How it's very awkward to force someone to buy something

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that they are saying they don't want. Um. And I

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how he reacts. I mean, I think one

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that Elon has proven is that he's quite unpredictable

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>um and quite um you know, uh, extremes sometimes and

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what he wants to do. So your guess is as

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>good as mine. You know, if he's forced to buy Twitter, um,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably what happens, if I were to just speculate,

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is that it will lead to some kind of renegotiation

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where he has some kind of face saving outcome where

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>he can claim he was happy and he becomes a

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>happy buyer again. Because I don't think he's going to

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to get out of this. Um. I'm not

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, but my read of the documents, um, uh,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what I believe. I don't think he's going to

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>get out of this. Maybe there's a compromise where he

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pays a little bit less for it, or the terms

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are altered in somewhere or another where he ends up

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>magically being a happy buyer again. And we'll see what

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he does. Um. I would be surprised, and I think

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be terrible, how come for probably everyone involved

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>if he buys it then turns around and looks for

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for a new buyer. UM. I think probably he would

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>take a bath on a transaction like that. UM. But

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in any case, Look, I don't My view of Twitter

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is it's too important a company to be a like

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a little hot potato that's jumping from you know, one

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>person's hands to another, going private and going public, etcetera.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, if he buys it, I hope he has

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, serious enough about really making the platform better

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and helping it to reach its true true potential. UM.

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's everyone's hope. UM. And I still, you know,

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I have my fingers crossed that that somehow happens. So

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason this is a you know, quote

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>unquote good deal for Twitter shareholders is because the market

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>has plummeted. Obviously putting on your y combinator hat and

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously you know, you've you've been the CFO

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>of of of big public companies. You know, how bad

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is this is this for Silicon Valley? How lasting is

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this downturn? And what does it look like as an

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>inflection point when we look back a decade from now. Yeah,

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>great question. I think it's important to put it into

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the right historical context. I mean, we went through a

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>really remarkable period, uh in one in terms of technology stocks,

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>where the covid um sort of changes in the COVID

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>economy really benefited a lot of tech stocks, and there

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was a feeling that like everything was moving into the

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>internet immediately um. And we saw a really historic run

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>up on technology stocks, with stocks trading at multiples that

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>had kind of never been seen before. And so everyone

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>was expecting a correction. Um. Perhaps not one that was

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as rapid and severe as what we've seen, but everyone

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was expecting a correction, and that's what we've seen. So,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there are a number of companies,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>great technology companies, recent I p o s like door

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Dash or Data Dog. They're just wonderful companies, and I

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>think they've been oversold. That's my personal view. But I

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think if you zoom out. My expectation is that um,

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this will be like other things, um, you know, like

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>other recessions and talent times of market. You know, turbulence

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>will be seen as just another one, perhaps one would

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a slope downward as a little sharper, but nothing that

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally alters the view that technology is changing our society,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and that technology companies that are driving that change will

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be valuable, and that there are many of more of

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>them to come in our portfolio. Companies like Stripe and

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>brex uh and uh, those are some of the public

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks that are ye combinator companies. But um, you know,

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the Stripes, the Brexast, the Fairs, Gusto, it's that are

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot more amazing companies that have great businesses, uh,

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that you know will continue to be disruptive and will

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to be really amazing assets for investors to own. Well,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting you mentioned Stripe because obviously they've been in

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the news for sort of an internal revaluation. Paul Graham,

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of hy Combinator, has this essay called

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Default Dead, Default Alive. Who do you think survives? Who

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think dies in this downturn? And how is

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that informing your investment decisions. Now. So this may surprise you,

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>but almost every company private company that you know, has

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a reputation you know that people on your program will

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have probably heard of. I think they all survive. Uh.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is the markets have been so frothy

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>over the past few years that almost every promising technology

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>come in the mid to late stages is extremely well capitalized.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are companies that have raised hundreds of

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars. And yeah, there have been some downsizing

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and some adjustments, um, but in most cases those were

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>done not because the companies were under dress, but because

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they said, hey, this is an opportunity for us to

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>right size the business a little bit. Given the economic climate,

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone will understand and lengthen our runway. So I don't

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>expect for you know, mid to late stage private companies,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for there to be a blood bath at all. I

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>expect modest belt tightening, but almost all these companies are

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>going to just continue to invest in growth. Interesting that's

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a more optimistic view than we've heard. Um Ali Roghani,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at y Combinator, also the former CFO and

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Twitter. Great to have your thoughts. Here on

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the show thank You, Thank You, Great to be with you.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple is arguing that is now a major force in healthcare.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>The iPhone maker is published and almost sixty page report

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>outlining all of its health features and partnerships with various

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>medical institutions. Though the Apple Watch dominates the market, the

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>device hasn't always gotten new health features as quickly as

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>its competitors. Bloom, we're smart, German here to tell us,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>spart Mark tell us. But what is in this report?

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is a nearly sixty page report, and I

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>rarely see Apple do things like this. Typically, when they

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>want to tout their initiatives, they make a new website

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for it, they put out a an event or a

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>video of some sort. But this is more of an

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>academically focused report. It's not for consumers. That really showcases

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>all the health and fitness and workout related features you know,

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as we all know and use across the iPhone, of

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Watch and the rest of its ecosystem. It

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>dives deep into how all the features work. They talk

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>about some of the research studies. They have sleep studies,

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they have walking studies, they have heart studies, and how

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>all of that works. Together complete in concert with different

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>medical institute sans and medical partners they have, you know,

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>globally to produce new features for their products. That's what

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought. I don't I can't remember a time that

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple has done this previously. You know, what does they

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>say about their plans for the future. I mean, that's

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what we want to know is how will you know

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>health tech increasingly be integrated into all of my Apple devices? Yeah,

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating. I think that health functionality will really spread

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to all of Apple's future products. I mean, don't forget

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the air pods, upcoming virtual reality headset, future augmented reality glasses.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see some health integration probably in all of

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>those products at some point. Maybe one day your air

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.239
<v Speaker 1>pods to be able to tell you your your heart rate, right,

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>or your body temperature. Maybe you'll have some health workout

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>functionality related to Apple's headset, just like Meta has with

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>its oculus move feature on its VR in a R headsets. Right.

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So the Apple future of health is very strong. This year,

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to add a body temperature sensor to the

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch, to new Apple Watch models with that feature

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>until if you have a fever or other things going on.

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>There'll be new women's health features tied to the new

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hardward this fall. Specifically, Apple wants to release a blood

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>pressure feature for the Apple Walk, something that Samsung and

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>others have had, but of course Apple needs to get

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in that space two and they're also very invested in

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>an R and D project to bring blood sugar monitoring

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to the watch eventually as well. Buying Peloton or has

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple purposely let that ship sail? I think the ship

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is sailed for sure on Apple buying Peloton, unless it

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>gets to an absurdly low price and Apple finds a

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>way to really integrate it. I don't think Peloton is

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>necessary to Apple. If Apple wanted, it can start producing

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bikes and treadmills at a far cheaper cost than what

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it would take to buy Peloton, unless there is a

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>fire sale at some point. I also think they'd rather

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>integrate their features into their existing ecosystem rather than add

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that really expensive business that fitness hardware would be all right,

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Mark German as always covers Apple and Peloton for us.

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Mark, But there was a single thing that might

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>say stranger things. But again we're talking about, you know,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>losing one million instead of losing two millions. So you

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>tough in in some ways losing a million and calling

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>at success, but you know, really we're set up very

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>well for the next year. Well come back to Bloomber Technology.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>That was Netflix co CEO Read Hastings on the Ernies call,

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm want to get to the Netflix relief rally after

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it over promised on subscriber losses for the second quarter.

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>James CHOCKMK, partner at Clockwise Capital, joins us now to discuss. James,

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>good to have you back here on the show. So

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>turns out over promising in this case was a good thing.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>But how good a thing? How confident are you that

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Netflix can continue it cut its losses. I think it's

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be difficult. Um, you know, they have a lot

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of battles to contend with. But I think when you

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the stock and the reaction, you know what

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a difference, you know, a quarter or two makes, you

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>know that we're seeing a big shift in the tone

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the market. I mean this Netflix was a company

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that only treated on subscriber growth. What's the sub number?

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the sub number? You know that that's pretty much

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was the singular metric that people looked at now you

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>had a decline in subs and a downward guidance to

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter subs and that the third quarter downward

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>outlook uh so in the stock. So there's clearly a

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>shifting sentiment and a reprioritization of what the metrics relevant

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>metrics are and it's increasingly looking like it's going to

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>be monetization over the absolute number of subs. So here's

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the question. The markets took a turn in part because

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of Netflix big loss in subscribers three months ago, which

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was totally unprecedented. Do you think that this shifting sentiment

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>will buoy markets through earnings over the next six weeks

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>near term? Yeah, absolutely, I think I think that the

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sentiment has become so bad and the bar is so

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>low that you aren't going to see, um, some some

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>level of relief. Obviously we're not out of the woods

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>as it relates inflation what the FED is going to do.

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that these companies have have come

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>down way too much, and I think that what you're

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be seeing is an increasing appreciation for mean

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>reversion in the growth rates. And what I mean by

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that is that you know, these companies pulled that companies

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>pulled forward so much demand during COVID and then you

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>had this growth drop off the last couple of quarters

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>where it looks like, is this a structural change in

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the growth rates where demand is actually slowing, or is

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this a mean reversion where we're just going to revert

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>back to the original growth curve. And I think what

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>people are investors are starting to increasingly areciate is that

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we're just coming back to the original growth group and

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that these companies can and will grow um the way

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that we thought before COVID, and in some cases like Amazon,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft, um like Apple, potentially even better uh than

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>they were before COVID. And as far as Netflix is concerned,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is still a company. You know, the

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>advertising is not easy, and you're contending with juggernauts like Amazon,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook, like Google. And when you think about the

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>level of differentiation you have as a service versus them

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>um in in order to targeting capabilities and whatnot, it's

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not that much. You know, we consider we put Netflix

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in the bucket of old media and then likely should

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>be valued as such. Interesting, So, if the streaming wars

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>are turning into an ad war, who wins you know,

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's Netflix, there's HBO and Disney Plus that are

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>also experimenting with advertisers. And then on the other side

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got Facebook and Google, which has been doing this

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time and snap. Yeah. I think

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that the big guys Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google will

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to command great share because of the fact that

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they are platforms um which which provide great stickiness for

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>their customers and great targeting capabilities from the data that

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>they collect. But we do think that it can become

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>increasingly fragmented as as other outlets explore their advertising um capabilities,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in a word, to better monetize their businesses. But ultimately,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't see We see the likes of

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon gating a disproportionate share and Netflix having to contend

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>with everybody else, And when you think about the data

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that they have, you know, how is it much more

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>differentiated than what a linear television station has. All right,

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>interesting view there. Um, we will of course continue to

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>cover all of this. James Chapman, Clockwise Capital, thank you

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for waiting. Meantime. Phase Clan is one of the biggest

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>e sports companies in the world, with eleven competitive teams

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in games like counter Strike in Fortnite. The company has

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>officially started trading on the NASDAC Phase Clan a lifestyle brand,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a gaming lifestyle brand that's now extremely popular with younger

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>audiences and includes big personality streamers and content creators like

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Snoop Dob, who's also on the company's board. CEO Lee

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Trad joins us now live from the NASDAC League. Good

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to have you here on the big day. You know,

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody thought that the go public window has been slammed

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and sealed shut for the foreseeable future. Why did you

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>decide to try to rip it open? Well, first of all,

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Emily, I really appreciate you having me. UM.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Big day, great day for gaming, great day for gen

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Z UM. And you know, you know, talking about gen Z,

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the the timing is actually prescient because gen Z is

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>actually rising to power, not only as a cultural driver

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>um like all youth youth generations are. But there are

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 1>clips and there are clips in your drivers as just

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>culture into changing how we transact, UM, changing how they consume.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the end of the decade, they're gonna have

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty three trillion dollars of spending power. And so what

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is this ascendency of gen Z. I think

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're, um, we're we typify that ascendency as the

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>first gen Z native public native company to go public.

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Um and so I think I think the timing feels perfect.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Shares did drop some, you know, or so, I mean,

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>do you still think the timing is right? Uh? The

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>timing is definitely right. And the reality is, uh, this

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>day is about the launch of the of the first

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>gen Z native company to go in public. It's not

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about the market conditions to a We're building value for

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the long term. You know, we're check in with us

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at twelve months, at eighteen months, at twenty four months.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>We're building value for our community, for our shareholders, um

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and we'll just be building for the long term.

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>The phase is at the intersection of some really volatile

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>industries including a sports and web three. You know, talk

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to us about what makes this uh you know, sort

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of cocktail this place where you sit in business so

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>unique and potentially valuable. So we really do sit at

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the at the intersection of technology and culture. That's really

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>what we did starting in right, gaming sits at at

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the intersection of technology and culture. I don't think people

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>understood that about gaming, that gaming is culture. UM. Gaming

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>culture has become youth culture overall. UH. And we've been

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>pioneers at that, and our plan is to continue to pioneer.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And a great example of that is Web three, which

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>also happens to be led and driven by culture at

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the moment. And so we've been positioning ourselves amongst all

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of the blue chip companies and brands within Web three,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and we see our opportunity to bring the massive gaming community,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>which is not yet in Web three. We see the

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for us to build that bridge and usher in

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that massive gaming audience, not only our five million plus

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>follower network, but the gaming community at large into what

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>will be UM really a colossal part of our future.

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That that frankly will will disrupt UM not only what

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you've seen so far and things like like art but UM,

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but Web three is going to impact commerce overall. UM. So,

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so we're positioned ourselves to to bring our generation into

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>that and UH and we and we see that as

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>an amazing opportunity for us. What don't investors understand yet

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>about how gen z is is really going to change

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>things and how to capitalize on these trends. So I

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>think what we've seen so far is the way they

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>consume content, right, They've they've moved away from the traditional

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the traditional spaces of content heavy on YouTube, heavy on Internet,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>heavy on Twitch, And that's really the beginning of the change.

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not the totality of the change. Gen Z just

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>demands something different UM from the brands that they support.

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Gen Z wants to be treated as a community, not

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a customer. At this point, I hesitate to always use

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the word customer because it almost feels pejorative from the

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gen Z lens, and I think that that the majority

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of of traditional companies don't really understand it. They don't

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>understand that see change. They don't understand that gen Z

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is rising to power in a different way. You know

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>again by by the by the end of the decade,

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to have thirty three trillion in buying power. Another another

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sign of this is that this this election is where

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the first gen Z candidates for Congress UM

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a massive sea change coming. I think

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies are are are not quite prepared

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for the amount of change that's required to treat their

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>their customers as their community. UM and you know we

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>speak the gen Z language natively. Um, we've been leading

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>gen Z on on the culture side and we are

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're continuing to lead them on the commercial side

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. Alright, Lee Training Phase Clan CEO. We will

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch y'all. Thanks for take off. Thank you. Meantime,

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Tesla Arties call still underway, Musk stating that the company

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>has the potential for record breaking output in the second

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>half of this year. Again, it would have to be

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>record breaking if they're going to make their own targets. Plus,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he says, the Tesla cyber truck is on track to

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>debut next year. We're gonna continue to listen to it,

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>listen in and bring you the headlines as we have

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>them coming up. Sam Bank and Freed's growing empire. We're

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the crypto billionaires spending spree and his

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>intentions behind it all in the middle of a very

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>coold crypto winter that is next. This is Bloomberg at

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the very least. I want to be doing something that positive,

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like with the making money perk, like like a I

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>want to be good actor there. It is time now

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for our Crypto Report as we take a look at

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the most prominent figures in the industry, and

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that is f t X founder and CEO Sam Bankman Freed.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Over the span of two weeks in June, the crypto

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>billionaire bought two companies, propped up the crypto platform black Fly,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and tried to save another, Voyager Digital with a large loan.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>In all, he committed about a billion dollars all in

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the midst of a crypto rout that has wiped two

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in market value out in just eight months.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Hannah Miller now for more on today's

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>big take. Hannah, thank you. It is just fascinating to see, uh,

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, just how ambitious and seemingly successful ASBF has

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be. But there are competing views of him

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.479
<v Speaker 1>within the industry. Is he more of the messiah or

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is he a shark? Yes? No, you have people calling

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Fried the patron saint of crypto, that he

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is bailing out the industry, coming swooping in as a

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>white knight to save struggling companies. And then on the

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you have people really seeing him as a

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>robber baron consolidating power and control over the industry. So

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as we have spoke at our Bloomberg Crypto Summit this week,

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a quick listen to what he

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>had to say. Certainly, the asset you know, price declined

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a strong sign that in crypto and Frankling a lot

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of fintech like there, like things were way too late

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on use cases, and that there's a lot of hand

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>waving going on both on use cases and on sort

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of financial modeling. That was suspect tell us a little

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more about his view on this market downturn. I mean,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly he is more optimistic than the markets would suggest.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But busy right. Yes, No, he puts protecting customers above

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>all else. Um. Within this industry, UM, he is looking

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to swoop in, help people out. He believes that this

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is an industry with extremely strong long term prospects. Um.

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>He while he sees opportunity in terms of buying up

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>companies bailing out others. UM. He thinks that by helping

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>these companies you can ensure that customer's assets remain safe.

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you expecting his acquisitions free to continue? What's next? Yeah,

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So we know that f t X and f t

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>x US is both these companies are focused on raising funding. UM,

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we know that they're in talks with people. That's pretty

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>unique because venture capitalists have really cooled down on the

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>industry um within the past few months in light of

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto winter. So it's pretty fascinating to see that he

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>still has a lot of compidence he can raise funds

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at high valuations. He's also eyeing assets at distressed companies

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin minds for acquisitions. Meantime, you've got Elon Musk,

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>who you know, at one point was also considered a

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of crypto savior, uh, coming out and saying that

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Teslas sold seventy of its bitcoin purchases turned that into

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>cash to improve its cash position. I mean, do you

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>expect something like that to have, you know, a continued

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>negative effect on the industry or can the optimism of

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bulls like Sam Bankman Freed went out. Yeah, I think

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Bankman Freed's support for the industry shows that,

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are people who have confidence in it.

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>He's also has his eyes outside of the crypto industry.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>He's talked about um, you know, even choked around about

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>buying Golden Sacks, and we've also reported that he was

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:29.280
<v Speaker 1>eyeing a potential takeover of Robin Hood, so he sees

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>mainstream finance blurring with crypto and while big names like

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk may be dampening a little bit on their

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm for the industry, it seems like those within it

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 1>have the competence to branch out beyond it and are

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>still competent about so long term prospects interesting. All right, Well,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there are many more twists and turns to come.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Hannah Miller with this week's big Take, Thank you.

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic has of course changed how we look at healthcare,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and the digital health landscape was a booming industry through

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen. But where are we now. Let's take a

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the future of health tech with Dina Shaquire,

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a partner at Lux Capital. Obviously, there's been a lot

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of optimism about the future of healthcare technology, in part

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>accelerated by the pandemic, but we've also seen some of

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>these companies like cerebral Um a string of other companies

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that have had layoffs coupled with this downturn. How optimistic

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or how bright is the future really? Bottom line is,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm still incredibly bullish, as are we at Lux healthcare

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>is fundamentally recession proof. Human health will always continue to

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>be a big sector. Humans are not going anywhere anytime soon.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll continue to give birth, will continue to get sick,

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and we'll continue to die. And while the pandemic may

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have accelerated growth in certain areas, it's also sort of

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>opened up a watershed of opportunity for the key stakeholders

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in the industry will have no choice but to undergo

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a digital transformation. How is the downturn impacting the industry

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>impacting valuations? You know, I'm sure companies are struggling under

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the pressure of this. Absolutely, there's no denying we are

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not immune from the macro at all, and certainly health

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tech in particular, given it as very services oriented, is

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>keenly affected by it, particularly at the later stage. So

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing there's still a massive influx of funds that

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>venture funds are raising focused on healthcare. In fact, SPB

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just released a report this morning documenting that, and I

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's on track to be the third highest year

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of venture fundraising in history. There has been a slowdown

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of dollars deployed towards healthcare, So it's the

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>latest stage companies in particular that will see it's not

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>quite the fundraising environment of one. Apple just came out

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with unique for Apple, a sixty page report detailing its

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>role in the health tech industry. Is Apple going to

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>own this industry as a device maker and an operating system?

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, this has always been a big question for healthcare.

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I t is it going to be Apple? Is it

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be Google? What rolled us face of play?

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's no denying and especially now with the

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple watches that we're all wearing that there is a

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 1>massive consumer trust in Apple and iOS and that it

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>will be very interesting to see how providers actually step

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>up to integrating this data with their e mrs. I

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>think if they can bridge that gap, there could be

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>something very interesting and last you know, and I know

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>this isn't necessarily a quick question, but obviously the overturning

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of Row versus Wade, how does that change you know,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>where you're thinking about putting your money and your view

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>on this industry where you FORRANTO human's health. You know,

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of course we've been long term investors in women's health,

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and fundamentally women's health is population health. This overturning has

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>been a very sad moment, not just for women but

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for all of us. And it's also been a moment

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>where employers are stepping up to the table where we've

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>seen major companies taking stands funding the care of women

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to to cross state lines if they need to to

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>to receive the care that we need. One of our

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>companies may even clinic is already served, being nearly half

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Fortune fifteen companies, and they've actually seen an

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>increase month over month in terms of the inbound sales

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for companies who want to do more for their

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>women and for their families, who want to address the

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.479
<v Speaker 1>maternal health crisis that we face in this country where

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>women today are percent more likely to die in childbirth

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>than our mothers before us, and that's three to four

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>x if you're a black or a woman of color.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Maven, which obviously one of your companies, was

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>just on the show and she talked about maternity deserts

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in these pockets of places across the country that just

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have at a quick care Udeo Shaquier Lux Capital.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Always great to have you here on the show. Thank

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you great to be here for stopping by UM We've

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>been continuing to listen into that Tesla earnings call. Elon

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Musk has been talking about his decision to sell the

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>majority of the company's stake in bit coin SEV. Take

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a listen to what he had to say the recently

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>sold a bunch of hed coin hold agent is that

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we were uncertain as to when the COVID lockdowns in

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>China would alleviate, so it was important for us to

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>maximize our cash position given the answer of the COVID

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns in China. Musk also said he's open to increasing

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the company's bitcoin position in the future, and he said

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he's holding on to his doors and that does it.

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>For the edition of Bloomberg Technology tomorrow, we're gonna be

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.439
<v Speaker 1>speaking with a T and T CEO, John Stanky. That'll

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>be a big one. He'll be talking to us about

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>earnings in the state of the wireless industry. And as always,

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.240
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to check out our podcast wherever you get

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco. This is

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg