WEBVTT - What We Know About How Coronavirus Spreads 

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.356
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:22.396 --> 0:00:25.636
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:26.076 --> 0:00:30.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman, and right now the only story that

0:00:30.196 --> 0:00:33.956
<v Speaker 1>anyone is talking about is coronavirus. In order to make

0:00:33.996 --> 0:00:38.316
<v Speaker 1>sense of coronavirus, we decided to speak to Sidhart Mukherjee,

0:00:38.636 --> 0:00:42.876
<v Speaker 1>who is probably the foremost interpreter in my generation of

0:00:42.916 --> 0:00:46.636
<v Speaker 1>the meaning of disease and how it affects our daily lives.

0:00:47.076 --> 0:00:49.716
<v Speaker 1>You probably know his book The Emperor of All Maladies

0:00:49.836 --> 0:00:53.076
<v Speaker 1>of Biography of Cancer, which one the twenty eleven Pulitzer

0:00:53.116 --> 0:00:56.396
<v Speaker 1>Prize for General Nonfiction. You may also know his twenty

0:00:56.396 --> 0:01:00.716
<v Speaker 1>seventeen book The Gene and Intimate History. Sidhart is a

0:01:00.836 --> 0:01:04.876
<v Speaker 1>voice of reason, logic, and thoughtfulness, and he's the person

0:01:04.996 --> 0:01:08.276
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to hear from at exactly this moment of panic.

0:01:09.836 --> 0:01:11.836
<v Speaker 1>So Sid, maybe we can start by a my just

0:01:11.996 --> 0:01:17.116
<v Speaker 1>asking you, how have you been thinking medically, statistically, personally,

0:01:17.196 --> 0:01:21.116
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise about the coronavirus epidemic as it gradually rolls

0:01:21.156 --> 0:01:25.876
<v Speaker 1>itself out. Well, so there are several questions in that,

0:01:26.036 --> 0:01:29.796
<v Speaker 1>because there's that I've been thinking different medically, personally and statistically.

0:01:29.836 --> 0:01:32.996
<v Speaker 1>But let me just tell you a very broad through

0:01:33.116 --> 0:01:38.276
<v Speaker 1>landscape view. Right now, we're in a moment of some

0:01:38.596 --> 0:01:43.036
<v Speaker 1>degree of confusion. There are, like any epidemic, or like

0:01:43.116 --> 0:01:48.036
<v Speaker 1>any virus, coronavirus has some absolutes. In other words, there's

0:01:48.036 --> 0:01:51.356
<v Speaker 1>some absolute things about the virus that are determined by

0:01:51.396 --> 0:01:54.396
<v Speaker 1>its biology and by the interaction of that biology with

0:01:54.516 --> 0:01:59.076
<v Speaker 1>the host. There's a real number which predicts how many

0:01:59.156 --> 0:02:01.836
<v Speaker 1>people you infect if you you know what the so

0:02:01.956 --> 0:02:05.036
<v Speaker 1>called are not value is and what the case fatality

0:02:05.156 --> 0:02:08.836
<v Speaker 1>rate is, etc. And we need to know those very

0:02:08.916 --> 0:02:12.956
<v Speaker 1>much in order to understand how to develop an effective

0:02:12.956 --> 0:02:16.396
<v Speaker 1>strategy against it, whether it be quarantine or you know,

0:02:16.796 --> 0:02:21.196
<v Speaker 1>medicines or whatever it might be. The problem is that

0:02:21.236 --> 0:02:28.636
<v Speaker 1>those numbers are included by random chance events and by

0:02:29.076 --> 0:02:32.916
<v Speaker 1>underreporting of the actual virus. So what do I mean

0:02:32.956 --> 0:02:34.956
<v Speaker 1>that by that? If you look at the map of

0:02:36.036 --> 0:02:39.516
<v Speaker 1>the spread, there are, as you know, eighty thousand odd

0:02:39.516 --> 0:02:44.516
<v Speaker 1>cases in China, there are one thousand od cases in Japan.

0:02:45.116 --> 0:02:48.396
<v Speaker 1>There are x thousand odd cases you know, in neighboring countries.

0:02:49.116 --> 0:02:53.836
<v Speaker 1>But then there are some obviously some peculiar anomalies. There's

0:02:53.836 --> 0:02:56.236
<v Speaker 1>this big case load in the Italy of all places

0:02:56.236 --> 0:02:59.956
<v Speaker 1>in northern Italy and Lombardy and other places. Why did

0:02:59.996 --> 0:03:02.236
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden it skip all of Europe and

0:03:02.316 --> 0:03:08.356
<v Speaker 1>become this major infection in northern Italy. It's not as

0:03:08.396 --> 0:03:11.676
<v Speaker 1>if you know Han and you know Venus our major

0:03:11.756 --> 0:03:14.636
<v Speaker 1>criss crossing destinations for each other. I mean, there is

0:03:14.676 --> 0:03:17.956
<v Speaker 1>tourism of course between Italy and China. But something bizarre

0:03:17.996 --> 0:03:20.956
<v Speaker 1>happened there, something that we can we cannot simply explain.

0:03:21.436 --> 0:03:24.956
<v Speaker 1>So we are in a situation where we have to

0:03:24.996 --> 0:03:28.836
<v Speaker 1>get we have to provide two kinds of explanations. One

0:03:28.956 --> 0:03:31.916
<v Speaker 1>kind of explanation is as what I call are the

0:03:32.036 --> 0:03:37.276
<v Speaker 1>viral absolutes, the epidemiological absolutes, and the statistical absolutes. What

0:03:37.436 --> 0:03:40.676
<v Speaker 1>is the actual number of cases that is being detected

0:03:40.956 --> 0:03:43.436
<v Speaker 1>or found? And then there are these things that, you know,

0:03:43.436 --> 0:03:47.276
<v Speaker 1>how do we explain it that places that shouldn't seem

0:03:47.316 --> 0:03:52.076
<v Speaker 1>to have any connection are suddenly epicenters of the worst

0:03:52.116 --> 0:03:55.476
<v Speaker 1>parts of the epidemic. And that's what's that's what's very

0:03:55.476 --> 0:03:59.556
<v Speaker 1>confusing about it at the moment. So from what you've said,

0:04:00.236 --> 0:04:04.156
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that although there are absolutes, we definitely

0:04:04.156 --> 0:04:06.036
<v Speaker 1>don't know them now and we may not know them

0:04:06.116 --> 0:04:09.716
<v Speaker 1>until very very late in this process. They are there somewhere,

0:04:09.756 --> 0:04:12.036
<v Speaker 1>but we can't get at them. The best way to

0:04:12.036 --> 0:04:14.956
<v Speaker 1>get at them is is to let time is a

0:04:14.956 --> 0:04:16.796
<v Speaker 1>little bit more time pass, And I'm not talking about

0:04:16.796 --> 0:04:19.316
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time. I'm talking about, you know, a

0:04:19.396 --> 0:04:22.556
<v Speaker 1>process of weeks, maybe a couple of weeks, three weeks, etc.

0:04:23.636 --> 0:04:27.756
<v Speaker 1>And then also to in the meantime to separate the

0:04:28.116 --> 0:04:31.076
<v Speaker 1>wheat from the shaft, so to separate out the things

0:04:31.076 --> 0:04:36.676
<v Speaker 1>that are including these absolutes such as random movements and underreporting,

0:04:36.996 --> 0:04:39.516
<v Speaker 1>and find out what the real numbers are, so that

0:04:39.556 --> 0:04:42.756
<v Speaker 1>we get some sense in a given population what these

0:04:42.756 --> 0:04:47.476
<v Speaker 1>epidemological absolutes are. What is the actual case fatality rate?

0:04:48.316 --> 0:04:50.396
<v Speaker 1>So if you look, for instance, in the United States,

0:04:50.716 --> 0:04:54.556
<v Speaker 1>there have been five hundred odd cases and twenty two deaths,

0:04:54.596 --> 0:04:57.596
<v Speaker 1>that would put the case fatality rate at four percent,

0:04:57.756 --> 0:05:02.076
<v Speaker 1>give or take. If you look at another place in

0:05:02.116 --> 0:05:05.556
<v Speaker 1>parts of Europe, there've been a thousand cases and three deaths,

0:05:05.596 --> 0:05:08.916
<v Speaker 1>which would put it a full magnitude less than the

0:05:09.196 --> 0:05:12.556
<v Speaker 1>United States. But there is there is an actual number.

0:05:12.596 --> 0:05:14.636
<v Speaker 1>There's a number to be had, or even a range

0:05:14.636 --> 0:05:16.796
<v Speaker 1>of numbers to be had, of what the actual case

0:05:16.796 --> 0:05:19.796
<v Speaker 1>fatality rate is and the decision of the severity of

0:05:19.836 --> 0:05:23.036
<v Speaker 1>the epidemic will depend on that actual case fatality rate.

0:05:23.436 --> 0:05:27.036
<v Speaker 1>There is an actual number, an absolute truth as to

0:05:27.076 --> 0:05:30.916
<v Speaker 1>the number of people you are likely to infect under

0:05:30.956 --> 0:05:33.596
<v Speaker 1>normal circumstances in it through going through a normal day.

0:05:33.836 --> 0:05:37.396
<v Speaker 1>So it will take a few days, perhaps weeks, before

0:05:37.476 --> 0:05:40.836
<v Speaker 1>some of these clouds clear and we begin to get actual,

0:05:40.956 --> 0:05:43.996
<v Speaker 1>real estimates of what those numbers are. We're getting there.

0:05:44.076 --> 0:05:46.356
<v Speaker 1>We have a sense of what it is, I think

0:05:46.396 --> 0:05:50.316
<v Speaker 1>with COVID nineteen, but it's not all there yet and

0:05:50.636 --> 0:05:54.956
<v Speaker 1>we're slowly getting there. So first point then for listeners,

0:05:54.956 --> 0:05:57.596
<v Speaker 1>I think, is that this number, which we're all going

0:05:57.676 --> 0:05:59.996
<v Speaker 1>to have to become very familiar with, the R zero

0:06:00.156 --> 0:06:02.116
<v Speaker 1>or are not as you called it, which is the

0:06:02.196 --> 0:06:05.556
<v Speaker 1>number that tells us for a person who's infected and

0:06:05.716 --> 0:06:08.476
<v Speaker 1>is exposed to others, how many people will become infected,

0:06:08.916 --> 0:06:12.636
<v Speaker 1>is going to become clearer in the relatively near future.

0:06:13.036 --> 0:06:16.076
<v Speaker 1>And of course it might depend on the genetics of

0:06:16.116 --> 0:06:19.276
<v Speaker 1>a population. That's a very important point, which is to

0:06:19.316 --> 0:06:23.676
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether there's some populations that are particularly susceptible,

0:06:23.796 --> 0:06:28.076
<v Speaker 1>whereas some populations are particularly non susceptible. We just don't

0:06:28.116 --> 0:06:31.516
<v Speaker 1>know that yet. But again, these numbers will become clear.

0:06:32.556 --> 0:06:36.476
<v Speaker 1>Once they do become clearer, what will the next step

0:06:36.836 --> 0:06:39.996
<v Speaker 1>really be, Because then we leave the realm of absolutes

0:06:40.276 --> 0:06:45.156
<v Speaker 1>and we enter the realm of social policy response. First

0:06:45.156 --> 0:06:46.876
<v Speaker 1>of all, if it turns out that the number of

0:06:46.876 --> 0:06:50.716
<v Speaker 1>people that you can infect while you're an asymptomatic carrier

0:06:50.756 --> 0:06:55.236
<v Speaker 1>of the virus is large, then it makes most sense

0:06:55.316 --> 0:07:00.476
<v Speaker 1>to impose quarantining and rather draconian quarantining in areas that

0:07:00.516 --> 0:07:03.836
<v Speaker 1>are very severely affected, as China has done. As China

0:07:03.876 --> 0:07:07.236
<v Speaker 1>has done. That's correct. So if both those things are true,

0:07:07.276 --> 0:07:10.836
<v Speaker 1>if you're an asymptomatic carrier and you can infect a

0:07:10.916 --> 0:07:14.396
<v Speaker 1>large number of people, then quarantining and other sort of

0:07:14.596 --> 0:07:19.756
<v Speaker 1>I would say broadly prophylactic measures. Work Number two is

0:07:19.796 --> 0:07:23.716
<v Speaker 1>to identify the susceptible population, like who is the most

0:07:24.036 --> 0:07:28.756
<v Speaker 1>susceptible population to the exposure. Remember in the early days

0:07:28.836 --> 0:07:34.036
<v Speaker 1>of the HIV epidemic in the United States, those numbers

0:07:34.076 --> 0:07:36.636
<v Speaker 1>came about quite slowly, but eventually wor figure out there

0:07:36.756 --> 0:07:40.316
<v Speaker 1>was a susceptible population men who had sex with men,

0:07:40.716 --> 0:07:43.916
<v Speaker 1>and there was a susceptible population of hemophiliacs who are

0:07:43.956 --> 0:07:48.116
<v Speaker 1>receiving blood transfusions. Of course, internationally, now that's no longer true.

0:07:48.156 --> 0:07:52.316
<v Speaker 1>The vast number of people infectively HIV are no longer

0:07:52.316 --> 0:07:55.356
<v Speaker 1>those two populations. It's now become a completely different disease.

0:07:55.876 --> 0:08:01.156
<v Speaker 1>But when you identify susceptible populations where you have a

0:08:01.236 --> 0:08:04.716
<v Speaker 1>high level of transmission of risk, then you can make

0:08:04.996 --> 0:08:08.276
<v Speaker 1>social policy measures which are not as blunt as the

0:08:08.316 --> 0:08:11.676
<v Speaker 1>ones that are are made without those so they can

0:08:11.716 --> 0:08:14.236
<v Speaker 1>be much more targeted. You target the people at risk,

0:08:14.316 --> 0:08:16.596
<v Speaker 1>and you try to figure out how to move about

0:08:16.716 --> 0:08:21.236
<v Speaker 1>life in business and economy without imposing the kind of

0:08:21.436 --> 0:08:27.156
<v Speaker 1>very draconian quarantining efforts that we've seen in places like China.

0:08:27.236 --> 0:08:30.196
<v Speaker 1>So let's try to see if even under these conditions

0:08:30.196 --> 0:08:34.396
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty, you can't guide our listeners through some kind

0:08:34.436 --> 0:08:37.716
<v Speaker 1>of rational behavior. I'm not saying rational behavior once we

0:08:37.836 --> 0:08:41.036
<v Speaker 1>know the numbers, but rational behavior right now under conditions

0:08:41.036 --> 0:08:47.156
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty. So let's take a really simple example. You know,

0:08:47.236 --> 0:08:49.876
<v Speaker 1>I planned a month ago to bring my kids on

0:08:50.116 --> 0:08:54.076
<v Speaker 1>a spring break trip to New Orleans, so it's domestic

0:08:54.156 --> 0:08:57.636
<v Speaker 1>travel their kids. Very few kids have gotten this. If

0:08:57.676 --> 0:09:00.556
<v Speaker 1>they have gotten it, they haven't haven't had very bad symptoms.

0:09:01.076 --> 0:09:02.996
<v Speaker 1>But of course New Orleans is a tourist destination. There

0:09:03.036 --> 0:09:04.716
<v Speaker 1>are lots of people there. If you click on the

0:09:05.196 --> 0:09:07.676
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana State Board of Health, they say there are no

0:09:07.756 --> 0:09:10.676
<v Speaker 1>reported cases in Louisiana. Now you look at the CDC website,

0:09:10.956 --> 0:09:13.876
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't tell you not to engage in any domestic travel.

0:09:14.436 --> 0:09:17.796
<v Speaker 1>And yet, on the other hand, you know universities are

0:09:17.836 --> 0:09:20.836
<v Speaker 1>in the process as we speak, of telling everybody that

0:09:20.876 --> 0:09:23.556
<v Speaker 1>they're going to run their classes remotely, even in places

0:09:23.596 --> 0:09:27.556
<v Speaker 1>with very few cases of the disease reported. How irrational

0:09:27.756 --> 0:09:31.316
<v Speaker 1>is it or how rational is it to say, you know,

0:09:31.436 --> 0:09:33.676
<v Speaker 1>we've planned this trip, we're going to go. We're not

0:09:33.716 --> 0:09:36.596
<v Speaker 1>in any great risk factor. Airplane travel is not inherently

0:09:36.596 --> 0:09:40.356
<v Speaker 1>more dangerous than getting on public transportation. There's a question

0:09:40.476 --> 0:09:45.196
<v Speaker 1>of particular in dissociety. There's a question of personal liability

0:09:45.396 --> 0:09:49.836
<v Speaker 1>versus I would say institutional liability. So, and they're different.

0:09:49.996 --> 0:09:52.996
<v Speaker 1>When you're taking your children to travel with you to

0:09:53.116 --> 0:09:55.596
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, I agree with you that the risk is

0:09:55.836 --> 0:09:58.716
<v Speaker 1>small children, as you very well know, don't seem to

0:09:58.756 --> 0:10:00.876
<v Speaker 1>get the severe variant of the disease. In fact, i'd

0:10:00.876 --> 0:10:05.156
<v Speaker 1>be more worried about you than your children. But you're

0:10:05.156 --> 0:10:09.676
<v Speaker 1>taking that on as a personal liability. Institutions, as you know,

0:10:10.596 --> 0:10:16.716
<v Speaker 1>especially in this climate, political climate, and social climate, don't

0:10:16.756 --> 0:10:20.236
<v Speaker 1>want to take institutional liabilities. It's a difference between personal

0:10:20.276 --> 0:10:23.116
<v Speaker 1>liability and institutional liability that we're talking about. I would

0:10:23.116 --> 0:10:26.116
<v Speaker 1>say the likelihood that a Stanford student will get a

0:10:26.156 --> 0:10:31.276
<v Speaker 1>severe variant of COVID nineteen is extremely low. The closure

0:10:31.276 --> 0:10:34.876
<v Speaker 1>of the university and conversion of into remote classes is

0:10:34.916 --> 0:10:39.276
<v Speaker 1>not the biggest deal, and so in that risk benefit analysis,

0:10:39.516 --> 0:10:44.636
<v Speaker 1>the institution chose to diminish their institutional liability by saying, look,

0:10:44.676 --> 0:10:48.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have the infrastructure already to do this,

0:10:48.836 --> 0:10:51.636
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll go ahead. This is in great contrast too.

0:10:51.716 --> 0:10:55.276
<v Speaker 1>For instance, the New York school system. As you very

0:10:55.276 --> 0:10:57.676
<v Speaker 1>well know, the New York school system is not just

0:10:57.796 --> 0:11:00.916
<v Speaker 1>a school system, but it's a social network, and it's

0:11:00.956 --> 0:11:06.036
<v Speaker 1>a social network that provides meals, often to under privileged

0:11:06.116 --> 0:11:10.436
<v Speaker 1>and kids from very poor back grounds. If they were

0:11:10.476 --> 0:11:13.076
<v Speaker 1>to stay at home, they would mean that their parents

0:11:13.476 --> 0:11:16.636
<v Speaker 1>would need to take time off work, and you know,

0:11:16.676 --> 0:11:20.036
<v Speaker 1>the economic costs would be staggering. So it's closing down

0:11:20.076 --> 0:11:23.996
<v Speaker 1>a school system where there is no simple infrastructure for

0:11:24.076 --> 0:11:27.636
<v Speaker 1>remote schooling anyway. Plus the actual school provides a safe

0:11:27.636 --> 0:11:32.596
<v Speaker 1>haven for millions of kids. The question of institutional liability

0:11:32.716 --> 0:11:37.716
<v Speaker 1>is completely different. So in your particular case, I think

0:11:37.756 --> 0:11:40.876
<v Speaker 1>that's a personal liability that you're taking with pretty minimal risk.

0:11:41.036 --> 0:11:42.716
<v Speaker 1>And then that, by the way, that might not only

0:11:42.756 --> 0:11:45.796
<v Speaker 1>be about any potential downside for a mere my kids.

0:11:45.796 --> 0:11:48.676
<v Speaker 1>It might be about we don't want to become carriers.

0:11:48.836 --> 0:11:51.956
<v Speaker 1>And the reality is that the more people circulating, the

0:11:52.036 --> 0:11:55.756
<v Speaker 1>more difficult it becomes to restrain the spread of the virus.

0:11:55.796 --> 0:11:57.676
<v Speaker 1>And so it might be as a publicly interested matter,

0:11:58.076 --> 0:12:00.236
<v Speaker 1>you know, one arguably ought to stay home, right, And

0:12:00.636 --> 0:12:06.636
<v Speaker 1>again the question really becomes a question of looking very

0:12:06.636 --> 0:12:11.556
<v Speaker 1>dispassionately at risk versus benefit. So remember that if you

0:12:11.996 --> 0:12:15.556
<v Speaker 1>look through as anyone might, you can it's all accessible.

0:12:16.076 --> 0:12:19.796
<v Speaker 1>There are recommendations now for virtually every country where you

0:12:19.796 --> 0:12:24.596
<v Speaker 1>could travel too, in terms of completely rest travel, restrict

0:12:24.676 --> 0:12:29.556
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary travel, or be free to travel. It would be

0:12:29.596 --> 0:12:33.356
<v Speaker 1>helpful to have that for the United States as well,

0:12:33.396 --> 0:12:36.596
<v Speaker 1>in terms of potentially every city or state that you're

0:12:36.636 --> 0:12:41.116
<v Speaker 1>traveling to, because the hotspot areas are known. So in

0:12:41.116 --> 0:12:44.476
<v Speaker 1>other words, someone like you should be able to without

0:12:44.596 --> 0:12:48.316
<v Speaker 1>multiple clicks, go to Louisiana, go to New Orleans, figure

0:12:48.316 --> 0:12:52.396
<v Speaker 1>out what the case numbers are today, and figure out

0:12:52.476 --> 0:12:56.476
<v Speaker 1>what the actual risk is, and make a personal decision

0:12:56.796 --> 0:12:58.956
<v Speaker 1>whether to take on that risk, whatever it might be.

0:12:59.436 --> 0:13:01.756
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a policy question that follows from that?

0:13:01.876 --> 0:13:04.876
<v Speaker 1>So one interesting thing to me is that no government

0:13:04.916 --> 0:13:10.276
<v Speaker 1>website has said the following, we advise you not to

0:13:10.356 --> 0:13:13.836
<v Speaker 1>engage in unnecessary travel, even to places where there are

0:13:13.836 --> 0:13:16.836
<v Speaker 1>no reported cases. That has not been said on any

0:13:16.836 --> 0:13:21.116
<v Speaker 1>government website. And yet my guess is that many physicians

0:13:21.156 --> 0:13:23.516
<v Speaker 1>would say, well, this is common sense, don't engage in

0:13:23.596 --> 0:13:26.356
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary travel, even to an unaffected place. I mean, my

0:13:26.476 --> 0:13:31.036
<v Speaker 1>university sent around guidelines saying if it's university business, no

0:13:31.236 --> 0:13:36.196
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary travel on university business anywhere within the domestic United States.

0:13:36.876 --> 0:13:39.476
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm wondering is, as a physician, do you

0:13:39.516 --> 0:13:42.156
<v Speaker 1>have the sense that there is some gap between what

0:13:42.916 --> 0:13:46.596
<v Speaker 1>rational medical professionals would at this point recommend and what

0:13:46.676 --> 0:13:51.676
<v Speaker 1>government agencies are recommending, maybe potentially for political reasons, you know.

0:13:51.876 --> 0:13:53.556
<v Speaker 1>In other words, I I don't have the faith that

0:13:53.556 --> 0:13:56.356
<v Speaker 1>I would like to have that the CDC hasn't advised

0:13:56.396 --> 0:14:01.756
<v Speaker 1>me not to travel domestically because it's safe to do so,

0:14:02.116 --> 0:14:04.996
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the CDC hasn't recommended that I not

0:14:05.076 --> 0:14:07.556
<v Speaker 1>traveled domestley because they're worried that the President will get

0:14:07.596 --> 0:14:11.356
<v Speaker 1>angry at them because he'll say there's down the economy. Well,

0:14:11.396 --> 0:14:16.436
<v Speaker 1>I think the CDC is being quite rational and careful here.

0:14:17.956 --> 0:14:21.516
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I'm not sure, but I don't think

0:14:21.556 --> 0:14:25.796
<v Speaker 1>that the reason that the CDC has not issued a

0:14:25.836 --> 0:14:29.796
<v Speaker 1>blanket statement against travel is that it's it's it's trying

0:14:29.836 --> 0:14:32.316
<v Speaker 1>to appease the president. I just think the CDC is

0:14:32.836 --> 0:14:38.796
<v Speaker 1>trying to be reasonable about shutting down, you know, things

0:14:38.836 --> 0:14:42.756
<v Speaker 1>that make the normal business and the normal lives of

0:14:42.796 --> 0:14:49.676
<v Speaker 1>Americans livable under these circumstances. Said, one of your superpowers

0:14:49.956 --> 0:14:53.356
<v Speaker 1>is not only to be a top and scientist, but

0:14:53.476 --> 0:14:56.836
<v Speaker 1>also to be able to explain to us the cultural

0:14:56.916 --> 0:15:02.036
<v Speaker 1>meanings of our interaction with scientific reality. When you wear

0:15:02.196 --> 0:15:05.996
<v Speaker 1>that hat, your interpreter of maladies had, how do you

0:15:06.036 --> 0:15:10.396
<v Speaker 1>think about what we're going through at the moment. Well,

0:15:10.436 --> 0:15:15.316
<v Speaker 1>I think that in some ways this reads like a

0:15:15.476 --> 0:15:21.196
<v Speaker 1>modern version of Cameos. The plague. The first set of

0:15:22.076 --> 0:15:25.596
<v Speaker 1>decisions that were made in Wuhan which we now know

0:15:25.956 --> 0:15:29.596
<v Speaker 1>and understand a little bit better, were made out of

0:15:29.636 --> 0:15:35.436
<v Speaker 1>fear and were actually extraordinarily erroneous decisions, which in turn

0:15:35.516 --> 0:15:40.756
<v Speaker 1>points to the idea that given the globalization of the world,

0:15:40.836 --> 0:15:43.556
<v Speaker 1>given the nature of travel, given the nature of the

0:15:43.556 --> 0:15:47.156
<v Speaker 1>interactions between people, you know, this isn't this isn't a

0:15:47.316 --> 0:15:52.196
<v Speaker 1>China only problem. It soon becomes a world problem. China's

0:15:52.236 --> 0:15:56.516
<v Speaker 1>suffering grave economic consequences of this now, and it will

0:15:56.556 --> 0:16:00.036
<v Speaker 1>continue to suffer grave economic consequences. But those grave economic

0:16:00.076 --> 0:16:05.076
<v Speaker 1>consequences were themselves the consequences of a political regime which

0:16:05.156 --> 0:16:10.916
<v Speaker 1>is fundamentally unable to be free with information. So the

0:16:10.996 --> 0:16:14.516
<v Speaker 1>first thing it highlights, I think in the cultural realm

0:16:15.116 --> 0:16:18.436
<v Speaker 1>is that information moves at light speed around the world today,

0:16:18.436 --> 0:16:21.156
<v Speaker 1>and that's a good thing in the case of an epidemic.

0:16:21.476 --> 0:16:26.356
<v Speaker 1>The suppression of information, a paternalistic attitude towards a grave

0:16:26.396 --> 0:16:31.276
<v Speaker 1>disease is a terrible decision to make, And in some ways,

0:16:32.356 --> 0:16:35.596
<v Speaker 1>there's a kind of reckoning that's going on within China,

0:16:35.596 --> 0:16:39.076
<v Speaker 1>as many people have noted, there's a reckoning that's going

0:16:39.156 --> 0:16:41.956
<v Speaker 1>on whether this can continue or not, I mean, can

0:16:42.276 --> 0:16:47.516
<v Speaker 1>this statewide a suppression of facts we still don't know

0:16:47.596 --> 0:16:50.636
<v Speaker 1>actually what's true and what's not true. The Chinese are

0:16:50.636 --> 0:16:55.276
<v Speaker 1>now telling us that they're quarantining has been extraordinarily successful, etc.

0:16:56.156 --> 0:17:01.276
<v Speaker 1>Strong Men presidents who believe in confining people are very

0:17:01.356 --> 0:17:03.636
<v Speaker 1>likely to believe this kind of rhetoric. Oh, you know,

0:17:03.716 --> 0:17:07.276
<v Speaker 1>just throw everyone into, you know, behind blue doors and

0:17:07.596 --> 0:17:10.876
<v Speaker 1>it'll all be fine. So I think what it's revealed,

0:17:11.476 --> 0:17:15.916
<v Speaker 1>I think is the is how vulnerable the world is

0:17:16.516 --> 0:17:21.236
<v Speaker 1>to political regimes that have really become outdated, and how

0:17:21.276 --> 0:17:25.796
<v Speaker 1>quickly information can move, how restricting that information can have

0:17:25.876 --> 0:17:30.636
<v Speaker 1>grave consequences for the country itself. What if it turns out, though, that,

0:17:30.956 --> 0:17:35.236
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding China's restriction on information, and notwithstanding the fact that

0:17:35.276 --> 0:17:37.956
<v Speaker 1>we of course can't trust what the government is saying

0:17:37.956 --> 0:17:41.756
<v Speaker 1>about data, that the rather draconian response that they did

0:17:41.836 --> 0:17:44.396
<v Speaker 1>worked really well. I mean, I can imagine, you know,

0:17:44.436 --> 0:17:46.076
<v Speaker 1>this is just one of the possible states of the world,

0:17:46.116 --> 0:17:49.356
<v Speaker 1>but I can imagine an outcome where it actually turns

0:17:49.356 --> 0:17:52.956
<v Speaker 1>out that the draconian response was very effective, and that

0:17:53.116 --> 0:17:56.556
<v Speaker 1>the less draconian responses that may be undertaken by more

0:17:56.596 --> 0:17:59.356
<v Speaker 1>liberal countries like the United States turn out not to

0:17:59.436 --> 0:18:03.836
<v Speaker 1>contain the disease as well, absolutely, and which is again

0:18:03.916 --> 0:18:09.636
<v Speaker 1>why you know a kind of help from the the

0:18:09.796 --> 0:18:14.116
<v Speaker 1>CDC would be is coming and is most appreciated. I

0:18:14.116 --> 0:18:17.916
<v Speaker 1>should also say that the way to do this, it's

0:18:17.956 --> 0:18:23.036
<v Speaker 1>really threading a needle, and threading a needle very carefully.

0:18:23.116 --> 0:18:24.916
<v Speaker 1>This is going on right now in Italy, as you

0:18:24.996 --> 0:18:29.236
<v Speaker 1>very well know. I mean, the Italians are famously suspicious

0:18:29.236 --> 0:18:33.756
<v Speaker 1>of their political system. They enjoy an enormous number of

0:18:33.756 --> 0:18:37.636
<v Speaker 1>liberties and freedoms, and you know their police cars parked

0:18:37.676 --> 0:18:41.796
<v Speaker 1>along the major highways of in northern Italy making sure

0:18:41.836 --> 0:18:45.396
<v Speaker 1>that people don't move. You can't imagine the conflict between

0:18:45.436 --> 0:18:48.636
<v Speaker 1>those two cultures. Giving up the people who have enjoyed

0:18:48.676 --> 0:18:52.996
<v Speaker 1>historical and continue to enjoy an enormous amount of personal freedoms,

0:18:53.796 --> 0:18:57.556
<v Speaker 1>forcing them not to move, not to congregate in the square,

0:18:57.636 --> 0:19:01.116
<v Speaker 1>or to go to their local bar for casual drink

0:19:01.756 --> 0:19:06.436
<v Speaker 1>is obviously extraordinarily disruptive. So I think we'll have to

0:19:06.476 --> 0:19:10.436
<v Speaker 1>thread a very fine needle in terms of identifying hotspots,

0:19:11.236 --> 0:19:17.236
<v Speaker 1>identifying the vulnerable populations, and giving reasonable advice which takes

0:19:17.276 --> 0:19:20.876
<v Speaker 1>the cost and benefit risk appropriately. And it has to

0:19:20.876 --> 0:19:24.116
<v Speaker 1>be done on a case by case basis. It can't

0:19:24.156 --> 0:19:27.636
<v Speaker 1>be done on a blanket basis. Yet, Now, if it

0:19:27.676 --> 0:19:31.516
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the you know, there's more mutations coming more,

0:19:31.956 --> 0:19:33.436
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it turns out that you can get

0:19:33.436 --> 0:19:37.556
<v Speaker 1>reinfected by the virus, which we don't know yet. It's unlikely,

0:19:37.556 --> 0:19:40.076
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know yet, then of course all bets

0:19:40.076 --> 0:19:42.156
<v Speaker 1>are off. I wanted to ask you actually about that,

0:19:42.276 --> 0:19:45.076
<v Speaker 1>about the genetic side of it, wearing your geneticis had.

0:19:45.756 --> 0:19:47.876
<v Speaker 1>What do you think are Maybe it's impossible to say,

0:19:47.916 --> 0:19:53.036
<v Speaker 1>but the probabilities of evolution happening rather quickly in the

0:19:53.036 --> 0:19:56.116
<v Speaker 1>middle of the outbreak in such a way that we

0:19:56.236 --> 0:19:59.476
<v Speaker 1>get not only the question of people getting reinfected, but

0:19:59.516 --> 0:20:02.876
<v Speaker 1>also potentially just different strains of COVID nineteen, you know,

0:20:02.916 --> 0:20:06.996
<v Speaker 1>COVID twenty or twenty one making their way into the population. Well,

0:20:06.996 --> 0:20:10.196
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what the counter pressure are, as it were,

0:20:10.276 --> 0:20:18.916
<v Speaker 1>because evolution happens through various mechanisms with these viruses, with

0:20:19.076 --> 0:20:24.596
<v Speaker 1>these families of viruses, and usually the sort of the

0:20:25.196 --> 0:20:28.956
<v Speaker 1>big evolutionary change, as it were, which is the assortment

0:20:29.036 --> 0:20:34.396
<v Speaker 1>of the segments of RNA, have already happened. Most of

0:20:34.476 --> 0:20:39.636
<v Speaker 1>these viruses come from other populations, other animals and so

0:20:39.756 --> 0:20:44.836
<v Speaker 1>therefore usually have not developed strategies to evade the immune

0:20:44.836 --> 0:20:49.076
<v Speaker 1>system and remain or become chronic in humans. In terms

0:20:49.076 --> 0:20:52.596
<v Speaker 1>of new epidemics. It was an exception with HIV, but

0:20:52.676 --> 0:20:56.316
<v Speaker 1>aside from that, most of these viruses usually once you

0:20:56.356 --> 0:20:59.036
<v Speaker 1>get immunity to it, you get immunity to it and

0:20:59.196 --> 0:21:02.436
<v Speaker 1>you don't get reinfected. We think that that's the case

0:21:02.636 --> 0:21:06.476
<v Speaker 1>given what's happened. Otherwise you you know, WUHAN would still

0:21:06.516 --> 0:21:11.036
<v Speaker 1>be flaring. So based on all the information that we have,

0:21:11.116 --> 0:21:14.036
<v Speaker 1>if it's true information, we have a center of the

0:21:14.036 --> 0:21:17.276
<v Speaker 1>epidemic where there was a wave of deaths unfortunately, but

0:21:17.316 --> 0:21:20.996
<v Speaker 1>then it stopped brewing. It's not flaring still. So to

0:21:21.156 --> 0:21:24.836
<v Speaker 1>some extent, the best information that we have so far

0:21:25.076 --> 0:21:27.796
<v Speaker 1>is that the virus, of course it will mutate, but

0:21:27.836 --> 0:21:31.196
<v Speaker 1>that immunity does develop to it, and that immunity is protective.

0:21:31.996 --> 0:21:35.076
<v Speaker 1>That's very good news for future vaccines. A vaccine is

0:21:35.076 --> 0:21:37.356
<v Speaker 1>not coming tomorrow, but that's very good news for a

0:21:37.396 --> 0:21:40.756
<v Speaker 1>future vaccine because of course you need community. Is there

0:21:40.756 --> 0:21:44.196
<v Speaker 1>anything that you think we're missing from the public discourse

0:21:44.436 --> 0:21:48.516
<v Speaker 1>around COVID nineteen right now, Well, one thing that's missing

0:21:48.676 --> 0:21:51.196
<v Speaker 1>is you know, look getting a vaccine will take a

0:21:51.196 --> 0:21:55.076
<v Speaker 1>long time because vaccines are complicated to make. They're complicated

0:21:55.116 --> 0:21:58.116
<v Speaker 1>a test. They have to be tested on populations to

0:21:58.196 --> 0:22:02.316
<v Speaker 1>be produced at a very high standard. What's missing is

0:22:03.196 --> 0:22:07.956
<v Speaker 1>why and why not for the people who are actually

0:22:07.956 --> 0:22:13.036
<v Speaker 1>falling sick. Why or why not? We don't have either

0:22:13.596 --> 0:22:18.596
<v Speaker 1>antibodies or in others biological or small molecules that are

0:22:18.636 --> 0:22:23.596
<v Speaker 1>directed against the viral enzymes. We know them. The genome

0:22:23.636 --> 0:22:27.236
<v Speaker 1>has been sequenced, we know what the what the vulnerabilities are,

0:22:27.396 --> 0:22:29.996
<v Speaker 1>and I know that there's several facilities that are screening

0:22:30.116 --> 0:22:34.196
<v Speaker 1>for small molecules as well as biologics that will help.

0:22:34.476 --> 0:22:37.636
<v Speaker 1>These are not vaccines, right, so these are injected biologics

0:22:37.636 --> 0:22:42.636
<v Speaker 1>that will enact, hopefully inactivate the virus. So an update

0:22:42.836 --> 0:22:49.636
<v Speaker 1>from the CDC on that process, those kinds of ideas

0:22:49.796 --> 0:22:53.076
<v Speaker 1>from the nation's highest authority in terms of the management

0:22:53.076 --> 0:22:55.676
<v Speaker 1>of illness would be a helpful thing to have, because

0:22:56.156 --> 0:23:00.196
<v Speaker 1>talking emptily about a vaccine which could really be months away,

0:23:00.516 --> 0:23:02.636
<v Speaker 1>is not not going to help right now. If we

0:23:02.636 --> 0:23:05.436
<v Speaker 1>could say to it to you that you know, if

0:23:05.436 --> 0:23:08.556
<v Speaker 1>you get really, really sick, Here's where we are in

0:23:08.636 --> 0:23:12.356
<v Speaker 1>terms of medicine development for this, and there's no better

0:23:12.396 --> 0:23:14.996
<v Speaker 1>country in the world, I think, than the United States

0:23:15.036 --> 0:23:18.756
<v Speaker 1>in developing medicines. Then I think there will be less

0:23:18.796 --> 0:23:22.276
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty and a panic around what's happening next in terms

0:23:22.316 --> 0:23:27.436
<v Speaker 1>of medical development against the virus. Last question for you,

0:23:27.476 --> 0:23:31.356
<v Speaker 1>who said, where are you telling your kids? Well, so,

0:23:31.596 --> 0:23:34.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've been following every day what the CDC

0:23:34.596 --> 0:23:38.036
<v Speaker 1>has been recommending. I mean, thankfully, as I said, children

0:23:38.076 --> 0:23:43.116
<v Speaker 1>are not the worst affected. We have not been doing

0:23:43.156 --> 0:23:47.556
<v Speaker 1>anything except saying to them, try to in New York City,

0:23:47.556 --> 0:23:50.316
<v Speaker 1>where now there are several cases, we've been telling them,

0:23:50.356 --> 0:23:53.236
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid public places which are not you know,

0:23:53.276 --> 0:23:56.956
<v Speaker 1>where there's where it's not necessary to go, wash your

0:23:56.956 --> 0:24:01.556
<v Speaker 1>hands frequently, as frequently as possible. And if you know

0:24:01.676 --> 0:24:06.636
<v Speaker 1>someone who's sick, or obviously if you have symptoms yourself,

0:24:07.076 --> 0:24:09.036
<v Speaker 1>let us know at the earliest. I mean, nothing more,

0:24:09.396 --> 0:24:11.876
<v Speaker 1>nothing less than that. I also led with my kids

0:24:11.876 --> 0:24:13.916
<v Speaker 1>with the don't worry, you're going to be fine. Kids

0:24:13.916 --> 0:24:15.916
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to be getting this, and that an amazingly

0:24:15.956 --> 0:24:18.996
<v Speaker 1>calming effect on them. So I appreciate that part of

0:24:19.036 --> 0:24:21.196
<v Speaker 1>the advice as well as the rest of it. Thank

0:24:21.236 --> 0:24:24.196
<v Speaker 1>you so much for a really calm and rational account

0:24:24.236 --> 0:24:28.476
<v Speaker 1>of an ongoing breaking story that continues to have scary parts,

0:24:28.516 --> 0:24:31.996
<v Speaker 1>but that, as you say, canna, ultimately be managed by

0:24:32.196 --> 0:24:35.196
<v Speaker 1>getting to the absolute truths that are out there and

0:24:35.236 --> 0:24:38.996
<v Speaker 1>then using logic and reason and risk benefit analysis to

0:24:39.076 --> 0:24:42.556
<v Speaker 1>try to get us to a manageable outcome and perhaps

0:24:42.636 --> 0:24:46.556
<v Speaker 1>even to some potential treatments for the worst affected. Thank

0:24:46.596 --> 0:24:48.356
<v Speaker 1>you very much for your time, my pleasure. Thank you

0:24:48.396 --> 0:24:56.596
<v Speaker 1>so much. We'll be back with this week's playback in

0:24:56.636 --> 0:25:03.516
<v Speaker 1>just a moment now for our playback. I want to

0:25:03.556 --> 0:25:07.756
<v Speaker 1>tell you Gorezuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you

0:25:07.876 --> 0:25:12.636
<v Speaker 1>have released earl Wind and you will pay the price.

0:25:15.076 --> 0:25:19.116
<v Speaker 1>That's Democratic Senator Charles Schumer last week, speaking in a

0:25:19.276 --> 0:25:22.116
<v Speaker 1>slightly unhinged tone, if you ask me, in front of

0:25:22.116 --> 0:25:24.956
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court at an abortion rights rally while an

0:25:25.076 --> 0:25:28.316
<v Speaker 1>oral argument was going on about an important abortion rights case.

0:25:29.196 --> 0:25:33.276
<v Speaker 1>Since then, Schumer received intense criticism from President Trump, but

0:25:33.396 --> 0:25:36.836
<v Speaker 1>maybe more significantly from Chief Justice John Roberts and a

0:25:36.876 --> 0:25:41.676
<v Speaker 1>number of Republican senators, and he apologized, kind of saying

0:25:42.076 --> 0:25:45.996
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't have used the words I did. Here's why

0:25:46.076 --> 0:25:49.276
<v Speaker 1>this whole moment in the news is actually a pretty

0:25:49.316 --> 0:25:53.356
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Ever since Donald Trump became president, and in

0:25:53.396 --> 0:25:55.676
<v Speaker 1>fact even before that when he was running for office,

0:25:56.156 --> 0:25:59.396
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has made the federal judiciary one of his

0:25:59.476 --> 0:26:03.276
<v Speaker 1>central targets. He has a specific goal in mind to

0:26:03.596 --> 0:26:07.956
<v Speaker 1>undercut and undermine public trust in the judiciary, and he

0:26:07.996 --> 0:26:10.876
<v Speaker 1>has a very Trumpian way of doing it. He singles

0:26:10.916 --> 0:26:15.316
<v Speaker 1>out individual judges, often by name. He says that they're illegitimate,

0:26:15.556 --> 0:26:17.836
<v Speaker 1>He points to who appointed them and says that that

0:26:17.876 --> 0:26:20.516
<v Speaker 1>will determine what they're going to do when they're in office,

0:26:20.916 --> 0:26:23.436
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately he hints that he would like to be

0:26:23.516 --> 0:26:27.596
<v Speaker 1>able to push them around. What Schumer was doing was

0:26:27.716 --> 0:26:32.476
<v Speaker 1>borrowing a page from the Trumpian rhetoric a threat. Each

0:26:32.516 --> 0:26:35.996
<v Speaker 1>time someone outside of the Trump administration does that, it

0:26:36.076 --> 0:26:39.676
<v Speaker 1>tends to suggest the Trump's approach is perfectly fine. It

0:26:39.756 --> 0:26:44.076
<v Speaker 1>tends not only to further undercut the judiciary, it also

0:26:44.156 --> 0:26:46.276
<v Speaker 1>tends to suggest that we should all move to a

0:26:46.316 --> 0:26:49.756
<v Speaker 1>world where it's completely normal and fine to threaten and

0:26:49.836 --> 0:26:53.396
<v Speaker 1>attack judges. And there's one more problem with what Schumer's doing.

0:26:53.716 --> 0:26:58.196
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty much guaranteed to backfire. In the case that

0:26:58.276 --> 0:27:00.556
<v Speaker 1>was going on in the Supreme Court when Schumer was

0:27:00.636 --> 0:27:04.916
<v Speaker 1>outside making his threats. The primary issue before the justices

0:27:05.276 --> 0:27:08.556
<v Speaker 1>was whether the Court would follow its precedent that would

0:27:08.556 --> 0:27:11.996
<v Speaker 1>actually lead to the striking down of a Louisiana anti

0:27:12.036 --> 0:27:15.116
<v Speaker 1>abortion law, or whether the justices would deviate from a

0:27:15.116 --> 0:27:19.316
<v Speaker 1>relatively recently created precedent and go a different way. In

0:27:19.356 --> 0:27:23.556
<v Speaker 1>that debate, Chief Justice John Roberts is the absolutely all

0:27:23.676 --> 0:27:27.436
<v Speaker 1>important swing vote. He in fact did not vote for

0:27:27.476 --> 0:27:29.756
<v Speaker 1>the decision on which the precedent would be based in

0:27:29.796 --> 0:27:31.916
<v Speaker 1>this case, so we know that he didn't agree with

0:27:31.916 --> 0:27:34.356
<v Speaker 1>that case. But what he was thinking about, and this

0:27:34.436 --> 0:27:37.316
<v Speaker 1>was very clear in the oral argument, was precisely whether

0:27:37.516 --> 0:27:40.076
<v Speaker 1>to follow that precedent even if he didn't like it,

0:27:40.396 --> 0:27:42.556
<v Speaker 1>even though that would send the public message that the

0:27:42.596 --> 0:27:46.556
<v Speaker 1>Court was not following precedent. There's probably no more pressing

0:27:46.556 --> 0:27:48.596
<v Speaker 1>issue in front of the Supreme Court right at this

0:27:48.716 --> 0:27:52.516
<v Speaker 1>juncture than how much precedent should matter. Roberts is the

0:27:52.516 --> 0:27:58.036
<v Speaker 1>swing vote. By attacking other justices, Schumer guaranteed that Roberts

0:27:58.076 --> 0:28:00.316
<v Speaker 1>would have to come out against him, and in the

0:28:00.396 --> 0:28:03.436
<v Speaker 1>process of doing so, Roberts would find that he did

0:28:03.476 --> 0:28:05.316
<v Speaker 1>not want to signal to the world that he was

0:28:05.396 --> 0:28:11.996
<v Speaker 1>listening to Schumer. Schumer very possibly caused Liberals Roberts's own

0:28:12.276 --> 0:28:15.876
<v Speaker 1>vote in this case. In other words, Schumer was really

0:28:15.956 --> 0:28:19.436
<v Speaker 1>playing with fire. His words at the margin might be

0:28:19.516 --> 0:28:22.916
<v Speaker 1>a decisive factor in pushing John Roberts to the conservative

0:28:22.916 --> 0:28:25.756
<v Speaker 1>side in a case where his comments and oral arguments

0:28:25.796 --> 0:28:28.716
<v Speaker 1>suggest he was at least toying with the possibility of

0:28:28.756 --> 0:28:32.196
<v Speaker 1>sticking with the Liberals on a precedent theory. We don't

0:28:32.196 --> 0:28:33.756
<v Speaker 1>know how this case will come out, and we don't

0:28:33.756 --> 0:28:36.756
<v Speaker 1>know how the other important cases involving president will come out.

0:28:36.956 --> 0:28:39.556
<v Speaker 1>We do know that in this moment, John Roberts must

0:28:39.556 --> 0:28:42.876
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about nothing but the question of precedent all day,

0:28:42.916 --> 0:28:46.956
<v Speaker 1>every day. In that environment, it is remarkably unwise for

0:28:46.996 --> 0:28:50.036
<v Speaker 1>the Senate minority leader to contribute to an environment where

0:28:50.116 --> 0:28:53.116
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are threatening the courts in just the way that

0:28:53.196 --> 0:28:56.556
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is the correct narrative for Democrats and indeed

0:28:56.596 --> 0:28:58.916
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who wants to protect the independence of the

0:28:58.996 --> 0:29:01.796
<v Speaker 1>judiciary and precedent, and the value of the rule of

0:29:01.876 --> 0:29:04.476
<v Speaker 1>law is that the courts should be allowed to do

0:29:04.676 --> 0:29:07.996
<v Speaker 1>their job and should be treated respectfully in the process.

0:29:08.676 --> 0:29:11.636
<v Speaker 1>Chumer wasn't just wrong on the merits, he was dangerously

0:29:11.636 --> 0:29:16.716
<v Speaker 1>wrong in the real world. Deep Background is brought to

0:29:16.716 --> 0:29:20.316
<v Speaker 1>you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia gene Kott,

0:29:20.636 --> 0:29:23.996
<v Speaker 1>with studio recording by Joseph Fridman and mastering by Jason

0:29:24.076 --> 0:29:28.556
<v Speaker 1>Gambrell and Jason Rostkowski. Our showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Our

0:29:28.596 --> 0:29:31.916
<v Speaker 1>theme music is composed by Luis Gera special thanks to

0:29:31.916 --> 0:29:35.716
<v Speaker 1>the Pushkin Brass, Malcolm Godwell, Jacob Weissberg, and Mia Lobel.

0:29:36.316 --> 0:29:39.836
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. I also write a column for Bloomberg Opinion,

0:29:39.956 --> 0:29:43.236
<v Speaker 1>which you can find at Bloomberg dot com Backslash Feldman.

0:29:43.836 --> 0:29:47.596
<v Speaker 1>To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go to Bloomberg

0:29:47.636 --> 0:29:51.156
<v Speaker 1>dot com Backslash Podcasts. You can follow me on Twitter

0:29:51.356 --> 0:29:54.636
<v Speaker 1>at Noah R. Feldman. This is Deep Background.