WEBVTT - Potential Trade Packages For O.G. Anunoby, Feat. Knicks, Pelicans, Suns & More

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, I'm gonna teach you about one of my favorite

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>guitar cordes, known as the James Bond chord, very famous

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for being in most, if not all, of the Games

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Bond films, and it usually happens after he says one

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of his.

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Infamous lines like.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh, mister Goldfinger, Yeah, come in, we've got space field wabber,

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>come on, sit down here.

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Fucking joking dickhead, I'm not really a barber. I'm fucking

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>James Bond. Shot back and blow your fucking head off.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Good morning, swel and welcome to the Now Dunks podcast

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>on the Athletic Network. It's Thursday, February second, twenty twenty three.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Happy Groundhog Day to all the Phil's and the Willies out.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 4>There of J. E.

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Skeed's here in the Classic Factory and alongside me as

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 3>always as tas Melis.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Kids are still learning about that to this day, stills

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 5>kicking it next.

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>To Tassie as the beer Woman, touched a hot boy,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 3>Trey Kirby, Hey oh, hey yoh, and last but not least,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>making the magic happen over yonder. If he sees his shadow,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 3>it means six more weeks of classics.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 2>JD.

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 5>Hello, there is He.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 6>Didn't see my shadows, so I guess indefinite classics.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh wow, very nice.

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow wow wow wow. Shout out to the stream team

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 3>joining us live right now on YouTube. Take a second

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 3>hit that thumbs up. Subscribe to No Dunks as well,

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 3>share the show. Get your tickets to our No Dunks

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 3>Live show in Salt Lake City Friday, February seventeenth. That

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>is right around the corner. That's basically two weeks from tomorrow.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, tickets in the link in the show notes,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>So go grab a ticket if you are in the

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Salt Lake City area, if you're making your way to

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>All Star weekend, come hang with us at the Urban

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Lounge on Friday night. Yep, getting hyped for that one.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 3>On today's pod, we're gonna slap it up and run

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>through five teams who could put together some fairly enticing

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>trade packages for Raptors wing Ojiannaobi. That's coming up in

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, and JD has an amazing tweet of

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>the night, so stick around for that as well. But

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 3>but but let's start with the games. We're gonna play

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 3>what you got, But I want to just start with

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Damian Lillard going off as the Blazers beat the Grizzlies

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 3>one two, one twelve. Uh, just sort of money there,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 3>hitting some clotch threes, great steal, late kick ahead to

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>U Banks for the huge jail entertaining game here with

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the Blazers really needed this one. Grizzlies reeling a little bit.

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>What'd you think of a dame specially his performance.

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, at the end of the fourth quarter, there one

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 5>team executing the other one not Drew U. Banks able

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 5>to get a fast break dunk like that.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 3>That was huge. Man, was the perfect Jordan dunk.

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 4>And I guess you know I said it was on

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Jaron Jackson Junior. He just hustled into the play to

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 4>pick up a foul for basically no reason. But still,

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 4>that was cool to see that. The name is Drew Eubanks.

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 5>We say that name more than any other show in

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 5>the history of podcasting. I guarantee that that was It

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 5>was a big dunk, big win for the Blazers. As

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 5>you said, they hadn't won on the road since December seventeenth,

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 5>that's a long time. That's six weeks.

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 4>Six weeks.

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Did they see a shadow? It meant they were gonna

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>win on the road for six weeks.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 5>They had a lot of home games in there, so

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 5>it's a tiny bit of uh, you know, e skewed

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 5>stat but they had some road games. They needed this one,

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 5>and again Dame executed down the stretch. My worry is

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 5>for these this Grizzlies team. I know a lot of

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 5>people are worrying about or thinking about, are they a

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 5>real contender here in the second seed in the Western Conference?

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 5>And you see their end of game execution, and that's

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 5>the worrisome part. It's a lot like last year. They

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 5>don't have a great half court offense when it comes

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 5>down to it, and that gets even more magnified in

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 5>playoff basketball. They're twenty third in half court offense. That's

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 5>freaking low. The teams that are below them are all

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 5>non playoff teams. And so when it gets even tougher

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.119
<v Speaker 5>in the postseason, when teams are ready to buckle down,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 5>that's a problem obviously. And then you got to win

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 5>all those other categories like fast break, points, points off, turnovers,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 5>more free throws, and they lost a couple of those

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 5>in this game, but they were up five to ten

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 5>points throughout the entire game, and then it just came

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 5>down to execution at the end. And they're just a

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 5>little too predictable. I think it's jaw, pick and roll.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 5>Just get in the lane and figure it out. They

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 5>need somebody else to score more, and I think it's

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 5>not gonna be Jered Jackson Junior. As much as you

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 5>know we want to throw them on the All Star team,

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 5>he's not a go get a bucket type guy. And

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 5>I know we'll talk about them as the trade deadline approaches.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 5>To get somebody else, I think it's got to be

0:04:58.160 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Desmond Bane a little bit more. But I think also

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 5>just they've got to get a little bit more creative

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 5>and moving the ball a little bit more. Danny Green

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 5>debuted out there, hit a shot, and I know they

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 5>think that he can help a little bit, but I

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 5>think it's more they're just too freaking predictable and that's

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 5>the problem here, and if they're going to be a contender,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 5>they got to be better than that. That Literally, it's

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 5>bad teams below them in half courts, Hettings and them.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 5>So that's all I want to point out. But yeah,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 5>the Blazer's obviously executing like crazy.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Damian Lillard forty two points tennisist, eight boards, and

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 3>he is on an unbelievable heater right now. And Dame

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 3>does this every season, Like for the most part, there's

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 3>a chunk of like call it three to six weeks

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>where it's just like, holy crap, Damian Lillard another forty

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 3>point game, a fifty point game, whatever, and he's in

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 3>that stretch right now. But he was special those Some

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>of those threes he made in this one were just like,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 3>there's a there's like a handful of guys that can

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 3>hit those, and he's one of them.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 4>What you got skates, which is the better Dame time

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 4>moment in this game, Lillard himself had a seven point

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 4>possession in the third quarter, hit a three pointer, was

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 4>called a flagrant foul, made the flagrant free throw, they

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 4>get the possession back, made a three pointer on the

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 4>same possession. You don't see that very often. Then he

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 4>had back to back threes with about three minutes left

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 4>in the fourth quarter, both of them gave the Blazers

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 4>the lead at the time. And he also made a

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 4>shot from like eighty feet out that didn't count barely

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 4>just barely didn't count. So I don't know. All three

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 4>of those moments to me are like very much tap

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 4>on your wrist kind of moments from Dame Lillard last night.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 4>Also fifteen for sixteen free throws. That's big time. Went

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 4>seventeen for seventeen against the Hawks in his last game out.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 4>In his last eleven games, he's taken ten or more

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 4>free throws nine times. A lot of teams complain about

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 4>the refs. You don't hear it much from the Blazers, though.

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 5>That's a lot for a game.

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 4>I'd say a lot of free throws for Dame Loward.

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's averaging basically thirty nine points per game and

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 3>eight assists per game over that eleven game stretch where

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 3>he's shooting fifty three from the field, forty point five

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 3>percent from deep, and then ninety five percent at the

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>free throw line.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 4>And they're sending in there all the time. Yeah, and

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, I mean, the Grizzlies are a rough and

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 4>tumble team inside, so he's earning the free throws and

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 4>he's just putting his head down and saying, I'm gonna

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 4>get the calls if I go in there, because I'm

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 4>usually the highest named player on the court and it's

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 4>working out. I also thought it was weird in this

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 4>game that it felt like everybody was getting hurt all

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 4>the time. Nurkic left early with calf's drain, Jeremy Grant

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 4>had to lead the game. He's in concussion protocols at

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 4>the end. Uh, this is a completely different game that

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at nowt injuries that game. I'm like nas

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Reed was grabbing his hip late, Jalen McDaniels was crampy.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Kyle and that.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how these crossed over for me here.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it was it was the Kyle Anderson that

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 4>threw me off. Maybe it used to be a Grizzly

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 4>but people were getting hurt last night.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 3>They absolutely are. Despite uh, despite John Morant saying not

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 3>that long ago that no one in the West was

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 3>a problem for Memphis, the Grizzlies are fifteen and sixteen

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 3>against the Western Conference teams and seventeen and three the East,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 3>So it's the East that's not a problem. Maybe that's

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 3>what he meant. He just misspoke. We get there, no

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>one's a problem in the East because we're amazing against them,

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, this is not great. And got a lot

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 3>of skilled games left against your Western Conference sponents, but

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them. Yeah, over twenty probably.

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 4>And I will say specifically problem wise is three point

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 4>shooting for the Grizzlers. Just look at the fourth quarter. Here,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 4>the Blazers hit five threes, the Grizzlies hit one, and

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 4>then you look around the Western Conference. Nuggets are a

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 4>great three point shooting team. The Warriors are the Warriors.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 4>The Kings are hot from three at basically all times.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 4>The Clippers can have a twenty three point game any

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 4>single night. We just saw Lebron have his career high

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 4>in three point shooting. They're going to run into teams

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 4>that make a lot of threes, and then you got

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 4>to be able to beat up the offensive glass. You

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 4>got to go to the free throw line and make

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 4>all your free throws to kind of counteract that sort

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 4>of stuff. So that's who the Grizzlies need to be targeting.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Is somebody who's just chucking threes. Maybe it is Malik Beasley,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe it is Ojan Andobi as we'll see, but they

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 4>need somebody else out there who shooting and make it.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, midway through the fourth quarter, they're up, John Morant

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 5>comes back into the game. It's a job versus Dame thing.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 5>A lot of injuries, the entire NBA was injured last night.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 4>They weren't believe nas Red went down. That was crazy.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 5>There were a lot of injuries, and uh, yeah, you're

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 5>you're right about the three point shooting. That's that's a problem.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 5>This happened in that big game against the Warriors recently.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 5>They were up ten late in this in the fourth

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 5>quarter and they gave it away because of end of

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 5>game execution. And they need to find somebody else. It's

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 5>just a little too predictable, as I said. And yeah,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 5>the three point shooting on top of that is a problem.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 5>Desmond Bane might have to fire. Twenty three is a game.

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 5>It's it is a lacking and that's why the Danny

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 5>Green thing is a positive for them. They may turn

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 5>him into another asset, into a three point shooter. They

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 5>also didn't have Steven Adams in this game, if we

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 5>want to talk about injuries, which was a bit of

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 5>a problem. But yeah that the Grizzlies are, yeah, reeling

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 5>seven and eight. Since John Moran actually said that when

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 5>he said, who are you worried about? Milik Andrews asked him,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 5>and he's the Celtics. Anybody in the East, No seven

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 5>and eight Since then, so, uh, they are second in

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 5>the in the West, it's a good problem to have.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, the three point shooting is something that it's

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 5>it's it's trade deadline season, baby, it's exciting times here.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 3>So we from today. All right, let's get to a

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 3>little what you got, what you get?

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 4>What's your good?

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 3>That says, this is what's your good? Sort of like

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Sam Crenshaw Special the Canadian viewers and listeners.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, go ahead, you want to. I'm not gonna I

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 5>wasn't gonna give.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 3>My freeze like Jeff Jeff.

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's yeah. I was gonna ask who I.

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Was even with you on Sam Crenshaw.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Ye ye, the mannequin Man to life had to do

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 3>with the half all right, once you got first one here, okay,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>we had him beat and hardened. They both had double

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 3>double lifted the Sixers past the Magic little revenge there

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 3>one of five ninety four because they had just lost

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to Orlando. We had Sabonis and darreon Fox, both big,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 3>big games. They helped the Kings power past the Spurs

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 3>one nineteen one o nine. There are a few injuries

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 3>in that game.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>That one.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and he went down, he came, don't worry.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 3>And D'Angelo Russell and Anthony Edwards were great as the

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Wolves got a really quality win against the Warriors. That

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 3>one went to overtime. They pulled it off in the end,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>but the Q off all of that. You know, I

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 3>slipped in a Harden, I slipped in a Fox, I

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 3>slipped in Edwards. There in those headlines who is most

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 3>likely gonna be a twenty twenty three NBA All Star

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 3>Reserve tonight when we find out on TNT Harden, Fox

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 3>or Edwards? What you got, who you got, why you

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 3>got it?

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 5>I got you? I got James Harden. I know that

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Chad has been about oh darreon Fox and Anthony Edwards,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 5>but Harden plays at a far easy your position to

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 5>get in in the Eastern Conference, the guards, he might

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 5>just tick him. If you're a coach, well, in the West,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 5>there's just so many guards, and I know you can

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 5>manipulate the reserves to what you want, but you know

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 5>you might get Fox get losing some votes to Sabonis.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Anthony Edwards, as much as we've been talking about him,

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 5>is on a team that's lower in the standings. Harden

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 5>is up there. You might get the coaches just say,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 5>oh old James. The guy. We know, he's just steady.

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 5>He's got the name recognition. Coaches like that. Yeah, the

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 5>expectations are a little bit lower for James Harden this

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 5>year when he's clearly the number two taking that pay cut.

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 5>So he's kind of meeting those while it's just it's

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 5>just tough in the West. This is a tough queue.

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 5>But you think, but the surprise, the surprise tonight for

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 5>some could be James Harden.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, where are you going with this one? Most

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>likely to be announced tonight? Harden, Fox or Anthony Edwards.

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Hardens a lock. I don't even think it's really a

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 4>questions at this point. Yeah, he's showing up in all

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 4>kinds of play. Hey, you know media sort of lists

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 4>as a player to be tabbed. He hear it on

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Zach Low's podcast. That guy's pretty influential. I think Harden's

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 4>a handful of games from qualifying from all these leader boards.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Like if he plays in the next four games, I

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 4>think he's then at seventy percent of the games, which

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 4>gets you on all the leader boards, which then he'll

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 4>be leading the league in assists. He's put on twenty

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 4>two points a game, eleven assists, shooting forty five, forty

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 4>and eighty six. That's really good. The Sixers have been

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 4>the best team in the Eastern Conference for a month,

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 4>and he's going to be competing against guys who have

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 4>outside stats on kind of middling teams a Trey Young,

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 4>a DeRozan, a Siakam. Sixers are winning and it's a

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 4>large part because Harden is setting up Embiid so nicely.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 4>I think maybe it'll also be a nice bone throw,

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, for Joel Embiid having an MVP season coming

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 4>off the bench in the All Star Game again, but

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 4>what if you have two Sixers. So I definitely think

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Harden is getting in the game. And I actually think

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 4>whoever doesn't make it between Fox and Edwards gonna be

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 4>the biggest snub because both of these guys are deserving. Yes, certainly,

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 4>they're both making a case every single night. It feels

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 4>like that they go out there and play. It's just

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of the timing of their seasons is a little

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 4>bit different. Like Edwards had a slow start Timberwolves took

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit to get figured out, but he's peeking

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 4>at the right time. Fox, on the other hand, brilliant start,

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 4>lost his jumper in December, but now it's he's balling again.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know. I had Fox when we did

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 4>our picks, but it's hard to be mad at somebody

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 4>picking Edwards, that's for sure.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think you're right that of those

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>two Western Conference cards, Fox and Edwards, one of them

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 3>will not be selected tonight, and that will be probably

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the leading snub on tomorrow's Drop podcast. But we'll wait

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 3>and find out. But great great games from all three

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>of those in their teams getting victories. Any thoughts on

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 3>maybe that Wolves Warriors game down the stretch. I don't

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>know if you caught that one and into overtime. I

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 3>thought the Warriors played sloppy. They looked like are you know?

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I have practice tonight with our our seven year old team,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>and the number one thing I swear that we're always

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 3>trying to work on is like catch the ball, hold

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>on to the ball, like what it's I mean, it's

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 3>really the the simplest part here of basketball. Then we'll

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>talk about shooting and dribbling and playing defense. But it's

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 3>like the Warriors, like three or four times Wiggins just

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 3>completely botched the dunk that he just like just slipped

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 3>out of his hands. Curry had one too. It's like

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 3>the hell was going on with them last night. But

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the but the Warrior, excuse me, the Wolves Russell again

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 3>awesome in the fourth, then he fouls out on some

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty questionable calls. Ant stepped up though. He would attacked

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Wiggins there in overtime, even when they got switched like

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the best defender on him. He didn't care. I was like,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll take him and put him in the back in

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the bucket, and then Nas reed he was getting a

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 3>little too shot happy. Oh yeah, he was turning into Carlin.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Then he towns there a little much. He was open,

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I think by designs and he was sort of breaking

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 3>three after three after three did hit one that was

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>pretty pretty important. But yeah, you know, played hard still.

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Then he got that rebound off the corner miss and

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 3>threw it down and that was sort of the nail

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>in the coffin good Win. But I thought the Warriors

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>played so, I thought they played the crap.

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 4>There's turnovers in the fourth corner, three more in overtime.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 4>That is the Warriors at the worst, just sloppy, ridiculous turnovers,

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 4>like you know, not wanting to bring up the ball

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 4>up the court, so he throws it to Wiggans, who's like,

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 4>oh stuff, he's bringing the ball at the court. Ridiculous

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 4>turnovers and that's how the Warriors get beat. They get

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 4>a little bit too sloppy and don't make enough shots.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, Nazried, it was hilarious because he was hitting

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 4>big shots and then I'm with you. I was like,

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna shoot him out of.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 3>The game, I know, and it wasn't going to Edwards.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 4>At all, no, just standing in the corner. Edwards disappeared

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 4>in the fourth quarter a little bit over two no points,

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 4>but it was Dangela Russell thankfully was cooking fourteen points,

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 4>four threes, mostly tough ones, but it was hilarious. Reid

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 4>hit a bunch of big shots, went down with the injury.

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 4>I was like, this is kind of perfect right now

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 4>because he was just taking him out of it and

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 4>he came back at the perfect time. The dagger dunk

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 4>was big time from Nasried, So I thought he was great.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 4>D'angela Russell obviously, and then Kyle Anderson as well. I

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 4>thought that was just a really nice win for the

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Minnesota Timberwolves in their game.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they were down eleven going into the fourth and

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 5>then the Warriors just gave this game away. That was

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 5>a big part of it. Although the Wolves were second

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 5>in the defense, second in defense in January, which is surprising,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 5>that's a great mark for them. That's why they're climbing

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 5>the standings, which are still ridiculously tight. There's gonna be

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 5>a lot of disappointed teams at the end, just like

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 5>there'll be some disappointed All Stars tonight. And just just

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 5>to add one more thought about James Harden and the

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 5>games played thing. Coaches tonight are not going to care

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 5>about how many games played. We sit here and throw

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 5>a line in the sand here, and I do think

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 5>him projected to play fifty six games of eighty two.

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 5>When you look at it like that, that's a low number.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.239
<v Speaker 5>It's not a lot of games played at the end

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 5>of the season. So for us, yeah, that's to me,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 5>that's the breaker that he just hasn't played enough. But

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 5>coaches are gonna say, I don't care, I don't know,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 5>they don't look at that well.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 3>And I believe that then we're gonna see Harden on

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the team. We're gonna see a D on the team.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna see Kawhi on the team, like, yeah, they're

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 3>not different. I mean they've all played the same amount

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 3>of games. Yeah, pretty close.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So I don't think you're right, there's I think

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 5>there is a difference though, just conceptually, just the way

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 5>Anthony Davis missed so many games for a long stretch.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, and maybe because he's got that reputation

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 5>while Harden doesn't have that reputation. Harden plays all the time.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I don't know. You gotta draw a line

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 5>in the sand. I think coaches are going to say,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 5>as Trey said, but they're so high in the standings

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 5>too that well it helps the Bucks don't have a

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 5>lock of a second pick as well. You know that,

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 5>those those top teams. Anyways, it's gonna be fun. It's

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 5>gonna be fun.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Wait, can't wait? All right? Moving on here we had.

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Shall we see? Shall we see coaches? Like a live

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 5>room of coaches making their picks. We get to see

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 5>the live draft. I want to see coaches talk it out.

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 5>I want to see Doc Rivers. He'll never do this, obviously,

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 5>but talk out. I'm voting for Chris Bosh. Oh he's not.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 5>He's not in the league anymore. Just like pick a guy.

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 5>I just want to see it.

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Well I saw I think was it? Billups I was

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 3>reading this morning, said, uh, other coaches had been, you know,

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>calling him one of the coaches where Yeah, other coaches

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 3>call each other and be like, hey, you got to

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.719
<v Speaker 3>take my guy. Man, I'll give you a cigar mare.

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 3>How do you feel about that?

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 5>All right?

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Tatum scored thirty one. Celtics whoa hot early in this game,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 3>destroyed the Nets one nine ninety six. That's what I

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 3>wrote down. I believe that's correct.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 4>That sad on this one.

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Holy moly, I mean it was over. It was over

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 3>five minutes if you were watching it. This was a

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 3>nationally televised game. Whoops. And then we had de Jonta Murray.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 3>He scored twenty one and the Hawks rolled past the

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Suns one thirty two to one hundred. So Trey, you

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>gotta start it.

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Here was the.

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 3>Wilder blowout, Celtics crushing the Nets or the Hawks crushing

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the Suns in Phoenix.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 4>I gotta go at the Celtics. They were up forty

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 4>six to sixteen after the first quarter. They lied by

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 4>forty nine at one point. Like once you start seeing

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 4>the scoreboard pictures screenshots going around on Twitter. You're like, uhh,

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 4>this is not gonna be good. It just lets you know,

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 4>don't tune in right now because you want to see

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>some three pointers. But this is the kind of Celtic

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 4>win that we haven't seen for a while. Celtics had

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the second most games this season with twenty or more

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 4>three pointers, behind only the Warriors. It's their ninth time

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 4>this season making twenty your more threes, but only the

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 4>third time since November. Celtics take a ton of threes.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 4>They got up fifty four I think last night, and

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 4>they can get really, really hot. It's the second most

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 4>three pointers in a game this season by any team,

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 4>number one team. It was the Celtics. You guessed it

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven against the Knicks earlier. So if you're a

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 4>team from New York, they are gonna hit you with

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 4>some three pointers. And when you make twenty six threes,

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I have to imagine that teams are like ninety nine

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 4>percent winning percentage. There's gotta be one out there that like,

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 4>somebody hit twenty threes and the other team hit twenty

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 4>two and they took the loss there, But uh yeah,

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean a forty nine point margin that's that's wild,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 4>that's serious. That's a big time one. So give me

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 4>the Celtics.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, fair enough, you had a great case.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would go the Hawks just because the Celtics

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 5>were the best offense in the history of the NBA

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 5>for a while or whatever that's stat is. They obviously

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 5>dropped off since you know, they were hitting those threes,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 5>as you said, the October and November, they have slowed down.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 5>But they can hit a bunch of threes. They are

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 5>a great offense. You do see them blowout teams like

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 5>this the Atlanta Hawks.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, Tatum and Jellen Brown sorry, both hitting seven

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>threes and a lot of them early in this game.

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 3>They couldn't miss.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh, it was great to not have to tune into

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 5>that game. To be totally honest, it was a spanker. Well.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 5>The other one the Hawks in their Flaming Reds, their

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Calgary Flames Reds on the road. To have that forty

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 5>points second quarter was surprising to me. The fifteen ozer

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 5>run to start the second quarter, and yeah, absolutely ran out.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 5>The ran the Suns out of the building, a team

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 5>that's pretty good defensively, so a little bit more surprising

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 5>there that the Hawks put it together that their bench

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 5>was kicking, but a guy like Jalen Johnson stroking a

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 5>three more surprising for him to be hitting threes than

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 5>the Celtics to me.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, both of those were over pretty early. Final one

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 3>here Jazz beat the Raptors. Walker Kessler the rook seventeen fourteen,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 3>seven blocks. Meanwhile, we had the Rockets defeating the thunder

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 3>bit of a surprise victory. Tarry Eason, their rook twenty

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 3>and thirteen in nineteen minutes, filled up the box score.

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>He had some defensive stats as well. So I don't

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 3>usually do this in what you Got, but the better

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>rookie performance. Listen to these two names, Walker Kessler or

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Tarry Eason. What you got?

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 5>A good one here? Sorry Easton. While back I said

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 5>he was a young Jonathan Isaac, Jonathan Isaac pre injury young,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 5>A young young Jonathan Isaac. Is that a compliment? I

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 5>don't know. Jonathan Isaac was good before he got injured.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 5>But he feels like a guy that could scrap and fight,

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 5>and he was doing that against an undersized Okac team. Okay,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 5>see plays real small. All their Williams's, they're giddies that

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 5>they started, you know, six eight sixty nine, so he

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 5>got five rebounds, one possession, so the five of thirteen there,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 5>he just kept tipping it to himself.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:06.959
<v Speaker 3>He had twelve offensive rebounds.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thirteen boards, twelve offensive that's amazing.

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 5>Actually, Yeah, so three steals, two blocks though in great

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah in nineteen minutes. I gotta go with him because

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Walker he's been steady this season.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh and he was amazing in this Raptors game, Like

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>there were they were terrified of him, Like he had

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>seven blocks. He deterred, I want to say another ten

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 3>or like we was in the heads of the Raptors

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 3>players inside a little bit more. The Raptors lost a

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 3>game where they had like twenty five more shots than

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the Jazz and still lose.

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 5>So he did it all in the first cord. He

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 5>had six blocks in.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 3>He sets the tones. He set the tone. I mean

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I might go Walker Kessel because I saw and heard

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 3>like multiple things about the Raptors could have had Walker

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 3>kel Yeah yeah, like ooh man, maybe could have drafted him.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, both were great performances.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Where you going for the Rooks, I'd be twelve offense rebounds,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Like Tass said, he had a beef slider. If you're

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 4>getting a quarter of a beef on one possession, that's ridiculous.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 4>But does that count as a revenge game for Walker Kessler?

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 4>He could have been a wrapped but it took like

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 4>several things would have had to have been different, right,

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 4>because it was the Rafts traded a first rounder for

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Thadeus Young at the deadline, but then the Spurs used

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 4>the pick they traded to take Malachi Branham. But then

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 4>I guess, like Kessler when a couple of picks later,

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't even the pick they had, But you know,

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 4>I guess theoretically he could have. I don't know sure

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 4>that's that's like a sideways revenge. I don't know exactly

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 4>what it is, but it comes down to seven blocks

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 4>or twelve offensive rebounds, both pretty weird to see on

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 4>a stat sheet.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Yeah, the raption stink. So they have to shoot

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 5>in the lane a lot because they can't shoot. So

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 5>that's why Walker Kessler was just coming helping over. They

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 5>were the help variety too. It wasn't just like one

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 5>on one, It's just like coming over and helping. They're

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 5>ap stink, So I wasn't that surprise I guess is

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 5>what I'm saying.

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 3>Raptors were on fire from three point distance last night,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 3>ten to twenty three. That's lights out for them. But

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the Jazz a lot Jazz took way more attempts forty

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 3>seven hit seventeen, and again it is weird to see

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 3>a game where the team had twenty seven more field

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>goal attempts. Raptors had one hundred and ten field goal

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 3>attempts and they lost because the Jazz, you know, shot

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 3>out a much better efficiency and put up one hundred

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 3>and thirty one on their head too. Let's not gloss

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 3>over that they were getting whatever they wanted. Raptors are

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 3>down bad right now, guys, and we're going to talk

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 3>about them and a bunch of Oganobe trades that I'm

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 3>gonna throw at you guys, and will debate which team

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe has the best package, most enticing package that the

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Raptors would consider. We'll be right back. Don't go anywhere

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>all right here in the Classic Factory. Hit the like button.

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 3>If you're joining us live on YouTube, make sure you subscribe.

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 3>The NBA trade deadline a week away, and as of

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 3>right now, it does feel like Ognnobi is one of

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 3>the biggest names on this trade block. It makes sense

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>because of his player role, his player type. It's pretty

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 3>coveted in this league, that sort of three and D guy,

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 3>elite defensively. That when you think about it, and I

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 3>heard Michael Grange say this on the Raptor Show, try

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and think of a team where like, if you made

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 3>a move for Ognnoby, he wouldn't fit in your starting lineup.

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 3>It's really tough to go through like and find teams

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 3>where you're like, nah, he wouldn't be starting. There's usually

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 3>a slot for a guy like him. So this is

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 3>why he's probably coming up in numerous trade rumors along

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>with the Raptors falling.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 5>Apart here plug and play.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>That's right. In forty five games this season, just to

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 3>let you know about Og, he's averaging seventeen points per game,

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 3>five and a half rebounds, two assists, two point one steals,

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 3>just under a block per game, so he's he's at

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 3>or near the league leaders and steals in deflections and

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 3>loose balls recovered. That's his thing, that's his mo. He's

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 3>shooting right around forty six percent from the floor and

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven percent from three. Those are both right in

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 3>line with his career averages, so nothing crazy. But what

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 3>makes them really enticing is his salary. His contract. He

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 3>has two years thirty six million dollars remaining, plus a

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>player option in twenty four to twenty five for nineteen

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 3>point ninety three million, so just under twenty which makes

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 3>them like a lot easier than your superstar level players

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 3>to put in trades because it's just a more movable contract.

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 3>But for the Raptors to give them up, by all accounts,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 3>they're going to want some young rotation players and maybe

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of draft picks. Remember in December, our guy,

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 3>professor Zach Lowe, he said the price for og could

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 3>be on par is what the Cavs gave up for

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Donovan Mitchell, and we laughed at that, what as too much?

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 3>But NBA insider Mark Stein he did add it would

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>take lots to pry oj Anobi away from the Raptors.

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Could be some posturing here from the Raps. Maybe they

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 3>don't even move them, for crying out loud, but we

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 3>have an idea of what they want. They obviously want

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>young players. They probably want probably minimum two picks first

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 3>round picks, you know, be it sort of twenty three

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 3>first round picks or future first round picks, or maybe

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 3>even three. Anyway, I've got five teams, boys, five teams

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 3>that should take a long hard look at trying to

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 3>acquire ogn Anobi over the next week. Here a lot

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 3>of these trades. The inspiration they come from Sporting News,

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 3>from the Athletics, their Creed who does a great job

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 3>covering the Raptors, and from our guy sports Nets Blake Murphy,

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 3>who told me he has a big og Anaobi trade

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 3>piece coming out soon.

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 5>He's got a big spreak Internet. He broke down every team,

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 5>every pick, they have, their salary. Get into its true

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 5>sick o shit right there.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>For Blake Murphy, it's great, It's great. Okay, So I

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 3>thought again, five teams. I have a usually like two

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to four trade versions for a potential move to get

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 3>for each team, So.

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:02.959
<v Speaker 5>I better have a spreadsheet for that.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Dude, I did some work on this, all right, So,

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and shout out to our guy Jerome helping with the graphics. Here,

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>let's start with the Knicks. We'll start in the Eastern Conference.

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 3>We'll move to the West, but we'll start with the Knicks.

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 3>They're rumored to be interested. I mean, he sure feels

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:14.719
<v Speaker 3>like a Tips type of player. I'll tell you that

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 3>obviously with the defense he gives you. So two hypothetical

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Knicks Raptors trades. First one, obviously the Knicks get og,

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the Raptors would receive it's not pretty Derek Rose Cam Reddish.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 3>And then three first round picks. Now they have like

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 3>their own pick in twenty three they got the Mavericks,

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 3>so it could be the better one of those future

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 3>first round picks. This is pick heavy. This is not

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>great players coming back unless you really believe in cam Reddish,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 3>like our buddy Grish. But the second version of this

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 3>would be the Knicks getting og and let's say kem

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Birch to make the money work. Four maybe enticing younger

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 3>player and Obi toppin Evan fourniad because of the contract,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and let's bump it down a first round pick. We'll

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 3>go with two thoughts on the Knicks. I mean, you like,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.959
<v Speaker 3>you can like rip apart my hypothetical trades. You can

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 3>just talk about the team in theory trying to acquire og.

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 3>If you like the fit, hate the fit, what do

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 3>you think Knicks raps something along these lines. TK Getta started.

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 4>He's from the six, give me the picks from the Knicks.

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Well done.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 4>So honestly, if you're getting three first round picks, even

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 4>depending on what the protections are, you could probably draft

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 4>yourself an Obi top and like player because that's the

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 4>best guy coming back. I don't think the Raptors are

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 4>going to want to take on the additional salary that

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 4>fourtyer brings along with him. Rose and Reddish are non entities.

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's a that's a money matching kind of move.

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 4>But I think I would prefer getting the picks because Toppin,

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 4>while a good player who would probably be okay on

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 4>the Raptors as a big guy, I don't think he's

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 4>such a good prospect that you would choose him over

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 4>the potential of any of the other prospects out there.

0:30:55.800 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're talking about three picks for og Annobi. I mean,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 5>it feels like we're a little high right now. It

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 5>feels like we're a little drugged up. But I will

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 5>say he is obviously every GM's wet tree. When you're

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 5>looking at the players that they talk about every single

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 5>draft season, it's this, It's long. An incredible defender can

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 5>fit with every sort of team, So in a seller's market.

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 5>This is definitely ripe for Massiu Jiri to get something big.

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 5>That's totally true because there's so many teams in the

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 5>play in tournament picture and the playoff picture. They're going

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 5>for it. So if you have one of these guys,

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 5>it makes sense for Massia. I will say three picks amazing,

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 5>this is that's the better package from the Knicks, for sure.

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 5>But I'm unlikely to deal with the Knicks because I

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 5>don't think those picks are what you're looking for if

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 5>you're in the six. I think there are better picks

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 5>out there. Because this is the New York Knicks we're

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 5>talking about. Doesn't matter. There's a lot of their py're.

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Having a good year this year, but at two decades

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 3>are usually gurbage.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but a lot of their picks are from other teams,

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 5>so we don't know what we're talking about specifically.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I didn't want to get bogged down with these boards, like, Okay,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>it's the Mavericks pick, but then it's a twenty five,

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 3>and then it's twenty seven, and then you know, I

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 3>because like I think you can get a little lost

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 3>in the weed with that stuff.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 5>But you gotta be picky here. If you're a Missilea's year,

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 5>you gotta be picky with the picks, and I think

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 5>you can be. I think when we look at other teams,

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 5>even though historically they are the Knicks, they got a

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 5>rock in Jalen Brunson, they're not gonna be bad right now. No,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 5>they're not gonna be bad. There are other teams which

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 5>potentially I think could be worse, that are at the

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 5>sort of the end of their windows. So I love

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 5>the three picks. I think that's what you're looking for.

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 5>But I think you can get a little bit better

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 5>here in the seller's market.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think with the Knicks, Raptors and a potential

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 3>og the ones I just gave you there, I actually

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 3>don't like it from either side all that much. I

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 3>think the Raptors are gonna hope to get a better

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 3>player in addition to picks that they could use in

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 3>the rotation in any of these deals. So there's that.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 3>And also I am wary of the Knicks, like having

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 3>all these picks doing a good job of, you know,

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 3>keeping their their cupboards full. Are they really gonna trade

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 3>three of them for Ogi? Like he's a good player,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>But like the Knicks. The whole time, we're always like, oh,

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 3>they're holding on to this. They're gonna go for the superstar,

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 3>and you're gonna need a lot of picks to get that,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 3>as we've seen with Rudy's and Donovan and stuff like that.

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 5>But they have a lot of them. If if it

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 5>ends up being two first round picks this season, even

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 5>they still have so many more just from this season,

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 5>because they've got the Hornets, they've got the MAVs, they've

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 5>got the Nuggets, they've got the Pistons in a scenario,

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 5>they've got a lot of picks.

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 3>But I think Messi and Bobby and the Raptors like

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 3>when we do these picks, like you're going to want

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 3>them over years, because like even the Knixt pick, it's

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 3>not gonna be like good this year, you know, but

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the Knicks three years from now, after James Dolan's like

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 3>suddenly decides, well, I want to start calling the shots

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 3>again and doing everything like they could be bad. And

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>then it's like, oh my god.

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 5>Here's right. I know, it does feel like we're high

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 5>here with three picks coming for og Annobe, but yeah,

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 5>you're looking for a Paul Pierce type of swindle here,

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 5>like Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett swindling the Nets Celtics. So yeah,

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 5>you're looking long term, but I think maybe I'm just

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, I'm a little too high on the Knicks.

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 5>But other teams I think will give you them.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, another Eastern Conference team. Then let's get Og home

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 3>to Indiana. All right, how about the Pacers. Okay, so

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 3>the Pacers receive Ognaoby, I got two trades for you here.

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 3>The first one, Raps get TJ. McConnell, Daniel Tice, and

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 3>then three first round picks. Okay, so we'll stick with

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 3>the three. In the second version of this Pacers Raptors trade,

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 3>we get rid of a lot of picks and we

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 3>actually just get more maybe help for the Raps in

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>terms of shooting. Og and Thadius Young going to the

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Pacers in exchange for Buddy Heeled, TJ. McConnell and a

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty three first round pick. So just one pick.

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 5>So when you're when you were talking about you wanted

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 5>better players and picks, was this what you were talking about.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean we're gonna get to some other ones too,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, like you're not going to get it all right,

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>you're not getting three first round picks, and then maybe

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 3>guys that are you're actually playing, and the Raptors have

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 3>no bench so they need players. There's gonna be a balance.

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 3>I also don't think o g if he's traded in

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the next week, I don't think he's going to get

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 3>three first round picks. I think it'll be settled on

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 3>two and then there will be a second round pick.

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 3>It could be like an early second I think that's

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 3>where it will go. It happens.

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 5>But for the sake of argument, yeah, it's fun here

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 5>seven days out dream big ye, sure, yeah, it'll be different.

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of the pacers? Though? It's better

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 3>a move.

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 5>You get a point guard and a center. The Raptors

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 5>need both plus three round three first round Yeah, yes, yeah,

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 5>I know it's Daniel Tys, but it fills holes. They

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 5>don't want to tank. The Raps don't want to tank.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 5>There's no doubt.

0:35:57.800 --> 0:35:59.439
<v Speaker 3>They're doing a pretty good job of tanking though.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but yeah, right now, yeah, I think, yeah, this

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 5>could be just a perfect scenario here where they are

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 5>getting bad here on this West coast trip. They keep losing.

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 5>It's a good time to lose. It's a seller's market.

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 5>You want to be one of those teams selling both

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 5>of these. I think I think they're a little bit

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 5>they're better than the Knicks packages.

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>From the Raptors side of things, Yeah, okay.

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't care about any other team. I care

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 5>about the What.

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 3>About what about Indiana's like side of this? Like, you know,

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 3>they're not a free agent hotbed, right, you know, I

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think a lot of people are going to sign

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 3>in Indiana, So getting a player of Og under contract

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 3>for a couple of years to fit with their younger

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 3>players in Halliburton and Mathrin even, Like, does this make

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 3>sense to you a little bit?

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 5>Here?

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 4>I can see Og on the Pacers certainly, because you

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 4>know they've got in Halliburton and Mathurin, they've got a

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 4>good offensive back court. They need somebody who's gonna be

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 4>able to stick perimeter guys defensively, so Og definitely helps there.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 4>I also like the idea of Fatteus Young going back

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 4>to Indianapolis as well. That'd be exciting. I assume he

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 4>was there actually longer than Og was. I know Og

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 4>only played one season of high school or college basketball

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 4>for the Hoosiers there, So yeah, I mean, they would

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 4>much rather give up one first round pick, I think,

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 4>than three first round picks. But the thing with the

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 4>Pacers is you talk about a team that never wants

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 4>to tank, that's them. They've had like one season in

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:21.959
<v Speaker 4>the lottery recently. The pick right now would be number eight,

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 4>but maybe that goes back up, or maybe that climbs

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 4>back to be a higher pick. If og joins the

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 4>team and Halliburton comes back, they'd be looking a lot

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 4>better and maybe still stay competitive in the Eastern Conference.

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 4>I could definitely see them doing it, though. TJ. McConnell

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of feels like a main stay there right now.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, a little bit.

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 4>He's a culture guy for sure.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 3>And then there's the whole Buddy Heeld situation and what

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 3>they would get back. All right, we'll keep it moving here,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 3>keep some pace. Let's go to the West. I pissed

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 3>people off a couple of weeks ago when I was

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to get Desmond Bane from the Grizzlies. Just chucked

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 3>it out there. See what happened, Memphis Grizzly fans, I

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 3>got very upset with me. That's fine, But I got

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 3>some other Grizzlies trades. I don't really really love them,

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think they're all that realistic, but I

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 3>like the idea of Og on the Grizzlies. Again, he

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.479
<v Speaker 3>fits there, So the Grizzlies get Og first one here,

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Danny Green in that contract Tias Jones because the Raptors

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 3>desperately needs a point guard play though as Blake Burpy

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 3>DMed me too small for Nick Nurse. Nick Nurse does

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 3>not like his tiny guys. And Zion Williams there sort

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 3>of as a flyer, and then two first round picks.

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 3>The second Grizzly Raptors trade would be Og and Thaddius

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Young going to the Grizzlies for Danny Green, Dylan Brooks,

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 3>good old Canadian boy, Zion Williams, and then two first

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 3>round picks. So pretty similar deals here, Dylan Brooks or

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Tias Jones sort of being swapped in there Thattius to

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 3>make the one deal work money wise. Well what do

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 3>you think? You're shaking your head? You don't know.

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm excited. I'm excited getting into these teams that have

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 5>some interesting picks. The Grizzlies have the Warriors pick. Couple

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 5>of years from now, it'll probably be post Draymond Green,

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 5>it's got light protections, turns into an unprotected pick. Eventually,

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 5>you've got a couple guys the Zaire Williams Tias Jones package.

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm fine with Tyas Jones small. Sure they've got Fred

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 5>van Vliet like Murphy, he's small, he can he can

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 5>take Tias Jones.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 4>Tyo, what's wrong with that?

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 5>And shout out to her man Jerome for spelling Zaire. Right,

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 5>that's a tough tough one to spell. You got a

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Z I A I R E.

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I'd like to take some credit for that too.

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 5>But okay, sure, congratulations from spelling.

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, hold on, I think there's another

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 3>eye in there somewhere.

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 5>I ridiculed Jerome yesterday, so I got give him some

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 5>more today. But that's an interesting one. That's an interesting one.

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 5>I like. I like MESSI gambling on the quality of

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:51.760
<v Speaker 5>the pick. Because if you've got all these teams actually

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 5>at your door, actually giving you a call, you've gotta

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 5>make a If you're fun like it's supposed to be

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 5>fun for us, it's fun here sitting back. Yeah, we

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 5>can make these trades. I think you want to you

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 5>want to take a wager on a team that's gonna

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:06.479
<v Speaker 5>be bad a few years from now, and I think

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 5>I'd rather pick getting the Warriors, you know, getting the

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 5>Warriors past their window, than you know, one of these

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 5>these Pacers picks. I'm a little bit worrisome that they're

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 5>going to be bad. Ever, so I think it's I'm

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm gearing out for these teams that we're getting into.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 5>I like this one. If it's the Warriors pick involved

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 5>with Tyas Jones, and I do like Zire Willims, who

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 5>would fit in with the Reps.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 3>And do you think the Grizzlies would you know, consider

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 3>either of these trades.

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 5>I think so.

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 3>Maybe even Dylan Brooks, he is sort of like their

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 3>culture dude.

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Definitely true o G though definitely an upgrade over Dylan Brooks.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 4>He does like basically the exact same stuff, but doesn't

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 4>take all kinds of crazy shots, has a little bit

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 4>more size, and he's got a slightly longer contract, which

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I think could be a factor for the Grizzlies. They

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 4>tend to ship guys out when they're getting ready to

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 4>get paid. It happened with Melton, happened with Kyle Anderson?

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Could it happen with Ellen Brooks. He seems more locked

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 4>in there to me. But they signed Tias Jones to

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 4>a deal last year, so he's on the books for

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 4>next season already. If they do this trade, they got

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 4>Og for next season, right, and then I guess he's

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 4>got a player option after that, so they would have

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 4>to make a decision.

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 5>But I don't know.

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 4>I would do it if I'm the Grizzlies, But I

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 4>don't know if the Grizzlies would do it.

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Ku.

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 3>They do love their first round picks too.

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 4>They like pick. That's why I don't think they'll trade

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 4>that Warrior's pick, because that does have a shot at

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 4>being a really good one.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 5>When is that twenty four?

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, that's when it's top.

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Four protected and then top one protected and then unprotected

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 5>the following year. Could be juicy. You're right, it's it

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 5>sound like they made a great deal to get that thing.

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, Let's go to the Pelicans. They've been rumored

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 3>in Og on Noobi trades. I mean, they're on a

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 3>hell of a slide right now, so maybe that changes things.

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 3>But let's get Og to the Pels in exchange four

0:41:55.600 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Herb Jones, Jackson Hayes, Devonte Graham and two first round picks.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 3>They got a lot of picks, two those pellies. That's

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 3>version one, Version two. OG to the Pelicans, of course,

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.919
<v Speaker 3>in exchange for Dyson Daniels, DeVante Graham and two first

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 3>round picks. What do you think, Trey?

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Honestly, the Pelican slide makes me hesitant to make an

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 4>all in move right now. We've talked about him as

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 4>one of the deepest teams in the league. They're certainly

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 4>fun to watch their bench units when they're cooking. Usually

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 4>when they're playing at Smoothie King, the crowd is lit,

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 4>it's exciting times, but they're really struggling without their two

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 4>best guys. And yeah, I mean, if Zion's healthy, if

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Brandon Ingram is healthy, it'd be nice to have OG

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 4>alongside them. But I'm I just don't think that this

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 4>is the team right now that needs to make a

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 4>move for OG, despite the fact that he would look great.

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 4>I find the Raptors that's a tough call here. I

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 4>think I would rather have Dyson Daniels and the picks

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 4>over Herb Jones and Jackson Hayes. Then the picks Herb

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 4>seems like too much of a Raptor like not a

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 4>great shooter from three, great defender, the perfect size, but

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 4>they're trading that guy away.

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so they're trying to get like a worse OG back.

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I know Pelicans fans would rather keep Dyson Daniels over

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Herb Jones. I remember that was going around on Twitter

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 3>there when I was throwing out hypotheticals along these lines

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 3>like you know, who would you want more? I'm a

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Herb Jones fan. So if you're moving OG and you're

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 3>getting picks for it, and he's like a sort of

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 3>a poor man's OG right now, being younger, like a

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 3>little early in his career than I'm not angry with it.

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:39.839
<v Speaker 3>I think there's something here.

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Things change fast with the fan bases of teams because

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 5>Herb Jones was untouchable once upon a time and then

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 5>he's tradable. And I still think there's a big faction

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 5>that wouldn't trade him here. But I totally agree he

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 5>is an OG light. It doesn't make a ton of sense,

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 5>I think for the Raps, if you're focusing on that,

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 5>I think you want something different than what you got.

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 5>Why are you loading up on a Scottie Pascal out

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 5>and Herb's good?

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we are including in that hypothetical Herb Jones,

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 3>So that's your OG replacement Jackson Hayes. They need a center.

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think he's amazing, but obviously an

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 3>athletic big DeVante Graham okay as a shooter, but you know,

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 3>a high volume shooter that's more for the money. And

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 3>then the picks, I mean they do have a Lakers

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 3>pick too, is the other thing.

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's the weird thing they've got. They've got the

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 5>right to swap with the Lakers this year and next year,

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 5>I do believe. And so how does that work. Can

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.359
<v Speaker 5>you swap a pick swap? I guess you can in

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 5>that you know, you trading. They have the Lakers pick

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:36.839
<v Speaker 5>and the right to swap. I guess those are two

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 5>different things that maybe they have the right to swap

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 5>next year well having the Lakers pick. Yeah, they have

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 5>a bulb.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:44.919
<v Speaker 3>And these could be in the future too. We could

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 3>be getting into twenty fives and twenty sevens and stuff

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 5>And they've got a trader in David Griffin sitting back there.

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 5>I agree, though it's difficult to go all in.

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So you think because of the timing of this nine

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 3>game lo using streak and the injuries of Zion and

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 3>branding Are and all that, like it actually makes them

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 3>less likely to be making maybe you could argue a

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 3>semi aggressive move at the deadline. Then if they hadn't

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 3>had that and they were near the top of the

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 3>West and they're going like, holy crap, we got a

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 3>path here. You're nodding, you think that's probably true.

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because the Pelicans still don't really know what the

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 4>best version of their team looks like. They even when

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 4>they were in the first that in the Western Conference,

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 4>it was like you had a chunk where Brandon Ingram

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:29.320
<v Speaker 4>was healthy, at a chunk where Zion was healthy. We

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 4>haven't been able to see these two guys together and

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 4>what they can actually do at the peak of their

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 4>powers to know the proper player to put alongside. And

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 4>maybe they want to use this pick to get more

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 4>of a stretch big to replace Valancenis, which I think

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:41.280
<v Speaker 4>is going to be a smart move down the line

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:45.359
<v Speaker 4>at some point. But it's easier to talk yourself into

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 4>giving up a little bit of your future when it

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 4>feels like, yeah, we're right there, we're a third place

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 4>right now, we're one of the best teams in the league.

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.240
<v Speaker 4>We had a ton of young talent. It feels different

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 4>than when you're losing nine of twelve or whatever it

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 4>has been.

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, final team, the Phoenix Suns. I have four

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 3>variations of Sons Raptors trades for Og. All right, buckle up,

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Sons get OG in the first one here for Jay Crowder,

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Cameron Johnson, two first round picks. Second version is more picks,

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 3>Cam Johnson off the table, So it's OG to the

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Sons for Jay Crowder, Darius Sarich and three first round picks.

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 3>And again I'm saying three first round picks. Probably it's

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 3>probably like a twenty three, twenty five, twenty seven type

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 3>of thing.

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, with them, it's it's definitely that.

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Another version is take out Jay Crowder and go

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Landry Shammitt. You know, Raptors may be more interested in

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a Shamit type of player as a shooter, So Shammitt

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Sorich and three first round picks for OG. And then

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 3>the final one is completely different. I'm fascinated to hear

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts on this. It is getting DeAndre Ayton for

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 3>OG and Thadeus Young and then maybe just one first

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 3>round pick. Thoughts on any of these with the Sons

0:46:56.880 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 3>either moving sort of jay crowder like the way I

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.359
<v Speaker 3>look Cam Johnson is a really good player. There's your

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 3>young promising player. Feels like a Raptor player too that

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 3>you would remove one of the first round picks. If

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 3>he stays with the Sun because they love him, then

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 3>it's three first round picks, and then the whole other

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 3>sort of wild card is like why not eating They

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 3>don't seem to love him all that much. You know

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 3>he has his limitations, but he is a decent center.

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 3>He's obviously still young under a contract all that. What

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 3>do you think of a bunch of Suns trades? I

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 3>just chucked at you for ogi.

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't do the DeAndre Ayton one. I would be

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 5>worrysome that we I'll go we that the Raptors would

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 5>get enough out of him. They don't really have a

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 5>great pick and roll partner for him. I don't think

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 5>he would be amazing. I'd rather have the picks. I

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 5>think the three first round picks plus Shammant, who's definitely

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 5>a player that you can use forever and Sarch would

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 5>make a little bit more sense. I would call me

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 5>crazy rather bet on the Suns being bad in the

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 5>long term than the Knicks just because of a potential implosion,

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 5>because Chris Paul is going to retire one day, because

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 5>the way they've looked this season, because the Deandreton scenario.

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 5>I'd rather bet on that than betting on the Knicks

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 5>being bad and combined with their picks. So this is

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 5>all Suns picks. I'm a little bit more excited than

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 5>the next situation. I like it compared to the Grizzly situation.

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 5>I think I think that would be my number one

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 5>pack at Shamit sarch and three first round picks TK.

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a tough call here, but it feels like

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 4>this is good deals Like it feels like a deal

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 4>could be made here because there was people reporting that

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 4>the Raptors, like entire brain trust was out in Phoenix

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 4>this week basically scouting and chatting seeing who it could

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 4>be a man. I kind of think that Cam Johnson

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 4>in two first round picks is the way to go

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 4>because it splits the difference between a sham At lead package,

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 4>which I mean, sham It's fine, He's just a fine guy.

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.320
<v Speaker 4>Cam Johnson, though, is a real player. I do think

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe he would have trouble finding a spot with the Raptors,

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 4>since as much as he's touted as a little bit

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 4>of a stretch five, he's a four. He's definitely a four,

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 4>and the Raptors, as we're seeing, they got a ton

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.600
<v Speaker 4>of it here. I have hope for Aton away from Phoenix.

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 4>I think I think he'll be a pretty solid player

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 4>when he's, you know, at the worst, the number two option,

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:16.239
<v Speaker 4>and he's much more involved as we've seen. He's got

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 4>some big games for sure, but kind of with task

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 4>that I'd rather have more picks than Ayton because I

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:25.560
<v Speaker 4>don't know. You can find centers these days, you know,

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 4>and I mean the Raptors haven't, but I can find centers.

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 4>So it makes you think, at least we'll try something

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 4>a little bit cheaper for our center position. So I

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 4>guess I'm going cam in a couple of first rounders

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 4>in this.

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:41.760
<v Speaker 5>One, all right. And Ayden is playing fine, puts up numbers,

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 5>but you can find a little cheaper, You can find

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot cheaper. He's a Max guy. Yeah, and so

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 5>you got Max Siakam beside him. Well we were what

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 5>are we running here? Doesn't feel like a recipe for

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 5>an incredible team. I'm it doesn't and he also doesn't

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 5>seem really like a MASSI player. But draft picks, dude.

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I liked some of these from the sun side of

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 3>things though. I mean, you imagine mckail, bridges and Og

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 3>out there, like locking up your perimeter players. That would

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of fun. And they're obviously a team

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 3>that they're sort of like they racked it, you know,

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 3>they put together some wins there. They obviously got hammered

0:50:16.640 --> 0:50:19.839
<v Speaker 3>last night. Bookers should be back soon. We've seen them

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 3>win sixty plus games, We've seen them go to the finals,

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 3>so they know. They're like they've flirted with being an

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 3>elite team in this league for a couple of seasons.

0:50:28.040 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Like adding Og again under contract, I think it makes

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 3>some sense, especially some of those deals. It's really like, yeah,

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 3>they're just like, yeah, we're okay, we're fine, We're giving

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 3>up a bunch of picks, be it two or three,

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 3>and then players like Crowder doesn't play for us, and

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 3>then whoever, if it's Shamanton Sarich, they would do that

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:43.719
<v Speaker 3>in a heartbeat. I would think, Yeah.

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:46.279
<v Speaker 4>I think Ayton is the one that gives you any

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 4>sort of pause here, because basically it's like Cam Johnson

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 4>is the only other guy who's a real rotation member.

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Sorry has been fine playing off the bench.

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:54.960
<v Speaker 4>For sure, He's had some big games as well, But

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean Cam is the guy who's kind of locked

0:50:57.480 --> 0:50:59.240
<v Speaker 4>in there as a little bit of a core member.

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 4>But it would be an upgrade to get Ojannaoby.

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, that's a lot of trades. I just chucked

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 3>at you, guys, which team do you think makes the

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 3>most sense? From the Knicks, the Pacers, the Grizzlies, the Pelicans,

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 3>the Sons, there are other teams. I'm sure you could

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 3>get frisky with. Let us know in the comments right

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 3>now here in the stream. Team tweeted us at no

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 3>dunk sink and thanks again to uh to Blake, to Eric,

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.879
<v Speaker 3>to Sporting News, Michael, to Michael.

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Gay as they say in Canada, to William lou.

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Blake Murph, I said, yeah, Murph dog sure and Matt Doudlin,

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 4>why not?

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 5>Sure? Jack? Jack, congrats, Jacky, Savannah, Akil, Randy, Randy, all right,

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 5>Jerry who Jared y?

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's what we do, family view, just a fan

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 3>pick of results last night. Man Trey Kirby is on fire.

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 3>You could be rich right now. Back in this guy's picks,

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:08.919
<v Speaker 3>you had the Wolves who had some points to play

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 3>with at home plus two and a half, they were

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 3>the dogs. They obviously win in overtime. Another l for

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 3>me in another overtime loss. I mean, this sucks, this

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:20.240
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be. It's brutal. But yeah, we have the Warriors,

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 3>so we're all in one here in February. Tray one

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to know what's Tonight's game?

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 5>Heavy? Thursday night's sked unusual in the National Basketball Association.

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 5>I think there's seven on tonight and I saw a

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 5>nice one the Pelicans at the MAVs, who are favored

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 5>by four and a half at home against these struggling Pelicans.

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Pelicans have lost nine in a row, but I think

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 5>they can cover that four points the way they looked

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 5>in their last game. While you guys think that the

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.759
<v Speaker 5>MAVs will win by five or more.

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, Trey thinks that, and I have just decided whenever

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 3>I can, I'm just gonna back Tray right now, gotcha,

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:59.800
<v Speaker 3>because he's at So what's your reason?

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:01.640
<v Speaker 4>The Pelicans are just bad?

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 5>Good reason?

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 4>They're they're struggling. They lost their last game by nine

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 4>previously twenty five, previously ten, previously nine. They haven't played

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 4>a close game in a while, so maybe you should

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:13.640
<v Speaker 4>actually switch to the Pelicans.

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 5>Hope me.

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, no, I'm going with you.

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:15.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, smart movie.

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:17.399
<v Speaker 3>You don't want me though, you don't want me back

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 3>to you is the problem?

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Four and a half. We got the mass task has

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 3>the pels and some points to play with. Let's get

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 3>to tweeted the.

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Night, tweet out the night, Wow j D with tweet

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:32.239
<v Speaker 5>of the night.

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, more like tweet of five minutes before the show.

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 3>Tweet in the morning, Yeah, the morning to you.

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:43.720
<v Speaker 6>Yesterday we were talking about Dennie Avida.

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:44.759
<v Speaker 5>What's going on here?

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 6>It's still good this music though.

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 5>We're always talking about Deny.

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 6>Every single day. But yesterday we talked about how he

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 6>has a new nickname, Turbo. Yeah, very American Gladiators. Still

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 6>not on the basket reference website.

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 3>No, No, let's get that up there. Let's do that

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 3>b ref Come on.

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 6>But our man sixty five percent font asked mid journey AI,

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 6>which I assume is a it's an AI art generator,

0:54:16.000 --> 0:54:19.879
<v Speaker 6>right to visualize what Danny Adio would look like as

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 6>a nineteen nineties American glass. Okay, so apologies to the audio.

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 6>Listeners are just gonna have to come on over to

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:31.359
<v Speaker 6>YouTube to check these out because they are incredible. There's

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 6>four of them. Here's the first one.

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Whoa damn what what team is he playing?

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:54:44.239 --> 0:54:44.479
<v Speaker 3>Wow?

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 6>And here's what this one looks very I don't know, it's.

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, it looks like Art Rivals.

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:53.359
<v Speaker 4>It looks like the Nintendo video.

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, definitely, yeah, and like Drogo or you know, yeah

0:54:57.719 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 6>from Rocky.

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, more from street Fighter. Yeah, very tall. That's a masterpoof.

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 5>Zeus is playing on the far left there and no

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:14.799
<v Speaker 5>holds barred right left No, oh yeah, yeah, I thought

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 5>his counterpart on the left side there kind of looks

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 5>like Zeus. He also has the eye thing going on.

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I think AI hasn't figured out human eyes eyes.

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Here's a this is w w E to me, Shamrock.

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 3>I wish it looked a little bit more like off

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:37.800
<v Speaker 3>you like.

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 4>But got a little Adam Levine to it.

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:41.720
<v Speaker 5>That's true.

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:45.960
<v Speaker 3>That's for Kyle hat So boom.

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:50.360
<v Speaker 5>And finally, oh man, what a jaw line?

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what a brawl line. That's my favorite one though, again, like,

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 3>come on, a I put a little go tea on there.

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Put a little mustache for I feel like he has one,

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 3>or did at least all stubble. The haircuts good, yeah,

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 3>haircuts good, really good, strong job.

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:11.279
<v Speaker 4>That looks like an American gladiator.

0:56:11.320 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't that look like what Turbo looked like?

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:20.959
<v Speaker 5>That's what the Star Trek logos in there. Wow?

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Those are those are great?

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:24.240
<v Speaker 4>A lot like the real Turbo.

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:26.280
<v Speaker 3>That's what they pulled from.

0:56:26.400 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so yeah, I mean, just go back and just

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 6>add to mid Journey. Just add with a goate.

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:33.879
<v Speaker 5>That's it.

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I got to make it.

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:39.279
<v Speaker 6>Learn You gotta tell it what you want. I mean,

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:43.399
<v Speaker 6>you can't, you know, put in just random stuff.

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 5>And it's pretty cool. It's you guys play with chat

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 5>gp I of.

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Course, what if you do?

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 4>Just tell like write me a tweet about the bulls

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:56.359
<v Speaker 4>being back. It's like, seriously, the things I put into it,

0:56:56.840 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 4>putting too many hashtags in though, that's my my chat.

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:01.880
<v Speaker 4>I tried to fire up mid Journey. You got to

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:04.719
<v Speaker 4>join their Discord server, so I'm going to figure it out.

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:07.240
<v Speaker 3>That's like a community for us to get.

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it just works differently like their Their AI

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:14.880
<v Speaker 4>bot is done somehow through through Discord and it was

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.280
<v Speaker 4>like I tried whatever, man, I tried to join the beta,

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 4>tried to join the beta. You gotta join the discord.

0:57:21.080 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Then you got to learn prompts, then you got to

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:25.920
<v Speaker 4>learn imagines. I don't know, it was more than just

0:57:26.040 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 4>typing in what you want to see. Like the first

0:57:28.280 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 4>time all the AI things went around, I was.

0:57:30.920 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Like, this is easy.

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Vin Diesel holding a tune of Sandwich twenty results all hilarious.

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Do it in the style of Salvador Dali, please, That

0:57:40.880 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 4>was That's my only go to for AI stuff. Is

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 4>a famous actor doing something weird in the style of

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:52.960
<v Speaker 4>a classical artist. Yeah, Tom Cruise running in the style

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 4>of Henrima greet something.

0:57:56.680 --> 0:57:56.919
<v Speaker 5>Great.

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like, when you think about it, we've done

0:58:01.760 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 3>We've done over three thousand shows, you know, not all

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 3>on camera, but a huge chunk for basically a decade,

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:14.240
<v Speaker 3>if not longer on camera. We could input that into

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:18.360
<v Speaker 3>obviously some sort of AI platform. And what I'm getting

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:19.920
<v Speaker 3>at is like, we don't need to I would sit

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 3>a year from now. We don't need to be here. Yeah,

0:58:22.440 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna have every mannerism you've ever done here, your sayings,

0:58:25.680 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the way I talk, he thought, I mean, I'm just like,

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 3>punch it in it uploads what happened in the NBA

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 3>last night? Yeah, spits it out our show.

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean chat GPI doesn't do current events yet.

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's true.

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 5>It's older. It's twenty twenty one in past.

0:58:46.400 --> 0:58:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh interesting, so oh so that would be an issue

0:58:49.560 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 3>a little hurdle right now is like games happening last night.

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 3>It's good.

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:57.960
<v Speaker 6>Sometimes this show feels like it was it's Ai, you

0:58:58.000 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 6>know what I mean, just the tangents we go on

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 6>and just.

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 3>The malfunctions like yesterday.

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Why are you saying that we've talked about today Special before? Yeah,

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 5>of course, yeah, I'm kidding.

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, the American Gladiators talk about over and over.

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, humans, it's just a loop. It's a loop. We

0:59:18.040 --> 0:59:23.439
<v Speaker 5>have the same thoughts every day, our thoughts exactly the same. Really, Yeah,

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 5>that's what they say. That's what AI says. Ay is

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:28.400
<v Speaker 5>better than us.

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, that's a good tweet of the night, great photos.

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:36.120
<v Speaker 6>Shout out to his skeets forgiving that to me. Otherwise,

0:59:37.440 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty minute Pickle report, but save it, save it.

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 3>You have an unsponsored Pickle report.

0:59:44.320 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 6>Now it's just yeah, because well you know, put it

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.560
<v Speaker 6>out there. It's like the your Ernie's segment. Let's put it,

0:59:51.840 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 6>slap a sticker on it.

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, Uh, Pickle Report coming soon maybe, uh maybe tomorrow.

0:59:59.120 --> 1:00:02.080
<v Speaker 3>We have a lot tomorrow's podcast. Definitely not tomorrow. You

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 3>know this is just going to be lengthier Pickle Report,

1:00:04.840 --> 1:00:05.840
<v Speaker 3>well kind of.

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:08.439
<v Speaker 6>But also we've got Worst of the Week, we got

1:00:08.680 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 6>five Star Star. There's seven games on tonight, all Star snubs,

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 6>all Star snubs.

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 3>There's just no time.

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we may have to do two shows.

1:00:17.920 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Tomorrow only snub show.

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Why don't we just do a pickle show.

1:00:22.680 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 6>We can't do that too. Nods coming soon.

1:00:27.040 --> 1:00:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, The Pickle Report is coming either in its own

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:37.040
<v Speaker 3>separate podcast or it's coming next I care. I mean,

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I know it must be good for you wanting to

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>have turned it into it.

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, it must A lot happened, A lot happened, a

1:00:43.040 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 6>lot of.

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a big deal.

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Joke. Yeah, but if you want to beat chat GPT JD,

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:01.160
<v Speaker 5>you got to start making a pickle. They don't know

1:01:01.240 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 5>about two years ahead, exactly knows nothing about pick a ball.

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 5>Make a show. Let's go, Yeah, let's call it.

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Hold on.

1:01:10.840 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Just to clarify, I said, here mcgreet, I meant to

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 4>say Renee mcgreet, Matisey jammed those jammed them.

1:01:19.480 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>That was like an ai exactly.

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 4>I got confused, like why is why was Denny Abdiya

1:01:23.600 --> 1:01:27.760
<v Speaker 4>wearing Kristaps Porzingis's number? Exactly right? But Skeets, I'm gonna

1:01:27.760 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 4>need you to come to me for the quote at

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:31.600
<v Speaker 4>the end because I asked chat GPT write me a

1:01:31.680 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 4>task Mellie quote to end it.

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Not well, okay, okay, here we go. So so tomorrow

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>we'll be back with the Drop Podcast, obviously talking some

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>All Star snubs. I'm sure talking about the games, five

1:01:41.480 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Star Friday Worst of the Week nominees, Tweet of the Night,

1:01:44.920 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff. That's ten am Eastern live here from

1:01:47.160 --> 1:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the Classic Factory. Get your tickets to our Salt Lake

1:01:49.680 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 3>City show. Keep reminding you, guys, but if you're in

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the area, you should come on out hang with us

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>on Friday night at the Ober Lounge. But until then,

1:01:57.400 --> 1:01:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Clover Bros.

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:00.880
<v Speaker 4>You heard it here first, have a great to turn up.

1:02:01.040 --> 1:02:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Love you guys, awesome, Thanks for joining us, and remember,

1:02:05.720 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 4>as tas Mella says, keep grinding, stay focused, and never

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:13.080
<v Speaker 4>let the haters dunk on your dreams. I've said that before.

1:02:13.920 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm giving that.

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Place the day people.

1:02:16.160 --> 1:02:16.720
<v Speaker 5>That's good