WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: TechStuff Enters the Singularity

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Say hey there,

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, jonvan Strickland.

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>tech are you. So it's January second, twenty twenty four.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>As you listen to this, it's actually back in the

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>past in twenty twenty three when I record it and

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we are on vacation. You know, I brought you a

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of new episodes over the holidays, but I

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>feared it's about time for Jonathan to maybe rest a

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit, So we're going to listen to a classic

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>episode today. This episode is called tech Stuff Enters the Singularity.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, after all, we're in a new year, so

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>why not talk about the future a little bit. This

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was recorded way back in February eleventh, twenty thirteen. Lauren

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Vogelbaumb now host of brain Stuff and Savor along with

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>other Things, was my co host at the time, and

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we sat down to talk about this vision of the future,

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the singularity. What does it mean that when we're talking

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about the technological singularity? That is So sit back, relax

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy this classic episode from twenty thirteen called tech

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Enters the Singularity. Get in touch with technologies with

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>tex Stuff from HowStuffWorks dot com. Hey there, everyone, and

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Jonathan Strickland, Host Extraordinaire.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Lauren vocal Bam, host Extraordinarier.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That's very true, and today we wanted to talk about

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the future. The future. Yeah, really, we're talking about kind

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of a science fiction future. We're talking about the singularity.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.559
<v Speaker 1>And long time listeners to tech Stuff and I'm talking

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>about folks who listened way back before we ever talked

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>out at thirty minutes, let alone an hour. May remember

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that we did an episode about how Ray Kurtzwel works

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ray Kurtzwell is a futurist and one of the

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>things he talks about extensively, particularly if you corner him

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at a cocktail party, is the singularity. And so we

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about what the singularity is, what this idea,

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we really wanted to kind of dig down

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>into it and why is this a big deal and

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>how realistic is this vision of the future.

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because some people would take a little bit of

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a would would argue with your concept of it being

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 2>science fiction. They take it extremely seriously.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, they say it's science fact, science fact, it's

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>science inevitability.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The term was actually coined by a mathematician, Jean

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>von Newman in the nineteen fifties, but it was popularized

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 2>by a science fiction writere.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's also a There are a lot of different

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>concepts that are tied up together, and it all depends

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on upon whom you ask what it means by the singularity.

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>For instance, there's some people who when you hear the

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>term the singularity, what they say is, Okay, that's a

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>time when we get to the point where technological advances

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are coming so quickly that it's impossible to have a

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>meaningful conversation of what the state of technology is because

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it changes changes by the milliseconds. Right. So that's one version,

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But most of the versions that we're familiar with that

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the futurists talk about incorporate an idea of superhuman intelligence

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>or the intelligence explosion, right.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>A kind of combination of human and technological development that

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>just dovetails into this gorgeous you know, space baby from

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and one kind of that's.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>An excellent way of putting it. The documentary two thousand

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and one. I remember specifically when the space baby looked

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at Earth. Okay, that documentary example doesn't work at all.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It usually does, but not this Yeah, not this time.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, space babies are a poor example in this one instance.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>But metaphorically speaking, yes, you're right on track because the

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>intelligence explosion. That was a term introduced by someone known

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>as Irving John Good or if you want to go with,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>his birth name is Adore Jakub Gudak. I can see

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>why he changed it. Yeah. He actually worked for a

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>while at bletch Lee Park with another fellow who made

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of a name for himself in computer science, a

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>fellow named Alan Turing. Oh oh, I guess I've heard

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of him. Yeah. Touring will come up in the discussion

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later, but for right now, So, Irving

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>John Good just just a little quick anecdote that I

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thought was amusing. So Good was working with touring to

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>try and help break German codes. I mean that's what

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Bletchley Park was all about, right right, So Good apparently

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one day drew the ire of touring when he decided

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>to take a little cat nap because he was tired

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and he was it was Goods philosophy that being tired

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>did not mean that he meant that he was not

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>going to work at his best, and he might as

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>well go ahead and nap, exactly, take a nap, get refreshed,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and then tackle the problem again, and you're more likely

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to solve it. Whereas touring was very much a workhorse,

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know he was he was no rest, no rest,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>We have to.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Do so touring.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>When he discovered that Good had been napping, decided that

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this was the Good was not so good and and

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>touring touring sort of treated him with disdain. He began

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to essentially not speak to Good. Good meanwhile, began to

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think about the letters that were being used in Enigma

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>codes to code German messages, and he began to think,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what if these letters are not completely random? What if

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the Germans are relying on some letters more frequently than others.

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And he began to look at frequency of these letters

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>being used. He made up a table and mathematically analyzed

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the frequency that certain letters were used and discovered that

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a bias. There was a pattern. Yeah, so

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, with this bias, that means that we

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>can start to narrow down the possibilities of these codes,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and in fact he was able to demonstrate that this

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>was a way to help break German codes, and Touring,

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>when he saw Goods work, said, I could have sworn

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I tried that, but clearly that showed that it worked well.

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 1>And then good and another point apparently went to sleep

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>one day and they've been working on a code that

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>they just could not break, and while he was sleeping,

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>he dreamed that perhaps when the Germans were encoding this

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>particular message, they used the letters in reverse of the

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>way they were actually printed, and so he tried that

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>when he woke up, and it turned out he was right.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>And so then his argument was Touring, I need to

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>go to bed.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, what the moral of the story here

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 2>is that naps are good?

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and no one should talk to you, right, yeah, yeah,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that's how I live my life. But yeah, so so

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Goods point. Anyway, he came up with this term of

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence explosion, and it was this this sort of

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>idea that we're going to reach a point where we

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>are increasing either our own intelligence or some sort of

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:23.239
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence so far beyond what we are currently capable

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of understanding, that life as we know it will change. Completely,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and because it's going to go beyond what we know

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, there's no way to predict what our life

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>will be like, right because it's beyond our because it

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is it.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Is Yeah, by definition out of our comprehension.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, as the Scots would say, it's beyond our ken.

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to be doing accents of this episode?

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So that was a terrible one. I actually regret doing

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it right now. I already knew I couldn't do Scottish

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and yet there I went. Anyway, you're trail placing again. Yeah,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So to to kind of backtrack a bit before we

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>really get into the whole singularity discussion, that was just

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a brief overview. A good foundation to start from is

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the concept of Moore's law. You know, Originally Gordon Moore,

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>who by the way, was a co founder of a

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>little company called Intel, he originally observed back in nineteen

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty five in a paper that I'm going to I'm

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>going to with this, but it was called something like

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>cramming more components onto integrated circuits something like that. That

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was actually cramming was definitely one of the words used,

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and circuit probably was too. Anyway, he noticed that over

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the course of I think originally it was twelve months,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but today we consider it two years.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Eighteen to twenty four months, I think is the official, unofficial.

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, right, Yeah, that the number of discrete components

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on a square inch silicon wafer would double due to

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>improvements in manufacturing and efficiency, so that in effect, what

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this means to the layman is that our electronics and

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly our computers get twice as powerful every two years.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you bought a computer in nineteen ninety eight

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and then bought another computer in two thousand, in theory,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the computer in two thousand would be twice as powerful

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>as the one from nineteen ninety eight. This is exponential growth.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's an important component, this idea of exponential growth, right,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And it goes without saying that if you continue on

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this path, if this, if this continues indefinitely, then you know,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you quickly get to computers of almost unimaginable power just

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a decade.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Out certainly, although I mean I still don't really understand

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>what a gigabyte means, because when I first started using computers,

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 2>we were not counting in that. I mean, I mean,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I was still impressed by kilobytes at the time.

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Now, I remember the first time I got

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a hard drive, I think it had like a two

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty megabyte hard drive. I thought, you're like,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>who needs that much space? Now? Grat that's that's space

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, not even processing pay right, absolutely, So, yeah,

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's one of those things where the older

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you are, the more incredible today, is right, because you

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>start looking at computers and you think, I remember when

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>these things came out, and they were essentially the equivalent

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>of a of a really good desktop calculator. Right. So,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but Moore's law states that this advance will continue indefinitely

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>until we hit some sort of fundamental obstacle that we

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just cannot engineer our way around.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh right, you know, and people that's why it's it's

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of in contention right now, because people are saying that, well,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 2>there's there's only so much physical space that you can

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 2>fit onto with silicone. There there's there's a physical limitation

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 2>to the material in which there's only so much it

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>can do about it. And so does More's law still

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>apply if we're talking about other materials and what's you.

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Know, right, and and how small can you get before

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>you start to run into quantum effects that are impossible

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to work around. Uh, and then do you change the

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>geometry of a chip? Do you go three dimensional instead

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of two dimensional? Would that help? And yeah, there are

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of engineers are working on this, and frankly,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every couple of years, someone says, all right,

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the year Moore's Law ends to end. It's over,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>it's gone, it's done with. Five years later, you're still

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>going strong. Yeah, And then on the six years someone

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>else says More's Law is gonna end.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit of a self fulfilling prophecy. I

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 2>think that a lot of companies attempt to.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Keep it going. To keep it going, oh sure, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no one wants to be the ones to say, uh, guys,

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>guess what, we can't keep up with More's law anymore.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to do that, so it is a

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>good motivator.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Also, if I can footnote myself real quick, I'm pretty

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>sure that I just pronounced silicon is still a cone,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>and I would like I would like to stay for

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the record that I know that those are two different substances.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's fair. Anyway, I was I was going to

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you about it, but by the time you were

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>finished talking, I thought, let's just go Yeah, that's cool.

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It's all right. If you knew how many times I

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have used that particular pronunciation to hilarious results, excellent. So

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>moving on with this whole idea about Moore's law, I mean,

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason this plays into the singularity is with the

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>technological advances, you start to be able to achieve pretty

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>incredible things, and even within one generation of Moore's law,

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>which kind of a meaningless term. But let's say you

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>arbitrarily pick a date and then two years from that

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>date you look and see what's possible with the new technology,

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and getting to twice as much power however you want

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to define it doesn't necessarily mean that you've only doubled

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the amount of things you can do with that power.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>You may have limitless things you can do. So with

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that idea, you're talking about being able to power through

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>problems way faster than you did before. And there's lots

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of different ways of doing that. For example, grid computing.

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Grid computing is when you are linking computers together to

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>work on a problem all at once. Now works really

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>well with certain problems parallel problems we call them. These

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>are problems where there are lots of potential solutions and

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:12.239
<v Speaker 1>each computer essentially is working on one set of potential solutions.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And that way you have all these different computers working

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>on it at the same time. It reduces the overall

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>time it takes to solve that parallel problem. And so

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like if you've ever heard of anything like folding at

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Home or the SETI project, where you could dedicate your

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>computer's idle time, So the idle processes, the processes that

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>are not being used while you're serving the web or

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>writing how the singularity works, or I don't know, building

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>an architectural program in some sort of CAD application. Anything

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're not using can be dedicated to one of

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>these projects. Same sort of idea that you don't necessarily

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>have to build a supercomputer to solve complex problems if

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>you use a whole bunch of computers, whole bunch of

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>small ones. Large Hadron Collider does this, although they use

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>very nice advanced computers, but they do a lot of

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>grid computing as well. So just using those kind of models,

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we see that we're able to do much more sophisticated

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>things than we could.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise if we were certainly, Yes, networks, as it turns out,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 2>are pretty cool.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and networks play a part in this idea of

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the singularity. Actually, I guess now is a good time

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll kind of transition into Werner Venge's and I honestly,

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to say his last name. I

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>say Vinge, and it could end up being ringy. But

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I just went with what you said. So that's great,

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Let's do it. What we'll say that Venge

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>says everything is silicone. So Werner though he vern, I

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>call him Vern. He suggested four different potential pathways that

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>humans could take, or really that the world could take, yes,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to arrive at the technological singularity. Okay, what are they?

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The four ways are we could develop a superhuman artificial intelligence,

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So computers suddenly are able to think on a level

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that's analogous to the way humans think and can do

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it better than better. Right whether or not that means

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>computers are conscious, that's debatable. We'll get into that too.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Computer networks could somehow become self aware. That's number two. Okay,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So yes, skynet, so like the grid computing we were

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just talking about that. Somehow using these grid computers. The

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>network itself.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Having enough cycles and enough pathways and enough loops back around,

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>it starts going like, hey, I recognize this, yeah, and

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>starts thinking about.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Like thinking about IBM's Watson. But it's distributed across a network.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So computers. You can think of computers as all being

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>super powerful neurons in a brain, and that the network

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually neural pathways. And it's definitely a science fiction

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>ye way of looking at things. Doesn't mean it won't happen,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>but strangers, my friends, it feels like a matrix kind

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of thing to me. Then we have the idea that

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>computer human interfaces are so advanced and so intrinsically tied

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to who we are, that humans themselves evolve beyond being human,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>we become trans human. Okay, So this is an idea

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that we almost merge with computers at least on some.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Level via kind of nanobot technology, you know, stuff stuff

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>running through our bloodstreams, stuff in our selves yep.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Or we have just brain in our faces where our consciousness,

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>our consciousness is connected to So for example, we might

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have it where instead of connecting to the internet via

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>some device like a smartphone or a computer device. Yeah,

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's right there in our meat brains, so that you know,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting there having a conversation with someone. Then you're like, oh, wait,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>what movie was that guy in? Let me just look

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>up IMDb in my brain. And then you you know,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on how good your connection is, which means, by

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you are a journalist and you attend CEES,

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you will automatically be dumber because all the all the

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>internet connectivity will be taken up, and so you'll be

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting there trying to ask good questions and druel will

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>come out of your mouth, which to me is a

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>typical CEES.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I can I can only assume that that wireless technology

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 2>would advance also at this point, but one can only

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>hope fingers crossed.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>There are certain technologies that are not advancing at the

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>exponential rate of Moore's law, which is another problem. We'll

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. Yeah. And then the fourth and final

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>method that Werner had suggested the world may go would

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>be that humans would advance so far in biological sciences

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>that they would allow us to engineer human intelligence so

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that we could make ourselves as smart as we wanted

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to be. This is sort of that Gattica future where

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got all the another another great documentary where we

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>engineer ourselves to be super smart. Right, So those are

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the four pathways artificial intelligence, computer networks become self aware,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>computer human interfaces become really really awesome, or we have

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>biologically engineered human intelligence, and all four of these lead

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to a similar outcome, which is this intelligence explosion. And

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the idea that some form of superhuman intelligence

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is created, either artificially or within ourselves, and that at

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that point we will no longer be able to predict

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>what our world will will be like, because by definition,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we will have a superhuman intelligent entity involved. And because

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that's superhuman, it's beyond our ability to predict. Right, which

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is you know which.

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Which makes that experience experiments about it a little bit uh.

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Philosophical. Yeah, that's the kind way of putting it pointless,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>would be another way of putting it, like we could

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>we could, you know, sit there and and spitball a

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of possible futures. But that's the thing, they're possible.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't know which one could come out. We don't

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>even know if these four pathways are inevitable. We have

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>futurists who truly believe that this is something that will

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>happen at some point. There are other people who are

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>more skeptical, but we'll talk about them in a bit.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>So one of the outcomes that Werner was talking about,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's a fairly popular one in futurist circles, is

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the robo apocalypse. Essentially, right, this is

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>where you've got the humans are bad, destroy all humans idea,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Essentially the ideas that humans would become extinct, either through

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>definition because we've evolved into something else or because whatever

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the superhuman intelligence is it besides, we are a problem.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and a lot of futurists are a lot more

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 2>positive about that. They're more looking forward to it than

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>being scared of it. It's less of a oh no,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 2>big scary robots are coming to take over our society

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 2>and more of a robot it's are coming to take

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 2>over our society like free day.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah, I don't have to work anymore,

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and and I don't because robots are supplying all the

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>things we need. There's no need for anyone to work anymore.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no need for money anymore because the only reason

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you need money is so you can buy stuff. But

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if everything's free, then you don't need you. So it

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>becomes Star Trek and we all, you know, run around

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in jumpsuits and right punch people. And if you're Kirk,

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you make out a lot. I mean a lot. That

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>dude every week Becrden Riiker. If you add them together,

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>make one.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Kirk and yes in this documentary series.

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Star Trek. Yeah, I don't know about our trick

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>because I never watched Enterprise, So you guys have to

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get back to me on that. Yeah, sorry, sorry about that. That.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 2>It's also a gap in my personal understanding.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I just took one look at that decontamination chamber and

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, yep, I'm out anyway. So that's that's Werner Revenge.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>It's he's sort of popularized this idea, but he's there

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are other people have kind of I think their names

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are synonymous with it, and we will talk about them

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in just a minute and now back to the show.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So Werner Venge again very much associated with the idea

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>of the singularity. But there's another name that comes up

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time, Ray Kurtsweile.

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Ray Kurtsweil, and this is a fellow who has been

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>referred to in various circles as the Thomas Edison of

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 2>modern technology, or or, perhaps more colorfully, the Willy Wonka

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>of technology. That was by Jef Duncan of Digital Trends,

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and I just wanted to shout out because that was great, nice.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But you get nothing. I shared a remix of Willy

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Wonka earlier today and it's still playing through my head.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 2>We're fans, we might be fans of the Gene Wilder

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 2>Willy Wonka. Everyone, homework assignment, go watch that. It has

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with the singularity, the singularity at all.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know there's some chocolate singularity in there, Chocolate Singularity.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to do an episode on.

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 2>If I were better at cover band names, I totally

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>would have said something whitty right there.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, well, fair enough, we'll say it's the

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Archies for Sugar Sugar, Oh dear, Oh my goodness.

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So Ray Kurtzweil, Yeah, Ray Kurtzweil is the kind

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>of cat who you know, when he was in high

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 2>school invented a computer program. And this is in the

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 2>mid nineteen sixties. This isn't like last year or something

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>in the mid nineteen sixties, created a computer program that

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>listened to classical music, found patterns in it, and then

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 2>created new classical music based on that.

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So as a computer that composed classical music, yes, following

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the rules of classical music that other composers had created. Yes,

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of cool. That's just that's just something he did,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, And yeah, that's dude's got credentials. Yeah.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 2>He also kind of invented flatbed scanners, has done a

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of stuff in speech recognition, and.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Which that's interesting because we'll and we'll talk about that

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>in a second. But one of Kurtzweld's big points is

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that he thinks that by and this all depends upon

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>which interview you read of Cartswell, but in various interviews

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he said that essentially, by twenty thirty, we will reach

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a point where we will be able to make an

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>artificial brain. We'll have reverse engineered the brain, and we'll

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to create an artificial one. And there's a

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of debate in smarter circles and the ones I

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>move in. That's not a slap against my friends. They're

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty bright, but none of us are neu quirologically gifted

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>at that point. I include myself in that circle. So,

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are some very bright people who debate about

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this point, whether or not we'll be able by the

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>year twenty thirty to reverse engineer the brain and design

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>an artificial one. And I think the debate is not

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so much on whether or not we'll have the technological

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>power necessary to simulate a Sure we can simulate brains

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>on a certain superficial level today, well, I.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Mean hypothetically we could connect enough computers that we could

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 2>make it go.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, we could probably get the computer horsepower,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>especially by twenty thirty, to simulate a human brain. The

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>question is whether we will understand the human brain enough

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>to do so exactly. So that's sort of where the

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>debate lies. It's not so much on the technological side

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>of things as it is the biological side of things,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of interesting. I've read a lot of

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>critics who have really jumped on Kurtzweld for this. Particularly PZ.

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Myers has written some pretty yeah strongly worded, strongly worded

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>criticisms to Kurtzweil's theories, saying that Kurtzweil simply does not

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>understand neurological development and activities, and that you know, the

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>nature between the environment and the way our brains develop

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>over to versus the you know, nurture versus nature, all

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff with the hormonal changes, electrochemical reactions.

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Saying that there's there's so many little bits that make

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 2>up our brains, so many hormones, so many processes, and

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 2>we understand such a small fraction of what they do.

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 2>This is why a lot of psychiatric drugs, for example,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 2>are kind of like, oh, well, we invented this thing,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 2>and we guess it does this thing right, take it

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 2>and see what happens?

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>We do stuff? Yeah, we don't. It tends to make

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you happy. It also makes you perceive the color red

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as having the smell of oranges, like you know that

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that's we don't. We don't understand it fully. And in fact,

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there are other people like Stephen Novella, who is uh

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he's the author of the Neurological Blog, and he also

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is a host on a wonderful podcast called Skeptics Guide

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Universe. If you guys haven't listened to that,

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you should try that out if you especially if you

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like skepticism and critical thinking. But he's he's a doctor

0:25:55.119 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and a proponent of evidence based medicine, and he talks

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>about how we don't know how much we don't know

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>about the brain. We have no way of knowing where

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the endpoint is as far as the brain is concerned,

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we cannot guess at how long it will

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>take us to reverse engineer. It's simply because we don't

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>know where the finish line is.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Right right, Yeah, Kurt Kurtzwell's Kurtzwell has a new book

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 2>new as of we're recording this in January twenty thirteen.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>It just came out in November of twenty twelve called

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>How to Create a Mind. The Secret of Human Thought Revealed.

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 2>And in the book he theorizes that Okay, if you'll

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 2>follow me for a second, adams are tiny bits of data, Okay.

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 2>DNA is a form of a program. The nervous system

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 2>is a computer that coordinates bodily functions, and thought is

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of simultaneously a program and the data that that

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 2>program contains.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha. See, now, this is another problem that some scientists have, yeah,

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is reducing the human brain to the model of a computer.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, because it's you know, it's it's a very it's

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>a very elegant, interesting proposition. Sure, and and it's kind

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 2>of sexy like that because you go like, oh, well

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 2>that's that that sort of makes sense. Man, Like, let's

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 2>go get a pizza and talk about this more.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me let me get a program that will

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>allow me to suddenly know all kung fu.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, and when you're a programmer, that's a great plan. Yeah,

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, that sounds that sounds terrific. But yeah,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 2>there's one one specific guy found. Jaren Lanier wrote a

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>terrific thing called One Half of a Manifesto, which is

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a really entertaining read if you guys like this kind

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.719
<v Speaker 2>of thing, where he was saying that what futurists are

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>talking about when they talk about this the singularity is

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 2>basically a religion. He was calling it cybernetic totalism, you know,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>like like a fanatic ideology. He compares it to Marxism

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 2>at some point. Interesting, Yeah, and he was saying that that,

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's this, this theory is a terrific theory

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 2>if you want to get into the philosophy of who

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 2>we are and what we do and what technology is.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 2>But that you know, cybernetic patterns aren't necessarily the best

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 2>way to understand reality, and that they're not necessarily the

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 2>best model for how people work, for how culture works,

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 2>for how intelligence works. And that's saying so is an

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 2>gross over simplification.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.479
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point, and we should also point out

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that it all depends on how you define intelligence as well,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>because Kurtzwell himself has worded his own predictions in such

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a way that some would argue. Novella argues, for example,

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that he has given himself enough room where he's going

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to be right no matter what, like saying that by

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty, we will be able to reverse engineer basic

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>brain functions, and Novella says, well, technically you could argue

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that now, So that kind of gives you a lot

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of room, a little bit of a gimme there. Yeah,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But whether or not it means total brain function, and

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a totally different question. And so the other

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>point is that we could theoretically create an artificial intelligence

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that does not necessarily reverse engineer the brain. It doesn't

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>follow the human intelligence model. I mean, that's IBM's Watson again,

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a good example of artificial intelligence that you know, in

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>some ways it mimics the brain because it kind of

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>has to. You know, we're coming at this human beings

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are the ones creating this technology, and so as human

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>beings creating this technology, it's going to follow the rules

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that as we understand them. So there's going to be

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>some medocry there. Right. But but IBM's Watson, you know,

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you think about that. It doesn't really understand necessarily the

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>data that's passing through it. It's looking for the connections

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and making.

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>It really savvy at making connections and recognizing patterns and

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>spitting out useful information.

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's looking for whatever answer is most likely the

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>right one. It's all probability based, right, So, and if

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it does doesn't reach a certain threshold, it doesn't provide

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the answer. So if arbitrarily speaking, i don't know what

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the threshold is, so I'm just making a number eighty

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>five percent. Let's say it has to be eighty five

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>percent certain or higher for it to give that answer.

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>If that if the if a certainty falls below that threshold,

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>no answer is given. That's essentially how it worked when

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Watson was on Jeopardy, right. It would analyze the the

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer in jeopardy terms and then come up with

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>what it thought was probably the most accurate question for

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that answer, and occasionally it was wrong to hilarious results.

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But it did sort of seem to kind of mimic

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the way humans think, at least on a superficial level.

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>And I mean the thing about humans is that they're

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 2>they're wrong a lot more than a lot more than

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 2>what that fifteen percent of the time.

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's you know, we've we've got well, we give

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>answers even if we're not eighty five percent short a question.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I certainly do.

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Because we all know from going to trivia nights. Yeah,

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 2>and there's there's a lot of I've read a lot

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 2>on online about arguments of how it's our deficiencies, our memory, biases,

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>our rational behavior are weird hormonal stuff going on or

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 2>what make us human, and that you can't teach a

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 2>computer to be irrational.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>That's true, although you can't teach you to swear. You can.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We just we read a story last week, yeah, where

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>IBM allowed Watson to read the Urban Dictionary and then

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I Watson got a little bit of a botty mouth.

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 2>It got it got kind of fresh.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>It did it did it started it started to say that. Uh.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh see what was it? Oh, I'm going to say

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>something and it's going to be bleeped out, right Tyler Tyler,

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyler just said so. Uh. Anyway, so there's one point

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>where a researcher asked a question of Watson, and Watson

0:31:56.000 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>included within the answer the word bo. So since that

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>was bleeped out, you probably don't know what it was,

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so go look it up. It was funny. It was

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>really funny.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And then and then they basically nuked that part

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>of Watson from orbit. They were like, you know what,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 2>never mind.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>It was the only way to be sure. They wiped

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>out the Urban Dictionary from Watson's memory. They also said

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that a very similar thing happened when they let Watson

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>read Wikipedia. Oh no no judgments here, just saying what

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>what IBM said. Anyway, Again, the computer was unable to

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>determine when, when there, when it was appropriate and what's

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate context for dropping a swear word. Yeah, it

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't know, so it just started to speak kind of

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like my wife does. So yeah, it was I'm going

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to pay for that later. So anyway, that that that's

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.479
<v Speaker 1>an interesting point though. Again you're you're showing how machine

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and human intelligence are different because the machine intelligence

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that context for sure.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>And of course, you know, we're talking about about science

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 2>fiction or science future, however you want to term it

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 2>so that, you know, we might very well come up

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 2>with fancy little program script that lets you that lets

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>you introduce that kind of bias. But you know, yeah,

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 2>but again from that documentary Star Trek, I mean, data

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>never figured out those contractions.

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that's true. Touring actually had a great mental exercise,

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>really and it's called the Touring test, and this applies

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to artificial intelligence. Touring's point, and we've talked about the

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Touring test in previous episodes of Tech Stuff, but just

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>as a refresher, Touring had suggested that you could create

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a test and that if a machine could pass that

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>test at the same level as a human, in other words,

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>if you were unable to determine that the person who

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>took that test was human or machine, the machine had

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>passed the Touring test and had essentially simulated human intelligence.

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And it usually works as an interview, so you have

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>someone who's who's conducting an interview, and you have either

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a machine answering or a human answering, and there's a

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>barrier up so that of course the person asking the

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>questions cannot see who is responding. And of course they're

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>responding through you know, text usually because if they're responding

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>through a voice and it's like I think the answer

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as far you know, you'd be like, well, either it's

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a robot or the most boring person in the world.

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>The idea being you would ask these questions over a

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>computer monitor, get text responses, and if you were unable

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to answer with a certain degree of accuracy whether or

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not it was a machine or a person, then you

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>would say the machine passed the Touring the test test.

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And you could argue, well, that could just mean that

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the machine's very good at mimicking human intelligence, it does

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not actually possess human intelligence. Turing's point is, does that matter?

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I know that I am intelligent. I speak with

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>someone like Lauren, who I assume is also intelligent based

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>upon the responses she gives, But she could just be

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>simulating intelligence. However, I have already bestowed in my mind

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the feature of intelligence upon Lauren because what she does

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 1>is very much akin to what I do. So Touring said,

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 1>if you extend the courtesy to your fellow human being

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that they are intelligent based on the fact that they

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>act like you do. Why would you not do the

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>same thing for a machine? Does it matter if the

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>machine can actually think, If the machine simulates thought well

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>enough for it to pass as human, then you're giving

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>it the same benefit of doubt that anyone else.

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 2>You mean, right, this is what a lot of science

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>fiction movies are about.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yeah, there's a lot of philosophy.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, a lot of philosophy, a lot of Isaac Asmo,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of Blade Runner and that's not an author.

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, well no, but you know Philip K. Dick, look

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>him up. So anyway, thank you do. Android's dream of

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Electric Sheep. I won't I won't spoil it for you.

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>They to kind of wrap this all up, getting back

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>into the discussion of philosophy. We had very recently, we

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>did a podcast about our we living in a computer simulation, right, right,

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of plays into this idea of the singularity,

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>because that argument stated that if the singularity is in

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>fact possible, if it's inevitable, if we are going to

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>reach this level of transhumanism where we are no longer

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>able to really predict what the present will be like,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>because it'll be beyond our understanding. Then one thing we

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>would expect to do is create simulations of our past

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of study ourselves, sure, right.

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 2>And to see what happens play around variables yams.

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we could, if we're that advanced, we could,

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in theory, create such a realistic simulation that the inhabitants

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>of that simulation would be incapable of knowing that they

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>were artificial and would be completely, you know, self aware

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of themselves. You know, that was totally redundant, self aware,

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but unable to know that they were a simulation. He

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>said that if those things are possible, then there's no

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>way of knowing that, you know, the the overwhelming possibility

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is that we are in a computer simulation.

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a computer simulation, yeah, right now.

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Because yeah, if that's if that's what's gonna happen, then

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no way of saying with certainty that we are

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not in fact the product of that. And so, uh,

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the point being not necessarily that we are in fact

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>living in a computer simulation, but that perhaps this singularity,

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this transhumanism thing might not be realistic, It might not

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>be the future that we're headed to. Maybe it ends

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>up being a pipe dream that's not really possible for

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>us to attain. Or maybe we'll wipe ourselves out through

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>some terrible war or catastrophic accident. Maybe we create a

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>biological entity that wipes us out allah the stand, or

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we create a black hole at the LHC. Which come on,

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>people don't write me. I already know about that and

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>how tiny and and alm non existent they are because

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it lasts so quickly, it totally happened. Let's say that

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>they do that thing where you look at that one

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>website where the black hole forms in the parking lot

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>outside the LHC and you just see the whole picture

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>go which funny video. Anyway, that argument plays back into this.

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. I don't know if we're going

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to ever see a future where the singularity becomes a thing.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh and we never really talked about it. But one

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of the big points that Kurtzwell really punches in his

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Singularity talks is the idea of digital immortality, right right.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 2>And he's been obsessed with this, and obsessed is probably

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 2>a judgmental word. I apologize that's but he's been very

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 2>focused on this concept. His father died when he was

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 2>about twenty four, and he's been exploring theories on life

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 2>extension ever since then, and supposedly takes all kinds of

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 2>supplements and sells them as well to extend life. Has

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of kinds of health plans.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, dietary that he has exercise all the idea that

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that if he can preserve his own life.

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Last long enough that we hit the singularity, then he

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 2>can become immortal.

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, and either that, you know, we attain immortality through

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one of a thousand different ways. For example, we end

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>up uploading our own intelligence into the cloud, right, and

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>then we become part of a group consciousness, so we

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are no longer really individuals. Or we merge with computers

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in some other way so that we are technically immortal

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that way. Or we just conquer the genes that all

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>guide the aging process and we stop it, and we

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>stop disease.

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, we take like in transmit, you just take

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>a cancer pill and then you don't get cancer because

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that's what you do.

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So again the singularity. That's kind of why I

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of critics also point to it as

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>being more of a religion because it's kind of this

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of utopian pipe dream in their minds.

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.879
<v Speaker 2>There's the former CEO of Lotus, Mitch Kapor Kapper, I'm

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 2>not sure how you say it, once called called it

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the intelligent design for the i Q one forty people.

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, ouch ouch. Well, meanwhile, Kurtzwild's kind of laughing all

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the way to the bank. I hear that a company

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>that rhymes with Shmugel hired him Little little people.

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're you probably wouldn't have heard of him, Yeah,

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, they just tired him on to be uh.

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I have it in my notes the official title. I

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 2>think it's the director of engineering. Yeah, a director of

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>engineering over there.

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they get they get some big names. I mean

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they had Vince Surf as the chief evangelist, and of

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>course he was one of the fathers of the Internet.

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>So Google's Google's got a They're known for getting some

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>really smart people. And to be fair, while the singularity

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>may or may not ever happen, I think it's important

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>that we have optimists in the field of technology who

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are really pushing for our development to try and make

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the world a better place for people.

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Now, you know, oh, absolutely so, even if we're even

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>if we never reached the point of digital immorte in

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 2>our lifetimes or any other it's I mean, if someone

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 2>wants to think so big that they want to put

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 2>in nanobots to make my body awesomer, I mean, and

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 2>not that that came out. That came out possibly crude.

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 2>It mostly means that I don't get cancer and die

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff. That's that's terrific. Can I can't argue

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 2>with any part of that.

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm going to be on video so much this

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 1>year that I definitely need my body to be awesomer,

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm all for that well either way.

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And and Google, you know, Google looks forward so

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 2>much to augmented reality. Augmented reality. I'm sorry, I can't

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 2>pronounce anything today. I am on a non roll. It's okay,

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 2>in the Internet of Things and all of that wonderful

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 2>future tech that it seems like a terrific fit.

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, so we'll see how it goes. I mean, obviously,

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the nice thing about this is that all we have

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to do is live long enough to see it happen

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>or not happen. And most predictions have the singularity hitting

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between twenty thirty and twenty fifty. Yeah, it all

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>depends upon which futurist you're asking. And also it's one

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of those kind of I think it's one of those

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>rolling goalposts as well. You know how certain technologies are

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>always twenty years away, or five years away or ten

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 1>years away. So we'll see. Maybe by twenty twenty we'll

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>be saying, all right, we've revised our figures.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 2>By twenty seventies, definitely, but who knows.

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. Guys, if you have any suggestions or future

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, well here's what you can do.

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>You can write us an email. And a lot of

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>people have been asking about our email address. I do

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>say that every episode, but in case you've missed it,

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>listen carefully. Our email address is tech Stuff at Discovery

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Send an email. I'll prove it by writing back,

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or drop us a line on Facebook or Twitter. Our

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>handle there at both of those is text Stuff hsw

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and Lauren and I will talk to you again in

0:42:55.000 --> 0:43:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the future. And that was the classic episode tech Stuff

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Enters the Singularity, way back from twenty thirteen, more than

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago. Holy cats, I have been doing this

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>show for so long because Lauren, of course, was my

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>second co host. I had already done a couple hundred

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>shows with a different co host. Wow really does hit

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>me right in the brain. So I hope you all

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed that. I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next.

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna hit the Singularity this year.

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should have put that as one of my predictions,

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but who knows. Maybe open Aiye is gonna create the

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 1>next generative chat bot and it'll program the sky Net

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>like system that will bring us onto the Singularity kicking

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:52.399
<v Speaker 1>and screaming, or if you're me, I'm probably already kicking

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and screaming just just because I'm grouchy. Anyway, I hope

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you're all well. I hope you had a happy and

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>safe New Year, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.