1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,360 Speaker 1: Welcome to today's edition of The Clay Travis and Buck 2 00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:04,720 Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. 3 00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:08,280 Speaker 2: Third hour Clay and Buck kicks off now, everybody, and 4 00:00:08,640 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 2: we were talking before about how can it be? And 5 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:15,600 Speaker 2: I'm telling you right now, I've been texting even during 6 00:00:15,640 --> 00:00:17,119 Speaker 2: the show to day play in our and some of 7 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,040 Speaker 2: our break friends of mine that be polling and and 8 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:23,040 Speaker 2: people that are very in tune with the political climate, 9 00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 2: and they're all saying, yeah, man, it's wild, but these 10 00:00:26,920 --> 00:00:29,600 Speaker 2: numbers are these numbers like, these are legit polls from 11 00:00:29,680 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 2: legit pollsters, and Trump. 12 00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:35,000 Speaker 3: Is way way out ahead of Biden. 13 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:39,800 Speaker 2: Never mind the Republican primary field, but against Biden, it 14 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 2: is right now looking like he would win every swing state. 15 00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:47,440 Speaker 2: So yeah, he's not gonna win California, but Trump would 16 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:50,160 Speaker 2: win if the election were tomorrow. And people keep saying, oh, 17 00:00:50,200 --> 00:00:52,479 Speaker 2: you're falling for it. I see this on Twitter. I 18 00:00:52,520 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 2: probably should have pattench this stuff with. 19 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:56,080 Speaker 3: Like, well, are you falling? I'm not falling for anything. 20 00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 2: This is just what the polls are saying right now, 21 00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:01,040 Speaker 2: which is interesting because it's it's the only thing we have, 22 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 2: the only metric we really have to gauge political sentiment 23 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,720 Speaker 2: in the country. And it is very surprising, and it's 24 00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 2: from it. There is no one who is saying, oh no, 25 00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:13,039 Speaker 2: look at these polls. These are telling you the real 26 00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 2: All the poles say the same thing. And when that's happening, 27 00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 2: and it's not in a margin of error situation, it's 28 00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:21,959 Speaker 2: not like Trump up to or Biden up one or up. 29 00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:23,760 Speaker 3: Ten in Michigan, this is crazy. Okay. 30 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:26,400 Speaker 2: So then we get Clay to what we talked to 31 00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:29,000 Speaker 2: Center Advance about a few moments ago or last hour, 32 00:01:29,959 --> 00:01:32,400 Speaker 2: which is they must think that the ace up the 33 00:01:32,440 --> 00:01:35,720 Speaker 2: sleeve here, you know, otherwise the Democrats would be an 34 00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:36,600 Speaker 2: absolute panic. 35 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 3: And I think you're right. 36 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 2: You know, when we've talked about how I was saying, oh, 37 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:43,759 Speaker 2: get ready, because they're going to do the whole insurrection 38 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 2: January sixth, Trump is hitler all this stuff. They're starting it, 39 00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:54,320 Speaker 2: and it certainly hasn't really felt like it's landing yet either. 40 00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 2: So I think that will increase the panic Democrats feel 41 00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 2: over all this stuff. But ultimately, it seems, and JD 42 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:04,280 Speaker 2: said this as well, they think the ace up the 43 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:07,080 Speaker 2: sleeve is the legal situation. Now, Clay, we know that 44 00:02:08,919 --> 00:02:15,919 Speaker 2: Jack Smith, the Special Council has taken a pretty interesting 45 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:19,680 Speaker 2: action here. This was just breaking today when it comes 46 00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:23,920 Speaker 2: to trying to make sure that he can get that. 47 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:29,160 Speaker 2: This is the chuck Kin Judge Chuckkin DC based January 48 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:31,440 Speaker 2: sixth case, right, This is the one that I thought 49 00:02:31,919 --> 00:02:35,720 Speaker 2: was the likeliest federal case to happen and the one 50 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:40,560 Speaker 2: where a DC jury will probably convict Trump. Right, So 51 00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:43,239 Speaker 2: this is where he faces jeopardy in that sense. Clay, 52 00:02:43,919 --> 00:02:45,840 Speaker 2: take us through souse. I know you've you've been looking 53 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:50,480 Speaker 2: at what's in this appeal that Smith has has put. 54 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:52,480 Speaker 2: What do we need to know and how is it 55 00:02:52,639 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 2: likely to affect the timeline of whether this because if 56 00:02:56,720 --> 00:02:59,720 Speaker 2: the trial doesn't happened before the election, and especially if 57 00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:00,919 Speaker 2: Trump wins, it's all over. 58 00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:03,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, so this is important. 59 00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:05,080 Speaker 1: So let let's just kind of take a step back 60 00:03:05,240 --> 00:03:08,880 Speaker 1: and let's think rationally about where we are, and I'm 61 00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:10,320 Speaker 1: going to try to walk through it slowly, and by 62 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:12,480 Speaker 1: the way, if you have questions about this, I'm working 63 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:17,240 Speaker 1: through it too. And maybe there are Supreme Court attorneys 64 00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:20,160 Speaker 1: out there listening, are former clerks that can even give 65 00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:22,919 Speaker 1: us a better sense of timing on things like this. 66 00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:26,160 Speaker 1: Eight hundred two eight two two eight A two And 67 00:03:26,200 --> 00:03:28,519 Speaker 1: you heard jd. Vance say, Look, I'm not an expert 68 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:32,280 Speaker 1: in all of the minutia of the arguments, but I 69 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:36,840 Speaker 1: believe Donald Trump has a very strong legal argument that 70 00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:40,480 Speaker 1: all of his activities that they are trying to prosecute 71 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:44,760 Speaker 1: him for now are within the bounds of his presidential powers. 72 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:45,240 Speaker 3: Acts. 73 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:50,560 Speaker 1: Now, this is related to everything January sixth connected, right. 74 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 1: I think the case in South Florida dealing with whether 75 00:03:54,880 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 1: he could have possession of the classified documents, that's another case. 76 00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:01,240 Speaker 3: So I'm putting that on off the table right now. 77 00:04:01,480 --> 00:04:04,760 Speaker 1: But if you look at Atlanta, and if you look 78 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:10,360 Speaker 1: at UH at at DC Jack Smith, and what's the 79 00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:14,840 Speaker 1: uh the Willis is that the prosecutor in Fanny willis 80 00:04:15,040 --> 00:04:17,400 Speaker 1: Fanny Willis. I think in Atlanta these would this would 81 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:19,760 Speaker 1: relate to these two. One is federal, one of state. 82 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 1: They're trying to rush through these cases because they want 83 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 1: to brand Trump as a felon, because they believe it 84 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:32,560 Speaker 1: will be politically valuable, and Trump and his attorneys are 85 00:04:32,839 --> 00:04:36,479 Speaker 1: They're making very concrete, i think, legitimate legal arguments that 86 00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:39,560 Speaker 1: these are within his presidential powers. But the timing here 87 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:43,320 Speaker 1: is is really important because what's happening is right now, 88 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:45,800 Speaker 1: this case. And again if I'm wrong, staff, listen to 89 00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: these facts. Right now, the case in d C is 90 00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:52,440 Speaker 1: scheduled for March fourth, that is basically two months after 91 00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:55,320 Speaker 1: the first of the year. Right, January first happens, Boom, 92 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:59,479 Speaker 1: We're almost straight into the Judge Chuckkin January sixth, Jack 93 00:04:59,480 --> 00:05:01,359 Speaker 1: Smith case, first one that's going to go to trial. 94 00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:05,280 Speaker 1: And Trump's team is saying, wait a minute, you don't 95 00:05:05,279 --> 00:05:08,440 Speaker 1: have the right to engage in these charges. I have 96 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 1: not engaged in criminal behavior. This is within the scope 97 00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 1: of my presidential powers. They're now arguing this in front 98 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 1: of the courts and Judge Chuckkin. The trial court has 99 00:05:19,080 --> 00:05:24,520 Speaker 1: rejected it. Trump has appealed her decision to the DC Circuit, 100 00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 1: which is the next court group up. What has happened 101 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:33,679 Speaker 1: today is Jack Smith has jumped over the DC Circuit 102 00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:37,040 Speaker 1: and going straight to the Supreme Court. 103 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:38,240 Speaker 3: And sidential power. Now. 104 00:05:39,440 --> 00:05:42,160 Speaker 1: The reason he's doing it, Buck is Jack Smith I 105 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:45,479 Speaker 1: think is getting nervous based on the timeline here because 106 00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 1: they need to start jury's selection basically right now in 107 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:52,160 Speaker 1: order to be able to get a verdict before the election. 108 00:05:52,640 --> 00:05:56,960 Speaker 2: And can I just add right now that as if 109 00:05:57,000 --> 00:06:00,719 Speaker 2: we needed any more proof of how political this is. 110 00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:05,520 Speaker 2: It should just be a process that they go through 111 00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:10,320 Speaker 2: without concern about a looming election. A looming election for 112 00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:12,440 Speaker 2: an indictment that has already been brought. 113 00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:16,320 Speaker 3: Should they waited until this time of the election to 114 00:06:16,360 --> 00:06:17,839 Speaker 3: bring this is what I mean. 115 00:06:18,120 --> 00:06:23,520 Speaker 2: The whole thing is manipulated against Trump in a political fashion. 116 00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:26,400 Speaker 2: This has nothing to do with the criminal justice system 117 00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 2: in the sense that this is normal or ordinary process. 118 00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:33,360 Speaker 2: They waited to launch this an election year, and now 119 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 2: they're trying to manipulate the process in the election year 120 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:40,760 Speaker 2: so they can get this done in the timeline they 121 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:43,839 Speaker 2: want to be as politically damaging to Trump as possible. 122 00:06:43,960 --> 00:06:46,119 Speaker 3: Trump is an American citizen. I know, he's a former 123 00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 3: president and likely future president now too. 124 00:06:48,480 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 2: He's an American citizen. He should have his full rights. 125 00:06:51,640 --> 00:06:54,600 Speaker 2: We are talking about a federal criminal trial that could 126 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 2: theoretically clay lock him up for decades. I mean, federal 127 00:06:58,160 --> 00:07:00,680 Speaker 2: charges all carry like a ten year you know sentence, 128 00:07:00,720 --> 00:07:03,760 Speaker 2: and there's mandatory minimums could come into play. And they're 129 00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:05,720 Speaker 2: playing games with this because they want to make sure 130 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:07,840 Speaker 2: they get it before he can become president. Like you 131 00:07:07,839 --> 00:07:09,800 Speaker 2: see what I mean? This is Yeah, this is the 132 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 2: system is rigged anow. They're even trying to rig it 133 00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:17,920 Speaker 2: more to destroy him. And again, I think that this 134 00:07:18,040 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 2: might be what's driving the Trump's numbers keep going up. 135 00:07:21,280 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 2: I think people are seeing this and they're like, it's 136 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:23,640 Speaker 2: too gross. 137 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:25,080 Speaker 3: It's too gross. 138 00:07:25,560 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 1: So here is where it gets really interesting. First of all, 139 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:32,160 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, I believe, can say no, let's wait 140 00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: and see what the DC Circuit Court, the DC Court 141 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:39,160 Speaker 1: of Appeal says, and then we'll review their case, because 142 00:07:39,160 --> 00:07:41,360 Speaker 1: that's normally the way it would go. Right Jack Smith 143 00:07:41,400 --> 00:07:44,480 Speaker 1: is trying to expedite this case. I don't know why 144 00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:48,440 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court buck couldn't also say, look, no, we're 145 00:07:48,440 --> 00:07:50,320 Speaker 1: not going to expedite the case. We're going to kick 146 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:53,440 Speaker 1: it back down to the Court of Appeals in the 147 00:07:53,520 --> 00:07:57,640 Speaker 1: DC Circuit. They'll review it, they'll issue their opinions. Then 148 00:07:57,760 --> 00:07:59,760 Speaker 1: that would be the appeal. Would the next go to 149 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:02,880 Speaker 1: this Supreme Court, which the Trump team has said, certainly, 150 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:05,200 Speaker 1: we're going to appeal this to the Supreme Court. I 151 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:08,040 Speaker 1: don't know why the Supreme Court can't, And I had 152 00:08:08,040 --> 00:08:12,000 Speaker 1: our staff look up the oral argument schedule. I don't 153 00:08:12,040 --> 00:08:15,960 Speaker 1: know why the Supreme Court couldn't set an oral argument 154 00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 1: for the very end of their oral argument term, which 155 00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:23,000 Speaker 1: is the end of April. Have that oral argument heard 156 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:25,520 Speaker 1: at the end of April, and then they don't have 157 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 1: to issue opinions until late June. I'm not sure exactly. 158 00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:33,320 Speaker 1: Maybe our team can look out when the last day 159 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:36,160 Speaker 1: that the Supreme Court can issue an opinion. You know 160 00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:38,520 Speaker 1: a lot of times they wait buck until the very 161 00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:41,319 Speaker 1: end of the term to release the most controversial opinions. 162 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:45,040 Speaker 1: But if the Supreme Court scheduled an oral argument for 163 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:49,040 Speaker 1: late April and then issued a ruling for mid to 164 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:51,960 Speaker 1: late June, which they usually do as they go off 165 00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:55,080 Speaker 1: on their summer recess, there's no way Donald Trump could 166 00:08:55,080 --> 00:08:57,080 Speaker 1: be tied but tried before the end of the year. 167 00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:00,079 Speaker 1: So to me, on some level, by trying to go 168 00:09:00,120 --> 00:09:04,520 Speaker 1: straight to the Supreme Court, Jack Smith is acknowledging that 169 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 1: he is in a difficult place from a timing perspective 170 00:09:09,520 --> 00:09:14,280 Speaker 1: to try to get this case all resolved before people 171 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:17,000 Speaker 1: start going out to vote. And I think the later 172 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:20,520 Speaker 1: you move into twenty four the more challenging. Like, remember, 173 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:22,760 Speaker 1: you're gonna have to spend months getting a jury. Are 174 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:25,360 Speaker 1: they really going to try to see a jury in July? 175 00:09:25,480 --> 00:09:28,400 Speaker 1: And August of twenty twenty four. If the Supreme Court 176 00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:31,439 Speaker 1: comes down with a decision, and then Trump's people can 177 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 1: just delay. They can delay. I question if the Supreme 178 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:39,240 Speaker 1: Court wanted to. I think the Supreme Court could ensure 179 00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:41,400 Speaker 1: that this case basically isn't now. They could also say 180 00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 1: this is an illegitimate case and toss it. But even 181 00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:49,360 Speaker 1: if they allowed the case to proceed, they could basically 182 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:52,280 Speaker 1: time bar it. When I'm looking at the calendar, and 183 00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:54,080 Speaker 1: if I'm wrong on this, somebody can call in and 184 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:56,640 Speaker 1: tell me what I'm missing. But it seems to me 185 00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 1: that would certainly be in play. And here are the 186 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:05,640 Speaker 1: political implications of this. If the DC case is either 187 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:09,240 Speaker 1: is time delayed, or for some reason, Supreme Court just 188 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:10,320 Speaker 1: says this is all garbage. 189 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 3: I don't think they're going to do that, by the way. 190 00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:13,760 Speaker 2: I just I don't think even with a six to 191 00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:16,400 Speaker 2: three conservative majority, they're gonna say, yeah, we're just gonna 192 00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:18,080 Speaker 2: smack this whole thing down. 193 00:10:18,080 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 3: Although maybe I don't know who knows but Clay. 194 00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:26,079 Speaker 2: If they can't get Trump on this one, the New 195 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:30,520 Speaker 2: York case, no one takes seriously. Even Democrats can't keep 196 00:10:30,559 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 2: a straight face with the thirty one counts of writing 197 00:10:34,640 --> 00:10:39,760 Speaker 2: the wrong thing down. Again, if you believe what Alvin 198 00:10:39,840 --> 00:10:43,520 Speaker 2: Bragg has brought against Trump in New York, you have 199 00:10:43,640 --> 00:10:48,959 Speaker 2: to believe that Trump could pay off a dozen mistresses 200 00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:52,959 Speaker 2: with campaign funds. You have to believe that it's a 201 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:56,120 Speaker 2: campaign expenditure. Right, this is the whole thing, and that 202 00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:58,960 Speaker 2: he didn't list it as a campaign expenditure and therefore 203 00:10:59,360 --> 00:11:02,240 Speaker 2: violated New York state law. And because it also ties 204 00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:05,839 Speaker 2: into federal law, like the the whole thing is completely bonkers, right, 205 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:08,840 Speaker 2: It does not does not hold up at all. Okay, 206 00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:13,680 Speaker 2: Florida Trial Island Judge Ileen Cannon, it's set to start May. 207 00:11:13,880 --> 00:11:16,079 Speaker 3: Is that right June? I think they haven't a fit. 208 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:17,840 Speaker 3: It's in the it's in may or June. 209 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:21,200 Speaker 1: But they basically have acknowledged that they're in the on 210 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:25,959 Speaker 1: deck circle waiting for whatever happens in DC and gonna happen. 211 00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:27,839 Speaker 3: You get one I don't think it's gonna happen. 212 00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:31,520 Speaker 2: You get one Trump voter, one Trump voter on that jury, 213 00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:33,679 Speaker 2: and you're gonna have you. Yeah, you may not get 214 00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:35,560 Speaker 2: an acquittal, you'll have hung jury. Though there's no way 215 00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:38,280 Speaker 2: you get one Trump voter on that jury. And they're 216 00:11:38,280 --> 00:11:40,160 Speaker 2: gonna say, we all know what this is. Sorry, not 217 00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:42,240 Speaker 2: gonna happen. Okay, So I don't think he's in real 218 00:11:42,280 --> 00:11:44,960 Speaker 2: jeopardy there, Atlanta. Thing is just that you know the 219 00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:48,240 Speaker 2: rico and that's that's a giant mess. That's probably not 220 00:11:48,280 --> 00:11:52,560 Speaker 2: gonna happen either. So really, I think you can make 221 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:56,520 Speaker 2: the case if Jack Smith is sort of defeated legally 222 00:11:56,600 --> 00:12:00,319 Speaker 2: here in the January sixth case in d C. The 223 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:03,600 Speaker 2: entire thing we've been talking about, which is what switches 224 00:12:03,640 --> 00:12:07,320 Speaker 2: this election around, is a federal felony conviction of Donald Trump. 225 00:12:08,120 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 2: Pretty unlikely that happens at all, which means now it's 226 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:13,280 Speaker 2: just open field Trump vi. 227 00:12:13,400 --> 00:12:13,760 Speaker 4: Biden. 228 00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:17,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I want to ask you this question, because 229 00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:19,520 Speaker 1: I'm going to think about it during the commercial break too. 230 00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:24,040 Speaker 1: What are the political ramifications for the Supreme Court? Because 231 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:27,000 Speaker 1: I understand, I'm a lawyer. I understand that the Court's 232 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:28,560 Speaker 1: going to say, we care about the law, we care 233 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:31,600 Speaker 1: about the law. But the one thing that John Roberts, 234 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:33,600 Speaker 1: who is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, has 235 00:12:33,640 --> 00:12:37,400 Speaker 1: shown is he is super sensitive to what public perception 236 00:12:37,480 --> 00:12:41,040 Speaker 1: of the Court is. So Jack Smith is forcing them 237 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:45,839 Speaker 1: potentially to weigh in on an incredibly political issue In 238 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:49,200 Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, I told you what I think they 239 00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:51,640 Speaker 1: should do. I think they should just kick the can 240 00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:55,080 Speaker 1: down the road and keep this case from happening by 241 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:58,520 Speaker 1: continuing to like allow this to play out, and then 242 00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:01,400 Speaker 1: after the election they could weigh in and it's not 243 00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:05,640 Speaker 1: as political to examine. But I want I want to 244 00:13:05,679 --> 00:13:07,520 Speaker 1: discuss that with you Buck when we come back, because 245 00:13:07,520 --> 00:13:10,120 Speaker 1: I'm working through it in my head. How would that 246 00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:14,560 Speaker 1: play from a legal perspective somewhat but more so politically 247 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:18,319 Speaker 1: because Trump has appointed three of the judges. So if 248 00:13:18,320 --> 00:13:20,720 Speaker 1: you get if you get three of those judges that 249 00:13:20,760 --> 00:13:24,200 Speaker 1: he appointed who said, oh, Trump is not h even 250 00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:26,840 Speaker 1: if they're accurate, I think on the law, Trump is 251 00:13:26,880 --> 00:13:29,320 Speaker 1: not able to stand. And it's a five to four 252 00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:32,000 Speaker 1: decision or a six to three decision, and it's entirely 253 00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:36,000 Speaker 1: Republican appointed appointees on one side, Democrat appointees on the 254 00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:36,720 Speaker 1: other side. 255 00:13:36,880 --> 00:13:40,680 Speaker 3: What does that do to court legitimacy? Something to think about. 256 00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:44,120 Speaker 2: Eight hundred two A two two eight A two. We've 257 00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:47,120 Speaker 2: got any lawyers out there, any judges out there? Are 258 00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:49,080 Speaker 2: we seeing this one right? Are we missing something? Or 259 00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:51,160 Speaker 2: you want to just call in and say, claim, buck. 260 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:53,520 Speaker 3: You guys are geniuses. You've nailed it. We always like 261 00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:55,440 Speaker 3: those calls. That's fine, so give us a ring. 262 00:13:56,080 --> 00:13:58,480 Speaker 2: You know, you've worked hard to build your retirement savings, 263 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:01,600 Speaker 2: so you deserve an investment that delivers consistent returns without 264 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:03,880 Speaker 2: compromising your financial security. Look, I'll tell you I was 265 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:07,160 Speaker 2: just checking on the dashboard, my own dashboard as a 266 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 2: Phoenix Capital Group investor, because I am one, because I 267 00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:12,800 Speaker 2: believe in what they're doing. So they make it very easy. 268 00:14:12,840 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 2: The interface, it's very transparent. You log in, you see 269 00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:18,800 Speaker 2: how your investment with them is doing, and you can 270 00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:21,040 Speaker 2: do this through your four oh one K and I 271 00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:25,440 Speaker 2: for corporate bonds to start earning tax deferred annual returns 272 00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:29,080 Speaker 2: that range from nine to thirteen percent. Phoenix Capitol Group 273 00:14:29,120 --> 00:14:32,240 Speaker 2: is providing investors a new high yield option investing in 274 00:14:32,320 --> 00:14:35,440 Speaker 2: domestic energy assets. Look, they can tell you a lot 275 00:14:35,480 --> 00:14:38,200 Speaker 2: more about this and in more detail, but I can 276 00:14:38,240 --> 00:14:39,760 Speaker 2: just tell you that I'm a believer in the Phoenix 277 00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:41,840 Speaker 2: Capitol Group, which is why I'm an investor, and I 278 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:44,520 Speaker 2: gave them what for me was a substantial investment. So 279 00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:48,480 Speaker 2: go check it out. Go to PHX on air dot Com. 280 00:14:48,760 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 2: That's PHX on air dot Com. Learn how you can 281 00:14:51,960 --> 00:14:56,320 Speaker 2: diversify your investments and aren nine to thirteen percent annual interest. 282 00:14:56,600 --> 00:14:59,520 Speaker 2: Before making investment decisions, you should carefully consider and review 283 00:14:59,600 --> 00:15:05,480 Speaker 2: all involved. That's PHX on air dot Com today speaking 284 00:15:05,560 --> 00:15:09,880 Speaker 2: truth and having fun. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton. 285 00:15:09,800 --> 00:15:13,840 Speaker 1: Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show. We're going 286 00:15:13,920 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 1: to take a call here in a moment, but I 287 00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:18,960 Speaker 1: think again, seeking an expedited ruling from the Supreme Court 288 00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:22,480 Speaker 1: to me feels desperate by Jack Smith because it suggests 289 00:15:22,520 --> 00:15:25,600 Speaker 1: that he's aware that it's going to be very difficult 290 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:29,640 Speaker 1: to get this trial resolved before voters go to the 291 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 1: polls in the twenty twenty four election. And I'm curious 292 00:15:33,520 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 1: about the timing in many ways, and I've asked for 293 00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 1: people out there that are more of an expert on 294 00:15:37,840 --> 00:15:41,880 Speaker 1: Supreme Court jurisprudence and trials scheduling as it relates to 295 00:15:41,920 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 1: that to weigh in. Brian in South Florida, what's your take? 296 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:48,080 Speaker 1: Do you agree with me that this is Jack Smith 297 00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:50,120 Speaker 1: being afraid that he's not going to get the trial 298 00:15:50,200 --> 00:15:52,720 Speaker 1: dates start on March fourth, and he's trying to move 299 00:15:52,800 --> 00:15:56,880 Speaker 1: things as expeditiously as he can by advancing the appellate 300 00:15:56,960 --> 00:16:01,200 Speaker 1: process faster than normal. All right, So I don't know 301 00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 1: where Brian and South Florida just went, But what he 302 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:07,040 Speaker 1: was going to say is that he's had some experience 303 00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:10,600 Speaker 1: in Supreme Court jurisprudence and that he thinks there are 304 00:16:10,640 --> 00:16:16,040 Speaker 1: potentially issues that are arising associated with how that might go. 305 00:16:16,280 --> 00:16:19,960 Speaker 2: So allegedly back now we can get at Ryan's Hey. 306 00:16:20,120 --> 00:16:24,520 Speaker 5: Okay, so this is basically a checkmate moved by the 307 00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:28,120 Speaker 5: Trump legal team to punt this beyond election date. The 308 00:16:28,160 --> 00:16:31,000 Speaker 5: Georgia case is probably not going to go before election day. 309 00:16:31,280 --> 00:16:33,520 Speaker 5: The for Pierce case I think will get punted due 310 00:16:33,520 --> 00:16:37,400 Speaker 5: to discovery issues for the government not disclosing records, and 311 00:16:37,400 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 5: there's classification issues as well for review of those records. 312 00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:43,720 Speaker 5: So here you have a situation where they're trying to 313 00:16:43,760 --> 00:16:46,440 Speaker 5: in the DC case, where they're trying to skip over 314 00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:49,240 Speaker 5: the DC Court of Appeals to go right to the 315 00:16:49,280 --> 00:16:52,520 Speaker 5: Supreme Court when Trump is president. During his administration, there 316 00:16:52,560 --> 00:16:54,600 Speaker 5: was one case I forgot exactly what case it was, 317 00:16:55,040 --> 00:16:57,640 Speaker 5: where they tried to skip over the Circuit Court of 318 00:16:57,680 --> 00:17:00,640 Speaker 5: Appeal and go right to the Supreme Court. The Supreme 319 00:17:00,640 --> 00:17:02,800 Speaker 5: Court responded and stated, no, you have to go through 320 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:07,560 Speaker 5: normal course. So if that was an existential threat to democracy, 321 00:17:08,000 --> 00:17:10,760 Speaker 5: well this would be as well. What they're trying to 322 00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:13,760 Speaker 5: do for anyone with common sense is they're trying to 323 00:17:13,760 --> 00:17:16,720 Speaker 5: put someone to scale. Is a let're nervous. It's poll 324 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:19,480 Speaker 5: after poll after poll where he's up. They got a 325 00:17:19,480 --> 00:17:21,320 Speaker 5: poll today in Michigan up by ten points. 326 00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:21,600 Speaker 3: Yep. 327 00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:25,560 Speaker 5: Whether it's an outlier or not, the consistency with the 328 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:28,720 Speaker 5: polls is that he's up by two, three fours, six 329 00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:33,200 Speaker 5: points national polls, state poles, wain state polls. It's the 330 00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:34,320 Speaker 5: desperation move. 331 00:17:34,960 --> 00:17:36,840 Speaker 3: Yep. No, I agree with you. 332 00:17:37,040 --> 00:17:38,920 Speaker 1: I think it's a desperation move to try to get 333 00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:41,639 Speaker 1: this advance so they can guarantee that they're in spot. 334 00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:43,720 Speaker 1: You know what, a lot of you might be feeling 335 00:17:43,720 --> 00:17:46,240 Speaker 1: a little bit desperate out there because of how things 336 00:17:46,280 --> 00:17:50,920 Speaker 1: are going. When you analyze your financial situation, how many 337 00:17:50,960 --> 00:17:54,040 Speaker 1: people out there want to save money on gas, on groceries, 338 00:17:54,080 --> 00:17:55,760 Speaker 1: on a lot of the fast food meals, on some 339 00:17:55,800 --> 00:17:58,080 Speaker 1: of the restaurants that you run to. Upside can hook 340 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:00,199 Speaker 1: you up. It's a free app in the apps, or 341 00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:02,199 Speaker 1: you can go download it today. We've done it in 342 00:18:02,200 --> 00:18:04,720 Speaker 1: the Travis Household's already saving us money. All you have 343 00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:07,080 Speaker 1: to do get your phones, type in upside Boom you 344 00:18:07,080 --> 00:18:07,920 Speaker 1: can sign up Buck. 345 00:18:07,960 --> 00:18:10,439 Speaker 3: You've already got going to Kerry used it on the 346 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:11,920 Speaker 3: weekend she did her costco run. 347 00:18:12,040 --> 00:18:13,879 Speaker 2: She had to get some gas and guess what at 348 00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:18,040 Speaker 2: the Upside aff she was saving on every gallon and man, 349 00:18:18,119 --> 00:18:20,600 Speaker 2: she loves a deal. So a deal on gas, deal 350 00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:23,080 Speaker 2: on groceries. Upside app play we love it over here. 351 00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:26,160 Speaker 1: Get hooked up with it today Upside use the code 352 00:18:26,280 --> 00:18:29,119 Speaker 1: Clay and Buck. That's Clay and Buck all one word. 353 00:18:29,200 --> 00:18:31,679 Speaker 1: You get twenty five cents off every gallon of gas. 354 00:18:31,760 --> 00:18:32,479 Speaker 3: Do it today. 355 00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:37,159 Speaker 4: Donald Trump leading with an outright majority in Iowa fifty 356 00:18:37,200 --> 00:18:40,760 Speaker 4: one percent. Ron DeSantis a very distant second at nineteen, 357 00:18:40,840 --> 00:18:43,520 Speaker 4: Nikki Haley sixteen, Ramaswami. 358 00:18:42,800 --> 00:18:43,960 Speaker 3: And Christy at four. 359 00:18:44,400 --> 00:18:48,480 Speaker 4: We last pulled Iowa in October. Since then, look at 360 00:18:48,520 --> 00:18:52,439 Speaker 4: this Donald Trump's lead. He has added eight points to 361 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:57,240 Speaker 4: his total to Santus up a couple Hayley flat. Donald 362 00:18:57,240 --> 00:18:59,919 Speaker 4: Trump over the last month, last six weeks in Iowa 363 00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:04,440 Speaker 4: has actually improved his position. And the last time we 364 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:08,000 Speaker 4: were this close to the Caucasus that a Republican candidate 365 00:19:08,080 --> 00:19:10,720 Speaker 4: had a lead anywhere near this size. You gotta go 366 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:12,280 Speaker 4: all the way back to George W. 367 00:19:12,400 --> 00:19:15,520 Speaker 3: Bush. The year was two thousand. Bush won the caucuses. 368 00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:17,280 Speaker 3: Bush won the nomination. 369 00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:22,399 Speaker 2: Biggest lead for a Republican at this stage before the 370 00:19:22,440 --> 00:19:28,200 Speaker 2: Iowa caucuses in almost twenty four years. So you got 371 00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:31,959 Speaker 2: to go back quite a ways here in order to 372 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:33,280 Speaker 2: get to a similar position. 373 00:19:33,560 --> 00:19:35,440 Speaker 3: And that's interesting. 374 00:19:35,720 --> 00:19:37,280 Speaker 2: There are a lot of people that are looking at 375 00:19:37,280 --> 00:19:39,800 Speaker 2: this and trying to make sense of it. And all 376 00:19:39,840 --> 00:19:42,800 Speaker 2: the caveats, supply were a year out from the general 377 00:19:42,840 --> 00:19:46,200 Speaker 2: election snapshot. In time, a lot of things can change, 378 00:19:46,200 --> 00:19:47,840 Speaker 2: a lot of things gonna happen. Okay, fine, I want 379 00:19:47,840 --> 00:19:49,600 Speaker 2: to hear from a lot of you on this one. 380 00:19:51,040 --> 00:19:55,359 Speaker 2: Let's take Dave in Salt Lake City. We I believe 381 00:19:55,400 --> 00:19:57,160 Speaker 2: the show is number one. We love you, Salt Lake. 382 00:19:57,160 --> 00:19:57,840 Speaker 2: What's up, Dave? 383 00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:00,680 Speaker 6: Hey, not much and the show isn't umber one out here? 384 00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:03,000 Speaker 6: Thank you guys, what you do, Thank you for listening. 385 00:20:03,640 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 6: I want to start by saying patriot props to you guys. 386 00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:08,040 Speaker 6: You guys are my top patriots. So they go to 387 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:11,360 Speaker 6: my information and you know, I just read an article 388 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:13,199 Speaker 6: the other day that Salt Lake or Utah was one 389 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:14,920 Speaker 6: of the states that was slow to warm up to Trump. 390 00:20:15,000 --> 00:20:19,040 Speaker 6: I think back in twenty sixteen and I was one 391 00:20:19,040 --> 00:20:20,760 Speaker 6: of the people that was slow to warm up to him. 392 00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:24,879 Speaker 6: But based on everything that's happened now, I've warmed up 393 00:20:24,920 --> 00:20:26,359 Speaker 6: to him. And if they convict him, if he's a 394 00:20:26,400 --> 00:20:29,159 Speaker 6: felon by the time the election is held, that sales 395 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:31,080 Speaker 6: my vote for me right there. Because I know that 396 00:20:31,119 --> 00:20:32,040 Speaker 6: he's been railroaded. 397 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:34,720 Speaker 1: You're more likely to vote for him if he gets 398 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:37,040 Speaker 1: convicted then you would be if he were not convicted. 399 00:20:37,040 --> 00:20:39,679 Speaker 2: But Dave, to be fair, it sounds a little bit 400 00:20:39,760 --> 00:20:42,040 Speaker 2: like you're already at the at ten on the dial 401 00:20:42,080 --> 00:20:44,160 Speaker 2: and you would just make the dial go to eleven. 402 00:20:44,359 --> 00:20:45,399 Speaker 3: Is that is that fair? 403 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:47,280 Speaker 5: Yeah? 404 00:20:47,600 --> 00:20:49,680 Speaker 6: I think at this point, yeah, I think that's probably 405 00:20:49,680 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 6: a fair assessment. I would vote for him now, But 406 00:20:51,640 --> 00:20:53,760 Speaker 6: I definitely my vote will be stealed there. It won't 407 00:20:53,800 --> 00:20:56,359 Speaker 6: be anything, and it will change's if he's convicted fellon 408 00:20:56,520 --> 00:20:59,280 Speaker 6: come election day, He's got my vote, no matter what. 409 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,160 Speaker 6: I thank you days any of the US they're railroading 410 00:21:02,160 --> 00:21:02,680 Speaker 6: and for so. 411 00:21:02,800 --> 00:21:04,720 Speaker 2: Clay, do you think when I make the this is 412 00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:08,159 Speaker 2: spinal tap reference about the amplifier going to eleven? Do 413 00:21:08,240 --> 00:21:11,320 Speaker 2: people is that too too vague now or do people 414 00:21:11,400 --> 00:21:13,440 Speaker 2: catch the this is spinal tap? 415 00:21:13,600 --> 00:21:16,000 Speaker 1: I think that's such a cliche now. I don't even 416 00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:19,159 Speaker 1: know that it would be associated with spinal taps. 417 00:21:19,119 --> 00:21:21,200 Speaker 2: So people just know about take the dollar to eleven, 418 00:21:21,320 --> 00:21:24,240 Speaker 2: gon't realize it comes from that memorable see in the movie. 419 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:26,160 Speaker 3: That's a that's a fair point. All right, Fair enough 420 00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:27,760 Speaker 3: Joe in South Carolina. 421 00:21:27,840 --> 00:21:31,640 Speaker 7: What you got for us, gentlemen, Thank you so much 422 00:21:31,680 --> 00:21:34,040 Speaker 7: for taking my call. One of the things that I'd 423 00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:37,600 Speaker 7: like to remind our listeners or your listeners too, is 424 00:21:37,600 --> 00:21:41,320 Speaker 7: that RUSHLINBA taught us a long time ago that in 425 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:45,440 Speaker 7: this stage of the election cycle, polls are not meant 426 00:21:45,440 --> 00:21:49,160 Speaker 7: to show public opinion. It's meant to influence public opinion. 427 00:21:49,359 --> 00:21:53,120 Speaker 7: Every election cycle, we always see the polls represent them 428 00:21:53,119 --> 00:21:55,360 Speaker 7: trying to push the electorate in the direction that they 429 00:21:55,400 --> 00:21:57,439 Speaker 7: want to go, and then as we get close to 430 00:21:57,480 --> 00:22:00,919 Speaker 7: the actual election, they tighten up to show more realistic numbers. 431 00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:03,600 Speaker 2: So wait, Joe, Joe, can we can we roll with 432 00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:07,080 Speaker 2: this theory here for a second, So then you believe 433 00:22:07,160 --> 00:22:10,119 Speaker 2: that they're setting a trap by making it seem like 434 00:22:10,200 --> 00:22:14,399 Speaker 2: Trump is both inevitable and unbeatable, because otherwise, what are 435 00:22:14,400 --> 00:22:16,239 Speaker 2: they what are they trying to shape the electra with? 436 00:22:17,600 --> 00:22:20,240 Speaker 7: Well, what they're doing is normally what they do is 437 00:22:20,240 --> 00:22:22,640 Speaker 7: they hide those numbers. They try to show that those 438 00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:24,880 Speaker 7: numbers are less than what they are. In this case, 439 00:22:24,920 --> 00:22:27,080 Speaker 7: I do believe Trump is up that many points, maybe 440 00:22:27,119 --> 00:22:30,720 Speaker 7: even more, but Joe Biden needs to go according to 441 00:22:31,040 --> 00:22:31,920 Speaker 7: the Democrats. 442 00:22:31,960 --> 00:22:34,040 Speaker 1: Okay, but so let me I'm sure I'm just trying 443 00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:35,400 Speaker 1: to follow your logic here. 444 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:36,360 Speaker 3: All right, So you. 445 00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:38,360 Speaker 7: Believe that Trump is mine, it's Russia's. 446 00:22:39,280 --> 00:22:42,000 Speaker 2: Well, well, Russia is in assessment, due respect, you're calling 447 00:22:42,040 --> 00:22:44,800 Speaker 2: in reacting to the polls that are going on right now. 448 00:22:44,840 --> 00:22:46,840 Speaker 3: So I'm asking you what is your theory? 449 00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 7: Well, my theory is is that they want to replace 450 00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:53,240 Speaker 7: Joe Biden and put somebody in that's more electable. Uh 451 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:56,000 Speaker 7: and uh, or to try to possibly well listen too, 452 00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:57,880 Speaker 7: thinking that you know that the gap is a lot 453 00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:00,440 Speaker 7: wider than what it is, so that we do run 454 00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:02,760 Speaker 7: Trump so that they can easily defeat him in the Okay, 455 00:23:02,760 --> 00:23:04,000 Speaker 7: so you believe. 456 00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:06,600 Speaker 3: He believes the Trump trap theory. Just to be clear, Yeah, 457 00:23:06,880 --> 00:23:09,000 Speaker 3: So absolutely, Okay, So. 458 00:23:11,320 --> 00:23:16,240 Speaker 1: I guess the next question is if why the only So, 459 00:23:16,320 --> 00:23:17,000 Speaker 1: First of all. 460 00:23:16,920 --> 00:23:18,440 Speaker 3: I don't believe it. Okay. 461 00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:22,680 Speaker 1: My position is if there are one hundred poles out there, 462 00:23:23,160 --> 00:23:25,719 Speaker 1: and that's an exaggeration, Let's say there's fifteen polls right 463 00:23:25,760 --> 00:23:29,560 Speaker 1: now and they're all saying basically the same thing, and 464 00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 1: Trump has uniformly right. Anybody out there listening to me, 465 00:23:34,680 --> 00:23:40,000 Speaker 1: the polls have consistently undervalued Trump since he entered into 466 00:23:40,040 --> 00:23:43,360 Speaker 1: the political arenas, since he came down that staircase at 467 00:23:43,359 --> 00:23:48,120 Speaker 1: Trump Tower twenty fifteen, all the way through twenty twenty, 468 00:23:48,520 --> 00:23:54,560 Speaker 1: every pole undervalued Trump, undersold him. It doesn't make sense 469 00:23:54,600 --> 00:24:00,879 Speaker 1: to me that now everybody would be overvaluing Trump, right, Like, what. 470 00:24:00,760 --> 00:24:03,080 Speaker 3: Would the logic be behind that? Are you supporting Trump 471 00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:03,720 Speaker 3: in the primary? 472 00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:07,159 Speaker 7: Oh? Absolutely, I am. I supported Trump in the U 473 00:24:07,760 --> 00:24:09,920 Speaker 7: in both previous elections as well. I was a little 474 00:24:09,920 --> 00:24:13,000 Speaker 7: bit slow to come on board back in sixteen, but 475 00:24:13,560 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 7: definitely got on board shortly after he walked came down 476 00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:17,040 Speaker 7: that escalator. 477 00:24:17,119 --> 00:24:19,320 Speaker 1: Okay, so you're so, but so, like, what would the 478 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:21,879 Speaker 1: I don't understand the rationale. I agree with you that 479 00:24:21,920 --> 00:24:24,320 Speaker 1: Biden is a bad candidate, but I think he's a 480 00:24:24,359 --> 00:24:29,320 Speaker 1: bad candidate because the polls are accurately reflecting the fact 481 00:24:29,320 --> 00:24:32,720 Speaker 1: that seventy five percent of Americans think that Biden is 482 00:24:32,800 --> 00:24:35,840 Speaker 1: too old and too mentally incompetent to be president. By 483 00:24:35,880 --> 00:24:38,720 Speaker 1: the way, Republicans, Democrats, and Independence, it's like the only 484 00:24:38,760 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 1: thing in America they basically agree on now is Biden's 485 00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:44,560 Speaker 1: too old. So I guess what I'm saying is in 486 00:24:44,680 --> 00:24:49,120 Speaker 1: order for a grand conspiracy to exist, someone. 487 00:24:48,880 --> 00:24:52,359 Speaker 7: Trying to Benefiden, okay, but trying to replace Biden. 488 00:24:52,840 --> 00:24:54,000 Speaker 3: So they're exaggerate. 489 00:24:54,080 --> 00:24:56,840 Speaker 1: So you think that, Okay, So take a step back, 490 00:24:57,040 --> 00:25:00,280 Speaker 1: you think that Biden is actually way more popular, because 491 00:25:00,320 --> 00:25:02,600 Speaker 1: that's the only way your logic applies. 492 00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:06,440 Speaker 7: Right, No, no, no, they wouldn't be releasing these numbers 493 00:25:06,480 --> 00:25:09,640 Speaker 7: accurately if they didn't want to replace Joe Biden they would. 494 00:25:09,720 --> 00:25:12,919 Speaker 1: Okay, but do you understand my logic. What you're saying 495 00:25:13,119 --> 00:25:16,840 Speaker 1: only makes sense if Joe Biden is actually way more 496 00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 1: popular than the polls are reflecting, and they are then 497 00:25:21,160 --> 00:25:24,000 Speaker 1: driving him down to try to put pressure on him 498 00:25:24,000 --> 00:25:26,960 Speaker 1: to drop out. If the polls are accurate, they don't 499 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:29,800 Speaker 1: need to adjust them. The only reason they would need 500 00:25:29,840 --> 00:25:32,960 Speaker 1: to adjust them is if Biden is actually five points 501 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:35,960 Speaker 1: higher nationwide than he than the polls are saying, right, 502 00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:39,440 Speaker 1: the logic of what you're arguing only thanks for the call. 503 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:43,560 Speaker 3: Do you understand that I appreciation would why? Yeah, But look, 504 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:45,679 Speaker 3: I appreciate Joe calling in, appreciate him listening to us. 505 00:25:45,720 --> 00:25:49,879 Speaker 2: I just say, it is possible that Joe Biden is 506 00:25:49,880 --> 00:25:51,720 Speaker 2: weak right now for all the reasons that we know, 507 00:25:51,800 --> 00:25:54,480 Speaker 2: and the polls are accurately reflecting this, and that is 508 00:25:54,520 --> 00:25:56,879 Speaker 2: a part of the discussion about why he should be 509 00:25:56,960 --> 00:26:00,280 Speaker 2: replaced among Democrats. But the notion that this is being 510 00:26:00,880 --> 00:26:05,199 Speaker 2: this is your point, manipulated to change numbers, to shape 511 00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:08,520 Speaker 2: perception in a way that makes Biden look even worse. 512 00:26:09,640 --> 00:26:12,680 Speaker 2: Where's the evidence? Where's the evidence for that? You would 513 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:14,440 Speaker 2: have to believe? And I think this is what you're 514 00:26:14,440 --> 00:26:17,480 Speaker 2: getting at, that in reality Biden's actually up three or 515 00:26:17,480 --> 00:26:20,720 Speaker 2: four points or whatever on Trump naturally, that in reality 516 00:26:20,760 --> 00:26:23,280 Speaker 2: Biden's actually beating him in these swing states. 517 00:26:23,640 --> 00:26:26,800 Speaker 1: And the Trump argument, the anti Trump argument that I 518 00:26:26,840 --> 00:26:29,280 Speaker 1: will hear in that social media seems fired up about, 519 00:26:29,359 --> 00:26:33,360 Speaker 1: is oh, they're rigging things for Trump because they want 520 00:26:33,440 --> 00:26:34,760 Speaker 1: him to be the nominee. 521 00:26:34,880 --> 00:26:36,400 Speaker 3: And then as soon as he's the nominee. 522 00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:38,320 Speaker 1: Oh, they're pulling the rug out from underneath him, and 523 00:26:38,359 --> 00:26:40,080 Speaker 1: it actually turns out everybody hates Trump. 524 00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:42,280 Speaker 2: I think we could we can just on the shorthands 525 00:26:42,400 --> 00:26:44,400 Speaker 2: from the same page. That's the Trump trap, right, it's 526 00:26:44,400 --> 00:26:46,200 Speaker 2: a track. Yes, for those of you remember that meme, 527 00:26:46,440 --> 00:26:47,720 Speaker 2: it's a trap. That's the whole thing. 528 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:49,880 Speaker 3: You don't buy the Trump trap theory at all? Right? 529 00:26:51,880 --> 00:26:55,639 Speaker 2: Oh man, No, I don't not buy the Trump Well. 530 00:26:55,640 --> 00:26:57,280 Speaker 2: First of all, I think that the polls. I don't 531 00:26:57,280 --> 00:26:59,320 Speaker 2: believe that there's some hidden hand manipulating the poles. 532 00:26:59,359 --> 00:27:01,600 Speaker 3: I agree with that. Not a polling expert, but I'm 533 00:27:01,680 --> 00:27:04,640 Speaker 3: just I don't see that. I think you can. 534 00:27:04,880 --> 00:27:07,639 Speaker 2: I think you can also manipulate polls based on the 535 00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:09,760 Speaker 2: sample size and how you ask the question, everything else. 536 00:27:10,080 --> 00:27:14,080 Speaker 2: But to get so many polls so clearly saying the 537 00:27:14,119 --> 00:27:16,959 Speaker 2: same thing. You can manipulate a pole a few points, 538 00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:19,520 Speaker 2: just like you can manipulate elections a few points. But 539 00:27:20,080 --> 00:27:22,760 Speaker 2: when you're talking about being up ten points in Michigan, 540 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:25,920 Speaker 2: and this is in line with big wins and other 541 00:27:26,000 --> 00:27:29,000 Speaker 2: swing states, Trump up six you know here and seven there, 542 00:27:30,200 --> 00:27:33,119 Speaker 2: something else is going on. It's too broad of a 543 00:27:33,200 --> 00:27:36,880 Speaker 2: sentiment for it to all just be a manipulation. Now, 544 00:27:36,880 --> 00:27:39,800 Speaker 2: on the point about the Trump trap, I think that 545 00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:41,760 Speaker 2: Democrats want to run against Trump. 546 00:27:41,760 --> 00:27:42,600 Speaker 3: I do believe that. 547 00:27:42,840 --> 00:27:47,080 Speaker 2: I think they view it now, this is their perception, okay. 548 00:27:47,240 --> 00:27:51,480 Speaker 2: I think they view Trump as the most beatable by Biden. 549 00:27:52,080 --> 00:27:55,640 Speaker 2: I think they could be wrong, and right now there 550 00:27:55,680 --> 00:27:58,600 Speaker 2: may be a whole oh my gosh moment they're probably 551 00:27:58,680 --> 00:28:01,800 Speaker 2: not saying gosh, you know or holy you know what 552 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:07,080 Speaker 2: moment where they're saying, we might have miscalculated in the 553 00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:11,960 Speaker 2: Trump trap in the first place. That's because because remember 554 00:28:12,000 --> 00:28:15,719 Speaker 2: the bringing the indictments, it was understandable there was going 555 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:19,120 Speaker 2: to be some consolidation of the base. If we step back, 556 00:28:19,240 --> 00:28:22,960 Speaker 2: base consolidation makes sense. But we're seeing more than base consolidation. 557 00:28:23,520 --> 00:28:27,080 Speaker 1: I think what they have not taken into account is 558 00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:29,320 Speaker 1: and by the way, I think you should be skeptical 559 00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:31,600 Speaker 1: of everyone in a position of power, right so, I 560 00:28:31,640 --> 00:28:33,600 Speaker 1: don't think being skeptical is wrong. 561 00:28:34,040 --> 00:28:35,840 Speaker 3: I think what you have to be careful of is 562 00:28:36,440 --> 00:28:37,600 Speaker 3: just because one. 563 00:28:37,440 --> 00:28:41,240 Speaker 1: Thing is true, like it was true for everybody out 564 00:28:41,280 --> 00:28:47,120 Speaker 1: there listening that they exaggerated the threats of COVID, and 565 00:28:47,360 --> 00:28:49,920 Speaker 1: they also exaggerated the efficacy of the. 566 00:28:49,880 --> 00:28:51,160 Speaker 3: COVID shot, right. 567 00:28:51,800 --> 00:28:54,600 Speaker 1: I think you have to be careful believing that there 568 00:28:54,680 --> 00:28:58,400 Speaker 1: is a grand puppet master who is able to enact 569 00:28:58,680 --> 00:29:04,920 Speaker 1: fifteen simultaneous conspiracies. Because if polsters, and remember some of 570 00:29:04,920 --> 00:29:10,120 Speaker 1: the pollsters, for instance, are actually Republicans, right, their entire 571 00:29:10,240 --> 00:29:15,560 Speaker 1: basis of existence is to get things right. So I 572 00:29:15,600 --> 00:29:18,080 Speaker 1: think right now what they have missed on Buck is 573 00:29:18,440 --> 00:29:21,840 Speaker 1: the story is Biden's weakness and incompetence, which is why 574 00:29:22,920 --> 00:29:25,560 Speaker 1: I think that they never anticipated they would ever get 575 00:29:25,560 --> 00:29:28,240 Speaker 1: to a spot where seventy five percent of Americans would 576 00:29:28,240 --> 00:29:31,280 Speaker 1: think Biden's too old and too incompetent to be president. 577 00:29:31,680 --> 00:29:33,600 Speaker 2: And I would I would add to this Clay when 578 00:29:33,600 --> 00:29:35,840 Speaker 2: we say things like Biden's weakness, you know, we're all 579 00:29:35,840 --> 00:29:37,600 Speaker 2: we see this in the debate stage a lot, and 580 00:29:37,680 --> 00:29:40,880 Speaker 2: people using political language like no week on the world stage, 581 00:29:40,880 --> 00:29:42,520 Speaker 2: and I always say, okay, well what does that mean? 582 00:29:42,800 --> 00:29:45,320 Speaker 2: Give me the what when you say Biden is weak? 583 00:29:46,120 --> 00:29:51,000 Speaker 2: There are real tangible statistical data base things. You know, 584 00:29:51,400 --> 00:29:54,280 Speaker 2: the average home in America right now, the average mortgage 585 00:29:54,280 --> 00:29:57,560 Speaker 2: payment has what is it, It's gone from like nearly 586 00:29:58,320 --> 00:30:00,440 Speaker 2: it's basically double. This has gone from like sex seventeen 587 00:30:00,560 --> 00:30:04,200 Speaker 2: hundred a month to thirty two or thirty three. 588 00:30:04,040 --> 00:30:04,640 Speaker 3: Hundred a month. 589 00:30:05,000 --> 00:30:07,640 Speaker 2: That means for the middle class, for folks you know, 590 00:30:07,720 --> 00:30:10,600 Speaker 2: making making you know, forty to one hundred and twenty 591 00:30:10,640 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 2: thousand dollars or whatever it is, home ownership is not 592 00:30:13,800 --> 00:30:16,239 Speaker 2: a thing you're getting into right now. And then you 593 00:30:16,240 --> 00:30:18,520 Speaker 2: add the cost of goods because of inflation, because of 594 00:30:18,520 --> 00:30:20,960 Speaker 2: the excessive government spending, you have the worst border we've 595 00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:25,320 Speaker 2: ever seen. You add the continued Democrat cozying up to 596 00:30:26,520 --> 00:30:29,440 Speaker 2: lawlessness and crime in major cities, which you know Biden 597 00:30:29,480 --> 00:30:32,040 Speaker 2: doesn't really get tagged with, but generally speaking, it's something 598 00:30:32,080 --> 00:30:34,920 Speaker 2: of Democrats that drags them down. You know, he's weak 599 00:30:34,960 --> 00:30:37,680 Speaker 2: for good reason right now, right He's weak for reasons 600 00:30:37,680 --> 00:30:41,080 Speaker 2: that can be articulated, and that we articulate here, So 601 00:30:41,200 --> 00:30:43,160 Speaker 2: it all makes sense. That's that's the reason why I 602 00:30:43,160 --> 00:30:46,880 Speaker 2: don't discount the numbers, because what's the counter argument, right 603 00:30:46,920 --> 00:30:49,000 Speaker 2: The counter argument is a is Trump is hitler, which 604 00:30:49,000 --> 00:30:49,840 Speaker 2: I think isn't working. 605 00:30:50,480 --> 00:30:52,560 Speaker 1: And again I would just point out Trump has been 606 00:30:52,680 --> 00:30:58,200 Speaker 1: under underutilized or undervalued, I should say, in the polls 607 00:30:58,280 --> 00:31:02,320 Speaker 1: since twenty fifteen. So if there were some grand you know, 608 00:31:02,920 --> 00:31:04,600 Speaker 1: plan at stake. 609 00:31:05,040 --> 00:31:05,840 Speaker 3: I don't see it. 610 00:31:05,840 --> 00:31:09,640 Speaker 1: It doesn't add up the conspiracy theory unless you are 611 00:31:09,640 --> 00:31:12,520 Speaker 1: an anti Trump person and you're saying, oh, I love 612 00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:16,320 Speaker 1: Nikki Haley, I love Ron DeSantis, And what's really going 613 00:31:16,360 --> 00:31:18,600 Speaker 1: on here is Trump is super weak and they're trying 614 00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:20,920 Speaker 1: to goad you into making him the nominee. And then 615 00:31:21,560 --> 00:31:24,080 Speaker 1: my problem with that is, so you think every polster 616 00:31:24,720 --> 00:31:30,480 Speaker 1: is simultaneously trying to rig the game against Trump. 617 00:31:31,080 --> 00:31:34,120 Speaker 2: I mean, also, you know, if all it takes is 618 00:31:34,160 --> 00:31:37,600 Speaker 2: one polster, we don't even have outlier polls here, folks. 619 00:31:37,680 --> 00:31:38,720 Speaker 3: Yes, right, we're. 620 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:41,000 Speaker 2: Not even saying, you know, three of the four main 621 00:31:41,040 --> 00:31:43,000 Speaker 2: ones that have come out or indicating this, they are 622 00:31:43,040 --> 00:31:45,680 Speaker 2: all speaking with the same voice. Imagine if you could 623 00:31:45,680 --> 00:31:47,840 Speaker 2: be the one poll that gets it right, or the 624 00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:51,000 Speaker 2: one polster who's actually closer to what the reality ends 625 00:31:51,080 --> 00:31:51,480 Speaker 2: up being. 626 00:31:52,440 --> 00:31:52,600 Speaker 3: Now. 627 00:31:52,600 --> 00:31:54,720 Speaker 2: I know these things change, the numbers will change over time. 628 00:31:55,040 --> 00:31:56,600 Speaker 2: The point is, though, you want to be the guy 629 00:31:56,680 --> 00:31:59,080 Speaker 2: who looks for the gal who looks the most accurate 630 00:31:59,120 --> 00:32:02,600 Speaker 2: on this. I don't see the conspiracy. I think the Democrats. 631 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:05,600 Speaker 2: I think, at some level, the system. And now we're 632 00:32:05,600 --> 00:32:07,600 Speaker 2: talking about DJ and the Biden White House. So now 633 00:32:07,640 --> 00:32:11,480 Speaker 2: we can start to identify the actors that Democrat apparatus 634 00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:15,640 Speaker 2: thought that they could consolidate with the indictments of Trump 635 00:32:15,720 --> 00:32:17,880 Speaker 2: and then finish him off legally and what they may 636 00:32:17,960 --> 00:32:19,920 Speaker 2: and so there was a Trump trapped component. 637 00:32:20,000 --> 00:32:20,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, I do believe that. 638 00:32:21,320 --> 00:32:24,760 Speaker 2: But what we're seeing is Democrats realizing, oh my gosh, 639 00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:28,280 Speaker 2: it's not just a base consolidation for the primary. There 640 00:32:28,320 --> 00:32:30,200 Speaker 2: may be something else going on. He may be picking 641 00:32:30,280 --> 00:32:33,000 Speaker 2: up steam for independents who are outraged by this, and 642 00:32:33,920 --> 00:32:35,960 Speaker 2: they may not be able to finish him off legally, 643 00:32:36,200 --> 00:32:38,600 Speaker 2: which would mean that they've miscalculated on both ends of 644 00:32:38,640 --> 00:32:39,240 Speaker 2: this possible. 645 00:32:39,240 --> 00:32:41,760 Speaker 1: And it would also be old school boy who cried 646 00:32:41,800 --> 00:32:45,040 Speaker 1: wolf scenario, because they're trying to run the same game 647 00:32:45,080 --> 00:32:48,720 Speaker 1: plan that they've run before and finally it doesn't work anymore. 648 00:32:48,800 --> 00:32:50,320 Speaker 1: You know, there's a reason you have to change up 649 00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:54,760 Speaker 1: advertising campaigns. It's because if you run the same playbook 650 00:32:54,920 --> 00:32:57,640 Speaker 1: over and over and over again, eventually you start to 651 00:32:57,760 --> 00:33:00,280 Speaker 1: land on deaf years. And I think that that's what's 652 00:33:00,280 --> 00:33:02,400 Speaker 1: going on. I think this is all about Biden, not 653 00:33:02,480 --> 00:33:04,880 Speaker 1: about Trump. I think this is about Biden's weakness. Remember, 654 00:33:04,920 --> 00:33:07,440 Speaker 1: I've said for some time, I think the veg Gramaswami, 655 00:33:07,480 --> 00:33:11,360 Speaker 1: Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, or Donald Trump, any of the 656 00:33:11,400 --> 00:33:14,640 Speaker 1: top four candidates right now, I think they would all win. 657 00:33:15,120 --> 00:33:17,760 Speaker 1: I think they would all find a way to beat 658 00:33:18,240 --> 00:33:19,160 Speaker 1: to beat Biden. 659 00:33:18,880 --> 00:33:19,360 Speaker 3: Head to head. 660 00:33:19,920 --> 00:33:22,640 Speaker 1: Look, Christmas two weeks from today, don't wait, you got 661 00:33:22,640 --> 00:33:24,200 Speaker 1: another week to start shopping. 662 00:33:24,240 --> 00:33:25,000 Speaker 3: Man, that's crazy. 663 00:33:25,160 --> 00:33:26,560 Speaker 1: I've met a lot of you. Just panicked and I 664 00:33:26,560 --> 00:33:28,280 Speaker 1: said that I hadn't even thought and done the math here. 665 00:33:28,320 --> 00:33:30,120 Speaker 1: I was like, oh, I knew it was close, but yes, 666 00:33:30,440 --> 00:33:34,160 Speaker 1: two weeks from today is Christmas. Have you done your shopping? 667 00:33:34,680 --> 00:33:37,920 Speaker 1: Have you got the best possible gifts out there? Maybe 668 00:33:37,920 --> 00:33:41,000 Speaker 1: you're already starting to celebrate Christmas with friends and family, 669 00:33:41,080 --> 00:33:44,120 Speaker 1: not uncommon in tons of you. I'm sure this week 670 00:33:44,160 --> 00:33:46,680 Speaker 1: and this weekend are going to be celebrating in advance 671 00:33:46,720 --> 00:33:48,320 Speaker 1: and on for the next two weeks. This is the 672 00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:50,920 Speaker 1: holiday season. I've got an incredible gift for you, a 673 00:33:51,040 --> 00:33:53,680 Speaker 1: Legacy box. Just check them out right now, trust me. 674 00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:58,120 Speaker 1: Go to legacybox dot com, slash clay that's the legacybox 675 00:33:58,200 --> 00:34:01,240 Speaker 1: dot com slash clay my name. That's how you get 676 00:34:01,240 --> 00:34:05,120 Speaker 1: the deep discount they're offering right now sixty five percent 677 00:34:05,240 --> 00:34:06,640 Speaker 1: off regular prices. 678 00:34:07,000 --> 00:34:10,840 Speaker 3: Boxes and boxes of old photos, old cam quarters. You 679 00:34:10,880 --> 00:34:11,759 Speaker 3: can get hooked up. 680 00:34:11,960 --> 00:34:15,800 Speaker 1: Digitize every photo for as low as seven cents a photo, all. 681 00:34:15,680 --> 00:34:18,000 Speaker 3: Your old cam quarters, all your. 682 00:34:17,840 --> 00:34:22,080 Speaker 1: Old VHS tapes. Legacybox dot Com slash Clay. That's the 683 00:34:22,160 --> 00:34:25,480 Speaker 1: legacybox dot Com slash Clay. You are going to love it. 684 00:34:25,840 --> 00:34:29,759 Speaker 1: Hop in line today legacybox dot Com slash Clay the 685 00:34:29,880 --> 00:34:31,360 Speaker 1: perfect holiday gift. 686 00:34:31,960 --> 00:34:34,680 Speaker 3: Downloaded news, the New Clay and Fuckast. 687 00:34:34,880 --> 00:34:37,799 Speaker 1: Listen to the program live, catch up on any part 688 00:34:37,800 --> 00:34:40,600 Speaker 1: of the show you might have missed. Youse your CNB 689 00:34:40,800 --> 00:34:44,040 Speaker 1: twenty four to seven subscription to get access to the guys. 690 00:34:44,360 --> 00:34:46,760 Speaker 3: Fine the Clay and Buck app in your app store 691 00:34:46,800 --> 00:34:48,239 Speaker 3: and make it part of your day. 692 00:34:48,600 --> 00:34:52,120 Speaker 1: Welcome back in Clay, Travis Buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all 693 00:34:52,160 --> 00:34:54,120 Speaker 1: of you hanging out with us. 694 00:34:54,920 --> 00:34:55,120 Speaker 4: Uh. 695 00:34:55,160 --> 00:34:57,040 Speaker 1: We got a few more callers who want to weigh in. 696 00:34:57,080 --> 00:34:59,319 Speaker 1: We'll take some quick calls here. Encourage you by the way, 697 00:34:59,680 --> 00:35:04,319 Speaker 1: Ron Santas First Hour, jd Vance Second Hour, and we've 698 00:35:04,320 --> 00:35:06,520 Speaker 1: got a good show lined up for you tomorrow as well. 699 00:35:06,600 --> 00:35:08,280 Speaker 3: Always go download the podcast. 700 00:35:09,480 --> 00:35:14,879 Speaker 2: Yeah no, absolutely, We've got an excite, exciting stuff coming 701 00:35:14,960 --> 00:35:15,680 Speaker 2: up for you tomorrow. 702 00:35:15,719 --> 00:35:17,239 Speaker 3: We're gonna get too deep into it right now. 703 00:35:17,360 --> 00:35:19,799 Speaker 2: Then to say we've got some guests that will be 704 00:35:19,800 --> 00:35:21,279 Speaker 2: on the show this week, I think you're gonna really 705 00:35:21,280 --> 00:35:23,560 Speaker 2: want to hear from and especially tomorrow, a little bit 706 00:35:23,560 --> 00:35:25,360 Speaker 2: of a little bit of surprise for some of you folks, 707 00:35:25,360 --> 00:35:27,640 Speaker 2: which we are looking forward to. But you know, Clay, 708 00:35:27,680 --> 00:35:30,520 Speaker 2: I want to just continue. You know, this is what happens, Clint. 709 00:35:30,520 --> 00:35:32,319 Speaker 2: I end up texting about thoughts and things after the 710 00:35:32,320 --> 00:35:35,440 Speaker 2: show and with Ali and the team and sending it around. 711 00:35:35,960 --> 00:35:39,160 Speaker 2: I don't know what's going on right now, other than 712 00:35:39,840 --> 00:35:42,799 Speaker 2: I'm not hearing good explanations from anybody who thinks that 713 00:35:42,880 --> 00:35:47,560 Speaker 2: this is somehow all fake, like it's it's a conspiracy. 714 00:35:48,000 --> 00:35:52,000 Speaker 2: Trump isn't so far ahead, Biden isn't so weak, so 715 00:35:52,040 --> 00:35:55,319 Speaker 2: something's something's up, And I don't think it's all a fabrication. 716 00:35:55,680 --> 00:35:55,719 Speaker 7: No. 717 00:35:55,880 --> 00:35:59,360 Speaker 1: I think Look, the general rule was that Awkham's razor. 718 00:35:59,640 --> 00:36:03,920 Speaker 1: The most most likely explanation is typically the truth doesn't 719 00:36:03,920 --> 00:36:06,920 Speaker 1: mean it always is. The most likely explanation is this, 720 00:36:07,040 --> 00:36:09,120 Speaker 1: and I think this is what all of the media 721 00:36:09,160 --> 00:36:09,719 Speaker 1: polls are. 722 00:36:09,600 --> 00:36:10,600 Speaker 3: Reflecting right now. 723 00:36:10,960 --> 00:36:14,600 Speaker 1: Biden is the weakest incumbent presidential candidate in any. 724 00:36:14,400 --> 00:36:17,240 Speaker 3: Of our laws, and most people don't think he's able 725 00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:17,959 Speaker 3: to do the job. 726 00:36:18,400 --> 00:36:21,040 Speaker 1: And as a result, when given an option, whether it's 727 00:36:21,080 --> 00:36:25,000 Speaker 1: Donald Trump, Icky Haley, Ron De Santis, or vivek Ramaswami, 728 00:36:25,520 --> 00:36:27,920 Speaker 1: a lot of people say, I'm not picking Biden, and 729 00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:30,880 Speaker 1: I think Tucker's VP would be interesting. 730 00:36:30,960 --> 00:36:32,080 Speaker 3: Klay very much,