WEBVTT - Elon Musk's Pay Package and Broadcom's Surge

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where innovation, money and power collie in

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Karin hide A, Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York,

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and I'm Tim Standinbeck and for Ed Ludlow, this is

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Coming up.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 2>We push ahead to the all important vote results on

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk's fifty six billion dollar pay package, and as

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Tesla's agm it kicks off.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Plus, we'll turn to earnings as Broadcom surges, as AI

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 4>demand boosts its results, and we'll.

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Dig into the financial terms of Apple and open AI's

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>partnership mid their landmark agreement. Of First, let's check in

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>on these markets, because we've got more fuel to this far.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 2>We've got still record high after record high across benchmarks.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>If you look at the S and P five hundred

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>be your fourth straight record high. On the day, we're

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>seeing the nastack up another tenth of a percent. Look

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>not the big gains that we saw yesterday. But we

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>digest yet another cooling of inflation with a PPI report.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>The macro picture looks good.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>The tenure yield falls down another three four basis points.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's call it forloring costs. On the downside, not so

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>much love.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>For European stocks, though still open to trade. We're off

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 2>by one point three percent. More political anxiety happening in

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Europe and perhaps, of course, digesting a big move that

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>we had yesterday. Move on, see what's happening in the

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>world of crypto tim We have been seen basically US

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>hold in pretty steady. We're off by about a percent,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>just point sixty seven thousand, interestingly coming off of those highs.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 2>So that moon music about risk on not quite flowing

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>into bitcoin today.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 4>But what are you watching on the micro Well, speaking

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 4>of records, I'm watching shares of broad Com ticker AVGO.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 4>They are just surging by close to fourteen percent right now.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 4>The company did report earnings after the bill yesterday. It

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 4>beat on the top line, it beat on the bottom line.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 4>The guidance surpassed analyst expectations. The company also announced a

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 4>ten for one stock split. It's going to take effect

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 4>next month. Investors are certainly cheering that news, sending shares

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 4>higher widely see as sort of a barometer for what's

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 4>happening in the chip space. So checking out on some

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 4>other chip companies. Nvidia also at a new record right now,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 4>shares up more than two percent, and then watching what's

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>happening in the data center hardware networking when it comes

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 4>to these AI data centers. Arista Networks also right now

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 4>at a new record at more than four percent. But

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 4>speaking of shares surging, let's talk Tesla, because shares are

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>hired this morning, this after Elon Musk send a tweet

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 4>early this morning again as you mentioned, Caroline, the day

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>of that shareholder's meeting, saying that those two shareholder issues

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 4>that were being voted on have passed or will pass

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 4>by a quote wide margin. We're talking, of course, about

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 4>that twenty eighteen pay package that has been under so

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 4>much scrutiny in addition to that the idea of the

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 4>company moving its incorporation from Delaware to Texas. Shares high

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 4>right now by three point seven percent. Not much can

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>be said permanently about what happens with that pay package,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 4>but this vote widely seen as sort of a barama

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 4>or a test for how people are seeing Elon Musk's

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 4>leadership at a time when the stock has been under

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 4>pressure down going into today's trade, Caroline around to thirty percent.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's get some expertise even further on this. Tim Dana

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Hall joins us and Dana, Look, it's not going to

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>have an implications on the court in the here and now.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>This still is all riding on a judge in the

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 3>long term.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>But suddenly it holds on in a musk from walking

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>too soon.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And to be honest, like, I was not expecting

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk to front run Tesla's AGM.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 6>We thought we were going to get the vote results tonight.

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 5>But clearly Tesla is keeping very close track of the

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 5>votes that they do have, and a lot of votes

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 5>came in yesterday. The deadline two casts a vote was

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 5>late last night, and they've got the votes. I mean,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 5>if you believe Elon's tweet, and I don't think there's

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 5>a reason not to, they have the votes on both

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 5>his pay and on the move to Texas. And what

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 5>this means is that many of the very big shareholders

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 5>that Tesla was worried about either abstained or voted yes.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 5>And that's like a super fascinating dynamic because some of

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 5>the large funds like Vanguard actually voted no in twenty eighteen,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 5>and they are the largest shareholder in Tesla after Musk himself.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Dan, That's what surprised me so much about this vote.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 4>You had these large asset managers such as Vanguard that

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 4>you just mentioned, voting in favor of this. Do you

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 4>know anything about why they switched or the sort of

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 4>strange badfellows here in terms of who's voted for and

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 4>real To be clear.

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 5>Vanguard has not said anything yet. We don't know for

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 5>sure how they voted, but.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You should say this. Sorry the New York Times reporting

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>early this morning. Excuse me.

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 6>We have not confirmed that ourselves.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 5>But if you look at the vote count, just a

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 5>lot of yes votes came in yesterday and they have

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 5>to be the big votes from the shareholders Vanguard, black Rock, Geode,

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 5>State Street. So yeah, it's interesting too because both Iss

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 5>and Glass Lewis, the big proxy advisory firms, were no

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 5>on the pay package. And that's why Tesla was so

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 5>aggressively courting retail investors. Tesla was worried that they didn't

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 5>have the votes from the big funds, and they actively

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 5>courting retail.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 6>We know that they were actively.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 5>Courting the large shareholders too, but something's turned their way

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 5>and I think they've got it I mean, so tonight

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 5>we'll get the final tally.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 6>But I mean you're gonna see an ambulan.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk take the stage at the AGM today.

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, we'll certainly look forward to that again starting

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 4>at four thirty Wall Street time today, Bloomberg's Dana Hole,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 4>thanks so much for that.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Turning now to Apple, when CEO Tim Cook announced the

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 4>company's partnership with open Ai, they didn't disclose the financial.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Terms of the agreement.

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 4>For more on what we know about the deal, Let's

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 4>bring in Bloomberg's Lynn Duan. She's here in our studios

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 4>in New York. What do we know about the financial

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 4>terms of being greading of the agreement? Just zero's all around.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 8>Hi.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 9>First, thank you for having me. Second, there are no

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 9>financial terms.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 10>Apparently.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 9>It's funny because I feel like that was the biggest

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 9>question on that day when they announced this partnership.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 10>It was like, Okay, so who's paying who?

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Who's making money here?

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 9>It turns out there is no money exchanging hands at

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 9>least at the onset right. Actually happening is according to

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 9>Apple reporter Mark German, sources is Apple believes that there

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 9>is enough value, maybe even more value than monetary value

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 9>to open ai and having its products on a ton

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 9>of Apple devices across the board. The promotion of their

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 9>product there offers them a business proposition if people want

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 9>to say, go from the free version of open ai

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 9>to the paid version for twenty dollars a month. So

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 9>that's the proposition to open ai and for Apple it's

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 9>clearly a value add in allowing users like me and

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 9>you to be able to access open ai and all

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 9>of the tools the i generated content that it has

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 9>on our Apple devices.

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 2>That has been some cost apart from nal Musk's aya

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and claim that he'll ban Apple iPhones going into any

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>of his companies, but this integration will actually cost open

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>ai something, right because well, they've got to pay for

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the compute if everyone selves using.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 9>It, that's right, And the the idea behind it is

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 9>that in the long term, this cost, this investment that

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 9>they're making will pay off both for Apple and for

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 9>open Ai. For Apple, I think that the long term

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 9>advantage here. The reason why they are making partnerships with

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 9>open ai and are trying to make partnerships with other

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 9>AI developers.

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 10>By the way, this.

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 9>Is not an exclusive arrangement, is that hopefully one day

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 9>they will be able to monetize it through revenue sharing agreements.

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 9>So anytime one of these AI developers is able to

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 9>sell a subscription through an Apple device, hopefully Apple will

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 9>get a cut from it.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 10>That's what Apple hopes.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 9>And as far as the AI developers go, they are

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 9>willing to give this investment in the hopes that it

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 9>will generate more revenue. And mind you, this is a

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 9>big push for open ai right now. They are under

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 9>a lot of pressure to show that they can not

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 9>only generate revenue, but that they can generate enough revenue

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 9>to turn a profit. And that's what they really need

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 9>in order to keep all this AI compute going is

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 9>more and more money me into the institution to fund it.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, they're not out of data center capacity.

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Larder data center.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they're saving a little bit by Apple not getting

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>a cut on the chatchypt app for now, but certainly

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>lots of way that this can be earning some bucks.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>We thank you.

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 2>That was a perfect summary, Ninduan of Bloomberg. Meanwhile, coming up,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll go break down broad COM's pretty sensational results. Actually

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>shares surging as a timent outlined a little bit earlier.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>It's all on guess what AI demand. But we want

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>to go back actually to what's been happening overseas. A

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 2>BYD Chinese ev maker of course, actually traded here.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 3>In the US for some ADRs.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>We're higher on the day, and that's as we start

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 2>to digest the EU tarras, which initially was a shock,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 2>but actually we think this perhaps is slightly less of

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a taroff than having been anticipated seventeen percent of BYD

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and actually they can stomach it if they're going to

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>continue to sell into Europe.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 8>This is a broom make technology.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Well shares a chip supplier Broadcam, surging after the company

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 4>reported earnings that were boosted by demand for AI products.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Joining us now for more is Kun John Sabani of

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence. Kunjohn, These results just exceeded all analysts expectations

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 4>on the top line the bottom line guidance as well.

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Remind us of the space that broadcomplays and a huge

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Apple supplier of course, But tell us about the AI

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 4>element here.

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So they have two core AI businesses.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 11>One is the AC accelerators, which is alternative to merchant

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 11>GPU what someone like an Nvidia provides, so mainly focused

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 11>on the large cloud players and hyperscalers like Google, Meta, Microsoft, etc.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 11>And the second is the AI networking or the overall

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 11>networking business, which until now was the biggest piece, which

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 11>is where basically the pipeline that runs the data center

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 11>runs on. So anything outside of the cpugpun memory that's

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 11>basically all the networking components Qrinjin.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>We have clearly some competitive inching into the space. When

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 2>you think of Nvideo, it's a good strong number two.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 3>But what's also interesting is they're taking a leaf out

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 3>of Video's book. They're doing a stock split.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean that seems to be the trend these days.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 11>You beat on good AI results into a stock split

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 11>and you see what happens, double digit stock good. But

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 11>I think from a combination point of view, you know,

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 11>from in the near term, in terms of the use case,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 11>we don't think they're really competing with each other because

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 11>the use case right now are different and both of

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 11>them there's no hurdles to growth for both companies. But

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 11>I think in the long term it definitely will compete,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 11>not in the use case, but more in the wallet

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 11>share because there are clouds providers and hyperscalers would have

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 11>limited budget.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 2>To spend and designing their own chips slowly but surely

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 2>really interesting countries. Survanning, we thank you so much. A

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Boomberg intelligence running up on what is happening for broad Coom.

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>But let's broaden ow is all the play and AI

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 2>about the infrastructure space, the picks and shovels, the actual chips,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>So what about the applications, what about the large language models?

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>You've got the perfect voice to really dovetail that with

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>federal policy Reserve. Well, it is Joe Joo, his Millennia

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Capital managing partner. Joe used to work over at the FED.

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>So you're the perfect person to sort of outline whether

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 2>in this environment where eventually we might get one, maybe

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>even two cuts this year, in terms of overall policy,

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>you should be putting yet more money into a broad coom,

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>into an nvideo, into some other AI plays.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 12>Look, you know, by taking a step back, I think

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 12>that there's we're in this huge AI build out, and

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 12>there's a couple of ways you can employ this market.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 12>You could you could participate in a semis etf you

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 12>could pick the winners. But I think what I'm what

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 12>I'm thinking my head is I think there's some naysayers

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 12>who are saying, well, this AI build out is we're

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 12>going to see the peak of the curve in the

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 12>next couple of years. I personally think that this hyperworld

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 12>phase in the in the semis will probably go on

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 12>for years, just because I think what the street is

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 12>not saying is that there's going to be a lot

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 12>of incremental demand from some of the tech blaggers that

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 12>needs to catch up on AI. There's going to be

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 12>foreign buyers from let's say Europe and emerging markets. And lastly,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 12>I think what we're also thinking is there's going to

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 12>be a lot of training and retraining of AI. AI

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 12>is like software every time on your iPhone, You've got

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 12>to update your software every.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 7>Single every single week.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 12>So in AI, as their new data becoming available, you have.

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 7>To update the AI, you have to retrain.

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 12>So I personally think that the AI at the infratrate

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 12>as they had a lot.

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 7>Of room to go.

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, Joe, I'm sticking with your experience on the Federal

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Reserve because look, at the end of the day, rates

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 4>are pretty much everything when we're talking about this stuff.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering how you're thinking about these high flying tech

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 4>companies and what exactly is priced in with regard to

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 4>rate cuts. Are we going to see still moves higher

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 4>even after the Fed does cut rates if it does

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 4>cut rates this year, or is that already priced in.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 12>Look as a former staffer now and a founder of

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 12>my a firm, I take the view that it's important

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 12>to look at the long term directions of inter treates,

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 12>you know, in economic saying like, we're ninety percent confident,

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 12>we're ninety five percent competent, we're probably ninety percent competent

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 12>that there's going to be at least one rate cut

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 12>sometime in the next nine months. So whether it starts

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 12>in July, September, December, work in January, I think it

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 12>is not as important to me as an investor because

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 12>you know the directions of the rates are coming down.

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 12>So what that means what you can do is to

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 12>put you know, I think there's one more thing that

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 12>I think the street often gets run out, and I'll

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 12>say this for the record, is I think the street

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 12>put puts a lot of emphasis on the back plod chart,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 12>and I think what I would do is probably put

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 12>sixty percent of your weight on the BA plot chart

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 12>and put forty percent of your own research analysis into

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 12>the thinking. So you come up with your own framework

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 12>to what you think it's going to be the pack

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 12>of interest rates, and then you put that into your

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 12>financial model, your DCF model on Excel, and then you

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 12>can sort of figure out, you know, what you think

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 12>is fair value on the S and P, on MAST

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 12>and on the stocks.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 7>So for me, I just had to take a step back.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 12>I'm less worried about whether the cut starts in September

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 12>with December, but I know I think there's a rate

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 12>coming coming so that I'll just put back into my

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 12>model and then they'll be able to help me make

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 12>better decisions as an investor.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 2>You're betting on the trend and you're betting actually on

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 2>private companies. I'm thankful Lanthropic you put money into some

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>of the large language models.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Dissect for us.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Where the money then now is allocated in this space?

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Is it the large language models?

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>At what point do we start seeing more money allocated

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to the applications the use of these large language models.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So you know, there's sort of six broader themes

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 12>of this AI in value chain. In my head, if

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 12>you start from the very bottom, right, you have electricity,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 12>you have data centers, you have you have cooling centers,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 12>and then on top of that you'll have CHIPS's the

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 12>semi use and you have the data owners like the

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 12>Max seven, and then on the path you have the

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 12>large language models. And then you need human talent. You

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 12>need smart people to train the AI and work on it.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 12>And the lastly you need the app. You know, we're

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 12>going to build the applications. I think as an investor,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 12>you know you can have a They played this AI

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 12>trade in public markets by buying public stock to QQQ,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 12>But in private.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 7>Markets, what we're doing is sort of like we're sort.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 12>Of an ETF in the private markets, and that we're

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 12>invested in entroffic, WM, the cohere because these are the

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 12>innovations companies happening in the private markets.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 7>But there's also other ways to play this AI.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 12>Trade, because you could also be investing in utility, you

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 12>could be buying data centers.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 7>So I think there's no different waste. But I think

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 7>the fundamental.

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 12>Phasis in my head is that it's a foregun conclusion

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 12>what the AI is real. In fact, I think AI

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 12>is going to be you know, like software square, the

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 12>Internet cube, if you will, excuse me, but I think

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 12>the biggest question in my head.

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.359
<v Speaker 7>Is actually AI regulation. But that aside.

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 12>I think when you take a step back and you

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 12>look at some of the companies in this AI trade,

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 12>we're at the very beginning where you know, you can

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 12>think of it like a two year old baby. And

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 12>and so the saying is, in playing words, if this baby,

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 12>a two year old can do what it can do,

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 12>imagine when that baby matures as an.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 7>Adult, how much more where that person can do?

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, as a venture capitalist, you're thinking about that

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 4>baby as an adult. So very briefly, paint a picture

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 4>for us about what AI can do when it's nineteen

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 4>years old.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, then we're talking about the six layer, which is

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 12>the application layer. Right, So there's you know, I guess

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 12>the industry phrase theory is called vertical software, which is

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 12>you can apply AI in cybersecurity, in automation, in robotics.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 12>You know, there's a company called Figure ai that's combining

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 12>robotics the AI. We're invested in a AI cybersecurity company

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 12>called Deep Instinct.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 7>But you can also apply.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 12>AI to pharmer research to know, many other fields that

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 12>we haven't even thought about. There's one thing I got

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 12>to say that's really really important. When we think back

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 12>at the major technological innovations of the last two hundred years,

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 12>whether it was electricity, the engine, the Internet, how did

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 12>we as a humanity create that. We did it with

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 12>human intelligence, people working together. What happens now when you

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 12>can recreate intelligence, you can recreate many many atimics edicines.

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 12>So there's many infinite pathibilities that we can create. So

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 12>what I'm trying to say is it's really I think

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 12>about how we nurture this technology in a way that's

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 12>going to help us, help helps the community move forward

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 12>and grow in a way that's responsible.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Joja Ou of Millennia Capital, thanks so much for joining us.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Certainly do appreciate it.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm now for talking tech.

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 2>First startup al Alpha says, look, AI must grow beyond chatboots.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 3>In order to be profitable.

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Speaking to Bloomberg, the CEO Jonas Andreulis says businesses need

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 2>more specialized models other than Ela lambs that power the

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>likes to chutch ept. He went on to compare the

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 2>current AI craze to the likes of the dot com

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 2>bubble of the late nineties, plus Norway hits meta with

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 2>a complaint over their plans to use images and posts

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 2>from Facebook and Instagram to train AI models. Now, the

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Norwegian Consumer Council says Meta has made it quit deliberately

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>cumbersome to opt out of the AI scraping process, which

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>would violate EU.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Data protection rules.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, Open Ai CEO Sam Altman says the company is

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 2>on a pace for a three point four billion dollar

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 2>annual revenue now. According to a person familiar with the matter,

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Sam Altman's addressing staff and in an all hands meeting Wednesday,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 2>he added that the company was on track to generate

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>two hundred million dollars in this AI partnership through Microsoft

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 2>A zero.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, sticking with AI, Adobe out with earnings after the bell,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 4>where investors will be focusing on the company's AI progress

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 4>and if customers are spending for it.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is.

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's and Brody Ford Brody good to see you this morning.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering where where the context is here because shares

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 4>are down more than twenty percent going into the print

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 4>later today, and the company plays in an interesting space

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 4>because it provides AI services, but at the same time

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 4>it's software as a service, which has just been beat

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>up this year as companies have shifted their budgets more

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 4>to hardware. What has beat up the company more going

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 4>into ourn Is it competition or is it a lack

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 4>of spend when it comes to software and services?

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Adobe is one of the more interesting AI debates

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 13>out there because, like all software, it's been the question

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 13>of are they benefiting from AI or are they getting

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 13>replaced by AI? You know, Adobe is famous for their

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 13>creative portfolio Photoshop video editors, and they've introduced new features

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 13>to be able to generate imagery in there. The key

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 13>fear for investors is that over time with AI, if

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 13>I'm able to type in you know, I don't know

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 13>TV show anchors talking about tech, am I really going

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 13>to need you know, Photoshop to do that?

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 14>Am I gonna need a video editor to do that?

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 13>And are small business is going to stop using these

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 13>licenses so much?

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 14>Right? And so Adobe has spoken a big game.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 13>About AI uplift for the probably over a year now,

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 13>it really hasn't showed up in the numbers, and so

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 13>investors are starting to feel like, hold up, maybe these

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.719
<v Speaker 13>numbers aren't going to really come buddy.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>The numbers ain't that bad in terms of growth of

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 2>still ten percent for revenue expanded and actually consistently going

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>to be about ten eleven percent for the next few years.

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So where is the anxiety eventually going to show U

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>where we're going to actually see them eroding some of

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>that revenue game.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's it is for sure a long term risk.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I haven't seen a whole lot of evidence

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 13>of companies, for example, ending their Adobe licenses and saying

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 13>I'm just going to use Dolli to generate images. The

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 13>anxiety is that there's a lot of new spending going

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 13>toward these AI startups, and in theory that new spending

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 13>should have been going towards the software incumbent like Adobe.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 13>I mean, it is such a small metric investor's focused

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 13>on here with one of the craziest acronyms, it's like

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.719
<v Speaker 13>net new annual recurring revenue for their digital media segment,

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 13>and that has gone down bit by bit again because

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 13>there's this sense of like, hey, maybe they are not

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 13>getting new workloads that are ending up in the hands

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 13>of Runway or Dolli or mid journey.

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Hey Brody, I'm wondering what you see or analyst rather

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 4>as the biggest competition out there right now from the

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 4>upstarts that exist. Is it the lms or is it

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 4>the bigger companies that are starting to adopt what the

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 4>llms kind of started doing earlier.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 13>It's definitely not the bigger companies. I mean Adobe is

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 13>thecumbent here. I think the biggest anxiety point is Kanva

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 13>and has been for a long time.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 14>You know, that great Australian startup.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 13>They're known for making the templates that you might end

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 13>up seeing on Instagram or you might see your friend's wedding.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 13>You know, they've just made it a lot simpler to

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 13>do quick design, it's a little cheaper, it's all on

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 13>the web.

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 14>I mean that's who Adobe investors have been anxious about

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 14>for a while.

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 14>On the upstart side.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 13>It is more of those large language model makers who

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 13>are generating images.

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Brody, thank you for joining us.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 2>All eyes you want Adobe after the bell that.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 3>To Neumog Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde and.

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tim Staneviek in for a love.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's go quick check on these markets ten at the moment,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>because we're currently seeing higher just when you're looking at

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>technology stocks and US trade more broadly. S and P

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and a new record. NAZAC had a new

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 2>record two year yield. Moved by the fact that PPI

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 2>is showing once again inflatory pressure, is dialing back stock

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>six hundred.

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Over in Europe. Just finished trade.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm afraid to the one point three percent downside as

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>we still digest political risk and maybe you know a

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>reparthing of where Federal Reserve pushes rates and people having

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>some anxiety over that. Move on, have a look at

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>something individual movers because record high for broadcon thirteen percent

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>on the nose higher. They're doing what's rather in vogue

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.239
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, and a stock split by ten, so

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>we'll see perhaps a little bit more retail come into

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 2>this chip damaker that is also on a tear when

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>it comes to AI demand. Then revenue really managing to impress,

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 2>and the guidance to MicroStrategy off by six percent.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Why more supply coming?

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 2>But this term in convertible notes, why is Michael Sellers

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>sailor selling converts because he wants to buy mob bitcoin

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 2>and is currently up by three percent. Look that AGM

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>is going to be starting later today. We seem as

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>though shareholders are voting in favor not only of that

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 2>fifty six billion dollar pay package that was held from

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen, but also the move to Texas. The question

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 2>is will that judge think similarly. We want to get

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>onto another company at the moment, and I want to

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 2>discuss what's happening over at Intuit. Intuit Mailchimp is coming

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 2>out with a new revenue tool. It's a system of

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 2>predictive and generative AI models. Basically, it's designed to help

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 2>market is win more revenue. You're going to send the

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>right email at the right SMS at the right time,

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>with the right conversion into at.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 3>CEO is going to talk us through it.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Sasam Gourdalzi joining us for more and this is about

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence really in the here, renowned Sasan you have

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>been talking up AI. You've been reworking your business as

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the time you came in as CEO. I want to

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, qdos to you for talking about it before

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the market did. But how is it

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 2>actually going to generate revenue for you?

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 15>Well, first of all, thank you so much for having me.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 15>You know, what we announced today is a really big deal.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 15>Let me first quickly start with context and then talk

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 15>to what we launched, and how over time it will

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 15>generate revenue for into it. You know, strategically, there are

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 15>three big things really that we've declared. You know, one

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 15>is shifting from building workflows where customers do the work

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 15>to get to their financial outcomes to workflows where we

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 15>do the work for our customers. The second element is

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 15>that embedding AI powered experts human experts within every workflow

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 15>so that there's never a dead end for customers. When

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 15>there's a dead end with the technology doing the work,

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 15>are experts that actually sit on our data on AI

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 15>platform can be the assistant for consumers and small businesses.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 15>And third, to take our game to the mid market

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 15>and small enterprises and really serve our customers in ways

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 15>that they could never imagine possible. Specifically, what we announced

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 15>today on into it mailchip platform is what we call

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 15>revenue intelligence. You know, one of the things that small

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 15>businesses care about most is revenue growth and profitability growth,

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 15>and within that their cash flow matters a lot. And

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 15>so revenue intelligence does something remarkable. It leverages all of

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 15>our customers data across Mailchimp and QuickBooks and an essence

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 15>helps them with understanding how they can drive customer and

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 15>revenue growth, So imagine swan.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm just going to think about imagining as a

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 2>consumer here though, because I can see how this might

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 2>be music to marketiers is. But me as a consumer,

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 2>do I want more SMSs? Do I want more emails?

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Do I want more marketing heading my way?

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 15>Well, if I finish the thought around this small business

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 15>and the impact that we'll have to the consumer. In essence,

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 15>the small business can understand which customers they have an

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 15>opportunity to provide more services to where they can drive

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 15>more benefits and profitability. And for a consumer, let's use

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 15>couch as an example, or new chairs as an example,

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 15>as a furniture or that you just came out with.

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 15>As a consumer of those devices or those couches or chairs,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 15>I have an opportunity to know what's available, and I

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 15>have an opportunity to know where I can modernize my house.

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 15>And so from a consumer perspective, the benefit is significant

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 15>and consumers actually believe it or not. Ninety five percent

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 15>of consumers love to digest sms is because they're short,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 15>they're sweet and to the point, and it has an

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 15>enormous impact for consumers and a big impact for small businesses.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 15>And ultimately, to answer your question, the more we can

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 15>help drive revenue and profitability growth for small businesses, the

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 15>more we have the capability to monetize and be able

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 15>to drive growth into it. So we're very excited about

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 15>what we launched today.

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 4>So, Son, I want to talk about the TurboTax business

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 4>because you've spoken recently about the idea of looking for

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 4>more customers who actually use human accountants to adopt TurboTax

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 4>and not use those accounts anymore. Forgive me for getting

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 4>personal here, but there's a reason I'm asking this question.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 4>I would imagine you have a very very complicated tax situation.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 4>As the president and CEO of this company. Do you

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 4>use turbo tax for your taxes?

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 10>Great question.

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 15>First, let me start with answering your first question. Then

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 15>I'll answer your question about myself. You know, first and foremost,

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 15>there's a thirty five billion dollars a total addressable market,

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 15>and of that thirty five billion, thirty billion is consumers

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 15>and small businesses that actually go to somebody else to

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 15>have their taxes done. And that's really where we've built

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 15>out the platform, where it sits on a data and

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 15>AI platform where we can do your taxes for you

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 15>from a governance perspective, I do not use turbo tax

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 15>because it's important from a governance perspective that somebody else

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 15>does my taxes for me outside of our platform. So

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 15>that's the reason why I don't. I would okay to

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 15>do it because we have great experts.

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 4>What I was going to say is you, do you

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 4>ever picture a time where somebody with as complicated a

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 4>tax picture as the executive a publicly traded company can

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 4>only use a product like TurboTax for their taxes.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Does that day common? If yes?

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 10>When well, first of all, we can do that today.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 15>If there wasn't a governance issue, I could have one

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 15>of our experts do all of my taxes today. You know,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 15>our experts can today do anybody's taxes for them. And

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 15>it's all digital, it's all AI powered, and we have

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 15>multiple second reviews within our platform to ensure that your

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 15>taxes are done accurately and that you're either getting the

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 15>largest refund or if you have a balance due, that

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 15>you're paying the right amount.

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 10>But today, anybody can do their.

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 15>Taxes on our platform and have us do it for

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 15>them because we have all of the expertise, all of

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 15>the data and AI capabilities with the best experts in

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 15>the industry on our platform.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we were just seeing sasan how well your share

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.719
<v Speaker 2>price has been doing of late, and in many ways

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 2>of late we've seen it pop because there's a price

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>increase coming according to Mazooho analyst in particularly, who is

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>outlining what that's going to do for your revenue. Sasan,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>how big an increase are we going to see for

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 2>quick books?

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us a.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Sort of level revenue indeed a natural price point?

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:28:58.320 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 15>I mean, first of all, I would start by saying

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 15>that we've had significant innovation on our platform in the

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 15>last year across all of the elements of our platform,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 15>whether it's the ability to be able to fuel your success,

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 15>drive your revenue growth or profitability, and or having our

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 15>experts to help you run your business as a small business.

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 15>And we always price for value, and so this is

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 15>very much sort of in line with our pricing strategy

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 15>and our pricing principles, where we are raising prices all

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 15>the way from those that today start out to fuel

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 15>their success as a small business and follow their passion

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 15>to mid market customers. And we've gotten great feedback relative

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 15>to the innovations that we've delivered into last year, and

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 15>we're just simply pricing for value and we're excited about

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 15>the possibilities.

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 4>I just want to talk about Mint because there was

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 4>a lot of sadness when you guys shut Mint down,

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 4>and I'm wondering if you've seen those customers move over

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 4>to credit hakrmas products.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 15>Well, first of all, I'll start with what Mint actually

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 15>who had served it served what we call prime customers,

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 15>those that generally have credit scores above seven hundred. And

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 15>when we thought about our vision as a consumer platform,

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 15>we want to have a self driving platform where we

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 15>can serve you early on in your life to help

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 15>you build your credit all the way to how do

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 15>you build wealth over time. And so given that vision,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 15>we actually brought Mint and Credit Karma together so we

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 15>can serve all of our customers, from those that need

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 15>to build credit to those that have great credit scores

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 15>but also have different needs, all on one platform. We

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 15>actually had more than what we had assumed convert to

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 15>Credit Karma. In fact, the majority of our customers converted

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 15>to Credit Karma, particularly because of all the capabilities that

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 15>we have on credit Karma to be able to serve

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 15>our prime customers.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 10>There are a.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 15>Very small court of customers that did not convert. These

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 15>are customers that really their love is budgeting tools, budgeting goals,

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 15>and those are some of the capabilities that over time

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 15>we're building in credit Karma, but are not available today.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 15>I would tell you some court of customers were very

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 15>sad that Mint went away, but actually the majority of

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 15>our customers are delighted to be on credit Harma.

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm going to ask him off set whether he's

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>delighted or heartbroken, but I'm interested ss on.

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Lastly, we did just get some recent news out of

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the IRS.

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Basically, there's going to be a free tool the US government,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>in particular supporting Americans who want the option to file

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 2>directly with the IRS as ultimately to be in charge

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 2>of their own taxes.

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Is this going to be a competitive threat? Are you

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 3>going to lose people to this free tool?

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 15>I mean, the short answer is no, because free is

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 15>already available to all Americans today and so with what

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 15>the IRS has launched, it's just yet another free tool.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 15>So it is not a threat to us because freeze

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 15>are already available across all private companies. We also don't

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 15>believe that it's the best use of government money to

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 15>come out with another tool that's free where free is

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 15>already available.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 10>It's not the best use of money.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 15>We'd love to see more money go towards the service

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 15>that the IRS provides to take very good care of

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.959
<v Speaker 15>the citizens. But nevertheless, as far as the threat for us,

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 15>it really.

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 4>Is not into its CEO Sosan Ga Darzi Sossan, thanks

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 4>so much for joining us.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate it.

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 10>Thank you for having me.

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, coming up, we're going to be joined by Amber

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Atherton from Patron to talk all things gaming and VC.

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 10>That's next.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Now in today's VC Spotlight.

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the health of the video game industry,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>of social networks, of groupings, and whether we might see

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 2>actually an optic in investment in the second half of

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 2>the year into these sorts of processes. Amburatherton's with us

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 2>partner at the early stage at benufirm Patron, and you're

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 2>all in on sort of networks of people, of thinking

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and of gaming interaction online.

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Having been a founder now a VC.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 2>What is artificial intelligence doing to the conversations you're having

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 2>at the moment?

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean we're good to be back. Thanks for

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 16>having me. I think after selling my startup to Discord,

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 16>I saw firsthand that this younger generation really see gaming

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 16>not just as entertainment, but as a social networks where

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 16>they hang out with their friends. And I think you're

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 16>seeing us move towards a more community driven multiplayer internet,

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 16>and so I think when you see AI as part

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 16>of that story, I mean if you look at Nvidio,

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 16>you look at Microsoft, all of these are companies that

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 16>started out serving the gaming market, and it's not a

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 16>surprise that they now have an edge on AI. Because

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 16>they start out serving gamers who are very early adopters

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 16>to new platforms, they have huge demands in terms of

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 16>graphics and infrastructure.

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 3>So I think we're very excited about startups that.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 16>Are using gaming as a wedge to further improve AI.

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Wally and Brot, I want to talk about one of

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 4>your most recent investments. Caroline and I were talking about

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 4>it a little earlier. The company Aria just announced yesterday.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting because AI sort of goes into the background

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 4>there with sort of this AI powered concierge. Talk a

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 4>little bit about what exactly this investment is because it's

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 4>not completely in the world of gaming, as in your

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 4>playing games against somebody else in a virtual world, but

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 4>it actually takes a real world approach right exactly.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 16>And I think part of Patron's thesis is that gaming

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 16>can be a source of good and better goodness for

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 16>the world. And so I think when we're looking at gaming,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 16>it's from a broader lens of yes, we have mets

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 16>and studios, but we also look at how gaming is

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 16>influencing border consumer technology and Aria is a good example

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 16>of this where AI doesn't have to completely replace human interaction,

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 16>and in fact, what Aria is doing is helping couples

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 16>increase their relationship strength be better partners to each other

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 16>through this wonderful hybrid of an AI concierge, physical boxes,

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 16>and a lot of content. So we look at it

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 16>a much border lens, and I think companies like Aria

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 16>have a really great shot at using AI in a

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 16>way that doesn't isolate human connection.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Digital human beings is the the to surround Alterra a

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>different portfolio company of yours, and you're investing alongside the

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>likes of Eric Schmid in this one particular, it's about

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 2>lab building agents and how does that fit into a

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 2>gaming context. Are you're going to be gaming alongside agents.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Are they going to be within your in the world's

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 2>ones creating.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I think it's very rare as an investor to

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 16>witness a paradigm shift in terms of how humans interact

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 16>with computers. So when we met the founders of al Terra,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 16>we were very excited about what they were building. You know,

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 16>in the initial phases, it's very much you're able to

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 16>game with an AI agent instead of a friend or

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 16>with a friend, But where that's ultimately going is toward.

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Digital human beings.

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 16>So I don't think it's inconceivable to think that in

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 16>the future we will have AI agents and AI friends

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 16>that provide more than utility book companionship, friendship, and you're

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 16>able to play play games with them. They're able to

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 16>assist you in your life. And so I think al

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 16>Terra is a very interesting example of using gaming as

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 16>a wedge to ultimately the much much border consumer market.

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 2>But you wrote a book about online communities. They're real

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 2>people having real relationships via internet. Now we're thinking about

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 2>how we're going to be playing against totally false agents

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 2>who are not actually real humans, and we're thinking about

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 2>building our own intimacy via bets that you're making through

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the power of AI. Are you feeling comfortable with the

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 2>direction of travel of artificial intelligence and humanity at the moment?

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think it's ultimately helping or hindering in some way?

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 16>I'm, you know, in the business of optimism, So for me,

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 16>it's that AI is not replacing humans. AI is augmenting humans.

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 16>AI is bringing a new dimension of fun and personalization

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 16>into so many different consumer interactions. And I think for

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 16>us as patron, you know, we invest across this spectrum

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 16>of play, and I think it's very difficult to see

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 16>where consumer technology and AI is going if you don't

0:36:56.280 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 16>understand gaming. So for us, we are excited about founders

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 16>that are operating at the earlier stages, you know, seed stage,

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 16>and are using AI to really be a force of

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 16>good in the world.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Amber who's the platform winner in the world that you

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 4>envision in the coming years? Is it iOS? Is it Android?

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Is it Nintendo? Is it Microsoft? Is it Sony?

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Or is it somebody we're not even talking about.

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 16>I think you've mentioned a lot of very interesting names

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 16>there who are all experimenting at the forefront of you know,

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 16>different technological edges. Whether it is ARVR, which we talked

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 16>a lot about last time, Caroline, or whether it is

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 16>AI and so I think that looking at the gaming

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 16>stocks particularly, you know a discord if you look at Reddit,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 16>one of the most oversubscribed IPOs, and actually even a

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 16>company like web Tunes that is adjacent to gaming, those

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 16>types of platforms are very very interesting in terms of

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 16>where the next generation is spending their time.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, they're growing up on games.

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 16>Half of us eight to ten year olds playing Roadblox

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 16>every single day. So I think looking at those stocks

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 16>and those gaming companies is where you'll see the platform breakouts.

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to have to leave it there.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 4>That's patron partner Amber Atherton joining us from California, Thanks

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 4>so much.

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>On Wednesday, fired SpaceX engineers filed a lawsuit against Eno

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Musk for sexual harassment and retaliation. That was over in

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 2>a California state court. Now this escalates their multi front

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 2>legal battle with the billionaire chief executive and his aerospace company. Now,

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the Calllifornia suit claims the Musk posted sexual photographs, demeaning commentary,

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and chose to fire employees for speaking up. Josh Idelson

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 2>joins us now for more to discuss eight employees here,

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and this isn't the first time we've heard.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>From them, that's right.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 17>This is a case from twenty twenty two in which,

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 17>as you said, workers engineers say that because they worked

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 17>on an open letter raising concerns about the company's culture

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:03.399
<v Speaker 17>and Musk's behavior, or asking whether the company's policies were

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 17>being applied equally to the chief executive, asking whether this

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 17>was the kind of culture they wanted to bring to

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 17>mars that as a result, they were fired. They brought

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 17>a case to the US Labor Board, which issued a

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 17>complaint saying they were illegally retaliated against in violation of

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 17>federal labor law. Now that case at the Labor Board

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 17>is essentially frozen by a federal court injunction because SpaceX

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 17>responded by accusing the US Labor Board of having an

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 17>unconstitutional structure. So now this is a different front where

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 17>these workers are saying that the company also violated California's

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 17>state law. And in this case they are able to

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 17>name Elon Musk personally as a defendant. They're also able

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.399
<v Speaker 17>to seek damages that the Labor Board can't.

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Now we want to get to the response from SpaceX

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and eal mask. They've not immediately responded to request to

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 2>comment on the lawsuit. They previously denied though rom doing

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 2>as you said and said the fired employees violated policies

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and that Musk was actually not involved in their termination.

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 2>But ultimately, have we seen responses coming from the business

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 2>more coordinated fashion to try and tackle at least some

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 2>of the issues that are now being circulated amongst citizens

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 2>as well as those within the company.

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 17>Well, we've seen in the Wall Street Journal, for example,

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 17>Gwen Shotwell, the company's president, saying that allegations that have

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 17>been made don't reflect the culture at the company. The

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 17>lawsuit that these fired engineers filed seeks to get a

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 17>court to force the company to change its policies to

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 17>address what they say is the company and the CEO

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 17>knowingly creating a hostile work environment and retaliating against people

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 17>for bringing it up. They note that Musk has publicly

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 17>marked misconduct allegations against him in the past.

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 4>What could the implications be for Space if these engineers

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 4>are successful in their lawsuit and the implications for Elon

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Musk as well.

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 10>Well. They're seeking damages.

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 17>They're seeking in an injunction that would force the company

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 17>to change its behavior. One question here is how much

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 17>the entities that SpaceX contracts with care about this, including

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 17>the US government. Elon Musk has shown a lot of

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 17>tolerance for controversy and for legal battle and for appeals,

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 17>as we've seen in a number of cases. We will

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 17>see if the company chooses to change anything in response

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 17>to this escalating controverty.

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Does it have any implications for Tesla or any of

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk's other companies.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 17>People who've come forward with allegations have said that they

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 17>see patterns at each of these places in terms of

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 17>the company's behavior and in terms of the CEO's willingness

0:41:56.640 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 17>to continue taking the approach that he's taken, even in

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 17>the face of public embarrassment and allegations that the company

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 17>again is denied wrongdoing.

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Josh Idolson here in New York. Josh, good to

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 4>see you. Thanks for joining us on this to appreciate it.

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Great to have him in the studio meanwhile, But that

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 2>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You don't

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 2>want to forget to check out our podcast. You can

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 2>find it on the terminal as well as online on Apple,

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 2>on Spotify, and I heart Tim. It's great have you

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 2>sat next to me. And there's so much more to

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 2>digestoing for in the rest of the day.

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Should we do this again tomorrow?

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Baby, night?

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 10>Okay, cool, good stop by here.

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll be here to make your day a little bit longer.

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll see what will be.

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Watching the all important Tesla AGM a little bit later.

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 3>Stay tuned for it.

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 8>This is Blomberg Technology.