WEBVTT - I Need A Spirit Day

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty, arm Strong

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>and Getty and he Armstrong and Yeddy Michael. You're gonna

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>post your cheese dip or whatever your recipe, Yes, sir,

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna actually make that this year. Henry and I

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are gonna eat cheese dip. Matter of fact, it's already posted.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Henry's gonna wear his Mahomes jersey. I'm gonna wear my

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.959
<v Speaker 1>original Chief's Joe Montana jersey from way back in the day.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Watch the Big Game.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>You'll always be a forty nine er to me or

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 2>something irrelevant. So the Super Bowl is coming up Sunday, Shirley,

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>you know that. And this is a list of things

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the NFL requires your city has if you want to

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>host one.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 3>NFL requires access to two top tier boys alleys.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>No clue why.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Roger Goodell is a bowling enthusiast, but who knows.

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>The league also requires access to three top tier golf

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 3>courses no costs luss. The city must be able to

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 3>provide free apartment housing to NFL staff for over a

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 3>month before the actual game. Thirty five thousand free parking

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>spaces at the stadium, and twenty three billboards for promotional

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>use around the city. Not to mention the team. Hotels

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 3>must agree to televise the NFL network or a year

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 3>leading up to the Super Bowl.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Well that's an interesting one to jam in the

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They have to be there for a month before the game,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL officials. Yeah, golf courses doesn't surprise me. I guess

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>bowling alleys.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you probably have various parties for the owners and

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>sponsors and all sorts of stuffies. Actually surprised. Strip clubs

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>is not on that list. I wonder if that's in

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 2>the fine prints. Probably with a non disclosure agreement to

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>attack don rightly.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So in some sort of gentleman's entertainment.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh, gentlemen, I thought this is interesting if you're new

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to the show. Jack and I both have railed long

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and hard against critical theory and DEI it's neo Marxism.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Will explain a little more about that.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>It maskerrades quite successfully, though, as we just want everybody

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>to get a fair shot in America, and a lot

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 2>of people think DEI actually is just we want more diversity.

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 2>We want people to be able to apply for jobs

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 2>and get them. No, everybody wants that DEI is in

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>cities plot that mascarades as civil rights. Having said that

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the headline the journal America is abandoning DEI, the NFL

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>remains all in. Everyone from the federal government of the

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Fortune five hundred are dialing back diversity efforts DEI efforts,

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 2>but America's most popular sport is standing its ground. I'm

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>not shocked by this. I don't like it.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the fact that journalism regularly fudges the

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>difference between DEI, which is a specific thing, and diversity,

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>acting like they're the same thing. They don't know.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I honestly believe the percentage of Americans who understand that

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 2>that DEI is part of critical theory comes from the

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Frankfurt School of philosophy. It's a method of taking over institutions. Essentially,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you call everybody a racist unless they agree with you.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps you went to a delightful training session where this happened,

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and obviously, if you're a racist, according to the nice

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 2>people who are running your DEI department, you can't be

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>in charge, and so they get rid of you and

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>they bring in somebody who believes what they do, which

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>is Neo Marxism, equity, etc. DEI is Marxism. It's not diversity.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>That reminds me. I read a great piece yesterday on

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>how ibramx Kenny is one of the great sisters of

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>all time. Now that his run is over, I think

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>had to shut down his anti racist institute. He got

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars. Where's I think in donations from companies.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Never did anything. No people were falling all over themselves

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to give money. I'm not a racist. Don't call me

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a racist. Don't call me a racist.

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>And you remember, no matter how you intended what you said,

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 2>if I say you're a racist, you are a racist.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 2>It's a method of capture, of taking over institutions. And

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>he and Robin DiAngelo and that whole ridiculous scam which

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>is still going on. They knew precisely what they were doing.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 2>But back to my main point, I think a lot

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>of people don't understand it. Yeah, I see even in

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 2>fairly conservative publications, I still see people talk about DEI

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>as if it's just an honest and open hearted desire

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to have, you know, like a black kid have the

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>same opportunities in America as a white kid. Again, everybody

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 2>wants that DEI is not that anyway. Having said that,

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>back to the journal thing, the NFL is a TV show.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Never forget that it's an entertainment product from top to bottom.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Not actually an effort to see which city has the

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>best forty guys to play football. Hired bmuths.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>No, it's a TV show, and it is an incredibly popular,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 2>profitable TV show, and a huge percentage of the cast

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>are young black men and are incredibly important to the

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 2>game and its popularity.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed that, and given the fact.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>That most people don't understand what DEI really is and

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.559
<v Speaker 2>what it is not, including young black men who run,

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, receiving routes and get tackled hard and stay

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in incredible physical condition and memorize playbooks that would boggle

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the mind of an MIT physicist, that they don't spend

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time acquainting themselves with the subtleties of

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 2>sociological issues is not shocking. So I get why Roger

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Goodell has said, no, we're still up with diversity, up

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 2>with DEI. We're continuing all our programs. I get why

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 2>he does that. It annoys me, but I get it.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was more interesting and revealing. This is

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 2>a piece written by Callum Borcher's what happens when a

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>former NFL player becomes your office coworker. And I've got

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 2>to admit I haven't thought about this much. Oh and

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 2>he mentions, did we find the audio, guys from the

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and three that was.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two years ago?

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 2>A Super Bowl commercial featuring was it Terry Tait office

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>linebacker or something like that?

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Do we have that? Oh?

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, if you saw the commercial, you certainly remember it now.

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely hilarious. They hired a linebacker to root out inefficiency

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 2>at their office. It's kind of like Doge, except if

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 2>you weren't doing your job right, he would level you

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 2>wearing his football gear. Anyway, back to the threat of

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the thing. I thought this was super interesting. Turns out

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>real NFL retirees who entered the business world learned to

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>make an impact in different ways. Quote Will Rackley, a

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>former offensive lineman for the Jaguars and Ravens. He's a

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>couple of months into a job as a business operations

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>analyst at the staffing firm Atrium. He said it can

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 2>be a culture shock when stepping into a corporate setting

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to the locker room. But manager after manager

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 2>was telling callum borchers that they struggle to recruit people

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>who can take and deliver candid feedback, especially these days.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We've all heard stories of the.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Snowflakes and the gen Zers and millennials and gen zers

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>especially who if you say, you know that report wasn't

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>quite up to snuff, they will break down.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, you're crutching my spirit.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I need a spirit day, I need a mental health day.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>They have trouble with people that can deliver the candid feedback.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Though you smell funny, everybody's talking about it.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>No, not that sort of candid about job performance specifically

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people, particularly given the first thing I

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 2>was talking about, People who can't take candid feedback are

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 2>extremely uncomfortable giving it. You gotta stop eating with your

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>mouth open. You're gonna make somebody kill you. Wow, now

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about business performance again. But a former gridiron

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>pro accustomed to coaches a yell, cuss, and call out

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>mistakes in postgame film sessions every week of their careers

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>is not likely to will to under a little constructive criticism.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>That's funny. My son just said this is his first

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>real sport. I think he's playing volleyball. He said. The

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>coach is yelling at me all the time. I said,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what coaches do. Yes, good or bad, no matter

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, the coaches yell at you. That's the way

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it works.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the candid feedback we're discussing. And while there

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 2>are some truth to the cliche that athletes can bring

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>winning mindsets to business, it is actually their ability to

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 2>handle losing that stands out.

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>According to bosses and the former.

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 2>NFL players are talking about are like the vast majority

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>you leave the game, not hall of famers with set

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 2>for life money. They are often men who are pushed

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>out of the game by injuries or a younger, cheaper

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 2>draft pick who could play about as well.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Which is which is almost everybody who gets in the NFL. Right.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, vast majority they've dealt with disappointment and regrouped,

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>said an associate director of non traditional talent programs at Verizon.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 2>The ability to pick yourself up and get back into

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the game is really what business is all about. And

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 2>he's found these guys to be much more resilient. I

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 2>don't they understand, Wow, that went badly. What can we learn?

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't doubt that that should be focused on more

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for all professional athletes, the vast majority of them. Even

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>if you've reached your dreams, made it to that league,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna make a little money and be there a

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, and then you're gonna go back to

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>regular life and you're gonna be twenty five years old, right,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and that that would be an interesting mindset. I was

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>good enough to play in that league. I worked my

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's off ten hours a day, like my whole life.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's over now and I'm only twenty five, and

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I got to do something different, right. But I think

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the other aspects of it, because that's important, though, But

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea of somebody, well, they make another point. NFL

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>players are completely unfazed by the arduous process of interviewing

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for white collar jobs and or preparing for presentations and

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>interviews and stuff like that.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>It's what they've done their whole lives. It's a different

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 2>skill set that they're preparing for. But the idea of

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have to go really really hard to get

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>rid or get ready for this one particular meeting or

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>something they're completely in that mode, So I thought that

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>was interesting. It also reminds me of the New York Times.

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 2>There's a great piece they did. Yeah, I know, when

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 2>they're not completely biased, they do really good journalism once

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 2>in a while. That the single most important characteristic for

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>a child to predict their success in life is resilience.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Can they are they afraid of failure? Or do they

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>understand had happened sometime? Let's plunge on number one predictor,

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and I could see why NFL players would be really

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 2>good at that. I mean, even the Chiefs, who are

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>on the brink of a third consecutive Super Bowl, got

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>to help us.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>They lose games, not Sunday. They won't all right.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Looking, it's, oh yeah, we get to Terry Tate office linebacker.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Why not Michael Again? This was twenty two years ago.

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Good God.

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 4>When we asked Rebuk to send us Terry Tate, some

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 4>people thought we were crazy. But I'm a firm believer

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>in paradigm, breaking outside the box.

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Thinking anyway, break was over fifteen minutes ago match.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 4>And since Terry has been with us, our productivity has

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 4>gone up forty six percent. We're getting more from our

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 4>employees than ever before.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, you need a come a seat or your

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>TPS reports, Richie. That ain't new baby, hey Janis.

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 4>But what's really impressed me is how Terry has become

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 4>part of the Felcher family.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>He fits right in here. This is little thiss call Doug.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 4>To be honest.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish Reebucks sent us ten. Terry takes you want

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay games day time? His pay time?

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Baby?

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Who love it? Looking at CNN Elon Musk's Doge remaking

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the federal government at breakneck speed. Now, why you've gotten

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>many Democratic leaders screaming. You'll hear some of that screaming

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>coming up.

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 4>In the United States Senate.

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We will not cooperate. We will cooperate with no appointments.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the State Department. There should be

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands and millions of people to send Washington

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>d C. We must resisked, We must be in the streets,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>all right. Part of it might be this is a

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>pushback against Doge and shrinking the government and cutting costs

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and aid and all this different sort of stuff from

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. Some of it might be they just they're

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so demoralized on the left, and it's just part of

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a cycle. They'll be back in the right, will be

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>demoralized in the blink of an eye, because I've lived

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>through this enough times. But they're so demoralized, Joe Wall,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it lasts. They're so demoralized on the left they have

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to show some like fight to their crowd, like we're

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>fighting something. I guess, look at us. We're confident, we

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>know what we're doing.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 2>We're fighting for you by keeping the bloat in the

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 2>federal government.

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's a little more of that sort of thing. What

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is doing is illegal. It is a cupe. Elon ms

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>makes unsafe cause and now he wants to create an

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>unsafe world. We will not shut up. We will stand up.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>We will speak up that same spirit the Elon Musk

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has coming from South Africa. We're not gonna have apart

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>time in America. Oh boy, who the hell is Musk

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think he is? He has absolutely no right. He's shutting

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>down USA. I d we cannot allow that. We've got

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to take to the streets.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Tss.

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Wow, they tried to turn it racial with an apartheid reference.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>There. He builds unsafe cars, all right, Yeah, you loved

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>his cars until he became a Trump guy.

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 2>And look, we've we've met John Germundy's a longtime congressman

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 2>from northern California. He's one of Congressman Joe John. Look around,

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>look at the company you're keeping. You are so much

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>better than that, and.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You gotta say something. Yeah. We got a couple of

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>texts about things we've talked about. One we got a

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>number of texts about people had funny experiences with either

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>handyman or home improvement. People showing up drunk or not

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>having tools or a ladder or whatever like I experienced yesterday.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember the one time somebody, it was somebody who's

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>out there and they asked me, I think, for a

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>tool of some sort and I said no, And I

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>said you live on a farm and you don't have that.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought, okay, cool, so you can come out here

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>without tools and shame me for not having the tool

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you need. This is fantastic, four stars. It's on me,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess uh. And then earlier I was talking about

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm having the biggest sleep crisis of my life out

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere. I just can't sleep and it's making me insane.

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people recognizing recommending magnesium I have jackets

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly have a mineral deficiency. Take magnesium in all caps.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It is essential to help, he said. Lots of people

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are big on the magnesium. I don't know if that's

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a hot thing right now. Yes, Kate, it is a

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>hot thing. And one of the guys at my gym say,

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>because I was having trouble sleeping, he goes, you gotta

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>try this. But the only thing I'll tell you is

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that it gives you like acid dreams. Cool. I didn't. Yeah,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't try it, But well, you take magaza. I

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have any problem at all. How's your stool? Everything's final.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Have you tried vitamin B? That's what I call bourbon dad?

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>He needs his vitamin B. Magnesium might one percent be okay.

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's funny how various supplements come in and out

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of favor, and they're they're you know, for a year

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they're the hot thing. Well you're not getting enough whatever,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and every store in America sells a bottle of it,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and noverybody takes it.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, if I can buy a bottle

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of it for five dollars and I've convinced myself it'll work,

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and I fall asleep like.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>A baby, bingo I'm one hundred percent in favor of Placebia. Yeah,

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that that works. It works. I'll take magnesium until I oh,

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>until my stool's okay, you know, I'm Michael like yours.

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Good lord, Yeah, that's stop. So Kamala Harris was on

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes. You remember that big interview. They edited her

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>answer Trump is suing. We have what the actual answer was.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting case for those of us in the media.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Pretty interesting. So stay stay here, Armstrong and Getty. This

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is already a win for Trump and it will continue

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a win for most people. I think the

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>way most people will well, we'll hear this story about

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the sixty minutes editing Kamala Harris's interview, whether whether it's

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>accurate or not, this is the way it's going to

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>be come off, I think.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times headline is FCC releases sixty minutes

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 1>interview with Kamala Harris. Remember she did a big sit

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.239
<v Speaker 1>down in sixty minutes leading up to the election. Got

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of scrutiny because well, she

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>very rarely answered questions, and when she did, it was nonsensical.

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So it always got a lot of scrutiny, and then

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we all found out, like the next day or very

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>soon there after, that there was some editing and the

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>promos and this and that, and did they cut one

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of our answers to make her seem less crazy and

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff that was out there in

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the world. But so this sixty minute, this story from

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times Today again FCC, the FCC released this,

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not c the mean they made CBS get it. FCC

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>releases sixty minutes interview with Kamala Harris. The complete interview,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which is at the center of a lawsuit filed by

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>President Trump, shows that sixty Minutes aired a concise version

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of Miss Harris's answer on Israel. Thought it was interesting

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that The New York Times went with that is kind

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of the subheadline, because if all you look at is that,

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you certainly come away with the Trump was right, they

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>were wrong. They were trying to screw him. I think

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the way most people are gonna take that story.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the way CBS presented it.

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 5>Now have some news about CBS itself. Sixty Minutes has

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 5>posted on cbsnews dot com transcripts and videos from its

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 5>interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris at aired back

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 5>in October. The SCC had requested these materials as part

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 5>of an investigation into a complaint alleging quote intentional news

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 5>distortion close quote. The issue concerns one question about whether

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin at Yahoo was listening to the

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 5>Biden administration. CBS News broadcast a longer portion of Harris's

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 5>answer on Face the Nation, and then a shorter excerpt

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 5>of the same answer on sixty Minutes. In a statement,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 5>sixty Minutes said the transcripts and video show quote the

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 5>sixty Minutes broadcast was not doctored or deceitful close quote,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 5>adding that each.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Excerpt reflects the.

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 5>Substance of the Vice President's.

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Answer, which is a better story, a better explanation of

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it than They're probably not happy at CBS the way

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times boiled it down to one sentence.

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess I mean more concise is and it

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 2>doesn't strike me that judgmental either way.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, New York Post version uncut. Now we're about to

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>play the actual clips, but uncut sixty minutes Kamala Harris

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>interview reveals word salad responses were heavily edited by sixty minutes.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>UH snipped Israel answer to just twenty words. Kamala Harris

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>gave a one hundred and seventy nine word meandering answer

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on Israel that sixty minutes cut to twenty words, according

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to the transcripts released yesterday. Wow, that's some editing. One

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy nine word answer to twenty words. Now,

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>as executive producer, Hanson has been talking about as a

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>guy who's produced lots of different kinds of radio shows

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and sports highlights and all kinds of different stuff. That's

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what we do all the time the media business. Oh yeah,

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to. You have to for all kinds of reasons,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>time keeping people's attention, jazzing it up, making it punchy.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>The issue really seems to be to me that in

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this particular case, the number one knock on the candidate

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was they couldn't answer a question without going into word

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>solid mode.

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that was like one of the key questions

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 2>with her, right a campaign issue. But what question are

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>we asking here? And I'll tell you the reason I

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 2>asked that. I mean, CBS is wildly biased, wildly and

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.959
<v Speaker 2>I think most people know it. This lawsuit is nuts.

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>It'll be dismissed very very quickly. Well, so you're going

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to the legal thing. I don't care about the legal thing.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think politically it's going to be damaging, absolutely damaging

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to the media. Slash sixty minutes and vic st to

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>win for Trump, I think. And Trump doesn't think he's

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>going to win the lawsuit. I don't think. Oh no,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he just wants to people to talk about it.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Although getting back to the New York Times article, right,

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about it in a way that suggests

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that sixty Minutes did edit the answer to make her

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>look better, which you know, I'm sure he's very happy with.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>But farther down in the New York Times article about this,

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty Minutes argues that it did nothing wrong. It's common

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>practice for news organizations to edit for a blah blah bah.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Getting into the legal part of it. I want to

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>get this because this is really good sue. For the

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>legal part of it. Yeah, I should have highlighted this,

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mister Troops. Lawsuit has led to angst at CBS, where

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>many staff members believe that any settlement would be a

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>symbolic concession to the President and an acknowledgment of wrongdoing

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>by sixty Minutes. Bill Owens, the executive producer of sixty Minutes,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>said Monday in a meeting with staff that he would

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not apologize to Trump as part of any settlement with

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the network. But it looks like that's probably what going

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to happen. CBS is going to pay something to get

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>this over with and wants to include an apology, but

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the guy involves it. I'm not apologizing. And the staff

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that works there, We've heard this over and over again,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>right New York Times, sixty Minutes, all these different left

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>leaning organizations. The staff gets all upset. We can't have

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't give an inch on any of these things.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The people at the top or the lawyers often have

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a different point of view of we need to settle this.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>It's only going to get more expensive. People settle these

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of things all the time. Yeah.

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, if they do, I'll be really

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 2>disappointed you can't settle it.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll be interested to see if they do or not.

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm having this conversation with my kids the other day

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>about why lawyers recommend settling things when you did nothing wrong.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just a dollars and cents question often.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I were a smarter lawyer than their lawyers,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I'd say, you're going to be handling one of these

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>suits every week and a half to I don't know,

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>four days. If you settle this oh you edited it

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 2>made me look bad or made me unhappy. No, you

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 2>can't settle this suit.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder, I wonder where it's going or how

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to turn out. But anyway, let's play the clips,

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the actual clips. So this is one version of the

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>question in answer clip seventy one there between Bill Whitaker

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and Kamala Harris. But it seems that Prime Minister in

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>net and Yah who is not listening.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 6>in a number of movements in that region by Israel

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 6>that we're very much prompted by or a result of

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 6>many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 6>in the region.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm mostly reminded listening to that what a dope she is.

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>She was a dope. But here's the same question, different answer.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But it seems that Prime Minister net and Yah who

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is not listening, We're not.

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 6>Going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 6>States to be clear about where we stand on the

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 6>need for this war to end.

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a tough one. I mean, not the legal part.

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in that part. But that's a tough

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>one from a like even a news standpoint, because normally, yeah,

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you're interviewing, whether it's a politician or a coach or whoever.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You tried it, you just try to get it down

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to the answer. You had a question and you want

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the answer, and you want to give the answer to

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the people who are watching or listening, and you want

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to be short and interesting and easily understood. But in

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the case of Kamala Harris, because she was such a

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>meandering dope. God, the story is the long, meandering dopiness.

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>That is the story. What she she doesn't say anything. Ever,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know from a like even a journalistic standpoint,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>would I think how you should handle that? I mean,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had, unlike all other politicians, editing her at all,

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>was significant to the interview, Yeah, yeah, I get it.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what was the total on the words there

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that I mentioned? This is from the New York Post's

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>counting of it. She gave the total answer, which I

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think we you can. The whole thing is out now.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I started watching yesterday. It's like an hour long. But

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing is out there, and I'll have to

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>watch this later. They didn't air it in the sixty

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>minutes interview, the whole thing at all, but Kamala Harris

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>gave a one hundred and seventy nine word answer to

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that question, and then sixty minutes cut it down to

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty words, which still sounds dumb. She still sounds like

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>she has no idea what she's talking about.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, that first version was I was like, oh, that's right. Yeah, boy,

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 2>she's that dumb.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's the trip. That's the twenty one that's the

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty word version that they edited it out to. I

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>want to hear the whole ard seventy nine words? How

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>does she say good Lord?

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Keeping in mind she only lost because of misogyny and

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>racism according to the new head of the DNC.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I think what's going to come out

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of this? And like, looking at that New York Times

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>subhad people are gonna hear see Trump sues sixty minutes.

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Turns out sixty minutes did edit it. I think that's

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be in the ether of the conversation

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>about this. Yeah, if if it becomes against the law

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to edit answers at all, I don't know how we

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.959
<v Speaker 1>would even move forward as a species, those of us

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>who play clips for a living.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.959
<v Speaker 2>And if you're not familiar with this, politicians, especially if

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 2>they're in an even semi hostile forum, we'll try to

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>filibuster you. Yeah, you'll ask them are you going to

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>vote for the Jones Amendment? And five and a half

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 2>minutes of rambling later, you'll find finally be like.

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Can we readirect plays? And they do that intentionally, so

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to edit. Yeah, that's a good point right there.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It's often to not have to answer the question and

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>bor you to death, or knowing that you're going to

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have to get to a break at some point. I'm

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>not a big fan of horror movies. I just I

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>don't dig them.

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 2>But if I want to be horrified, I'll sit around

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 2>in daydream for five minutes.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>About what it would have been like if Kamala had won.

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>And we were going one hundred miles per hour down

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the road of DEI and white guilt and men playing

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 2>women sports and squandering money and the ridiculous USAID programs,

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 2>one hundred different examples. It's too terrible to contemplate.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>We you know, I believe in the parallel universe thing.

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to. I want Elon to put me on

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a spaceship to go to the parallel universe where she

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>won and see how it's playing out. Holy cow, no kidding, man,

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>You talk about a different next four years.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, in foreign policy wise, what are our adversaries going

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>to do with President kamalaw in charge?

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I would liked her super Bowl interview, or she

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't have done it. She'd have done like Biden

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and just skipped it. Yeah, Trump's doing it. He's gonna

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.239
<v Speaker 1>be interviewed by Brett Baer before the super Bowl. If

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you want more politics on your Super Bowl Sunday, I don't.

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got more on the way next. What's the most

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>sought after beer in America? Of that? For you in

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a moment? Sought after? Yeah, people can't wait till it

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>shows up. The annual delivery of what arguably the most

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>sought after beer in America. Well, I'll tell you now,

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Pliny the Younger, which I've never had. Are you familiar

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>with that?

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Beer.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I remember it was Pliny the Elder for a long time. Okay,

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 2>they've evolved.

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess when it shows up and it's going

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to at least in the San Francisco Bayry at the

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>bars this weekend. It's a hot thing and it doesn't

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>last long. Okay. Our former producer Scott was a big fan.

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh really. In fact, I think he brought a six

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>pack in. Yep. Yeah, so we got more texts about

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole sixty minutes Kamala edited thing than we get

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on most topics. So again, I think it's gonna end

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>up being a win for Trump overall. But somebody pointed

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>out the sixty minutes interview was mostly Bill Whittaker talking

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>over the video of Kamala summarizing her answers, which is

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>true if you remember that they do that all the time.

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>They'll just show a picture of her walking through the

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>White House or something, say Kamala hars. He went on

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that she believes that because she couldn't say

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it herself. Yeah, of course, they talk so freaking slow

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in sixty minutes. It is one of your big complaints

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and they repeat every question. Have you tried doing audio

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>books or podcasts at more than one time speed, like

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>faster or twice. Yeah, I don't think it's good for me.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I was listened to Elon on a podcast the other day.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>He does his at like one and a half to two.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Everything he takes in. He thinks our brains can take

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in information much faster, and that you know, we just

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>need to we need just to like acclimate ourselves to

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it and wrap ourselves up, and that we could and

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that we'll be able to take in stuff so we

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>can just take in so much more information. I think

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got like one of the more special brains in

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>world history, and he thinks everybody else's brain's like his.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm willing to consider it and give it a try.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:56.479
<v Speaker 2>But he's an autistic super genius right exactly. But man

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 2>like a greyhound looking at my Labrador retriever and saying

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you could run.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Faster than that. You know. I tried one point two

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on this book, and if you look at the it

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>really saves you a ton of time. I mean, the

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>math's pretty simple. But I had like three hours left

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on this book and I clicked up the speed, and

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden I got two hours and twenty minutes,

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought, Wow, I could get through it that much faster,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but it was making me insane trying to pay attention

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to was like, ah, is it making me nervous? Because

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't you can't let your mind drift for a

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. If when they're talking this fast all the time,

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you got to be right on top of it, right right.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 2>And you know, the stuff I listened to is like

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>full of ideas. That's why I'm listening to it, and

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.479
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to be able to absorb them and kind

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 2>of kick them around a little bit. Anyway, Speaking of media,

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 2>a couple more quick notes. The FCC has launched an

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 2>investigation into radio stations backed by leftist billionaire George Sorows

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 2>for broadcasting.

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Live locations about the cover immigration.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Right for broadcasting live locations of undercovered immigration and Customs

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Enforcement agents UH. One of those stations, case CBS in

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 2>San France, California's, come under scrutiny for revealing live locations

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of undercover ice vehicles and agents conducting operations outrageous. They've

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 2>sent a formal letter letter of inquiry to the radio

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 2>station as part of the FCC investigation.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>This is really serious stuff and it should be. How

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>much trouble is our friend in who has done news

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for us many, many, many times over the years, how

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>much trouble is he in? Like, legally speaking, I have

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>no idea. I've heard a couple of people say, like

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he could actually be in bad trouble. Yeah, I would.

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd have to look into that because the First Amendment

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 2>is a powerful son of a gun protecting the media.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.479
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not saying he should be. I just don't know.

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 2>But we'll be covering it, I mean, because it affects

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>us in a rather fundamental way. Not that we're going

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.959
<v Speaker 2>to out undercover operations anytime soon, because we're not I

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know, commie jackasses.

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, what if it was something we agreed with, though

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we should be able to do that, right, What would

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be a good example. I don't know. If the Kamala

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Harris administration was gonna come get you if you misgendered somebody,

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>which is against the law in California. So let's say

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom was gonna come arrest you because you misgendered somebody,

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And we decided to go on the radio and say

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>where the misgender police were so you could look out

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for them. We might do that.

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I would do that one hundred percent, and I would

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>expect to endure the consequences. I don't know, and then

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I would get a lawyer and fight it, and that

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 2>would be my thing, and I'd be really excited.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess your question is, should there be consequences as

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a free speech issue? I don't know. I never thought

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>at that angle. It just seems so unconsciable to me

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to tip off criminals. And I don't mean they're here

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>illegally criminals, they're criminals on top of that right to

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>try to protect them seems so crazy to me. Oh yeah,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 2>It purely as the First Amendment press issue, not whether

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 2>it was right or wrong. I mean, that's that's self

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 2>evident to me. It's funny I just wrote a thing.

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 2>It had to do with the idea of a brave

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 2>revolutionary college student, for instance, who considers himself a Jay Guavera.

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 2>They're wearing the caffia, which I heard referred to as

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 2>a terror scarf the other day.

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that kind of chilli. Honey, do

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you know where my terror scarf is?

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 2>My next exactly? But anyway, the brave little revolutionary who's

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 2>in there.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And you need to fight the power and bring revolution

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>from the river to the sea. And then they break

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>windows and get arrested, and it's oh, what are you doing?

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You're hurting my wrist? What are you doing? Yeah, you

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>can't rescue I have class tomorrow.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, you people are so pathetic. OI don't

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 2>have much time for this, and it's a damn shame.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 2>But I'll give you a touch of it. The Trump

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 2>administration is turning their gaze as soon as possible to

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:53.479
<v Speaker 2>NPR friends and the people who run NPR, and they're

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven to zero Democrats to Republicans at NPR in DC,

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 2>for instance, how that process is going to work, and

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 2>some great questions that ought to be asked. Next hour.

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 2>That's our four of the show. If you don't get

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 2>our four of the show, grab it later via podcasts.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Love this Since we have to compete against them and

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't get to government money to do it, Armstrong

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and Getty