WEBVTT - Former IBM CEO Sam Palmisano Talks AI

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 2>All Right, well, the biggest headline, of course, out of

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the WWDC was Tim Cook talking about artificial intelligence.

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Recent developments and generative intelligence and large language models offer

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 3>powerful capabilities that provide the opportunity to take the experience

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 3>of using Apple products to new heights. Introducing Apple Intelligence,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 3>the new personal intelligence system that makes your most personal

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 3>products even more useful and delightful.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Here in the studio with more is Sam Palmisano. He's

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>former CEO of IBM. He is also currently the board

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>chair of America's Frontier Fund, and nonprofit developed to support

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>critical tech to ensure US competitiveness. Sam, it's so great

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 2>to get you on set, your first guest on set for.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 4>The new show. I'm honor, thank you so much.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get you a hatter ache show that

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>it's something okay, perfect, We're gonna work my hair, little do,

0:00:58.160 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna work with shoot someone.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>So let's take a broader view. Then when it comes

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to AI, how does the US take the appropriate amount

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>of risk to make sure that it can stay ahead.

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question, quite honestly, and I'll step back

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 5>and say, look, at the models today and why we

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 5>created the American Frontier Fund. The models today are heavily

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 5>oriented around software. You heard that today or the Apple announcements.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 4>To stay ahead in tech, it has to.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Be much more than just software, So you need long

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 5>term investments in science and research. US is far ahead

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 5>in science and research, but we're losing track on commercialization

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 5>that builds the new technologies that changes the future, and

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 5>not just consumer convenience. I mean how healthcare is done,

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 5>how banking and our financial systems are run, how the

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 5>national security, national defense occurs. All those types of things

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 5>require much longer cycles of investment, and that's why we

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 5>created this thing called the American Frontier Fund.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>We want to keep the West ahead of the East.

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 3>So we have the Chips Act.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yes, we clearly have big tech innovating. Like where

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>are we falling short? Like where do you think the money,

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>in the talent and the time needs to go into That's.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 5>A great question because obviously the issues telling me that, Well, okay,

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 5>then I'll tell you that's an okay question.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 4>I asked Roman for a good question.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 5>But seriously, what it is that the point that the

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 5>cycles that we're talking about for these very advanced applications

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 5>to require I'll say, let's say ten to fifteen years,

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 5>we call it the value of death. To take it

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 5>from science and research through the value death to get

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 5>it to commercialization takes a long time. So to do

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 5>that you have to create a partnerships or an ecosystem

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 5>with the research laboratories, with the academic institutions, with the

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 5>private sector as well, and you need government involved because

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 5>of the risk associated of getting through the value of death.

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 4>And that's what we are about.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 5>And what we've created is a new model for commercialization

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 5>of this tech that it's required to keep the US

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 5>ahead of the rest of the world, but also the

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 5>funding models that make it attractive for private investment to

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 5>come in to these opportunities.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we have that right now? I mean, when you

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>look at sort of all the movement we see seen

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>an AI as of lately, so much of it seems

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to be driven by the private sector. And even when

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the government got involved, who do they turn to first?

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>They said, basically they brought the private sector and it

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>said give us a solution to regulating this, which I

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think caused everyone to kind of scratch their heads.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, they're t two different questions regulations different than actually

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 5>the creation of the tech and the creation of the tech.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 5>The reason why go back to the early days of

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 5>your INCU tell the CEO of the organization's give them

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 5>who created incutel.

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 4>That was for national security and defense.

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 5>But it was the same sorts of things that what

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 5>could you do long term in technology to make the

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 5>country more secure? And sometimes you need governments involvement because

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 5>of their risk factors, no different than the Chips Act.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 5>As far as you're talking about billions of dollars to

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 5>create these facilities which are necessary that we control the

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 5>resilience of the supply chain.

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 4>But who's going to take the risk of forty or

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>fifty billion in the private sector?

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Intel might invest twenty billion, but you're doubling

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 5>it up now for these kinds of technologies going into

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 5>the future.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>So this is why we've come up with this.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Model that says, Okay, we're going to collaborate in the

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 5>science with the national laboratories and everybody else, and then

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 5>when you have commercialization, we'll take it to the private sector.

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 5>But whether there's high risk involved, we're going to ask

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 5>for We're going to try to seek which we've done

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 5>in our first fund, there's government involvement, there's private sector

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 5>involvement as well. The combined are going to create the

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 5>first fund we're about to announce in two or three.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Are there parallels between what you're trying to do and

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing now and maybe what we saw coming

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the sixties seventies with some of the Defense

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Department projects and now there's some of the science based

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>projects that were government based that eventually created the foundations

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for what really is our tech industry.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, you go through a dark both, right, is the

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 5>in there? I mean, you go through those initials. I'm

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 5>so old I was involved with these things. I mean,

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 5>so I can take you through the history of hell

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 5>was all was done. But fundamentally, it's those kinds of

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 5>core technologies. Did you ever think of when you were

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 5>exchanging technical documents it would lead to what you do

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 5>today on your Apple phone, which you just heard about. No,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 5>of course not now, this is like what thirty forty

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 5>years later, But nonetheless it's the same sort of thing here.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 5>But a lot of this stuff does originate quite honestly,

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 5>in the science organizations within the government and the academics

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 5>research organizations. But you still need the private sector to commercialize,

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 5>not just the fund but also to commercialize because the

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 5>talent and the skills that are required to build these

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 5>companies don't exist in government. In fact, I would never

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 5>let government do it if I had an opinion on

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 5>that subject, because that's not what they do. So we

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 5>created these things we call road weather laboratories that actually

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 5>will take what we're not talking about and drive the

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 5>commercialization phase.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 2>So to that point, I've been wondering what the cycle,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what to call it, like the cycle

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 2>of AI or the cycle of AI chips, Like, what

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 2>what does that look like?

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Is it short? Is a long?

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 2>How does that affect the private the private money coming in?

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, give you a sense.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Historically, that's technology cycle. If I take you back fifty

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 5>years is fifteen to twenty years. So go back to

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 5>the mainframe mainframe, to the client server PC. Any clients

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 5>ever precede the cloud, they were fifteen to twenty year cycles.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 5>They started slower, Televisions, phones all started slower. Today with

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Jenner the AI, it is like on steroids relative to

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.559
<v Speaker 5>the pace of it. However, a lot of people argue

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 5>that it's at the peak, even there's research out there

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 5>that says we're peaking.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 4>In the cycle.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 5>So then what happens next and you hear it in

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 5>the enterprise talking about we can't use the stuff it hallucinates.

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 4>That's an indication that this thing is peaking.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 5>And maybe it's okay for music and poetry or marketing material,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 5>but you're not going to go defend the United States

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 5>infrastructure with that kind of technology, or you're not going

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 5>to have a bank and not deal a deal with

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 5>fraud or cyber with that kind of technology. So my

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 5>point being is this is where we are, but it's

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 5>going really really fast. Now the key, and we believe

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 5>the key for it to really be adopted in enterprise,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 5>it's basically you have to deal with we will call

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 5>them guardrails versus regulations room and we would argue that,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 5>and we do argue this that the right source for

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 5>the regular is not the tech industry itself, because there

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 5>are leaders in the tech industry and they're going to

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 5>show up with an opinion which is a valid opinion,

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 5>but also it serves the hyperscalers. We would say that

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 5>you really need to do who the users of the

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 5>technology are to take the businesses the CEOs of these

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 5>companies in healthcare, banking, government, whatever it happens to be,

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 5>and let them come up with let them innovative the technology,

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 5>but regulate the use cases the application, regulate the use

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 5>of the data, regulate the privacy, establish the guard rails

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 5>so that people are protected in their privacy and their

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 5>data is protected, both the consumer as well as the enterprise.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 4>That should be done by the enterprises.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Look, I was in the tech industry for forty years,

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 5>not by me or my counterparts.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, Sam, great conversation. I really appreciate you being

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 4>here today.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Sam pal Masano, former CEO over at IBM, and of

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>course now helping to shepherd that effort of that public

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>private partnership to further our technological advancement here in the US.