Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch. Lockdown. Pushback begins across
Speaker 1: the country. La Ban's outdoor Dining Oregon wants you to
Speaker 1: call cops on COVID violator neighbors. The vaccine is coming soon?
Speaker 1: And when will the Trump legal team release the Kraken.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake America. Here a great American again, The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexon Show begins, analysts he's a great guy. No, Well,
Speaker 1: we're finally there. We are at the point here where
Speaker 1: it's clear to everybody that the government's plan to protect
Speaker 1: you from COVID is to just keep piling nonsensical rules
Speaker 1: atop nonsensical rules, to demand that you ignore the hypocrisy
Speaker 1: that is going on, to demand that you pretend that
Speaker 1: they've told you things in the past that we're correct
Speaker 1: and true. Now it's what They're going to fiddle with
Speaker 1: the numbers a little bit. You've got cases rising across
Speaker 1: the country. What's really the plan here? I think finally
Speaker 1: Americans are starting to see and they're starting to understand
Speaker 1: that this is not going to get better until we
Speaker 1: tell the government. Enough is enough. This isn't just going
Speaker 1: to go away. They're not going to give back your freedom.
Speaker 1: They're not going to allow you to live your life again.
Speaker 1: You may say, oh, buck, but what about the vaccine?
Speaker 1: Into that, I would tell you, well, the vaccine isn't
Speaker 1: going to be the end of this for the government.
Speaker 1: Because the vaccine is not one hundred percent effective. They're
Speaker 1: going to continue this on deep into twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: You're hearing from Democrat politicians increasingly that even if it's
Speaker 1: ninety percent effective, and even if seventy or eighty percent
Speaker 1: of the population gets it, even at that point you're
Speaker 1: not one hundred percent, say from the RONA, you could
Speaker 1: still get COVID nineteen. So you don't get to have
Speaker 1: your life back, you don't get to have back your freedom.
Speaker 1: And so then that raises some very interesting questions, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: When do we say mass compliance is our non compliance
Speaker 1: is our only answer? When do we say we just
Speaker 1: simply refuse. We have been complying for months and months,
Speaker 1: and now here we are seeing this sum total of
Speaker 1: what the lockdowners, the mask shamers, what are they pulled
Speaker 1: together for a program here as we're about to enter
Speaker 1: these winter months across the nation. What are they saying
Speaker 1: that they want to do to protect us right, What
Speaker 1: are the claims that they are making that will somehow
Speaker 1: make you safe. They don't have anything. They don't know
Speaker 1: other than what they've been doing, which hasn't been working.
Speaker 1: Or this is one of the great lines of the
Speaker 1: Biden campaign that if only we listened to the scientists,
Speaker 1: everything would be so much better. The scientists that they're
Speaker 1: talking about have no idea how to make all of
Speaker 1: this better. All they do is keep repeating themselves. It's
Speaker 1: not changing anything. There is no perfect mass compliance, there
Speaker 1: is no perfect social distancing. The virus still continues to
Speaker 1: spread in California. Let's go through some of the examples
Speaker 1: here in California. Over the weekend, they decided that they're
Speaker 1: locking down outdoor dying now for three weeks. So it
Speaker 1: was that you couldn't need indoors. And there is a
Speaker 1: scientific basis at least for saying indoor transmission of a virus.
Speaker 1: Indoor transmission is a bigger risk. There's no evidence to
Speaker 1: suggest that odor transmission is a considerable enough risk to
Speaker 1: mandate the kind or to necessitate the kinds of mandates
Speaker 1: that we've had, and yet they're doing it anyway. Why
Speaker 1: are they doing this Because more restrictions on your life,
Speaker 1: more separation of you from the rest of your fellow
Speaker 1: human beings, including with prohibitions on Thanksgiving gatherings. That is
Speaker 1: the only answer they have. There's nothing else. Wash your hands,
Speaker 1: social distance, wear a mask. We've been doing that. It's
Speaker 1: not working. Mass compliance is higher than it's ever been.
Speaker 1: We've been social distancing for months, and yet the cases
Speaker 1: now they never said that it would go to zero,
Speaker 1: but the cases are spiking, folks, The numbers are jumping
Speaker 1: across the country. So why is that happening. We're entering
Speaker 1: the winter season. There's a seasonality of these viruses. Isn't
Speaker 1: it fascinating that Also, we're led to believe that this virus,
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen somehow the one respiratory virus for which asymptomatic
Speaker 1: transmission is the main method of main method of spread.
Speaker 1: This is where we're told now it's it's the asyn
Speaker 1: or at least half of cases are from asymptomatic spread.
Speaker 1: They're just estimating that, and they're also ignoring a Nature
Speaker 1: The journal Nature published a Chinese study of thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of people in Wuhan. That found three hundred individuals
Speaker 1: with asymptomatic cases. They tested over eleven hundred of their
Speaker 1: close contacts. Not a single one of them had COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: So three hundred people they test and traced everybody who
Speaker 1: lived with them and was around them. No transmission. But
Speaker 1: you won't hear about that. In fact, if I try
Speaker 1: to tell you about that on Facebook or Twitter, I'll
Speaker 1: get dinged, I'll get banned, I'll get throttled. Whatever. It's
Speaker 1: just the truth. I'm just telling you things that are true.
Speaker 1: But now you're seeing that there's a totalitarian impulse at
Speaker 1: work here. Now you're understanding I think, I think the
Speaker 1: American people, if they weren't already seeing it, as I
Speaker 1: know a lot of you were, our understanding. This is
Speaker 1: about so much more than just a virus. This is
Speaker 1: about our relationship with the government. This is about the
Speaker 1: ways that the state can control people and can transform
Speaker 1: society in the process. You don't think there are a
Speaker 1: lot of people that view that as an opportunity. You
Speaker 1: don't think there are a lot of people that view
Speaker 1: this as a chance to enact their policy whims and
Speaker 1: also to create a perception among the American people that
Speaker 1: if they listen and do what they're told, they'll be
Speaker 1: safe and everything will be better. And the demogogues out
Speaker 1: there use the frightened mob to coerce and threaten and
Speaker 1: shame free thinkers into compliance. That's where we are. That's
Speaker 1: what's happened right now. Remember this is about government action
Speaker 1: and government mandates. Whatever you think you need to do
Speaker 1: to protect yourself, whether that's staying home, triple masking, we're
Speaker 1: in goggles, that's your call. You have plenty of information.
Speaker 1: There's so much knowledge and data out there right now
Speaker 1: about different ways you can try to mitigate the spread.
Speaker 1: Will that all work at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe not, But do what you can for yourself
Speaker 1: that you think whatever you think is necessary. But that's
Speaker 1: not what's happening here in the state of Oregon. The
Speaker 1: governor there, Kate Brown, is telling people that they should
Speaker 1: call the police on Thanksgiving gatherings that exceed whatever the
Speaker 1: allowable number of people is today. And remember the number
Speaker 1: keeps changing. Is there any science to determine what that
Speaker 1: number is? No, they're just saying, yeah, and we think
Speaker 1: this is the right number. Is there any science to
Speaker 1: determine that outdoor dining in California should be banned for
Speaker 1: three weeks? Can't sit outside and need a mule around,
Speaker 1: so you can't go to a takeout place and sit
Speaker 1: at their benches out front. No, that's too dangerous, too
Speaker 1: dangerous for getting the rona. This is what they're saying.
Speaker 1: And yet we know that the governors who push this
Speaker 1: stuff the most violate their own orders and they don't care.
Speaker 1: They know that. We know that this continues to play
Speaker 1: out in the press, where they've created a perception that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is somehow responsible for all this. It's all
Speaker 1: Trump's fault, you see. And Trump supporters they weren't wearing
Speaker 1: masks enough. Well, somehow, here we are greater mass compliance
Speaker 1: than ever before, eighty to ninety percent nationwide for indoors
Speaker 1: and for most of the situations where we'd be required
Speaker 1: to wear them. And yet does it really seem to
Speaker 1: be slowing down the caseload anywhere? Now there's cases, there's
Speaker 1: positive tests, and then there's hospitalizations and debts. These things
Speaker 1: all get commingled, and that's also not helpful to this
Speaker 1: conversation of this discussion. But ultimately, We need to start
Speaker 1: boiling this down to very simple, very straightforward truths. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: this should be about things like we are Americans. We
Speaker 1: want to celebrate Thanksgiving and be with our families. It
Speaker 1: could happen that you will get COVID nineteen if you
Speaker 1: do that. That is, it also could happen that you
Speaker 1: will get COVID nineteen for walking into the elevator in
Speaker 1: your building or going to the grocery store. It could,
Speaker 1: And if that's not the case, then why are we
Speaker 1: wearing masks when we do those things. Obviously it could happen.
Speaker 1: Living your life means you are at risk of getting
Speaker 1: this disease. The good news is that the chances of
Speaker 1: you surviving, in fact, the chances of you not even
Speaker 1: knowing you have it, are very high. And the chances
Speaker 1: of you surviving if you're not a senior citizen with
Speaker 1: comorbidities is so is so good that you should have
Speaker 1: very little concern about this. You really should have no
Speaker 1: concern at all. But we have to start thinking about
Speaker 1: this in terms of freedom, freedom versus tyranny. Do you
Speaker 1: want the government to be able to tell you that
Speaker 1: your business has to be shut down because they say so?
Speaker 1: That's what they're doing. They don't point, there's no data,
Speaker 1: there's there's no answer to why they're doing this or
Speaker 1: even where they get the power. They've flipped quarantine which
Speaker 1: has been for sick people the sick, and made it
Speaker 1: a quarantine of all of society, and we call that lockdown.
Speaker 1: We accept this. I'm happy to see that in some states,
Speaker 1: in places like New York City, even there are people
Speaker 1: finally gathering to say no more, no more, because they
Speaker 1: realize that if we go into a long winter and
Speaker 1: we allow these petty tyrants, if we allow these idiot
Speaker 1: bureaucrats to just make decisions and tweak things all along
Speaker 1: the way, you know, to come up with whatever their
Speaker 1: policy feels like it should be today, they're going to
Speaker 1: destroy whole industries. They're going to dramatically increase depression and
Speaker 1: suicide and alcohol and drug abuse all throughout the winter
Speaker 1: for millions and millions and millions of people. And they
Speaker 1: don't really take all this stuff as seriously as they
Speaker 1: pretend to. We know their hypocrite. It's whether it's Cuomo
Speaker 1: in New York or Newsom or Whitmer or Lori Lightfoot,
Speaker 1: go down the list, huge advocates for this, Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: Diane Feinstein, They break their own rules as soon as
Speaker 1: they think nobody's looking. Oh, but they're all so worried
Speaker 1: about this. Look at all of the members of Congress.
Speaker 1: Look at all these people who in the case of Congress,
Speaker 1: you've got a lot of people that are not just
Speaker 1: senior citizens. They're deep into their seniors. Nancy Pelosi is
Speaker 1: almost eighty. Do you think they're living in fear. No,
Speaker 1: but they want you to live in fear. And they
Speaker 1: want to give government authorities the ability to make sure
Speaker 1: that even if you think that it's crazy, you still
Speaker 1: have to do this stuff. Deal with it, bend the knee.
Speaker 1: We can either say no, or we can allow the
Speaker 1: tyranny to continue. Those are the options. Mass non compliance,
Speaker 1: push back from people in cities and states across the
Speaker 1: country to say this is unacceptable. Law and officers, and
Speaker 1: you're seeing more of this who point out that they
Speaker 1: will not be a tool for this oppression. They're not
Speaker 1: going to do it. If people want to gather on Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: this is still America. They're allowed to. We do not
Speaker 1: live Every aspect of our lives is not at the
Speaker 1: whim of government. Bureaucrats and elected officials. That's not what
Speaker 1: we sign up for and that's not what our constitution
Speaker 1: allows for. So have we finally understood here as a country?
Speaker 1: Are we finally waking up to this? There are leftists,
Speaker 1: There are lives who like this. I understand that they're
Speaker 1: never going to change. They think they're in some great
Speaker 1: struggle by mask shaming the occasional person going for a
Speaker 1: jog outside by himself. They think they're saving millions of
Speaker 1: lives because they're morons. And they also believe that the
Speaker 1: planet is going to end unless we control CEO two
Speaker 1: emissions from twenty percent of the world's population. It's not
Speaker 1: going to happen, right, But they still believe these things.
Speaker 1: You are seeing. This is increasingly like a religious cult.
Speaker 1: There is a COVID lockdown cult that has grown all
Speaker 1: across the country. People don't want to be wrong, so
Speaker 1: they won't admit they were wrong. And people also like
Speaker 1: to be told what to do. They like a government
Speaker 1: that's in charge of everything. It absolves them of responsibility
Speaker 1: for their own screw ups, and it makes them feel
Speaker 1: like they're safe and fed and warm and everything's going
Speaker 1: to be fine. But that's not the truth. The government
Speaker 1: is doing a lot of damage with all of these mandates.
Speaker 1: The government is hurting people in the name of helping them,
Speaker 1: and it's not going to stop until we the people,
Speaker 1: say you're not allowed to do this anymore. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: What do I mean my pushing back? What does it
Speaker 1: sound like? What does it look like? Well over the weekend,
Speaker 1: video was circulating from a business in Buffalo, New York,
Speaker 1: where a health inspector showed up at at a private
Speaker 1: business operating on an anonymous tip about too many people
Speaker 1: inside without a mask on. And I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: I was so proud, yes, proud to be an American
Speaker 1: because of what the business owners said. They stood their ground,
Speaker 1: and the little Health Department bureaucrat realized, oh we got
Speaker 1: a problem here. Play it well. I don't think you
Speaker 1: lead leading. Now you're trust fasseling without a warrant. You
Speaker 1: mean a civil pistol trust Fasseling' get a war? Trust yes,
Speaker 1: you do, come back with the warrant or you don't
Speaker 1: write the law. Go get a war. You got your
Speaker 1: breaking the law right now, you're breaking a law. Go outside. No,
Speaker 1: go on your phone outside, Go on your phone outside.
Speaker 1: I whe who reported it? You know what I don't know? Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's anonymous that you gotta get a warrant. You don't
Speaker 1: get the piles constitution. That does not You don't circumvent
Speaker 1: or subvert the constant. You don't get to subvert the constitution.
Speaker 1: Go get a warrant. You see, the Health department inspectors
Speaker 1: are used to just being able to show up and
Speaker 1: you know, do whatever they want. I guess they had
Speaker 1: sheriff's uh sheriffs or sheriff's deputies with them, but the
Speaker 1: business owner said, no, you're know a lot. We don't
Speaker 1: we don't want you. You're not allowed here. Acting on
Speaker 1: an anonymous tip. Think about that. Just just play this
Speaker 1: one out in your head. Any business that I don't like,
Speaker 1: if they ever gave me cold pizza to place down
Speaker 1: the street, I can call in the health department and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I saw too many people not social distancing inside, and
Speaker 1: then law enforcement it's going to show up and they
Speaker 1: can go through the whole place and inspect the whole
Speaker 1: premises based on that, not on hey they're selling drugs
Speaker 1: or no, no, I saw a lack of social distancing.
Speaker 1: I saw somebody without a mask on what law is
Speaker 1: this based on? And you know, at some point you
Speaker 1: also get to the law of sanity. I don't care
Speaker 1: what these bureaucrats say. I don't care what the governor
Speaker 1: says about some bs executive order. We do not live
Speaker 1: in a totalitarian society. Or you can tell people how
Speaker 1: they can breathe, which is what they're doing. We do
Speaker 1: not live in a society where you can tell people
Speaker 1: they cannot see their loved ones on a holiday or
Speaker 1: any day for that matter. This is a time in
Speaker 1: our country we need to start embracing at least the mentality,
Speaker 1: if not the form of four letter words express loudly
Speaker 1: and in unison toward government authorities who are trying this crap.
Speaker 1: I guess technically that's a four letter word. Enough is enough.
Speaker 1: You can either agree with that and start to take
Speaker 1: actions on that, or you can think that this is
Speaker 1: still all about Trump somehow. Really, there are lockdown protests
Speaker 1: going on in European countries. There is a lockdown protest
Speaker 1: here in New York City over the weekend. Thank god,
Speaker 1: need a lot more of that. And it's about Trump.
Speaker 1: Still Trump right now is focused on continuing to be
Speaker 1: president and fighting this legal battle in the courts for
Speaker 1: an election that's not over. These state and local COVID
Speaker 1: lockdowns are not about Republican or Democrat. It's about whether
Speaker 1: or not we live in a free society. It's about
Speaker 1: whether or not we're in a circumstance where we still
Speaker 1: get to determine our fates in our future. I'm still appalled, honestly,
Speaker 1: that we've gotten to this point with so many people.
Speaker 1: They've just the media, mass media, social media. We live
Speaker 1: in a time of mass hysteria and mass media, and
Speaker 1: the results are terrible because everyone's so frightened all the
Speaker 1: time now because of what they're seeing on their phones,
Speaker 1: on the news headlines and the stories. They don't stop
Speaker 1: to think, what am I gaining by listening to these people?
Speaker 1: Have they earned my trust? Have they earned the right
Speaker 1: to dictate every aspect of my life to me? Because
Speaker 1: they say they'll keep me safe, They're not going to
Speaker 1: keep you safe. It's all a lie. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, at the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Am I exaggerating the desires of democrats. Here,
Speaker 1: Am I pretending like they want things that they don't
Speaker 1: or that they're holding positions that they really don't. Well,
Speaker 1: let's listen to one of the most powerful democrats in
Speaker 1: the country right now, explain what the new standard is
Speaker 1: for you getting your life back, getting any aspect of
Speaker 1: your life back right now during this time time of
Speaker 1: the COVID pandemic. Here's Nancy Pelosi play sixteen. We should
Speaker 1: be having the resources to make sure that the vaccine
Speaker 1: is distributed immediately equitably so that everyone has access to it.
Speaker 1: In that regard, though, for that to happen, the President
Speaker 1: must must must implement the Defense Production Act so that
Speaker 1: those companies, those entities that are used to this new
Speaker 1: technology that both Feiser and Maderna have used, can can
Speaker 1: undertake making this this vaccine more available, because we're going
Speaker 1: to need quite a bit for ourselves and for the world.
Speaker 1: Because unless everyone is safe, as I said, no one
Speaker 1: is a safe. Well that's everybody's safe. Do you that
Speaker 1: unless everyone is safe, no one is safe? What is that?
Speaker 1: Everyone is never going to be safe. Everyone is never
Speaker 1: going to be safe from this virus. They're never going
Speaker 1: to be safe in terms of overall health risks, and
Speaker 1: the government is in no position to destroy or eliminate
Speaker 1: those risks entirely. The COVID nineteen vaccine is not one
Speaker 1: hundred percent perfect, not one not one hundred percent of
Speaker 1: people will get it. There could be mutations of COVID
Speaker 1: in the future. So what I'm trying to tell you,
Speaker 1: which is the truth there, is that either we understand
Speaker 1: that there is allowable, acceptable risk in society that freedom necessitates,
Speaker 1: or we're living in some COVID health or talitarianism. That's it.
Speaker 1: And I think everybody intuitively understands that. They know that,
Speaker 1: but we've forgotten it during this period. We've reached this
Speaker 1: other place where we think, oh, well, I will wait
Speaker 1: until they tell us it's safe. That's never going to happen. Really,
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan, one of my favorite members of Congress, I
Speaker 1: can say it. Jim Jordan is out there making the case.
Speaker 1: He's saying, this is just my friends, this is wrong.
Speaker 1: What's going on right now with these anti Thanksgiving travel
Speaker 1: not just the prohibitions on the gatherings, but the CDC
Speaker 1: saying don't go anywhere, don't travel, don't live your life
Speaker 1: who do they think they are? I mean, really, I
Speaker 1: want to say, who the bleep do they think they are?
Speaker 1: What is going on? This is the biggest challenge we
Speaker 1: face right now from a policy perspective. I know we
Speaker 1: still have this legal fight going on over the election,
Speaker 1: and I'm happy to see that the team is still
Speaker 1: digging in and going to get to the truth. We
Speaker 1: absolutely need answers. We need to use this process to
Speaker 1: the fullest possible extent to make sure that only legal
Speaker 1: and every legal ballot is counted. But in the meantime,
Speaker 1: we still got a big problem as a nation that's
Speaker 1: not going to get better anytime soon. This doesn't have
Speaker 1: a three week expiration or at two month expiration. This
Speaker 1: is going to go on deep into twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: And that's why I'm happy that Jim Jim Jordan Lesa
Speaker 1: is out there saying this is crazy. Play eight, it's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: In Ohio, you now have to be in your home
Speaker 1: by ten o'clock. In Pennsylvania, when you're in your home,
Speaker 1: you have to wear a mask. And in Vermont, when
Speaker 1: you're in your home you don't have to wear a
Speaker 1: mask because you're not allowed to have friends over to
Speaker 1: your home. I mean, this has gotten so ridiculous and
Speaker 1: we forget this is America. I mean, I go back
Speaker 1: to when the first lockdown happened, the attorney Joney and
Speaker 1: I State sent out a memo to all US attorneys.
Speaker 1: This is back in April of this year. Sanw that
Speaker 1: memo to all US attorneys. A lot of important things
Speaker 1: he discussed there, but near the end of memo had
Speaker 1: a great line. He said, the Constitution is not suspended
Speaker 1: during a crisis, and amen to the and we need
Speaker 1: to remember that. In fact, I would argue the Constitution
Speaker 1: is most important when you're dealing with something unique, something
Speaker 1: big like this. So this is it's as wrong as
Speaker 1: it gets. And I'm sorry, I'm just gonna say it.
Speaker 1: I wish that I wish that Trump would use the
Speaker 1: megaphone a bit more on this on this issue. I
Speaker 1: know he's focused on the election, but this really matters.
Speaker 1: They used COVID panic to change the whole election system.
Speaker 1: They used the fear that the public had around COVID,
Speaker 1: the irrational level of fear, to make these very changes
Speaker 1: so that they could try all the shenanigan, so they
Speaker 1: could try to steal in Pennsylvania and Michigan and Georgia.
Speaker 1: It was all based in COVID. I've been trying to
Speaker 1: tell people all along, stop with the Hunter Biden, start
Speaker 1: focusing on COVID and this need that we have to
Speaker 1: re establish freedoms as Americans and to deal with this
Speaker 1: this insanity that going on. Oh no, you know, we're
Speaker 1: gonna We're gonna just wait for the Durham prole. That's
Speaker 1: gonna save us all. The Durham Prole any minute now
Speaker 1: is gonna sweep in there like the cavalry at the
Speaker 1: end of an old Western. I mean, it's just not
Speaker 1: gonna happen. But they got away with it. They got
Speaker 1: away with misrepresenting this and and creating a narrative that
Speaker 1: was used against against Trump. I mean, here's Joe Scarborough
Speaker 1: just straight up saying Trump is responsible for all the
Speaker 1: people who have died of this place. Seven. I do
Speaker 1: if it matters to the Republicans at all, but that
Speaker 1: the backdrop to this is very bad short term news
Speaker 1: on the coronavirus and the numbers surging all over the place,
Speaker 1: and the President tweeting all weekend long about himself and
Speaker 1: about the election. He wants to steal. That's who they're in.
Speaker 1: They don't care about all the people die. So there
Speaker 1: was really because if they did, they would let Joe
Speaker 1: Biden start working his transition so they could start getting
Speaker 1: the vaccines ready and they can make up a plan
Speaker 1: to distribute vaccines from across the country down to three
Speaker 1: hundred million people to get the economy started again, to
Speaker 1: get the economy started again. But they don't care. This
Speaker 1: is all about Donald Trump. People calling into rush limbossing
Speaker 1: they're ready to die for Donald Trump. Really, is this jonestown?
Speaker 1: People are dying? Really? Yeah, you don't have to say
Speaker 1: you're willing to die for Donald Trump because hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of people already have died because of Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and it's only going to get worse. I mean the
Speaker 1: TV executives who put this more on Scarborough and his
Speaker 1: wife after he left his other family and she left
Speaker 1: her family because they're working together, and you know that
Speaker 1: putting him on air so he can say things like
Speaker 1: the president's responsible for hundreds of thousands of debts. How
Speaker 1: is it possible to be such an idiot? I mean,
Speaker 1: to really have such either low intellectual capacity or to
Speaker 1: be of such low character that you'll say things that
Speaker 1: are so obviously not true, not fair, inaccurate. How many
Speaker 1: deaths would there have been if Joe Biden were the
Speaker 1: president during this Let's just let's just deal with this
Speaker 1: for a second. How many deaths would there be if
Speaker 1: Joe Biden were in charge? Can they give us an estimate?
Speaker 1: A Warren a mask? What a hid no joke in
Speaker 1: the basement with my mask on, wearing the mask? Here
Speaker 1: you go, here's the guy that would have been the
Speaker 1: great savior. He would have saved two hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: thousand lives if only he had been in charge the
Speaker 1: last the last eleven months or so. Here's Joe Biden
Speaker 1: play clip one. They talked about that in some detail. Thirdly,
Speaker 1: we discussed the need to help stays with Title thirty
Speaker 1: two funding for the National Guard. That's a fancy way
Speaker 1: of saying governors. Governors need to be able to get
Speaker 1: funding when they need to bring their National Guarden to play.
Speaker 1: The National Guards are gonna have to play this. It
Speaker 1: cost a lot of money. Scarts. Another fancy way of
Speaker 1: the government is the whole thing with them them. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: he's a genie. He would have had a great leadership
Speaker 1: would listen to the science. He would have had to
Speaker 1: listen to science. I suppose in the beginning, when Fauci
Speaker 1: was saying, don't wear a mask, which we all know,
Speaker 1: he said, I'll probably get censored for that. I'm getting
Speaker 1: dinged on Facebook for telling you things that are factually
Speaker 1: accurate now, but they have fact checkers say that it
Speaker 1: lacks context. That's the new game. Lacks context is a
Speaker 1: way of saying, I don't like these facts you're presenting,
Speaker 1: and I have other facts that I like better, so
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say this lacks context and therefore is misleading.
Speaker 1: This is this is the little totalitarian censorship game that
Speaker 1: the biggest and most powerful companies in the world right
Speaker 1: now are playing on behalf of the collectivists, on behalf
Speaker 1: of the left. That's what's going on. That's right though,
Speaker 1: put put Joe Biden in charge, all of her problems
Speaker 1: would just melt away. Scarborough here saying that we don't
Speaker 1: care about people dying. No, we very much care about
Speaker 1: people dying. But they're the ones who are claiming that
Speaker 1: everything will be better if we just do what they say.
Speaker 1: We've been doing what they say. That's what has been happening.
Speaker 1: We've been listening to them, We've been listening to the science.
Speaker 1: All the data supports this, all the evidence we have
Speaker 1: supports this, and they just don't want to They don't
Speaker 1: want to ever face the reality that they've been spewing
Speaker 1: lies this whole time. All we have to do is
Speaker 1: the following, and the virus will go away. And it's
Speaker 1: on us, and we're going to save ourselves if we
Speaker 1: just do the right thing. What are they toddlers? They
Speaker 1: are they repeating some song they were taught at a
Speaker 1: day camp for ten year olds? Well, what who could
Speaker 1: believe this stuff? All we have to do is wash
Speaker 1: our hands and wear a cotton mask and everything's gonna
Speaker 1: be fine. They said, Trump's responsible for two hundred fifty
Speaker 1: thousand deaths. That's what Scarborough and his wife are saying.
Speaker 1: So what exactly, what exactly am I missing here? He's
Speaker 1: responsible for all the deaths, So clearly all we'd have
Speaker 1: zero deaths, unlike Europe and all these other countries, zero
Speaker 1: deaths from this if only we listened to Fauci. This
Speaker 1: is idiocy, This is intellectually indefensible. But their hatred of
Speaker 1: Trump clouds everything else. This isn't even about Trump for me.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm so I'm so dug in on this issue.
Speaker 1: It's not about Trump. It's about the country, and it's
Speaker 1: about whether or not people believe that we are a
Speaker 1: free people or not. They have taken away our freedoms,
Speaker 1: they have violated the constitution. You either have a problem
Speaker 1: with that or you don't. You're in the freedom u
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. But we do
Speaker 1: have some realities that are stark. Number one, the weather
Speaker 1: is colder. We're living a lot more of our lives indoors.
Speaker 1: There's real pandemic fatigue and a lot of transmission behind
Speaker 1: private doors. So we have surgically gone after cutting indoor
Speaker 1: dining at ten PM, lowering indoor gathering limits to ten people.
Speaker 1: We've amped up enforcement, but there is only so much
Speaker 1: you can do. So we're pleading with people keep thanksgiving
Speaker 1: really small, immediate family, don't travel, and don't let your
Speaker 1: guard down just because you're at home. Yeah, we just
Speaker 1: turned that police chief say he's not going to enforce
Speaker 1: these new rules. Anything you can do about that. Listen.
Speaker 1: I heard him say, I don't want to ruin anyone's
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving and that gentleman, I believe is an outlier. What
Speaker 1: would really ruin your Thanksgiving if somebody gets sick and
Speaker 1: God forbid dies. So we got to do everything we can.
Speaker 1: But there's a huge amount of burden here on personal
Speaker 1: responsibility and doing the right safe it's the governor of
Speaker 1: New Jersey just falls back on the same thing every time.
Speaker 1: Do what we say, or you'll die. Meanwhile, doing what
Speaker 1: they say doesn't prevent the spread of the virus. I
Speaker 1: did indoor dining over the weekend in New York City.
Speaker 1: Let me let me explain to you a little bit
Speaker 1: of what that's like with my brother who has moved
Speaker 1: to Texas and loves it. By the way, so there's
Speaker 1: that he's in Austin, so KLBJ fam, you've got you've
Speaker 1: got a sexton in your midst now, Yeah, absolutely loves
Speaker 1: it there. But he was he was in visiting for
Speaker 1: the holidays and we went out to dinner. We had
Speaker 1: a bro dinner and we arrive at the restaurant and
Speaker 1: we have to wait outside. So we're we're waiting and
Speaker 1: so there's about twenty people that we're all waiting for
Speaker 1: tables at this restaurant. We're all waited, But we're really
Speaker 1: kind of waiting in this confined area. We all have
Speaker 1: our masks on, but it is outdoors. This is after
Speaker 1: they take our temperature. Now, remind just there's a reminder.
Speaker 1: You often can have COVID and not run a temperature,
Speaker 1: but they take your temperature. Okay, so they say that's
Speaker 1: a little precaution. But we're all standing outdoors without masks on.
Speaker 1: And then we all go inside and see, I'm sorry
Speaker 1: with masks on. And then we all go inside and
Speaker 1: take our masks off and sit in and close room together.
Speaker 1: What are we doing? Yeah? Who think? Who wants to?
Speaker 1: And these are the rules we're doing this, you know.
Speaker 1: And we don't touch menus, oh, because if we touch menus,
Speaker 1: that's how we're all going to get sick. So we
Speaker 1: have to do this little virtual menu thing. Well, are
Speaker 1: these restrictions good enough that it's safe or not? Because
Speaker 1: if they're good enough, why are we going to shut
Speaker 1: down indoor ninety? You know, you could see you could
Speaker 1: have endless iterations of this. Do a little more, do
Speaker 1: a little more, a little more restriction, a little bit
Speaker 1: more the government telling you what's acceptable. You can't go
Speaker 1: out and go to the grocery store twice a week.
Speaker 1: You gotta go once a week, maybe maybe once every
Speaker 1: other week. Do you want to die? Do what we say,
Speaker 1: you're going to die. This is what they're telling you.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not making this up. I'm playing the
Speaker 1: clips where you can hear government officials saying this, Do
Speaker 1: what we say, You're gonna die. Meanwhile, we're doing what
Speaker 1: they say. And the virus is spreading all over the place,
Speaker 1: and a vast majority people who get this that's not
Speaker 1: even that doesn't even begin to cover it. Less than
Speaker 1: one percent of people who get this actually die from it.
Speaker 1: So they act like, if you get this, it's a
Speaker 1: death sentence, and that's crazy, But that's the way to
Speaker 1: get to keep people in fear. That's the way to
Speaker 1: have people who are willing to obey this stuff. They
Speaker 1: want to send people into it to arrest you for
Speaker 1: having folks in your home over a holiday. That's the plan, right,
Speaker 1: and Pelosi said it very well. Nobody is safe. Until
Speaker 1: everybody is safe. The government will let you know when
Speaker 1: there's one hundred percent safety from this virus. Until then,
Speaker 1: you do what the government says, or you're killing people.
Speaker 1: This is the standard they've set up. You see it.
Speaker 1: You see it happening all over the place. The only
Speaker 1: reason they don't tell us all you cannot leave your
Speaker 1: homes on pain of arrest is that then, finally, I
Speaker 1: think people would say, hold on, hold on, hold on
Speaker 1: a second. That's too far you're going. That's not an
Speaker 1: acceptable level of lockdown. But we should be at that mentality.
Speaker 1: We should have been at that a long time ago.
Speaker 1: Governor Abbott of Texas, who's been okay on COVID, not great,
Speaker 1: not great, but at least he understands that what the
Speaker 1: governor of Oregon is saying that you should call the
Speaker 1: police on your neighbors for gathering for Thanksgiving, think about
Speaker 1: how toxic this is going to be because people will
Speaker 1: do it. There are lunatics out there who will do this.
Speaker 1: They'll say, oh gosh, you're putting me at risk. My
Speaker 1: mask protects me, your mask protects you. You know, nonsense
Speaker 1: like that. Play eighteen The Government Before you Go. The
Speaker 1: governor of Oregon, a woman by the name of Kate Brown, says, Hey,
Speaker 1: if you see anybody breaking any of our state suggestions
Speaker 1: and guidelines, call the cops. Is that the way they
Speaker 1: should handle that? Call the cops if you see somebody
Speaker 1: walking around with no mask. I gotta tell you, I
Speaker 1: think they may have some Fourth Amendment based challenges there.
Speaker 1: But also I have to point out the irony. If
Speaker 1: I understand correctly, Oregon just legalized heroin and maybe cocaine. Yes,
Speaker 1: and so it's okay to heroin and cocaine, but not
Speaker 1: turkey for Thanksgiving. That is Unamerican. It just does not
Speaker 1: make sense. The right of the people to be secure
Speaker 1: in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search
Speaker 1: and seizure shall not be violated, and no warrants shall
Speaker 1: issue but upon probable cause. Gathering with your family on
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving is not probable cause of the commission of any crime.
Speaker 1: This is unconstitutional. They do not have the right to
Speaker 1: do this. Don't let them continue to threaten you and
Speaker 1: to create all this fear so that you forget that
Speaker 1: what they're doing is wrong. These are government powers that
Speaker 1: are undermining the very basis for government's authority, which comes
Speaker 1: from the Constitution. That's what's happening right now all across America.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeartRadio app or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Never trust a lib or any
Speaker 1: politician for that matter, But never trust them when they
Speaker 1: tell you that whatever they're doing, they're doing it for
Speaker 1: the children. Right, this is what we're always here. Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm doing it for the children. Really. Where's the best
Speaker 1: example of that that you can see in our society?
Speaker 1: In our political debates? Where is it always about the kids?
Speaker 1: But it's actually not about the kids at all? Something
Speaker 1: you're probably already thinking what the answer is and you're
Speaker 1: getting it right. Teachers unions, Ah, Yes, public sector unions
Speaker 1: that are the beating heart of the donations and political
Speaker 1: mobilization and machinery of the Democrat Party. Teachers unions which
Speaker 1: are all about very low show jobs for adults and
Speaker 1: not about making things better for kids. Why am I
Speaker 1: bringing this up? Well, here is a social worker talking
Speaker 1: about how in Hillsborough County they're missing in that school
Speaker 1: district seven thousand. This is in Florida, in a large
Speaker 1: school districty're missing seven thousand students unaccounted for playclif two.
Speaker 1: What do you hear from teachers? Are they saying, do
Speaker 1: you we're missing kids? He should have been in my class.
Speaker 1: Where is he? He's not showing up? Do you hear that? Well,
Speaker 1: in are in Hillsboro County. We're missing seven thousand students.
Speaker 1: Seven thousand kids didn't come back, seven thousand. How does
Speaker 1: that seven thousand number compared to previous years. We've never
Speaker 1: had that happen, to have that many kids with a
Speaker 1: question mark next to their name. Where do you begin? Well,
Speaker 1: every student attended some school last year, all seven thousand
Speaker 1: of them. So we start there. You know, what about
Speaker 1: their emergency contacts? You know, maybe grandma and grandpa is
Speaker 1: on the emergency card, and grandma and grandpa can tell
Speaker 1: you where they are. You know, we find kids because
Speaker 1: another one went to a birthday party and they saw
Speaker 1: them and so yeah, they're still in Tampa. Okay, you
Speaker 1: know we're energized to keep looking for that student. This
Speaker 1: is disastrous for kids. These school lockdowns are school shutdowns,
Speaker 1: and this remote learning thing is it doesn't work. It
Speaker 1: does not work, and especially for low income kids, kids
Speaker 1: who need additional assistance, need more personal attention from teachers.
Speaker 1: This is pushing them so far behind at critical stages
Speaker 1: in their development. And we've we've already seen there is
Speaker 1: no argument here, there's no debate over whether kids are
Speaker 1: safe from COVID in schools. The answer is yes. Anyone
Speaker 1: who tells you otherwise is lying or an idiot. They're
Speaker 1: at no risk and so or you know, I say that,
Speaker 1: and yes, I mean you're not at risk really of
Speaker 1: being struck by lightning when you walk out your house.
Speaker 1: But I mean technically you are. It's like that for kids,
Speaker 1: if you're under nineteen. COVID is like lightning strike risk. Okay,
Speaker 1: are you never going to leave your house? Now? Why
Speaker 1: are these school districts all shut down? Why is it
Speaker 1: that I can walk to a grocery store and see
Speaker 1: the same clerks, the same eloyees that I've seen for
Speaker 1: the entire outbreak here in New York, the entire pandemic.
Speaker 1: You're in New York. But teachers can't show up to school.
Speaker 1: Too dangerous, so many other people. I'm going into an
Speaker 1: office and do a TV show. Every day. People are
Speaker 1: showing up to offices, being around other people. It's happening,
Speaker 1: but teachers can't do it. Why. Oh, because the teachers unions.
Speaker 1: Because the teachers unions want to flex their muscle here.
Speaker 1: They want to make sure that their employees have the
Speaker 1: option to sit at home and basically play you know,
Speaker 1: YouTube videos for the kids, not really do anything. It's
Speaker 1: a great deal. Get to stay at home, you know,
Speaker 1: you sit there in front of a screen for a
Speaker 1: little bit and then you don't have to do anything.
Speaker 1: I think it's fantastic for them. It's not about the
Speaker 1: kids though, It's not about them. And I think you
Speaker 1: are seeing a surge of a bipartisan recognition here that
Speaker 1: kids suffer because of these teachers unions, that that children
Speaker 1: suffer because of what's going on here. And and that's
Speaker 1: at least a recognition that should have been a long
Speaker 1: and that's a recognition that's a long time in coming.
Speaker 1: And I wish everybody would really understand that this is
Speaker 1: just horrific what's going on here. It's wrong, it's selfish,
Speaker 1: and it's a lesson in why public sector unions are
Speaker 1: a terrible thing. They should not exist. In fact, that
Speaker 1: the origins of the union movements in this country, even
Speaker 1: I think it was FDR himself said that public sector unions,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's a terrible idea. Now you're going to
Speaker 1: have people that are supposed to be serving the public
Speaker 1: who are also forming unions to make sure that they
Speaker 1: can get paid more and do less at the public's
Speaker 1: expense all the time. And all you need is one
Speaker 1: political party, in this case, the Democrats, to feed at
Speaker 1: that trough and it never goes away. It never goes away.
Speaker 1: So the teachers' unions are shameful. That's that's not new.
Speaker 1: And also our political class is utterly shameful. Back to Pelosi,
Speaker 1: Remember she's been holding out here, She's been holding out
Speaker 1: for now going on months. Will not pass a COVID
Speaker 1: relief bill, will not get people additional funds, will not
Speaker 1: get people to help that they need, because she has
Speaker 1: in her head that there are demands that need to
Speaker 1: be met for other things and the GOP won't do it.
Speaker 1: So she's just holding the American people hostage. And then
Speaker 1: she turns around, when she's not diving into her twenty
Speaker 1: five thousand dollar refrigerator to eat some twelve dollars a
Speaker 1: pint ice cream that's delivered to our house by workers
Speaker 1: who are of course at risk for COVID. I mean
Speaker 1: she's not. She gets to just you know, Queen Nancy
Speaker 1: gets to sit there and have everything brought to her.
Speaker 1: But here she is telling you that the GOP is
Speaker 1: the reason people are suffering. Place seventeen sadly are traditional
Speaker 1: some of the things that we do regularly, but especially
Speaker 1: a thanksgiving to minister to those who are full didn't
Speaker 1: secure and the rest will not actually be possible, but
Speaker 1: nonetheless we must tryn We are in a full blown
Speaker 1: economic and health catastrophe, and it's amazing to see the
Speaker 1: patience the GOP has for other people suffering. She's the
Speaker 1: one with the patients for suffering. She's the cause of
Speaker 1: additional suffering now because she's not getting what she wants.
Speaker 1: You know, there was a twelve mile long food line
Speaker 1: in Atlanta. Tyler Perry gave out five thousand meals. There
Speaker 1: was a twelve mile long of cars, people waiting, and
Speaker 1: it ran out in two hours. That's what's happening in
Speaker 1: the country. While Democrats are out there lecturing people about
Speaker 1: how they're not wearing and they're not wearing masks. People
Speaker 1: can't put food on the table, they have no money.
Speaker 1: And the response we get is somehow, this is this
Speaker 1: is all Trump's fault, right, That's the easiest thing for
Speaker 1: them to switch to, which is what they do, and
Speaker 1: they'll just continue on with this, they'll continue on. Queen
Speaker 1: Pelosi doesn't care about the suffering. She's a chardonnay socialist.
Speaker 1: It's all going to be fine for her either way.
Speaker 1: Do you think she looks word she's almost eighty years old.
Speaker 1: Do you think she's worried all about Covida? She'll be
Speaker 1: all right. Trump had it better in three days. He's
Speaker 1: seventy three. What are we really waiting for here? What
Speaker 1: are we doing as a society. Well, some people view
Speaker 1: this crisis, as she rightly points out, it is a crisis.
Speaker 1: It's partially a health crisis. It's partially a government crisis
Speaker 1: because of what they're doing. But they view it all
Speaker 1: as an opportunity and they're trying to leverage it and
Speaker 1: use it to those ends and for those purposes. And
Speaker 1: we've let them get away with it far too much already.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Oh absolutely. And it's been organized and conducted
Speaker 1: with the help of Silicon Valley people, the big tech companies,
Speaker 1: the social media companies, and even the media companies. And
Speaker 1: I'm going to release the kracking at Sidney Powell, and
Speaker 1: she's gonna do it. She's gonna do it. For those
Speaker 1: of all catch the movie reference play a producer, Mark
Speaker 1: Kracking was a giant sea monster. If you ever saw
Speaker 1: the movie, Well, what's what's it called? Again? Um? About
Speaker 1: gods and something or other. It's a Greek god movie.
Speaker 1: I forget what it's called. But that was the Liam
Speaker 1: Neeson that was the more recent remake of it. There's
Speaker 1: a nineteen eighty one version of it too, but Release
Speaker 1: the Kraken. And this was trending on social media for
Speaker 1: a while because it's a phrase that it's kind of fun.
Speaker 1: First of all, it's fun to say, and second of all,
Speaker 1: it is, oh, well, what is what is the name
Speaker 1: of the movie? Producer? Mark? Do we know? I gotta
Speaker 1: know this. It's from looking at looking at it? Hold on? Yeah,
Speaker 1: well anyway, that's what's Clash of the Titans. There we go,
Speaker 1: Clash of the Titans. So Sidney Powell is basically saying
Speaker 1: that she's gonna she's gonna be dropping bombs here. That
Speaker 1: would be it would be truly earth shattering. I mean,
Speaker 1: if what she says here is true, then we need
Speaker 1: to get ready for And I'm actually gonna tell you this.
Speaker 1: I want we need to know it. If it's true,
Speaker 1: the American people have a right to know, and there's
Speaker 1: an obligation for us to know this truth. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna say this if and I'm not even trying to
Speaker 1: give you the odds here of whether I think, but
Speaker 1: if this were to happen and Sydney Powell did release
Speaker 1: the Kraken, this country would get very tense. You think
Speaker 1: the Democrats are annoying and totalitarian, Now what do you
Speaker 1: think their response would be if and when we get
Speaker 1: to the point where they're told, you know, you actually
Speaker 1: we can prove. It's one thing to think or to
Speaker 1: know in your heart that they cheated in the election.
Speaker 1: It's another thing if you have proof that a judge
Speaker 1: will not be able to ignore. But the voting machines, friends,
Speaker 1: this would be the biggest story. I mean, unless you
Speaker 1: had aliens landing or something and we discovered life from
Speaker 1: other planets. I mean, this would be the biggest story
Speaker 1: you could you could have right now. I don't know,
Speaker 1: this is just this would be crazy. And Sidney Powell,
Speaker 1: a lot of people really respect her, and I think
Speaker 1: she loves the country, and I think she's she's fighting
Speaker 1: for us, and she's doing what she thinks is best here.
Speaker 1: So I want to see this play out. I don't
Speaker 1: I don't see any reason to short circuit it. I
Speaker 1: don't see any reason to to smear her. You know why?
Speaker 1: Why are people jumping to that right away? That doesn't
Speaker 1: seem it doesn't seem like that's a fair approach. Now,
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign put out a statement, and this is
Speaker 1: what's gotten a lot of people very well, let's just
Speaker 1: say they're very quick to say that Sydney Powell is
Speaker 1: way off base here. But they put out a statement
Speaker 1: that says that Sydney Powell is operating as a lawyer
Speaker 1: in her own capacity and is not a part of
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign legal team. Sidney Palace practicing law on
Speaker 1: her own. She's not a member of the Trump legal team.
Speaker 1: She is also not a lawyer for the president in
Speaker 1: her personal capacity. That's what the statement says. Okay, now
Speaker 1: it's fair to say what the heck is going on here?
Speaker 1: That seems a little bit strange considering that she was
Speaker 1: a part she was a part of that Trump press
Speaker 1: conference last week which I watched and then also went
Speaker 1: back and read through the transcript a couple of times,
Speaker 1: and they clearly are separating this out so that there's
Speaker 1: going to be the Sydney Powell looking this investigation, and
Speaker 1: then there's going to be the Trump legal team specifically. Now,
Speaker 1: let's all remember that the Russia collusion hoax also involve
Speaker 1: multiple angles, and they never had any evidence of anything.
Speaker 1: But they were coming at Russia collusion from the possibility
Speaker 1: of you know, wiki leaks, hacking and and the Kremlin
Speaker 1: working through Papathopolis and Carter Page. And they had the
Speaker 1: FBI looking into this, and they had media outlets that
Speaker 1: were pushing the narrative the CIA CIA director was involved,
Speaker 1: you know, So they were coming at that from all
Speaker 1: these different angles. I don't see why we can't have
Speaker 1: a multi pronged investigation of voter fraud. What's the issue,
Speaker 1: what's the problem. There isn't one. Here's Jenna Ellis of
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign play clip nine. And the common question
Speaker 1: that I've gotten since the press conference is why haven't
Speaker 1: you brought forth evidence We have and we will in court.
Speaker 1: We have not yet had what the legal process calls
Speaker 1: an evidentiary hearing. That's where you go into court and
Speaker 1: you say I have all of this evidence, judge, now
Speaker 1: let me bring forward the witnesses, the direct testimony of
Speaker 1: people who saw the events, they heard from election officials,
Speaker 1: who told voters who to vote for, or who told
Speaker 1: them to manipulate ballots, all of those things, and also
Speaker 1: the circumstantial evidence, which is all of these ballots being
Speaker 1: delivered late at night. Now, there was a decision from
Speaker 1: the Third US Circuit Court of Appeals over the weekend
Speaker 1: on Sunday, and the judge, Matthew Brand, wrote that they
Speaker 1: were asking for far too much and that the remedy
Speaker 1: effectively is far beyond what they can prove. This has
Speaker 1: been my concern all along. I've been saying this to you.
Speaker 1: It's not just about what you can prove, it's about
Speaker 1: what a judge will be willing to do. And so
Speaker 1: here's the situation you have in Philadelphia. Even if you
Speaker 1: can prove from my witness affidavits say, and you're going
Speaker 1: to need more than eyewitnesses. That's that's the reality here,
Speaker 1: a judge is it doesn't matter how many eyewitnesses say
Speaker 1: they saw something. They're going to need to prove it.
Speaker 1: And the Democrats set this up. I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: the truth. The Democrats set this up. So it's very
Speaker 1: hard to prove the fraud after it has occurred. That's
Speaker 1: why they wanted the mail in ballots this way. That's
Speaker 1: why they wanted it to be so wide open without
Speaker 1: the kinds of protections that you would need to ensure
Speaker 1: voter or integrity. But even if you could prove that
Speaker 1: there were a few hundred or even a few thousand
Speaker 1: votes that were illegally counted as part of an illicit
Speaker 1: process in the state of Pennsylvania, which is where we
Speaker 1: are in all this, now a judge is not going
Speaker 1: to say, well, then every vote that may have been
Speaker 1: counted using that process is going to get tossed out.
Speaker 1: And that's what I mean. They're asking for a huge
Speaker 1: number of ballots where where they didn't either sequest or
Speaker 1: them or were the postmarks. I'm going to forget what
Speaker 1: the what the specific law is, but they're asking for
Speaker 1: a huge number of ballots to get thrown out and
Speaker 1: it's just not going to happen. Judge is not going
Speaker 1: to do it. Now, you could say the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: And I know a lot of people have been saying, oh, well, now,
Speaker 1: because this got looked at quickly, the Supreme Court will
Speaker 1: take this up. Really, you think Kavanaugh and John Roberts
Speaker 1: are going to have the backbone to do this where
Speaker 1: other federal judges have not. Again, I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: what I think. I could be wrong. I think that
Speaker 1: I was very confident that Donald Trump is going to
Speaker 1: win the election. I was closer in the reality than
Speaker 1: pretty much all the posters were with my assessments and
Speaker 1: my analysis of it. But I didn't know that the
Speaker 1: Democrats mail in fraud thing would work so well, or
Speaker 1: mail in you know scheme we could say would work
Speaker 1: so well. So I couldn't account for that. That's just
Speaker 1: my way of saying I could be wrong here. It
Speaker 1: is possible that I could be getting this one wrong.
Speaker 1: But here's what I see right now. Now, even with
Speaker 1: the presentation of evidence, judges will always say better to
Speaker 1: have more votes counted than fewer. And so that means
Speaker 1: that the remedy that the Trump campaign is seeking here
Speaker 1: of we got to throw out you know, three hundred
Speaker 1: thousand ballots here or a million ballots there or whatever.
Speaker 1: It maybe depends on the state. Judges are gonna say, no,
Speaker 1: you have a guy that says he saw boxes, but
Speaker 1: only you know, only ten ballots that he actually saw
Speaker 1: change but he had boxes and boxes coming out of
Speaker 1: a truck. I'm not going to throw out all the
Speaker 1: ballots out of the truck. You don't know, you don't
Speaker 1: know if those are valid or not right, that's going
Speaker 1: to be the excuse. I'm just telling you what i'm seeing.
Speaker 1: I'm not telling I think that that's I think it's wrong.
Speaker 1: I think it's sad what's happening here. It bothers me.
Speaker 1: But I always feel an obligation to tell you. This
Speaker 1: audience that is so humbling and kind as to give
Speaker 1: me their time, I'll always tell you what I really
Speaker 1: think is happening is I think you deserve that because
Speaker 1: I have respect for you. I have respect for the
Speaker 1: people who listen to this show. So that's what I
Speaker 1: see going on here, and I think that's going to
Speaker 1: be a very challenging to get around. I think that's
Speaker 1: going to be a big issue. Whether Sidney Powell ends
Speaker 1: up with nothing, I don't know. I just don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean, how could I know. At this point, she
Speaker 1: hasn't shown us the goods, but she says she's got them.
Speaker 1: We'll see, and I'm not I'm not judging her one
Speaker 1: way or the other until we see what she's got.
Speaker 1: As for the rest of the Trump legal team, I
Speaker 1: want them to turn over every rock. I want them
Speaker 1: to look in every crevice here. I want them to
Speaker 1: do everything they can because really, in a sense, this
Speaker 1: is like a juice cleanse for our democracy here. Let's
Speaker 1: allow the cleansing process of the courts to play out.
Speaker 1: That's what I want to see happening, and I think
Speaker 1: that we're going through that now. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Facts do not care about your feelings. That's what conservative
Speaker 1: commentator Ben Shapiro famously said several years ago, and it's
Speaker 1: still true today. The facts are the facts. Spiden's win
Speaker 1: is being certified and there Trump is wrong, by the way,
Speaker 1: to say that every Trump voter feels that this thing
Speaker 1: was rigged. Not every Trump voter does. But seventy seven
Speaker 1: percent of Americans who bats Trump did tell polsters from
Speaker 1: Monmouth do they believe voter fraud tipped the scales for Biden.
Speaker 1: This conspiracy crap is just like Trump's anti media enemy
Speaker 1: of the people smear. It's a slow acting poison that
Speaker 1: is crippling the American body politic election denialism is like
Speaker 1: a middle finger to democracy in the same way that
Speaker 1: Rich Lawyer said that a vote for Trump was like
Speaker 1: a middle finger, a rude gesture to the left. Well,
Speaker 1: now I'm getting excited about it. I mean, if it
Speaker 1: means that I can give a middle finger to folks
Speaker 1: like Snelter, sign me up. But let's hear from my
Speaker 1: friend Harlan Hale. He's a GOP political consultant. He also
Speaker 1: is on the Trump campaign advisory board. About what he
Speaker 1: thinks it's going on here, Harlan, I'm always good to
Speaker 1: have you. Well, that's great to be with you. Is
Speaker 1: there anybody more sanctimonious and than is sufferable as Brian
Speaker 1: Stelter at CNN. He keeps raising the bar for out
Speaker 1: not just somebody in the mainstream media can be I
Speaker 1: think it's I think it's fantastic that we have we
Speaker 1: have the Brian Stelters of the world out there lecturing
Speaker 1: goes on journalism and credibility and speaking truth to power.
Speaker 1: It's pretty hilarious. So I'm glad that that CNN keeps
Speaker 1: in there. Although if Zucker goes. I believe that that
Speaker 1: Stelter has his show because he kind of looks like Zucker,
Speaker 1: and so Jeff SE's in a little Stelter what you know.
Speaker 1: So there's a little bit of that going on. But
Speaker 1: I think he may he may be gone. But let's
Speaker 1: let's get into the serious stuff here for a second.
Speaker 1: About these legal challenges and what are you hearing from
Speaker 1: the campaign? How are we how are we doing with
Speaker 1: all this right now? There was there was a not
Speaker 1: a very good court decision for the campaign on the
Speaker 1: Third Circuit in Pennsylvania over the weekend. What do you
Speaker 1: see happening here? Well, I would say it's not a
Speaker 1: good decision, but at least it happened on an excidited schedule.
Speaker 1: I think that this was the anticipated outcome based on
Speaker 1: and everything that I'm hearing out of the campaign. They
Speaker 1: knew that this would this would go this way. Um
Speaker 1: and uh, the President is not giving up. The boats
Speaker 1: have not been certified in all of the key states.
Speaker 1: There are going to be a series of legal challenges,
Speaker 1: and I think the plan is to take this all
Speaker 1: the way to the Supreme Court. I think that what
Speaker 1: the American people are rightfully starting to Demando is that
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign start to present all of these legal
Speaker 1: challenges not in a press conference but um but actually
Speaker 1: through legal proceedings, like let's see, let's see some legal
Speaker 1: work actually start to come to fruition here. What do
Speaker 1: you make of the statement from the campaign about Sydney
Speaker 1: Powell that she's a private lawyer and not a part
Speaker 1: of the campaign, and then Powell's own responses she put
Speaker 1: out that she's just trying to get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of this for democracy and to save America. What's going
Speaker 1: on here? Actually, I think it's okay. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think it's a little overplayed. I mean, there are obviously
Speaker 1: some tensions there, and because just two days prior she
Speaker 1: was on stage with Channelis and Rudy Giuliani seemingly as
Speaker 1: part of the team. But I think officially she really
Speaker 1: wasn't integrated into the team, but that they were collaborating
Speaker 1: for the last two weeks, and I just think that
Speaker 1: that is not going to change. Really, I think there
Speaker 1: still probably will be some some collaboration. You know, Sidney
Speaker 1: Pale is moving more along a criminal path and the
Speaker 1: campaign is following a constitutional path. You know, these things
Speaker 1: do not conflict, and I think that they can move
Speaker 1: forward in tandem, and her case could go well beyond
Speaker 1: even the outcome of this election if it doesn't work
Speaker 1: in our favorite And I think that's a good role.
Speaker 1: I think it's a good place for Sidney Pale to
Speaker 1: be in is to try to hold some people criminally
Speaker 1: accountable for any crimes that may have been committed across
Speaker 1: the country. So can you delvinto this a little bit more?
Speaker 1: This is an interesting separation that you're describing here between
Speaker 1: the constitutional challenges. So that's that seems like it's more
Speaker 1: what the Trump legal team right now is focused on effectively,
Speaker 1: to say there's an equal protection violation when you have
Speaker 1: some counties in a state, for example, allowing the curing
Speaker 1: of ballots, allowing different processes that are going to include
Speaker 1: more votes in Democrat leading precincts. Right, So those there
Speaker 1: are those constitutional arguments, And what Sidney Powell's talking about
Speaker 1: is I mean that's just straight up voter or fraud
Speaker 1: where people are getting paid money and changing votes. Right,
Speaker 1: That's that's what you mean by this difference. Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: So actually, you know, investigating the relationships between elected officials
Speaker 1: and the election technology vendors. I'm talking about the voting
Speaker 1: machine vendors. UM. Also, I think that she's she's going
Speaker 1: to start to lay out this case based on what
Speaker 1: I've had had a conversation with somebody that works with her,
Speaker 1: just lay late last night on this UM. I don't
Speaker 1: think Sidney Pale's going to fall into the shadows here.
Speaker 1: I think she's just doubling down. And in many ways,
Speaker 1: I think it benefits the Trump campaign to follow this,
Speaker 1: this this dual road strategy UM, so that she can
Speaker 1: act more unilaterally and non encumbered by the campaign hierarchy
Speaker 1: that needs to be a little more conservative in its
Speaker 1: messaging UM as it's representing the president personally. So I
Speaker 1: actually think this is a this is a good thing
Speaker 1: for us, honestly. I mean that's not talking about I
Speaker 1: think it's actually good that Sydney is is off the
Speaker 1: tether and uh and and can do it. She thinks
Speaker 1: best advantage is the president in American democracy. We're speaking
Speaker 1: to Harlan Hill. He's a political strategist, consultant and also
Speaker 1: an advisor or on the advisory board of the Trump campaign. So, Harlan,
Speaker 1: how do you see this now playing out? We have
Speaker 1: we've got this Pennsylvania certification, We've got uh deadlines, We've
Speaker 1: you know, what do you think is going to happen? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean we got to be honest. I mean, our
Speaker 1: chances of winning here are in the single digits. I mean,
Speaker 1: what the I believe wholeheartedly that there was material, um,
Speaker 1: industrial scale manipulation of the outcome of this election through
Speaker 1: a variety of means. UM. But that is a very
Speaker 1: difficult case to prove out um in the short period
Speaker 1: of time that we have. And the problem is the
Speaker 1: way that that this fraud was perpetuated, for instance by
Speaker 1: um uh, you know, taking ballots that shouldn't have been
Speaker 1: out of their secrecy envelope before against court orders. You know,
Speaker 1: that's something that you can't you can't you can't undo
Speaker 1: once ballots, once bad ballots have been flamingled with good ballots,
Speaker 1: there's no way of backing out what the results would
Speaker 1: have been. So um. The Democrats did do an extremely
Speaker 1: effective job at rushing through the vote tally um, even
Speaker 1: though they knew that some of the ballots that that
Speaker 1: they were accounting were not eligible. UM. But you know,
Speaker 1: we have to be honest about what our aspects are here.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's it's slim. But what that means is
Speaker 1: that going forward in subsequent elections, there needs to be
Speaker 1: a wholesale overhaul, not from the federal level down, because
Speaker 1: I don't think that that's going to fix anything having
Speaker 1: Washington dictate how we cast I mean, it'll just be
Speaker 1: a mangled mess that advantages the companies with the biggest lobbyists.
Speaker 1: But there need to be conversations in each of these
Speaker 1: states about how we rectify this, because if we lose
Speaker 1: faith in our democracies, especially now when we bost faith
Speaker 1: in so many other institutions, that does not spell well
Speaker 1: for for for the law and order on our streets.
Speaker 1: How are we looking in Georgia. I'm seeing some troubling
Speaker 1: news stories about the amount of effort that Democrats are
Speaker 1: putting into trying to turn those two seats blew those
Speaker 1: two Senate seats, And I do have a concern here
Speaker 1: that Republicans are so fixed on the election outcome, which
Speaker 1: is obviously very important, the presidential election outcome, that maybe
Speaker 1: there's not necessarily the focus there needs to be on
Speaker 1: making sure that those two Georgia Senate seats go red.
Speaker 1: Because you know, if you do have a Biden administration,
Speaker 1: but you have a Republican Senate majority, we can weather
Speaker 1: that storm for two years pretty well. It's not going
Speaker 1: to be pleasant, but it's not if they take control
Speaker 1: of the Senate. I think Harland, you and I would
Speaker 1: have to agree. It's it's bad news. It's big problems. Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean it'll be a repeat of the first two
Speaker 1: years of the Obama administration, where we got you know,
Speaker 1: Obamacare and a whole lot of excess government spending and
Speaker 1: an unchecked executive. Um So, I mean, that's what we're
Speaker 1: likely to get. I think. I mean, I'm not encouraged
Speaker 1: at all by the numbers that I'm seeing out of Georgia.
Speaker 1: And right now I'm talking about fundraising numbers. And I
Speaker 1: talked to a lot of people that expected that there
Speaker 1: would be a lot more money flowing in. And there
Speaker 1: is a lot of money, don't get me wrong, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of money. But they thought there'd be more
Speaker 1: coming into register voters, to run ads on television, run
Speaker 1: direct mail, that sort of thing. And there are big numbers,
Speaker 1: but not as much as as I think was anticipated.
Speaker 1: But listen, it's so early days. I mean, they don't
Speaker 1: cast the final ballot until January fifth. Um, So, I
Speaker 1: think a lot of people, at least in our world,
Speaker 1: in big donors, they've been tacked, they've been dry, they've
Speaker 1: been drained dry over the last four years by the
Speaker 1: re election effort, and they're probably feeling a little bit
Speaker 1: of shock because the election hasn't turned out to as
Speaker 1: positive as as positively as we expected. And so um.
Speaker 1: You know. But but do you know the Georgia teams, Harlan.
Speaker 1: I know you know this world and you've worked with
Speaker 1: and you know the Georgia team. Are they pretty good?
Speaker 1: The GOP side, Yeah, they're they're they're all very confident.
Speaker 1: I mean, the campaigns are very good. And there are
Speaker 1: a lot of outside packs that are that are playing
Speaker 1: down there, that are going to that are they're doing
Speaker 1: really good work. Actually, you know, we did a pack
Speaker 1: down there to help leffler Um at least to this runoff.
Speaker 1: But I'll say this, even if they even if we
Speaker 1: do lose this Senate in some ways, as we're looking
Speaker 1: to reignite the fire within the conservative movement here to
Speaker 1: define what the future of the Republican Party is. Letting
Speaker 1: Democrats run hog wild for two years. It will be
Speaker 1: a repeat of the Tea Party in twenty ten. But
Speaker 1: unlike then, we do still have a leader at large,
Speaker 1: and that will be President Trump, and I think that
Speaker 1: he will be extraordinarily effective at defining what the future
Speaker 1: of the party is and who who who the future
Speaker 1: leaders are. So I don't think all hope is lost
Speaker 1: even if this doesn't work out. But I mean, every
Speaker 1: Republican that's that's you know, living in adjoining states should
Speaker 1: be flooding Georgia on the weekends to go knock doors
Speaker 1: and make phone calls because it's critical. But you know,
Speaker 1: even if it doesn't work out, I think Democrats are
Speaker 1: always has been remarkably effective at wasting a really good opportunity.
Speaker 1: There's gonna be so much infighting within them, within the party.
Speaker 1: People at aos, he's saying, well, we have full control
Speaker 1: of the House, the Senate, and the White House renew
Speaker 1: deal and all. You know, all this just wild and
Speaker 1: crazy stuff that American voters did not they're going to
Speaker 1: reject to the sale. So you know, we'll make the
Speaker 1: best of the situation either way, all right, Harland Harlan Hill,
Speaker 1: everybody political consultant and adviser to the Trump campaign. Good
Speaker 1: to talk to you, my friend. Thank you. You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: How do we do everything possible to make sure that
Speaker 1: we become a vibrant democracy? Said, we do exactly the
Speaker 1: opposite of what Trump and his authoritarian friends want to do.
Speaker 1: And clearly some of the answers are that we have
Speaker 1: got to eliminate an end. The electoral college turns out
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden will end up receiving some six million
Speaker 1: more votes than Donald Trump. That's a lot of votes.
Speaker 1: And yet if it weren't for a couple of hundred
Speaker 1: thousand voters in Pennsylvania, in Wisconsin, in Michigan and Nevada
Speaker 1: and Arizona, Trump would have won the presidency. That does
Speaker 1: not make any sense. If we believe in one person,
Speaker 1: one vote, we cannot continue a situation where a few
Speaker 1: hundred thousand votes in five or six states can determine
Speaker 1: who the next president is. The good thing Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: is not teaching a class on constitutional law. Doesn't seem
Speaker 1: to understand the system of government that we have. And
Speaker 1: here he is talking about protecting our sacred democracy by
Speaker 1: dramatically altering the system that we have for the perpetuation
Speaker 1: of that democracy. And I know we're in a republic
Speaker 1: on a democracy, but we have democratic processes. So that's
Speaker 1: what we're always talking about here. Get ready for it.
Speaker 1: This will be this will be the path forward. This
Speaker 1: will be the decision that they make if they get
Speaker 1: the opportunity. I was just speaking to Harlan Hill about
Speaker 1: what happens if in Georgia we lose those two Senate seats.
Speaker 1: They will make these transformative decisions. They will go forward
Speaker 1: with the elimination of the filibuster. They will go after
Speaker 1: the electoral college. They will add DC in Puerto Rico
Speaker 1: for statehood, which means you've got four more US Senators
Speaker 1: that would be in the mix. That would be from
Speaker 1: total Democrats strongholds. Now, I think there's a clear constitutional
Speaker 1: argument against DC becoming a state, even if they tried
Speaker 1: to make it a state, but Puerto Rico, it could happen.
Speaker 1: And this is the plan. This is what they're trying
Speaker 1: to do so that this election, and this is a
Speaker 1: little bit scared to think about or a little sad
Speaker 1: to think about, but the way that they change the
Speaker 1: rules in this election may allow them to change the
Speaker 1: rules in every election going forward. That's something we need
Speaker 1: to be aware of that that is a realistic possibility
Speaker 1: trying to address everything that's going on here right now.
Speaker 1: So I am I am concerned about where we go,
Speaker 1: especially if the Democrats managed to take take control here.
Speaker 1: And I'm also concerned because you can see that there
Speaker 1: are Republicans who are already angling to be the leaders
Speaker 1: of a new post Trump Republican party. It's already it's
Speaker 1: already happening. Yeah, that's going on. Like you've got Chris
Speaker 1: Christi out there. Why did you think this is helpful?
Speaker 1: Play clip ten? The president has had an opportunity to
Speaker 1: access to courts, and I said to you, you know, George,
Speaker 1: starting at two thirty am on Wednesday morning, if you've
Speaker 1: got the evidence of fraud presented, and what's happens here
Speaker 1: is quite frankly the contact of the president's legal team
Speaker 1: has been a national embarrassment. Sidney pal accusing Governor Brian
Speaker 1: Kemp of a crime on television, yet being unwilling to
Speaker 1: go on TV and defend and lay out the evidence
Speaker 1: that she supposedly has. This is outrageous conduct by an eaglayer.
Speaker 1: And notice George. They won't do it inside the courtroom.
Speaker 1: They allege fraud outside the courtroom, but when they go
Speaker 1: inside the courtroom, they don't plead fraud and they don't
Speaker 1: argue fraud. This is what I was concerned about at
Speaker 1: two thirty in the morning on Wednesday night. Listen. I've
Speaker 1: been a supporter of the presidents. I voted for him twice.
Speaker 1: But elections have consequences and we cannot continue to act
Speaker 1: as if something happened here that didn't happen. You have
Speaker 1: an obligation to present the evidence. The evidence has not
Speaker 1: been presented. The evidence. No one says it has been
Speaker 1: presented yet. This is where I get very short tempered
Speaker 1: with the likes of Chris Christie and others. They're either
Speaker 1: going to have this evidence to present he or not.
Speaker 1: Why are they saying it's a national embarrassment before? Before
Speaker 1: Sydney Powell has done this in court. She's pursuing different pathways.
Speaker 1: We've already talked about this, pursuing different pathways than some
Speaker 1: of the other that some of the Trump legal team,
Speaker 1: the official legal team of the campaign, that are looking
Speaker 1: at the constitutional challenges to what happened in this election,
Speaker 1: that effectively, the Democrats changed the rules so much that
Speaker 1: they knew they'd be rampant fraud and it would be
Speaker 1: very hard to prove. Well, Sydney Powell's going after this.
Speaker 1: She's the one, the only one who's been talking about
Speaker 1: dominion voting machines and also smart matic software, and she's
Speaker 1: either going to have the proof or not. So why
Speaker 1: get ahead of it? Why? Why defamers? She also said
Speaker 1: that General Flynn was railroaded and people made fun of
Speaker 1: her for that and said she had no proof, and
Speaker 1: she was one hundred correct on that, So I think
Speaker 1: she deserves the deference here to see. Let's see what
Speaker 1: she's got. Let's see what she has. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Well.
Speaker 1: Our plan is to be able to ship vaccines to
Speaker 1: the immunization sites within twenty four hours from the approval,
Speaker 1: so I would expect maybe on day two after approval,
Speaker 1: on the eleventh or on the twelfth of December, hopefully
Speaker 1: the first people who will be immunized across the United States,
Speaker 1: across all states, in all the areas where the state
Speaker 1: departments are held, will have told us where to deliver
Speaker 1: the vaccine. Could be as soon as the eleventh or
Speaker 1: the twelfth of December for the vaccine to start getting
Speaker 1: out there. And as I've been telling you, because I
Speaker 1: do look at the science and the data and what's
Speaker 1: really happening. If we get this vaccine out just to
Speaker 1: those at highest risk, if you do ever this vaccine
Speaker 1: to people who are in nursing homes, and to seniors
Speaker 1: you know, sixty five and over, particularly with any comorbidities,
Speaker 1: but just in general, if we get this to that
Speaker 1: segment of the population, you'll see fatalities from COVID. Thank god,
Speaker 1: I'm assuming I'm correct here fall off a cliff. They'll
Speaker 1: just go way down because people who are thirty and
Speaker 1: forty don't die from this, So them getting the vaccine
Speaker 1: is far less important in the early stages than getting
Speaker 1: it to those who are at highest risk. And we're
Speaker 1: weeks away from this thing, and I'm sorry, but I'm
Speaker 1: not going to let go the fact that the Biden
Speaker 1: and Harris ticket we're undermining and underplaying. How incredible a
Speaker 1: feat this is, I mean, how amazing it is that
Speaker 1: here we are at this stage with a vaccine that
Speaker 1: could save so many lives, save so many people, and
Speaker 1: the speed of this has been absolutely incredible. And yes,
Speaker 1: the Trump administration deserves to take a real bow over this.
Speaker 1: The Trump administration deserves some credit here. Regardless of what
Speaker 1: happens with this, this election counting issue right ballot counting
Speaker 1: and the legal challenges and all the rest of that,
Speaker 1: Trump helped get us to this point. Big Pharma is
Speaker 1: also seeing a you know, they're going to see a
Speaker 1: surge of support here for a Big Pharma if this
Speaker 1: thing allows us to return to normal life. Think of
Speaker 1: what it will be like to be able to go
Speaker 1: to a go to your local cafe or a bar
Speaker 1: and not have a mask on. Everyone's so worried and
Speaker 1: sit down. I think people are going to break down
Speaker 1: in tears the first time they're able to do this again,
Speaker 1: you know, I think I think people are really they're
Speaker 1: going to be overcome with emotion. I mean, we are,
Speaker 1: we are getting so used to this bizarre and largely
Speaker 1: you know, I think unnecessary in terms of the restrictions,
Speaker 1: but put that aside for a moment. This bizarre new
Speaker 1: life where human beings are treated like vectors of disease
Speaker 1: where your loved ones are a threat to your health.
Speaker 1: This is it's horrible what's gone on here terrible And
Speaker 1: for those of us that live in reality, Look, there's
Speaker 1: some people that even after the vaccines are in widespread distribution.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just telling you right now, I'm waiting
Speaker 1: for the day when after I'm going to get the
Speaker 1: vaccine as soon as I can. And I mean, I
Speaker 1: know I'm not in front of the line or anything,
Speaker 1: and I don't I wouldn't expect to be, but I'll
Speaker 1: get the vaccine one I can. And I'm not wearing
Speaker 1: a mask anymore. I forget the VACT. It's not happening.
Speaker 1: And I know they are going to be people that
Speaker 1: are saying, oh, but but you know it'll make people
Speaker 1: more comfortable if No, this isn't about someone's perception. This
Speaker 1: is supposed to be about science. This is supposed to
Speaker 1: be about facts, and it is entirely acceptable for a
Speaker 1: ninety five percent effective vaccine. Let's say I get the
Speaker 1: fives are one which everyone's most effective. All right, If
Speaker 1: a vaccine is ninety five percent effective, then people need
Speaker 1: to be comfortable with I'm not giving them that disease. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's not happening. They don't need to worry about that.
Speaker 1: And you know, in the one in a million chance
Speaker 1: that it happens, life's tough. Bad things happen. Like I know,
Speaker 1: I don't know. We can't live our lives this way,
Speaker 1: but I do think it's important that we all remember
Speaker 1: and we all recognize that we're getting really close. And
Speaker 1: I know it's been hard and it's being made harder
Speaker 1: right now because there's there's this sense of panic from
Speaker 1: so many of the people who are uncharged. There's this
Speaker 1: sense of if you don't listen to us, you're gonna die.
Speaker 1: I mean, the governor of Jersey says this, Oh, you're
Speaker 1: you're upset about us sending the police after you because
Speaker 1: you want to celebrate Thanksgiving. Well, you should be more
Speaker 1: upset if you die. That's the way that he speaks
Speaker 1: to all of us. I mean, you don't live in
Speaker 1: New Jersey necessarily, but that's the way that he publicly
Speaker 1: talks about this issue. And he's not the only governor
Speaker 1: that feels that way. This is what they do. This
Speaker 1: is the governor's wielding their power in ways that would
Speaker 1: have been unamounaginable not long ago, and now we're told
Speaker 1: that this is just somehow normal. We will get through this,
Speaker 1: but I think you should be prepared for the fight
Speaker 1: that will come even after the vaccines are distributed. But
Speaker 1: we'll talk. We'll talk more about that later. In the meantime,
Speaker 1: I'm just trying to take a moment with all of
Speaker 1: you to say, we are going to get our lives back.
Speaker 1: It is going to happen, and we are going to
Speaker 1: have society and social life and interaction back, and it
Speaker 1: will be it will feel, I would assume something like
Speaker 1: it would feel after you know what a country has
Speaker 1: been at war for a long time. And I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about the soldiers now they have a whole other
Speaker 1: sense of what war really is. But I mean for
Speaker 1: the people back home, you know, the relief that they
Speaker 1: feel when that war ends and their loved ones come home.
Speaker 1: And right now Trump calls it a the invisible enemy.
Speaker 1: But as as a society, America has been at war
Speaker 1: with this virus in many ways, and when it ends,
Speaker 1: I mean, I just hope that the real jubilation in
Speaker 1: the streets. Part of me is a little sad to
Speaker 1: know that even though even though the vaccine is coming,
Speaker 1: there's not going to be the same dancing in the
Speaker 1: streets on vaccine distribution day one that there was when
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was declared the winner. And that's that's kind
Speaker 1: of sad, it's a little pathetic, but that's where we
Speaker 1: are as a country that for Democrats, Joe Biden winning
Speaker 1: is more important than the vaccine. And look, that's a prediction.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe they'll be dancing in the streets and everyone
Speaker 1: playing music and having a great time, which is what
Speaker 1: I saw in New York when they called it for Biden.
Speaker 1: I doubt it. Though I doubt it. In fact, I
Speaker 1: think there are going to be a lot of people
Speaker 1: that fall into this posture of oh, well, now you
Speaker 1: have to be more careful than ever because you don't
Speaker 1: want to be the last person to die in the
Speaker 1: COVID war, so to speak, right, You don't want to
Speaker 1: be the last person to get this and die before
Speaker 1: the vaccine gets to everybody. So there is going to
Speaker 1: be this anxiety pushing in the other direction. And it's
Speaker 1: remarkable when I sit here and think about what we've
Speaker 1: we've been through as a country and how earlier this
Speaker 1: year I went from somebody who was in New York
Speaker 1: City going to events speaking to I mean, I spoke
Speaker 1: to the New York Young Republicans and I don't know
Speaker 1: what it was, maybe November, I think of twenty nineteen.
Speaker 1: There or two hundred and fifty people in the room,
Speaker 1: you know, sitting packed in like sardines and chairs. I mean,
Speaker 1: and that's I know, people give speeches for thousands of people,
Speaker 1: But I'm just saying that was for me, that was
Speaker 1: how we I was going into twenty twenty. That was
Speaker 1: life Fred going into bars. People's going to a restaurants.
Speaker 1: But I'm a guy. I'd like to get out and
Speaker 1: be around and I enjoy. That's why it's worth it
Speaker 1: to be in New York City. The crowdedness, the density
Speaker 1: gives you these options. The density is the reason for
Speaker 1: all the frenetic energy and everything else. And that density
Speaker 1: became the enemy during COVID. And this was true in
Speaker 1: a lot of places where all of a sudden, a
Speaker 1: lot of human beings. Are those of you who live
Speaker 1: in more rural areas or just less crowded parts of
Speaker 1: the country know that it was a huge advantage during COVID,
Speaker 1: huge huge advantage. You know, all of a sudden that
Speaker 1: if you had your own you know, a lot of
Speaker 1: your own food supply nearby, and you're own well water,
Speaker 1: and you were an even better shape, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: if you can avoid people altogether for a while, that
Speaker 1: was considered the best possible scenario. But the vaccines are
Speaker 1: the cavalry in this battle, and they are coming over
Speaker 1: the ridgeline. They are they are going to be making
Speaker 1: this whole thing a very, very tragic nightmare. I think
Speaker 1: that we will emerge from, but it's going to be
Speaker 1: quite a day, so keep that in mind. I thought
Speaker 1: we would have reached it, you know. I thought we'd
Speaker 1: get through the virus sooner, but a lot of people
Speaker 1: were wrong about many different stages of this. I figured
Speaker 1: we would emerge with therapeutics even by last summer that
Speaker 1: would be able to really knock this thing out. But
Speaker 1: it looks like the vaccine is going to be what
Speaker 1: what's the real game changer here? And that's fantastic, And
Speaker 1: so I know that there's a lot right now that's
Speaker 1: that's stressful. We still up. We've got these lockdowns, and
Speaker 1: I'm very angry about them, and I think people are
Speaker 1: going to suffer, and the vaccines are not It's not
Speaker 1: like day one, it's all over, but it's the beginning
Speaker 1: of the end of the COVID mania, and then the
Speaker 1: fight becomes is that end once we get to vaccine distribution.
Speaker 1: Day one is the end of this three months away
Speaker 1: or nine months away. And this is where the discussions
Speaker 1: about lockdowns and acceptable risk and all this, that's where
Speaker 1: that comes in, because I think there are a lot
Speaker 1: of people, unfortunately, who are extreme lockdowners and who believe
Speaker 1: so much in all this that what they're going to
Speaker 1: try to do is say that until it's what Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi said, I've talked about about this earlier in the show.
Speaker 1: Until everyone is safe, No one is safe, until every
Speaker 1: person in this country has no chance of getting this virus,
Speaker 1: no one's allowed to live normally. Again, there will be
Speaker 1: that mentality, and we're gonna have to fight back against that.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to push very hard to prevent that
Speaker 1: from becoming the dominant narrative because I think there are
Speaker 1: a lot of people who will want it to be
Speaker 1: just that you're in the freedom This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sex and Show podcast. Ah. Yes, The New York Times
Speaker 1: refers to him as president elect Biden. It's not yet
Speaker 1: true that he's president elect. The States have not certified,
Speaker 1: Electoral College has not passed on its votes, but they're
Speaker 1: calling him that. But I just bring it up because
Speaker 1: he's already picked his secretary of State, Anthony Blincoln. And
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you this is this is troubling. This
Speaker 1: is troubling because it's showing us a return to these
Speaker 1: these people with all of these credentials. It's a lot
Speaker 1: of credentials and institutions, and the credentials are just the
Speaker 1: names of institutions and spending time at them in places,
Speaker 1: and not really a focus on results underlying philosophy. Who
Speaker 1: this person is in terms of what they've done, it's
Speaker 1: always where they've been, who they worked for or with
Speaker 1: or you know, this guy blinking was now, look, I
Speaker 1: know that we may not even get to this point,
Speaker 1: but they're already making moves, So we should talk about
Speaker 1: the moves because no matter what, it's a reminder of
Speaker 1: what Trump is. A departure from Trump has been a
Speaker 1: departure from this false sense of international consensus and these
Speaker 1: globalist norms that if you disagree with, you're considered less sophisticated.
Speaker 1: You're considered less, you know, less enlightened on these issues.
Speaker 1: You know, for example, it was an international kind of globalist,
Speaker 1: internationalist consensus that if you wanted to achieve any piece
Speaker 1: in the Middle East, you had to do something first
Speaker 1: with the Palestinians and the Israelis, and that that was
Speaker 1: without that, you couldn't do anything. That wasn't true. As
Speaker 1: we see from this administration, it's just not true. But
Speaker 1: if you went against that until now, you were just
Speaker 1: considered ignorant. You were considered somebody who didn't understand things.
Speaker 1: You know, this guy Blincoln was Deputy National Secure, a
Speaker 1: deputy Secretary of State under Obama to John Kerry, I mean,
Speaker 1: John Carey's another He's a perfect example of this, a
Speaker 1: deeply unimpressive individual who you know what he went to.
Speaker 1: I guess he went to Yale or something. And then
Speaker 1: he we all know about his military service in Vietnam,
Speaker 1: and then he married a couple of rich ladies and
Speaker 1: ran for Senate and it's just been in the Senate forever.
Speaker 1: And so we're supposed to think this guy has some
Speaker 1: ability or some leadership or knowledge that's really worthwhile. And
Speaker 1: I just sit here and say, nah, no, John Carey's
Speaker 1: a he's very similar to Joe Biden that he's a
Speaker 1: an intense mediocrity. I mean, he is like the distillation
Speaker 1: of the mediocres. What you get with a John Kerry
Speaker 1: with it with a Joe Biden. Nothing special or or
Speaker 1: impressive about them. But Blincoln, you know, he went to
Speaker 1: Harvard and he's a lawyer. You always got to remember
Speaker 1: so many lawyers in national security, people that have never
Speaker 1: had to be around or understand what it means to
Speaker 1: get to be near the implementation of these orders. They've
Speaker 1: never been handed a rifle and told you're gonna not
Speaker 1: go out and hopefully you don't get shot at, and
Speaker 1: if you do, you got to shoot back. They've never
Speaker 1: they've never been through that process. A lot of lawyers
Speaker 1: get to very senior positions in national security. Now. I
Speaker 1: know they're lawyers who also had military service and stuff,
Speaker 1: but I'm talking about the ones that end up making
Speaker 1: these decisions. True under the Bush administration, True under the
Speaker 1: Obama administration. You've had national security advisors. You look at
Speaker 1: their background, he said, this person's just been like a
Speaker 1: corporate lawyer who did some maybe did some time at
Speaker 1: DJ or something and now there's some grand national security strategist,
Speaker 1: so Blinking would be would be the pick. And he's
Speaker 1: very tied in I think his wife is a journo,
Speaker 1: and there's all this. The swamp is coming back, is
Speaker 1: what I'm trying to say. The swamp is coming back
Speaker 1: if you have a Biden administration, and you'll see it
Speaker 1: in all kinds of ways. Blinking was the architect in
Speaker 1: many ways of the Obama administration's response on Syria. Syria,
Speaker 1: as you remember from the Obama administration years, was an
Speaker 1: abject disaster, a humanitarian catastrophe. Five hundred thousand people it
Speaker 1: is believed at least lost their lives in that conflict,
Speaker 1: half a million killed. And what did the Obama administration manage?
Speaker 1: I remember when they spent what was it, five hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars to train what ended up being seven soldiers
Speaker 1: for the Free Syrian Army something like that. So it
Speaker 1: was a total fail Obama leadership. And Blinking Now people
Speaker 1: forget that or that's not part of the official narrative.
Speaker 1: So the fact that he was a senior Obama administration
Speaker 1: foreign policy official during that spearheading that it's not just
Speaker 1: like he was at the State Department. He was involved
Speaker 1: in the Syria policy for the Obama administration, total disaster,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna bring him in now, make him secretary
Speaker 1: of State because ultimately, the people who get these jobs,
Speaker 1: it's based on their connections and what they do for
Speaker 1: the people in positions of power, what their relationships are
Speaker 1: like to those individuals, and what their implicit promises for
Speaker 1: those people if they're in this position of authority. Again,
Speaker 1: it's not about the results for the American people. We
Speaker 1: know that because if it were, you wouldn't have this
Speaker 1: guy Blincoln talked about as a secretary of State. They're
Speaker 1: talking about bringing back Susan Rice in a very senior
Speaker 1: capacity as well. I mean, there's going to be a
Speaker 1: lot of Obama administration round two here or around three,
Speaker 1: I suppose you could say, with who are going to
Speaker 1: be in senior positions of authority? And that's really bothers
Speaker 1: because I can tell you this right now, We're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to count on the left. We're
Speaker 1: not gonna able to count on the Libs out there
Speaker 1: who are anti war to be anti war during a
Speaker 1: Biden administration, they'll they'll abandon the whole anti war thing
Speaker 1: as long as there's a Democrat in office, because ultimately
Speaker 1: the left uses anti war posturing as a weapon against
Speaker 1: Republicans and conservatives. That's really what it is. So that's
Speaker 1: that's a concern that I have about Lincoln. And you also,
Speaker 1: we're going to have a return to this internationalist consensus
Speaker 1: stuff with climate in another issues. As you know, here's Trump.
Speaker 1: You know, he's doing this virtual G twenty and they're
Speaker 1: all saying that he's actually out playing golf or something,
Speaker 1: and they're all angry at him. You know, it's like,
Speaker 1: who cares? But oh no, he missed. He missed an
Speaker 1: important lecture virtually at the G twenty And what announces sense?
Speaker 1: But Trump spoke on the Paris Climate Accord. Here's what
Speaker 1: he said, play for I withdrew the United States from
Speaker 1: the unfair and one sided Paris Climate Accord, a very
Speaker 1: very unfair act for the United States. The Paris Accord
Speaker 1: was not designed to save the environment. That was designed
Speaker 1: to kill the American economy. I refused to surrender millions
Speaker 1: of American jobs and send trillions of American dollars to
Speaker 1: the world's worst polluters and environmental offenders. And that's what
Speaker 1: would have happened. Since withdrawing from the Paris Accord, the
Speaker 1: United States has reduced carbon emissions more than any nation
Speaker 1: anywhere in the world. Our air is seven percent cleaner
Speaker 1: than when I took office. At the same time, we've
Speaker 1: made America energy independent, bolstered by our historic tax and
Speaker 1: regulatory cuts. The United States is now the number one
Speaker 1: producer of oil and natural gas in the world. Results data, fact,
Speaker 1: these all look very good when Trump lays them out
Speaker 1: on climate that the errors were actually making the air
Speaker 1: cleaner and producing more energy than ever before. You don't
Speaker 1: hear you don't hear that in the mainstream media. Do
Speaker 1: you know? It's all he pulled out of the Climate
Speaker 1: Accord in Paris, and so the world is gonna mount
Speaker 1: and we're all gonna die. They're they're just nuts, religious
Speaker 1: zealots on climate. That's what Democrats have turned into. It's
Speaker 1: both troubling and sad. Thanks for listening to The bus
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, at
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. The
Speaker 1: show ain't over yet, folks. Keeping it real, It's time
Speaker 1: for roll Call, Roll Call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com if you
Speaker 1: want to email us, and can also send us direct
Speaker 1: messages on Instagram. Remember I'm on Parlor buck Sexton and
Speaker 1: you can check out our stories at buck Sexton dot com.
Speaker 1: But yes, I am on parlor and I am on
Speaker 1: as of now TikTok. That's right, China collecting all of
Speaker 1: my data on TikTok. I'm not worried about that. There
Speaker 1: didn't they sell it to an American company or they're
Speaker 1: about do It's fine? TikTok is fun. Check it out. No, Buck,
Speaker 1: don't do it. The Chinese are sparing on you. Yeah. Maybe,
Speaker 1: but have you seen the way they cook these steaks
Speaker 1: on TikTok and they show you the best way to
Speaker 1: do a producer mark, it looks delicious. It does. Steak
Speaker 1: TikTok is a very fun thing. Steak TikTok is just cooking.
Speaker 1: TikTok in general is great. But I like I like
Speaker 1: the TikTok. What other TikTok is? Producer mark into. I
Speaker 1: love anything with dogs. Those are fantastic. Dogs and food
Speaker 1: are the big two things. Yeah, there's a there's a beaver,
Speaker 1: a pet beaver that somebody has that's become a TikTok sendation.
Speaker 1: And I gotta tell you now, I kind of want
Speaker 1: a pet beaver and you're so cute Manhattan apartment. They'd
Speaker 1: be perfect. Is this a little fat, little dude. He's fine.
Speaker 1: He's just gonna hang out one his belly scratch, want
Speaker 1: to gnaw on some wood, you know? Yeah, when he
Speaker 1: starts gnawing on your kitchen table, I don't think you're
Speaker 1: gonna be a very happy. That's not as good. I
Speaker 1: agree with that, and I want to do I have
Speaker 1: to get him a little kittie pool, you know. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think they like the wetness. Yeah, they like to
Speaker 1: be they like to be in the water, So maybe
Speaker 1: that might be. But I think this beaver just like
Speaker 1: hanging I'm not. People are thinking I'm crazy right now.
Speaker 1: It's like a sensation. Millions and millions of views of
Speaker 1: this of this pet beaver on TikTok. So I'm not
Speaker 1: the only one who thinks he's cute. Most people prefer
Speaker 1: their beavers to be moist. Um. That is true. That
Speaker 1: is true, Producer Mark all Right. And oh and also
Speaker 1: did you see the video of the uh the guy
Speaker 1: in Florida who saves the puppy from the alligator. It's amazing.
Speaker 1: Oh I did see that? Yeah? Crazy? Right? So first
Speaker 1: of all, uh, I mean the puppy was fine, apparently
Speaker 1: so that the alligator was small. It was a little
Speaker 1: like a tiny alligator maybe maybe two or three feet long.
Speaker 1: But it grabbed this tiny puppy that could have been
Speaker 1: older than a couple of months, and it dragging the water,
Speaker 1: is clearly going to eat it. And this guy with
Speaker 1: the cigar in his mouth jumps in the water, grabs
Speaker 1: the alligator, frees the puppy from the alligator, and keeps
Speaker 1: the cigar in his mouth the whole time. Florida man,
Speaker 1: Sometimes you impressed me. It was pretty amazing. He is
Speaker 1: the new Florida man. Like that's it that that was
Speaker 1: next because he kept the cigar in his mouth the
Speaker 1: whole time too. He didn't let that coheba fall, and
Speaker 1: it's it's pretty remarkable. But yeah, I mean I would look,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this right now, and that's if if
Speaker 1: God forbid, she's never even been in a place where
Speaker 1: alligators exists, But if an alligator grabbed my little Tulou,
Speaker 1: I'd get in that water and I would gouge that
Speaker 1: thing's eyes out with my thumbs until it let go
Speaker 1: of my my beloved frenchie. So I told total respect
Speaker 1: for this guy. Total respect. That's the move. So you know,
Speaker 1: that's another thing though. Got to be careful with the
Speaker 1: puppies near alligator ponds. Producer Mark. One thing about Florida.
Speaker 1: There are alligators. Yeah, that is a problem, especially for
Speaker 1: your small animals that you keep his pets. Yeah, so
Speaker 1: you know, you know they don't have I don't think that. Maybe, no,
Speaker 1: they don't have alligators in Texas. Maybe they're do in
Speaker 1: like the far eastern part of Texas, you know, close
Speaker 1: to uh, you know, the Louisiana and Mississippi, that area.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe, but I don't think so. I don't
Speaker 1: think do they have gators anywhere they have gators in Texas.
Speaker 1: I don't know about Texas. I feel like Louisiana, Mississippi,
Speaker 1: that area, Louisiana, Mississippi. Yeah, live in Texas is interesting.
Speaker 1: You know what on the west coast you have in
Speaker 1: the desert, you have to watch out for coyotes with
Speaker 1: your dogs. I've seen people have to put these like
Speaker 1: spiky things on them to make them look like Sonic
Speaker 1: the hedgehog that deters the coyotes from going after docs.
Speaker 1: Really I didn't know that. Yeah, there are alligators in Texas.
Speaker 1: That's I thought they would be along the east. But
Speaker 1: that's that's right. Um there are. They are found in
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty of two hundred and fifty four
Speaker 1: counties in Texas, according to this Texas website that I
Speaker 1: see here. So yeah, there are there are alligators. Um. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there you go learn something. And it's where I thought.
Speaker 1: They're in the eastern part of the state. Uh, closer
Speaker 1: to the to the Gulf. So there you there you
Speaker 1: go learn something new every day. All right, let's get
Speaker 1: to uh to a roll call. Oh and I but
Speaker 1: one more thing. I finished Barbarians over the weekend. Have
Speaker 1: you tried any new shows, Producer Mark, I haven't. I
Speaker 1: did watch the Fresh Prince of bel Air reunion show.
Speaker 1: I was very well done. Really. It was a little
Speaker 1: sad at points because James Avery uncle Phil has passed away,
Speaker 1: but it was the thirty year anniversary. They brought back
Speaker 1: all the old characters. It was really interesting and fun.
Speaker 1: Is that on Netflix? On HBO Max? Oh okay, I
Speaker 1: love that show. I used to watch The Fresh Prince
Speaker 1: of Bella all the time. I thought it was great.
Speaker 1: It's one of the best ninety sitcoms there was. I
Speaker 1: think that's fair. Not quite Seinfeld level though, right, producer,
Speaker 1: not on the Seinfeld level, but up there pretty good.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get to a roll call. We got
Speaker 1: Joe first up, Good evening, gentlemen. Producer Mark is spot
Speaker 1: on about bidays. He's super smart. You want to take
Speaker 1: a little bow, Producer Mark, I am super smart. I agree. Yeah.
Speaker 1: They make a simple attachment that can attach under the
Speaker 1: seat in a matter of minutes. And trust me, once
Speaker 1: you go biday, there's no other way. Interesting. I was
Speaker 1: not aware of that, but oh oh, here you go.
Speaker 1: Please continue with the outstanding show as I listen while
Speaker 1: working in If I didn't, it would be very dreary existence.
Speaker 1: So thanks for doing what you guys do. Shields High, Well,
Speaker 1: Joe Man. We are honored to keep you company while
Speaker 1: you are engaged in labor and getting paid for it
Speaker 1: because capitalism is good. So thank you so much for
Speaker 1: being a part of what we do here and write again,
Speaker 1: we appreciate it. Michael. Your call on COVID exactly the
Speaker 1: same as mine, but with a lot more detail and
Speaker 1: thoughtful considerations. I consider Maryland to be a step below
Speaker 1: New York. But our Republican governor, a rhino that loves
Speaker 1: media gratification, has threatened to arrest Marylanders on one hand,
Speaker 1: while signing an order to release people serving sentences for
Speaker 1: fear of COVID. Schools are also shutting down. Also been
Speaker 1: told at work to stay downstairs for fear I will
Speaker 1: kill them from a person that had COVID. Yeah, it's nuts.
Speaker 1: Maryland's pretty strict about it from what I understand. So
Speaker 1: there are a lot of states now that have just
Speaker 1: they've they've embraced, Unfortunately, they've embraced, you know, the extreme
Speaker 1: positions on this that are just not supported by the data.
Speaker 1: We're just not it's not worth it, but people are
Speaker 1: doing it anyway. Claire, Hey, I just watched your interview
Speaker 1: with Jim Jordan regarding Giuliani Powell press or press conference.
Speaker 1: Powell made a statement near the end that's gotten almost
Speaker 1: no coverage. She implicated both Democrats and Republicans in this scandal.
Speaker 1: I don't think she was implicating Republicans in the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty elections. She might have been but she was very
Speaker 1: directing or believe that people from both parties had used
Speaker 1: smartmatic software, whether in Dominion or other ems machines to
Speaker 1: secure elections. Yeah, Claire, I think that she did. I
Speaker 1: remember what you're talking about. She did say that, and
Speaker 1: this just brings you back to she's making very bold
Speaker 1: accusations here. This is big stuff, and she's either going
Speaker 1: to have the proof in court or not. And we've
Speaker 1: just got to see there's there's no rushing it. There's
Speaker 1: no jumping to conclusions about it. We'll see she's either
Speaker 1: going to have it or not, and we'll all be
Speaker 1: able to see for ourselves. You don't need me to
Speaker 1: tell you it's either going to be there or it's
Speaker 1: not going to be there, right, So we'll all together.
Speaker 1: That's where I am on this one. But think about
Speaker 1: that though. I mean, if it is as easy as
Speaker 1: people are saying to mess with and hack this software,
Speaker 1: that's something that we should all be aware of for
Speaker 1: elections going forward, regardless of what happened in this election.
Speaker 1: And I know that Dominion had a spokesperson did an
Speaker 1: interview I think on Fox over the weekend. He says
Speaker 1: their computers are air gapped and there's no way any
Speaker 1: of this could happen. And now that's, for one, what
Speaker 1: you would expect the dominion guy to say. But beyond that,
Speaker 1: let's find out what's true. I really do want to
Speaker 1: know what the truth is. I want to know what
Speaker 1: happened and what the risks are in all of this.
Speaker 1: I don't want this to continue to be I don't
Speaker 1: want people say it's a conspiracy theory and all this
Speaker 1: other stuff. So I think it's important Terry. Watching your
Speaker 1: show from November nineteenth about the lockdowns and fighting back,
Speaker 1: I couldn't agree more that all this crap is bull.
Speaker 1: It's hard to believe this is happening in America. When
Speaker 1: I go out, I generally don't wear a mask and
Speaker 1: avoid wars that insist on it. However, I have to
Speaker 1: wear it to keep my job, and it infuriates me,
Speaker 1: but I need my job. What are people to do
Speaker 1: when that's the case. I personally believe no mandated precautions
Speaker 1: should be implemented. Back to normal now, let people mingle
Speaker 1: at the chips, fall where they may, and even living
Speaker 1: in fear, make your own choices. Terry, this is kind
Speaker 1: of you, know what I always say when people ask
Speaker 1: about what to do in college, Like when I have
Speaker 1: college students who write into me and they say, hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: should I take a big stand in my sociology class
Speaker 1: in my paper for conservatism? And I say, no, don't
Speaker 1: do that because it doesn't help. You're just gonna get
Speaker 1: dinged by your professor. You're just gonna get a you know,
Speaker 1: a C minus on your paper. And when you go
Speaker 1: to apply for jobs or for business school or whatever
Speaker 1: or you know, grad school, you're gonna have gotten a
Speaker 1: bad grade in this class, or at least maybe you know,
Speaker 1: a worst grade than you would have gotten. And for
Speaker 1: what because you wanted to show one lib that you
Speaker 1: won't bend the knee when you're in his class. You're
Speaker 1: in his class, you're in world in terms of these
Speaker 1: these papers that you're writing. So you know, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: write things that you're that you're ashamed of or embarrassed of.
Speaker 1: But you know, you play the game a little bit
Speaker 1: because that's the smarter move. This is a version of mine.
Speaker 1: Don't charge the machine gun nests without a plan to
Speaker 1: take it, or don't just don't get mowed down because
Speaker 1: you think you're being a hero when you have no
Speaker 1: chance of success. You know, you fight when you can win.
Speaker 1: So when you say that you pick stores, for example,
Speaker 1: where they don't mandate masks, you know, that's that's you
Speaker 1: taking an active role in trying to fight back against
Speaker 1: the insanity. But when you say that you want to
Speaker 1: keep your job and so you're gonna wear a mask
Speaker 1: because your job requires requires it, Yeah, that's the right move,
Speaker 1: you know, don't don't suffer. Look, I I was in
Speaker 1: my building in New York. I live in a large
Speaker 1: apartment building with hundreds and hundreds of people, and I
Speaker 1: was one of I was told by the building staff
Speaker 1: all summer I was one of two people in the
Speaker 1: whole building who never wore a mask. And like, now,
Speaker 1: when I say never, I mean walking through the lobby
Speaker 1: and stuff. If I was going to be stuck with
Speaker 1: somebody in an enclosed space for a while, you know,
Speaker 1: in the gym, I've always worn a mask. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, just because I'm more willing to concede at
Speaker 1: least if you're going to be indoors for more than
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes with somebody, all right, maybe it makes them
Speaker 1: feel better, maybe it has some minimal benefit. I doubt it,
Speaker 1: but walking through a lobby to get from the elevator
Speaker 1: to the outdoors for ten seconds. No, that's crazy, that
Speaker 1: there's no reason to wear a mask doing that. And
Speaker 1: I was one of two people in my building over
Speaker 1: the summer. Now people saw me and all and they're
Speaker 1: all complained. And technically the building has since said that
Speaker 1: it's a violation, a violation of building policy. And you know,
Speaker 1: they could even move theoretically to an eviction proceeding against
Speaker 1: you if you continue to violate building policy in this way.
Speaker 1: So what's you know? I'm gonna I'm gonna keep doing
Speaker 1: it and get kicked out of where I if what's
Speaker 1: the what's the point? Right? I mean, that's so that's
Speaker 1: not smart. But do I wear a mask outside? No?
Speaker 1: I do not. And if people come up to me
Speaker 1: and they try to tell me to wear a mask outside,
Speaker 1: do I do I comply? No? I do not. And
Speaker 1: if the police we're going to try to ticket me
Speaker 1: or something, we would have a respectful but firm conversation
Speaker 1: about why they're doing this. And I would want their
Speaker 1: names and badge numbers. I wouldn't file a formal complaint
Speaker 1: against them, but I would want to have all my
Speaker 1: documents lined up so that I could take this and
Speaker 1: fight it if I need to, because I would fight that, right.
Speaker 1: So it's it's picking your battles here, I think, Terry,
Speaker 1: that's the best way that I can think of with this.
Speaker 1: It's pick your battles and and don't don't needlessly punish
Speaker 1: yourself by fighting. By fighting a fight you can't win.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Next up, we got Susan who rides. Can
Speaker 1: you please address, as an XCIA person, where is our
Speaker 1: intelligence community with all this election fraud? They seem m
Speaker 1: I a Susan when you say where's our intelligence community?
Speaker 1: The intelligence community overwhelmingly focuses on foreign and military intelligence stuff.
Speaker 1: But it's you know, if you're talking about the CIA,
Speaker 1: which is where I work and what I know best,
Speaker 1: that's overseas intel collection. So the FBI is a part
Speaker 1: of the intelligence community. So really we would only be
Speaker 1: focused here on where's the FBI with this election fraud issue? Now,
Speaker 1: the Attorney General Bill Barr has said that if there's
Speaker 1: a real reason to investigate election fraud, that the US
Speaker 1: attorneys and various federal prosecutors and federal investigators have his
Speaker 1: support to go do that. We haven't seen yet. Any
Speaker 1: may your action based on any of that, We haven't
Speaker 1: seen it yet. So that's where I mean. But no,
Speaker 1: the CIA doesn't have any I mean, they shouldn't have
Speaker 1: any role in this. I know that Sidney Powell is
Speaker 1: making some pretty pretty severe allegations here, but yeah, I
Speaker 1: know the intel community has gotten has got really nothing
Speaker 1: on this, and you know, you don't want the intelligence
Speaker 1: community to get involved, because then you have things like
Speaker 1: Russia collusion. Right, That was the intelligence community going beyond
Speaker 1: it's mandate to get involved in something that really was
Speaker 1: just about people being bitter than Hillary Clinton lost the
Speaker 1: election and pretending that there was some you know, imminent
Speaker 1: intelligence reason, you know, the FISA stuff on Carter Page.
Speaker 1: I mean, all that was just absurd. It was nonsense.
Speaker 1: Sarah hey Buck, My head wants to explode every time
Speaker 1: I think of a President Biden. But more importantly, I'm
Speaker 1: heartsick about election fraud going unchecked. America is better than that.
Speaker 1: I know. There are many ways to eat the system,
Speaker 1: and there's no panacea for fixing it. However, I believe
Speaker 1: it would help of each state held its election gathered
Speaker 1: all the ballots, closed the polls, tally the votes, and
Speaker 1: certified its election prior to making the results public. This
Speaker 1: business of watching the polls on election night to determine
Speaker 1: how many votes need to be guaranteed need to be
Speaker 1: generated rather after the fact is awful. Oh and if
Speaker 1: there's proof of voter fraud, throw the book at them.
Speaker 1: Don't prosecute only if the outcome would be affected. Slapping
Speaker 1: risks is not a deterrent. Keep up the good work
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hut love in the show. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much, Sarah. Look, a lot of people are very
Speaker 1: upset about the real possibility here of widespread election fraud.
Speaker 1: And we know there was people who were honest. We'll
Speaker 1: even say we know there was fraud. The question is
Speaker 1: how much fraud and can we prove it? That's what remains.
Speaker 1: And we know there are irregularities as well, and those
Speaker 1: same questions would apply to that. But it's friends, we're
Speaker 1: in this fight. We can win this fight, so it
Speaker 1: doesn't fall into the why are we fighting? There's no point.
Speaker 1: We can win this fight about the election, but it's
Speaker 1: gonna be hard and the odds are not on our side.
Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean we give up the fight, you
Speaker 1: know we do. Friends, We keep on going, searching for,
Speaker 1: demanding the truth, and we keep our shields high