WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Geoffrey Yu & David Doyle

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Single best idea and when the news changes, we change.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday we wrote David Gera in Rio and it was

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 2>a G twenty meeting and the muckety MUCKs get together

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 2>and all that, and it's a time for you know,

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 2>we played Barry Manilow Lola and copa cabana and all that,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and there's some lightness a caparina and where's David going

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>to dinner? And then just like that it changes into

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 2>deadly serious news. A link Tempco vote, Lockheed Martin missil

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>that goes at mock three. That's the headline. This thing

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>moves as fast as anything out there, one hundred or

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>whatever miles into Russian territory and the facts changes. We're

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>live on air headline and some mister Lavrov of Russia

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 2>move the markets. We try to get conversation previously scheduled.

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey you from B and Y and Jeffery you of

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 2>course talking about finance and investment. We asked jeff for

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 2>you do you have to look at geopolitics.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 3>You can never ignore a geopolitics. So it's your fiduciary

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>responsibility to have those fundamental allocations. You know that premiure

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 3>within your asset allocation full stop. So that that I

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>think is the case in terms of why despite the

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 3>lack of a fiscal argument in the US, we still

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>see international investors being overweight US treasuries or at least

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 3>if I look at duration the tenure plus based on

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 3>our CUS Studio data, that hasn't been that much selling

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>over the last few weeks or so. And this is

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>another reason why you want to hold onto those treasuries

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>for now, it helps with the US sustain its fiscal spending.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>But over the medium to longer term there's a story there.

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 3>But you want to overweight, to be weighting at these

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 3>assets even though it doesn't give you a strong yield,

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 3>or you worry about other forms of premium as well.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 3>But then we fall back to diversification again. You want

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 3>to be diversified. You look at your portfolio, your overweight dollars,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 3>overweight treasuries. Where are markets that you can afford to

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 3>add to your weightings decorrelated India is a very good example,

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>and that those are the other correlations we're looking.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>At too, Jeff. For you bing why very typically and

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm guilty of this, we really fight against it every day.

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 2>But the bottom line, folks, is gloom cells. Somebody worried

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and their angst and they're wringing their hands. It's always better.

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>It just it works. So we really focus people that say,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 2>you know what, we're optimistic. David Doyle has led the

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 2>charger on this at Macquarie. His notes very very constructive,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 2>even if maybe it's getting along in the toothier three

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>percent real GDP five percent nomenal GDP. Here is David

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Doyle or Macquarie, his optimism and the American consumer.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>From what we've looked at when it comes to wage gains,

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 4>it's been broad based. So when you look at wages

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>as being the driver of consumption, that broad based wage

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 4>gains we think is propelling things across the spectrum of

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>income earners. Now you may see some disproportionate gains from

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 4>higher income earners due to the wealth effect from the

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 4>strength and equity markets, but overall we think it's almost

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 4>all income groups that are participating.

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>David Doyle at Macquarie really thanks to our team. We

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>had to blow up the show today. The interns got

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>together with Eric and really put together a terrific effort.

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>David Gerr of course in Rio on short notice. Tina

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Fordam was with his Ford and Global Insight look for

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>that out on Bloomberg Digital. She was absolutely lights out

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>on the optionality that mister putin faces in a special

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Bloomberg's Mark Champion. Mark Champion was the editor

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Moscow Times in the early middle nineteen nineties.

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>He has encyclopedic knowledge east of the Eastern Front, and

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>we really thank Mark Champion for joining as well on

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>your commute Look first ninety nine to one FM in Washington,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Up the Corridor, Bloomberg eleven three to zero in New York,

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and of course ninety two nine FM in Boston. Across

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the nation, among others on Apple CarPlay and serious XM

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>in your Office. Subscribe to Bloomberg Podcasts out on YouTube

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube podcast. This is single best idea.