WEBVTT - Is Elon Really Quitting Politics... for Banking?

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you we have a new star. A

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 2>star is born hounded up on Mars Juthan Kennemy.

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 3>He is the Thomas Edison plus plus plus of our age.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel for the guy.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 2>I would say ninety eight percent really appreciate what he does.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>But those two percent that are nasty, they I'll pay

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 2>in four.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Folks, we are meant for great things in the United

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>States of America, and Elon reminds.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Us of that we don't have a fourth branch of

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 4>governments called Elon Musk.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Elon, Inc.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk. It's Tuesday, May twenty seventh.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm Max Chafkin, sitting here with Bloomberg's Elon Musk reporter

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Dana Hall. Hey, Dana Hey, Max, and Bloomberg Social media reporter,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 4>our favorite high school quarterback, Kurt Wagner.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Kurt, how are you? How is your Memorial Day?

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi?

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 2>Max?

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It was wonderful.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>How was yours? It was good? It was good. So

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>we have a lot to talk about.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Even though I'd say Elon has been maybe a little

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 4>bit quieter than usual over the last week. Maybe it

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>was the Memorial Day holiday. So today I want to

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 4>unpack some of the things that we talked about on

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 4>our last episode last week. As you'll remember if you

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>listen to podcast, David Popadoppolis and I reacted kind of

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 4>in real time to Elon Musk's comments in Qatar to

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Michal Hussein saying essentially he was going to spend

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 4>less money in political contributions.

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>We're getting more indications here.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 4>We're getting a little bit of news, including some news

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 4>from Elon about what's happening, what he has planned. And

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 4>then the other thing I want to do is I

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 4>want to talk about X money, the big.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>New Twitter X credit card.

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 4>This is the everything app. And we'll get into that

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 4>next from Kurt. But before we do that, so Elon's

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 4>future plans, Dana, I feel like we need a new

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 4>term for this. We need to say, what is this

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 4>a sleeping arrangement update? Because Elon went on X and

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 4>he essentially said that after having spent the last few

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 4>months sleeping on the floors of the White House or whatever,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 4>he's got a new location that he plans to take

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 4>his rest.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, he said, he's like laser focused on his companies, right,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 3>and he's I mean today he's in Brownsville, Texas where

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX is about to launch Starship yet again. But maybe

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I missed this over the long holiday weekend. Did he

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>give like a bedroom?

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? May twenty fourth.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 4>In response to and we'll get to this with Kurt

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 4>to some news out of X fire at one of

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 4>the data centers, he said, back to spending twenty four

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 4>to seven at work sleeping in conference server factory rooms.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So apparently sleeping in the server room since it sounds

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of loud. But in any case, he said, I

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 4>must be super focused on x XAI and Tesla plus

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Starship launched next week. As we have critical technologies rolling

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 4>out as evidenced by X uptime issues this week, major

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 4>operational improvemcy to be made. Kurt, there was a fire, right,

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>that's what prompted this.

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>There was so there was a fire at one of

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>X's data centers near Portland. There was an outage on

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Saturday for a few hours for a lot of users.

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't personally experience it, but others did. And it's

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not entirely clear if the fire and the outage were linked,

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but the timing is certainly interesting. And then you have,

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, Max, the comments from Elon basically saying, hey, look,

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I need to start spending more time here. There's been

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of technical issues that I have to deal with.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You said, there should have been like a failure redundancy

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that should have happened. What that means is that when

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the data centers went down, the other one

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>should have picked up the slack and consumers should not

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have noticed there was an issue. But that didn't work.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And so the fact that he's sitting here saying, hey,

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>look I need to get back to spending twenty four

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to seven on the tech of these companies that I run,

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think is a signal that, you know, the fire

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>or the data centers, all of this stuff are sort

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of intertwined.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, was this a particularly bad one, Kurt? I mean

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 4>I did on Friday notice people complaining about it. Maybe

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 4>my ex usage isn't as sort of fanatical as it

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 4>once was, so I actually didn't personally notice this.

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was bad enough that people notice for

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>extended period of time, which is sort of rare. You know,

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I cover all these big platforms and max as you know,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and like, it's not uncommon for there to be hey,

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes people are having trouble on Instagram or TikTok

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>or x or whatever. What it extends beyond an hour

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>or two is when you start to scratch your head

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and say, Okay, something meaningful happened here. I think Elon's

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>again his responses acknowledging that you know, that backup plan

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that they had in place essentially did not work, I

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>think to me as a sign that this was you know,

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it was it was worse than average. It wasn't like

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the X was down for the whole day or something

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>like that, but it was a just a blip.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 4>I would say, yeah, and Dana, there's been a few

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 4>of these data points. I mean, you brought up the

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 4>fact that there's a starship launch. He's going to have

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 4>an event a live stream later today, I believe, noon

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 4>Texas time talking about Mars. He sort of seems to

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 4>be trying to focus publicly on the companies, maybe more

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>than the past. Also twenty third, just to point you

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 4>to a couple of other posts, I have come to

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 4>the perhaps obvious conclusion that accelerating GDP growth is essential.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Doge has and will do great work to postpone the

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>day of bankruptcy in America, but the proflicacy of government

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 4>means that only radical improvements in productivity can save the country.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>It almost sounds like he's.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 4>Declaring what like failure right, Like he's sort of saying,

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, it turns out, actually, Doge.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Didn't do that much. I need to focus on my

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>companies for the good of the country.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm very cynical about this messaging because I

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 3>feel like it's a very convenient narrative for a lot

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>of reporters in Washington to be like Musk is distancing himself.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, Musk is.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Giving up and going home and taking his ball and

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 3>like focusing back in his companies, and like everyone is

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 3>parenting the message that Musk himself wants to get out.

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 3>And the reason why he is trying to get this

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>message out is because he really wants Tesla's board to

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>give him a pay package. And you know, for better

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>or worse, Like Musk has that kind of messiah complex

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 3>of I alone can fix it. So now he's like,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I've got to deal with this data center issue at

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 3>X and like we're gonna roll out this ROBOTAXI in

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Austin and we're going to go to Mars, And like

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 3>he's trying to signal to investors that he is focused,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>because the big complaint of investors has been that he

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 3>was spending too much time on Washington. So so I

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>feel like this is a lot for his audience of

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>investors and board members. I mean, he's always kind of

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 3>micro focused and multitasks in a way that is sort

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 3>of unique in corporate America. But is he really giving

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 3>up like on the DOGE ambitions.

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 3>He's got all of his people still there. It's like,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>is Steve Davis still the COO of Doge? Is Antonio

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Grassia still at the Social Security Agency? He's got CIOs

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 3>in place, Like it's hard for me to imagine him

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>really sort of working so hard in Washington and just

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>like abandoning ship. I feel like this is optics more

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 3>than a real change.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I tend to agree with you. I do think.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like two things could be true.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Like one is, he could have less influence in Trump's

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 4>White House today than he did I don't know a

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 4>month ago. And also he could be more focused on

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 4>his companies, like on a day to day basis, and

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>also hardly moving away from politics. You know, he's still

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 4>very much focused on, you know, on his influence in Washington.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 4>The other thing is, and I brought this up last week,

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 4>he's going to this Bloomberg event in Qatar or dialing

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 4>into the event and saying he's he's sort of spending

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 4>less time on less money on politics, but at this

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 4>in the same breath saying he's going to the White House.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Like that week we saw him at the White House

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 4>with the South African President Kurt. You know, X was

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of in the favored position before it was Doge.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Has X suffered like.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 4>You kind of see it going, you know, one of

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 4>two ways, but like, how have things worked at the

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 4>company as Elon Musk Musk's attention sort of turned away

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 4>from it.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean my understanding is that he's been quite absent,

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which makes a lot a lot of sense. Right as

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about he's he not only has four other businesses,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but that he's also you know, full time, halftime, part

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>time whatever in DC. I look at the Doge thing

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and Elon and X more as a what does this

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>mean for the business of the company, not so much

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>even his time, his personal time, which is that I

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think in January and February, when he's tweeting constantly, when

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he's hanging out with Trump, when he's literally sort of

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>dictating US policy via his Twitter account or his ex account,

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that gave X this continued influence. Right, you

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of had to pay attention to it still because

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it was still driving literal US policy decisions via his

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>X account. As Elon has the last month or two,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>he has stopped tweeting as much about politics. He's obviously

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>saying he's going to step away from politics. And so

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>what I wrote last week in our newsletter was sort

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of like what happens to X if Elon truly follows

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>through and steps away from politics, because he spent the

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>last year turning this thing into a political machine. Like

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it the purpose of X for the most part was

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to get Donald Trump elected and then to support his

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>agenda and possibly push his agenda in the ways that

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Elon wants it to. And if that's not what he's

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>going to do anymore, like what is X, right, it's

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not really a place for breaking news, It's not really

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a place for the global conversation like it has historically

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>been because Elon pivoted so aggressively into politics a year ago,

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't know, I'm sort of kind of

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting around wondering, like, what does this platform become if

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not a Donald Trump Elon Musk politics machine. I

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if either what I mean, you two have

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>both been on it for years as well. I'm curious

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have thoughts on that, But like, what's the

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>identity of this thing now? It keeps morphine and I

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>think the political identity that he's created is sort of

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>crumbling as we're as we're standing here.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't really use x anymore. I lurk on it,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>but like I locked my account and I don't have

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 3>it on my phone and I kind of like check

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>in like every once in a while, but like, I

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 3>don't use it. It is it is not the platform

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>that I joined over a decade ago.

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, I from when I'm still addicted. Although Kurt, to

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 4>your point, you know, I do think it loses some

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 4>of its vitality. We will in the second segment talk

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit about, you know, possible future identity for

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 4>x as A as a bank before we get there.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there is a swirl of things, right.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not just the fact that Doge hasn't cut as

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 4>much maybe as promised. It's not just the fact that

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 4>there are fires breaking out in Twitter data centers and

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Twitter is going down. It is also, of course, you know,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Tesla and the fact that the sales are are still

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 4>despite Elon Musk's comments. You know, Elon Musk said last week,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 4>yet you're bad for us, but it's bad for everyone.

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Although as a report today essentially showing that Tesla sales

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 4>are way down, down by more than fifty percent, while

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 4>overall EV sales in the region are up twenty eight percent. Dana,

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 4>one thing I've wondered about. We've talked about the demand thing,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 4>but if you look in that one big beautiful bill

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 4>that the Trump budget bill, it is not a great

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 4>bill for Tesla. And like the combination of Tesla's sales

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 4>and this kind of potential hit to the revenue in

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 4>the form of this budget build which takes away or

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 4>would take away EV tax credits, do you think that

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 4>could be pushing him away?

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Elon has always sort of said that he

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't think there should be any subsidies whatsoever, whether it's

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 3>for evs or oil and gas. So I don't know

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 3>if that alone is enough to make him angry or

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 3>cause some kind of rift with Trump. I think that

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 3>tariffs are not good for Tesla, but like, fundamentally, like

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 3>he what he cares the most about is SpaceX and

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 3>he wants funding for a Mars mission, So I don't

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 3>know if he's willing to jennison one for the other.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 3>But the any thing I pointed out about the European

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 3>sales is that like Tesla has a factory in Germany

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 3>that makes the model, why if these sales in Europe

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 3>continue to crater, there's gonna be real questions about like

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 3>do they keep this factory open or like do they

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 3>start scaling back production, Like you don't keep making cars

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 3>for a market that does not need them. And everyone

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 3>always sees the problems in Europe as like, oh, Elon

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 3>being so close to Trump, but it's really like it

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 3>was really Elon Musk supporting the AfD in Germany that

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 3>has caused this huge backlash in Europe. Like European consumers

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 3>are very concerned about what Elon is doing with Visa

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 3>v European politics.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump aside, last thing, this SpaceX launch, Dana, what are

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>you going to be looking for here? Like he's saying

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that twenty twenty six, right, He's that that's the goal

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>for like some kind of Mars demonstration mission.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you have any sense of how far away we

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 4>are from that in terms of milestones that have to

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 4>be hit? To me from the outside, it seems like

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 4>a lot.

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's a very ambitious, very aggressive timeline, and

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Musk's plan is that like, not only will Starship launch

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 3>to Mars in twenty twenty six, but Optimist is going

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to be on board. So he has a lot of

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot writing on this and we'll hear from him

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>later today when he gives this, you know speech about Mars.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, he's always talked about going to Mars,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 3>but now Starship does exist. They've had a couple of

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>launches that have haven't totally gone well, and so like

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot riding on this one going better. I

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 3>think obviously he wants to show to Trump and a

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 3>NASA that like this vehicle is ready and that like

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>it can do all the things that it's supposed to do,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 3>but you know, they're constantly tweaking with the heat shield,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 3>and you know, there's all kinds of issues that they

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 3>that they still work out. And I think in the

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 3>world of space, you know, everyone will say space is hard,

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>and you learn by doing and you iterate, and like

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 3>what we might see as quote unquote failure is actually

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>just part of the design, iteration, engineering learning process. So

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, SpaceX has always been very good at that.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, you know, the window to go to Mars,

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't come around very often. So that's like a

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 3>big reason why he is pushing for this twenty twenty

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 3>six Dad.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 4>So in our first segment, you know, Kurt talked about

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of like what x becomes, and I think that

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 4>is a big question.

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 2>That's an open question. Of course.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Last week we talked about Xai and this potential deal

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 4>that it had with Calshi, which is a predictions company.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, hours after we recorded that episode, Calshie actually

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 4>did a one eighty pulled the announcement on the Xai deal,

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 4>essentially saying that that x had not confirmed the announcement

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 4>or something like that. So it sounds like some sort

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 4>of either miscommunication or sort of a one eighty that

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 4>business is up in the air. But Kurt, the business

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 4>that I think feels actually a little bit easier to

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 4>get your arms around, if not necessarily, I don't know.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 4>The most promising is money, right, the idea that Elon

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Musk has talked about for years that he's going to

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>turn x Twitter into a bank.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he has been talking about this. I was

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this just last night as I was preparing

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to chat about it. It was October of twenty twenty

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>two that he first, you know, took over Twitter and

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, We're going to turn this thing into a bank.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>He was telling employees that from the get go, almost

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>three years max. Where you know, we're summer of twenty

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. Now, I think we can say after a

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Memorial Day and we still haven't seen anything other than

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a some hints, some teases that something might

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be coming. And the idea here, I think, to your point,

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is easy enough to wrap your head around. I think

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the execution is another thing. And then the adoption is actually,

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, probably the toughest hurdle for them to

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>get over. But let's talk just briefly about what this

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like I mean, imagine opening your X account and

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>having a balance there right like essentially your your your

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>debit card, your your account, your debit account right there,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>linked to your X account. Now, if I want to

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>send you money, Max, I could. I could shoot you money,

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>similar to Venmo. If I'm scrolling through my X feed

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and I see an ad for something I want to buy,

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I could click and I could buy it right there.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, he had talked about having a really high

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>interest yield on this, on the money that's in these accounts,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so you'd be incentivized to essentially use this as like

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a safe account because you'd be making who knows how much,

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>but we'll say three, four or five percent on that money.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So that is the idea is like your X account

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and your financial accounts are linked together, and what would

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that do for you? Now, as we're now learning, it's

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>been almost three years they haven't launched anything. So technologically

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>this is clearly harder than they anticipated. I think they're

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>running into some regulatory issues. They're trying to get licensed

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.959
<v Speaker 1>for payments in all fifty states. I believe they're in

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>forty one states. But you don't want to roll out

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a product. When you know, if someone in New York,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>for example, where they're not licensed, can't send money to

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>someone in California, like it just it doesn't really work

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>all that well if you don't have all fifty states.

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And then the last thing is just adoption. Is the

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>average X user going to actually move their money from

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a Chase or a Bank of America or something like

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that and store it in X And I think that's

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>just an incredibly, incredibly high bar for a consumer to do.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 4>Dude, I don't trust X with my jokes, let alone

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 4>my you know, let alone my life savings. But that said,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 4>there will be people, and I should just say the

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 4>reason we're talking about this, so you know, Elon Musk

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 4>as often, is kind of driving this with his with

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 4>posting on X. A Tesla owners group tweeted that X

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 4>money was launching soon. X Money being this you know,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 4>financial service offered by the company formerly known as Twitter.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 4>Elon wrote on May twenty fifth, so I believe that

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 4>was on Sunday. This will be a very limited access

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 4>beta at first. When people's savings are involved, extreme care

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 4>must be taken.

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't want my bank account to be in beta,

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 3>like sorry, like I just told like, I just would

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>never want my personal finances to be in beta mode

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>at an Elon Musk company like that. I mean, there's

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 3>already enough problems as it is with just like security

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 3>of data in this new world of you know, hackers

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 3>and the Internet and like online banking in general. Like

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I'm just I'm very I'm very like

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 3>old school with my banking and would not willfully share

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 3>my banking contacts with the social media platform, particularly one

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 3>that's like AI based and trying to use information to

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 3>train their algorithms.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 4>We're joking about this because of course the failwell and Twitter.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 4>As Kurt knows well. He wrote a book about Elon's

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 4>takeover of Twitter, Battle for the Bird. This is a

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 4>company that has like has sort of for its entire history,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 4>had technical problems even dating back to Elon. It definitely

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 4>doesn't convey like trusted secure. It's more like free wheeling.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Anything could happen. It's pretty much all the things you

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 4>don't associate with a bank. On the other hand, Kurt,

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean you talked about the regulatory progress that they've made.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 4>There was also this report that I believe you wrote

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 4>about back in January Musk essentially striking a deal with

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Visa that would make Visa a payments partner X. I mean,

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 4>what is in place right now outside of the sort

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 4>of regulatory issue that you talked about.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I believe they have licenses secured in forty

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>one states. So again that's just sort of bare bones.

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>You need that in order to operate in those states

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to send money to other people or to businesses. So

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>they're working their way through that. The Visa thing, My

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>understanding of that is, you know, you would have some

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>type of card that is linked to your accounts SOL,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>like a debit card for example, that you could literally

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>go out into the real world and walk into a

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>store and buy something with this card. And so in

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>order to do something like that, Max, you need partners

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>who do debit cards or credit cards, and Visa would

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>make sense. They're they're gonna need banking partners, right, They're

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna need We know some of them, which of course

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't call at the top of my head, but

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>we know some of them via their payments applications documents

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that we've gotten from some of these states. We've done

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Foyer requests to try and get those applications to get

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a better sense of what it is that they're doing.

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>This will only if they are partnering with other financial

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>services providers, Visa being one, and then once you get

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff in place, you need to convince

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>actual people to do this, and we've talked about how

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a problem. But you know, a

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Visa that's a well known name, that's a household name.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a good sign for them that they have partnered

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with someone that people are familiar with and who know.

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's sort of table stakes when it

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>comes to your money, right, Like You're not gonna sit

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>there and be like, wow, Visa, this is incredible. You're

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, yeah, that's what I expect. Like if

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be giving you my money, I expect

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to have household names involved. And so they are, to

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.959
<v Speaker 1>their credit kind of getting that. But I think that

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that again is sort of the bare minimum at this point.

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 3>What is the model for this? Is this what Weibo does,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Like is there payments on some of the apps in China?

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Because I feel like Musk is very aware of what

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 3>consumer behavior is in China and there must be like

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 3>even though this might be going back to the early

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 3>PayPal days. Like this idea of making X the everything

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 3>app is that modeled on something that already exists elsewhere

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>in the world.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone always points to we Chat in China,

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this idea of you know, having entertainment, banking, social networking,

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all shopping all in one location. The issue and why

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty skeptical that this is going to work, is

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that several companies, including Meta and Mark Zuckerberg, have attempted

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to do this already in the US without success. And

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I think sort of the conclusion that I've come to

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>from having spoken with people about this over the years

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the US market is just so fragmented already

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of sort of putting it all back

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>together feels almost impossible. Right Like you go to Uber

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>when you want a ride, and you go to your

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>banking app when you want a bank, and you go

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to X or Meta or TikTok or whatever when you

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>want a social network. And I think the consumer behavior

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is just so different in the US than it was

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in China, and in China it's controlled more, right, like

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the government can basically control which companies, you know, get

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>get market share, or can sprout up and so it's

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>just not the case here. And so I'm pretty skeptical

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna happen, in part because this is an

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>idea I've probably been writing about for like ten years

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>in the US specifically, and it just hasn't come to fruition.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Facebook is way way bigger than X like, so, so

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 4>you're starting with a much smaller base of users, a

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 4>base of users that are not as addicted to it

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 4>as as people are of Facebook.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's just it's just a much weaker position.

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 4>In addition to like all the market challenges we talked

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 4>about as well as the political challenges, there is one

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 4>little wrinkle. I've seen a couple of reports suggesting that

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 4>when Elon Musk creates this X credit card, you will

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 4>be able to print your Twitter user.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Name on it. Wow. Okay, I think that could change everything, Kurt,

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 2>because you know, throw.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Out everything I've said to this point and let's let's

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>start from zero. No, I'm just kidding. Yeah, that sounds

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like something that would happen, you know. I feel like

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's like the ex premium subscriber perk, right that

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>lures people into their eight dollars a month.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm picturing you taking the team out to.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>The local you know, Buffalo wild Wings after a taping

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and throwing down that visa card.

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so we just got through Memorial Day, you know,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five, or two to a third of the

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>way through a little more than that.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>But I wanted to look ahead to next year, and.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 4>We've been talking about all of these things that Elon

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 4>Musk is trying to do, the reasons why he wants

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 4>to sleep on the floor, sleep in the factory or whatever.

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 4>And what I'd like, Kurt and Dana, what I'd like

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 4>you both to do is sort of rank these from

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 4>most likely to succeed to least likely to succeed by

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 4>the end of twenty twenty six. So by the end

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 4>of next year, so the list goes a functioning flea

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 4>of robotaxis Tesla's trying to do that x money, surpassing

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 4>one of the big mobile payment apps in usage by

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 4>the end of twenty twenty six. Or third Optimist that's

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 4>Tesla's humanoid robot heading on a starship rocket to Mars

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 4>by the end of next year. Kurt Wagner, what's the

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 4>most likely of those?

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I know you're going to pick me.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 2>First.

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Least likely is probably a full functioning fleet of robotaxis,

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just because now I think that's actually the most likely

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of those, like long term probably, but twenty twenty six,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not sold. I'll say the second least likely

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is X payments. As we've talked about, I've already shared

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>why I'm pretty skeptical that that's going to take off.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And then I'm going to say the most likely is

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the sending Optimists to Mars. And it's purely because of

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the window that Anna mentioned earlier, how there's sort of

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like limited windows that you can you can send these

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>ships on their way to Mars, And so I think,

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, Elon will Again. I don't think any of

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>these things are very likely, but I guess of the three,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I would say maybe that one's most likely simply because

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it has that time pressure built in of trying to

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>hit that window. So don't play this tape again at

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty six. Let's let's burn this

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>one after this.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I agree because I think also of all of the

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 3>things Elon cares the most about, Mars, like Mars has

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 3>been the animating force of his life for over two decades,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and like, you know, for whatever criticism you might have

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 3>of Elon, he's like what do they call it, like

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 3>a forcing function, Like he will bring the full force

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 3>of his personality and his ambition and he will drive

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 3>his team to meet that deadline because it is a

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 3>window and like Optimus is exists and is like walking

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>around and you know, like who knows if it's tele

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 3>operated or not. But like, I don't think there's anything

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 3>stopping them from putting an Optimist a couple of Optimist

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 3>robots on a ship and trying to send it to Mars.

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Whether they get to Mars remains to be seen, but like,

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that they will do everything in their power

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 3>to meet that deadline. And as we've talked about before,

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 3>President Trump mentioned it in his inauguration speech, and I

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 3>think that that is really the main thing that Elon

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 3>has always cared about.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you guys are wrong.

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 4>The most likely is the payment thing, because that's the

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 4>only one of the.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 2>Three that could conceivably happen.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 4>And like I don't again, like I don't know that

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 4>ex money can really take on Venmo or Zell or.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Apple pay or Square.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 4>But to me, like you never know it like there

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 4>are no like technological barriers to that one. Succeeding that

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 4>one is just purely about perceptions about Elon Musk And

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 4>maybe I mean, I feel like it's a comment on

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 4>how difficult he like his position has gotten politically, that

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 4>that we have trouble picturing it, because I do agree

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to imagine. I would say that the second

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 4>most likely is the Robotaxi fleet only because I think

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 4>like there's a lot of squishiness in that in that term,

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 4>and I could see defining it in a way where

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Elon would allow himself to declare victory. I don't I

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 4>don't buy Optimist getting to Mars by twenty twenty six.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Guys.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I feel like it's it's gonna be tough. They got

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 4>to refuel the thing. They're like eight zillion steps there.

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 4>And like Danna does, does optimists actually work or we've

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 4>seen some videos? Like again, like, I don't know, I

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 4>don't know if I've seen enough optimists here to trust

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 4>him on another planet.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh, come on, Optimist is gonna be babysitting your kid

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 3>and doing ballet and playing the piano.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Come on?

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, new nickname for Max the contrarian.

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Name.

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Listen, I'm gonna sign up for X money right now,

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 4>get that credit card out, start and start buy you

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 4>guys things, and before you know it, ts.

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Up handedly push your prediction over the finish line. I

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good idea.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Dana, thanks for being here as always.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Max.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 4>This episode was produced by Stacey Wong. Annam Maserakis is

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 4>our editor, Blake Maple's handles engineering, and Dave Purcell factchecks.

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Our supervising producer is Magnus Henrickson. The Eloni theme is

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 4>written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sagiera. Brendan

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Francis Newtam is our executive producer, and Sage Bauman is

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 4>ahead of Bloomberg Podcasts. A big thanks to our supporters

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Joel Weber and Brad Stone.

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Max Chafkin.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 4>If you have a minute, rate and review our show,

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 4>it'll help other listeners find us and we will see

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 4>you next week.