Speaker 1: All of you for being with us. Right down our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. It's eight hundred ninety four one
Speaker 1: Sean if you want to join us. I had fully
Speaker 1: anticipated coming on the program and reporting that we are
Speaker 1: five hours away from the deadline when President Trump has
Speaker 1: promised that this would be Bridge and power plant Day
Speaker 1: and Infrastructure Day, and that's how I planned the program.
Speaker 1: And as I've been following the news, you know, the
Speaker 1: last hour and a half in the lead up to
Speaker 1: the show today, I keep getting more and more updates
Speaker 1: about what is happening, and it looks like both Israel
Speaker 1: and the US have already started conducting a round of
Speaker 1: air strikes against more military targets on Irans, you know,
Speaker 1: in different Iranian locations, including is a report US military
Speaker 1: has conducted a new round of air strikes against military
Speaker 1: targets on Iran's Krg Island. Explosions heard after the air
Speaker 1: strikes carg Island early today. Ninety percent of Iranian oil
Speaker 1: exports processed and shipped from the island. Wall Street Journal
Speaker 1: reported fifty sites were targeted during those strikes, which you know,
Speaker 1: we're confined to military targets, but you know, not yet
Speaker 1: really going after their full infrastructure. The IDF this report
Speaker 1: from the Jerusalem Post warplanes targeting railways and a report
Speaker 1: that eight to ten bridges have already been taken out
Speaker 1: by the IDF in a bid to make it easier
Speaker 1: for Israeli and American forces to locate and destroy things
Speaker 1: and the Prime Minister Benjamin at Yahu confirmed the IDF
Speaker 1: strikes while adding that attacks against Iran are being conducted
Speaker 1: with increased intensity. We are targeting the railways bridges used
Speaker 1: by the Revolutionary Guards. They use them to transport raw
Speaker 1: materials for weapons and the operatives that attack US, the
Speaker 1: US and other countries in the region. The IDF said
Speaker 1: it struck eight bridge segments in several areas across Iran,
Speaker 1: the military confirming that prior to the strikes that steps
Speaker 1: were taken to mitigate harm to civilians. Later this afternoon.
Speaker 1: Just a short time ago, the IDF announced that it
Speaker 1: had struck Iran's most central site for the production of
Speaker 1: sonar systems and underwater detection systems and other reports. The
Speaker 1: Israeli Air Force launched a wave of other attacks today,
Speaker 1: killing two senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officers in Tehran,
Speaker 1: the first strike killing Majid Khadami, the head of the
Speaker 1: Intelligence Protection Organization of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and
Speaker 1: the intelligence organization of the IRGC. A separate strike in
Speaker 1: Tehran killed another top IRGC of fIF Yazdan Meir, who
Speaker 1: headed the IRGC Cuds Forces Clandestine Unit eight forty and
Speaker 1: that has been implicated in kidnappings assassinations of figures outside
Speaker 1: of Iran. The Israeli forces also hit targets at the
Speaker 1: largest petrochemical plant, blowing up several airports used by the IRGC.
Speaker 1: Is fighting continued, despite you know, efforts for negotiations. Now
Speaker 1: Axios reported it this was about two and a half
Speaker 1: hours ago, that progress had been made the past twenty
Speaker 1: four hours. And I got this report to last night
Speaker 1: that some progress might have been made. And what Axios
Speaker 1: is reporting, I'll give you what they were reporting. I'll
Speaker 1: keep my sources to myself for now. Iran sent a
Speaker 1: counterproposal to the U. I love these people in their counterproposals.
Speaker 1: They're great negotiators, but they're horrible at keeping their work.
Speaker 1: This has been the history of Iran, and we always,
Speaker 1: we always underestimate their capabilities, be it their nuclear capability,
Speaker 1: ballistic missile capability. Anyway, so I ran stupidly with just
Speaker 1: hours left until this deadline is hit. You know they
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what part of Midnight Hammer and epic
Speaker 1: Fury they missed. Uh. When Donald Trump gives you a deadline,
Speaker 1: usually the deadline kind of gets moved up a little bit,
Speaker 1: just to create the element of surprise that that's just
Speaker 1: the way it works, and love and war and everything
Speaker 1: in between. But anyway, while it was incompatible with the
Speaker 1: US positions, the White House actually saw it as encouraging.
Speaker 1: This is not complicated for the Iranians. If the Iranian
Speaker 1: regime wants this conflict to end, there are two specific
Speaker 1: things they would have had to agree to open the
Speaker 1: straight oh horror moves One. Two handover their sixty percent
Speaker 1: enriched uranium they have. You know that they think. I
Speaker 1: don't know why they think they have any leverage in
Speaker 1: any direct talks. Now. One other source Wall Street Journal
Speaker 1: saying is that Iran cut off all direct communications with
Speaker 1: the US after the President's vow on truth social to
Speaker 1: destroy Iran's whole civilization if the country doesn't reach a
Speaker 1: deal by eight pm Eastern time tonight, again less than
Speaker 1: five hours away. The journal is Alexander Ward, adding talks
Speaker 1: with ceasefire mediators continue. Middle Eastern officials say the move
Speaker 1: has temporarily complicated those efforts, but Trump sparked a lot
Speaker 1: of anger and concerned. Well, I'm sorry that they got angry,
Speaker 1: but you know something, I'm angry too. I'm angry that
Speaker 1: they didn't take this deal. I'm angry that they have
Speaker 1: caused the deaths of tens and tens of thousands of
Speaker 1: incalculable numbers because they use proxies to kill innocent men,
Speaker 1: women and children. You know, I'm angry too what they
Speaker 1: did on October seventh. I'm angry that they foment terran
Speaker 1: have been fomenting terror in the Middle East and around
Speaker 1: the world for decades now, for wopping forty seven years.
Speaker 1: I'm angry at how they treat their own citizens. I'm
Speaker 1: angry seeing images of citizens surrounding what are known targets
Speaker 1: right now as we speak. I'm angry at all of it.
Speaker 1: But we have every right to go after the infrastructure
Speaker 1: of Iran, and I'll get to that in a second.
Speaker 1: You would think, you know, this is the most amazing
Speaker 1: part of this. This is how corrupt and this is
Speaker 1: why I guess I've been successful in my career thanks
Speaker 1: to all of you. I never forget that part. But
Speaker 1: the other part of it is the legacy media never
Speaker 1: has ever brought up the idea of war crimes when
Speaker 1: it comes to Iranians targeting as they have been day
Speaker 1: after day, night after night, densely populated cities in Israel
Speaker 1: and other parts of the world and targeting civilians at
Speaker 1: all times, that is their number one strategy. Or allowing
Speaker 1: in Gaza schools to be used as shields. They're now
Speaker 1: using their people to surround known targets that the president
Speaker 1: is laid out for them. I guess with the promise
Speaker 1: of martyrdom. I don't know. We also have an update
Speaker 1: US Israel airstrikes decimating Iran's repressive secret police. This is
Speaker 1: a big deal. There are five thousand members of Iran
Speaker 1: security forces. They apparently have been killed another whopping twenty
Speaker 1: one thousand wounded. Now why would Donald Trump move earlier?
Speaker 1: Thought he gave them a deadline. Okay, he did give
Speaker 1: them a deadline, and originally the deadline was ten days.
Speaker 1: And the fact that they're futzing around with you know,
Speaker 1: with some false, you know, delusional mindset that they're in
Speaker 1: any position to negotiate. They're not. This was very straightforward.
Speaker 1: It wasn't complicated. Open the straight a hormone for the
Speaker 1: free flow of oil at market prices, and stop holding
Speaker 1: the world's markets hostage. It's the lifeblood of the world's economy.
Speaker 1: It's about twenty percent of the world's oil supply. I
Speaker 1: find it fascinating that other countries in the region are
Speaker 1: very cleverly now partnering with Israel to build pipelines so
Speaker 1: that this situation won't ever arise again because of the
Speaker 1: close proximity to the Uranians. Although I'm not sure in
Speaker 1: the end, long term if this regime will survive whatever's
Speaker 1: left of the regime. We're now with the fourth and
Speaker 1: fifthier of it. You know, as I said on TV
Speaker 1: last night, as I sat on this radio programming yesterday,
Speaker 1: I really hoped that they would come to a smart,
Speaker 1: negotiated settlement. There were two main things they had to do. Immediately,
Speaker 1: open the STRAIGHTAHR moves, allow the free flow of oil
Speaker 1: at market prices. And number two, the only other thing
Speaker 1: they had to do was take the sixty percent enriched uranium,
Speaker 1: some thousand pounds of it or foreigner and sixty kilograms
Speaker 1: of it, whichever measurement you prefer. Linda doesn't like the
Speaker 1: kilogram figure that I use, which could be used to
Speaker 1: make ten or eleven bombs handed over to the US
Speaker 1: led America to extract it the way we did in Libya.
Speaker 1: And guess what, your country stops getting bombed, you have
Speaker 1: an opportunity to rebuild society, although I doubt this whatever
Speaker 1: remaining parts of the regime would be smart enough to
Speaker 1: build it in a way that actually gave rights to
Speaker 1: their citizens, the very same people that today they are
Speaker 1: having surround you know, their power plant structures and other
Speaker 1: you know, target mentioned targets to the president. Anyway, the
Speaker 1: President has been urging the Iranian people to rise up
Speaker 1: and take their government back for weeks now, and the
Speaker 1: only thing standing in their way is fear of the
Speaker 1: Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces. But you know now that Israel
Speaker 1: in the US are targeting them. But anyway, report this
Speaker 1: morning and Iran in ourn all of this is about
Speaker 1: to change. A review of citizen reports and source material
Speaker 1: found in the months since the war began, at least
Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty sites tied to internal repression were
Speaker 1: destroyed or hit. They include a lot of the buildings
Speaker 1: of both the police, Revolutionary Guard forces, compounds and other
Speaker 1: security complexes involved in the repression of citizens. So they
Speaker 1: are being weakened, and as the President mentioned yesterday the
Speaker 1: Iranian people, there are attempts now to get arms into
Speaker 1: the hands of the Iranian people, so hopefully they can
Speaker 1: take their country back. We do have an update on
Speaker 1: the son of the now dead Supreme Leader who was
Speaker 1: killed in the opening salvos of Epic Fury. And this
Speaker 1: is the son that the Supreme Leader, Ali Hamani, never
Speaker 1: wanted to replace him. This is the one that the
Speaker 1: New York Posts reported was gay, which by the way,
Speaker 1: is a death sentence in Iran. Bring brought up to
Speaker 1: a tall building. I mean, that was Linda. Did you
Speaker 1: see we did a segment last night that General Solomani's
Speaker 1: niece and grand niece living large in Los Angeles were
Speaker 1: taken into custody. Did you see the skimpy outfits we
Speaker 1: were showing them wearing last night, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: I'm not judging them. I don't give a rip what
Speaker 1: people wear. I don't care about that. My only point is,
Speaker 1: can you imagine if we send them back to Iran
Speaker 1: and those pictures go viral when eventually one day the
Speaker 1: Internet gets turned back on there? And why were they
Speaker 1: living the high life in the US while simultaneously calling
Speaker 1: America the Great Satan. They're living in the Great Satan.
Speaker 1: And the niece and grand niece of the now dead
Speaker 1: General Solomani anyway back to the son of the Supreme
Speaker 1: leader is quote unconscious, unable to be involved in any
Speaker 1: decision making, according to the New York Post, and according
Speaker 1: to an intelligence memo weeks after he was really injured.
Speaker 1: He was injured in the opening salvo of this this
Speaker 1: conflict and that killed his father and all his top deputies.
Speaker 1: Some reports claimed he suffered only a fractured foot and
Speaker 1: minor injuries. Others suggested he was in a coma. But anyway,
Speaker 1: he's not been seen since that initial strike on February
Speaker 1: twenty eighth that killed his father and much of his
Speaker 1: family and much of the top brass and top leadership
Speaker 1: that had been in charge for the longest period of
Speaker 1: time in Iran, and anyways, currently undergoing medical treatment for
Speaker 1: a severe condition. We apparently even know where he is.
Speaker 1: It's about eighty seven miles south of tey Ran. Let's see.
Speaker 1: Weight says, stay inside unless only of the utmost necessity
Speaker 1: to leave. US. Israel intelligence reports, you know now confirming
Speaker 1: that the son of the former Supreme leader, the guy
Speaker 1: we're told is the current Supreme leader. You know, we
Speaker 1: don't know anything about him except that he's absolutely not
Speaker 1: part of any decision making process, was not part of
Speaker 1: any negotiations with Steve Whitcoff Jared Kushner, Iran's president warning
Speaker 1: their economy is near full collapse. According to Iran International News,
Speaker 1: a deepening rifted at the top of the Islamic Republic
Speaker 1: is now spilled into an unusually sharp confrontation, with the
Speaker 1: president accusing senior Iranian Revolutionary Guard commanders of unilateral actions
Speaker 1: that have wrecked ceasefire prospects and pushed Iran towards disaster.
Speaker 1: Too close to the presidential office. That apparently this tense
Speaker 1: exchange is going on, So you've got a power struggle
Speaker 1: at the top, which I guess is fairly predictable. But
Speaker 1: Iran's economy will not be able to withstand a prolonged
Speaker 1: war for much longer that the full economic collapse is
Speaker 1: inevitable under current conditions. It sounds like there might be
Speaker 1: a couple of reasonable voices that have been trying to
Speaker 1: talk some sense.
Speaker 2: You have to be.
Speaker 1: Really dumb, really really dumb, after being given every opportunity
Speaker 1: before Midnight Hammer to come to a peace agreement and
Speaker 1: not doing so. Okay, midnight happens, fourteen bunker buster bombs.
Speaker 1: We take out so much of their ballistic missile air
Speaker 1: defense systems, et cetera. Okay, that ends in twelve days.
Speaker 1: Then we discovered then we find out, yeah, they're bragging.
Speaker 1: They have fourner and sixty kilograms of sixty percent enriched
Speaker 1: uranium which can be enriched to weapons grade in less
Speaker 1: than twelve days. We learned during this conflict that their
Speaker 1: ballistic missile range was far longer than we originally thought. Okay,
Speaker 1: now the president has a very short timeline. That's what
Speaker 1: precipitated Operation Epic Fury. But even before Epic Fury, they
Speaker 1: were giving a given a timeline to choose piece. They
Speaker 1: chose not to accept it. Now everything has been pretty
Speaker 1: much out. Now they've been given a final timeline. You know,
Speaker 1: it just shows you the degree of fanaticism and evil
Speaker 1: and radicalism, and now they're sending their own people to
Speaker 1: what are known targets so that they will in all
Speaker 1: likelihood be dead by the end of today, and they
Speaker 1: don't care. And then reports that they're putting arms in
Speaker 1: the hands of children, you know, to fight against the
Speaker 1: infidels that of course would be us in Israel. Oh okay,
Speaker 1: this is a great regime that's not evil, though you
Speaker 1: can't say that it's evil. No, the United States, according
Speaker 1: to some as evil, and if God forbid, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: actually talks to an evil regime in the language they understand.
Speaker 1: This is unbelievably shocking. Eleven years of Donald Trump talking
Speaker 1: this way, and it's shocking still. And I'm gonna bubble
Speaker 1: and fizz and melt like el Alca Seltzer in water.
Speaker 1: It's such a it's so phony. I can't stand these people.
Speaker 2: Alec Baldwin's favorite radio talk show host is on the
Speaker 2: air right now, right mister Baldwin's sean Hennity by twenty
Speaker 2: five till the top of the hour, or four hours
Speaker 2: and twenty five minutes until the President has promised that
Speaker 2: the whole civilization will die tonight unless then this will
Speaker 2: be a Bridge Night, an infrastructure night, and you know,
Speaker 2: the President has been very clear.
Speaker 1: The truth is, according to reports, this is this military
Speaker 1: effort has already started, and it doesn't. There seems to
Speaker 1: be no indication that there is going to be any
Speaker 1: type of deal. You know, I'm watching this guy, Broe
Speaker 1: Connor on Fox News. You know this guy, Linda. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's yeah, no, okay, let me tell you something. His
Speaker 1: arguments are stupid. There are dumb people. He goes, well,
Speaker 1: American's died. What if? And you cannot you cannot ignore
Speaker 1: what we've learned here. And there are people that will
Speaker 1: put their head in the sand and they are willing
Speaker 1: to gamble with our children's lives and our grandchildren's lives,
Speaker 1: and they don't want to neutralize a threat while we're
Speaker 1: able to do it with the minimal amount of risk.
Speaker 1: Every military effort has risk. I don't want to minimize that.
Speaker 1: I don't want to minimize the loss of any one
Speaker 1: person's life in any way. However, if this regime gets
Speaker 1: those nuclear weapons with those four nitred and sixty kilograms,
Speaker 1: you don't like that measurement, but I do. Of sixty
Speaker 1: percent enriched uranium less than twelve days weapons grade coupled
Speaker 1: with longer range ballistic missiles that anybody knew, anybody thought
Speaker 1: they had, and the idea that this regime that is
Speaker 1: killed tens and tens of thousands of na some people
Speaker 1: number one state sponsor of terror. They have read nothing
Speaker 1: but death, havoc, destruction in the entire region. They have
Speaker 1: fomented terror around the world. And for those ignorant people
Speaker 1: that somehow believe that it's okay to let them move
Speaker 1: forward with their nuclear program. Now, even Obama, even Biden,
Speaker 1: even Kamala, even the Clintons, they all said Iran can
Speaker 1: never have a nuclear weapon. They all said it. We've
Speaker 1: played it repeatedly, and it doesn't seem to matter, and
Speaker 1: Donald Trump stops it now all of a sudden. It's
Speaker 1: a bad thing. The reality is neutralizing a future threat
Speaker 1: shows that you have learned something from history. You've learned
Speaker 1: that if you can neutralize a threat, take it out.
Speaker 1: Yes it's dangerous, Yes it is hard, there's nothing easy
Speaker 1: about it. Yes it's temporary, but it's a lot better
Speaker 1: dealing with it now then dealing with it at some
Speaker 1: point in the future. I mean, it's so simple. This
Speaker 1: is common sense. And if the Democrats, radical Democrats, legacy
Speaker 1: media mob, the weirdo isolationists that would never use American
Speaker 1: American military mind until until you are forced to when
Speaker 1: they have a nuclear weapon. Great, they get to hold
Speaker 1: your children, your grandchildren hostage. And the sad part is
Speaker 1: in this is you'll never be able to calculate how
Speaker 1: many lives potentially could be saved by the President realizing
Speaker 1: this is an existential threat for our future, the world's future,
Speaker 1: our children's future, your grandchildren's future. And I really I
Speaker 1: have no patience for stupid people, because there are a
Speaker 1: lot of stupid, stupid people that are making a lot
Speaker 1: of dumb commentary. You know, just like from the very beginning,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is doing the bidding of bb Netanyahu and Israel.
Speaker 1: No he wasn't. Right now, they have ballistic missile range
Speaker 1: capability that could reach Paris in London, They're twelve days
Speaker 1: away from enriching enough uranium as soon as they build
Speaker 1: back their Richmond facilities. Especially if we didn't do anything
Speaker 1: militarily now to prevent that from happening, they would be
Speaker 1: able to do that in twelve days. That would be
Speaker 1: a clear and present danger that would hold the world hostage,
Speaker 1: and then they'd only continue to build that out. Now,
Speaker 1: it's hard to make tough military decisions and national security decisions,
Speaker 1: but I am flabbergasted that people haven't learned a thing
Speaker 1: from the last century. They haven't learned a single solitary
Speaker 1: thing from history. Nothing. They just they just put their
Speaker 1: head in the sand. Now let's deal with the latest
Speaker 1: liberal talking point. It is liberal talking point. It's very,
Speaker 1: very simple and stupid. Donald Trump said the US would
Speaker 1: target every Iranian bridge and power plant. Now we actually
Speaker 1: have images on Fox News amazing the things that the
Speaker 1: Iranian regime will let out and they have. Now they
Speaker 1: are now forcing their citizens. You will never convince me
Speaker 1: that they're doing this voluntarily. They have people with Iranian
Speaker 1: flags surrounding their power plants and the military targets. The
Speaker 1: President Trump has stated unequivocally that he will be going
Speaker 1: after And why would they do that? Explain that to me.
Speaker 1: Why would they ever do that? Because they don't care
Speaker 1: about their own citizens. Those are the people they put
Speaker 1: to death on a regular basis. Those are the women
Speaker 1: that they give beatings to. If there his job is
Speaker 1: not fully covering their head or God forbid, you know,
Speaker 1: other more severe rules on dress code or not met.
Speaker 1: You know, they could face the death penalty been slaughtering
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of their own people, you know. And
Speaker 1: this hypocrisy really really irritates the hell out of me,
Speaker 1: because here President Trump, just like Israel, we target military targets,
Speaker 1: period and dissentence. And the President is not wrong when
Speaker 1: he says when every bridge and power plant in Iran
Speaker 1: is taken out, that the whole civilization will die. And
Speaker 1: it's going to take a hell of a lot to
Speaker 1: bring it back. But it probably would would result in
Speaker 1: the end of the radical regime that exists, especially if
Speaker 1: we could ever get arms into the hands of the
Speaker 1: people of Iran that don't want to live this way anymore.
Speaker 1: It's been forty seven years a hell for them. It's
Speaker 1: not really much of a life. But this is how
Speaker 1: the media spins this. Here's the Washington Post. Trump threats
Speaker 1: against civilian targets put military in legal and moral quandary.
Speaker 1: Oh it doesn't. What they're saying is not true. Have
Speaker 1: you ever seen the Washington Post or any of these idiots,
Speaker 1: and they are idiots. Be it on MSDNC, Legacy Media, CBS, AVC, NBC,
Speaker 1: Fake News, CNN, any of the major newspapers. Have they
Speaker 1: ever done any articles about the moral and legal quandary
Speaker 1: of the murderous regime, the terrorist regime, the terror proxy
Speaker 1: supporting regime that has willfully been targeting, you know, this
Speaker 1: entire conflict. They've been targeting densely populated areas in Israel
Speaker 1: and other parts of the Middle East. They have been
Speaker 1: targeting the very same infrastructure in all these Gulf state
Speaker 1: countries that produce oil. And not a single thought or
Speaker 1: one of these liberal commentators or writers has ever written
Speaker 1: about the moral quandary of the Iranian leadership. They haven't,
Speaker 1: they're saying. But the president's unrestrained statements have alarmed legal
Speaker 1: experts and former military officials, who argue the President Trump's
Speaker 1: threat to conduct broad attacks on civilian infrastructure very off
Speaker 1: limits and could undermine America America's aims in Iran and
Speaker 1: create legal jeopardy for military leadership. I'm concerned the President's
Speaker 1: bombast is putting operational commanders in difficult positions. At Jeffrey Korn,
Speaker 1: who served as a top lawyer of war in the
Speaker 1: US Army from two thousand and four to two thousand
Speaker 1: and five. They know you can't just draw a circle
Speaker 1: around the country and say every element of the electric
Speaker 1: grid is now a lawful target. This is where they're wrong,
Speaker 1: and we'll getting into this in more detail at the
Speaker 1: top of the hour. No, President Trump's promised to target
Speaker 1: Iran's energy sites and bridges and key infrastructure. That is
Speaker 1: not a war crime. I had a long discussion with
Speaker 1: Greg Jared, Who's going to join us at the top
Speaker 1: of the hour. It's not a war crime. An enemy combatants,
Speaker 1: fuel and power sources that support its military capabilities, often
Speaker 1: delivered across bridges, are permissible under the Common Rules of War,
Speaker 1: meaning Iran's bridges, their power plans, their oil ins, the relations. Sorry, yeah,
Speaker 1: they have civilian purposes, but they also have military purposes
Speaker 1: and they also so that does not render it a
Speaker 1: war crime. It would be akin in many ways to
Speaker 1: collateral damage. It's a military target that has to be
Speaker 1: taken out. Unfortunately, it might have civilian purposes. Now the
Speaker 1: critics are arguing that international law, we don't recognize the ICC,
Speaker 1: the International Criminal Court number one, number two. We should
Speaker 1: not be a part of these globalist organizations like the
Speaker 1: United Nations, you know, with their the IAEA that has
Speaker 1: forever gotten wrong and underestimated the Iranian capabilities when it
Speaker 1: comes to nuclear weapons because their inspections are complete Adam
Speaker 1: shift and they they are bamboozled again and again and
Speaker 1: again by the Iranian regime. It's like they underestimated their
Speaker 1: ballistic missile capability and range. They do it constantly. But
Speaker 1: you know, the critics are saying laws prohibit the president
Speaker 1: and and and the UN is angry at Donald Trump
Speaker 1: for deploying any military measures or intimidation of terror against
Speaker 1: the civilian population. Well, if you look at this conflict,
Speaker 1: only one side has targeted densely populated civilian areas, and
Speaker 1: that would be the Iranians. They're the ones that have
Speaker 1: been raining down cluster bomb after cluster bomb after cluster
Speaker 1: bomb in Tel Aviv, a densely populated city in Israel.
Speaker 1: They're the people that have been funding, fomenting terror and
Speaker 1: supporting Hamas in Gaza. And what does Hamas do in Gaza.
Speaker 1: They fired their missiles from schools and hospitals because they
Speaker 1: know Israel does not want to strike civilian targets, because
Speaker 1: they actually respect human life, and they have tried up
Speaker 1: until October seventh to follow those quote rules until it
Speaker 1: got to the point of no return. And as the
Speaker 1: Iranians were raining down two thousand pounds and soon promising
Speaker 1: four thousand pound ballistic missiles, they really got to a
Speaker 1: point of no other option. And the same thing is
Speaker 1: now happening with Hasbala. What is hamas, as Bala and
Speaker 1: the Uti rebels all have in common is that they're
Speaker 1: proxies of the Iranian regime. Now I understand this probably
Speaker 1: conflicting voices, those that are hardliners going up against those
Speaker 1: people that actually may have opened their eyes a little
Speaker 1: bit and realized this country is being decimated and is
Speaker 1: not going to be much left of the country. Uh
Speaker 1: So there's this internal power play struggle. But obviously if
Speaker 1: the more moderate voices don't win the day in the
Speaker 1: next oh, I guess, you know, coming up on you know,
Speaker 1: four hours and twelve minutes, then it's it's gonna be
Speaker 1: what the president promised. Donald Trump doesn't make idle threats.
Speaker 1: And by the way, depriving the enemy of fuel is
Speaker 1: very different than targeting densely populated Civilianaireas. My question is
Speaker 1: in any of your coverage, in any of your reading,
Speaker 1: and any of You know, if you ever watch these
Speaker 1: other channels, that have they ever once complained about the
Speaker 1: war crimes committed and perpetrated by the Iranian regime during
Speaker 1: this entire conflict and during their forty seven year reign.
Speaker 1: And the answer to the question is no. And the
Speaker 1: only reason they're bringing it up now is because Donald
Speaker 1: Trumps president, and they just don't want Donald Trump to
Speaker 1: win the war. If we're going to engage in a conflict,
Speaker 1: it is best that we win that conflict. It is
Speaker 1: not complicated, not that sophisticated. Anyway, President is aware of
Speaker 1: Pakistan's proposal to extend the deadline two weeks. We'll see
Speaker 1: what happens with that. Anyway, Depriving the enemy of their
Speaker 1: fuel resources has always been the legitimate objective of any
Speaker 1: war or War II. The Allied Oil Plan systematically targeted
Speaker 1: German synthetic fuel plants for finery storage facilities. Was that
Speaker 1: the wrong thing to do. The strike reduced production by
Speaker 1: ninety percent by September nineteen forty four. Resulting fuel shortage
Speaker 1: crippled the German warmesth and immobilized their tanks. Did it
Speaker 1: have a severe impact on German civilians? Of course, it did,
Speaker 1: but it didn't. But it's not a war crime. Now.
Speaker 1: I would imagine that if we were living in a
Speaker 1: different time and we had Americans dying and you know,
Speaker 1: by the thousands and thousands, like we did in World
Speaker 1: War Two, and we had to make a decision. My
Speaker 1: dad spent four years in the Pacific during that conflict
Speaker 1: after Pearl Harbor, and he signed up, and he spent
Speaker 1: four years in the Pacific and the Navy, serving the
Speaker 1: country and hated every minute of it. Lost a lot
Speaker 1: of friends there, didn't want to talk about it much.
Speaker 1: But was it the right decision or the wrong decision
Speaker 1: to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? I guess
Speaker 1: you know the concept of war crimes based on these
Speaker 1: international treaties, the Jev Geneva Conventions, the Hague Regulations. But
Speaker 1: the US is also has its own federal law called
Speaker 1: the US War Crimes Act of nineteen ninety six, which
Speaker 1: prohibits things like torture, mistreatment of prisoners, chemical or biological weapons.
Speaker 1: Trump's actions don't even violate our own laws. You're just
Speaker 1: being lied to as usual and propagandized as per usual.
Speaker 1: All right, Listen, most of us are guessing our way
Speaker 1: through our health and guessing what foods are compatible with
Speaker 1: your specific body type, what supplements may be right or
Speaker 1: wrong for you, wondering why some things make you feel
Speaker 1: better than others. The truth is everybody's got a different fingerprint,
Speaker 1: everyone's got a different body type. Now, if you suffer
Speaker 1: from bloating, fatigue, brain fog, maybe just at different periods
Speaker 1: in your life, well, those are often just messages from
Speaker 1: your body, and you need to listen to them. If
Speaker 1: your DNA is your blueprint, well the RNA will show
Speaker 1: you what's happening with your body right now. That's where
Speaker 1: biome comes in. It is a simple, at home gut
Speaker 1: health test that uses advanced RNA technology to analyze your
Speaker 1: gut micro biome and understand how your body is really
Speaker 1: functioning now. From there, Biome creates a personalized food supplement
Speaker 1: plan designed specifically for your body. Instead of guessing, you
Speaker 1: get guidance based on real data based on your gut health,
Speaker 1: which is really the key to your health. And when
Speaker 1: people follow the plan, many report better digestion, more energy,
Speaker 1: and improved mood, which I'm noticing in Linda biome dot
Speaker 1: com slash Hannity A right four hours, three minutes away
Speaker 1: from the Iranian deadline, talk about a potential two week
Speaker 1: how it is if the Pakistani plan goes through. Greg
Speaker 1: Jarrett on this war crimes issue next