WEBVTT - Harris Campaign, US Earnings

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll discuss why UPS suffered its worst stock decline

0:00:58.560 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>in twenty five years.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Last, we break down Astrazeneco's quarterly earnings in a conversation

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>with its chief financial officer.

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 2>But first we dive into politics and the aftermath of

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>President Joe Biden dropping out of the presidential race.

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Many people are now wondering whether Vice President Kamala Harris

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 3>could defeat Republican nominee and former President Donald Trump in November.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>And this week Bloomberg Intelligence took a deep dive into

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 2>how a potential Harris presidency could impact different sectors and

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>policies in the US.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 3>For more, we are joined by Nathan Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 3>senior policy analyst, and we first asked Nathan what life

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 3>would look like if Kamala Harris were to win in November.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 4>It's a lot of status quo for banks, evs, big

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 4>tech and so forth like that. The one caveat is

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 4>on taxes, and Kamala Harris's record in her tax aspect

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 4>of it has been a little bit more, you know,

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 4>i'd say progressive than what President Biden has said. But

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 4>ultimately we've viewed President Biden as moving more towards Kamala

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Harris's policies when he became president, rather than Kamala Harris

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 4>moving towards Biden's policies. So a lot of this if

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>she becomes president will be status quo.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's really interesting. So I was going to ask,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>where is Vice President Harris farther left than President Biden.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Where is that biggest daylight?

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 4>So the one thing that we actually hung down on

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 4>was her record as Attorney General, and you know, just

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 4>indicative of one of her actions as she joined about

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 4>forty seven other states, including the District of Columbia, on

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 4>a twenty five billion dollar settlement on home foreclosure practices,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of her campaign speeches when she was

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 4>running president in twenty twenty was talking about how she

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>took on big banks. Now, you know, to us, that

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 4>means there's a lot more consumer protection coming in the cards,

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the Consumer for Financial Protection Bureau, or whether

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 4>it comes through acts of Congress, or maybe it's even

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 4>executive orders like continuing President Biden's student debt relief pans.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 4>But I think there's going to be a lot of

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 4>focus on this idea of load to middle income consumers,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>protections against big corporations, and a lot more in terms

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 4>of disclosures and so forth like that. Now, is this

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 4>a material impact on big tech or on the big banks.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Probably not. A lot of it has to get passed

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 4>through Congress, but ultimately it certainly headline risk that I

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 4>would keep in mind for those sectors is in particular,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 4>is just to keep in mind, you know that if

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 4>she were to focus on this and specifically it's just

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 4>pick on anti trust. If she were to focus on

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 4>anti trust, there's a lot of you know, intense scrutiny,

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 4>more scrutiny than she could put there than a Biden

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 4>administration could.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, a lot of my M and A banker

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>buddies are wondering what would a Harris administration mean for

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>antitrust because Biden's been nobody into the M and A world.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>What's the is a feeling statisquo there as well?

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is one of those situations where I think,

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 4>whoever wins as president's probably not going to be helpful

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 4>to your M and A banker buddies, because on one hand,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>you have the continuation of the Biden presidency with Lena

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Khan at the FTC and taking a very skeptical look

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 4>at mergers. I mean just in the financial space alone.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, some of these merger reviews go over a year,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 4>if not longer, and you know we saw it certainly

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 4>with the TD Financial merger they pulled out as a

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 4>result of this. But then on the flip side, you

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 4>have Senator Advance and President Trump. And remember this idea

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>of economic popularism is rampted through that. You know that

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 4>RNC agenda at the moment, So you know, Senator Vance

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 4>even came down to a Bloomberg event here in Washington

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 4>and called Lena Kahan, the FTC chairwoman Biden's best picked

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 4>and insinuated that President Trump should even keep around. Now,

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's going to happen, but for unfortunately, Paul,

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 4>for your M and A banker buddies, I don't think

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 4>any other way this gets around, whether it's Harris or Trump,

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be a very skeptical world for anti

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 4>trust in M and A.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>So Paul's talking to his MENA buddies, I'm thinking about

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>my energy buddies, because one area where it feels like

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 3>President Harris could be farther left, of course, his energy.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 3>I was telling Paul earlier that she's been kind of

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>anti fracking, she's been anti offshore. California is notoriously not

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 3>loving any fossil fuels. How much of that do you

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 3>think we have to really start considering.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 4>I think it's important to consider it. In fact, our

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 4>colleague Rob Barnett put out a note talking about this

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 4>in the importance it has on the renewable sector. So

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Vice President Harris, you know, certainly has pursued a clean

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 4>energy agenda, and one of the things we see in

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, her presidency is a boosting of the Inflation

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Reduction Act. I don't want to say going back to

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the build back Better three point zero, you know, some

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 4>of the ideas that will float around. She'll have her

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 4>own ideas here, but this idea of the Inflation Reduction

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Act needs to be protected and enhanced. So if you're

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 4>in the renewable sector, a solar sector, it certainly could

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 4>be a boon idea. If Vice President Harris wins, you know,

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 4>I would also just offer this that a lot of

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 4>it also depends on who takes up Congress, because if

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Vice President Harris wins and the Republicans take one, if

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 4>not two, chambers of the House, then a lot of

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>those initiatives are going to be scaled down and actually

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 4>dramatically lowered and so forth like that.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we know Elon Musk is a big supporter

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>of Trump, But what would a democratic Harris administration mean

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>for the Elon Mussel of the world and the evs.

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, for the EV side, I think it's

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 4>actually a continuation of the Inflation Reduction Act tax credit,

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 4>if not an enhancement of that. You know, look, tax

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>reform is going to have to happen next year no

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 4>matter what, because the Trump era tax cuts for individuals

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 4>expires at the tail end of twenty twenty five. And

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 4>whether it's Vice President Harris or Trump, neither of them

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 4>are going to want to increase taxes for low and

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 4>middle and income you know, Americans. So for the EV's

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 4>of the world, I would say, under a Harris presidency,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 4>you'll certainly have protection from that tax credit in the IRA,

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 4>You potentially could have an enhancement of that. You certainly

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 4>will have regulatory policies trying to boost EV usage and

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 4>so forth like that. Comparing it against the President Trump presidency,

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 4>where you know, he has said that he doesn't like

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 4>electric vehicles. Obviously he has the Elon Musk whispering in

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 4>his ear and providing forty five million dollars a month

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 4>in PAC funding. But ultimately I think the Republicans you

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>probably would see a scaling back of those tax credits.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh maybe you.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Know, just additional you know, restrictions on EV's and so

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 4>forth like that. But you know, with the Trump presidency,

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 4>we'll have to see if he wins and also if

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 4>the Elon Musk is whispering in his ear income January

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 4>and February taxes.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 2>If former President Trump were to get a second term,

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 2>is there any consensus in Washington given the makeup of Congress.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 2>I guess we have to see how Congress shakes out.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 2>But what if anything, could Trump ad been tration get

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:01.239
<v Speaker 2>done on taxes?

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, the way I think about the tax

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 4>debate with my colleague Andrew Silverman is really print some timing.

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>So the first thing you'll note is the election.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 4>If the Republicans take the House and the Senate and

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 4>the presidency, then they have this opportunity for a reconciliation.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 4>This is how they got the Trump Ara tax cuts

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>through in twenty seventeen. It allows them to actually move

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 4>forth and enhance or you know, essentially conduct tax reform

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 4>and they can bypass the Democrats. So if the Republicans

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 4>win the House and the Senate and the presidency, then

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 4>this President Trump's idea of lowering corporate tax rates is

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 4>certainly in the carts now I have seen statements from

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 4>House Republicans saying, eh, maybe we don't want to do

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 4>that so much, but I do think that this would

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 4>be President Trump driving this. Now, if you get more

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 4>of a gridlock Congress, well, then the power of Congress

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>is going to come out, and the House in ways

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 4>and means Committee, whoever controls it, is certainly going to

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 4>want to play here and tell the Presidency this is

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 4>what we think. And so if you get a gridlock Congress,

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the tax reform or tax relief ideas

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 4>that are out there are going to be scaled down

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 4>or narrowed, but with one objective not to increase the

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 4>individual tax relief or tax cuts for that individual. If

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 4>you get President Harris, you may see tax increases for

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 4>individuals who make greater than four hundred thousand dollars, but

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 4>I think most individuals in the United States at the

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 4>end of twenty twenty five probably won't have their taxes.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Altered all that much. Our thanks to Nathan Dean Bloomberg

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence senior policy analyst.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 3>We moved out of corporate earnings and begin with the

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 3>ev giant Tesla. Tesla reporting another quarter of disappointing profit

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 3>and postponed a highly anticipated unveiling of autonomous taxis.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>For more and all this, we were joined by Steve Mann,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence, Global Autos and Industrials Research Channels.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 3>We first asked for his key takeaways from Tesla's results.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 6>I still like their long term medium term outlook on

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 6>AI in our view, were not including eight billion optimist robots.

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 6>I think that's a little bit out there. But AI

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 6>will continue to drive the stock. But I think people

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 6>are focused on their auto business. It's a little bit worrying.

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 6>I think investors were expecting their automotive gross margin to

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 6>flatten out in the second quarter versus the first, but

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 6>it did decline about one hundred and fifty basis points

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 6>to thirteen point nine percent, which is in line with

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, the legacy automaker's automotive growth marginal fourteen percent.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 6>So there is some concerns with the investors. Is you know,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 6>are there any more upside on margin? Are they you know,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 6>are they really that good with cost?

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>But I guess the question is how do we value

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the stock? So I hear you that the auto part

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 3>of their business is very much maybe in line with

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 3>what other auto companies are talking about but they trade

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 3>an estimated pe of like ninety times, Like is it

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>worth it for that if it's also being valued as

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>an AI company.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 6>I think there's a couple of things that the investors

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 6>are focused on beyond this second quarter. You know, they

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 6>did pull ahead the start of production for a more

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 6>affordable EV from like the second half of next year

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 6>to the first half, which is critical. I think the

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 6>EV market today globally is actually consumers in the EV

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 6>market actually looking for a more affordable EV, something that's

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, less than fifty thousand US dollars. You know,

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 6>most of the EV's offered today are above fifty thousand dollars. So,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, I think the investors are hoping that, you know,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 6>into twenty twenty five and into twenty twenty six, we're

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 6>going to get a rebound in EV sales because there's

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 6>going to be more affordable EV's, budget friendly EV's for

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 6>the mass market.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 2>Steve Tesla right now is an auto company and it's

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>an other company. Elon wants you to focus on the

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>other Can you define what's in that other bucket and

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 2>when investors believe it will be material to their revenution profits?

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, He talks about AI quite a bit,

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, robo taxi, optimist robot. But if you think

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 6>of AI, I think there's you know, potentially even more

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 6>ways to generate revenues from AI. One of the things

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 6>that I think the market is also focused on other

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 6>than robotaxi, taking a passenger from point A to point

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 6>B is for example. You know, these cars have huge

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 6>battery storage capacity, right, and these things, if they can

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 6>move about on its own, you can really help out

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 6>the utilities in terms of, you know, redistributing power across

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 6>the grid.

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Well to that point, I mean, their energy business was

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 3>actually quite impressive. It had its highest installation of batteries

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 3>and revenue ever, and energy accounted for just twelve percent

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>and sixteen percent of Tesla's revenue and gross profit respectively.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, it's going to fluctuate, but that's pretty strong.

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a good, good sign. I think those tend

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 6>to be a little bit lumpy because the orders are big,

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 6>and so whenever they deliver the order and when they

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 6>ever they book it, that tends to be lumpy. I

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 6>think we'll have to see if it's going to be consistent.

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 6>But I think the investors are very focused on business.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 6>Are they going to be on time in rolling out

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 6>the new EV, the affordable EV? And then longer term,

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 6>it's really you know AI. Is he going to deliver

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 6>What is he going to say in October the AI

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 6>event that he's hosting. There were a lot of questions

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 6>about that during the call, but they were pretty tight lip.

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Steve Man. Bloomberg Intelligence, Global, Autos and

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Industrials research channels.

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, We're going to break down how demand for

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 3>cloud computing services and advertising impacted Alphabet's quarterly earnings.

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal.

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Alex Steele, and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo Card playing Enbroud

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Want us live on YouTube.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>We move next to earning. It's from Logistic company UPS.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 2>This week, YOUPS suffered it's worst stock decline it's twenty

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 2>five years after reporting profit than missed Anamal's estimates for

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the quarter.

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 3>The company also trimmed its forecast for the year, and

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 3>this comes as UPS has failed to deliver fast enough

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 3>on a turnaround plan to cut costs and increase volumes.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>For more on this, we were joined by Lee Classical

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics and Shipping Antals.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Lee why it was another tough quarter

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>for UPS.

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a lot of things. You know, they

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 7>are seeing vuyume growth, which is good, but that mix

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 7>of growth is not good. What they're seeing is their

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 7>shippers trading down. So if you were going to maybe

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 7>send something via air, maybe you decide you go on

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 7>the ground, which is you know, cheaper and lower margin.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 7>And then if you're using ground, maybe you're going to

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 7>use one of their products like sure Posts, which is

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 7>like an economy product which is cheaper and again lower

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 7>margin business. So you're also seeing the mix of B

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 7>two C outpacing growth of B to B. B two

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 7>C growth was around four percent and B to B

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 7>growth was down four percent and B to B. So

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 7>think like a lawyer sending documents to another lawyer's office.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 7>That business tends to have better margins because of the

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 7>inherent density that follows that business, and density is really

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 7>good for acid intensive networks like ups is. And then

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 7>you also, you know, have another negative mixed impact you

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 7>had too. You know, they called out on their call

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 7>to large e commerce companies. I'm assuming that you know,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.359
<v Speaker 7>these are companies out of China that are you know,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 7>are kind of using more economy services, so you're seeing

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 7>a surge in that demand from from there as well.

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Is this the trough? Is this sort of the worst

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 3>it's going to get?

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 7>It's a great question. I mean, you know, I think so,

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, I think it feels like it's this is

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 7>the worst. I mean, you know, the company has done

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 7>pretty well in terms of eating expectations or beating expectations.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 7>This is the first miss since I believe the first

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 7>quarter of twenty twenty, so you know, Carol to May

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 7>and her team have been on quite a role. They

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 7>also have some easier comparisons going into the second half.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 7>You know, some of your listeners might have remembered they

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 7>had a new contract that was really you know, heavily

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 7>weighted in the first year that gets anniversaried in August first,

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 7>So therefore, you know, those higher labor costs, the comparables

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 7>will ease significantly, you know, after August first, so that

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 7>should provide a better cost for them in a third

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 7>quarter and going forward. Also, you know peak seasons here, right,

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, a lot of the companies that we cover

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 7>are talking about we you know, most of them are

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 7>expecting a real peak season and we're not talking about,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, the peak seasons that maybe we've seen the

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 7>nineteen nineties or early two thousand, but you're definitely going

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 7>to see seasonal increase in demand. And that peak season

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 7>is one of the shortest on record. You know, it's

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 7>around seventeen days between Thanksgiving and Christmas, and that will

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 7>allow ups to implement surve charges because they're going to

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 7>have to you know, get those resources in a short

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 7>amount of time or a short amount of time to

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 7>make sure that you know, they're able to deliver at

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 7>high service levels. So you should see probably some good

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 7>revenue growth in the fourth quarter from those sur charges.

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 7>So you know, that coupled with a lot of their

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 7>cost cutting measurements, they've they've they've reduced a lot of heads.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think a lot of things are going

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 7>to turn for this company once you're going to see

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 7>you know that B two B volume return and the

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 7>company is doing a lot of things I think to

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 7>position itself longer term, you know, whether that's you know,

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 7>focusing on the healthcare logistics. Healthcare logistics obviously there's a

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 7>lot of value add there and those margins are pretty

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 7>high relative to you know, someone throwing a package on

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 7>your porch, and so you know, they're really looking to

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 7>grow that business and they want to be a leader

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 7>in that business. Uh And and to be frank, it's

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 7>it's it's a fantastic uh business to be in if

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 7>you're a logistics provider. And then you know they're also

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 7>trying to do new things with or more things, I

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 7>should say, with with what we call SMBs, which are

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 7>small and medium sized businesses. You know that tends to

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 7>have better margins than you know, dealing with these super

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 7>large companies like Amazon, which you know the business is good,

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 7>but the margins could be better.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 2>I have actually no loyalty between these two services, I

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 2>mean the FedEx store and the UPS store kind of

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 2>right next to each other in my little strip malls.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 2>So whichever's got the shorter line, that's kind of where

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I go. But from an investment perspective, you know, you

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>got thirty seconds here. What's the difference between these two

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 2>companies From an investor perspective.

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's interesting. So like on FedEx, I think they're

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 7>dealing with more structural issues because that was a company

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 7>that I would say was extremely bloated, you know, over

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 7>the last decade, and they're kind of right sizing there network.

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 7>They're both making changes to their networks to kind of

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 7>meet the new demands, you know, that change of increase

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 7>in the home delivery versus you know, delivering to lawyers

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 7>or doctors' offices or corporations.

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 7>I think the biggest difference is, you know, there might

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 7>be more margin expansion opportunity at FedEx, just because they're

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 7>starting from a lower base than new ps.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 7>But you know, these are two what I would consider

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 7>blue chip companies that are you know, should benefit with

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 7>the economy and they should probably be able to grow

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 7>top line well passed Global GDP just given some of

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 7>the self help things that they have in front of them.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Are thanks to Lee Clasicow, Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior Transport, Logistics

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and Shipping Annals.

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 3>We moved now to big tech and Google parent Alphabet,

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the company reporting second quarter revenue that beat analyst expectations.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet's results for boosted by demand for cloud, computing services

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and advertising on a search engine.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Despite this, investors weren't pleased the capital spending rows more

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 3>than expected to support Google's AI programs and computing power needs.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by man Deep Singh, Bloomberg

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Senior Tech industry analysts.

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 3>We first asked man Deep for his take on Alphabet's

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 3>results this quarter.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 8>Companies are not getting a pass on boosting capex. That

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 8>wasn't the case last quarter. But clearly, I think investors

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 8>vary about how much CAPEX these companies are going to

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 8>throw on AI. And look, in the case of Alphabet,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 8>there is revenue in the cloud segment, so they quantified

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 8>the AI impact on cloud, which was high single digit

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 8>contribution to cloud segment, and cloud segment actually saw on

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 8>acceleration in top line growth. But YouTube miss, I think

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 8>I attribute that more to software spending outside of financial

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 8>services and retail sectors like automotive. They're not spending on

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 8>digital ads right now because the sector is going through

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 8>a cyclical downturn. So there is that cyclical element to

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 8>YouTube's business. But I think there are a lot of positives.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 8>Course search growing at fourteen percent. I mean, think about

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 8>the scale of search and the fact that they are

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 8>able to grow double digits. That's quite impressive, and that

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 8>too at a very healthy margin. I mean, the biggest

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 8>fear for this company was margins are going to get

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 8>degraded because of you know, AI and whatnot. That we

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 8>haven't seen that. So a lot of positives, but clearly

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 8>kapex was an overhang.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, I've been making a point if any team

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 2>deserves benefit of the doubt of higher CAPEX, it's Sundarprinchai

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and all the folks at Google. Stop whining about capex.

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Have they ever not generated to return on their spending?

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the problem with Google's management team is they

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 8>say very little on their earnings call Like even when

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 8>you answer them like ask a question, they would answer

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 8>it with as little words as possible, So you know,

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 8>it sounded like they are bullish on their AI opportunity

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 8>and it's actually monetized Uh, some of that capex is

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 8>going towards Wemo. If you think about you know, robotaxis

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 8>and what Tesla had to go through there called Wemo

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 8>actually did two million rides here to date and these

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 8>are all autonomous rides and they're expanding to other cities.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 8>So think about, you know, the scale in that business

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 8>if they're able to do actually autonomous driving successfully. So

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 8>I do think their capex as well spent, but they

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 8>just don't explain it that well to the street, you know,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 8>to get the credit.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 3>So when it comes to then the AI spend, what

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 3>other companies are going to get judged in the same

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 3>harsh light and what's Google's wan up on them?

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 8>If any Meta I mean you saw a negative reaction

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 8>with Alphabet, I mean think about what happened to be worse.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 8>Meta is going to be worse. Even last quarter when

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 8>they raise their capex, Meta had a negative stock reaction

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 8>simply because investors are concerned about how much this company

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 8>is going to spend on metaverse versus AI. And so

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 8>in the case of Meta, they're losing eighteen billion dollars

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 8>a year on reality labs. They're spending capex in addition

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 8>to the AI Capex, which they launched a new large

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 8>anglid model, And to my mind, any company right now

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 8>with their own large anglid model, whether it's Alphabet, Meta

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 8>or a Microsoft Open AI, they have an advantage. They

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 8>have the best reasoning capability when it comes to the

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 8>AI spend and it's actually a future driver of revenue.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 8>So it all comes down to how they are going

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 8>to monetize it, and I think with Microsoft and Google

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 8>they have an advantage because it shows up in the

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 8>cloud revenue. In the case of Meta, they have to

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 8>monetize the AI spend through ad revenue or a subscription

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 8>based you know, chat pot offering, which nobody knows when

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 8>that will come.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 2>What is Gemini that should I be using it?

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's a better way to search for certain type

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 8>of queries. So whenever you want you know something with

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 8>a detailed answer as opposed to going through ten blue

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 8>links to find that answer, Gemini is great. The one

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 8>good thing about Gemini is when you search for a query,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 8>it's going to show you the relevant YouTube link, whereas

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 8>if you search that on Chatchypt or Claude, it's not

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 8>going to have that YouTube link. So it's going to

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 8>generate the text, it's going to generate a summary, it's

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 8>going to answer your query, but it won't have that

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 8>appropriate YouTube link. And that's Google's biggest advantage with the

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 8>large anglid models.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 2>It's going to have to pay for that.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a twenty dollars subscription for the advanced version.

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 3>But some people will that that's kind of.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 8>And that's where I mean you are, you don't think

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 8>it's a big deal, But I think Google owning maps

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 8>and YouTube is such a big deal in this arena

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 8>of large anglid models, because it's one thing to generate

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 8>a text based response, it's another thing to have a

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 8>blue link with the you know, YouTube video that they

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 8>want you to see or the map link that they

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 8>want you to click on inside that response. And other

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 8>large anguid models can't do it because they don't own

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 8>these assets.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 3>So well, before we go, if these companies, though, don't spend,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>then at some point when all this is monetizable in

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 3>a big, big way, all of a sudden, them's gonna

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>complain that then metas super far behind. So what's the

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 3>chicken in the egg here?

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I still think nobody wants to be the

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 8>first one to pull back on capex. So it really

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 8>is a question of when do we have sufficient supply

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 8>of GPUs. And because the market is supply constrained when

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 8>it comes to the chip side of the equation, nobody

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 8>wants to come across and say, oh, I have enough

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 8>and I don't need to spend on capex anymore. And

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 8>I think right now, these companies generate so much cash

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 8>every year, like Alphabet will generate over one hundred billion

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 8>in free cash flow, so they can afford to spend

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 8>sixty billion in capex. And they're looking to make our

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 8>twenty three billion dollar acquisition that fell through, but clearly

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 8>they want to spend their free cash flow.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Mandeep singeing Bloomberg Intelligence, senior tech industry analysts.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, I'll look at why the

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 3>audio streaming giant Spotify reported record profit last quarter.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing indifferent

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries. We can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Bigo

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal. I'm Paul Sweeney, m.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steele, and this is.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 3>We move next to corporate earnings from Comcast and Spotify.

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 3>This week, Comcast reported second quarter revenue that missed analysts expectations.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>The global media and tech company was dragged down by

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 3>a slower season and its movie studio and theme parks.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, Spotify reported a record profit in

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 2>the second quarter and strong growth in paying subscribers. This

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 2>comes as Spotify has significantly trim costs over the last

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 2>year to boost profitability for more.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 3>We were joined by Githa rong Ganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>on US Media.

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 2>First ask Etha for her takeaways from Spotify's results.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 9>Really, the number here for Spotify and the main story

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 9>has not just been great subscriber growth. So they've been

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 9>adding a solid five six seven million premium subscribers every quarter.

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 9>But for them, what it really has been over the

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 9>past few quarters has been this inflection and profitability. Remember

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 9>what we're now looking for streamers across the board, and

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 9>this goes to Netflix and everybody else in video streaming,

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 9>as well as Spotify, which is, you know, the main

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 9>audio streamer with a thirty five percent market share. The

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 9>narrative has really shifted now to profitability, and they absolutely

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 9>blew it out of the park. So the gross margin

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 9>guidance that they had given was twenty eight percent. They

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 9>came in at twenty nine percent. But even better was

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 9>the outlook. So for the longest time Spotify was stuck

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 9>at like a twenty five percent gross margin. They were

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 9>pointing to like longer term margins of thirty percent. But

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 9>looks like they're going to be able to hit it

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 9>right in the third quarter.

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 3>So did it take anyone else's lunch or this was

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 3>just a really good sort of management cost issue.

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's excellent management. More importantly, it's also price increases.

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 9>They hadn't taken any price increase alex for more than

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 9>ten years, and then in a span of two years,

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 9>they've raised prices by twenty percent. And that's just because

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 9>they know that people love Spotify. Nobody's going to churn

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 9>from Spotify to let's say Apple Music or YouTube Music.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 9>They have a thirty six thirty seven percent share of

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 9>the global audio market, and they're just adding so many

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 9>features and so many new verticals that they're able to

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 9>take those price increases. But of course, apart from that,

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 9>you know, it's also been a very good story when

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 9>it comes to cost cuts. So they were investing heavily

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 9>in their podcasting business, you know, like with the Joe

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 9>Rogan Show and adding all these other exclusive podcasts. They're

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 9>being much more prudent now on that front, and those

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 9>again have really driven profitability.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 2>How much of their revenue is subscription versus advertising versus

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 2>other These days.

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 9>Almost all of their revenue, Paul, is subscriptions, so it's

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 9>a very Yeah, it's a very very heavy subscription based business.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 9>They are trying to build the advertising business, but as

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, again that takes time. You know, that will

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 9>drive the longer term margin story. But as of right now,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 9>the mixshift is really subscriptions.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty impressive. Hey, can I ask you about Comcast

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 3>and what you made of their earnings that came out

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 3>earlier reported second quarter revenue that misdanalyst estimates they had.

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 3>It was the movie season, you got theme parks, the

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 3>whole thing.

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So Comcast is an interesting story. So Comcast is actually,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, your typical media conglomerate. They own both video

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 9>distribution broadband connectivity as well as the media side of

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 9>the business with NBC. Eighty percent of their EBITDA actually

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 9>is related to just broadband subscriptions. And so what happened

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 9>this quarter. We were expecting a little bit of softness

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 9>in broadband and as expected, yes, they did lou subscribers. Remember,

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 9>the whole cable industry is really in a slump because

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 9>of a very very intense competition from some of the

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 9>telecom offerings, both with fiber and fixed wireless access. So

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 9>we're kind of seeing that slump and it looks like

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 9>Comcast is really not going to be able to get

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 9>out of that slump. More interestingly, however, for both Comcasts

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 9>as well as Disney, is that the theme park attendance

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 9>is actually flailing and you know, a twenty four percent

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 9>decline in their theme park ibadah. Yeah, and that's really

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 9>because huge pull forward, or what they're saying was a

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 9>huge pull forward post COVID and now we're kind of

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 9>seeing normalization. So that was a little bit of a disappointment,

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 9>but I think overall the business is fine, but we

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 9>are going to see some extended softness over the next

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 9>few quarters.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 2>And when you look at Comcasts, you know, great collection

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 2>of assets, but they're all facing serious headwinds. What's the

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 2>feeling among analysts and investors you talk to, like, what

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 2>can a Comcast actually do to become, you know, an

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 2>attractive stock.

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 9>So of course, Paul, as you well know, it's always

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 9>kind of been saddled by this conglomerate discount, I mean,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 9>the big question. And we know Brian Roberts has always

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 9>been hungry for some kind of deals, so they're obviously

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 9>a wildcard when it comes to M and A. I

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 9>guess once if the administration changes and if it's more

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 9>favorable for deals, I think Comcast will be a major player.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we don't know whether they'll look to do

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 9>some kind of joint venture with Warner Brothers or Fox.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 9>It remains to be seen, but of course they will

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 9>be a major player in the space. You know, again,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 9>in terms of what would move their stock, maybe they

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 9>spin off their NBC business. I mean, Brian Roberts has

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 9>not indicated any such thing, but I think over the

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 9>near term. What really needs to happen to kind of

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 9>move the sentiment on the stock is they have to

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 9>show positive broadband subscriber growth.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, Thanks to gith Rongganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst on

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 3>US Media.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 2>We move next to earnings from the pharmaceutical company. Asked

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 2>for Zeneca. The company raised its profit and sales forecast

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 2>for the year.

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 3>The results were boosted by demand for blockbuster cancer drugs

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and for more. Joined by AstraZeneca chief financial officer Radna Sarin.

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Your first asker for her take on this week's earnings.

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 5>All the upgrade is being driven by product revenue. This

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 5>quarter was actually a record quarter twelve point nine billion

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 5>in revenue, and it was driven across the board with

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 5>record revenues in all our therapeutic areas. So oncology which

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 5>is about forty one percent of our business five point

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 5>three billion in revenue, growing nineteen percent, cardiovascular medicines growing

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty two percent, Respiratory and immunology growing twenty six percent,

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 5>and a rare disease business which is about a two

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 5>point one billion dollar business growing fourteen percent. And same geographically,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, we're seeing very strong growth in the US

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 5>double digital growth also in emerging markets and in China

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 5>both growing around eighteen percent, Europe twenty four percent. So

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 5>it's really demand for all our innovative medicines across different

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 5>geography and across different therapeutic areas. So we raised our

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 5>guidance for the year both on revenue and EPs to

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 5>now mid teams and it's almost in some ways you

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 5>could consider a double raise because we also said that

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.719
<v Speaker 5>we would meet these guidance without any increase in collaboration

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 5>revenue that we were anticipating.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 8>Earlier in the year.

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 5>So it's really driven by fundamental underlying growth.

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 2>So doctor, I know, I'm just looking at the Bloomberg

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>terminal here. So you have a run right revenue of

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 2>about fifty billion right now. You guys have said that

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 2>you're targeting eighty billion in sales in twenty thirty. What's

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 2>going to bridge the gap? What's going to get you there?

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 2>What should we be keeping an eye on?

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's a lot going on in the pipeline.

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 5>What's the ambition that we set for twenty thirty of

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 5>eighty billion is driven by I would say three different elements.

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 5>The first element is the products that we have today

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 5>and the indications we have today and growth in those,

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 5>and that's sort of what you see in the quarterly performance.

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 5>The second element is the current products that are on

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 5>the market, but what we call life cycle extension, so

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 5>entering into for example, additional indications or expanding indications and

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 5>other tumor types, etc. That's a second element. And then

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 5>the third element is new molecular entities. So these are

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 5>brand new molecules which we've discovered, we're working on that

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 5>are in phase two or phase three clinical studies and

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 5>hope that will be successful in them and will launch

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 5>them by twenty thirty. We have set an ambition of

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 5>achieving this revenue but also launching twenty new molecular entities

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 5>by twenty thirty, having twenty five blockbusters, so that's products

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 5>over a billion dollars in revenues in the year by

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 5>twenty three. And you know what's going to bridge the gap.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 5>If you look at the studies we have ongoing, we

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 5>will have probably about forty studies in the next eighteen months,

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 5>so I end up twenty twenty five that we hope

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 5>to read out and that will give us more confidence

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 5>or the trajectory that we're on on achieving that twenty

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 5>thirty ambition. So you know, this is a it's a

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 5>risk business. Obviously, we take risk every day. We invest

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 5>twenty two percent of our R and D of our

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 5>revenue in R and D, so it's a very R

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 5>and D heavy business. And you know, we hope that

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, our studies are successful to achieve those goals.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Our governments your friend or foe right now in terms

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 3>of the UK being an unfavorable or favorable environment. There's

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 3>also the threats of IRA potentially being rolled back under

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 3>President Trump. How do you guys sort of think about

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 3>government interaction with your company?

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, governments are a very important state colder for us.

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 5>You know, in the US as well as outside the US,

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 5>many systems healthcare systems are single payer systems, so we

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 5>do work very closely with governments.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 5>The most important thing for us is, you know, once

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:17.439
<v Speaker 5>we've spent the money and developed innovative medicines, whether it's

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 5>for cardiovastlar disease or oncology, that patients actually get access

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 5>to those medicines, you know, and we can make an

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 5>impact in their lives, and you know from from diseases

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 5>they're suffering from and in that way, we need to

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 5>be able to demonstrate that these drugs have value and

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 5>are bringing value to the patients and to the healthcare system.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 5>And we work very closely with governments and with systems

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 5>to make sure we get access to those medicines.

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:48.959
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Saron, you know, I always joke on the show

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 2>that when I come back in the next life, I

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.399
<v Speaker 2>want to be a healthcare m and a banker, because

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 2>it seems every Monday we come in and there's another

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 2>deal out there. How do you and your company think

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 2>about M and A to kind of drive top line

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 2>growth versus the R and D that you've already talked about.

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 5>So the ambition that we set for twenty thirty, the

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 5>eighty billion does not include any major M and A.

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 5>You know, we are always looking from a scientific standpoint,

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 5>not only within our own labs and identifying what could

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 5>be the next most promising molecule, but also looking outside

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 5>and science that is happening in universities and biotech companies

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 5>and so forth. Over the last year and a half,

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 5>we've invested close to seven billion in doing licensing transactions

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 5>and partnerships and smaller M and A transactions that help

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 5>to build our pipeline and really fit very well strategically

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 5>with us in terms of the ambition that we have

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 5>and particularly in new therapy areas where you know we've

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:56.280
<v Speaker 5>made some investment, but it can help us leap frog

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 5>into the field, for example in the case of cell

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 5>therapies or in the case of radio pharmaceuticals and accelerate

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 5>the investments that we're already making. So you know, we're

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 5>always looking for those types of partnerships.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 3>So this is a really uncfo question to ask you

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 3>what's the coolest drug that you guys are working on

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 3>right now, the one thing that you're most excited about

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:20.479
<v Speaker 3>and a potential breakthrough there.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if it's an un pool or maybe

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 5>it's unfair. You know, it's hard to pick from brick

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 5>from your children, right so there are just so many

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 5>exciting things happening. You know, every few weeks we get

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 5>some new data that makes us excited. So it's really

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 5>hard to pick a favorite child. But you know, there's

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 5>a there's a lot going on, and and you know,

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 5>we live in very exciting times where not only is

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, what we do in astrosenca is important, and

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 5>but science is evolving so quickly, and technology is evolving quickly,

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 5>and you know we're we're sort of at the forefront

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 5>of that innovation.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to ask Resenika chief financial officer Radna Saran, they see.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify, and

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal