WEBVTT - Roshun Patel on What Really Happened During the Crypto Market Crash

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, do you

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>remember the recent episode that we did with Aaron Lammer

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>about Defy trading in the crypto space? How could I forgot, Joe,

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we are all defy all the time. It feels like, Well,

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I made a joke at the beginning of that episode.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, by the time, like we're covering

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>something that's probably the top and we're you know, there's

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be a crash right afterwards. And then like

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think literally two days or a day after that

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that episode came out, we actually did get one of

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest true crashes in the crypto space in a

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>long time. I mean, it's that classic UM magazine cover indicator,

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Like by the time the mainstream media is

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about something, it's probably reaching its zenith in terms

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>of popularity. That kind of makes sense. I gotta say

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I was really disappointed, I um I missed the crypto crash.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So I took a few days off that week, and uh,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I was out in the country and I wasn't really

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to either the news or social media, trying

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to take a break, and then I started getting all

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>these messages from people going, look at crypto, look at bitcoin.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>It's at thirty dollars. So it seems like it was

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>a very dramatic week. But I'm still trying to wrap

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>my head around exactly what happened. Yeah, it was. It

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>was a really dramatic week. There was already like a

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of like negative stuff. There was the Elon stuff

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and other things going on that we already talked about.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And then that Sunday, our episode with Aaron Lammer came

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>out on a Thursday. That's Sunday, which was just I

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>guess three days ago. So we're recording this Wednesday made

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, so let me I guess that was Sunday,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty three. We got this like really intense crash

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin touch like thirty thousand and ether fill below

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, really big crash, and I think are

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people that were like ready to say, oh,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>this cycle is over, the see you see you all

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>of four years when we do the next one. It's

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>actually like, I mean, it hasn't come back all the

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>way by any stretch, but pretty resilient actually the last

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>few days post that crash. I do think it highlights

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>something pretty important for the crypto market, though, which is

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>this idea that I think there's a tendency to look

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>at it and think that it's just a bunch of

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>people who are buying crypto on their computers, you know,

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>with their own wallets, when in fact, the market has

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>changed enormously and there's a whole ecosystem built around it.

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You have the big exchanges, you have people providing financial

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>services that are tied to bitcoin. You have derivatives contracts

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>in the form of a futures mark it, which seems

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to be playing a huge role. And I don't think

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>people have like appreciated enough the change that has overcome

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto and how it actually impacts the underlying price absolutely. So,

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's this sort of like crypto

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>conversation and then there's the crypto market structure conversation, and

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we're both super interested in that. So today we're gonna

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit bit more about market structure. I'm

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>very excited about our guest. We're gonna be speaking to

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Roshan Patel. He has the VP of Institutional Lending at Genesis,

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>which can be described as basically a crypto prime brokerage.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I think if we want to think about

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the role institutions are playing in the volatility, the role

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds, how they're trading this, what caused the liquidations,

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>where the money is coming in to buy the dip

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great, a great perspective on all this. So Roshan,

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Hey, Joe Um

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy, thank you guys so much for having me.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be here. So why don't you actually

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>just start off before we even get to the crash

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>or get to anything like that, why don't you sort

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of talk to us about where Genesis sits within the

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>crypto ecosystem and sort of what your role is there

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and how you got to occupy that seat to just speak.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, Genesis broadly speaking is kind of a basically

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a cell side dusk in the crypto ecosystem, similar to

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bank prime brokerage desk. We facilitate the

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ability for clients of ours to trade as well as

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>lend to us, borrow from US, um get yield on

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>their holdings. And then recently, as of last year, trade

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>derivatives with us BI lad early over the counter, so

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>we kind of offer the whole janet of financial services

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in cryptome markets. Genesis has its roots kind of they

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>go back to really that kind of mid two thousands

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to a company called Second Market. Without getting too much

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>into the details there, that company basically facilitated buying and

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>selling I liquid company stock really like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn,

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like those kind of things in the mid two thousands

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>between buyers and sellers when those companies weren't really public. Eventually,

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I was sold to NAZAC and one of the dusts

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>there started trading bitcoin in like two thousand eleven, two

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, and effectively that desk became Genesis and kept

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the broker dealer license, still based out in New York here,

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and we've kind of grown a lot since then. What

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>started as just a spot OTC trading desk added lending

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen, which is kind of when I joined,

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and derivatives in twenty so like we've you know, added

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>at a SLEW services and and Genesis now you know,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>facilitates billions of dollars of trades every you know, it

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>used to be every month, now it's like every week,

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of crazy to think. You know, we

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty large lending book. When I joined in,

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had a hundred million dollars in active

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>loans outstanding. Now that's kind of grown to nine billion

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars in active owns outstanding as of now. I think

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>prices are rallied a little bit, so maybe it's a

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. That mention of second market is kind

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of a from the past, and I haven't heard anyone

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it for a long time. But what was what

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was the sort of like overlap between dealing with UM

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>shares in the private market and crypto, Like is there

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a resemblance between the two asset classes or why did

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>UM this service that you just describe spring out of

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the private market area second market? What was interesting about

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that is is connecting to sort of different markets, which

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>was like you had early investors in tech companies as

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>well as employees that wanted to get some liquidity on

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>their holdings or shares or options. And then you also

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and and those guys tended to be on the sort

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of West coast, and then you also had like more

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>investor focused hedge fun types on the East coast. New

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>York base that wanted to kind of get it on

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that and you know, weren't necessarily physically or you know,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>financially close to Silicon Valley. That kind of uh, you know,

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>marrying of two differ markets. I think it's it's sort

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of ties into kind of bitcoin and crypto trading generally,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>just because you know that the people on the West

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>coast there that were early on tech tended to be

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the ones that were also early in the crypto space.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And it led Genesis and ultimately our parent company, Digital

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Currency Group, to establish a lot of these good relationships

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with early holders which are now you know, kind of

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>larger clients, no showing, so that we have like a

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>good asset base and a good client base and as

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>well as investor based to kind of lead on to

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to help build our business into into the future. Let's

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about that what that base looks like. And one

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really exhortinary, I mean, the sort of like

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the flora and fauna of crypto holders really diversified a lot.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, maybe before it's hobbyists on their phones

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>or like weirdos, and now you have pension funds and

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>your clients, like how many of them are sort of

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like funds that have some allocation to crypto sub strategic

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>allocation or how many of them are sort of like

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>very crypto focused. That's really the sort of like their

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>main energy. Yes, you know, that's really evolved. I would

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.559
<v Speaker 1>say over time, if you ask me, it was pretty

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>much the vast majority of our clients were extremely crypto focused,

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a crypto native, and to to this day, I would

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>say like a good portion of them still are as

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of late. It's it's evolved a bit where we do

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have more clients that are not necessarily crypto is their

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>main thing, but it's sort of an adject thing that

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they've added recently. I would say, are our cliente based

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>now is probably like if I had to put like

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>percentages on it, like seventy crypto focus, let's say, and

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest like more diverse and has uh as like

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a primary businesses outside of crypto. These funds, and I

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>guess maybe sort of the crypto focused ones and the

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>non crypto focused ones, but I guess the non crypto

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>focused ones, how many of them come into it because

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they say, Okay, we want to have some allocation to

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>this space because it seems to be diversified or it's

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>going up a lot. We want to have some exposure.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And how many you see come into the space because

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they see a nascent, inefficient market with lots of trading

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and lots of essentially arabs so to speak, to

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>exploit because the space is still, broadly speaking, pretty immature.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Both are both are pretty relevant in terms of the

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>inflow that we see. Just kind of given the services

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that we provide, our clients are more focused on the

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>trading ur and extracting yields and you know, sort of

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>value out of the market side of things. So I

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>would say it's a little bit skewed towards that side.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So since you're talking about the services you provide, when

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I hear prime brokerage, I usually think about investment banks

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>UM servicing hedge fund clients specifically by providing money, so

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, lending the money to trade. Is that something

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that you do as well? Yeah, definitely. So you know,

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we started our core business really by lending out crypto,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>particular bitcoin for cash collateral in terms of the lending

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.599
<v Speaker 1>side of things, and that trade was you know more

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or that real service was more you know, suited towards

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>crypto trading firms that had a reason for borrowing bitcoin

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Now, um, you know kind of

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in I would say, like around November of eighteen, stable

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>coins started becoming a much more popular and real thing,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, since we were more crypto native and focus,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we were thinking, like, you know, why don't we consider

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>lending out stable coins against bitcoin as collateral kind of

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>doing the inverse of what we were doing prior, And

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that business has ballooned quite a bit where now about

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's about of our active loan book is

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually stable coins right now, So you know, it's

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or cash equivalents like like tether dollar circle dollar packs

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>as those kinds of things, as well as USD So

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we do land cash against crypto and and

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the firms that do borrow that cash,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, are probably clients of prime workers at banks

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I want to get into, you know,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the recent volatility, but I actually think this is pretty

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>important to just draw this point out a little bit

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>more lending stable coins. I mean, you know, we had

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>um Sam Bankman freed on several weeks ago. He's the

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>founder of f t X and Alimator, research is huge

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in the space. And you know, we talked about various

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage opportunities. How much is the sort of stable coin

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>world essentially about the ability to move money quickly across

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>different exchanges in a short period of time to either

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>take a take advantage of price differences in spot or

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>futures markets and essentially attempt to close various arbitrages. Like

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>how closely those two concepts are related. I think, probably speaking,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this distable coin market, a huge aspect of it is

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of efficient settlement and timing on moving assets from

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>point A to point B, whether that's for exchanges or

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>even just more like settling OTC trades and dealing with dusks.

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's all relevant. You know. A good

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>example to point to is really the most innovative and

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>forward thinking banks I think out there are you know,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of building these seven settlement networks UM, some are

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which are really mirrored on kind of Ethereum itself and

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and kind of like private Ethereum networks. So yeah, table

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>coins are really just just frankly just easier to use

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>than wire is simply put right, So you've laid out

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what you do UM really well and it feels like

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you're in the perfect position maybe to describe um what

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly happened during the big crypto sell off. So there

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of talk about positions being liquidated. I

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think I saw one number that was like outstanding futures

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>contracts fell from I think it was as much as

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight billion in April to something like billion in

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a matter of days. And then there were all the

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>disruptions at the individual exchanges like coin base and cracking

0:12:55.760 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. So from your perspective, what actually

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>happened and what did you observe into the crypto market.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, over the years, you've seen some some pretty

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>wicked crashes to the downside, similar to last week, although

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I will say last week was probably the most brutal

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen in the last five years, but even

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>even crazier than March. I would say for a couple

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. But you could point to like a specific

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>headline or a specific narrative or specific theme that that

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>could be the cause of it. But it's really hard

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to say if that was the ultimate reason why, you know,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the market sold off. At the end of the day,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the crypto market is really just a spot order book

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and a derivatives order book. The derivatives order book is

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>is very levered, and you know, there's a lot of

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>people that take take positions down on futures and swaps

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>that that want to get upside but have like tight

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>liquidation levels to the downside. And you know, that market

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>has liquidity until it doesn't, and then you know it

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>could get a little hairy on the downside. And then

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the spot market is the same thing. And the spot

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>market is consisted of people that are buying and trading

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the underlying and I think really just what happened last

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>week was similar to what you've seen before, where the

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the futures market and the swaps market was

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was pretty leveled up. People were very very long, especially

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in the alt coins, thinking that, like, look, bitcoin has

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of found a floor here. The next sort of

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>thematic narrative shift that we'll see is a rotation into alts,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and as long as Bitcoin doesn't fall through the floor,

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the alts will kind of rallies. So a lot of

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the positioning was skewed down the risk curve and in

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>more volatile assets, and pretty much the exact opposite happened,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>which was spot Bitcoin started selling off in a significant way,

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and when that happens, there's such a scramble for collateral

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in the market, as well as like kind of getting

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>assets back to things that you know aren't really going

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to fall like seventy or eight percent, but you know

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>things that are going to fall maybe like twenty or

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent, like bitcoin. So there's a rotation back into bitcoin,

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know when that happens that the liquidations can

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>get can get pretty wild on alts, and they kind

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of cascade. And the difference I think with what happened

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>last week was usually when that happens once and gets

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to a certain point, it kind of bottoms out in floors.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>What was different last week it kind of just felt

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like it kept going and the pressure for the spots

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>selling just sort of continued. You know that that that's

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what made it particularly worse, I would say, relative to

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>let's say in March of last year, which was kind

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of a one day thing and then kind of we

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>rallied and there was also some solace in knowing that

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>other markets were behaving the same way. The fact that

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this was you know, sort of idios and neocratic to

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto makes it even a little bit more painful, but

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of the day, I think

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>what the takeaway is from it is more impactful than

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>like the than the actual sell off itself, which is

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>look like, you know, there was no lender of last

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>resort that had to step in. We sawraw down. There's

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>no you know, injection of capital into the market, no

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>firms defaulted, you know genesis. It's you know, on our side,

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>we manage our risk really well. All of our clients

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, topped up or return loans or you know,

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have any liquidations or defaults, and and the

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>more it kind of just carries on and now you

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>know that people left or another layer of survivors onto

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the next uh you know sort of market cycle. So

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it happens from time to time. It's hard to point

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to exactly what it is, but overall market moves on

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're in a healthier spot. Now, let's say, so

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the fact that we didn't get big defaults

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>or failures in the market. Can I ask, like, how

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>close do you think some market participants actually came to

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>failure in that week? Because I saw some pretty crazy

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>rumors flying around and I don't want to name specific

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>names for obvious reasons, but it does feel like some

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>people thought certain entities got pretty close to the brink.

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm I'm asking like, how crazy did it

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>get that week? Yeah, it's it's an interesting question because

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it really depends on the entity and the sort of firm,

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the type of firm you're talking about, if you're talking

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about trading firms and art shops like, you know, kind

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of our core client based. It was probably one of

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>their better weeks on their direction neutral books of all time,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>primarily because their long spot short futures or short swaps,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and when a move like that happens, those spreads really collapse,

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and not only do they come back to parity, they

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes go the other way, so like they go into

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>negative territories, so you get even more juice out of

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the trade. So a lot of our clients actually, you know,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>did really well that week kind of being positioned appropriately

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>for that trade and for that move. You know, if

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you're like a crypto hedge fund that's like aggregating you know,

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>assets and kind of just sitting net long, it was

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>probably not so fun for you. But you're not you know,

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>as long as you're not levered on top of your

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>SPOT holdings, it's not really that bad for you. The

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>only the only way really I would say firms are

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in a in a tough spot is if they're holding

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>just spot, they have no cash and then on top

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of that they've taken leverage out against that. You know,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in this market, I think the participants that do that

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of style of trading are it's just almost like

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>a ticking time bomb, right. It's like they're not going

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to a round for that long because you don't really

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>need that much leverage to capture this market. And even

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Spot itself is volatile enough where where you know you

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>you don't really need to like go crazy with futures

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>or swaps. So I think people like to speculate and

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>say like, oh, you know, this market sold off like

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>all you know, there's X, Y and Z might have

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>been in a tough spot. But when you really dig

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>into it, it's like, you know, exchanges or fine, you know,

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they're just facilitating trades. Trading firms had a great week

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>even if they're long on their core spot or down

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on their core long positions and um, yeah, you know,

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>service providers like Genesis, as long as you know, we're

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>managing our risk and knowing our clients positions and knowing

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>what our clients are are up to in their risk.

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Well we're doing fine as well. So overall I think

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, the price is probably the scariest part.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>The actual underlying behind it is, it's not so bad.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit more. There's been some

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>research done. Josh Younger at JP Morgan put out a

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>note about different times when the crypto market seems vulnerable,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and you noted that US hours seem to be a

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit more volatile lately than Asian and europe hours.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>And there's been a number of people who have observed

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that weekends tend to be more volatile, maybe there's less

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>liquidity than the weeks. And in fact I saw some

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>people talking about that on Thursday and Friday before all this,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>like this could be an interesting weekend, and then of

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>course it turned out to be. Can you talk a

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about the texture of markets in different

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>times and the way, say, traditional finance wires and institutions

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>taking a break for the weekend has an effect on crypto,

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>which obviously trades seven. Yeah, there is definitely a case

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the market depending on the hours, depending on the

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>day of the week. I think there's a couple of

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons for that. One is like there's like a sort

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of Western market and in an Asian market, um they

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>have different Sometimes they're very in line and doing the

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Other times they have different risk taking proclivities

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and preferences, and you know, they could sometimes be um

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>fighting each other in a sense. So like you know,

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you can see different price action in the Asia session

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>versus the U S session just because the user base

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is positioned differently and then moving in a different sense,

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>like you know, last summer, for example, in May, or

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>really after the March crash, a lot of the minors

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the sort of very long Asian

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>firms had a little bit of concern after the way

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>March moved that they were more inclined to hedge, So

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the cell pressure came out of Asia,

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>whereas the U S side of things had more of

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a bid, especially in the spot market. So those kind

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of flows were competing against each other a bit, you know,

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>regarding weekends and volatility on the weekends, I think a

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>huge part of that is really the market is still

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>very human driven it's not like everything is extremely algorithmic

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and high frequency trading and super qui pentative at the

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, that this is more of a

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>speculative marketplace where there's you know, there's leverage, of course,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>but also a lot of humans just kind of clicking

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>buying and selling and on the weekend of course, like yeah,

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, no wires is definitely a part of it,

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but also like the larger liquidity providers might just be

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more wide on the screens, so you know,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll kind of have like a easy way to like

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 1>like there's just like a high chance that like a

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>small amount of capital could could wipe through a lot

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of levels of the book, so you kind of get

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>those sort of drawn out moves. So I think it's

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>really just the human element of it and the fact

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that Asia and the West are sort of two different

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>markets and have their own little tendencies. So you mentioned

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic trading, just then why isn't there more algorithmic trading

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in crypto Because when you look at the space, you

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of fragmentation, a lot of inefficiencies um

0:21:55.520 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and pricing discrepancies like could in theory um that someone

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of profits. Why hasn't that happened more?

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong here, Like I think there's there's

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely a lot of algo trade and going out a crypto,

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>especially on the art of it at exchange side. Um

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>really since since when when March or kind of January

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to February where those spreads were really wild, the very

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 1>smart art trading firms out there definitely started looking at

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the space or and got involved in a big way.

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I just think the way the market is structured leads

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to like some ways that you know, it's it's more

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>difficult to be an art shop in crypto. You have

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to manage a lot more nuanced than say like uh

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>an exchange or et F art shop. One example is

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>really just the blockchain itself. You know, there's a men pool,

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>there's different chains. You know, it could be clogged with transactions.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Things could be slower on chain, so it's like physically

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to get assets from point A to point B.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Even service providers like Genesis, you know, we we settle

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>trades as fast as we possibly can, but when you

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>know the network is clogged, there's really not much that

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we can do other than kind of put put in

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>high our fees and wait for transactions to go through.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So all those sorts of elements make make our nuances

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>more prevalent, so you know, you do see a little

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>bit of widening there. And then there's also like limits

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>on how much you can withdraw from certain places and

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>liquidity constraints in terms of how much size can be

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>actually thrown at this, where like people that have really

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>big balance sheets and really big our trading capabilities might

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not be looking at a specific small art because it's

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>not worth their time just notionally what they can make.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, for all those reasons, I think you

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna see these spreads sort of persists for

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a while and and it's a good opportunity I would

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>say for like more like nimble, smaller size firms to

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to to really take advantage of. So just out of curiosity,

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>what we're settlement times actually like um, the week of

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the big sell off, um, you know, settlement times specifically

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for Genesis. I mean, we we were pretty good about them,

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we got through all of them totally fine.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>I think on the exchange there are some delays here

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and they're like kind of t plus one, which is

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>really just an eternity in crypto, which you know normally

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in traditional finance, it's like T plus three and it's

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like wow, arrives on time. And I think you know,

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a little bit of clogging of the ethereum

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>mem pool where gas fees went super high, and oh,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to mention this earlier. You know that that

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>causes it so that it's basically really hard to move

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>assets on ethereum. And there is a lot of collateralized

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>lending going on on Etherium, like you know, people are

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>posting the RC twenty tokens or eth as collateral to

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>borrow like stable coins from protocols. When a sell off

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like that happens in spot moves so significantly, all those

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of on chain deposits are very difficult to top up,

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>both from a collateral perspective or returning the loan perspective.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So you get this cascade of on chain liquidations where

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the prices of things on decentralized exchanges might be vastly

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>different than the price on centralized exchanges. And it's really

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just a product of difficulty actually, you know, coming in

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to support the bid and then and then it all

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sorts of normalizes and then and then it kind of

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>builds back from there. But yeah, that that the pace

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of that is difficult, right, and I want to go

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>back to the crash, But just from a sort of

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>market structure standpoint, speaking of the d the defy exchanges,

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>they don't go down, but the fees absolutely sore. The

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>gas fees, the sort of the the block space that's

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>required to execute your trades, everyone rushing through the door,

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it all, it all holds up structurally, but you could

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it's I guess it's easy to imagine and I'm thinking

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>about algorithmic trading, how in periods of high vall are

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities just completely disappear when the sort of I guess

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you could say the de facto commission of the trade

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely sours. Yeah, I mean it depends on the size

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the art. But in a sense like sort of

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>because like people can still pay really high gas fees

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and jam themselves into the into the pool and get

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>top priority from miners. It's just a matter of like

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>what if the opportunity you're looking at is worth that,

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Like a lot of like the smaller things aren't really

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>worth that, so they just kind of hang for a bit,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so just to go back to uh Sunday for a

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>second or that that crash And by the time people

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 1>listen to this, I think it'll be two Sundays from now,

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>but everyone should know we're talking about going back to

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that crash. Who bought the dip and you? Was it institutions?

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Was it funds? Was it retail? I actually had someone

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>talked to me like, I bought my first crypto today

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>after the big crash. I know there was at least

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I know there was at least one retail buyer, probably

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.239
<v Speaker 1>many more. But I'm curious, like what your senses in

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>terms of like what what put the floor under the

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>market and sort of what contributed to what's actually been

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a very strong bounce back as of right now. Yeah,

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so funny. I mean, I was working on

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Sunday and kind of on shot with the desk, and

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the amount of times I said, like, who is selling?

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Was that it was kind of crazy because the only

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>thing we're seeing on dips like that are our net buyers.

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>And granted, our our flow is very skewed and biased

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>towards the buy side because it kind of the new

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Sure the clients were dealing with, but we were seeing

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>institutions come in buying the dip, like you know, large

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, trading firms, as well as ultra high networth individuals.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Like really every single piece of flow that we saw

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in like the sub two k eight range and sub

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty five k bitcoin range was just net buyers. So

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>like we were supporting the bid in many ways there,

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and the question was really like, why the heck is

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you know kind of selling off so hard? So you know,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we we've just seen a lot of net buyers there. Well,

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>what's the answer to that question? Like when you were

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>asking that, why, so what is the answer? Because I

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like we haven't really correct It's like who where

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>did the selling pressure come from? And who wasn't Yeah,

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's like the billion dollar age old question, right,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>It's like I think it's just at the end of

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the day, you kind of just have to look at

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the activity on exchanges and the sort of the trading

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that that occurred. And there was large spots selling on

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>certain exchanges. So someone out there with a lot of inventory,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>um basically, and maybe it's not someone. I don't think

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely one person or anything. Like that. It's just

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like there was just a lot of exiting from the

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>market in spots. So you know, we don't know who

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>who that was because it's not really the flow that

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>we see, but it definitely existed. So you mentioned UM

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>leverage right at the very start of this conversation and

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>UM more recently, you you mentioned this idea of people

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>borrowing in ethere um too and using that to borrow

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>UM stable coins and then do something else with them.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is something that has come up again

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and again in all our podcasts on Defy, and I

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>know Joe has been asking this question of like where

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.719
<v Speaker 1>is the yield actually coming from? And why is it

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all crypto doing stuff with crypto? I guess it just

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>feels very circular or sort of like crypto all the

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>way down, Like somehow crypto is generating money from other crypto,

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but like what is the underlying mechanations of like how

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that yield is generated. Yeah, now I've been watching I've

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>been listening to kind of the recent podcast and it's

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a question that comes up so off

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Aaron one was great, by the way, you know,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two there's two sort of aspects of

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that yield that comes from the table point. One is

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the more the one that makes more sense, and the

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>one that's easier to understand. It's really just the basis trade,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>which is of course retail and leverage traders want to

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>be long. They bid up the market in futures. There

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was a good tweet actually by Sam Bank and Free

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>who was on this podcast, that kind of described why

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that exists, and in a nutshell, it's basically like, if

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the crypto market is worth you know, one or two

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars, and the sort of traders in the market

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be worth four trillion dollars, but only five

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars is being lent to the market as spot

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of cash leverage to use. The remaining difference is

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of bid up in interest rates, and that causes

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>derivatives and futures, you know, to kind of go bid

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>relative to spot, and then that's reflected in interest rates,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and then of course you get good yields on cash

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for coming into the other out of that trade and

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to help close it, which you know, it's not

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>completely free money in any sense, but it's it's very

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>simple to understand why you could earn yield on your

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>castion that way, and it makes sense like from an

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>end to end non circular crypto perspective. The crypto circular

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>perspective is, I think where you're gonna get as more

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:23.239
<v Speaker 1>on the yield farming side of things, which you know

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that that aspect of the market is game theory psychology

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of kind of getting in getting out yields

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like kind of delta risk and an impermanent loss and

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about all the ways that you know you can

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>actually extract the yield but also walk away in notional

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar terms in a decent sense without having to take

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of large bosses there. I would say the

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>main reason why those yields exist is really protocols are

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>formed which have an native token. That token contributes to

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>governance or has some sort of value tied to the protocol,

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>either through like a burn mechanism or some sort of

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>fee generation mechanism. Basically it's somewhat valuable if the protocol

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is valuable, and then to incentivize people to use the protocol,

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>especially at the start of the protocol's launch, the protocol

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>will emit sort of that token. Two people that contribute

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to providing liquidity on on the protocol, and that causes

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you to have good yield opportunities in crypto. But you know,

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what I just said there was like

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the start and at the beginning, and

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that eventually dies down, so like it's not

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>really something for like the passive yield yield seeking investor

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of just be like, oh, I'll just park

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this here for a bit, And you can do that

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in many ways on chain, but the sort of the

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>crazy yields that you're talking about, you know, you wouldn't

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't quite see if you were just so passive.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It takes a little bit of understanding as well as

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like nimbleness and willingness to be able to move around.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And also like the fact that Ethereum has like two

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty large side chains now. One is called Matic it

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:01.719
<v Speaker 1>rebranded to Polygon, and the other is Antum, where you know,

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>though you're basically if you're willing to go change up

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the change you're looking at, you know, you can be

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>compensated in a way because a lot of people aren't

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>just going to go do that, so like less people

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are looking at it. And then you get into other

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of layer ones like Salana and things like that,

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know you're compensated effectively for dealing with crypto,

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but then also going further down the rabbit hole and

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>into into areas where you know a lot of people

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>might not be looking. So yeah, you know, the first

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>time Roe, you and I connected, we were talking about

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the basis trade and I want to get to that

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, but before we do, just you know,

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the theories going into the crash, and you know,

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you were sort of racically questions like who is selling,

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>who is selling, and there's some One of the headlines

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that initially hit the market was China climbing down on

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>mining activity. And I know there's so many rumors in

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this area and it's always contradictory headlines and very opaque.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But minors have Fiat obligations. Their liabilities are in FIAT,

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>either in the form of electricity or acquiring new hardware

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in the form of chips. How much could that have contributed?

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I saw a bunch again on Twitter and things

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that are translated out of Chinese like multiple times and reinterpreted.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But this sort of like miners having to pick up

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>their stakes, so to speak, pay off their bills, liquidate

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>any holdings of coins that they had generated before winding down.

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>How much plausibly could that have been a catalyst. And

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious, like sort of more broadly, I know,

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like Genesis, I think you have a mining cousin or

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sister company out there, Genesis Mining. Correct me if I'm wrong,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But how much does that play into you know, sort

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of like that fit into the ecosystem. Yeah, so our

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>our sister company is actually a DCG foundry, which is

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>uh it is effectively a mining and staking company that's

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it also has like a core mission to help bring

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>pass rate to North America and also do it in

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a more conscious renewable way. But you know, the mining thing,

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked to to Mike Colier. They're a bunch

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>who's kind of runs that business and it's very very

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in tune with with the mining ecosystem. And you know,

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we have fins that are that are miners as as well.

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's less likely that the whole cash

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>obligation uh woe was like it was a reason for

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this most recent sell off, mostly because the break evens

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for miners in terms of like the prices they need

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>these assets to be apt to sustain their electricity costs

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and operational costs are significantly lower than where spot was.

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>It was more of the relevant concern, I would say

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in like the March of crash where we saw a

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>move past like four k and kind of into the

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>five K range on bitcoin, because at those levels you're

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>getting really close to this sort of cost of mining,

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and and like you know, it gets a little harrier

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>down there in terms of miners staying profitable if prices

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>were to sustain in the lows they're here at like

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, over third k, miners are doing fine in

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>terms of operational expenses relatives revenue. So I don't think

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>like a sudden urge for like you know, oh, you know,

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to pay our bills, you know, cause the

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>sell off. Just on a related note, I mean, even

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>before the massive sell off that we saw in May,

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>there was a sharp dip in bitcoin. I think it

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>was a few weeks before where some people were blaming

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it on a power outage in Shenjong where there are

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a bunch of miners. Can you maybe

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just talk more generally about how the miners and changes

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 1>in hash rates and things like that actually feed into

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>pricing and the market, because it seems like when like

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>every time Bitcoin does something that people can't quite explain,

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the miners often come up. And it's unclear to me

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>whether that's just a convenient thing for people to point

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to or whether it's something that actually matters for the market. Yeah,

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you actually that they're and you know,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll speak broadly on this because I'm by no means

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a mining expert or anything like that, but I think

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>from a psychological perspective and a trading perspective and markets perspective,

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and our markets sell off drastically and suddenly all of

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, there's like a there's a feeling that like

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>who is responsible for this? Like where do I point

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the finger? Like someone has to there's something that you know,

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>can can bear the blame here. I think miners just

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of given there maybe like elusive nature and activity

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>are easy to point to, but in reality, like it's

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not really you know, it's not really the cause of

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like the electricity concerns and the capex

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>concerns or the or the or the outages and shen

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and like, you know, those things relative to the actual

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>blows in the market, I think are are pretty small

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and and don't don't matter as much. But people like to,

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, paint narratives and and find a way to

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>like be like why is this happening? So that I

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>think you kind of nailed it with like why people

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>do it? It's just because people want a reason, and

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>miners are conveniently, you know, not that public about what

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they do, so it's easy to kind of say, like, oh,

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it must be the minor. Alright, one last miners question,

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But this is something I've wondered about, and I'm kind

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of guessing the answer is no, because there is, as

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you say, this huge gap currently between spot and UM

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>cost for most of them. Do minors currently participate in

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the futures market and use them as hedging instruments at all?

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Kind of the same way oil companies locked in prices?

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And if not, do you see a future in which

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the futures market serves a commercial purpose for miners? If

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that spread word to compress and it became and the

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they had a need to hedge volatility, So they definitely

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>do they definitely do they used UM, They use futures

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the use options, I think really after March of last year,

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>with with that sell off, I think a lot of

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>them are even more inclined to do so, which is

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of why you saw us rally from the lows

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of like let's say four four K on bitcoin to

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>ten k in June on pretty much a pancake forward curve,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the June futures were barely above or the September

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>futures were barely above Spot throughout that whole move up,

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>which is historically very different from than what you've seen

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto market, where like if the market swings

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>bullish and like two X is, you know, usually you

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>see a bit up in premiums. But the futures were

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>really tight relative to Spot. So the prevailing theory is

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>there is that, like, you know, there must have been

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a tight offer on futures. Who is selling those futures?

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think a lot of that people that

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have you know, sort of forward receivables in crypto and

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to hedge that, and and so

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's why you saw a little bit of

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>pressure there. So there's definitely a sophisticated, you know, participant

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in derivatives by miners. So I want to get to

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this um several weeks ago Row, and

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think this trade is still out there,

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and you sort of hinted at it. But there is

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like I called it in a newsletter,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like free money bitcoin trade. And you know,

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>nothing is free money, there's nothing guaranteed, but there is

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this big arbitrage opportunity that exists that more and more

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about, which is that there is a

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>huge gap, at least there was between bitcoin spot on

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the various exchanges and the various flavors of futures, whether

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about CMME futures or some of them more

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>exotic futures on the exchanges like f t X and

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:18.240
<v Speaker 1>cracking and so forth. And a lot of people seem

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to be interested in this opportunity to centrally by bitcoin

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>now short the futures because they're trading so much higher,

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and then over time and theory they converge and you

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>get free money. And these sort of basis trades are

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>like common in commodities, but they tend to be like

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>way narrower and rarer than they are, and usually there's

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a cost of carrying. So can you quickly sort of

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>like describe this opportunity and the degree to which sort

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.879
<v Speaker 1>of like non crypto interested money is sensing this opportunity

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and interested in exploiting it. Yes, I mean on the

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>interest side, there's definitely a lot of more eyes on

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it right now than I would say there ever had been. Um,

0:39:58.040 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a lot more popular, it's talked

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>abou a lot more. You know, in a nutshell, I

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>think you know, you described it pretty well. But you know,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 1>derivatives traded a premium to spot primarily because people want

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>leverage and people bid up those interest rates similar to

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:12.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of I was talking about what the market cap

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>should be worth in the eyes of traders relative to

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>what it is versus the amount of cash that's been

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>that's being lent to those traders. So you know, all

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>those parameters slide around, and I think you know, in

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in February and May and March and April, you had

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a pretty wide gap between where the market cap was

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>trading and versus where people thought it was going to go.

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But that is a you know, that is an emotional difference,

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, and and it and it ebbs and flows

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>over time. So if that gap narrows, which it actually

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 1>has right now as we're talking right now on this date,

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the futures are much more in line with

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Spot because after the whole sell off, all of a sudden,

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>people think that the market is not going to go

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>up as much and they don't really have a desire

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to own the curve as much. So to the spreads

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of yields have compressed there in terms

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of the difference between the two. But the underlying market

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>is so volatile in crypto like the spot market, where

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the interest rate market, which is basically

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the basis market, is equally as volatile. So these these

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>annualized rates swing all over the place like they were

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much negative the whole way through really since nineteen

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty they've been positive, and then you have these like

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>really really wild moves where the rates are super positive

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're so bit up, and then they kind of

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>usually come down. And I would say it's actually a

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, it's a it's a leading indicator as

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to where kind of spot could move next, because and

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 1>traders talk about this all the time. It's like, as

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.280
<v Speaker 1>these rates kind of get bit up and these curves

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>are very blown out. You know, it could indicate that, like,

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>look like there's there's some sort of wash up coming

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>up next, because you know, things are just a little

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>out of control right now and it's way too profitable

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to just buy spots sell future, where like I kind

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of just have to do it, and you know, the

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>unwinding of that trade, you know, kind of going back

0:41:57.800 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to talking about, oh, why is the sell off happening?

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to mention this then, but I'll mention it

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>now because it came up when you unwind this trade

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that the action you have to perform in the market

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is buying future and but more importantly selling spot at

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So when markets sell off, the basis

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>traders that are involved in the market are going to

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have to sell spot and buy future, adding to the

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>spot pressure that you see on the order book. So

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that is definitely a huge portion of the of the

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>offer you see right after a liquidation sell off. So

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say those are kind of the

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>things to consider there. But also the margin on the

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>futures leg is a concern generally for all traders and

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why potentially these markets blow out

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so wide because you don't really want to be in

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a position where you buy spots sell future, but then

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the underlying ten xes or five x is from there.

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's a it's a very tough position

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to be. And like last summer, for example, if you'ring

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was probably trading around, and the September and December futures

0:42:57.360 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>were trading, and even the March futures were trading at

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good annual eyes basis yield where you would

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be very comfortable to buy spot self future, but then

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ethereum teleports all of a sudden, you're scrambling for margin

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>on your future's leg and you know, it gets a

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>little harrier. So it's not it's not totally cut and

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>dry and and as riskless as as it might seem

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on the surface. This is gonna be a weird question,

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but how much does cryptos allure sort of depend on

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>these inefficiencies and having a fragmented market, because it does

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like a lot of people are clearly in the space.

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they might talk about blockchain technology and changing

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, but there is a big chunk of people

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>who just want to make money. Bitcoin is really volatile.

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It's fun to trade. Stuff is happening every day, but

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like as the market matures, the potential

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for those sort of big discrepancies in things like spot

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>versus futures, like maybe that starts to go away a

0:43:56.600 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit and that attracts and starts to wait. I

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's I'm having a hard time putting

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this intowards but hopefully you understand what I mean. Yeah,

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I think I get what you're saying, which is like

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people will be a lot of market

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>participants are here for the the inefficiencies of the market,

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and once the market becomes super efficient, it's like, Okay,

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>onto the next thing. What's next? Right, It kind of

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>gets to the the yield farming idea that you mentioned earlier, right,

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Like a lot of it depends on the new the

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>new coins, and that's where the opportunities are. But sorry,

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, no, I agree with you. I mean, like

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>broadly speaking, like, yes, the market is going to get

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:37.400
<v Speaker 1>more efficient over time, and the amount of very blown

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>out or you know, high yield arbitrage opportunities and similar

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of are are smaller. At the same time, though,

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think the tailwind of the fact that like

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>a new asset class is born here, which is like

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare for anyone to see in their lifetimes. Like

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't really get like a new asset class, right,

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like, okay, you know, you have assets and

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they kind of exist like stocks, realistic a gold, but like,

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, now there's a new asset class. It's called crypto,

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>whether people like it or not, Like it's here to

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>stay that it's like Pandora's boxes open, like you know,

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't just put this back and like end it.

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be around in some form of the other.

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>And and given the difference between the crypto market and

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the traditional market, which I think the key difference really

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is access, Like there's really low barriers to entry for

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 1>someone and and individuals to kind of come in and

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>trade and and you know, do leverage or whatever they

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>want to do. Where um, it's going to be much

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 1>more tied into like the nature of like the way

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>humans are are trading, and the emotional aspect of and

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 1>then the psychological aspect of markets more so than like

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say the stock market and the you know, the

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>commodities markets, out there. And on top of that, there's

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>no sort of blender of rap last resort or or

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>or similar in crypto, where like you know, liquidations can

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 1>happen and markets can can go really really south and

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and no one's really gonna no one really has to

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>come in and step in and be like a designated

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>market maker. Similar like you know on the CME there

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 1>are designated market makers and a lot of these products

0:45:58.360 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out there which are forced to be on the bid

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if markets sell off a certain amount. You don't have

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that in crypto. So the democratic nature of the market,

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's a new asset class, I think

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to cause these opportunities to almost persist a

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>lot longer than we think. So, you know, maybe some

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>very very future hyper efficient state like crypto has just

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>used as colloquially as as as cash or or you know,

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>venomo or stable clans, whatever, But I think we're long

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>ways away and these inefficiencies should persist for some time.

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I just want to go back real quickly to the

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 1>orb the spot futures are. I mean, you mentioned the

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 1>risk that can happen even if the trade should close profitably.

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>We get this sort of teleportation higher, which happens all

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the time in crypto, and so even if eventually the

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>spread does close, you have to put up a lot

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of cash. Potentially. Is anyone working on or you know,

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just solving the problem of using your spot as as

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 1>your collateral. Josh Younger has done that work. It's like

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>if there was an e t F, then it would

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be super simple because then you'd have this liquid product

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that traded on all the normal exchanges, just let you know,

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>on a desk, and then the futures trade on a desk,

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the e t F becomes your collateral and

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about putting up new cash.

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Like how much could that you know, could that be

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 1>made easier? But basically yeah, I mean you know one

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>example of this is and it's very relevant, is really

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Genesis started our registrating desk in May. We've seen explosive

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>volumes there. I think that's actually kind of why I'm

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. Anyways, Joe I shared you that that

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:46.240
<v Speaker 1>report on Q one which had a huge options and forwards,

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of trading section. Genesis is one of those

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>venues where you can post spot bitcoin against a short

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 1>futures position. You could face this bilatterally over the counter,

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>or you know, we can cross you on CME or

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a different exchange of your choice. But you know, well

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll do that for you because like we think

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's good collateral. We know that your short future is

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>long spot. It's a place that you know, it makes

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 1>sense to us and we're happy to Can we just

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>set that up after the podcast? Can I just go

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>do a Genesis account to like do that because it

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty easy. Yeah, just onward and yeah, shoot me

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a message and I'll get I'll get you also have

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very very simple and straightforward but in all seriousness, um,

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the Genesis is one. But but also more exchanges are

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are getting involved in that too. I think what Josh

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Younger brings up is really like a liquid point of

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 1>access for similar in the brokerage model, like the CMME model,

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the ETF model needs to have that sort of be

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a thing to to really close the spread. That is

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:44.359
<v Speaker 1>true in the sense that we would we would need

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:47.399
<v Speaker 1>that to see like that the trade be much more

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in line with like the traditional cash financing. Great in

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the market. I think the closest thing honestly you can

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:55.280
<v Speaker 1>see to that you know not financial advice or anything,

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:59.319
<v Speaker 1>but like if hypothetically, you know, g BTC was used

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>as collateral, which is not actually you know, how to

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>discount to NAV, Like you know that that's something where

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know, long GBTC short features is like a

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>trade where you get the discount to NAV and then

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>also the collapse of the curve as well. So there's like,

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 1>if you're prime broker, even where to take that and

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe some out there to do. I'm not I'm not

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 1>actually quite sure, but you know, those are kind of

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 1>things you have to see for it to be more

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of a point of access from those sort of brokerage

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:26.879
<v Speaker 1>accounts into the marketplace. So yeah, wait, the idea of

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe transacting with you actually reminds me of a question

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to ask, which is how do you

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>manage your counterparty risk? Because you know there are a

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of i would say sketchy players in the crypto space. Um,

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge question mark over doing due diligence and

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>how you do that and avoid money laundering and things

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 1>like that. Joe clearly sketchy guy. Um No, but like

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>how would you how would you go about like doing

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.399
<v Speaker 1>due diligence? On a potential client, and how does it

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>differ from investment than doing due diligence for prime brokerage

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>services for something more traditional like a hedge fund. I

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 1>mean to start regarding the m L and ky C

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we we actually Genesis is in the New York entity.

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 1>The broker dealer is kind of the point of access

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for all the onboarding. So we're SEC and FINN are regulated,

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and our onboarding is the same that you'd see for

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:22.720
<v Speaker 1>onboarding to any broker dealer, which you know, in short,

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>means that it's a long process and very thorough. Then

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>we do kind of warren clients before they onboard, like

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 1>look like you know, set aside thirty minutes to fill

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>out the app and then also expect some questions from

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>compliance if anything isn't perfectly right, so you know they're

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:38.399
<v Speaker 1>The onboarding is I would say, as robust as any

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>bank out there in terms of the other part of

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the risk, which is the counterparty and credit risk. And

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of I think what makes Genesis a

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty unique player in the space because of the client

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 1>base we've chose to to have at this point, you know,

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a lot of variety of players out there

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto market. What we do is we kind

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>of are facing not that many borrowers really, you know,

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>we're not a type of shop where you know, any

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of retail client can just post bitcoin is collateral,

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>borrow cash, go do whatever with it. But then like

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>if the price sells off, there's no like human interaction there,

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and like we're just gonna liquidate that collateral across thousands

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of customer accounts right now as at a

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollar it's probably ten billion now active loan

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>book outstanding, you know, we have I would say less

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred and fifty active borrowers, which is, you know,

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>not that many considering the size. And also like the

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>top ones, the top trading firms, you know, like our

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:32.760
<v Speaker 1>our core clients that we've known for years. But also

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we understand the nature of the risk they're taking, the

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>nature of the of the markets they're participating and the

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and the trades that they're involved in. So when an

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>event like March happens and bitcoin goes from like eight

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>K to five K, like rather than liquidating a bunch

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of retail accounts across thousands and thousands of clients, like

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing is like, hey, like we understand that

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin or the ethereum collateral you've posted with us

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is has fallen in value significantly, Like how fast can

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you get me the p m L from the future

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is leg to close up this margin gap, like whereas

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it is it on CMME, is it on some of

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the more faster settlement exchanges. And we kind of have

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that conversation and we work with our clients to to

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>understand their risk and and and bring bring the assets

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>back into line with with where they should be on

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>collateral levels. So that's kind of the main thing. And

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 1>then really just like in terms of managing our book,

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we've done a really good job of understanding

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, liquidity and duration and and creating like a

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 1>very good internal platform which we spent a lot of

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:31.879
<v Speaker 1>time in nineteen developing to help us have very good

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>visibility into purve risk and things like that, so a

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 1>very good picture of kind of how assets are going

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to move in and out of the firm. And then

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>also lastly on this point, I'll bring up kind of

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:45.239
<v Speaker 1>like reserves and balances, like banks have to obviously keep

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:47.839
<v Speaker 1>like reserves on their balance sheet for outflows and things

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. We're really good at like kind of thinking

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:53.799
<v Speaker 1>about the interest rate market and kind of how the

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>market is position from a demand perspective and supply perspective

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Bitcoin, ethery UM, and cash and then

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>all the other or altos of course, but those are

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>really the three main ones um and really you can

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>call it crypto and cash, where you know, we we

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:08.879
<v Speaker 1>can position ourselves in a defensive way if we think

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that market's going to sell off and bitcoin is going

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to be much more valuable relative to cash and kind

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of skew our inventory that way. And then when you know,

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>markets bottom out and curves are flat and things are

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking like they can go the other way,

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll position the reserves and inventory accordingly. We're we're

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:27.839
<v Speaker 1>floating large balances but also thinking ahead. So like going

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 1>into March of last year, we were well positioned for

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that because we we're really talking about it on the

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>dusk before we're like, look like, I feel like it

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense to hold a lot of

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:38.160
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin here. We're probably going to have some sort of

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>move that that we might need it, and even last week,

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we're positioned, we're positioned very defensively on

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the on the reserve front in that nature, and um, yeah,

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're always thinking ahead rather than like, you know,

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>we're not reacting, we're kind of like setting up for

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the future. You know. I want to go back to

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>something that you said early on. I think it might

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 1>be really important in this idea of like can the

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto market hold up with Bitcoin selling off and with

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the rise of ethereum this year more talk about the

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so called flipping ng and maybe a theorium will be

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:10.799
<v Speaker 1>a bigger coin this year. Could that happen in a

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of orderly manner. I mean, of course, eventually that

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 1>could happen, Maybe it could even happen this year. But

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>are we still at this point where there's just so

0:54:18.880 --> 0:54:23.240
<v Speaker 1>much of the money is Bitcoin related that any Bitcoin

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:30.319
<v Speaker 1>decline sort of automatically creates triggers and liquidations across the

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the across the ecosystem. Yeah, that's an interesting question because

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I think crypto market it evolves and involves at a

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 1>pace that's that's that's pretty fast, sort of astounding in

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 1>manuates in terms of like the narratives and kind of

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:43.959
<v Speaker 1>what people are doing and talking about or thinking about

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're almost on from one thing to the next. Like,

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, two weeks ago everyone hated Elon Must, now

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone loves Elon Must. Like what's happening? You know, there's

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like that the shift in the narrative there. But speaking

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically about Bitcoin and its position in the market relative

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to the others. Um, you know, I think for now,

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:04.839
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin it is the it does have like the most

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>common sort of collateral use case all over the all

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:10.359
<v Speaker 1>over the place, whether that's at Genesis or even on

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like the exchanges, where a sell off in bitcoin will

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:16.920
<v Speaker 1>always kind of impact other markets because kind of the

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:20.359
<v Speaker 1>collateral need for for it to be acquired as well

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as kind of like alts are usually haircut as collateral

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>even for us, Like you know, the the LTV that

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:27.759
<v Speaker 1>we'd lend against bitcoin is very different than the LTV

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>would lend against alts, and where we issue a margin

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 1>call is different. So like if the alts were to

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>sell off, you know, like it's going to be more

0:55:34.120 --> 0:55:36.080
<v Speaker 1>likely that those have to kind of move into Bitcoin

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to support margin and things like that. Um. That being said,

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I think like we're going back to the fact that

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 1>narratives can change very quickly. And the flipping being and

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Eve and whatnot. Like, I think the market is transcending

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in many ways a lot of the ties to its

0:55:50.920 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>past that it had before, like even for forgetting bitcoin

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:56.719
<v Speaker 1>for a second, but like tying assets to personalities, like

0:55:56.760 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it really like you know, everyone's like, oh,

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Tracy mentioned this on previous podcasts, like, oh,

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like decentralized. It's like the market's like, you know,

0:56:04.200 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>so out there and democratic. But like you know, a

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:09.200
<v Speaker 1>single tweet from a CEO could like move it right,

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but as that happens more and more, it could dilute

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the impact of that, and then the market sort of

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:17.000
<v Speaker 1>transcends that. So as you know, mapping that analogy to

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:20.279
<v Speaker 1>liquidations and collateral on bitcoin, like as all this stuff

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>moves down quite a bit, and bitcoin you know, has

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to be used as a collateral last resort. Like over time,

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think more and more exchanges and even Genesis will

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>will start using and and and liquidity will improve in

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:32.760
<v Speaker 1>other alts where we can use it more as collateral.

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, maybe bitcoin doesn't have to be

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that sort of de facto collateral piece um that's used

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the market sort of transcends that nature. It's just

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna take time, and I think the fact that bitcoin

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is like the sort of underlying based layer denomination of

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>everything will probably stick around for a bit. But I

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do think don't be surprised if it changes and change

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:56.240
<v Speaker 1>as faster than we think. Right. Wait, can I push

0:56:56.239 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you just slightly on that, because this is something I've

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about as well. But like, the bitcoin is

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:04.120
<v Speaker 1>almost designed to what it is designed to sort of

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 1>be this static, stable pool of value, and it's the

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>supply is like destined to reach a certain amount. I

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:13.480
<v Speaker 1>can't remember exactly how much it is right now, but

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>then it will stay at that forever. Is there a

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>point at which there's a mismatch between bitcoin the size

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of the market and it's usefulness as collateral versus the

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>size of the overall crypto market, Like, is there just

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a point at which crypto could outgrow bitcoin? Yeah? I

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 1>know you're you guys are getting really into the weeds

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the questions here, which I actually love because it's funny,

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like when you talk about long term bitcoin security and

0:57:43.520 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of the concerns that might be there, Like a

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:47.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that are involved in the bitcoin space

0:57:47.720 --> 0:57:50.800
<v Speaker 1>will like really just shun you, like kind of dismiss it.

0:57:50.880 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I'll get some hate for this response, but

0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I will say that you bring up a good point,

0:57:56.280 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 1>which is like, yes, bitcoin does have a finality to it,

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:03.440
<v Speaker 1>where if actively the the subsidy that's issued for you know,

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the blocks have to sort of ways of paying miners

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for securing the network. One is the block subsidy and

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the other is transaction fees. So the block subsidies is

0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the one that's declining in half every four years, and

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>eventually it's going to asmotically approach zero, where it's basically nothing.

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So and and bitcoin is proof of work where miners

0:58:24.960 --> 0:58:27.720
<v Speaker 1>have to spend energy and real you know, sort of

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 1>uh power to secure the network, where they're going to

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be compensated in some way. And at that point,

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the way that it's going to the conversation occurs is

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 1>through the transaction fee, which is like the people that

0:58:39.320 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are trading or the people that have transactions in the

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:44.520
<v Speaker 1>block are effectively paying the miners a certain amount. So

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what needs to develop them the long term for bitcoin

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is a robust market for block space um so that

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the miners are compensated to pay for it. What's happened

0:58:54.800 --> 0:58:58.520
<v Speaker 1>now empirically in the past two years is you know,

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a robust mark it for blocks based on Ethereum,

0:59:01.720 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and people are paying to be included in transactions quite

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit there on Bitcoin less. So part of that

0:59:07.640 --> 0:59:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is because you know, it is sort of a store

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 1>value narrative now less so than a medium exchange. And

0:59:12.480 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not like it doesn't really have robust decentralized finance

0:59:16.400 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>protocols in it yet. So what I think would have

0:59:19.920 --> 0:59:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to change there in order for that market to develop

0:59:22.240 --> 0:59:24.480
<v Speaker 1>appropriately is like this type of stuff you see on

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 1>ethereum where you can like borrow of lend even trade

0:59:27.280 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like you need swap deck style, like Bitcoin needs to

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out in many ways to incorporate that into its

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>on chain layer one sort of status the way I

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:38.360
<v Speaker 1>see it, And this is like, you know, maybe there's

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:40.760
<v Speaker 1>some cryptographers out there that are going to argue with

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 1>me on this point in some ways, but I do

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 1>think like at the end of the day, you're gonna

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 1>need like applications built on bitcoin where people are paying

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to use them so that the miners can be compensated

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 1>when there's no block reward. And I think how that

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>develops in the future, like you know, in the past

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>few years, it's it's really been ethereum show there. Could

0:59:58.160 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that change? I do think so? And do I think

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it has to change at some point? Yeah, Like I

1:00:02.320 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think you know it's going to have to that market's

1:00:04.280 --> 1:00:08.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to develop in many ways. I guess I

1:00:08.160 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>just have one last question, and I just want to

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>say I enjoy these conversations a lot because talk about

1:00:13.960 --> 1:00:16.959
<v Speaker 1>market structured and future it doesn't hurt my head quite

1:00:16.960 --> 1:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as much as the conversations about like staking and all

1:00:20.400 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, And I need to learn more about that.

1:00:22.880 --> 1:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry or is there concerned about like this

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like whether the future of crypto is entirely

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>on chane trading at some point, I mean, Genesis is

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a regulated financial institution, point bases, all these are. Is

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there like a threat long term to these sort of

1:00:41.880 --> 1:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>like I guess middle ground companies that handle what you do,

1:00:45.440 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>which is like you're dealing on the chain and dealing

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>with wires and traditional finance companies. And do you think

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>about like risk of getting squeezed by more activity just

1:00:54.480 --> 1:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>people trading directly on the decentralized exchanges without the knee

1:01:00.000 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>need for a GENEFF. I think, you know, in the

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>long term, there's going to be more of a harmony

1:01:06.560 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>between centralized finance and decentralized finance. They're gonna have to

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>work together in many ways, um more so than they

1:01:12.280 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>are now in order to kind of provide services to

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the broader marketplace. I do think the future, you know,

1:01:18.320 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>broadly and like ultimate finality speaking, is going to have

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of more on chain activity than it does now.

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think the way, you know, kind of bringing

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this more high level back to kind of like the

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>user and the participant in the marketplace, at the end

1:01:31.280 --> 1:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of the day, they're they're humans, right, like you know,

1:01:33.120 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we're all we're all humans. We we view counterparty risk

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to protocols, to exchanges, um to to to really banks

1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever in different ways you know, f d i C

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>non f d i C, things like that. There's always

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be in need and desire for market participants

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to have things that are not completely bearer because like

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you want that as like a as an asset holder,

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>as like a diversified and responsible whether you're an individual

1:01:59.080 --> 1:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or a family office, hedge fund or whatever, Like you

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have everything be in your control or nothing be

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in your control. There should be a balance in a ratio,

1:02:07.360 --> 1:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of services like Genesis and

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>other companies in space, you're going to kind of be

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there to help marry that that difference and and and

1:02:15.080 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>provide that diversification that holders want. But I do think

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of course that yes, DeFi is going to be it's

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be big in the future, and there's

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of stuff going on chain. I

1:02:23.680 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think another thing to think about when thinking when like

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking at the outlook, there is like the

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>pie is growing right now year over year, a day

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>over a day really where like nothing is cannibalizing into

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>each other quite yet. Where it's like as long as

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the market is growing, there's more and more stuff to

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to to do in trade, and more clients are entering

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and more participants are entering. So you know that that

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as long as that's going on, that's going to be

1:02:46.760 --> 1:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, not very competitive and more like sort of collaborative.

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, like once Crypto is that it's like finals,

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they were like every single human on the planet is

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like involved in it, and there's now like three thousand

1:02:58.080 --> 1:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>exchanges like yes, then then gets a little bit more

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>competitive and cannibalistic. But like there's like a lot of

1:03:03.920 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>room there right, Like you know, it's like not that

1:03:05.320 --> 1:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>many people are using this stuff just yet, like you

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it. But when you look at like

1:03:10.080 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this sheer number of people out there. I was listening

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to like CNBC this morning or wherever, it's like, you know,

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they're like asking people that have never used Defy if

1:03:17.160 --> 1:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they think Defies the future or or on Chaine is

1:03:19.680 --> 1:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the future, and they're like no, and then then everyone's agreeing,

1:03:21.600 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, like look at this guy brings up a

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>good point. It's like no one's using this yet, Like

1:03:25.160 --> 1:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're asking people that aren't using it if

1:03:27.280 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>if they think it's real. So I think there's a

1:03:29.400 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>lot more room to grow. And you know, CFI and

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>d FI will have a lot of sort of harmony

1:03:33.680 --> 1:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Broh. That was great. That was a

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>fantastic conversation, Super helpful both on the sort of what

1:03:41.800 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>just happened over the last several days, but also the

1:03:44.480 --> 1:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>big picture and the long picture. I love talking to

1:03:47.080 --> 1:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you and thanks for coming out on a lot. Yeah,

1:03:49.280 --> 1:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you guys so much for having me. This is awesome.

1:03:51.760 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for that was so good. All right, take care

1:03:53.840 --> 1:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of man. You know, I sort of got got there

1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in my last question. But I do find like, you know,

1:04:18.280 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>like I know we have some DeFi episodes coming up,

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but some of these questions about market structure and futures

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>trading and arbitrage and hedge funds and prime brokerages, it's

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>just like I feel like like I've been a cozy

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like blanket or like hoodie we're talking about it. I

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>still like sort of like feels like I kind of

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>get it in a way, you know what I'm saying. Absolutely,

1:04:39.840 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I definitely feel more comfortable having these kind of conversations

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>than they old farming one with Um Aaron for instance,

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that was a bit tough. Um. But I gotta say,

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like the thing that jumps out at me, the thing

1:04:51.560 --> 1:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that jumps out at me is just this idea of

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>how far the market has actually come. So I think

1:04:57.240 --> 1:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there are people, you know, probably my self included, but

1:05:00.720 --> 1:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I think of a bitcoin minor, and you know, it's

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>some guy that maybe has a few computers hooked up

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhere slightly cold, um, with good temperatures and cheap energy,

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's sort of like doing it in his basement

1:05:14.200 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or backyard or whatever. But the way Row was describing

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem, now, you know, you have huge miners basically

1:05:23.000 --> 1:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>computer farms doing this and taking out futures to hedge

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>their exposure. Like that is such a sea change from

1:05:31.120 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>where we were at the beginning of all of this,

1:05:34.080 --> 1:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's still kind of like, I don't know,

1:05:37.040 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really noteworthy, I have to say, like my misconceptions

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of it are probably the flip. Like I feel like

1:05:43.400 --> 1:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been like conceiving of miners for quite a long time,

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>as these like super industrial operations largely out of China

1:05:53.200 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and other or not even largely out of China, but

1:05:55.640 --> 1:05:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of all around the world where there's cheap

1:05:57.520 --> 1:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>energy and good temperatures and stuff like that, and that

1:06:01.040 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>like that that's been this industrial thing. But the speed

1:06:03.840 --> 1:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with which, like the sort of like pure financialization of it,

1:06:07.240 --> 1:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and the the existence of crypto prime brokerages and the

1:06:12.360 --> 1:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>popularity of stable coins to move money in a way

1:06:16.040 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that's in many ways, I actually do think it's probably

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>much better than the traditional wire system. That's the part

1:06:21.760 --> 1:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that I would say in recent you know, not now

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of like thinking about mentally updating my

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>model of the space, the swaps market, the derivatives market.

1:06:31.920 --> 1:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>How big that's gotten is the part where I've like

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of most needed to sort of like update my

1:06:36.760 --> 1:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>mental model, so to speak. That's a really good way

1:06:39.600 --> 1:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of putting it, updating mental models. I gotta say the

1:06:42.400 --> 1:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>point about you know, um crypto sort of getting worried

1:06:45.400 --> 1:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>over settlement times that are something like T plus one

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>when most of the traditional financial market deals with something

1:06:52.600 --> 1:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like T plus two or T plus three, and I

1:06:54.880 --> 1:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>think some parts of the corporate ball market like still

1:06:57.360 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>send trade settlements by facts and things like that. It's

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty amazing, and it does speak to really interesting

1:07:04.520 --> 1:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>things happening in the space that could potentially be applicable

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to more traditional finance. Yeah. Also Rose just like so

1:07:13.280 --> 1:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>good at uh so clear um and I love like

1:07:17.000 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like getting the full lay of the

1:07:18.840 --> 1:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>land from him, in the full picture and sort of

1:07:20.760 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like going back and forth between translating crypto speak to

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>traditional finance speak. Uh is. It's a real treat to

1:07:28.320 --> 1:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>get to speak with someone like that. Absolutely, and I

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta say I appreciate his um willingness to risk the

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>ire of the Bitcoin maximalists by talking about potential downsides there.

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a risky strategy as I personally know. Yes, exactly.

1:07:45.920 --> 1:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Wait Tracy before we go, Uh, how do you enjoy

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>blogging these days? Um? It's fun. I've had a like

1:07:53.920 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a slightly difficult time getting back into it, but I

1:07:57.800 --> 1:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>am starting to ratch it up my volume, so I'm

1:08:00.200 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to that. How about you. I love it.

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I love getting to write. I'm super excited. And I

1:08:04.960 --> 1:08:07.439
<v Speaker 1>don't just say this as a plug, but people should

1:08:07.480 --> 1:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>go check out the Low Odd Lots blog because I'm

1:08:10.120 --> 1:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm home again, getting to uh to

1:08:13.360 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be a blogger again, and I'm really enjoying it. Shall

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we leave it there? Yeah, let's leave it there? All right?

1:08:19.880 --> 1:08:22.679
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Why isn't all? You can

1:08:28.400 --> 1:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at the start? Everyone should go

1:08:32.479 --> 1:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>follow our guest on Twitter, Roshan Patel. He's at Roshan Patel,

1:08:36.000 --> 1:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the VP of lending at Genesis Trading. Very clear, very great.

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Follow on this whole crypto space. Follow our producer on Twitter,

1:08:43.960 --> 1:08:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Followed the Bloomberg

1:08:47.680 --> 1:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast, Francesca Levie at Francesca Today. And check

1:08:51.720 --> 1:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle

1:08:55.360 --> 1:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Thanks for listening to