WEBVTT - US-Iran Peace Prospects Dim as Trump Rejects Truce Extension

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, President Trump for poorly said he is in no

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:35.959
<v Speaker 2>hurry to end the war with Iran, and a US

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>naval blockade on Iranian ports is putting pressure, at no

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>doubt about it, on the country. President also warning that

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 2>if Alman gets in the way, we will bomb the

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>expletive out of them. Fill in the blank. I'm sure

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>you can figure it out. Also said back channels with

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>officials from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard remained open, which was

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>later denied. And then you know, we've just got kind

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>of back and forth. There's new in Lebanon. We've got

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to remember Israel and their role in all of this.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 2>It's a full plate and a reminder that this war,

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 2>which I think some Joe I think early on might

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>have thought it would have ended quickly, we are now

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 2>almost six months in.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, six months, I mean that's crazy to think about.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and some talk about this as a forever war.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to our Washington round up a lot out

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of the nation's capital. We head to our Bloomberg News

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Washington DC News. You're into Bloomberg White House and Politics

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 2>team leader Jordan Fabian Jordan, as always, there's a lot

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 2>coming at you, guys. They are in DC. Iran in

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 2>the United States, where to begin feels like we're not

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 2>necessarily moving closer to an end. And yet some say

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>it's always darkest before the dawn. How does the White

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>House see it? What are you guys hearing?

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, we should take stock of what's happening today, which

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 4>is that sixty days ago the President sat in Versy

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Palace and signed that Memorantium Understanding, essentially saying this is over,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>We're going to move toward an agreement to reopen the

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 4>straight of horror moves and we're moving on. And now

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 4>we're sitting here and their US is still stuck in

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 4>the quagmire there. The Strait is still close to a

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of maritime traffic, restricting oil supplies, and the President

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 4>has no real way out of this with Iran digging

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 4>in its heels, and so the White House is saying

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>they're going to continue with economic pressure. Scott Bessent tease

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 4>some developments this week, perhaps, but it's important to remember

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 4>that Iran has been under sanctions for years and it

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 4>hasn't changed their behavior. So it's hard to see how

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 4>this new approach quote unquote by the President is going

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 4>to yield any new results.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>And once again we do know that we hear from

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the President Jordan talking about the Strait of Hormuz a territory,

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>not the first time, right, and he chuckled. I think

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the first time he said it. I don't know the

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>more time you hear it. I don't know that they think.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>The Iranians think it's too funny.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 4>No, he could very well do some thing reckless, do

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 4>something along those lines. It's unclear to me how that

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 4>would change the reality on the ground, which is that, yes,

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 4>the US has opened a maritime channel south near Oman,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 4>but Iran controls the middle and the upper passages. There's

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 4>still concerns about sea mines, and if the US wanted

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 4>to really take control of the Straight, they would need

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 4>to occupy land on the Iranian side of that waterway,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 4>and that now we're talking about a land invasion of

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Iran by US forces, and that would certainly mark a

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 4>huge escalation of this conflict in one that the President

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 4>hasn't wanted to take before. So I still think that

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 4>he's essentially saying this is a tongue in cheek thing

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 4>that he's labeling it the US territory, but it's not

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 4>really going to mean much if there's not an increased

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 4>oil flow out of that waterway.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I think he says something Joe just kind of

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>get a feel of how people in the markets read it,

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>But who knows.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that certainly has been the case with

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 3>him many times. You know, Jordan, you're in this every day.

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>You've done this a long time, You've covered both of

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 3>these his administrations. I think for people in the markets

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 3>and generalists who are not necessarily you know, trading every day, right,

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>they might just feel like this is just another headline,

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 3>another part of the slog. But how can you parse

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>what we're seeing right now as to how this is

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 3>not just part of the slog, this is something new

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and what direction we're headed into right now?

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, Joe, it's an interesting question, and I do have

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:38.119
<v Speaker 4>a question about Trump's credibility with markets moving forward, given

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 4>all the pronouncements he's made throughout this conflict about how

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 4>close the deal is, and even the MoU didn't really

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 4>pan out to be much. It was pretty much dead

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 4>within three weeks. And even the other week he announced

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 4>that he had an agreement with Hamas in Israel to

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>disarm the militant group there, and that turned out to

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>be nonsense. Also, it was essentially a fake deal. Hamas

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 4>said that we're not going to do anything until Israel withdraws.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Israel said we're not going to withdraw until hamostis arms,

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 4>and we're still at square one. So it's increasingly harder

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to take his pronouncement seriously.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 5>You still have to.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 4>He's still the president of the United States, he still

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 4>commands the world's most powerful military. But he's made a

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 4>lot of pronouncements about things are going to happen that

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 4>haven't really panned out.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Your point on taking him seriously, I mean, how do

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 3>you think right now the shijin Ping and Chinese officials

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>are viewing this.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the problem for them and for markets and

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 4>people in general is that Trump has followed through on

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 4>enough of his threats that you do have to take it,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, seriously, And then the question is, like you

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>there's always this debate about seriously versus literally is he

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 4>going to follow through this time? That's a hard gamble

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 4>to make. But it does appear that he's promising these

0:05:59.360 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 4>things that.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 5>He can deliver.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's every foreign leader that's dealing with them,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 4>whether it's Jijinping or the leaders of Iran, or even

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 4>Kim Jong un. Giving this new threat on South Korea,

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 4>you have to be wondering, like, what is this guy about,

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Like is he just gonna, you know, tear this up

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 4>the minute he finds it inconvenient if you sign an

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 4>agreement with him. I mean you've seen this with the

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 4>trade deals he struck with US allies last year. So

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 4>it's just an increasingly reckless, you know, administration, and it

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 4>makes it very difficult to deal with if you're across

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 4>the table from them.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it certainly keeps everybody on edge, and certainly global

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 2>leaders or at least uncertain about what's next or what's real. Hey,

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 2>on South Korea, let's go there.

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 6>Jordan.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>President Trump telling the Pentagon to quote substantially reduce joint

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>military exercises with South Korea, signing the cost of the

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>drills and his quote very good relationship with North Korea's

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>leader at Kim Jong un. What's the read on this?

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, Shana's going to be watching. We keep

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>thinking about China, watching dwindling military and defense supplies here

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>in the US as we continue to fight wars, the

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>war in Iran and moving stuff around. So help us

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 2>understand what we need to know here.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, we've been hearing for a decade now about this

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>supposed pivot to Asia that was going to happen for

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the United States, where the US is going to focus

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 4>its power more in that region to counter China and

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 4>its advances there and away from traditional hotspots like the

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Middle East. And this is an exhibit a of how

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 4>that has failed, where you have the president bogged down

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 4>in another Middle Eastern conflict that there's no end in sight,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 4>and his reason for pulling back support for South Korea

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 4>is that they didn't offer him the military aid in Iran.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 4>So it's all coming back to this conflict that you know,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 4>we need to remind people he started in February and

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 4>I really had no exit strategy to get out of

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 4>and so you're seeing this reverb rate. Now now to

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 4>South Korea, which is one of the key US allies

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 4>in the region. It's a country that this administration is

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 4>said they're looking to to help revive the US shipbuilding industry.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 4>How does that all affect the administration's ambitions with South

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Korea given this latest outburst by the president, Just.

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Real quickly, Jordan on the South Korea point, I mean,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>when we read between the lines, how should we interpret

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 3>what the President is saying there?

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's put it pretty clearly, which is that he

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 4>has value his relationship with Kim Jong un, the leader

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 4>of North Korea, more than the US's his traditional alliance

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 4>with South Korea. And you know this could change tomorrow

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 4>the South Korean's good offer him a concession and he

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 4>could say, well, I've always been friends with South Korea.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Now we're going to increase the military jeels again. But

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 4>it again goes to the point we were talking about

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 4>earlier of reliability and if you make a deal with

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 4>this administration, is the President going to keep it or

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 4>is he just going to change his mind on a whim.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>And again it points to the increasing unreliability of the

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 4>President's public statements, and it arose to those alliances.

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Right in the past. Doesn't necessarily indicate what might be

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>done in the future, which makes it a little tricky

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>for the world, so appreciate it. Jordan Fabian, White House

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and Politics team leader for Bloomberg News. He's there in

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 2>our DC News bureau. When we come back, we're going

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to kind of stay on this topic more in geopolitics.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Everything we discuss what it means for those all important

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 2>global relationships. That's next.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 7>up after this.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five East during

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 2>But to headlines, Joe and I've been talking about them.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we just went over a lot of

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 2>stuff with Jordan Fabian, our White House and Political team leader.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Just to remind you if you're just joining us, US

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>are on peace prospects dimming with President Trump and no

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>hurry for a deal. He's also threatened to bomb mom

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>On if he gets in the way of the US

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 2>This is coming from Fox News. President Trump reducing US

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>South Korea drill citing a lack of help on Iran,

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and then we've got just some different stories going on.

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>It just thinks, you know, national security. I keep thinking, Joe,

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 2>are we a more secure world here in the US

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 2>or just globally? Are not necessarily?

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow? It really depends on who you talk to.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know. Maybe if you're in a bunker far,

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 2>far away, well.

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean even internally in this administration, right there are

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 3>people who feel like we are not. Yeah, there are

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 3>people who think we definitely are. So the divide is stark.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, which is kind of what we want to

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 2>tackle with our next roundtable. And lucky for us, we

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 2>have with us our own Nick Wadhams, his national security

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 2>reporter for Bloomberg News. He's out there in our Washington,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 2>d C. Bureau also with US and in the DC area.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Mark Hansei and He's Senior Advisor Defense and Security Apartment

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 2>at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He spent

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 2>time at the Office of Management and Budget, spent more

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>than seven years as chief of the Force Structured and

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Investment Division. He worked on Department of events, budget strategies,

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>and different issues. It's a great roundtable. Nick, I want

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to kick it off with you. I'm going to start

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>big and broad. Are we a more secure world? Or

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>are we less secure?

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 5>Or tbd?

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I never give you easy questions. Do I figure it

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>out well?

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 5>Listen. I mean, if you look at the pure metrics.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 8>Of the Iran war and the Strait of Horror moves,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 8>you would have to argue that we are not. Of

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 8>course President Trump would argue differently, but you had a

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 8>sort of status quo prior to the US attacks.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 5>On Iran where oil was flowing through freely through the Strait,

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 5>and now it's not.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 8>And this has been really one of the problems that

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 8>has bedeviled the president. Of course, his administration continues to

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 8>claim that it's Iran that wants a deal, that he's

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 8>in no rush, but there are some suggestions.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 5>That really indicate he's growing weary of this.

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 8>You also have the strain that I'm sure Mark will

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 8>be able to talk about as well, on the US

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 8>troops and the US assets that are in the region.

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 8>And there's a lot of broad concern from US allies

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 8>in Asia. You mentioned South Korea. If President Trump is

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 8>now going to try to exert leverage over a country

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 8>like South Korea over on, Well, what does that mean

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 8>for the US A commitment to South Korea in a

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 8>region where China is still looking to make its own moves.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 8>So a lot of uneasiness from US allies. Spin it

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 8>back to the Western hemisphere though you have Nicholas Maduro

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 8>who's been removed. The President argues that's a win. But

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, a lot of instability, a lot of concerns. So,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 8>you know, but certainly looking at Hormoz, I would say

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 8>we are not as secure as we were before February.

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Mark Nick, as he always does, laying it also while

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 2>come on in on it. I am curious too. We've

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>talked a lot about the USS Abraham Lincoln. We've heard

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the President saying the deployment not nearly long enough. There's

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things that we could hit on. But

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 2>take it away from your vantage point in terms of

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>global national security, US national security.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 9>Well, one of the problems is how do you define

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 9>US interests? Now, I agree with what we've just heard that,

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, there have been some very concerning events, straight

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 9>form moves being right up there Trump administration. You know,

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 9>they're much more skeptical about defending Europe. They are skeptical

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 9>about even the Western Pacific and believe that countries there

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 9>should do more that the United States has been taken

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 9>advantage of. So from the perspective of many in the administration,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 9>we're better off because if the Europeans are threatened by Russia,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 9>that's not our problem. You know, we will be able

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 9>to keep more of our forces and resources at home. Now,

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 9>the concern is that we've tried that strategy twice in

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 9>the past that failed both times. You know, there's no

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 9>need to try it a third time. But many of

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 9>the administration focused on America first, and one of the

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 9>problems that I think they're realizing is that even if

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 9>you have a strategy that says America first, we're going

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 9>to focus on the hemisphere and the home land, we

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 9>still get dragged into these foreign events like the Middle East,

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 9>like Europe, like the Western Pacific. So if we're a

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 9>global superpower, you know, we need to maintain those global capabilities.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 9>And right now we're seeing that the Navy is stretched

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 9>and our ammunitions inventories are much lower than the war

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 9>planners would like.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Mark, I mean you're really moving towards. In my estimation,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>here is this ongoing discussion of the US weapons stockpile.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, I've talked about this with Nick plenty of times,

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>but it seems like right now the administration is a

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 3>bit sensitive to this discussion. And I'm just curious what

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 3>you think you know and telling our viewers who maybe

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 3>aren't paying as much attention to the weapons aspect. Is

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 3>it a dire situation, is it a troubling situation? Where

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 3>do you benchmark this at?

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 9>I would put it at troubling, But you have to

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 9>keep in mind that munitions covers a lot of territory,

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 9>and there are some munitions where we have good stockpiles.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 9>For example, we're rebuilding stockpiles for ground munitions for and

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 9>there are some short range ground attack munitions that we

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 9>have pretty good stockpiles on. But there are other areas

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 9>where we are short. The one place where we're really

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 9>desperately short is defenses against ballistic missiles. And these are

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 9>systems like Patriot, which many people have heard of AD

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 9>and the Navy's SM three. We've used about half of

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 9>those Patriot little more SM three a little less, and

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 9>there are no good alternatives.

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Because, like I said, like a level those is it

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 3>like a level that keeps you up at night?

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 9>That would keep me up at night? Now you know,

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 9>we have alternatives to some of the other munitions, and

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 9>there are some things that have come out of the

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 9>war that I think do help the torrents against China.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 9>But this is the this is an area where we

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 9>are short. It's going to take a long time to

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 9>read buildbos and there are no good substitutes.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>So Nick, come on in on here. You know, you

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>cover national security from so many different angles, but let's

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 2>go to our military stockpile and what you're hearing because

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the administration and I guess I understand it on some level,

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 2>it's very defensive, no pun intended when it comes to

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 2>any criticism about the size of military stockpiles. What do

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 2>we know for real? And I do understand we have

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to keep some of this quiet because it is a security.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 5>Issue, right.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it's very interesting because having covered US wars

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 8>going back to Iraq in the early two thousands, I mean,

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 8>as a reporter, I was used to constant daily, incessant

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 8>briefings from the administration, certainly putting their spin on the

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 8>state of US forces, number of casualties, territory.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Stockpiles, things like that.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 8>And while a lot of this was considered a secret,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 8>you could get some estimation of where things stood. And

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 8>this administration has taken a much different approach. It's much

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 8>more difficult even to get assessment of damage on US

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 8>bases in the region that have been hit by Iranian attacks.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 8>So there is so much that we don't know. What

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 8>we can say, though, is that some of our reporting

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 8>does suggest that the administration is making decisions partly because

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 8>of concerns around stockpiles. So when you had the President

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 8>essentially prompt missing to unleash a massive new military campaign

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 8>against Iran a couple of weeks ago, and then the

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 8>reporting suggested that US allies in the region were telling him, listen,

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 8>we do not think this is the best path forward.

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 8>We did have some indication at that time that concerns

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 8>around strikes on US allies in the region Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 8>United Arab Emirates Cutter, for example, that the US understood

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 8>it would not be able to defend them as well

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 8>as it would want to because of concerns around its

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 8>ability to knock down all of those incoming strikes from Iran.

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 8>So it's a very complicated picture. There's a lot at play,

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot we don't know, but we can at

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 8>least say that the evidence we're getting from the reporting

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 8>does suggest that concerns around those stockpiles are starting to

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 8>influence the way the administration does make decisions in the

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 8>region about what it'll do next.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 3>And Nick, when you say not be able to defend

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 3>our allies in the region as much as we'd want to,

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 3>can you unpack that for listeners who maybe don't really

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>understand the day to day of what you might be

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about.

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean it's like what Mark said, I mean,

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 8>if there's a ballistic missile that comes in, I mean,

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 8>that's a very powerful weapon, and if it can't be

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 8>defended against because there's a shortage of patriot missiles or

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 8>they're being much more selective about their targeting, those sort

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 8>of targeting decisions are going to be influenced based on

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 8>your stockpiles. I mean, the US is starting to get

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 8>into other forms of defense. They're not effective against ballistic missiles,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 8>but against against incoming drones. So they do have more

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 8>counter drone defenses, and there are indications that they're ramping

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 8>up production of those Patriot missiles. Of course, of course

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 8>those take months or years to produce, but they are

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 8>bringing in cheaper anti drone defenses. They're working on directed

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 8>energy weapons. There's all sorts of stuff they're trying to

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 8>bring to the region to defend against Iranian attacks. But

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 8>the Uranian attacks are so varied, and the time lag

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 8>between when you expend those munitions and then can resupply them.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, if it's a cheap drone, okay, that's one thing.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 8>But if it's a pack three you know, Patriot interceptor,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, those take years to produce and they cost,

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, millions of dollars, so there's a much longer

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 8>time horizon to get those into the battlefield to be

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 8>able to defend the US forces.

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 9>Yep.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Can't flip a switch quickly on that one. Hey, Mark,

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to you for a moment.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I keep thinking about with any

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of this is that I do feel like the cards

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 2>are largely in the hands of the Iranians, and we

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>did a President Trump come out on social this morning.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 2>The number one goal is and always will be that

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Aron cannot have in any way, shape or form a

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 2>nuclear weapon. So we're back to that as the mission,

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 2>which is what we all thought that mission was in

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the beginning, but it's kind of gotten tossed around here.

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 2>From the Iranian perspective, this is existential for them. So

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 2>what do we need to understand about where they are

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>coming from and how long they're willing to keep this

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 2>going again, going to what some say will be a

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 2>forever war between the US and Iran.

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that's right for the Iranian regime. This

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 9>is an existential threat that the Israelis in the United

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 9>States have threatened to overthrow the regime. Now the focus

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 9>is back on nuclear weapons, but regime change would certainly,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, was certainly discussed early early on, and the

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 9>regime is willing to endure great hardship. They're willing to

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 9>inflict great hardship on the population in order to stay

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 9>in power. You have to keep in mind too, that

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 9>there's a religious element here. You know, It's not just

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 9>that there's a regime that wants to retain power, as

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 9>all regimes do. They believe that God has entrusted them

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 9>with certain responsibilities and they need to carry those out.

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 9>Both sides have cards. The Iranians, of course, are blockading

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 9>the Straight. The US is blockading the Straight also and

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 9>preventing Ranian oil from going out and materials coming in.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 9>We are in what I call it economic war of

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 9>attrition to see who can endure longer, who can force

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 9>the other side to make concessions.

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Mark, I want to flip the switch to the comments

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 3>the President had made over the weekend about the US

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>South Korea drills, wanting to reduce those setting a lack

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of help on Iran. From your perch, when you hear

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 3>something like that, I mean, what kind of goes off

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 3>in your mind?

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 9>From a military perspective, this is a bad thing. Now,

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 9>It's not an immediate problem the way that rediction forces

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 9>might be, for example. But these exercises, and the big

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 9>one is coming up. It's called Olgi Freedom Guardian. It's

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 9>been going on for literally fifty years.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 6>Year.

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 9>When I was in the Marine Corps, i participated. But

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 9>this is a mechanism to get the US forces in

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 9>South Korean forces working together to mesh the two military systems,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 9>to make sure our plans are consistent, to make sure

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 9>that all of our communications is consistent, that we can

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 9>fight together as a team effectively, and is also on

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 9>the South Korean side of mobilization aspect to the operation. Now,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 9>you cancel it one year and you lose some experience,

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 9>but there's still a lot of experience in the force.

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 9>But over time, as you cancel that, you cancel the

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 9>smaller exercises, that expertise declines, your credibility with the North, declines,

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 9>your military capabilities to conduct combined operations of conflict with

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 9>the United States and South Korea. That declines. And it's

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 9>not clear to me what we're getting for it. Something

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 9>offered anything, So I'm not sure you know what's in

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 9>it for us, But I'll defer to the political side

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 9>to answer that question.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 2>All right, Nick, come on back in here. In that

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 2>social post to President Trump said South Korea had declined

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to join us in the nuclearization of the Islamic Republic

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 2>of Iran. It did catch soul though by surprise this

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 2>is just another thing, or how are you and the

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 2>folks you talked to kind of assessing this latest move,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 2>which many say caught Soul by surprise, right.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 8>I think it probably caught a lot of Trump's most

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 8>senior advisors by surprise as well.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there is some president for this.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 8>When the administration in Trump's first term was in negotiations

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 8>with North Korea, the president scaled back US military exercises

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 8>with South Korea. It also gotten a big in broglio

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 8>with South Korea over the amount the US wanted South

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 8>Korea to pay for US troops hosted on its soil.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 5>So there was a lot of conversations.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 8>It was seen as sort of leverage the administration was

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 8>trying to use for to renegotiate those basing agreements to

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 8>get what President Trump believed was a better deal. So

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 8>when I see that, a lot goes through my mind. Okay,

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 8>maybe it's Iran. Maybe it's the basing agreements that they

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 8>have some more time to go there. Maybe we'll also

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 8>get back into some sort of conversation with Kim Jong

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 8>un in North Korea. You know, the white whale of

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 8>President Trump's first term an agreement with North Korea.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 5>Maybe he's going to make another run at it.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 8>So it's always difficult to divine, you know, on a

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 8>Sunday evening, where these pronouncements come from, though it does

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 8>have some historical president president for President Trump. Though I

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 8>do agree with Mark there on the question of, you know,

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 8>what does the US get out of this? How does

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 8>what help does President Trump actually want from South Korea

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 8>in helping with Iran. Maybe it's maritime patrols for the

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 8>Straight of Horn moves, but it's hard to see how

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 8>South Korea could actually help with denuclearization of Iran.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 5>Maybe it's just diplomatic support.

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 8>So again, a lot we don't know here, and we'll

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 8>really have to see how much he actually scales back

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 8>those drills when it comes down to it.

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Just another issue, right, I have to pull into kind

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 2>of the geopolitical conversations. You both are gems. Thank you

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>so much as always, Nick Wadams, He's Bloomberg News national

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>security reporter out there in our DC bureau, Marcansi, and

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 2>thank you as well, Senior Advisor Defense and Security Department

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. I mean,

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it is, right, always, just another layer on top of things,

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 2>and whether or not it's significant or whether it was

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 2>just a statement or tweet or social post by the president.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's what investors, the world at large, global

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>leaders and companies have to figure.

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Out every weekend. Nick and I are exchanging emails on

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 3>the latest comments made by the president or someone in

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 3>his cabinet about these things, and you have to be

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 3>quick to parse it.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, because sometimes it impacts the market, sometimes it

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 2>impacts the narrative in a big way, and sometimes it doesn't,

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>which is all another fascinating aspect to all of this.

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 7>up after this.

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five e's during

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the Listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Hey a Gulf Stream, a three hundred and sixty seven

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar asset management firm, not too shabby an effort

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>to revive the Wooly Mammoth. I had no idea ownership

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 2>of a storied, iconic NBA team until last week. A

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 2>steak in Chelsea Football Club and a federal probe and

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the financial troubles that a followed that led to a

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 2>possible sale of that Chelsea Football Club, and it did

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>lead to a sale of the La Leakers that we

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 2>learned last week. This is the life of the CEO

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of Guggenheim Partners as he rushes a makeover a mid

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 2>it all talk about a full plate. It is today's

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Big Tay, and joining us is Srinatarajan, Ploomberg News

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Chief Wall Street correspondent Here in studio Shre, I feel

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 2>like we've seen these stories before, these people that achieve

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 2>incredible levels of success and then they either stumble or

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of fall from on high. He's got a full plate?

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 5>Where is he?

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 2>And tell us about the things that he's kind of

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 2>dealing with.

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 10>Okay, the whole storyline is interesting because of who he is,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 10>Mark Walter Right. It's not just a name that you

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 10>would recognize on Wall Street, which he would because on

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 10>Wall Street you have his giant asset manager, Google Name Investments,

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 10>his broker dealer that's run by the former Bearston CEO,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 10>Alan Schwartz, but also a name that should be known

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 10>on Main Street and has bled through to that space

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 10>because in his stable of sports team are the Dodgers,

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 10>the Chelsea Football Club, Lakers, Cadillac F one team, the

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 10>professional women's hockey league where the winner plays for the

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 10>Walter Cup. So here is someone who's at that intersection

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 10>of Main Street and Wall Street. So when you have

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 10>this sort of money trouble that pops up, and when

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 10>we and money trouble is perhaps a very loose term

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 10>for what is happening right now, because he also owns insurers,

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 10>and as the FEDS probe how these insurers made loans,

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 10>whether they made loans to affiliated assets or not, it's

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 10>clearly raised the temperature a little bit. All our reporting

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 10>shows that he has been accelerating in rushing efforts to

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 10>try and clean up that insurance balance sheet, but the

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 10>spillover effect of that, as a result of that, you

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 10>are seeing some big ticket, important trophy assets being taken

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 10>away from him potentially. Today's new story talks about the

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 10>Chelsea Steak going to another Chelsea owner, clear Lake. No

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 10>deals there, but the talks are happening, and they seem

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 10>to be happening in the last few days. Last week,

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 10>you had that surprise sale of the Los Angeles Lakers.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 10>The headline figure says a twelve point five billion dollar

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 10>record breaking sale. Sounds great, but when was the last

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 10>time you've heard of a profession sports team like that

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 10>of that stature getting flipped in less than a year,

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 10>as if it was some Jersey Shore mansion.

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Hey watch that Jersey, Hey I throw I went to

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 2>school in New Jersey, Florida.

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 11>I don't forget that.

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Thank you?

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, So, as you dig into this story, I

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>do wonder, is this the guy who stumbles and falls

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and then is gone? Or is he a mean he's

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>got so many coveted assets? Is this enough? But then

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 2>when you've got also a federal probe, you do wonder

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 2>what's the implications longer term?

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 10>The implications on what's happening to your cabinet of assets, right,

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 10>whether that grows or you know, shrinks, is one thing.

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 10>What happens to a federal probe is a whole another thing.

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 10>So I don't know we can if we can square

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 10>away the two. Right now, we are obviously seeing as

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 10>they try and remediate the issue with his insurance firms,

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 10>and again to explain to our listeners and viewers what

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 10>exactly the issue is is Mark Walter owns an insurance firm.

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 10>Through that insurance firm, they were getting loans to fund

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 10>other parts of Mark Walter's sprawling empire. The problem was

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 10>a lot of those loans were tagged as unaffiliated. When

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 10>they did a review, they suddenly said, at least one

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 10>of the bigger insurance, Delaware Life that he owns, said,

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 10>our affiliated assets have gone up from three percent to

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 10>forty percent after we did some checks. And why did

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 10>they do the checks Because the gods of penas from

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 10>the Feds. So the problem is real and he'll have

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 10>to find a way to get through that. Again, it's

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 10>a federal probe that matters, and we're all paying attention

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 10>to see where that goes. But you are seeing the

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 10>dynamic of that in some of these big asset sale

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 10>and discussions.

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is a story that, like every day,

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 3>there's some new scoop coming out from us or from others.

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 3>It just does not go away. Can you kind of

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 3>dive into that aspect? Coupled with the you sitting down

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 3>and saying, you know what, let's just do a quick

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 3>let's do a profile of this man. Let's explain to

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 3>people who are are interested, both in the sports world

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and the finance world, who he is and catching them

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 3>up to speed and knowing this is maybe just the beginning.

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 10>And that's always a challenge with the fast moving news cycle.

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 10>There are a lot of developments happening, and you will

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 10>find news interest in different corners of that empire, just

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 10>because of all that he owns. How often do you

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 10>see Sportico and the New York Times Sports section and

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 10>Bloomberg and the Financial Times on the Wall Street Journal

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 10>focusing on the same subject, focusing on the same person.

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 10>That is exactly what's happening right now, but also an

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 10>interesting life story. We all know him for that Gougenheim name.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 10>He has nothing to do with that great American dynasty.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 10>He's not a direct descendant. It was a chance meeting

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.719
<v Speaker 10>where Mark Walter was running a financial firm in the

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 10>backwaters of Chicago, or at least in the financial backwaters

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 10>in Chicago, to be clear, and had this meeting with

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 10>a great grandson of the original Gougenheim baron, the mining

0:32:55.920 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 10>Baron Meyer. Gugenheim turned that partly that into this big

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 10>empire that he has because he folded his firm into

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 10>that family office, Gugenham family office. And really, when you

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 10>think of Googenem today, you think of this man who

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 10>grew up in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, son of a factory worker,

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 10>had nothing to do with that great dynasty, but that's

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 10>the name you think of. And then over time that

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 10>has it's expanded. You have the Dodgers, Lakers, and all

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 10>these other teams. Last month, he was getting feted at

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 10>the Rose Garden by President Donald Trump, where the President

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 10>calls him my friend. Mark Walter then compare him to

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 10>George Steinbrenner, famous for his win at all cost mentality. Again,

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 10>Steinbrenner rest in peace was a polarizing figure. So it's

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 10>not really clear to me whether Mark Walter would have

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 10>heard that comparison and been happy about it or not

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 10>so thrilled.

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 2>We've only got about a minute left here and there.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, in the story, it's like he talks about

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I hate losing. He said this back in twenty twenty

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 2>four next to Laker's legend and turn business alheimh Magic Johnson.

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I just can't stand it, yes, says I reduced to

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 2>being poor and happy. Then I just got in business

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and was competitive and things worked out. I mean, what

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>is it in kind of digging into his past and

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 2>understanding a little bit about who he is and what

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 2>he's about that really just struck you, as he is

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 2>really kind of fighting for his I don't want to

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 2>say fighting for his life, and I'm more with drama,

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>but what he does will determine kind of where this goes.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 10>More importantly, what happens with the federal probe will determine

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 10>what his legacy and standing will be. And it's not

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 10>like in the past the Feds haven't tried to look

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 10>at other aspects of his business empire. The SEC in

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.919
<v Speaker 10>years passed at various stages without bringing any cases, without

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 10>accusing anyone of wrong ring, but at least had explored

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 10>various investigations that looked at elements of conflicts of interest.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 10>That is what this current probe also seems to at

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 10>least recof It seems to have some of the same flavors.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 10>But really the outcome of this probe will tell us

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 10>how we'll see history. Is he, at the end of

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 10>the day, the epitomy of that true great American dream, right,

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 10>you know, from nothing to become one of America's great

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 10>wealthy as financiers?

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 10>Is it financial ingenuity or something worse? And we'll have

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 10>to wait to see what that is.

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Highly recommend this is one of the stories that Sri

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 2>You and the team always just do so well. It's

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg. It's on Bloomberg dot com. Thank you,

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. It's a great Monday. Read Sanataraja on Bloomberg News,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Chief Wall Street Correspondent.

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Weekdaily coming up

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 7>after this.

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during it.

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us Live on YouTube.

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, so there's a lot going on in terms

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 2>of geopolitics and how it impacts things like supply chains

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>and just kind of the global grab for so much

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and how it impacts different economies. And when we were

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>planning for the show, we knew you were going to

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 2>be here. You're like, I've got a perfect guest.

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right. We are fortunate enough to bring

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 3>in someone I've known for a little while now, Peter Herrel.

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 3>He's the visiting scholar at the Georgetown Institute of International

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 3>Economic Law. He's also a former Biden, a White House

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Senior Director for International Economics, and he's joining us from Washington,

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 3>d C. Peter, thanks for coming on.

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 11>Joh thanks for having me on. It's a real pleasure.

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 3>So Peter one of the things I wanted to dive

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 3>in is you have been writing quite a bit about

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 3>the latest grouping of trade tears that have been coming

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 3>out in the section two thirty two's and all the others.

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 3>You've been talking about budget deficits. I feel like in

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the backdrop of all of this, hanging over these massive

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 3>trade and economic questions, is this ongoing war with Iran.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 3>And I'm just wondering is that fair to say? Is

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 3>it fair to say that the war in Iran is

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 3>actually maybe causing a bit more of a policy problem

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 3>for this current White House over all these other trade

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 3>and economic issues that you've running amount.

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, Joe, first of all, thanks for having me on.

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 6>And I think it's a really important question. I do

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 6>think we are seeing some interplay between the war in

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 6>Iran and the White House, the White House's terif agenda,

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 6>you know, as I think of it. On the war

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 6>in Iran, we're in kind of the phase of this

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 6>war where it is a war.

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 11>Of economic attrition on both sides.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 6>Right the Trump administration is naval imposing a naval blockade

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 6>on Iran's oil exports. Iran is trying to reduce global

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 6>oil exports from the Gulf by keeping the straight of

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 6>horror moves closed, and that is keeping energy prices elevated

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 6>at least where they were at the beginning of the year.

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 6>Going into a midterm, we are in a higher oil

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 6>price environment, which is politically challenging for the president. And interestingly,

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 6>one thing you see the President having done over the

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 6>last month or so is having made a decision not

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 6>to take US teriff rates all the way back to

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 6>where they were at the beginning of this year before

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court ruled his first round of tariffs illegal.

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 6>So you know, his average teriff rate at the beginning

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.919
<v Speaker 6>of the year was maybe about fifteen percent or so.

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 6>After the Supreme Court that fell to about ten percent.

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 11>They have said, you know, they said at the.

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 6>Time, we're going to fully recreate these tariff rates, but

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 6>they haven't actually done, so they've kind of kept them

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 6>more in that ten to eleven percent range. And I

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 6>do think that's because the war in Iran has made

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 6>energy prices in thus inflation run a little bit hotter

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 6>than it otherwise would have. And I do think that's

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, we still have tariff man for a president.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 6>We got to be direct about that. But I do

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 6>think that has made them a little bit more cautious

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 6>about fully reimposing that full tariff rates they had before

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court ruled in February.

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 3>So more of a practical approach this time than maybe

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 3>what we saw about a year year and a half ago. Peter, Yeah,

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's correct.

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 6>I actually think one of the stories of Trump tariffs

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 6>over the course of really starting late last year, is

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 6>that beneath the headlines, beneath the president who continues to

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 6>want to talk about tariffs lean into tariffs, beneath those headlines,

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 6>you have begun to see the Trump administration take a

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 6>more practical approach. You know. So, as I say, he

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.280
<v Speaker 6>has not fully recreated the tariffs the sort of high

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 6>tariff rates that he had earlier this year, I don't

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 6>want to minimize them. They're still several times higher than

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 6>they were when he came in, but you know, they

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 6>are a couple of percentage points lower. But we've also

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 6>seen him take often quiet, you know, sometimes on Friday afternoon,

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 6>take measures to exempt different kinds of price sensitive products

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 6>from the tariffs. Right so late last year, earlier this year,

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 6>they exempted a bunch of food stuffs, from the tariffs

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 6>to try to take some of that price pressure off.

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 6>They have very quietly, you know, made sure that they

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 6>are exempting farm and fertilizer inputs, did that earlier this spring,

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 6>so you know, again they want to be able to

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 6>talk about tariffs. It is a very aggressive tariff regime

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 6>compared to what we've seen in recent years, but I

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 6>think they have pivoted to be a little bit more

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 6>pragmatic than they were, you know, kind of peaked tariff

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:11.240
<v Speaker 6>last spring last summer.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Peter, we mentioned in the intro to you that you

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 2>worked with the Biden administration White House senior director for

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 2>International Economics. I do wonder if you think now that

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 2>in terms of international economics, you look around the world,

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 2>are we in a completely new era, and whether it's

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 2>tariff's investments in companies, governments taking investments in companies on shoring,

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 2>that we are whoever is in the White House, whatever

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.479
<v Speaker 2>happens in the midterms, he's ever in the White House

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 2>next that this is our new era when it comes

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 2>to what companies and countries are doing to kind of

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 2>protect themselves.

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 11>I think we are.

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 6>In a quite different era, certainly at a policy level,

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 6>and we talked about tariffs. You bring up another very

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 6>important point on government equity investments. I think this is

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 6>often underappreciated by the public here in the US. You know,

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 6>the Trump administration has taken it's either thirty five or

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.360
<v Speaker 6>thirty seven different equity stakes with a market value of

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 6>sixty or seventy billion dollars today, just on a straight

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 6>line trajectory, we're probably looking at by the end of

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.760
<v Speaker 6>the Trump administration. I don't know, you know, one hundred

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 6>to two hundred equity stakes, one hundred to two hundred

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 6>billion in market cap.

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 11>Like this is very different from what we have.

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 6>Seen in the past, and I do think we are

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 6>in a new era when it comes to policy, whether

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 6>it's trade policy and tariffs, whether it is this sort

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 6>of supply chain policy, whether it is these these these

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 6>equity investments. I think there's still an open question about, Okay,

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 6>we have a very different policies, but what is this

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 6>going to do on the data? Because you know, for

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 6>all the tariffs that were imposed over the last year,

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 6>year and a half, the US trade deaf as it

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:57.919
<v Speaker 6>was basically it has basically been unchanged over the last

0:41:57.960 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 6>six months pretty well. You know, I think we have

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 6>to be realistic that policy is changing. The data has

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 6>not yet caught up with the policy changes.

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 2>But can I just just real quickly, like twenty thirty seconds,

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 2>whoever is next in the White House? Do you think

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 2>these kind of policies continue If it's a Democrat, if

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a socialist, if it's a communist, who knows. But

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there will continues.

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 6>There will certainly be differences with the next president.

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 11>But I do think we.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 6>Are in a structurally higher tariff environment than we were

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 6>a couple of years ago. And I do also think

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 6>this kind of idea of a more activist, interventionist government

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 6>in markets is going to be here to stay. Though

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 6>whether it partly rolls back, I think is an open question.

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there's a book in there for you, Peter.

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 3>There's so much on the table for this, But I

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 3>do want to pivot. We have we have the meeting

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 3>from Xijinping, the president of China, that's supposed to be

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 3>coming up in the next month with Donald Trump, the

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 3>President of the United States. All of this tariff discussion,

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, like you said, we've seen polysilicon tariff announcement

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 3>come out, drone tariff come out. All of this is

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>slowly coming out ahead of that meeting. How do we

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 3>position the importance of that meeting and what we're seeing

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 3>from this White House right now in the weeks leading

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 3>up to it.

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is interesting to me that we have seen

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 6>some continued action again that is clearly focused on China,

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 6>even if sort of the stated reason is more general. Right,

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 6>it wasn't Chinese polysilicon tariffs, it was polysilicon dariffs, but

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 6>this is really all about China. Similarly, similarly, we have

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 6>seen the Federal Communications Commission, you know, roll out some

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 6>bans on robots, on power inverters. These are also not

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 6>stated to be about China, but are about China. It

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 6>has been interesting to me to see the Trump administration

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 6>continue to put some pressure.

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 11>On China in advance of the she meeting.

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, sometimes you think, oh, there'll be a period

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 6>of quiet before a summit like that to keep the

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 6>diplomatic waters calm. The Trump administration has clearly been willing

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 6>to put some chips on the table in advance of

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 6>that meeting. I think what will be interesting to see

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 6>is does does the Trump administration negotiate any of this

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 6>away or are they setting a new baseline going into

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 6>that negotiation, that negotiation with she to say, hey, this

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 6>is what we've done. You know, we're only going to

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 6>be talking about the future.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, on that, I just want to throw in.

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the US planning to warn dozens of countries

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 2>that would shut out of a US led AI coalition

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 2>if they sun into a similar framework proposed by China.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 2>This is coming out of Reuters. I mean, yeah, is

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 2>it just US reminding China of potentially the power they

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 2>can still wield? Are they serious about this? I mean,

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the big races and wars of

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 2>our time. It feels like and I think the.

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration well, I think the Trump administration is internally

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:09.879
<v Speaker 6>divided sometimes about they want the decoupling with.

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 11>China to go.

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Clearly on AI, they are quite committed to an aggressive

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 6>American pre eminence posture. We've seen that with their you know,

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 6>kind of diplomatic initiatives. We've seen that with their kind

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 6>of accelerationist posture, putting aside the issues with US recently

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 6>with anthropic on model safety. But they clearly want to

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 6>have an accelerationist posture here Visa v.

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 11>China on AI.

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 6>That said, I do think both Trump and She will

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 6>want to talk about AI next month at Mara a Lago,

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 6>and I won't be surprised if we see at least

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 6>some rhetorical talk around cooperation on safety and the like.

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that's necessarily mutually exclusive. I think the

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 6>US would like have those negotiations from kind of a

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 6>position of strength, But I do think there will be

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 6>some desire to cooperate on some for safety principles.

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Just as a quick one though, Peter. I mean there's

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:12.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of concern in the circles that I speak

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:14.760
<v Speaker 3>to and the circles that you run in as well,

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 3>that this is a tough meeting for Donald Trump because

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 3>in the minds of a lot of folks who've been

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 3>around this space for a long time, they feel like

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Hijinping holds a lot more cards than the President of

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.839
<v Speaker 3>United States does at this moment. Do you think that

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 3>is fair directionally?

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 6>I think both governments here hold quite a bit of

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 6>quite a number of cards. Like clearly the Chinese continue

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 6>to hold a lot of leverage through their control of

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 6>Yer Earth. So Trump administration is trying to reduce US dependencies,

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 6>but that's a two to three year, four year kind

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 6>of play. The Chinese continue to have a lot of

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 6>leverage there. Clearly, Actually the Chinese. We talked about oil

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 6>markets earlier, like the Chinese have actually been incredibly helpful

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 6>in keeping oil prices from going even higher because they've

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 6>been releasing enormous amounts from stock files.

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 11>I think President Trump is going to want that to continue.

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 11>I think the Chinese have a lot of cards.

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 6>Of course we do too, right, We continue to have

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 6>a lot of cards on the financial domain and the

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 6>technology domain in the life.

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would love to be a fly on the wall.

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like that ultimate frenemy relationship. Peter, you rock. This

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 2>was really fun. Thank you so much. Peter Heraw Visiting

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Scholar at Georgetown Institute of International Economic Law, former Biden

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Whitehouse Senior Director for International Economics. Great to have him here.

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal,