WEBVTT - Strike Shuts US Ports, Mideast Latest

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affocarplaying and Broun Auto

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Jess Metton, she's sitting in for Alex Steel today. I'm

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney. We're live here on a Bloomberg Dinner at

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the Broker Studio. We're streaming live on YouTube as well,

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 3>so you can check us out there Bloomberg you know,

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>go to the YouTube dot com search Bloomberg Live, Radio,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Podcast, any which way.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 2>We'll get you.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>There and we will have continuing coverage throughout the rest

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>of the morning on the escalating tensions in the Mid

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 3>East and the impact they're having on the markets. The

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 3>other major story obviously out there, is the day one

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>of the port strike here on the East Coast. I mean,

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at some graphics on various TV networks

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's pretty much all down the entire East Coast,

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>winding around our friends in Florida and all the way

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 3>to the Gulf Coast. We start thinking about you know,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that's a lot of territory there that does a lot

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>of shipping, So you really want to get some perspective

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>on that. You go to the folks on the left

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 3>side of this country, on the West coast, they had

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 3>their labor issues. A couple of years ago. A Mario

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Kodero joins a CEO for the Port of Long Beach. Mario,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us here. What role do

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>you believe the West Coast ports your port in Long

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Beach can have and maybe relieving some of the pressure

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 3>on shippers who can't unload or load their goods on

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>the East coast. How are you guys approaching that?

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you for the invitation. I mean, I think

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 4>when you talk about Long Beach, we're part of the

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 4>largest container gateway for the nation. So I think the

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 4>road that we play is a continued rod that we

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 4>move a great percentage of the nation's trade, and I

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 4>think we're in a very good position to handle whatever

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 4>search comes our way. And last, I'll make the point

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>that August we had a historic number of containers moving

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 4>through the Port of Long Beach. That number was nine

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirteen thousand plus content. That's a historical high

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 4>number for US, a record number, and when you add

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 4>the Port of la for August, we approximate about one

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 4>point nine million containers in this gateway the Sampeter Bay complex.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 4>So our role here is to continue to move cargo

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 4>in an efficient manner. And again Port Labbach has a

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 4>tremendous capacity right now, in that words, good capacity around

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 4>seventy percent, so we are prepared to continue to move

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 4>that containerized cargo that comes our way.

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm curious what kind of lessons did you end up

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 5>learning from the pandemic because we had so many supply

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 5>related issues with the chains there, and how could that

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 5>help you try to navigate this instance?

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Great question, a lot of lessons learned. Number One, expanding

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 4>operation hours. I've been a big spokesperson for twenty four

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 4>to seven operations. Again, to qualify that or put that

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 4>in perspective, you know, we're not going to go twenty

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 4>four hours a day, seven days a week anytime soon,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 4>but there's a frame of expansion of hours. So in

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Long Beach we've done that. We've done staging areas, and

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 4>again this is going to be very beneficial for us

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 4>if in fact we need the stage containers outside the terminals,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 4>and I think the lessons learned from COVID. Again, it's

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>a supply chain issue, so the warehouse that is the

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 4>end product here of the supply chain in this region.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 4>They also are very collaborative with us and making sure

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 4>that inventory moves. So again, a lot of lessons learned

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>from COVID nineteen supply chain crisis. So we're applying those

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 4>lessons and hopefully, again as I just noted, we're moving

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 4>a record amount of cargo here at to Port Long

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Beach without any congestion or bottlenecks whatsoever.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Mario, if I'm a shipper, I've got a ship

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>at sea in the Atlantic steaming towards New York or something,

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>and that's closed. Now what are the economics for me

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 3>to say, Oh, I'll go to the Panama Canal, go

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 3>through there, then I'll come up to your port in

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Long Beach. Is that realistic? Is that a decision option?

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean that decision for shipper is based on economics,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 4>So obviously if they're going to come to the West Coast,

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that decision comes into play that for them,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 4>it's a reduced cost. With regard to the option that

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 4>potentially could happen. But in that regard, yes, there's increased

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 4>transportation costs for sure, but I think again, I think

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be a scenario which we'll be able

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 4>to manage that and move forward as we have in

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 4>previous instances. We talked about COVID nineteen. But again we

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of lessons learned from COVID nineteen, and

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 4>one of them is we are prepared no matter where

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 4>the options are in terms of cargo flow, we're going

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 4>to be moving to cargo here.

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 5>What other ports along the West coast do you foresee

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 5>field cargo that ends up getting re routed?

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry I repeat that question.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 5>So what other ports along the West coast do you

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 5>foresee other field cargo ended up getting rerouted at this point?

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, Number one, poor Los Angeles. Again, they're part of

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 4>this gateway, the Port of Oakland in northern California, and

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 4>you also have the Port of Way NIMI. So there's

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 4>other ports in the West coast here and again if

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 4>you go to the northwest port of Seattle and Tacoma.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 4>So I think the West Coast is in a very

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 4>good position to make sure that we not only receive

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>the car a little, but continue to move it inland

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 4>to the nation's midwest.

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 5>Maria.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>One of the topics that I guess the long shoremen

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>and the shippers have is a wages of course, and

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>presumably that will work itself out. But the other one

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 3>is automation and what that means for jobs. How do

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 3>you guys talk to your long shorman about the need

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 3>for you guys to automate to remain competitive versus their

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>need to preserve jobs. What's that discussion like these days?

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean you mentioned an issue here. Automation robotics

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>has been a continued concern in all sectors of labor.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 4>So for the portal lombies, I think the way we've

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 4>been able to navigate well with our labor partners is

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 4>anyone who's interested in better developing the terminals of the

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 4>poor long beach number one, you have to have a

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 4>meeting of the mines with the IOWU, so that collaborative

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 4>partnership and works well for us. So in that regard,

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 4>that's been our policy. Anybody who wants to expand or

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 4>develop their terminals, they have to go through the isow first,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 4>and that mitigates any serious differences as we go down

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 4>the road. So for us, it's been a successful path.

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 4>But on the other hand, again keep in mind this

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>is an issue across the board in terms of workforce

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 4>in the nation, if not the global community.

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 5>Do you have a sense from retailers how they're potentially

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 5>making contingency plans as of.

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Now, Well, I think what I can tell you is

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 4>I gave you these record numbers that we're moving here

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 4>at the Poor of Long Beach for August. That's almost

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 4>a thirty four percent increase year to year. So I

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 4>think the retailers in the shippers have already anticipated a

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 4>scenario that's occurring in the East Coast and they've already

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 4>made that decision to move their cargo to the West Coast.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 4>And again, the August numbers for both these ports Los

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Angeles and Long Beach here in the Sanpedo Bay complex

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 4>are historical numbers, so that basically answers the question that

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 4>I think they've already made those decisions, and I do

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 4>expect to have additional car a little bit. Have me

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 4>said all this, I want to make sure that again

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 4>from the poor lobbies, we encourage that the parties in

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 4>the East Coast moved to a resolution because any bottleneck

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 4>and the supply chain in the nation is not good.

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 4>So for my perspective, I think again, it's not about

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 4>additional cargo that we're going to get. It's about hopefully

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 4>these parties coming to a mutual resolution soon so that

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 4>we don't impact the nation's supply chain anywhere in the country.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Mary, thank you so much for joining us. Really

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 3>appreciate getting some of your time at MARYA. Cordero, he's

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of the Port of Long Beach, giving us

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>a sense of kind of they're busy and presumably they

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 3>still have some capacity to take some shipments if somebody

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>want to divert them from the East coast to the

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 3>West coast. And the other thing we learned about talking

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>to Jean Soroka, who is his counterpart at the Port

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>of La is that those West coast ports, particular the

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>ones in the La area, they just got a great

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 3>view of China trade. They do contannerships could just keep

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 3>coming back and forth back and forth into that port

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>so you can get a good view.

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and androyd

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.679
<v Speaker 2>Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Tensions and Conflicts in the Middle East returned to Mick mulnoy.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 3>He's a co founder of the Lobo Institute. That's just

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the beginning. He's a former senior fellow at the Middle

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 3>East Institute, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Middle East at the US Department of Defense. That was enough,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 3>former Power Military Operations officer at CIA, and of course

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 3>a former US Marine Infantry officer. And for his service,

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 3>we say thank you very much, Mick for your service.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Make it looks like we're going to take another rung

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 3>up on the escalation ladder today. What do you make

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>of this news that the US is saying that it

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 3>ran as preparing to hit Israel with ballistic missiles.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Good to be with you, guys. I think this is expected.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they've been claiming they're going to retaliate ever

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>since we saw the assassination of the Hamas leader in Tehran. Then,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of course the assassination of the Hesbela leader in Beirut

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was expected. Now the question is is it

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be like April where we have the capacity

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and we do have the capacity to essentially shoot down

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>all of the incoming drones and missiles, or is it

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be more substantial or is it going to

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be coordinated with Hesbelah and the Huthis so that it

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>can try to overwhelm the defenses of Israel and the

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>United States combined. That's the question We'll see soon because

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's eminent and it's going to take

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>some of these projectiles hours to get to Israel. So

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to stand by and see how this goes.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 5>To what extent does the United States rely on Israeli

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 5>intelligence streams and its assessment of those different regional threats.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's a back and forth when it comes to

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the Israeli US intelligence cooperation. Oftentimes Israel has better intelligence

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on the threats that are immediate to them. Of course,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States also has its independent intelligence and then

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and when it comes to big regional intelligence, usually the US,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the CIA, and other organizations inside the intelligence community are

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>better and past the information to Israel. For example, the

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>IDEF spokesman said that the US had notified Israel that

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Iran was preparing these cruise ballistic missiles and potentially drones

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>earlier this morning. So that shows the cooperation and the

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>sharing that goes on near constantly, Mick.

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Immediately following the October attack on Israel prime mention Netnyan,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 3>who said quite simply that the strategy, the goal of

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Israel is to one eliminate Hamas and to get the

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>hostages back. That seems to have broadened out significantly. The

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 3>scope to now take in on Hesbela and going into Lebanon,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 3>dealing with all in any adversaries. Is that, in fact true,

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>has his war aims broadened significantly?

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I do think it's broadened, but I would have

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to say if somebody spends quite a bit of time

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in Israel. The Israelis have been messaging directly that they

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>knew that this war in the north between Hesbelah would

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have to happen if they were to get their six

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred or excuse me, sixty thousand plus citizens back to

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>their homes in northern Israel. They were very clear about that,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's important to point out Hesblah has

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>been just hacking Israel since October eighth, there's been over

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand missiles, rockets, drones, an say, tank weapons fired

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>into Israel. And this was inevitable if this was going

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to continue, and I think they have shown that they

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have very good capabilities in Lebanon. I don't think it's

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in anybody's interest, including Israel, and it's certainly not Lebanon's,

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>but this to turn into a full scale ground invasion.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>But from Israel's perspective, this was inevitable if Hezbolah was

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to attack their northern settlements and essentially

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>put hat at least one third of their country off

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>limits to their own citizens.

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 5>Well, the conflicts between Israel and has blowed inevitably drawn

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 5>in Iran into the conflict. What does that mean for

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 5>the wider region in general?

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Now, So that was the biggest concern of the United States.

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why we've had so many military assets in the

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>region to try to deter a course, and to a

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>certain extent it has deterred Aron, I believe. And then

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>also to defend and we've seen how capable the US

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was when it came to defending Israel, along with Israel

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and other countries in the regions such as Jordan, which

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>defended Israel against the April thirteenth attack by Iron. But

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this is what the biggest concern is for the United States,

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>that Iran would mount something that wasn't manageable, that wasn't

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>for show, that was or actually just got through and

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>caused substantial damage or loss of life in Israel, because

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been clear that Israel will respond directly

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to or on and they might take direct, meaningful strikes,

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>not like they did last time in Iran. In fact,

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>several of the IDF spokesperson have referenced their recent attack

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on the WHO thi's in WHO data Yemen is further

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>away than from Israel than Iran's oil fields, specifically citing

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Iran's oil field. So I think there's a lot of

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>messaging coming out of Israel right now that if Iran

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is successful so not for show like many in it

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>believe April was, and actually causes damage to this could

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>escalate very quickly and have impacts that go beyond the

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>two cunt treason, certainly beyond the region.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Mick.

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 3>We've seen the US government repeatedly call for a restraint

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 3>on the part of Israel, yet Primeister Netanya, who has

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 3>effectively ignored those Please here, What is the current state

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 3>of the US Israeli relationship.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I certainly think there is some tensions. I mean,

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the US overall supports Israel defeating Hamas of course they

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>were the terrorist attack that attacked them on October seventh,

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and Heswela, which is a US designated terrorist organization and

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>has been constantly attacking Israel. When it comes to the

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship in Gaza, I think there's been differences of how

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that was prosecuted, and now I think the US just

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to see this get contained and have a cease

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>fire so that they can do everything that they would

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like to see policy wise, which is in the conflict

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in both Gaza and obviously not have one if you

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>will in Lebanon. But Israel has their own interests, they're

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>their own sovereign country, and they make their own decisions.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>If they were asking me, I would suggest to the

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>White House that they take more of a behind the

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>scenes role and not have public disagreements with Israel. They

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>could certainly have private disagreements Israel when it comes to

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this seaspar because in Lebanon specifically, because this is very

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>difficult for any country to tell another country that's been

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>attacked again nine thousand missiles in less than one year

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not to do something that they know they would do,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So that makes this a bit different. And essentially the

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Sea spire needs to come from Hesbela, who could simply

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>stop attacking Israel, agree not to continue, potentially move to

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the Litati River, which is required by a UN resolution.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So most of the I think negotiations on this side

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>should be focused on Hesbela vice Israel, which both countries

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, put in the same situation, would be doing

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>something similar to Israel right now.

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, thank you so much. As always, really appreciate

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 3>getting some of your time and your perspective.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Mick mulroy.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>He's a co founder of the Lobo Institute and really

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 3>one of our expert voices that we rely upon whenever

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 3>there's some of these geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 3>where he has so much experience.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Focar playing and broud

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Geopolitical story of the day movie markets is US is

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 3>saying that is a rands preparing to hit Israel with

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 3>ballistic missiles. We've been covering that story all day. We

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 3>will continue to do so. Jonathan Panakoff he joins us now.

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 3>He's a director of the Scowcroft Middle East Security Institute

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 3>at the Atlantic Council. He is based in Washington, DC. Jonathan,

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 3>thanks so much for joining us here. What do you

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>make of the last I guess forty eight hours in

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East, with Israel having some troop and versions

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>into southern Lebanon, and now the news today that the

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 3>US says that Iran may be preparing to hit Israel

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 3>with the ballistic missiles. That's been quite the escalation in

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 3>the last forty eight hours.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it?

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for having me. It certainly has been the escalation.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 6>I don't expect it to end anytime soon. I think

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 6>the Iran strike that is probably going to be coming

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 6>shortly here, it's going to look slightly different than April.

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 6>I think certainly it's still going to probably target first

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 6>military assets in israel intelligence headquarters.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 5>Perhaps.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they're going to see their runnings go

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 6>after civilian infrastructure. But I do think the question is

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 6>going to be how does Israel respond, And I'm skeptical

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 6>that you will see the same response that you had

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 6>in April. And then that means that the chances for

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 6>increased escalation as we go up the escalatory ladder are

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 6>only going to go up. So this is going to

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.959
<v Speaker 6>take a little bit of time to see where it resolves,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 6>and of course at the end of it, you still

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 6>have what will be an ongoing war between Israel and Hezbolah.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 5>Has the UN Security Council had a reaction yet to

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 5>the latest news on this.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 6>The Secretary General did come out and say every effort

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 6>has to be made to try to prevent a full

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 6>scale war between Israel and Hezbola that could engulf the region.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 6>But we haven't seen UN Security Council immediately this morning

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 6>meet my senses, you'll see them meet as soon as

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 6>Frankly Iran launchers and you start to see more kinetic

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 6>action being taken. But the reality is going to be

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 6>the impact of the UNSC is going to be, if anything,

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 6>very minimal.

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan, I guess maybe with a little bit of hindsight,

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 3>we should not have been too surprised that we've had

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 3>this escalation here because you think about just last week

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Prime mentioned that Yahoo at the United Nations here in

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 3>New York. Pretty defiant speech there is he boldened down

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 3>to do more than maybe what the initial aims were,

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 3>which is to get the hostages back and take out Hamas.

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>His aims much broader now.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 6>They certainly are oka. I think Israel has been split

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 6>for quite a while. They were some at the beginning

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 6>of the war, including Yoev Galant, the Israeli Defense Minister,

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.479
<v Speaker 6>who said, no, we can actually deal with Hamas at

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 6>a later time, we should go after Hezbala, and that

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 6>was in late October of twenty twenty three. That's not

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 6>the direction that Netanyahu chose to go. It's not the

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 6>direction most security officials chose to go. But it also

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 6>didn't resolve the fundamental challenge that you had. Hisbela beginning

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 6>October eighth, begin rocket attacks into northern Israel that has

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 6>displaced tens of thousands of Israeli citizens who Netanyahu has

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 6>now faced political pressure to return them home. It's now

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 6>been a year. The original promise was to restart at

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 6>the beginning of the school year, that didn't happen, and

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 6>so now I think the view is and we've seen

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 6>this in the last few months, Israel very methodically went

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 6>after Hezbala's command of control, its leadership. It took out

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 6>more Hebela leaders in the last two months than it

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 6>had in the last two decades, and so clearly there's

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 6>a concern that this is going to escalate, and it

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 6>probably will. But you're right, some of this has been

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 6>telegraphed in the last few months about the direction we

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 6>were heading.

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 5>What types of weapons could Iran use in an attack

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 5>and would they use all of their military capabilities for one?

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think so. Look, Iran has a really large

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 6>inventory of ballistic missiles, of cruise missiles, of drones. You're

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 6>talking about dozens of different types with significant ranges. The

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 6>ballistic missiles, the time to get them from Iran to

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 6>Israel is about twelve minutes, give or take, so it's

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 6>really quick. The cruise missiles there is a little slower,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 6>the drones much lower than that. But the reality is,

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 6>at the end of the day, Iran's number one concern

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 6>is always regime stability and regime security, and so the

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 6>odds that it's going to use the entirety of it's Arsenal,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 6>I think is very very low, because if it does so,

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 6>then it's got nothing left to protect itself or even

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 6>to protect Kabala in another month or two, if there's

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 6>a need that, if follow looks like it's really suffering,

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 6>the question for Ron is going to be, how does

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 6>it respond in a meaningful way that can try to

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 6>create some increased deterrence against Israel without actually leading to

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 6>a full scale war that jeopardizes the stability of the

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 6>Iranian regime. And that's going to be a really hard

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 6>balance to me.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Jonathan, thank you so much for joining us.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate it. Jonathan Panacoff, he's a director at the

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative at the Atlanta Council. Giving

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 3>us the latest on the geopolitical tensions rising there. In

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the midist, you're listening.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>To the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 2>ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android Otto with

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live on

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just Say

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Alexa Play.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg eleven thirty Economic data also coming out impacting these markets,

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 3>ice and manufacturings. John Tucker just reported came into forty

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 3>seven point two. They could say since it was forty

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 3>seven point five, so a little bit light but kind

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 3>of flat with last month. Let's break it down a

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit. We can do that, Tim Fury, he's a

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 3>chair for the Institute for Supply Management's Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. Tim,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>what do you make of the data we saw here

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 3>from the US manufacturers today?

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 7>Good morning, So we have a stable contraction compared to

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 7>the prior month at forty seven to two. Like you said, Paul,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 7>it's a good report. I think on the demand side,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 7>we're still looking for demand to surface. And of course

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 7>our panelists only had a little bit of the benefit

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 7>here of the federal rate reduction announced several weeks ago,

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 7>but it's not reflected really in our report. Just the

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 7>sentiment would be. On the output side, output was good,

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 7>our revenue and our production base was stable month a month,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 7>which is excellent. Employment stepped down again. We could talk

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 7>a little bit more about that now. On the input side,

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 7>we returned to a normal minimal stress and the supplier

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 7>side and manufacturing inventories back and the level that you

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 7>would expect them to be. So we're kind of where

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 7>we thought we would be in a little bit about

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 7>forty sive. You know, we're still thinking that we're probably

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 7>going to stay below fifty before we get to the

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 7>beginning the next year. But yeah, so we'll talk a

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 7>little bit about employment and prices. So we've kind of

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 7>been preceding what's been happening on the jobs. Joelts CPI

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 7>and PPI in terms of direction. Our employment came down

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 7>again pretty strongly, but I think the fact that the

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 7>revenue maintained this level that we had back in August

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 7>indicates that we're just trying to make sure that we

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 7>have employment levels aligned properly with the latest demand for gasts. Now,

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 7>on the prices side, we came down to forty eight three.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 7>We're easing a little bit. We've seen some softness on

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 7>steel and aluminum, more of the foundational commodities, and I

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 7>think that's probably a good omen for the CPIPPI PC

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 7>that comes out later on the month.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 5>So Tim, we know that previously declining orders had been

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 5>that issue in a persistent retreat in the backlogs that

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 5>had remained kind of key headwinds here for production where

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 5>are new orders increasing versus decreasing, So.

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 7>Demand overall I think is still negative. This month, we

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 7>have very weak new export orders. The new order level

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 7>contracted again, but not quite as bad as it did

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 7>in the prior month. We contracted minimally, but we're still contracting.

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 7>Our backlog gained a little bit in terms of slowing

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 7>down its contraction, but it's still contracting fairly heavily, so

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 7>you know overall, and customer inventories came in about right,

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 7>which really isn't all that good for next month's activity,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 7>So overall demand is still weak. Wouldn't expect with the

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 7>Fed announcing and interest rate reduction just a couple of

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 7>weeks ago that we would see an impact on the

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 7>demand side. I'm hoping to see additional investments start to

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 7>occur in the November timeframe. Maybe that will help as

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 7>we build up maybe manufacturing inventory to do better on

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 7>customer demand. But overall, I really don't see demand coming

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 7>back until we close the year and the election gets

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 7>behind us.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, Tim, thanks so much for joining us. Really

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 3>appreciate you breaking down this news here. Tim Fury, chairman

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>of the Manufacturing Business Survey. The firm is the Institute

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 3>for Supply Management breaking down some of those numbers came

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 3>in a little lighter than expected, but a little stable

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 3>relative to last period, still in a contraction mode.

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, Boeing some news here, Maybe weighing to raise

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 3>at least ten billion dollars in stock because why, they

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 3>got a cash flow problem here and they're not delivering

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 3>as many planes as they need to. It's definitely a

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 3>challenge for them. So they did go to the bond market.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 3>They're concerning going to the equity market. Lets see if

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 3>that's enough. George Ferguson, Senior Airspace Defense analys for Bloomberg

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence Joints us George, again, this is something you've talked

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 3>to us about in the past, that the company may

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 3>need to go to the equity market and raise some equity.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 3>It stocks down forty percent year to date, ideally not

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 3>a good time to raise money. At this valuation. But

0:25:58.280 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 3>what do you make of this?

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, you know, I think the strike is

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 8>sort of dragged on enough and they have to be

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 8>concerned about having enough cash to continue to run the

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 8>business that they're ready to do whatever it takes right

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 8>to show up their position. I guess it kind of

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 8>gives me a sense that maybe they think the strike's

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 8>going to last longer than maybe even we anticipated originally,

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 8>and so you got to do it, you gotta do,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 8>I guess.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 5>And we do know that Boeing is on the cusp

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 5>of seeing its credit rating cut to junk. Here, what's

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 5>the likelihood that we could see this happening soon?

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think that again, if this strike drags on,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 8>you know, you're starting to get to the point where

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 8>I think once you get past a month, where you're

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 8>probably doing more damage to the supply chain, and so

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 8>losing a month due to the strike, you know that

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 8>doesn't just going to take you a month to sort

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 8>of recapture where you were previously. I think losing a

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 8>month means you put the suppliers a much more strain.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 8>Maybe it means it's six weeks, seven weeks worth of recovery,

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 8>So the further drags on, I think the more the

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 8>rating agencies have to think about when are they going

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 8>to really bance back to profitability and you know, and

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 8>generate some decent cash and they've got to keep sort

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 8>of pushing it out at a multiple the time the

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 8>strike has gone on. And so you know, that's what

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 8>I think the real challenge here, I think the I

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 8>think I'm not the credit analyst, but I think that

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 8>the credit agencies, if we drag on again past a month,

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 8>I think they have to really start to think about

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 8>whether they can hold Boeing in a band that frankly,

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 8>I think they weren't really in any ways. But the

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 8>credit agencies are trying to look through the cycle a

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 8>bit here.

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 3>The stock's actually up three and a half percent on

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the news today, so maybe the investment great credit rating

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 3>is more important. That made me some delution here, George,

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 3>where are we in terms of these negotiations here in

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 3>week three? Any any movement there?

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 8>You know, not what we're hearing. You know, I think

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 8>you've heard the same as we did. That another offer

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 8>came out. It looked like I think it was about

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 8>thirty percent increase. Looks like the union wasn't very interested.

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 8>I think if you're Boeing right now, you know what

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 8>I understand is a lot of these union members got

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 8>one of their last paychecks either at the very end

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 8>of September bidding of October here, and so I think,

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 8>now what you're really trying to do is figure out

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 8>what the reserve, you know what, the you know what

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 8>the union really, how far they're willing to go right,

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 8>whether they they're as as girded as they say they

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 8>are to keep going into a world where they're just

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 8>not getting paychecks, right. And so maybe here we're in

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 8>a bit of a who knows it, you know, sort

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 8>of the chicken phase where Boeing says, look, we can

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 8>push this further, and let's see how long you can't

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 8>take a paycheck and see how how much the union

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 8>is saved up. And I think the challenge here really

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 8>is Boeing has to live with whether whatever cost structure

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 8>they ultimately agree to, right, and so as much as

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 8>they just want to get back and start building airplanes,

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 8>they also have to be very careful about what the

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 8>long term effects are on their financials. It's really challenging

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 8>right now for going in their financial position to have

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 8>to do this, but they've got to think about the

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 8>long term here, all.

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, George, thanks very much. We appreciate it. George Ferguson's

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 3>senior Airspace, Defense and Airlines analys for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 2>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 2>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.479
<v Speaker 2>always on the Bloomberg terminal