1
00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:02,480
Speaker 1: Whether you have your own bathroom or you share one

2
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:05,280
Speaker 1: with your family, A little extra help keeping the bathroom

3
00:00:05,320 --> 00:00:08,560
Speaker 1: seeing counter and mere clean goes a long way. And

4
00:00:08,720 --> 00:00:11,480
Speaker 1: Viva paper Towels are for the long haul. There are

5
00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:14,480
Speaker 1: two times more durable when we compared to the leading

6
00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:17,360
Speaker 1: value brand, and they clean like cloth, helping you keep

7
00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:21,200
Speaker 1: the surfaces near bathroom dry and fingerprint and toothpaste free.

8
00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:25,799
Speaker 1: For an exceptional bathroom clean, there's Viva Paper Towels. Visit

9
00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:31,760
Speaker 1: Viva Towels dot com to learn more. The Armstrong and

10
00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:38,400
Speaker 1: Getty Show. Look, I think the good news but Joe

11
00:00:38,400 --> 00:00:41,040
Speaker 1: Biden is this was maybe the best he could do.

12
00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:43,680
Speaker 1: And the bad news is this maybe the best he

13
00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:49,240
Speaker 1: could do. That's David axel Rod and David axe Rod

14
00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:52,879
Speaker 1: ran Obama's campaign. Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe had this

15
00:00:52,960 --> 00:00:55,080
Speaker 1: to say, give me a prey. I don't have an

16
00:00:55,120 --> 00:01:01,360
Speaker 1: You people, Donald trop and you're talking about defending Obamacare.

17
00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:08,760
Speaker 1: It's Republican talking points. Who is advising you? Wow? A

18
00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:11,360
Speaker 1: lot of beating up on the Obama Ara policies on

19
00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:13,760
Speaker 1: the debate stage last night. Well, they're going after that

20
00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:18,120
Speaker 1: three percent of Democrats that didn't like Barack Obama exactly.

21
00:01:18,240 --> 00:01:21,200
Speaker 1: Finally they get the pummeling they deserve. Lan he Chen

22
00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:24,080
Speaker 1: joins us. Lan He is a David and Diane Stephy

23
00:01:24,160 --> 00:01:27,040
Speaker 1: research Fellow at the Whoever Institution, Director of Domestic Policy

24
00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:30,399
Speaker 1: Studies and Lecture in Public Policy at Stanford University. Lan

25
00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:33,880
Speaker 1: he how are you, sir, Oh, I'm doing fine. Nothing

26
00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:35,560
Speaker 1: like two nights of debates to get you going in

27
00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:38,280
Speaker 1: the morning. Tell you what. I feel, re energized and

28
00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:41,920
Speaker 1: just more in love with life than ever. So what

29
00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:44,640
Speaker 1: stood out most to you? What's what's on the tip

30
00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:48,480
Speaker 1: of your tongue this morning? Debate? Wise? Well, I think

31
00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:51,560
Speaker 1: it's interesting. You know, the candidates had two nights to present.

32
00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:54,200
Speaker 1: You know, what I would say is a vision for

33
00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:57,520
Speaker 1: how they plan to govern, how they plan to maybe

34
00:01:57,560 --> 00:02:01,600
Speaker 1: even defeat Donald Trump, and instead, especially last night, they

35
00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:04,200
Speaker 1: really spent their time attacking one another. I thought last

36
00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:08,600
Speaker 1: night was really interesting because everyone's coming after Joe Biden,

37
00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:12,360
Speaker 1: then Kamala Harris gets attacked, and then kind of inexplicably,

38
00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:15,960
Speaker 1: Joe Biden attacks Corey Booker, and it was just a

39
00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:19,560
Speaker 1: very bizarre confluence of events when when I thought it

40
00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:21,800
Speaker 1: was going to be a much more substantive conversation. I

41
00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:24,000
Speaker 1: really thought it was a lot more of a scrum,

42
00:02:24,040 --> 00:02:25,880
Speaker 1: and I don't know that's going to serve the Democrats

43
00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:27,200
Speaker 1: well in the long run. So I thought it was

44
00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:29,480
Speaker 1: a little puzzling from that perspective. Well do you do

45
00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:31,359
Speaker 1: you blame? The candidates? Are? A lot of people are

46
00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,840
Speaker 1: blaming CNN. They're they're taking a beating from MSNBC in

47
00:02:34,880 --> 00:02:37,760
Speaker 1: The Washington Post has a whole column about that. What's

48
00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,640
Speaker 1: with this? Pitting each other? Them against each other? Every

49
00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:43,440
Speaker 1: question is set up a she said something bad about you,

50
00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:45,600
Speaker 1: You said something about her. Now you argue, I mean,

51
00:02:45,639 --> 00:02:49,840
Speaker 1: what what is that? Well, here's my thing. The first

52
00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:52,560
Speaker 1: rule in politics is you don't answer the question, so

53
00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:54,560
Speaker 1: you don't have to take the bait. I mean why

54
00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:56,240
Speaker 1: these guys take the bait and it's like, oh, well,

55
00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:58,040
Speaker 1: Joe Biden to this about you a great, I'm gonna

56
00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:01,480
Speaker 1: attack Joe Biden. The reality is that the person who

57
00:03:01,720 --> 00:03:03,560
Speaker 1: I thought that the most to lose last night was

58
00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:07,400
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. And I know the conventional wisdom as well. Okay, look,

59
00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:09,919
Speaker 1: he didn't do that badly. Let's be honest, he didn't

60
00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,320
Speaker 1: do all that great either. I mean, if if if

61
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:15,680
Speaker 1: you watch that debate and you see Joe Biden punching again,

62
00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:17,960
Speaker 1: punching down at Corey book of the first rule that

63
00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:20,960
Speaker 1: we always use with candidates and debate preparation. When I've

64
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:23,600
Speaker 1: been in dozens of these meetings, if you don't punch down,

65
00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:25,720
Speaker 1: if you're the front runner, why do you punch down?

66
00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:28,760
Speaker 1: And so in my mind, for Joe Biden last night,

67
00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:31,280
Speaker 1: it may have been a better performance in the first

68
00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:32,840
Speaker 1: time he went out there, but gosh, if that's the

69
00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:36,000
Speaker 1: best he can do, I think his campaigns in trouble. Well, boy,

70
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:37,920
Speaker 1: you and I are some of the few people saying

71
00:03:37,960 --> 00:03:41,800
Speaker 1: that I didn't think he was very impressive, but he

72
00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:45,640
Speaker 1: did avoid disaster. You know, you mentioned substance and policy,

73
00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:49,360
Speaker 1: and I've advocated for more of that in my whole life,

74
00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:52,680
Speaker 1: and I finally got it the last couple of nights,

75
00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:57,320
Speaker 1: and I found myself just mystified and bored by the

76
00:03:57,600 --> 00:04:02,040
Speaker 1: endless recitation of the minor differences between various people's health

77
00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:07,760
Speaker 1: care policies. I like substance, But how did this strike you? Yeah?

78
00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:10,520
Speaker 1: I thought the health care discussion dived into the weeds

79
00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:13,920
Speaker 1: quite quickly. I mean, look that the reality is that

80
00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:17,920
Speaker 1: there are very stark differences between what someone like Joe

81
00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:20,640
Speaker 1: Biden and what someone like Kamala Harris want to do

82
00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:24,440
Speaker 1: with healthcare. And they could have made those things abundantly clear,

83
00:04:24,520 --> 00:04:26,599
Speaker 1: while at the same time, by the way, pointing out

84
00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:29,160
Speaker 1: the differences between what they want to do and what

85
00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:32,240
Speaker 1: they allege Republicans want to do. But instead they were

86
00:04:32,279 --> 00:04:35,039
Speaker 1: talking about this percentage of people and that percentage of

87
00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:36,920
Speaker 1: people on this element of the plan, and that all

88
00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:39,360
Speaker 1: on the plan. So I did think they get lost

89
00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:42,359
Speaker 1: in the weeds really quickly, and and there I do

90
00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:44,800
Speaker 1: blame the moderators a little bit, and the moderators could

91
00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:47,080
Speaker 1: have jumped in and tried to pull them out of

92
00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,760
Speaker 1: the weeds. But you're right, I think the conversation got

93
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,440
Speaker 1: way more specific than most Americans cared to hear about,

94
00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:54,760
Speaker 1: even those who like policy. I know we talked about

95
00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:57,360
Speaker 1: this before the first debate started. How much do these

96
00:04:57,400 --> 00:05:00,640
Speaker 1: debates matter. There's not a lot of da to show

97
00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:03,919
Speaker 1: that they move the needle much that the polls move much.

98
00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:05,560
Speaker 1: Maybe for a day or twobe and they kind of

99
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:08,680
Speaker 1: settled back. There are a couple of examples of people

100
00:05:09,760 --> 00:05:12,720
Speaker 1: when Rick Perry couldn't name, you know, the main departments.

101
00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,560
Speaker 1: I think that really damaged him, But there are very

102
00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:18,760
Speaker 1: few examples. And then I saw an article today Laundry

103
00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:22,080
Speaker 1: listing all of the times Hillary Clinton has want a debate,

104
00:05:22,200 --> 00:05:25,360
Speaker 1: Like practically every debate she's ever been in she won.

105
00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:28,120
Speaker 1: She's had like one gaff in her entire career, yet

106
00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:33,960
Speaker 1: she lost repeatedly running for president. So what do they matter? Well,

107
00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:36,320
Speaker 1: I think you raise a very good point, which is

108
00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:40,839
Speaker 1: what generally happens with these debates is they create temporary

109
00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:46,200
Speaker 1: changes in temporary shifts in how voters view various candidates,

110
00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:50,360
Speaker 1: but they don't have lasting changes necessarily in the scope

111
00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,920
Speaker 1: and the nature of the race. Now, what they can

112
00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:57,520
Speaker 1: do is, in this situation, they can create uh, sort

113
00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,520
Speaker 1: of a buzz around a candidate who maybe nobody was

114
00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:03,679
Speaker 1: paying attention to. So Julian Castro got his five minutes

115
00:06:03,720 --> 00:06:06,360
Speaker 1: of fame out of the first debate. In the second debate,

116
00:06:06,400 --> 00:06:09,200
Speaker 1: you know, you could argue that, um, there were others

117
00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:12,080
Speaker 1: potentially like Corey Booker, who may have benefited. But in

118
00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:15,000
Speaker 1: the long run, I'm not really convinced the debates matter

119
00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:17,719
Speaker 1: a whole ton in terms of the atmospherics of the

120
00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:20,080
Speaker 1: race and where things are headed. Biden is still going

121
00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:21,800
Speaker 1: to be the front runner. You're still going to have

122
00:06:21,839 --> 00:06:23,599
Speaker 1: a pack of three or four that are in that

123
00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:26,520
Speaker 1: next group that are nipping at his heels. And I

124
00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:29,839
Speaker 1: don't think that changes very much. When it could change potentially,

125
00:06:29,880 --> 00:06:31,719
Speaker 1: as when we get down to two or three people

126
00:06:31,760 --> 00:06:34,039
Speaker 1: in the debates, then if someone has a very good

127
00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:36,520
Speaker 1: performance or a very bad performance, it could affect things.

128
00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:38,960
Speaker 1: But for now, at least, I do think as steady

129
00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:42,280
Speaker 1: as she goes lanh chen is with the Hoover Institution

130
00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:46,479
Speaker 1: and Stanford University. Listen, I'm going to make a number

131
00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:50,200
Speaker 1: of very wobbly assumptions and leap right to Biden versus

132
00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:54,960
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump on stage debating. Uh, Trump's gonna go

133
00:06:55,240 --> 00:06:59,200
Speaker 1: mean Biden is going to try to be the ah

134
00:06:59,279 --> 00:07:01,320
Speaker 1: shucks every And how do you see that plan out?

135
00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:05,640
Speaker 1: Any idea? Well? You know here, here here's the thing.

136
00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:09,840
Speaker 1: I mean. Trump is very very skilled in these debate contexts,

137
00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:13,240
Speaker 1: and and I just don't think that people realize that

138
00:07:13,400 --> 00:07:17,520
Speaker 1: he is able to use um elements of his rhetoric,

139
00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:20,280
Speaker 1: elements of his now his record as president. I think

140
00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:23,720
Speaker 1: he's gonna use that very effectively. I think Biden, if

141
00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:26,000
Speaker 1: anything in the last couple of debates has shown that

142
00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:30,280
Speaker 1: he's just a step slower then he was. You know,

143
00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:32,840
Speaker 1: the last time I really remember him on debate stage, obviously,

144
00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:35,920
Speaker 1: was in twelve when he was in that VP debate

145
00:07:35,960 --> 00:07:37,840
Speaker 1: against Paul Ryan. I think that's the last time he

146
00:07:38,200 --> 00:07:42,120
Speaker 1: debated before this, seven years ago. And yeah, it's seven

147
00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:44,040
Speaker 1: years ago. And what you realize is if you go

148
00:07:44,160 --> 00:07:46,080
Speaker 1: I would encourage people go back and watch some of

149
00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:49,680
Speaker 1: that tape. The Joe Biden from seven years ago very

150
00:07:49,760 --> 00:07:51,640
Speaker 1: different than the Joe Biden that we've seen in the

151
00:07:51,680 --> 00:07:53,640
Speaker 1: last two debates. And I do think he's gotten a

152
00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:56,720
Speaker 1: step flower And I wonder what it's gonna look like

153
00:07:56,720 --> 00:08:00,120
Speaker 1: when he's debating Trump, because Trump is gonna be relatively nimble,

154
00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:04,200
Speaker 1: relatively agile, and and Biden may be able to CounterPunch,

155
00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,040
Speaker 1: but is he gonna be able to do it effectively?

156
00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:08,960
Speaker 1: I'm just not sure. I'm convinced, based on what I've

157
00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:11,320
Speaker 1: seen the last two nights or the last two debates,

158
00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:13,680
Speaker 1: that he's gonna be a great counterpuncher. And I think

159
00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:16,120
Speaker 1: that you've got to be a great counterpuncher, and you've

160
00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:17,680
Speaker 1: got to be able to think about ways to put

161
00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:19,840
Speaker 1: Trump on the defensive if you're gonna go up against it,

162
00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:22,160
Speaker 1: I'm just not sure Biden can do that. If you

163
00:08:22,200 --> 00:08:24,960
Speaker 1: were advising Kamala Harris prepping her, what would you say

164
00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:30,320
Speaker 1: about last night's debate performance or her performances in general. Yeah,

165
00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:32,920
Speaker 1: I think I think she's been fine. Um. I think

166
00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:36,920
Speaker 1: that that her problem is that at some point her

167
00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:41,120
Speaker 1: rejoinder was always, well, those are Republican talking points, and

168
00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:44,440
Speaker 1: it's like, yeah, there Republican talking points, but there's some

169
00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:47,120
Speaker 1: truth to the matter in other words, And Republicans say

170
00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:49,400
Speaker 1: your plan is going to kick hundreds of millions of

171
00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:51,920
Speaker 1: people off their health insurance. You know you gotta have

172
00:08:51,960 --> 00:08:53,960
Speaker 1: an answer for that, right. You gotta tell us why

173
00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:55,800
Speaker 1: it is that your plan is not going to decimate

174
00:08:55,800 --> 00:08:58,280
Speaker 1: private health insurance. It will, by the way. Uh, you've

175
00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:00,760
Speaker 1: got to be able to tell us why your criminal

176
00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:04,880
Speaker 1: justice record as as d A doesn't square now with

177
00:09:04,960 --> 00:09:07,760
Speaker 1: what you're saying you want to do as president. You've

178
00:09:07,800 --> 00:09:09,440
Speaker 1: got to be able to answer these kinds of tough

179
00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:12,120
Speaker 1: questions without sort of going, well, they're just Republican talking points.

180
00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:15,160
Speaker 1: And I think for now it's an interesting line. People

181
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:17,280
Speaker 1: in the crowd like it. But it's gonna get old,

182
00:09:17,320 --> 00:09:20,120
Speaker 1: So she's gonna have to really have a substantive set

183
00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:23,640
Speaker 1: of responses to some of these challenges. And I think

184
00:09:23,720 --> 00:09:27,800
Speaker 1: she's got to better articulate what her theory of the

185
00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:30,320
Speaker 1: case is. Why is it that she thinks she can

186
00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:32,400
Speaker 1: beat Donald Trump? Why is it that she thinks she's

187
00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:35,120
Speaker 1: got a better vision for America? And that hasn't really

188
00:09:35,120 --> 00:09:37,400
Speaker 1: come through in the last two debates. She I saw

189
00:09:37,440 --> 00:09:39,600
Speaker 1: her pretty low and a likability pull the other day.

190
00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:42,000
Speaker 1: She needs to come up with a second tone. She

191
00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:46,200
Speaker 1: has one tone and if she retrieved, angry is self righteous.

192
00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:48,280
Speaker 1: Sometimes I see stuff where she's like at a coffee

193
00:09:48,280 --> 00:09:50,040
Speaker 1: shop or something talking to people and she's got kind

194
00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:52,720
Speaker 1: of this giggly schoolgirl thing going that's very appealing, But

195
00:09:52,840 --> 00:09:56,720
Speaker 1: on the stage it's just always the same tone. Well,

196
00:09:56,720 --> 00:09:58,520
Speaker 1: listen to Jack the section, um you want her in?

197
00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:00,679
Speaker 1: What a school girl out for it? Or what? I

198
00:10:00,800 --> 00:10:05,240
Speaker 1: just I'm shocked for this. Sorry you go ahead. I

199
00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:07,520
Speaker 1: was gonna say. I think I think it is a

200
00:10:07,559 --> 00:10:10,080
Speaker 1: little bit of a problem for her in that in

201
00:10:10,120 --> 00:10:13,199
Speaker 1: that she she doesn't seem to have multiple gears, as

202
00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:16,600
Speaker 1: it were, and be effective in a campaign, you will

203
00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:18,559
Speaker 1: need to have that nuance and be able to shift

204
00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:20,439
Speaker 1: into different gears at different times. So we'll have to

205
00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:22,760
Speaker 1: see if she develops that as a campaign goes on one.

206
00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:26,800
Speaker 1: He who among the like the third tier people, the

207
00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:32,240
Speaker 1: one to two percenters, has impressed you lately? Okay, So

208
00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:34,640
Speaker 1: I'll say this. I thought the first night Steve Bullock,

209
00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:39,040
Speaker 1: the governor of Montana, was was actually quite effective because

210
00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:41,640
Speaker 1: of his case is, Look, I'm the only Democrat up

211
00:10:41,640 --> 00:10:43,679
Speaker 1: here who's one in a state that Trump won. That's

212
00:10:43,679 --> 00:10:46,120
Speaker 1: pretty darn compellent. I mean, if I'm a Democrat who

213
00:10:46,160 --> 00:10:48,560
Speaker 1: wants electability, why not go for a guy who's been

214
00:10:48,600 --> 00:10:51,640
Speaker 1: a governor who's got, you know, some some good plans

215
00:10:51,679 --> 00:10:56,200
Speaker 1: that seem relatively reasonable, who has got some progressive streaks.

216
00:10:56,760 --> 00:10:58,520
Speaker 1: Why not go for a guy like that? So I

217
00:10:58,679 --> 00:11:02,600
Speaker 1: Bullock has been good and by the same token, Um Bennett,

218
00:11:02,640 --> 00:11:04,960
Speaker 1: the Senator from Colorado last night, I thought did a

219
00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:08,560
Speaker 1: great job of going up against the more liberal policies.

220
00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:11,720
Speaker 1: Particularly that meant I thought he was pretty effect right.

221
00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:14,280
Speaker 1: But he's got a voice like a cartoon barrel on here,

222
00:11:14,400 --> 00:11:16,959
Speaker 1: so that's gonna hurt him. Heyst that's going to be

223
00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:18,920
Speaker 1: a problem. We'd love to talk to you all day.

224
00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:22,040
Speaker 1: We're out of time, but lanhy Chen of the Hoover Institution,

225
00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:25,559
Speaker 1: Stanford University, Uh, it's always great to talk to you,

226
00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:29,200
Speaker 1: and we'll talk again soon. Thanking our plus Sean do

227
00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:32,520
Speaker 1: your do your Governor Bennett voice? Oh hi, I think

228
00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:35,560
Speaker 1: we should just all get together and have a nice picnic.

229
00:11:36,120 --> 00:11:42,840
Speaker 1: Sounds like a cartoon. Isn't this great? Everybody? The real

230
00:11:42,920 --> 00:11:47,520
Speaker 1: lesson is the friends we made along the way. Now

231
00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:51,680
Speaker 1: let's have a delicious picnic. Yeah, he can't help, but

232
00:11:51,760 --> 00:11:57,600
Speaker 1: this is you're not gonna get this analysis CNN if

233
00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:02,079
Speaker 1: you're not and getty. Whether you host a nightly dinner

234
00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:05,199
Speaker 1: party for two or five, keeping your eating and dining

235
00:12:05,280 --> 00:12:07,920
Speaker 1: area clean helps keep your mind on the dinner party

236
00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:11,240
Speaker 1: and not on the clean up afterwards. Viva paper towels

237
00:12:11,320 --> 00:12:14,520
Speaker 1: clean like cloth, trapping splatters and sauces that could become

238
00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:17,360
Speaker 1: countertop stains or stuck on messes, and there are two

239
00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:20,520
Speaker 1: times more durable when wet compared to the leading value brand.

240
00:12:20,920 --> 00:12:24,400
Speaker 1: For an exceptional cloth like paper towel, there's Viva Visit

241
00:12:24,559 --> 00:12:27,160
Speaker 1: Viva Towels dot com to soak up the clean filling

242
00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:27,560
Speaker 1: of home