WEBVTT - The Semifinal Countdown!

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio. Time

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly source

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now along

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>with the guys.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>From Guillotine Leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Paul Jargia.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Semi Finals Week. It's Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchi and co host today are Scott Fish and

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Hey guys, Hey charch how are you doing? How is

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>how is house arrest going for you? And is the

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 3>ankle bracelet itchy?

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I am at home, which is part of my

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>three step process of finding ways to make my radio

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>show podcast audio quality sound like hot garbage in three

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>different weeks. So I had to do it with the

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>flu once and that sounded bad. And I had to

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>do it in Vegas from an echoee hotel room was

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>shaky Wi Fi and that's sounded bad. And now now

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm at home with COVID where we have both the

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the remote internet connection and my voice is

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>shot because I got COVID. So this is like for

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the hardcore of our hardcore listeners, very very grateful. Then

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>on top of everything else, the house arrest because of

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole ty Chandler pantsiless incident going down last Saturday.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I can't help it if ty Chandler just put together

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the best running back season that Alexander Madison has ever seen,

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and so of course I was pantiless.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Have you put pants on yet? That's the real question,

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>not even right now.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh you don't have to. I guess I'm.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Glad you said all that because those other shows that

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 5>you were at home were my shows, and I just

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 5>figured you were dodging me for something.

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Well that's not mutually exclusive, got you coming up on

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the show. We've got three tough questions. Of course, we

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>still take a chance an players you're in a pinch

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at some position, we're still here to help. And then,

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of course we've got all the matchups, and we got

0:01:58.120 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the full slight of matchups going all the way into

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Smiths Day, finalizing with that big one on Monday night

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that could be a Super Bowl preview. We'll get to

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>all of those, beginning with Scott Fish Indianapolis taking out Atlanta.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's Indianapolis not getting enough national attention for being in

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoff hunt. And here we are late December. Very

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>impressive run for them against the Falcons. Let's start with

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor expected to return. Zach Moss not gonna go

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in this one.

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 5>Yes, by the way, on that indie team that Shane

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 5>Stike and he can coach, man, he can coach. I

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 5>think they got a good one there. Yeah, at least

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 5>now I do. Jonathan Taylor, Yeah, full participate in practice

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Thursday and Friday is good to go. Moss missed some practice,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 5>Zach Moss missed some practices. He says he's gonna play

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 5>through his injury, through his arm injury that he sustained

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 5>last week. But I feel like it's gonna be mostly

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Jonathan Taylor in this one, and it's gonna go, especially

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 5>if Moss doesn't doesn't suit up. It's gonna be mostly

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 5>back to the Taylor show of old, where he's getting

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 5>fifteen plus touches, he's catch the ball. This Falcons team, though,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 5>it's their second best against runners, allowing just three point

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 5>seven three yards per carry, so not much there no

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 5>rushing touchdowns on the year, which feels so fluky to

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 5>me that I'm giving Jonathan Taylor a B grade with

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 5>that fifteen plus touches and I think he scores a touchdown.

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna call it. This is the first touchdown against

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 5>first rushing touchdown against the Falcons. In this one, Rashad

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Way Tuba Hubbard, they both went over one hundred total

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 5>yards and back to back games they get tagged by volume.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 5>I think Taylor's gonna be fine here, B grade over

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 5>to the passing game. I have a C grade on

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Gardner Minshew the second. It's the ninth best matchup for quarterbacks.

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 5>Minshew's been a top twelve quarterback in two the last

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 5>three games. Atlanta has been tough recently, but that like

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 5>that's against Bryce Young and Tim Boyle and players like that.

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Those are real players, are they?

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 5>They are there are But before that they'd given up

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 5>three hundred plus yards and or multiple scores in four straight.

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 5>I got a C grade on Minshew. Here, Michael Pittman's

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 5>gonna play. He's full practices and to end the week

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 5>he cleared concussion protocol. It's it's a good note for

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 5>the listeners. Sometimes a huge hit can be, you know,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 5>a concussion you can get over, and sometimes a light

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 5>hit is one that takes quite a while. Trust me,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 5>as a guy who's had a lot of concussions. I've

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 5>from what Yeah, I've had plenty of concussion, concussions and

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 5>concussions obviously.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>No, I've been coying Madden.

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 5>I know I've been. I've I've been knocked completely out,

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 5>and I've had other ones that were just like barely anything.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 5>So you can get them of all varieties. But Michael Pittman,

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 5>since he's going double digit targets in all but three games,

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 5>including four straight before leaving last week. Even last week

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 5>he had five targets on just twenty one snaps. I

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 5>got an A grade here. It's not the best spot,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 5>but he just gets such incredible volume. Josh Downs. I'm

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 5>also giving a C grade too. It's it is really

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 5>really tough to trust. So I am okay with you

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 5>mentioned him, but it's just the Falcons are one of

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 5>the worst teams against the slot Josh Downs. When he's

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 5>had good slot matchups this year has shown up. Those

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 5>are where his good games come come up, and this

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 5>is one of them, shut up multiple times in those.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 5>So I would give it more if Piman was out,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 5>but it's just a secret. On Downs. On the other side,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm having trouble starting almost anyone for Atlanta. With Heinike

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 5>in there, we saw one Heinike full game and then

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 5>a couple of Partia partials. Those weren't spectacular at all.

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 5>It's the middle of the pack matchup. But I have

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 5>him and the almost the entire passing game on the bench. No,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 5>the entire passing game. I got Drake Lennon on the bench.

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 5>He's been pretty hit and miss, but his hits are

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 5>against you know. His misses, excuse me, are against you know,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 5>good pasties that are bad against the run, and that's

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 5>what the Colts are. They're gonna Arthur Smith likes to

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 5>run more. I don't know how much Drake London is

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 5>actually gonna get in this one. I'm not confident he'll

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 5>get enough targets. And in the two partial Heinike games

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 5>he got one target from heinikkey one and two in

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 5>the other. And in the full game he barely got

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 5>that much. Excuse me, in the full game he didn't play.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 5>That was the one game he didn't play. So I

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 5>don't know. We don't have a good track record of

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 5>him with Heineke. Kyle Pitts and Johnners Smith are going

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 5>to monopolize themselves to the bench. The Colts have allowed

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 5>the tenth most tight nind yards, which is great, but

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 5>only two touchdowns and tight ends that get under six

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 5>targets don't do very They do very little against the Colts,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 5>and I'm not sure that either of them will get

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 5>enough to be viable there in the run game. Bjeon

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Robinson Tyler Algier both getting C grades. It's just such

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 5>a good spot for the Colts in this one, or

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 5>against the Colts in this one. They're bottom five and

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 5>running back touches yards and touchdowns third easiest spot for

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 5>running backs. Eight running backs have had double digit sea

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.679
<v Speaker 5>level or better days just in the last five games.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 5>Five running backs over one hundred yards in that span.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 5>We don't know who it's going to be. It seems

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 5>like he loves Algier, but because he Bejon didn't get

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 5>anything last week, you know Arthur Smith is gonna flip

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 5>it up just to an Is. So I'm giving a

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 5>C grade to both of them.

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense. It's tough to if you've found your way

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>here on Bijon Robinson, it's not a clear path even

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>now in the semi finals. Unfortunately.

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 4>No, Yeah, Jon's just that's a rough place.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 5>To be right now, Yeah, I could.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 2>It is well.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anything attached to Arthur Smith is a rough place

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to be, right.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't blame anyone.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Remember Arthur Smith's old team, the Titans. They sure had

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 3>it figured out when he was there.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, speaking of the Titans, Seattle taking on the Titans.

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.679
<v Speaker 1>That's a nice segue there. Let's start in the Seattle

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>side map. I thought Kenneth Walker played great last week.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to see him healthy and dominating like he

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was at the beginning of the year. So if you

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>don't mind, let's let's start in Kenneth Walker. What do

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you think of him this week?

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, don't be fooled by the recent snap counts.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 3>All of the important touches are going to Walker. Despite

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>a narrow thirty two to twenty seven lead in snaps

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 3>last week, Walker led touches twenty two to four over

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Zach Sharbonay, and he missed weeks twelve and thirteen with

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 3>an injury. He wasn't quite right in week fourteen, but

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>he was totally fine last week, and he is the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 3>expected bell cow once again. If Walker gets twenty touches

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 3>again this week, I think you could expect a similar

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 3>output to what Devin Singletary did against the Titans just

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 3>last week, which was one hundred and seventy total yards

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>on thirty touches.

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 4>That's huge.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to give Walker an A grade. Sharbone

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 3>on the bench and is only a handcuff at this point.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that you can trust him really on

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 3>your bench if you're in a Fantasy semi final either

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 3>you could drop him.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 5>With sharbon Ay and Walker, that defense is missing like

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 5>six starters going into this game.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, Let's talk talk about some of those missing starters

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>when I talk about the wide receivers here. The Titans

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 3>already bad secondaries in shambles right now. Christian Fulton on

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>I are Sean Murphy Bunting looks like he might miss

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 3>this game due to a hip injury, and this leaves

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Trey Avery in a starting position. He's allowed a passer

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 3>rating of one for one in his coverage this year,

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 3>and he lines up primarily on the right, and that's

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 3>where DK Metcalf goes more than half of the time.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 3>So DK gets an easy A grade here. Tyler Lockett

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 3>gets a B and is an intriguing boom er bust player.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 3>This week against either the injured Sean Murphy Bunting or

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 3>backup Eric Gerrer. Roger McCreery's their only real good corner.

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 3>He usually mans the slot where Jackson Smith and Jigbo

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 3>runs from. So I'm gonna leave JSN on the bench

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 3>for this one. And their past thrower Geno Smith full

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 3>participant in practice all week and he's expected to start.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>The Titans are a super weird opponent though They've held

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 3>eight different quarterbacks under two hundred fifty yards this year

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 3>and only allowed five multi score games. But they've faced

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>exactly one top twelve quarterback in the last eight weeks.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 4>That was Tua that kind of held him in check.

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 3>So roll that all together with Gino's injuries and the

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 3>fact that if he's banged up at all, they could

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>just opt for Drew Locke to come in and relief,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>and he looked good last week. So the highest I

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 3>can muster on Geno Smith is a and I got

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>to start him in a league that's a super flex league,

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and I'm vomiting a little bit in my mouth about it.

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Over on the Titan side, there's not a lot to like.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Will Levis is dealing with an ankle injury and has

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 3>not practiced yet this week, and Mike Vrabel confirmed that

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 3>if Levis is unable to go, it will be Ryan

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Tannehill starting for the Titans, probably in his final game

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 3>for the Titans. The Seahawks pass defense has been in

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a downturn lately, but here are the

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks they've faced in the past few weeks. Jalen Hurts,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 3>brock Purty, Dak Prescott, brock Purty, Matthew Stafford, Sam Howell,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 4>That causes downturns right there.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 3>So the four games prior to that murderer's row of chuckers,

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 3>they held four straight quarterbacks to under two hundred and

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty yards and only three passing scores in those four weeks.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 3>They're really They're bad against really good quarterbacks, and neither

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Titans guy is that. So the only Titan in the

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 3>passing game that you could consider starting is DeAndre Hopkins.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 3>He gets a C grade because he's averaging double digit

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>targets and it doesn't matter who the quarterback is. Some

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>extra coverage might float his way this weekend, though, as

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Nick Westbrook a Keene just hit ir with a hand injury.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Traylon Burks or Kyle Phillips neither practiced it yet this

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 3>week their game time decisions. They might play, but it

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 3>could be Hopkins as the only wide receiver and they

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 3>could easily double cover him. And as for the run game,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 3>I've been struggling whether I start Derrick Henry in a

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>playoff matchup this week on my own. He pretty much

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 3>laid an egg last week, and if you're still alive

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>despite that, He's got a very juicy matchup this week

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 3>against the Seahawks defense. Over the last five weeks, Seattle

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>has given up the most running back rushing scores in

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the league and have allowed the fourth most rushing yards

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:47.359
<v Speaker 3>to the position. However, they've allowed the third fewest receiving

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 3>yards to running backs in that time. That's with two

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 3>games against Christian McCaffrey in that span too, So for

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that reason, ty J.

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Spears is on the bench.

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>The Titans are eliminated from the playoffs already, and it

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 3>seems like this could be like the very last Derrick

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Henry Bell Coow Day in Tennessee, like the swan song

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 3>of Derrick Henry right here. So I'm gonna give him

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 3>a bee, and I'm gonna start him in my league.

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a bold move. A lot of people very hesitant

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>after what happened last week, But I do like the matchup,

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, and maybe this is the this is

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the farewell. Who knows We're gonna squeeze in one fast

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>one here because it won't take long to get through

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders versus Jets. On the commander's side, Sam Howell

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and the entire passing games on the bench, Howell coming

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>off his worst performance of the year and an ignominius benching.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk more about him later. Terry McLaurin coming

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>off a season high in targets and yards, but those

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>are in garbage time with Brissette. Thank you nice.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 4>That's a sad howl right there.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a sad howl. We need Robbie off season.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get us a better howl. We've cried like

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>four howls.

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm going up to Alaska to the I will We

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 5>need it Sea.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about that later.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, the Jets are an elite secondary and they ranked

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>number three in passing yards allowed, number three and passing

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns allowed. Brutal matchup for both Howell and the rest

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of the passing game. We've got Brian Robinson out this week.

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Rodriguez, as you're expected lead running back. Jets allow

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the ninth most rushing yards, but only three point nine

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. Teams can volume their way to ground

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>production against the Jets. I don't know that Chris Rodrigue

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly a volume guy. Jets have the third best run

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>stuff win rate, and so I just I don't love

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it here. I mean total dart throw at best for Rodriguez,

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a bench grade. But if you're in

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a desperation spot somehow in the semi finals, fine. Antonio

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Gibson also on the bench. He never scores, and he's

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>even unreliable when Robinson's hurt. And the only only angle

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>here is that the Jets. You know, maybe he'll catch something,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>but the Jets have been very good against receiving backs,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>including dominating guys like Bijon Robinson and Devon ah Chane.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You can catch, so they're all out on the Jets side.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Know Zach Wilson, Trevor Simeon starts. He has looked brutal

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>through five quarters, completing forty seven percent of his passes,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>so that doesn't leave us many options, and it puts

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson managers into a tough spot here. Obviously, the

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>whole passing game goes through him. By the way, get this, guys,

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Wilson ninety more targets than the next closest Jets receiver

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 5>Ninety that's a lot.

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Remember in the preseason that we thought that the Jets

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 3>were just stacked at wide receiver and now they have

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Garrett Wilson and nobody.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You can barely start against the worst secondary in the

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>league by a mile, and that's Washington. Players who get

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>seven catches against Washington, which Wilson could even from Simeon,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They're averaging one hundred and twenty five yards in a

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>full touchdown per game. Washington has been smoked for twenty

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>two wide receiver touchdowns, second most and this from Scott Fish.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington has allowed ten touchdown receptions of over twenty yards

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just the last eight games, worse than the league. C

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>grade on Garrett Wilson is a boomer about option for

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you against the worst secondary in the league. And then lastly,

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Breeze Hall commanders are bottom ten in rushing yards receiving

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>yards touchdowns and yards per carry allowed to running backs,

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and they've gotten way worse since they traded away. They're

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>arguably their best two players on their defensive line, Montese

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Sweat and Chase Young. Get a load of some of

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>these recent running back performances against Washington, Kyron Williams a

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>buck fifty five and one, a Chain and Mostard combined

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred and fifty four and three. Pollard one

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and one, Barkley one hundred and forty and two,

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Walker one hundred twenty seven and one, Ramandre Stevenson

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty and one, Breeze Hall absolute lock

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a grade. When we come back, it is time four

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>nine players not normally in your starting lineup segment we

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like to call take a chance on me. We'll give you,

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hopefully in the semi finals. You don't need this kind

0:15:59.640 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of help.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 4>You never know.

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you do. We're here either way. When we come

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>back to Fantasy Football Weekly, take a chance on me.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not normally in your starting lineup. We begin

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterback position and Scott Fish.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I am going to go with a guy who

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 5>currently leads the NFL in yards per game and touchdowns

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 5>per game for these who have played at least three games,

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 5>and that would be Joe flat three games Joe Flacco

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 5>averaging three hundred and thirteen yards per game and two

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 5>point three scores per game. Since taking over for the

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Cleveland Browns, they are dropping back to pass over.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Nine times nine times over.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 5>Nine times per game, more than they were before. Houston.

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 5>Did you press the button on this?

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I I man, I'm just off. I don't usually hit

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the button, so I had to find it there.

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 5>I should have done that. Ye I knew it was coming.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 4>You knew it was coming. Queue it up.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Come on us. Having the button bars is so fun.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Houston allowed multiple scores in five straight before. Levis only

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 5>got one last week. But Houston, they have allowed the

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 5>seventh most passing yards. Pretty stingy on passing touchdowns. But

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a good game here for a Flaco.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, man, you'll take a chance with me quarterback.

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I've got Jake Browning who's thrown four over two hundred

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and seventy five yards and three straight and had a

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 3>pair of touchdown passes in each of the last two weeks.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 3>The last time he didn't throw for two hundred and

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>seventy five or more yards was against the Steelers, who

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 3>he plays this week. The Steelers have had a pretty

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 3>decent pass defense all year, but that's changed in the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 3>past two weeks, where they've allowed three touchdowns apiece to

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 3>Bailey Zappi and Gardner Minshew. And all of a sudden,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 3>all of the Steelers' safeties are out. Minka Fitzpatrick out

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 3>with a knee injury, Demante Kyz was just suspended for

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the season for targeting. Kean O'Neil's been

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 3>out since Week eleven. Fourth stringer Trenton Thompson out with

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 3>a neck injury. That leaves Elijah Riley and Darius Rush,

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 3>who has have a combined sixty nine snaps on the

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 3>field this season between the two of them to anchor

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the back end of the secondary for the Steelers. They're

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 3>wide open to be picked apart over the top Jake Browning.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm moving Jake Browning up my ranking right now. I

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>did not realize that it was quite that severe of

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a situation in the in the secondary for Pittsburgh. Holy cow,

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Nick Mullins. A high risk play

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for for sure. Mallins looked very inconsistent in his first

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>start last week, but maybe that's because he hadn't played

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>in two years, but still found his way to a

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine percent completion rate, three hundred yards and two

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>scores even a game where he didn't look that sharp,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe knocks the rust off here and as

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a better showing against a worst secondary Detroit. Pro Football

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Focus grades the Lions at thirty first in coverage and

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>for a team that is Aiden Hutchinson. Weird that the

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Lions ranked twenty eighth in pass rush by Pro Football

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Focus and twenty seventh in pass rush win rate. Nick mullins,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he's got justin Jefferson, will give him a try. Let's

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>go to the running back position, Scott, Who's you taking

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>chance with me? Runner?

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm going with Ty Johnson, mostly because I love the

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 5>possible game script of Buffalo against the Chargers. Here the

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Chargers fifth worst against running backs, including second worst against

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 5>backs in the pass game, which is a part of

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 5>the game that Ty Johnson excels at. It's just a

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 5>great matchup. In the last two Bills blowouts, ty Johnson

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 5>at about sixty yards in each he caught five balls.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 5>He scored. This is one of those where they should

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 5>get a lead and be able to run the clock out.

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 5>And those two blowouts, by the way, much better run

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 5>Dyes the Jets and the Cowboys, so he might even

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 5>get more this week.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, who's your take a chance on me?

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Running back?

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I've got Zeke Elliot because it looks like Rimandre Stevenson

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 3>is going to miss his third straight week with an

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>ankle injury. Elliott hasn't really popped off on the ground

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 3>in relief of Stevenson, but he's done really well in

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 3>the receiving game. Over the last two weeks. He's had

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 3>twelve receptions ninety three yards in a score just through

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the air. Denver has been dinged by runners all year,

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 3>but they're bottom seven in every category against running backs,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 3>whether that's the run or the pass, and they're allowing

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 3>an average of twenty eight touches and one hundred and

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 3>sixty six yards per game to opposing runners. Almost all

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 3>of that would go to Zeke, even if that's restricted

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. He's looking at one hundred total yards

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 3>in this game, almost guaranteed.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Yeah, I have Zeke in my top five

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this week, so Yeah, to me, this's an absolute lock.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going a little bit tougher spot than that. Danta Foreman,

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>who I tried last week did not work out, but

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that was against a far tougher Cleveland opponent. This week,

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Foreman gets Arizona, so this should be a easier They

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ranked twenty seventh in run stuff win rate, They rank

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>thirty first in rushing yards allowed, They rank thirtieth in

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>yards per carried aloud, and since returning from injury, Foreman

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>has gotten one hundred percent of the rushes from inside

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line. Five of Arizona's last six opponents

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have scored rushing touchdowns. I think Foreman's up to make

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that six of the last seven. All right, let's go

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to the receivers. We begin with Scott Fish who you got.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm gonna switch it up because I had David

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 5>and Djoku, but I feel like he's been good for

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 5>long enough. Then, Yeah, he's in my top five tight ends.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 5>This week. We can't do that, so I'm going to

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 5>don Tavion Wicks leads the team in yards per route

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 5>run has has had three very startable or B level games.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 5>With Watson out, Christian Watson and Jayden Reed looking like

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 5>they will both be out for this game, which lead

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 5>should lead to a bunch more opportunities here. Wicks will

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 5>get the best matchup of the receiving core there in j. C.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Horn allowing a one to sixteen passer rating against and

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 5>this week Matt Lafleur and Pressers spoke really glowingly about Wicks,

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 5>even saying he sees glimpses of DeVante Adams in him

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 5>and saying the sky's the limit.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow, geez, well that's not it's a lot to live

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>up to. I don't know. You want to put that

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on a kid? Yeah, all right, no, dy, who's your Yeah? Yeah,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Matt, you're your receiver this week.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 3>You probably don't need a deep dart throw at tight

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 3>end if you're in a Fantasy semi final. But I

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 3>really like Tanner Hudson of the Bengals this week against

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers. Since Week nine, Hudson averaging four target or

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 3>four catches per game, and nothing has really dropped off

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.959
<v Speaker 3>since Joe Burrow went down. I mentioned with Jake Browning

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 3>that the Steelers' top four safeties are out, but another

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 3>interesting fact is that Pittsburgh has allowed a tight end

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 3>touchdown in four straight weeks after only allowing one in

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the first ten games of the season. So if four catches,

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 3>forty five yards and a touchdown will help you, I

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 3>think that's about what we're looking at for Tanner Hudson

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 3>this week.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>That would help me. I think that would help most people. Yeah,

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I am also going tight end. Pat Fryarmouth, got to

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>pick your spots here, but this is the spot because

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati allows the most tight end yards by a mile,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy two per game and worse lately, allowing eighty two

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>yards to tight ends over the past five weeks, a

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>span that includes a mammoth game from Pat Fryarmouth. We

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>put up eleven targets, nine catches, and one hundred and

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards in Week twelve. Now, it's been a while

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>since we've seen Mason Rudolph start a game. Two years

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>ago it was Friar Mooth's rookie year, and in that

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>game again, the last Mason Rudolph start, Pat Fryarmuth was

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>targeted nine times.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 5>Oo nine times.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to draw that out.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, it worked.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 4>You should have like whispered n times before.

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there we go, Scott. If you like Ty Johnson.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Something tells me that James Cook is a lock here

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in this game against the Chargers.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I got James Cook is a lock here. He's

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 5>he's been RB three since week ten. Since since Joe

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Brady took over. He's averaging twenty four point one PPR

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 5>points per game. His target share has doubled since Brady.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 5>He's running the same amount of routes, but he's getting

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 5>double the targets. Not just that his red zone snaps

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 5>have also doubled. Maybe Brady watched the film and he's like, wait,

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Latavius Murray's just not working. Why do we not have

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 5>Cook in here? Head over one hundred total yards in

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 5>five straight Chargers as I mentioned before, really bad against

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 5>backs and the Ti Johnson things. So I have an

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 5>A grade, I could go double a rdvarc, I could

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 5>go fonsie whatever. I got an A grade there. Over

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 5>to the passing game.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's the thing. You the button bars right in

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>front of you, so you can do any of those.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah you know, I can drop that or I don't

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 5>know where they all are. There's one there. We go,

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 5>our wonderful Ardvark. Over to the passing game. Josh An,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 5>I'm giving the A grade too as well. It's the

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 5>eighth easiest matchup for quarterbacks against the d that just

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 5>gave up sixty three points and four touchdowns to eight.

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 5>And O'Connell. Granted, it'll be a different defensive play caller

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 5>this week with Brandon Staley fired and on, and the

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 5>data shows when a coach gets fired, the team plays

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 5>better the next week. It's just what happens. So maybe

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 5>it's a little tougher. But Allen has multiple scores in

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 5>fourteen straight. Stefan Diggs, Oh man, it's it's been rough.

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 5>It's been rough lately. But I'm going with him. I

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 5>think this is a get right game. I'm giving him

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 5>a B grade. You could talk me in new An A,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 5>but I'm going with a B just because it's so risky.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 5>Nearly nine targets per game under Brady. That's probably deserves

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 5>it nine times. But his catch totals four, six, four four,

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 5>his yardage totals twenty seven, seventy four, twenty four forty eight.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 5>He's and no scores. He's just not getting he's just

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 5>not getting getting it done.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh, actually one score, the six catch, seventy four yard

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 5>and a score game against the Eagles is the one

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 5>that's more comparable to this defense than the Chargers a

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 5>poor pass defense. So I like him here. He's got

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 5>He's matching up against Michael Davis too, which who allows

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and sixteen point one passer ray against Just

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 5>a good spot for him, so B grade. As for

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:27.959
<v Speaker 5>Gabe Davis, Khalil Shakir, Dalton Kinkaid, and Dawson Knox, this

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 5>is really frustrating. But since Dawson Knox came back, now

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 5>Kinkaid has two catches for twenty one yards in the

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 5>two games with Knox returning. Knox's Knox is not worthy

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 5>worthy of it, and Kinkaid's going to come into this

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 5>questionable as well. Also, he managed to Joe Brady coming

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 5>over be coming oc. Gabe Davis has a goose egg

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 5>in three of the four and once Shaquille once Dawston

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 5>Knox came in, Shakir's numbers just completely dropped off and

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 5>he has one catch for twelve yards since Knox came back.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 5>So Dawston Knox basically took four players out with it

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 5>just coming back, so they're all on the bench over

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 5>on the other side, the Chargers are going to be

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 5>without Keenan Allen, which makes me really hesitant to start

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 5>a lot of players in that past game or start

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 5>Eastern Stick. H Get this stat about the Chargers. The

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 5>last time they converted a third down was week thirteen.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 5>What That's what seemed to me.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>That is insane. Even all that garbage time stuff.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 4>They haven't converted a third battle.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 5>That's three weeks ago or two and a half weeks ago,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 5>whatever it is.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have a buy in there, did they.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 5>They only have to check Mahomes is the only quarterback

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 5>with over two hundred yards in the last five weeks

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 5>against this Buffalo. You got you got stick on the.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Bench anyway, nobody, Josh, you don't even need to expand it.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 5>Josh Palmer, I got a B grade on He can

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 5>find mismatches, he plays left right hand slot about a

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 5>third each he's he can easily avoid Rosweld Douglas uh

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 5>so I and he got forty percent of the air

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 5>yards with Eastern Stick last week. I got to be

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 5>on him. The target's got to go somewhere. I do

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 5>have Quentin Johnson on the bench. The first Stick game

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 5>good was good. The second one not so good, and

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 5>he's gonna get Razuill Douglas, who get this, is allowing

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 5>a twenty five point two passer rating against since coming

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 5>to Buffalo's That's absurd. Just ten completions.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>They worked the Packers on that grade.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Ten completions in ten completions in six games. Allowed two

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 5>picks in a Folmer recovery. Just unreal. Gerald Evertt, I

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 5>got a C grade on two Eastern Stick games. Eight

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 5>targets in each, five catches in each. The yardage isn't

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 5>quite there, but with Keenan out, he's probably gonna get

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more volume. It could be a volume seed.

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 5>But I got a B grade. Ferguson and Kelsey the

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 5>last couple weeks have done well against this team. Austin Eckler,

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 5>I got a C grade, but I don't blame you

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 5>for benchingin nowadays. Prop Stackler, by the way, for coming

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 5>in late in that blowout and getting a first down

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 5>and celebrating it. You know, it's the little victories. You

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 5>gotta celebrate the little victories. Bills are middle of the

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 5>but in the second half of the season, you basically

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 5>he's basically been a twenty touch guy. He could get

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 5>to a B level game and if they don't decide

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 5>to split it later on in the game. But I'll

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 5>just give him a C.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, we need to move quickly through Cincinnati Pittsburgh. Fortunately,

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know our take a chance on me is were

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>replete with Bengals and Steelers. So let's start on the

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati side, and let's start with the running game. What

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think of Joe Mixon here?

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's still getting most of the running back touches,

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 3>but Chase Brown starting to eat into that workload just

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. Brown's seen an average of eight carries

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 3>over the last three weeks, compared to about seventeen per

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 3>week for Mixing. Mixing was absolutely stuffed by the Steelers

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 3>in Week twelve on the eight carries for sixteen yards,

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 3>although he did add forty four receiving yards in that game.

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 3>The Steelers d did allow two hundred total rushing yards

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 3>to the Colts backs last week, which was mostly Tyler

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Goodson and Trey Sermon. So with a bit of a

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 3>downturn and touches for Mixon, I'm downgrading him to a B.

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 3>But he's still pretty reliable here as far as the

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 3>receivers and the passing game. Jake Browning was might take

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a chance on me quarterback, and Tanner Hudson might take

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 3>a chance on me receiver. Jamar Chase is going to

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 3>be out this week. That means t Higgins becomes the

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 3>focal point for Jake Browning yet again, just like he

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 3>was last week. Higgins had two second half touchdowns and

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 3>eight targets against Minnesota and his a dot in that

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 3>game was twenty three point three. And we just mentioned

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 3>all of the safeties are out for the Steelers, Higgins

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 3>should be able to go pretty deep, especially with Levi Wallace,

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the corner who's he's going to match up most often with.

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 3>He's tied for fifth in the league with six touchdowns

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 3>allowed in its coverage this year. So for all of

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 3>you who've been disappointed in te Higgins all season, he

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 3>gives you an a grade right here. Tyler Boyd saw

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of an uptick and work when Chase

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 3>went out, so he gets to see he'll primarily face

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Chandon Sullivan from the slot and Chandy Land doesn't usually

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 3>see a ton of targets, but seventy percent of them

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 3>are completed in his coverage over on the Steelers side

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Jason Rudolph week, but he's not a guy that you'd

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>start in your fantasy semi final, but it's worth looking

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 3>at some of his past history with receivers. The last

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 3>two times Rudolph has started a game was Week ten

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty one and Week seventeen of twenty twenty.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 3>In those Mason Rudolph games, Deontay Johnson averaged eight and

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 3>a half targets five catches in eighty nine yards. And

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Johnson has averaged six and a half targets per game

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 3>over the last month and a robust ninety three air

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 3>yards per game. So I've got a B grade on Johnson. Pickens,

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little leer on here. He hasn't scored our

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 3>top one hundred yards in seven games and was held

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 3>to just three catches in fifty eight yards in the

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 3>week twelve meetings. So just to see on Pickens and

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Rudolph targeted slot guys Juju Smith, Schuster and Chase Claypool

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 3>a ton in the twenty twenty games.

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Two.

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Alan Robinson usually runs from the slot, but he's not

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 3>on the field very much, so I think this is

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Pat Fryarmuth running from the slot and charge alluded to it.

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.479
<v Speaker 3>He was his take a chance on me tight end.

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 3>I got an A grade on Friarmuth. As for Naji

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Harris and Jalen Warren, this is still a horrifically gross

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>complete split backfield. Over the last five games, the snap

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 3>count is almost equal. They're both getting about fourteen touches

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 3>per game. They're both getting about the same amount of

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 3>touches inside the five. Naji had fifteen carries for ninety

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 3>nine yards in a score in the week twelve meeting,

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 3>and Warren had sixteen touches and sixty two yards that game.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 3>You normally, if you normally start them, you can start

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 3>them with a seed, but it's not a particularly good

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 3>or bad matchup. I'd feel gross starting either in a

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy playoff game.

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 4>So just sees.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you on that. It's a it's a

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>tough spot for sure, and as we as we had

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to break. I don't know if you guys saw the

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>blocking effort put forward.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 4>By George Pickens. Oh, George Pickens, Yet he.

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't want to git well, oh no, yeah, I got it. Yeah,

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to run block. Yeah, you know, that's

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the job user, Come on, that stuff does

0:32:55.840 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not sit well with your teams wide receiver man, what

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is it? Holy cow? I don't know when he come back.

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>What we do know is Lions and Vikings gonna match up.

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk through that matchup and perhaps another big game

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>from Jared Goff find out when we come back. Welcome

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>back Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Jargi and Scott Fish and

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison with you. De Trod and Minnesota will play

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for the first time this year this weekend, and there's

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of players to start here, and a lot

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of reason to feel pretty good about a variety of

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>different Vikings and Lions. Let's start on the Lion side.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Ross Saint Brown, clocking in with a A grade.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>He's the rare slot receiver who gets reliably used near

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the stripe. He's tied for fifth in red zone targets.

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He accounts for thirty seven percent of the Lion's targets

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. The Vikings defend the slot with

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a wide variety of players, but very commonly, defensive coordinator

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian Flores uses safety. Josh mctellis, who ranks his Pro

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Football focuses twenty eighth coverage safety, so he's just okay,

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>but he gives up an eighty eight percent catch rate

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that is gigantic, So don't see any reason to not

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>expect good things from Aman Ross. Saint Brown comes in

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with an A grade, also coming in with strong grades.

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>B grade for Sam Laporte here coming off a huge grade.

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a trickier matchup though, than what he has

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>seen In recent weeks. The Vikings have been grading against

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends behind the play linebacker Ivan Pace Junior, who

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>ranks his Pro Football Focus's tenth best coverage linebacker, and

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he's allowed the lowest yards per reception of all linebackers,

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>just five yards per reception. Vikings allowing only five receptions

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and forty six yards per game to tight ends. None

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>have found the end zone in five weeks, so a

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Sam Laporte a little down from what

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we're used to seeing the other receivers for the Lions.

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I get the feeling one of them is probably in

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of a good game, especially because Vikings cornerback Byron Murphy's

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>has been ruled out of this one. But the problem

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is Josh Reynolds, Khalif Raymond Jamison Williams. They all split

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>time almost evenly. Impossible to really know which one might

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit here, so I don't know them on the bench.

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 5>How many yards per game does Jameson Williams average against

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 5>the Vikings?

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 1>About fifty eight?

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 5>I think I think it's forty one in a score

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 5>it might be on one catch.

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I've got A grades. I've got B grades here.

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Jared goff feels like a safe play, always better indoors,

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>where he scores double of touchdowns from his outdoor games,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>including last week's five score finanza. Vikings defense. Yeah, there

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you go. The Vikings pass defense had been downright stifling

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>before they'd yielded to Jake Browning last week, and some

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of that came in overtime too. The Vikings ranked eighth

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in pass coverage by Pro Football Focus. They've surroundered multiple

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns and only two of their last nine games.

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to I want to give Jared goffin

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a grade here, but I can't do it because the

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Vikings pass defense has generally been very good. I do

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like Jamiir Gibbs a lot. He's out touched David Montgomery

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>six to three in the red zone over the last

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, which is surprising, including getting the only one

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>touch they've given a running back from inside the five

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>yard line. That'd be a major shift if they start

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:38.479
<v Speaker 1>giving Jamir Gibbs goal line carries. Here. He's averaging five

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards per carry on the season, including

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at least six yards per carrying each of the last

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>three games. He's also reliably notching about three receptions per game,

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Vikings give up the fifth most receptions per

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>game to running back, so jumior Gibbs a safe B grade.

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery C grade and a difficult matchup for him, particularly

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>since he's not going to help through the air. As

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, that's where the Vikings are most vulnerable to

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Minnesota's only given up fifty rushing yards to

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a running back once since Week six, and that includes

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>shutting down the likes of Christian McCaffrey, Bjohn Robinson, Alvin Kamara,

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs, Joe Mixon. In fact, the in fact, only

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift has surpassed sixty five yards against the Vikings

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all year. I can only get you to a C

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>grade on David Montgomery, and that's what the hope for

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown Viking side. I told you Nick Mallins might

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me quarterback. He comes in with

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Justin Jefferson A grade. I love that

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you saw ten targets from Nick Mullins last week. That

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was a great That's a great indicator here. Detroit much

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>worse against the pass than against the run. They rank

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>thirtieth in coverage by Pro Football Focus. Detroit corner Cam

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Sutton shadows bigger, physical opposing number ones like Jefferson, and

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>he shut down Denver's Courtland Sutton last week in a

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Sutton versus Sutton matchup. Over the last three games, Sutton

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 1>has allowed only thirty six total receiving yards, So a

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup for Justin Jefferson and I almost gave him

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>a B grade here, but I think on volume, I

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>can't get myself to do it, and I'm keeping him

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>at an A grade. Jordan Addison with the big game

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>last week and with Sutton and on Jefferson, that means

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Addison draws far inferior coverage from Jerry Jacobs. He's allowed

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a league worst seven touchdowns, and Addison's nine scores leads

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>all rookie rookie wide receivers, So I like the touchdown here.

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And what's more, Addison is a deep ball threat and

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the Lions give up thirteen yards per reception, which is

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>a gigantic number. So I like Addison. B grade on

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>him and for TJ. Hockinson while we stay with the

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>passing game, A rare B grade for me. Hockinson has

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>remained consistent. He's racking up between like fifty and sixty

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>three yards in his past four games. That's good, but

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not explosive output the Lions haven't allowed. Hey, there

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you go. The Lions haven't allowed more than sixty six

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:02.760
<v Speaker 1>yards to a tight end all season. They're only averaging

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>five receptions on per game. So there's just not a

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of upside here for Hawkins, and so I can

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 1>only get you to a B grade. Looks like Alexander

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Madison's going to be active for this game, So where

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>does that leave you with Ty Chandler. Kevin O'Connell suggested

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Chandler will start and be the lead back and he

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>should be in one NFL start. Last week, Chandler posted

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 1>more rushing yards than any game in Madison's career. Very

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup, though, Detroit Pro Football Focus's fourth best run defense.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The Lions have not had an opposing running back top

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven rushing yards against them. They've given up a

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 1>league low sixty two rushing yards per game, and they're

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>giving up the six fewest receptions to the position and

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>no receiving touchdowns to running back. So very tough matchup

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>for Chandler. I can only get you to a C

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>grade there. All right, Scott, let's go over to Green

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Bay taking on Carolina. You already told us that you

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like Wis as a deceiving option. Yeah, Dust, you like

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from the passing game for the Packers.

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Sure, sure, Let's stick with the wide receivers for a

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 5>secon second, because Jaden Reid and Christian Watson are both

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 5>likely out. One is doubtful, one is questionable. But they

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 5>missed practice every day to end the week. I'm playing

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 5>it as if they're out. Jaden Reid is the one

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 5>that might go. He's questionable. If he does go, I

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 5>would give him a C grade, but I expect both

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 5>to be out. I do have Romeo Dobbs on the bench.

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 5>He's consistently a three to five catch guy. Didn't even

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 5>get that much work after Jaden Reid went out last week.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 5>He's usually getting in your thirty in the thirties for yards.

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 5>He hasn't scored over a month, just two red zone

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 5>targets in last month. I don't think that's where the

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 5>targets go. I think they go to Wis and I

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 5>think they go to Tucker Craft as well. With Luke

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Musgrave gonna miss this one again. Kraft has scored twice

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.240
<v Speaker 5>in the four games without Musgrave, has four plus catches

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 5>in back to back yardage totals of fifty seven and

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 5>sixty four. That's that's very that's very nice for a

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 5>SEA level tight end, maybe even a B level. The

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 5>volume matches what similar targets have been doing against the

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 5>tight ends for similar tight ends have been doing against

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 5>the Panthers. So I have a C grade there with those.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 5>I have a very hesitant, very very hesitant C grade

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 5>on Jordan Love. He's getting it done, He's finding ways

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 5>to get it done. He's got multiple scores in five

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 5>to the last six five to the last six games.

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 5>This just this is just a really tough Panthers pass defense,

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 5>mostly because teams just run with their running backs on him.

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 5>That that's really what it is. Over the last eight weeks,

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 5>the highest passing yardage day was two hundred and two yards.

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 5>That's that's nothing in the past game, but there's been

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 5>a couple of multiple score games. This is a fun

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 5>note on the Panthers. They've allowed nine rushing yards to

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 5>quarterbacks this year total.

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 5>New England is second. New England is second in that

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 5>court category with one hundred and six. Panthers have allowed

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 5>nine rushing yards. Over to the run game. AJ Dillon's

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 5>questionable with that thomb. Even if he plays, He's we

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 5>mentioned before, he's not getting inside the five stuff. He's

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 5>less efficient. Less pass game works with Jones playing, I

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 5>got him on the bench and I'm giving it an a

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 5>grade to Aaron Jones. Just an awesome matchup against the

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 5>Panthers run game along in the fifth most yards and

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 5>the most touchdowns. Hopefully he gets those snaps back up.

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 5>He got a decent amount of touches last week, ninety

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 5>the touches, but the snaps he he only played about

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 5>half the snaps. Let's let's hope that increases with the

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 5>second week and fully off the injury report over to

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 5>the Carolina side. I don't have any of the past

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 5>game starting at all I know that the Packers have

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 5>allowed back to back NFC Player of the Week awards

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:50.439
<v Speaker 5>to the quarterbacks. Thanks thanks Brian Johnson for that note.

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 5>Rest in peace.

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Brian's not dead. He just moved.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 5>No, he moved, and he took like a red Eye flight.

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted him to rest, to be peacefully rested

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.959
<v Speaker 5>in his new city with the red Eye flight there.

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, Adam Thielen, in recent weeks, the targets have

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 5>gone down. Early in the year, he was hyper targeted

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 5>and that's what helped him. It's now split multiple ways.

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Jonathan Mingo is a low volume two to five catch

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 5>wide receiver with When you're sharing less than two hundred

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 5>yards every game from Bryce Young and it's between three

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 5>or four options, you're just not getting it done. So

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 5>bench the whole passing game. And I have a B

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 5>grade on Chewba Hubbard. Here's the last month of touches

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 5>for Cuba nineteen twenty five twenty four with yardage totals

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 5>ninety to one hundred and five yards. Grim Bay is

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 5>allowing the fourth most rushing yards and eighth most running

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 5>backs scores. But Cuba needs a lot of touches to

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 5>do less than four yards per touch, so he's not

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 5>very efficient with it. So just a B grade on

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Chewba Hubbard.

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, Three Tough Questions, a forward looking

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>time machine style edition of Three Tough Questions. When we

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly, our number two. Welcome

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>back our number two Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchi and

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish, Matt Harrison with you. This is a game

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we like to play called three Tough Questions, and we

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>begin with.

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 2>This tough question number one.

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's fast forward to week one of next year. Is

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Chase Brown the lead back in Cincinnati. We begin with

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish.

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Let me let me turn on my mic here once.

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:58.280
<v Speaker 1>The classic Scott Fish right there.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 5>Classic classic. They have a potential out with Mixing after

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 5>this year, but it's also not super super costly to

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 5>keep him and the cap hit plus what they would

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 5>pay him is you know what they would have to

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 5>pay a replacement like a pickup a picked up free

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 5>agent would probably cost more than just keeping Mixing. So

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 5>the question is closer to do they continue to run

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Mixing down and split the role or do we think

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 5>Chase beats him out right? Or is it an Alexander

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 5>Madison Tdy Chandler situation where the more talented back is

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 5>shelved longer than it should be despite all of us

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.720
<v Speaker 5>seeing that Chase is clearly the better player. Not exactly

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 5>sure what happens happens by week one. I think with

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 5>most NFL teams, you usually see them just stick with

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 5>the old hat until he's until the new one can overtake.

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 5>But you know what I texted you last week, I

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 5>thought Chase could beat the start, be the starter next year.

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm just gonna go with bold with it and say, sure, yeah,

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 5>why not?

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt? Fast forward to Week one of next year?

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Is Chase Brown the lead back in Cincinnati?

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Do we believe that the Bengals, a team that's win

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.879
<v Speaker 3>window is now, is gonna stand pat and do nothing

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 3>at the running back position? I simply don't. They'll sign

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 3>someone or draft someone. It could be a split backfield

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 3>in Cincy. But here's the list of free agent running

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 3>backs coming up this year. Joe Mixon, Derrick Henry, Austin Eckler,

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Josh Jacobs, Saquon Barkley, Tony Pollard, DeAndre Swift and those.

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Are just the highlights.

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 3>You'd think that those seven guys are likely to be

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 3>on an NFL roster starting somewhere. Plus, there's a decent

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 3>crop of rookie runners highlighted by Jonathan Brooks, Trey Benson,

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Blake Klorum, Traveon Henderson, probably another three or four guys

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to start to like next spring. I

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 3>just think that the Bengals are going to have another

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 3>running back there, and if it's not Mixon, I think

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 3>that they'll have somebody that they've spent a lot of

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 3>assets on.

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I ran the Bengals, I would draft

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a high profile, really good running back too, But they haven't.

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>They've not shown a predilection to do that since Joe Mixon. Interesting,

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really thought about that angle. You know, I was

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>looking at a seven year veteran in mixing with high

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.720
<v Speaker 1>mileage who's going to turn twenty eight and has averaged

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>three point nine yards per carrying back to back years.

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You cut that guy, right, I mean, you know you

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>can find three point nine yard per carry guys washing

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>dishes at Applebee's right now. So why keep Joe Mixon here?

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>He's out Chase Brown looks good. I mean the eye

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>test says he's pretty good and maybe better than a

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of those older veterans that you've just described. You know,

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt I. You know, those are all big name players

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>who have been very important to their offenses for a

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>long time. But they're all, like, all of those guys

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>really struggling right now. I don't know that Cincinnati makes

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a move for any of those guys. Maybe in the draft. Yes,

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I was tempted to make a last minute switch to

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>go to your side to this match, just in the

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>prospect that they draft they put real draft equity here

0:47:57.719 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>into the running back position. But I'm not going to

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:01.879
<v Speaker 1>bank on it. I'm gonna trust my eyes. Chase Brown

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.359
<v Speaker 1>looks like a good player, averaging four and a half

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, all the explosiveness, the big plays. You're

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with, Yes.

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Tough question number two.

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, since you've got the time machine, I'll

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:18.760
<v Speaker 1>set and ready to go. Let's hear from the time machine.

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Hm. There it is.

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So we fast forward to week one of next year,

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>just like we did with Chase Brown, Let's stay with

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the same team. Potentially, is Jake Browning a starter for

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>any NFL team next season? For this one we begin

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with Matt.

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 3>My answer is no, Caleb Williams, Drake may Jaden Daniels,

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Michael Pennox, Bow Nicks, Quinn Ewers, JJ McCarthy. That's seven

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 3>rookies who could be drafted and just be launched into

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 3>a starting job, plus the potential openings or landing spots.

0:48:57.920 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 3>They're not as many as you think. There's a lot

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 3>of injured quarterbacks this year. But the open spots are Atlanta, Vegas, Minnesota,

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:09.840
<v Speaker 3>if they don't re sign Cousins, New England, Tampa, Tennessee,

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe Washington. That's only seven teams, and Kirk Cousins in

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Baker Mayfield are top free agents. I think Jake Browning

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 3>signs a nice backup contract somewhere.

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go over to Scott. Fast forward a

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>week one of next year. Is Jake Browning starting for

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an NFL team?

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm in lockstep with Matt on this one. I've

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:34.800
<v Speaker 5>almost immediately said no. I feel like the only place

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 5>Jake Browning gets a starting job is with one of

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.280
<v Speaker 5>those teams that drafts one of those and he fights

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 5>him and battles it out and beats him.

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 4>In camp and holds the job for six weeks quarterback.

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 5>Won for like the early part of the season, and

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 5>that's how he is the starter through week one. Otherwise

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 5>he strikes me more as more like Keenum or Dobbs,

0:49:55.760 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, mostly just ex vikids where they show up

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 5>up for a portion of a season and then they

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 5>get it back up, they get a backup ro all

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 5>somewhere in the next season. That's it's x Viking thing apparently,

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 5>But no.

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Jake Browning has played his way into the conversation as

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>applausible starter for sure. Since becoming the starter, he leads

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the NFL INN adjusted completion percentage and this, and it's

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>not thinking dunk stuff. He has the second longest yards

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:29.360
<v Speaker 1>per attempt nine and he's looked better than half the

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>starters in the league honestly since he's come in. Now,

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>obviously this is a deep quarterback class and everybody, all

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the teams that are positioned inside, like the top ten,

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>top twelve, they're gonna hit that pretty hard. But then

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:44.479
<v Speaker 1>what do you do about Atlanta, Las Vegas, Cleveland, which

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody mentioned, and that job is still potentially open. Tampa,

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody talked about Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh meets a quarterback, Yeah, is

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flaco. I don't think Joe Flacco's coming back, so

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer and if only for week one,

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>only at the beginning of the year, any where he

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:03.280
<v Speaker 1>could beat out a rookie, I'm the answer here is yes.

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, tough question number three?

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward to week one of next year. Is Sam

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Howell the starting where's the Howell sounder? By the way,

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is Sam Howell the starting quarterback for the Commanders?

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 5>I just love how we have this, but Barrown lock, yeah,

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 5>right on top of it. Yeah, I'll start this one.

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:29.760
<v Speaker 5>This is a tough one for me. I can't remember

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:33.799
<v Speaker 5>who said it, but Sam Howell's stats this year are

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:38.280
<v Speaker 5>really empty calories. The offense is not good, he's every

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:42.360
<v Speaker 5>All of his metrics outside of volume aren't good. He

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.640
<v Speaker 5>even got bench last week. Things really need to be fixed.

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Will they draft a guy? If they do, can that

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 5>guy take overtake Sam for week one? I'm gonna go no,

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 5>He's not the start. I think they might might try

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:58.320
<v Speaker 5>to find something else, but yeah, for now, I'll go no.

0:51:58.440 --> 0:51:59.840
<v Speaker 5>But I could go either way on this one.

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, We're gonna put you on no, all right, Matt

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Is Fast forward a week one of next year. Is

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Sam Howell the starting quarterback for the Commanders.

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm pretty negative today. I've got no.

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.839
<v Speaker 3>And here's why. There's a new owner in Washington. He's

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:16.919
<v Speaker 3>about to fire Ron Rivera after the season, and either

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 3>they're going to elevate Eric Bienemy to the head coach

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 3>position or they're going to hire a new coach with

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 3>an offensive pedigree.

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 4>If it's b Enemy, maybe he has some loyalty to Sam, but.

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's just been waiting for the shot for ten

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:30.439
<v Speaker 3>years and he's going to want to draft his guy.

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 3>And the Commanders currently have the fourth pick in the draft,

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and a new owner probably wouldn't mind either making a

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 3>quarterback selection at number four or even trading up to

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 3>two or one with maybe Chicago if he wants the

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 3>perfect quarterback to compliment his new head coach. I don't

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 3>think Sam Howell has a chance to be the Commander's

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 3>starter next year.

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say I think not a chance is a

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>little strong, but I'm with you. I think the answer

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>here is no. I'm a little rattled over the past

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks where Sam has looked Haggard and I

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>guess when you absorb fifty nine sacks. Maybe the season

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is eventually gonna it's gonna beat beat you down, which

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>has happened to him. You know part of it though,

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:13.640
<v Speaker 1>as a Sam Howell apologist. Washington has lost these last

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:18.480
<v Speaker 1>five games, which is bad. They've given up twenty nine points,

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty one points, forty five points, forty five points, and

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight points. And people are pinning these losses on Howel.

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just like it's just like last year with Kirk Cousins. Right,

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.800
<v Speaker 1>defense is giving up these massive leads and opposing defenses

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:35.439
<v Speaker 1>know that Howel's gonna pass zero thread of a running game.

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But the Jacobey Brissett, you know, like last third of

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that game kind of rattled me a little bit, and

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he came in and just powered that offense. It was

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>garbage time. But I think Matt's fundamentally right. New owner

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Harris is gonna replace everybody. You didn't mention the GM.

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:51.959
<v Speaker 1>They're probably gonna replace Martin Mayhew as well, and that GM.

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, new gms and coaches want their quarterback. They

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:56.879
<v Speaker 1>want to pick their guy. And when you picked fourth

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the draft and a deep quarterback draft, you're gonna

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:01.800
<v Speaker 1>get You're gonna somebody you like. So I think the

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>odds are that Sam Howell's not the starting quarterback for

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders, and it makes me sad.

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Ah, Well, maybe let's go to our next to MAT's

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 3>squeally Howl next year.

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Well that's true, let's go. Uh, let's go back to matchups.

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville taking on Tampa Bay, Matt, this is uh, let's

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start with the running game, since the

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>passing game, you know it's it's CJ. Bethard, so probably

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:29.319
<v Speaker 1>so that probably doesn't bode very well. Travis Etn, who

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>powered teams in the first half of the season, has

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 1>struggled significantly in the second. What do you expect here

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>against Tampa Bay.

0:54:35.719 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've got him just as a C grade in

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:40.280
<v Speaker 3>this one. Over the last three weeks, he's had eleven,

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 3>fourteen and ten carries. Well, he has scored in two

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 3>of the past three games. He hasn't topped forty five

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:48.320
<v Speaker 3>yards in that span, and the matchup is just horrible.

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Tampa's allowed only five rushing scorers to a running back

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 3>this season. Only four running backs have topped seventy yards

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 3>all season against the Bucks. So it's just a C

0:54:57.360 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 3>for etn. On the passing side, as you mentioned, charge

0:55:02.160 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Trevor Lawrence has an ankle injury that he's been playing

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 3>through for a couple weeks, and he's also in the

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 3>concussion protocol. If he's unable to clear that, we get CJ. Bethard.

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 3>If Lawrence is able to go, I do love this

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 3>matchup for him. The Bucks are allowing two hundred eighty

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 3>two yards per game, what's the second most in the league.

0:55:18.239 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 3>And since Lawrence does run a little bit, it's worth

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 3>noting that the Bucks have given up the second most

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 3>quarterback rushing touchdowns this year at six. So if Lawrence goes,

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll give him an A grade. They play Sunday afternoon,

0:55:29.239 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 3>and if you have to decide between Lawrence and one

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of the Saturday guys, I think it's probably worth picking

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:36.920
<v Speaker 3>up Bethard as an insurance policy. I think I'd give

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Bethard a C grade in for the matchup alone. But

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 3>as for the receivers, I'm going to grade them out

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 3>as if Lawrence was playing. If it's Bethor drop them

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:48.239
<v Speaker 3>a letter grade. Okay, Calvin Ridley gets an A or

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 3>a Bethard B Wow. Brandon Ayuk, Michael Pittman, Drake London

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Dontavian Wicks all had huge days against Tampa's secondary in

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:58.759
<v Speaker 3>the last month, and with Christian kirk on Ir and

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Zay Jones looking like a game time decision at best,

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Ridley becomes a huge focal point in a good matchup.

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Ridley had thirty percent of the team's targets last week

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 3>and it's probably a similar number this week. Evan Ingram

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 3>gets an A or a Bethard B. He's just a

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 3>week removed from twelve targets as well, and Tampa's allowed

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 3>the fifth most receptions and receiving yards to the tight

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 3>end position, and after twelve weeks of no scoring, he's

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 3>got three touchdowns in the last three weeks.

0:56:26.239 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 4>But that's it for the Jaguars.

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Tampa side, where Rashad White

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 3>is the highest priced running back on DraftKings for the

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Sunday Slave.

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:37.319
<v Speaker 4>Wow, what a world we live in.

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 5>He's my number one ranked.

0:56:40.360 --> 0:56:43.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he gets an A grade this week. Jags are

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 3>actually good against the run, top seven and yards per carry,

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 3>rush yards and rushing scores allowed, but they're bottom three

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 3>in receptions and receiving yards allowed to opposing backs, and

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 3>the Bucks have given White at least two receptions in

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:00.720
<v Speaker 3>every game this year, and they I've seen him garner

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 3>at least five receptions four different times this year. Ten

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 3>different running backs have got to the five reception mark

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 3>against Jacksonville just this year, and they're allowing almost seven

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:14.240
<v Speaker 3>receptions per game to the running back position. So, especially

0:57:14.280 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 3>in a PPR league, he's a definite A. If you're

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 3>in some sort of weird non PPR league, it's probably.

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Just a C.

0:57:21.000 --> 0:57:25.920
<v Speaker 3>But the A for PPR for touchdown your touchdown only league,

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh yuck. Mike Evans gets an A grade. He scored

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.240
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown in ten games this year. He has not

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 3>scored a touchdown in four games this year, and the

0:57:34.120 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars have allowed the fifth most touchdowns to wide receivers.

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Chris Godwin hasn't practiced yet this week with a knee injury,

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 3>but had the same injury last week and then played

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:46.360
<v Speaker 3>and then oh, by the way, saw twelve targets ten

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:49.280
<v Speaker 3>catches in one hundred and fifty yards last week. I'm

0:57:49.280 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 3>sure this is more veteran maintenance for the.

0:57:52.600 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 4>VET in Tampa.

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:56.960
<v Speaker 3>The Jags have also allowed the ninth most receiving yards

0:57:56.960 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 3>to opposing wideouts. So if Godwin is active, he could

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 3>a B grade. That's a much closer to an A.

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:04.919
<v Speaker 3>I'd call it a B plus if Chart was here.

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, oh boy, I'm at home.

0:58:08.840 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Speaker 4>I can't do any you can't do anything. Sorry, no

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 4>fake across the Death from strad exactly.

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 3>You could throw a dart at Kate Otten this week too,

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:19.160
<v Speaker 3>but it's just a C for him. The Jags have

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 3>allowed the fourth most receiving yards to opposing tight ends

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:25.760
<v Speaker 3>this season, and Baker Mayfield had a perfect passer rating

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 3>last week in lambeau Field. It's the first time of

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 3>visiting quarterback has ever done that in lambeau Field sixty

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 3>six years as the Packers home. I'm giving him an

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:36.920
<v Speaker 3>A grade this week for a lot of the reasons

0:58:36.960 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 3>I liked his wide receivers. In the last month, the

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Jags have allowed three hundred eleven yards and three scores

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:45.479
<v Speaker 3>to Joe Flacco, three point fifty four and a score

0:58:45.560 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 3>to Jake Browning and three oh four and two to c. J.

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 4>Stroud. Let's keep the Baker bus rolling, all right.

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:54.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna work in one quickie with Arizona in Chicago.

0:58:55.040 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot to talk about here. As you can imagine,

0:58:57.120 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with these offenses, Trey McBride, though, is just becoming an

0:58:59.800 --> 0:59:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ob tight ends against the Bears are seeing the sixth

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>most targets and the third most receptions in the twelfth

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>most yards and he's just dominating right now. So we're

0:59:09.600 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick with Drey McBride as an a. The only

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:15.439
<v Speaker 1>other guy with a letter grade, James Connor, comes in hot,

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's a very tough matchup against Chicago. No runner

0:59:18.160 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has topped eighty yards against the Bears all year, and

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:25.080
<v Speaker 1>since Week five, opposing runners averaging just fifty four yards

0:59:25.120 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>per game. That is nothing. Chicago gives up a lot

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of receptions, but James Connor, get this, he hasn't topped

0:59:32.040 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 1>five receiving yards since Week three. That's it. So zero

0:59:37.200 --> 0:59:40.920
<v Speaker 1>participant in the receiving game startable only on volume here

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in a C grade for him. The rest of the

0:59:42.200 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>passing games on the bench, Kyler Murray is averaging zero

0:59:45.720 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 1>point eight touchdown passes per game and his only reliable receiver,

0:59:49.400 --> 0:59:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Markis Brown has been ruled out, so they are nothing

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to like there. And on the Chicago side, got a

0:59:56.400 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of A grades for you, Justin Fields would have

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>had a mind sins game last week had Robert Tunyan

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and Darneld Mooney not dropped easily catchuple long bombs. Arizona

1:00:07.280 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>has allowed multiple thank you touchdowns in three of the

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>last four games, and two of those quarterbacks three for

1:00:13.280 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>four scores. Cardinals have only faced one mobile quarterback that

1:00:16.720 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was Lamar Jackson, who they held to seventeen yards, which

1:00:19.040 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is impressive, but they've given a four quarterback rushing touchdowns.

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Field could score here, although we haven't gotten a lot

1:00:25.400 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of rushing touchdowns out of fields this year. DJ Moore

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>another a grade for the Cardinals. Even after they've benched

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>weekly roasty cornerback Marco Wilson, they still have got the

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>worst set of starting cornerbacks in the league and DJ

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Moore very positive matchups no matter where he lines up,

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and he lines up all over the field. He's a

1:00:45.280 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>deep ball specialist and Arizona gives up the fifth most

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>receptions of forty or more yards, so easily easily easy

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to see a big play coming here. Moore's been targeted

1:00:56.960 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at least nine times since Justin Fields return from injury

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in Week number one. The only other part of the

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>receiving game. You might care about Cole Comet. He's got

1:01:06.200 --> 1:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a quad injury. You want to check his status. He's

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>shaping up his game time decision over the past seven games,

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>averaging that have very healthy six catches for forty seven

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>yards and importantly the second most receptions from inside the

1:01:18.520 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>ten yard line, and he scored the second most touchdowns

1:01:22.320 --> 1:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>from inside the ten yard line. In previous years, Arizona

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:28.439
<v Speaker 1>was terrible against tight ends, but that's all changed this year.

1:01:28.800 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>They give up the second fewest receptions and the second

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>fewest yards to tight ends, just thirty eight. So I

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>can only get you to a C grade on col Comet.

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 4>And lastly, Don.

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>De Foreman was might take a chance on me runner.

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I already talked about him. I like him here this

1:01:42.160 --> 1:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>week expected to go in a weird situation where he

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice Friday for reasons that were just listed as personal.

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But whatever, you should be able to go here, and

1:01:50.640 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like his opportunity. And I've got a

1:01:52.440 --> 1:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Don de Foreman. When we come back,

1:01:57.000 --> 1:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland takes on Houston. Joe Flacco hop we already talked

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. Some Scott will bring us through the rest

1:02:03.040 --> 1:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of the matchup when we return to Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to a semi finals edition of Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Six more juicy matchups to break down for you, beginning

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with Cleveland Houston. Scott, you already tipped your hand earlier

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in this show that you are very high on David

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and Joko. He's my number two ranked tight end this week.

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you love about it?

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Well, since week seven, he is averaging fifteen point

1:02:56.200 --> 1:02:58.920
<v Speaker 5>five points per game, twenty five percent target share in

1:02:58.960 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 5>that offense, leads tight ends in targets inside the five six,

1:03:03.680 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 5>plus catches in five of the last six, scoring three

1:03:06.800 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 5>times in the last two games. And he's facing a

1:03:10.080 --> 1:03:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Houston team allowing the second most receptions, third most yards

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:18.080
<v Speaker 5>and fourth and is overall fourth worst against tight ends.

1:03:18.120 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 5>It's just a smash spot for a guy who is

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:23.240
<v Speaker 5>just exploding, especially with Joe Flacco. Might take a chance

1:03:23.280 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 5>on me quarterback at the helm. Also in the passing game,

1:03:26.920 --> 1:03:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Amari Cooper, I'm giving a B grade two. He has

1:03:29.680 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 5>seen his target skyrocket as well, with Flacco pulling in

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 5>twenty two targets in the last two games. You'll remember

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:40.760
<v Speaker 5>that first Flaco game of Flacco's three games, Amari Cooper

1:03:40.800 --> 1:03:44.200
<v Speaker 5>went out and Elijah Moore got hyper targeted with twelve targets.

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 5>Since Stefanski mentioned in the post game that's because Cooper

1:03:47.440 --> 1:03:50.520
<v Speaker 5>went out. Now we're seeing what Cooper's doing with that

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 5>huge volume. He'll be the number one option.

1:03:52.920 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 4>All number one up.

1:03:53.720 --> 1:03:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Most of the number one options against the Houston Texans

1:03:57.080 --> 1:04:00.440
<v Speaker 5>have seen seventy two plus yards, almost all of them

1:04:00.480 --> 1:04:04.200
<v Speaker 5>double digit PPR days. So I got a B grade here.

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:07.320
<v Speaker 5>You could talk me more into an A, but I'm

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:09.360
<v Speaker 5>gonna stick with a B. I think it's a little safer.

1:04:09.840 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 5>I do have the run game on the bench. I

1:04:11.640 --> 1:04:13.800
<v Speaker 5>know Houston's a mill of the pack run dye mostly

1:04:13.840 --> 1:04:16.440
<v Speaker 5>to being bottom seven. But you know those nine to

1:04:16.480 --> 1:04:19.560
<v Speaker 5>ten extra dropbacks Joe Flacco's taking, they're coming away from

1:04:19.560 --> 1:04:24.360
<v Speaker 5>the run games, and the Ford is splitting Jerome. Ford

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 5>is splitting with Kareem Hunt and Pierre Strong. So if

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:30.840
<v Speaker 5>you're only taking half of a possible twenty touches in

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:33.920
<v Speaker 5>the middle of the pack matchup, the only backs that

1:04:34.000 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 5>have really tagged Houston are high volume, Ford's not gonna

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 5>get it. I have a bench grade on all the

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:41.880
<v Speaker 5>runners over there. Over on the Houston side. I'm sorry,

1:04:41.920 --> 1:04:44.440
<v Speaker 5>Case Keenum. I still love you for the Minneapolis miracle,

1:04:44.480 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 5>but I got you on the bench.

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 4>It's a Case Keenum revenge game, though they're.

1:04:48.400 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 5>All revenge goes at this point. For Case Keenum, come on,

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:53.640
<v Speaker 5>he gets the fourth toughest jog against fantasy quarterbacks. That

1:04:53.960 --> 1:04:57.040
<v Speaker 5>brownstee is no joke, allowing the fewest passing yards. I

1:04:57.040 --> 1:05:00.400
<v Speaker 5>got Keenum on the bench. Nico Collins is trending hords

1:05:00.440 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 5>going with that calf injury. I missed, missed the first

1:05:03.800 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 5>few practices of the week, but then started practicing. If

1:05:07.400 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 5>he goes, I expect him to go back to his

1:05:09.960 --> 1:05:13.400
<v Speaker 5>hyper volume met volume work with Case Keenum in there

1:05:13.440 --> 1:05:16.920
<v Speaker 5>seven plus catches in his three last three fully healthy games.

1:05:17.240 --> 1:05:19.200
<v Speaker 5>It's not a tough draw though. I mean it's not

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:23.080
<v Speaker 5>an easy draw though. The Cleveland Brown's top six and receptions,

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:25.680
<v Speaker 5>yards and touchdowns alloted to wide receivers. So just to

1:05:25.760 --> 1:05:28.560
<v Speaker 5>C grade there, if he does not go, I give

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:31.040
<v Speaker 5>that C grade to no Brown because we saw last

1:05:31.080 --> 1:05:34.000
<v Speaker 5>week Keenum sent all those targets right over to Noah

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Brown and he became the de facto one. As for

1:05:38.000 --> 1:05:41.080
<v Speaker 5>tight ends, Dalton Schultz. He's also getting a C grade.

1:05:41.240 --> 1:05:44.080
<v Speaker 5>You look at that number one ranked defense against tight

1:05:44.200 --> 1:05:46.480
<v Speaker 5>ends with the Cleveland Browns and it does look a

1:05:46.520 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 5>little scary, But Keen Keenum targets the tight ends. Last week,

1:05:51.320 --> 1:05:54.920
<v Speaker 5>schultzaw four catches for fifty nine yards, with second in

1:05:55.000 --> 1:05:57.720
<v Speaker 5>targets on the team. Browns have allowed four tight end

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:00.920
<v Speaker 5>scores in just last four weeks, including three very decent

1:06:01.000 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 5>tight end day So all those tight ends that they

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:06.240
<v Speaker 5>stopped were early in the year. They've led it up recently.

1:06:06.320 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 5>So a C grade on Dalton Schultz and a B

1:06:09.120 --> 1:06:12.120
<v Speaker 5>grade on Damian Pierce. I'm just Kadie Josh. I'm sorry.

1:06:12.400 --> 1:06:13.440
<v Speaker 5>I didn't mean to do that.

1:06:13.760 --> 1:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>A B grade hurts and it's very personal. I don't

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>know why you would do that.

1:06:18.280 --> 1:06:21.520
<v Speaker 5>B grade on Devin Singletary. Forty three touches in the

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:25.080
<v Speaker 5>last two games, including thirty last week with Keenum in

1:06:25.160 --> 1:06:26.919
<v Speaker 5>it tells you they just want to run the ball

1:06:26.960 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more. With him in there, you keep

1:06:30.080 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 5>it in his hands instead of Keenums. Perhaps only one

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 5>back under fifteen touches topped seventy yards against the defense,

1:06:36.760 --> 1:06:39.360
<v Speaker 5>but I think he might get over over seventy yards.

1:06:39.520 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 5>By the way, the one back who tops seventy yards

1:06:42.320 --> 1:06:46.640
<v Speaker 5>with under fifteen touches against the Browns Jalen Warren twice.

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:52.000
<v Speaker 5>He's just cele efficient. It's a top ten run dye,

1:06:52.040 --> 1:06:53.520
<v Speaker 5>but I think the volume is going to get him there.

1:06:53.600 --> 1:06:56.560
<v Speaker 5>I got a B grade on him. On Devin Singletary.

1:06:58.200 --> 1:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go over to Dallas taking on Myami

1:07:00.400 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt and at this point Dak Prescott ceedee lamb. Just

1:07:03.920 --> 1:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like in every week A grade.

1:07:06.320 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but if you survived the Dak Prescott goose egg

1:07:09.880 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 3>last week with one hundred and thirty four passing scores

1:07:12.360 --> 1:07:16.040
<v Speaker 3>and no touchdown passes, you've built yourself a fantasy jugger.

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Not really.

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>In the prior twenty two game or prior seven games,

1:07:19.600 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>he was averaging three point three touchdown passes per game,

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:24.520
<v Speaker 3>and in five of those seven he got to at

1:07:24.600 --> 1:07:27.880
<v Speaker 3>least two undred ninety nine yards. Miami is okay against

1:07:27.920 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the pass I don't see how you could bench Dak

1:07:30.120 --> 1:07:31.600
<v Speaker 3>right now. I'm giving him an A grade in the

1:07:31.680 --> 1:07:34.200
<v Speaker 3>highest over under of the week. But it is worth

1:07:34.240 --> 1:07:38.360
<v Speaker 3>noting that offensive lineman Tyron Smith and Zach Martin both

1:07:38.400 --> 1:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>haven't practiced yet this week. Due to injuries. I think

1:07:42.440 --> 1:07:44.960
<v Speaker 3>both might suit up, but if both of them missed,

1:07:45.000 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 3>it's probably enough to downgrade Dak to like a B plus,

1:07:49.520 --> 1:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>and if Dak gets an a CD, Lamb gets an A.

1:07:51.640 --> 1:07:53.560
<v Speaker 3>He's ran from the slot about sixty percent of the

1:07:53.600 --> 1:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>time this year, which means he's going to get the

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 3>best matchup most often against Dolphin slot corner Cater Kohu,

1:07:59.480 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 3>which leaves Brandon Cooks and Michael Gallups seeing a lot

1:08:02.280 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 3>of Jalen Ramsey and Xavian Howard. Cooks and Gallop each

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:08.280
<v Speaker 3>move around quite a bit, and Howard stays on the left,

1:08:08.360 --> 1:08:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Ramsey to the right, So I'll give Cooks a C

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>grade in this one. That's likely because it's a shootout.

1:08:13.320 --> 1:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Gallop on the bench, though Jake Ferguson gets a be

1:08:17.760 --> 1:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of a C grade. He's seen exactly eight targets

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:24.559
<v Speaker 3>in three straight games, with an average line of six

1:08:24.680 --> 1:08:27.160
<v Speaker 3>receptions sixty four yards, and he had one score in there.

1:08:27.280 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Although the Dolphins have only allowed three tight end touchdowns

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:33.479
<v Speaker 3>on the season and none since Week seven, so that's

1:08:33.479 --> 1:08:35.400
<v Speaker 3>why I want to give him a BEE. But it's

1:08:35.560 --> 1:08:38.320
<v Speaker 3>on the matchup alone. It's kind of a C. Tony

1:08:38.360 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Pollard probably sees a slight uptick in his work this

1:08:42.479 --> 1:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>week with Rico Doubtel injured and limited all week with

1:08:45.960 --> 1:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>an ankle. The problem is, unless Pollard scores, he's killing

1:08:49.840 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 3>your team. He's had four games where he's scored this

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>year and is averaging twenty PPR points in those games.

1:08:55.400 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 3>In the ten he hasn't scored in, he's averaging only

1:08:58.240 --> 1:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>eleven PPR points per game in Miami's only allowed three

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:05.519
<v Speaker 3>total running back touchdowns in the last seven games. So

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:08.400
<v Speaker 3>it's just a C grade on Tony Pollard. And if

1:09:08.400 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 3>his offensive lineman don't go, he's on the bench. Over

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:15.880
<v Speaker 3>on the Dolphin side, Tyreek Hill limited all week. They

1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:17.800
<v Speaker 3>didn't need him to beat the Jets last week, but

1:09:17.840 --> 1:09:20.839
<v Speaker 3>I think they will suit him up to beat Dallas

1:09:20.840 --> 1:09:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and if he's if he's active, he's an A grade.

1:09:23.240 --> 1:09:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Wattle gets an A as well. The Cowboys have

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:28.439
<v Speaker 3>look look like they have a tough matchup on paper,

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:31.240
<v Speaker 3>but much of that was against some pretty bad quarterback

1:09:31.280 --> 1:09:35.679
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver combos this year. Courtland Sutton, Stefan Diggs, Adam Thielen,

1:09:35.760 --> 1:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>aj Brown, Devonte Adams, Garrett Wilson, DeAndre Hopkins all had

1:09:38.920 --> 1:09:41.080
<v Speaker 3>really good days against the Cowboys d So I'm not

1:09:41.120 --> 1:09:42.880
<v Speaker 3>scared there, you know.

1:09:43.040 --> 1:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I With Wattle, it's I always feel like when Hill plays,

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>it's just, you know, he has that dud game where

1:09:50.680 --> 1:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>just Hill just dominates box scores. And maybe because he'll's

1:09:53.280 --> 1:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent, Wattle is more safe. But I

1:09:56.040 --> 1:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>always feel like I can't trust Waddle at the A

1:09:58.400 --> 1:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>level when when he'll play.

1:10:00.320 --> 1:10:03.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm still gonna trust him, just based on we

1:10:03.600 --> 1:10:05.880
<v Speaker 3>don't know if Tyreek hills one hundred percent and maybe

1:10:05.880 --> 1:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>he tweaks that ankle a little bit and suddenly Jalen

1:10:08.080 --> 1:10:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Waddle's the focal point in which should be a shootout

1:10:11.240 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>if Tyreek and Waddle are a's. In my mind, Tua

1:10:14.240 --> 1:10:17.160
<v Speaker 3>is as well. Gino Smith and Sam Howell each topped

1:10:17.160 --> 1:10:19.759
<v Speaker 3>three hundred yards against Dallas in the last four weeks.

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:24.679
<v Speaker 3>Raheem Mostert is a must start, especially after James Cook

1:10:24.840 --> 1:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>exposed this Cowboys defense to the tune of twenty five

1:10:28.479 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 3>carries one hundred and seventy nine yards and a score

1:10:30.840 --> 1:10:33.720
<v Speaker 3>on the ground, plus two receptions forty two yards and

1:10:33.760 --> 1:10:34.960
<v Speaker 3>another score through the air.

1:10:35.240 --> 1:10:36.559
<v Speaker 4>That was just last week.

1:10:37.120 --> 1:10:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Mostart's seeing about ten more snaps per game and about

1:10:40.120 --> 1:10:44.080
<v Speaker 3>five more rushing attempts over Devon ah Chan right now

1:10:44.479 --> 1:10:47.479
<v Speaker 3>over just the last three weeks, although ah Chan has

1:10:47.479 --> 1:10:51.439
<v Speaker 3>been leading in targets over that time at sixteen to

1:10:51.479 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 3>four over Mostert. However, Dallas is the number one defense

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>in the league against running back receptions. They only allow three,

1:11:00.720 --> 1:11:02.960
<v Speaker 3>and a Chan is dealing with a toe injury. It's

1:11:03.000 --> 1:11:06.719
<v Speaker 3>caused him to mispractice time both last week and this week,

1:11:06.800 --> 1:11:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So Moster gets an A grade. A Chan, I'm given

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:13.000
<v Speaker 3>just a C because I think this matchup just favors

1:11:13.040 --> 1:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Mostart a lot more.

1:11:16.000 --> 1:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly, plenty

1:11:18.439 --> 1:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>more games to get to, including the Kansas City Chiefs

1:11:22.520 --> 1:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that used to be certain starters but not necessarily anymore.

1:11:26.680 --> 1:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelcey possibly benching in the playoffs. It

1:11:32.400 --> 1:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds absurd. You may have better options. We'll talk it

1:11:35.760 --> 1:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>through when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly Final

1:12:04.920 --> 1:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Segment Fantasy Football Weekly Semi Finals edition. Let's hope you're

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>listening next week. I have that'd be the best.

1:12:13.040 --> 1:12:13.840
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to those two.

1:12:13.840 --> 1:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I want you to get there, Yes, yeah, we'd love championships.

1:12:17.200 --> 1:12:19.639
<v Speaker 1>You never remember the money, you remember the winning. That's

1:12:19.920 --> 1:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that's always the best part. We have three games on Monday,

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Day, and you've still got a Sunday matchup to

1:12:27.080 --> 1:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>get through. Let's advance to Las Vegas Kansas City. This

1:12:32.560 --> 1:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>is the earliest of the Christmas Day games. Josh Jacob's

1:12:37.479 --> 1:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>status as of the moment we're recording this still unknown.

1:12:40.280 --> 1:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>You return to practice on Friday. In the old days,

1:12:43.439 --> 1:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you would worry about the Chiefs, like getting ahead by

1:12:45.320 --> 1:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and a half, and then the game script

1:12:47.000 --> 1:12:48.639
<v Speaker 1>is such that you couldn't help you know, runners couldn't

1:12:48.640 --> 1:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>help you anymore. But that's that is not the Kansas

1:12:51.200 --> 1:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs anymore. And Josh Jacobs against Kansas City a

1:12:54.439 --> 1:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>month ago twenty four touches one hundred and twenty three

1:12:58.120 --> 1:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>yards in a touchdown. Chiefs give up four point seven

1:13:01.520 --> 1:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry to opposing running backs. That is second

1:13:04.400 --> 1:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>worst in the league, and they've got the second worst

1:13:07.320 --> 1:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>run stop win rate. So, Josh Jacobs, if you were

1:13:10.840 --> 1:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy, I'd give him an A. But even with

1:13:12.439 --> 1:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the quad injury, I'll just I'll knock him down one

1:13:14.760 --> 1:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>letter to a B. The receivers you care about are

1:13:17.960 --> 1:13:20.639
<v Speaker 1>DeVonta Adams and Jacoby Myers. Let's talk that through because

1:13:20.640 --> 1:13:24.599
<v Speaker 1>it's really fascinating. Adams was held to a modest game

1:13:24.640 --> 1:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City. In that game a month ago, seven catches,

1:13:27.920 --> 1:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy three yards, did not score. Good game, not great game,

1:13:31.520 --> 1:13:35.639
<v Speaker 1>difficult matchup on the outside because Lagerius Sneid is emerging

1:13:35.640 --> 1:13:37.799
<v Speaker 1>as one of the best young cornerbacks in the league.

1:13:37.880 --> 1:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't allowed to score all year. He shadowed Adams

1:13:41.320 --> 1:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in the previous game, giving up sixty six of the

1:13:44.360 --> 1:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>seventy three yards that Adams did get. So that is

1:13:48.560 --> 1:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot as a big game by Snead standards to

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>give up sixty six yards. But it kind of tells

1:13:53.880 --> 1:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get something out of Adams here, but probably

1:13:56.080 --> 1:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>not an explosive game. I can only get you to

1:13:58.320 --> 1:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on DeVante Adams. Now, Myers is really

1:14:02.240 --> 1:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because in this matchup last month he got more

1:14:06.040 --> 1:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>yards than Adams. He got a touchdown that Adams didn't

1:14:08.800 --> 1:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>get because he didn't have to see Legerius Snead. Same

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thing coming here in all probability. In the previous game,

1:14:15.600 --> 1:14:21.719
<v Speaker 1>six different Chiefs defenders were on to Kobe Myers. Total

1:14:21.720 --> 1:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>boomer Bus play here, but the opportunities are going to

1:14:24.360 --> 1:14:27.559
<v Speaker 1>be there for Myers with a lot worse coverage than

1:14:27.600 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what Adams get. So boomer Buss guy, if you're like

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:33.559
<v Speaker 1>already behind because you're playing against I don't Matthew Stafford

1:14:33.520 --> 1:14:36.519
<v Speaker 1>pookin a cool or whatever. Jacoby Myers intriguing play all

1:14:36.600 --> 1:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>right on the Kansas City side. We're at a stage

1:14:40.240 --> 1:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>now where Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelcey are merely B

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:48.799
<v Speaker 1>grades and that's it. Get this for Patrick Mahomes. Twenty

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>five quarterbacks have posted three touchdown games more recently than

1:14:54.200 --> 1:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes did back in Week seven. Unbelievable that we're

1:14:59.160 --> 1:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about this now. Last time when these when these

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>teams met a month ago, he put up two hundred

1:15:03.840 --> 1:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and ninety eight yards and two scores. It's totally solid numbers.

1:15:07.000 --> 1:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the same range you're gonna get here.

1:15:09.640 --> 1:15:12.479
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders haven't seen many good passers, but they generally

1:15:12.560 --> 1:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>end up giving up in the high two hundreds for

1:15:14.439 --> 1:15:17.559
<v Speaker 1>yards and they generally giving up around two scores. That

1:15:17.680 --> 1:15:21.479
<v Speaker 1>sounds about right for Mahomes. Here for Kelsey, where she

1:15:21.840 --> 1:15:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Rice's emergence maybe taking a lot of targets away from Kelsey.

1:15:26.040 --> 1:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Rice runs from the slot through the middle of the

1:15:27.920 --> 1:15:31.479
<v Speaker 1>field that's in the past has been like exclusively Travis

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Kelcey territory, and over the last four weeks, Kelsey has

1:15:35.400 --> 1:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>only seen seven targets and five receptions per game. Those

1:15:38.720 --> 1:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are low numbers for him. Now he has had at

1:15:41.080 --> 1:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>least eighty targets in three of those games, so you know,

1:15:43.800 --> 1:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the productivity is still okay. Raiders, though, have been strong

1:15:47.240 --> 1:15:50.519
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends, not allowing more than fifty seven yards

1:15:50.880 --> 1:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>other than the ninety one yards the Kelsey put up

1:15:53.520 --> 1:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in Week twelve. For ra she Rice a grade. Yes,

1:15:58.080 --> 1:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm delighted that it's come to this.

1:15:59.800 --> 1:15:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:16:00.120 --> 1:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Over his last four games, fourth in yards among wide

1:16:03.360 --> 1:16:06.519
<v Speaker 1>receivers while scoring three times in those four games. The

1:16:06.600 --> 1:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs lead the league in drops, but not because of Rice.

1:16:09.880 --> 1:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>He's got an eighty percent catch rate, The highest mark

1:16:12.360 --> 1:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for a rookie receiver with seventy or more targets in

1:16:14.880 --> 1:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty years is wow. I love it. Rice

1:16:19.360 --> 1:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>has orchestrated his best game of the season against Vegas

1:16:23.040 --> 1:16:25.559
<v Speaker 1>in Week twelve. Eight catches, one hundred and seven yards

1:16:25.560 --> 1:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. He runs from the slot a lot.

1:16:27.840 --> 1:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>That puts him up against Nate Hobbs, who allows us

1:16:30.280 --> 1:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight percent catch rate, and Hobbs gave up Rice's

1:16:33.479 --> 1:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in the previous meeting. So I love her. She

1:16:35.840 --> 1:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Rice here? Yeah, oh great.

1:16:37.360 --> 1:16:39.840
<v Speaker 5>That previous meeting was kind of his breakout game. By

1:16:39.880 --> 1:16:42.640
<v Speaker 5>the way, She right was second in yards after the

1:16:42.680 --> 1:16:47.080
<v Speaker 5>catch per reception, only behind Deebo'. That's I love it. Yeah,

1:16:47.160 --> 1:16:48.920
<v Speaker 5>love it. He needs it with a three yard eight

1:16:48.960 --> 1:16:49.559
<v Speaker 5>ot though.

1:16:50.240 --> 1:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Well that is true. You gotta you better do something

1:16:52.240 --> 1:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>after the catch at that point. Yeh Iszam Pacheco is

1:16:55.000 --> 1:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>going to return to this game. Medically cleared last week,

1:16:58.600 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 1>but the team decided to play its IF and they

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>sat him, and so he should be near one hundred

1:17:02.360 --> 1:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>percent health. He's gonna be rested and ready for the

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Monday game. He's posted a career high two scores against

1:17:08.880 --> 1:17:11.559
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in the previous game, and the Raiders allow

1:17:11.600 --> 1:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the seventh most total yards to opposing running backs. But

1:17:13.920 --> 1:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll cost that is. Receiving numbers are way down. He's

1:17:16.880 --> 1:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>averaging just nine receiving yards over the last five games,

1:17:21.400 --> 1:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>although Jerrick McKinnon may not go with a groin injury,

1:17:23.880 --> 1:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>so that might give him a couple extra catches. All right,

1:17:27.080 --> 1:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>let's move over to our next game, which is the

1:17:28.960 --> 1:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants taking on Philadelphia. Scott Saquon Barkley major bummer last week.

1:17:35.080 --> 1:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you put him in your lineup against a good

1:17:37.240 --> 1:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Eagles run defense.

1:17:38.320 --> 1:17:42.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's really tough. At best, it's probably your volume

1:17:42.280 --> 1:17:45.919
<v Speaker 5>see alert. He has been averaging fifteen touches with Devido

1:17:45.960 --> 1:17:49.720
<v Speaker 5>in but in the blowout last week, split snaps with

1:17:49.800 --> 1:17:53.080
<v Speaker 5>Braida and Brada got a third of the touches. Game

1:17:53.120 --> 1:17:57.920
<v Speaker 5>script is going to be a thing. But with Barkley, Walker, Dowdell, Pollard, CMC, Cook,

1:17:57.960 --> 1:18:01.799
<v Speaker 5>Pacheco all had decent and days in recent weeks against

1:18:01.800 --> 1:18:04.519
<v Speaker 5>the Philly Rundy that was awesome, like top five for

1:18:04.680 --> 1:18:07.240
<v Speaker 5>most of the year, but the last four or four

1:18:07.320 --> 1:18:09.479
<v Speaker 5>or five weeks they've been tagged a little bit. So

1:18:09.520 --> 1:18:11.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give him the volume C in the past

1:18:11.960 --> 1:18:14.479
<v Speaker 5>grade that pass game. I actually have some grades here.

1:18:14.520 --> 1:18:16.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm giving Tommy DeVito a C. Philly is the second

1:18:16.960 --> 1:18:19.960
<v Speaker 5>best matchup for quarterbacks, and the game script should have

1:18:20.080 --> 1:18:23.280
<v Speaker 5>him passing more. His really good passing day with the

1:18:23.320 --> 1:18:26.679
<v Speaker 5>three touchdowns was against that also very poor Washington pass

1:18:26.720 --> 1:18:29.680
<v Speaker 5>d so it's a little bit comparable. I'll give him

1:18:29.680 --> 1:18:32.200
<v Speaker 5>the C grade here. I'm giving a B grade to

1:18:32.280 --> 1:18:35.479
<v Speaker 5>Darren Waller has played seven full games. In those seven

1:18:35.520 --> 1:18:38.040
<v Speaker 5>full games, he had six or more targets in all

1:18:38.040 --> 1:18:41.920
<v Speaker 5>but one. And despite playing a full game last week,

1:18:41.960 --> 1:18:44.160
<v Speaker 5>he only played twenty six snaps, but he had four

1:18:44.200 --> 1:18:47.559
<v Speaker 5>for forty in those twenty six snaps. Once he's closer

1:18:47.560 --> 1:18:50.200
<v Speaker 5>to you know, ninety percent of the snaps, should have

1:18:50.200 --> 1:18:52.519
<v Speaker 5>a much bigger game here. I am given a C

1:18:52.640 --> 1:18:55.599
<v Speaker 5>grade as well to wan Dale Robinson. I really have

1:18:55.640 --> 1:18:59.320
<v Speaker 5>trouble giving grades to New York Giants wide receivers at all.

1:18:59.439 --> 1:19:01.759
<v Speaker 5>But if you're really, really, really really in a pinch,

1:19:02.080 --> 1:19:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Eagles allow the most slot points yards and second most targets.

1:19:06.200 --> 1:19:08.559
<v Speaker 5>It's it's just a really good spots. The Giants very

1:19:08.560 --> 1:19:11.280
<v Speaker 5>who the leading receiver is, but Robinson has been the

1:19:11.360 --> 1:19:15.519
<v Speaker 5>consistent one, you know, three to five catches most weeks.

1:19:15.560 --> 1:19:18.200
<v Speaker 5>It's just it's it's a great matchup where he plays

1:19:18.200 --> 1:19:20.519
<v Speaker 5>eighty percent of the time in the slot. Over on

1:19:20.600 --> 1:19:23.080
<v Speaker 5>the other side, Jalen Hurts and A J. Brown are

1:19:23.120 --> 1:19:24.960
<v Speaker 5>getting a's. I don't know how much I have to

1:19:25.000 --> 1:19:27.880
<v Speaker 5>go into them with a J. Brown's only had a

1:19:27.880 --> 1:19:32.840
<v Speaker 5>couple duds, and it's lagarious need in one other DeVonta Smith.

1:19:33.560 --> 1:19:36.920
<v Speaker 5>If he goes, and mind you, he did not practice Wednesday,

1:19:36.960 --> 1:19:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Thursday or Friday, he's questionable.

1:19:40.280 --> 1:19:41.839
<v Speaker 4>Do they need him to beat the Giants?

1:19:41.920 --> 1:19:42.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, exactly.

1:19:43.120 --> 1:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>He may not gooff.

1:19:45.040 --> 1:19:47.439
<v Speaker 5>If he goes, I have a B grade on him.

1:19:47.760 --> 1:19:51.000
<v Speaker 5>If he doesn't go, I have a B grade on

1:19:51.120 --> 1:19:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Dallas godd or Dallas Goddard'll get a see if Davonta smits, goes.

1:19:54.360 --> 1:19:56.840
<v Speaker 5>But we have talked about this for two years. When

1:19:57.240 --> 1:20:00.280
<v Speaker 5>Davonta Smith and Goddard are tied, it's like the vlume

1:20:00.400 --> 1:20:02.680
<v Speaker 5>goes to the other one when the one when the

1:20:02.720 --> 1:20:05.360
<v Speaker 5>one is out. So I will give the B grade

1:20:05.360 --> 1:20:09.439
<v Speaker 5>to Dallas Goddard, assuming Davanta Smith doesn't go. Thirteen targets

1:20:09.439 --> 1:20:12.479
<v Speaker 5>in his last two games since returning, not a whole

1:20:12.520 --> 1:20:14.640
<v Speaker 5>lot of volume, but he'll get a little more with this.

1:20:14.720 --> 1:20:17.240
<v Speaker 5>And the Giants just allowed two tight end scores last

1:20:17.280 --> 1:20:20.719
<v Speaker 5>week and a Tucker craft bit decent day the week before.

1:20:21.520 --> 1:20:23.680
<v Speaker 5>In the run game, I'm only giving a grade to

1:20:23.760 --> 1:20:27.960
<v Speaker 5>DeAndre Swift. Since his breakout against Minnesota, he's been very,

1:20:28.120 --> 1:20:31.880
<v Speaker 5>very pedestrian, but he's still getting fifteen to twenty touches.

1:20:32.240 --> 1:20:35.799
<v Speaker 5>Hurtz keeps stealing the touchdowns. I'm gonna give him the volume.

1:20:35.880 --> 1:20:39.880
<v Speaker 5>C I expect more running this game as they Philly

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:42.880
<v Speaker 5>pulls ahead and they just run later. I don't think

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:45.760
<v Speaker 5>I can give anything to Kenneth Gaywell gain Well, and

1:20:45.800 --> 1:20:50.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm not gonna start Boston Scott do the accent despite

1:20:50.280 --> 1:20:52.799
<v Speaker 5>him scoring in all nine games.

1:20:52.840 --> 1:20:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Come on, come on, he's played Boston Scott.

1:20:57.120 --> 1:21:00.160
<v Speaker 5>Now, including the playoff game. He's got ten touchdowns in

1:21:00.320 --> 1:21:03.760
<v Speaker 5>nine games against the Giants. I just can't do it.

1:21:03.760 --> 1:21:04.720
<v Speaker 5>He's got You don't think that.

1:21:05.040 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>If so, let's he just set this up. No, they're

1:21:08.560 --> 1:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>at the goal line where they would normally do a twist,

1:21:12.120 --> 1:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>two cheek, sneak or whatever. Yes, you don't. You don't

1:21:15.760 --> 1:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>think Nick Sirianni Boston Scott. I heard do what he's

1:21:22.680 --> 1:21:23.599
<v Speaker 1>done every time.

1:21:23.880 --> 1:21:26.559
<v Speaker 5>If you're if you're balls enough, go for If you're

1:21:26.560 --> 1:21:28.920
<v Speaker 5>desperate enough and balls enough, you might get six point

1:21:28.920 --> 1:21:29.479
<v Speaker 5>one points.

1:21:29.880 --> 1:21:32.320
<v Speaker 3>It could just be a blowout to and and they

1:21:32.400 --> 1:21:35.439
<v Speaker 3>might want to not give Swift all the touches.

1:21:36.200 --> 1:21:37.679
<v Speaker 5>That's very true, very true.

1:21:39.400 --> 1:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>When we lose a touchdown out of Jalen Hurts box

1:21:41.800 --> 1:21:44.599
<v Speaker 1>score because of this, it's going to be a major bummer,

1:21:45.160 --> 1:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>really will be. It's that it's not about Boston Scott.

1:21:49.120 --> 1:21:51.519
<v Speaker 1>It's about Jalen Hurts losing a rushing touchdown and that

1:21:51.520 --> 1:21:54.519
<v Speaker 1>that would worry me a little bit. Yeah, that part's

1:21:54.680 --> 1:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>a bummer. New England takes on Denver. Matt I got

1:21:57.479 --> 1:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott's right now sitting at run back five. I

1:22:02.040 --> 1:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think you've already touched on the positivity of that matchup.

1:22:05.160 --> 1:22:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he is.

1:22:07.160 --> 1:22:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Might take a chance on your runner. I should say,

1:22:10.160 --> 1:22:12.840
<v Speaker 3>very solid A grade in this one, Hunter Henry the

1:22:12.880 --> 1:22:14.920
<v Speaker 3>only part of the passing game you could consider. He

1:22:14.920 --> 1:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>gets a C grade against Denver, who's bottom four in

1:22:18.120 --> 1:22:20.800
<v Speaker 3>receptions and yards to the tight end position, and they've

1:22:20.800 --> 1:22:23.519
<v Speaker 3>given up the most tight end touchdowns this year with

1:22:23.760 --> 1:22:26.680
<v Speaker 3>nine of those. So Hunter Henry C grade if you

1:22:26.760 --> 1:22:29.680
<v Speaker 3>need him on the Broncos side. I'm not feeling a

1:22:29.760 --> 1:22:32.760
<v Speaker 3>huge Russell Wilson week this week. He's topped two hundred

1:22:32.760 --> 1:22:36.559
<v Speaker 3>and fifty passing yards only once in his last eleven games,

1:22:36.960 --> 1:22:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and he's thrown for exactly one touchdown and four of

1:22:39.680 --> 1:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>his last five. What's kept his fantasy managers afloat is

1:22:43.240 --> 1:22:44.920
<v Speaker 3>that he's ran for a score in three of the

1:22:45.000 --> 1:22:48.160
<v Speaker 3>last four games. The Patriots have only allowed two rushing

1:22:48.200 --> 1:22:50.840
<v Speaker 3>scores to a quarterback all season, and four of the

1:22:50.920 --> 1:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>last five quarterbacks they faced have had two hundred and

1:22:54.320 --> 1:22:58.559
<v Speaker 3>twelve or fewer yards and one or zero touchdown passes.

1:22:58.640 --> 1:23:02.640
<v Speaker 3>So just a SEA grade for Wilson Courtland. Sutton is

1:23:02.760 --> 1:23:05.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of like the AFC version of Mike Evans. He's

1:23:05.160 --> 1:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>scored in ten games this year and not scored in four.

1:23:09.439 --> 1:23:11.519
<v Speaker 3>I'll throw him a B grade as the Pats present

1:23:11.560 --> 1:23:14.880
<v Speaker 3>a slightly better than average matchup for wide receivers. They've

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:18.120
<v Speaker 3>allowed the ninth most receptions to the wide receivers at

1:23:18.120 --> 1:23:21.040
<v Speaker 3>about fourteen per game, and they do allow about a

1:23:21.080 --> 1:23:23.200
<v Speaker 3>touchdown per game to the position. Who do you think

1:23:23.240 --> 1:23:26.839
<v Speaker 3>that goes to. It's gonna be Sutton. Finally, Javonte Williams

1:23:26.920 --> 1:23:29.559
<v Speaker 3>is still getting most of the work, but his shares

1:23:29.560 --> 1:23:33.679
<v Speaker 3>have been cut into recently by Jalil McLoughlin and samaj

1:23:33.880 --> 1:23:37.920
<v Speaker 3>p Ryin. The problem is Williams only good Fantasy Day

1:23:37.920 --> 1:23:40.080
<v Speaker 3>in the last month came against the Chargers, who are

1:23:40.080 --> 1:23:43.120
<v Speaker 3>a terrible run defense, and the Patriots are not terrible

1:23:43.160 --> 1:23:46.040
<v Speaker 3>at this They're second best in the league at yards

1:23:46.040 --> 1:23:48.720
<v Speaker 3>per carry at three point two. They're only allowing one

1:23:48.800 --> 1:23:51.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred and seven combo yards per game to the position,

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:53.639
<v Speaker 3>which is sixth best in the league. And if Williams

1:23:53.680 --> 1:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>gets about sixty percent of the touches here, he's looking

1:23:57.080 --> 1:23:59.400
<v Speaker 3>at like a sixty five yard game and his chances

1:23:59.400 --> 1:24:02.519
<v Speaker 3>of a touchdown are a coin flip at best. So

1:24:02.760 --> 1:24:04.320
<v Speaker 3>just a C grade for Williams.

1:24:05.520 --> 1:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, final matchup the Monday nighter Super Bowl preview,

1:24:10.640 --> 1:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe Baltimore at San Francisco. Let's start with Let's start

1:24:15.200 --> 1:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with Lamar Jackson. You know, for San Francisco, every opposing

1:24:18.360 --> 1:24:21.559
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with six or more carries has scored a rushing

1:24:21.600 --> 1:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdown or top forty three yards. So Jackson's gonna help

1:24:24.120 --> 1:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you on the ground here can good passers generally fare

1:24:27.800 --> 1:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty well against the Niners. Matthew Stafford, Dak Prescott, Kirk, Cousins,

1:24:32.040 --> 1:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow, Jalen Hurts average tw hundred and eighty four

1:24:34.040 --> 1:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>yards and one and a half touchdowns. The question is

1:24:36.640 --> 1:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is Lamar Jackson in their category in their strata. I

1:24:40.720 --> 1:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's quite there, And every other passer besides

1:24:44.280 --> 1:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>those elite level passers only post two hundred and nineteen

1:24:48.600 --> 1:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>yards and zero point eight touchdowns per game. Now where

1:24:52.120 --> 1:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he could help you out his volume, forty nine ers

1:24:53.800 --> 1:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>see the second most passes thirty eight per game. Distill

1:24:57.200 --> 1:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>all that into one letter grade, then we've got to

1:24:59.280 --> 1:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>be on the mo Jackson A see on Zay Flowers

1:25:02.800 --> 1:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as the go to receiver for this offense. Leading the

1:25:05.600 --> 1:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>team in targets over the last three weeks, forty nine

1:25:07.880 --> 1:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>ers have allowed the third most receptions to opposing receivers.

1:25:11.920 --> 1:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Zay lines up all over the field and his matchups

1:25:14.120 --> 1:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on the outside are difficult, but he's got this path

1:25:17.400 --> 1:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of least resistance in the slot against Isaiah Oliver, which

1:25:20.800 --> 1:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>is very positive among all cornerbacks who's played at least

1:25:23.439 --> 1:25:26.839
<v Speaker 1>three hundred snaps. Oliver's giving up an eighty nine percent

1:25:26.920 --> 1:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>catch rate that is the worst in the league. So

1:25:29.360 --> 1:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Flowers out of the slot. Here an opportunity

1:25:32.040 --> 1:25:36.599
<v Speaker 1>to start him. Odell Beckham had an inexplicable dud last

1:25:36.640 --> 1:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>week in a far easier matchup, but I don't know.

1:25:40.560 --> 1:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe startable if you believe the Ravens are going to

1:25:42.600 --> 1:25:45.479
<v Speaker 1>be passing from behind throughout the game. The forty nine

1:25:45.520 --> 1:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ers see the third most wide receiver targets and the

1:25:48.720 --> 1:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>second most wide receiver reception, so you know he might

1:25:53.160 --> 1:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>be startable, particularly if Niners cornerback Deamador Lenor does not

1:25:57.200 --> 1:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>play and he's questionable, then I think you could give

1:25:59.760 --> 1:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a throw to Odell Beckham, but that's it. Isaiah likely

1:26:04.680 --> 1:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in consecutive games. Tough matchup, though, Niners allowing just

1:26:09.439 --> 1:26:12.519
<v Speaker 1>forty seven yards and five receptions per game to tight

1:26:12.600 --> 1:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ends thanks to the large part to Fred Warner, who's

1:26:14.800 --> 1:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously great. He's Pro Football Focused's fourth best rated coverage linebacker,

1:26:20.520 --> 1:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and before they allowed Trey McBride to go for a

1:26:22.920 --> 1:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yards last week, tight ends have only gotten

1:26:25.080 --> 1:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>over fifty yards twice this season, but McBride did hit

1:26:28.320 --> 1:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>him for one hundred, so Isaiah likely started ble with

1:26:30.880 --> 1:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a C grade in this game. Gus Edwards C grade.

1:26:35.240 --> 1:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Keaton Mitchell out for the year, so Edwards should see

1:26:38.080 --> 1:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>an upticking usage. Although you know what's gonna happen in

1:26:41.760 --> 1:26:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Justice Hill is going to be frustratingly involved. Yep, forty

1:26:45.640 --> 1:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>nine ers allow the second second fewest total yards and

1:26:48.720 --> 1:26:51.519
<v Speaker 1>the fewest touchdowns to opposing running backs only twenty one

1:26:51.520 --> 1:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>per game. Opponents to know the runs coming when Edwards

1:26:54.439 --> 1:26:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is on the field. He faces eight or more defenders

1:26:56.400 --> 1:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in the box on thirty three percent of his rushing attempts,

1:26:59.360 --> 1:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>which is four highest among all running backs. And that

1:27:02.680 --> 1:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>makes it tough for Edwards goal line. Maybe you get

1:27:05.280 --> 1:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown here, that's it for Edwards and a C grade.

1:27:07.960 --> 1:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to San Francisco. Brat Perdy and Christian

1:27:11.760 --> 1:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey obvious as and you would think Deebo Samuel would

1:27:15.640 --> 1:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be as well. He comes in his Fantasy Football's highest

1:27:19.360 --> 1:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>scoring receiver over the last six games, so I know

1:27:22.920 --> 1:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to start him, but he carries some sneaky downside.

1:27:26.320 --> 1:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to explain to you here. First, Deebo's had

1:27:29.560 --> 1:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>four or fewer receptions in five of his last seven games.

1:27:33.400 --> 1:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That is very low volume. That means he has to

1:27:35.680 --> 1:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>get touchdowns to make up for the low volume. And

1:27:38.120 --> 1:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>as you can guess, the Ravens don't give up a

1:27:40.280 --> 1:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of touchdowns. Fourth fewest to wide receivers just half

1:27:43.720 --> 1:27:47.559
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown per game on average to wide receivers. Samuel

1:27:47.640 --> 1:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>runs from all parts of the field evenly, but hopefully

1:27:51.479 --> 1:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>more so from the slot on Monday, because the Ravens

1:27:54.360 --> 1:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>have given up one hundred yard games to Cooper Cup

1:27:56.720 --> 1:27:59.519
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen and I'm on Ross Saint Brown great slot

1:27:59.560 --> 1:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>receiver recently, so you hope he can run from the slot.

1:28:02.800 --> 1:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I can only give you a B grade on Deebo

1:28:05.080 --> 1:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Samuel in a tough matchup. Brandon Ayuk runs from the outside,

1:28:09.000 --> 1:28:12.519
<v Speaker 1>isn't his favorable as the slot. He'll see cornerback Marlin Humphrey,

1:28:12.520 --> 1:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>who's been lights out since Week six, giving up just

1:28:14.840 --> 1:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty three scoreless yards in his coverage, so I can

1:28:17.880 --> 1:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>only get you to a B grade on him. And lastly,

1:28:20.520 --> 1:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle, Deebo Samuel carves into his box score a

1:28:23.640 --> 1:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>lot in games with a healthy Deebo Samuel Kittle averaging

1:28:27.479 --> 1:28:29.799
<v Speaker 1>just three and a half catches for fifty eight yards,

1:28:30.080 --> 1:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Ravens allowed the eighth fewest yards and the

1:28:33.360 --> 1:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>twelfth fewest receptions the tight ends and only three touchdowns

1:28:36.840 --> 1:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all season, so it's a tough matchup for Kittle and

1:28:40.080 --> 1:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I've only got a C grade on him this week.

1:28:44.600 --> 1:28:47.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of talking. Yeah, thanks everybody for us

1:28:48.000 --> 1:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>list this.

1:28:49.760 --> 1:28:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thank you very much.

1:28:50.840 --> 1:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Merry Christmas, everybody, Happy holidays. Great semi finals matchup, I

1:28:54.640 --> 1:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>hope for all of you, and we'll talk to you

1:28:56.320 --> 1:29:08.799
<v Speaker 1>for the championship week next week. Bye bye. Fantasy Football

1:29:08.840 --> 1:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

1:29:12.840 --> 1:29:16.479
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

1:29:16.520 --> 1:29:17.519
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.