1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. The Supreme Court 6 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:25,560 Speaker 1: is not scheduled to hear its arguments until January seven, 7 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 1: but the justices will be meeting for a conference this Friday. 8 00:00:29,040 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 1: Joining me to talk about what's coming up is Bloomberg 9 00:00:31,120 --> 00:00:35,360 Speaker 1: News Supreme Court reporter Greg's store in our DC Studios. Greg, 10 00:00:35,440 --> 00:00:37,680 Speaker 1: It seems as if the Court has been trying to 11 00:00:37,760 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 1: avoid contentious issues since the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. 12 00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:46,519 Speaker 1: Will that become more difficult on January four, when the 13 00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:50,560 Speaker 1: justices meet to consider new cases for April It will 14 00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:53,000 Speaker 1: junr right. The Court seems to have been trying to 15 00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 1: take a low profile over the last few months, but 16 00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:57,760 Speaker 1: there are a spate of cases that are going to 17 00:00:57,840 --> 00:00:59,520 Speaker 1: be right in front of them when they come back. 18 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:01,680 Speaker 1: In Jeanne Weary that are going to make that very 19 00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:04,520 Speaker 1: hard to keep keep up. The first one is a 20 00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:06,520 Speaker 1: case or two of the first ones that are going 21 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 1: to be there are a case involving partisan jerrymandering. That's 22 00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 1: the the issue of voting maps that are drawn to 23 00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:17,360 Speaker 1: maximize the the advantages of the party in power. Uh, 24 00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:19,800 Speaker 1: it's possible the court, very likely the court will take 25 00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 1: that up, and possible the courts conservatives will say once 26 00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:25,200 Speaker 1: and for all that those sorts of maps cannot be 27 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 1: challenged in court. And then there's the issue of the 28 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:32,720 Speaker 1: federal law that bars job discrimination, and lower courts are 29 00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:37,000 Speaker 1: divided as to whether people who are discriminated against on 30 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,800 Speaker 1: the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity are protected 31 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:43,560 Speaker 1: under that law. Uh, there are several appeals that are 32 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:45,920 Speaker 1: gonna be waiting for the court when they come back, 33 00:01:46,319 --> 00:01:49,240 Speaker 1: and there's again an excellent chance the Court will agree 34 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:52,520 Speaker 1: to take those issues up. Do you see more of 35 00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:58,240 Speaker 1: the conservative justices, including Kavanaugh, trying to t up controversial 36 00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:03,760 Speaker 1: cases that might might advance a conservative agenda? Certainly with 37 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:09,280 Speaker 1: the three established conservatives on the court, Thomas, Alito and 38 00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:13,480 Speaker 1: Gorstch Kavanaugh is a really interesting case because we're still 39 00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:15,400 Speaker 1: seeing what kind of justice he is going to be. Like. 40 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:18,200 Speaker 1: Up until a couple of weeks ago, I would have 41 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:21,200 Speaker 1: said to you, so far, Justice Kavanaugh has seemed to 42 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:23,800 Speaker 1: be a little more like Chief Justice Roberts in that 43 00:02:23,880 --> 00:02:26,800 Speaker 1: he wants the court to move slowly. But there was 44 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:32,320 Speaker 1: UH an emergency application filed by the Trump administration recently 45 00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:36,400 Speaker 1: having to do with restricting where people could claim asylum 46 00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:40,480 Speaker 1: along the Mexican border. The Chief Justice John Roberts voted 47 00:02:40,520 --> 00:02:46,000 Speaker 1: with the liberals to reject the administration's emergency application UH, 48 00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:50,000 Speaker 1: and Justice Kavanaugh joined with the conservatives, saying, we would 49 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:53,600 Speaker 1: we would have voted to let the Trump administration require 50 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:57,000 Speaker 1: that any asylum applications be made at ports of entry. 51 00:02:57,280 --> 00:03:00,600 Speaker 1: So we're we're seeing that Justice Cavana to be starting 52 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:02,880 Speaker 1: to show some some different colors than we saw from 53 00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:06,240 Speaker 1: him in the first few months. And at the conference 54 00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 1: on January eleventh, there are also some controversial cases coming. Yeah, 55 00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 1: so this will be the second private conference that they 56 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 1: have coming back in the new year. UH to two 57 00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:20,639 Speaker 1: big issues there too of many significant issues, but the 58 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:24,760 Speaker 1: two biggest ones I highlight are one the Trump administration 59 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:28,000 Speaker 1: trying to let the president resend the DACA policy, that's 60 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:32,400 Speaker 1: the fird deportation policy for UH young immigrants who came 61 00:03:32,440 --> 00:03:37,360 Speaker 1: here as children illegally UM and the second appeal that 62 00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:41,080 Speaker 1: involves the Trump administration's efforts to largely ban transgender people 63 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:44,120 Speaker 1: from serving in the military. Both those cases will before 64 00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: the Court be before the court in both cases. It's 65 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 1: possible the Court will duck those fights and not take 66 00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:53,240 Speaker 1: up the Trump administration appeals. But again, it's gonna be 67 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:55,760 Speaker 1: hard for them to avoid them, particularly when you have 68 00:03:56,520 --> 00:03:59,240 Speaker 1: the federal government saying this is a really important issue 69 00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:01,920 Speaker 1: and we think you need to decide it. Now. What's 70 00:04:01,960 --> 00:04:05,840 Speaker 1: the latest on that mysterious filing that everyone's been talking 71 00:04:05,920 --> 00:04:09,040 Speaker 1: about that appears to ask the Supreme Court to intervene 72 00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:13,320 Speaker 1: for the first time in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation 73 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:16,599 Speaker 1: into the election. Yet right now we're just waiting for 74 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:19,239 Speaker 1: the court to act. So the Chief Justice John Roberts 75 00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:24,320 Speaker 1: has temporarily UH blocked a lower court order that imposed 76 00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 1: finds on a mystery company H for not UH it's 77 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:34,680 Speaker 1: owned by an an unidentified country, UH finds imposed for 78 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:38,520 Speaker 1: not complying with a grand jury subpoena. Almost all the 79 00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 1: documents in the case are undersealed, so we don't know 80 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:43,520 Speaker 1: a whole lot. There are strong indications that it does 81 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:47,040 Speaker 1: involve Robert Mueller, but beyond that, it's it's hard to 82 00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:50,960 Speaker 1: speculate on on exactly what's involved. But we are waiting 83 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:54,160 Speaker 1: for the Supreme Court to do something that uh, potentially 84 00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:57,359 Speaker 1: will affect the Muller probe for the first time. Now. 85 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:00,480 Speaker 1: A new movie came out over the weekend, the holiday 86 00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:04,559 Speaker 1: weekend about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. What's her prognosis after 87 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:08,000 Speaker 1: undergoing lung surgery and the fall she had a few 88 00:05:08,040 --> 00:05:11,359 Speaker 1: months ago. She's an eight five year old woman, and 89 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:14,960 Speaker 1: so you know that that grain of salt. But but um, 90 00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:18,080 Speaker 1: it appears to be good. There's no Uh. All the 91 00:05:18,120 --> 00:05:21,080 Speaker 1: information we've received from the court is that there's no 92 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:24,600 Speaker 1: sign that the disease, the masses that were found on 93 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:28,240 Speaker 1: um on her lung, there's no sign that those have 94 00:05:28,360 --> 00:05:31,400 Speaker 1: spread anywhere else. She was released from the hospital on 95 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:34,800 Speaker 1: Christmas Day, UM, and every indication is that she will 96 00:05:34,839 --> 00:05:37,840 Speaker 1: be on the bench when the court returns next week. 97 00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:42,840 Speaker 1: You wrote a story about how her her medical condition 98 00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:47,240 Speaker 1: has led some to speculate on both sides. Yeah, this 99 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:50,039 Speaker 1: is the you know, the greatest nightmare for liberals and 100 00:05:50,360 --> 00:05:54,479 Speaker 1: uh and potentially an amazing opportunity for conservatives if either 101 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:57,719 Speaker 1: she or some other liberal justice. Keep in mind Stephen 102 00:05:57,720 --> 00:06:00,400 Speaker 1: Briars also eighty years old. If either the word to 103 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:04,440 Speaker 1: have to step down, we would potentially move away from 104 00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:07,279 Speaker 1: this world where John Roberts is in the middle of 105 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 1: the court and holding the court back and limiting what 106 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:14,479 Speaker 1: the Court does, to a world where John Roberts's vote 107 00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:17,200 Speaker 1: might not matter because Donald Trump could appoint a fifth 108 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,240 Speaker 1: hardcore conservative to the Court, and then we could see 109 00:06:20,279 --> 00:06:24,039 Speaker 1: some real dramatic changes in American law. Greg you know, 110 00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 1: John Roberts is the chief. I know his vote counts 111 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:28,720 Speaker 1: as just as much as the other justices or the 112 00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:31,200 Speaker 1: other justices votes counts just as much as his. But 113 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 1: is there any more pull that he has or pushed 114 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:38,479 Speaker 1: because he's the chief? Can he twist a few arms? 115 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:40,920 Speaker 1: Certainly he can try. There are subtle ways. He does 116 00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:44,600 Speaker 1: have the power to assign opinions when he's in the majority, 117 00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:47,680 Speaker 1: and that's potentially a very important power because if you 118 00:06:47,839 --> 00:06:50,480 Speaker 1: have a justice who wants to go further in a 119 00:06:50,480 --> 00:06:54,599 Speaker 1: particular case, and John Roberts wants to issue a narrow ruling, uh, 120 00:06:54,640 --> 00:06:57,640 Speaker 1: he can assign himself the opinion and make sure that 121 00:06:57,680 --> 00:07:01,960 Speaker 1: the language of it is pretty limited. So it's potentially important, 122 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:04,440 Speaker 1: but at the end of the day, Uh, he certainly 123 00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:08,200 Speaker 1: is a conservative justice. Now, there is a big argument 124 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:11,720 Speaker 1: coming up in February that we've been talking about regarding 125 00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:14,280 Speaker 1: the census. So you have about a minute here to 126 00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:17,240 Speaker 1: tell us about that. Okay, this is the case, a 127 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:22,000 Speaker 1: controversy over the addition of a citizenship question to the census, 128 00:07:22,040 --> 00:07:24,840 Speaker 1: and people who are opposed to it, UH say it's 129 00:07:24,840 --> 00:07:29,559 Speaker 1: going to depress depressed participation, UH and make it less 130 00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 1: likely that that heavily Hispanic and often democratic areas will 131 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:36,640 Speaker 1: be counted in the census. UH. And the issue is 132 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: what sort of evidence can be used in the trial 133 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:43,280 Speaker 1: to consider whether the administration can put that that question 134 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:48,800 Speaker 1: on the next census. Uh. The Supreme Court has interviewed, intervened, 135 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:53,080 Speaker 1: excuse me, in a couple uh incremental ways before this 136 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:56,400 Speaker 1: this argument. Now in late February, they're going to hear 137 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:59,640 Speaker 1: arguments UH in a way that will potentially determine whether 138 00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 1: that question can be on the next census. All right, 139 00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 1: we'll be looking forward to that. That's Bloomberg News Supreme 140 00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:11,120 Speaker 1: Court reporter Greg Store. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg 141 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:14,280 Speaker 1: Law podcast. You can subscribe and Listen to the show 142 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:19,040 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and on bloomberg dot com slash podcast. 143 00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 1: I'm June Brosso. This is Bloomberg