WEBVTT - Banks, Housing, Markets, and UK CPI

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day, we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Our great friends of Goldman Sachs kind of a tough quarter.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't feel sorry for them because they

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>win a lot more than they don't. I competed against

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>them for many, many years, with some success, but always

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>always tough competitors everywhere you go. Somebody's also followed this

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>company for a long long time. Allison Williams Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>She's her senior banks analyst, and you know she's also

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a suit. She's now management. She runs the US Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, you know, now she's a suit, she's

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a boss.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 4>You're a boss now exactly you were a boss before

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 4>because I have tough.

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, Allison, I don't know talk to us

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about Goldman Sachs here. It feels like they kind of

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>got a little off track with that retail push and

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe that took some attention away from some of their businesses. Yes,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>it is a tough environment, but Goldman Sacks is still

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sacks.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Right they are, and you know you're seeing the other

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 5>side of holatility to some extent, right, So, I mean

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 5>the ro is very tough. This quarter includes a lot

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 5>of one timers, there's some charges, there's you know, they're

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 5>working towards a longer term strategy and I think they're

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 5>doing the right things. The alternative strategy. You're really showing

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 5>this quarter why that they're implementing that in terms of

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 5>moving to a model that's more focused on fees and

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 5>managing assets for clients versus taking the risks directly on

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 5>their balance sheet, which is something that regulators have wanted

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 5>them to move away from for a long time. So

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 5>they had that charge. They also had the charge related

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 5>to Green Sky offset by a little small gain related

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 5>to some sale Marcus Loans. I think, you know, moving

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 5>away from those businesses also strategically the right thing for

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 5>Goldman focused on want what you're good at. Unfortunately, it's

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 5>a tough quarter for the business. But equities trading up

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 5>one percent, I mean that's oppressive in this quarter, and

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 5>that's you know, that's a prime brokerage business, and that

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 5>shows that they're executing on what they do well.

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 4>So when it comes to the consumer business in Green Sky,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 4>like you mentioned, is part of what we're seeing right

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 4>now with Goldman, just some pain that they have to

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 4>go through to kind of have this transition out of

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 4>and away from those two things.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean general, when you shift strategy and do

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 5>some kind of restructuring, you know, first of all, it's

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 5>never in a straight line, and there's always charges before

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 5>you sort of move on to the better stuff. Because

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 5>they were performing well, you probably are were not businesses

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 5>that you're getting rid of, and so it's tough for

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 5>them to take the impairment and shows that that was

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 5>not an asset purchase. Well, but I think that on

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 5>the cost side of things, if we strip out these costs,

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 5>there's stills a little bit more work to do. So

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 5>they do you know, they want to get to a

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 5>sixty percent cost ratio over the cycle. They're at about

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 5>seventy percent once you make all the adjustments. So part

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 5>of that is the tougher part of the cycle. So

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 5>I talked about equity trading which was a real positive fix.

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 5>Trading was weak as expected. You know, Goldman and Morgan

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Stanley especially you're seeing big declines because they had such

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 5>good quarters a year ago due to commodities. And on

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 5>the banking side, Goldman is the m and a revenue leader,

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 5>as you know Paul from competing with them in the past.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 5>That so they you know, the league tables move around,

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 5>but that's a big chunk for them, and that's just

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 5>going the wrong way right now for the industry. We're

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 5>hearing a lot of constructive comments about the pick up there,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 5>and you know you've also mentioned from some folks, you know,

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 5>hearing some positive comments, but those are really not going

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 5>to play out in the second half. That's a twenty

0:03:58.800 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 5>twenty four story.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's step back and just talk regulation, not so much

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for for Goldman per se, but just for the banks,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>all right. Post financial crisis, a lot of new regulations

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>came on in the industry.

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Fine, we get it.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>There had to be some response and probably well deserved regulations,

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought, and over time a lot of

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>those regulations would just kind of fall to the wayside,

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>peel back. But now the discussion is actually even for

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>more regulations. What is driving that that need for more

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>regulation of the banks? I know Jamie Diamond's been a

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>big spokesperson kind of against that with along with Brian

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>morning Hand.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 5>So there's two things, you know, first, which is on

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 5>you know the quote smaller banks, but you know, not

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 5>the not the biggest banks that I cover. Right, So

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 5>we had the issues in March that did raise a

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of questions of you know, some of the things

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 5>that were rolled back, Okay, should they have been? And

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 5>so I think that sort of, you know, to your point,

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 5>things started to roll back, but now the question was

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 5>like was that the right thing to do. The second

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 5>part that's more germane to the banks that I cover,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 5>which is Basil three endgame, which we hope is finally

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 5>the end. So again we've had all these regulations over

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 5>the years. You know, there's some some still finalization that

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 5>we're expecting any day now for the last few weeks.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 5>And I think that why you're hearing the bank management's

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 5>complain is that you know, first of all, the way

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 5>that the basil works, because you hear this term a lot, right,

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 5>So Basil is really an entity that sort of sets

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 5>the guidelines and then the jurisdictions go out and implement those.

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 5>So the US has a lot of other very strict

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 5>regulations that other countries don't have. Right, so we have

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 5>the stress test every year. That adds a lot of volatility,

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 5>and that really is very punitive to the trading books

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 5>of banks. This buzzle three endgame, again supposedly from what

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 5>we've heard from the proposal outlines, is also going to

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 5>be tough on the trading books of banks. So do

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 5>you really need to have this sort of double whammy

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 5>and these different types of conflicting regulations that you know,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 5>really make it very difficult. And I think you know

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 5>what the bank managements will say is you might make

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 5>the banks safer, but the risks will still be there

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 5>and they'll be outside of the system.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 7>Ye.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 5>And is that really what you want?

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Unintended consequence, because that goes too just to the business

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>at Maddie and I talked to talk about a lot,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>which is the private credit business.

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And these private creditors come in with almost these Cheshire smiles.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're like, I can't believe how good it

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is for us now because the banks have so much

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>regulation that they're reluctant to put some of these loans

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on their books, and so the barers, big private equity

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>shops are coming to us and we're making money handover

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>faced here.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 5>And if you look at if you looked at a

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 5>very long term chart of banks, you know since the crisis,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 5>you will see the huge growth of credit in the

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 5>non bank center, shadow bank, whatever you want to call it,

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 5>private credit is that is certainly a huge player there.

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 5>And then the decrease on banks balance sheets. But again

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 5>like these private credit firms are getting there. You know,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 5>they're raising capital, you know, from someone, And if you

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 5>think about it, the private private credit is really sort

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 5>of the talk of the entire asset management industry, even

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the traditional managers buying into private credit, the private equity

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 5>managers building up their private credit businesses. So you have

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 5>all this money going there.

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 3>There's more talk.

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 5>About getting this into pension portfolios and other portfolios. So

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 5>you can think about, you know, sort of wear the

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 5>risks and who's going to bear those risks and how

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 5>that's all shaping up.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Thinking about going into the private credit.

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>See I went through thesemen bank, the Chase Manhattan Bank

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>credit training, which is the best on Wall Street. Back

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, I can take those skills and

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>go to private credit.

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 8>There you go.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 4>I should have done it. I mean, there's still time

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>for me, you guys, I can get an MBA tomorrow. Allison.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I want to ask you a weird one in our

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 4>final minute and a half with you. A lot of

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 4>my friends got the Apple savings card with the Goldman.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>What do I need to tell them? Are they gonna

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 4>get ditched by Goldman any day?

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 8>Now?

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 5>What's going on with I mean, they they probably don't

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 5>even know that Goldman's evolved, and except that you probably

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 5>told them that, and that's why those cards are those

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 5>cards are generally.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Called private label.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 5>So what Goldman had said right was that they were

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 5>getting away from Marcus. They did keep the GM relationship,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 5>the Apple relationship, where there's some kind of a relationship,

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 5>but in general, when those relationships fall apart, it's it

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 5>tends to be because the economics just aren't working for

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 5>one or someone else is coming in and willing to

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 5>accept lower economics. So, you know, and of course we

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 5>never know that, We never know that. Most of us

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 5>never know exactly what happens. But you know, that could

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 5>be the case that someone's coming in and just you know,

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 5>more interested in the credit card business, and now that

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 5>it's not so strategically important for Goldman, you know, will

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 5>they be willing to sort of give that away? And

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 5>it's it's also been interesting, right So the other side

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 5>of it is the deposit gathering business, and you see

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Apples introducing this new product, but then you have the

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 5>Marcus product and you see the yields on both of

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 5>those and kind of competing, and you know where we're

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, Goldman liked those. They obviously would like to

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 5>get one hundred percent of the economics where they.

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Can, right, Okay, all right, Alison, thanks so much for

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>joining us. I know there's a busy, busy few days

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for you.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Alison Williams.

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>She covers all the banks on a global basis for

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. She's also the director of research for the

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>US business for Bloomberg Intelligence, so we appreciate getting some

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of her time here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the Team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 9>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 9>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 9>on demand wherever you get your podcasts, Madison.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>When I bought the Jersey Shore Compound earlier this year,

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>my mortgage had a six handle on it, and I

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>was not happy.

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Just got rooked at because I know Matt.

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Millers is I think sub three on his estate up

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in Westchester. But I'm looking at the bankrate dot com

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>US home mortgage thirty year fixed national average today seven point,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I'm not that dumb of a buyer. But

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>any who, where are mortgage rates going? What's going on

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in that market? I have no idea other than we'd

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>call Erica Adelberg. She's an MBS strategist that's mortgage backed

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>securities for you out there for Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. So, Erica,

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>how are mortgage backed securities? How's the market in twenty

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty three so far you're to date?

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 8>Hi, thanks for having me on. The market is actually

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 8>just barely up, I think on an excess return basis,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 8>and it's we actually have great rates are up one

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 8>hundred as you pointed out, they're up about one hundred

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 8>basis points in terms of primary mortgage rates year every year.

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 8>But they are off their recent peaks, so at least

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 8>you didn't take out a seven point three five percent

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 8>mortgage last week or so. As you know, they ratesed,

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, fled higher once again when non fine pay

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 8>rolls came in a little stronger than some people had

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 8>hoped her expected. But there has been some retreat in

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 8>that again with CPI coming in a little bit lower.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 8>So you know, we're still closer to the hives than

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 8>the lows, but you know, we are off the tippy top.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 8>But anytime you have mortgage rates around or above seven percent,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 8>it probably is restrictive on an affordability basis for quite

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 8>a few people.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, it's really interesting. I know that you know

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 4>all about this, but this Redfin report was fascinating to

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 4>me showing that just one percent of the nation's homes

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 4>have changed hands this year. And they also have data

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 4>showing the ninety percent of Americans do have a mortgage

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 4>under six percent. So why would anyone ever be incentivized

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 4>to let that go when, like you said, Paul, now

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 4>we're at the seven handle. What could be the catalyst

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 4>for people to start to say it's time to leave

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 4>behind my home and get a new mortgage.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 8>I mean to state the obvious. Life happens. You know,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 8>people have kids, you know, there's divorces, there's you know,

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 8>so over time and and I mean, if you look

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 8>at the very long range average, it's not like seven

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 8>percent is it's it's high, but you know, we've had

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 8>rates a lot higher. It seems like all of our

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 8>you know, older siblings or parents, depending on what generation

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 8>we're in, you know, at one point probably had rates

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 8>that were seven seven to ten percent or you know,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 8>even higher. And of course all those people have now

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.479
<v Speaker 8>refinanced two and a half percent if they still have mortgages.

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 4>But is that the move then for people listening? Just

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 4>if you are waiting to buy a home, don't wait,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 4>just do it now in refinance.

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 8>That's that's certainly what a new homebuilder would tell you.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and new.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 8>Home builders are you know that That's that's really the

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 8>game in town right now, because as you just mentioned,

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 8>except for the people who do have to move for

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 8>one reason or another, very few people are listing their

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 8>their homes. You know, the numbers on listenings are extremely low.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 8>So the resale market as they call it is, or

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 8>existing home market, is very slow. But new home builders,

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 8>as just alluded to, permits and starts, are up new

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 8>home sales. New home inventories are about a third of

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 8>existing homes of homes listed for sale these days, and

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 8>the new home builders are finding ways to incentivize first

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 8>time home buyers and you know, even some move up

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 8>buyers by offering them slightly lower rates. What's interesting, I

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 8>was reading just the other day that some of these buydowns,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 8>as they call it, were relatively temporary. They offered like

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 8>a three two one buy down, where it's basically only

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 8>good for three years the first year they buy down

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 8>the rate for three years, then two, then one. They

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 8>have to qualify them at the higher mortgage rate, so

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, unlikely to be another subprime teaser mortgage rate,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 8>but it might become as a rate shock. Maybe some

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 8>people had expected, as you mentioned, rates to fall sooner

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 8>and to be able to refinance in that time, and

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 8>that's what the home builders are selling. They're like, you know,

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 8>for right now, we'll give you a lower rate because

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 8>surely you'll be able to refin in a year or two.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 8>Some of those people certainly haven't been able to.

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I kind of thought I gave myself twelve months,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>which I still plenty plan of time that i'd refinance

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>with a FOE handle, and I'm not sure that's going

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen, but we'll see, but I will refinance a

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>low I'm not too concerned about that, all right, So

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about Uh yeah, I think about office space,

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and in some of the biggest cities there's so much

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>office space, and people are telling us that's going to

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be a real problem for the lenders and so on

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and so forth.

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 3>How does that impact your market, the mortgage backed securities market, I.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 8>Think the actual office space. There's two ways that could

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 8>impact it. For one thing, as we've just mentioned, there

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 8>is a bit of a lack of availability of homes

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 8>for sale for those who do want to get into

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 8>the market. You know, the new home builders are picking up,

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 8>but actually if you look at the charts of permits

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 8>and starts, we're a lot higher than we were in

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 8>pre pandemic levels. But that's because there had been ten

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 8>years post financial crisis of underbuilding. So there's a big

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 8>troth after two thousand and nine two thousand and eight,

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 8>and it was just creeping slowly up and then shot

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 8>up during the pandemic. So we're about twenty percent below

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 8>pandemic levels. We're well above that we were in the

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 8>ten years beforehand. But what that means, that's the other

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 8>reason there are so few homes being listed. Not only

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 8>are people locked into their mortgages, but honestly, there was

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 8>probably a structural underbuilding of new homes to begin So

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 8>some of the people have talked about converting some of

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 8>this office space into residential loans, residential homes, which could

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 8>offer more opportunities. But you know, from a macro perspective,

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 8>loans that were made to office spaces that are now

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 8>falling a price, maybe even underwater, those have to be refinanced,

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 8>re constructed, you know, on a more regular basis, and

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 8>that could be a drag for lenders, which, whenever you

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 8>have a drag in the banking industry, can be a

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 8>drag generally for the economy.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Is the decreasing construction costs and kind of the alleviation

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 4>of some of the deeper supply chain issues of the

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 4>pandemic having an impact on home builders that will ever

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 4>gets passed on to home buyers.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, actually, in some ways it already is. If you

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 8>look at the difference between the median new home price

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 8>and the median existing home price, because existing home prices

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 8>haven't fallen maybe as quickly as some would have expected

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 8>given the lack of listing, the difference between those is

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 8>almost a record type, like new homes are normally more

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 8>expensive right but right now they're just very marginally more expensive.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 8>So I think some of that, whether it's you know,

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 8>through price concessions which actually builders say they're not really

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 8>offering as much anymore, or just costs coming down relative

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 8>to what they had been, I think that already is

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 8>manifesting itself, and some people have I've read some people

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 8>even calling for new homes to be priced below existing homes.

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 8>And again this is all median prices, so this is

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 8>not adjusted for square footage or anything. But it's an

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 8>interesting you know, potential.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Eesg Environmental social governance is that kind of a part

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of the mortgage lending market as well.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 8>It is interestingly I put out a note yesterday that

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 8>you may have seen that you're referring to, And first

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 8>of all, in terms of Ginny made mortgages, those back

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 8>by FHA, for instance, in some ways those were already

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 8>fundamentally ESG loans because they're targeted towards trying to improved

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 8>affordability for lower income and higher LTV borrowers. Now Fanny

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 8>and Freddie have also started to highlight their efforts. They've

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 8>always they've always had a little bit of a mandate

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 8>there anyway, and their duty to serve. But they have

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 8>these new social criteria scores and social density scores that

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 8>they're publishing that are available here on the terminal that

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 8>tell you just how many of these socially responsible criteria

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 8>they're fitting. And in the research that we put out yesterday,

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 8>we pointed out that some of these highest social responsibility

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 8>loans and Somebody's offer the best risk award characteristics because

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 8>a lot of these homeowners are a little more restricted

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 8>from refinancing, but at the same time they may have

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 8>more more incentive to be move up borrowers, for instance,

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 8>so they tend to have less extension risk too.

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, interesting stuff.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Always talking about the housing market, the mortgage market. Everybody

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>has their thoughts and opinions. Eric Adelberg, we get pay

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>her to have for those opinions in that analysis. Eric Aidelberg,

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>she's a mortgage backed security strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. Joining

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio again that

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the bankrate dot com average mortgage rate for

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty year mortgage seven point. It's off the highs, as

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Erico was just mentioning, but certainly a lot higher than

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people want to deal with.

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 3>That question is to what extent? When will that come down?

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the tape Cat's are Line program Bloomberg

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 9>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 9>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 9>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 9>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Every once in a while, we'd like to get a

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of where high net worth investors are

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>putting their capital these days, and to do that we

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>check in with Michael Sonefeld. He's a chairman and founder

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of Tiger twenty one. Tiger twenty one is a network

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of learning groups for high net worth investors. We usually

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>get some really interesting perspective from Michael. So Michael, again,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the year was a lot better

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for most investors in twenty twenty two, where you really

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>had nowhere to hide last year, whether it's equities or

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. Maybe some of your alternative investments did better.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>What are your members saying today? How did they feel

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>here in mid July after what was a pretty good

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>first half of the year.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 7>Nice to see you guys, And you know, our members

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 7>are mixed, like the reports that you've been sharing all morning.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 7>On the one hand, inflation is coming down, the business

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 7>climate is good, unemployment is low, but everybody thinks that

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 7>we're sort of at the crest, or many people think

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 7>we're at the crest, and at least half of our

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 7>members think we're going into recession. And when you have

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 7>this kind of diversity, our members try and create something

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 7>like an all weather portfolio where they have some bets

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 7>on the upside and protection on the downside. And that's

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 7>sort of been the magic quest that they're looking for

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 7>in preserving their wealth.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Part of the flows into the SMP, obviously related to

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 4>the Magnificent Seven, are related to the AI rally. I

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 4>wonder to what extent your clients experience FOMO when something

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 4>like an AI rally is happening, or are they kind

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 4>of immune to that?

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 7>So I just have to say we don't have clients,

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 7>We only have members. These are all entrepreneurs who have

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 7>no problem. These are alleople who built great businesses and

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 7>now we're preserving wealth. But I don't think it's so

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 7>much bomo because our members have been playing AI. Over

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 7>fifty six percent of our members either have or intend

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 7>to make AI investment plays. And one of the things

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 7>that's really different about AI if you think about recent fads,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 7>either in crypto or the web, twenty years ago, when

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 7>you had these technology plays, you didn't have the equivalent

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 7>of a Microsoft, which is already a cash flowing company,

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 7>also be the technology play if you want to play AI.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 7>Of course, there's lots of small venture capital opportunities, but

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 7>the best opportunities, many of our members think, are in

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 7>like the Microsoft and the Googles that have the largest

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 7>AI treasure troves, and yet they're really solid businesses. So

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 7>it's very it's a unique moment in AI that this

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 7>kind of fad. I don't mean that it's unimportant. I

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 7>mean this flavor of what everybody is focused on. You're

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 7>not taking the kind of extra ordinary risks that most

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 7>other technology rallies require, because here you have comp have

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 7>real profits and real businesses and real futures no matter

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 7>what happens on AI. But it'll be really enhanced as

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 7>they roll out and continue to build their AI functions.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Michael, how about alternative investments? I mean your members

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>they sell oftentimes their businesses for tens or hundreds of

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars and then they really have to allocate

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>capital cross a portfolio. How is investing in alternative investments,

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>whether it's head funds or private equity or private credit.

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Has that changed over the last decade for your members?

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 7>So the two biggest changes, The single biggest is that

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 7>private equity fifteen years ago with about ten percent of

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.479
<v Speaker 7>our members' portfolios. Today our members manage one hundred and

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 7>fifty billion dollars and private equity is just about thirty percent. Wow,

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 7>that's been the biggest change. And a big portion of

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 7>that private equity is venture capital because a period of

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 7>time ago you wouldn't have even seen venture capital fifteen

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 7>years and now we think that's the largest sub segment

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 7>of private equity. But on the other side, more recently,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 7>the biggest down shift we've ever seen is in real estate.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 7>Real estate was king for fifteen years bouncing between twenty

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 7>seven and thirty percent, and in the last year it

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 7>came down quite precipitously to around twenty two percent. And

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 7>you know, our members are exquisitely sensitive to interest rates,

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 7>and as interest rates are going up, that takes some

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 7>of the potential off the table for real estate. But

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 7>as your last speaker was mentioning, office, which was one

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 7>of the most solid areas in the real estate area,

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 7>is now up for grabs. A lot of problems, not

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 7>just with vacancies, but you know where offices were easy

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 7>to lev and so as buildings, they probably are more

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 7>highly levered and the equity is more at risk. And

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 7>behind that on the negative would be retail and on

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 7>the positive side would be industrial. But the office, you know,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 7>where the office is going is one of the great

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 7>conundrums that will only figure out over the next decade.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's one of the things I find interesting about

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>these member feedback results you sent us is that you

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 4>asked about their most favorite public equity sectors and they're tied.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 4>Twenty four percent said real estate and twenty four percent

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 4>said it. I'm fascinated that real estate is getting as

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 4>much love as the IT space given the big tech

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 4>rally that we've seen this year, can you help me

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 4>make sense of that?

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Sure, our members are by accomplishment about one in ten thousand,

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 7>equivalent to being in the major League. And the largest

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 7>area our members created wealth in maybe a quarter of

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 7>our members, was in real estate. So you have extraordinary

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 7>knowledge that most investors don't have. That's the advantage of

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 7>being in one of our groups and being with somebody

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 7>who built their career in real estate. So my guess

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 7>is that real estate has been beaten up in certain

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 7>areas and our members are a little more attuned. The

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 7>big question we ask in a meeting is if you

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 7>buy something at twenty and it goes down to fifteen,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 7>should you get out? And the answer is, if you

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 7>really knew what you were investing at twenty and it

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 7>goes down to fifteen, it's a better deal. But as

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 7>I think you guys well know, over the history of

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 7>the stock market, individual investors have never matched the returns

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 7>because they buy at the wrong time and sell at

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 7>the wrong time. And so I think the high interest

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 7>in real estate opportunities shows the sort of expertise that

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 7>our members has looking for deals and navigating in this

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 7>volatile climate.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Hey Michael, real quick, just give us the latest on

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of estate planning. What are your members kind of

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>focused on these days.

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 7>Well, first of all, there's a big date coming up

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 7>at the end of twenty twenty five where some of

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 7>the major estate planning tools will sunset. But you know,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 7>I think our members are focused on the tension between

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 7>giving kids too much and ruining. Essentially, what they saw

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 7>was their entrepreneurial ability to be successful. So this notion,

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 7>this notion of kying to figure out what to do

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 7>and how much to leave. So you know, there's something

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 7>called the giving pledge among billionaires where they are at

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 7>half of their money to foundation and philanthropy, and a

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 7>lot of our members are thinking about philanthropy in a

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 7>new way, particularly with all the problems that are in

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 7>the world today.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Michael, thank you so much for joining us.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Always a unique perspective there, Michael Snefelt. He's a chairman

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and founder of Tiger twenty one kind of collection of

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>high net worth individuals get a really interesting perspective how

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they allocate capital across the sectors.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the teenth Ken's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 9>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 9>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 9>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We've been hearing from a lot of the big banks

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last four or five days talking about their

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>business net interesting income positive, but certainly offset by a

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>lack of deal making for a lot of these companies.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Comparisons are very tough. We want to get a sense

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening in the mn A space. We talked

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to Rob Brown, he's the CEO of Lincoln International. He

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>joins us here live in the Bloomberg Interactor Brokers studio.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>They're based in Chicago, one of my favorite towns anywhere. Rob,

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us here. Talk to us about kind

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of the m and A environment we're seeing out there now.

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>A lot of uncertainty about the economy and not historically

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really bode well for boards and CEOs getting

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>out there and putting big capital to work.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing in your practice?

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think what you just allude to, Paul is

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 6>what we've seen really over the last eight months to

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 6>a year, right, the economic uncertainty really slowing down on

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 6>the m and a market, and you're seeing it in

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 6>the release of some of the big bakes and even

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 6>Goldman's release today, in the investment banking business being down.

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 10>So I think that's what we've seen.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 6>Interestingly, there's some alchemy right now for improved activity, and

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 6>I think there's really four factors that are driving that.

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 6>I think one is, if you go back to how

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 6>we came into the year, there seems to be more

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 6>consensus of a soft landing, or at least not a

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 6>really hard landing.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 10>And I think there was always that.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.719
<v Speaker 6>Fear of investors saying, well, joh, I don't want to put

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 6>something to work and have the bottom fall out of

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 6>the economy. So I think the backdrop is we may

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 6>have a recession, but it's probably not going to be

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 6>as severe as I thought. I think the other the

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 6>other key input here is that as each quarter has

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 6>gone by since probably midyear last year, when you saw

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 6>inflation spike and the FED respond aggressively, you're seeing sellers

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 6>expectations moderate.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 10>Down a bit.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 6>So you know, twenty twenty one and the first half

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 6>of twenty twenty two were really peak valuations. So I

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 6>think as time has gone on, sellers are starting to

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 6>realize I may not be able to sell it for

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 6>exactly what I could, but I can still get a

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 6>good return. So and I think the two last pieces

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 6>are we are seeing the aperture of the private credit

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 6>markets improve a bit, the credit markets are actually hardening

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 6>up in a good way, and that lenders are saying,

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 6>I will finance this deal. It's going to be expensive, right.

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 6>Rates are high, but they're going to be there. And

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 6>the last and maybe the biggest driver is the amount

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 6>of dry powder sitting in institutional equity holders, in private equity,

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.479
<v Speaker 6>venture capital, and even the private debt funds. It's starting

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 6>to burn a hole in the pocket of investors, and

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 6>on top of that, they're under pressure to show some

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 6>returns and return some capital to raise the next fund.

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 6>So I think all of that kind of pointing maybe

0:29:58.160 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 6>not up hugely, but starting to trend in the right.

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 6>I think we're expecting much better activity for the back

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 6>half of the year than the first half.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, Paul and I talk about this all the time,

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 4>just that it's a challenging environment to get deals done

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 4>in I'm curious how your conversations and strategies have shifted,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 4>if at all, Given some of the hawkishness that we've

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 4>seen from the FDC, from the Justice Department when it

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 4>comes to M and A deals.

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 10>Well, there's no doubt about that.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we're all trying to wait and see what

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 6>comes out of the new proposed FTC rules for Heart

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Scott Ridino and clearance, and we're in a comment period

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 6>on that, and I know our industry is commenting aggressively

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 6>to we understand.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 10>Listen, these rules haven't been changed in forty or fifty years.

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 6>It's okay to revisit them, but I think they need

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 6>to be done in a way that's going to achieve

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 6>the objective. So there is worry about that. But I

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 6>think your point is right. Deals are harder to get done.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 6>I think what we're seeing is more targeted processes, making

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 6>sure you have financing lined up before you approach anybody,

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 6>and really going to investors with a pretty compelling investment

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 6>thesis that says, listen, you know, we know what you

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 6>like to acquire. Here's why you really need to look

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 6>at this. But it's more challenging to get things done right.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 6>You got to get the financing in place. I think

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 6>the leverage has shifted a bit to the buyers in

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 6>terms of dictating the due diligence schedules and dictating what

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 6>they need to get done. But we are seeing things

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 6>get done. They're taking longer, they're a little more painful,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 6>but they're getting done.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the role of private credit because

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a relatively new business.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 3>In Madison.

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I we spend a lot of time talking about We

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>try to speak to as many smart people as we

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>can about the private credit business because really it's really

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>just became a big source of capital after the financial crisis.

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.479
<v Speaker 1>How does that factor into your deals? You typically do

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more middle market transactions. How does that factor into your deal?

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 10>It factors in massively.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Most of our deals, particularly if we're selling to a

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 6>financial sponsor, a private equity group, or an institutional investor.

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 6>A good chunk of our deals are going to need

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 6>leverage to get done. And the entire market for that

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 6>is a private credit market. I mean, the banks have

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, the compliance issues coming out of the global

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 6>financial crisis. The banks are out of this market, so

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 6>now you're dealing with private credit funds, hedge funds, unitronics investors,

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 6>and that market has attracted a tremendous amount of capital

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 6>over the last decade, and they have a lot of

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 6>dry powder too, But that market really closing up a

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 6>bit in the back half of the last year as

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 6>much as the fear of the economy downturning is what

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 6>really casts a little of appall over our market. So

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 6>what happens in that market is a really important driver

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 6>of the overall private the overall private capital markets and

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 6>the deals that get done on the private market.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Did some of the banking turmoil have any impact on

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 4>you guys via the impact on private.

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 10>Credit, You know, not really.

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 6>I think in particularly you look at SVB, there was

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of a shock as to you know,

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 6>what does that mean? But they were really in the

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 6>venture debt market, and so the short answer is not really.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 6>Although one thing I will say that's interesting is our

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 6>European M and A business, and we have offices in

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 6>sixteen countries, twenty offices. We've got a lot of offices

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 6>in Europe. It's a big part of our business. That

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 6>M and A market is actually holding up better than

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 6>the US M and A market this year, partly because

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 6>there still is a bank lending market in some of

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 6>the major economies to get deals done where we don't

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 6>have that here, so they've been able to look through

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 6>some of the private credit markets pulling their horns in.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 6>I think they also have a situation where in the UK,

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 6>the largest capital market in Europe, they're worried about a

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 6>labor government next year and cap gains rates going up,

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 6>so there's a little bit of a push to get

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 6>things done now.

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 4>The more regulation in the UK.

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 6>Definitely, definitely. I think the regulation headwinds are going to

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 6>be everywhere.

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you guys are a lot bigger than I thought

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you were in I'm just reading some reporting that you

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>guys did.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 3>It recently got into Australia, India.

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>You guys, you said you're in sixteen countries reporting here,

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and fifty investment bankers.

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you guys.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 10>Public You know we've followed.

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 6>We have followed our public investors or our public competitors. Right,

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 6>there's clearly an appetite for what we do. I think

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 6>for us, we have a pretty clearly stated goal to

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 6>be the leading advisor in the private capital markets, and

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 6>to date we felt that being a private.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 10>Partnership is the right way to do that.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 6>But we're constantly evaluating should we have a different ownership

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 6>structure and access to broader capital. So it's something we

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 6>haven't ruled out. And I think we've made some investments

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 6>to be public company ready. If and when we determine

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 6>that's the right thing to do.

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 10>What is the.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Biggest benefit for you staying private?

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 6>Then you know, for us, I think the thing we

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 6>need to balance that. What's made us unique and what's

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 6>allowed us to grow from seven of us to one

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 6>of the largest private markets M and A Advisors in

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 6>the world has been a real focus on culture that

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 6>attracts people and keeps people for the long time, long term.

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 6>And we've been able to define that measure against it

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 6>managed to it as a private company without having to

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 6>worry about what's going on in every single quarter. And

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 6>you know, if we were to go public, we'd want

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 6>to make sure that we can continue to really have

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 6>that as the oxygen of everything we do. So and

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 6>I think part of it's just different, right We kind

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 6>of know, we know the governance, we know how this works.

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 10>But I think organizations, if.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 6>They're going to evolve, if they're going to continue to grow,

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 6>have to continually reevaluate, you know, what's the right capital

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.720
<v Speaker 6>structure and ownership structure to achieve our goals.

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.439
<v Speaker 1>So India, for example, a lot of folks are saying

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>India over the next twenty years is going to be

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the It's gonna be China.

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 6>Was the last twenty years maybe for example, but better.

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 6>How do you guys view if you I agree with

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 6>that statement. We have been in India a long time.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 6>We've been in India over a decade. We are about

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 6>to announce in the very near term here an acquisition

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 6>in India that's going to materially increase our presence there

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 6>as And we also have offices in China. As we're

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 6>seeing as we're seeing those off to slow down, as

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing the economic ties really cool with China, we

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 6>think that the biggest benefactor of that is going to

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 6>be India. I mean India, it's the largest democracy on

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 6>the planet. Their laws based on English common law, it's

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 6>much easier to do business there, and it's a really

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 6>really innovative economy. So we're very bullish on what we're

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 6>seeing in India right now and really doubling down in

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 6>that market.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And conversely, twenty seconds left China.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, I don't see in the near term

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 6>any sort of warming up of the economic ties with China.

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 6>I think that it's very difficult to get a Chinese

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 6>investor clear we were talking about compliance. Trying to sell

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 6>something to a Chinese buyer today in any Western country,

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:48.959
<v Speaker 6>very very hard.

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, all right, Rob, thanks so much for joining us.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating company which I need to learn more about. Rob Brown,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Lincoln International. They're based in the Great City

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago, but as Rob is just saying, these guys

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are all over and they focus on middle market M

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 1>and A, which, as we've learned from a lot of

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>people like Rob, a very lucrative business. Competitive business, but

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>very lucrative business, and so we'll pay attention to that

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the tape Can't Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 9>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.959
<v Speaker 9>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 9>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 9>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's check out with Poocha Kumra.

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>She's a European rate strategist at TD.

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Poocha, what did you.

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Make of the UK economic data. The inflation data came

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>out today.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 11>Good morning. Yes, never a dull moment in UK. I

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 11>think for the first time since February, the inflation did

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 11>surprise you downside, and I think this has come as

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 11>a big relief for the hawkish expectations that we're actually

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 11>playing out in UK and right our markets have actually

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 11>moved the tom expectations from close to six point five

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 11>that you saw a month ago to actually five point

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 11>seventy five, which seems much more reasonable. But as you say,

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 11>inflation in UK is still very elevated. Food intation is

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 11>almost thrice the levels that we see in US, so

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 11>I think we do have a long way to go.

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 11>But on the positive side, going forward, the base effects

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 11>both the energy and good prices should actually allow UK

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 11>inflation to actually be more correlated to what we are

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 11>seeing in UK and we have in sorry in Europe,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 11>and we do see inflation to end the year around

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 11>the four to five percent level, which is a big

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 11>relief for BOE as well as riches.

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 12>Luck.

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned the cost of food and I wonder to

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 4>what extent your average I'm going to steal this from

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Paul the watering Hole attendees of the UK are able

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 4>to feel any sort of decrease in the inflation numbers

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 4>when they're still going out to get the same meal

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 4>they would have gotten a year ago and it's so

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 4>much more expensive. Do you have a take on when

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 4>the consumer in the UK might start to be able

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 4>to feel any sort of decline to the red hot

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 4>inflation they've been experiencing.

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 11>Yes, I mean the last six months have been pretty

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 11>much high prices everywhere, but we are actually seeing prices

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 11>going down when we go to all supermarket as well

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 11>as grocery stores there. We are actually getting emails from

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:25.720
<v Speaker 11>all the grocery chains that they are actually reducing prices.

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.760
<v Speaker 11>So I think there is some government pressure also involved.

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 11>And also one of the key things that the government

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 11>as well as the BOE is aware of is that

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 11>we are going to get very big mortgage payments as

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.760
<v Speaker 11>we enter towards the end of the year and twenty

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 11>twenty four, so household buffer is actually going to be

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 11>more compressed and it's going to be a slow move,

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 11>but definitely we are moving in the right direction and

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 11>that should be a good news for you.

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 7>Ken.

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 11>That's why the crank basis points rally in today's session.

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So putji, you talk to your institutional clients around the world,

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're talk talking to about the European rates business,

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>what's kind of the most common trade that you're hearing people,

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess are most interested in right right right now.

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 11>So right now, I think the US CPI as well

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 11>as the UK CPI have actually told us one thing

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 11>that we are done with this entire hiking story you

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 11>want or two hikes more central banks are done And

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 11>the key thing is how long we stay here. From

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 11>a trading perspective, we like long duration and I think

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 11>that is something even investors are looking at. But I

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 11>think after today's UK CPI report, one of the key

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 11>traits that I like is being long UK versus Bunce.

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 11>Just given the fact that that I think euro has

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 11>rallied quite a bit, when inflation will be equally sticky

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 11>in Europe as compared to in UK as.

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, are you thinking about currency quite a bit then

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 4>in your calculations.

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 11>When it comes to the general strong pounds.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 4>In Yeah, the strong pound, and I guess, particularly as

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 4>we're starting to see the decline of the U US

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 4>dollar hitting fourteen months low last week, is that something

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 4>that you think is going to be potentially a tail

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:09.720
<v Speaker 4>or headwind for you this year.

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 11>I think generally now it's the FEDS show, just because

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.919
<v Speaker 11>the fact that I mean so far, what we saw

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 11>that UK was just not correlated with the moves in

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 11>US as well as in Europe, just because we had

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 11>the strength of inflation, and BOE actually had to come

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 11>up more hawkish as well as hawk fifty basis points

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 11>when most of the central banks are actually at the terminal.

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 11>But I think that pound strength should actually be a

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 11>little new, more muted, and we should now be more

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 11>driven by where FED takes it from here, whether it's

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 11>one hike or two hikes going forward. And I think

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.439
<v Speaker 11>that would be key when it comes to messaging going

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 11>into next week's FED meeting.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And to what extent just give us a kind of

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of tutorial here, to what extent does

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England and the European Center Bank, to

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:58.360
<v Speaker 1>what extent do they follow the US FED Reserve?

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, to quote unquote, I mean actually's on the central

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 11>back meetings. We are told that we are different, we

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 11>have different economic background to handle it. But I think

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 11>FED is one central bank that basically determines interest rate

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 11>for the entire world, so I think one way or

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 11>the other one when FED actually decides to stop, it

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 11>would actually mean that the other central banks also need

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 11>to do less. So I think yes, FED still plays

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 11>a very key role when it comes to where terminal comes.

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 11>For most central.

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Banks, we think that next week the FED is it

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 4>seems like a foregone conclusion. Here in the state, it's

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 4>a twenty five basis point hike. When you look ahead

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 4>to August for the ECB, is it going to be

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe down to twenty five basis points after this inflation print.

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 11>So for when it comes to ECB, they've already told

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 11>us that they will be doing a twenty five basis

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 11>points in July. I think the key question is whether

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 11>they go twenty five again in September. I think at

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 11>this stage they will like to maintain the optionality. But

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 11>we have had hawks even coming in last this week's thing,

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 11>that there's no need to press that much on terminal.

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 11>So I think it is very much possible that we

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 11>are done with one high. But I think central banks

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 11>right now, including FED, wants to keep the optionality for

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 11>going in September as well. And I think the key

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 11>driver right now will be the August Jackson Hole meeting.

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 11>I think that would be the stage, the next stage

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 11>where central banks give us the key insight into what

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.919
<v Speaker 11>they are thinking for the September meeting. I think right

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 11>now all central banks want a little more data to

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 11>convince themselves, whether it's one or two highs and they're done.

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Pusha, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>getting your perspective. The European call there the UK call

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on rates Poosiakumra European rates Strategists at TD.

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the Tape Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 9>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. Tune in

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 9>up Bloomberg dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 9>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 9>New York station, Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So Madison back in my cell said research days, you'd

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>have to slip out through San Francisco two or three

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 1>times a year to see institutional investor clients out there.

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Love that town, still one of my faves.

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But then you'd have to go not downtown, you have

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to go slept all the way out to San Mateo

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to see these Franklin Templeton people.

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, it wasn't a.

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Bad trip because they have a great Starbucks right there.

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But nice people, smart people, and they manage a bunch

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of money. So I've still got some bodies out there

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.439
<v Speaker 1>from back in the day. Ed Perks, he's out there

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 1>in San Mateo. He's the CIO Franklin Templeton Income Investors. Ed,

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you got fix income folks had a brutal

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two. There was just nowhere to hide off

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to a little bit better start this year. How are

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys position out there with some of your fixingcome,

0:44:57.480 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of asset allocations in your performance?

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, absolutely, you're right. Twenty twenty two was a tremendous

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 12>challenge for fixed income investors. You know, I think the

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 12>key element for us, for Franklin income investors is multi

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 12>asset flexibility. So really, at no other time in my career,

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 12>really have I theened this play out in a six

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 12>to eight quarter way where we entered twenty twenty two

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 12>with a very strong bias and tilting our multi asset

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 12>portfolios towards dividend paying common stock, and that was really

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 12>just reflecting the landscape and the opportunity set entering last year.

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 12>Ten year rates were I think we were down here

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 12>one and a quarter still one in a quarter, one

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 12>and a half percent, and you just didn't have enough spread.

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 12>And you know, the key things that we looked to

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 12>fixed income for in our portfolios attractive yield, potential for

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 12>some upside, or potential to help diversify our portfolio. And

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 12>I tell you, you know, most of twenty twenty two,

0:45:57.640 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 12>particularly the start of the year, we couldn't check any

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 12>of those. So we've come full circle though, and today

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:06.720
<v Speaker 12>we sit from a tilt of nearly seventy five twenty

0:46:06.760 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 12>five in favor of equities eight to twelve quarters ago

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 12>to now better than sixty forty tilting to fixed income.

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 12>So that landscape has totally changed. And yes, you are

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 12>seeing it, whether you look at broader aggregate bomb market returns, investment,

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 12>great corporate returns. How ye, corporate returns all doing much better,

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 12>a little paling in comparison to something like the NASDAK move,

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 12>But I think fixed income investors have a lot to

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 12>look forward to.

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, Okay, since you brought up the NASDAK move, I

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 4>just have to ask you about this. We saw the

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 4>NASDAK dip into the red a couple of minutes ago

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 4>because of some moves that we're seeing in the big

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 4>tech names, the Microsoft's, the Googles. It feels like the

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 4>perfect example of why it's a challenge when you have

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:55.320
<v Speaker 4>this breadth of names leading the charge when it comes

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 4>to these indices. Is that a concern for you that

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 4>you think think about in terms of your allocation into equities, you.

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 12>Know it as it relates to the Nasdaq in particular,

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 12>given given worry income investors, we really aren't too concerned about,

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, some of those moves or the narrowness of

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 12>the leadership. I know that's well been well discussed in

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 12>markets here the last couple of months. You know, we're

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 12>really focused on this kind of broader move. So we

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 12>clearly point more to you know, the S and P

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 12>five hundred, both the difference we've seen, the dispersion we've

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 12>seen year to date between something like the market cap

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 12>weighted index and the equal weighted index. You know that's

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 12>starting to perform a little bit better, But we wouldn't

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 12>be surprised if there's a pretty significant breather here in

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 12>in equity markets, and uh, you know we are going

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 12>to see you know, we'll see even even with companies

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 12>reporting slightly better earnings, we're still looking at at likely

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 12>flat to slightly negative year year earnings. And that's something

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 12>that you know, we think as you look forward into

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 12>the end of twenty three and particularly into twenty twenty four,

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 12>this bar, the hurdle really starts to rise, because consensus

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 12>really bakes in a resurgence in growth in Q four

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 12>and then into twenty twenty four, and we just think

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 12>that maybe a little premature. You know, we're still looking

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 12>at a pretty modest level of GDP growth, we're seeing disinflation.

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 12>We think a lot of companies have actually had a

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 12>bit more of a struggle with unit volumes, but have

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 12>had tremendous pricing that's going to start to wane and

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 12>certainly become much tougher with comps. So you know, we

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.879
<v Speaker 12>wouldn't be surprised if the remainder of this year might

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 12>tilt a little bit more to some of the fixed

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 12>income markets, and equities have some digesting to do of

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 12>this very big move they've had.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey ed in the fixed income space, you know, as

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>income investors where are you guys kind of putting.

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Your money to work? Where have you been putting your

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 3>money to work this year?

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we've really focused on some of the higher quality

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 12>segments within investment great corporates. And that's a big difference

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 12>from you know, last year, where we started with much

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 12>shorter duration. We're very selective, actually liked high yield bonds.

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.839
<v Speaker 12>We didn't see the economy completely create airing and then

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 12>high yield you can find some really interesting opportunities with

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 12>very minimal interest rate risk as rates move first into

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 12>the fall last year, then this spring before the regional

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 12>banking crisis, and then more recently we've had you know,

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 12>opportunities with the ten year in and around four percent

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:34.880
<v Speaker 12>through that level a couple of times, and UH and

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 12>spreads while not maybe as wide as a lot of

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 12>credit investors would would you know, would ideally like to see.

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 12>You had yields at levels that we haven't seen in

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.280
<v Speaker 12>a while. You had bond prices because of last year's decimation,

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 12>at much more attractive discounts to face, and like I

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 12>said before, you know, you want to check some of

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 12>these boxes and fixed income today, particularly higher quality investment

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:03.360
<v Speaker 12>Great corpor Brits you now have that opportunity incomes. Attractive

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 12>total return possibilities are there as we think rates do

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 12>decline over the next four to six quarters, and they're

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 12>nice diversification again in a multi ASID portfolio.

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, hey, Ed, why don't you in your lunch break

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>hop down on the one on one go a little

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>bit south to Coopertino see our friends there that make

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:21.879
<v Speaker 1>cell phones and tell them to step up and pay

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a real dividend. Is that frustrate you as an income investor

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that you got a company with a ga jillion dollars

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of cash on a balance sheet, one hundred billion dollars

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for free cash flow every year and they pay a

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dividend yield less than one percent.

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:36.760
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you're preaching to the choir. We certainly are strong

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 12>advocates of that. We think it just makes sound sense.

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 12>It broadens your investor base, and you know, there's certainly

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 12>other things that we can do with using convertible securities,

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 12>for example in our portfolios or other structured equity like

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 12>investments where you're kind of effectively doing some covered call

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:54.839
<v Speaker 12>writing and getting some premium. So you know, we do

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 12>have some opportunity in lower dividend paying or non dividend

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 12>paying stocks, but absolutely would firmly agree with you there.

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, if you see him, you know, Tim Cook,

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:07.439
<v Speaker 1>around the neighborhood, maybe can put that in his ear.

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Ed Perks Cio Franklin Income Investors out in San Mateo,

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>giving us some good discussion on income investing.

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:51:22.440 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Faul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio