WEBVTT - OpenAI Part2: Ilya Dreams of AGI

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to start by talking about a dream, the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dream of building an artificial mind. It's something people have

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>imagined and written about for decades, humans working together to

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>construct a new entity more powerful than ourselves, and some

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 1>researchers think this dream may be within reach.

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 2>The day will come when the digital brains that live

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>inside our computers will become as good and even better

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>than our own biological brains. Computers will become smarter than us.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Vicoll such ANAI and AGI artificial general intelligence.

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>That's Ilia set Skiver, one of the co founders of

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>open ai and at ted talk he gave last year,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and he often sounds like a religious mystic when he

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>talks about the future of artificial intelligence. But right now

0:00:56.160 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he's just talking about this quest to build artificial general intelligence,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>an AI that can think and solve a variety of problems.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Like a person. It could switch between playing games, solving

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>science problems, creating beautiful art, and driving a car. Open

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>AI's goal is to build AGI. It's a pretty out

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there idea in the AI world, or at least it

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>used to be. Ilia frames AGI as this almost mystical,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>momentous leap forward, like Prometheus channeling fire and the consequences

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>will be huge. It will usher us into technological glory

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time into chaos. In this tape

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>from the documentary film I Human, he sounds certain of

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the tidal waves that will come now.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 3>AI is a great thing because AI will solve all

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 3>the problems that you have today. If you solve employment,

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>if you solve disease, it will solve poverty. But it

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 3>will also create new problems. The problem fake news is

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be a million times worse. Cyber attacts will

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>become much more extreme if people have totally automated AI weapons.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Ilia is an incredibly accomplished AI researcher. Before open Ai,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he worked at Google, and he has several passions that

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I see as a celebration of being human. He plays

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the piano, he draws and paints. One of his paintings

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>hangs in the Open Ai office. It's a flower in

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the company's logo. At the same time,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>he's also hyper focused on his AI research. He told

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a reporter once, I lead a very simple life. I

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>go to work, then I go home. I don't do

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>much else. There are a lot of social activities one

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>can engage in lots of events one could go to,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>which I don't. He spends a lot of time looking

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>at the current trajectory of AI and extrapolating to try

0:02:55.440 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>to predict the future. In particular, Ilia is worried about

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>what happens if AGI gets its own desires and its

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>own goals. You can hear this dreamy equality in his voice.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>It's not said it's going to actively hate humans and

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 3>want to harm them, but it is going to be

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>too powerful. And I think a good analogy would be

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the way humans treat animals. It loves to be hate animals,

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 3>but when the time comes to build a highway between

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 3>two cities, we are not asking the animals for permission.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Imagining it this huge.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Unstoppable force, and I think it's pretty likely the entire

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 3>surface of the areas will be covered with solid panels

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 3>and data centers.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to pause here for a minute. This is

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a really intense, powerful image that we are creating some

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>new kind of being that would view us with interest,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately with indiffer friends, like the way we look

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>at deer. What strikes me most in this audio is

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Ilia's tone of voice isn't one of fear. It sounds

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>more like awe Ilia imagines an AGI that we create

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that would be likely to bulldoze over us in order

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to reach its own desires. It's a dramatic vision, hard

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to really grasp, and it has a religious quality in

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>its conception of a supernatural, all powerful entity. I should

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mention this is all totally theoretical. We are still nowhere

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>close to AGI. Open AI's best efforts are statistical models

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that convincingly mimic humans, and mimicry is a far cry

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>from AI that can think for itself. Still, open Ai

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wants to do this, and do it right, and do

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it first. Here's Sam Altman testifying in front of Congress

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three.

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 4>My worst fears are that we cause significant We feel

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 4>the technology the industry caused significant harm to the world.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 4>It's why we started the company. I think if this

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 4>technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong.

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Foundering. I'm your host, Ellen Hewitt, and

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in this episode will take you inside the messy and

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>idealistic early years of open Ai. We'll discuss this dream

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of building all powerful agi. It's important because this is

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the destination that open ai is speeding toward. It's this

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>generation's race to the moon. We'll discuss how ai technology

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>changed dramatically and quickly, and how that change made this

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>dream of AGI feel closer than ever before. In just

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a few years, it went from an eccentric idea that

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>people were scoffing at to a milestone some experts think

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>could happen within a few years. Sam Altman has even

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>suggested twenty twenty eight. And we'll examine the compromises open

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Ai made in its pursuit of this dream. At first,

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the company made promises to share its research widely and

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to not be corrupted by for profit incentives. But once

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>their technology began to advance and it looked like there

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was serious power to be had, they.

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Made a u turn.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Then this pivotal moment, kareemed into a power struggle at

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, and Sam Altman took charge.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 4>We'll be right back.

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll start In twenty fifteen, open Ai had just been founded.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It had a commitment from Elon Musk for a billion

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars in funding, plus some money from other donors as well.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It was this small, scrappy research lab. Sam and Elon

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>weren't around much in the early days. At the time,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Sam was actually still running y Combinator, the startup accelerator,

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but he was beginning to position himself as a thought

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>leader in the AI space. In particular, he was talking

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>about AI doomsday scenarios. In twenty fifteen, he declared on

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>his blog development of superhuman machine intelligence is probably the

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity. He also

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote that AI could destroy every human in the universe.

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Here he is at a tech event the same year,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>referencing the founding of open AI.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I actually just agreed to fund a company doing AI

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 4>safety research. You know, I think AI will probably, like

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 4>most likely sort of lead to the end of the world.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 4>But in the meantime there will be great companies created

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 4>with serious machine learning.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about that comment for a second.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>He's saying AI might kill us all, and he's asking

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>us to trust his conclusions as an expert, but he's

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>also being glib about making money along the way. In

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of open AA, Sam and Elon weren't around

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for the day to day. They were out glad handing, recruiting,

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and talking to journalists. They would pop in once a

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>week or so to get progress updates. In those days,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Sam would swoop into a conversation then leave.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 5>So he struck me as very very sharp, incisive, and

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 5>also superficient with this time. When the conversation is done,

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 5>it's done.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>That's Peter Abiel, a researcher who worked at open ai

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in its first two years. He says, in the early

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>days open ai looked like a typical startup. They didn't

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>even have an office for a while. They met in

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the home of one of the co founders.

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 5>When we started out late twenty fifteen early twenty sixteen,

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 5>it was in Greg Brockman's apartment in San Francisco Mission District.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 5>It was you know, we're sitting essentially on a couch,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 5>at a kitchen counter and on a bed, and that's

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 5>pretty much that's where the work is getting done. It's

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 5>it's kind of crazy to think that, you know, that's

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 5>where something big got startup. We just had twenty of

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 5>the world's best AI researchers together, really focused on trying

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>to get some things done and I've never been done before.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>In the absence of Sam and Elon, the main leaders

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 1>were two people who aren't famous but who will play

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a mammoth role later on. There's Greg whose apartment served

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>as their office, and Ilia, the research scientist we heard

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>from at the beginning of the episode. You can think

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of Greg as the workhorse in charge of business operations,

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ilia as the AI genius, and together they ran

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>open AI. Peter remembers going on weekly walks with Ilia

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>around the neighborhood in San Francisco, talking about big picture stuff,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>asking themselves, are we working on the right problems?

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 5>I feel like he he just kind of saw AI

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 5>what it could be doing, could be capable of, more

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 5>clearly and earlier than anybody else. He's seeing it more

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 5>optimistic than everybody else. He would come up with analogies like, okay,

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 5>and the ONAL network is just a computer program. It's

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 5>just a circuit. We're just programming it differently.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg meanwhile, was grinding away.

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Greg is somebody who can just apply himself. He can

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 5>just you know, keep working and keep working and keep working.

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 5>I've seen some people like that, but very few.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Even after open AI moved out of Greg's apartment, he

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>still practically lived at the office. One former employee said

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he would be hunched over his laptop when they showed

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>up to work in the morning and was still tapping

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>away when they went home at night. Years later, when

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg got married, he even held a civil ceremony in

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the office with a big backdrop made of flowers, again

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in the shape of the open ai logo. The ring

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bear was a robot hand and the officiant was Ilia.

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>When Greg and Ilia joined open ai, they didn't need money.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>Ilia had sold a company to Google, and Greg owned

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shares of stripe, and that company was

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>worth tens of billions of dollars. In Silicon Valley, people

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>usually create startups because they think they can build a

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>lucrative business, but open ai was a nonprofit. Greg and

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Ilia were motivated by this dream. Here's Reid Hoffman, one

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest donors to open ai.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 6>There was no equity upside for that. Initial crew was like, look,

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 6>we're doing this for humanity.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Doing it for humanity. Open ai talks like this all

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the time. Their website says, our mission is to ensure

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. Okay, So

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's well known that Silicon Valley loves grandiose mission statements.

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>We work wanted to elevate the world's consciousness, but open

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>AI's mission statement is even more sweeping. And it has

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>this overtone of altruism. When Sam talks about the company's work,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he often discusses potential disasters. Here he is with Rebecca

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis on ABC. His voice sounds grave. Again, he's positioning

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>himself as a thought leader in this space.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 7>So what is the worst possible outcome?

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 4>There's like a set of very bad outcomes. One thing

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm particularly worried about is that these models could be

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 4>used for large scale disinformation. I am worried that these systems,

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 4>now that they're getting better at writing computer code, could

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 4>be used for offensive cyber attacks.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 7>But you raise an important point, which is the humans

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 7>who are in control of the machine right now also

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 7>have a huge amount of power.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 4>We do worry a lot about authoritarian governments developing this.

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 7>Putin has himself said, whoever wins this artificial intelligence race

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 7>is essentially the controller of humankind.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Do you agree with that?

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 4>So that was a chilling.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Statement for sure, Sam saying this stuff is so valuable

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that global superpowers are going to fight over it. The

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>cynical take is that if you make what you're working

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on sound really important, you attract a lot more attention

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and money. We'll talk more about this dynamic in the

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>next episode. In open AI's early years, their humanity saving

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>plan wasn't that clear. Their strategy was a bit scattered.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's Peter again.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 5>We looked at robotics, did some work there. We looked

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 5>at simulated robotics, did a bunch of work there. We

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 5>looked at digital agents that navigate the web and do

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 5>all kinds of tasks online, like booking flights. We looked

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 5>at video games.

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai said one of its first goals would be

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to build a robot butler which could set and clear

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a table, kind of like the maid on the Jetsons.

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 7>Coming Sir, Hey William Sir.

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The company also built a robot arm that could solve

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a Rubik's Cube single handedly, and they put a lot

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of effort into building bots that could play Doda two,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a massively popular multiplayer video game. They imagined that the

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>complexity of the game environment could lead to an AI

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that could better navigate the real world. Here's someone testing

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the bot.

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 6>The bot is good. The bot is better than I

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 6>could have ever imagined.

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Those Doda bots even competed against professional players.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 7>Already up stop the actions kicking off sopen Ai will

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 7>claim first blood.

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 5>No tawn is to be caught out here.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>A bot that could play Doda was technically impressive, but

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it didn't look very impressive to the average person, and

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the commercial applications for these products were not immediately clear.

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's how one former employee put it. We were doing

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>random stuff and seeing what would happen. There were not

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>really defined goals. Sometimes it felt like there was a

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>big gap between what was being built and what was

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>being imagined. People would spend their days programming bots that

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>played video games. Then they would sit around the lunch

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>table and talk about saving humanity. The prevailing wisdom in

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the AI world was that in order to make something powerful,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you sometimes have to start with something trivial. Video games

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and robot maids would pave the way to self driving

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>cars and cancer curing AI. Internally, at open AI, they

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes compared themselves to the Manhattan Project, the team given

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the mission to create the first atomic bomb, and they

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>meant it as a good thing, ambitious and important. Here's

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>how one former employee described it to me. It's an

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>arms race. They all want to make the first AGI.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>They believe they can do it best. I didn't see

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fear of AI itself. I just saw

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>excitement to build AI. Back in twenty fifteen, AI looked

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty different from today. It was weaker and harder to train.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>At the time, the major breakthrough was that a bot

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>had been able to beat the world's best player and Go,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a complex strategy board game from China, but that AI

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>could only play Go, it couldn't do anything else. Here's

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Orn Etzioni, a computer science professor and the former research

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>director for an AI institute.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 8>The thing about these is these were narrow systems, very

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 8>highly targeted. So the system that played Go couldn't even

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 8>play chess, certainly could not cross the street or understand language.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 8>And the system that understood airfare fluctuations and predicted very

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 8>well whether airfares were going up or down could not

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 8>handle text either. Right, So basically, every time you had

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 8>an application, you'd have to train up a new system.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 8>And this took a long time, took a lot of

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 8>labeled data, etc.

0:16:55.040 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>But then came a major breakthrough in AI technology. In

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, a group of researchers from Google Brain published

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a paper called Attention Is All You Need, and in

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it they describe a new kind of AI architecture called

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the transformer, and the transformer did something huge. At the time,

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>AI systems needed to be fed very specific data. Each

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>piece of data had to be labeled this is correct,

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this is incorrect. Spam not spam, cancer not cancer. But

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the transformer allowed AI to take in messy, unlabeled data,

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and it could actually do so even more efficiently than expected,

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>using less computing power than before. Now these transformer based

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>models could just teach themselves in a way. It was

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like if you wanted to teach a kid to read,

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and you used to have to hire a tutor to

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>sit there with flashcards, and now instead you could just

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>let the kid run through a library and they would

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>emerge knowing how to read and write. This was, as

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 1>one investor described to me, a surprising and bitter realization

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that the best AI would come not from the most

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>specialized training techniques, but from whichever had the most data. Peter,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the early open AI employee, says Ilia immediately saw its promise.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 5>Ilia's reaction was pretty affirmative right away. It's like, this

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 5>is something special we need to be we need to

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 5>be looking at this. This seems a big breakthrough.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Even in the early days of open AI, Ilia had

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>always had this hunch that big advances in AI wouldn't

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>come from some specific tweak or new invention, but just

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.719
<v Speaker 1>from more data pouring more and more fuel into the engine.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And now Ilia had the research that backed up his hypothesis.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 8>Here's Oren again, Ilia from open ai is known as

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 8>the person who said, it's the data, and it's the

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 8>amount of data, and if we just scale that up

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 8>tremendously of magnitude much much more, we're going to achieve

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 8>what we need. That was not the common perception and

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 8>some very smart and very famous people. I don't want

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 8>to cast aspersions, but certainly I'm I'm not that smarter

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 8>with that famous, but I'm one of the AI experts

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 8>who did not see that coming.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Because of Ilia, open Ai started experimenting with the transformer.

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>They were one of the earliest companies to do so.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>They made models with the now familiar acronym GPT Generative

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>pre Trained Transformer, and in particular, they started experimenting with

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>how the transformer performed with written words, because they could

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>basically feed the model anything written any book, newspaper, article,

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>reddit posts, blogs. Humans have spent a lot of time

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>writing things down, and those words now had another purpose,

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>training data. The Internet wasn't created to train, but in

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the end that may become its legacy. Open aiyes, models

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>got better and better at generating text, and they weren't

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>limited to just one field of knowledge.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 8>The amazing thing about these GPT systems is that they're

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 8>very broad. They are actually generalists. You can ask them

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 8>about virtually any topic and they'll produce surprisingly good answers.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 8>And that's because they've been trained on effectively the entire

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 8>or at least an approximation of the entire corpus of

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 8>text that's available to humanity, billions of billions of sentences,

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 8>all the books you've read, all the documents, the memos,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 8>the silliness, Harry Potter fan fiction. It's all grist for

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 8>the mill. And then once it's read all that, it's

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 8>remarkably general. So for the first time we would have

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 8>a system that you could ask it about anything and

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 8>it would give you a surprisingly intelligent answer. So we

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 8>went from narrow AI to a kind of general or

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 8>broad AI.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Through the massive amount of writing that they were feeding

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>into their models, open ai found they could create AI

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that was much much better at forming convincing sounding responses

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to questions. In fact, at some point they started to

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>worry it was maybe too good. When OpenAI announced its

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>language model GBT two, they initially decided not to share

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the model more openly because they were concerned it could

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>be dangerous. Here's Peter. He had by that time left

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>open ai to start his own company, but he remembers

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the day of the release.

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 5>It was just obvious that it had a much better

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 5>understanding of language than anything that had been trained before.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Its release was indeed accompanied by a lot of I

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 5>guess great marketing or caution or combination of both. It

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.959
<v Speaker 5>was headline that's too dangerous to be released, and so

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 5>I think it was probably one of the first projects

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 5>where open i decided to not release some of the

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 5>work because all of a sudden, the thinking had become, well,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 5>what if it's something is so powerful that people could

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 5>go misuse it in ways that we can't control.

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>As soon as open ai had a product that was

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>actually powerful, they started rethinking their openness.

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 5>Open Ai started with that name where to open really

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 5>stood for everything's going to be open sourced built, you know,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 5>anybody else can build on it.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Openness was a crucial part of the company's brand when

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>they were founded, Sam told the journalist Stephen Levy, it

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>will just be open source and usable by everyone. He

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>also told him that their AI would be freely owned

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>by the world. Open source software in its broadest sense,

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>means that the source code is made available to the

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>public freely, and that anyone can tweak the code and

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>distribute it themselves. But the company soon started walking back

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>those commitments.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 5>Obviously that evolved over time into something that is not

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 5>so open source, if open source at all for anything.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's definitely not open sourcing. It's hits work.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Right now, that open source ethos seemed to fade away.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's Sam giving a talk in Munich in twenty twenty three.

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious, if we stay on the same like GPT

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 4>two to three to four trajectory for five and six,

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 4>how many of you would like us to open source

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 4>GPT six the day we finished training it. Wow, Well

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 4>we're not going to do that. But that's interesting that.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, Sam sounds pretty arrogant here. He knows open AI

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>started off with promises of being open source. Now he's

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>pulling the audience about open sourcing models and immediately dismissing

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>their response. Over the years, Sam has subtly changed the

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>meaning of openness. It's become fuzzier here he is at

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a VC firm.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 4>So I think that is that's what we call open ai,

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 4>open AI. We want this to be open technology made

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 4>available to.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Everyone, open technology made available to everyone. He says it

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>so plainly, as though that's obvious what open means, But

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>his definition strikes me as so vague that it's essentially meaningless.

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Google Search is available to everyone. It seems

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like open ai was happy to let people guess what

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they meant by open. In an internal email just months

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>after it was founded, Ilia wrote, as we get closer

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to building AI, it will make sense to start being

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>less open. The open in open ai means that everyone

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>should benefit from the fruits of AI after it's built.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's totally okay to not share the science, even

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>though sharing everything is definitely the right strategy in the

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>short and possibly medium term for recruitment purposes. This email

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting because it shows that from the beginning

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>open ai had planned not to freely share their se science.

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want to be open source, as they claimed,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but they wanted to keep up the public appearance of

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>openness because it gave them a recruiting advantage like, don't

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>go build AI for the bad guys, come work for us,

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the open virtuous choice. When we asked about their changing

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>definition of openness, a company spokesperson said, our mission has

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>remained the same, but our tactics have had to change. Okay,

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So let me bring us back to twenty seventeen. It's

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>two years after the company's founding, and another problem was

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>brewing an Open AI a power struggle. Elon wanted to

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>take over. He's someone who's used to being in charge.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>According to open AI, he wanted to move the company

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>under Tesla, and he wanted to be CEO, and he

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted majority equity, and if it couldn't be done his way,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he was out.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 9>Like with everything Elon, as time goes on, he wants

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 9>to assert more and more control and make sure the

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 9>company is operating in exactly the image and way that

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 9>Elon wants it to operate. And so this is going

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 9>to create tension.

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That's Ashley Vance, my colleague who has written a biography

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of Elon.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 9>Elon's preferred role in anything is to be the CEO

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 9>and the dominant force and the one who controls what's

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 9>going on day to day and.

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The guys actually running the day to day. Greg Brockman

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and Ilias Aitzkiv were wary because Elon was reckless, impulsive,

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and difficult, but he was also their main source of money.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>He had pledged them almost a billion dollars. Open Ai

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>had other donors, but nothing close. One option was to

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>go with Elon and keep the money.

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 9>The employees weren't all on board with that idea and

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 9>had some concerns, and so you get to this, you

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 9>get to this decision point where it's kind of like,

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 9>you know, are we going to go on with Elon

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 9>or without him? Almost always in recent years people have

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 9>kind of put up with Elon and his demands.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Or another option was to split with Elon and figure

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>out how to get a different source of cash, you

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>know who would probably be good at raising money. Sam Altman.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 9>Reached's point where Elon wanted the company to go one

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 9>way and then the employees wanted it to go another,

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 9>and Sam was picked as the person to lead open

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 9>Ai forward.

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Sam hadn't been that involved in open Ai for the

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>first few years. He was still president of YC actually,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but in this jostling for power, Sam beat out Elon,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big deal. Elon was much more famous

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and experienced, and notably, he hates losing well.

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 9>In most conflicts, Elon reacts by trying to win at

0:27:55.920 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 9>all costs, and whatever whatever which earth you know, may

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 9>may arise from that, Elon doesn't. He doesn't lose too

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 9>many battles. Usually he either. If it's not within a company,

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 9>he usually sues somebody into submission. If it is within

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 9>a company, he throws his weight around in politics until

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 9>he gets what he wants. It's hard to find too

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 9>many examples in recent years where he did not get

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 9>what he wants, and so the turmoil inside of the

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 9>company must have been quite drastic in order for this

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 9>not to happen.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So in twenty eighteen, Elon walked away in a huff

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and took his money with him. Years later, he'll actually

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>end up suing Sam and open Ai, claiming they broke

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>their original commitment about remaining nonprofit and open source. Soon

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>after Elon left, Sam became CEO of open Ai. There

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been a CEO before, but this power struggle crystallized

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Sam's new dominance over this company. Remember what the founder

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of YC once said, Sam is extremely good at becoming powerful.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Sam's excitement about open Ai kept growing, his attention started

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>drifting away from his job running YC. Sure, running a

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>world famous startup accelerator is a position of a lot

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of influence, but the race for building AGI was heating up,

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and if OpenAI succeeded in creating AGI before anyone else,

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to imagine a position in the world with

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>more power than being its CEO. But Sam didn't give

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>up his job at YC right away. This situation made

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the people running the accelerator grumble. They felt

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like Sam was spread too thin, pushing to expand too fast,

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and prioritizing his own interests above those of YC. It

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>earned him some enemies within his own ranks. In fact,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>according to a source, Sam's mentor, Paul Graham, the guy

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>who put him in the job in the first place,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>flew in from the UK to ask Sam in person

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to step down. Paul had lost confidence in his former protege,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but he also didn't want to create public drama, so

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam was ushered out and they kept the backstory quiet.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Now focused only on open Ai, Sam had one big

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>goal to raise money to train open Aiy's models. They

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>needed a lot of computing power, and computing power is expensive.

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Sam tried to raise money but wasn't getting traction. Here

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he is on the Lex Friedman podcast.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 4>We started as a nonprofit. We learned early on that

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 4>we were going to need far more capital than we

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 4>were able to raise as a nonprofit to do what

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 4>we needed to go do. We had tried and failed

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 4>enough to raise the money as a nonprofit. We didn't

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 4>see a path forward there. So we needed some of

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 4>the benefits of capitalism, but not too much. I remember

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 4>at the time someone said, you know, as a nonprofit,

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 4>not enough will happen. As a for profit, too much

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 4>will happen.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>They needed something in the middle, and honestly, Sam doesn't

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>sound that hung up about leaving nonprofit life behind. He

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Frankenstein something together. Basically, he created a for profit entity

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that lived under the umbrella of the original nonprofit. The

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>for profit could do all the things normal companies do,

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>like raise investment and offer equity to employees, but its investors'

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>returns were capped, whereas at other companies they'd be unlimited.

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>This corporate structure was grafted together. Open Ai was essentially

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>now a for profit controlled by the board of the nonprofit,

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>which sounds a little unstable. Open Ai had spent years

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>saying they would be a non profit. Now they had

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>come up with this for profit workaround. After that change,

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were upset, but open Ai was

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>more focused on their end goal. They wanted to build

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Agi and they needed to raise money to do it.

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>And then in twenty nineteen, Sam the deal maker made

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a big, hugely important deal. He raised a billion dollars

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>from Microsoft. Here's Microsoft CEO Satya Nandela after they signed

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the deal.

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Hi, I'm here with Sam Altman's CEO of open Ai.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Today.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 4>We are very excited to announce a strategic partnership with

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 4>open Ai.

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And I thought one important thing Microsoft had was lots

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of raw computing power and open Ai could now use it.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember open Ai had originally been conceived to be an

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>antidote to Google. They presented themselves as fundamentally different from

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>profit hungry tech giants, and then overnight they became intimately

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>enmeshed with a tech company worth more than a trillion dollars.

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Now open Ai was in many ways an arm of Microsoft.

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>This was a remarkable about phase. Reid Hoffman was on

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the board of open Ai and on the board of

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft at the time of the deal. He didn't see

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this as an abdication of open AI's initial premise.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 6>There were parties who worried about with this corrupt the mission.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I think that's a little bit of

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 6>like kind of a modern naivete is to say corporation

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 6>equals bad or corrupt, and it's just naive because there's

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 6>lots of ways that companies are are collaborative with humanity anxiety.

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 6>They try to serve the customer as well, they hire employees,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 6>they have shareholders, they exist within societies.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Reid's perspective is that just because you want

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to make money doesn't mean you're bad, which is on

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>brand for a billionaire venture capitalist. And I guess one

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it is that the Microsoft deal

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>may have been the most practical way for open ai

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to continue its mission of creating safe agi for all

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of humanity, but it also highlighted an important pattern so

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that OpenAI often walked back its promises when it was

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 1>convenient to do so. And amid all this, people started

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to doubt Sam's integrity both inside and outside the company,

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and that would lead to a major rift. That's next

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>time on Foundering. Foundering is hosted by me Ellen Hewitt.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Sean Wen is our executive producer. Rachel Metz contributed reporting

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to this episode. Molly Nugent is our associate producer. Blake

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Maples is our audio engineer. Mark Million and Vandermay Seth Fiegerman,

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Tom Giles and Molly Schutz are our story editors. We

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had production help from Jessica Nix and Antonia Mufferetch. Thanks

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>for listening. If you like our show, leave a view,

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, tell your friends. See you next time.