WEBVTT - Writing a Book With Paul Volcker

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul Vulker is a giant of global finance, literally and figuratively.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>At six ft seven inches or about two meters tall,

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>he towered over most everyone around him, and as Chairman

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Reserve in the nineteen eighties and in

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>countless other roles in public service, he made his mark

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on the world. Now, at age ninety one, he's published

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a new memoir called Keeping at It, and his collaborator

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>happens to be one of our Bloomberg colleagues, Christine Harper.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>This week on Benchmark, we'll talk with Christine about why

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>he wrote the book and what it was like to

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>work with him. Welcome to Benchmark. I'm Scott Landman, economics

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>editor with Bloomberg News in Washington, and now I'm Daniel Moss,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>columnist at Bloomberg Opinion in New York. Were joined by

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Christine Kappa, editor of Bloomberg Markets the same She's been

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>a reporter and editor with Bloomberg for twenty years. I

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>first met Christine in the early aughts in the London office,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>when she was wrestling with stories about Merrill Lynch's bond desk.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>We're recording this on Tuesday. The book Keeping at It

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>should be available wherever you buy good books. Christine, welcome

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to Benchmark. Thanks for having me. It's a it's a pleasure, Christine.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations on the book. How did you come to work

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Wolker on it? Well, it really does a

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>hugely lucky break. Unlike the two of you, I'm not

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>an economics expert, as you know, I have been covering

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the financial industry here for a long time at Bloomberg,

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>and I happen to know a man named Peter Osenos

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>who runs a publishing firm called Public Affairs. He's quite

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>close to Paul Volker, having having published Mr Walker's book

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in h called Changing Fortunes. So Peter called me up

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>one day and said that Paul Wolker was interested in

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>writing a memoir. But at that point he was a

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>vettor ninety and Peter, who's been in publishing for a

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>long time, thought it might make sense to have somebody

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>work with him, And it might make most sense if

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it was somebody in New York City who could easily

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>get back and forth to Paul's office and um to

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>his home to work with him. So was I interested,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and I said, let me think about it for one

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>day and pretty quickly realized this was a once in

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime opportunity. Even though I had never written a

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>book and I was an expert economics, I couldn't imagine

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there was any downside and getting to spend time with

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Paul Walker and learned all his stories and just see

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what that was like. So, um, that's what I did.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and I think Peter's view was that there'd

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be some kind of chemistry that we would work well together.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure why he had that insight, but

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it proved to be correct. Paul didn't know me from Adam.

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>When he was introduced to me, he immediately was very

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>friendly and very willing to work with me, and we

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>started having regular meetings where I would record these interviews

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with him, with the thought being that I would eventually

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>take the transcripts and blend them all into a book.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>But of course, you know, even though he was kind

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of in and out of the hospital with various health issues,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>he ended up started churning out pages and pages on

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a yellow pad of basically the manuscript and having his

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>assistant typed them up. And I looked at them and said, well,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.839
<v Speaker 1>these are really good. Keep going. So I would get

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>these emailed files his assistant would you know, send them

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>along to me, and I would work with Paul and

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>them and he was just great. And I kept waiting

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>for him to become in some way, you know, difficult

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to our dolimineering or stubborn or something, and he was.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>He never was. We just had a great time. I

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>never went to a meeting with him, and we we

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been meeting now for more than a year, several

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>times a week. I never left a meeting with him

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not feeling happier than when I went into it. He's

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just a wonderful guy. And I learned so much every

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>every meeting. Okay, now, twice in that answer, you've mentioned

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're not an economics expert. You don't have a

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>background in economics. I think you're selling yourself a little

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>short here. You have run finance reporting at Bloomberg News.

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But to the core of that question, did that make

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>your role easier or harder not having formal qualifications in economics.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it was probably a little bit of both.

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So I I didn't have the familiarity with some of

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the um stories that both of you I'm sure would

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>have had, so I had to do more research to

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>understand them. But I also sort of forced him to

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>explain things that maybe somebody who was very comfortable with

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>economics wouldn't have needed explained and might have been just

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>more willing to fall into sort of a jargony insider voice. Um.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.239
<v Speaker 1>That said, he his natural inclination is to be pretty

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>plain spoken. So a lot of the out of the

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>book is very readable just because he writes in a

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>very readable way. He doesn't like to um to use jargon.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He really doesn't. I mean, I don't. I don't know

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if can I tell the story about how we came

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>up with the title. Okay, So we really struggled with

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the title, and it was very telling about him because

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but we were coming up with all these titles that

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>sounded like, you know, the titles of a great man's book,

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, Mr Chairman, and you know, things with

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>great sort of august themes, and he couldn't stand that.

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>He really was opposed to anything that sounded pompous. He

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't want anything like, for instance, Ben Bernanke's book The

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Courage to Act. He was allergic to that type of

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>tone in his in in a book title. So we

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>kept going back and forth, and there's a story if

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you read the book that he starts out with a joke,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and the joke is about a parent. And so he

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted the title to be, and he was quite serious

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with this. He wanted the title to be The Wise

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Parrot Speaks, and the publisher and I and everybody around

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>him sort of said, well, that's very funny, but I

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody will understand it. They don't really necessarily

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>recognize what that's about. And he said, yeah, but that'll

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that'll intrigue people. People buy it anyway. So we had

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of we had a lot of discussion that

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this was probably the most difficult thing. And then finally

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>one day I said, well, there's this phrase in some

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of the minutes sustained commitment, which I think sort of

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>sums up your description of your life and you're fighting

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.559
<v Speaker 1>against inflation. And he looked at me and said, keeping

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>at it, and I realized, like, that's the simplest way

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to say sustained commitment. So that's that became the title.

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.239
<v Speaker 1>So he gave up on The Wise Parrot Speaks, and

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>UH gracefully suggested the title that we have now. Um,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to hear that. I'm curious also, Christine, you

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>know some more about the collaboration process that you were

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to go into. Yeah. I think he refers to

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in his book that that that you were checking and

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>rechecking some of his anecdotes. I mean, as someone in

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>his forties now, I think it would be difficult for

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>me to write my own memoir. And yet at age

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>he was recalling things from his childhood, you know, all

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>sorts of events early in his life, a lot of

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>his work life in the fifties, in sixties at the

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and and the Fed. How were you able to,

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, to flesh out some of these stories that

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>he told. Well, one thing that's so remarkable about his

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>life is almost every chapter there are stories that have

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>entire books written about them. So my my home office

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>right now is stacked from from Florida ceiling with various books,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>which in many cases are just to sort of do

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>more research on a few paragraphs in one chapter of

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>his book. So you know, I just wentn't to find

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>any kind of source material, I shood there are a

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of it was and you if you look at

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the notes, a lot of it is looking back at

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>news articles from the time. You know, there are great

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>archives on the New York Times website, for instance, which

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>really help, and then newspapers dot com things like that

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>where you can find news articles about events as they

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>were happening, and that's that was a pretty helpful way

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to check things. Many people would recognize Vulcar as the

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>central banker that broke the back of inflation, of course

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. How comfortable is he with this

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of canonization, Well, I he appreciates that, with the

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>fact that people um sometimes still come up to him

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on the street and thank him for what he did,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>He's humbled by it, but he's grateful, and he feels

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so strongly about serving the country that to know that

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he's done something that people feel made a difference, I

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think matters a lot to him. I think he's constantly

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>coming up with new things he wants to fix in

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the country, and he's also quite humble about ways in

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>which he failed to do things. I mean, there's a

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the beginning of the book is about his

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>failure to basically create an international monetary system, and once

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Breton Woods broke down and he was really he was

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really upset about that. So um, there's a combination in

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the book of I think him telling the sort of

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>heroic story of Paul Wolker, which you can't avoid but

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>admit is heroic in many respects, but also being quite

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>self critical at points. He doesn't always come off as

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>an amazing superhero. Do circumstances create the man or does

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the man shape the circumstances. Would anyone serving as chair

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>of the FADE, given the inflation landscape at the time,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 1>have taken the steps he took. Well, that's interesting thing

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that he likes to talk about. So obviously he followed

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>two FED chairman who didn't take the action that was required.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>When he was brought in, the problem was so acute

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that he felt that he had great support in doing

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>things that were very difficult. So he he does sort

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of admit that as much as he gets credit for

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>being strong and fighting back against politicians who wanted to

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>impeach him, he always felt there was this reserve of

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>public support from him because things had gotten so bad

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and they were at such a point of crisis. So Um, however,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he did have to be very clever and

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>how he did that, and there's a section and how

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he where he describes the decision to target the money

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>supply as effectively sort of lashing the FED to the mast.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>They had no choice but to follow through, and that

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>inoculated him against some criticisms because he could say, we're

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the money supply. We're sorry, he and

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he admits if if he had ever been told interest

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>rates were going to go up, he might have just

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>run away immediately, but he sort of he sort of

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>created a system where he almost had had an ability

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Fed had ability to say, it's out of

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>our hands. We're just we're just looking at something else.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates are not under our control anymore. We'll get

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the issue of targets in a minute. It

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like Christine that you know, there are so many

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting stories about his early life and his childhood, and

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one of them in there may even have informed his

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking when he was at the FED in the late

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>seventies without him even knowing it. And it seems like

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it that that comes from his mother's economics textbook that

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he found from all the way back in nineteen eleven

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and the notes she wrote in the margins. Can you

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about that part of the story. Yeah,

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this is this is this was an amazing discovery. I mean,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot in the book about his father

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and they influence his father and his father's career in

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>public service had on Paul. But what was really interesting

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>was right towards the end when that we already actually

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>put out the Galley version of the book and we're

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>making final corrections to it. I was at his home

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was looking through He has this room with

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the you know, bookcases all around the room, and I

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was looking for a book that he said I could

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>find somewhere, and I found another book and it was

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a tiny, little hard wound volume which was printed in

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the early nineteen hundreds. It was it was his

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>his mother's Vasser economics text book from nineteen eleven. It

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of her handwriting in it. All all

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the margins were covered with her handwriting, and including on

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>page eight, I think there was a sentence where she

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>had scrawled economic laws cannot be dependent upon if we

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>disregard psychology, et cetera. And I showed this to him

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and he was, first of all, he'd just dunfounded, he'd

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>forgotten he had it. It reminded him that his mother

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>had been I guess, really passionate about economics, studying it

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>before the FED was created in nineteen eleven. Anyway, he

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>he had completely forgotten how much his mother cared about economics,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and also that people were having this in site about

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the importance of psychology even before. He sort of feels

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that he had that insight during his career at the fact,

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in the understanding that you had to find a simple

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>way to communicate with the public about what you were

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>doing and the money supply with the way to do it.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>He appointment in nineteen sev nine by Jimmy Carter can

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>also be seen as the start of the quote unquote

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>model an era in central banking. Uh thereafter inflation not

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so much of a problem, but also the idea of

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>policy and the controversy that it's sometimes courted being associated

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>with a single figure, and it sort of helps that

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he's this towering guy. Do you think Carter knew what

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he was getting into when Volka was appointed? How big

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a job was the Federal Reserve chairman back in the day. Well,

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he describes how there was a lot of controversy he

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>knows about appointing him, and there was a camp in

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the Carter White House that was very opposed to appointing

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>him because they recognized he would be independent, they wouldn't

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to control him. He was likely to raise

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>interest rates a lot. That was not going to be

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>good for Carter and his reelection chances. And they were right,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But there were obviously other voices that persuaded him. It

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>was important he was going to be popular and Wills

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>read for instance, and and Carter realized the problems were

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>so bad he couldn't get anything done that he had

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this inflation problem and basically took a bullet,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>basically agreed to do this. And it was one of

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the things that perhaps cost some re election. But yes,

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>so you have this FED chairman who's got the willingness

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of the President and also his successor, Ronald Reagan, who

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>supported him publicly all the time to do what what

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>needed to be done. And uh, and he did it.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And that was a big difference because a lot of

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>other FED chairman had had I mean, Arthur Burns had

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a great you know, he was very well respected figure,

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>he was very well known, but he just didn't do

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what was required. Through the eighties when you and I

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>were growing up, there was a narrative that the Carti

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>years were sort of a shorthand for American weakness and

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>American failure. That view, you know, has come into some

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny lately, and President Carter looks better with a couple

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of decades hindsight. How does folk feel about President card Well,

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>so early in our discussions, early in our meetings, he

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was reading the early version of Stuart Eisenstadt's book about Carter,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's a big chapter in there about Vulcar and uh,

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was very pleased by that, you know, because

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Stewart Eisenstadt was one of those people who opposed Vulcar

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. He was, you know, more on

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the liberal wing. He was afraid about high interest rates.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But now in hindsight recognized and recognizes that one of

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the great things that President Carter did was named Paul Wolker.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And President Carter has always said that as well. So

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, obviously Paul Wolker loves that, and uh,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think he really respects Carter and and his

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>willingness to do the difficult things. Um and and sort

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of the way he also has behaved in his post

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>presidency He sees him as a really great public servant

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>who hasn't quite gotten his due. He recognized this, that

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he made mistakes, and there are reasons that, you know,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Reagan was able to achieve things that Carter wasn't. But

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think he considers Carter one of the

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>presidents he admires. For sure. It sounds like he thinks

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>or is still underwrited. Yes, I would say that's true, Christine.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>In the thirty years since Vulcar left the chairmanship of

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED, he's rarely set still. He served on many

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>public commissions, reparations for Nazi victims, the the Obama uh

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>financial regulation initiative that eventually became the Vulcar Rule. He

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>even expresses some amusement that his name always became attached

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to these commissions, like the Vulgar Commission, the Vulcar this

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the Vulgar that does any of these? Do any of

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>these particular roles stand out for him as the most

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>memorable or the most important in his post FED career. Uh? Well,

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean he talks about how pretty much the first

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>thing he left he left to do after leaving the

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>FED was to serve on a national commission for public service,

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and then he immediately served on another one, and he

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>has devoted his career in the last few years to

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>an organization called the Vulkan Alliance, which is trying to

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>improve public service. So I think that, above all is

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing that he cares about the most. Obviously these

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>other things. Trying to end corruption is incredibly important to him,

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and he feels very proud of what they did, um

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>with getting some money back for the families of Holocaust victims, um.

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know the thing, that thing that really strikes

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>me about all of that is that he he did

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these very difficult, very controversial jobs that

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>required somebody of great integrity, and he wouldn't take money

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>for that. And I sort of mentioned this to him

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>while we were working on the book, that should we

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>mention you didn't take money. He said, now, so we

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>don't even have that in the book. But he he

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really felt that it was important to do and he

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to get renumerated for it. I want to

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>get back to this issue of his chairmanship and the

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>dawn of the modern central bank. I mean, again partly

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>helped by the break of inflation and the fact that

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Vulcar is physically a very big guy. Do you think

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that the cult of personality surrounding many central bankers in

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the world today is a good thing, and more importantly,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>does Vulca think it's a good thing. Well, I I

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think we ever talked about the cult of personality,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'll tell you a few things that he said

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that sort of connected to that. One is that it

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>bothers him that he's sometimes criticized for being having been

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>secretive at the FED. And he will point out that

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>there was one year he testified in front of Congress

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>something like thirty four times. He felt he was on

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>things like the Sunday Morning Meet the Press shows, which

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>you don't see the FED chairman do anymore. He was

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>very out there, So it bothers him that he's sort

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of sometimes tagged with the secrecy thing. He also feels

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>very strongly that it's helpful to have central bankers who

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't just academic economists. He reserves a little bit of

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>scorn for the academic economists in the book, and things

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like econometrics he's not a fan of. Well. He talks

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>about how how he was going to get his PhD

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but kept putting it off and putting it off. Yeah, yeah,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he never He never did his dissertation, and he really

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>feels what he what he learned about economics that served

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>him well was understanding the psychology of the market from

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the trading desk at the New York FED

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and from being a chase for two stints in his

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>early career and working in the Treasury department. So he

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is very supportive of having people at the FED who

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't just academic economists. So I'd say, you know, the

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>current FED chairman who served in the Treasury, he served

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>in business. He's he likes that about him. That's what

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say. More than anything, he thinks you should

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have people who really understand the markets in the real world. Christine,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>on a lighter note, I learned some new words in

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>this book, and there was one in particular on page

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>one oh nine called disappeal. I guess it's a French

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>word and it means the state of being dressed only

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>partially or nightclothes. And it doesn't that make the book

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>sound sexy? Don't you want to run into that? Central

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Banking is sexy, but full of words like that that

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really use it in a in a sexy ways

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>us to refer to some people protesting the FEDS monetary policy.

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>But I understand that he did have a very fascinating vocabulary.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us a little bit about that. Yeah,

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean that. One thing that was interesting to me

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>as sort of the professional writer who came into that

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>exercise and him being a you know, central banker and

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>government official, was how often I would come across these

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>words that he would use that I'd say, Wow, that's

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>an interesting, unusual word, and I'd look it up and

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and he'd nailed it. He'd find that he'd find these

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>uses of words that I wouldn't. And I did look

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in this book because I wanted to talk about it.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't find any quick examples. But that's a good

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>one that dil. We had a whole debate about whether

0:21:58.200 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that was really the right word. We looked it up

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in various dictionaries. But he cared immensely about word choice,

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and he would go back and forth and come up

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>with exactly. You know, we we discuss what is the

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>best word to describe this person? You know? And and

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>when you read Minutes, you see how much of the

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>discussion often comes down to how do we communicate this

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>particular idea and what what wording should we use in

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the statement, because so much about how central bankers communicate

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and and do their job is through word choice and

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>writing and communications and and so so he does have

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this gift for language, which I hadn't really anticipated when

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I went into it. I've written thousands of words about

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>one or two words in the FED statement. I can

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>exactly agree with that. On the subject of the minutes.

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Back to the transparency issue, it is also true we've

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>become accustomed two minutes of each Federal Open Market Committee

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>meeting coming out three weeks after that meeting. That didn't

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>used to be the case, and certainly was not the

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>case in the Volka era. Right. No, and actually in

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>his early years, I mean or actually through his career,

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they never they never stated what the FED funds rate

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>was going to be. They would state what they were

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>doing in the money supply, and people in the market

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>were paid a lot of money to try to figure

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>out what the FED funds rate was going to going

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to do. And it's only more recently and he and

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not completely convinced that that's better, you know. So,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some ways in which this transparency has gone maybe

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>beyond what he thinks is right, and he and he

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>admits maybe he's wrong. Maybe it's just he's used to

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the way it was, but he thought there was a

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>certain flexibility they had and not having to come right

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>out and say here's what the Fed funds rate is

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be. Now he reserves some special scrutiny for

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.959
<v Speaker 1>a very small country on the far side of the world.

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not talking about Australia. I am talking about

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the place right next door. What is his bugaboo with

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. Well, his bugaboo is not so much with

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, which he commends for its excellent fishing. But

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>he talks in the end of the book about this

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of targeting two percent inflation, which, as somebody who

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>fought inflation, he doesn't like the idea of trying to

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>create inflation of any number. And so it puzzles him

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and frustrates him that everybody is obsessed with trying to

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>get inflation up to two percent. Getting inflation up is

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>anathemat Now he's for down, He's for down, easy, for

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>lower inflation, no inflation. But he so he has this

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>whole section which we ran on Bloomberg opinion as well

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about how that number came to be. How the where

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the two percent come from? And he said, he thinks

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, which decided

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>they needed to take drastic action on inflation back in

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties, late eighties, and they set a two

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>percent target and got there and found it was a

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 1>very effective means of fighting inflation. And so it's been

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>adopted by other countries. Not least target have proliferated. I mean,

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the US has a version of two, European Central Bank,

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan, Sweden, you name it, far and wide.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>How much do these numerical targets and the almost sacramental

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>quality that they've taken on hinder good policy in his

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>view greatly the policy should be. You know, it's kind

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of the difference between principles based regulation and rules based regulation,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>which is another bugaboo of his. He likes things to

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>be based on principles. You know, let's let's have inflation

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't you know, price stability, you know, you know,

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>when prices are reasonably stable because they don't effect of

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>business or consumer decisions. That's what he wants. He doesn't

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like this idea of being so precise on the numbers,

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>because he thinks it's ridiculous. The data is not that precise,

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's this kind of false belief in precision that

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>troubles him. Christine just wants to wrap up with a

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of final questions here. You know, there's this sense

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of public service under current of his commitment to good government,

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>like like you were talking about that that really runs

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>throughout the book. And yet you know, someone might think,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is this a screed against Donald Trump? And it's it's

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>really not. The words Donald Trump only appear once in

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the book, that the Trump administration has mentioned only a

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>handful of times. He even even positively once or twice.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And Folker says several times he's often labeled as a Democrat,

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>but he actually gave up his political affiliation many decades ago,

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and he really tries to be a political And yet

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and yet we can sense that he's really no big

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>fan of President Trump. Why did he not go any

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>further in this book. Well, he at his root does

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>not believe in being political. His father wasn't a political

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>city manager who executed excellent management of the city of

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>t Neck, New Jersey and helped turn it around and

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it as FED chairman, he didn't think you should be political.

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>He's been so much of his career in the in

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED, he served under Democrats and Republicans. He doesn't

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>think that the issues for him are about which party

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is in office. It's really about are they running things well?

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>How can it be better effective government? And so to

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the degree that the Trump administration is not effective and

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is not running things well, he's obviously unhappy, but he

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>also sees that there have been other administrations, both Democratic

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and Republican, who have done the same, and he he

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically calls out Ronald Reagan for having started this kind

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of language about government being the problem that has infiltrated

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>are our discourse in this country and reduced the trust

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in government. You know, looking back over old magazine covers,

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Vulker is often pictured surrounded by these clouds of smoke.

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Now were they from cigars? Were they from pipes? What

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>did he like to smoke? And it's inconceivable we would

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>see that today. Does he think society has become too sanitized? No? Actually,

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean most of the photos you'll see in stock

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>photography of him or him with this big cigar. He

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>was famous for his cheap cigars. He'd never liked to

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>smoke expensive cigars because he, you know, was very frugal

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at heart, And so I actually persuaded him to include

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a few a short little section on his cigars, because

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he has an interesting story about how he decided to

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>quit right around the time he left the FED, and

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he really is so glad he quit and feels so

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>guilty actually for subjecting so many people to the cigar

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>smoke for so long. It was I think in part

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of prop you know, it helped calm him down. He

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>um recognizes that society changed. He's in no way trying

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to persuade anybody to smoke ours. Christine. Finally, this book

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was actually not supposed to come out for a few

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>more weeks. The publisher moved it up to, uh, the

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>end of October. Can you tell us a little bit

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about that decision. Yes, that was pretty unusual for the publisher,

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're grateful they were able to do that. Paul's

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty sick. He was in great shape and still going

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to the office until mid August, and you know, really

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>worked hard, hard, hard, often staying later in the office

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and his assistant or I would working away on his

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>draft and taking the bus and going to uh fishing

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>trips and things like that. And then in August he

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was diagnosed with pretty serious illness. So he's been he's

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>been home and he's you know, fighting this and you know,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he's ninety one, so he's doing his best to keep going,

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>keeping at it, so to speak, exactly all right. Christine Harper,

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Markets magazine and collaborator with Paul Vulker

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on the new book Keeping at It. We're very grateful

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that you were able to join us on Benchmark. Thank

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Christine, Thank you so much for having me.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Benchmark will be back next week. Until then, you can

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, our

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg app, as well as podcast destinations like Apple Podcast,

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Spotify or wherever you listen. We'd love it if you

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>talk the time to rate and review the show so

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>more people can find us. You can follow me on

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at moss Underscore Echo, I'm at start Lammin and Christine,

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you are d r under Poor Harper. Benchmark is produced

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>by Topah Foreheads, the head of Bloomberg podcasts is Francesca

0:30:51.000 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>lev thanks for listening, See you next time. Four