WEBVTT - Bailey Pulled a Blinder

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>His chance of the Quasi Quati says the Bank of

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>England would be responsible for any market in volatility after

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>its bomb buying program ends, and that infusion, I think

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>comes between the financial side of the Bank of England

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and the monitary side of the Bank of England, which

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>are now trying to do different things. They're trying to

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>hold things together as best they can and trying to

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>maintain postability and at the same time address financial stability

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>issues with his other instrument Monday. But this is going

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to get tense perhaps. Yeah. So you've got both the

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister and the Bank of England. There you have

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the sounds of investors, fund managers, analysts, everyone talking on

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg over the last month, throughout the remarkable political and

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>financial chaos we've all been witnessing. Of course, everyone's been

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>questioning throughout all this the credibility of the Bank of England.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So where are we now, guilt back to where they

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>were actually before Quasi Kwarteng's budget. Liz Trust of course

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>did not survive as Prime Minister, but still sitting over

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the road from a here a Bloomberg HQ at the

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England is Governor Bailey. So We're going to

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>ask the question this week, did Andrew Bailey in fact

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 1>fuller blinder? I'm David Merritt. This is In the City,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloombergs podcast, connecting you to these stories and the voices

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of the heart of the city of London. You followers

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of France scenes Instagram or no, she's still in New

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>York City in her Halloween costume, no less, but here

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>with me in the London studio. I'm joined by Bloomberg

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>reporter Phil Audrick and Bloomberg Television Economics and Government correspondent

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Lizzie Burton. Welcome Phil and Lizzie back to in the City.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But before we get going to discuss I just it's

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just been pointed out to me by my producer that

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the phrase pull a blinder is apparently not internationally recognized,

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and she's got an article about a t eight very

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>British phrases that will confuse anybody who didn't grow up

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in Britain. So we're gonna have to define what we

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>mean pull a blinder. Lizzie, can you have a go

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>at defining what we mean by that? Pulled it out

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the hat? It was he was a walking comms crisis

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and now he's shown how shown how it's done. There

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we go. So would you agree with that film that

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Bailey is now showing the world how it's done. Yeah.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>The handling of the ld I f s was pretty

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive by the by the Bank of England. They

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>used a market intervention tool that they never used before.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It worked, It stabilized along into the guilt market. They've

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>started quantitative tightening, so they're starting to sell guilts that

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they bought during the sort of easy years of after

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis that has never been tried before. Days

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>after this near catastrophe and markets they're able to do this.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So all of that would suggest that the Bank of

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>England has has pulled a blinder here. I think that's

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm swelling with pride. What do you think, Lizzie de agree?

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just throwing it back a bit. The reason

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that I think he pulled a blinder was because Andrew

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Bailey said that this emergency intervention to help out pension

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>funds was only going to be temporary, and then you

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>had the Chancellor at the time, Quasi quarteng saying that

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if the market termoil continued after the deadline, then that

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>was a matter for the Bank of England, so a threat.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And Andrew Bailey was really saying, get your act together,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>pension funds, and then what it really meant was get

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>your act together government. They seemed to liquidity improved and

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it made Quasi Quarteng look like he'd lost to Andrew

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Bailey in the end. Yeah, I mean that it all

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>happened in Washington during the IMF meetings, and it was

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>where it was. It was it was at the event

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>where he where Bailey said, we are ending this temporary

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>guilt bye program on Friday as planned. We've announced that

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>we will be out by the end of this week.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got three days left. Now you've got to get

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this done, which was that was also when Quarting said

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going exactly and then and then literally the

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>next day, Quarteing's pulled back to the UK, sacked on

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the Friday, and and the government then changes its fiscal policy,

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>which was what was unsettling markets. You spoke to speaking

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to bankers and investors in Washingtons big ancillary convention called

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the International Institution Cycle Finance Meetings, and they were all

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>saying the problem is not not you know, necessarily what

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is happening in markets. The core of the problem was

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal plan that was the mini budget. They have

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to deal with that, and Bailey did kind of give

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the government a very strict deadline to address this and

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they responded and of course it caused complete mayhem at

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the top of politics. And let's not forget what's so

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing for quarteng and Trust is that they spent the

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>whole summer trashing the Bank of England and saying that

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the BOE didn't do enough to fight inflation, that it's

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>mandate needed reviewing. And then they before they you turned

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on the whole budget sack Quarte and Trust went as well.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>They had to go cap in hand to the BOE

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and say it's independence with sacrosanct and basically dropped the

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>mandate reviews. It's just exhausting and I think people listening

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to this um will be you know, their heads are

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>spinning right like all of ours were tracking this. So

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just diving this back to where we when we all

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>are sat down in the summer, the Tory leadership campaign

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was in midflow and as you said, Lizzie, sort of

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of barbs are being thrown around. We discuss,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't we how the bank was under attack by the

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Tory Party. The Bank of England persisted beyond any rational

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of the data to tell us that inflation was transient.

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to look at the best practice

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world, the countries who have been most successful

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>at controlling inflation, for example, the Bank of Japan. I think,

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Liz Trust use the phrase bean counters right about the

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are too obsessed with balancing the budget or

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe reining in inflation um And you know the bean counters,

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as we've now seen bit back, didn't they big time?

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And there they had now won the argument. But could

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you just sort of spell us out a little bit

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>for the listeners to explain how we got here right now?

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You know you mentioned Phil that the banks started tightening

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>on the quantity the contract of tightening before anyone else,

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and then it had to do this emergency measure. But

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can we just give everyone a bit of a timeline.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Liz Trust wins, She announces that mini budget with quasi

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>quateng tell us talk us through what happened in the

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks. Well, was the queen died? Of course,

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that was the integratory He had basically ten ten days

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of zero government and then uh and then and then

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.119
<v Speaker 1>literally just within a few days the mini budget was

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>was out and um it was. The bizarre thing was

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the mini budget had been trailed

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in advance, like thirty five billion of the forty billion

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts was trailed in advanced. But the tone of

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the the tone of the statement, the fact that the

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Office for Budget Responsibilities, the chief being counters for the

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>UK were not were not involved in this. So there

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>was no sense of forecast uh, and there was there

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>was there was no there was no watchdog who was

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just who act that the head first in quasi quatting

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>did on becoming chancellor. So um, there was no one's

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>mark their homework. They pushed back and they've lost exactly

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And so Scholar really knew he had deep connections with

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets, he had deep knowledge of financial crisis, having

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 1>been there during the two thousand and eight two thousand

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and nine financial crisis. And so they lose all this

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>expertise and and they deliberately sideline the people who can

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>who can basically mark the government's homework. Um and uh,

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course the markets just suddenly here they get

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>this the tone from Quarteng was like, we're going to

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be ambitious and we're pushing ahead. He completely ignored what

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was happening in global markets at the time, which was

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>generally interest rates were rising, and the higher interest rates

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously increasing debt servicing costs, and so the sustainability of

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the public finances. You know, there's going to be questions

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. There was apparently thirty billion of headroom. He

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>spent the lot then went beyond it, and actually the

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>real picture was probably that the thirty billion of headroom

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>had shrunk because we were looking at recession and I

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are interesting say at the time, markets will do what

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they and exactly and so there's this kind of turning

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>point at them Ani budget where everybody has seen, has

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>listened to the words, and suddenly you see it written

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>down that they don't care about the you know, these

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>these issues, and the market just literally just flips, completely flips,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and you have you have these immediate that collapse in

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the power to record low like historic low ever and

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and this and this spike in government borrowing costs which

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>caused complete catastrophe at this long end of the market,

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>which blew up these ld I funds. That was the

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>key thing, wasn't it. This is how you mentioned ld

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I just to explain it over means this is this

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is the pension's market, right. The crisis in the pension's

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>market was linked to the surge and boring costs the

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>long dated UK government debt, And that's what really freaked

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody out, wasn't it. Yeah, because they had collateral demands,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so that when huge collateral demands, so that when prices

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fell and yields rose to raise the necessary cash, they

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>had to sell more guilts. It created a doom loop

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was all about the pace of this money

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>floating out of the door, not really the level. And

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>that's what the Bank of England happened. That's when the

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>banking woke up, right when the well, I should be fair.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they are awake all throughout right, but that's

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>when they had to take really quite serious action. Remember, Phil,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we were warned about the market reaction. We had Martin Real,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the former Bow policymaker on Bloomberg TV, not a headline hunter.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>As Phil putt it uncounter. He utimate. He said there

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a run on the pound. And

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this was the night before And I must say I

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>expect the same sort of thing will happen with Fartean's policy,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that they'll probably be all I wouldn't like to say when.

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>They'll probably be a clear run on the pound, and

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>then the Bank of England will be forced to put

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>up interest rates to stabilize the exchange rate. Much as

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and former Chancellor Philip Hammond came on, he said, the

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>market is watching, the markets are looking very very closely

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>at political pronouncements and the UK does face some serious headlings.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>He was encountering. They were all right right lining up

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to warn everybody. Well, in the end we all know

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened, right, Liz Trust had to first of all

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>fire her chancellor and then in the end her entire

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>political project was in tatters and she to resign as

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>well and became the shortest tenured prime minister in British history. Um,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>at the Bank of England, can you just explain a

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about what they had been through, because

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of course they were about to start quantitive tightening, and

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that was the plan to start selling again. The vast

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>reserves of UK bonds had built up nine billion pounds

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>since the financial crisis. The first central bank to go

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead and do that, but then they had to suddenly

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>reverse Veriot on that didn't they around to to save

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the pension's market. I mean, I remember on Bloomberg Television

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that day we were calling it quantitative confusion because we

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't sure which way they were going to turn. Can

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you give us a bit of insight what was going

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on in the bank at that time? Well, I mean,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so when we talk about barely playing a blind, I

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think you should distinguish into two periods. So

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>there was the period of the immediate crisis after the

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>mini budget, and I think that was dealt with, you know,

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a series of events that were pretty disastrous. They handled

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it very well. Prior to that. They've had years again

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>on top of areas of the market where they could

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>see potential in stability and also to build proper functioning

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>tools to fix markets when they absolutely need to in

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a crisis, and they and I'd say that they can.

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>They failed quite considerably at that end, you know, in

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of the preparation, in terms of the in terms

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of the oversight. It's the financial Stability Mandate, financial stop

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>another financial crisis in COVID there was this dash for cash.

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Bailey has since in recent weeks conceded that that that

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what the bank did then was a two billion pounds

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>quantity of easing a bond purchase, which was basically exactly

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the same as what they did after the ld I

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>crisis in the last few weeks. So they bought guilts

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>off market participants directly, and that was presented as a

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as a quantitative easy mechanism back in the dash for

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>cash days in at the start of the pandemic, because

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy had to be loosened at the same time,

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and so they were loosening monetary policy, so doing normal QUEI,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but also at the same time it was serving a

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>market stability function. Now, they knew at the time that

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>there would be there would be a day when interest

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>rates were rising when QT was happening, so quie was

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>being sold and they would get a market blow up,

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and the only thing that they could do would be

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy guilt. So they would effectively restart QUEE on

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a financial stability mechanism rather than a montary policy mechanism.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And they knew this would cause vast confusion, but they

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't get on top of this matter. And and I've

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>been told that people senior policy makers in the bank

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>were talking in sort of March around that time about

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>them needing these two buckets. They needed to have blue

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>queue and red QUEI and and blue QUEI would be

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>normal monthly policy queie and red QUEI would be this

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>financial stability mechanism. But the matrix right, which, so what

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do? But they needed to communicate this,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>They needed to tell everybody beforehand. They needed to design

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>a tool, and they were talking about this, and there

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 1>was there was no formal disclosure of all of what

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>was going on. They didn't have a to Like they

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have other funitial stability tools, like they've changed the borrowing

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>requirements for more mortgages to make it harder to worre

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>they did a few years ago. They have these particular tools.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>People know about them, and this one just was like,

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the king of all financial stability tools go

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>into the markets by guilt rescue everybody indiscriminately put the

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer at risk fundamentally, although it actually looks like with

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this l d I stuff, they're going to make a fortune.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And but it hadn't been communicated and they didn't really

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>have have it properly set up. So in that respect,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>it was bad, but in the actual crisis they then

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just sort of unleashed everything they knew they were going

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to have to do, and they did it very well

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and the outcome has been to stabilize them. I mean,

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, thinking about the outcome right, even chaos behind

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. But you know, the market is back, as

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, guilt yields are back now at the long

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the curd, back down to where they were

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.599
<v Speaker 1>before the Mini budget. You know, we've been talking a

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lot about what sort of permanent scarring is there in

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of the guilt market, in terms of London's reputation,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the Bank of England. But isn't it

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the case now that things are sort of back to

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>where they were and its business as usual. Well I

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>did an interview with the Trade Secretary kemmy baden Ark

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>which suggests to me that we're still a little bit

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in the trust era, because she was criticizing the

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Office for Budget Responsibility. She said that it's forecasts are

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>not always right. Yes, I do dispute the bas forecast

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>because what happens with trade depends on the actions that

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I am my colleagues across government to take right now

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the o b R is probably making a forecast based

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>on how we used to do things. They don't know

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>how we're going to be doing things, so I think

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we wait and see. We were talking about whether the

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>o brs forecasts on Brexit mean that the Trade Department

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>ought to reconsider the relationship with the EU, and she

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was referring back to her time as a Treasury minister.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But really what's interesting about questioning the o b R

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>at this moment, when we're about to have a budget

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on November the seventeenth again, is that she's kind of

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>undermining its credibility by questioning its sums, just as Clarting

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was doing with the BOE. Just as well. Mark Harney,

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the former BOE governor, said that the government was undermining

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of the UK's economic institutions. Soonac and Jeremy Hunt,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the new Chancellor, are going to have to rely on

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the o BRES forecasts to get credibility and markets that

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they can balance the books. Are we to think that

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we can believe the o b R sums on growth

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if we can't believe them on Brexit. I was in

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Washington when the day that Liz Trust resigned and there

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of kind of sympathetic faces around there,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the people who have been covering the Trump White House

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of the chaos that we've been seeing

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it totally broken through in America and all around the world,

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and they were saying, are you okay? You know with

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>all this gus And there was a bit of a sense,

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there when Soona was anointed that maybe in for

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a period of calm here, maybe you know, we're back

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to a little bit more of a kind of nor

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Conserva approach and a little bit of the heat taken

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>out debate. But what you're saying, is he is that

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the same group of MPs, isn't it

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the Houses of Commons? And maybe sic priorities

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are not that much different to his his maybe his

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>two pre assessors, in fact, both both Trust and Boris Johnson. Well,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone's penning their hopes on Richie Sunac. But um, I

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think you have to ask digg dig a little deeper.

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's go past his economics. Is he really a brexitter?

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering, is he just a brexitter? Because yeah,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>well you need to be a brexitor if you wanted

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to rise to the top of the Tory Party, get

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>into power and make change in government. But speaking to

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>people who say, look, he's an Atlantic sist, he went

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to Stanford, he worked for Goldman. In his heart he

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>believes in Brexit. Then think about the Rwanda policy. He's

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>reappointed seller Bravernment as Home Secretary and we are to

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>understand that he does believe in sending asylum seekers to Rwanda.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't go down well with swades of the UK population

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.479
<v Speaker 1>green policy he demoted to climate ministers. He said he

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to cop but well we've been on it.

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>He said that he will. There we go. But nonetheless,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Alok Sharma is not attending cabinet. Here is

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>a question mark over is green credential. I guess we

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>know that he is. He is sort of fiscally conservative,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so that much was clear during the Borough series where

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>he had fights with with Boris Johnson about you know,

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>paying for stuff. Cakism was not his economic strategy. But

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>what we don't really know about him, as you're kind

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>of a leading to, is his is his social and

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>his cultural vision for the UK. So we we've still

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>got to learn who who Rishi is someone described that

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Jill Rutter at the Institute of Government. She said, it's

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not Singapore on Thames that he wants to create. Here

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is California on Thames. It's like, you know, we want

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring Silicon venture capital, spirit of entreprene neuralism to Britain.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>That's his that's his kind of vision. Yeah, right, and

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know in terms of how that spills over to

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the City of London, right, and his relationship with the

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England as well. What does that mean? I mean,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's talked about obviously boosting the city and

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got the Services Bill, the Financial Services but is

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>making its way through. You know. One thing that really

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>struck my eye this week was this suggestion, and this

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>has been a controversial amendment to that bill, that the

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>government can override the city regulators if there's some what

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they would say as emergency reason, but really for any

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>reason that they seem deemed necessary. So again to this

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>point about attacking the institutions of Britain or the City,

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the financial services, but in front of Parliament at the moment,

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if if the reports are true, is going to chip

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>away at the independence of institutions like the f C

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>A and presumably the Bank of England as well, and

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that's got to hurt as well in terms of global investors,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it. Some words from the Bank thing then said

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>that at Mansion House last week that it would undermine

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the credibility if the city internationally, and well, you just

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you need to think about the offering of the city

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>under Sounac if you're going to have all these tax

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>rises as well, because the UK Finance was warning that

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>London might be less competitive than Frankfurt and New York.

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time he and Jeremy Hunt need

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to balance the books. As they say, there are eyewateringly

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult decisions to make. And if you I mean Sam

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>whats the head of the Predational Regulation Authority the Thank

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of England, he U if we're going to I mean

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Richie is a pure Brexiteer because he obviously he backed

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>he backed in twenty six and he's only just become

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an MP and at that point he was going against

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the government because the government was a remainer government under

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Um, so you know, he took an ideological position there.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And now you've got Brexit and what you don't have

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is we have have access to the financial services on

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the in Europe, and so they're not granting us equivalents.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>You can see his thing, King, We we need to

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>be Singapore California in terms we need to deregulate, we

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>need to take advantage of this. But of course, as

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the regulators point out, you need to have stables, really

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>stable financial center. That is a prerequisite of a strong

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a strong city. So there's this balance which he's obviously

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to strike, which the regulators think he's planning to

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>go too far on, which is a sort of deregulatory

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>drive to to boost growth using the city, which was

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of what happened in the eighties and the Thatcher

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Big Bang. And it's but I mean, you're

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to get a new Big Bang when everything

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>has already been deregulated. So it's all, yeah, it's a

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a really tricky one to see how it's this

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>one's going to work out. And they're certainly going to

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>go up against the institutions against to your point that

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this fight against our institutions is and over, Yeah, and

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>so in that fight just to because back to where

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>we started on this, you know, did the institutions managed

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to pull a blinder. We've seen Andrew Bailey ride out

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this storm has gone from the commons disasters, as you said, Lizzie,

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to actually outlasting that Prime Minister. I mean, so do

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you see his um that project continue. You know we're

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>going to hear from the we're recording this on on Wednesday.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we had the Bank announcing what everyone's

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>expected to be another three quarter point rate hike tomorrow.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Potentially we might be nearing the peak of interest rates.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Are things looking rosy next year? That is the bank

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have an easier ride? I mean, if you

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if you take what's happening in the economy at face value,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that there is going to be a natural um sort

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of squeezing out of inflation as people as we head

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>into what is expected to be at least a shallow recession. Um. So,

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what the bank has to do, if

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we're already kind of having a having a recession, they

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>won't have to raise rates quite as aggressively. UM. But

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I imagine they're going to do a three quarter point

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>rate rise now because they're kind of behind everyone this.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>The Bank went first on raising rates and then just

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of went at a more. It's gone first on QT. Yeah,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but we criticized things slow. New Zealand. New Zealand is

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the only other bank doing it. They're they're they're not

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the G seven. So the first major the

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>banking is the first major one to be doing this

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>active selling of guilts, which is which is proper sort

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of intervening again in the in the in the markets,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>which can dislocate things. But in that sense, Bailey's one

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>because he's got back to what he wanted to inflation

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>fighting and retooling. If there is another crisis, can the

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>bank complete its plan for quantitative tightening over the next

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>five months. It really wants to start reducing that huge

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>bank of guilts that our owns um This latest blow

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>up came out of what you said, they should have

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>expected it. But from their perspective, coming of nowhere, is

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it going to be able to complete that program and

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of complete its ark of the interest rates over

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the over the coming months. Andrew Haws at the Bank

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of England, he's the head of Markets, he's this massive brain.

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>He was saying that this l d I blow up

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and the pension fund crisis has obviously it's been sparked

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>by right interest rates, and rising interest rates make pension

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>funds natural buyers of guilts. So one of the bizarre

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of things that may be happening here is the

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>rising interstrates are going to make are going to make

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>pension funds more purchase more of the government debt that

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is issued. So can they get through this? Can they?

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Can they do the forty billion of active banking and

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>do forty billion active sales that they're planning. They're targeting

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it at the at the short end of the market

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>where there is appetite and then and you potentially actually

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>have these pension funds becoming more attracted to buying buying

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it because of rising interstrates. So they the first one

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>got away really well. Then there was three points six

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>times cover. Um. You know, if if, if if the

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>government doesn't issue masses of debt like you know, as

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was expected on the Quasi and co, then maybe there

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is there is the capacity to absorb it without without

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>another blow. And so we're talking about the ultimate blinder,

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>are we for the next year? Vainly, vairely the hero

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>it saves the UK. Let's see what they do at

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the long end, because that's obviously where the market doing

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>well happen. We might hear more about that at the

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Bore Decision tomorrow or today when you're listening to this

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe Okay, thank you brilliant, Thank you so much for

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Lizzie Burson into Lordrick. Thanks for listening to this week's

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in the City. We will be back next week, but

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, if you like our show, please head

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on over to Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and rate, review and subscribe. This episode was hosted

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>by me David Merritt. It was produced by Summersadi and

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>special thanks to for Lordrick and Lizzie Burden.