WEBVTT - When Words Take on New Meanings

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles w Chuck Bryant, and uh, let's see, we've

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of producers out there. We're in a

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>new studio. We've got Will and man Guesh from Part

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Time Genius. It's like we all have our pants on.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a that's weird. That's the weird part. It's a

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a just a big family fest. Stuff you should know. Yeah,

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>welcome you guys. Thank you. Guys were in this brand

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>new studio. Isn't this exciting? From from the fromale the hide.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot like a science class And yes, yes,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what happens in here at night science class.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>There making extra money to pay for this new studio

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to fill everybody in. We're just doing like in joke

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>frenzy right now, Stuff you should Know or I'm sorry,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Work says um expanded. We've got so many

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>podcasts these days, and so many coming down the pike

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that they've built out new studios and we're using this

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is our first time, but you guys have used this

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>one before, right, yeah, it's an awesome studio. So Chuck,

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>let's introduce these guys. Huh, okay, well, will is who

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you've heard speak? Man guesses who you've heard laugh? I

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>would say you do have a great laugh uh, and

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they are the we should have a laugh off at

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>some point you and me laugh. Right, I've been told

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know all right man, guests, you go oh wow. Yeah. Uh.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So these guys are the hosts of Part Time Genius,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and they just let us know that it is your

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and co founders of Mental Plus many years ago. But

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>today is your one year anniversary. We have been at

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>house stuff works for one year. Congratulation. Hopefully Jerry will

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>work in some sort of post production sound effect or

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>applause or the fanfare button. Right, yeah, well, congrat um

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and you guys. So you guys have been doing Part

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Time Genius? Has it come out like three times a

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.919
<v Speaker 1>week from the get go? No, it was two times

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a week at the beginning, and then and we decided

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have enough work. Right there was it was

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>around the time of the eclipse, and we thought, you

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>know what we should have done in eclipse episode and

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 1>let's just share some fun facts and then the next

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>week we were like, you know what, there's been some

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>really bad news, as there has been frequently recently, and

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>so we thought, you know what, let's do an episode

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on nine things to make you smile. And so most

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of our episodes are big questions where we ask a

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>question like, you know, will we ever be able to

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>live without sleep? Or something like that, and so we

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>decided to start throwing in these bonus episodes where we

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do nine things about whatever. It might be, facts about

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Mr Rogers or house plants. Yeah, you know, house plants,

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the usual. But there's still pretty robust episodes of like

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes basically. Right. Yeah, so three times, three times

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a week. My hat is off to you. I'm also

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>vaguely threatened by that because I'm worried, like, did you

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>guys put out three a week? Yeah? We were running

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>at the Classic. I don't know if that counts because

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not extra work, you know what I mean. So

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little a little nervous, but still it's pretty awesome.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>We're so building up to get the Classics Wednesdays, Thursdays

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and Fridays, right, that's right, So how did you guys

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>end up at housetuf works because Chuck said, you're you're

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>the co founders of mental floss, Like, I feel like

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that's worth saying a couple more times. Yeah, Mental Flaws magazine. Ye,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like a site we used and still use all Ye,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>actually we don't use anymore now that you guys, that's

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>not true. I emailed them about a bug. I found

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a bug where like if you went to go put

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the like the like easy reader format or whenever I'm Firefox,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it would bring up a different article. So I let

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>them know I did, but I was like one degree

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>separated from the dev team mental Floss. Yeah, Josh emailed me,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course we reached out to them, and they

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>were very much appreciative like that. It's a great team there.

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It's still obviously a great site, and uh, we love

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all the crew at mental floss. And we were just

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>excited about what's happening in the world of podcasting. We've

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>been big fans of you guys for a long time,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you, and just knowing how much is happening in

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this space. Um, we were eager to try something new

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>when we were approached about the idea of coming here

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and and we've been doing mental Flass. We've been talking

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about Mental Class since we were nineteen, you know, like

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like it's been a long time and and we've done

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>like so many fun projects, so many things. But by

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the end of it there we're just managing so many people,

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we weren't getting to do the creative

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff as much. At least that's how I felt. And

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>when we started, like you know, thinking about podcasts, it

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>just really felt like how Mental Class started, where it

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>was conversations and it felt like intimate and the way

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to build such an amazing community of people

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>who care and are so invested, and and somewhere along

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the way I felt like, um, you know, mental Class

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>was such a massive site that I didn't know the

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>readers anymore. Too many and somehow, somehow, even the a

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts are huge, Like you know, you guys have millions

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and millions of listeners, like they all feel like they

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know you, and we sort of missed that connection. Is

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>truly in the cradle, guys. Very sad with the Silverspoon. Well,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you guys are here. I know Chuck is too,

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>so welcome, Welcome to the family. After a year, Well

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on our first day here. Were talked about this previously,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 1>but like we we went around the house, works offices,

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we met everyone. We're in these meetings and stuff. Everyone

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>went home early and and and yeah that's a staple.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing. I mean, everyone works hard, but they also

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>get to spend time with their families. And uh, when

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we got in the elevator, We're like, where did they

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>keep the jerks? Like there don't seem to be any

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in this company. It was just so not did you say,

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>are we the jerk? That's what I said, We're here

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>at the jerks. Yeah, that's one of the really cool things,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Like we I think we differ from a lot of

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast companies in that way, and that we have all

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>this great like talent on the roster and we're also

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>going out and developing cool stuff. Yeah, very cool. So

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>so enough about all this, Let's talk about the show

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>some more. All Right, you guys have like quizzes typically

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you have lots of guests on what are some of

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the best um questions that you've asked and some of

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the best guests that you've had so far. I mean,

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that's been one of the most fun parts about this

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>is getting to reach out to experts in different things,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and even experts in areas that we didn't realize there

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>were experts. You know, we got to talk to America's

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>only certified water Somali A. I mean, we always hear

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>about in the world of wine and that there's an

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>expert in the world of water that these fine restaurants

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>reach out to and getting me hear the ins and

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>outs of that. But it was Antarctica's poet in residence

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>right right, So it's wonderful or she's not allowed to

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>leave the hu Well she eventually left, but we didn't

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>get to take a lot of hot showers, don't you.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine, And she probably swam away made her getaway.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>We had a a guest on recently that an author

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>of a book called When, and it was about the

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>science of perfect timing. His name is Daniel Pink, and

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he was teaching us about, you know, how much time

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of day affects all of us and helping us learn

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the disturbing fact that we're all a little

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>more racist than the afternoons. And it was just weird

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>things like that. He was talking about staging these court

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>cases where they have these kind of mock jurors and

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they put them together. This was not on a real trial,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be an unfortunate way to test this, and um,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>they would test their behavior and whether they were more

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or less likely to convict someone um in certain scenarios.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And they looked at what happened in the morning and

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the afternoon, and had people of different races,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and they were more likely to come down more hard

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on on someone of you know, a different race in

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the afternoons. Yeah, I mean it really does have to

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>do with our our body clocks are circadian rhythms, and

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's honestly that's that's that's part of it. But yeah,

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the the science of that perfect timing, and uh, we

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>learned we've changed our behavior around this. A different fact

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that came out of that one was that they've done

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a statistical analysis on teams that do more high fiving

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and chest bumping, and it said head slapping. I'm not

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>sure exactly what that dangerous mango slaps my head before

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>every episode and they are actually shown to win more frequently.

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It might be because they're winning, so they're high fiving.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Probably not high fiving, but it's just a lot of

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>fun to have these people on that have studied such

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>fascinating things. You know, we consider them the experts. Were

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>not experts, but it's a selfish thing for us. We

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get to sit back and learn from people who know

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so much about so many interesting things. Yeah, we we

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>had we didn't show on rudeness and and whether there's

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a rudeness epidemic. And there's this guy at Danny Wallace

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>who wrote this great book, and one of the facts

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about was that this mayor in uh

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Cortina or somewhere in Columbia he uh he fired the

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>corrupt police force and hired a bunch of mimes to

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>mock people as they were jaywalking. And it basically shames

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the into being more polite. It was amazing or annoyed

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>them into being either way. But I mean, I feel

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>like minds are underused career. They really are, especially as

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>civil servants arise in mind violence. That's right, there's another

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>study being done about how that could have happened. Well,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody out there, if you haven't picked up on the

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that you would love Will and Man guests show,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>all you have to do is go to their website.

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>It's part time Genius dot Com. Right, part Time Genius

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Show. We decided to check it to another lot,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>right Yeah, yeah, Um that's really really um forward thinking

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of you or dot com was, but we were really

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. Yeah, Part Times Genius dot Show. You've

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>got the podcast archives on there, so everybody go check

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it out, yeah, or of course iTunes or where we

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast. That's right, and that what we say.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we say those things all right, fis bumps, guys,

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>no head slaps, Thank you so much. All right, thanks guys.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>It's always a joy to hang out with those two. Huh.

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I love those guys. They are truly good guys. Um, so, Chuck.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>We are talking about words today, Yeah, specific words, historical

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>words that people may or may not be using correctly,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>correct that people may or may not have really defined

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these instances. There's really no problem with them,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're fun to talk about, right. It's that whole

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>descriptive ist prescriptive ist thing, you remember, that whole thing

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we used to get into. Boy, it's a trip down

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>memory lane, isn't it. Thing? So so like descriptivists are

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like language is constantly involved. Just go with

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>the flow. Prescriptivists are like, no, no, that languages language,

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're if you're using it wrong, you're wrong, right, Um,

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Like David Foster Wallace was a prescriptivist, like basically, grammar

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>nazi is another way to put it right. Yeah, And

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to go ahead and this is not on

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>our list, but let's go ahead and throw decimate in there,

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>because um, that is a word that we used to

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hear from a lot when we said something was decimated,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and we would have perse script which one is the

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>yes email us and say decimate means you know, desa

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>is by tin, so reducing by ten percent is what

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>it means, guys. And eventually I had just started writing

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people back and saying, you know, the modern dictionary even

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>says that it has now come to learn decimate can

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just mean you know, yeah, later waste wiping out like this,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this bush mails decimated me last night. It well reduced

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you by probably more than ten percent, depends on how

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that's always been a grete for me. Like

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>even when it's officially changed its stephan and over time

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and recognized as such, people will still get their hackles up.

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, dude, it's usually dude. Yeah, but that's

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>a prescriptive ist railing against it. Well yeah, and it's

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>also like, come on, man, like I'm sorry, we're not

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>using the fifteen century usage of the word. So yeah,

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>decimate they got their tunic in a twist, no tunics technically,

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So I guess this one is. I think this episode

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is kind of for the prescriptivists if you think about it,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know who's who. Prescriptivists are the ones

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who are who you're talking about the what are we

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>prescriptive ist pennant? So we're not that, no, no, okay,

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely we go with that to each each their

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 1>own motto. Yeah, and this is, of course another we

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't done a top ten in a while, but as

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows, our top tens are never ten U And

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of occurred to me that's usually because some

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of them we just think are dumb, and also because

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of because the way we go these things would be

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a way we're an hour long, we decimate the top

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>ten lists. Actually, yeah, alright, so let's start. Man, we're

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>talking again. I don't know if we got this across

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>yet or not, but we're talking about historic words that

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>come from history that are either used wrong or not

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fully not not. They don't really get across the original

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 1>intent necessarily. They're just kind of evolved over time, right,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and the first to kind of pair together quite well,

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like a nice like a nice wine and a shot

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of bush mills. Right. Oh god, I'm not even on

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a bush mills kick. I don't know where this came from.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>We had bush mills and a long time. Yeah, and

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not something you would normally shoot it either, oh yeah,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>or dropping a glass of cabernet. Right, yeah, I think

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>people shoot bush mills. Yeah, you probably shoot anything. You

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>know who do headonists? Very nice, thank you, very clever.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's so that's the first word is hedonism, right yeah.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So uh, most people think of the word hedonism as

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and and they do mention in this article that there

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is a nudist resort in Jamaica called Hedonism, which I

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's hedonism too. I think there's more than one. Well,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of nudists crowded on the island. I

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>remember remember when we did our nudist episode. Um, I

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>ran across an article about like a swingers resort. I

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think it was hedonism and it was just like it

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>may have been immense health article or BuzzFeed or something

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, but it was like, I want to a

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>nudist swingers resort and basically never want to have sex again.

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grossed out with myself humanity. Yeah. Yeah, not

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to say that that's hedonism, because they may eventually be

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a sponsor one day, that's right. But hedonism is most

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>people use that throw that word around to equate with

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just the ultimate in like sexual slash uh party, debauchery.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Debauchery is a great word for it. Drinking fornicating orgies

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or find uh scented oils and silken linen's being completely ruined. Yeah,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so that is that's basically what most people think of

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>with hedonism. It's like giving into your every desire, especially

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>carnal desires um even at great personal risk and without

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>much foresight. Right. Apparently that is not at all the

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>case of what hedonism meant originally, but you can kind

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of see how it evolves over time because hedonism stems

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from the Greek word for pleasure, right, hedonia, And the

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>idea is that originally the Heatonist it was an umbrella

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>school of philosophy. I think We kind of touched on

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it in our Stoicism episode, but it was an umbrella

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>philosophy where I basically said, there's two things in life

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that are that you need to pay attention to, and

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>everything else falls into place if you are maximizing pleasure

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and avoiding pain. Yes, those are the two things, pleasure

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and paint. Maximize one, minimize the other. Yeah, But the

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is they don't say. Nowhere in there does

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it say and by the way, this involves um orgies,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>um charcooterie trays, which is weird because we're talking the

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Greeks here. You know. Well, I mean, I'm sure hedonism

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it also meant that, but it didn't exclusively mean that,

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying, so like, it could also

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>mean delights of the mind, intellectual pursuits, stuff like that.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It even says altruism, which is it's kind of funny

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about someone saying like I brought I bought

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>groceries from my elderly neighbor and it was a pure

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>hedonistic sensation came up from So you're such a hedonist.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But technically back then that could have been the way

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you might use that word. Yeah, And and even more

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to the point that hedonist said, there is there's something

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you really want to pay attention to here. Yeah, you

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>want to experience pleasure, but it is really easy for

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to turn into pain or degradation or addiction. And

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to bear this stuff in mind or else

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're going to pursue pleasure at your own expense,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you're not doing it right. Um, there's actually

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy in the I think the eighteenth century, Jeremy Bentham.

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember if he was at Cambridge or Oxford.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Were five million emails, surely we have. But he was

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a fellow or a dawn or whatever of philosophy at

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this university that's still around, and every year at one

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of their annual banquets they bring his mummified head out

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and put it at the head of the table. I

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>think on it like a wax dummy. So he's dressed

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as himself and they've got the guy's mummified head. That's

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>how much of a revered philosopher he was. He came

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>up with this thing called philosophic calculus. It's basically a

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>an equation an equation, right, This is pretty dry, but

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.479
<v Speaker 1>it's the whole point is is to pursue pleasure as

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>much as possible and to avoid pain. And he said,

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>you have to consider things like the duration of the

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 1>pleasurable event, the intensity um, how certain it is, the

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>fecundity like is it going to spawn more pleasure afterward? Um,

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the purity will it actually devolve into pain? Um? The

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>extent of it, which means how many people are are

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>affected by it um. And if you take all these

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>factors into account, you can you can run any experience

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>or any decision you have in life through that and

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>decide I'm not gonna do this, or yeah, I'll have

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that bite of cool whip out of the fridge. Is

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone still use that? I'm sure there's a few people

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that do. They're very exacting, I mentioned so,

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>so that's hedonism. Yeah right, we took all the pleasure

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>out of that pretty quick. But that leads to another

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>word that's misused frequently, epicurean. Epicurean. Yeah, that's the thing

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>that nowadays you hear people use the word epicurean. There

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are probably a lot of restaurants that have a name

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on some derivation of this word, but it's tied into

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>food and drink, like really fine food, top shelf wine

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and food. If you have epicurean tastes, then you were

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who concerns yourself with the finer things at in

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the dining room specifically, right, And it's not quite as much,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite as much identified with overdoing it as hedonism,

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But there's um I think more than anything. It's like

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you said, it's it's the finer things, but you might

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>overindulge here there. Yeah, and if you use that word

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about yourself then you are probably pretty obnoxious. Yeah, it's

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>people like you who are needed at parties for other

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>people to avoid. But the word, once again from Greek epicure,

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>came from the philosopher Epicurus, and people, if you don't

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>know much about the root of the word, you probably

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think that his whole deal was about food, and that's

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the case. But he was a a hedonist

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in there, right. Yeah, he was like one of the

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>great hedonistic thinkers, but in the ancient Greek sense of

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the word. Right. So his whole his whole deal was

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>at our axia, which was inner tranquility, and that you

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>should pursue pleasure by just being content rather than going

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>off and getting like wasted or eating a bunch or

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>something like that. That and that if you did have desire,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it was better to eliminate it than satisfy it. But

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>it was. But if you did satisfy it, you should

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>do it thoughtfully your mind. So really he was kind

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of the opposite of what people who consider themselves epicureans

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>or Yeah, but also didn't he have a lot to

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>say about following your own path when it comes to that.

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like it was very, very centered around the self.

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So you do whatever you whatever is best for you

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in the moment, and not necessarily what someone else thinks

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>might be the best thing for you. Right. But again

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the point is his virtue um like value hedonism, like

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>doing things that are actually good and that produced good

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than um, I'm going to shoot this heroin even

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>though my my significant other doesn't want me to. That's

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not what it was about at all. It was moderation.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to find what gives you pleasure in life

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than looking to other people, look inward to yourself. Right.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, moderation was a huge part of it. Yeah,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And what I couldn't find and that was the case

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with a few of these is where it got all

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in food. I couldn't either, Um, I think

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it was people like food. So we just sort of yeah,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that's all I can think of. I couldn't find. I

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>was really hoping that there was like a turning point

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>where it was like, this is where it happened. And

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>there are a few places where I couldn't find that

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. It's just not out there, is lost

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>to history. All right, So we're disappointed. So we're going

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to take a break, go put our heads together, pull

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>ourselves together, and turn our attitude around. We'll be right back.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back. We're gonna stick around in ancient

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>grease for a little while long. Why not? I mean

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they've produced a lot of misused words. Frankenstin's all open here?

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you like frankinsense? I don't even know what it is.

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a resin based incense. Yeah, I don't.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Have you smelled it? Sure? Yeah? I

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I was raised Catholic? Oh is that a Is

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that a thing? Have you ever been to a Catholic mass?

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>M Nope? So there they'll go through with like this

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>big incense burner and just stink up the whole church

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with frankinsense. I've seen that in movies and they're well,

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're doing, is burning frankinsense, and it's actually

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty good smell. Now, the only Catholic jams I've

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>been involved in were sadly a couple well wine tastings now,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>a funeral, uh, and a wedding or two maybe maybe four, Well,

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like four four weddings and that was close. Uh.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>So cynic is the word? Did you already say that? No?

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't, Okay, cynec is the word, and this is one.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like this word as we use it

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>today because I try to abandon cynicism in my own

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>life and I'm pretty turned off by cynicism as a whole, okay,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which means in our usage is like a cynic to

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>me is someone who's uh, who's always suspicious, suspicious of

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, Like yeah, like that person is doing

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>something seemingly pure, but um cynical, So I wonder what

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's all about. It can't be true. I saw a

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>great um definition of cynicism and the modern usage a

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>cynic as a person whose faded belief or kurdled trust

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>had left him unfit for attachment to others. That's a

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like a that's a deep cynic definition. Yeah, that's pretty heavy,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it can be a little lighter than that.

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>It could just be somebody who's not willing to just

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of go with the flow and take things at

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>face value and be happy about things. Trust other people. Yeah, trust,

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think has a lot to do with it, right, agreed.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of those words I actually kind

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of found where this one turns, which we'll get to

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in a second, But it's based on so cynicism again

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is a is an ancient Greek philosophy, and the cynics

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>were not like the hedonists at all. They actually thought

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>that pleasure was to be avoided, that if you're going

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to lead a virtuous life, you basically need to needed

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to be um, take a vowid poverty, um issue any

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>comforts or pleasures, just basically be a bit of a jackass.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Really kind of the idea of like, you know, the

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>guys who like walk around and whip themselves self flagellation, right,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>that would have been a very cynical thing to do.

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>In the original sense of the term. Yeah, and our

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>own article brings up this guy. Apparently he was a

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty notable cynic diogenous. I think diogenes diogenes of sinope.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's sinope or signope. I bet

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>a snope. Okay, we'll go with that. Sounds nice, So

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>diogenesis connected dianetics of Elrond Hover. Uh he was. He

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was one of these guys that would, uh and they

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the example he's in here. He would he would go

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>barefoot in the cold weather just to like acclimate his body,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and his friends would just watch with their arms crossed

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and shake their head like what. Yeah. But he would

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>also bark at them right and said that you need

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to be doing this stuff like you and your luxurious

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>things need to be more like me. You like that wine,

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You're a loser for drinking that wine. You're a loser

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for enjoying it. That was his thing. Yeah, you should

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>be a cynic, right, And he was definitely not one

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of those go along and get along types. Right. Doesn't

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>sound like it, So maybe that is a little bit

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>where it evolved from it. Certainly, he certainly seems to

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>have taken cynicism to the extreme. One of the one

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the legends of this of cynicism is that, um,

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he was at a banquet once and he was I think,

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of telling everybody what jerks they were for enjoying themselves.

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>No idea who invited this guy, but they yeah, but

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they threw bones at him like he was a dog,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>like here, eat these bones, enjoy yourself for once. Uh

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe they were saying, I'm just paraphrasing, but um he said,

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'll show you I think your bones and

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>hempeate on them. Which this whole thing is just taken

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like a violent, weird turn violent. And we still haven't

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten to the root of where cynicism came to be understood,

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as as how we how we use it today. The

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>best I could find was that it lies in the

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century with Russo, who was a critic of the Enlightenment,

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>who was, from what I understand, the embodiment of modern cynicism.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>He couldn't just trust that the Enlightenment and rationalism were

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the way to go and that it led to good things.

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>He's a huge vociferous critic of the Enlightenment, and I

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>think was either self labeled the cynic or label the cynic,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and that was the modern use of the word. Haven't

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>seen it everywhere, but that's the closest I've found man

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>ancient Greece. How'd you like to hang around there for

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like a week. I don't know that I would. It

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>just seems like such a crazy time, and that all

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>these deep thinkers and philosophers and then hey, let's go

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he's fourteen people in a room with some farm animals

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and some feathers, and see what kind of party we

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>can have. Yeah, I mean, I guess I want to

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>take that back if I ever got the opportunity to

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>travel anywhere in time for a week. Since I mentioned

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the farm animals, you're like, I hadn't thought about the

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>farm animals. It just seems like a really crazy time

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in our history for man, almost like it's like it

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>took place on a different planet. Yeah, you might as

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>well have been, like Asian Greece is on Pluto. Actually, yeah,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but so many things, I mean, and that's what I think,

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking about like the arts and sciences and mathematics is

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just like what weird amazing time. So we're gonna go fat,

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna fast forward a little bit in history so

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>far we've generally been hanging out in the uh fourth, third,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>second century BC. Here, we'll take a few hundred years. Now,

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go to the nineteenth century, right, We're gonna

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>go to Um the Antibellum South, which is where, surprisingly,

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the term cakewalk came from. Yeah, and this was remember

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>when we used to blog. Yes, this is a blog post.

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to tell you that because you wrote

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it and then send it to me yesterday. But I'm

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>telling everyone else out there. We used to blog like

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone else did in the early two thousands. And uh,

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 1>this is one of Josh's post And I had no

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>idea did you read the blog post that I wrote?

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The Sorry, but this had has weird racist roots. When

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you hear term cake walk, everyone uses it now to

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>say something that's super easy to do, absurdly easy. Yeah,

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that was a cake walk, Like you just basically show

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>up and you you win the pride. It's a cake walk. Right.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that that's actually extremely denigrating to um

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>anti bellum slaves in the nineteenth century because cake walks

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>used to be an actual thing. Yeah, this is distressing

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and weird to me, it really is, and especially that

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you can trace the evolution of the word for once. Yeah. Alright,

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 1>So here's what would happen on a plantation and how

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>often did this happen. I would guess it was annual.

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>It seems like something like that. So let's just say

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>once a year every so often at the plantation, the

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>white folks would get together and they would throw a

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>big ball, like they would throw for themselves, but they

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>would have the slaves played the part of the white people,

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and actually it was a ball for the slaves. Yeah,

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't you know, like here, let me reward

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you with something nice. It's hey, dress up as us,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll all sit back and laugh at how you

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think we are right, and you do your best impression

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of of slave master and kind of entertain us right

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in a mocking, jeering way. Like have you heard of

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you have Saturnalia, which is like again a

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Greek I believe it was Greek maybe roman Um, this

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>festival where social conventions were turned upside out and the

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>masters became the servants and the servants became the masters

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for like a day, and the whole point of this

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was culturally socially that had actually reinforced social norms, because yes,

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>these slaves in Saturnalia and then the slaves at the

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>cakewalk were mocking the social conventions that they had to

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>live in the other three hundred and sixty four days

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a year, but they were doing it within a socially

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>prescribed framework that was really overseen by the people in charge.

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So yes, they were forced to do it, but they

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>were allowed to do it, I think, is you know so,

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so actually in a really weird roundabout but very very

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>real way, reinforce the social norms that that kept slavery afloat. Yeah,

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think we mentioned the reason cake comes

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>into it to begin with is whichever couple uh in

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the cake walk did the best job and was able

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to mimic the white people the best got a cake

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>as a as a prize. So the cake walk was

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>an actual thing. And the story actually continues on a

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>little further and it gets even worse to tell you

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the truth. Um, those cake walks they happened on plantations

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in the South, and so if you went to a

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>cake walk, you were probably one of a very few

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>number of people, especially outside of the South, who had

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>been to one of these things. But the minstrel shows

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that led to the vaudeville shows in the nineteenth century.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>UM they would actually very frequently perform a cake walk,

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but the cake walks they did were basically making a

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>mockery of even the mockery that the the slaves were undertaking. Right,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>So at the very least you could say of the

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>cake walks that the real ones the slaves were most

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>likely they meant the mockery that they were doing right.

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Even though they were allowed to mock it, they still

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.719
<v Speaker 1>meant it. The reason the minstrel shows were so horrible

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is that it was a cakewalk. It was a a

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>staged version of a cake walk, making fun of the

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>cake walks, so it even removed and robbed from the

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>slaves that little bit of agency that the cake walks

0:33:53.280 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>gave them because it was white minstrels in black face. Yes, right,

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so the but the the whole premise of the minstrel

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>show version of the cake walk was not that the

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>black slaves were mocking white society, but that they were

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>actually doing this because they really wanted to emulate white society.

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're failing miserably at it. So it's a really

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>despicable and disgusting change, conversion or perversion of the original intent,

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which is already pretty messed up to begin with, just

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>just one of the many problems of minstrel shows. Right, So,

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea of cake walk, since more people saw minstrel

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>shows than actually we're at a cake walk, this was

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the cake walk. So when people said

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a cake walk, the idea was that even

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>if you were just clumsy and inept and could never

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>hope to succeed at what you're trying to do, you

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>could still win the cake That was the original usage

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>of the word. So what I can't gather is is

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>this a term now that like people just shouldn't use

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>or has it changed such that it's not like a

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.919
<v Speaker 1>genuinely offensive thing. I don't know. I don't think there's

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>too many people out there that take offense to it.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if that's because a lot of people

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the origins of the worlds are. Not

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>many people probably know this. Who knows? But you can

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 1>also make the case that the use of it today

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is actually agi because cake walks are normally found in

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>nursing home. Really, yeah, I never heard that, And the

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the couple's promenade is replaced with musical chairs. And even

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>even in even in these these competitions of musical chairs,

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody's still basically a winner. I wonder if piece of

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>cake comes from cake walk. Yes it does. So that

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of cake interesting, I think we just covered it.

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm gonna start saying it was a total piece

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of pie. Right there you go, easy as pie. Well

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Where did that come from? Uh, it's

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>probably somebody who knew what cake walk meant and wanted

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to change things a little. Or I wonder if that

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>came from the fact that pie is generally easier than

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 1>baking a cake. I don't know if that's true, is it?

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I think so, because there's not chemistry like you can

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>bind some apples and cinnamon and stuff and throwing an oven.

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>He got a pie. There's a pie maker just like

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>through their iPod across the room, Like a pie is

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna fall because you didn't put just the right

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>amount of That's a good point. You know. There's no

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Lady Baltimore pile. I'll tell you that. I think what

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is pie makers you need to step up

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>your game. Try a cake. Try making a cake United

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>take over. I love pie. We've had this talk. I

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like it all. I don't see any reason to to

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>choose no, have both? Um, should we move on? Should

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we do Kafka esque? Yes? Sure, all right. So Franz Kafka,

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.399
<v Speaker 1>very famous writer. This is I did not know that

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of most of his works were published after

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>his death. I didn't know that either. But he had

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a knack for writing books. And I read The Metamorphosis

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in high school. But it feels like to his books

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>had a central character that was going through some kind

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of like walking through molasses, some really hard struggle that

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they have no control over, probably have no hope of solving.

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of times it was a an I guess,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>an allegory for an oppressive government. Yeah, almost always right.

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So the person is being there, their forward progress of

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>their life or whatever it is they're trying to do

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>is either interrupted or um being opposed by some faceless,

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>immutable yeah entity, typically in the form of like a

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>government or an office or something like Yeah, like the

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>movie the Terry Gilliam movie Brazil is probably accurately described

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>as cough esque. I would guess that's absolutely right. But

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Kafka, Um wrote, he's very well known for the

0:37:54.960 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Trial of the Metamorphosis. Um, but he wrote a lot

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of the different uses of kafka Esque

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>actually work because they definitely touch upon some of his

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 1>different work. Right. So one of the uses of kafka

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Esque that came into fashion supposedly in the nineteen sixties

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and Eastern Europe as the Iron Curtain fell. Um, well,

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Iron curtain fell before that, but as as the

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the faceless centralized government bureaucracies like really kind of put

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>their stamp on on the lives of all millions and

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>millions of people. Apparently the word cough gaeste came into

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>use then to kind of describe having to deal with

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>these absurd bureaucracies that made zero sense but still could

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just shuffle you around for days on end if it

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>wanted to. Yeah, And then the article uses a good

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>example that it started getting misused and that somebody might

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>say that they uh race to catch a bus and

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 1>then got to the bus stop and they made this

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>great effort to get there, but then they find out

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a bus driver's strike and said that that was

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>kafka esk, when in fact that's just bad luck. It is.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's if that's the worst thing that happens to

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 1>you that day, you're probably doing but just life. But

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>that's not cough gask. No, it's not so um that that.

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But but that's not to say that there is a

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>central definition of cough gask. It is a pretty wide um,

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>widely defined, a multiply defined word. This guy does a

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>good job of describing. And I thought it is an

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>author named Frederick Carl with a K, and apparently in

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times he said this, what's kafka esque

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>is when you enter a surreal world which all your

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 1>control patterns, all your plans, the whole way in which

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you have configured your own behavior begins to fall to pieces.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>When you find yourself against a force that does not

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>lend itself to the way you perceive the world. You

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>don't give up, You don't lie down and die. What

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>you do is struggle against this with all of your equipment,

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>with whatever you have. But of course you don't stand

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance. That's tough, Gask, especially the last part two.

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like you don't stand a chance, but you still try,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You still try, because yeah, what are you gonna do?

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Is just be like, Okay, well I guess I'll die.

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>You still try to save yourself for to to to

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 1>follow your self determination, but you're never going to win.

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You're doomed from the outset. That is super tough. Gask that.

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>That dude, he was his biographer, so he's kind of

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>an authority on him, right, you know, so doomed. In

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>other words, you want to take one more break, Yeah,

0:40:35.400 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. Okay, we're doing that right now. All right, Chuck.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for one of my favorites on this list. Yes, blood,

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I got called this a few years ago by my

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>friend Scotty Scott. Come on, this is more than a

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>few years ago. But I'm ashamed to say I had

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>never even heard the word I used it. Yeah, I

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.720
<v Speaker 1>can't remember what I was complaining about. Really, you hadn't

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>heard the word ludite? Huh? Had never heard it? I

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 1>mean this wasn't like six months ago. It's like five

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or six years ago. But he called me that. I

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>think called me that, or maybe Emily did you go

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>what I think? I was like, well, I'm no luddite,

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and then I like raced over and looked at him

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on my smartphone problem. Uh. Yeah, So people throw that

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>word around to mean anyone who's anti technology basically, right, Yeah,

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people throw it out apparently. Um. Prince

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Charles railed against g m os famously he was called

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a ludite. I know France and UM just talk mad

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>trash about Twitter. Yeah, I think on Twitter even I

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>can't remember, but he was called a luddite. I don't

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>remember how it played up, but I'm pretty sure it

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was on Twitter. Um. But yeah, any anybody who is like, um,

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like like we used I was just getting used to

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like Google docs, and all of a sudden, we're using

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>base camp around here. And I think you called me

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot I didn't you or an old man one

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>of the two. Non, okay, but you could have also

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>said you're a luddite. The thing is is this is

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those words that has evolved to basically mean

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing as a technophone, Right, somebody who's

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>afraid of technology, either because they don't understand it or

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>their words going to lead to the end of the world,

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever the reason. New technology makes you nervous, Right. That

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is such a generally accepted definition of this word that

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for all intents and purposes. It is um. It is

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the definition of blood. The thing is is, if you

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>dig back in history, is totally wrong. Yeah Bloodyes, were

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>people from ancient Greece. They were they were from Nottinghamshire.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I love that word England and they were weavers. So

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>what was beginning to happen and you can see how

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it got its roots here is automated looms came around

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteenth century during the Industrial Revolution, and they

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 1>were like, wait a minute, this puts our jobs at risk,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're not gonna take it. Like twisted sisters will

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually say we're not gonna take it, and they would

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>go like, trash these looms. And they named themselves real

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they took the name or they were they were named.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how it panned out, but they were

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 1>called Bloodites because decades before, and I think seventeen seventy nine,

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a guy in the same area named Ned Blood had

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>trashed like asie hose reframe yeah, ned lud too many

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>too many d's and too few other letters. Um. He

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>trashed to hosiery frame and became kind of a hero,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>working class hero for doing that. And the thing is is, yeah,

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you can get the idea that these people were afraid

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of these automated looms, and it was they were really

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>afraid of technology. No, that is has zero to do

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>with it. It turns out that looms had been in

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>use for hundreds of years already. This is not really

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>new technology, which is a kind of an ironic thing

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>about the whole thing. What they were were it was

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>class warfare is what they're engaged in, not anti technology.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Um terrorism, Yeah, they were. They wanted to keep their jobs. Uh,

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>there was a ban on trade unions, so they had

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 1>no well, let's say they had no choice. They felt

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like they had no choice rather than to go out

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and riot and trash these looms. Um. But they they

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>they used all sorts of technology to do so. Well.

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw that the the to these people, to the Latites,

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the looms were they symbolized the concentration of wealth because

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>they didn't own the looms. Somebody they worked for own

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the looms, and that they weren't seeing anything from They

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>weren't reaping any benefits from these looms. So when they

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>were destroying a loom, they were striking at the loom owner,

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 1>this this wealthy person, which is why it was such

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>class warfare rather than anti technology rioting. Yeah, and that

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't I think until the nineteen seventies that bloodite became

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of the more modern usage. Is that right? So

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I found so this this thing the seven says the seventies.

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>There's actually an article in New Scientists that used the

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>word in nineteen seventy. But apparently there was a famous

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>essay called the Two Cultures by a scientist named CP.

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Snow and he basically said, we have a problem here

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>because literary intellectuals and scientific intellectuals are beginning to diverge,

0:45:56.840 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and you literary intellectuals, you guys are basically nothing more

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>than luddites. This is nineteen fifty three, and I think

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he might have been the first person to use it

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>to mean technophobes or in this case, I think he

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>was saying, like, you don't understand what the importance of

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the industrial revolution. Two people sat on that for seventeen years,

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and then New Science is like, the time is the right,

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 1>let's bring it back, all right. That's a good one.

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>That's that's my favorite. These are kind of like I

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:27.839
<v Speaker 1>think a few of these you can throw around your

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>next dinner party and either make people think you're interesting

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:35.879
<v Speaker 1>or that you're an obnoxious jerk. It depends on how

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you present it. Agreed. You know, so what else we

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 1>got here? I don't know. You want to do two

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>or one? Let's do well, let's definitely do nim Rod.

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>How about that Nimrod. This one confuses me because that

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Pixie song Nimrod's son. Oh yeah, so Nimrod actually did

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>marry his mother. He had a mother wife for a queen,

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>but he was That's not what he was known for.

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>No that was a real Nimrod in the Bible, and

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Nimrod was if you've ever heard of Noah from the Bible,

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 1>this Noah was the great grandfather of Nimrod. So he

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>had quite a pedigree. He was Ham's son Ham. Yeah,

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:17.399
<v Speaker 1>if we don't use that as a first name enough

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>these days. Yeah, here it is a last name occasionally,

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>but John Ham. Yeah, with two m's, but you never

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hear like, hey, I'm Ham Johnson, good to meet you.

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>That would be a great name for a sportscaster or

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a weather person. Ham Johnson casters the Ham Cast with

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Ham Clark and Ham Bryant. That's not bad, that's good.

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.959
<v Speaker 1>That's our spinoff idea and we threw around that word

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot in our ham Radio podcast because they're called hams.

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's what our ham Cast could be about, how

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>nice ham radio operators are as well as bad comedy. Right,

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and then every once while we review a ham that

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:57.439
<v Speaker 1>we eat on air. Dude just figured it out. Look

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at that, I mean you predicted shark Nato. Alright, The

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>ham Cast coming soon iTunes where if you get your podcasts.

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Somb his hams Son. He is a biblical figure. He

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>was very well known as the founder of Babylon. Yes,

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that. I'm not much of a Bible

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>scholar myself. No, not really, um, but he was. He

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was the founder of Babylon and one of the big

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>features of Babylon was the Tower of Babel. Yes, this

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.320
<v Speaker 1>one I did know about. Yeah, the Tower of Babel

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is what he was credited with constructing, and that was

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a structure on top of a temple with the idea

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that you could reach God ultimately and destroy God and

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>push him around. Yeah. So not a good thing for

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>ancient Christians. No, So God was like, um, I can

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of see into the future, so I'm not gonna

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>let that happen. And he goes um different languages, she's am,

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And all of a sudden, the people who are building

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and constructing this tower Babbel can no longer speak to

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one another because they all speak different languages. And this

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is supposedly the origin story of different languages, foreign languages

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So everybody, since they couldn't really communicate

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 1>with one another, went off their separate ways. And this

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is another one where they don't know for sure where

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it made the switch eventually to be like a dumb

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>dumb but I think this Bugs Bunny. I think this

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>holds water. It definitely has some legs. It tracks, uh

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Looney Tunes. Bugs Bunny nineteen forties, shout out to our

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>friend Jessica. Oh yeah, whose grandfather was Noah? Was Chuck Jones?

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right? Greater so, uh, Bugs Bunny. In one of

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the Elmer Fud episodes, who was a hunter? Um called

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>him Nimrod in an episode, And I don't think we

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 1>said Nimrod was known as a great hunter. Yeah, I

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>guess that the irony was lost then, right, Yeah, They're like,

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I get it it. Yeah, So I don't know if

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they put Nimrod in there, because Nimrod was a great

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hunter if it just worked out that way. But it

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 1>had to have been had to mean because that was

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing that was Fudd's whole thing. He was just

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>terrible at hunting, but that's what he was always doing,

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>was hunting, right, So we called him a nimrod, right,

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and I saw that it became into use of slang

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>among teenagers in three. Yeah, that seems about right, does

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it really? Oh it feels like a very eighties I

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 1>heard that a lot growing up. Really to me, it

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:34.640
<v Speaker 1>seems really square in like fifties. Oh no, I'm thinking like, yeah,

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I hear Nimrod and I think grody to the max

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and like pop callers and the cost alligators. Did you

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 1>ever pop your collar? Sure? I always I never felt

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like I could pull it off. That was a bit

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of a prep I was too, but I just I

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know it. Never I tried it. I looked at

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 1>myself in the mirror a lot. Well that's the key.

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.040
<v Speaker 1>He's popped the collar and go out the door. Yeah,

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have that kind of collar. Still, don't you

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>get the get done with your flow, be cut poper

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>collar and go Yeah. Yeah, as the other confidence, it's

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>just foolishness. I was thinking the other day, how I

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't touched a hair brush since like seven or eight.

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I literally have not put a brush or

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>comb in my hair. Did you have one of those

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Goodies tortoise shell brushes from the eighties? Remember those? Now

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I had a Goodies and it wasn't tortoise shell, but

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably the same thing where yeah it

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:30.080
<v Speaker 1>had it been, or the burnout come where you had

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it sticking out of your back pocket and every I'd

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>never really used combs. I was a brush guy, but

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to get my wings down. But ever since high school

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is I've just been a finger comer? Yeah? Same here

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>these these these five fingers. Yeah, to get out of

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the shower, just gonna spike the hair up and it

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.439
<v Speaker 1>stays there. Yeah, it's nice. It's very lucky. You don't

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>use product. No, man, that's insane. Are you kidding? Man?

0:51:57.040 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>My hair won't stand up. It's just limp and lifeless.

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Well minus too. I don't wash my hair much. How

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>often do you wash your hair every day? Oh, well

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that's your problem. Well, there's your problem. Here's your problem.

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Get a little get a little little funk build up.

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I need a little funk. I guess product is natural funk.

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Go party with some farm animals. And I think that

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:17.439
<v Speaker 1>was a George Clinton album. My product is natural funk.

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It's nice. Should have been, it's it definitely should have been.

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And now because of the Sharknado thing again, that's his

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>comeback album. Uh, you got anything else? Well, if you

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:31.760
<v Speaker 1>want to know more about George Clinton, you can type

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 1>his name into the search part house to works dot

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>com and it'll bring up something. And since I said's something,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listening to mail. I'm gonna call this

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:45.359
<v Speaker 1>vaping backlash. Oh yeah, we're hearing about it. Yeah, it's

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>nice to hear the vapors stand up and be like, hey, dudes,

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to heck with you. Yeah. So, in retrospect, I think

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we kind of made fun of them a little too much. Think, yeah,

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect. Sure, so this is from Peter, So this

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>is a mea culpa? Then, well sort of. Hey, guys,

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>usually enjoy your work, which is that's always a great start.

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But the vaping episode, come on, guys, the whole episode

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:14.440
<v Speaker 1>reeked of mockery and belittled all vapors, even the ones

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>who are simply using it. As a harm reduction method

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.719
<v Speaker 1>or to quit smoking. I'm fifty one and use the

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>cigrettes to quit smoking instantly and permanently. Mind you, about

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>eight years ago. It's the only thing that worked for me.

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:28.840
<v Speaker 1>All I can do all day is puff flat fat clouds.

0:53:29.160 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Your research was seriously lacking in this one. You would

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have been much more informed if you actually talked to

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a vaping advocate. I I wanna. I want to interject here.

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Our research is not at all lacking. We did a

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of research for this episode. Please go on. Well,

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we tried to get in touch with vapors, but they

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 1>are all out on the sidewalk blocking backglouds or at

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>least someone on the local scene. Guys from this century, preferably,

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 1>things have come a long way in the last ten years.

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Some of the facts he uses in quotes you were

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 1>citing based on seriously flawed research. For example, the vapor

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>vaporized metals particles portion was brand new. Nobody, nobody, he says,

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 1>would vape at the temperatures needed to replicate that in

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the real world. Um, but as usual, people see the

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:19.920
<v Speaker 1>headline and don't dig deeper. Uh. This guy is starting

0:54:19.960 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>to really upset me to really. Yeah, we've researched just

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>as much as we ever do. Buddy, what's this guy's name.

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that. Okay, we did get called out.

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:34.319
<v Speaker 1>A couple of other people said that those temperatures, like,

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't vape at those temperatures. No, but you can

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and some people do. And I, if I remember correctly,

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the leaching metals thing was not about temperatures. It was

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:48.759
<v Speaker 1>about the newness of the coil. Okay, I feel like

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm refereeing, uh calling people stupid and dummies

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:56.879
<v Speaker 1>for vaping at zero nicotine levels. Smack my head. There's

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.799
<v Speaker 1>more to cigarette addiction than the nicotine issue. I think

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 1>aping could potentially eradicate smokers from our society the very

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>least safe, thousands of lives and millions of dollars in

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:08.120
<v Speaker 1>medical and pharma. To paint it all with the idiotic

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>foolishness brush is playing wrong in a real disservice to

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>your audience. I'm pretty piste off. As you can tell.

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:19.839
<v Speaker 1>There are only I'm sorry, sure, there are people who

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>vape that make us all look silly, but man, this

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is the only smoking cessation method that works for many people.

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You just turned a lot of people away from it

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:32.359
<v Speaker 1>who could really benefit possibly not die disappointed listener here

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's from Peter Joett in Vancouver. Peter, Peter, I

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>will totally agree with you. Our mockery was way over

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and be above and beyond. We yucky. Um, totally for sure,

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and I apologize. I want to make a couple points here.

0:55:50.360 --> 0:55:53.760
<v Speaker 1>We definitely definitely did our research. We don't just phone

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 1>episodes and it doesn't matter what we think of the topic. Yeah,

0:55:56.840 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we still do our research. And then secondly, I really

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like we turned people off of vaping and

0:56:04.200 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>onto tobacco, because if I remember correctly, we definitely made

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it clear that you were even dumber if you smoke tobacco.

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 1>The tobacco was far, far worse. I think the whole

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>point of that episode was that vaping was not necessarily

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as good for you as it's been portrayed in the

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>same media that you railed against earlier. I would agree

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>with that. I don't think we I think we po

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>po all forms of nicotine and definitely did there you go.

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, if you're using it to get off

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of tobacco, that's great. Step two is getting off of

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the baking. Uh. Well, if you're like Peter and you're

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:41.839
<v Speaker 1>pod about something you want to get in touch with us,

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you can tweet to us. I'm at joshum Clark, Chuck's

0:56:45.520 --> 0:56:48.319
<v Speaker 1>at movie Crush uh, and we're both at s Y

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 1>s K podcast, Chuck's on Facebook dot com, slash stuff

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know and slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Uh.

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email to Stuff Podcast at

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com and has always showed us

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:07.280
<v Speaker 1>her home on the web Stuff you Should Know dot com.

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:09.839
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, visit

0:57:09.880 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com. M